1 25 14 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/1b41592b2135b7a82f6841185d913d1f.pdf ed2875851d6ad6c594854eb066a8b17f PDF Text Text North Tarrytown, New York January 16th, 1992 REGULAR MEETING A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on the above date at Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: James Galgano, Chairman Richard Ayers Roman Windas Edward McCarthy ABSENT: Steve Baderian Ellen Tsangaris Steve Salman ALSO PRESENT: Robert Spencer, Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Thomas Gissen, Planning Consultant Chairman Galgano called the meeting to orer at 8:20 P.M. 1. Public Hearing: HUdson Canyon Constr. 2 81 No. Broadway, Changing use to office space. Clerk read the public notice to hear and consider an application by Hudson Canyon Construction Co. for site plan approval for the renovation and rehabilitation of premises at 281 North Broadway, North Tarrytown (Section 15, Block 14, Lot 16 on the tax assessment map of the Village of North Tarrytown). Mr. Gissen stated that he had discussion with the contractor and were close to an agreement. After a discussion Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers that the hearing be continued to the next meeting. Carried. 2. Phelps Memorial Hospital, North Broadway-Continued. Mr. John Hughes, representing Phelps Memorial Hospital presented Affidavit of Service of Papers by Mail, designating lead agency and site plan application. (Copy in official minutes) Mr. Gissen presented memorandum dated January 13th, 1992 designating the Planning Board as lead agency, requesting additional information from the applicant regarding revisions, so that the Planning Board could make a negative or positive declaration with regards to a determination of significance. (Copy of memorandum in official minutes). Discussion followed regarding the sub-division of the property, additional parking, etc. Mr. Gissen recommended that the board hold up on the declaration until all requirements have been submitted. <•?' �-2Mr. Hughes stated that the Hospital would like to have the declaration as soon as possible. He stated he would get the information in draft to the Engineer and Planner before the next meeting. He stated that he would have to research the matter of sub-dividing hospital property and the way it is handled by other municipalities. Mr. Windas stated the Board would like plans showing character of the building, walkways and footprint of the proposed builsing so that the project would not be criticized. He felt that the project should hot be a lingering project. Mr. Hughes stated that the request for Recreational Feesibased on a per parking space would wreck the project. It would be financially impossible to complete the project if the hospital had to pay $1,000. for each parking space. It was the concensus of the Board that Mr. Hughes would have to appeal to the Village Board of Trustees for exemption of the fee. After a discussion, Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy that the matter be continued at the next meeting. Carried. 3. Puhlic Hearing: Antonio Rodrigues, 358 No. Broadway, Cabinet Mfg.-Subject to Zoning Board Approval. Chairman Galgano stated there was no one present representing Mr. Rodrigues, therefore there would be no hearing. HINUTES;I Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy that the minutes of the November 21st, 1991 be approved as corrected. Carried. Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Mr. Windas that the minutes of the December 19th, 1991 meeting be approved as submitted. Carried. There being no further business to come before the Board, Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers that the same be duly adjourned. Carried. Respectfully submitted, Irene Amato Acting Clerk �A i C 3 2 1 ^Affidavit of Service of Papers by Mail. • Affirmation of Service by Mail on Reverse Side. COPYRIGHT iBBS BY J U L I U S QUUMBERG, INC.. LAW BLANK PUBLISHERS > Jj Index No. I £*-<-«/&««>-» In the Matter of Phelps Memorial Hospital *MHtoMff AFFIDAVIT BY OF SERVICE MAIL wteinnnt STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER The undersigned being duly sworn, deposes and says: Deponent is not a party to the action, is over 18 years of age and resides at O s s i n i n g , New York ss.: 801 P i n e s b r i d g e Road That on December 5, 19 91 deponent served the annexed n o t i c e of l e a d agency d e s i g n a t i o n , s i t e p l a n a p p l i c a t i o n , 0/7 t h e a t t a c h e d l i s t of New York S t a t e , W e s t c h e s t e r County and l o c a l m u n i c i p a l a g e n c i e s in this action at t h e a d d r e s s l i s t e d below t h e name of t h e agency the address designated ^*OTVft^aWMWfrjk for that purpose by depositing a true copy of same enclosed in a postpaid properly addressed wrapper, in-~j&fiQ9t*<*i£8**-official depository under the exclusive care and custody of the United States Postal Service within the State of New York. Sworn to before me lU/92- 'F •*•«•« | r/<7\r �Mailing Date: December 5, 1991 VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SEQRA LEAD AGENCY DESIGNATION Please take notice that this is a notice designating the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown as the Lead Agency for the purposes of Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law for the following proposed action: Construction of a medical office building at Phelps Memorial Hospital Center, Route 9, North Tarrytown, New York. The proposed building will consist of approximately 60,000 square feet, will be 4 stories high and will accommodate office space for approximately 30-40 physicians and an outpatient radiology suite. Please be advised that the Planning Board has directed the preparation of the attached Environmental Assessment Form. The office of the Lead Agency is located at: Village of North Tarrytown 2 8 Beekman Avenue North Tarrytown, New York 10591 Contact: William T. Regan, Environmental Review Officer, at the above address or by telephone at 914-631-1440 for information concerning this matter. cc: Mayor Rey and Board of Trustees North Tarrytown Planning Board North Tarrytown Zoning Board of Appeals Counsel Robert Spencer �INVOLVED AGENCIES: Thomas Jorling, Commissioner New York State Department of Environment Conservation 50 Wolf Road Albany, NY 12233 NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Department of Regulatory Affairs 21 South Putt Corners Road New Paltz, NY 12561 Mr. Al Dickson, Regional Director NYS Department of Transportation 4 Burnett Boulevard Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 John H. Kennedy, Regional Director New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation Taconic Region P.O. Box 308 Staatsburg, NY 12580 Ms. Lynn Oliva, Acting Commissioner Westchester County Planning Department County Office Building, Room 432 148 Martine Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. William Borghard, Commissioner Westchester County Department of Environmental Facilities County Office Building, Room 400 148 Martine Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. John Muenzinger Director of Natural Resources Department of Planning County Office Building, Room 412 148 Martine Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Ms. Louise Doyle, Senior Engineer Board of Environmental Quality Westchester County Health Department 112 East Post Road White Plains, NY 10601 Town of Mount Pleasant One Town Hall Plaza Valhalla, NY 10594 Architectural Review Board Village of North Tarrytown 2 8 Beekman Avenue North Tarrytown, NY 10591 �Jerome Fine, Commissioner North Tarrytown Zoning Board of Appeals 28 Beekman Avenue North Tarrytown, NY 10591 William T. Regan, Administrator North Tarrytown Board of Trustees 28 Beekman Avenue North Tarrytown, NY 10591 Jim Haggerty United States Army Corps of Engineers 26 Federal Plaza New York, NY 10278-0090 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. David J. Portman. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye. New York and Southport. Connecticut Frederick E. Wiedle, AICP Howard I Reynolds, nr David H. Stolman. MCP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye. New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 FAX (914) 967-6615 MEMORANDUM Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder. Ai-rr Jim Donovan, RLA. ASLA . To: North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: January 13, 1992 Subject: Hudson Canyon Construction II - North Broadway - Site Plan Approval I. Introduction The purpose of this memorandum is to provide our analysis of the revised plans for the proposed renovation of an existing structure located at 281 North Broadway, as identified on plans entitled, "281 North Broadway Renovation Hudson Canyon Construction Inc.," prepared by Francis X. Arvan, Architect, dated November 8, 1991 and last revised January 7, 1992. We previously reviewed an earlier version of this plan in our memorandum of November 19, 1991 entitled, "Hudson Canyon Construction - 281 North Broadway - Site Plan Approval." Our previous memorandum detailed a number of variances and/or approvals that might need to be granted by the North Tarrytown Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) with regards to the proposed application (i.e., variances for use, driveway width and setbacks, as well as approval of the provision of required parking on a lot other than that supporting the principal use). It is our understanding that the necessary variances and approvals have been secured from the ZBA. This office's November 19, 1991 memorandum also detailed information and/or plan revisions that were needed to address site planning issues associated with the site's parking, lighting and buffering. The remainder of this memorandum is devoted to addressing those site planning issues. II. Analysis A. Parking and Loading Requirements 1. Loading Space: The applicant has revised his plan to provide one conforming loading space, as required by § 62- �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning /Development/Environment/Transportation that there does not exist the reasonable likelihood for potentially significant environmental impacts associated with this application. A negative declaration would also terminate the SEQR review process. Pending the submission of additional information, this concludes our comments at this time. Thomas Gissen, AICP Associate/Planning cc: Mayor Frank Rey William Regan James Margotta Joe Gulino Irene Amato Robert Spencer John Hughes 500\not2-001.tg 2 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 FAX (914) 967-6615 David J. Portman, AICP Frederick E. Wiedle, AICP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP Jim Donovan, RLA, ASLA MEMORANDUM To: North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: January 13, 1992 Subject: Phelps Memorial Hospital - Medical Office Building - Site Plan Approval , Since the submission of our November 19, 1991 memorandum of review entitled, "Phelps Memorial Hospital - Medical Office Building Site Plan Approval," the only new submission by the applicant has been a completed Full (long Form) Environmental Impact Statement (EAF). It is our understanding that the EAF, along with a notice designating the North Tarrytown Planning Board's intention to be lead agency, was distributed on December 5, 1991 to all identified involved and interested agencies. Consequently, assuming the Village has received no objections from any other involved agency, the Planning Board should officially declare itself lead agency at the January 16, 1991 Planning Board Meeting. There remains some outstanding information and/or plan revisions that must be provided by the applicant before the Planning Board will be in a position to make a determination of significance with regards to this application's compliance with the requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR). This information has been previously detailed in the November 19, 1991 memorandum of review from this office, as well as in memorandums from the office of the Village Engineering Consultant and during the Planning Board hearing process. We would recommend that the applicant provide all information previously requested so that the Planning Board can make a negative or positive declaration with regards to a determination of significance. A positive declaration would indicate that the Planning Board, acting a lead agency, believes that there exists the potential for significant environmental impacts associated with this application and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) should be prepared to address those areas of potentially significant environmental impacts. Conversely, a negative declaration would indicate that the Planning Board is satisfied �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning / Development /Environment/ Transportation 14.A.(2) and § 62-14.F. of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown (the Code). 2. Handicapped Parking Space: The applicant has revised his plan to comply with the New York State Building Code requirement that handicapped parking spaces maintain sixteen feet of width, with an eight-foot wide aisle and an eight-foot wide parking area. We would only recommend that the plan be amended to show the required handicapped parking aisle area as being that area adjacent to the structure's stairway. 3. Apartment Parking Need Generation: As previously requested, the applicant should specify the number of bedrooms in the site's two apartments so as to provide the necessary information to calculate parking need. B. Lighting A lighting plan, inclusive of calculated foot candle measurements at the property line (not to exceed one and onehalf foot candles at the property line) should be supplied. C. Buffering The applicant has amended his plan to provide for a five-foot high ceder stockade fence around the perimeter of the parking area. We would recommend that the plan be amended to designate that the finished side of the fence face the adjoining residential uses. III. Pending the submission of the information and plan amendments identified above, this concludes our comments at this time. Thomas Gissen, AICP Associate/Planning cc: Mayor Frank Rey William Regan James Margotta Joe Gulino Irene Amato Robert Spencer T. Muldon 500\not2~003.tg 2 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development /Environment /Transportation Rye. New York and Southport. Connecticut David J. Portman, -ucr Frederick E Wiedle. Aicr Howard I Reynolds, rr David H Stolman, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye. New York 10580 (914)967-6540 FAX (914)967-6615 Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, -xirr Jim Donovan, RLA. ASLA MEMORANDUM To: North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: January 13, 1992 Subject: Proposed Antonio Cabinetry Shop - North Broadway I. Introduction Subsequent to the submission of our December 30, 1991 memorandum of review entitled "Antonio Cabinetry - North Broadway," the applicant revised his plans to address some of the concerns we raised. The revised plans include the following: "Proposed Antonio Cabinetry," prepared by Contadino Architects, dated December 19, 1991 and last revised January 2, 1992. "Antonio Cabinetry," prepared by Contadino Architects, dated January 2, 1992. We will not endeavor to fully repeat here all of our comments from the December 30, 1991 memorandum. However, we will now briefly review any previously identified areas of concern that have not been adequately addressed in the applicant's revised plans. II. Analysis A. Required Variances As further detailed in our memorandum of December 30, 1991, a number of variances will be required in order for this application to move forward. Specifically, a use variance for the proposed manufacturing/wholesale uses will be required, as will be bulk variances for deficient front and rear yard setbacks. The applicant also submitted a letter of December 24, 1991 detailing the nature of the proposed showroom use and �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning / Development/ Environment / Transportation limiting, to five, the number employees that will be allowed to work at this site. Consequently, our concerns regarding the site's numerical parking demand have now been met. (However, as detailed below, we remain concerned about the tight parking layout and deficient parking space sizes.) Also, the note on the plan stating, "Total parking provided excluding shared parking," should either be further explained or eliminated. It is not clear what, if any, uses are sharing what parking or how this affects the site's ability to meet its numerical parking demand. B. Performance Standards As previously detailed, this use is regulated under the Special Permit standards of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown, as articulated in § 62-16. This section identifies specific potential impacts (e.g. atmospheric pollution, odors, liquid and solid waste, noise, vibration and electrical interference) that must be examined and mitigated to the maximum extent practicable in order for the special permit to be granted. Apparently in response to our last memorandum, the applicant added some brief notes to the plan indicating their belief that no impacts identified in § 62-16 would extend beyond the site's property lines. Notwithstanding these site plan notes, we remain concerned that this use may result in neighboring properties being affected by several of the impacts identified as areas of concern in § 62-16. For example, it seems reasonable to expect that a furniture shop would use paints and varnishes as well as power tools. Consequently, information on the types of ventilation that will be employed on the site should be supplied so that the Planning Board can make a determination as to the potential impacts, if any, to adjoining neighbors that may be involved in the venting of fumes and odors or in the noise of ventilation equipment itself. Also, if the structure does not have air conditioning within the work areas, it seems reasonable to expect that windows and doors would be left open during the warmer months. This could be expected to result in the release of noise, odors and fumes to adjoining residential and commercial properties. Furthermore, the disposal methods that will be employed for paints, varnishes and other potentially hazardous materials should be supplied. C. Transitional Use Because the use is proposed for a lot that abuts residential properties within a residential district, the applicant is 2 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation required to provide for buffering as detailed in § 62-9.C. While we agree with the applicant that a fence would serve no buff ering v purpose on this property and that the natural vegetation on the property should remain, we feel that the permanent protection of this existing vegetated buffer area should be ensured through the addition of a site plan note identifying all. existing vegetated areas as, "Vegetative buffer areas -to be permanently maintained in their natural state. '•• D. ParkinaL Layout As detailed in our December 3Q, 1991 memorandum, and as further noted in the January 7, 1991 (sic, probably 1992) letter of review from the Westchester County Planning Board, the site's parking layout is tight and some parking spaces are deficient.. We urge that the parking layout be improved, as the existing layout constitutes a potentially hazardous situation. E- Lot .Lines At the Planning Board meeting of December 19, 1991, several member of-tfo£i Board requested that specific information on the lot's exact -^boundaries be provided. Although the applicant has provided information on existing tax lot lines that are internal -teethe identified site, it remains unclear whether the identified- site constitutes a previously subdivided lot or whether the site is composed of parts of existing lots. This information must be supplied. Ill. Conclusion Pending the submission of the information identified above, this concludes our comments at this time. Thomas Gissen, AICP Associate/Planning cc: Mayor Frank.Rey William Regan James Margofcta Joe Gulino Irene Amato Robert Speneer Louis Contaidino 500\not2-002.tg 3 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1992-01-16 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1992 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/1bac5640cdb8ae3f8ce9c8ecc21a00a6.pdf 1cd58e99a78e5cced415d10667ad4eee PDF Text Text £ - r ^r^tlJ REGULAR MEETING NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK February 20th, 1992 A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on the above date at Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: ABSENT: ' James Galgano, Chairman Ellen Tsangaris Richard Ayers Edward McCarthy Steve Salman Roman Windas Steve Baderian ALSO PRESENT: Ken Powell, Acting Village Attorney James Margotta, Building Inspector Thomas Gissen, Planning Consultant Joe Gulino, Engineering Consutltant Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8 P.M. 1. Mary Fisher-Beekman Avenue-Preliminary Hearing-Site Plan, John Hughes, Jr., representing Mary Fishery stated it was the intention of the owner to rebuild the fire damaged structure within the same shell. Several variances would be required as the original building was built many years ago. They would include parking, sideyard and several other variances. He requested permission from the Board to apply to the Zoning Board for the variances. After a discussion Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy%that the application be referred to the Zoning Board for ilhs approval. Unanimously carried. 2. Phelps Memorial Hospital, North Broadway, Continued. John Hughes, Jr., representing Phelps Memorial Hospital, stated the hospital was anxious to proceed with the project and would like Site Plan Approval. Mr. Tom Gissen stated that several items regarding engineering and site planning had been requested but have not been supplied. (Copy of Memo in official minutes). Mr. Gulino stated he has not received information regarding drainage and sewers..-' Mr. Hughes stated that I.B.M. does not move quickly, but information on the storm drain calculations would be -jonalvoda,o.» h &A The sewer issue might take some time but they would ask for a v r letter of intent from I.B.M. ^ 'f^**' Mr. Hughes also stated they vould obtain the necessary agreements from I.B.M. before obtaining a building permit. �-2Mr. Hughes stated he would appear before the Mayor and Board of Trustees at their next meeting to discuss taxes and recreation fees. After a discussion Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy.that the matter be continued at the next meeting. 3. Hudson Canyon Construction, North Broadway-Continued. Mr. T.J. Muldoon/stated he had appeared before the Zoning Board and had received all variances and approval to convert to offices and storage garage with parking on the back of the lot. He presented revisions dated January 7th, 1992 to the Board. Mr. Gissen stated he had conferred with Mr. Muldoon and asked that a lighting plan be submitted, the stockade fence should be towards the back of the property, he should indicate the number of bedrooms in each apartment and several minor items. He recommended approving the project. l/vlv Mr. Muldoon stated that a lighting plan will be submitted when tkey appl^for a building permit. Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers> that the application be approved as submitted, with the changes requested by the Board. Unanimously carried. 4. C.Pateman, F. Racanell, N.T. Associates (Bedford Park) Preliminary Hearing-Site Plan. Mr. C. Pateman submitted plans for fifteen single family homes for the Board's approval. Each lot will be approximately 50 x 100 and the houses will front on Bedford Road, Webber Avenue and Amos Street. He stated he would submit topo and site plan at the next meeting. After a discussion Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthyjthat a public hearing be held for site 'plan review and sub-division on March 19th, 1992. Unanimously carried. Mr. Gissen asked that all information be submitted to him as soon as possible for his review. 5. Antonio Rodrigues, 358 No. Broadv/ay-Site Plan approval of kitchen cabinet manufacturing-subject to approval of ZBA. Clerk read the public notice to hear and consider an application by Antonio Rodrigues for site plan approval for the renovation of premises at 358 North Broadway, North Tarrytown, New York (Section 17, Block 21, Lot 32-37) on the tax assessment map of the Village of North Tarrytown for the operation of a facility for the manufacture and assembly of kitchen cabinets and related products. �Mr. Powell stated tfe represents Mr. Rodrigues and he left the meeting. Mr. Gissen stated he has received material regarding revised plans. He recommended that any approvals that mavfce forthcoming with regards to the cabinetry snop application be conditioned upon a requirement that the cabinet shop's parking area be re-examined whenever an application is made for the redevelopment of the remainder of the property. He felt that the parking proposed for this use is somewhat tight. (Memo submitted-copy in official minutes.) Mr. Gulino stated there were no problems, no additions or constructual changes. Discussion followed regarding parking and curbing in front of the premises. Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers^that the site plan be approved, with the condition that the parking be re-examined whenever an application is made for the redevelopment of the remainder of the property. Unanimously carried. Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy.that the Public Hearing be closed. Unanimously carried. Minutes Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers. that the minutes of the meeting held on January 16th, 1992 be approved as submitted. Unanimously carried. There being no further business to come before the meeting Mr. McCarthy moved,seconded by Ms. Tsangaris .that the same be duly adjourned. Unanimously carried. Mr. Galgano stated that the next meeting of the Board would be held on March 19th, 1992. Respectfully submitted, Respecttuiiy suDmittea, Irene Amato, Acting Clerk �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport. Connecticut 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye. New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 FAX (914) 967-6615 David J Portman. AICP Frederick E Wiedle. AICP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H Stolman, AICP Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP Jim Donovan, RL A. ASLA MEMORANDUM To: North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: February 20, 1992 Subject: Antonio Cabinetry Site Plan Application The purpose of this memorandum is to provide our on-going analysis of the applicant's site plan submissions for the development of a furniture shop, to be located in an existing structure situated on the east side of Route 9 (Broadway), approximately 140 feet north of Gordon Avenue. The applicant's latest submissions include the following: "Map of Property Prepared for Antonio Cabinetry Situate in the Village of North Tarrytown, Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester Co., New York," dated February 1, 1992 and prepared by John J. Muldoon, New York State Licensed Surveyor. "Proposed Antonio Cabinetry, Village of North Tarrytown, New York," Site Plan, Sheet 1, dated December 19, 1991, last revised February 4, 1992 and prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA. "Antonio Cabinetry, Village of North Tarrytown, New York," site section, sheet 2, dated January 2, 1992, last revised January 15, 1992 and prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA. Letter to the Village of North Tarrytown Zoning Board of Appeals, dated February 10, 1992 and from Steven L. Kroleski, Attorney for the applicant. �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning, Development/Environment/Transportation The applicant's revised plans, as well as the letter from his Attorney have provided most of the information necessary to address those concerns previously raised by the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown (the Board) and by this office. However, whereas the previously submitted plans and statements by the applicant appeared to indicate that the subject site was an independent lot within a larger property, the new submissions now show the entire property the applicant proposes to purchase to be one un-subdivided lot. The entire property is significantly larger than the area identified within the project limit line and maintains the potential for additional development. As we have noted in our previous memorandums and in comments before the Board, the parking proposed for this use is somewhat tight. Previously, we were left with the impression that this was an existing site with a pre-existing condition limiting its parking and circulation to the area shown on the site plan. While the arrangement of the two structures located on the entire property and shown on the "Map of Property" does tend to limit the area that can be used conveniently as parking for the proposed cabinetry shop, we feel that a better parking arrangement would be feasible if the remaining portion of the site were to be redeveloped and the structure located therein were removed or relocated. For this reason, we would recommend that any approvals that may be forthcoming with regards to the cabinetry shop application be conditioned upon a requirement that the cabinet shop's parking area be re-examined whenever an application is made for the redevelopment of the remainder of the property. In this way, at some point in the future, it may be possible to improve upon the tight parking and circulation area shown on this plan. This concludes our comments at this time. Thomas Gissen, AICP Associate/Planning cc: Mayor Frank Rey William Regan James Margotta Robert Spencer Joe Gulino Louis Contadino 500\not2-009.tg.crc 2 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development /Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 FAX (914) 967-6615 David J. Portman, AICP Frederick E. Wiedle, AICP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP Jim Donovan, RLA, ASLA MEMORANDUM To: North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: February 20, 1992 Subject: Phelps Memorial Hospital Site Plan Approval Outstanding Issues _ _ At the Planning Board meeting of January 16, 1992, this office recommended that the North Tarrytown Planning Board (the Board) withhold making a determination of significance under SEQR pending the submission of some additional engineering and site planning information. To date, the requisite information has not been supplied. Based upon a discussion with the Village of North Tarrytown Engineering Consultant, Joe Gulino, we understand that information regarding the site's storm sewer drainage, which discharges into the Hudson River, as well as the site's increased sanitary sewage flow, has not been supplied. It is imperative that this information be supplied and analyzed prior to the Planning Board making a determination of environmental significance, as required by the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR). Once this information has been submitted, we believe that the Planning Board will, in all likelihood, be in a position to make a positive or negative declaration under SEQR. A resolution of site plan approval for the proposed office building cannot be adopted until a determination of environmental significance has been made with regard to this Type I Action (see memorandum from this office of November 19, 1991). Furthermore, the issue of how to best address the tax assessment status of the proposed office building and ancillary parking must be addressed prior to the drafting and adoption of a resolution of site plan approval. It is our understanding that counsel for the applicant and counsel for the Village are currently in discussions as to how best to resolve the tax rateable status of this property. If it is determined that a subdivision will be required, then an application, inclusive of full subdivision plans, must be submitted. It is our initial expectation that such a subdivision would necessarily require that certain variances be granted by the �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development /Environment /Transportation Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA). Consequently, the issue of how best to resolve the tax status of the office structure and ancillary parking should be resolved prior to the drafting and adoption of a resolution of site plan approval for this proposed office structure. Additionally, there are several minor site planning issues that should be resolved. As we indicated in our memorandum of November 19, 1991, the plan should be amended to indicate pavement markings and traffic circulation signage. Also, we feel it is important that the applicant address the concerns we raised in our November 19, 1991 memorandum regarding the viability of the applicant's plan to protect certain identified significant trees. Specifically, we remain concerned that the parking plan may not provide a substantial enough area of porous soils within the drip lines of some of the significant trees the applicant has indicated he is prepared to preserve. This issue would appear to be readily resolvable but most likely will require some minor adjustments to the proposed parking plan. Lastly, while the applicant has removed proposed grading from its location immediately north of the subject site, on adjoining property owned by the State of New York, the applicant has shown a grading plan indicating a slope of approximately 1:1, or 100%. Based upon our discussion with Joe Gulino, it appears that the applicant should either revise these grading plans to show a slope no steeper than 1:2 (50%) or the applicant should provide a technical analysis of the rock formation in the area proposed for this 1:1 slope. In conclusion, we believe that it is necessary for the applicant address the issues of storm water runoff and sanitary sewage flow prior to the Planning Board making a determination of significance under SEQR. Furthermore, the question of the need for a subdivision of this property as part of its taxable assessment should be resolved prior to the drafting of any resolution of site plan approval. In order to draft this resolution, we must know whether it will be necessary to condition the resolution upon the granting of a subdivision by the Planning Board and the granting of any associated variances by the ZBA. As soon as we have received conformation from the Village Engineering Consultant that the drainage and sanitary sewage information is satisfactory and we have received information from the Village Counsel that the issues regarding the tax assessment of this property have been satisfactorily resolved, we shall draft a resolution of environmental significance under SEQR and a resolution of site plan approval, if appropriate. 2 I �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development /Environment /Transportation Pending the submission of this information, this concludes our comments at this time. Thomas Gissen, AICP Associate/Planning cc: Mayor Frank Rey William Regan James Margotta Robert Spencer Joe Gulino John Hughes 500\not2-008.tg.crc t �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development /Environment /Transportation Rye, New York and Southport. Conneoticut David J. Portman, AICP Frederick E. Wiedle. AICP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye. New York 10580 (914)967-6540 FAX (914) 067-6615 Michael A. Galante Joanne P Meder, AVP Jim Donovan, HLA. ASLA MEMORANDUM To: North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: February 20, 1992 Subject: Fisher Site Plan The purpose of this memorandum provide our analysis of the above noted application for site plan approval. In support of the application the applicant has submitted the following plans: "Survey of Property Prepared for Mary E. Fisher," dated September 23, 1991 and prepared by Charles Riley, Land Surveyor. "Topography Mary E. Fisher," dated December 20, 1991, last revised January 22, 1992 and prepared by Charles Riley, Land Surveyor. Based upon our discussion with the applicant's attorney, John Hughes, Jr. Esq., our review of the submitted plans and a site visit, it is our understanding that the applicant is requesting site plan approval to reconstruct an existing fire damaged structure to its original design and condition. This structure is located on the south side of Beekman Avenue, in the C-2, Highway Commercial district, of the Village of North Tarrytown. Site plan approval from the Planning Board is required under § 6229.A.(1) of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown (the Code). Additionally, this use and development of this site prior to its being damaged by fire was not in conformity with the requirements of Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code. The fire damage to this structure appears fairly extensive. Under § 62-24.C. of the Code, any "structure damaged by fire or other causes to an extent exceeding fifty percent (50%) or more of its theoretical full value...shall not be repaired or rebuilt except in conformity with the regulations of this ordinance." Consequently, if the applicant proposes to rebuild the structure to its former condition, several variances probably will be required. Based upon our initial review, we believe that the required variances include the following: \ �•*% FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development /Environment /Transportation o A use variance to re-establish the four apartments. The only types of residential units permitted in the C-2 district are one- and two-family homes. o A parking variance for failing to provide the requisite number of parking spaces. Section 6214.E. of the Code requires that one parking space per 200 square feet of retail area, one parking space per dwelling unit and one-half parking space per bedroom be provided. The applicant should provide information on the number of square feet of retail area and the number of bedrooms that will exist in the rebuilt structure so that an accurate variance application can be processed. Pending the submission of additional information, this concludes our comments at this time. Thomas Gissen, AICP Associate/Planning cc: Mayor Frank Rey William Regan James Margotta Robert Spencer Joe Gulino Louis Contadino 500\not2-010.tg. 2 �n P " ^ — 12. 2 — 3» 2 W E Hi 1 •=• : 5 «S F R C L_ £* R K H S S O C /7^/- #• r R . 0 SZ75-^7 RESOLUTION Adopted at the February 20, 1992 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board RESOLUTtON* SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A LIGHT MANUFACTURING KITCHEN CABINET ASSEMBLY USE. PROPOSED: CONVERSION OF AN fcxiSTINQ 8,800 SQUAREFOOT STRUCTURE FROM AN AUTOMOTIVE USE TO A LIGHT MANUFACTURING KITCHEN CABINET ASSEMBLY USE. OWNER: CAR-RIK, Inc. LOCATION: 358 NORTH BROADWAY TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 17. BLOCK 21, LOT 32 - 37 ZONING: C-l HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown haa reviewed an application for site plan approval pursuant to Article VIII of the Zoning Code of the Village of North Tarrytown for the conversion of an existing 8,800 square-foot structure from an automotive use to a light manufacturing kitchen cabinet assembly use, said structure being located at 358 North Broadway. • WHEREAS, as part of its review, the Planning Board haa reviewed numerous documents, statements and plans, including the following: 1* "Map of Property Prepared for Antonio Cabinetry Situate Village of No Tarrytown, Town of Mt. Pleasant, Westchester Co., New York,1* prepared by John J. MiUdoon and dated February 1, 1992. 2. "Site Plan" for Antonio Cabinetry, prepared by Contadino Architects and as last revised February 4, 1992. 3. "Site Section" for Antonio Cabinetry, prepared by Contadino Architect* and as last revised February 2, 1992. 4# Letter from Antonio Rodrigues, the applicant* to James T. Margotta, North Tarrytown Building inspector dated December 24, 1991 and promising to limit the number of employees on the site bo not more than five. 5. Letter from Steven L. Kroleski, attorney for the applicant, to the Village of North Tarrytown Zoning Board of Appeals, dated February 10, 199? and detailing certain aspects of the kitchen cabinet assembly operation (e.g. no use of pressurized sprayers, etc.) and providing the applicant's promise to apply for a new site plan approval if the specified aspects of the operation were to change. 6.. A short form Environmental Assessment Form (EAF)• WHEREAS, in the course of its review and pursuant to provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, the Planning Board has made the rollowing findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: ', 1. Received an application fee1of $ 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property and of the surrounding area; ' 3. Requested, received and reviewed a Sh6rt Form Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR). ; i l 2 �— 2 2 — S» 2 W E D 1 •£. : 5 © R R C: l_rtR K rt :=: :=; O C: R - 0 4 plin approval, subdivision approval or building permit that affects the remaining portion of the property^ as shown on the "Map of Property Prepared for Antonio Cabinetry Situate Village of No Tarrytown, Town of Mt»'pleasant, Westchester Co J, New York,w prepared by John J. Muldoon and dated February 1,j1992 and located immediately to the north'of the proposed kitchen cabinet manufacturing shop and associated parking area. 3. Revision of the above noted "Site jplan" to include the following note! "The continuing validity of this site plan and thA site's certificate of occupancy shall be conditioned upon an application for amended site plan' approval being filed wi£h, and approved by, the Planning Board ot the Village of North Tarrytown prior to the, granting of any site plan approval, subdivision approval or building permit that affects thi remaining portion of the property, as shown on the 'Map of Property Prepared for Antonio Cabinetr^ Situate Village of No Tarrytown, Town of Mt. Pleasant, Westchester Co., New York,' prepared by John J. Muldoon and dated February 1# 1992. The purpose of such amended site pian approval amplication shall be to improve the site's parking and circulation area and to interconnect said parking and circulation' area with the parking and circulation area of all lands located immediately to the south of the site's parking anp circulation area and shown on the plan entitled, 'Map of Property Prepared for Antonio Cabinetry Situate Village of No'Tarrytown, Town of Mt. Pleasant, Westchester Co., New York,< prepared by John J, Muldoon and dated February 1, 1992." 4. Pr(or to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the Applicant shall submit to the IVillage Building Inspector a mylar reproduction of the ejLte pla|n complete with the certification of a professional 'Architect and/or a professional Engineer attesting that tht property as developed conforms to the site plan as'approvedJ i If • ' 6. Ail elements of this approved site plan shall be completed to thd satisfaction of the Villag£ Building Inspector within a period of eighteen (18) months ifrom the date; of the issuance of j the building permit and prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The Planning Board may issue en extension of this time limit, or may mjodify any of the above conditions with respect thereto for good cauke. i 7. Th<> Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field inspection of the project after 'construction Of the facilities, upon notice of the Building Inspector, and before th<i issuance of a certificate of occubancy. The purpose of th: s final inspection is to review tpe development and to re< uire any modifications to1 parking, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details, Which dp not comply with the approved plan in the •interest •of j safety, convenience, aesthetics and the enjoyment and peace1 and quiet of adjacent neighbors. j * ' PLANNING BOARD «f \ VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN ! i i ! I By: | ; Date^ James Galgano, chairman Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board 500\not2-019.tfi •I1 �WED 1 €• : 5 T F R C L A R K A S S O C R -0 3 After review of said field conditions, public comments, recommendations and environmental assessment form as well as other matters noted above, the Planning Board has determined that the proposed action is ap Unlisted Action and hereby is$ues a "Negative Declaration^ determination of nonsignificance of environmental impict for this Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, the site has been visited by the Village's Planning Consultant and the Planning Board is thoroughly familiar with the site an<jl all aspects of the proposed* project; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has received all necessary variances from th4 Zoning Board of Appeals of the village of North Tarrytown to operate the proposed light manufacturing iise within the existing structure and site in the C-l district ot\ the Village of North Tarrytown; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised' public hearing was held at the Village Hall on February 20, 1992 r at which time all those wishing to be h^ard were given the opportunity to be heard and the public hearing was closed on that date;' and i WHEREAS, the Planning Board has requested, received and considered comments from the Village Planning Consultant, the Village[Engineering Consultant and Building Inspector about the proposed project; and WHEREAS, the Village Planning Consultant expressed some concern'that the existing parking and vehicular Circulation area was somewhat more restricted than is generally preferred; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and plans noted above be and hereby are granted conditional site plan approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or; as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of this site plan resolution and upon thi final mylar copy of the site plan drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with trie following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing* in the offices; of the Village Building Department for purposes df obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire twelve (12) months |from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not b^en completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and/or the Applicant has not obtained a building permitx 1. F_efis_ - The Applicants shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytownx l.\ An inspection fee for construction inspection of the proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage system, i sewage, lighting and other site plan elements for compliance with the approved site 61 an id accordance with the Village of North Tarrytown Zohing Code. thousand two hundred dollars i ($1,200) per parking space, whi^h results in a total ' recreation fee of nine thousand six hundred dollars ($9,600). | l.i 1 The Applicant shall submit payment of all application review fees as noted and required in Section 62-30(f) of the Village Zoning code, as approved by the Village Attorney. i . The applicant shall apply for amended site plan approval so as to revise his parking and circulation plan to the satisfaction of 'the Planning Board at the time of application for any site * i �J:. Approved to substance and form: Droved with with respect respect to Village Attorney Dated: 2_/ad /fa^ proved by the Planning Board irman or Acting Chairman man or Ac1 ated: i AD A / y Filed with Deputy Clerk eieik ui Beputy Clerk Dated: ^/ai/9^— DATE OF MEETING: J A fiJV Q& Y / (=> I * ? ? � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1992-02-20 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1992 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/eed5c618d9360e8325de612a19742788.pdf 4cb433d6a0b8c388a4b5a36be80ac674 PDF Text Text REGULAR MEETING NORTH TARRYTCWN, NEW MARCH 19th, 1992 $RK A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on trhe above date at Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: James Galgano, Chairman Roman Windas ABSENT: Ellen Tsangaris Richard Ayers Edward McCarthy Steve Salman Steve Baderian ALSO PRESENT: Robert Spencer, Village Attorney James Margotta, Building Inspector Thomas Gissen, Planning Consultant Joe Gulino, Engineering Consultant At 8:40 P.M. Chairman Galgano apologized to those present, and stated there would be no meeting due to a lack of a quorum. Respectfully submitted^ Irene Amato Acting Clerk �DUE TO A LACK OF QUORUM, NO PLANNING BOARD MEETING WAS HELD ON MARCH 19, 1992. James T. Margotta Building Inspector \ �Approved with respect/to substance and form: Village Attorney Dated: *f//*f/y v. Approved by the Planning Board tf/ryyeA- T^^t^^^t^H^J airman or A c t i n g C|^irman ated: */,+/fX F i l e d w i t h Deputy Clerk •Clork or .Deputy Clerk Dated: ^ 4 / 9 ^ DATE OF MEETING: f^broCLYU X° I I I ^-" � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1992-03-19 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1992 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/7bddca911ced2b1382ecf66ee624cdb6.pdf b12a911d711fdefc9f85b1d86d01b1ee PDF Text Text Planning Board Regular Meeting North Tarrytown, New York April 14, 1992 A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on April 14, 1992 at Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: James Galgano, Chairman Ellen Tsangaris Richard Ayers Roman Windas Steve Salman Edward McCarthy ABSENT: James Donohoe ALSO PRESENT: Ken Powell, Acting Village Attorney James Margotta, Building Inspector Thomas Gissen, Planning Consultant Robert Curti, Engineering Consultant Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8 P.M. 1. Levy Estate, Barnhart Avenue-Preliminary Hearing-Sub-Division of Property on west side of Barnhart Avenue. Mr. Ennis, representing the Levy Estate, outlined the proposed sub-division of property into six separate lots with six one-family residences. He stated that every house would require several variances. Mr. Gissen presented a memorandum outlining an analysis of the project. (Copy in official minutes). Mr. Curti presented a memorandum stating comments regarding water supply, sewage and stormwater runoff. (Copy in official minutes). After a discussion Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Mr. Salman, to refer the matter to the Zoning Board of Appeals for the consideration of any required variances. Unanimously carried. 2. Public Hearing-Donna Rutigliano-Site Plan Approval for 314 North Broadway, Section 17. Block 20. Lots 14. 15 & 16. Clerk read the notice of public hearing to hear and consider an application by Donna Rutiglan a/k/a Donna Rutigliano for site plan approval for use of Section 17, Block 20, Lots 14, 15 & 16 on the tax assessment map of the Village of North Tarrytown, as an auto service and repair facility. 1 �Chairman Galgano asked if there was anyone present who would like to address the Board. Mr. Gary Raniolo, representing the proposed purchaser of the property from the Village of North Tarrytown, stated it was the intention of the purchaser to continue the use of the property as a service and repair facility. The building has been used by the Village for many years to maintain and repair the trucks of the Water Department. He is asking that the Planning Board agree with the applicant's position and formally declare that the property and use of the ground floor for a commercial automobile repair shop be deemed to be the same use of the property as repair and maintenance of Village vehicles. If the Board agrees with the purchaser's position, no further approvals are necessary. He stated that all parking will be in the interior of the building. Ms. Tsangaris stated she disagrees, stating that public use of the property as a repair and maintenance shop is different from private use as a repair and maintenance shop. She also stated there would be difficulty in parking in front of the property, and felt that the Board should have more time to review the matter. Mr. Windas asked if the building footprint would be changed. Mr. Raniolo stated there would be no structural changes but a sign would be installed on the front of the building. He also stated that the use would be the same, only the ownership would change. Mr. Windas noted that the property is zoned highway commercial and the use would continue to conform to the Zoning Code. Mr. Gissen presented a memorandum outlining an analysis of the project. (Copy in official minutes). Mr. Curti presented a memorandum stating comments regarding water, sewage and oil/water separator. (Copy in official minutes). Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. Salman, that the Attorney for Donna Rutiglan submit a letter stating that no structural changes or site plan changes will be made. Based upon such assurances, no action need be taken by the Planning Board as the use will not change. Chairman Galgano polled the Board as follows: Ms. Tsangaris - No Mr. Ayers - Yes Mr. Windas - Yes Ms. McCarthy - Yes Mr Salman - Yes Chairman Galgano declared the motion carried. 