1 25 6 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/ac6eaa6b1e4cb1a3331b5e8736356822.pdf 00b30a06917e0e178a83bc5003e5bf9b PDF Text Text REGULAR MEETING NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK March 21. 1996 A regular meeting of the North Tarrytown Planning Board was held on March 21,1996 at 8:00 p.m. in the Village hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: George Hritz, Chairman Donald Caetano Nicholas Cicchetti Betsy Sawyer Gaylin Joanne Becker Edward McCarthy David Perlmutter ALSO PRESENT: Janet A. Gandolfo, Village Attorney James Margotta, Building Inspector Christian Miller, Frederick P. Clark, Assoc. Mark DiGennero, CAMCE Chairman Hritz called the meeting to order at 8:10 p.m. Chairman Hritz commented that Trustee Sweet reminded him that a meeting was scheduled on Monday night before the Tarrytown Planning Board regarding the Hudson Recyling, Inc. final environmental impact statement. 1. Roger and Graciela Rodriguez. 23 Hudson Street - Application for retaining wall Applicants were not present. 2. Chestnut Ridge site plan application continuation - Laurentino Rodrigues Chairman Hritz read a memo from the engineers dated March 14,1996 and according to Mr. Cheverlier, the applicant's engineer, the project submittal should not be considered final at this time. Chairman Hritz confirmed this fact with Mr. Turnquist, architect for the applicant. Mr. Turnquist explained that some of the testing on the borrings werre not good and had to be done over. The applicant went back to the structural engineer to do several borrings again. Mr. Turnquist said that the Village engineer wanted a stamp or seal on the documents from the soil engineers but this was a problem because the engineer was in South Carolina. Mr. DiGennaro stated that there was a discrepancy between the two sets of borrings submitted by the application. He also insisted that the applicant's engineer stamp his seal on any submissions. This had not been done. Mr. Miller stated that he had two outstanding items with the parking area on the plans. The clearance height did not seem to be high enough to meet the 9'6" required by the State and the handicapped space did not appear to be big enough. Ms. Gandolfo asked whether the plans now submitted combined all of the earlier plans. Mr. Miller stated that this final submission was considered a complete plan and it �contained all the relevant information. Discussion on the plans followed. Mr. DiGennerao stated that he wasn't sure what the applicant planned for Wall B. Mr. Turnquist stated that the entire wall was going to be a crib wall. The applicant stated that he need approval for Wall A so that he could get started before the bad weather. Mr. DiGennaro stated that if he straightened out the issue of the seal with Wall A he would have no problem approving it. The Chairman stated that the Board could pass a resolution approving the project subject to the receipt of the seals by the applicant's engineer. Mr. DiGennaro stated that it was up to the board whether they wanted to allow a project to commence with that condition. Mr. Miller stated that if approval was granted, it should be granted for the whole project subject to the above conditions. A discussion on Walls A and B ensued. Mr. Caetano asked Mr. Turnquist how long it would take to submit the final stamped plans. Mr. Turnquist stated that could be submitted next week. Mr. Cicchetti stated that in November of 1995 the Board faced a similar situation with this application. The Board said then that Mr. Rodrigues could go ahead with one wall on conditional approval. Mr. Perlmutter stated that once the applicant submits all final plans to the Village consultants he can get started. Mr. Caetano made a motion to close the Public Hearing. Mr. Perlmutter seconded. Public Hearing closed. Chairman Hritz stated that the site plan approval was subject to the following: 1. Receipt of the plans for retaining Wall B by Frederick P. Clark, Assoc, and the Village Engineer and their approval of same. 2. Receipt of the final seals from the crib wall design engineer. 3. Corrections of the drawings to reflect the clearance height for handicapped parking and the tree change. 4. Receipt of the final seals for the soils. Mr. Caetano made a motion to approve the site plan application subject to the �conditions previously mentioned. Mr. Cicchetti seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Sunoco Service Station canopy application. 377 No. Broadway John Hughes, Esq., attorney for the applicant, stated the Nick Galbo has been operating the gas part of the business for the last 5 years and has a long term lease to continue to operate the business. The only new structure in this application would be for a canopy over the pumps. It involves taking the existing structure and remodeling the interior, so the garage bays are essentially removed and in their place a convenience style store would be built. Discussion on the existing and proposed lay-out ensued. Mr. Hughes stated that if the applicant were not allowed to maintain a large apron on the property, he would not continue with this application. Discussion followed as to whether the New York State DOT would allow the apron. The application was adjourned to the next Planning Board meeting. 4. Tim Cronin. 15 Bedford Road - Sleepy Hollow Road Mr. Cronin said that the ARB referred them to the Planning Board because they fell under the new ordiance in reference to changing the slopes. They had a back yard that the slopes are appoximately 33%. When we built a retaining wall, an 8" high retaining wall, it created a 40%. There was a vacant lot behind and south of that was a new sub-division owned by Mr. Barstow. We promised to put trees on top of the wall. Chairman Hritz asked if all he needed was a specific approval for the wall. Mr. Cronin said that was it. He passed pictures of the property and wall around to the Board members and explained them to the Board. He said that the ARB did not opposed the 3 level wall. He submitted a drainage analysis to the engineer. They will not increase the run-off to the neighbors. Discussion followed on the wall. Mr. Caetano asked about landscaping. Mr. DiGennaro said that his only comment was that he was asked to look at the wall. It seemed to satisfy the requirements. The only thing was that on the plans there weren't any calculations for the wall. Chairman Hritz asked for a motion to approve the application subject to Mr. DiGennaro receiving satisfaction with the wall calculations. Mr. Caetano made the motion to approve subject to Mr. DiGennaro receiving the wall calculations. Ms. Becker seconded. Motion carried unanimously. �Mr. Perlmutter moved to approve the February 15, 1996 minutes as amended. Mr. McCarthy seconded. Motion carried unanimously. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submited, ^ CARMEN G. MARIANO Recording Secretary �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. David J. Portman, AICP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: March 15, 1996 Subject: 377 North Broadway Site Plan Application As requested, we have inspected the subject premises and reviewed the application for site plan approval to alter and convert an existing gasoline station and repair shop to a convenience store. The proposed development also includes the relocation of existing gas pumps and the construction of a 24' x 40' canopy over the relocated pumps. The property is located at the intersection of North Broadway and Pocantico Street immediately south of Philipsburg Manor and is situated in the C-l Highway Commercial District. We offer the following comments for your review and consideration: 1. Required Variances The Applicant should provide a zoning compliance table which identifies the proposed development's conformance with the standards of the C-l Zoning District. This information is required to ascertain those variances that will be required from the Zoning Board of Appeals. Preliminarily, it appears that the subject property will require a variance from the 20-foot rear yard setback requirement of the C-l District, loading space requirements and the 5,000 square foot minimum lot size requirement for gasoline service stations located on corner lots. The Applicant will need to provide, however, further information regarding the size of the property and the gross square footage of the proposed convenience store to establish whether additional variances are required. 2. Placement of Underground Storage Tanks The Applicant should indicate whether the existing underground fuel storage tanks will be replaced as a part of the proposed development. If such a relocation is proposed, the location of the tanks should conform to the street and yard setback requirements of § 62-19(b) in the Village's Zoning Code. Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX • (914) 967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation 3. Drainage Under the provisions § 62-19(c) of the Village's Zoning Code, surface drainage contaminated with petroleum products shall not be permitted to drain into any natural watercourse in the Village. To assist the Planning Board in this determination, the Applicant should provide a drainage plan for the proposed development. The plan should include the location of existing and proposed stormwater catch-basins. 4. Curbing and Circulation The site currently has very little curbing separating it from North Broadway and Pocantico Street. We recommend that the plan be revised in accordance with § 62-22 of the Village's Zoning Code regarding vehicular access to commercial uses. Issues of access are important given the amount and type of traffic the proposed use is expected to generate. Poorly designed access could impact traffic flow at the adjacent intersection of North Broadway and Pocantico. The applicant should also provide on-site vehicular and pedestrian circulation plan indicating the location of all curb-cuts on the property. The plan should be revised to include the right-of-way for North Broadway. 