1 25 8 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/0c34b91a8c4ae3386ea55c131ad5e153.pdf 6ddaf573b507dcad48a4cfec6127ea26 PDF Text Text NORTH TARRYTOWN, N.Y. January 19th, 1989 PUBLIC HEARING A Public Hearing was held before the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown on the above date. PRESENT: ABSENT: James Galgano, Chairman Frank Rey Roman Windas Ellen Tsangaris John O'Leary Miguel Jimenez Richard Ayers ALSO PRESENT: John Hughes, Jr., Village Attorney Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8 P.M. Mr. Rey moved, seconded by Mr. Windas that the Minutes of the meeting held on November 17th, 1988 be approved as submitted. Carried. The Acting Clerk read the Public Notice to hear and consider an Application made by County Manor Homes, Inc. for "Final Site Plan approval of plans for the premises located at 15 Chestnut Street, North Tarrytown, N.Y. and known as Section 16, Block 7, Lot 27 on the Village Tax Assessment Map. Mr. Donald Walsh representing County Manor Homes, Inc. requested that the Board ratify the decision of the Zoning Board and authorize the Chairman to sign the "Site Plan". He stated that all requests made by the Zoning Board and Building Inspector have been complied with, all easements had been obtained and several recommendations made were accepted. All items requested by the original resolution have been complied with. Mr. Rey requested information regarding property and parking on Gesner Place property. Mr. Walsh stated that several changes were made and all are in conformance with recommendation of the Zoning Board and the Planning Board. Mr. Rey moved, seconded by Mr. Windas that the Chairman be authorized to sign "Site Plan" in order that the project could proceed. Carried. After a discussion Mr. Rey moved, seconded by Mr. Windas that property immediately west of 13, 15 and 16 Chestnut Street and bordering on Gesner Place will be reserved for parking of vehicles' belonging to tenants of 19 Chestnut Street, Carried. �-2Mr. Walsh stated that as a Trustee for the Levy Estates he was at this time submitting "Preliminary Plans" for property' located on Kendall Avenue. Mr. Walsh stated that said buildings would be demolished and new buildings erected. Further studies will be made and he would keep the Board informed. There being no further comments, Mr. Rey moved, seconded by Mr. Windas that the Public Hearing be closed. Carried. Chairman Galgano stated that the next order of business was a Preliminary Hearing on plans presented by "Rodreugues Enterprises for property located on Clinton Street. He stated that said plans provide for the erection of a building to house five (5) units and ten (10) parking spaces on a lot approximately 76 x 58, and that several variances will be required. After a discussion Mr. Rey moved, seconded by Mr. Windas that the plans be referred to the 2bning Board for their approval. Carried. Chairman Galgano stated that the next order of business would be a Preliminary Hearing on "Preliminary Plans" presented by Mr. & Mrs. Sebastian Amenta. The plans are for the erection of a addition to their office building located at Broadway and Chestnut Street. Said property is known on the Village Tax Assessment Map as Section 16, Block 7, Lots 4 to 8. Mrs. Amenta presented plans and various items and changes were discussed. . Mr. Hughes,Village Attorney, presented a memorandum fromprederick P. Clark Associates to the Building Inspector regarding their comments and recommendations of the plans presented by Paul Amenta on November 8th, 1988. "Copy of memo in Official Minutes. " After a discussion Mr. Rey moved, seconded by Mr. Windas that a Public Hearing be scheduled for the purpose of approving the plans for an office building to be erected on property owned by the Amentas on Broadway and Chestnut Street. Carried. Chairman Galgano stated that the next phase would be the Development Stage and that the drainage and water run-off problem still needed to be addressed. Mr. Friedner presented plans for the former Picard property and the construction of homes on the site. After a discussion regarding said plans Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. O'Leary that a Public Hearing be scheduled to �-3discuss various variances that would be needed, and that preliminary plans submitted by Mr. Friedtier be approved. Carried. There being no further business to come before the Board Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. Rey that the same be duly adjourned. Carried. Respectfully submitted, Z/£^v—•**—*^ Iftene Amatb Acting Clerk �MEMQRANPVM To: Jim Margotta, North Tarrytown Building Inspector From: Frederick P. Clark Associates Date: January 12, 1989 Subject: Preliminary Site Plan for Paul Amenta As requested, we have reviewed "Preliminary Site Plan for: Paul Amenta" and last dated November 8, 1988. The professional who prepared the plan is not identified on the plan. GENERAL INFORMATION Proposal. To enlarge the office use of the site by constructing a second building, of 15,000 square feet, on the 37,104-squarefoot site. Redesign of the parking lot for the existing building is also proposed. When the proposed expansion is completed according to the plan, the site will contain two office buildings totalling 25,000 square feet, 67 parking spaces, and two loading spaces. Vehicular access to the new building is proposed off of Broadway; access to the existing building is from Chestnut Street. Tax Map. Section 16, Block 7, lots 4-8. Location. The northwestern Broadway and Chestnut Street. Zoning. corner of the intersection of C-l Highway Commercial. Existing Land Use. Office. Physical Characteristics. An office building with approximately 5,000 square feet of lot coverage and 11 parking spaces occupy the southern portion of the site. The northern portion of the site, to be developed with the new office building and rearranged parking facilities, is occupied by approximately 43 parking spaces. COMMENTS We have the following comments regarding the preliminary site plan: 1. Frontage on Broadway. The site plan proposes a new building facing Broadway and vehicular access to the site off of Broadway. The plan offers the opportunity to improve the visual aspects along Broadway by replacing the existing parking lot with a structure that can be more in keeping with the existing uses and development in the area than is �the existing parking lot. However, it is critical that the Planning Board ensure compatibility as the Board reviews the site plan. It is important that the use of the building not generate high volumes of additional traffic; therefore, the Planning Board should ensure that the proposed uses will generate acceptable volumes of traffic. It is also critical that the new building be compatible with surrounding buildings and with the character along Broadway that the Planning Board wishes to see for this major corridor through the Village; therefore, the Planning Board should carefully review details for the proposed facade along Broadway, signs, landscaping, and exterior lighting, as well as details for other elements of the plan such as the perimeter fence, screening for the trash bin, retaining walls, and regrading. Second Building. The plan proposes a second building on this tax parcel without subdividing the lot. This is contrary to Section 62-7.C of the Zoning Ordinance. If the applicant wishes to seek a variance of this provision from the Zoning Board of Appeals, the Board may wish to ensure that the site may be subdivided at some time in the future without the need for an areal or dimensional variance. It would appear that a lot line could be placed between the two buildings to allow for acceptable side yards and lot coverage without adversely affecting the proposed plan. However, the proposed driveway for the new building would probably not comply with Section 62-22.B. Furthermore, the applicant would have to ensure that any off-site parking resulting from by a future subdivision of the property would comply with Section 62-21 to the satisfaction of the Zoning Board. Compact Cars. The plan proposes 23 parking spaces labeled as compact spaces and measuring eight feet in width by 14 feet in length with a two-foot overhang. This is not consistent with the minimum area for a parking space required by Section 62-14.A(l). If the applicant wishes to seek a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals, we note the following: o This office generally discourages the provision of parking spaces for compact cars in developments of this small size because it is difficult to estimate the correct ratio of compact cars to full-sized cars that will use the parking lot. This is in addition to the general problems with compact spaces: They create maneuvering difficulties for drivers and administrative difficulties for the property owner and the Village Zoning Officer to enforce compliance with the parking scheme. 2 �o When municipalities permit compact spaces, generally no more than one third of the required spaces in large developments are allowed to be compact. For a development of the proposed size, ve recommend that no more than 15 percent (10 spaces) of the proposed parking be for compact cars, provided the Zoning Board finds the use of compact spaces acceptable. o Parking spaces should be with a driveway aisle at allow adequate room for parking space. (The aisles.) o The two-foot overhang for the length of the space is permissible only if the site plan includes details which ensure that the curb along the front of the parking space is no higher than six inches. o The plan proposes 14 compact spaces in front of the proposed building, the most desirable parking location. Therefore, it is expected that drivers in full-sized cars will in fact use these spaces. If compact spaces are found acceptable, approximately half of those in front of the proposed building should be replaced with full-sized spaces. no less than 8.5 feet wide least 24 feet in width to maneuvering in and out of plan proposes 20-foot-wide Full-sized parking spaces. o All of the 44 proposed full-sized parking spaces make use of a two-foot overhang in order to comply with the minimum area requirement of Section 62-14.A(l). The Planning Board should decide if the overhang is acceptable. We note that this design reduces impervious surfaces and stormwater run-off. Despite these benefits we recommend that the overhang not be accepted in the garage because actual and perceived restrictions on movement (caused by columns, walks, low ceilings, etc.) normally encourage a driver to occupy two parking spaces rather than one. For the other parking areas, the design should be accepted only if the curb height along the front of the parking space is no higher than six inches. o Almost all of the full-sized parking spaces have access via a twenty-foot-wide aisle. The plan should be revised to provide a minimum aisle width of 24 feet in order to provide adequate room for maneuvering into and out of the parking spaces. o A back-up area parking garage. is not provided at the end of the This makes the two end spaces in the 3 �garage virtually Inaccessible. A back-up area should be provided or, at a minimum, the two end spaces should be labeled for compact parking only, if the Zoning Board determines compact spaces to be acceptable. Handicapped parking. o The plan proposes only one handicapped parking space for the 25,OOO-square-foot development. This does not meet New York State standards for handicapped spaces. At least one handicapped space should be provided for the existing building. o The proposed handicapped parking space is located so that it is very difficult to find and very difficult to drive to. Although the plan does not illustrate pedestrian circulation, it would appear to be very difficult for a handicapped person to gain access into the proposed building. It is recommended that the handicapped space be relocated to the surface parking near the main entrance to the building. Loading spaces. The plan proposes one loading space for each of the two buildings located within circulation aisles and blocking access to adjacent parking spaces. This is inconsistent with Section 62-14.a. If the applicant wishes to seek a variance for the loading spaces, we suggest the following: o Because of the location of the loading space for the proposed building, it is doubtful that a truck would ever in fact use this space. Because of this and for reasons of circulation, this loading space should be relocated. A space in the aisle between the two buildings and at least 50 feet in from the street line would seem acceptable, provided the aisle is 26 feet in width. We note that even with this arrangement, the driver of the truck will have to back out of the site onto Route 9. To avoid this, the Zoning Board may wish to evaluate the possibility of a designated off-site curbside loading space on Route 9. It would be important to analyze impacts on sight lines at all nearby driveways, interference with the travel lane on Route 9, and the availability of curb-space for loading (in the place of the existing parking spaces) . o Although the proposed loading space for the existing building makes several parking spaces inaccessible when the loading space is in use, the proposed location appears to be acceptable if it is compatible with 4 �existing loading patterns for the building. However, the plan could be improved by rearranging the compact and full-sized spaces on the western side of the parking lot so that the two full-si zed spaces are not behind the loading space. (In addition, the driveway and aisle for that parking lot should be at least 24 feet wide, as noted above.) Width of driveways. The two driveways are proposed to be 20 feet wide. The proposed width is too narrow to provide adequate turns into and out of the property, and the New York State Department of Transportation will require a wider driveway for the entrance onto Broadway. Therefore, the plan should be revised to provide entrances at least 24 feet wide. David P. Fuller Michael A. Galante 5 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1989-01-19 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/0532ffa31b6918744c3b161bf2394882.pdf 36464e98f2e083d7f13fef77a676bad9 PDF Text Text Y '* PUBLIC HEARING NORTH TARRYTOWN, N.Y. February 16th, 1989 A Public Hearing was held before the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown on the above date. PRESENT: James Galgano, Chairman Ellen Tsangaris John O'Leary Richard Ayers Frank Rey ABSENT: Miguel Jimenez Roman Windas ALSO PRESENT: tytysb John Hughes, Jr. Village Attorney Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8 P.M. The Acting Clerk read the Public Notice to hear and consider an application of Edward and Mary Friedner, 28 Lakeview Avenue, North Tarrytown, N.Y. for a Final Subdivision of the premises located at Lakeview Avenue and Pokahoe Drive known and designated on Village Tax Assessment Map as Section,11, Block 1R, Lot 1. Chairman Galgano asked if there was anyone present who would like to address the Board. Mr. Hughes stated that several inquiries had been received regarding "wet lands" and"flood lands". He stated that as early as the summer of 1987 the Village had requested the State and the County to rule on the possibility of the said area being considered "wet lands" or being in a "flood zone". Mr. Hughes stated that he has on file, correspondence from the Department of Environmental Conservation, the Army Corps, of Engineers and the County of Westchester, all stating that the construction did not interfere with any waterways or with the outlet of Fremonts Pond. Mr. Hughes stated it was his conclusion that the construction would not obstruct any waterways and that a single family residence would be constructed. He also stated that the plans had been reviewed by Mr. George Lackowitz on behalf of the Village. Dr. Richard Sweet stated that the Department of Environmental Conservation is not concerned with any wetlands less than 12.4 acres in size, but recommended that the Village adopt an Ordinance that would cover various other streams and waterways in the Village. Chairman Galgano reported that the Sleepy Hollow Manor Improvement Assoc* had various convenants and suggested that the Friedners contact them in order to conform with their covenants. �-2After a discussion, Mr. O'Leary moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers that the Final Subdivision of Section 11, Block 1-R, Lot 1 as requested by Mr. & Mrs. Friedner be approved. Carried. Mr. O'Leary moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers that, the Public Hearing be closed. Carried. Chairman Galgano stated that the next order of business would be a preliminary hearing on the Amenta Project. Mr. John Amenta submitted revised plans to each member of the Board, stating that with the plans submitted there would be no Zoning changes required. Mr. Amenta stated th^at two (2) catch basins would be installed to tie in with the Mangieri property, more trees will be planted and sufficient flood lights would be installed, Mr. O'Leary asked if there was an artist rendition of the new building. Mr. Amenta stated they would have drawings made after preliminary plans were approved by the Planning Board. After a discussion Chairman Galgano stated that the Planning Board would review the plans and contact the Amenta family. Mr. Margotta, Building Inspector stated he would see that the plans were sent to the State and County for their approval. Mr. O'Leary moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers that the Planning Board be the lead agency in this project. Carried. Mr. Rey moved, seconded by Mr. O'Leary that the Minutes of the meeting held on January 19th, 1989 be approved as submitted. Carried. Chairman Galgano stated that the next meeting of the Board would be held on March 16th, 1989 at 8 P.M. There being no further business to come before the Board, Mr. O'Leary moved, seconded by Mr. Rey that the meeting be duly adjourned. Carried. Respectfully submitted, C^TL^_ / <y*=^ Irefie Amato Acting Clerk • • • • • y fg Fffi~3 DEPUTY CLERK —.1 �Mr. John O'Leary moved, s e c o n d e d by Mr. Richard Ayers and unanimously carried that the following resolution be adopted as read: WHEREAS, this Planning Board, on the application of Edward FrJPdnpr and Mary Friarinar ' d i d o n February 16, 1989 Name of Applicant Date grant permission for a subdivision of their property located at Section n Lakeview Avenue and Pokahoe Drive , Sheet , Block 1R , Lot l ; and WHEREAS, the aforesaid subdivision permits the development of uses that are identical to those previously permitted, in that the action did not provide for any change of zone, or approval of site plan; and WHEREAS, the property contains no structure or area that is listed or eligible to be listed on the Federal Register of Historic Places or designated by the local Historic Architectural Review Board as an historic landmark or district and the said subdivision complies with all regional, state and local land use plans; �NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The subdivision of the property as above described is an unlisted action pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and Part 617 of the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder, and will, in and of itself, not have a significant effect on the environment, so that no Environmental Impact Statement is required or need be filled therefor. 