1 25 8 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/672bcd1a0bbbb324725ff78b6cffb780.pdf e75c559547703848334610c11913e2e4 PDF Text Text / MINUTES OF THE NORTH TARRYTOWN PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK October 29, 1987 Present: Chairman James Galgano Miguel Jimenez Frank Rey Ray Windas R. Thomas Homan, Village Administrator James Margotta, Building Inspector John Hughes, Village Attorney Chariman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8:10 P.M.. 1. PROPOSED CHESTNUT STREET DEVELOPMENT-FRANK MANGIERI'S SITE PLAN Mr. Walsh, representing Mr. Mangieri, approuched the board with the matter of parking. It was noted that the variances are all ready in place, and- that parking has now been removed and four (4) designated spaces have been set aside in the adjoining lot. This is the only matter that will require an additional variance which the board will have to recommend to the DZA. The developers have the buildings, parking, and the designated number of parking places as were agreed upon. They also have the agreement on the easement, from Crass Realty. This is contingent on The Village providing the exact size and George Lackowitz will be meeting with them on this matter. Right now, it runs parallel to the parking and about ten (10) feet in. Mr. Walsh said that this is land that we are turning over to The Village with a permanent easement. It was asked for the record what remaining areas the board was concerned with. Chairman Galgano stated that the main concern was over sanitation, sewers, and rainfall run-off. Chairman Galgano asked how much run-off would there be. George replied 1.2 CFS storm water run-off under existing conditions. Hydraulic rainfall run-off calculations are being performed by the developer, per Georges' request. The board requested that at post development that the developers maintain 1.2 CFS. The developers are proposing to put in one hundred forty (140) feet of thirty six (36) inch diameter pipeline which will act to retain storm water. This will meter (1) �(2) the water into the North Tarrytown drainage system. George pointed out * that this is the problem of the adjoining properties and the sewers' downstream, particularly Gestner Place, whether they can handle all the drainage as it exists right now. It was noted that the Public Works crew will look into this matter, and see if there is enough capacity on Gestner Place. They will take elevation measurements to determine the slope and capacity of the Gestner and Chestnut sewers. Mike stated that he half expected to resolve this matter today, and have all the figures available. Now that it is known how much water they are putting into the system, we need to know whether or not the system can take it. It was also stated that before any new sewers were hooked up, the board wanted to be sure that they weren't being overloaded. The main concerns are therefor: 1. Getting a consensus for the use of the adjoining property, approved by the Zoning Board. 2'. An amended plan, dealing with two (2) separate easements, one (1) of which will be used for parking. 3. A resolution or findings was asked for dealing with the landscaping, dimensions on driveway, parking both on-site and on the adjoining site. Mr. Walsh asked for guidance from the board, so that he may go back to th ZBA, showing that he moved the four (4) spaces into the adjoining property. Chairman Galgano asked for any comments. Mr. Mangieri noted the variance for the curb cut was not used for access, but will keep it and it meets all citizens comments. Chairman Galgano stated that more water work be performed by George, and also to review those facts prior to preliminary. The board agreed to the preliminary layout. Let the record show that without the drainage, it meets concerns, and the easement will be donated and the use of the land on the adjoining property. Approved by-Chaiman Galgano. 2. PHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL-ROBINS NEST DAYCARE Chairman Galgano asked if they have the Resolution. Tom Homan said that it was sent out and proceeded to hand out copies to all concerned. Chairman Galgano stated that the final site plan approval for The Robins Nest Daycare �w ^ (3) I Center at Phelps needed minor changes on the final resolution. (See Attached). Chairman Galgano read The Public Notice regarding Robins Nest Daycare Center, and that a hearing will be held by The Planning Board of The Village of North Tarrytown on October 29, 1987 for the application submitted by Phelps Memorial regarding The Robins' Nest Daycare. Tonight we met for the final approval of Robin's Nest. The premises are known as North Broadway, Route 9, North Tarrytown, and are also known as Tax map Section 11, Block 1, Map 3A. George noted that the following additions were to be made to the Resolution (See Attached Resolution). George stated that we have a survey performed by Wine & Grade South of 100 Mitchell Drive, Somers, New York. This drawing contains the documentation requested on the drainage from The Robins' Nest Site. Mike Amatto asked about the proposed fire protection system. George said that it was 1.8 on the attached resolution. "Three sheets titled "Site Plan" by Perillo Associates dated October 16, 1987. Tom Homan asked if there were any outstanding issues for the satisfactory site plan. George stated that all the information for the fire protection system, including; 1. A layout in plan of the proposed water main, fire hydrants, fire pumps, and tanks, 2. The dimensions of the tanks, flow and pressure rating of the fire pumps, 3.The hydraulic calculations of the proposed water distribution system showing that it would meet the required volume and duration of flow, have all been provided. A stamped set of drawings was provided for Jim Margottas' file. The required reading of the resolution was WAIVED. There was a motion to approve the changes in the resolution. It was unanimously approved by all members present. 3. NORTH TARRYTOWN ASSOCIATES SITE PLAN Chairman Galgano reviewed what had been discussed at the last meeting; 1. The possibility of emergency exits, (A Public Hearing will have to take place on this ) , �(A) 2. The sanitary sewers and there possible problems. George was asked to give a run down on this, and he found that the sanitary sewer has had a history of cronic back-ups on New Broadway, a build up of roots in the sewer system, even though it had been cleaned out four (4) years ago. It was noted that it ran well for a period of three (3) years, but after that time the roots seemed to be coming back again, clogging the sewer. George stated that cleaning it out again would be a "Band-aid" solution, meaning that the problem would only reappear in a matter of time. The preferred solution would be to go in and renovate (re-build) that portion of the sewer. Slope information was obtained on that protion of the sewer and it was noted to have the lowest capacity of the system. Until we have this problem completely corrected, there is concern over adding any additional load. George reccomended putting in a new line at a cost of approximately $75,000.00. The cost to clean it would run about $1000.00. It was also noted that the problem of the back-up could be caused by the slope of the New Broadway sewer. George was concerned over adding any additional load to the sewer, until it was certain that the problem was due only to the roots. The capacity of the New Broadway sewer was about 2.5 CFS, whereas the capacity of the Webber Ave. sewer was about 3.5 CFS. George said that he will personally check the slopes himself, because he is concerned about the conditions and the 1% difference in the capacity. Mr. Kroco prepared an overlay showing fourteen (14) units in all. Mr. Kroco added an additional unit, bringing the total number of units to fifteen (15). The additional unit would have one (1) parking space and one (1) garage. The developers will make a catch contribution to the Village of $24,000.00, on the condition that they can proceed from here as planned and not waste any more time. More firm language was asked for, and a Public Hearing was asked for on the entire matter, to be held within two (2) weeks. 4. VALLEY STREET SITE-LARRY RODRIQUES* SITE PLAN Chairman Galgano stated that we needed a flow sink, water and sewer, etc. Mr. Turnquist, speaking for Mr. Rodrigues, parking stated that ther would be additional off-site on Valley St. What they are propossing is a multi-dwelling building: 1. Level one (1) Office space 2. Level two (2) The ingress and egress from Depyster would have additional �(5) outside parking. 3. Level three (3) would be a two (2) story dwelling, It was noted that the off-site parking would be metered parking. On-site there will be thirty-two (32) spaces. Off-site the additional three (3), required by the board. The calculations for the ISO (required 2700 gallons for fire fighting). It was suggested to install a sprinkler system. Chairman Galgano asked what the height of the building would be. It was noted that from Valley Street it was 42-43 feet (which is just under the maximum for zoning, which is 45 feet). The back is two (2) stories. Chairman Galgano stated that the presentation tonight is just a repitition of past meetings. The developers stated that they have met with the Village Engineers and the Planning Consultant, and that they were just bringing the Board up to date on the finalization on the site work. They have the ISO calculations. It was asked if the gas station was now out of service. Tom responded by saying that the tanks are to be removed. Tom stated that the parking was tight. From curb to curb it was 44 feet, with an 18 foot ingress and egress. Chairman Galgano asked if there was going to be any excavating. He expressed concern about digging into the bank. It was stated that the excavation would be six (6) feet behind the building to about eighteen (18) feet to the north end of the property. It was also noted that the site consists of various lots, all owned by one (1) owner. (Lots 6A-8, as per Zoning). There is no need to sub-divide the properties. Chairman Galgano stated that until we get more figures, The Planning Board cannot even give a preliminary approval of the site plan. Chairman Galgano also said that we are going to get a motion from a Lead Agency. The resolution was read ; It is hereby resolved, pursuant to Section 617.6 of The Code of The Rules and Regulations that the Planning Board of The Village of North Tarrytown designated itself to be the Lead Agent to consider the environmental impacts of the Rodrigues - Valley St. project. There was a motion by Mr. Rey, seconded by Mr. Jimenez. (Motion approved.) There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 P.M., until November 18, 1987. �(6) Respectfully submitted, (jLAA-T^ Ann D'Incecco VAJ&UIA^ �c- y?-r> PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN RESOLUTION: SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROPOSED CBILD CARE CENTER AT PHELPS APPLICANT: PHELPS COMMUNITY CORPORATION ARCHITECT: PELLATON 6 CHAPMAN SITE ENGINEERS: DOLPH ROTFELD, ENGINEERING LOCATION: PHELPS HOSPITAL GROUNDS APPLICATION #: WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarry town has reviewed an application for site plan approval of a not-for-profit day care center to be located on a portion of the Phelps Memorial Hospital grounds east of the Hospital and west of Route 9; and WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead Agency in this site plan review, the Planning Board has conducted the following activities and made the following findings and determinations in accordance with Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law (SEQR): 1. The application consists of the following documents: 1.1 A topographic and property boundary map entitled Total Site Plan Locating Project, The Robin's Nest Child Care Center, Phelps Memorial Hospital, North Tarrytown, New York, by Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, Tarrytown, New York, Scale 1" * 50*, dated Pebruary 25, 1987; 1.2 A site plan entitled "Site Grading/Utilities Plan, The Robin's Nest Child Care Center at Phelps, North Tarrytown, New York", prepared in the office of Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, P.C., 555 White Plains Road, Tarrytown, New York 10591, dated 3/2/87, Sheet 1 of 1; 1.3 Schematic (Building) Elevations, The Robin's Nest Child Care Center at Phelps, North Tarrytown, New York, Owner Approved Schematic, Scale 1/8" » 1', dated 11/20/86, last revised 12/3/86, Drawing #32, Job 8667; 1.4 A 2-page letter to Jim Galgano, Chairman of the Planning Board, Village of North Tarrytown, dated March 10, 1987 and signed by Victoria Miller, Assistant Vice President, Planning, for Phelps; �1.5 A packet of written material including: 1. Standard Village application; 2. Project narrative; 3. Various letters of support from social services agencies involved; insurance and 1.6 The 13-page(+) statistical appendices (traffic impact study) prepared by Raymond Parish Pine & Weiner, Inc., dated March 1987; 1.7 Several additional drawings entitled Total Site Plan, Project Site Plan, Schematic Floor Plans, Elevations, Schematic Elevations and two views; 1.8 Three sheets titled "Site Plan" by Perillo Associates dated October 16, 1987; 1.9. "Site Plan and Details for the Robin's Nest" by Roger A. Pellaton, dated October 12, 1987; After study of the above maps and information the Planning Board has caused, found and determined that, among other matters: 2.1 There is a need for day care facilities in Westchester County as expressed by the following statistics: 2.1.1 In recent years women from all social and economic levels have entered the labor force in record numbers; 2.1.2 If current trends continue, within a few years, 64 percent of all families with children will include working mothers and nearly 20 percent of these children will live in single parent families; 2.1.3 Currently in Westchester there are 50,000 children under the age of 12 whose mothers work. The County's 97 day care and family care centers serve less than 5,000 of these children. There is a strong need for child care facilities in Westchester• 2.1.4 The child care center proposed will be a not-for-profit operation to primarily support the greater North Tarrytown community. 