5. Architectural Review Board Because of the visual prominence of this corner (directly across from the Philipsburg Manor) and the fact that this is among the first commercial properties one encounters when approaching the Central Business District from the north, the Planning Board should refer this application to the Architectural Review Board with regard to the design and details of the proposed canopy and convenience store. This will help to ensure that issues of community appearance are properly addressed. 6. Landscape Plan The applicant should submit a landscape and screening plan indicating the type and quantity of plant material. It appears that there maybe opportunities for additional landscaping at the southwest corner of the property. 2 �I f FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation 7. Lighting Plan The applicant should provide a lighting plan that includes the proposed hours of operation. 8. Parking • 9. Refuse • 10. The plan should be revised to increase the handicapped access isle width to 8 feet. No provisions for garbage disposal have been included on the plan. The plan should be revised to show the location of any dumpsters on the property and their appropriate screening. New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) • The construction of the proposed canopy is considered a Type I Action under SEQRA since the proposed action is "substantially contiguous to" Philipsburg Manor, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is also a National Historic Landmark. This Type I Action will require a "coordinated review" since it involves approval from other involved agencies. At its next meeting, the Planning Board should declare its intent to be Lead Agency. Christian K. Miller Associate/Planning cc: • Mayor Sean Treacy Linda E. David, Village Administrator Janet A. Gandolfo, Esq., Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Dr. Richard Sweet, Village Trustee Mark A DiGennaro, Village Engineer David Arus, Applicant 5oo\not6-oi3.cicm:ev �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut David J. Portman, AICP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tanytown Planning Board Date: March 14, 1996 Subject: Review of Proposed Retaining Wall For 23 Hudson Street As requested, we have inspected the property and reviewed the application of Mr. Roger Rodriguez for site plan approval. The applicant is proposing to construct a retaining wall along the rear perimeter of the lot, regrade the property and construct an asphalt parking area. The property is located at 23 Hudson Street and is situated in the M-Manufacturing District. The property currently contains a 2 1/2 story frame building containing four dwelling units and is a nonconforming use in the M-Manufacturing District. We provide the following comments for your review and consideration: 1. Regulation of Walls Under the provisions of Section 62-13.F(3) no wall shall be permitted in excess of six feet in an M Manufacturing District. Significant portions of the proposed wall exceed this six-foot limitation and in portions are between 15 and 18 feet above the existing grade. Variances from this provision will be required from the Zoning Board of Appeals. 2. Location of Proposed Wall The applicant has located the proposed wall along the outer-most edge of the rear property line. Given the size of the wall and its proximity to existing buildings and structures, it could have an impact on adjacent properties. The applicant should revise the plan to include all structures and buildings located on adjacent properties. In particular, the plan should clearly show the location of the building owned by the Village of North Tanytown immediately west of the site, the Village of North Tanytown parking lot to the north and the dwelling and retaining wall located on the adjacent property to the south. Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX • (914) 967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Proposed Use of Property The Applicant should clarify for the Planning Board the intended use of the site after the proposed wall is constructed. Given the considerable expense of constructing the wall, it is logical to speculate that the applicant intends to make additional improvements to the site or use the property for additional purposes, such as off-street parking. If future improvements are anticipated for the property, such as an expansion of the existing residential building, the applicant should include such improvements as a part of this application. If not, the filing of two separate applications for development on this property would constitute "segmentation" under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and is not permitted. Safety Considerations The height of the wall, combined with the slope of the adjacent grade, pose a potential safety hazard to people, particularly children, and objects falling from the top of the proposed wall. Given the property's location within a residential area a fence should be required around the top perimeter of the proposed wall. Parking and Circulation The plans should be revised to show the exact extent of the proposed asphalt paving area and all pavement markings. Visual Impact The proposed height of the wall is considerable and could result in significant visual impacts on adjacent properties or views from the west. The applicant should identify the materials to be used for the proposed wall and how impact on views will be mitigated. New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) Under the provisions of SEQR the construction of the proposed wall constitutes an Unlisted action. 2 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation 8. Additional Information The plan should be modified to reflect the removal of the frame shed located in the northeast corner of the property and the dilapidated shed on the rear of the site. The plan should indicate the size of the parcel. The plan should show all proposed grading and quantify the amount of filling that is proposed on the property. Christian K. Miller Associate/Planning cc: Mayor Sean Treacy Linda E. David, Village Administrator Janet A. Gandolfo, Esq., Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Dr. Richard Sweet, Village Trustee Mark A. DiGennaro, Village Engineer Roger Rodriguez, Applicant 500\not6-010.ckm.crc 3 �< « Approved w i t h > r e s p e c t t o s u b s t a n c e and form: illageftAtxto: Villag Dated: ^\\% Approved by the Planning Board > Chair Dated: ' Chairman Filed with Village Clerk 03T TX "D-eguty Clerk (JleikT or Dated: <* JJZJ* J f^ \S\<L\.cL 3U?76 Date of Meeting � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1996 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1996-03-21 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1996 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1996 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/bb881e5c1e60ba45821adc69d5c0e6e1.pdf 284ea173bf197890cdaa08b5b2804b40 PDF Text Text REGULAR MEETING NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK April 18. 1996 A regular meeting of the North Tarrytown Planning Board was held on April 18, 1996 at 8:00 P.M. in the Village hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: George Hritz, Chairman Donald Caetano Joanne Becker Edward McCarthy Nicholas Cicchetti David Perlmutter Betsy Sawyer Gaylin ALSO PRESENT: Janet A. Gandolfo, Village Attorney Mark A. DiGennaro, CAMCE Christian K. Miller, Assoc /Planning Chairman Hritz called the meeting to order at 8:10 p.m. 1 Roger & Graciela Rodriguez, 23 Hudson Street - Discussion Mr. Barstow, representing Rodriguez, came forward and said that they had the memorandum from DiGennaro and Clark Assoc. He asked DeGennaro if he had received the fax and DeGennaro answered that he did receive a fax on the retaining wall. Mr. Barstow explained the site plan for the retaining wall in detail. He said that it did back up to the Village property. The applicant presently has three(3) parking spaces. He intends to provide two(2) more spaces and a garden area. There are 4 apartments in the building. He went on to address some of the comments from DiGennaro's, particularly the soil borring He said that he consulted with a soil boning company and that it was difficult to get a machine in there to do the borring. One borring could be done per day at a cost of $1,000.00 plus per borring. He continued to explain the conditions around the area and that there was a Village parking lot on the other side of the proposed retaining wall. He concluded by stating that they wanted to get an idea as to what to expect from the Board on this application. They were proposing a retaining wall for the applicants property. Mr. Caetano asked if Mr. Barstow thought that the Village parking lot might be damaged by the construction of the retaining wall. Mr. Barstow said that it wasn't for him to say. Mr. DiGennaro said that the fill under the parking lot was composed of different things. A tree seemed to be holding up the wall. He didn't know how they were going to put up a retaining wall without touching the existing tree. �Discussion on the existing tree that seemed to be holding up the wall followed. Mr. Miller stated that even if the tree was not moved, if the new wall disturbed xU roots, the parking lot could become unstable. Chairman Hritz asked Mr. DiGennaro if he recommended that they wait for the Building Inspector to check it out. Mr. DiGennaro went over other conditions that the applicant had to address. Mr. Miller stated that it was a tall structure, about 20 feet above grade and one of the concerns was in a residential area was a safety concern from people falling. He wanted to know how the applicant was going to address the issue. Mr. Barstow said he was thinking of a 6 foot chain link fence. Discussion on the fence ensued. Ms. Gandolfo mentioned that if they were going to change the grades of the property, it had to be reflected on the site plans. Mr. Caetano made a motion to adjourn this matter to the next meeting. Mr. McCarthy seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Sunoco Service Station Mr Hughes came forward and reminded the Board that they had been before tfcie Board the previous