2. Nothing herein contained, however, shall be deemed to indicate or suggest that subsequent submissions for development of the property will not require the preparation and filing of Environmental Impact Statements. 3. This resolution is a Negative Declaration for the purposes of ArticXe 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Local L^v Environmental Quality Review Act for the Village of North Tarry town, and will be kept on file at trie Village Hall and be available for public examination. 2 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1989-02-16 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/5b6f82fa0a2c39c1b204a608c6fc7c7f.pdf f392c441e538e34de997521fdbe1ebbb PDF Text Text PUBLIC HEARING NORTH TARRYTOWN, N.Y. MAY 18th, 1989 A Public Hearing was held before the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown on the above date. PRESENT: James Galgano, Chairman Ellen Tsangaris Richard Ayers Frank Rey Roman Windas ABSENT: Miguel Jimenez John 0'Leary ALSO PRESENT: John Hughes, Jr. Village Attorney Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8 P.M. The Acting Clerk read the Public Notice to hear and consider an Application of Sebastian and Caroline Amenta for a final subdivision and final site plan approval for the construction of an office building located at 231 North Broadway, North TayrytownN.Y. known and duly designated on Village Tax Assessment Map as Section 16, Block 7, Lots 4-8. Chairman Galgano asked the Building Inspector for any comments. The Building Inspector stated that he would recommend that the Planning Board withhold approval for thirty (30) days in order for the Engineer and the Planning Consultants to review the final site plan. Chairman Galgano stated that the Planning Board had received a memorandum from Frederick Clark Associated regarding the Amenta subdivision and final site plan dated May 17th, 1989 and felt that the Board did not have sufficient time to review the memo. He stated that it was the consensus of the Board that several variances would be needed,as suggested in the memo. After a discussion, Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers that the Public Hearing be adjourned to the Planning Boards next meeting in June, in order to give the Amenta's time to finalize plans. Carried. Mr. Amenta asked if the Planning Board was goin^ to recommend to the Zoning Board that various variances required be granted to the Amentas. Chairman Galgano stated that based on the recommendation of Frederick Clark Associates they would delay their decision until drawings of the new building were presented at the next Planning Board meeting. Mr. Margotta, Building Inspector stated that the drawings would also have to be presented to the Architectural Review Board �-2and to the New York State Building Board for their approval, which would probably take 2-3 months. Chairman Galgano stated that the next order of business would be a request from the Immaculate Conception Church of North Tarrytown, new York regarding a proposal to construct apartments in a structure owned by the Church on Depeysterfetreet. Armando Galella, Trustee of the Immaculate Conception Church and a member of the Parish Council outlined the Church*s plan to renovate the existing structure on Depeyster Street and to erect 6 families in the present building. Plans called for off-street parking and to protect the huge oak tree on the property. Preliminary Plans were submitted by the Church Advisor who stated that several variances would be required. Counsel Hughes accepted the plans and stated that the Plans would be referred to Mr. Lackowitz and Frederick Clark Associates for their comments and recommendations. Mr. Rae moved, seconded b ^ r . Windas that the Plans as submitted to the Planning Board be referred to Mr. Lackowitz and Frederick Clark Associates for their comments and recommendations. Carried. Mr. Rae moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers that the Minutes of the meeting held on April l^th, 1989 be accepted as submitted. Carried. Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers that the next meeting of the Board be held on June 15th, 1989. Carried. Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. Rae that there being no further business to come before the Board that same be duly adjourned. Carried. Respectfully submitted, Irene Amato Acting Clerk � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1989-05-18 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/3de0fa6fb690143eed078a80e064fb90.pdf eb5b7a8576e27cf719c25b083cfc38ff PDF Text Text * A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on August 17, 1989 at 8:00 PM in Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. Present: James Galgano, Chairperson John O' Leary Ellen Tsangaris Frank Rey Ray Windas Also Present: Jim Margotta, Building Inspector John J. Hughes, Village Attorney IN THE MATTER OF NOLAN ASSOCIATES (Immaculate Conception Church Depevster St.. North Tarrytown^ A preliminary hearing was held to request a public hearing on the site plan approval for Nolan Associates' proposed condominium plans. Mr. John Nolan of Nolan Associates stated that Archdiocese has hired his firm to come up with a viable plan to develop the property on Depeyster Street. He stated that the Zoning Board had granted variances at their August 6th meeting for this project, and was now appearing before the Planning Board for final site plan approval. He presented blueprints indicating design of the units and parking areas, and also stated that the black walnut tree on the property would be preserved. Mr. Nolan also indicated that Clarke Associates made recommendations on this project and Nolan Associates have followed through with them. Mr. Galgano again stated that this was just a preliminary hearing and that a Public Hearing would be held on September 21st. A motion for a Public Hearing on September 21st was made by Ray Windas, seconded by Frank Rey. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF DEMETRIS KRINGAS. 149 WEBBER AVENUE. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. This was a prliminary hearing for approval of the of the property to build condominiums. subdivision Mr. Turnquist, architect, give a brief history of Mr. Kringas proposed project. Chairperson Galagano asked if any one attending the meeting had any comments and a number of residents spoke against the proposed plans. A petition was present to the Board, a copy of which will made part of minutes. A motion to send plans to Village Planning Consultants for a report to Planning Board was made by John 0'Leary, seconded by Frank Rey. Motion passed unanimously. 1 �IN THE MATTER OF UNCLE JERRYS DELI. 410 NORTH BROADWAY.NORTH TARRYTOWN. N. Y. This was a preliminary hearing regarding the alterations and additions to convert the Headless Horseman Garage to a Restuarant/Deli. Mr. Donal Walsh represented the petitioner and stated that all requested variances have been granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals. He was now requesting a date for a Public Hearing for site plan approval. A motion for a public hearing on September 21st was made by Chairperson Galgano, seconded by Frank Rey. Motion passed unanimously. At this point of the meeting, Attorny Walsh spoke off the record about Domino's Pizza opening on Valley Street and he expected to be appearing before the Board for site plan approval sometime in the near future. At this point, Chairperson Galgano suggested that perhaps Halpern Associates should be consulted on the development of this proposal. IN THE MATTER OF D'OLIVERI. GORDON AVENUE. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK This was a preliminary hearing on the proposed subdivision rquested by Mr. D'Oliveri. Ron Turnquist, Architect, presented plans for the subdivision, however, questions arose as to whether or not the adjoining neighbor would be building on his property sometime in the future. If he did, he would be required to apply for a variance, and the Board felt, it was presumptious of petitioner to consider the subdivision at this point in time. The Village Attorney, John Hughes, suggested that he and Mr. Turnquist set up a meeting and discuss the project. A motion to close the meeting was passed unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 9:50 PM. Respectfully submitted, -"7'yOuu £<L^^^—C>\ <f^< Francesca Lorenz Village Administrator y encl. (petition) 2 �M x u a r y 4 , 1989 ME THE OOBISIGNED RESIDBITS OP THE SIGHBGR900D ARE PErmOKDX* TBE ZONING BOARD OP APPEALS I D UPHOLD THE DBOSSCN OP THE BOILDIIIG INSPECTOR REGARDING THE APPLICATION OP DfMETRIQg KRINGaS, 149 MEBBER AVENDB, NORTH TARRXTCJWN. WE ASK THAT THE ZONING CODE AM) OUR NKJLGHHCH0XD BE PROJECTED SINCE THE CORRHfT APPLICATION INDICATES NUMEH005 VIOLATIONS. (2n«w- D« QefcuA (3- L^&e^^ L^y &*.&LAJJ lom^icK tor, ^^.jte^yiu [j^VL^LUt- U^V^CJC *44L^ �February 4, 1989 MB IBB UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OP IBB NEIGHBORHOOD ARE PETITIONING 1HE ZONING BOARD GP APPEALS ID UPHOLD IBB DECISION GP IBB BUILDING INSPECTOR REGARDING THE APPLICATION GP DEHBTRIOB KRINGAS, 149 WEBBER AVENOE, HOR9B TARRXTOHN. HE ASK THAT THE ZONING CODE AND OCR NEIGHBORHOOD BE PROTECTED SINCE THE CURRENT APPLICATION INDICATES NOHEROOS VIOLATIONS. y l £-> u,i.lUr#-\j. 7 »-frr*v u tr nrti^Uts'a+isT.c �February 4, 1909 ME I K UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD ARE FETITIOHING I B ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 10 UMKJLD IBB DECISION OF IBB BDILDING U E M O C R REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF DBMETRI06 KRINGAS, 149 WEBBER AVENUE, NORTB TARRX30MN. ME ASK THAT IBB ZONING CODE AND OCR NEIGHBORHOOD BE PHOIBLTBD SINCE THE CURRENT APPLICATION INDICATES NUMEROUS VIOLATIONS. �N b r u a c y 4, 1989 • MB IBB UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF SHE HSIGBBQRBOOD ARE PESniOKlNS WE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS K> OPBOLD SHE DBCISICN OP SBB BUILDING USHttCKJK REGARDING THE APPLICATION OP DEHE3RI0S KRINGAS, 1 4 9 WEBBER AVENOB, NORTE TARRXTOHN. HE ASK THAT THE ZONING OQOB AND OCR NEIGBBORB00D BE PROTECTED SDKS THE CURRENT APPLICATION INDICATES NCMERCUS VIOLATIONS. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1989-08-17 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/454bfd959d0c0f585425728e4e3f680c.pdf 538b35abbd3e00c67ac67f218badd11e PDF Text Text NORTH TARRYTOWN, N.Y. September 21st, 1989 PUBLIC HEARING A Public Hearing was held before the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown on the above date. PRESENT: James J. Galgano, Chairman Ellen Tsangaris Richard Ayers Roman Windas Frank Rey ABSENT: John O'Leary Miguel Jimenez ALSO PRESENT: John J. Hughes, Jr., Village Attorney Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8 P.M. 1. MATTER OF KRINGAS, 149 WEBBER AVENUE, NORTH TARRYTOWN, N.Y. Chairman Galgano stated that the purpose of the hearing was to hear comments on the D. Kringas application for condominiums, but Mr. Kringas had withdrawn his application. Mr. Arthur Ceconi Amos Street asked if it was possible to obtain a copy of the Enviromental Report on the Kringas Project? Chairman Galgano stated he would see that Mr. received a copy. 2. Ceconi MINUTES OF AUGUST 17th, 1989 MEETING Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris that the minutes of the August 17th, 1989 meeting be approved as submitted. CARRIED. 3. MATTER OF WAYNE,' JEFFERS (UNCLE JERRY'S) 410 North Broadway, NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK The Acting Clerk read the Public Notice to hear and consider an application of Wayne Jeffers, 184 Midland Avenue, Tarrytown, N.Y. for Final Site Approval of plans for the premises located at 410 North Broadway, known and duly designated on Village Tax Assessment Maps as Section 17, Block 21, Lots 1-9 and 109-112. Mr. Donald Walsh, Attorney for Uncle Jerry's, presented an application on behalf of Uncle Jerry and Mr. Jeffers, stating that he had met with Mr. Wery the Village's Consultant, who is reviewing preliminary plans for the proposed project. �-2Mr. Walsh stated that the addition to the present building would be approximately 20 x 20 and would be used as a restaurant and deli. He stated that parking spaces would be marked off, between the restaurant and Mangieri's property. He stated that they were open to suggestions of the Planning Board regarding straight or slant parking, and said they would go along with whatever the Planning Board recommended <j. He also stated that "No Parking" signs be allowed so that cars may come in and out of the parking lot. Mr. Margotta, Building Inspector inquired if a sidewalk would be installed around the property. Mr. Walsh stated a sidewalk was not included in the plans as there is not a sidewalk there now. He stated that Mr. Jeffers property goes right to the road. Mr. Rey stated that the plan was presented was going backward not forward. He felt that a renovation of the present building with the addition was an improvement but felt that curbing and sidewalks should be installed. Mr. Nema Baldare, Architect for the project, stated ^.t the present time there is no sidewalks or curbing in the area and it was not their plan to repave as it was too costly and Uncle Jerry had not anticipated the cost. He stated that the road would be too narrow if the Village decided to put sidewalks on Village property. Chairman Galgano asked if there was anyone present who would like to address the Board on the subject. No one spoke for or against. BUSINESS SESSION Mr. Margotta stated that revisions had to be made and felt that sidewalks and curbing should be included. Ms. Tsangaris stated she felt the restaurant would generate pedestrian traffic and there is no place to walk. Mr. Wery stated that the plans should show,that New York State has a "Right-of-Way" on the "Island" across from the project. He also stated that Old Broadway was a Village Street. Chairman Galgano stated that the Board would like to study the plans and would like Mr. Walsh to study the reportr from the Village Consultant. Mr. Rey stated he would like more information as to drainage, water line and sewers to the building. �-3'i After a discussion, Mr. Rey moved, seconded by Mr.;Windas that the hearing be continued to the next meeting. CARRIED. 4. MATTER OF IMMACUALTE CONCEPTION CHURCH - MULTI-FAMILY at former Methodist Church on Depeyster Street. The Acting Clerk read the Public Notice to hear and consider an application of the Immaculate Conception Church of 199 North Broadway, North Tarry town, N.Y. for Final Site approval of plans to convert the former Methodist Church located on Depeyster Street, into a six-family condominium, known and duly designated on Village Tax Assessment Map as Section 16, Block 15, Lots 3 & 4. Chairman Galgano asked if there was anyone present who would like to address the Board on the subject. Ms. Joanne Campbell, xAttorney authorized by the Archdiocese of New York in the disposition of the Immaculate Conception Church property stated that the purpose of the project was to utilize the property to the best possible purpose. She stated it was the intention to sell the property outright with no conditions but felt a contractor would buy the property, demolish the old church and build a multi-family building. After studying the matter it was felt the Church should approach the Zoning Board and Planning Board and request variances, sell the property and restrict the use to a sixfamily dwelling. Ms. Campbell also stated that the intention was to save the "black oak" tree Mrs. Judith Washburn, 180 North Washington Street, stated that her property adjoined the project property and she was very concerned about drainage, screening and presented a letter which she wished to be made a part of the minutes. Ms. Campbell stated the plans as submitted had been submitted to the village consultants and the architects had followed their instructions as to changes that have been made. Mr. Duo Dickinson, Architect explained various items on the plans to the Board regarding lighting, parking spaces, buffer zones, drainage, plantings, etc. Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr.Rey that the Public Hearing be continued to the next //meeting. Carried. BUSINESS SESSION Mr. Windas s t a t e d that the Board should review the plans taking into consideration the Washburn's l e t t e r and having the Engineer review the drainage and report back to the �-4Board. Engineer Manganero stated that a possible solution to the drainage proo±em would be to elevate the basement floor at least two feet, then run the sewer line to +h* front of the building and out onto Depeyster Street. He stated that this was not "good engineering practice" for a number of reasons. 5. EARL JOYNER - PRELIMINARY HEARING - 17, 19 & 21 Clinton Street, North Tarrytown, N.Y. Mr. George Topper, Attorney for Earl Joyner presented Preliminary Site Plans to the Board for the above parcels. Mr. Topper explained that it was the intent of Mr. Joyner to build townhouses with parking underneath. He stated that the proposed project would conform to all Zoning Codes and Ordinances. The existing structure which is Mr. Joyner*s residence would remain. After a discussion, Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers that a Public Hearing be scheduled for the October meeting. CARRIED. 6. MATTER OF AMENTA - 2 30 NORTH BROADWAY, NO. TARRYTOWN,N.Y. Mr. Amenta presented a "Site Plan" and a "Model" of the project for the Board's perusal. He stated that Solari and Brana had signed a contract for easements on the former Mangieri Property. Mr. Amenta asked the Planning Board members if there was anything the Board would like to know regarding the Project. He stated that the only issue before the Zoning Board is the request for four parking spaces to be used by the Police Department. After a discussion Mr. Amenta stated he would appear oefore the next meeting of the Board. 7. BEDFORD ROAD PROPERTY Mr.' Hughes stated that the above property was in the process of being sold to another developer who will develop the property. He stated that the owners permit had lapsed in August and they were requesting an extension. After a discussion regarding the sewer system on New Broadway and Pine Street which would pick up the project's sewer line, it was referred to the Engineer for study. Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris that an extension be granted until June 30, 1990. Carried. �-58. Duarte Olivieri - Dell Street Property. Chairman Galgano stated that the above matter has been continued as Mr. Turnquist the Architect for the project has backed out. There being no further business to come before the Board Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. Rey that the same be duly adjourned. Respectfully submitted Irene Amato Acting Clerk I I W II « T I 3 (989 I DEPUTY CLERK III �TO: The Planning Board of North Tarry town FROM: Clesson H. and Judith K. Washburn 180 North Washington Street RE: Site Plan Proposal Concerns -for development o-f 22 Depeyster Street The -following are concerns -for development of said property as the development could have adverse a-f-fect on our property and style o-f living. 1. 2. Screening Plants A. Request that screening plants on west boundary be 5 (•five) -feet high at planting and be densely planted. B. A suitable distance be provided between stockade -fence and screening plants so that maintenance can be done on both sides of screening plants as to prevent damage to stockade fence. C. What type of screening plants are planned? Present Hedges A. 3. An easement be granted so that existing hedges on south property line, adjacent to our property line, may be maintained as they presently are. Drainage A. Dry we 11 at southwest corner of property - size and capacity - possibility of connection to town sewer as overflow may undermine wall, shrubbery, patio and perhaps house with water seepage. B. Slope of land to regulate amount of water and distance water will flow to southwest catch bas i n. C. Snow cleaning - removal or plowed to catch basins - concern about drains being blocked and water unable to run off. D. Assurance that lot is kept clean - free of debris and leaves which will clog catch bas i n. 1 �Park i ng Area A. Parking area lights - none adjacent to illuminate property. B. Sizes o-f parking spaces to remain as proposed 9 feet by 20 -feet. C. 10 (ten) parking space limit. D. Direction o-f parking - pull in, not back in, which will cause damage to shrubbery. E. Who will regulate parking area so it does not become a public parking lot when tenants are not using it. Den si ty o-f Lot Use A. Concern as Depeyster Street has become a main route to High School, Middle School and Pri mary School , s&^^/u JtLdL, _fid*Lj£Mi<J6L ned. : September 2 1 , 1989. 2 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1989-09-21 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/cbdac051e4b596019c5df4f1b4c7c853.pdf f320dd41855ee73447eb1aaec2b4d5e1 PDF Text Text f PUBLIC HEARING October 19, 1989 North Tarrytown, N.Y. A Public Hearing was held before the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown on the above date. PRESENT: James J. Galgano, Chairman Ellen Tsangaris Richard Ayers Roman Windas Frank Rey ABSENT: John O'Leary Miguel Jimenez Also present: John Hughes, Village Attorney James Margotta, Village Building Inspector Dan Wery, Frederick P. Clark Associates A motion to approve the minutes of the September 21, 1989 meeting was made by Mr. Ray Windas and seconded by Ellen Tsangaris. Motion carried. IN THE MATTER OF EARL & MARIE JOYNER. 17-21 CLINTON STREET, NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK The acting clerk read the public notice to hear and consider an application of Earl C. and Marie Joyner for final site plan approval of plans for subdivision of property at 17-21 Clinton St. North Tarrytown, N.Y., known and designated on Village Tax Assessment Map as Section 16, block 8, Lots 26 & 28. The Joyners were not present, and matter adjourned until the next public meeting. A motion to continue the public hearing was made by Ray Windas, seconded by Richard Ayers, motion carried. IN THE MATTER OF THE AMENTA PROJECT. NORTH BROADWAY. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK. This was a continuation of a public hearing from last month. Mr. Paul Amenta addressed the Board and discussed the relocation of the proposed loading zone, from Route 9 to Chestnut Street. It was stated that he must appear before the Board of Trustees and then the NYS DOT for approval of loading zone site. He also stated that the Zoning Board of Appeals make the following recommendations: a) That better visability be provided for in the parking lot for spaces #13 and 14 north and spaces #38 & 39 south. b) That there would be no left turn onto Route 9 when exiting the parking lot. 3 �Mr. Rey asked if the new building would be complimentary to the existing building. Mr. Amenta answered in the affirmative and stated that the sprinklers in the new building would be up to code. Mr. Hughes, Village Attorney stated that a resolution to approve the site plan would be prepared for the next public meeting.He also noted that Mr. Amenta will be required to appear before the Architectual Review Board to certify the drawings of the proposed project. IN THE MATTER OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH - MULTI-FAMILY at the former Methodist Church on Depevster Street. This was a continuation of a Public Hearing from last month. Mr. Duo Dickinson, Architect, stated that the removal of surface water would be collected in one area and carried out by a storm drain. He stated there would be a 1,000 gallon capacity catch basin. He also noted that the parking fence questioned was addressed. Mayor Gandolfo asked that the Planning Board give adequate time for the Village engineers to look over the plan. She also asked about the drainage from the site, and if it would be harmful to the historic tree that is on the site. Mrs. Washburn of 180 North Washington Street felt that many of her concerns were answered when Nolan Associates indicated that the new hedges planted would provide a 5 ft x ft screen . Mr. Nolan, Planner for the project, requested the Board to give site plan approval based on the engineers report. John Hughes, Village Attorney, asked that their proposal with changes be presented to the Board in writing. Mr. Hughes stated that a resolution well be prepared for the next Board Meeting. IN THE MATTER OF UNCLE JERRYS DELI. NORTH BROADWAY. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK This was a continuation of last month's Public Hearing. Mr. Donal Walsh, attorney for Mr. Jeffers, appeared before the Board. Mr. Galgano, Chairman, ased if anyone on the Board had any objections to the opening of the new Uncle Jerry's Deli. Mr. Windas addressed the pressure that the Board has been under due to the many rumors that Uncle Jerry would be going out of business if the site plan approval was not given. 4 �Dan Wery of Frederick P. Clarke Associates was asked to make recommendations regarding sidewalks, curb cuts, and the rock situation behind the property. A motion to continue the Public Hearing until next month was passed unamiously. IN THE MATTER OF THE KRINGAS DEVELOPMENT. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK Mr. Ron Turquist, architect for the project announced that he would not be presenting his proposal in view of the unfavorable report he received from Clarke Associates. Barbara Quinn, of the Briggsville Neighborhood Association, addressed the Board and said a petition with 25 signatures was presented to the Board against the new development. Being no further business, Frank Rey made a motion to close the public meeting. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, ^ /Ubu ton &^JJY SU<* / Francesca Lorenz Village Administrator's Office 5 �As •r :>g^r-^ t^w D R A F T PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN RESOLUTIONS FINAL SITE PLAN PROPOSED: PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING OWNER: SEBASTIAN AMENTA & SONS LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF BROADWAY (ROUTE 9) AND CHESTNUT STREET WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarry town has reviewed an application, for final subdivision approval and final site plan approval pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article VIII, Site Plan Review to construct a professional office building, including related off-street parking, landscaping, storm drainage and other supporting utilities and facilities, on a site approximately 37,104 square feet in size; and WHEREAS, said property is proposed to be subdivided into two separate parcels; one containing the existing office building on approximately 17,035 square feet, the other parcel to contain the proposed professional office building on the remaining 20,069 square feet, as shown on one drawing prepared in the offices of David Graham Architects in conjunction with James Piccone and Associates, identified as follows: 1. S-l "Site Development Plan Prepared for S. Amenta", dated 2/16/89, last revised 6/22/89. WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead Agency pursuant to provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 1. Billed an application fee of %r\*Xt /c' for the action under review; ^ ^ c /V\jy* ^ 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property under review and surrounding areas; 3. Acting as Lead Agency, requested, received and reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR; 4. As Lead Agency for site plan and subdivision review in the Village of North Tarrytown, the Planning Board, after the review of such field conditions, recommendations and environmental assessment form, as well as other matters noted herein, has determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted type and hereby issues a "Negative Declaration," �determination of non-significant this Unlisted action; and environmental impact for WHEREAS, the Applicants have received from the Zoning Board of Appeals: A variance for provision of parking spaces, which do not meet the definition under Article 2, Section 62-4 of the Zoning Code; a variance for the provision of 39 parking spaces for the proposed professional office building, when 40 such spaces are required in accordance with Article 3, Section 62-14 of the Zoning Ordinance and; a variance for Article 4, Section 62-8 for the proposed use of the site for a professional office building which is not specifically listed in the Schedule of permitted or accessory uses for the C-l Highway Commercial Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the proposed loading zone for Parcel B was located on Chestnut Street near Route 9 since there was no suitable location for an on-site loading space; and WHEREAS, the small parking lot for the existing building on proposed Parcel A, located off Chestnut Street, is proposed to be expanded to add 4 additional parking spaces which will involve relocating and reconstructing the existing stone retaining wall on the east side of said parking area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and site plan drawings noted above be and hereby are granted site plan approval and final subdivision approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman, or as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of this plan drawing, revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the office of the Village Building Department for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire six (6) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and the Applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1. Utilities - Storm drainage, water supply and sewage disposal have been approved by the Planning Board's engineering consultant. 1.1 Storm water runoff provisions shall comply with the Planning Board's policy of "zero" increase in rate of runoff. 1.2 The Applicant has submitted a written report, with back-up calculations indicating his intention to 2 �provide adequate fire flow, water supply and pressure for the site. 1.3 All final utilities including conditions noted above shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Board's designated engineering consultant. Exterior Lighting - All exterior light structures shall be screened so as to prevent glare upon adjacent properties. All driveways and parking areas shall be contained poured-in-place reinforced concrete or cut stone curbs. by The four easternmost parking spaces located along the north side of the existing office building on proposed Parcel A, shall be designated as "small cars only", as shall be the two parking spaces on the southwestern corner of the proposed professional office building on proposed Parcel B, indicated on the site plan as spaces 38 and 39. The parking space indicated as #19 on Parcel B, in the proposed underground parking area for the proposed professional office building, shall be designated as "handicapped parking only," as shall the parking space opposite the entry on the north side of the existing office building on proposed Parcel A, indicated on the site plan as space #21. The parking access and drainage and landscaping approvals at the New York State Route 9 entrance are contingent on the approval of the State Department of Transportation. By acceptance of this resolution, the Applicant agrees that should the Village determine the presently approved parking and traffic flow plan causes a future severe traffic problem, said determination to be made by the Village of North Tarry town, with input from the New York State Department of Transportation, then the Village may require the Applicant to amend and, if necessary, reconstruct the approved parking plan and traffic flow pattern controls. Review Fees - The Applicants shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 7.1 An inspection fee for the construction inspection of the proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage system, sewage, landscaping, lighting and other site plan elements, for compliance with the approved site plan in the amount of $ . 7.2 The site plan escrow amount pursuant to SEQR and in the amount of $ or 4% of the total project cost, whichever is less, which shall be used for consulting services rendered in the review of the project. 3 �7.3 A subdivision recreation fee of $ acquisition of recreation facilities statute. for the pursuant to 7.4 The above fees shall be paid prior to the signing of the final site plan by the Chairman. 8. The final site plan review shall be accomplished by the Planning Board's engineering consultant and shall Incorporate all applicable conditions of this resolution and the construction standards of the Village of North Tarrytown as they may be appropriate. 9. Signage on the premises shall be subject to the approval of the appropriate Village agency. 10. The Applicant shall submit an recordable form to the satisfaction for the common use of the entrance accessed from Broadway (Route 9) office building on proposed Parcel A building on Parcel B. 11. The site plan shall be amended to revise the bulk regulations schedule for Parcel B to correct the provided side yard notation of 5 feet and 20 feet to 0 feet and 20 feet, to correct the provided building height from 34 feet to the revised elevation, to correct the required parking calculation to indicate the correct net rentable square footage of 12,000 feet as opposed to the 11,700 as indicated on the plan. 12. Revise the site plan to reference the dates (and the appropriate sections of the Zoning Code) of the variances which have been granted for the subject application. 13. The site plan shall be amended to show no left hand turn from the northerly parking lot, shared by Parcel and Parcel B, onto Broadway (Route 9 ) . The Applicants shall revise the plan to indicate the appropriate signage to control the restriction of such movement. 14. The site plan shall also be revised to indicate the provision of catch basins and the appropriate pitch to the underground parking area, so as to collect and remove any water which may enter the garage through the various windows and openings. 15. A note shall be added to the plat indicating that the "finished" side of the wood fence surrounding Parcel B shall face towards the adjacent properties. 4 easement agreement in of the Village Attorney way and parking spaces by both the existing and the proposed office �16. The site plan shall be revised to show the existing or proposed trash dumpster for the existing building on Parcel A. 17. The site plan shall receive approval from the Architectural Review Board. 18. The site plan shall be revised to indicate the widening of the garage entrance to permit improved visibility of the outdoor parking area and vehicles. 19. The Planning Board reserves the right to make the final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities upon notice by the Building Inspector but before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to parking, landscaping, signs, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details, as built of same, do not comply with the approved plan. The Applicant shall maintain all elements of the approved site plan, including landscaping in a neat and healthy condition so as to retain and approve Certificate of Occupancy. Date James Galgano Planning Board Chairman DKW:rr 5 �* CAMCE CHARLES A. MANGANARO C0UOT*AtANO»TH» MAM tT.tUCKflOACK. «U !*•»*.»