2 �2.1.5 The center will operate year-round, Monday through Friday, from 6:45 AM to 6:45 PM. The center will be licensed by the State of New York and have an initial capacity for 100 children. 2.1.6 Enrollment follows: priority Phelps employees Corporate supporters Community residents (with priority to North Tarrytown) will be allocated as 50 percent 25 percent 25 percent; and 3. Conducted or caused field inspections to be made of the site so as to ascertain field conditions; and 4. Requested and received reports from Village authorities and/or the applicant on such matters as water supply, sewage disposal, drainage, fire safety and police protection and traffic impact; and 5. Recognized that the Board of Trustees of the Village of North Tarrytown has recently amended the Village Zoning Ordinance to permit the construction of a child care center as an accessory use within the Hospital H zone; and 6. Acting as Lead Agency, requested, • received and reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR; and 7. As Lead Agency for site plan review in the Village of North Tarrytown, the Planning Board, after review of said field conditions and Environmental Assessment Form and other matters noted above, has determined that the proposed action is an unlisted type and hereby issues a "Negative Declaration", determination of non-significant environmental impact for this unlisted action; and 8. As a result of the above and after public hearing granted preliminary site plan approval with conditions, by resolution dated July 30, 1987; and 9. Received an application for final site plan review from the applicant which was presented before the Planning Board on October 29, 1987; and 3 �WHEREAS, in the opinion of the Planning Board the applicant has complied with the Village's development regulations except as may be noted below; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and site plan be and hereby is granted approval and that the applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or, as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of said site plan resolution and upon the final site plan drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the Village Building Department office for purposes of obtaining a Building Permit in accordance with this resolution and all Building Code requirements provided, however, that this approval shall expire six (6) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and/or the applicant has not obtained a Building Permit: 1. The building is approved for a use or uses permitted in the Hospital H District as a child day care center. Any revised use, or change in accessory use will require further site plan approval. 2. All conditions of the Planning Board's resolution of preliminary approval shall remain in effect as deemed appropriate by the Planning Board. 3. A recreation fee of $5,000 shall be submitted to the Village for the acquisition or maintenance of recreation facilities in the vicinity of the project and available for use by users of the housing facilities. 4. The Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field inspection of the site after construction of the facilities but before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development for compliance with this resolution and the Village Site Plan Regulations and to require any modifications to parking, landscaping, signs, drainage, access, paving, and other site plan details in the interest of safety, convenience, enjoyment of peace and quiet of adjacent neighbors and aesthetics. The applicant shall maintain all elements of the approved site plan including landscaping in a neat and healthy condition so as to retain an approved Certificate of Occupancy. 4 �BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that prior to a further approval for any development on the Phelps Hospital property the Hospital shall submit a plan for improvement and upgrading of the Hospital wat^r supply facilities as recommended by the Village Water and Pi re Department. Datevl ateU Planning B<ird Chairman James JGalgano, G PEW/3:go 10/28/87 5 �PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OP NORTH TARRYTOWN RESOLUTION: SITE PLAN/CLUSTER SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PROPOSED: 15 UNITS OP TOWNHOUSING OWNER: NORTH TARRYTOWN ASSOCIATES LOCATION: BEDFORD ROAD ACCESS (AMOS STREET, WEBBER AVENUE) TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 1 7 , BLOCK 7 , LOTS 2 A - 1 , 3 , 4 , 4A, 5 , 6, 7 and 8 ZONING: APPLICATION # WHEREAS, t h e P l a n n i n g Board o f t h e V i l l a g e o f North Tarrytown h a s r e v i e w e d an a p p l i c a t i o n f o r s i t e p l a n approval and r e l a t e d s u b d i v i s i o n a p p r o v a l p u r s u a n t t o Z o n i n g Ordinance A r t i c l e V I I I , S i t e P l a n Review and A r t i c l e XIV, M o d i f i c a t i o n o f Zoning i n C o n n e c t i o n w i t h S u b d i v i s i o n R e v i e w by t h e P l a n n i n g B o a r d , and t h e V i l l a g e S u b d i v i s i o n R e g u l a t i o n s t o c o n s t r u c t 15 u n i t s o f s i n g l e - f a m i l y h o u s i n g i n t h r e e and f o u r u n i t a t t a c h e d s t r u c t u r e s , including related o f f - s t r e e t parking, landscaping, s t o r m d r a i n a g e and o t h e r s u p p o r t i n g u t i l i t i e s and f a c i l i t i e s , on a s i t e a p p r o x i m a t e l y two a c r e s i n s i z e , a s shown on f i v e d r a w i n g s p r e p a r e d i n t h e o f f i c e s o f J o s e p h R. C r o c c o , A r c h i t e c t and Howard L i e b e r m a n , C o n s u l t i n g E n g i n e e r , and i d e n t i f i e d a s follows: 1. S-1 S i t e Plan - l a s t r e v i s e d 1 1 / 4 / 8 7 , 2. Site 20 • ; 3. S-3 S i t e P l a n , Landscaping - l a s t r e v i s e d 4. S i t e P l a n , Grading, Preliminary s c a l e of 1" = 2 0 ' , undated; 5. D e t a i l s , undated, and Plan, Grading - last WHEREAS, in the course of agency pursuant to provisions of Conservation Law, the Planning findings and caused, noted activities: revised scale 8/7/87, for 1" » 2 0 ' ; scale of 1" * 8/7/87; Site Plan Review, its review and acting as lead Article 8 of the Environmental Board has made the following or conducted the following 1. Received an application fee of $250.00 paid for the 15 dwelling units and theoretical subdivision lots under review; 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property under review and surrounding area; �3, 4„ Requested and reviewed a conventional of the property, held a public hearing Article XIV, Modification of Zoning Subdivision Review by the Planning determination that: subdivision design thereon pursuant to in Connection with Board and made a 1. The proposed development will be consistent with the Comprehensive Development Plan and with the Official Map of the Village. 2. The maximum population density will be no greater than would otherwise be permitted by the regulations of the district in which it is located. 3. The land coverage will not exceed the coverage which would otherwise be permitted by the regulations for the district in which it is located. 4. The appropriate use of adequately safeguarded. adjoining land will be Conducted or caused field inspections to be made of the site so as to ascertain field conditions and determined that: 4. 1 The site is steeply sloped downwards from Bedford Road northward toward Webber Avenue; 4. 2 The New York State Department of Transportation and the Westchester County Department of Public Works find the project's access to Bedford Road (County Route 448) acceptable; 4.3 The frontage along Webber Avenue is extremely steep; 4.4 The access via Amos Street would put further traffic burdens upon that already crowded street; and 4.5 In consideration of the above, the best access is via the southwesterly frontage of Bedford Road. 5. Requested and received reports from Village authorities and/or the applicant on such matters as water supply, sewage disposal, storm drainage, fire safety, police protection, traffic impact and access safety. 6„ Referred the development proposal to the Westchester County Department of Planning pursuant to Sections 239 1, m and n of the General Municipal Law. 7, Acting as lead agency, requested, received and reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR. 2 �8. As lead agency for site plan and subdivision review in the Village of North Tarrytown, the Planning Board, after review of said field conditions, recommendations and environmental assessment form as well as other matters noted above, has determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted type and hereby issues a "negative declaration" determination of non-significance and environmental impact for this unlisted action; and WHEREAS, in the opinion of the Planning Board the applicant has complied with the Village's Development Regulations except as may be noted below; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and site plan drawings noted above be and hereby are granted site plan approval and that the applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or, as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of this site plan resolution and upon the final linen copy of the site plan drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the offices of the Village Building Department for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire one (1) year from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and/or the applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1. Use - The site plan is approved for a maximum of 15 units of housing as shown on the site plan. Accessory uses shall be those permitted in the. zoning district within which the property is located. 2. Utilities - Storm drainage, water supply and sewage disposal shall be approved by the Planning Board or its design engineering representative: 2.1 Storm water runoff shall comply with the Planning Board's policy of "zero" increase in rate of runoff. 2.2 The applicant shall submit a written report, with back-up calculations indicating his intention to provide adequate fire flow, water supply and pressure for the site. 2.3 The applicant shall designate storm water catch basins where and as approved by the Planning Board. 2.4 As suggested by the applicant, the applicant shall contribute $75,000 at the time of issuance of the building permit, to be used for improvements to the Village's sanitary sewerage system below the site in order to mitigate impacts of the proposal upon the system. 3 �2.5 All utilities including conditions noted above shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Board or its designated engineering consultant. 2.6 The applicant shall discuss with the New York State Department of Transportation the feasibility of providing a deceleration lane on Bedford Road for vehicles traveling southeast wishing to enter the site. Such deceleration lane shall be constructed if approved by the New York State Department of Transportation. 3. Safety - The Village Fire Department has indicated the desire for emergency access via Amos Street. For purposes of safety, screening of vehicle lights and to restrict the casual use of the emergency access, yet to make it possible for emergency vehicles to gain entrance the applicant shall install a five (5) foot tall cedar stockade-type fence, with evergeen shrub plantings where it can be viewed from Amos Street, to extend (finished side out) along the entire easterly property line to points approximately seventy-five (75) feet in from Bedford Road and Webber Avenue so as not to interfere with traffic sight distances. The fence shall include a locking gate, capable of being opened at least ten (10) feet wide, to make it possible for fire, police or ambulance vehicles to gain access. The emergency access shall be used only for emergency vehicles and neither the gate or Amos Street shall be used for construction vehicles, site workers vehicles or occupants of.the site during or after construction. A temporary fence may be provided during construction but the permanent fence shall be in place prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. No trees greather than 6" caliper shall be removed during the fence installation and the alignment of the fence may be adjusted as reasonably necessary to achieve its purposes. 4. Landscaping - All landscaping shown on the site plan shall Ee maintained in a healthy growing condition so as to maintain the certificate of occupancy. A typical landscaping plan around one of the buildings shall be submitted for approval by the Planning Board or its designated representative. Final review of tree cutting shall be made by the Village Tree Committee. 5. Exterior Lighting - All exterior light structures shall be screened so as to prevent glare upon adjacent properties. 