month and they were only present for a brief discussion and to get some direction from the Board. They were not asking for approval at this time. Referi-ing to the memorandum from Fredrick P. Clark Assoc, of 3/15/96 on curving and circulation, he referred to comment #4 on page 2. He passed out pictures to show what existed at present at the location. He said that to construct curving will interfere with the current trade which currently used this station. It would affect the business in a negative way. Mr. Miller commented that it was a change in the nature of the use of the property It is going from a service station which didn't have a whole lot of traffic to a convenience store which should involve a considerable increase in traffic during peak hours. Mr. Cicchetti commented that the problem on Pocantico street was that most o f the time the traffic was backed up. Discussion on the igress to the service station followed. �Mr. Caetano made a motion that this be checked out by the DOT of the State of New York because of the heavy congestion. Ms. Gandolfo stated that it was premature at this point to do that. They should wait until the Board decides what it wants to do. Mr. Aruj said that its been like that for many years. Mr. Hughes commented what was there now was an Auto repair shop, a dying type of business and this was a simple replacement of a dying business with one that would involve more customers. Mr. Hritz said that the Board could give him an answer at next month's meeting. Mr. Caetano commented that for safety factors there should be a curb on Rte 9. The Village was responsible and he didn't see any reason why a curb be put alongside of the tanks, straight across, to protect a vehicle from hitting the tanks. Mr. Perlmutter said he agreed with Mr. Caetano. He didn't see any reason why there couldn't be a curb at least for the length of the tanks. Discussion on the drainage for the property ensued. Mr. Caetano made a motion to send this to the DOT of the State of New York for a traffic study. No. one seconded. Motion not carried. This application was adjourned to next month's meeting. 3. A T & T - Phelps Memorial Hospital Site Mr. Christopher B. Fisher, Attorney from Cuddy & Feder & Worby, came forward on behalf of AT&T. He explained the proposed project to the Board. He introduced the following people: Susan S. Gruel, P.P. from Moskowitz, Heyer & Gruel, PA. (Community Planning); John D. Fuller, Staff Engineer, and Ron Peterson, Engineer, from Tectonic Engineering Consultants P C ; and Ratna Gupta, AT&T. R. F. Engineer Cellular Division. Using enlarged drawings and pictures they all gave the Board a brief explanation of the proposed project. The issues brought up were the visual impact of the utility poles, the proposed barbed wires for fencing, proposed antennas adjacent to the child day care center; proposed tree removal and the proposed equipment buildirg �Ron Peterson said that the most sensible thing was to compare the standard used for emissions by the NYS Dept. of Health. By referring to a site design he explained the distance of the antenna from the day care center. Mr. Miller ask for a diagram for the Board. Mr. Fisher commented on the tree survey issue and said that there might be an alternative to removal of trees. On the fencing he said that the barbed wire could be removed. Mr. Caetano made a motion to declare the Planning Board Lead Agency. Ms. Becker seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Ratna Cupta, referring to the enlarged drawings explained the way the cellular phone worked. She showed the different areas where the cell sites are. Ms. Gaylin asked how A.T.&T. came about choosing this section for their cell site. She answered because of the poor signals and bad service for the area. They need to set up another cell site to cover the gap in service. Ms. Becker asked her to state when and where the other cell sites were constructed. John Fuller went over the construction of the proposed building by referring to the enlarged drawings. Ms. Gaylin asked if there was a possibility of them installing a bigger antenna. Mr. Fisher answered that they (antenna) will get smaller and smaller. He explained how the antenna worked and how the signals traveled. Susan Gruel went over the photos and pointed out that there will be no impact on services, no visual impact on the existing condition and the antenna would not be obvious. This application was adjourned to next month's meeting for a public hearing on the site plan. 4. Arlindo Ruivo - 39 Depeyster Street The applicants did not appear. �The Board went into a work session. Trustee Sweet commented on the Tarrytown Moratorium. Mr. Perlmutter made a motion to ask the Board of Trustees to stop televising the meetings because it was a waste of money. Mr. McCarthy seconded. Chairman Hritz abstained. Motion carried. The Board instructed Ms. Gandolfo to notify the Board of Trustees. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, CARMEN G MA|aANO Recording Secretary �David J. Portman, AICP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: April 15, 1996 Subject: AT&T Wireless Services at Phelps Memorial Hospital - Cell Site Site Plan Application Applicant: AT&T Wireless Services Requested Action: Site Plan approval for the installation of six cellular telephone antennas and utility poles and the construction of a 240 square foot equipment building. Site Location: Phelps Memorial Hospital, 701 North Broadway Site Size: 13.47 acres Existing Zoning: H Hospital Existing Land Use: Hospital, day care center, and two water tanks. Surrounding Land Use: North: Vacant/woods South: Sleepy Hollow Manor neighborhood East: North Broadway and woods West: "The Robin's Nest" Day Care Center Applicable Village Regulations: Article VIII Site Plan Review Chapter 52A 'Tree Conservation" Chapter 62 "Zoning" SEQR: Proposed action is an "Unlisted" action under SEQR and will require a "coordinated review" since it involves approval from other involved agencies including the North Tarrytown Planning Board and Tree Commission. The Planning Board should declare its intent to be Lead Agency. Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX • (914) 967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation As requested, we have inspected the property and reviewed the following materials submitted by Christopher B. Fisher on behalf of the AT&T Wireless Services (the Applicant): Site Plan and Drawings prepared by Tectonic Engineering Consultants, P.C., dated January 9, 1996 having the following sheet numbers and titles: Sheet Number Sheet T-l S-l S-2 S-3 E-4 E-l Jiik Title Sheet Plot Plan and Partial Site Plan Site Plan Detail and Details Foundation Plan and Antenna Details Specifications Electrical Plan and Details A Safety Analysis prepared by Bell Laboratories dated March 22, 1996. A Full Environmental Assessment Form together with photographs of the proposed cell site location. We offer the following comments for your review and consideration: 1. Project Information The application for site plan approval involves a proposal to install six cellular radio transmitting antennas on an existing water tank and to construct a 240 square foot unmanned computer and electrical equipment building on the property of Phelps Memorial Hospital Center. The proposal also includes the installation of four utility poles and lines extending from the proposed equipment building to existing utility lines on North Broadway. Each of the six antennas are approximately four feet in height and one foot in width. No antenna is proposed to extend above the top of the existing water tank which is approximately 32.5 feet in height. 2. Proposed Tree Removal The Applicant is proposing to trim and remove some existing trees within the vicinity of the existing water tank and the proposed antennas. The Applicant also proposes to clear a 20-foot wide path extending from the proposed equipment building to the 2 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation northwest approximately 450 feet to the existing utility poles located along North Broadway. The proposed utility poles will be located in this cleared area. The proposed tree clearing could have a significant visual impact. This portion of the property is heavily wooded with steep slopes and functions as a continuous and undisturbed buffer along North Broadway. It would be preferred if the Applicant could find an alternative means of providing electricity to the proposed equipment building or provide mitigation measures that reduce the number of trees to be removed and potential visual impacts. The Applicant should provide a tree survey within the vicinity of the cleared area for the proposed utility poles. It is important to assess whether the proposed alignment of the utility poles will result in the removal of some of the more significantly sized trees on the property. Pursuant to Chapter 52A of the Village Code it appears that the proposed tree removal will require approval from the Village Tree Commission. 3. Land Use Compatibility The proposed antennas will be located adjacent to "The Robin's Nest" child day care center. The safety analysis prepared by the Applicant does not explicitly discuss the potential impacts of radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields on this adjacent land use. The analysis indicates that potential health hazards appear to be quite low, however a discussion of the potential health impacts of the transmitting antennas on the children at the adjacent center should be specifically addressed. 4. Proposed Fencing The Applicant has proposed the installation of an 8-foot high chain link tence around the perimeter of the proposed equipment building. Barbed wire is proposed along the top of the fence. For safety reasons, barbed wire is not a desirable fencing material. In addition, a solid fence, such as a wooden stockade fence, would be preferred in order to better screen the proposed building. 