••» t«otaxMOTONM«.tum««r.MtwvoM.MTt«an CONSULTING ENGINEERS MEMORANDUM TOt FROMt DATEt RE i James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown Joseph A. Gulino, Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers September 5, 19 8 9 Review of Additions and Alterations to 410 N. Broadway Gas Station/Restaurant Village of North Tarrytown, NY CAMCE #1329 We have reviewed the following site plan and site detail prepared by Badaly & Badaly Architects, Drawing A-l dated May, 1989 and A-2 and A-3 dated June, 1989 for the above referenced project. The following items are necessary in order for us to proceed with our reviews A) The name, address and signature of the present owner of the property should be on the above referenced drawings • B) The names of the adjacent property owners should be included on the above referenced drawings. C) The street widths should be indicated on the site plan. D) The lot lines with accurate dimensions and bearings of angles are required. E) All existing utilities specifically locations of sanitary sewers, including house connections, drainage lines, water lines and the location, size and type of existing and proposed oil /grease /water separators. F) The Planning Board Endorsement, which can be found from the Subdivision Regulations Part IV on Page 7817(14C), should be shown on the drawing. In summary, once the above-mentioned comments are addressed, final recommendation can be made to the Planning Board. JAG:ab * cc: Mr. Mohammad R. Badaly - Badaly & Badaly Architects Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Engineers ••»•»•*• t w u * � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1989-10-19 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/064a3b8ec60752599ae575e1bf68ea99.pdf 02d3a8c9b236cea8b57fdcabc727aba6 PDF Text Text NORTH TARRYTOWN, N.Y. November 16th, 1989 REGULAR MEETING A Regular Meeting of the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown was held on the above date. PRESENT: James Galgano, Chairman Ellen Tsangaris John O'Leary Richard Ayers Roman Windas Frank Rey ABSENT: Miguel Jimenez ALSO PRESENT: John Hughes, Jr. Village Attorney Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8 P.M. Chairman Galgano stated that the Joyner Project which was to be discussed was postponed to a later date. After a discussion it was decided to hold the next meeting on December 14th, 1989 due to the holidays. AMENTA SUB-DIVISION-FINAL SITE PLAN- Northeast Corner of Broadway (Route 9) and Chestnut Street. Frederick P. Clark Associates, Cons .ultants to the Village presented a Draft of a Resolution to be adopted by the Planning Board. (Copy in Official Minutes). Mr. Hughes read the Resolution and a discussion followed. Items discussed were as follows: Utilities, Storm Drainage, Loading Zone, Number of Parking Spaces, Exterior Lighting, Review Fees, Police Parking Easement, Sub-Division Recreation Fee, No Left-Turn onto Route 9, and Final Site Plan. Mr. Hughes was instructed to prepare the Final Resolution for the next meeting of the Board. WAYNE JEFFERS, (UNCLE JERRY'S RESTAURANT)-410 North Broadway. Mr. Reidel of Frederick P. Clark Associates , Consultants to the Village presented a Draft Resolution regarding Final Site Plan for the proposed Gas Station Improvement and Restaurant Conversion by Mr. Jeffers and Uncle Jerry. (Copy in Official Minutes). �-2Mr. Donal Walsh representing Mr. Jeffers and Uncle Jerry stated he had just received the Memo and did not have the opportunity to read it through. Mr. Reidel stated that there was great concern over the loose rock formation over the existing building. Mr. Walsh stated that all loose rock would be removed to the satisfaction of the Village. A discussion followed regarding the various items listed in the Draft Resolution. Mr. Walsh stated that he had written to the N.Y.S. D.O.T. regarding "Old Broadway" and has had no response. Mr. Walsh stated that the Plans were to be presented to the Architectural Review Board for their in-put. Chairman Galgano stated that the Board was spending too much time on the matter and should make a decision. Mr. Rey stated that approval be granted to this point and that Final Approval be given when "Final Plans" are submitted. He questioned the reason for the hold-up of the gas station portion of the project. Chairman Galgano suggested that the Police Chief be consulted regarding "Ingress" and "Egress" onto Gordon Avenue and Old Broadway. Mr. Walsh stated he would confer with the Police Chief. Mr. Windas stated that he would like the following items incorporated in the Resolution to be adopted at the next meeting: Curb cuts, sidewalk, curb at Gordon Avenue, Exhaust system, pre-cast parking stops, Mr. Yarabek's Plaza Plan, Response to Items 12, 13 and 14 in the Draft, new blacktop, halite lights, directional arrow to be on map, etc. It was also felt that a Statement be made and notorized by a Professional Engineer regarding the conditions of the rock formation at the rear of the property. Mr. Hughes was directed to prepare the resolution for adoption at the next meeting. Mr. O'Leary moved, seconded by Mr. Windas that upon satisfaction of modification of plans as specified in the Resolution7plans would be adopted at the December meeting. CARRIED. �-3Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. O'Leary that the Planning Board be the "Lead Agency". CARRIED. Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. Rey that the minutes of the October, 1989 meeting be approved as submitted. CARRIED. Mr. Windas recommended that in the future no resolution should be considered for Public Hearing until the Site Plan is processed or resolution is in its Final Form. IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH- MultiFamily Project- Depeyster Street. Chairman Galgano stated that discussion was postponed to a later date. WEBBER MEWS-KRINGAS PROPERTY-WEBBER AVENUE Mr. Rey stated that the Planning Board should not be considering the project until it has been considered by the Zoning Board. The project would then come to the Planning Board for a Sub-Division Hearing. There being no further business to come before the Board, Mr. Rey moved, seconded by Mr. O'Leary that the meeting be duly adjourned. CARRIED. �f£* fUfrf /W/; r RESOLUTION: DRAFT R E S O L U T I O N PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN FINAL SITE PLAN PROPOSED: GAS STATION IMPROVEMENT AND RESTAURANT CONVERSION OWNER: MR. WAYNE JEFFERS LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF OLD BROADWAY AND GORDON AVENUE WHEREAS, the site plan application has been submitted to the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown for the alteration and extension of an existing non-conforming gas station use, the conversion of the unused service bays and the construction on an addition onto said service bays to house a restaurant/deli on the same site located on the corner of Gordon Avenue and Old Broadway across from the Pocantico River and the Historic Philipsburg Manor; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarry town has reviewed the application for final site plan approval pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article VIII, Site Plan Review as shown on the following drawings prepared by Badaly & Badaly Architects, identified as follows: 1. Sheet A-l BIS "Addition and Alterations to: 410 N. Broadway, North Tarrytown, New York - Site Plan", dated September 1989, last revised 10/18/89; 2. Sheet A-l "Addition and Alternation to 410 N. Broadway, North Tarrytown, New York - Site Plan/Site Details", dated September 1989, last revised 10/18/89; and WHEREAS, the proposal involves the removal of an existing gas tank, the relocation of existing gas pumps, the relining and modernization of the remaining gas tanks and pumping system and the construction of a 55 x 30 foot (1,650 square foot) canopy structure over the filling area; and WHEREAS, the Village of North Tarrytown has spent a considerable amount of resources for studies evaluating the methods and opportunities for discouraging further expansion and development of automotive and automotive related uses along the Broadway/Route 9 corridor, for eliminating or phasing out existing automotive and automotive related uses and for generally revitalizing said corridor with commercial retail and office uses which would be more compatible with the surrounding residential areas, the various public and semi-public uses and historic landmarks and be more pedestrian oriented in nature; and �WHEREAS, the Planning Board and the Village's Planning Consultants have recognized that the proposal is an immediate short-term improvement towards the objectives mentioned above, however, they further note that the proposal involves a considerable investment in the non-conforming gas station use which will effectively preclude any possibility of eliminating or reducing the apparent presence of the automotive uses in this area over the long term; and WHEREAS, the Village's Planning Consultants have raised several concerns regarding the continuation and reinvestment in this non-conforming use with particular respect to its location in close proximity to various historic and outstanding landmarks including the Pocantico River; and WHEREAS, the Village's Planning Consultants have expressed concern about the construction of a 1,650 square foot illuminated canopy over the filling area of the gas station in front of the existing building, which would be highly visible from Route 9; and WHEREAS, this property is the first commercial property one encounters while traveling southbound on Route 9 into the heart of the North Tarrytown central business district; and WHEREAS, the existing service station and site plan proposal was found to be non-conforming with regard to the following sections of the Zoning Code: a. Section 62-19A - The existing filling station is located within 300 feet of a church, the Sleepy Hollow Cemetery, Kingsland Point Park, the Historic Philipsburg Manor, the Sleepy Hollow Restoration and another gas station; b. Section 62-19Bf2) - The fuel tanks are located within 25 feet from the streetline and within 15 feet from the side lot line; c. Section 62-19B(31 - The fuel pumps are now and proposed to be relocated within 15 feet of the streetline; d. Section 62-19C - Surface drainage contaminated by petroleum products is allowed to flow directly from the site into two existing catch basins and directly into the Pocantico River, less than 150 feet away; e. Section 62-19D - The Applicants have not shown the arrangement of site drainage and flow patterns, nor have they shown the relationship to public or quasi-public uses; f. Section 62-8B - The restaurant use is not specifically listed as a permitted use within the C-l District; 2 �g. Section 62-22A - The exit and entrance driveways are now and are proposed to be more than 25 feet wide along the streetline on both Old Broadway and Gordon Avenue; h. Section 62-22B - The entrance and exit driveways are less than 15 feet from the side lot line; i. Section 62-22C? - The entrance and exit driveways are located less than 25 feet from the corner of the intersecting streets of Gordon Avenue and (lid Broadway; and WHEREAS, the subject application has received variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals for items a through f, as listed above, but have not received variances for items g through i, and said site plan cannot be approved by the Planning Board unless variances for items g through i are obtained; and WHEREAS, the site plans involves modifications to the entrance and exit driveways and the construction of new curbing along the right-of-way of Old Broadway, which may still be owned by New York State, in which case a construction permit and approval will be required by the New York State Department of Transportation; and WHEREAS, an engineer has inspected the rock outcroppings above and immediately beyond the subject building and proposed construction for structural integrity and has recommended both immediate and long term procedures to ensure the safety of patrons of the uses on the subject site; and WHEREAS, in the course of its review in acting as Lead Agency pursuant to provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 1. Building review; application fee of $ for the action under 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property under review and surrounding areas; 3. (Planning Board has yet to determine Lead Agency nor receive and review an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR); 4. (Planning Board has yet to make a determination of the action type in accordance with SEQR nor has it made a determination of environmental significance (i.e., Positive or Negative Declaration) for the subject action); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and site plan drawings noted above be and hereby are 3 �granted site plan approval and that the applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman, or as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of this plan drawing, revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the offices of the Village Building Department for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire six (6) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and the applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1. The Applicants have received variances for Sections 62-22A, B and C from the Zoning Board of Appeals. 2. Removal of the identified rock as per memorandum from Environmental Consulting Group, Incorporated, prepared by Edward A. Walsh in conjunction with Michael R. Starllacci, P.E., and submission of a written agreement in recordable form to the satisfaction of the Village Attorney, certifying that the owner of the property will be responsible for causing the inspection and compliance with any recommendations made by a qualified and state certified engineer in a signed and sealed annual report in review of the stability of the rock formation behind the proposed gas station/restaurant. 3. To repave the entire parking area with either macadam or cement to the satisfaction of the Village Engineer. 4. Specify wheel stops for parking the spaces indicated on the subject site plan as numbers 11, 12 and 13 and the adjacent loading space, and provide adequate protection from vehicle interference with the existing "vapor stage" located at the end of proposed parking space #12. 5. Revise the site plan and riverbanks as follows: 6. a. Show the location of the Pocantico River (both sides); b. Show the location and type of traffic light at the intersection of Old Broadway, Gordon Avenue, Dell Street and Route 9; c. Include an inset map on the site plan showing the relation of the subject property to all public and quasi-public uses as specified in Section 62-19A of the Zoning Ordinance. Verify the ownership of the Old Broadway right-of-way. If the right-of-way is owned by the New York State DOT, then 4 �the site plan shall be revised as per New York State DOT conditions of approval and any required construction permits shall be obtained prior to submission of the revised plan for signature by the Planning Board Chairman. 7. The site plan shall be revised to Indicate the rounding of the proposed curbs on either side of the 10 restaurant parking spaces, so as to ease vehicular maneuverability. 8. The site plan shall be revised to specify whether the "sewer line and M.H." as indicated on the plan is for a sanitary or storm sewer line and indicate where said lines go. 9. The site plan shall be revised to indicate utility lines (i.e., electric, gas, storm sewer, etc.) and connections to the existing building/facilities on site and within Old Gordon Avenue. 10. Verify whether the existing gas tanks to remain on site will require complete replacement and whether excavation of soil around the tanks to be removed or modernized must be tested for petroleum contamination and removed and disposed of. 11. Indicate what procedures are involved for the removal of the existing tanks located off the southwest corner of the existing building and under whose jurisdiction for approval and enforcement does this activity fall under. Specify precautions to be taken to ensure that any accidental spill of petroleum product or petroleum contaminated soil during the removal or improvement process will not impact any areas off site, particularly, from entering the catch basins which flow directly into the Pocantico River less than 200 feet away. 12. Indicate the estimated cost of total improvements to the gas station operation, including the cost of removal of the unused gas tank, the restoration or modernization of the other tanks to remain, the cost of repaving, the construction of the proposed canopy, pump replacement and computerization and any necessary improvements to the portion of the building to be utilized for the gas station service (i.e., computerized system for monitoring pumps, tank leak detection, etc.). 13. Specify whether the gas station will be self-service only or if the station will include a service attendant for fullservice customers; how many employees will be required to operate the gas station; when the service bays were last used for servicing automobiles; and when the service station was first in operation. 5 all existing and sanitary and proposed Broadway and �14. The site plan shall be revised to indicate that oil/water separators shall be installed in all catch basins to which drainage from the subject property flows, in order to protect the run-off of any spillage of petroleum product from entering the Pocantico River. 15. Indicate how the proposed site improvement (repaving and recurbing) may effect drainage flow from the property. 16. Revise the plan to include reference to the dates and appropriate sections of the zoning code for which variances were required and received for said application, including any variances required for the improvement and construction of the proposed canopy structure. 17. The Site plan shall be revised to meet all conditions required by the Architectural Review Board of the Village of North Tarrytown with specific regard to the approval (or disapproval) of the proposed canopy, lighting details, building renovation and construction, and site landscaping. 18. The site plan shall be revised to include as proposed in the reduced revised plan plannings included in a transmittal to Mr. Hudson and Pacific Designs Incorporated, letter dated November 10, 1989 from Stephan to Donal Walsh. 19. A final site plan review shall be accomplished by the Planning Board's Engineering Consultant and shall incorporate all applicable conditions of this resolution and the construction standards of the Village of North Tarrytown as they may be appropriate. 