2 �3. Phelps Memorial Hospital. North Broadway-Continued. Mr. John Hughes, representing Phelps Memorial Hospital, has been conferring with the Board of Trustees regarding the recreation fees to be levied by the Village. Mr. Curti presented a memorandum of comments on stormwater and existing sanitary sewers in Sleepy Hollow Manor (Copy in official minutes). Discussion followed regarding surcharging for sewage in Sleepy Hollow Manor and Philipse Manor. Mr. Curti stated that further investigation is necessary to solve the problem in this area. Mr. Salman stated he would like a written agreement that the flow from I.B.M. will be decreased in order to accommodate the increased flow of sewage from the proposed project. Mr. Hughes stated that the proposed resolution to be adopted by the Board would contain assurances that all requests made by the Consulting Engineers would be met. Mr. Gissen stated many of the questions of the Board members will be covered in the adoption of the Resolution. (Copy of draft resolution in official minutes). Mr. Hughes stated that the Board of Trustees is awaiting a recommendation of the Planning Board before making a decision on the recreation fees. Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers, that the resolution granting site plan approval, as presented by the village planners, be adopted with minor modifications, subject to payment of recreation fees in the amount of $248,000 or other compensation in lieu of money, as determined by the Board of Trustees. Unanimously carried. Discussion followed regarding the Phelps Memorial Hospital project. The members felt that the Board of Trustees should consider each application on a case by case basis. Mr. Hughes felt that the hospital project does not add to the burden of recreation and the Hospital should not be required to pay a fee of $1,200 per parking space. The Hospital was willing to make other donations in lieu of the fees. Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. Salman, that the Planning Board recommend to the Board of Trustees that the Board of Trustees negotiate with the hospital for services or property in lieu of money. Unanimously carried. 3 i �4. Bedford Park-Subdivision-Webber Avenue & Bedford Road. Continued. Mr. Chuck Pateman stated he has responded to a number of comments and requests of the Board. He has submitted a long form Environmental Assessment Form to the Board and responded to requests made by the Engineer and the Planner. Mr. Gissen responded to the Applicant's most recent submissions regarding Sketch Plan for Lots 8-15, Erosion Control Plan, Preliminary Subdivision Plan and Site Plan for Bedford Park, and letter from Mr. Pateman to the Planning Board of the Village dated April 1, 1992. (Copy of memo in official minutes.) Mr. Curti made several comments regarding the project with reference to potable water, sewage and stormwater runoff. He also stated that Mr. Pateman would install a new sanitary sewer on New Broadway in lieu of payment of $40,000. He stated the Village should request a Performance Bond from the developer to perform the sanitary sewer work on New Broadway. (Copy of memo in official minutes.) A discussion followed regarding the length, width and turnaround radius of the proposed cul-de-sac which would be at the end of Amos Street. Village subdivision regulations specify that cul-de-sacs should not be longer than six hundred (600) feet, not be less than fifty (50) feet wide and shall provide a turnaround at the end with a radius of not less than sixty (60) feet and tangent whenever possible to the right of the street. The proposed cul-desac would make Amos Street approximately 800 feet long, would be only forty (40) feet wide and would have a turnaround radius of only thirty five (35) feet. Mr. Pateman is requesting a waiver of those regulations. Mr. Patemen stated that the Fire Chief and a member of the Department of Public Works approve of the cul-de-sac's length and width and turnaround radius. Philip Zegarelli, President of the Briggsville Neighborhood and Association, stated the Association had met with Mr. Pateman, and discussed various items with him. The Association was against shared driveways, and against the cul-de-sac as requested by Mr. Pateman. He stated that the Association would like the number of units to be built to be less than 15 houses. The Association was interested in keeping the neighborhood as it is and looks to the Planning Board to address the matter and asks for a solution. Mr. Zegarelli stated that many children use Amos Street as a play street, neighbors use each other's driveways to turn around and felt that the cul-de-sac should be as wide as Amos Street. He asked the Board to make the project conform to the neighborhood. 4 �Arthur Ceconi, Amos Street, stated that Amos Street is used as a playground for the neighborhood children, and felt that the culde-sac should be as wide as Amos Street. John Cappello, 51*s New Broadway, stated he was interested in the replacement of the sewer line on New Broadway because of the sewage and storm water overflow. Mr. Pateman stated that the project would conform to all Zoning Regulations, and stated that the original application required the builder of the condos to make a deposit of $75,000 to replace the sewer line on Pine Street and New Broadway. He stated he has agreed to replace the sewer line on New Broadway and Pine Street. He stated that the problem with the sewers is due to roots of trees growing into the pipes causing the pipes to crack. Chairman Galgano stated that the project meets the Zoning requirements, and stated we can't make the applicant downsize the project and make the lots bigger. We can recommend, but we can't make him make the lots bigger. Mr. Zegarelli stated they would like the Board to review the number of houses to be built. Mr. Pateman stated he was asking for conditional preliminary approval of the subdivision plat and stated it was not financially feasible to reduce the size of the project. He felt that the area is not congested. Mr. Gabriel Hayes, Sr., Amos Street, stated he was against condos being built on the property, but is not against the property being developed. Mr. Zegarelli asked that the Planning Board visit the site before making a decision. Mr. Pateman stated he must have a decision as soon as possible or he will lose his financing. Mr. Windas stated that the Board wants the area to be developed but also wants the neighbors to be satisfied. He also suggested that a performance bond be filed to insure that the project will be completed. Mr. Windas moved, that the request be continued to the next meeting, after a physical examination of the property, and a special meeting called, if necessary. There was no second. Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris, to reject the preliminary subdivision. 5 �Chairman Galgano polled the Board as follows: Ms. Tsangaris - yes Mr. Ayers - no Mr. Salman - yes Mr. McCarthy - no Mr. Windas - no Chairman Galgano declared the motion rejected. Mr. Windas stated the following: 1. We want something to happen in that neighborhood. 2. We need additional revenues-more single family residences. 3. Condos available. aren't moving-single family houses are not 4. Curb cuts have to be approved by the county and state on Webber Avenue and Bedford Road. 5. Number of units-should be reduced to lessen the impact on the area. Mr. Pateman stated if his plan is rejected he will build condos. A discussion followed and Mr. Ayers moved, seconded by Mr. Windas, that preliminary approval of the sub-division plat as presented be granted, subject to conditions to be prepared by the Village planner based upon the public hearing and Board discussion. Chairman Galgano polled the Board as follows: Ms. Tsangaris - No Mr. Salman - No Mr. Ayers - Yes Mr. Windas - Yes Mr. McCarthy - Yes Discussion followed concerning the vote. The statement was made that for a vote to pass, 4 votes must be voted yes. Thereupon, Chairman Galgano voted "yes" and declared the motion carried. Discussion followed regarding the Chairman voting. Ms. Tsangaris protested the vote stating the chairman should not vote unless there is a "tie". Attorney Powell stated the Chairman could vote, whether or not there is a tie. 6 �5. Marv Fisher. Beekman Avenue-Continued. Mr. John Hughes, representing Mrs. Fisher, stated that the property had been more than fifty percent damaged in the fire, the Zoning Board has given variances as requested and he was asking the Planning Board for Site Plan Approval. Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy, that a Public Hearing be held at the next meeting to consider an application by Mary Fisher for site plan approval for the reconstruction of premises at 78 Beekman Avenue. Unanimously carried. MJNUTEg Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. Salman, that the minutes of the meetings held on February 20, 1992 and March 19, 1992 be approved as presented. Unanimously carried. A discussion followed regarding items to be put on the agenda for each meeting. Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. Windas, that information must be received at Village Hall at least two weeks before the meeting in order to be placed on the agenda. Unanimously carried. There being no further business to come before the meeting, Ms. Tsangaris moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers, that the same be duly adjourned. Unanimously carried. Respectfully submitted, Irene Amato Acting Clerk 7 �C —f^U- RESOLUTION Adopted at the April 14, 1992 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board RESOLUTION: SITE PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE EXISTING PHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CENTER1S REGIONAL MEDICAL FACILITY. PROPOSED; ONE MEDICAL • •••••««»• ....... . ,,»f •»••» OFFICE BUILDING OF XP'P'RO'XXlftKTt^Xri S I X T Y - T W O TftOV3SWSTi ^ , 6 2 , 0 0 0 ^ SQUARE FEET AND ASSOCIATED PARKING AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS. OWNER: PHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CENTER LOCATION: 701 NORTH BROADWAY TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION _11# BLOCK _1_, LOT 3A_ ZONING: H - HOSPITAL , WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for site plan approval pursuant to Article VIII of the Zoning Code of the Village of North Tarrytown for the development of a medical office building of approximately sixty-two thousand (62,000) square feet and associated parking and infrastructure improvements to be located on the existing sixty-six (66) acre Phelps Memorial Hospital Center site at 701 North Broadway. WHEREAS, as part of its review, the Planning Board has reviewed numerous documents, statements and plans, including the following: 1. An aerial photograph of the site and surrounding neighborhood, dated spring 1990, photographed by Keystone Aerial Surveys Inc. of Philadelphia, PA, prepared for the Westchester County Department of Planning and identified as photograph "F-27." 2. "Topographic Survey Prepared for Phelps Memorial Hospital Situated in the Village of North Tarrytown, Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester County, New York," prepared by Charles H. Sells, Inc., survey completed on May 16, 1991 and map prepared May 20, 1991. 3. "Topographic Survey Phelps Memorial Hospital Village of North Tarrytown, Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester County, New York," prepared by Charles H. Sells, Inc., survey completed on May 16, 1991 and map dated May 20, 1991 and last revised June 19, 1991. 4. "Existing Hospital Site Plan," prepared by Mediplex Medical Building Corporation, dated February 21, 1991 and last revised November 6, 1991. ' - i 5. "Campus Site Plan," prepared by Mediplex Medical Building Corporation, dated May 16, 1991 and last revised November 6, 1991. 6. An elevation plan, prepared by Mediplex Medical Building Corporation, dated May 16,'1991 and last revised October 11, 1991. 7. "Existing Site," prepared toy Charles H. Sells, inc., dated October 1991. 8. "Site Improvement Plan," prepared by Charles H. Sells, Inc., dated October 1991. l �9. A table identifying the site's proposed parking relative to the parking requirements identified in Section 62-14 of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown. 10. A full (long form) Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), prepared by Victoria Miller, Vice President of Planning and Operations for Phelps Memorial Hospital, and dated October 10, 1991. WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead Agency pursuant to provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted to the following activities: 1. Received an application fee of $ 250 ;00. 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property and of the surrounding area; ! 3. 4. Acting as Lead Agency, requested, received and reviewed a Long Form Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR. As Lead Agency for site plan review in the Village of North Tarrytown, the Planning Board, after review of said field conditions, public comments, recommendations and environmental assessment form as well as other matters noted above, has determined that the proposed action is a Type I Action and hereby issues a "Negative Declaration" determination of nonsignificance of environmental impact for this Type I Action; and « WHEREAS, the site has been visited by the Village's Planning and Engineering Consultants and the Planning Board is thoroughly familiar with the site and all aspects of the proposed project; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held at the Village Hall on Nov- -1 , 1991 and continued through March 19, 1992, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard and the public hearing was closed on that date; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has requested, received and considered comments from the Village Planning Consultants, the Village Engineering Consultants and Building Inspector about the proposed project; and WHEREAS, the applicant has not yet submitted to the Village Engineering consultant the necessary storm drainage runoff and sanitary sewage flow plans and calculations so as to demonstrate a satisfactory post-build condition, the applicant has agreed to provide said plans and calculations, inclusive of any off-site improvements that may be necessary, to the satisfaction of the Village Engineering Consultant; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and plans noted above be and hereby1 are granted conditional site plan approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or, as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of this site plan resolution and upon the final mylar copy of the cite plan drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the offices of the Village Building Department for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire twelve (12) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the I • , �satisfaction of the Planning Board and/or the Applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1. Fees - The Applicants shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 1.1 An inspection fee for construction inspection of the proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage system, sewage, lighting and other site plan elements for compliance with the approved site plan in accordance with the Village of North Tarrytown Zoning Code. 1.2 A recreation fee of one .thousand two hundred dollars ($1,200) per parking space, which results in a total recreation fee of two hundred forty-eight thousand four hundred dollars ($248,400), or other compensation in lieu of money, or some combination of the above, subject to the approval of the Village Board of Trustees. 1.3 The Applicant shall submit payment of all application review fees as noted and required in Section 62-30(f) of the Village Zoning Code, as approved by the Village Attorney. 2. Provision of all necessary plans and calculations necessary to demonstrate satisfactory post-build storm water runoff and sanitary sewage flow to the satisfaction of the Village Engineering Consultant and all other applicable approving authorities. i 3. Revision of the above noted plans, to the satisfaction of the Planning Consultant, to demonstrate the following: t i , ;i ! 3.1 All proposed grading,' ^whether said grading is to be accomplished by grading of soils, rock cuts or retaining walls, shall be maintained exclusively on the subject site. 3.2 Protection of all those trees identified as "Existing Trees to Remain" on . the Campus Site Plan through modifications to the parking layout, grading plans and/or provision of other mitigative measures, to the satisfaction of the Planning Consultant. 3.3 The addition of pavement markings and traffic circulation signage to the Campus Site Plan, to the satisfaction of the Planning Consultant. 3.4 Minor modifications'and/or clarification of the parking calculations to the satisfaction of the Planning Consultant. • 5. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the Applicants shall submit the Village Building Inspector a mylar reproduction of the site plan complete with a certification of a professional Architect and/or a professional Engineer attesting to the construction of the site plan and its improvements as shown thereon. 6. All elements of this approved site plan shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Village Building Inspector within a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the issuance of the building permit and prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The Planning Board may issue an extension of this time limit, dr may modify any of the above conditions with respect thereto for good cause. 7. The Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field inspection of the project 'after construction of the facilities, upon notice of the Building Inspector, and before 3 �/ the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to parking, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details, which do not comply with the approved plan in the interest of safety, convenience, aesthetics and the enjoyment and peace and quite of adjacent neighbors. PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN J6m'es Galgano, Chairman^/ ff illage of North Tarrytown Planning Board 500\not2-012.tg / �yaAt-r PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN RESOLUTION: PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PROPOSED ACTION: SUBDIVISION OF UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY INTO FIFTEEN (15) LOTS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. OWNER: NORTH TARRYTOWN ASSOCIATES LOCATION: SOUTH OF BEDFORD ROAD, NORTH OF WEBBER AVENUE AND EAST OF AMOS STREET. TAX MAP NUMBER: SECTION 17, BLOCK 7, LOTS 2A-1, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. ZONING: R-3, RESIDENTIAL. WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for subdivision approval (the Application) pursuant to the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown, Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown and other requirements of the Village Code considered pertinent to the Application, which application is to subdivide property identified on the tax maps of the Village of North Tarrytown as Section 17, Block 7, Lots 2A-1, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 6, 7 and 8 into fifteen (15) lots for single family residential development; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted the following materials in support of his application: o Erosion Control Plan. Preliminary Subdivision and Site Plan Known as Bedford Park, prepared by Cronin & Associates P.E., P.C. and dated March 27, 1992. o Sketch Plan Prepared for Lots 8-15 of Bedford Park. Sheet 1/2, prepared by Cronin & Associates and dated February 25, 1992. o Sketch Plan Prepared for Lots 8-15 of Bedford Park. Sheet 2/2, prepared by Cronin & Associates and dated March 19, 1992. o Subdivision application, prepared by Charles M. Pateman, III. o Letter from Kenneth N. Karpel to the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown and dated February 5, 1992. o Full Environmental Assessment Form, prepared by Charles M. Pateman, III. o Letter from Charles M. Pateman, III to the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytowi, dated April l, 1992. o Letter from Charles M. Pateman, III to the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown, dated April 9, 1992. o Letter from Joseph R. Potenza, Deputy Commissioner, Westchester County Planning Board to the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown, dated March 25, 1992. WHEREAS, in the course of its review pursuant to the provisions of Article VIII of the Environmental Conservation Law, the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: �1. Caused field inspections to be made of the property under review and surrounding areas. 2. Reviewed said application materials. 3. Held a public hearing on said application on April 16, 1992, at which time the Applicant, Planning Board, it's consultants and members of the public were given an opportunity to be heard. 4. Requested, received and reviewed a Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR. 5. After review of said field conditions, recommendations and environmental assessment form as well as other matters noted above, has determined that the proposed action is an unlisted type and hereby issues a "negative declaration" determination of non-significance and environmental impact for this unlisted action; and WHEREAS, at the April 16, 1992 Public Hearing of the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown, the Applicant and the Planning Board agreed that the use of shared driveways was not appropriate for this subdivision; and WHEREAS, in his letter of April 1, 1992 to the Planning Board, the Applicant requested that Preliminary Subdivision conditioned upon all necessary approvals being Approval be granted toy the appropriate New York State and Westchester County approval authorities with regards to each of the four (4) driveways on Bedford Road and the four (4) driveways on Webber Avenue maintaining adequate sight distance and all other requirements for the required curb cuts; and WHEREAS, the Application as proposed provides for an extension to Amos Street with a right-of-way with a width of forty feet, a cul-de-sac with length of approximately seven hundred (700+) feet and a cul-de-sac radius of thirty-five (35) feet; and WHEREAS, the §§ 12.B.(2)(a)(3a) and 12.B.(6)(a), respectively, of the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown require that a local street maintain a right-of-way width of fifty (50) feet and that a cul-de-sac maintain length of not more than six hundred (600) feet and a radius of sixty (60) feet; and JJW^ ^' WHEREAS, § 13.B. of the Subdivision Regulations of the village of North Tarrytown permits the Planning Board to modify the above noted standards when the Planning Board determines that such a modification would be in the public interest or will avoid the .imposition of unnecessary individual hardship; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board thereafter received a letter dated April 27, 1992 from Philip Zegarelli, 35 Amos Street, raising certain objections and concerns about the project; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said application for preliminary subdivision approval, as shown on the above noted plans, be and hereby are granted preliminary subdivision approval by a vote of the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown with four members voting in favor of the application and two members voting against the application, provided, that this approval shall expire within one hundred eighty (180) days from the date of this resolution if the following conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board: 1. Confirmation by the Building Inspector of the Village of North Tarrytown that the lots shown on the above noted plans conform with all applicable lot width and frontage requirements for the R-3 District of the Village of North Tarrytown, as specified in Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown. �I v i 70 ^* L »/UA 2. The Applicant shall obtain from the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board final subdivision plan approval and site plan approval conforming with all requirements of this resolution, the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown, Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown, all other applicable laws and regulations and all requirements of the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown. 3. The Applicant shall provide a planting plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and said planting plan shall be incorporated into the Applicant's final subdivision and site plan applications. 4. The granting of a tree removal permit, inclusive of all required bonding and mitigation measures, by the Village Tree Commission of the Village of North Tarrytown, as per Chapter 52A, Tree Conservation, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown. 5. The underground placement of all required utilities, including, but not limited to water, sewer, gas and electric service. 6. All necessary approvals being granted by the appropriate New York State and Westchester County approval authorities with regards to each of the four (4) driveways proposed for Bedford Road and each of the four (4) driveways proposed for Webber Avenue prior to the granting of final subdivision approval and a demonstration to the satisfaction of the Planning Board that each of the proposed driveways will maintain adequate sight distance and grades. 7. Provision by the Applicant of all bonding of improvements determined to be necessary by the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown on advice of the Village Engineering Consultant and the Building Inspector. 8. Provision of driveway turnaround areas within the confines of each lot, to the satisfaction of the Planning Board. 9. The modification of the subdivision regulations for cul-de-sac length, width and turnaround radius in accordance with the preliminary subdivision plan is in the public interest or avoids the imposition of unnecessary individual hardship. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that prior to the granting of a building permit, the Applicant shall provide seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) to be used for improvements to the Village's sanitary sewerage system below the site so as to mitigate the impacts of the proposal upon the system, or, in lieu of the above monies, the Applicant may perform improvements to said sewerage system, to the satisfaction of the Village Engineering Consultant. oC Wb ifflXnW PLANNING BOARD #/U»* ^ V I L L A G E 0 F NORTH TARRYTOWN pfpv#*L By James Galgano, Chairman tA1T py- 500\not1-021.tg Date � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1992-04-14 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1992 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/aa540b5d6ff44771ffb672da53dc18c5.pdf 6df36231e21a3105b88f8a141f2dabec PDF Text Text Planning Board Regular Meeting North Tarrytown, New York May 21, 1992 A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on May 21st, 1992 at 8:00 P.M. at Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: James Galgano, Chairman Ellen Tsangaris Richard Ayers Roman Windas Steve Salman James Donovan Edward McCarthy ALSO PRESENT: Robert Spencer, Village Attorney James Margotta, Building Inspector Thomas Gissen, Planning Consultant Joseph Gulino, Engineering Consultant Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8 P.M. 1. David Rockeffer-Subdivision-Final Site Plan Approval. Chairman Galgano reported that an easement will be provided by the applicant, as required by the Planning Board. The draft of the easement will be provided to the Village Attorney for review. A discussion followed regarding the final site plan. The Board determined that the proposed action is a Type II action under SEQRA and will have minimal adverse impact on the environment. Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy, that the Board approve final site plan for subdivision as requested by David Rockefeller. Unanimously carried. 2. Luberaer Estate-143 Valley Street-Subdivision. Thomas McKenna, Attorney representing the Luberger Estate, informed the Board that the property was listed as one lot with two buildings. The applicant is seeking to subdivide the property into two lots. At present, the buildings are non-conforming. There is no site plan approval requested. The estate is in contract to sell both buildings. A survey of the property will be provided to the Board. Attorney for Peter Gasperini, the proposed purchaser of the �former liquor store, stated that Mr. Gasperini would like permission to open a retail store for plumbing fixtures and plumbing supplies. He would like a guarantee that he will be able to use the building as a commercial establishment. No such guarantee was given by the Planning Board. The Board will review the site plan application when it is properly submitted. Gary Raniolo, representing Joseph Tanzillo, a tenant at 143 Valley Street, stated Mr. Tanzillo has signed a contract to purchase the three family residence located on the site and wanted assurances that no Planning Board review is required. Mr. Spencer advised that if no change is made to the structure, no site plan review will be required. Mr. McKenna stated that the Luberger Estate is only requesting a subdivision of the parcel, and the use of the parcel will be determined by the new owners. Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Mr. Windas, that the matter be referred to the Zoning Board for its review. Carried unanimously. 3. Anthony Marmo-Gordon Avenue-Preliminary Site Plan Approval. Mr. John Hughes, representing Mr. Marmo, submitted a survey for the Board to review. After a discussion, Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy, that the matter be referred to the Zoning Board for its review. Carried unanimously. The Board raised the concern about the grant to the Village by the applicant of an easement for a sewer line. 4. Mary Fisher-78 Beekman Avenue-Public Hearing-Site Plan Approval. The Clerk read the public notice to hear and consider an application by Mary Fisher for site plan approval for the reconstruction of premises at 78 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, (Section 16, Block 6, Lot 12 on the tax assessment map of the Village of North Tarrytown). Chairman Galgano asked if there was anyone present who would like to address the Board on the matter. Mr. John Hughes, representing Mary Fisher, stated that the engineer for the village had determined that the building was more than fifty (50%) destroyed during the fire. Mrs. Fisher has been a resident of the village for over forty years and wishes to reconstruct the building to its original state. Mr. Gissen stated his comments were made in a memo dated April 13, 1992 and his only concern was that the open space at the rear 2 IMM I �of the building be used by the residents for recreation. The Building Inspector stated that the matter has been before the Zoning Board and the required variances have been granted. The building will be a three family residence with a retail store on the first floor. The Board determined that the proposed action is a Type II action under SEQRA and will have minimal adverse impact on the environment. Mr. Donovan moved, seconded by Mr. Salman, that the Board grant site plan approval as requested by Mrs. Fisher. Unanimously carried. 5. North Tarrytown Realty Associates-Bedford Road Extension of Preliminary Site Plan Approval. The Clerk read the public notice to hear and consider an application by North Tarrytown Associates for a one-year extension of preliminary site plan approval for premises located adjacent to Webber Avenue, Amos Street and Bedford Road (Section 17, Block 7, Lot 7A on the tax assessment map of the Village of North Tarrytown). The Chairman noted that when the Board granted the most recent extension to North Tarrytown Associates in 1991, the Board specifically requested that North Tarrytown Associates notify the Board of its plans for the property at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration date. North Tarrytown Associates did not comply with this condition; the applicant requested the extension only two (2) months prior to the scheduled expiration date. Mr. Spencer stated that the Board should hold a public hearing on the requested extension, in view of the fact that almost four years have expired since the applicant was granted preliminary site plan approval. Mr. Kenneth Karpel, representing North Tarrytown Realty Associates, stated that the preliminary site plan is the same plan that was approved previously by the Board. The Board has in the past received many timely requests for extension of the preliminary site plan approval, and although this request is short of the required ninety days, it would be an imposition if the Board where not to grant the extension. Ms. Tsangaris stated that this is a different Board and felt the Board should look at the project and review the project and the site at this time. Mr. Philip Zegarelli, Amos Street, stated that a petition was submitted in 1987 by the Briggsville Association stating the 3 �neighbors were against the construction of condos on the site. He stated the Association was against the grant of any extension of the preliminary site-plan approval. He stated that Mr. Pateman wants permission to build fifteen houses on the same site. After the last meeting of the Planning Board, Mr. Karpel had delivered a letter to the Village Hall requesting an extension. Mr. Gabriel Hayes, Amos Street, stated he was against the building of condos on the site. There are two condos in the village and they are not selling. Ms. Viola Andrycich, Webber Avenue, state that several years ago a Webber Avenue resident wanted to build condos on the site and his request was denied. Chairman Galgano stated that the request was denied as the resident's plans did not meet the zoning requirements. Mr. Peter Kringas, Webber Avenue, stated he had asked permission to build two five family attached units on another site and his request was denied. He now has permission to build two two-family units. The applicant should not be granted an extension and he feels a developer should construct single family houses to conform to the neighborhood. Mr. Salman stated the Board has to consider the impact that the project would have on the neighborhood. He stated he was not in favor of condos, and was not in favor of granting the extension. Mr. Donovan stated he had inspected the area and was not in favor of condos, and felt that condos would not fit in the neighborhood. Mr. Karpel stated when the applicant filed preliminary site plans, it deposited $25,000 with the Village, and asked if it would be entitled to a refund if the preliminary site plan was not extended. He also stated that his tax assessment was tripled based on the approved preliminary site plan. Mr. Spencer directed the applicant to appear before the Board of Assessors for real estate tax relief. There being no further comments, Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris, that the public hearing be closed. Carried unanimously. Discussion followed regarding the project not being started or completed. Mr. Karpel stated the current extension expires on June 14, 1992. 4 �Mr. Donovan stated he has been sifting through all the information on the matter and feels that the Board should make a decision tonight. He felt that Mr. Karpel should have abided by the ninety day requirement. Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris, to deny the extension as requested. Unanimously carried. 6. North Tarrytown Realty Associates-Bedford park-Continuation of Public Hearing regarding subdivision approval for construction of 15 homes. Mr. Salman stated he had just received a packet with information regarding the matter and felt he could not render a proper decision without reviewing the contents. Mr. Pateman stated he had received a request for information only two days ago and that was the reason for the packet being presented tonight. A discussion followed regarding Robert's Rules of Order pertaining to voting held at the last meeting of the Board. Mr. Salman stated he made a motion, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris, that was not in the minutes of the meeting. Mr. Spencer stated that he would review the minutes with Ken Powell, the attorney from his office who covered the meeting, and prepare corrected minutes. Chairman Galgano read the draft resolution for preliminary subdivision approval as prepared by village planner (copy of draft in official minutes). Mr. Salman questioned the width of the road and stated the road should be fifty feet wide to correspond with the existing Amos Street. He also questioned if all the lots were to have a fifty foot frontage. Mr. Richard Blancato, Attorney for Mr. Pateman, stated that the Building Inspector has determined that the lots comply with the Zoning Code, and stated that the Planning Board cannot disagree with the Building Inspector. Mr. Zegarelli read from the Subdivision Regulations - Lots(Article V, Section 12B 9 (c)) that each lot must front on an approved street at least fifty in width, and claimed that this provision requires a lot to be fifty feet wide at the curb. Chairman Galgano stated that the Building Inspector has determined that the lots comply with the Zoning Code and the Board chose at the meeting on April 14 to waive the required width of the street and the radius of the cul-de-sac. 5 �Carol Morrow, Amos Street, stated she was opposed to the lots being less tha\n 50 foot frontage. She stated that the Board is here to protect: the residents and urged that the Board stick to the requirement of: fifty foot frontage. Chairman calgano stated that the matter was a question for the Building Inspector and the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Zegarelli stated that in granting the request the Board should look at the surrounding area to see if the project fits in the area. 1 ^ the cul-de-sac is built as planned it will be difficult for cars, trucks, snow plows and other vehicles to turn around. They \tjill have to back out, which is the problem they now have on Amos Street. Mr. Salma*] stated he has seen letters signed by the Fire Chief and the Highway Foreman, and would like to know who requested them to sign the letters approving the subdivision. Chairman oalgano stated that Mr. Pateman had spoken to the Fire Chief and the Highway Foreman, who had inspected the site, and they signed th^ letter as they were in agreement. Mr. Salman stated he did not think that Mr. Pateman had the right to ask Village employees to go up to the site and to sign the letter. Mr. Zegar*elli stated the letters from the Fire Chief and Highway Forman were drafted by Mr. Pateman on his stationery but feels the letter should be on Village stationary. Mr. Blancsato asked that the Board grant final subdivision approval. Mrs. Arthur Ceconi stated that the motions made and passed at the last meeting were confusing to everyone and felt that the actions taken at the meeting should be declared null and void. Mr. Gabriel Hayes stated he has lived on Amos Street since 1954, his property has a 150 foot frontage, and he would like to see single family houses built on the property. He stated that the Board has a responsibility to the Village and to the neighborhood. He stated he v^s against the building of condos. Mrs. Anne*. DeCarlo stated she has been a resident of Amos Street since 1926, she is a senior citizen and does not want the Board to mess vjp the area. She loves her home and does not want a lot of trash thrown in there. Mrs. Ann j>etri, Sleepy Hollow Road, stated she is a life long resident of t h ^ area and is not against development but would like the Board to take a closer look at what the developer has planned 6 �for the area. She feels the project as planned would downgrade the area. Chairman Galgano asked Mr. Gissen to do an analysis of the project if the cul-de-sac was fifty feet wide instead of thirtyfive feet. How many parcels would be lost and how many houses could be built? Mr. Donovan asked for the analysis to show how many units would be built if all Subdivision Regulations were observed, including the cul-de-sac. Mr. Zegarelli stated that the preliminary subdivision resolution was not available at the last meeting. He also stated that no one from the neighborhood association had notice of what items were coming up before the Board. Mr. Spencer stated that the preliminary subdivision resolution previously read by the Chairman this evening reflects what happened at the last meeting. Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris, to table the adoption of the preliminary subdivision resolution. Carried unanimously. Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris, that the Board adjourn to Executive Session for consultation with the Village Attorney. Carried Unanimously. The Board then went into executive session with Counsel. After the Board returned from Executive Session, without taking any action, Mr. Pateman stated he feels that the Board made a decision at the last meeting and feels that some consideration should be made for the developer. He has invested a lot of money, but is still willing to make changes so that everyone is satisfied. Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. Windas, that the Board recall and reconsider its preliminary subdivision approval. Chairman Galgano polled the Board as follows: Ms. Tsangaris - yes Mr. Salman - yes Mr. Donovan - yes Mr. Ayers - abstain Mr. Windas - yes Mr. McCarthy - yes Chairman Galgano declared the motion carried. Hence, there is no preliminary subdivision approval of the project. iMriti �Mrs. Tsangaris moved, seconded by Mr. Salman, to defer any further action on the matter until the study requested of the Planning Consultant to determine how many lots would be lost if the subdivision regulations are followed, as written, is completed. Chairman Galgano polled the Board as follows: Ms. Tsangaris - yes Mr. Salman - yes Mr. Donovan - yes Mr. Ayers - abstain Mr. Windas - yes Mr. McCarthy - yes Chairman Galgano declared the motion carried. Mr. Blancato stated that their Engineer had made a quick calculation and if the width of the cul-de-sac is increased to fifty feet and the radius of the cul-de-sac is increased to meet the Subdivision Regulations, there will be a loss of at least two lots and perhaps as many as four. Mr. Pateman feels he needs the fifteen lots to make the project financially feasible, and if he does not get 15 lots he will not be able to go forward. Mr. Spencer noted that the Board will be deemed to have approved the preliminary subdivision unless it acts within 60 days of submission of the preliminary subdivision application. Mr. Blancato refused to waive the 60-day period. Ms. Tsangaris then moved, seconded by Mr. Salman, to recall and reconsider the motion on defer any further action on the matter and to deny preliminary subdivision approval as requested. Chairman Galgano polled the Board as follows: Ms. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Tsangaris Salman Donovan Ayers Windas McCarthy - yes yes yes abstain yes yes Chairman Galgano declared the motion carried. MINUTES After a discussion it was decided that the minutes be reviewed by the Attorney and presented at the next meeting for approval Mr. Margotta stated that Mr. Pateman will have to deposit $75,000 for the sewer improvements before he can begin the condos. He also stated that Mr. Pateman has two weeks in which to begin 8 �construction on the condos. Discussion followed regarding the building of condos on the site. Mr. Gulino was instructed to see what permits have been issued regarding driveways on Bedford Road, which is a State highway. Mr. Zegarelli would also like the name of the D.O.T. person in charge of issuing permits for driveways entering on Bedford Road. Chairman Galgano stated that the next meeting will be held on June 18th, 1992. Discussion followed regarding information being presented to the Board before the public hearings. It was again decided that material must be presented to the Village and then forwarded to the Planning Board, at least two weeks in advance of meetings. There being no further business to come before the meeting, Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers, that the same be duly adjourned. Unanimously carried. Respectfully submitted, Irene Amato Acting Clerk 9 �Appr/ovejjl w i t h / r e s p e c t t o s u b s t a n c e and form: Village Attorney D a t e d : </,»* Approved by the Planning Board rrman or Acting £nairman :ed: Filed with Village Clerk C l m rk k or Deputy Clerk Dated: £,/2<f/? April 14, 1992 Date of Meeting � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1992-05-21 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1992 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/d78ef010c7dbc6cbf450a85a3abf4f3d.pdf 50caed1a5c5eba9e121fc16ad893098c PDF Text Text Planning Board Regular Meeting North Tarrytown, New York June 18, 1992 FINAL A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on Thursday, June 18, 1992 at 8:00 PM in Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. Present: James Galgano, Chairman Edward McCarthy Ray Windas Steve Salman Also Present: Absent: James Margotta, Building Inspector Robert W. Spencer, Village Attorney Joseph Gulino, Charles Manganaro Thomas Gisson, Frederick P. Clark Associates Ellen Tsangaris James Donovan Richard Ayres IN THE MATTER OF JEAN ORR, 174 KELBOURNE AVENUE. NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK. This matter was adjourned until July 16, 1992 pending adoption by the Board of Trustees of the revised site plan law. IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES M. PATEMAN - BEDFORD PARK ASSOCIATES. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK. Mr. Pateman stated that this matter is a brand new application for preliminary subdivision approval. The developer presented two proposed subdivision plans: one for a 15-lot subdivision and the other for a 14-lot subdivision. Mr. Pateman stated that he is looking for direction from the Planning Board for the project. If the Board wants to have a cul-de-sac and street width as required by the subdivision regulations, he is willing to comply with those requirements. Mr. Galgano asked when it was appropriate to use a cul-de-sac. Mr. Gissen stated that good planning normally requires the use of a cul-de-sac when there is a public dead end street, such as Amos Street. Discussion then ensued concerning the proposed cul-de-sac with a dedicated radius of 50 feet, and a paved radius of 42 feet. The subdivision regulations provide for a turnaround at the end of the cul-de-sac with a radius of not less than 60 feet. The question was raised whether vehicles such as a fire truck, a snow 1 �plow, a garbage truck or an ambulance could turn around in a culde-sac with a 42 foot paved radius and not have to back out Amos Street. Mr. Gissen noted that a standard size UPS truck could turn around in a cul-de-sac with a 42 foot radius. He did not know if a fire truck or a garbage truck could do so. Mr. Salman asked if curb cut approvals on Bedford Road or Weber Avenue had been obtained yet. Mr. Pateman stated that curb cuts on Bedford Road had to be approved by the New York State Department of Transportation, that no such approvals had been issued yet, and that he could not obtain building permits and start construction until he had received curb cut permits from DOT for Bedford Road. Weber Avenue is County road. Mr. Salman then raised the issue of parking in the cul-de-sac, and asked if adequate off-street parking would be provided. Mr. Pateman stated that the driveway area for each house on Amos Street could be enlarged to provide parking for two cars on site. Mr. Spencer noted that the Board will have to decide the application for preliminary subdivision approval at the next meeting on July 16. He noted that the subdivision regulations provide that the Board may require the developer to set aside and dedicate to the Village up to 10 % of the area of the proposed subdivision for parks, playgrounds or other recreational purposes. Mr. Spencer further stated for the record that the approval for the condominium project on the site had expired. Mr. McCarthy made a motion to set a Public Hearing for July 16, 1992 seconded by Mr. Salman. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Salman made a motion to approve the minutes of April 14th and May 21st, 1992, seconded by Mr. Windas. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. McCarthy made a motion to hear public comments seconded by Mr. Salman. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Zegarelli stated that he and the residents of Briggsville are just looking for safety. The residents would accept a 13-lot subdivision. Some residents were not against the project but did have concerns. Mr. Poli stated that it is a good idea to have new housing built because it will provide tax revenue for the Village. Mr. Kringas stated that the Village should be in favor of the development. 2 �Mr. McCarthy made a motion to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Mr.Windas. Motion carried unanimously. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:30 PM. ictfully submittec Christine A. YurkoVlc Recording Secreta] 3 �t Approyed J/ith respect to substance and form: / Village Attorney Dated: t/^ Approved by the Planning Board A^tMd d/&S!L„ ited: Filed with Village Clerk -Qjrei-k or Deputy Clerk Dated: L/^^Q^ May 21, 1992 Date of Meeting � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1992-06-18 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1992 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/fe0de494a58de9b53ab8fc55b941ea60.pdf ff362da1da8de3f99cf39a6f173cd2d3 PDF Text Text Planning Board Regular Meeting North Tarrytown, New York July 16, 1992 • FINAL A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on Thursday, July 16, 1992 at 8:00 PM in Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. Present: James Galgano, Chairman Edward McCarthy Ray Windas Steve Salman Richard Ayers Also Present: Absent: ^B ^^ 1. James Margotta, Building Inspector Robert W. Spencer, Village Attorney Robert Curti, Charles A. Manganaro, Village Engineers Thomas Gisson and Susan Portman, Frederick P. Clark Associates Ellen Tsangaris James Donovan IN THE MATTER OF ARLINDO RUIVO, CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND DEPEYSTER STREET John Hughes, counsel for Arlindo Ruivo, advised that the application requests approval of a site plan for a three family residence and a subdivision which would create two lots from one. A rear yard variance is requested. Mr. Galgano advised that this request be referred to the Zoning Board. A motion was made to this effect by Mr. R. Windas, seconded by Mr. Salman, and carried unanimously. 