3 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation 5. Fire Safety The proposed equipment building would contain computers, batteries and other electrical equipment The Applicant should identify the provisions for fire suppression for the proposed facility. Christian K. Miller Associate/Planning cc: Mayor Sean Treacy Linda E. David, Village Administrator Janet A. Gandolfo, Esq., Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Dr. Richard Sweet, Village Trustee Mark A. DiGennaro, Village Engineer Christopher B. Fisher, Applicant 500\not6-014.ckm.crc 4 �Approved w % h raspect to substance and form: Approved by the Planning Board ds: Chairman or Aoting Chairman Date *i j j -to, (Vlt Filed with Village Clerk lork off- Deputy Clerk Clerk Dated: C laM /IJL Date o&f Meeting /£ /?% � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1996 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1996-04-18 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1996 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1996 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/c571e005caabd1f930789b16730cb86b.pdf 02a98e94734731bba877cfab0ad8150f PDF Text Text t REGULAR MEETING NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK May 16,1996 A regular meeting of the North Tarrytown Planning Board was held on May 16, 1996 at 8:00 P.M. in the Village hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT. George Hritz, Chairman Donald Caetano Nicholas Cicchetti David Perlmutter Betsy Sawyer-Gaylin ALSO PRESENT: Janet A. Gandolfo, Village Attorney Mark A. DiGennaro, CAMCE Christian K. Miller, Assoc./Planning James Margotta, Building Inspector Chairman Hritz called the meeting to order at 8:15 p.m. 1 Sunoco Service Station, 377 No Broadway - Continuation Sunoco Service Station asked for an adjournment. Chairman Hritz excused himself due to knee surgery and asked Mr. David Perlmutter to sit in as chairman. Mr. Perlmutter commented that he was given the impression that the Sunoco Service Station was not filtrating at all and he wanted to know what requirements there were against them doing that. He wanted the Building Inspector to look into whether in fact they were doing that. Mr. DiGennaro said that they were not going to do repairs or oil changes. They were not going to generate that kind of waste. Mr. Margotta asked if he was interested in an existing gas station or new ones. Mr. Perlmutter said he wanted to know what jurisdiction the Board had. Mr. Margotta commented that the Getty Station was selling gas, auto parts and doing repairs. Discussion on various service stations followed., I i �2* A T & T - Phelps Memorial Hospital Tenter Mr. Christopher B. Fisher, attorney from Cuddy & Feder & Worby came forward on behalf of A T & T. He went over some of the issues discussed at last month's meeting. He said that they had submitted an alternative means of providing electrical service to the proposed unmanned computer and electrical building. He explained the alternative plan to the Board. Unlike the proposed utility plan previously submitted, the alternative plan will not result in the removal of existing trees. The new plan also showed the removal of the barbed wire along the top of the proposed fencing around the building. Mr. Fisher passed out a letter by Paul A. Testagrossa, Environmental Health Specialist, in which he states that the proposed facility met the Federal Communications Commission's Criteria for evaluating environmental effects of RF energy, (attached to minutes). Mr. Cicchetti commented that his only interest was in the trees. Will they come back at a later date and cut them down. Mr. Fisher answered that the trees will be preserved. Mr. Margotta said they didn't need to go to the Zoning Board or the ARB. It was private property. The antennas wouldn't be seen by the public. If you can't see it, no ARB. Trustee Sweet asked if this would be on the tax rolls, for assessment purposes. Ms. Gandolfo answered there would be a franchise tax. Mr. Fisher said that they will be paying rent to the hospital. They had a five (5) year lease. Mr. Caetano made a motion to declare the Planning Board Lead Agency. Ms. Sawyer-Gaylin seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Weiss, President of the Sleepy Hollow Manor, Improvement Assistants commented that they didn't have information on the impact for radio and television reception. He asked the Board to consider this in granting the application. Mr. Perlmutter advised him that he could discuss his concerns at the Public Hearing next month. Mr. Caetano made a motion to adjourn the Public Comments section of the meeting. Ms. Sawyer-Gaylm seconded. Public comments adjourned. �Mr. Perlmutter made a motion to hold a Public Hearing on June 20,1996 to discuss the issues. Ms. Sayer-Gaylin seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 3 Roger & Graciela Rodriguez 7X Hudson Stri** - Discussion Mr. Barstow, representing Mr. Rodriguez came forward. He explained that his client was trying to get approval for a retaining wall to improve his property for quite some time. He passed out some photographs of the adjacent property (Village property). He felt that the photographs proved the poor condition that the adjacent property was in. "We may or may not disturb the adjacent property. To hold my client responsible for disturbing the property is absurd. These photographs represent the existing conditions of the property. My client wants to improve his property". Mr. DiGennaro said that his feeling on this was that the parking lot had a retaining wall made of telephone poles. By constructing the wall right on the property line will cause some disturbance. Mr. Caetano stated that if he felt that his contractor, architect or engineer had looked this over that they should take into consideration that the Village had neglected the property. They are people who are licensed and if there is any problem they will be responsible. The Board should give the man permission to do what he wanted to do. DiGennaro stated that they had not shown how they were going to stabilize the existing condition during and after construction. Mr. Caetano asked Mr. Barstow if they will accept the responsibility for anything that might go wrong. Mr. Barstow answered that it was very unreasonable to be asked to accept responsibility for the poor condition of the adjacent property. Discussion on the guarantee to preserve the Village property followed. Mr. Caetano made a motion to approve the application. No second. Mr. Perlmutter suggested that the applicant's engineer get in touch with the Village's engineer. 4. Gordon & David Hecht �Mr. James Sauter, from O'Neill, DiManno & Kelly, representing Gordon and David Hecht came forward. He stated that his clients were intending to purchase the property on 8 Teresa Street, a former beer distributor which is now a warehouse not being used. He said Mr. Hecht had a business which distributed hair products. It was a small scale of mixing and blending of the products on she. A letter from Mr. Margotta said that the Zoning was not for that specific use. They wanted the Board to consider the change of use. A variance to allow the mixing and blending-manufacturing of the product. Ms. Gandolfo said that they were here to ask the Planning Board to review a change of use but then they had to go to the Zoning Board of Appeals for the use variance. Mr. Sauter stated that there was no intention to change the structure, just the signage in the loading zone. There was a no-parking sign extension of the loading zone. Mr. Caetano asked if they were going to manufacture perfume or soap. Mr. Sauter answered that it was going to be non-toxic. They passed out samples of the products and explained the contents of the products. They claimed that this was a small operation. Discussion on the products followed. Mr. Sauter commented that they wanted to bring this application to the Board's attention in an informal way and to get the Board's feelings on it. David Hecht explained the operation and the delivery trucks trips in and out of the premises. RFPRF ATTON FF.F.S Ms. Gandolfo explained the recreation fees to the Board. All the money goes to the a Recreation Fund for the following:. Site plan review and Sub-division review She reviewed the formula for figuring the recreation fee for site plan review. She commented that Antonio Rodrigues had 49 spaces @ $1,000.00 = $49,000.00 Mr. Cicchetti said that the Hospital paid $50,000 to the Board of Trustees. Mr. Caetano made a motion to authorize Counsel to negotiate with Antonio Rodrigues on the recreation fees. _4_ �Ms. Sawyer-Gaylin seconded. Motion carried unanimously. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, CARMEN G MARIANO Recording Secretary �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, I N C . Dav,d J. Portman, Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 Michael A Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP AICP MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: May 16, 1996 Subject: AT&T Wireless Services at Phelps Memorial Hospital Cell Site Site Plan Application As requested, we have reviewed the site plan drawings having the following sheet numbers, titles and dates prepared by Tectonic Engineering Consultants, P.C. on behalf of AT&T Wireless Services (the Applicant): Sheet No. T-1 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 E-l Title Date Title Sheet Plot Plan and Partial Site Plan Site Plan and Details Foundation Plan and Antenna Details Specifications Electrical Plan and Details 1/9/96 1/9/96 5/8/96 5/8/96 1/9/96 5/8/96 We offer the following comments for your review and consideration: 1. Plan Revisions As requested by the Planning Board at its last meeting, the Applicant has provided an alternative means of providing electrical service to the proposed unmanned computer and electrical equipment building. As the Board will recall, the previous plan involved removing numerous trees within a 20-foot wide path that would include utility poles. Electrical service under the revised plan is proposed to be provided to the cell site facility by extending a new electrical line from North Broadway on existing poles which run alongside the Hospital roadway. Five new poles would also be installed along an internal roadway which runs to the proposed cell site building. Unlike the previously proposed utility plan, this alternative will not result in the removal of existing trees. Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX • (974; 967-6675 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation • 2. The plan has also been revised to remove the barbed wire along the top of the proposed fencing enclosing the proposed building. Zoning Compliance The proposed communication facility and antennas are not explicitly listed as permitted accessory uses in the Village's H Hospital zoning district Typically, uses which are not explicitly listed are considered to be prohibited. However, communication antennas are afforded certain protection under federal laws and may be protected from a zoning ordinance which is interpreted to prohibit such uses. This legal issue should be addressed by the Village Attorney with respect to the procedural implications of regulating uses in light of federal law. 3. Additional Information As requested at the last meeting of the Planning Board, the Applicant should provide a plan showing the maximum amount of electromagnetic radiation emitted by the proposed antennas. Christian K. Miller Associate/Planning cc: Mayor Sean Treacy Linda E. David, Village Administrator Janet A. Gandolfo, Esq., Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Dr. Richard Sweet, Village Trustee Mark A DiGennaro, Village Engineer Christopher V. Fisher, Applicant 500\not6-019.ckm.crc 2 I �MAY-14-96 THE 10:45 AM CUDDY AND FEDER FAX NO. 19147615372 P.02/02 XB££ EERMIX VILLAGE OF NORTH TAKRYTOWN 28BEEKMANAVE>JUE NORTH TARRYTOWN, N. Y. 10591 PERMIT No. May 16 .1996 The following information is provided in accordance wife Local Law No. 1,1984 adopted by the Village of North Tanytown on January 23, 1984. Subiect- Unmanne 3 Wireless Communication Equipment Site No. 619 AT&T Wireless Services k Applicant: 15 E. Midland Ave. Paramus, NJ 07652 site: Phfilps Memorial Hospital Section: 11 Block 1 701 North Broadway Lotfe) 3A Location of tree(s) on. property: Approx. 25 f t . north of water tank Tree type: Size range: oak _ * Sixty (60) feet ^ Twenty (20) inches l(height) (Caliper, diameter at breast height) Purpose: Emergency removal Other (specify) : To ____ __ permit construction of communications equipment shelter Signed: title f W . / /• • lt.i.h^\ {~j. COM/ This is to certify that permission is hereby granted for the removal of the tree (or trees) with the understanding that this removal will conform to the provisions of the North Tarry-town Tree Conservation Local Law. B:.'e LUUicrLuCC: If ;-"iL"iUi.T.p einiit, c:.ie of expiration: /"'* _; �w Bell Labs Lucent Technologies Innovations for Lucent Technologies May 16, 1996 Lucent Technologies Inc. 600 Mountain Avenue Murray Hill, NJ 07974-06 36 ChriS FiSher Telephone 908 582 3000 Cuddy & Feder & Worby 90 Maple Avenue White Plains, New York 10601-5196 RE: Proposed Cellular Radio Facility, North Tarrytown, NY Chris: This letter was prepared in response to your request for an additional safety analysis of the electromagnetic environment in the vicinity of the proposed AT&T Wireless Services cellular radio facility in North Tarrytown, NY. Specifically, with regards to the maximum level of RF energy at three locations surrounding the proposed facility to which the public may be exposed. The attached figure shows a graphical representation of three different radials: the 50 ft radial extends to the adjacent driveway, the 170 ft radial extends to the nearest building on the property, the 600 ft radial extends to the nearest residential property. The power density will be less than 6.4 LiW/cm2, 10.3 LiW/cm2, and 5.3 nW/cm2 for the 50 ft, 170ftandioo ft radials, respectively. As indicated in our previous report*, the results of our analysis indicate that the maximum level of RF energy to which the public may be exposed is below all applicable health and safety limits. Specifically, for the locations above, the maximum level of RF energy associated with simultaneous and continuous operation of all transmitters will be at least 55 times below the exposure limits of ANSI, IEEE, NCRP and the limits of all states that regulate RF exposure. Additionally, since the antennas are not directed toward the above locations, the actual levels will be below the safety guidelines by a much greater amount. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 is the applicable Federal law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of radiofrequency emissions in the siting of wireless facilities. It is the conclusion of this report that the proposed facility meets Federal Communications Commission criteria for evaluating environmental effects of RF energy. Sincerely, Paul A. Testagrossa Environmental Health Specialist Radiation Protection and Product Safety Department X Safety Analysis of the Electromagnetic Environment in the Vicinity of a Proposed Cellular Radio Installation, Site 619: Phelps Memorial Hospital Center, 701 North Broadway, North Tarrytown, New York, March 22, 1996 �HIGHWAY PROPERTY—( (ACQUIRED 1966) \ p \ \ V p PROPOSED SITE • /A 1ST WATER TANK (TYP V . / / AfAY / (H0 7961' $A 7^) '»Ai A >J LOT 5 .OTj 6A -01 < * BLOCK 1A LOT LOT 1 / LOT 8 fLOT 9 LOT 2 ~l LOT 3 BLOCK 1G / LOT 10 BLOCK 1 LOT 16 LOT 11 / •LOT 'LOT 68^ / LOT 8 / BLOCK 1B' 'IT ELAN ' * » * > * � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1996 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1996-05-16 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1996 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1996 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/1a7736cdf58a770d3f3bd5c2e3964146.pdf 52c2e222ed1dbb30c02e13c9b177e2c2 PDF Text Text REGULAR MEETING NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK June 20, 1996 A regular meeting of the North Tarrytown Planning Board was held on June 20,1996 at 8:00 p.m. in the Village hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: George Hritz, Chairman Donald Caetano Nicholas Cicchetti Betsy Sawyer-Gaylin Joanne Becker David Perlmutter ABSENT: Edward McCarthy ALSO PRESENT: Janet A. Gandolfo, Attorney James Margotta, Building Inspector Mark DiGennaro, CAMCE Christian K. Miller, Assoc./Planning Chairman Hritz called the meeting to order at 8:15 p.m. 1. A T & T , Phelps Memorial Hospital Center - Continuation Chairman Hritz read the Public Notice. Mr. Fisher stated that the public within the 200 ft. were notified and presented proof of same. He said that they have been before the Board in April and May. He said that he believed that all the issues were addressed. He went over what had been discussed at these past meetings. Chairman Hritz asked Mr. Miller for any comments. Mr. Miller said that Mr. Fisher was correct. Mr. Caetano made a motion to open the Public Hearing. Ms. Sawyer-Gaylin seconded. Public Hearing was opened. Chairman Hritz asked if anyone had any comments. There being no comments, Mr. Cicchetti made a motion to close the Public Hearing. Mr. Caetano seconded. Public Hearing closed. Chairman Hritz asked Ms. Gandolfo to explain the law of emissions. Ms. Gandolfo said that the local authorities were pre-empted by federal law which sets the standards for emissions. Localities can regulate and review issues regarding neighborhood quality of the neighborhood issues, esthetics, impact on neighborhoods, etc. �Chairman Hritz commented that he had noticed that the emissions were directed in the opposite direction of Sleepy Hollow Manor. He was pleased with the applicant's decision about cutting down the trees. Mr. Caetano made a motion to make a Negative Declaration for SEQR, that this will not have a sufficient negative impact on the environment. Mr. Cicchetti seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Caetano made a motion to approve the site plans as submitted. Mr. Perlmutter seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Roger & Graciela Rodriguez. 23 Hudson Street - Continuation Mr. Barstow, the architect representing Mr. Rodriguez came forward. He stated that he was asked at the last month's meeting to have his engineer contact Mr. DiGennaro and to come up with solutions in regard to the adjacent property which was Village property. He said there seemed to be one particular tree that was holding up the village parking lot that might have some impact. Chairman Hritz asked about the impact on the off site parking. Mr. Barstow went over some of the issues that were brought up at the last meeting. Mr. DiGennaro said that the engineer's design for the retaining wall was satisfactory. The issue that needed to be addressed was the tree that seemed to be holding up the parking lot. He also commented that several other issues were outstanding. 