20. Payment of all applicable fees. 21. (Army Corps of Engineers, New York State DEC and EPA may be involved agencies due to possible impacts upon the Pocantico River and Hudson River.) Date the street trees for landscaping Donal Walsh from enclosed with a A. Yarabek, ASLA James Galgano, Planning Board Chairman DKWrrr 6 �M E M O R A N D U M TO: James T. Mar gotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROMs Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: November 14, 1989 RE: Proposed Redevelopment of the Immaculate Church Building, Depeyster St. Village of North Tarrytown, NY CAMCE #1328 Per the Planning Board meeting of October 19, 1989 revised drawings from Duo Dickinson Architects were submitted showing the revised layout of the storm drainage. It was agreed that Duo Dickinson was to obtain the invert elevations of the Village storm sewer on Depeyster Street to verify that the proposed system is feasible. We were contacted on Friday, November 10, 1989, by Mr. David Basilone from Duo Dickinson, relating to the drainage. However, no information has been received to date. In addition, Item C of our September 5, 1989 Memorandum (copy attached) relating to the Sanitary System was not addressed. Final recommendations will be made to the Planning Board once the necessary items have been addressed. If you should have any questions or require further information, please let us know. enc. ccs Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Engineers (via Facsimile) Mr. David Basilone - Duo Dickinson Architects �M E M O R A N D U M TOi Janes T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM: Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATEs November 14, 1989 RE: Proposed addition and alterations to 410 N. Broadway Restaurant/Gasoline Station Village of North Tarrytown, NT CAMCE #1329 Of the comments listed in our Memorandums offf*pt.CTftM>y* f 1989 and W^October 18f 1989 (copies attached), the items listed as A, B, E and P i^/ were not addressed by the architect (Badaly and Badaly) as of this date. As you are aware, the storm water drainage lines on North Broadway discharge into the Pocantico River, which is in close proximity of the site. Due to the nature of the business, there is a strong likelihood of a spill or leakage, therefore, it is recommended that a oil/water separator be proposed. Final recommendations will be made to the Planning Board at such time as the required information is provided. If you should have any questions or require further information, please let us know. enc. cc: Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Engineers (via Facsimile) Mr. Mohammad R. Badaly - Badaly & Badaly Architects �MEMORANDUM TO: Janes T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROMs Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATEt November 14, 1989 REs Proposed addition and alterations to 410 N. Broadway Restaurant/Gasoline Station Village of North Tarrytown, NT CAMCE #1329 Of the comments listed in our Memorandums of September 5, 1989 and October 18, 1989 (copies attached), the items listed as A, B, E and F were not addressed by the architect (Badaly and Badaly) as of this date. As you are aware, the storm water drainage lines on North Broadway discharge into the Pocantico River, which is in close proximity of the site. Due to the nature of the business, there is a strong likelihood of a spill or leakage, therefore, it is recommended that a oil/water separator be proposed. Final recommendations will be made to the Planning Board at such time as the required information is provided. If you should have any questions or require further information, please let us know. enc. cc: Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Engineers (via Facsimile) Mr. Mohammad R. Badaly - Badaly & Badaly Architects � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1989-11-16 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/24b60e807e31556d7c6953571978cf1c.pdf 31c7d85f06e5e818b2803451dcbaf816 PDF Text Text REGULAR MEETING NORTH TARRYTOWN, N.Y. DECEMBER 14th, 1989 A Regular Meeting of the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown was held on the above date. PRESENT: James Galgano, Chairman Ellen Tsangaris John O'Leary Richard Ayers Alan Kaplan ABSENT: Roman Windas Frank Rey ALSO PRESENT: John Hughes, Jr. Village Attorney Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8 P.M. J. Tornello -254-256 No. Broadway- Alterations to Service Station. Mr. Wiedle of Frederick P. Clark Associates, Consultants for the Village of North Tarrytown presented a Draft memorandum for their perusal regarding the Tornello Project. (Copy of memo in Official Minutes) A discussion followed regarding screening, entrance and exitways, canopy etc. Chairman Galgano stated that the matter should be referred to the Zoning Board. Mr. O'Leary moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris t hat the Tornello Project be referred to the Zoning Board. CARRIED. MASSARO and PALUETTI Proposed Dwelling Unit Addition- 6 family to 7 family dwelling. (Corner of Valley Street and Chestnut Street) Mr. Wiedle presented a Memorandum to the Board Members regarding the proposed changes. (Copy in Official Minutes) A discussion followed regarding minimum lot size, setbacks, maximum height and parking. Mr. O'Leary moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris that the matter be referred to the Zoning Board. CARRIED. JOYNER PROJECT-Cinton Street Proposed Residential Development Mr. Wiedle presented a Memorandum to the Board Members regarding the Joyner Project. (Copy in Official Minutes) A discussion followed regarding parking spaces, floor plans, conversion of the existing residence to a two-family residence, and the new three proposed dwelling units.- It was �-2bited that the existing building is non-conforming with regard to front and side yard setbacks, and a variance may be required. The applicant was directed to submit more complete utility plans including water, sewer, gas and electric, sidewalk improvements etc. Mr. O'Leary moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris that the applicant be referred to the Zoning Board. Carried. AMENTA PROJECT - PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING - Northeast Corner OF Broadway (Route 9) and Chestnut Street. Mr. Wiedle presented a Draft Resolution for Final Site Plan/Sub-Division Approval for the Board's perusal. After a discussion Mr. O'Leary moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers that the Resolution be adopted after approval by the Village Attorney. CARRIED. (COPY IN OFFICIAL MINUTES). Mr. Joseph Gulino, Representing Charles Manganaro, Consulting Engineers for the Village presented a memorandum regarding various items which need to be addressed. (COPY OF MEMO IN OFFICIAL MINUTES). WAYNE JEFFERS, (UNCLE JERRY'S RESTAURANT) - 410 North Broadway The following items were discussed by the Board: Curb cuts, sidewalk along Gordon Avenue, unstable rock, on-site parking, loading zone, canopy in service station area, utilities, storm drainage, water supply and sewage disposal facilities, landscaping, buffers, signs and lighting. The Village Attorney was instructed to prepare a Final Site Plan Resolution to be presented*to the Board at their next meeting. Mr. O'Leary moved, gecon^ed by Mr. Ayers that the Minutes of November 16th, 19 89 be approved as submitted. CARRIED. It was noted that the Minutes of the October, 1989 meeting had not been received by the Board members. Chairman Galgano stated that due to the complexity of the proposed Halpern Project he felt that the Planning Board should appoint a sub-committee to meet separately from the regular Planning Board. There being no further business to come before the Board, Mr. O'Leary moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers that the meeting be duly adjourned. CARRIED. Respectfully spectruiiy submitted, supmitted,j Irene i ^ ^ A ^ n T ^ e r T �tlJ/^PJ PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN RESOLUTION: FINAL SITE PLAN/SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PROPOSED: PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING OWNER: SEBASTIAN AMENTA & SONS LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF BROADWAY (ROUTE 9) AND CHESTNUT STREET WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for final subdivision approval and final site plan approval (the Application) pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article VIII, Site Plan Review, and the Village Subdivision Regulations, to construct a professional office building, including related off-street parking, landscaping, storm drainage and other supporting utilities and facilities, on a site approximately 37,104 square feet in size; and WHEREAS, said property is proposed to be subdivided into two separate parcels; one containing the existing office building on approximately 17,035 square feet, hereinafter known as Parcel A; the other parcel hereinafter known as Parcel B, to contain the proposed professional office building on the remaining 20,069 square feet, as shown on one drawing (S-l) prepared in the offices of David Graham Architects in conjunction with a perspective sketch prepared in the office of James Piccone and Associates, identified as follows: 1. S-l "Site Development Plan Prepared for S. Amenta", dated 2/16/89, last revised 6/22/89; and 2. Perspective Sketch entitled: Armonk Office Building, undated; filed "Armonk Office Building," prepared in the office of James Corrado Piccone & Associates, Architects, Ossining, New York. WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead Agency, in site plan and subdivision review, pursuant to provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, (SEQR) the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 1. Billed and received a site plan application fee of $910 for the action under site plan review, $25 for the action under subdivision review for a combined initial fee of $935; still to be paid is the SEQR review fee, noted below. 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property under review and its surrounding areas, pursuant to Article VIII of the Village Zoning Ordinance. �3. Requested, received and reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR; 4. Held a duly noticed public hearing in on July 20, 1989 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to comment and be heard on the proposed site plan and subdivision. 5. After the review of field conditions, recommendations and EAF, as well as other matters noted herein, has determined that the proposed Action of site plan review and related subdivision is an Unlisted type and hereby issues a "Negative Declaration," determination of non-significant environmental impact; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have received from the Zoning Board of Appeals: 1) a variance for provision of parking spaces, which do not meet the definition under Article 2, Section 62-4 of the Zoning Code; 2) a variance for the provision of 39 parking spaces for the proposed professional office building, when 40 such spaces are required in accordance with Article 3, Section 62-14 of the Zoning Ordinance and; 3) a variance for Article 4, Section 62-8 for the proposed use of the site for a professional office building which is not specifically listed in the Schedule of permitted or accessory uses for the C-l Highway Commercial Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the small parking lot for the existing building on proposed Parcel A, located off Chestnut Street, is proposed to be expanded to add 4 additional parking spaces which will involve relocating and reconstructing the existing stone retaining wall on the east side of said parking area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and site plan drawings noted above be and hereby are granted site plan approval and subdivision approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman, or his designated agent, as authorized by the Planning Board, on a copy of the site plan and subdivision plat, when revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the office of the Village Building Department and Westchester County Clerk (for subdivision purposes) for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire six (6) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the 2 �satisfaction of the Planning Board and the Applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1. Utilities - Storm drainage, water supply and sewage disposal facilities shall have been approved in writing on the site plan and subdivision plat by the Village Engineer as designated by the Village Board of Trustees, including but not limited to the following: 1.1 Storm water runoff provisions shall comply with the Planning Board's policy of "zero" increase in rate of runoff. 1.2 The Applicant shall submit a written report, with back-up calculations to the satisfaction of the Village Engineer, indicating his intention to provide adequate fire flow, water supply and water pressure for the site development. 1.3 The written approval of the Village Engineer regarding all concerns expressed in a memorandum to James T. Margotta, Village Building Inspector, from Joseph A. Gulino of Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers, entitled "Proposed Professional Office Building - Amenta & Sons, Village of North Tarrytown, NY, AMCE #1340", shall be obtained for his file. (Copy attached). 2. Exterior Lighting - All exterior light structures shall be screened so as to prevent glare upon adjacent properties and shall be of the halide or incandescent variety. 3. All driveways and parking areas shall be contained by pouredin-place reinforced concrete or cut stone curbs. The wall proposed to be reconstructed adjacent to the southerly side of parking space #8 on Parcel A shall be limited to 2' in height above grade and shall be parallel and abutting the adjacent property boundary to facilitate vehicular entrance to parking space #4. 4. The proposed loading zone for Parcel B shall be located on Parcel B in the general vicinity of parking spaces numbered 510 in a specific location which minimizes any possible conflict with vehicle movements; and 5. The four easternmost parking spaces located along the north side of the existing office building on proposed Parcel A, shall be designated as "small cars only", as shall be the two parking spaces on the southwestern corner of the proposed professional office building on proposed Parcel B, indicated on the site plan as spaces 38 and 39. The parking space indicated as #19 on Parcel B, in the proposed underground parking area for the proposed professional office building, shall be designated as "handicapped parking only," as shall 3 �the parking space opposite the entry on the north side of the existing office building on proposed Parcel A, indicated on the site plan as space #21. A screened trash collection facility shall be shown on the site plan and maintained at the northerly end of the parking lot on Parcel A, adjacent to the building. The parking access, drainage and landscaping approvals at the New York State Route 9 entrance are contingent on the approval of the State Department of Transportation (DOT). The large tree located immediately to the north of the proposed driveway access to Parcel B shall be maintained in a healthy growing condition until such time as the Applicant is directed to remove said tree, in writing, by the the New York State Department of Transportation, or the DOT removes said tree of its own volition. The Applicant shall submit a Final Plat subdivision pursuant to Section 11 of the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown for Planning Board review and approval, which plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and shall show all data listed therein as deemed pertinent by the Planning Board. The site plan shall be amended to show "no left hand turn" from the northerly parking lot, shared by Parcel and Parcel B, onto Broadway (Route 9). The Applicants shall revise the plan to indicate the appropriate signage to control the restriction of such movement. By acceptance of this resolution, the Applicant agrees that should the Village determine the presently approved parking and traffic flow plan causes a future severe traffic problem, said determination to be made by the Village of North Tarrytown, with input from the New York State Department of Transportation, then the Village may require the Applicant to amend and, if necessary, reconstruct the approved parking plan and/or traffic flow pattern controls. Review and Recreation Fees - The Applicant shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 10.1 An inspection fee for the construction inspection of the proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage system, sewage, landscaping, lighting and other site plan elements, for compliance with the approved site plan in the amount of $1,000. 10.2 The site plan escrow amount pursuant to SEQR and in the amount of $10,000 or 4% of the total project cost, whichever is less, which shall be used for consulting services rendered in the review of the project. 4 �10.3 A recreation fee of $14,000, based upon the sum of $1,000 per theoretical building lot. 10.4 The above fees shall be paid prior to the signing of the final site plan and subdivision plat by the Chairman. Signage on the premises shall be subject to the approval of the Architectural Review Board, which agency's recommendations shall be a condition of this Site Plan/Subdivision resolution of approval. The Applicant shall submit an easement agreement in recordable form to the satisfaction of the Village Attorney for the common use of the entrance way and parking spaces accessed from Broadway (Route 9) by both the existing office building on Parcel A and the proposed office building on Parcel B. All easements shall be noted on the final site plan and final subdivision plat. The site plan shall be amended to revise the bulk regulations schedule for Parcel B to correct the provided side yard notations of 5 feet and 20 feet to 0 feet and 20 feet, to correct the provided building height from 34 feet to the revised elevation, to correct the required parking calculation and to indicate the correct net rentable square footage of 12,000 feet as opposed to the 11,700 as indicated on the plan. Revise the site plan to reference and note the dates (and the appropriate sections of the Zoning Code) of the variances which have been granted for the subject application. The site plan shall be revised to indicate the provision of catch basins and the appropriate pitch to the underground parking area, so as to collect and remove any water which may enter the garage through the various windows and openings, the foregoing to be approved by the Village Engineer or his designated agent. A note shall be added to the site plan indicating that the "finished" side of the wood fence surrounding Parcel B shall face towards the adjacent properties. The site plan shall receive approval from the Architectural Review Board, which agencie's recommendations shall be a condition of this resolution. The site plan shall be revised as appropriate to indicate the widening or redesign of the garage entrance so as to permit improved visibility of the outdoor parking area and vehicles. 5 �19. The Applicant shall obtain the signed professional seal of architect James Piccone on that portion of the site plan and notations for which Mr. Piccone is responsible. 20. The Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities, upon notice by the Building Inspector but before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to parking, landscaping, signs, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details, as built drawings of same, which do not comply with the approved plan. The Applicant shall maintain all elements of the approved site plan, including landscaping in a neat and healthy condition so as to retain an approved Certificate of Occupancy. 21. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall submit to the Village Building Inspector a mylar reproduction of the site plan, as constructed, and subdivision plat, as filed in the County Clerk's office, to be filed in the office of the Village Building Department for reference by the Village. 