1 25 11 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/0cd3b60edea0fbb822b749b93bcd568c.pdf 8f64497480f5c229db77caca81add1f3 PDF Text Text The meeting was called to order by Peter Koffler, Chairman at 8:03 pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Peter Koffler, Chairman Linda Moiron Jennifer Lobato-Church M. Gorete Crowe Timothy Judge Michael Wernick Absent : Sherry Bishko Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village of Sleepy Hollow/Building Inspector) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Janet Gandolfo (Village Attorney) Agenda: 1) Laurentino Rodrigues 172 Valley Street Mixed use structure 2) Amy and Hal Poret 50 Devries Ave Addition and alterations 3) Antonio Soares 64 Depeyster Street Converting 2-family to 3-family 4) Minutes for May, June, July, September and December 2010 Announcements: None. 1) Laurentino Rodrigues 172 Valley Street Mixed use structure - This is a continuation from previous meetings. William Simeoforides is the project architect representing this application along with owner Laurentino Rodrigues. The public notice was read aloud. The Chair recapped the last meeting. William Simeoforides gave an overview of the proposed project. He discussed the changes in the proposed exterior materials that are now being proposed. He stated that the exterior materials were �changed to stucco and brick to better conform to other properties in the neighborhood. He stated that all of the buildings in the area have flat roofs. He showed elevations of the proposed structure. The Chair stated that the FAR variance is needed due to the parking level. William Simeoforides responded that the building was elevated to accommodate the required parking. The Chair asked about the commercial space. He stated that a reduction of 200sf will eliminate the additional parking space requirement. William Simeoforides responded that the commercial parking space is small. He also stated that the property is a triangular shape. He stated that the reduction is difficult. Timothy Judge stated that the public comments included the aesthetics of the structure. William Simeoforides responded that the existing structure on the property is a 2-story house. He stated that the Valley Street side is recessed but on the Depeyster Street side, the property comes out to the property line which is permitted since it is in a commercial zone. The Chair re-opened the public hearing. Jose Shivare of 70 Depeyster Street stated that the inner Village is being urbanized. He stated that the bulk of this structure will impact the quality of life as a homeowner in the immediate area. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair made a motion to close the public hearing. Jennifer Lobato-Church seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). M. Gorete Crowe asked if the brick material could be reduced. Larry Rodrigues responded if the ARB agrees, he will reduce the brick. Sean McCarthy responded that the material must be non-combustible. Jennifer Lobato-Church asked for the number of bedrooms per apartment. William Simeoforides responded two 1-bedroom units and two 2-bedroom units. Timothy Judge asked about the required loading zone. Sean McCarthy responded that the space is required since it is a commercial property. Timothy Judge asked if the wall could be broken up so minimize the massiveness. William Simeoforides responded that if the property was pushed back, some landscaping could be proposed. There was an open discussion on the mechanical space. William Simeoforides responded that if one of the mechanical spaces were eliminated, 450sf of space could be saved. The Chair stated that there are a few options that can still be worked on to reduce the proposed square footage. �The Chair made a motion to deny the variance. He stated that the variance is substantial and there are still issues with parking. He stated that the proposed bulk of the structure is too large for the area. Jennifer Lobato-Church seconded the motion. She stated that the proposed structure is out of character with the neighborhood. Linda Moiron stated that the applicant was requested to go back and review the board's comments. She stated that the exterior materials were changed from stucco to brick but the comments were not addressed. The application was unanimously denied (6-0). 2) Ramon & Debra Misle 75 College Avenue Convert 2-family to 3-family - This application was postponed to the next meeting. 3) Amy and Hal Poret 50 Devries Avenue Addition and alteration - The public notice was read aloud. Sean McCarthy stated that proof of public notice has been received. The Chair stated that the Board has received the following: 1) Public Notice 2) Survey 3) Application Frank Tancredi is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owners. Frank Tancredi submitted photos of the existing property. He discussed the proposed alterations. He stated that a mud room is being added on the side of the property. He also spoke about the additional 2-story addition that will be added. Frank Tancredi stated that the combined side yard setbacks are not met but the individual side yard setbacks are in compliance. The Chair asked about the existing square footage. Frank Tancredi responded 1758sf. The Chair asked if other alternates were proposed that would eliminate the need for the variances. Frank Tancredi responded that the entire structure was looked at to see where the addition would be placed. He stated that based on the orientation of the existing house, the addition can only be �placed in its proposed location. He reviewed the interior layout to further illustrate the location of the addition. Amy Poret added that the location of the addition is also based on the school bus drop-off points. She also stated that the adjacent neighbors do not oppose the proposed addition. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair asked if ARB approval is required. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair stated that the proposed addition is not substantial and will not negatively impact the neighborhood. He made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Michael Wernick seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 4) Antonio Scares 64 Depeyster Street Convert 2-family to 3-family - The public notice was read aloud. Sean McCarthy stated that proof of public notice has been received. Richard Blancato is an attorney representing this application along with the applicants. Richard Blancato gave an overview of the history of the property. He stated that the house was built in the 1800s. He stated that the exterior of the house has not changed since 1970. He stated that the Building Inspector has stated that the basement apartment is the third apartment. He stated that the 2nd floor apartment was the added apartment. Richard Blancato submitted an affidavit from the previous owner regarding the status of the apartment units. There was an open discussion on which apartment is in dispute. Richard Blancato submitted an affidavit from a neighbor that stated that driveway between the 2 houses has been a common driveway for the last 27 years. He stated that parking on the site is not an issue. The Chair stated that the Board needs to make its decision on the requested variances. The Chair asked if the property were a 2-family, how many parking spaces would be required. Sean McCarthy responded only 2 parking spaces would be needed (one space per dwelling unit). �The Chair stated that the information being presented is not addressing the issues surrounding the requested variances. Richard Blancato responded that he wants to create a complete record in case the matter required further legal action. Jennifer Lobato-Church stated that the FAR request is substantial. She asked if the FAR requirements change for a 2-family to a 3-family. Sean McCarthy responded that the FAR requirements do not change for 2-family to 3-family but the calculations would include all finished space. Richard Blancato stated that the tax records indicate that the property was taxed as a 3-family since the 1970s. He stated that it was inspected by the Tax Assessor and the tax records were changed back in 1972. Jennifer Lobato-Church responded that the tax records do not impact occupancy. She stated that a Certificate of Occupancy does not exist for a 3-family structure. The Chair asked the applicant to clarify the presentation of materials. Richard Blancato responded that the applicant is requesting that the Board consider the facts. He stated that the materials will show the Board that the variance is not self-created. The Chair asked about what the attorney did when the property was purchased in 1967. Janet Gandolfo responded that back in 1967, only building violations were sought. Richard Blancato stated that when the property was purchased back in 1967, the property was a 2-family residence. He stated that it was converted to a 3-family in 1972. Antonio Soares stated that in 1972, a permit was issued to fix a porch. He stated that the 1 st floor kitchen was removed as a result. He stated that the 2 nd floor kitchen was added so that the 1 st floor could be renovated. He stated that the work was completed in 1972. He also stated that in 1971, he took a permit out to add the 3rd electrical meter. Michael Wernick asked if a variance was needed. Antonio Soares responded that he applied for a permit and was never told that a variance was needed. He stated that the final inspection was completed and a Certificate of Occupancy was never issued. Antonio Soares stated that he never heard anything about the Certificate of Occupancy until 8 years ago when Robert Stiloski issued a violation for the 4th apartment. He stated that he submitted the historical documents and never heard about the violation until a few months ago. Richard Blancato stated that the building has been used as a 3-family since 1972. He stated that most of the area is multi-family so it is not out-of-character with the neighborhood. He stated that it is not self-created. �Michael Wernick asked about the fact that the 2nd floor apartment would have to be the unit that vacated. He asked why. Richard Blancato responded that the 2 nd floor unit is the illegal apartment. He stated that the basement apartment has always existed. He stated that if the 2 nd floor apartment were to be vacated, the current tenant would need to vacate the unit. He stated that she has lived in the unit for over 30 