1. Need to get the soil boring, they could be granted a contitional approval 2. Need to address the Village property, have to hold the applicant responsible for any kind of damage. Ms. Gandolfo said that they could do that if the applicant gave a performance bond. She didn't know if the applicant wished to spend that kind of money. Ms. Barstow said that it would be difficult. Very few contractors give performance bonds because they are too costly. Mr. DiGennaro said that in that case he will have to get more details. Not disturbing the tree was not going to satisfy or assure him. he felt that the base of the tree was going to be distrubed. Discussion on the tree holding up the lot followed. Mr. Caetano asked if it will be of any help if they built a retaining wall around the tree. DiGennaro answered that he didn't know. Mr. Miller stated that they wanted to protect the roots of the tree. Discussion continued on the tree. �Chairman Hritz advised Mr. Barstow to address all the outstanding issues because he had to come prepared to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Margotta asked what were they proposing on the area. Mr. Barstow said that they were proposing five (5) parking spaces and some gardening area. The spaces may be for the tenants. Mr. Margotta said that the parking spaces should be for the tenants in the building. Discussion on the parking spaces ensue. Mr. Cicchetti commented that the engineer was not satisfied. That the conditions had to be met and they had to be done. He suggested that the applicant come back with a plan not to disturb the tree. Mr. Margotta stated that the code said a wall. Was there a difference between a wall, certain type of wall and a retaining wall. Ms. Gandolfo said that they had been sending to the ZBA retaining walls higher then 6 ft. for the last several applications. Mr. Perlmutter said that all he had to do was satisfy the village engineer. Discussion on sending the applicant for the retaining wall to the ZBA followed. Ms. Gandolfo commented that they should be fair and consistent to all and send this applicant to the ZBA for the retaining wall. Mr. Caetano asked why waste time and not waiver sending them to the ZBA. Ms. Gandolfo answered that they wouldn't waste time. Mr. Margotta asked if they would make it to the ZBA July's meeting. Ms. Gandolfo answered yes. Mr. Caetano made a motion to refer the applicant to the ZBA for the retaining wall approval. Mr. Perlmutter seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Ms. Sawyer-Gay lin motioned to approve the minutes of March 21, 1996 as amended. Mr. Caetano seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Cicchetti motioned to approve the minutes of April 18, 1996 as amended. Ms. Sawyer-Gaylin seconded. Motion carried unanimously. -3- �Mr. Caetano motioned to approve the minutes of December21,1995. Ms. Sawyer-Gaylin seconded. Motion carried unanimously. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submited, CARMEN G. MARIANO Recording Secretary _4_ �June 18, 1996 Mr. George Hritz, Chairman North Tarrytown Planning Board Beekman Avenue North Tarrytown, NY 10591 Re: Barnhart Avenue Properties Dear Mr. Hritz: This letter is being written to bring to your attention our interest in the purchase of the properties located at #19, #21, #23, #25, #27, and #29 Barnhart Avenue. Most of us have been living in these homes for over 30 years. We have been interested in buying the properties since 1987 from Mr. Albert Peck who is the current owner. Currently we have offered up to $500,000. for the six properties. Mr. Peck is reluctant to accept. It is our understanding that the properties have been looked at by the developer, Pateman, who wishes to build condominiums in place of these homes. I would ask that you consider a couple of things as we have when making an overall evaluation of the present offer: First of all, we the tenants, have repaired all of these homes over the years without much complaint and financial assistance from Mr. Peck. Upon buying the homes, we have every intention of restoring the houses while still maintaining their turn-of-the-century, New England aspect. This is in line with the Mayors plan of keeping this a quiet, aesthetically pleasing town with the possibility of a water front community to be established in the near future. We doubt that condominiums on a dead-end street would be in-line with maintaining the old-fashioned heritage that North Tarrytown is known for. Furthermore, did any of the planning board members consider the horrendous traffic problem that these condominiums would cause on a one-way and dead-end street? Please do not consider this plan of building condominiums simply because it will create a larger tax base for the town, but rather consider that if this were allowed, six families would be out of a home. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Mr. Carlos Hernandez Mr. Pedro Escobedo Mr. Aresky Valdez Mr. Rene Hernandez Mr. Oliverio Ojito C^U-i^/i^ (U^J^ Mr. Mariano Meneses #%&<>;,*^s^— y?Ld. �•v Approved with reafcect to substance and form: Approved by the Planning Board Chaiman or Acting Chairman Dat&at^^llLLpr] Filed with Village Clerk Clerk -or Deputy Clerk Dated: / m J <\n j- /^; l??6 �Approved with^fespect to substance and form; Approved byjthe Planning B( Chairman Date 3 cting Chairman Filed with Village Clerk 0 ( . Cjj ej^L^fetr •eierk^or Deputy Clerk Dated: ij^^-j J USKZ £o, \TT£ Date of Meeting �JULY 16, 1996 PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THERE WILL BE NO MEETING OF THE PLANNING FOR THE MONTH OF JULY, DUE TO THE FACT THAT THERE IS NO AGENDA. ^ j f ( / Jxr*^£ JAMES MXRGOTTA BUILDING INSPECTOR �August 7, 1996 To: Planning Board From: James Margotta THERE WILL BE NO PLANNING BOARD METING I N AUGUST. �SEPTEMBER 17, 1996 THERE WAS NO PLANNING BOARD MEETING HELD QfrJ SEPTEMBER 19, 1996 DUE TO LACK OF AN AGENDA. /jU^±> // v JAMES MARQ0TT A BUILDING INSPECTOR �THERE WAS NO PLANNING BOARD MEETING IN OCTOBER 1996 a-Building Inspector �18 November 1996 To: From: Planning Board Members James Margotta There will be no Planning Board meeting for the month of November. �t December 2, 1996 To: Planning Board Front: James Margotta There will be no Planning Board meeting for the month of December. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1996 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1996-06-20 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1996 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1996 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/0aa0046e315b50c19051651fd77aed2a.pdf 8ed2772c15e129ce88c13c5a2e04d830 PDF Text Text A regular meeting was held by the Planning Board on January 18, 1996 in Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York 10591 Members Present: George Hritz, Chairman Donald Caetano Betsy Sawyer Gay1in Edward McCarthy Joanne Becker David Perlmutter Also Present: James Margotta, Building Inspector Emanuel Lobato, Esq. IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK 10591 PATEMEN, AVENUE, NORTH There were no representatives for this application. application will be place on the February agenda. This IN THE MATTER OF ALBERT PECK, TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK 10591 BARNHART 38-40 KENDALL AVENUE, NORTH Mr. Mathew Worner is representing Mr. Peck on the above matter. All paperwork have been distributed to the Board. At the present time there are two houses on one lot. would like to sell the lots individually. Mr. Peck Mr. Margotta stated that there will be no changes in contour. It will still remain non-conforming. Mr. Peck stated that there are two homes directly in back of the property which is located on Irving Place. At this time during the meeting no public comments were made. Ms. Becker made a motion pursuant to declare this a Type II Action which will have no material adverse impact on the environment, seconded by Mr. Caetano. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Caetano made a motion to approve the subdivision at 38-40 Kendall Avenue, seconded by Ms. Becker. Motion carried unanimously. �IN THE MATTER OP PHILP8E PIA2A. MORTH BROADWAY. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YPBK This application has been postponed until the February Planning Board Meeting. Ms. Gloria Esteve, 15 Holland Avenue stated that she owns property directly in back of the project and is concerned about the erosion. Mr. Hritz stated that a report is being submitted by the engineers and will address all related problems such as erosion. Dr. Sweet asked if the Planning Board was going to attend the Tarrytown Planning Board meeting on January 29, 1996 concerning the Concrete Recycling Plant. Mr. Hritz stated that he would be attending and has invited all members of the Planning Board. Being no further business the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Christine A. Zambrano Recording Secretary �« . < Approved with respect to substance and form: vyilage Attorney Daxed: Approved by the Planning Board ^Chairman r)r Anting rha DatWr Filed with Village Clerk Clerk ^or Deputy Clerk Dated: tfec/f& Date of Meeting ' � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1996 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1996-01-18 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1996 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1996 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/869cca8d1dbfba369e30b1c7876cdec8.pdf b6670ab01e7bbb9dbe99d297aa96c309 PDF Text Text A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on February 15, 1996 at 8:00 PM in the Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York 10591 Members Present: Absent: George Hritz, Chairman Joanne Becker Donald Caetano Betsy Sawyer Gaylin David Perlmutter Edward McCarthy Nicholas Cicchetti James Margotta, Building Inspector Janet Gandolfo, Esq. Christian Miller, Frederick P. Clark Assoc. Mark DiGennaro, CAMCE IN THE MATTER OF ALBERT PECK, BARNHART AVENUE, NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK. Also Present: Mr. Peck stated that all the members of the Board have received a copy of the proposed sub-division on Kendall Avenue which is self explanatory. There are two homes on one lot and in order for them to be marketable each needs to be on its own lot. Mr. Hritz stated that Barnhart Avenue was supposed to be on the agenda this evening and that Kendall Avenue has already been approved. In accordance with the Frederick P. Clark report, are required and the whole area is nonconforming. some variances This matter will be on the agenda for next month. IN THE MATTER OF ANTONIO RODRIQUES, BROADWAY, NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK. PHILIPSE PLAZA, NORTH Mr. Hughes who is representing Mr. Rodriques stated that he would review and answer any final questions relating to the latest reports submitted by CAMCE and Clark Associates. Mr. Hughes stated that he would hope for a preliminary approval which would allow his applicant to take the next step by meeting with the Architectural Review BoardMr. Contandino the applicants architect stated that a report dated January 18, 1996 states concerns with walls and inconsistencies which were corrected. There were also concerns with the final grades. there were no problems with the grades. At this point �I A retaining wall for a draining system should be placed in the plan. A different type could be used in the wall. There was nothing showing drainage to a retaining wall. There is loose sand/soil behind the