6. All driveways and parking areas shall be contained by stone set in concrete or poured-in-place reinforced concrete curbs. All parking for occupants and users of the project shall be confined to the site. 4 �7. Review Fees - The applicant shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 7.1 An inspection fee for construction inspection of the proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage system, sewage, landscaping, lighting and other site plan elements for compliance with the approved site plan in the amount of $5,000.00. 7.2 A site plan escrow account pursuant to SEQR and in the amount of $5,000.00 or such specific amount which is billed to the Village and approved and paid for consulting services rendered in the review of this project, whichever is the greater amount. 7.3 A recreation fee of $1,000.00 per dwelling or $15,000.00 for the acquisition or maintenance of recreation facilities in the vicinity of the project and available for use by occupants of the housing facilities. 7.4 The above fees shall be paid prior to the signing of the final site plan by the Chairman. 8. Performance Guarantee - Prior to the issuance of a certif icate of! occupancy, the applicant shall complete the construction of all facilities shown on the site plan to the satisfaction of the Building Inspector. Alternatively, the applicant shall post a bond in an amount to be determined by the Building Inspector to ensure the satisfactory construction and installation of driveways, parking areas, drainage facilities, water supply utilities, sanitary sewers, and landscaping. Such guarantee shall be satisfactory to the Village Attorney as to form, sufficiency, and execution, and shall be issueds by a bonding or surety company approved by the village Board or by the owner with security acceptable to the Village Board. The term of the bond shall be fixed for a period of three (3) years; however, the term may be extended with the consent and agreement of all parties. The guarantee shall extend for a period of one (1) year beyond the date of completion of the required improvements to ensure their satisfactory condition. Any defects in construction or faulty equipment shall be repaired or replaced by the applicant without cost to the Village. 9. The Planning Board reserves the right to make and shall make a final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities upon notice by the Building Inspector but before the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to parking, landscaping, signs, drainage, access, paving and 5 �other site plan details in the interest of safety, convenience, enjoyment of peace and quiet of adjacent neighbors and aesthetics. The applicant shall maintain all elements of the approved site plan including landscaping in a neat and healthy condition so as to retain an approved certificate of occupancy. 10. Prior to obtaining a building permit, four (4) copies of this final site plan as revised to meet the above conditions shall be submitted to the Planning Board office for final approval. This final site plan review shall be accomplished by the Village Engineering Department or consultant and shall incorporate all applicable conditions of this resolution and the construction standards of the Village of North Tarrytown as they may be appropriate. (pate ' ' ! Jamej^Galgano, Planning Board Chairman DPF/22:crc November 30, 1987 6 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1987 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1987-10-29 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1987 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1987 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/87d3f6033cd657d08155fbb9ac21c994.pdf cb3b2873738a86ef0bb3a623c9f1039c PDF Text Text PLANNING BOARD OF NORTH TARRYTOWN Present: April 2, 1987 James Galgano, Chairman Frank Rey Raymond Dool John O'Leary Robert Ponzini, Counsel James Margotta, Building Inspector Mr. James Galgano, Chairman, opened the meeting of A p r i l 2 , 1987 at 8:05 p.m. i n regard to the review o f Mr. Mangieri's s i t e plan. Mr. Galgano stated that Mr. Mangieri had gone to the building inspector, Mr. Margotta, and the building inspector had a l i s t o f v i o l a t i o n s that had to be done f i r s t before going t o The Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Mangieri's architect f o r the project presented the s i t e plan to the Board explaining the location o f the two buildings, parking, and number of dwelling u n i t s . Mr. Galgano questioned the Board about the resolution for a lead agency. Mr. Ponzini commented that the Board should declare themselves as a lead agency f o r any environmental considerations when i t comes to the f i n a l s i t e plan review. Frank Rey make a motion to declare themselves a lead agency; Mr. Dool seconded the motion. A l l Board members present voted i n favor of the motion. Mr. Galgano questioned the Board i f t h e i r was a resolution of the s i t e plan. Mr. Ponzini commented that The Planning Board might want to make a resolution with the appraisal of the preliminary approval subject to the variance of The Zoning Board and subject t o f i n a l s i t e plan review. Mr. Rey made a motion to pass the s i t e plan on to The Zoning Board; Mr. Dool seconded the motion. A l l Board members present voted in favor of the motion. The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, jfp^ 7kAjA**y, Lynn Murray Acting Clerk LM � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1987 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1987-04-02 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1987 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1987 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/ddd3002944505bb670a7f7682cedaf7d.pdf af2dd1b94a4175f352ce0335548afaed PDF Text Text NORTH TARRYTOWN PLANNING BOARD August 27,1937 Present: Chairman James Galgano John O'Leary Frank Rey Vill. Administrator Tor« Homan Building Inspector Jim Margotta Vill. Attorney John ftu^hes Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8:15p.m..He said this would be an "information gathering" session, with no decicions to be made. I. North Tarrytown Associates Site Plan It was noted that the original 17 lots with 4units had been reduced to 14 lots, with 3 units at the March,1987 meeting. The review is to cover:-drainage -the turn around area, so as to be sure i_t.;-$s large enough for a fire truck - environmental impact Mr Margotta asked if the fire department had been consulted. Mr. Lackowitz said he would be in contact with them. Mr. Lackowitz summarized 3 major issues: 1.-water supply- that there be enough for each fire hydrant 2.-sanitary sewage- it will go to Webber Ave. and on to New Broadway. He asked the N. Tarrytown Associates how they would mitigate this problem. 3.-drainage-dry wells and drains have been added, but calculations as requested by the county nust show a zero degree runoff. �• (2) • The spokesman for N, Tarrytown Associates asked if volume might be causing the backup that has led to a sanitary problem. Mr. Lackowitz said a study would be done to investigate the problem. Mr. Rey asked if there were plans for dry wells. N. Tarrytown Associates said yes, there would be dry wells to collect water from the roofs. It was noted the pipes in the area were cleaned several years ago when roots were found growing underground in the drainage system.N. Tarrytown Associates said they would address the storm drainage problem, but said they felt the village should solve the sanitary backup problem. Chairman Galgano asked about an alternate solution to the sanitary sewage. Mr. Lackowitz suggested directing sewage from Webber onto Bedford Road as a possibility. Mr. O'Leary asked that the changesytrom the original plan be noted. The spokesman said: the original plans for 4 units now call for 3 units; that the three units are now placed slightly closer; there are plans for a larger quantity of foliage;howeverf roads will be of the same width, 20 feet. Mr. Homan noted that the fire chief must approve the width of the roads. II. Larry Rodrigues' Site Plan - Valley Street Mr. Turnquist, speaking for Mr. Rodriges, showed plans, indicating the. building would be multifunctional. The first level would be for retail, the second for parking, with the third and fourth levels for 12 duplex apartments. The garage entrnce would be from Depeyster Street. Mr. Turnquist explained that from the ijont, the building appears �W as a (3) W 4 level, but from the rear of the building it appears as 3 levels due to the grading. He noted this is a C-2 area that allows both commercial and residential use of a building. He also noted the required 35 parking spaces would be met. Mr. Margotta asked if there was a state code requiring automatic fire extinguishers on the parking level. Mr Turnquist said no such code exists. Mr. Homan noted the applicants have discussed their plans with Mr. Lackowitz. Mr. Turnquist said water,gas and electricity would be installed underground in the meter room. A catch basin for the parking level has been planned for. The storm sewar will be on Valley Street. Chairman Galgano asked Mr. Lackowitz what his initial impression was. Mr. Lackowitz said sewage lines will have to be checked to be sure they are adequate. Mr. Homan noted the existing storm sewar is a problem. Mr. O'Leary asked about the building facade. Mr. Turnquist said it would be made of concrete reinforced with steel, and a stucco finish^t the duplex levels there would be steel studs, with wrtK floors and roof to be of wood. The outside of the duplexes waid be stucco. Mr. O'Leary asked how many stores would the proposed building have. Mr. Turnquist said there were ten small spaces. Mr. O'Leary expressed concern over lack of parking. Mr. Turnquist noted that at present there is curbside parking on Valley Street. He suggested 45degree parking on Valley St. , which would allow for more spaces. Mr. Turnquist also said there would be 14 spaces on the parking level for tenants. �• (4, • Chairman Galgano asked if the apartments were to be coops or rentals. Mr. Turnquist said they would be rental apartments. Mr. Turnquist noted there are two small lots on Depyster St. (going west towards Cortlandt) that would be available for additional parking spaces. Mr. O'Leary noted the plans looked good, but parking had to be improved. III. Frank Mangieri's Site Plan- Chestnut Street Mr. Donal Walsh, representing Mr. Mangieri, asked Board members to review the site plan along with Mr. Turnquist. Mr. Turnquist described 2 buildings for the site. The entrance would be from Chestnut St., with the exit onto Gesner. One building already exists. The proposed one is to have 10 dwelling units. He said three variances had been granted by the Zoning Board: 1. a 10 foot setback 2. a density of 15,500 square feet 3. allowance for 2 separate buildings Mr. Turnquist said aside from parking spaces next to the proposed building, another six spaces could go near the present building on the site. He said water,gas and electricity will come in off of Chestnut and run through to all units. The sanitary line will connect to the Chestnut line. There will be catch basins for both the present and proposed buildings, Mr. O'Leary asked about space from the the fence to the front of the building. Mr. Turnquist said it would be approximately 20feet. Chairman Galgano asked about provisions for easements. Mr. Walsh said the original water line from Mario's Greene County could be tied in to the new ones on Mr. Mangieri's lot. Water easements could �(5) • be tied in. The storm sewar for Mr. Mangieri's project would be paid for by Mr. Mangieri;said Mr Walsh. Mr. Margotta suggested a 6 month time limit to have the drain installed by Mr. Mangieri so others can tie into the system. Mr. Lackowitz discussed the need to find the best location for a manhole, so that the Amenta's property can also tie in. Mr. Walsh said a second manhole on the lot would be desirable. Mr. Walsl)feaid his party would sign an easement agreement with the village. Mr. Walsh said he would do the ISO. Mr. Lackowitz said the water supply would have to be checked, along with checking the site plan with the fire department to see if a new hydrant might be needed.A zero post development discharge from a qualified party was requested. Runoff calculations for once the area is paved can't be more than now, noted Mr. Lackowitz— the present runoff must be maintained with the new lot. Chairman Galgano acknowledged that the Planning Board had received a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Amenta regarding the need for an easement. Mr. O'Leary asked if the^>arking spaces could be changed. Mr. Mangieri noted that the present building on the site is not required to have parking. Mr. Mangieri asked the Board to look ahead for improving the village. He also said that all easement work for his site and other property owners would be on his property. Mr. Margotta asked where and when would the collective drain be built. Mr. Homan suggested waiting for the next meeting, when calculations would be complete. Mr. Walsh agreed, saying such calculations would be done, including the ISO and zero runoff calculations. It was noted that Amenta would provide their topographical map. �(6) Vice - Chairman John O'Leary then called for a public hearing at 9:50p.m. in regard to Mr. James Galgano's application for a subdivision of 54 Gory Brook Road. Mr. O'Leary explained that since a quorum was not present, the hearing was adjourned until Sept. 10,1987, when the Planning Board would meet again. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:00p.m, Respectfully submitted, Linda T. Fukuchi �VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN 28 Beekman Avenue North Tarrytown, N.Y. 1. 1 2 2 2 ^ Name WEfrBEfc Metals 2. Location (tax section, block and lot number or other specific information). SECT. 17 ftLK 4, LOT 5C 3 . Property owner's name end address D f e M E f K l O S t^T uiFJsaeft Aafimie MOETH |<RIM6AS TasaeVTOtoNyK). y, ' 0 3 ^ ' 4 . K^ffelr^FsurKeyog-'a Name and Address TUKfrflOISf <?g fofeKKMAM AVg. AROtfTECTS MOKTM TAEEYTOCJA, M."/; I f l g f f 5. Size in Acres MA 6. Fee: Date Paid Proposed Number of Lots NA "____ 7. Is the entire parcel involved to be subdivided at t h i s time 8. Is any land to be dedicated to public use? MA Acres 9. Will any zoning changes aa^-SMbdiviaion regulation waivers be requested? V&3 ' Describe? g fTlJOClPAL ftLPgff OK Qtt& ffttfrEL ^ P g M g ' W 10. Date of Preliminary Layout Submission KV*>gtt'ft6lC 17, \<\J>fe | 1 . Conditions to be met in Plat Submission 1kt> M1/AJ*Y PPAAAMAAA* PtrtuuL, Signature w � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1987 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1987-08-27 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1987 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1987 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/f4187b0d399bc52b3deb937684696eb5.pdf cb8000523fac74f9a89362c98816316c PDF Text Text .» • ^ # NORTH TARRYTOWN PLANNING BOARD September 10,1987 Present: Chairman James Galgano Miguel Jimenez Frank Rey Ray Windas Vill. Administrator Tom Homan Building Inspector Jim Margotta Village Attorney John Hughes Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8:10p.m. I. North Tarrytown Associates Site Plan Chairman Galgano asked Mr. Lackowitz if he had received a submission in regard to the water runoff. Mr. Lackowitz said he had not, nor had the engineer been in touch. A written report with backup calculations of storm drainage and sanitary sewage is needed, along with a fire flow for the site. Hydraulic calculations are needed. A copy of such was given to Mr. Karpel. Mr. Wiedle said he would draft a resolution with all the particulars as requested by Mr. Homan. He noted the need for a hidden emergency exit and entrance. Mr. Lackowitz agreed. He said he had met with the fire department who want an extra access to the property from Amos Street. Mr. Karpel agreed, saying he was originally told an emergency exit was not wanted as some feared its purpose would be abused. Mr. Karpel saidsuch an entrance/exit could be designed. Mr. Margotta asked what good would the access be in inclement weather?He noted a concern that the access road might be neglected, Mr. Karpel said if the road were paved and kept clear, no problem should arise, Mr, Wiedle said the use of the emergency access road should be included in the resolution. He also noted that cars must be prevented from using the access road - the use is only for emergency vehicles. �• (2, * r Mr. Windas said he felt this called for a public hearing, and Mr. Hughes concurred. Mr,Windas noted ho residents of the area expressed such concern at the last public hearing. He suggested that the Planning Board wait for this issue to be discussed. In sum, Chairman Galgano said that storm, sewage and emergency exit are the remaining issues. He asked Mr. Karpel that a written report be sent to Mr, Lackowitz, with alternate proposals included for the emergency exit. Mr, Lackowitz noted results of the fireflow test from Webber Ave,, noting static pressure was 103 psi, and that the flow of hydrant #10 began at 1,030 p/minute, lowering to91 psi. Mr. Karpel said Mr. Crocco would draw up some new sketches. Chairman Galgano asked Mr. Lackowitz to make a standard form with a list of needed requirements for Mr. Margotta to give people before hearings so that all needed information is obtained in advance. Mr. Windas said such a similar format could be done for a site plan review. Chairman Galgano agreed. II.Frank Mangierifs Site Plan Mr. Walsh, representing Mr. Mangieri, said he would give a sketch plan to see if it would meet with the parking and fire department's access needs. He said more data will be needed, but for tonight he was asking for EAF. He said drawings would show no negative impact on the environment. Mr. Hughes said there would be no positive or negative declaration tonight. Mr. Hugheasaid this would be an unlisted action. Mr. Hughes said the Planning Board would become the lead agent. He read a proposed resolution (see attached). �• * (3) # A motion to accept said resolution was made by Mr, Windas, seconded by Mr. Rey and passed by a unanimous vote, A resolution to classify this as an unlisted action was moved by Chairman Galgano, seconded by Mr. Rey, and passed by a unanimous vote. Mr. Windas asked if all basic plans had been submitted. Mr. Walsh said he had done so, and had seen the fire department. Mr. Fuller reviewed his report 1. He noted that all environmental for the Board. pbcedures had been covered. 2. He asked for a written record of all variances granted by the Zonong Board. 3. He asked if the pedestrian section of the property would be connected to the property on the north side, and would it be open to the public. 4. In regard to the parking area, he^felt the circulation area was very tight, that a 9%ft. width for the lane was inadequate. Mr. Turnquist assured him the width was 12 ft. , not 9k ft. 5. He expressed concern over the narrowness ;of the garage doors which he said should be 9feet wide. Also, no parking zones are needed in the driveway area. Parking space #12 is not big enough, and should be eliminated. 6. A guide rail or fence between Mr. Mangieri's property and other lots should be considered, along with the need for handicapped ramps. Mr, Hughes said the major issue appeared to be parking. Mr, Turnquist then showed new parking plans to the'Board. The fire department had expressed a concern over the width of of the ingress-a20 foot wide entrance from Gesner was needed. �w i (4) By eliminating present parking sites 1,2,3 and 12, and putting 8 spaces next to the present building, along with 8 spaces next to the proposed building, the 20 foot width requirement would be solved. Mr. Walsh noted this would make the walkway area safer and easier to get to. The wider 20 foot driveway would serve as both the ingress and egress for the fire department. Mr. Mangieri asked how the widened driveway would affect the curb area on Chestnut. One parking space might be lost, said Mr. Walsh, yet there would be more spaces on the property. Mr. Wiedle asked if this was an increased intensity of land use. Mr. Walsh noted this permanent easement division was better, as the redesign gives all spaces needed. Mr. Hughes agreed. Mr. Walsh said that the value of the main project must include the value of the easement. Mr. Hughes said that would be decided later. Mr. Wiedle noted a future possibility for a pedestrian walkway from Beekman Ave. to Chestnut St. with this site plan. Mr. Mangieri also noted that the change in the entrance/exit area, with fewer parking spaces next to the proposed building would be better for the fire department. Mr. Hughes asked how many bedrooms would the apartments have. Mr. Walsh said plans were for four 1-bedroom units and six 2-bedroom units. Mr. Hughes noted the present ruling calls for 1.2 parking spaces per unit. This ruling may be modified to a new code of one space per dwelling unit, and one half space per bedroom. Mr. Walsh said he felt the 1.2 space per dwelling should apply here. Mr. Wiedle said he was satisfied as long as the fire department �(5) could get in, turn around and get out onto Chestnut St. Mr. Lackowitz noted that Gesner would not have been a good exit for the fire department. Mr. Wiedle asked that Mr. Mangieri consider as embellishment the following: sight-lighting for pedestrians more detail for the landscaping the exterior facades Mr. Walsh said these items would be covered in the final site plan,as would ISQfcalculations and storm water calculations. III. Larry Rodrigues' Site Plan It was noted that Mr. Rodrigues was out of the country, and this matter would be discussed at a later date. IV. Site Plan for This piece of land is located at the corner of Broadway and Bedford Road, site of the former Tom's Exxon, property is designated on village map as Section 17-Block 12-Lot 1 and owned by Dominic LaCaruba, with applicant being Dominic LaCaruba. Mr. Viedle noted the busy intersection where this site is, and said parking spaces 4 and 5 as they appear on the site plan, off of Hudson Terrace might be unsafe. He asked if more parking spaces were possible on Hudson Terrace . Mr. Margotta said the plans had been sent to the county. They don't allow for an exit or entrance closer than 37 feet to a corner on a state road. As this would be for a new use of this land, the present rules would apply.Bedford Road and Hudson Terrace would still be available for such use. * �(6) Mr. Wiedle noted this is one of the most important sites in the village, and the plans need a lot of thought, and must be done as well as possible. Mayor Gandolfo agreed, saying this is the village's gateway, Mr. Homan said proper lighting and landscaping would be important. Functionally, more thought must be given to parking, said Mr. Wiedle. After discussing possible alternatives for parking, entrance and exit, Mr. Wiedle asked that they bring assigned proposal to the next meeting. Chairman Galgano noted a variance would be needed to begin with. Mr. Hughes asked Board members if they wanted to send this matter to the Zoning Board. All agreed, as at present the plans could not be approved. Mr. Lackowitz said the DOT might have a voice in these plans. Mr Rey said the idea was good, but suggested that the area in front on Broadway be kept as free from parking as possible. Chairman Galgano noted the county would notify the state. A resolution was made by Chairman Galgano that this site plan be recommended to the Zoning Board, seconded by Mr. Rey, and was carried with a unanimous vote. Subdivision of James Galgano's Property - 54 Gory Brook Road Mr. Windas presided over the meeting. Mr. Galgano requested a subdivision of his lot, that has an existing building,Mr. Windas noted. This lot could be subdivded with a second lot on his land off of New Broadway. Mr. Windas asked if the sewar,water and electrical lines fed to his present house from Gory Brook Road. Mr. Galgano said no, the lines were from New Broadway, and through the^subdivided lot. �$ (7) # r It was noted by Mr. Hughes that a public hearing on this subdivision was held at the last meeting, but not voted upon, as a quorum was not present. Mr. Windas asked if there were any easements to be noted? Mr. Galgano said they were in a deed. A ist of three resolutions were made for the subdivision of Mr. James Galgano*s property (see attatched). A motion to accept the resolutions was made by Mr. Rey, seconded by Mr. Jimenez, and carried by a unanimous vote. Mr. Homan noted a memo dated Aug, 4,1987 re recreation fees to be charged to developers on new projects. The Planning Board could make a formal recommendationon an amount to the Board of Trustees. At present the village charges no such fee. Mr. Wiedle said $1,500- $2,000 per lot is not uncommon. A condccminium is coum+ad as one lot. Mr. Windas said this is an exhcange for a loss in recreation area, but feels such a fee is too high. Chairman Galgano felt the Planning Board's action isn't needed by the Board of Trusteees; the idea is fine, but not within the mandate of the Planning Board. Mr. Wiedle said the charter says the Planning Board's advice is to be given when asked, Mr. Windas asked Mr. Wiedle to provide the Board with some guidelines. Mr. HtLghes noted a zoning change on parking with forthcoming in October. He asked Board members fo^their comments. Mr. Windas' concern is that the Zoing Board grants vairances anyway. Chairman Galgano said larger units might need more spaces per unit than smaller units. Mr. Margotta feels too many applicants try to outmaneuver by requesting for more than possible hoping to settle for fewer spaces than orginially needed, Mr. Hughes said he would prepare a member to Board Members re possible new plans for parking. �(8) jfc There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10: 20 p.m. Respectfully submitted Linda T. Fukuchi � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1987 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1987-09-10 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1987 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1987 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/c8395f1eb39f766dde3d52b0b063f56f.pdf 2e882c3dee4bdfd312b6ebc4876e7771 PDF Text Text PLANNING BOARD MEETING Present: January 14, 1987 James Galgano, Chairman Raymond Dool Frank Rey John O'Leary Matthew Arkin, Counsel James Margotta, Building Inspector Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8:15 P.M. He explained there would be a preliminary hearing on Mr. Rodrigues' request for a sub-division of his property at 56 Clinton Street. He would like to sub-divide lot 6A from lots 7 and 7A, and build a four family apartment house on lots 7 and 7A. Parking would be provided for twelve spaces. The building permit was denied on the premises that lots 6A, 7 and 7A are considered one building lot. The sub-division would cause lot 6A to become non-conforming, as more than 307o