years. Sean McCarthy stated that the Building Department considers the basement apartment to be illegal. Richard Blancato stated that the Building Department does not feel that the existing parking spaces are accessible since there is only a 6'-8"space to the property line. Sean McCarthy responded that there is no easement on file to use the neighbor's property to access the parking spaces. Richard Blancato stated that based on the current configuration of the property, the applicant cannot comply with the zoning code requirements. He stated that this is not a self-created hardship and it will not adversely impact the neighborhood. He stated that the all of the criteria for an area variance have been met. Linda Moiron asked if all three floors could be used if one apartment would be eliminated. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) reviewed the guidelines for approving an area variance. Impacting the character of the neighborhood. Benefits sought could not be achievable by other means. Requested variances are not substantial. No adverse impact on the environmental conditions of the neighborhood. Proposed change is not self-created. Richard Blancato stated that the 3-family use is a permitted use in the R-5 zone. He stated that the density of the neighborhood would not be changed. He says that the conversion took place in 1972. He stated that there have never been any complaints or traffic problems. The Chair stated that the prolonged illegal use does not grant an approval. Timothy Judge stated that certain requirements need to be met to obtain a Certificate of Occupancy. Richard Blancato responded that the only variance that the applicant does not meet is the FloorArea-Ration (FAR). Timothy Judge responded that there is no parking. Richard Blancato disagreed. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. �The Chair stated that the criteria for an area variance have not been met by the applicant. He stated that the requested variances are substantial specifically the required parking. He stated that he feels that this is a self-created hardship. The Chair made a motion to deny the application. Jennifer Lobato-Church seconded. It was unanimously denied (6-0). 5) Minutes for May, June, July, September and December 2010 The minutes for the May, June, July, September and December 2010 meetings were reviewed. The minutes for the May 2010 meeting were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Jennifer Lobato-Church seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). The minutes for the June 2010 meeting will be reviewed at the next meeting. The minutes for the July 2010 meeting were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Linda Moiron seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). The minutes for the September 2010 meeting were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Jennifer Lobato-Church seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). The minutes for the December 2010 meeting were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Jennifer Lobato-Church seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). Adjourned 10:28 pm. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2011-01-19 Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2011 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/3ac4219fc32d13ed9cadaefd464c647e.pdf 1f193f4540134331f2a7aa1cffaf5ab1 PDF Text Text The meeting was called to order by Peter Koffler, Chairman at 8:07 pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Peter Koffler, Chairman Linda Moiron M. Gorete Crowe Timothy Judge Michael Wernick Absent : Sherry Bishko Jennifer Lobato-Church Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village of Sleepy Hollow/Building Inspector) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Janet Gandolfo (Village Attorney) Agenda: 1) Ramon and Debra Misle 75 College Ave 2) AECOM 30 Andrews Lane 3) Minutes for June 2010 and January 2011 Converting 2-family to 3-fanily Non-permitted use Announcements: None. 1) Ramon and Debra Misle 75 College Ave Converting 2-family to 3-family - This is a continuation from previous meetings. The Chair recused himself from this agenda item. He stated that Timothy Judge will be the Acting Chairman for this item only. The Acting Chairman re-opened the public hearing. Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owner. Sam Vieira spoke about the previous meeting and the comments from the Board. He stated that the applicant was trying to rent parking spaces from another property owner. He stated that the owner has owned this property for many years. He stated that the parking requirement for this property is 6 parking spaces and the owner can only provide 3 parking spaces. He stated that if the variance is denied, the property will be a legal 2-family house that will require only 2 parking spaces. He stated that the zoning code also requires 1-1/2 spaces for a one bedroom apartment. He stated that the �zoning code math is causing the increase of 3 parking spaces for the additional one bedroom basement apartment. Sam Vieira spoke about the parking requirement reduction for the new senior housing development. He stated that the parking requirements were reduced to ^ space per