22. This resolution of site plan/subdivision approval is conditional upon the execution of a lease agreement between the Village of North Tarrytown and the Applicant for four (4) parking spaces on the site. The four (4) parking spaces are numbered and designated as Numbers 10, 11, 12 and 13 on the Site Development Plan referred to above. This lease shall be satisfactory, with respect to both form and substance, to the Village Attorney, prior to execution by the appropriate Village Official. Of*. e Date James Galgano 0 Planning Board Chairman 500\not0-003.dkw:rr 12/8/90 12/14/90 6 �MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board From: Frederick P. Clark Associates Date: December 12, 1989 Subject: Tornello - CITGO Service Station Canopy - Sketch Site Plan Review As requested, we have reviewed the application for sketch site plan approval for the construction of a proposed canopy over three existing gas pumps for the CITGO gasoline service station located on the southeast corner of Broadway/Route 9 and Hudson Street. The Applicants have submitted one sheet of plans entitled "Survey of Property Prepared for John Tornello Situate Village of North Tarrytown, Town of Mount Pleasant", prepared by John J. Muldoon, dated November 4, 1989. REVIEW COMMENTS The Applicants have not shown adequately review this application. sufficient information to The Applicants should be required to submit a revised site plan indicating at least the following information: A location map, existing zoning, the proximity to public/quasi-public uses, all information necessary to indicate compliance with Section 62-19 of the Zoning CodeGasoline Service Stations, existing site contours, drainage, curbs, sidewalks, existing landscaping, tank locations, parking, location of nearby traffic diagram/compliance schedule. lights and a zoning bulk �In general, we do not recommend any action on the part of the Village Planning Board or Zoning Board of Appeal which would allow further investment and strengthening of such automotive uses along the Route 9 corridor, in particular, along this most important intersection of the Village. This proposal is an example of why the Village should proceed with their long range planning central goals to business hasten area and the rejuvenation surrounding of the residential Village's areas, not prolong the existence of inappropriate and unattractive uses in critical areas. This proposal is, however, in compliance with the permitted uses within the Zoning District, but is one that is detrimental to the Village as a whole. The zoning is this area should be changed from C-l Highway Commercial to a new zone that would prohibit automotive related businesses and would allow a limited range of non-residential uses that do not generate much traffic, such as certain professional offices, as well as multifamily uses districts. that would help buffer the Such a limited commercial adjacent residential zone would further the planning objectives of the Village of improving the visual image of the Village, the traf^rc situation at Beekman and Route 9 and improve the compatibility ^«/surrounding residential areas. fi' Although no rezoning this area has occurred, we feel that such a rezoning and improvement of the existing uses in this critical area for the Village is inevitable and essential rejuvenation of the Village of North Tarrytown. to the The Village �Board of Trustees, the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Planning Board should be encouraging such new uses and improvements in anticipation of these legislative acts. The Planning Board should be concerned with more than the issue of a canopy for this gas station, but with the overall improvement and conformity of the property with the zoning code and the long term planning goals and objectives of the Village of North Tarrytown. The impact of this proposal goes far beyond the limits of the property boundaries. This property is one of the most visible properties within the Village, as it signals the entrance to the central business district and Beekman Avenue, the heart of the Village, and as it terminates the view along the Beekman Avenue corridor. The Master Plan for census tract 116 of the Village of North Tarrytown, New York, prepared by RPPW, Incorporated states "The impression gained by travelers from the north as they pass the intersection of Broadway and Beekman Avenue, the major entrance to the business area, is negative and uninviting. present, some main features of this intersection At are service station signs, large paved areas, and a vacant building. Not an inviting scene for motorists driving through the Beekman Avenue shopping district." (Page 7). That plan continues on to recommend the beautification of the intersection of Beekman and Broadway to serve as an inviting entrance point to the central 3 �business area. A subsequent study of the Broadway/Beekman Avenue/Bedford Road intersection area was prepared for the Zoning Committee of North Tarrytown by Frederick P. Clark Associates back in September of 1988. conclusions rezoning of of automotive the this This plan essentially agrees with the 1980 RPPW critical related uses in Master Plan, area and for the Village this area and proposes to the prohibit to permit limited commercial development on this property as discussed above. The Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals should consider the recommendations of these two Village documents when considering such proposals. ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS It appears that this application /"^~7\ is non-conforming^6o the existing zoning in several respects: 1. 62-14C Access. The curb cuts exceed the maximum 25 foot measurement along the property line. 2. 62-14D. A^~^\ No screening of the parking l o / ^ r institutional uses is indicated on the site plan. 3. 62-22A. Entrance and exitways exceed the 25 foot maximum width. 4. 62-22B. Entrance and exitways are less than 15 feet from the side lot line. 5. 62-22C. Entrance and exitways are less than the 25 foot minimum from a street intersection. 6. 62-19. Specifies that no gas station shall within 300 feet of any public/quasi-public use. be located �7. The Planning Board and Zoning Board should study closely Article VII of the Zoning Code regarding non-conforming uses, their continuation, alteration or extension. 8. The proposed canopy would not conform with the required front yard setbacks. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS With regard to this particular application, the Planning Board has no alternative but to deny the application for *L leant, for the violations of the Zoning Code as noted above and to require the information requested at the beginning of this memo if any and all such variances are granted by the ZBA. However, we do not recommend any action which would promote further investment in automotive related uses in this area or in uses or proposals which are contrary to Village planning goals and objectives. This concludes review comments at this time. Daniel K. Wery Associate Planner DKW:rr 5 �Frederick P. Clark Associates. Consultants ^ / • j 'je'.v /Off art.; Souircc" - '"•>.'•,:':..: •-> ' * • .•'•.•;-'••.- .. /.eu'-e ••.< 3,~ *;e.v ''or* '0530 December 14, 1989 John Hughes, Jr., Esq. 49 Beekman Avenue North Tarrytown, New York 10591 Subject: Final Site Plan Resolution - Amenta & Sons Dear John: As a result of the Planning Board meeting of 12/14/89, I submit herewith the final version of the subject resolution. Please note that I have added all your comments of 12/8/89, plus those of the Village Engineer, dated 12/13/89 which we discussed with the Planning Board at last night's meeting. Sincerely, Frederick E. Wiedle, AICP FEWrrr cc: Mayor Janet Gondalfo James Galgano, Planning Board Chairman l/James Margotta, Building Inspector Joseph Gulino, Village Engineer Irene Amato, Planning Board Secretary Amenta & Sons �*. M E M O R A N D U M TO: James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM: Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: December 13, 1989 RE: Proposed Professional Office Building - ^enta t» Sons Village of North Tarrytown, NY wAMCE #1340 As per my recent telephone conversation with Mr. Amenta, it was agreed that the items or comments listed below would be addressed: A) The existing and proposed sanitary sewer connections, as well as the potable water system should be shown. Show all utilities on Broadway (Route 9). B) The calculations of sewage flow from the proposed building should be submitted. C) The proposed domestic water connection and sprinkler system should have separate line connections with backflow prevention systems. D) Confirmation of the existence of a curb/wall isolating the site drainage is to be submitted. In addition, a letter from Lackowitz Engineering confirming their recommendation of the storm drainage system was submitted to us. Accordingly, final recommendation will be made to the Planning Board once the necessary items have been addressed. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. cc: Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Associates Mr. Paul Amenta, V.P. - ATC Travel, Inc. (via Facsimile) �D R A F T PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN RESOLUTION: FINAL SITE PLAN/SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PROPOSED: PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING OWNER: SEBASTIAN AMENTA & SONS LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF BROADWAY (ROUTE 9) AND CHESTNUT STREET WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for final subdivision approval and final site plan approval (the Application) pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article VIII, Site Plan Review, and the Village Subdivision Regulations, to construct a professional office building, including related off-street parking, landscaping, storm drainage and other supporting utilities and facilities, on a site approximately 37,104 square feet in size; and WHEREAS, said property is proposed to be subdivided into two separate parcels; one containing the existing office building on approximately 17,035 square feet, hereinafter known as Parcel A; the other parcel hereinafter known as Parcel B, to contain the proposed professional office building on the remaining 20,069 square feet, as shown on one drawing (S-l) prepared in the offices of David Graham Architects in conjunction with a perspective sketch prepared in the office of James Piccone and Associates, identified as follows: 1. S-l "Site Development Plan Prepared for S. Amenta", dated 2/16/89, last revised 6/22/89; and 2. Perspective Sketch entitled: Armonk Office Building, undated; filed "Armonk Office Building," prepared in the office of James Corrado Piccone & Associates, Architects, Ossining, New York. WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead Agency, in site plan and subdivision review, pursuant to provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, (SEQR) the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 1. Billed and received a site plan application fee of $910 for the action under site plan review, $25 for the action under subdivision review for a combined initial fee of $935; still to be paid is the SEQR review fee, noted below. �2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property under review and its surrounding areas, pursuant to Article VIII of the Village Zoning Ordinance. 3. Requested, received and reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR; 4. Held a duly noticed public hearing in on July 20, 1989 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to comment and be heard on the proposed site plan and subdivision. 5. After the review of field conditions, recommendations and EAF, as well as other matters noted herein, has determined that the proposed Action of site plan review and related subdivision is an Unlisted type and hereby issues a "Negative Declaration," determination of non-significant environmental impact; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have received from the Zoning Board of Appeals: 1) a variance for provision of parking spaces, which do not meet the definition under Article 2, Section 62-4 of the Zoning Code; 2) a variance for the provision of 39 parking spaces for the proposed professional office building, when 40 such spaces are required in accordance with Article 3, Section 62-14 of the Zoning Ordinance and; 3) a variance for Article 4, Section 62-8 for the proposed use of the site for a professional office building which is not specifically listed in the Schedule of permitted or accessory uses for the C-l Highway Commercial Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the small parking lot for the existing building on proposed Parcel A, located off Chestnut Street, is proposed to be expanded to add 4 additional parking spaces which will involve relocating and reconstructing the existing stone retaining wall on the east side of said parking area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and site plan drawings noted above be and hereby are granted site plan approval and subdivision approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman, or his designated agent, as authorized by the Planning Board, on a copy of the site plan and subdivision plat, when revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the office of the Village Building Department and Westchester County Clerk 2 �(for subdivision purposes) for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire six (6) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and the Applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1- Utilities - storm drainage, water supply and sewage disposal facilities shall have been approved in writing on the site plan and subdivision plat by the Village Engineer as designated by the Village Board of Trustees, including but not limited to the following: 1.1 Storm water runoff provisions shall comply with the Planning Board's policy of "zero" increase in rate of runoff. 1.2 The Applicant shall submit a written report, with back-up calculations to the satisfaction of the Village Engineer, indicating his intention to provide adequate fire flow, water supply and water pressure for the site development. 1.3 The written approval of the Village Engineer regarding all concerns expressed in a memorandum to James T. Margotta, Village Building Inspector, from Joseph A. Gulino of Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers, entitled "Proposed Professional Office Building Amenta & Sons, Village of North Tarrytown, NY, AMCE #1340", shall be obtained for his file. (Copy attached). 2. Exterior Lighting - All exterior light structures shall be screened so as to prevent glare upon adjacent properties and shall be of the halide or incandescent variety. 3. All driveways and parking areas shall be contained by poured-in-place reinforced concrete or cut stone curbs. The wall proposed to be reconstructed adjacent to the southerly side of parking space #8 on Parcel A shall be limited to 2' in height above grade and shall be parallel and abutting the adjacent property boundary to facilitate vehicular entrance to parking space #4. 4. The proposed loading zone for Parcel B shall be located on Parcel B in the general vicinity of parking spaces numbered 5-10 in a specific location which minimizes any possible conflict with vehicle movements; and 5. The four easternmost parking spaces located along the north side of the existing office building on proposed Parcel A, 3 �shall be designated as "small cars only", as shall be the two parking spaces on the southwestern corner of the proposed professional office building on proposed Parcel B, indicated on the site plan as spaces 38 and 39. The parking space indicated as #19 on Parcel B, in the proposed underground parking area for the proposed professional office building, shall be designated as "handicapped parking only," as shall the parking space opposite the entry on the north side of the existing office building on proposed Parcel A, indicated on the site plan as space #21. A screened trash collection facility shall be shown on the site plan and maintained at the northerly end of the parking lot on Parcel A, adjacent to the building. The parking access, drainage and landscaping approvals at the New York State Route 9 entrance are contingent on the approval of the State. Department of Transportation (DOT). The large tree located immediately to the north of the proposed driveway access to Parcel B shall be maintained in a healthy growing condition until such time as the Applicant is directed to remove said tree, in writing, by the the New York State Department of Transportation, or the DOT removes said tree of its own volition. The Applicant shall submit a Final Plat subdivision pursuant to Section 11 of the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown for Planning Board review and approval, which plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and shall show all data listed therein as deemed pertinent by the Planning Board. The site plan shall be amended to show "no left hand turn" from the northerly parking lot, shared by Parcel and Parcel B, onto Broadway (Route 9). The Applicants shall revise the plan to indicate the appropriate signage to control the restriction of such movement. By acceptance of this resolution, the Applicant agrees that should the Village determine the presently approved parking and traffic flow plan causes a future severe traffic problem, said determination to be made by the Village of North Tarrytown, with input from the New York State Department of Transportation, then the Village may require the Applicant to amend and, if necessary, reconstruct the approved parking plan and/or traffic flow pattern controls. Review and Recreation Fees - The Applicant shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 10.1 An inspection fee for the construction inspection of the proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage system, sewage, landscaping, lighting and other site 4 �plan elements, for compliance with the approved site plan in the amount of $1,000. 10.2 The site plan escrow amount pursuant to SEQR and in the amount of $10,000 or 4% of the total project cost, whichever is less, which shall be used for consulting services rendered in the review of the project. 10.3 A recreation fee of $14,000, based upon the sum of $1,000 per theoretical building lot. 10.4 The above fees shall be paid prior to the signing of the final site plan and subdivision plat by the Chairman. 11. Signage on the premises shall be subject to the approval of the Architectural Review Board, which agency*s recommendations shall be a condition of this Site Plan/Subdivision resolution of approval. 12. The Applicant shall submit an easement agreement in recordable form to the satisfaction of the Village Attorney for the common use of the entrance way and parking spaces accessed from Broadway (Route 9) by both the existing office building on Parcel A and the proposed office building on Parcel B. All easements shall be noted on the final site plan and final subdivision plat. 13. The site plan shall be amended to revise the bulk regulations schedule for Parcel B to correct the provided side yard notations of 5 feet and 20 feet to 0 feet and 20 feet, to correct the provided building height from 34 feet to the revised elevation, to correct the required parking calculation and to indicate the correct net rentable square footage of 12,000 feet as opposed to the 11,700 as indicated on the plan. 14. Revise the site plan to reference and note the dates (and the appropriate sections of the Zoning Code) of the variances which have been granted for the subject application. 