wall. Mr. Contandino stated that placing a double wall is just a coordination issue. Some areas are steep and there should be some kind of fence on top of the wall as a safety barrier. The ARB would review this type of fence. A condition of a variance for a fence needs to be provided. Mr. Caetano asked what the height standards are in the code? Mr. Margotta stated that there is a maximum of 6ft. The fence is also a concern of the owner. The Board would like three final copies of the plan, signed and sealed with no provisions. Mr. Contandino stated that this would not be a problem. Landscaping could be approved through the Tree Commission. The Tree Commission can consult with Frederick P. Clark Associates and go ahead with recommendations, it should not hold the project up at the preliminary hearing stage. Mr. Hritz stated that the project could benefit from the Tree Commission. Mr. Contandino stated that minor points have to be addressed which are only due to lack of coordination. Mr. Miller stated that the retaining wall may reduce the possible number of parking spaces, and this is being modified in the final plan. Ms. Gandolfo asked if the County or the State Department of Transporation have approved curb cuts in order to grant final drawings. Mr. Contandino state that this process comes in after the plans are in place. Ms. Sawyer Gaylin made a motion to open the public hearing seconded by Mr. Caetano. Motion carried unanimously. Ms. Gloria Esteves of 15 Holland Avenue stated that she was concerned about land erosion and the obstruction of the view. The top of the building is a full ten feet below the elevation. The fence would have to be 10 feet high to obstruct the view. These items v/ill go before the Architectural Review Board. Ms. Sawyer-Gaylin made a motion to close the public hearing which seconded by Mr. Caetano. Motion carried unanimously. �Mr. Caetano made a motion to grant a negative declaration on the preliminary site plan seconded by Ms. Sawyer Gaylin. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Caetano made a motion on behalf of the Planning Board to grant preliminary site plan approval subject to the following provisions: 1) To install an additional wall for drainage purposes. 2) The landscaping scheme should be referred to the Tree Commission. 3) Subject to the approval of the Village engineer. 4) Subject to the results of the submission of the final plan. Seconded by Ms. Gaylin. Motion carried unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF CHESTNUT RIDGE, NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK 10591 Mr. Hritz stated that he has not seen any applications on the above project. MINUTES Mr. Perlmutter made a motion to approve the January, 1996 minutes with a correction of deleting Mr. McCarthy's name as it was listed twice, seconded by Mr. Caetano. DISCUSSION Dr. Sweet stated that he attended the Planning Board meeting in Tarrytown. There were approximately 2-3 hundred people that attended and no one spoke in favor of the project. The FEIS was incomplete. The Hudson Recycling Corp. needs to submit a new FEIS. If it is not completed the Village of Tarrytown will complete it. Mr. Hritz stated that he presented the Village's Riverfront Park model and the report from Arthur Andersen. Being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Christine Zambrano Recording Secretary �DRAFT RESOLUTION Adopted at the February 15,1996 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board SUBDIVISION APPROVAL FOR TWO RESIDENTIAL LOTS. PROPOSED: 2-LOT SUBDIVISION OF EXISTING SINGLE LOT SUPPORTING TWO FREESTANDING RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES. OWNER/APPLICANT: ALBERT PECK LOCATION: 38 AND 40 KENDALL AVENUE TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 15, BLOCK 11, LOT 17 ZONING: R-5 RESIDENCE DISTRICT �* RESOLUTION Adopted at the February 15, 1996 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board RESOLUTION: SUBDIVISION APPROVAL FOR TWO RESIDENTIAL LOTS. PROPOSED: 2-LOT SUBDIVISION OF EXISTING SINGLE LOT SUPPORTING TWO FREESTANDING RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES. OWNER/APPLICANT: ALBERT PECK LOCATION: 38 AND 40 KENDALL AVENUE TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 15, BLOCK 11, LOT 17 ZONING: R-5 RESIDENCE DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for subdivision approval (the Application) pursuant to the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown, Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown and applicable laws and regulations considered pertinent to the application, which application is to subdivide an existing 3,629 square foot lot supporting two freestanding residential structures into two individual lots, with each lot supporting one of the existing freestanding residential structures; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has reviewed the following materials: 1. A drawing entitled "Final Resubdivision Plat Lot Line Change Prepared for Albert Peck in the Village of North Tarrytown, Town of Mt. Pleasant, Westchester County, N.Y.", prepared by William H. Free, Jr., Licensed Land Surveyor dated September 29, 1995 drawn at a scale of 1" = 10'. 2. A subdivision application for the subject site, undated and signed by Albert Peck. 3. A short Environmental Assessment Form (EAF); and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held at the Village Hall on January 18, 1995, at which time those wishing to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard; WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead Agency pursuant to Part 617 of the Implementing Regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 1. Received an application fee; 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property and the surrounding areas; 3. Requested, received and considered commentsfromthe Village Planning Consultants and the Building Inspector about the proposed project; �4. Requested, received and reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); 5. After review of the field conditions, public comments, recommendations and environmental assessment form as well as other matters noted above, has determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action and issued a Negative Declaration dated February 15, 1996, in which the Planning Board stated its determination of non-significance of environmental impact for this Unlisted Action; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the said subdivision application and subdivision plat as shown on the subdivision plat entitled "Final Resubdivision Plat Lot line Change Prepared For Albert Peck in the Village of North Tanytown, Town of Mt. Pleasant, Westchester County, N.Y." prepared by William H. Free, Jr., Licensed Land Surveyor, dated September 29,1995 be and hereby are granted subdivision approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or as an alternate the Village Administrator, on a copy of this subdivision plat resolution and upon final mylar copy of the subdivision plat drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the offices of the Village Building Department for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire 90 days from the date of this resolution if the following conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board: 1. The Applicant shall pay the Village of North Tanytown all application review fees as noted and required in Section 62-30(f) of the Village Zoning Code, as approved by the Village Attorney. 2. The Plat shall be revised and titled "Final Subdivision Plat." 3. The date of this resolution shall be noted on the Final Subdivision Plat. 4. The Applicant shall obtain all necessary variances to permit this 2-lot subdivision from the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of North Tarrytown. PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN : Georgp F. Mritz, Chairman / J Village^o^North Tarrytown Phtftmng Board Date 500\not6-006.ckm.crc 2 ,A*A �OCT-03 97 1^:03 FFOMrFP CLAFK ASSOCIATES 9149676615 TO:9146315880 PAGE:OS DRAFT RESOLUTION Adopted at the February 15,1996 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board RESOLUTION: SUE PLAN APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A 12,000 SQUARE-FOOT RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDING. PROPOSED: CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDING TOTALING 12,000 SQUARE FEET, REMOVAL OF EXISTING DELICATESSEN AND MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR BUILDING, AND CONTINUATION OF THE EXISTING 6,800 SQUARE FOOT MANUFACTURING USE ALSO LOCATED ON THE LOT. OWNER/APPLICANT: ANTONIO RODRIGUES LOCATION: 358 NORTH BROADWAY TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 17, BLOCK 21, LOTS 15 - 37 ZONING: C-l HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL n �16:03 FFOn:FF CLARK H550CIRTE5 5143676613 TC: 31^63178SO PAGE:03 RESOLUTION Adopted at the February IS, 1996 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board RESOLUTION: SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A 12,000 SQUARE-FOOT RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDING. PROPOSED: CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY RETATL AND OFFICE BUILDING TOTALING 12,000 SQUARE FEET, REMOVAL OF EXISTING DELICATESSEN AND MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR BUILDING, AND CONTINUATION OF THE EXISTING 6,800 SQUARE FOOT MANUFACTURING USE ALSO LOCATED ON THE LOT. OWNER/APPUCANT: ANTONIO RODRIGUES LOCATION: 358 NORTH BROADWAY TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 17, BLOCK 21, LOTS 15 - 37 ZONING: C-l HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for site plan approval (the Application) pursuant to Article VII of the Zoning Code of the Village of North Tarrytown for the construction of a two-story retail and office building totaling 12,000 square feet, removal of an existing delicatessen and motor vehicle repair building and continuation of the existing 6,800 square foot manufacturing use also located on the lot; and WHEREAS, as part of its review, the Planning Board has reviewed numerous documents, statements and plans, including the following: 1. Topographic map prepared for Antonio and Linda Rodrigues situate Village of No. Tarrytown Town of Mt. Pleasant Westchester Co., New York," prepared by John H. Muldoon, dated April 5,1993, last revised February 5, 1995. 