2. IN THE MATTER OF BEDFORD PARK ASSOCIATES - APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL The Secretary read the Public Notice concerning the application by Bedford Park Associates for preliminary subdivision approval for a subdivision located at the end of Amos Street. Charles Pateman, representing the applicant, advised the Planning Board that the application is a new application. Plans were submitted for a 15-lot subdivision and a 14-lot subdivision. The plans show a 50-foot wide roadway, as required by the Subdivision Regulations, and a cul-de-sac with a radius of 60 feet (the paved cul-de-sac will have a radius of 50 feet). �Charles Pateman stated that the applicant will follow the directions of the Planning Board; either plan is acceptable to the applicant. Chairman Galgano then opened the meeting for public comment. Philip Zegarelli, 35 Amos Street, stated that the residents had not yet seen the plan for the 14-unit development. The neighbors are not against development of the property, but are concerned about frontages on Amos Street and would favor a 13-unit subdivision. Mr. Zegarelli requested that preliminary subdivision approval not be granted until the State and County have reviewed the proposed subdivision. Mrs. A. Petri expressed concern whether the size of the culde-sac was adequate and suggested opening up Cottage Place, a paper street, as another exit. Mr. Salman stated that he believed that the incline of the driveways from the proposed houses onto Webber Avenue and Bedford Road would be a significant problem. He had measured a number of cul-de-sacs in the Village and would recommend a cul-de-sac with a paved radius of 60 feet as required by the Subdivision Regulations. A motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to close the Public Hearing. Members of the Planning Board then made comments about the proposed subdivision. Mr. Windas suggested that the Board consider a 14-lot subdivision with a cul-de-sac having a paved radius of 50 feet and with each lot having 50-foot frontage. Mr. Salman noted that the Board must still deal with the needed waiver for a cul-de-sac with a length of more than 600 feet (the Subdivision Regulations do not permit a cul-de-sac to be longer than 600 feet without a waiver by the Planning Board). Mr. McCarthy stated that he believed that a cul-de-sac with a radius of 50 feet is adequate; he is opposed to any parking in the cul-de-sac. The engineer for the applicant noted that the driveways could be widened to permit off-street parking. Mr. Pateman noted that if the applicant was permitted to build only 14 houses, it could not afford to make off-site improvements to the sewer system. Mr. Salman favors a 13-lot subdivision. Mr. Windas questioned what egress will be used by the applicant during the course of construction; how will construction be conducted so that the neighbors will not be abused. The applicant will submit a plan to state how 2 �construction will be accomplished to minimize inconvenience to the neighbors. Mr. Windas stated that he also favored a 13-lot subdivision. The applicant noted that there is no application pending for a 13-lot subdivision. The only applications pending are fo^- a 15-lot subdivision and a 14-lot subdivision. Chairman Galgano called for a vote on the application 14-lot subdivision. for a The Planning Board then considered the classification of the proposed development under SEQRA. A motion was made by Mr. Windas, seconded by Mr. Ayers, that the proposed developmervt be considered an unclassified action under SEQRA, and that a negative declaration be made concerning the proposed project/ subject to the following conditions: (1) the applicant provide more detailed information concerning the vegetation and grading behind Lots 8-14; and (2) the applicant provide a wildlife corridor behind 8-14. lots The motion was carried unanimously. Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers, that the application for preliminary subdivision approval of the 14—jot subdivision shown on the plan entitled Preliminary Final Subdivision and Site Plan known as Bedford Park, prepared o y Cronin & Associates, P.E., P.C., dated February 25, 1992, Xast revised April 28, 1992 be approved, subject to the applicant satisfying the following conditions to the satisfaction of the Planning Board within 180 days from the date of this resolution: (1) Revision of the subdivision plan to show a confowning cul-de-sac with a right-of-way radius of sixty (60) feet and a paved area radius of fifty (50) feet. (2) Inclusion of a detail plan, to the satisfaction of the Planning Board, for the stabilization and replanting of the steeply sloped area located a t , or near, the rear yard areas of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, X2f 13 and 14 for the duel purpose of providing slope stabilization and a wildlife corridor in the are^. (3) Provision of driveways with widths of not less tfcjan twenty (20) feet for Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. (4) Confirmation by the Building Inspector of the Village 3 �of North Tarrytown that the lots shown on the above noted plans conform with all applicable lot width and frontage requirements for the R-3 District of North Tarrytown, as specified in Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown. (5) The Applicant shall obtain from the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board final subdivision plan approval and site plan approval conforming with all requirements of this resolution, Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown, Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown, all other applicable laws and regulations and all requirements of the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown. (6) The Applicant shall provide a planting plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and said planting plan shall be incorporated into the Applicant's final subdivision and site plan applications. (7) The granting of a tree removal permit, inclusive of all required bonding and mitigation measures, by the Village Tree Commission of the Village of North Tarrytown, as per Chapter 52A, Tree Conservation, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown. (8) The underground placement of all required utilities, including, but not limited to water, sewer, gas and electric service. (9) All necessary approvals being granted by the appropriate New York State and Westchester County approval authorities with regards to each of the four (4) driveways proposed for Bedford Road and each of the four (4) driveways proposed for Webber Avenue prior to the granting of final subdivision approval and a demonstration to the satisfaction of the Planning Board that each of the proposed driveways will maintain adequate sight distance and grades. (10) Provision by the Applicant of all bonding of improvements determined to be necessary by the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown on advice of the Village Engineering Consultant and the Building Inspector. (11) Provision of driveway turnaround areas within the confines of each lot, to the satisfaction of the Planning Board. 4 �FURTHER RESOLVED, that the modification of the subdivision regulations for cul-de-sac length in accordance with the preliminary subdivision plan is in the public interest or avoids the imposition of unnecessary individual hardship. FURTHER RESOLVED, that prior to the granting of a building permit, the Applicant shall provide seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) to be used for improvements to the Village's sanitary sewerage system below the site so as to mitigate the impacts of the proposal upon the system, or, in lieu of the above monies, the Applicant may perform improvements to said sewerage system, to the satisfaction of the Village Engineering Consultant. The vote on the motion was as follows: Mr. McCarthy Yes Mr. Windas Yes Mr. Ayers Yes Mr. Salman No Chairman Galgano Yes. Cha_irman Galgano declared the motion carried by a 4-1 vote. The minutes of the previous meeting of June 18, 1992 were apprroved on a motion made by Mr. E. McCarthy, seconded by Mr. S. Saltan, and unanimously carried. There was discussion on changes in .occupancy, change of use, site plan revisions, and subdivisions subject to review by the Planning Board. Mr. Salman suggested that a letter received from the County may have something to do with our discussion of tonight regarding density. The Board should review the letter from the County. Mee-ting adjourned on a motion made by Mr. Windas, seconded by Mr. Ayejrs, and unanimously carried. Respectfully submitted, Mar- ie Timmings 5 �Approve/t\with respect to substance and form: Village AttorAe^ Dated: [ I tfi/fy/ Approved by the Planning Board Chairman pr Ac Acting^^nairman man pr Dated F i l e d w i t h V i l l a g e Clerk Clerk or Depu Deputy Clerk Dated: ?I/O /<* : rp*/s JUNE 18, 1992 Date of Meeting �2661 9 91W � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1992-07-16 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1992 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/a2c75eeee66afef355329541750cc017.pdf 88128f50b780f86aeaa0cbe51f7cae20 PDF Text Text REGULAR MEETING NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK August 20, 1992 FINAL A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on Thursday, August 20, 1992 at 8:00 PM in Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. Present: James Galgano, Chairperson Edward McCarthy James Donovan Roman Windas Steve Salman Also Present: James Margotta, Building Inspector Robert W. Spencer, Village Attorney Joseph Gulino, Charles Manganaro Thomas Gisson, Frederick P. Clark Associates The meeting was called to order at 8:10 P.M. by the Chairperson, James Galgano. IN THE MATTER OF ALBERT PECK. BARNHART AVENUE. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK. Mr. Galgano stated that this matter will be adjourned until the next meeting due to the fact that not enough information about the proposed subdivision is available at this time. IN THE MATTER OF CHUCK PATEMAN. BEDFORD PARK ASSOCIATES. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK. Mr. Galgano stated that the Planning Board will go through the conditions that were set at the time of approval of the preliminary subdivision at the July meeting. 1. Revision of the subdivision plan to show a conforming cul-de-sac with a right-of-way radius of sixty (60) feet and a paved area radius of fifty (50) feet. Mr. Pateman stated that this condition has been satisfied. 2. Inclusion of a detailed plan, to the satisfaction of the Planning Board, for the stabilization and replanting of the steeply sloped area located at , or near, the rear yard area of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 for the dual purposes of providing slope stabilization and a wildlife corridor. Mr. Pateman stated that he was under the impression that this matter would be considered as part of the site plan approval application. The Applicant has added Note 24 to the General Notes on the final subdivision plat which provides that all grading shall not exceed 1 foot vertical to 2 feet horizontal. The Applicant has also included Erosion Control Notes on the ,— > IT �plat. There was an extended discussion of the replanting of trees on the site. The plat- provides for the planting of new street trees on Amos Street and the cul-de-sac. The Applicant has added Note 12 to the Erosion Control Notes on the plat which provides that the species and size of proposed street trees shall be determined by the Tree Commission at the time of planting. Jack Arcate of the Tree Commission commented that Jeff Wiegert, the DEC Forester, had examined the site and determined that 61 trees would be lost because of the development, and 25 trees were to be retained. There was concern whether those 25 trees would survive construction on the site. Dr. Sweet noted that the existing trees on the site were dead, diseased or inferior trees. Better trees could be planted as replacement trees. The Sugar Maple tree would be an ideal tree. It was agreed with the Applicant that no certificates of occupancy would be issued until the Street trees and the replacement trees in the development were planted. (Correspondence concerning trees is in the official minutes.) Mr. Gissen stated that there are two different issues. One concerns the tree removal permit. The other issue concerns control of erosion on slopes. Mr. Tim Cronin of Cronin & Associates, P.E., the engineer for the Applicant, stated that the slope is stable without a root system. The slope is less than what soil will seek in nature. 3. Provision of driveways with widths of not less than twenty (20) feet for Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. Mr. Pateman stated that the plans do not provide for driveway widths of twenty (20) feet which he said would be excessive, particularly in view of the size of the cul-de-sac. Mr. Cronin stated that he was not sure of the reasoning why each driveway had to be 20 feet wide. Mr. Spencer stated that it was to eliminate off-street parking. Some members of the Board did not want parking in the cul-de-sac. Mr. Gissen stated that the reasoning behind the twenty (20) foot width was that if someone wanted to plant a hedge, install a wall or plant flower beds along the side of the driveway, the usable driveway area would be reduced. Many codes require a width of 10 ft. for each parking space. Mr. Pateman stated that he has conformed to the regulations by providing one parking space. The ordinance calls for one parking space. Mr. Pateman stated that he is more than willing to provide adequate parking. Mr. Cronin stated that a 20 ft. driveway is not necessary. Mr. Windas stated his opinion that 16 ft. for two cars, along with a garage, would be no problem. Mr. Galgano agreed that a width of 16 ft. should be used for the driveways. 2 �4. Confirmation by the Building Inspector of the Village of North Tarry town that the lots shown on the plans conform with all applicable lot width and frontage requirements for the R-3 District of the Vil-lage of North Tarrytown, as specified in Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown. Mr. Margotta stated that the applicant conforms with the requirements. Mr. Spencer stated that he would furnish written confirmation for the file with respect to the question of frontages. Mr. Windas was concerned about the lot widths. It's a matter of not setting a precedent for future applications. Dr. Salman stated that a letter should go to the Board of Trustees and ask for the definition of lot frontage to be clarified. 5. The Applicant shall obtain from the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board final subdivision plan approval and site plan approval conforming with all requirements of this resolution, the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown, (except as modified by the Planning Board), Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown, all other applicable laws and regulations and all requirements of the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown. Mr. Spencer stated that under Section 7 of the subdivision regulations the Applicant, prior to the submission of the final plat, shall have installed the necessary improvements (or guarantees shall be provided for the installation of such improvements). Mr. Pateman stated that General Note 5 was put on the plan submitted to the Board (Copy in Official Minutes.) Mr. Windas stated that he was concerned about improvements which deal with streets, such as street lights and trees. Mr. Spencer stated that the Code provides that prior to the Planning Board's approval of the final subdivision plat, the Applicant shall have installed or shall provide guarantees for installation of any required street, sanitary improvements, and utilities, including electric, gas, and telephone. Mr. Pateman stated that the Applicant agrees that the final plat shall not be signed until the Applicant has complied with all of the provisions of the resolution granting final subdivision approval. Mr. Pateman believes that this is a good guaranteebonding is extremely expensive and difficult to get. This will be a stated condition as part of the final approval of the Planning Board. Mr. Windas feels that the Tree Commission should be the controlling agency with respect to the selection and planting of trees, and would report back to the Planning Board. Mr. Windas made a motion to delegate responsibility to the Tree Commission for the selection and planting of trees on the site, which was seconded by Dr. Salman, and unanimously adopted. 3 �6. The Applicant shall provide a planting plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and said planting plan shall be incorporated into the Applicant's final subdivision and site plan applications. 7. The granting of a tree removal permit, inclusive of all required bonding and mitigation measures, by the Village Tree Commission of the Village of North Tarrytown, as per Chapter 52A, Tree Conservation, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown. Discussion of this matter was covered in the preceding condition 7. 8. The underground placement of all required utilities, including, but not limited to, water, sewer, gas and electric service. Mr. Gulino stated that storm drainage should be added. Mr. Pateman stated that there would be no problem with underground service, but Con Edison may want to service overhead, since there currently are poles on Bedford Rd. and Webfeer Ave. An application can be made for underground service. Mr. Windas stated that he would like to add certain services such as Cable T.V., alarm systems and telephone services. Mr. Pateman stated that he would put a note on the plan. Mr. Galgano stated that all utilities will be covered. 9. All necessary approvals being granted by the appropriate New York State and Westchester County approval authorities with regard to each of the four (4) driveways proposed for Bedford Road and each of the four (4) driveways proposed for Webber Avenue prior to the granting of final subdivision approval and a demonstration to the satisfaction of the Planning Board that each of the proposed driveways will maintain adequate sight distance and grades. Mr. Patemen stated that approvals from New York State and Westchester County cannot be obtained if the State and County do not know the exact location of the driveways. (A letter from New York State and Westchester County are in official minutes.) Mr. Pateman stated that he is willing to put a note on his plan stating that no lot shall be transferred until such time as the appropriate driveway permit has been obtained from the New York State D.O.T. and the County. Each driveway will have a different profile. Mr. Pateman said that he would not develop a lot if he cannot get the proposed driveway permit for that lot. Mr. Salman asked if the driveway should be delineated on the plan at this time. Mr. Pateman responded that the driveways should not be shown until a later date, but that the potential location of the driveways is relatively limited. 10. Provision by the Applicant of all bonding of improvements determined to be necessary by the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown on the advice of the Village Engineering 4 �Consultant and the Building Inspector. Mr. Pateman stated that he has agreed to install the utilities before the Board signs the plat. 11. Provision of driveway turnaround areas within the confines of each lot, to the satisfaction of the Planning Board. Mr. Pateman does have turnaround areas on the plan for the houses on Webber Ave. and Bedford Rd. Mr. Gulino stated that the provision of bonding could be important if during construction the developer goes bankrupt. The Village might have the burden of completing the work at its expense. Mr. Spencer requested that in reference to condition number nine concerning driveways, the Board should hold up giving final approval until the Applicant received driveway approvals or give final approval subject to the Applicant getting driveway permits. Mr. Pateman suggested that the Board adopt a resolution with a stated condition the Chairman does not have to sign the plat until the driveway permits are granted. In other words, have a condition that the plat is not signed by the Chairman until such time as the Applicant obtains those permits. At this point during the meeting, discussion took place concerning the sewerage system on New Broadway. Mr. Gulino stated that the Village had looked into the situation a few years ago and at that time was considering repairing the system or banning construction in that area. The prior developer agreed to repair the sewer. Mr. Pateman said the other developer would have repaired the sewer in exchange for 15 units instead of 14 units. He will not do so if he only has 14 units. Mr. Donovan stated that the Village should look at the sewer line. He feels that Mr. Patemen is bringing out a good point, that the problem is a Village problem. Mr. McCarthy agrees that it is a Village concern. Mr. Galgano asked if Mr. Gulino could provide a report regarding his opinion. A letter is to be sent to the Board of Trustees about the sewer problem. A letter was submitted to the Planning Board by Mr. Cronin concerning construction and congestion on Amos St. during construction. (Copy in Official Minutes) Mr. Spencer stated that the Board should determine whether the application for final subdivision is complete and the matter is ready for a Public Hearing. Mr. Windas so moved, seconded by Mr. Donovan. Motion carried unanimously 5 �PUBLIC COMMENTS Mrs. Ceconi asked if the subdivision was based on 14 homes or six. Mr. Galgano answered 14. Mr. Gissen stated that his understanding was that the Applicant has agreed to put something in writing that if he fails to receive all the driveway- curb cuts on Webber Ave. and Bedford Rd., he will lose those lots* for which he is unable to obtain a permit and won't contest it wxth the Village. If he cannot get any permits for Bedford Rd. lie will lose four lots, but he still has 10 lots to build on. Furthermore, if the Applicant does not develop the lot after clearing the lot, the Applicant will replant trees to Restore the area. Mr. Pateman stated that he has no problem if the plat is not signed until such time as he has received driveway permits from the D.O.T. and the County. If the plat isn't filed, h ^ cannot build on the lots. Mr. Spencer asked Mr. Pateman how lie can guarantee the Village if and when trees are cleared from "the property that the replacement tree planting will take place. Mr.Pateman stated that $10,000 in inspection fees can fee kept by the Village for such purpose. Mr. Donovan made a motion to close the Public Comment section, seconded by Dr. Salman . Motion carried unanimously. It was the consensus of the Board that the Village should have some assurance that the utilities will be completed, i ^ started, and that replacement trees will be planted if necessary. Mr. Pateman stated that he will also waive the recreation ^ees which are $15,000 towards the completion of the utilities anci rehabilitation of the site. The amount available to tfcie Village would be a maximum of $25,000. Mr. Windas made a motion to approve the final subdivision with conditions, seconded by Mr. Donovan. The conditions a^e as follows: 1. All references to the applicant shall include the applicant's successors and assigns. The conditions included as part of the approval of the preliminary subdivision plan are incorporated by reference. 2. The applicant shall obtain from the Village of No^th Tarrytown Planning Board site plan approval for each and every lot in this fourteen (14) lot subdivision conforming with all requirements of this resolution, Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown, all other applicable laws and regulations and all other requirements of the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown. 6 �3. The Applicant shall provide a detailed plan as to the replanting of the site for the purposes of providing soil stabilization/erosion control to the satisfaction of the Village Engineering and Planning consultants and said planting plan shall be incorporated into the Applicant's final subdivision and site plan applications. 4. The granting of a tree removal permit, inclusive of all required bonding and mitigation measures, by the Village Tree Commission of the Village of North Tarrytown, as per Chapter 52A, Tree Conservation, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown, with the Applicant's compliance with said tree permit and all of the conditions thereof to be required conditions for the continued validity of this resolution of final subdivision approval. 5. The underground placement of all required utilities, including, but not limited to, water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, gas, cable television, alarm systems, telephone and electric service for all of the proposed lots fronting on Amos Street and wherever else permitted by the appropriate public utilities. 6. The installation of all utilities, to the satisfaction of the Building Inspector and all other applicable approval authorities, prior to the signing of the final subdivision plat. 7. Provision of all drainage calculations and other required engineering details to the satisfaction of the Village Engineering Consultant. 8. All necessary approvals being granted by the appropriate New York State and Westchester County approval authorities with regards to each of the four (4) driveways proposed for Bedford Road and each of the four (4) driveways proposed for Webber Avenue prior to the signing of the final subdivision plat by the Village of North Tarrytown. 9. The Applicant's continuing refrain from transferring title subdivision lots until driveway final form from the appropriate County approval authorities. compliance with its offer to to any of the proposed permits have been obtained in New York State and Westchester 10. The Applicant's continuing compliance with its offer to absorb the full cost and financial impact of the loss of any lots and to waive any rights to compensation due to a reduction in the proposed subdivision's lot count that is the result of the Applicant's failure to obtain from the appropriate New York State or Westchester County approval authorities driveway curb cut permits for any of the four (4) driveways proposed for Bedford Road and any of the four (4) driveways proposed for 7 �Webber Avenue. 11. In lieu of bonding for the proposed utilities, planting plan and tree removal permit requirements, if the Applicant fails to complete the project, all monies held in escrow by the Village of North Tarrytown, including but not limited to, fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) in payments for recreation fees associated with this site and any outstanding sums not previously spent for inspection and consultant fees, shall be forfeited to the Village and may be used by the Village to complete the utilities and to restore the site to a vegetated state as similar to its existing condition as is practicable. In no case, shall the use of such monies release the Applicant from his duty to pay such recreation, consultant and inspection fees and to complete all utilities and plantings required by this resolution or by the Tree Commission of the Village of North Tarrytown. 12. The Applicant, at its sole cost and expense, shall repair any public street that is damaged or subjected to unusual wear due to the Applicant's construction activity and associated activities. 13. Provision of a construction sequences plan to the satisfaction of the Village Engineering and Planning Consultants. 