15. The site plan shall be revised to indicate the provision of catch basins and the appropriate pitch to the underground parking area, so as to collect and remove any water which may enter the garage through the various windows and openings, the foregoing to be approved by the Village Engineer or his designated agent. 16. A note shall be added to the site plan indicating that the "finished" side of the wood fence surrounding Parcel B shall face towards the adjacent properties. 5 �17. The site plan shall receive approval from the Architectural Review Board, which agencie's recommendations shall be a condition of this resolution. 18. The site plan shall be revised as appropriate to indicate the widening or redesign of the garage entrance so as to permit improved visibility of the outdoor parking area and vehicles. 19. The Applicant shall obtain the signed professional seal of architect James Piccone on that portion of the site plan and notations for which Mr. Piccone is responsible. 20. The Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities, upon notice by the Building Inspector but before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to parking, landscaping, signs, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details, as built drawings of same, which do not comply with the approved plan. The Applicant shall maintain all elements of the approved site plan, including landscaping in a neat and healthy condition so as to retain an approved Certificate of Occupancy. 21. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall submit to the Village Building Inspector a mylar reproduction of the site plan, as constructed, and subdivision plat, as filed in the County Clerk's office, to be filed in the office of the Village Building Department for reference by the Village. 22. This resolution of site plan/subdivision approval is conditional upon the execution of a lease agreement between the Village of North Tarrytown and the Applicant for four (4) parking spaces on the site. The four (4) parking spaces are numbered and designated as Numbers 10, 11, 12 and 13 on the Site Development Plan referred to above. This lease shall be satisfactory, with respect to both form and substance, to the Village Attorney, prior to execution by the appropriate Village Official. Date James Galgano Planning Board Chairman DKW:rr 12/8/89 12/14/89 6 �M E M O R A N D U M TO: James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM: Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: December 13, 1989 RE: Proposed Addition and Alterations to 410 North Broadway Restaurant/Gasoline Station Village of North Tarrytown, NY CAMCE #1329 Per our review of the drawings submitted to us on December 11, 1989 by Donal M. Walsh, Esq., it was determined that the required items of the CAMCE Memorandum of September 5, 1989 (copy attached) were substantially addressed. Accordingly, we have no significant objections to the proposed plan. If you should have any questions or require further information, please let us know. enc. cc: Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Associates (via Facsimile) Donal M. Walsh, Esq. Mr. Mohammad R. Badaly - Badaly & Badaly Architects �M E M O R A N D U M TO: James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM: Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: December 13, 1989 RE: Proposed Redevelopment of Townhouses and Conversion to a Two-Family Dwelling on Clinton Street Village of North Tarrytown, NY CAMCE #1332 As per our review of the drawings submitted to us on December 7, 1989, there have been substantial changes from what was originally proposed. Therefore, all the necessary items listed below should be addressed: A) The interior floor plans should be included for review. B) The names of the adjacent property owners should be included on dwg. C) The existing and proposed sanitary sewer connections should be shown, as well as potable water system. Show all utilities on Clinton St. D) Any proposed drainage lines and connections should be shown all the way to the existing storm drainage system. E) The owner's signature of approval should be on the drawing. F) The Planning Board endorsement should be placed on the drawing from Subdivision Regulations Part IV, Page 7817 (14C). 6) The location of the nearest fire hydrants should be indicated on dwg. Accordingly, final recommendations will be made to the Planning Board once the necessary items have been addressed. If you should have any questions or require further information, please let us know. enc. cc: Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Associates (via Facsimile) Mr. Robert Stanziale - Robert Stanziale, AIA �M E M O R A N D U M TO: James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM: Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: December 13, 1989 RE: Proposed Professional Office Building - Amenta & Sons Broadway (Route 9) and Chestnut Street Village of North Tarrytown, NY CAMCE #1340 As per my recent telephone conversation with Mr. Amenta, it was agreed that the items or comments listed below would be addressed: A) The existing and proposed sanitary sewer connections, as well as the potable water system should be shown. Show all utilities on Broadway (Route 9). B) The calculations of sewage flow from the proposed building should be submitted. C) The proposed domestic water connection and sprinkler system should have separate line connections with backflow prevention systems. D) Confirmation of the existence of a curb /wall isolating the site drainage is to be submitted. In addition, a letter from Lackowitz Engineering confirming their recommendation of the storm drainage system was submitted to us. Accordingly, final recommendation will be made to the Planning Board once the necessary items have been addressed. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. cc: Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Associates Mr. Paul Amenta, V.P. - ATC Travel, Inc. (via Facsimile) �M E M O R A N D U M i TO: James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM: Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: December 13, 1989 RE: Proposed Canopy for Tornello Service Station on corner of Hudson Terrace & Broadway Village of North Tarrytown, NY CAMCE #1343R Per our review of the following site plan dated November 4, 1989 from John J. Muldoom, Licensed Surveyor (New York State), for the abovementioned project, our comments or questions concerning water, sewage and drainage facilities only are as follows: A) The interior floor plans should be included for review. B) The names of the adjacent property owners should be included on dwg. C) The existing and proposed sanitary sewer connections should be shown, as well as potable water system. Show all utilities on Broadway and Hudson Terrace. D) Any proposed drainage lines and connections should be shown all the way to the existing storm drainage system. E) The owner's signature of approval should be on the drawing. F) The Planning Board endorsement should be placed on the drawing from Subdivision Regulations Part IV, Page 7817 (14C). G) The location of the nearest fire hydrants should be indicated on dwg. H) The situation may have been previously addressed; however, no mention was made of bringing the underground tanks and fuel pumps into accordance with current Federal regulations. In summary, once the above-mentioned comments are addressed, final recommendations can be made to the Planning Board. cc: Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Associates (via Facsimile) �MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board From: Frederick P. Clark Associates Date: December 12, 1989 Subject: Clinton Street Proposed Residential Development Sketch Plan Review As requested, we have reviewed the plans submitted for sketch plan approval of the conversion of an existing single-family dwelling to a two-family dwelling and the construction of three attached dwelling units on the adjacent property located along the east side of Clinton Street. The applicants have submitted one sheet of plans for review entitled "Proposed Three Family Dwelling and Conversion to a Two-Family Dwelling - Site Plan, Driveway Elevation" prepared by Robert Stanziale, AIA, undated. Although the plans have changed somewhat from the original proposal back in October, most of the comments of our October 19, 1989 memo (attached) still apply, specifically review comments 1 and 3 through 12. We have the following additional review comments: 1. The applicants should prepare a schedule indicating the required compliance with the standards. bulk zoning compliance standards and proposal 2. The applicants should provide floor plans for both the proposed conversion of the existing residence to a twofamily residence and for the three new proposed attached dwelling units. 3. The revised plans should always be clearly identified and dated. 4. The three open parking spaces on Lot 27 are indicated as 9 feet wide each. However, the total width of the three spaces is only 24 feet wide, i.e., each space can only be eight feet wide. These spaces should be redrawn to comply with the Village standard. 5. The applicants indicate a total of six packing spaces, which would satisfy the minimum for three twxrbedroom dwelling units. Any additional bedrooms or "sleeping areas" will require additional parking spaces. 6. It should be noted that the existing building on Lot 26 is non-conforming with regard to the front and side yard setbacks. The applicant should be aware that conversion of �the building variance. resulting in any expansion may require a 7. The maximum coverage for a "Multiple Dwelling on a Single Lot'* is 30%, however the maximum coverage for a "Planned Residence Development" on a single lot is 20%. The existing proposal would result in a coverage of approximately 27% or 28% on Lot 27. The Village Attorney should determine whether this proposal qualifies as a "Multiple Dwelling" on a single lot or as a "Planned Residence Development". 8. The applicant should be required to indicate the names of the adjacent property owners abutting this property. 9. The applicant should be required to submit complete utility plans (i.e. sewer, water, gas and electric, etc.). These plans should include the location and depth of existing utility lines within the Clinton Street right-of-way. 10. The applicant should be required to indicate the appropriate facilities and screening for trash collection. 11. The applicant should be required to include street tree and sidewalk improvement details as part of their next submission. Respectfully submitted, DKW:crc Daniel K. Wery Associate Planner 2 �MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown From: Frederick P. Clark Associates Date: December 12, 1989 Subject: Massaro and Paluetti Proposed Dwelling Unit Addition Sketch Plan Review As requested, we have reviewed an application for site plan approval for the conversion of an existing basement garage to a proposed basement "handicap" dwelling unit within a three-story frame apartment building containing six existing dwelling units located on the corner of Valley Street and Chestnut Street in a C-2 General Commercial Zoning District. The applicants have submitted a plan entitled "Proposed Handicap Dwelling Unit Floor Plan - Site Plan" dated December 4, 1989, prepared by Julius Twyne, Jr., Architect. Review Comments The Planning Board has no alternative application for the following reasons: but to deny the 1. Minimum Lot Size. This residential development is regulated under the R-5 Residence District Standards which requires a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet for the first three dwelling units and 1,500 square feet for each additional unit. The existing site area is presently somewhat less than 4,000 square feet in area yet contains six existing dwelling units which require a minimum lot size of 9,500 square feet. The proposal would make this property further non-conforming and that it would add an additional dwelling unit and require a minimum lot size of 11,000 square feet. 2. Maximum Coverage. Again under R-5 Standards, the maximum coverage of the site is 30%. The existing structure presently covers approximately 45% of the site area. 3. Yard Setbacks. The existing building is currently nonconforming with regard to the rear, front and side yard setback requirements. 4. Maximum Height. The maximum permitted height for a building in this zoning district is 45 feet. The applicants have not indicated the existing height of the building. 5. Parking. The existing building presently contains an existing two-car basement garage with no additional offstreet parking. The existing six dwelling units within this structure presently require a minimum of nine (and most �likely twelve) off-street parking spaces, and is therefore non-conforming due to a shortage of between 7 and 10 parking spaces. The proposal would remove the existing two-car garage for conversion to a handicap apartment and additionally require three more parking spaces, thereby eliminating all off-street parking spaces on the property and increasing the lack of required off-street parking spaces to between 12 and 15 parking spaces depending on the number of bedrooms in the existing units. Respectfully submitted, crc Daniel K. Wery Associate Planner 2 �D R A F T PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN RESOLUTION: FINAL SITE PLAN/SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PROPOSED: PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING OWNER: SEBASTIAN AMENTA & SONS LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF BROADWAY (ROUTE 9) AND CHESTNUT STREET WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for final subdivision approval and final site plan approval (the Application) pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article VIII, Site Plan Review, and the Village Subdivision Regulations, to construct a professional office building, including related off-street parking, landscaping, storm drainage and other supporting utilities and facilities, on a site approximately 37,104 square feet in size; and WHEREAS, said property is proposed to be subdivided into two separate parcels; one containing the existing office building on approximately 17,035 square feet, hereinafter known as Parcel A; the other parcel hereinafter known as Parcel B, to contain the proposed professional office building on the remaining 20,069 square feet, as shown on one drawing (S-l) prepared in the offices of David Graham Architects in conjunction with a perspective sketch prepared in the office of James Piccone and Associates, identified as follows: 1. S-l "Site Development Plan Prepared for S. Amenta", dated 2/16/89, last revised 6/22/89; and 2. Perspective Sketch entitled: Armonk Office Building, undated; filed "Armonk Office Building," prepared in the office of James Corrado Piccone & Associates, Architects, Ossining, New York. WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead Agency, in site plan and subdivision review, pursuant to provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, (SEQR) the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 1. Billed and received a site plan application fee of $910 for the action under site plan review, $25 for the action under subdivision review for a combined initial fee of $935; still to be paid is the SEQR review fee, noted below. �2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property under review and its surrounding areas, pursuant to Article VIII of the Village Zoning Ordinance. 3. Requested, received and reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR; 4. Held a duly noticed public hearing in on July 20, 1989 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to comment and be heard on the proposed site plan and subdivision. 5. After the review of field conditions, recommendations and EAF, as well as other matters noted herein, has determined that the proposed Action of site plan review and related subdivision is an Unlisted type and hereby issues a "Negative Declaration," determination of non-significant environmental impact; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have received from the Zoning Board of Appeals: 1) a variance for provision of parking spaces, which do not meet the definition under Article 2, Section 62-4 of the Zoning Code; 2) a variance for the provision of 39 parking spaces for the proposed professional office building, when 40 such spaces are required in accordance with Article 3, Section 62-14 of the Zoning Ordinance and; 3) a variance for Article 4, Section 62-8 for the proposed use of the site for a professional office building which is not specifically listed in the Schedule of permitted or accessory uses for the C-l Highway Commercial Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the small parking lot for the existing building on proposed Parcel A, located off Chestnut Street, is proposed to be expanded to add 4 additional parking spaces which will involve relocating and reconstructing the existing stone retaining wall on the east side of said parking area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and site plan drawings noted above be and hereby are granted site plan approval and subdivision approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman, or his designated agent, as authorized by the Planning Board, on a copy of the site plan and subdivision plat, when revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the office of the Village Building Department and Westchester County Clerk 2 �(for subdivision purposes) for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire six (6) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and the Applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1. Utilities - Storm drainage, water supply and sewage disposal facilities shall have been approved in writing on the site plan and subdivision plat by the Village Engineer as designated by the Village Board of Trustees, including but not limited to the following: 1.1 Storm water runoff provisions shall comply with the Planning Board1s policy of "zero" increase in rate of runoff. 1.2 The Applicant shall submit a written report, with back-up calculations to the satisfaction of the Village Engineer, indicating his intention to provide adequate fire flow, water supply and water pressure for the site development. 1.3 The written approval of the Village Engineer regarding all concerns expressed in a memorandum to James T. Margotta, Village Building Inspector, from Joseph A. Gulino of Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers, entitled "Proposed Professional Office Building Amenta & Sons, Village of North Tarrytown, NY, AMCE #1340", shall be obtained for his file. (Copy attached). 