of the land would then be covered, and not allowed in a C-2 zone. Mr. Hughes, representing Mr. Rodrigues, said two parking spaces per family are required, but that three spaces per family will be made available. He noted that the building now on lot 6A has four families living in it. Mr. Margotta noted that the rear lot behind 7A and 7 is considered part of lot 7. Mr. Hughes said he would return if a variance is granted to Mr. Rodrigues. A motion to refer the Rodrigues Enterprise situation to the Zoning Board was made by Mr. O'Leary, seconded by Mr. Dool, and was unanimously passed. Chairman Galgano brought up a matter formerly discussed, that of Greene County. The question of how much enforcement power the Planning Board has was raised. Mr. O'Leary asked for a review. Mr. Margotta explained that Greene County's new property was given a variance by the Zoning Board with the understanding that off-street parking would be supplied for the loading and unloading of trucks. The factory would be at their "old" store. It was decided by the Zoning Board that retail sales in their new store was alright, but the request for manufacturing in the old store was denied. Mr. Dool noted that a 9/18/86 request for a sub-division would not require any zoning changes. Minutes from May 9, 1986 Zoning Board meeting allowed the variance with the understanding that all loading and unloading by Greene County would be off the street, and done in the parking area on the side. Mr. O'Leary asked if a certificate of occupancy had been granted, �-2to which Mr. Margotta said no such certificate has been issued. Mr. O'Leary said he would like to know how Greene County plans to provide off-street parking. This should be cleared up before any decision on a sub-division is made, he noted. Mr. Margotta asked the attorney, Mr. Arkin, how this could affect the Planning Board's decision. Mr, Arkin said the Planning Board has the power to grant the sub-division even if the variances are not being adhered to. Mr. O'Leary said he wants the applicant to answer how this issue can be met, what solution or steps can be taken to meet proper parking. Chairman Galgano asked Mr. Arkin to please write Greene County a letter that would cover these questions, and to ask for a reply. Mr. Dool asked the Board members to meet next Thursday, January 21, at 8:00 P.M. for further discussion of this matter. The topic of the James House at Phelps Memorial Hospital was raised for discussion by Chairman Galgano. The issue raised by Mr. Dool was whether use of the James House would be bad for competition with the hospital itself. Mr. Rey said he. felt no harm would come of it. Chairman Galgano noted a Permitted Accessory Use list to which the James House could be added. The Planning Board will send the Board of Trustees a recommendation of inclusion of the James House to the list of Permitted Accessory Uses. A motion was made by Mr. Rey for the temporary use of existing buildings and facilities at Phelps Hospital for fund raising activities, including leasing of space for catered affairs, art shows and other similar activities. The motion was seconded by Mr. O'Leary, and was unanimously carried. Mr. O'Leary requested that the Planning Board ask Phelps for the results of a survey as to what would be the most likely uses of the James House. Chairman Galgano adjourned the meeting at 8:55 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Linda Fukuchi Acting Clerk � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1987 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1987-01-14 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1987 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1987 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/e875a2d44712ae3e121029f20e1c53b8.pdf 876e492bafa177867e815d32a8fc06ed PDF Text Text ££ANNING BOARD MEETING - January 19, 1987 Present: James Galgano, Chairman Raymond Dool John O'Leary Roman Windas Thomas Homan, Administrator Robert Peirce, Village Attorney Jeff Schimade, Attorney James Margotta, Building Inspector Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8:05 P.M. The first issue for tonight's hearing was given by Mr. Leonard Sieverding. His presentation was for a possible condominium complex of 3 buildings called Pocantico Mews, located between Pocantico and Washington Streets, and behind the Morse School. The site is of such a size that would allow for 11 units, and the builder is seeking permission for 18 units. When asked about parking, it was explained that parking would be provided under the first building, and is a courtyard. Total parking spaces would be 22, meeting the required 1-2 spaces per unit. * Chairman Galgano asked if retaining walls would be built. Mr. Sieverding said there would. Would there be any exit or entrance from Washington Street? Mr. Sieverding replied there would not be any such access - only from Pocantico Street. Mr. O'Leary asked if fire trucks could enter the complex. Mr. Sieverding said no, but that fire trucks would have access from the side of the Mews complex. He noted an ambulance could go under the first building (9? ceiling). Mr. O'Leary asked if this would be considered cluster housing. Chairman Galgano said yes, it would. Chairman Galgano asked if the apartments would be for sale or rent. Mr. Sieverding said they would be for sale. Mr. Windas noted that as zoning regulations aren't being met, the site plan can't be dealt with until variances are taken care of. Mr. Windas made a motion recommending that the Planning Board endorse the Pocantico Mews site plan in terms of concept. The motion was seconded by Mr. O'Leary and the vote was unanimous. Greene County Chairman Galgano raised the issue of approval for sub-division. Attorney Schimada explained that the variance was granted with the understanding there would be a side area for loading and unloading. At present this is in violation. He explained that if the Planning Board were to /_ �-2» grant the sub-division, they would be granting a power that is not there. Mr. Schimada recommended that the Board take no action. Instead, he flk explained, there are two options: 1. Have Greene County return to the Zoning Board and comply with the variance or, 2. Having the Zoning Board take away the variance. Phelps Hospital - Day Care Center The architect for Phelps gave a detailed explanation of their site plan. The building would be of 7,700 sq. ft., with 8 child care rooms in a one story building for children of ages through high school level. It would be located close to the nurses residence. The land is of sufficient size for the building, grass, and a parking lot. The Day Care Center would be opened from 6:45 A.M. to 6:45 P.M., so nurses on the 7:00 A.M. shift could be accomodated. Parking would be sufficient for parents and visitors. There would also be a 50 ft. sidewalk. The roadway would have a turn-around. A traffic study is being done at present. Mr. Homan said a report is on file as far as any environmental ^ ^ impact the center would have. Food would be cooked at the hospital and delivered to the Day Care Center. Steam heat would be used. Chairman Galgano noted that the main concern is water. Steve Grollman of Dolph Rotfeld, Engineers who is doing the water study for Phelps, proposed using the present supply of water at the top of the hill, but increasing the pump size. He said he will get back to George Lackowitz (hired by the Village for the water study) re: water supply for fire-fighting. Yard drains will be installed. Mr. Homan introduced Mr. Lackowitz to Planning Board members. Flow availability tests were just done in Sleepy Hollow Manor to see what effect it had on Phelps. 100,000 gal. storage tank is presently available for fire-fighting, but how much water is really needed? And what is the best method? Chairman Galgano and Mr. O'Leary asked what is the norm? Mr. Lackowitz said that depends on whether it is low density or not, and whether a sprinkler system is installed or not. # Phelps spokespeople said their insurance company wants 1,500 gallons of water per minute. The infant area only would have a sprinkler system. They noted that the North Tarry •-.own Fire Department is in on these studies as to how best deliver the water and how much water is needed. fc < — • * �-3A loss of pressure at Phelps was noted when the test in Sleepy ^kH»ollow Manor was done. Phelps is seeking a conditional approval of their site plans. Board members asked what plans did they have for sewage? Phelps p. eople said it would tie in with the present system at the nursing home. Mr. Peirce asked how many employees planning to use the Day Care C enter are North Tarrytown residents? Phelps people said they did not tu ave a number for that, but planned to have a usage of 25% for North T. arrytown residents, 50% for Phelps employees, and 25% for corporate b. ackers. Mr. Margotta raised the issue of what if costs for the center and wv^ater changes can't be met? Mr. Windas noted that Section 62-30 in the Zoning Ordinances says n*o site plan shall be approved until reviewed by the Village engineer. Mr. Homan said he felt the impasse could be resolved. The Planning B»oard needs more time to deal with issues other than water i.e. traffic, r%oad. Phelps people said a maximum of 110 children would be allowed on the premises at any one time. Their plans have been basically approved by ^ ^ t d e Department of Social Services they said. Chairman Galgano asked for a site plan as soon as possible. A motion was made by Roman Windas, seconded by John O'Leary and u^nanimously passed to hire George W. Lackowitz, a private engineer, to d»o the water engineering study for the Village. Board members asked that the state evaluate the area being considered. M^rr. Homan suggested that Mr. Schimada make contact through the state. Mr. Windas noted that the owner should also be given information on tTlie Day Care project. The issue of a northern loop for water at Phelps was raised by Mr. Hocinan. Would this be something for the Village to consider sharing the Cocsts with Phelps? Mr. Lackowitz said 2 topics are of importance: 1.) how much water i;s needed at Phelps and, 2.) what modifications to their system are n e e d e d for fire-fighting. Mr. Lackowitz said 1,500 gallons of water per minute is the minimum PBielps is required to provide. However, he feels 2,500 - 3,500 gallons i^s recommended. This is from other studies for commercial building for a supply of water for a 3 hour duration. Three engine companies would ^fe rrespond, each capable of pulling 1,000 gallons per minute - thus the need jjV fc2or 3,000 gallons per minute. u -~~*~ •• • �-4•» Possible conditions to meet this water supply: 1.) Instead of a 1,500 gallon ground storage tank, it would be an active elevated water tank with 3 hours duration, which would also handle the water pressure problem (cost-approximately one million dollars). 2.) A northern loop which goes up the North Tarrytown water supply system. However, this would have to go through the Rockefeller park and estate. (cost: approximately 1% million dollars). But there is opposition from Phelps' primary benefactor. It was asked if any C D . grant would be a possiblity. he had already applied, but was unable to get the money. Mr. Homan said Mr. Margotta asked if there was any other area besides Phelps for the water tank. Mr. Lackowitz said the only other area would be east of Broadway. Mr. Lackowitz noted that Phelps is talking of replacing the pipes which would help the hydraulic pressure. Mr. Homan said he would like to negotiate with Phelps to meet one of the two conditions previously mentioned. Mr. O'Leary said he felt the Board has a responsibility to enforce Phelps to enact on having a better quality and quantity water supply system. » There being no further business, Chairman Galgano adjourned the meeting at 10:10 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Linda Fukuchi Acting Clerk �*> VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK -* 2 8 BEEKMAN A V E N U E PHILIP E. ZEGARELLI. MAYOR MISS FILOMENA PALLACARO V I L L A M CUmK J A M E S J . T I M M I N G 8 . DEPUTY MAYOR |LKN T . W I L L I A M S WEN SALMAN SUSAN OALOANO P R A N K M A N O I E R I . JR. A R T H U R B. C E C O N I MRS. I R E N E A M A T O V I U A M TMtASUItUt ROBERT J . P O N Z I N I VILLASK COUNML R. T H O M A S H O M A N AOMINimiATOR INCORPORATED IS74 January 29, 1987 Ms. Victoria Miller Assistant Vice President Phelps Memorial Hospital Center North Tarrytown, N.Y. 10591 Dear Ms. Miller: RE: Women's Treatment FAcility We have received and thank you for the copies of the articles on the concept of a women's treatment facility. Would you kindly furnish us with any information you may have regarding similar health care facilities at other institutions. Additionally, we would appreciate receiving a summary of what your market research may have revealed concerning the types of services you anticpate providing at the center. Thank your for your attention to these matters. Very Truly yours* yo^<i James Galgano Chairman 'where the Headless Horseman rode" � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1987 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1987-01-19 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1987 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1987 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/80a22ab9d407a80c786ee75b1c36b5c6.pdf ea9b770597b29f7b6b8112df3c4f152e PDF Text Text /•" 1 NORTH TARRYTOWN PLANNING BOARD December 2, 1987 Present:Chairman J. Galgano .Ray Wandas Miguel