unit. Michael Wernick asked if the applicant has exhausted his efforts to secure off-street parking. Sam Vieira responded yes. He stated that there are no available spaces in the area. M. Gorete Crowe asked if the property is a legal 2-family or 3-family. Sam Vieira responded it's a legal 2-family property. He also stated that the parking requirement is the only variance needed to make this a legal 3-family property. Linda Moiron asked about the size of the basement apartment. Sam Vieira responded about 900sf. Sean McCarthy responded that some minor modifications are required to make it a legal apartment. Sam Vieira responded that proposed construction documents have been submitted to the Building Department. He stated that the owner will bring the unit into compliance. Acting Chairman Judge asked Sean McCarthy if he agreed. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Acting Chair asked if there were any questions from the public. Since there were none, Linda Moiron made a motion to close the public hearing. M Gorete Crowe seconded. It was unanimous (4-0) (Koffler abstained). The Acting Chair stated that the parking issues in the Village need to be addressed. He stated that this is a self-created hardship and is a negative impact to the community. The Acting Chair made a motion to deny the application since the applicant cannot provide additional parking and that the zoning requirements are the only thing that the Board can use to determine what is required. Sam Vieira requested that the application be withdrawn. Janet Gandolfo stated that the violations are still pending and that the court proceedings will resume. The Acting Chairman asked if the application is withdrawn, can the applicant reapply within 6 months. There was an open discussion on possible options available to the applicant. It was agreed that the applicant will seek a 60 day adjournment to try and resolve the parking issues. The Acting Chairman made a motion to adjourn this application for 60 days. Michael Wernick seconded. It was unanimous (4-0) (Koffler abstained). �2) AECOM 30 Andrews Lane Non-permitted use - The Chair read the public notice aloud for the record. The Chair asked if the public notices were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Victor Miles and Scott McDonough are representing this application on behalf of the applicant. Victor Miles stated that the area is being further analyzed for mercury contamination. He stated that the applicant is looking for some property to use for a staging area, employee parking and portable bathrooms. He stated that the applicant tried to get approval to use the GM site and also to use the UAW site but the neither owner was interested. He stated that the owner of 30 Andrews Lane is willing to allow the applicant to use this site for the same purpose. Victor Miles stated that 2 variances are needed. He stated that a portion of 30 Andrews Lane and a portion of the Village property will be used for staging. He stated that traffic flow will be thru the rear of the Village parking lot onto Elm Street. The Chair asked if the soil testing is under a DEC order. Victor Miles responded yes. The Chair wanted to know how long the temporary variance will be needed. He asked the applicant for a timeframe. He stated that the application is for one-year with unlimited renewal years. Victor Miles responded that it depends on the number of properties that will be impacted. He stated that it will be at lease one year. He stated that the property owners will all need to be contacted and negotiations will all be different depending on the testing results. The Chair asked about the soil storage. He asked if the soil stored on site will be clean. Victor Miles responded that the soils will be treated as contaminated but that are not anticipated that they will be hazardous. Timothy Judge asked about the type of soil tests being performed. Victor Miles responded total mercury content and total lead content. Timothy Judge asked about the size of the containers. Victor Miles responded 30 yards. M. Gorete Crowe stated that she is a property owner in the immediate area and is named in the applicants submitted report. She asked about the impacts to the municipal parking lot. Victor Miles responded that part of the parking lot will be used by the project employees. �Scott McDonough responded that the Village has agreed to rent the applicant 13 parking spaces for the project duration. There was an open discussion on the number of commercial vehicles on site daily and the traffic flow in and out of the site. Linda Moiron asked if there was any proposed weekend or evening work. Victor Miles responded there is currently no work planned for the evening or weekends. Linda Moiron stated that there are about 30 property owners in the area. She stated that theoretically, this could last 30-years. Victor Miles stated that the equipment that will be used will be small to be able to maneuver around the properties as well as to comply with the Village Noise Ordinance. John Tavaras of 30 Andrews Lane stated that the lot is currently is 50% empty. He stated that there will be no impact to the current parking set-up. The Chair asked if this is the only staging area. Victor Miles