2. "Site Plan" fox Philipse Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and last revised February 4,1996. 3. "Site Grading Plan" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and last revised February 4, 1996. 4. "Deli Operation Plan" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and last revised May 8, 1995. 5. "View Analysis" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and as last revised May 8,1995. �16:03 FPOM:FP CLARK ASSOCIATES 9149676615 TO:9146315880 PAGE:3* 6. "Floor Plan" for Philips* Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and as last revised May 8, 1995. 7. "Building Elevations" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and last revised May $, 1995. 8. "Retaining Walls plan" for Pbflipse Plaza, prepared by Bruno Leitenberger, P.E., State of New York license No. 053849, and dated August 199S. 9. "Drainage Layout Plan, Philipse PUoa Village of North Tarrytown Town of Mt Pleasant Westchester County, New York", prepared by Donald A. Benrie, PJL, Stale of New York License No. 062787-1, of Tectonic Engineering Consultants, P.C and as last revised December 27, 1995. 10. Detail sheet "Philipse Plaza Village of North Tarrytown Town of Mt Pleasant Westchester County. New York", prepared by Donald A. Benvte, PJL, State of New York License N o , 062787-1, of Tectonic Engineering Consultants, P.C and dated October 20, 1995, 11. "Planting Plan" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Studer Design Associates, and as last revised December 8, 1995. 12. "Cross Sections" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Studer Design Associates, and dated November 28, 1995. 13. A full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF). WHEREAS, on July 19, 1995 the Zoning Board of Appeals granted all area variances, including those for required number of parking and loading spaces, buffer strip and rear yard setback, which that Board determined were necessary for the application. WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held at the Village Hall on July 21,1994, which hearing was continued and closed on February 15,1996, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given the opportunity to be beard; and WHEREAS, the site has been visited by the Village's planning and engmeering consultants and the Planning Board is thoroughly familiar with the site and all aspects of the proposed project; and WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead Agency pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 2 �16:04 FR0M:FP CLARK ASSOCIATES 9149676615 TO:9146315880 PAGE:05 1. Received an application fee; 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property and of the surrounding areas; 3. Requested, received and considered comments from the Village planning and engineering consultants and the Building Inspector about the proposed project; 4. Requested* received and reviewed a full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEORA); 5. After review of the field conditions, public comments, recommendations and environmental assessment form as well as other matters noted above, has determined that the proposed action is a Type I action and issued a "Negative Declaration," dated February 15, 1996, in which the Planning Board stated its determination of non-significance of environmental impact for this Type I action; and WHEREAS, in accordance with a condition of the resolution for site plan approval for the application known as "Antonio Cabinetry," and located on the same lot as said site plan application, traffic circulation has been revised and coordinated; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and plan noted above as amended herein be and hereby are granted site plan approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or, as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of this site plan resolution and upon the final mylar copy of the site plan drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the offices of the Village Building Department for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire twelve (12) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and/or the Applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1. FteS - The Applicant shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 1.1 An inspection fee for construction inspection of the property for compliance with the approved site plan in accordance with the Village of North Tarrytown Zoning Code. 1.2 Payment of all remaining application review costs as noted and required in Section 62-30(f) of the Village Zoning Code, as approved by the Village Attorney. 1.3 A recreation fee of $ Board of Trustees. , subject to the approval of the Village 3 �OCT-03 97 16:05 # 2. t FROM:FP CLARK ASSOCIATES 9149676615 TO:9146315380 PAGE:06 Revision of the above noted site plan to demonstrate the following: 2.1 A signature block shall be added to the site plan for the signature of the Planning Board Chairman or, as an alternate, Village Administrator. 22 The final alignment of the retaining wall and the configuration of parking stalls within the immediate vicinity of the retaining wall. 3. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall submit to the Village Building Inspector a mylar reproduction of the site plan complete with the certification of a professional architect and/or a professional engineer attesting to the construction of the site plan and its improvements as shown thereon, 4. All elements of this approved site plan shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Village Building Inspector within a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the issuance of the building permit and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The Planning Board may issue an extension of this time limit or may modify any of the above conditions with respect thereto for good cause. 5. The Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities, upon notice of the Building Inspector, and before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to on-site parking, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details, which do not comply with the approved plan in the interest of safety, convenience, aesthetics and the enjoyment and peace and quiet of adjacent neighbors; and A> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that approval of said site plan application and plans noted above be and hereby amends the site plan for the application known as "Antonio Cabinetry." originally approved by the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown on February 20,1992. PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN By George F. Hritz, Chairman Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board J 500\ftoU5^D5j*m.cv 4 Date �J SEQR ErMronmental QuaBy Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION of DotomsnaSjon of I Project Number_ Dole March «. 1—6 This notkx to issued pursuant to Part 617 of tto i ^ ^ Environmental Quatty Review Act) of the Environmental Conaervanun Law. The VWaoa of North Ti action described below wft not have a be prepared. HI lead agency, has determined that the proposed on the envfronmws; and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement wM not Name of Action: 40 Kendal Avenue SuhdMeion SEQR Status: Type I Unlisted X Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes _JLNo Description of Action: The applicant is proposing to subdivid* an existing 3,629 square foot lot supporting twofreestandingresidential structures into two individual lots, wfth each lot supporting one of the existingfreestandingresidential structures. The application wW require several variances from Hie Zoning Board of Appeals, however, pursuant to the provisions of Part 617.5 of the State Environmental Quafty Review Act (SEORA), the gnvmng of area, setback and lot line variances for single lamay reaidances ant Type • Actions and are not subject to environmental review. Location: (Include street address and the name of the rnuricyafty/counry A location map of appropriate scale is also recommended.) 40 Kendall Avenue, VMage of North Tarrytown, W< County, New York. �3EQR. Negative Declaration Page 2 Supporting This Determination: 617.7(c) for requirements of this determination; see 617.7(d) for ConrJMoned Negative Declaration) Tilt proposed action wM not cause • significant adverse impact on land, ground or surface water quaWy or quantity, drainage) patterns, air quality, plants and animals, agricultural land resources, sssmsttc resources, historic and archaioologlcal resources), open specs snd recreation, traffic and transportation systems, soM production, energy, pubec hcolth, growth and character of the communlly, cause contact wMi communtty pJans or goals, or cause) significant adverse noise and odor. If Conditioned Negative Declaration, provide on attachment the specific mitigation measures imposed. For Further Information: Contact Person: Unds David, Village Administrator Address: Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue North Tarrytown, New York 10591 Telephone Number: 914-631-1440 For Type I Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a Copy of this Notice Sent to: Chief executive officer of the political subdivision in which the action wfll be principally located. Lead Agency AH Involved Agencies (if any) Applicant (if any) 500\not6-006.cKm �1^ Approved with Vespect to substance and form: Village Attorney g& Atstorney Dated U\ Approved-toy t h e Planning, Chairman or\ A c t i n g Chairman DateUi. J ) 4 u ^ W v |^> F i l e d w i t h V i l l a g e Clerk Clerlfl or-JDeputy iputy Clerk Dated: c/i£/^C* HJ21A Date of Meeting if ^—- WI^.I^M^lpi —T � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1996 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1996-02-15 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1996 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1996