Jimenez John O'Leary Frank Rey Tom Homan, Vill. Admin John Hughes, Vill. Att Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8:10 p.m. North Tarrytown Realty Associates Site Plan Mr. Karpel, speaking for the N. Tarrytown Realty Associates, gave a detailed account on the history of the development . Almost 150 meetings have been held with the village, county, and state. Access to the site was to originally to have been through Amos St., but the state, county and village recommended access off of Bedford Road. But, an emergency alternative access road was needed, and Amos St. was the choice of the fire department. It would be chained off, with bushes to discourage any use of the area other than emergency vehicles. Mr. Karpel noted zoning regulations allowed for 17 single family units, which was reduced to 15 units in three cluster buildings. Extra parking -a total of 45 spaces - was supplied when only 15 spaces were required. A turn around area was made for easier entrance/exit. Benefits of the development are many, as this will contribute to the village taxes-'— he estimated sveral thousand dollars per year, per unit. The roads will be private, and maintained by the property owners, and garbage removal will be done by a private firm. On approval of the site plan, N. Tarrytown Assoc, will give approximately $25,000.00 for recreational purposes, and $75,000.00 will go to �/ a sewar rehabilitation fund. In consideration of neighboring properties, it was said there would be no building on heavily wooded areas, leaving the trees and plantings as they are now, nor will roads disturb trees or bushes. A setback from the property lines is planned for on the northern side. It was noted that the old cottonwood trees won't be affected. There will be 4 buildings, three with four units, and one with three units.Each unit will have its own driveway and garage. Mrs. Andrycich asked how high the buildings will be. She was told they would be 2*5 stories high, approximately 35 feet high. Mr. Hayes read his letter to the Board to all present, expressing his concern over the development, and its being too close to property ownners on Amos St. When asked about setbacks, Mr. Karpel said they were in compliance with the zoning codes. He said sewar pipes will be put in by N. Tarrytown Realty Associates, not the village. Residents asked if they were covered by the village for any possible damage that might occur from the blasting. They were told yes. Concerns over bus stops and left turns onto Bedford Rd. from the development were expressed. Mr. Zegarelli asked if there might be a better road than Amos St. to use as an access. Mr. Karpel said a stockade fence would be installed along the property line at Amos St. Some residents asked why the special fire access road was needed. Board members explained the fire chief said it was so needed. Residents asked for aguarantee that Amos St. would only be used for fire and/or emergency vehicles. Mr. Ceconi asked the Board to delay their vote so that residents in the area might obtain a lawyer. �Mr. Zegarelli asked if catch basins were planned for. Mr. Lackowitz said yes, and that they would run together, with a zero runoff. The sanitary sewer and the storm sewer would run under the aqueduct at different points. A total of $75,000.00 is for the North Broadway downhill sewer. Mr. Hayes asked why had plans changed from 14 units to 15 units. It was expalined that had been for 14 individual units versus the now four buildings on the site. A resident who lives on New Broadway asked if the board would guarantee no new runoff? be installed. Mr. Lackowitz said that the new sewer is to Every development has its water supply, runnoff and downstream problems checked in advance. Mr. Zegarelli asked if the $75,000 would dover the entire cost for the sewer lines? Was there any margin for a higher cost? Mr. Lackowitz noted the Webber Avenue sewer comes down Pine Street to New Broadway where past problems existed when roots had grown inside the pipes and the cleaning then done was only a "band-aid approach." He said depending on the competitive bidding by contractors, the cost could range from $35 to $50 thousand. He said for $75 thousand the entire sewer lines so far mentioned, and that sewer from Pine Street to New Broadway could be done. Mr. Lackowitz said the size of the sewer and the CFS can be increased at New Broadway. A resident asked Chairman Galgano what his feelings were regarding having Bedford Road used as the site's entrance. Chairman Galgano noted that access to and from Webber Road to Route 448 is dangerous, as there is less sight there than directly onto Bedford Road from the �- 4 development. i Member Ray Windas said no matter which road is used, access to the development from Bedford Road will be hard, when making a left turn. Mr. Ceconi asked that a fence be built to keep contractors from parking on Amos Street. He also expressed concern about the playground area. A resident read from the January 26, 1987 minutes that safety issues concerned then Mayor Zegarelli. were hired four years ago. Mr. Zegarelli said consultant- The four cluster home were all right with him, but the fire department's request for access from Amos Street concerned him. He asked if school buses would have difficulty entering and leaving the development. Business Meeting Mr. Hayes said he would prefer a buffer hedge. He was told the site will have proper, lovely landscaping. When asked, no "guesstimate" would be given as to the possible cost of these units. Mr. Homan read several changes in the resolution to all present. They concerned: 1. Regarding fire safety, page 4. 2. Performance guarantee, paragraph 9, page 5. Mr. Ceconi asked Village Attorney, John Hughes if he would give the residents any legal advice. Mr. Hughes declined, saying it would be fair, as he represented the Planning Board. Mr. windas asked the public what where they against. Mr. Ceconi asked for a five-foot buffer hedge at the emergency entrance/exit to keep AMos Street safe for the children who live there. A resident asked if North Tarrytown zoning allowed for cluster housing? Mr. Zegarelli said he felt cluster housing was better than 17 or 14 separate units. �-5f Board member Frank Rey said he felt an access from Webber Rd. is not needed. And, Amos St. will not become an access road to the property for residents of the new development. Mr. Ceconi said a fence and shrubbery would keep owners from parking on Amos St. It was asked if a dead end sign on Amos St. would help deter traffic. The Board said they would look into this. Mr. O'Leary asked how much a fence would cost, and said he joined with the residents over their concerns. The developer said he couldn't give a figure. Mr. O'Leary said the Planning Board has worked hard to make adjustments and to help all concerned. A certificate of occupancy will not be given by the Planning Board unless they give the site plan their final approval. A motion to end the public hearing was made by Mr. O'Leary, seconded by Mr. Rey, and carried by a unanimous vote. BUSINESS MEETING It was decided that the banking of the houses be buffered as ori- ginally planned. Mr, windas said that on p.9, paragraph 3, the word "may" should be changed to "will". He noted that the entrance onto Bedford Rd. may need special treatment. It was noted that the state DOT recommended that no light was needed at the entrance/exit at Bedford Rd. However, the DOT will look at the plans again before giving their final approval. Mr. Margotta said the fence should be installed before the construction begins. Mr. Rey said he wanted a deacceleration lane on Bedford Rd. as �-6- an access to the entrance/exit of the condominiums. Mr. Jimenez suggested a higher hedge. Mr. Rey then said thattrees and buffers should be continuous along Mr. Haye's property. A motion for a temporary barrier to deter entrance from Amos St. was made, along with a final barrier to be installed upon completion of the housing, was made by " and seconded by Mr O'Leary, and carried by a unanimous vote. 00 Larry Rodrigues Site Plan Mr. Homan said the resolution re the preliminary site plan puts into writing all that was discussed at the last meeting. Mr. Windas asked if all property on the site plan was in the same zone? Mr. Margotta said yes. Mr. Windas said he questioned the use of the property now coming down Depeyster St. that is used as a parking lotr— was this the same piece of land? Mr. Margotta said it was not. Mr. Rey said p.3, paragraph 5.3 of the resolution should have the words "in the vicinity" deleted. Mr. Homan asked Mr. Weidle to please show a more detailed land plan in regard to the landscaping for the next meeting. He suggested grating around the trees. A motion to pass said resolution for Larry Rodrigues' site plan was made by Mr. O'Leary, seconded by Mr. Jimenez, and was carried by a unanimous vote. Chairman Galgano asked if there was any other pending business. There being none, the meeting was adjourned at 10:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Linda T. Fukuchi, Clerk �PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OP NORTH TARRYTOWN RESOLUTION: SITE PLAN/CLUSTER SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PROPOSED: 15 UNITS OF TOWNHOUSING OWNER: NORTH TARRYTOWN ASSOCIATES LOCATION: BEDFORD ROAD ACCESS (AMOS STREET, WEBBER AVENUE) TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 17, BLOCK 7, LOTS 2A-1, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 6, 7 and 8 ZONING: APPLICATION # WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for site plan approval and related subdivision approval pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article VIII, Site Plan Review and Article XIV, Modification of Zoning in Connection with Subdivision Review by the Planning Board, and the Village Subdivision Regulations to construct 15 units of single-family housing in three and four unit attached structures, including related off-street parking, landscaping, storm drainage and other supporting utilities and facilities, on a site approximately two acres in size, as shown on five drawings prepared in the offices of Joseph R. Crocco, Architect and Howard Lieberman, Consulting Engineer, and identified as follows : 1. S-1 Site Plan - last revised 11/4/87, scale 1" * 20'; 2. Site Plan, Grading - last revised 8/7/87, scale of 1" = 20' ; 3. S-3 Site Plan, Landscaping - last revised 8/7/87; 4. Site Plan, Grading, Preliminary scale of T* » 20', undated; 5* Details, undated, and WHEREAS, in the course of agency pursuant to provisions of Conservation Law, the Planning findings and caused, noted activities : for Site Plan Review, its review and acting as lead Article 8 of the Environmental Board has made the following or conducted the following 1. Received an application fee of $250.00 paid for the 15 dwelling units and theoretical subdivision lots under review; 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property under review and surrounding area; �Requested and reviewed a conventional subdivision design of the property, held a public hearing thereon pursuant to Article XIV, Modification of Zoning in Connection with Subdivision Review by the Planning Board and made a determination that: 1. The proposed development will be consistent with the Comprehensive Development Plan and with the Official Map of the Village. 2. The maximum population density will be no greater than would otherwise be permitted by the regulations of the district in which it is located. 3. The land coverage will not exceed the coverage which would otherwise be permitted by the regulations for the district in which it is located . 4. The appropriate use of adequately safeguarded. adjoining land will be Conducted or caused field inspections to be made of the site so as to ascertain field conditions and determined that : 4. 1 The site is steeply sloped downwards Road northward toward Webber Avenue; from Bedford 4. 2 The New York State Department of Transportation and the Westchester County Department of Public Works find the project's access to Bedford Road (County Route 448) acceptable; 4. 