2. Exterior Lighting - All exterior light structures shall be screened so as to prevent glare upon adjacent properties and shall be of the halide or incandescent variety. 3. All driveways and parking areas shall be contained by poured-in-place reinforced concrete or cut stone curbs. The wall proposed to be reconstructed adjacent to the southerly side of parking space #8 on Parcel A shall be limited to 2' in height above grade and shall be parallel and abutting the adjacent property boundary to facilitate vehicular entrance to parking space #4. 4. The proposed loading zone for Parcel B shall be located on Parcel B in the general vicinity of parking spaces numbered 5-10 in a specific location which minimizes any possible conflict with vehicle movements; and 5. The four easternmost parking spaces located along the north side of the existing office building on proposed Parcel A, 3 �shall be designated as "small cars only", as shall be the two parking spaces on the southwestern corner of the proposed professional office building on proposed Parcel B, indicated on the site plan as spaces 38 and 39. The parking space indicated as #19 on Parcel B, in the proposed underground parking area for the proposed professional office building, shall be designated as "handicapped parking only," as shall the parking space opposite the entry on the north side of the existing office building on proposed Parcel A, indicated on the site plan as space £21. A screened trash collection facility shall be shown on the site plan and maintained at the northerly end of the parking lot on Parcel A, adjacent to the building. The parking access, drainage and landscaping approvals at the New York State Route 9 entrance are contingent on the approval of the State Department of Transportation (DOT). The large tree located immediately to the north of the proposed driveway access to Parcel B shall be maintained in a healthy growing condition until such time as the Applicant is directed to remove said tree, in writing, by the the New York State Department of Transportation, or the DOT removes said tree of its own volition. The Applicant shall submit a Final Plat subdivision pursuant to Section 11 of the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown for Planning Board review and approval, which plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and shall show all data listed therein as deemed pertinent by the Planning Board. The site plan shall be amended to show "no left hand turn" from the northerly parking lot, shared by Parcel and Parcel B, onto Broadway (Route 9). The Applicants shall revise the plan to indicate the appropriate signage to control the restriction of such movement. By acceptance of this resolution, the Applicant agrees that should the Village determine the presently approved parking and traffic flow plan causes a future severe traffic problem, said determination to be made by the Village of North Tarrytown, with input from the New York State Department of Transportation, then the Village may require the Applicant to amend and, if necessary, reconstruct the approved parking plan and/or traffic flow pattern controls. Review and Recreation Fees - The Applicant shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 10.1 An inspection fee for the construction inspection of the proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage system, sewage, landscaping, lighting and other site 4 �plan elements, for compliance with the approved site plan in the amount of $1,000. 10.2 The site plan escrow amount pursuant to SEQR and in the amount of $10,000 or 4% of the total project cost, whichever is less, which shall be used for consulting services rendered in the review of the project. 10.3 A recreation fee of $14,000, based upon the sum of $1,000 per theoretical building lot. 10.4 The above fees shall be paid prior to the signing of the final site plan and subdivision plat by the Chairman. Signage on the premises shall be subject to the approval of the Architectural Review Board, which agency's recommendations shall be a condition of this Site Plan/Subdivision resolution of approval. The Applicant shall submit an easement agreement in recordable form to the satisfaction of the Village Attorney for the common use of the entrance way and parking spaces accessed from Broadway (Route 9) by both the existing office building on Parcel A and the proposed office building on Parcel B. All easements shall be noted on the final site plan and final subdivision plat. The site plan shall be amended to revise the bulk regulations schedule for Parcel B to correct the provided side yard notations of 5 feet and 20 feet to 0 feet and 20 feet, to correct the provided building height from 34 feet to the revised elevation, to correct the required parking calculation and to indicate the correct net rentable square footage of 12,000 feet as opposed to the 11,700 as indicated on the plan. Revise the site plan to reference and note the dates (and the appropriate sections of the Zoning Code) of the variances which have been granted for the subject application. The site plan shall be revised to indicate the provision of catch basins and the appropriate pitch to the underground parking area, so as to collect and remove any water which may enter the garage through the various windows and openings, the foregoing to be approved by the Village Engineer or his designated agent. A note shall be added to the site plan indicating that the "finished" side of the wood fence surrounding Parcel B shall face towards the adjacent properties. 5 �17. The site plan shall receive approval from the Architectural Review Board, which agencie's recommendations shall be a condition of this resolution. 18. The site plan shall be revised as appropriate to indicate the widening or redesign of the garage entrance so as to permit improved visibility of the outdoor parking area and vehicles. 19. The Applicant shall obtain the signed professional seal of architect James Piccone on that portion of the site plan and notations for which Mr. Piccone is responsible. 20. The Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities, upon notice by the Building Inspector but before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to parking, landscaping, signs, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details, as built drawings of same, which do not comply with the approved plan. The Applicant shall maintain all elements of the approved site plan, including landscaping in a neat and healthy condition so as to retain an approved Certificate of Occupancy. 21. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall submit to the Village Building Inspector a mylar reproduction of the site plan, as constructed, and subdivision plat, as filed in the County Clerk's office, to be filed in the office of the Village Building Department for reference by the Village. 22. This resolution of site plan/subdivision approval is conditional upon the execution of a lease agreement between the Village of North Tarrytown and the Applicant for four (4) parking spaces on the site. The four (4) parking spaces are numbered and designated as Numbers 10, 11, 12 and 13 on the Site Development Plan referred to above. This lease shall be satisfactory, with respect to both form and substance, to the Village Attorney, prior to execution by the appropriate Village Official. Date James Galgano Planning Board Chairman DKW:rr 12/8/89 12/14/89 6 �MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board From: Frederick P. Clark Associates Date: December 12, 1989 Subject: Tornello - CITGO Service Station Canopy - Sketch Site Plan Review As requested, we have reviewed the application for sketch site plan approval for the construction of a proposed canopy over three existing gas pumps for the CITGO gasoline service station located on the southeast corner of Broadway/Route 9 and Hudson Street. The Applicants have submitted one sheet of plans entitled "Survey of Property Prepared for John Tornello Situate Village of North Tarrytown, Town of Mount Pleasant", prepared by John J. Muldoon, dated November 4, 1989. GENERAL REVIEW COMMENTS The Applicants have not shown sufficient information to adequately review this application. The Applicants should be required to submit a revised site plan indicating at least the following information: A location map, existing zoning, the proximity to public/quasi-public uses, all information necessary to indicate compliance with Section 62-19 of the Zoning CodeGasoline Service Stations, existing site contours, drainage, curbs, sidewalks, existing landscaping, tank locations, parking, location of nearby traffic lights and a zoning bulk diagram/compliance schedule. In general, we do not recommend any action on the part of the Village Planning Board or Zoning Board of Appeals which would allow further investment, intensification and strengthening of such automotive uses along the Route 9 corridor, in particular, at this most important intersection in the Village. This proposal is another example of why North Tarrytown should proceed with its study of long range planning goals to hasten the rejuvenation of the Village's central business area and surrounding residential areas, and not prolong the existence of inappropriate and unattractive uses in critical areas. This proposal is in compliance with the permitted uses within the Zoning District, but is one that may be detrimental to the Village as a whole. The zoning in this area should be considered for change from C-l Highway Commercial to a new zone that would prohibit automotive related businesses and would allow a limited range of non-residential uses that do not generate excessive peak hour traffic, such as certain professional offices, as well as multi-family uses that would help buffer the adjacent residential districts. Such a limited commercial zone would further the �planning objectives of the Village of improving the visual image of the Village, easing the traffic situation at Beekman and Route 9 and adding to the compatibility the surrounding residential areas. Although no rezoning of this area has occurred, we feel that such a "cleansing" of the existing uses in this critical area for the Village is essential to the rejuvenation of the Village of North Tarrytown. The Village Board of Trustees, the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Planning Board should be encouraging such new uses and improvements in anticipation of these legislative acts. The impact of this proposal goes far beyond the limits of the particular property boundaries. This property is one of the most visible properties within the Village; it signals the entrance to the central business district and Beekman Avenue, the heart of the Village. The Master Plan for census tract 116 of the Village of North Tarrytown, New York, prepared by RPPW, Inc. states "The impression gained by travelers from the north as they pass the intersection of Broadway and Beekman Avenue, the major entrance to the business area, is negative and uninviting. At present, some main features of this intersection are service station signs, large paved areas, and a vacant building. Not an inviting scene for motorists driving through the Beekman Avenue shopping district." (Page 7). That Plan continues on to recommend the beautification of the intersection of Beekman and Broadway to serve as an inviting entrance point to the central business area. A subsequent study of the Broadway/ Beekman Avenue/ Bed ford Road intersection area was prepared for the Zoning Committee of North Tarrytown by Frederick P. Clark Associates back in September of 1988. This plan essentially agrees with the conclusions of the 1980 RPPW Master Plan, and proposes the rezoning of this critical area for the Village to prohibit automotive related uses in this area and to permit limited commercial development on this property as discussed above. The Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals should consider the recommendations of these two Village documents when considering such proposals. The Planning Board should be concerned with more than the issue of a canopy for this gas station, but with the overall improvement and conformity of the property with the zoning code and the long term planning goals and objectives of the Village of North Tarrytown. SPECIFIC REVIEW COMMENTS It appears that this application is non-conforming with respect to the existing zoning in several respects: 2 �1. 62-14C The curb cuts exceed measurement along the property line. the maximum 25 foot 2. 62-14D. No screening of the parking lot from institutional uses is indicated on the site plan. 3. 62-22A. width. 4. 62-22B. Entrance and exitways are less than 15 feet from the side lot line. 5. 62-22C. Entrance and exitways are less than the 25 foot minimum from a street intersection. 6. 62-19. This section specifies that no gas station shall be located within 300 feet of any public/quasi-public use. This property is located near several public/quais-public uses. 7. The Planning Board and Zoning Board should study closely Article VII of the Zoning Code regarding non-conforming uses, their continuation, alteration or extension. This proposal constitutes an expansion and alternatives of a nonconforming use in violation of the Zoning Code. 8. The proposed canopy front yard setbacks. Entrance and exitways exceed the 25 foot maximum does not conform with the required CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS With regard to this particular application, the Planning Board has no alternative but to deny the application for at least the violations of the Zoning Code as noted above and to require the information requested at the beginning of this memo if any and all such variances are granted by the ZBA. In general, we do not recommend any action by the Planning Board or the Zoning Board of Appeals which would promote further investment in automotive related uses in this area or in uses or proposals which are contrary to Village planning goals and objectives. Having said this, we must also caution against arbitrary or capricious actions which might deny an Applicant's rights under current zoning. Respectfully submitted, Daniel K. Wery Associate Planner DKW:rr 12/13/89 �DEC-13-'89 l b : 3 3 TEL MO:201-342-0790 ID:CfiMCE tt077 PilS M E M O R A N D U M TO: James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM; Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: December 13, 1989 RE: Proposed Professional Office Building - *.ni«&nta f* Sons Village of North Tarrytown, NY wAMCE #1340 As per my recent telephone conversation with Mr. Amenta, it was agreed that the items or comments listed below would be addressed; A) The existing and proposed sanitary sewer connections, as well as the potable water system should be shown. Show all utilities on Broadway (Route 9) . D) The calculations of sewage flow from the proposed building should be submitted. C) The proposed domestic water connection and sprinkler system should have separate line connections with backflow prevention systems. D) Confirmation of the existence of a curb/wall isolating the site drainage is to be submitted. In addition, a letter from Lackowita Engineering confirming their recommendation of the storm drainage system was submitted to us. Accordingly, final recommendation will be made to the Planning Board once the necessary items have been addressed. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. cc; Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Associates Mr. Paul Amenta, V.P. - ATC Travel* Inc. (via Facsimile) �M E M O R A N D U M TO: James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM: Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: December 13, 1989 RE: Proposed Redevelopment of Immaculate Church Building Depeyster Street Village of North Tarrytown, NY CAMCE #1328 As of this date, no further information has been received. Therefore, those items relating to the storm drainage, water and sanitary system have not been addressed. (See attached CAMCE memo of November 14, 1989). Final recommendations will be made to the Planning Board once the necessary information has been addressed. If you should have any questions or require further information, please let us know. enc. cc: Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Associates (via Facsimile) Mr. David Basilone - Duo Dickinson Architects �M E M O R A N D U M TO: James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM: Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: December 13, 1989 RE: Proposed Handicapped Dwelling Unit Addition 190 Valley Street Village of North Tarrytown, NY CAMCE #1344R Per our review of the following site plan dated December 4, 1989 from Julius B. Twyne, Jr., Architect, for the above referenced project, our comments or questions concerning water, sewage and drainage facilities only are as follows: A) The names of the adjacent property owners should be included on dwg. B) The existing and proposed sanitary sewer connections should be shown, as well as potable water system. Show all utilities on Valley St. C) Any proposed drainage lines and connections should be shown all the way to the existing storm drainage system. D) The owner's signature of approval should be on the drawing. E) The Planning Board endorsement should be placed on the drawing from Subdivision Regulations Part IV, Page 7817 (14C). F) The location of the nearest fire hydrants should be indicated on dwg. In summary, once the above-mentioned comments are addressed, final recommendations can be made to the Planning Board. cc: Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Associates Mr. Julius B. Twyne, Jr. - JT2 Architects (via Facsimile) �^tOtndolfo,M^or Sean Treecy, Deputy Mayor A f AtathooyApollonlo ^ ^ t o r i » Alter If I I TbaotliyCocm Michael Hyland / ^ >jfflL W^ttK^P J^^^^^^p \ \ ^^r V \ f ^ I I J I / / J nm—T • — William T.KegMi VBaftOomia' Angela Bverett Frank Ansovino Vfflafiltaaiuwr HISTORIC PAST - GREAT FUTURE December 7, 1989 Mr. Pedro Lopez 30 New Broadway North Tarrytown,New York 10591 Dear Mr. Lopez: After reviewing your request and visiting the site, the Board, in unanimous agreement, feel that the house should be completely resided with the imitation brick veneer. The half brick , half clapboard siding design is not acceptable. In addition, we will require detailed plans of the siding at the windows and frieze board. Please submit this information 10 days prior to the next meeting in January. The next meeting date is January 24, at 8:00 PM. Sorry for the delay. Sincerely yours, Frank Arvan - V ^ Chairman 0 Architectual Review Board // / yrfames Margotta/ ^/Building Inspector \ 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York 10591 (914)631-0113 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1989-12-14 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989