14. Prior to the signing of the final plan, the Applicant shall have completed the required improvements to the satisfaction of the Building Inspector and the Village Engineering Consultant. With a roll call vote, the vote to approve the motion was unanimous. Mr. Windas made a motion to approve the minutes of July 16, 1992, seconded by Mr. McCarthy. Carried unanimously. The meeting was then adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Christine A. Yurkovic Recording Secretary 8 �V Approved with respect to substance and form: * tv 'm^, Village Attbrhey Dated: \ I f ^ / Approved by the Planning Board 4>y>?Ms,J 7^ n / ^ ^ y ^ ^ tairmari o r A c t i n g Cha^ppfen ^/Dated: Filed with Village Clerk d- CuJLAJL^Cb Clork or Deputy Dated: 9 / ^ 9 ^ Clerk JULY 16, 1992 Date of M e e t i n g � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1992-08-20 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1992 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/6ab3a5d526659f3da55d4052d206d0f0.pdf 5ffb31b5d281fd9ffe96fe58a0ef20d1 PDF Text Text Planning Board Regular Meeting North Tarrytown, New York September 17, 1992 FINAL A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on Thursday, September 17, 1992 at 8:00 PM in Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. Present: James Galgano, Chairman Edward McCarthy Ray Windas Steve Salman Ellen Tsangaris James Donovan Also Present: Absent: 1. James Margotta, Building Inspector Robert W. Spencer, Village Attorney Joseph Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Village Engineers Thomas Gisson and Susan Portman, Frederick P. Clark Associates Richard Ayers IN THE MATTER OF ALBERT PECK (ESTATE OF BESSIE LEVY and HANNAH LEVY (TRUST) Barnhart Avenue This is a continuation of the public hearing for a subdivision to create six (6) lots from one existing lot (one lot for each currently existing residence). Mr. Peck advised that he has submitted the proposed Declaration of Easements to Village Counsel for review. Mr. Salman asked about parking. Mr. Margotta advised that there was sufficient parking in the rear yards of the lots, through a common driveway. A motion to close the public hearing was unanimously adopted. A motion to declare the proposed subdivision an unclassified action under SEQRA which would have no material adverse impact on the environment by reason of the granting of the subdivision request was unanimously adopted. Mr. Windas moved that the application be granted as submitted. Mr. Donovan seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously adopted. 9 > .•AsteiiaL..' �ESTATE OF WALTER LUBERGBR, Valley Street This is a public hearing to approve a subdivision to create two (2) lots from one existing lot. One lot would be occupied by an existing multi-family residence. The second lot would be occupied by an existing commercial building. The applicant is proposing to create a common driveway 15 feet in width. Existing parking on the property in front of the commercial building will be eliminated. Two matters were raised concerning parking on the site. At the rear of the portion of the site occupied by the residence is a garden which should be paved for a parking space, and there is a pipe protruding from the ground from an old oil tank. The applicant agreed to remove the pipe. There is an existing berm in one of the rear parking spaces in the portion of the site occupied by the commercial building. There was extended discussion concerning the removal of the berm. A motion to close the public hearing was unanimously adopted. A motion to declare the proposed subdivision as an unclassified action under SEQRA which would have no material adverse impact on the environment was unanimously adopted. Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. Donovan, that the application for subdivision be approved, subject to the following conditions: (1) Frederick P. Clark Associates will review and approve the revised subdivision plan; (2) the berm will comply with national standards as confirmed by Frederick P. Clark Associates; (3) the driveway easement should be approved by Village Counsel and filed with the County Clerk. The motion was unanimously approved. PHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL-MRI BUILDING This is a public hearing for site plan approval for a new MRI unit adjacent to the South wing of the Hospital. Representatives of the Hospital explained the details of the building. The hearing will be continued after the Board, the Building Inspector and Frederick P. Clark Associates review the plans. The building must be sprinklered. A 2 �recreation fee will be due the Village. The Hospital needs to prepare and file an environmental assessment form. 4. BEDFORD PARK-SITE PLAN APPROVAL This is an application for site plan approval of the 14-lot subdivision north of Bedford Road, South of Amos Street and east of Webber Avenue. The Board reviewed and approved the following resolution concerning final subdivision approval for the project: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said application for final subdivision approval for a fourteen (14) lot subdivision, as shown on the plan entitled, Final Subdivision and Site Plan Known as Bedford Park, prepared by Cronin & Associates P.E., P.C. and dated August 5, 1992, be and hereby is granted conditional final subdivision approval by a vote of the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown with five (5) members voting in favor of the application, no member voting against the application and two members absent, provided, that this conditional final subdivision approval shall expire within ninety (90) days from the date of this resolution if the following conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board: 1. All references to the applicant shall include the applicant's successors and assigns. 2. Except as specifically amended herein, the conditions included as part of the approval of the preliminary subdivision plan are incorporated by reference. 3. The Applicant shall obtain from the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board site plan approval for each and every lot in this fourteen (14) lot subdivision conforming with all requirements of this resolution, Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown, all other applicable laws and regulations and all requirements of the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown. 4. The Applicant shall provide a detailed plan as to the replanting of the site with sod for the purposes of providing soil stabilization/erosion control to the satisfaction of the Village Engineering and Planning consultants and said planting plan shall be incorporated into the Applicant's final subdivision and site plan applications. 5. The granting of a tree removal permit, inclusive of all required bonding and mitigation measures, by the Village Tree Commission of the Village of North 3 �Tarrytown, as per Chapter 52A, Tree Conservation, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown, with the applicant's compliance with said tree permit and all of the conditions thereof to be required conditions for the continued validity of this resolution of final subdivision approval. 6. The underground placement of all required utilities, including, but not limited to, water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, gas, cable television, alarm systems, telephone and electric service for all of the proposed lots fronting on Amos Street and wherever else permitted by the appropriate public utilities. 7. The installation of all utilities, to the satisfaction of the Building Inspector and all other applicable approval authorities, inclusive of compliance with all scheduling of inspection requirements of the Village of North Tarrytown and all other approval authorities or their agents, prior to the signing of the final subdivision plat. 8. Provision of all drainage calculations and other required engineering details to the satisfaction of the Village Engineering Consultant. 9. All necessary approvals being granted by the appropriate New York State and Westchester County approval authorities with regards to each of the four (4) driveways proposed for Bedford Road and each of the four (4) driveways proposed for Webber Avenue prior to the signing of the final subdivision plat by the Village of North Tarrytown. 10. The applicant's continuing compliance with its offer to refrain from transferring title to any of the proposed subdivision's fourteen (14) lots until driveway permits for each of the site's four (4) driveways proposed for Bedford Road and each of the site's four (4) driveways proposed for Webber Avenue have been obtained in final form the appropriate New York State and Westchester County approval authorities. 11. The applicant's continuing compliance with its offer to absorb the full cost and financial impact of the loss of any lots and to waive any rights to claims of compensation due to a reduction in the proposed subdivision's lot count that is the result of the applicant's failure to obtain from the appropriate New York State or Westchester County approval authorities driveway curb cut permits for any of the four (4) 4 �driveways proposed for Bedford Road or any of the four (4) driveways proposed for Webber Avenue. In lieu of bonding for the proposed utilities, planting plan and tree removal permit requirements, if the applicant fails to complete the project, all monies held in escrow by the Village of North Tarrytown, including but not limited to fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) in payments for recreation fees associated with this site and any outstanding sums not previously spent for inspection and consultant fees, shall be forfeited to the Village and may be used by the Village to complete the utilities and to restore the site to a vegetated state as similar to its existing condition as is practicable. In no case, shall the use of such monies release the applicant from its duty to pay such recreation, consultant and inspection fees and to complete all utilities and plantings required by this resolution or required by the Tree Commission of the Village of North Tarrytown. The applicant, at its sole cost and expense, shall repair any public street that is damaged or subjected to unusual wear due to the applicant's construction activity and associated activities. Submission to the Village of North Tarrytown of a letter of agreement by the applicant in form satisfactory to the Village Attorney, stating that the applicant has made the offers contained in conditions ten (10), eleven (11), twelve (12) and thirteen (13), above and will abide by those offers. Provision of a construction sequencing plan, inclusive of a set maximum scheduled duration of time for each phase of construction, to the satisfaction of the Village Engineering and Planning Consultants. Prior to the signing of the final plan, the applicant shall provide all bonding of improvements determined to be necessary by the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown on advice of the Village Engineering Consultant and the Building Inspector, including, but not limited to, bonding for all public travel ways and all public and private utilities with the exception of individual house connections not located within the public right-of-way, or the applicant shall have completed the required improvements to the satisfaction of the Building Inspector and Village engineering Consultant. 5 �17. Submission to the Village of North Tarrytown of a letter of agreement by the applicant in form satisfactory to the Village Attorney, assuring the Village that the applicant shall file with the Village of North Tarrytown "As Built," or Record drawings on linen signed and sealed by a licensed land surveyor, showing and locating all improvements, services and utilities and their respective appurtenances, as shown on the approved construction plans. Such drawings shall include depths and ties to water service lines, sanitary sewer lines and storm drainage lines. 18. A note shall be added to the final subdivision plan stating, "In no case shall slopes greater than one foot vertical to two feet horizontal (1:2 Slope) be permitted on this site." There was a question raised whether the Planning Board was required to hold a public hearing on the application for site plan approval. The applicant noted that Article VIII Site Plan Review of the Zoning Code does not provide for a public hearing. Furthermore, Section 7-725 of the Village Law provides that subdivision plats subject to review under Section 7-728 shall not be subject to review under Section 7-725 (Planning Board approval of site plans). The Board directed counsel to have the Village Board clarify whether public hearings are required for site plan reviews. The Board directed counsel to advise the Village Board of Trustees of the need to repair the sewer line on New Broadway. The Board had decided that the developer should not be held responsible for this cost. A prior report on the sewer line from the Village Engineer is attached. Mr. Windas asked if the developer was required to have any other Village body review the site plan. He was advised that the Architectural Review Board will have to review the site plan. The Board reviewed the site plan presented by the developer. The Board then unanimously determined that the review and approval of the site plan was an unclassified action under SEQRA and would not have any material adverse impact on the environment as proposed. Mr. McCarthy moved to approve the proposed site plan as submitted to the meeting. Mr. Donvan seconded the motion. The Board voted to approve the site plan presented by the developer in accordance with the following conditions: 6 �NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the site plan application and plan be and hereby are granted conditional site plan approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or, as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of this site plan resolution and upon the final mylar copy of the site plan drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the offices of the Village Building Department for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire twelve (12) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and/or the Applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1. Y+ -*«* i" Fees - The Applicants shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 1.1 An inspection fee for construction inspection of the proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage system, sewage, lighting and other site plan elements for compliance with the approved site plan in accordance with the Village of North Tarrytown Zoning Code. 1.2 A recreation fee of one thousand two hundred dollars ($1,200) per lot, which results in a total recreation fee of sixteen thousand eight hundred dollars ($16,800). 1.3 The Applicant shall submit payment of all application review fees as noted and required in Section 62-30(f) of the Village Zoning Code, as approved by the Village Attorney. 2. Revision of the above noted "Site Plan" to include a note stating that all tree removal and compensatory planting shall be subject to the appropriate permitting procedures as required by Chapter 52A, Tree Conservation, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown. 3. The conditions included as part of the Bedford Park Final Subdivision resolution of approval are incorporated into this resolution by reference. 4. All necessary approvals being granted by the appropriate New York State and Westchester County approval authorities with regards to each of the four (4) driveways proposed for Bedford Road and each of the four (4) driveways proposed for Webber Avenue prior to the filing of this site plan with the Village of North Tarrytown. i I �5. All elements of this approved site plan shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Village Building Inspector within a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the issuance of the first building permit and prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The Planning Board may issue an extension of this time limit, or may modify any of the above conditions with respect thereto for good cause. 6. The Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities, upon notice of the Building Inspector, and before the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to parking, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details, which do not comply with the approved plan in the interest of safety, convenience, aesthetics and the enjoyment and peace and quiet of adjacent neighbors. The motion was adopted on a roll call vote as follows: McCarthy Windas Donovan Salman Tsangaris Chairman Galgano Mr. Mr. Mr. Dr. Ms. Yes Yes Yes No No Yes The Chairman declared the motion adopted by a 4-2 vote. The minutes of the meeting of August 20 were approved as written except the last sentence of the third paragraph on page 2 should read: "Some members of the Board did not want parking on the cul-de-sac." The meeting was then adjourned. Respectfully submitted Marie Timmings •,-*-. ' « M a * i. �11/12/92 13:39 © 914 631 2384 MP&S @ CERTIFICATE I, WILLIAM REGAN, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I am the Village Clerk for the Village of North Tarrytown, and DO HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY that the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown duly adopted the following resolutions on September 17, 1992: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said application for final subdivision approval for a fourteen (14) lot subdivision, as shown on the plan entitled, Final Subdivision and S^te Plan Known as Bedford Park, prepared by Cronin & Associates p.E., P.C. and dated August 5, 1992, be and hereby is granted conditional final subdivision approval by a vote of the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown with five (5) members voting in favor of the application, no member voting against the application and two members absent, provided, that this conditional final subdivision approval shall expire within ninety (90) days from the date of this resolution if the following conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board: 1. All references to the applicant shall applicant's successors and assigns. include the 2. Except as specifically amended herein, the conditions included as part of the approval of the preliminary subdivision plan are incorporated by reference. 3. The Applicant shall obtain from the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board site plan approval for each and every lot in this fourteen (14) lot subdivision conforming with all requirements of this resolution, Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown, all other applicable laws and regulations and all requirements of the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown. 4. The Applicant shall provide a detailed plan as to the replanting of the site with sod for the purposes of providing soil stabilization/erosion control to the satisfaction of the Village Engineering and Planning consultants and said planting plan shall be incorporated into the Applicant's final subdivision and site plan applications. 5. The granting of a tree removal permit, inclusive of all required bonding and mitigation measures, by the Village Tree Commission of the Village of North Tarrytown, as per Chapter 52A, Tree Conservation, of the Code of the �11/12/92 13:40 © 914 631 2384 MP&S Village of North Tarrytown, with the applicant's compliance with said tree permit and all of the conditions thereof to be required conditions for the continued validity of this resolution of final subdivision approval. The underground placement of all required utilities, including, but not limited to, water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, gas, cable television, alarm systems, telephone and electric service for all of the proposed lots fronting on Amos Street and wherever else permitted by the appropriate public utilities. The installation of all utilities, to the satisfaction of the Building Inspector and all other applicable approval authorities, inclusive of compliance with all scheduling of inspection requirements of the Village of North Tarrytown and all other approval authorities or their agents, prior to the signing of the final subdivision plat. Provision of all drainage calculations and other required engineering details to the satisfaction of the Village Engineering Consultant. All necessary approvals being granted by the appropriate New York State and Westchester County approval authorities with regards to each of the four (4) driveways proposed for Bedford Road and each of the four (4) driveways proposed for Webber Avenue prior to the signing of the final subdivision plat by the Village of North Tarrytown. The applicant's continuing compliance with its offer to refrain from transferring title to any of the proposed subdivision's fourteen (14) lots until driveway permits for each of the site's four (4) driveways proposed for Bedford Road and each of the site's four (4) driveways proposed for Webber Avenue have been obtained in final form the appropriate New York State and Westchester County approval authorities. The applicant's continuing compliance with its offer to absorb the full cost and financial impact of the loss of any lots and to waive any rights to claims of compensation due to a reduction in the proposed subdivision's lot count that is the result of the applicant's failure to obtain from the appropriate New York State or Westchester County approval authorities driveway curb cut permits for any of the four (4) driveways proposed for Bedford Road or any of the four (4) driveways proposed for Webber Avenue. @ �11/12/92 13:41 © 914 631 2384 HP4S @ In lieu of bonding for the proposed utilities, planting plan and tree removal permit requirements, if the applicant fails to complete the project, all monies held in escrow by the Village of North Tarrytown, including but not limited to fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) in payments for recreation fees associated with this site and any outstanding sums not previously spent for inspection and consultant fees, shall be forfeited to the Village and may be used by the Village to complete the utilities and to restore the site to a vegetated state as similar to its existing condition as is practicable. In no case, shall the use of such monies release the applicant from its duty to pay such recreation, consultant and inspection fees and to complete all utilities and plantings required by this resolution or required by the Tree Commission of the Village of North Tarrytown. The applicant, at its sole cost and expense, shall repair any public street that is damaged or subjected to unusual wear due to the applicant's construction activity and associated activities. Submission to the Village of North Tarrytown of a letter of agreement by the applicant in form satisfactory to the Village Attorney, stating that the applicant has made the offers contained in conditions ten (10), eleven (11), twelve (12) and thirteen (13), above and will abide by those offers. Provision of a construction sequencing plan, inclusive of a set maximum scheduled duration of time for each phase of construction, to the satisfaction of the Village Engineering and Planning Consultants. Prior to the signing of the final plan, the applicant shall provide all bonding of improvements determined to be necessary by the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown on advice of the Village Engineering Consultant and the Building Inspector, including, but not limited to, bonding for all public travel ways and all public and private utilities with the exception of individual house connections not located within the public right-of-way, or the applicant shall have completed the required improvements to the satisfaction of the Building Inspector and Village engineering Consultant. Submission to the Village of North Tarrytown of a letter of agreement by the applicant in form satisfactory to the Village Attorney, assuring the Village that the applicant shall file with the Village of North Tarrytown "As Built," or Record drawings on linen signed and sealed by �11/12/92 13:42 © 914 631 2384 M P &S a licensed land surveyor, showing and locating all improvements, services and utilities and their respective appurtenances, as shown on the approved construction plans. Such drawings shall include depths and ties to water service lines, sanitary sewer lines and storm drainage lines. 18. A note shall be added to the final subdivision plan stating, "In no case shall slopes greater than one foot: vertical to two feet horizontal (1:2 Slope) be permitted on this site." NOW, THEREFORE/ BE IT RESOLVED, that the sits plan application ana plan be and hereby are granted conditional site plan approval anci that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or, as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of this site plan resolution and upon the final mylar copy of the site plan drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the offices of the Village Building Department for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire twelve (12) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and/or the Applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1. Fee9 - The Applicants shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 1.1 An inspection fee for construction inspection of the proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage system, sewage, lighting and other site plan elements for compliance with the approved site plan in accordance with the Village of North Tarrytown Zoning Code. 1.2 A recreation fee of one thousand two hundred dollars ($1,200) per lot, which results in a total recreation fee of sixteen thousand eight hundred dollars ($16,800). 1.3 The Applicant shall submit payment of all application review fees as noted and required in Section 62-30(f) of the Village Zoning Code, as approved by the Village Attorney. 2. Revision of the above noted "Site Plan" to stating that all tree removal and compensatory be subject to the appropriate permitting required by Chapter 52A, Tree Conservation, of Village of North Tarrytown. include a note planting shall procedures as the Code of the 3. The conditions included as part of the Bedford Park Final Subdivision resolution of approval are incorporated into this �11/12/92 13:43 © 914 631 2384 MP&S @ 06 resolution by reference. 4. All necessary approvals being granted by the appropriate New York State and Westchester County approval authorities with regards to each of the four (4) driveways proposed for Bedford Road and each of the four (4) driveways proposed for Webber Avenue prior to the filing of this site plan with the Village of North Tarrytown. 5. All elements of this approved site plan shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Village Building Inspector within a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the issuance of the first building permit and prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The Planning Board may issue an extension of this time limit, or may modify any of the above conditions with respect thereto for good cause. 