3 The frontage along Webber Avenue is extremely steep; 4.4 The access via Amos Street would put further traffic burdens upon that already crowded street ; and 4.5 In consideration of the above, the best access is via the southwesterly frontage of Bedford Road. Requested and received reports from Village authorities and/or the applicant on such matters as water supply, sewage disposal, storm drainage, fire safety, police protection, traffic impact and access safety. Referred the development proposal to the Westchester County Department of Planning pursuant to Sections 239 1, m and n of the General Municipal Law. Acting as lead agency, requested, received and reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR. 2 �8. As l e a d agency for s i t e plan and s u b d i v i s i o n review in the V i l l a g e of North Tarrytown,. the Planning Board, after r e v i e w of said f i e l d conditions, recommendations and environmental assessment form as w e l l a s o t h e r m a t t e r s noted a b o v e , has determined that the proposed a c t i o n i s an U n l i s t e d type and hereby i s s u e s a " n e g a t i v e d e c l a r a t i o n " d e t e r m i n a t i o n of n o n - s i g n i f i c a n c e and environmental impact for t h i s u n l i s t e d a c t i o n ; and WHEREAS, in the opinion of the Planning applicant has complied with the Village's R e g u l a t i o n s e x c e p t as may be noted below; Board the Development NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that s a i d s i t e plan a p p l i c a t i o n and s i t e plan drawings noted above be and hereby are granted s i t e plan approval and that t h e a p p l i c a n t may o b t a i n t h e endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman o r , as an a l t e r n a t e , the V i l l a g e Administrator, on a copy of t h i s s i t e plan r e s o l u t i o n and upon the f i n a l l i n e n copy of the s i t e plan drawing r e v i s e d as necessary to show compliance with the f o l l o w i n g c o n d i t i o n s , which endorsement s h a l l permit f i l i n g in the o f f i c e s of the V i l l a g e Building Department for purposes of o b t a i n i n g a b u i l d i n g permit in accordance with t h i s r e s o l u t i o n and a l l b u i l d i n g code requirements, p r o v i d e d , however, t h a t t h i s approval s h a l l e x p i r e one (1) year from the d a t e of t h i s r e s o l u t i o n i f the f o l l o w i n g m o d i f i c a t i o n s and c o n d i t i o n s have not been completed t o the s a t i s f a c t i o n of t h e Planning Board and/or the a p p l i c a n t has not obtained a b u i l d i n g p e r m i t : 1. Use - The s i t e plan i s approved for a maximum of 15 u n i t s of housing as shown on the s i t e p l a n . Accessory u s e s s h a l l be t h o s e permitted in t h e . zoning d i s t r i c t w i t h i n which the p r o p e r t y i s l o c a t e d . 2. Utilities - Storm d r a i n a g e , water s u p p l y and sewage d i s p o s a l s h a l l be approved by the Planning Board or i t s design engineering representative: 2.1 Storm water runoff s h a l l comply w i t h the Board's p o l i c y of "zero" i n c r e a s e in r a t e of 2.2 The a p p l i c a n t s h a l l submit a w r i t t e n r e p o r t , with back-up c a l c u l a t i o n s indicating h i s intention to p r o v i d e adequate f i r e flow, water supply and p r e s s u r e for the s i t e . 2.3 The a p p l i c a n t s h a l l d e s i g n a t e storm water catch b a s i n s where and as approved by the Planning Board. 2.4 As s u g g e s t e d by the a p p l i c a n t , the a p p l i c a n t s h a l l c o n t r i b u t e $75,000 at the time of i s s u a n c e of t h e b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , t o be used for improvements t o the V i l l a g e ' s s a n i t a r y sewerage system below the s i t e in o r d e r t o m i t i g a t e impacts of the p r o p o s a l upon t h e system. 3 Planning runoff. �2.5 All utilities including conditions noted above shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Board or its designated engineering consultant. 2.6 The applicant shall discuss with the New York State Department of Transportation the feasibility of providing a deceleration lane on Bedford Road for vehicles traveling southeast wishing to enter the site. Such deceleration lane, shall be constructed if approved by the New York State Department of Transportation. Safety - The Village Fire Department has indicated the desire for emergency access via Amos Street. For purposes of safety, screening of vehicle lights and to restrict the casual use of the emergency access, yet to make it possible for emergency vehicles to gain entrance the applicant shall install a five (5) foot tall cedar stockade-type fence, with evergeen shrub plantings where it can be viewed from Amos Street, to extend (finished side out) along the entire easterly property line to points approximately seventy-five (75) feet in from Bedford Road and Webber Avenue so as not to interfere with traffic sight distances. The fence shall include a locking gate, capable of being opened at least ten (10) feet wide, to make it possible for fire, police or ambulance vehicles to gain access. The emergency access shall be used only for emergency vehicles and neither the gate or Amos Street shall be used for construction vehicles, site workers vehicles or occupants of.the site during or after construction. A temporary fence may be provided during construction but the permanent fence shall be in place prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. No trees greather than 6" caliper shall be removed during the fence installation and the alignment of the fence may be adjusted as reasonably necessary to achieve its purposes. Landscaping - All landscaping shown on the site plan shall Ee maintained in a healthy growing condition so as to maintain the certificate of occupancy. A typical landscaping plan around one of the buildings shall be submitted for approval by the Planning Board or its designated representative. Final review of tree cutting shall be made by the Village Tree Committee. Exterior Lighting - All exterior light structures shall be screened so as to prevent glare upon adjacent properties. All driveways and parking areas shall be contained by stone set in concrete or poured-in-place reinforced concrete curbs. All parking for occupants and users of the project shall be confined to the site. 4 �Review Fees - The applicant shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 7. 1 An inspection fee for construction inspection of the proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage system, sewage, landscaping, lighting and other site plan elements for compliance with the approved site plan in the amount of $5, 000.00. 7.2 A site plan escrow account pursuant to SEQR and in the amount of $5,000.00 or such specific amount which is billed to the Village and approved and paid for consulting services rendered in the review of this project, whichever is the greater amount. 7.3 A recreation fee of $1,000.00 per dwelling or $15,000.00 for the acquisition or maintenance of recreation facilities in the vicinity of the project and available for use by occupants of the housing facilities. 7.4 The above fees shall be paid prior to the signing of the final site plan by the Chairman. Performance Guarantee - Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall complete the construction of all facilities shown on the site plan to the satisfaction of the Building Inspector. Alternatively, the applicant shall post a bond in an amount to be determined by the Building Inspector to ensure the satisfactory construction and installation of driveways, parking areas, drainage facilities, water supply utilities, sanitary sewers, arid landscaping. Such guarantee shall be satisfactory to the Village Attorney as to form, sufficiency, and execution, and shall be issueds by a bonding or surety company approved by the Village Board or by the owner with security acceptable to the Village Board. The term of the bond shall be fixed for a period of three (3) years; however, the term may be extended with the consent and agreement of all parties. The guarantee shall extend for a period of one (1) year beyond the date of completion of the required improvements to ensure their satisfactory condition. Any defects in construction or faulty equipment shall be repaired or replaced by the applicant without cost to the Village. The Planning Board reserves the right to make and shall make a final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities upon notice by the Building Inspector but before the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to parking, landscaping, signs, drainage, access, paving and 5 �other site plan details in the interest of safety, convenience, enjoyment of peace and quiet of adjacent neighbors and aesthetics. The applicant shall maintain all elements of the approved site plan including landscaping in a neat and healthy condition so as to retain an approved certificate of occupancy. 10. Prior to obtaining a building permit, four (4) copies of this final site plan as revised to meet the above conditions shall be submitted to the Planning Board office for final approval. This final site plan review shall be accomplished by the Village Engineering Department or consultant and shall incorporate all applicable conditions of this resolution and the construction standards of the Village of North Tarrytown as they may be appropriate. [/Date " Jamafe "Gaigano, PlannJm/g Board Chairman DPF/22:crc November 30, 1987 6 �y> PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN RESOLUTION: PINAL SITE PLAN PROPOSED: MIXED RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL USES OWNER: RODRIGUES ENTERPRISES LOCATION: VALLEY STREET TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 16, BLOCK 12, LOTS 6A, 6B, 7, 7A, 7B, 7C, AND 7E ZONING: C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL APPLICATION # WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for site plan approval pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article VIII, Site Plan Review to construct 12 units of multiple-dwelling housing, 2,460 square feet of office space, 2,460 square feet of retail space, and 21 parking spaces within a single structure, including related off-street parking, landscaping, storm drainage and other supporting utilities and facilities, on a site approximately 13,700 square feet in size, as shown on six drawings prepared in the offices of Turnquist Architects and identified as follows: 1. Site & Location — dated 11/18/87, scale 1" * 10*; 2. Valley Street Level — 3. Parking Level — 4. Dwelling Units (12) — 5. Typical Dwelling Unit — 6. Untitled (front and rear elevations) — and no date, no scale; revised 11/16/87, scale 1/8" • I 1 ; no date, no scale; no date, no scale; WHEREAS, in the course of agency pursuant to provisions of Conservation Law, the Planning findings and caused, noted activities: no date, no scale; its review and acting as lead Article 8 of the Environmental Board has made the following or conducted the following 1. Will receive an application fee of $580.00 paid for the 12 dwelling units and 4,920 square feet of nonresidential space under review prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property under review and surrounding area; �3. Requested and received reports from Village authorities and/or the applicant on such matters as water supply, sewage disposal, storm drainage, fire safety, and parking. 4. Acting as lead agency, requested, received and reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR. 5. As lead agency for site plan and subdivision review in the Village of North Tarrytown, the Planning Board, after review of said field conditions, recommendations, and environmental assessment form, as well as other matters noted above, has determined that the proposed action is an unlisted type and hereby issues a "negative declaration" determination of non-significance and environmental impact for this unlisted action; and WHEREAS, in the opinion of the Planning Board the applicant has complied with the Village's Development Regulations except as may be noted below; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and site plan drawings noted above be and hereby are granted site plan approval and that the applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or, as an alternate, the Village Administrator on a copy of this site plan resolution and upon the final linen copy of the site plan drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the offices of the Village Building Department for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire six (6) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and/or the applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1 - Utilities — Storm drainage, water supply and sewage disposal shall be approved by the Planning Board or its design engineering representative: 1.1 Storm water runoff shall comply with the Planning Board's policy of zero increase in rate of runoff. 1.2 The applicant shall submit a written report, with back-up calculations indicating his intention to provide adequate fire flow, water supply and pressure for the site. 1.3 The applicant shall designate storm water catch basins where and as approved by the Planning Board. 2 �1.4 All utilities including conditions noted above shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Board or its designated engineering consultant. 1.5 All habitable space within the building shall have a fire suppression sprinkler systems in place prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 1.6 Fire water supply parking area. 1.7 The location and size of the water supply shall be acceptable to the Chief of the Fire Department of the Village of North Tarrytown. shall be available within the Landscaping — All landscaping shown on the site plan shall be maintained in a healthy growing condition so as to maintain the certificate of occupancy. Landscape Plan A, dated January 1983, is attached hereto. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall provide landscaping in accordance with the plan. Exterior Lighting — All exterior light structures shall be screened so as to prevent glare upon adjacent properties. All driveways and parking areas shall be contained poured-in-place reinforced concrete curbs. by Review Fees — The applicant shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytowns 5.1 An inspection fee for construction inspection of the proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage system, sewage, landscaping, lighting and other site plan elements for compliance with the approved site plan in the amount of $5,000.00. 5.2 A site plan escrow account pursuant to SEQR and in the amount of $5,000.00 or such specific amount which is billed to the Village and approved and paid for consulting services rendered in the review of this project, whichever is the greater amount. 