6. The Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities, upon notice of the Building Inspector, and before the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to parking, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details, which do not comply with the approved plan in the interest of safety, convenience, aesthetics and the enjoyment and peace and quiet of adjacent neighbors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the Village of North Tarrytown this /£- day of November, 1992. William Regan • ~7s �Approved with respect to substance and form: V i l l a g e Attotfndy Dated: I J <ffa^ Approved by the Planning Board Filed with Village Clerk Clerk oy Deputy Clerk Dated: /d/S/fi^ AUGUST 20, 1992 Date of Meeting �KHffif I SEP 29 MMOMEY MMUM* m •**#$? � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1992-09-17 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1992 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/aec10d9a4d9276a8c1c535afded6b3e2.pdf cc43bc4d83ec333bc073a0e9573a55af PDF Text Text 27-5 drift!"*!-. White County of Westchester Duplicate Ortgfnal—Canary Department of Public Works Triplicate Original—Bf ue 148 Martinc Ave., Rrn. 518 Application No. „,. $&?.<</. Co. Roid No 14 Dtte August 25, 1992 White Plains, New York 10601 i " • ! : • • — •« DO NOT WJOTE JfcO'HIS.SEAiCE COUNTY OP V V & S T C H E S T E R APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DO WORK O N AND WITHIN A COUNTY ROAD AREA OIV. OF ROAD MAINTENANCE (To be Executed in Triplicate) J To the County of Westchester Department of Public Works;: * LT.:. OCT 0 2 1992 . - ; • -ItEPOSIT: %l±ZizML?.<£U: :n or open a road constructed ;oi OTAU - i ^ 7 ^ ' ^ , •.-•*;. / > • ^ Application is hereby made for permission, under the Westchester County ^'AST'-'!"-"'' '' A ' J " • • : .' <J v: 7 w ^ . i ' w . - j * * - . * , . " - •"•"* ' ^ •;••»• *«•. •'-~—i';»,.*•-«'.<-.> •- • -••- •• ^Administrative Code* to enter upon, construct, -••••< "",*!„ .-V~.."JJir PERMIT A G E ^ ^ F ^ ^ ^ erry ^ N . Y.'^10522 ^ p i ^ & * 9 1 4 ^ 6 9 3 - 1 2 3 1 " .. . . „, J&^:#7>2. "^Address #f^^Hiw'nf-R^P^" W e b b e r Av t enue «^**-:^orth TarrytovrT ^ • T ^ c T ^ ^ f i 4 ^ ^ ^ ^ r - f f ^ ^ ^ V ' - U N * " * ) - . ;' ^ l " ^ ^ ^ - - ^ - ^ ' * * - ' - 1 - ' .Location . ' (Municipality* _ F." " *:•£*.£?££ 7 ;3&cJ** . ' - b ^ S ^ i ^ _ .. . E a s t . S i d e / 5 0 0 F t„••;...... - - S o u t h. of N o -.r t h S t r e e t on Road .... Maximum size of opening allowed' .'?'.'.'!'.1 . . . . . ? • . ?.Q,\ 6. Work to" be started . . . . . . . . . . ?/?/?^......; Yes 7.' Ts pavement to be disturbed? 8. Purpose of Application ,L~., •... . . . . . Depth To be completed . . , ASAP__ If so, what type . . Macadam Curb Cut & Drive Permits & Excavation for -Water & Sewer 9- *»_«, ! ... .T": T-f*'•"'' Attach 3 copies of a sketch showing location of work, aire of openings, sad giving distance to nearest sower intersectiosu 10. State Owner for whom work is being performed: Associates C/0 Ken K a r p e l , Esq. North Tarrytown 9 2 5 W e s t c h e s t e r A v e . ' / S u i t e ,311., White.J>laijLST»»«N'e<Yvu 1 0 6 0 4 • .£& xfts ayspjts.iall WQWP. A -.;.: :-.v: ir:;::.".. :T*-.:' .j;£t; *•• • • STATE O F NEW YORK COUNTY OF (Owner) ___,.__._„ TT Westchester •: ^ ^ sui3se quent to the date of ifAkHrm^ siamped ^ o ^ . - . r . _ _ ^ Tne owr.ittee shall contact the issuing authority iorauthoraatton ; ^ .... of extension time beyond the one year restricted period. -.,.• . . . . H^. 2 ; •L.^. . ? . ^ 9 . ^ g . ? A l . i ^. ........: .'. .bein« duly sworn, deposes end savs that he is P.r S S J . OLeilt. of the Permittee herein named; that all Insurance required by. the New York State Workmen's Compensation and Disability Laws has been secured, and the provisions of said Laws.will be' applied with during the life of this permit, and that no subcontractor will be permitted to do any work under this-permit until he has fully and completely complied with all the terms and provisions of the aforesaid Laws. (f permit is granted, I hereby agree to comply with all the terms, covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth which are attached to and form part of the permit, *nd to restore the road t5^its original artgptal condition, condition, in in accordance accordance therewith. then Sworn to before this . . . , 19^&H Notary Public. State o! New York Notary ^ rV *4-v \;xi>i; Applicant's Signature & T i t l e No 4989872 - . W J , \ k f c f c ^ b . .Q^UtlwL i/i. Dutchess County _ :jrv • >iitp..np c,0ir^<. r>ecemuer 16, 19iL? THE PERMIT WILL BE GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TERMS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS All applicants for County Permits shall file with the Permit Agent, 148 Marine Ave.-Rm. 518, White Plains, New York, New York State Workmen's Compensation Board Standard Forms C-105.2 and DB-120.1 as proof of compliance with the Workmen's Compensation and Disability Benefits Laws. If an applicant or holder of a permit represents that he is not required to carry either a Workmen's Compensation policy or a Disability Benefits policy or both, New York State Workmen's Compensation Board Standard Form C-105.21. in duplicate, shall be filed with the Permit Agent. Section 57 ot the Workmen's Compensation Law and Section 220, Subdivision 8 of the Disability Benefits Law provide that a permit shall not be issued unless the above prerequisites are satisfied. fOver^ t : �( I) The term " C o m m i s s i o n e r " shell M M the G > m m i i » i o i i c t of P u b l i c Works of die County of W e s t c h e s t e r or h i * aushorixed representative. ( 2) The term " P e r m i t t e e " s h a l l M I M the party o b t a i n i n g t h e permit or hia or i t * duly a u r h o r i z e d i | t M a or r t p w t n w t i f t t , and m u t t be t h e p e r s o n , fins, c o r p o r a t i o n , d i s t r i c t , or mun.icipa.lirf a c t u a l l y performing the work. ( 3) ( 4) ( 5) ( 6) • t. . .._«•. . r ''"'-'""Li. ->;-••--"•'- •»'» I) The permit ahatl not b e a s s i g n e d or transferred e x c e p t upon t h e written c o n s e n t of t h e C o m m i s s i o n e r . T h e work a u t h o r i z e d by the permit m a l l be d o n e to t h e c o m p l e t e s a t i s f a c t i o n of the C o m m i s s i o n e r . In r e p l a c e m e n t of p a v e m e n t s , t h e Standard County S p e c i f i c a t i o n s therefor s h a l l be f o l l o w e d s s more particularly s e t forth in S e c t i o n 4 hereof. Written n o t i c e e s c e p t in e m e r g e n c i e s s h a l l be given by s a i d P e r m i t t e e t o the C o m m i s s i o n e r t t l e a a i hours in a d v a n c e of d i e date w h e n the work of c o n s t r u c t i o n i s to c o m m e n c e . -.*--' forty-eight(4fi) The P e r m u t e * shall indemnify and s a v e h a r m l e s s t h e C o u n t y , , l o c a l m u n i c i p a l i t y And improvement d i s t r i c t from s i ! •„'••. " , c l a i m s , l i e n s , s u i t s , l o s s or d a m a g e of e v e r y k i n d w h a t s o e v e r , whether d i r e c t or i n d i r e c t , w h i c h may a r i s e by r e a s o n of, _.';'«-.•."•'.'• '-'..the granting o f this p e r m i t . • . _ . . . ••<•."; .—•~~':~^Ly£Z.".~21~. .' i.;'(*< '»'vY*T; ' ( 7 ) T h e P e r m i t t e e a g r e e s , in c o n s i d e r a t i o n of d i e granting o f t h e permit, that any p r e s e n t o r future dam a g e , i a j e r y to o r ; / . ...-.-••^'V.y'!V.--V' ' d i s t u r b a n c e o f the h i g h w a y , it* p a v e m e n t s , s l o p e s or g u t t e r s , c a u s e d by p l a c i n g of any s t r u c t u r e s p u r s u a n t t o t h e ^''^"^liXis. mil.?:,. •. 0 f t h * permit, s h a l l b e i m m e d i a t e l y l e p a i r e d by the P e r m i t t e e at hia or ita own e x p e n s e a n d to t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f me' ^r/'f\;'^'^'''"'•,' * *^^?^Q{&'l0:'... &trixj#£&-v5w'T-'.: t m 8 'U'S"^X^ifnkiF' ^ "**" r > * n , l » , t * * a g r e e s *» P"7 *M aureesaary e x p e n s e s t h a t may b e incurred by the County i a c o n a e c t i o a with d t e woak to Jit&rrt'=;1xvJsy]JiJP"' ^ I S : ^ ! ^ * ^ 1 1 ^ be d o n e nader the p e r m i t , w h i c h p a y m e n t s h a l l be m a d * w i t h i n t e a ( 1 0 ) d a y s a f t e r the s e n d i e g o f a s t a t e m e n t of. t a » . i ^ ' i " ^ . " ^ ' * ? ^ ' ^ ,+ ,,t \-V<^^(^\'4,^'T/ * *' " » * • » • « • • • c e r t i f i e d by the C o m m i s s i o n e r a n d , if not p a i d by t h e P e r m i t t e e , the s a i d e x p e n s e s s h a l l be dedncteW ^ » t J i ^ v i V - ' - . ^ > i ' ' i t ' * f v , f ->R f *""• »*K:S i* Yvff* ''"*' ~ * * < * * l K , » i l * * »«»•»» o t h e r w i s e p r o v i d e d for. Where work of a n t s t e n a i v e o r d i f f i c u l t aature i s i n v o l v e d the^^ P • a ^ B i l l w e ^ T ^ j ^ ; r ^ * - ' ^ ) r • • " ' • ^••'^^•^••:f-•-^''T.^yt^ _ may b e required to p a y t h e c o a t a of a M l or part t i m e I n s p e c t o r to be d e s i g n a t e d by the C o m m i s s i o n e r t o i n s p e c t m e * ^ . ^ V » i j ^ ' M a S > , - *$&z$'tyj$!& '<f^rrMZ ''"" ' * • 1 P o r k f o r * • P « r p o a e of p r o t e c t i n g t h e C o a n t y ' s i n t e r e s t . •• ,.^ pj^^:.(ty%i?l$Mf>:-. 9 A^V^^^^^'IIK'^ * ** c - * * * * fl*-1 p a v e m e n t baa n o t b e e * p l a c e d when o p e n i n g i s m a d e , where the road improvement i s n a d e r c o n t r a c t , ' *j£*Lji. 'i""&6iw'&£ ^^%rf.ty'$£<M^£' • * * P e r m i t t e e a g r e e s t o r e i m b u r s e the road c o n t r a c t o r for s u c h a d d i t i o n a l c o a t a of r e i n f o r c i n g s t e e l i n p a v e m e n t , when ^ f'i'i.': A "" "" '"~ '"'' r , - v ; ' • p l a c e d , aa are required by the C o m m i s s i o n e r . .: \-t,f'V,\1£l.'"}^C'.'J-. „ . „ „ . . . - .- -'..u- • ^10) ?* X ^ ^ t ^ , , ^ . * V l / ' i " " ^ * * £*»•»•»»»a' 0 0 *' r e s e r v e s the right to r e v o k e o r c a n c e l the p e r m i t at any t i m e s h o u l d the P e r m i t t e e fail to c o m p l y w i t h „^;£,*iV.; • * * ° ' ' * • * * « • * • s g i e e u s e e i a , c o v e n a n t s and c o n d i t i o o a t h e r e o f . T*-^, ••,. f ]\'}i;£?r^,[~-*fVTj^£ •'-(11) '•''"•'^'^S'-y~2""i '„'._ A f u l l y e x e c u t e d copy o f t h i s p e r m i t m e a t be i n p o s s e s s i o n of t h e p a r t i e s a c t u a l l y d o i n g t h e work. It must be exhibited 1 - " ' ! " . on d e m a n d to t h e C o m m i s s i o n e r o r h i s r e p r e s e n t n t i v e . . . . r CJ*-UV;. ''..„'.' '"''.'.:'. "• ' .„._. ..»V.U,K-»- . - . "2) ^ * permit d o e s not grant p e r m i s s i o n for c o n n e c t ioa a to w a t e r or s e w e r m a i n s , e t c . Such p e r m i t s m u s t be o b t a i n e d from d i e l o c a l m u n i c i p a l i t y o r improvement d i s t r i c t prior to and in a d d i t i o n to permit for s t r e e t o p e n i n g s a p p l i e d for h e r e w i t h . . , '.','22.' vv - r i-- 'y ' ~ ( 1 5 ) V e h i c u l a r traffic shall b e m a i n t a i n e d on any s e c t i o n o f the road disturbed by the P e r m i t t e e at s l l t i m e s during t h e term , 'a;'-*\'- '.„**' '•'. . . . . . ° ' **•• permit. .j..'.:.'!.''.'-".:.( 1 4 ) ITie contractor assumes all risks in the operation covered by the permit and shall be solely responsible and answerable in data. .-V-"acts for all accidents or injuries to person or property of whatsoever kind and nature, whether direct or indirect, arising out '"/_•' y', of any operations under the permit, even though said accidents or injuries to person or property are or may be due, In whole o r i n pnn .»r*l" '"Z . _ . . - ' < , 0 t h t County of Westchester, its acents. servants or employees. ' ' : T " " « . . ' . . SECTION 4. T H E WORK T O BE D O N E AND P E R F O R M E D P U R S U A N T T O T H E P E R M I T S H A L L B E D O N E A C C O R D I N G T O T H E FOLLOWING S P E C I F I C A T I O N S A N D C O N D I T I O N S : • •'• - - : • - r-. '_,'Jj;.r' ....... ' ' " I S '....:'.?&." t I) AH locations and tints of performing the work shall be approved by the Commissioner. , - -.---•-"( 2) The Permittee shall arfange his or its work so as to cause a minimum of inconvenience and delay to " "-'-."£' vehicular traffic. The Commissioner reserves the right to order the removal of any and/or all obatruo ,'.,..l\ tions to traffic on Saturdays, Sundays, Holidays and other periods of unusually heavy traffic volumes. The permittee shall erect and maintain suitable barricades to adequately delineate and protect the site during and in which his or its work is in progress. Warning flags, signs, flashing yellow lights and • . . . . . watchmen shall be provided a s necessary. Excavated material should be stored in neat piles, so placed as to cause the least interference with the use of the roadway or sidewalks. Where the free flow of traffic la interfered with, the permittee shall place and maintain traffic control devices pursuant to prov i s i o n s of sections 1680 and 1682 of trre New York State Vehicle and Traffic Law. All traffic control associated with maintenance, repair, and construction, within the highway limits, shall be carried out in accordance with standards set forth in the New York State Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, '-,"/* * * latest revision. The Commissioner reserves the right to order the correction of any unsafe condition and ' ? the installation of additional signs, lights or other traffic control devices. ( 3) U n l e s s o d i e r w i a e p e r m i t t e d , tight s h e s t h i n g a t I n n s t t w o ( 2 ) i n c h e s in d i i c k n e s s s h a l l be p l a c e d in a l l t r e e c h e a h a v i n g " "', a depth in e x c e a a of font ( 4 ) feet a n d widtin t h r e e ( 3 ) f e e t of any p a v e m e n t or o d i e r h i g h w a y structure w h i c h i a p r o p o s e d .,». . ^ . - ^ to remain in p l a c e e s c e p t where e x c a v a t i o n i a i s rock. S h e a r * i n a; s h a l l b e s e c u r e l y f a s t e n e d i a p l a c e with w h a l e r s and ' b r a c e s during s l l o p e r a t i o n s and a h n l l be d r i v e n t o * d e e d s o n e ( 1 ) foot b e l o w the l o w e s t part of t h e atrucrare p e o p o a e d . . . . to be i n s t a l l e d a s the e a c a v a t i o m p r o g r e s s e s . In s l l s u e * , e x c a v a t i o n s h a v i n g a d e p t h ia e x c e s s o f s i x ( 6 ) f e e t * such * * ' . a h c a d t i n g shall b e left i n p l a c e w i t h a c u t o f f l i n e e i g h u e e o ( 1 8 ) i n c h e s b e l o w ground s u r f a c e , la t h e t r e a d l e s h a v i n g a depth o f more than d i r e e ( 3 ) feet a n i l l e s s than s i s ( 6 ) foot m e s h e a t h i n g s h a l l be l e f t in p l a c e if o r d e r e d by d i e Comm i s s i o n e r of P u b l i c Wonka. S h e a t h i n g m a y b e o m i t t e d whets p e r m i t t e d by d i e C o m m i s s i o n e r if. die e d g e of rhe p r o p o s e d ' * trench i s o f f s e t from rhe n e a r e s t e d g e o f d i e p a v e m e n t or o t h e r stroctare by a d i s t a n c e at l e a s t e q u a l t o t h e v e r t i c a l ' -' i depth o f the t r e n c h s a m e a s u r e d from d i e h i g h e s t p o i n t o l t h e s d j u c i r a t p a v e m e n t or s t r u c t u r e . - . . ....... " ' " • '' ( 4) Back i l l l i n g around c o m p l e t e d s t r u c t u r e s s h a l l be made o f s e l e c t e d m a t e r i a l , free from l o o s e s t o n e s , a s s o o n n i t structure h a s a t t a i n e d s u f f i c i e n t s t r e n g t h t o p r e c l u d e injury and s h a l l be m a d e in s u c c e s s i v e horixontnl I ay era. not. ex* c a r d i n g s i x ( 6 ) i n c h e s i a depth. E a c h l a y e r s h a l l be t h o r o u g h l y c o m p a c t e d by t a m p i n g to rhe s a u a f a c t i o n o f t h e Comm i a a i o n e r . N o f r o x e a m a t e r i a l s h a l l be u s e d i n the b a c k f i l L S p e c i a l c a r e s h a l l be taken t o thoroughly c o m p a c t t h e portion directly under the h a u n c h e s , around t h e a i d c a and for a d e p t h of o n e ( 1 ) foot o v e r p i p e s or d u c t s . No r o c k shall be p l a c e d in the b a c k f i l l within t w e l v e ( 1 2 ) i n c h e s of a p i p e or d u c t . If permitted by t h e C o m m i s s i o n e r , the b a c k f i l l i n g of t r e n c h e s may b e thoroughly p u d d l e d by d e p o s i t i n g the earth i n water. N o b a c k f i l l i n g of t r e n c h e s by s c r a p e r s o r other m a c h i n e r y will b e a l l o w e d e x c e p t that on l o n g i t u d i n a l t r e n c h e s o u t s i d e the p a v e m e n t l i m i t s t h e u s e o f power b a c k f i l l e r s mounted on p n e u m a t i c t i r e s may b e u s e d if p r o v i s i o n s are m a d e for a d e q u a t e c o m p a c t i n g o f filled material. T h e work shall be so carried on t h a t not o v e r 300 l i n e a r feet of t r e n c h s h a l l remain o p e n at any time, u n l e s s o t h e r w i s e a u t h o r i x e d by die C o m m i s s i o n e r . ( 5) All s u r p l u s e s c a v a t e d m a t e r i a l and d e b r i s s h a l l be c l e a n e d up a n d removed from d i e s i t e o f t h e work upon t h e c o m p l e tion of t h e work by the P e r m i t t e e l e a v i t i g thm s i t e of t h e work in a n e a t and orderly c o n d i t i o n . ( 6) Where t o p s o i l . s e e d e d a r e n a or s o d arc d i s t u r b e d in the e x c a v a t i n g , P e r m i t t e e s h a l l r e a t o t e d i e ground s u r f a c e s to the same c o n d i t i o n s . ( 7) Manhole c o v e r s , frames a n d other a t r o c t o t w s p l a c e d wisianw d i e saauswwy l i m i t * s h a l l be of s u f f i c i e n t w e i g h t and strength snd of a s u i t a b l e type a n d s t a b i l i t y approved by rhe Cnsansiaaioaves and s h a l l be set f l u s h with the s u r f a c s of t h e p a v e ment. ( 8) The P e r m i t t e e s h a l l repair and m a i n t a i n at hia or its e x p e n s e any p r e s e n t or future d i s t u r b a n c e of d i e r o a d w a y *ad p a v e m e n t which may h a v e been c a u s e i t Vy work done pursuant to the term* of the permit h e r e i n , s a i d m a t a t e u a a c e to rover a period of ihirry ( } 0 ) dar» after c o m p l e t i o n of the work. - '. f ' r i ' | �( 9) All ••tail pipe* or conduits erecting road way pavesaeeta aUall, wherever poitiblc, be drivre beneath the p i r r i x w , without disturbances 10 die i » n i c c . Such pipe* or coadiuts ahull be eucloaed in sleeves or larger pipes ao that repaired replacements may be raade to the future without disturbance la the pavement, Fae the purpose of driving sack pipea or coaduita, ao opening or trench shall be made closer d»an two (2) (eel lo the edge of die pavement. Tuuaeliag under the pavement is prohibited. Driviag of pipes or conduits having s dimeaaioa greater diaa eight (8) inches shall be permitted only under »»ch special terms and coaditiona MI (he Commissioner may prescribe. (10) Permanent restoration of the finished pavement shall not be made until complete aettlement of the trench backfill shall have taken place, as directed by the Commissioner. Immediately sfter backfilling the trench, aa acceptable temporary repair of cold patch, bituminous macadam or other acceptable flexible pavement ma ten si shell be placed which shall be aaaiatained even with the roadway surface until permanent restoration of the pavement is ordered by the Commissioaer. If ordered bv the C o m m i s s i o n e r , c e m e n t c o n c r e t e may b e substituted for bituminous m a t e r i a l s in temporary r e p l a c e m e n t s . (11) At such rimes a a directed by the Commissioner, die peraaaaent replacement of pavement shall be made under the super vision and inspection of the Commiaaioner, as follows: (A) OB CONCRETE PAVEMENTS, which become undermined or broken the slabs shall be completely replaced on a prepared foundation with rein breed concrete nine (9) in. thick in the proportion of 1:2:5'/$ using High Early or Quick Setting Cement mixed by machine for at least 2 minutes. Materials and proportioning of aggregate shall be inspected aad approved by the Commissioner. When cross-trenches are excavated vertically, without undercutting the concrete pavements, die slab shall be oeady eat back a distance or* at least two (2) feet on each side of die outer walla of the trench aad replaced with a reinforced concrete patch. Wbere any portion of a patch ia nearer than eight (8) feet from an expansion joint the patch shall be ex••aded to die joint. There longitudinal trenches have been made in concrete pavements, the enure slab shall be ir* placed. Ia any event the new patch must re at upon undisturbed subgrade for at leasi two (2) feet ia all directions from the excavated area, aad muat be at least ten (10) feet lone ss measured parallel to center line of pavement, la removiag portioaa of slabs or reinforced concrete, care ahall be taken not ID remove all die reinforcing metal. New reiaforciag •trf7 1 shall be carefully tied aad bonded to old reinforcing ateel when making restorations. All reinforcement shall be 3/8" bars,scpaced 14" in each direction. Approved premouided expansion joints shall be inserted where directed aad all .'.'."-L'.': 'i ",j' BJ .. construction joints shi.ll be poured with an acceptable asphaltic material. The concrete ah ail be completely wetted mtt -i~ • ^.~J»,V *' P'* C » B I •* d covered wirf» six (6) inches of hay aad kept continuously saturated for ten (10) days. The u s e of aa ' ' j appmved high early-strength cement placed under approved methods, msy be required by die Commissioner for certain " " .. ' ' concrete pavement replacements where the delay aad inconvenience to traffic is of sufficient importance to warrant same. Satisfactory curing of die concrete ia of the greatest importance. , . . (B) On TEARING SURFACE PAVEMENTS (Asphaltic Concretes and blackeops, Granite blocks. Asphalt Blocks, Brick, etc.) n concrete foundation eight (8) inches ia dtickness shall be placed on a prepared foundation, ia the proportion of 1:2/4:5, uaing High Early or Quick Setting cement in the same manner as reinforced concrete pavements. The concrete j-s-ir •. - , a , j | be reinforced wid» approved wire mesh or 3 / 8 " reinforcing bars, placed 2" above bottom of concrete. This re> . placement shall cover an ares for a distance of not l e a s rkma two (2) feet on each aide of die outer walls of d»e uuacb ~. a s excavated aad must be at leaat ten (10) feet long aa measured parallel to center liae of pavement. This concrete .., _ foundation ahall be completely wetted after placing and kept covered with sis (6) inches of bay and kept coatinuouaty natttrtted for eight (8) days. After this curing i s completed, a wearing surface equivalent to pavement removed shall be ."V~U ' " placed in accordance with Standard County Specificationa, s s directed by the Coaunieainner. -•'-."'"w». iTL-!^ _" . At the- option of die Permittee die requireaaeat of ateel reinforcement is hereby rescinded provided the diickaess of ••-'-f + *. ~£*Z r, -the concrete uader (n) shall be eleven (11) inches and under (b) tea (10) inches. \~-i^ . . - ' - ( O On MACADAM PAVEMENTS, die replacement ahall be die same aa for wearing surface pavements, section (bL j - ^ •» ~*{12) Tbe permittee shall replace or re a tore satisfactorily to die Commissioaer of Public Works any pavement or other same& i ' j , - ^ -,' rase which may have seen damaged during die progress of die work for which die permit was issued even daongb suck "„•» « *»»- • pavenvent or structure was not proposed to be disturbed at die time of die granting of the pesmit. Section 5. All applications and permits ahall be in the form prescribed by the Commissioner of Public Works and shall be executed in triplicate by die applicant, ewom to before a awraam qualified a* administer oaths aad shall urn forth die amouat of depoaii accompanying said permit, together with a saute meat saving the County harmless for say claims of whatever nature arising out of the conduct of die work eo be performed under we peanut. •j;~';Vr.. ::.'" \ i i . . . \ "7 ". Section 6. If the character of me restoration work ia aot covered by die specificationa herein, die Commissioaer of ..•."i-,Uri,-.'.:v.Vi <•''••*:/'>':• Public Works shall prepare such additioaal specificationa, safegunrds, aad conditions as may be required a> be done M 7^f^y?:?^~?~- .'rS\-ir.-..' nmd performed by the applicant. ! ^ ^ ? ^ ^ . ^ ^ r ' ^ ; ' Section 7. STORING BUILDING MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT ON COUNTY ROADS: If in the course of building , ^^I^^>^;;7 / ^-.^:i'v;^^''op•»lim•a oa adjacent property it becomes necensnry to store building materials or equipment upon any County Road or T " ; T - ~ " V ^ ~ -; f:"^ aortioa tnereof, an application for a permit dierefor must be made, subject to die followiag terms aad conditions: — . . »•**.' . ^ ^ ' ' V ^ ^ - ^ i f * * " ^'** ' _ / •••••' "' ~ • v?Svj)^'-'*?«'-V*:S" *•' : '' .•l^S^J:^^'£;---.;:?•'' "'- •x^.-^iL.;.;.'-'.,».'' * v i s e ; '!••'•'»•. • „•>•'•/• *- • ^ft;:-VvrV..V'' '"'"," .»*: '"""'"'"'*'' •'r«'*V-\ >''•"" " la no cnae shall die area of die pavement used for such storage exceed in width twenty per cent of the total width of tme pavement or in length one huadred (100) feet. Such materials or equipment ss may be scored shall be neatly piled or placed, protected with adequate barricades and illuminnted, except during the daylight hours, with red lanterns or flares, spneed at intervals of aot more tkaa ten (10) feet. Appropriate warning signs and flares shall be kept coaataudy .«-\ . .•,&££^--.vrv'\Y V an position direc bmndred (300) feet distant from die space occupied as a warning to appaoaching vehicles. ' No buildiag amterial ot equipment shall be placed upon die pavement closer dinn tea (10) feet so aay hydraat nor ^C^'-:•,••'', •.";'' nwoa say manhole, valve or catch basins, nor s o as to interfere in any way with proper drainage upon the highway. i'^ : "'>.-v'«'V..