5.3 A recreation fee of $1,000.00 per dwelling or $12,000 for the acquisition or maintenance of recreation facilities and available for use by occupants of the housing facilities. 5.4 The above fees shall be paid prior to the signing of the final site plan by the Chairman. 3 �6. The Planning Board reserves the right to make and shall make a final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities upon notice by the Building Inspector but before the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to parking, landscaping, signs, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details in the interest of safety, convenience, enjoyment of peace and quiet of adjacent neighbors and aesthetics. The applicant shall maintain all elements of the approved site plan including landscaping in a neat and healthy condition so as to retain an approved certificate of occupancy. 7. Prior to obtaining a building permit, four (4) copies of this final site plan as revised to meet the above conditions shall be submitted to the Planning Board office for final approval. This final site plan review shall be accomplished by the Village Engineering Department or consultant and shall incorporate all applicable conditions of this resolution and the construction standards of the Village of North Tarrytown as they may be appropriate. j Date ' James Galgano, Planning Board Chairman DPPy22:crc January 18, 1988 4 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1987 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1987-12-02 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1987 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1987 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/2522a3a41cbe5ce0422739c35831dba7.pdf a4ee1c6cd6910a94475a14d8453e819f PDF Text Text • NORTH TARRYTOWN PLANNING BOARD Nov. 18.1987 Present;Chairman J. Galgano John O'Leary Frank Rey Tom Homan, Vill. Admin Jim Margotta,Bldg. Ins John Hughes, Vill. Att Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8:10 p.m. N. Tarrytown Realty Associates Site Plan The clerk read the public notice to all present. Mr. Ceconi expressed concern over the use of Amos Street as an alternate route for fire trucks and ambulances, as the street is narrow and always fill of children playing there. Mr. Zegarelli noted how AMos St, is a dead end street. How, he asked, does the Planning Board plan to keep others besides just fire engines and ambulances from entering the new development? And which trees would be cut down? He expressed concern over the prospect of possible extra development on Sleepy Hollw Rd., and concern over the density the 15 condominium units will bring. A resident asked why had Amos St. been chosen for the emergency entrance/exit? Chairman Galgano said it had been so recommended by the state and county, whereas Pine St. had not. He was asked if any guarantee could be given that the fence would remain locked in the future. xMr. Ceconi said he felt that with cars parked on both sides of Amos St., only 14 feet in width remained. How could a fire truck get through? Also, a chain can't deter anyone who really wants to gain access �to the property. And would the chain be enough to deter traffic irom trying to use Amos St. as an access road to the new development? Lucille Ceconi asked why the second entrance/exit couldn't be off of Webber Ave? She felt that would be less dangerous, as fewer homes would be involved, and asked the Board to please consider Webber Rd. Another resident noted a lot that is next to where the alternate gates will be. Would any of the new buildings sit next to the fence on Amos St? Again, concern that the new residents might park on Amos St. was expressed. Chairman Galgano reminded all that the entrance/exit at Amos St. will be only for emergency vehicles. Mr. Zegarelli said he feared the fire lane on Amos St. will cause trouble as it is too narrow for-fire trucks why not use Webber Ave. instead? Chairman Galgano said Amos St. would only be used if the access from Bedford Rd. was no good. Mr. Ceconi said it would be difficult turning into the entrance on Bedford Rd. in bad weather. A spokesman for the fire department said their main concern is for the fastest access to a building. As Bedford Rd. is a main road, the second entrance/exit is only for an emergency backup road. He said Amos St. will get a new hydrant that the develpers will install which will also help owners on Amos St. Maple and Pine Sts. would not be accessible, and Webber would be too steep a climb. Chairman Galgano was asked if the access road would be two lanes. He said yes, and that the road would meet village specifications. Mrs.Ceconi expressed concern over the access road during and after a heavy snowstorm. The fire department spokesman said the developer will keep the area cleared. Mr. Zegarelli asked if permits had been given for cutting trees down, I �»• and for th eplumbing work for the hydrant. Mr. Koman said all these matters were taken care of. Mr. Zegarelli asked if the village's liability would make sure that the developer keeps his roads clear to avoid using Amos St. anymore than needed. Viola Andrycich asked if the entrance/exit on Bedford Rd, would be close to the high school. Sha also said she was concerned about the trees, as she doesn't want to see them cut down. Chairman Galgano said the entrance will be close to the school. She asked if any notification had had been sent by mail to residents in the area, and if not, why not? Chairman Galgano said technically, as no zoning changes are being made, tonight's public hearing was not legally needed. A public notice was in the paper . Mr. Ceconi said many residents don't get the local paper, and felt the Board should had sent letters--- a public notice is not enough. A resident asked where will the builders park when at work? On the building site, it was said. Another resident asked why the architects didn't stick with the original 14 units instead of the 15 units now planned for. Chairman Galgano said the original plans were for 17 units. Concern over the sewage problem on New Broadway and the nearby streets was raised. Will the $75,000.00 the developers are giving be enough for the new sewage project? Will it take care of all the problems residents have had in the past? Mr. Lackowitz said the New Broadway line is supplied from the sewar on Webber, with the flow going to Pine and New Broadway and down to Broadway. He said each new development must solve their own backup. The money will rebuild the sewars and solve the backups. Mr. Zegarelli asked what happens if the cost ends up being more than $75,000.00-— who picks up the difference? Mr. Lackowitz said bids could be rejected if so needed. �Mr. Ceconi said he felt the Plannorig Board should have the North Tarrytown Realty Associates install the sewar at their own expense. Mr Lackowitz said the new sewar should take no more than one month to complete. Mr. Zegarelli said the sewar sholud go in first as security so that the developer won't possibly walk away and leave the taxpayer with a big bill. Mr. O'Leary asked Mr. Lackowitz if $75,000.00 would be enough. Mr. Lackowitz said the amount should cover the work. Mr. O'Leary then asked if a higher figure, $75-100,000.00 would be safer. Mr. Lackowitz said that range would definitely cover the costs. It was asked if the sewar line would run into Tarrytown. Board members said it would not. Mrs. Andrucich asked what the new houses are like. She was told they would be frame houses. Would the big tree stay up? She was told by the developers. When asked if there were any pictures of the new houses, Mr. Homan said he had some in his office. There will be 8 three bedroom units and 7 two- bedroom units. No price has yet been established. Another resident asked if Cottage Rd. would be affected he was told no. A motion to adjourn the public hearing was made by Mr. O'Leary, seconded by Mr. Rey and was carried with a unanimous vote. 000 Business Meeting Mr. O'Leary thanked all neighbors for coming and for their input. He agreed a tree committee chairman is needed, and that better notification of future meetings was a good point. He noted that Section 52 �states that before any trees can be removed, permits to but said trees must be obtained."Mr. Homan said a new chairman was being sought for the tree commission, as the prior chairman has recently resigned. Mr. O'Leary asked where equipment would be stored during the construction. Developers told him they would keep it all on site. Mr. O'Leary said the fire department felt Amos St. was the best route. However, many of the residents concerns could be in the permission to be granted to the delelopers. The Planing Board is fortaking the public's input and concern to the developers. Maybe Amos Street's parking can be changed; maybe $100,000 is needed; maybe the chain guarantee is a need. The Board will will look at these issues, and asked residents to join them and work together. Mr. Rey noted how the Planning Board is trying to assist the developers and at the same time help the community. The developers have a legal right, he said. In regard to the access road, Amos St. is needed. Mr. O'Leary said the number of parking spaces will be in excess of village requirements. The Planning Board has worked hard on these plans, he said. The state DOT gave guidelines for the best entrance/exit, and the present plans for Bedford Road as the primary road and Amos St. as as the emergency access are what they arrived at. Mr. Homan said both the state and county turned down initial plans for a secondary access on Cottage. Both recommended using the southern side of the property instead. Mr. Ceconi said this will become a model for future developments, and asked Board members to please do it right. Mr. Weidle said the access route has to fit in with zoning ordinances. Mr. Ceconi expressed concern over traffic at the four corners in the �early morning hours and in the late afternoon when traffic is heaviest. He said he could foresee residents having to pay for an extra road to Webber for the condominium owners. It was asked if a traffic study had been done that would defer traffic to both Webber and Bedford Roads.to ease the overall traffic. Mr. Homan then began to read the resolution,when Mr. O'Leary said in the interest of time he would be unable to vote on the resolution tonight as so many residents had been unaware of tonight's meeting. He made a motion to table the matter until a later date. Mr. Hughes said this had all been handled properly and legally. Mr. Homan then read the resolution with the new alterations and modifications that had been made, (see attatched) Mr. Hughes said any further changes could be done at a later work session, Mr. O'Leary made a motion to adjourn tonight's public hearing, and to reconvene at a future date to act upon tonight's matters. Mr. Rey seconded the motion, which was carried by a unanimous vote. Chairman Galgano called for a ten minute recess at 9:55p.m. 000 Larry Rodrigues' Site Plan Mr. Turnquist addressed the Board and went over the changes that had been made. In regard to the ingress and egress, concern had been expressed over the parking level in that someone or someone's vehicle might inadvertently be hit. Two parking spaces have thus been eliminated, along with the sidewalk so as to discourage pedestrians. There will be better drainage, said Mr. Turnquist, with a 15 inch retention outlet to the public system. Mr. Weidle asked if a preliminary approval would be alright tonight? �Mr. Hughes said yes, with this to be followed by a public hearing and then the final site plan would follow. Mr. Homan asked Mr. Lackowitz if he was satisfied with the utilities. Mr. Lackowitz said the fire flow calculation will be satisfied by the sprinkler system. The utility, storm and sewage water are alright. Mr. Homan asked what tress and shrubs were planned for. Mr. Turnquist said the trees in his sketch would be maples and yews. Mr. Homan said he wants this project to to have nice greenery so as to set a nice example for the area. Chairman Galgano asked if the gas tanks presently on the property will be removed, Mr. Turnquist said yes. Mr. Rey suggested that the Planning Board be sure to advertise for the next public hearing as much as possible. A motion for preliminary site plan approval of Larry Rodrigues• property on Valley St. was made by Mr. O'Leary, seconded by Mr. Rey, and carried by a unanimous vote. There being no further business, Chairman Galgano adjourned the meeting at 10:20p.m. Respectfully submitted, (7%. UU~- I • ^"^^-r V^K, Linda Fukuchi, Clerk �PUBLIC NOTICE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown will hold a Public Hearing in the Municipal Building, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York on Wednesday, December 2, 1987 at 8:00 FM to consider an application by North Tarrytown Associates, 141 Central Park Avenue South, Hartsdale, New York for a oreliminary and final site plan approval for the premises located at Bedford Road, North Tarrytown, New York. Said premises are known as Section 17, Block 7, Lots 2A-1, 3,4, 4A, 5, 6, 7, and 8. All taxpayers, residents and parties in interest are entitled to appear and be heard at said hearing. By Order of the Planning Board Village of North Tarrytown Dated: November 19, 1987 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1987 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1987-11-18 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1987 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1987