>Section 8. RULES AND REGULATIONS REGULATING THE OPERATION OF HEAVY CONSTRUCTION EQUIP">. ; ^' ,; \>Vdoi. MENT, INCLUDING TRACTORS, POWER SHOVELS, ROLLERS. TRAILERS, GRADERS AND OTHER MACHINERY - ; : •WHICH DO NOT OPERATE ON PNEUMATIC TIRES: No construction equipment, excepting trucks, shsll operate on or be hauled over any County Road ualesa same shall be equipped with pneumatic urea or mounted upon a pneumatic tired trailer unless a permit dierefor shall have been first obtained from the Commiaaioner of Public Works. Said permit shall not be construed as s waiver of die provisions of die Vehicle and Traffic Law or of any local ordinance relative thereto. Said permit shall provide among odier things :e (a) # Each such vehicle when operated on a County Road shall be operated upon planks, mats or other suitable cushions, acceptable to and approved by the Commiaaioner of Public Works. (b) A competent flagman ahall at all times be placed at leaat two hundred (200) feet distant from the operating equipment to warn approaching vehiclea. (c) Adequate barricades and warning signs shall be creeled to protect the traveling public. (d) Any damage resulting from the operation of die equipment shall be repaired by the Permittee to the satisfaction of die Commiaaioner of Public Works. Section 9. SHADE TREES: No person, firm or corporation shall plant, remove, trim, damage or odicrwise alter any shade a r e or planting on any County Road outside of cities ot villages without fiist obtaining approval thereof in writing from the Commissioner of Public Works. �*t DRIVEWAY * CURB YORK Section 10. (•) Im lowering curb for driveways, only blue stone, granite, or integral curb will be allowed to b« cut. All concrete curb •M»I b« removed and replaced with new concrete curbing to b» the required height. (b) On ihoulder roads, the grade of driveway at the property tine should be the same elevation ac the Center line grade at die rood. Modification of this may be allowed if apecidcaUy permitted by the Commissioner. (c) Driveway entrance shall not begin within five (5) feet of the point where the prolongation of the property line meeta the edge of the pavement. Id) No more than two points of ingress or egreaa to a County Road from a tingle commercial or industrial establishment will be permitted. Neither of the foregoing shall be more than 30' wide measured at the pavement edge, unless special approval i s obtained from the Commissioner. The Commissioner reserves the right, however, to require th* construction of acceleration and deceleration lane* together widi channelization at certain types of high traffic volume generating -•a V'M facilities. -,,.•;• .; . -, Driveways crossing sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the specifications oftne thetocat local muntcipaury. municipality. , u . ^ ^ ^ . ^ i j ^ L cations ot (0 Wherever a driveway aproa i s installed, die area fron the pavement to die propertyy line shall be paved to die s a t i s f a c .l*^^rfif'^i^i• tion of the Commissioner. t J;.". - . Section U . EXCEPTIONS* Nothing la d i e s * rotes and regulations shall be construed to restrict "oir prevent the '.>..., w.»*«•>> constriction, maintenance or repair of any sidewalk by a municipality under laws and ordinances applicable thereto "•&} OTS& %& A -*. except 1* those operations o f construction, maintenance or repair where the use of any portion of the pavement of »'T,,j Couary Road is affected or re u trie ted or to restrict or prevent the adoption and enforcement of local municipal traffic ... v '; coatrol ordinances, roles and regulations not inconsistent widi the provisions of Chapter 609 of die Laws of 1941„ • ' J ^ ^ S S vf» •!,; nad/or subsequent revisions. >, : .... -•.*--' • -<.:<.;•..•.--. .».-. .v •*• ..»-»M~ -, W-»*ii£-«f!j$ • *,,.-,, ^.u.A.^^.^^K-i,^ ;.: ••:»r--,X,..^w;«:.^<. U/ - \ ^ '- ;^,;^\i fXy^f-tVn**T^^^''^^^&^ '"• (13) The Permittee hereby deposit* with the Commissioner die sum of I ........".^......;...'^..7...................'.as security for the. i&'$ljfc!»S . '•'•.' .v/ faithful performance of all the terms, covenant* and conditions on his part to be done and performed, which said sum -srl^iS • ' •-« shall be retained by die Commissioner until ac least 30 days after die date of final completion and acceptance by die [,$$$'4 •;: -.. ;' y* Commissioner of the work to be done and performed'pursuant to die terms of diis permit. Upon- the failure or. default by .^""jKj .•"' -»i *> -i: the Permittee of any of the terms, covenants and conditions on hi» part to be done and performed said deposit may be ' / H i ? -.' .' '..'-used by the County of Westchester for any expense incurred by the County of Westchester by reason o>Psuch-failure or ' ~'X™'' J---T-' - default on the part of die Permittee. The Permittee agrees that such expenses as certified by die Commissioner shall.be <--!f''.'5 binding upon said Permittee. • •^---^•^••! . •'• • • -•• -•- • •"••• i V V V - - • ••- '•v-^.; "(14) The Commissioner by issuing this permit assumes no liability on his psrt or on the pnrt of The County of Westchester and die Permittee shall be solely liable for all acts done or to be done pursuant to same. "' " "'* * ., -. (15) In addition to die above conditions, the Permittee shall conform to the following special requirements fc>i die wont permitted: „ . - . , . . .,—. .; SPECIAL CONDITIONS . . , - . , r .-..• ~ ::'" " PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION A FIELD KEETIEG WILL BE BErQUIREDWITH OUR ^'' ENGINEERING INSPECTOR BILL PHILLIPS. 2 8 5 - & 9 5 1 - THE'APPLICANT SHALL SAW CUT ANY ASPHALT OVERLAY ON EXISTING CONCRBTF ROABVAT; ~MOL.LEAST 6 * OF? ROAD EDGE ONTO PAVEMENT*. THE EDGE SHALL BE TACK COATED FOR TOP COURSE ASPHALT FLACEHENTe. EXISTING ROADWAY TO BE SAW* CUT AS PER THE ENGINEERING INSPECTOR'S DIRECTION* I" Approval and consent to grant die permit i s hereby given by the duly authorized municipal representative. .19 / / ^ V Name and Title (J Municipality Date Chairman. Planning BnaH (To be executed by Contractor, if road i s under construction) I, the duly authorized representative of Contractor, who ia under contract for improvement of die road herein mentioned, ' do hereby approve die granting of the permit. Maria Racanelli, President Racwel Construction Aug. 25 Firm or corporation Name and Title 92 JO 19 Date If this application is accompanied by deposit, state name and address to whom refund is to be made. Racwel Construction 63 Main Street Dobbs Ferry, N^Y. (Name) APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE DATED .GCI.0.2...E92. /iddress) COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ,19 By - DE ^ 9 B M £ N ) T » « OK^UBUU / ... 1 Supi. of Road Maintenance 10522 �BEDFORD PARK ASSOCIATES, INC. CHASE BUILDING - 2ND FLOOR 3 6 0 SOUTH BROADWAY TAR&YTOWN, NEW YORK 1 0 5 9 1 (914) 693-1231 FAX ( 9 1 4 ) 6 7 4 - 0 2 9 1 « U W K RACAwau. wies. MAJHA RACAHB4J. SCCTY. ouflLSs M . PATEMAN. vies n o . THOMAS J. UmfTW. TUBAS. Mr. James Galgano, Chairman Planning Board Village of North Tarrytown 28 Beekman Avenue North Tarrytown, New York 10591 Re: Bedford Park Subdivision Dear Mr. Galgano: In accordance with condition 14 of the Resolution of the Planning Board dated September 17, 1992, the applicant makes the following offers to the Village of North Tarrytown and will abide by those offers: 1. Condition 10 of Resolution- The applicant offers to refrain from transferring title to any of the proposed subdivision's fourteen (14) lots until driveway permits for each of the site's four (4) driveways proposed for Bedford Road and each of the Site's four (4) driveways proposed for Webber Avenue have been obtained in final form the appropriate New York State and Westchester County approval authorities. 2. Condition 11 of Resolution- The applicant offers to absorb the full cost and financial impact of the loss of any lots and to waive any rights to claims of compensation due to a reduction in the proposed subdivision's lot count that is the result of the applicant's failure to obtain from the appropriate New York State or Westchester County approval authorities driveway curb cut permits for any of the four (4) driveways proposed for Bedford Road or any of the four (4) driveways proposed for Webber Avenue. �3. Condition 12 of Resolution' In lieu of bonding for the proposed utilities, planting plan and tree removal permit requirements, if the applicant fails to complete the project, all monies held in escrow by the Village of North Tarrytown, including but not limited to fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.) in payments for recreation fees associated with this site and any outstanding sums not previously spent for inspection and consultant fees, shall be forfeited to the Village and may be used by the Village to complete the utilities and to restore the site to a vegetated state as similar to its existing condition as is practicable. In no case, shall the use of such monies release the applicant from its duty to pay such recreation, consultant and inspection fees and to complete all utilities and plantings required by this resolution or required by the Tree Commission of the Village of North Tarrytown. 4. Condition 13 of Resolution- The applicant, at its sole cost and expense, shall repair any public street that is damaged or subjected to unusual wear due to the applicant's construction activity and associated activities. Very truly yours, G&tcfc—-^ Charles M. Pateman Vice-President � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1992-10-02 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1992 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/2d5098b5695ea173f4b44e1cd80e7c1b.pdf eae0ab127e82708150320477d72d8d27 PDF Text Text PLANNING BOARD Regular Meeting North Tarrytown, N.Y. October 15, 1992 FINAL A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on Thursday, October 15, 1992 at 8:00 P.M. in the Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: James Galgano, Chairperson Steve Salman Roman Windas Ellen Tsangaris Edward McCarthy ABSENT: James Donovan Richard Ayers ALSO PRESENT: James Margotta, Building Inspector Robert W. Spencer, Village Attorney Joseph Gulino, Chas. Manganaro Susan Portman, F. Clark Assoc. Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8 P.M. IN THE MATTER OF AFFORDABLE RIVER COMMUNITY HOUSING, Depeyster Street, Owned by Immaculate Conception Church, Extension of Planning Board site plan approval at 20 Depevster Street. Chairman Galgano reported on the status of the project. John Hughes, Jr., representing the intended sponsor, requested that the Board grant a one year extension of site plan approval. He stated that applications for funding had been submitted to the State, but no answer has been received yet. After discussion, Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris, that, due to extenuating circumstances, the project was being held up for State approval and the Board hereby grants a one year extension of site plan approval. Carried unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF DR. LAWRENCE GELLERMAN, 170 HUNTER AVENUE. Chairman Galgano stated that this matter was a continuation from a previous meeting. Mr. Spencer stated that the Zoning Board granted various variances as requested by Dr. Gellerman. Mr. John Hughes, Jr., representing Dr. Gellerman, stated that Dr. Gellerman was not in good health and was in the process of getting his estate in order. He has no plans for building in the near future on the vacant lot to be created by the subdivision. He stated that several items requested by the village planner would be �costly to obtain; and he felt that they were unnecessary at the present time. He stated that he would present additional information at the next meeting in order for the Board to make a decision on the subdivision application. Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris, to open the public hearing. Carried unanimously. George Fitzpatrick, 142 Hunter Avenue, a neighbor of Dr. Gellerman's, stated that most lots on Hunter Avenue are 60 feet in width and Dr. Gellerman's lots will be 66 feet and 70 feet wide. Mr. Fitzpatrick felt that the Board should approve Dr. Gellerman's request. Mr. Salman stated that blueprints should be provided to the Board in order to make a decision. A) §s ft O There being no future comments, Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. Windas, that the hearing be adjourned to the Board's November meeting. Carried unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF PHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, NORTH BROADWAY Chairman Galgano stated that the matter was a continuation from the last meeting of the Board. Bruce Allen, representing Phelps Memorial Hospital, outlined the new plans for a M.R.I. Facility. He stated that many patients of the hospital must be transported to a M.R.I, facility elsewhere in the county. It is the intention of the hospital to install its own. He stated that the building will be temporary until the new medical building is constructed, It will be leased to a group of doctors and will be taxable by the Village. He stated that the Building Inspector has looked at the plans and has approved them. Chairman Galgano questioned the number of parking spaces to be added. Mr. Allen stated that sufficient parking spaces will be added. Mr. Salman asked if the equipment would interfere with police and fire radios. Mr. Allen stated that it would not. Mr. Allen stated that it was the intention of the Hospital to start immediately before the cold weather sets in. Discussion followed regarding environmental assessment for the new project. The Hospital maintains that it was part of the office project previously submitted and that it was approved by the Planning Board. • Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. Windas, that the Planning Board be designated the lead agency for the project. Carried unanimously. •-k&ciii* �Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr, McCarthy, that the meeting be adjourned to October 21st to allow the Hospital to present an environmental assessment for the M.R.I, building. Carried unanimously. Discussion followed regarding the two projects and Mr. Salman stated that he would like to see final plans for the medical building and the M.R.I, building. Mr. Windas stated that the site plan for the medical building has previously been approved with no changes, and the proposal submitted for the M.R.I, should be voted upon separately. MINUTES After a Tsangaris, to September 17th members of the discussion, Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Ms. postpone approval of the draft of minutes of so that they may be corrected, as suggested by the Board. Carried unanimously. There being no further business to come before the Board, Mr. Windas moved, seconded by Mr. Salman, that the same be duly adjourned. Carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Irene Amato Acting Clerk ./.i.'jrtaiaki'''' �Approye^with respect to substance and form: Vr- Village Attorney Dated: i t ^ ^ Approved by the Planning Board . lrroan or Acting Chairmajr/ Dated: t(/n/ ?t(/ Filed with Village Clerk :ierk or Clerk Clerk or Deputy Depu Dated: it I^41 a* SEPTEMBER 17, 1992 Date of Meeting � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1992-10-15 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1992 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/2fffa960dc40d1b47947bf0e8e33fa2d.pdf 63e51a949a013f8e5ae0f59f4a460135 PDF Text Text « r Planning Board Special Meeting North Tarrytown, New York October 21, 1992 FINAL A special meeting of the Planning Board was held on Wednesday, October 21, 1992 at 8:00 PM in Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. Present: James Galgano, Chairman Edward McCarthy Ray Windas Steve Salman Richard Ayres (arrived late) Ellen Tsangaris Also Present: Absent: Robert W. Spencer, Village Attorney Susan Portman, Frederick P. Clark Associates James Donovan IN THE MATTER OF PHELPS HOSPITAL - MRI PROJECT This is an adjourned public hearing. Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Mr. Windas, that the Planning Board declared itself lead agency for purposes of conducting an environmental review of the project. The motion was unanimously adopted. The Hospital advised that it will provide handicapped parking spaces, as required by the ADA Act. The Hospital will provide a revised site plan of the entire Hospital site to show the location of the spaces. The Hospital will also show on the revised site plan the details of the MRI building. Phelps requested that the Village issue a conditional foundation approval so that it could prepare the site for the MRI unit. The Hospital agreed that the Village could grant such approval subject to: (i) any comments of the Westchester County Planning Department with respect to the project and (ii) the approval of the Planning Board for the parking spaces (including the handicapped spaces). Phelps agreed to contribute $2400 in recreation fees based on 2 required parking spaces for the MRI building. Dr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. Windas, that the project should be classified as a Type I action because the Hospital is located in a critical environmental area and that the Planning Board has determined that the project would not have any material adverse 1 �impact on the environment. The motion was unanimously adopted. IN THE MATTER OP THE LUBERGER ESTATE - SUBDIVISION Mr. Spencer reported a conversation with Robert Barstow, architect for the project, in which Mr. Barstow advised that the berm had been removed from the parking space in back of the commercial building and the oil tank pipe had been removed. The oil tank is to be removed or filled with sand in accordance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. The Planning Board wants the tank removed. There is a question whether the garden in the rear of the multi-family residence will be paved. The Planning Board requested that the Building Inspector check on the status of the project. IN THE MATTER OF THE BEDFORD PARK PROJECT The Board asked who was responsible for making certain that the developer complied with the various conditions of approval of the subdivision and site plan. The Building Inspector has primary responsibility. There was a question whether the developer had filed any bond required by the tree removal permit. Dr. Salman requested that counsel review the bonding provisions of the various resolutions to insure that there were no conflicting provisions. Respectfully submitted, Robert W. Spencer RWS/ab 2 �Approved with, respect to substance and form: Uo Village Attorney , Dated: y V J " M I? Approved by the Planning Board / X-^z^ /Cnafirman or Acting Chairman f Dated: n. 'f/?i~ F i l e d w i t h V i l l a g e Clerk Clerk orm)eputy Clerk orm)epi Dated 9-U OCTOBER 15r 1992 Date of Meeting � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1992-10-21 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1992 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/b068c11738bf5225de3c84652a3638f2.pdf 28cb719f737eed164f1cd6cf0a21950f PDF Text Text FINAL A Special Meeting was held by the Planning Board on November 5, 1992, in Village Hall. Members Present: Also Present: Absent: Roman Windas Ellen Tsangaris Edward McCarthy Steven Salman James Galgano Susan Portman, Frederick P. Clark Associates Robert Spencer, Esq. James Margotta, Building Inspector James Donovan Richard Ayers The meeting was called to order at 8:00 PM. IN THE MATTER OF PHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, NORTH BROADWAY, NORTH NEW YORK. (M.R.I, site Plan Proposal) TARRYTOWN, Mr. Galgano stated that the Board has received the site plans. Mr. Salman asked if anthing had been heard from Westchester County Planning Department. Ms. Portman stated that the County would respond only if there were an issue. No response has been received. Mr. Galgano stated that our Village Engineer and Ms. Portman are satisfied with the project. Mr. Salman made a motion to approve the (M.R.I.) site plan seconded by Mr. McCarthy. Motion carried unanimously. Being no further business, this meeting was adjourned. Christine A. Yurkov Recording Secretary �Approv^d^with Respect to substance and form: Village Attorne Dated: -fhlh Approved by the Planning Board Chairman or. Acting Chairjsan pafie&i i if 9hi. Filed with Village Clerk Clerk ov Deputy Clerk Dated: n/zLiJlJL— OCTOBER 21, 1992 Date of Meeting (SPECIAL MEETING) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1992-11-05 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1992 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/dc4b6f08cced00adab7f25368f64a9d1.pdf 99d538a7cea28bd89d57c0103c658aa7 PDF Text Text I I. PLANNING BOARD REGULAR MEETING NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK FINAL NOVEMBER 19, 1992 A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on the above date at Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: James Galgano, Chairman Ellen Tsangaris Steve Salman Richard Ayers James Donovan Edward McCarthy ABSENT: Roman Windas ALSO PRESENT: Robert Spencer, Village Attorney James Margotta, Building Inspector Joe Gulino-Chas Manganaro Engineer Susan Portman-Frederick Clark Associates Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8 P.M. 1• ARLINDO RUIVO, 39 DEPEYSTER STREET-REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION Mr. John Hughes, Jr., representing Mr. Ruivo, stated that Mr. Ruivo purchased the property from Albert Peck and had completely renovated the existing building. He would now like to subdivide the property in order to build a new residence. Mr. Hughes presented a preliminary sketch of a layout, stating that several variances would be required. He stated that the Code would allow the building of a four family dwelling, but parking would be an issue. He stated that he would confer with the Planning Consultant and then go before the Zoning Board. Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. Donovan, that the matter be referred to the Zoning Board. Carried unanimously. 2. LAWRENCE GELLERMAN Mr. Hughes requested that the matter of Dr. Gellerman be postponed to a later date. The Board agreed to postpone this application. �3. CHARLES PATEMAN-BEDFORD ROAD ASSOC.-CONTINUED Mr. Pateman stated he has received permits for driveways on Bedford Road and Webber Avenue from the County and State. His purpose was to request the Board to reduce the requirements for the cul de sac on Amos Street to a 50 foot radius (40 feet paved radius). Mr. Salman stated he would like to hear the comments of the residents who were present. Ann Petri stated she would like Mr. Pateman to abide by the requirements of the Code. She stated she was concerned for the safety of the area children and would like to keep the character of the neighborhood. Arthur Ceconi, Amos Street stated that a letter from the Briggsville Neighborhood Association reiterated the area residents' view. (Copy of letter in official minutes). Gabriel P. Hayes, Amos Street, stated that the letter did not present the views of all the residents of the area. He felt that a cul-de-sac with a paved diameter of 100 feet was too large and that 85 feet should be enough. With the construction of new homes he felt that the area would be beautiful, and he welcomes the construction. Dorothy Paolantonio, Amos Street, stated that a lot of trucks, including U.P.S. and oil trucks, turn around on Amos Street and there have been no problems. She is in favor of the smaller cul-de-sac. She stated her daughter is interested in purchasing one of the homes and felt that all the children in the area will be playing in the new cul-de-sac if kept at its present size. Joseph DeMichele, Amos Street, stated that his home is right next door and he feels that the cul-de-sac will be too big. Executive Board members of the Briggsville Neighborhood Association stated they had met the previous night and the letter was an official communication from the Association. Their main concern was the ability of ambulances and fire trucks to get in and out of the area quickly. Mr. Kringas, Webber Avenue, stated that he was not in favor of the large cul-de-sac. The members of the Association opposed to the smaller cul-de-sac do not live directly adjacent to the cul-de-sac. The neighbors who do live adjacent are not in favor of the large cul-de-sac. Mr. Arthur Ceconi stated he wanted the contractor to adhere to the Code. �Mrs. Ann Petri wanted the Board to consider opening up Cottage Street. Mr. Galgano stated it had been considered, but the grade up to Bedford Road was too steep to comply to safety standards. Mr. Pateman stated that due to the opposition he would withdraw his request to make the cul-de-sac smaller. Mr. Pateman stated he was awaiting approval from the Board of Health and would like the Board to grant him a ninety day extension to complete the conditions for approval of the subdivision and site plan. He stated it would take more than ninety days for the Board of Health to act on the matter. He stated the local district office has approved but he is waiting for State approval. After discussion, Mr. Spencer stated that to obtain a building permit he must satisfy all the requirements as spelled out in the Board's approval of the subdivision. After discussion, Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers, to grant Mr. Pateman an extension up to 180 days in order to obtain the necessary State and Local Health Department permits. Carried unanimously. MINUTES Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy, that the minutes of the meeting held on September 17th, 1992 be approved as submitted. Carried unanimously. Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers, that the minutes of the meeting held on October 15th, 1992 be approved as submitted. Carried unanimously. Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy, that the minutes of the meeting held on October 21st, 1992 be approved as submitted. Carried unanimously. Mr. Tsangaris moved, seconded by Mr. Salman, that the minutes of the meeting held on November 5th, 1992 be approved as submitted. Carried unanimously. Discussion was had on the timely submission of information to the Board. Discussion followed regarding the Luberger Property on Valley Street. Mr. Margotta stated that all requirements have been met. He stated that the material in the oil tank has been removed and the "berm" has been taken care of. The matter of parking on the premises was also discussed. There being no further business to come before the Board, �Mr. Salman moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy, that the meeting be adjourned. Carried unanimously. Mr. Galgano stated that the next meeting of the Board would be held on January 21st, 1993. Respectfully submitted, Irene Amato Acting Clerk nmiTV CLERK �Appr/ro^d w i t h r e s p e c t t o substance and form: J 6xyrM Village Atton Dated: f J u({<{fcy Approved by the Planning Board Ch%ifman or Acting Chairjfran •ed: //^Y?2_ Filed with Village Clerk .erk ov ov. Deputy Clerk Clerk Dated: Mo*// 9 NOVEMBER 5, 1992 (SPECIAL MEETING) Date of Meeting � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1992-11-19 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1992 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1992