responded yes. Timothy Judge asked about the proposed security that will be used on the site. Victor Miles responded that security is not expected but its proposed in case its needed. Scott McDonough also added that the security lighting will be on motion sensors to minimize the impacts to the property owners. Linda Moiron asked if the entire staging area will have an 8-foot fence around it. Victor Miles responded yes. M. Gorete Crowe asked if any trees in the staging area will be removed. Scott McDonough responded no. The Chair opened the public hearing. A resident from 20 Andrews Lane stated that she proposed an alternate plan but has not heard from the applicant yet. She stated that her property was almost sold back in 2008 but the soil testing results cancelled the sale. She stated that the applicant can buy her property and use it as the staging area. Louis Gonzalez from Andrews Lane stated that the proposed plan of picking up a 30-yard container twice a day will be difficult to maneuver around. He proposed using the Village DPW area and get the projects traffic out of the area. He was concerned with the duration of the cleanup. �Lloyd Conners of Andrews Lane stated that Andrews Lane is difficult to maneuver thru with the snow. He stated that the applicant has taken many samples of the property. He asked if the material becomes airborne, how will that be mitigated? Victor Miles responded that the work would stop and the reasons for why the material became airborne will be evaluated and preventative measures will be placed to prevent any reoccurance. Lloyd Conners also asked when the work might start. Victor Miles responded that the work cannot start until the results are validated. Joan Conners of Andrews Lane stated that traffic in the area will be greatly impacted. Ellen McDonough asked about the noise and dust levels that the neighbors will be exposed to as a result of this work. She stated that the small lot at 30 Andrews Lane will not work for this proposed staging area. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair made a motion to close the public hearing. Timothy Judge seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). The Chair stated that the public has raised many issues but the cleanup must be completed. He stated that the proposed staging area is not meant to be used for this purpose. He also stated that the impacts to the neighborhood during the clean-up will be significant. Victor Miles stated that the trucks will be traveling thru the Village from the site. He stated that this staging location is ideal because it is close to the work sites. Linda Moiron stated that a temporary use variance is only valid for one year and can only be extended for one additional year. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant would have to apply for the 1 year renewal. Timothy Judge asked about the DEC work plan approval Victor Miles responded that the work plan is not yet approved since the soil results are not available. M. Gorete Crowe asked about the parking configuration in the parking lot. Sean McCarthy responded that the parking lot will not be altered. He stated that a parking spot on the street might be altered to accommodate trucks that need to visit the site. Michael Wernick stated that the permit should be applied for once the soil testing results are available and the work plan is approved. The Chair stated that the proposed staging area is the most beneficial to the applicant. He also stated that the applicant should show that they have exhausted all alternative sites to minimize the impacts to the neighbors. �Linda Moiron stated that the work needs to get done. She stated that the best location might be the proposed location since it will minimize the number of commercial vehicles traveling thru the Village. M. Gorete Crowe asked if Village property was evaluated. Sean McCarthy responded that the Village parking lot was evaluated but the Trustees rejected the proposal due to the impacts to the residents. Timothy Judge stated that the DEC work plan should be reviewed by the Board. He stated that the number of remediated properties will be known and the number of vehicles and possible time frames will be better understood. Victor Miles stated that the properties that were evaluated will be presented to the Board. The Chair stated that he will visit the site to better understand the parking and traffic impacts. The Chair made a motion to adjourn the application to the next meeting. He asked for a copy of the work plan as well as the description of the other sites that were considered as the staging area. Scott McDonough responded that the DEC might not want the draft work plan released at this time. The Chair stated that the draft work plan will be subject to getting the NYS DECs approval to release it. Timothy Judge seconded the motion to adjourn. It was unanimous (5-0). 3) Minutes for June 2010 and January 2011 The minutes for the June 2010 and January 2011 meetings were reviewed. The minutes for the June 2010 meeting will be reviewed at the next meeting. The Board requested that the minutes as well as the stenographers notes be redistributed to the Board. The minutes for the January 2011 meeting were reviewed. Linda Moiron made a motion to approve the minutes as amended. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). Adjourned 9:55 pm. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2011-02-16 Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2011 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/6a96ec08c689dcbd85d212f8f51fd974.pdf 6b33593ee89caffa543dfce85e09eaef PDF Text Text The meeting was called to order by Timothy Judge, Acting Chairman at 8:06 pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Linda Moiron M. Gorete Crowe Timothy Judge, Acting Chairman Michael Wernick Sherry Bishko Jennifer Lobato-Church Absent : Peter Koffler, Chairman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village of Sleepy Hollow/Building Inspector) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Ray Endreny 127 Millard Avenue 2) AECOM 30 Andrews Lane 3) Minutes for June 2010 and February 2011 Addition Non-permitted use Announcements: None. 1) Ray Endreny 127 Millard Avenue Addition The Chair read the public notice aloud for the record. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings was submitted. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ray Endreny is the owner and is representing this application. Ray Endreny stated that the existing home has an existing pool and patio in the rear yard. He stated that the pool and patio are being used as part of the lot coverage calculations which is causing the variance. He stated that the side yard is increasing by over one foot. He stated that the additional area is needed to keep consistency in the interior space. He stated that the neighbors do not have any issues with the proposed addition. The Chair asked if the Board had any questions. Linda Moiron asked if the pool was included in the FAR calculation. Sean McCarthy responded that the main house, pool, patio and garage are included in the calculation. �Ray Endreny stated that the existing attic space is 4-foot tall. He stated that the profile is changing because the additional cost to raise the roof is not that much. He stated that the new house will be an improvement. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair made a motion to close the public hearing. Linda Moiron seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). The Chair stated that the proposed addition is not substantial and will not negatively impact the neighborhood. He made as motion to approve the application as submitted. Linda Moiron seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 2) AECOM 30 Andrews Lane Non-permitted use - This is a continuation from previous meetings. Victor Miles and Scott McDonough are representing this application on behalf of the applicant. Victor Miles presented a chronology of events for the application. He stated that back in 2010, the applicant contacted local real estate agents for possible properties to use for the staging area. He stated that there were not many options available in the area. In Sept 2010, the applicant met with the Village Trustees to investigate using the Village parking lot. In October 2010, the applicant met with the Planning Board to get approval to use the parking lot for the staging area. The Planning Board suggested using the GM property or the UAW property. He stated that GM said that they would not permit the applicant to use the space and the UAW never responded. Victor Miles stated that the Planning Board requested that different port-a-johns be utilized so they are not offensive to local residents. In December 2010, the Planning Board was presented a new port-a-john design as well as a new location to use 30 Andrews Lane as a staging area. Scott McDonough provided a list of the properties that were contacted. He stated that local realtors provided 3 properties in the area that could be used for staging. He stated that they are very far away from the site and should not be considered for staging. Jennifer Lobato-Church asked if there are any variances needed for using 60 Elm Street. Victor Miles responded that a right-of-passage will be needed to bring trucks into the area. Linda Moiron asked about 30 Andrews Lane. Sean McCarthy responded that the Village will enter into a licensing agreement with the applicant for the use of the parking lot. Jennifer Lobato-Church asked about the staging area. �Victor Miles explained the purpose of the staging area and how is will be used. Jennifer Lobato-Church stated that the remediation will need to take place regardless of the location of the staging area. Victor Miles responded yes. He briefly summarized the entire remediation process starting with soil sampling and the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) work plan process. Jennifer Lobato-Church asked who will be ensuring compliance with the work plan. Victor Miles responded the NYS DEC and the NYS Department of Health (DOH). Michael Wernick asked if the property in Elmsford is feasible. Scott McDonough responded that if the staging area is that far away, an additional staging area will be needed in the immediate site area. The Chair stated that the area residents need to be considered. He stated that this staging area will be there for a considerable time. Victor Miles responded that there will be twice as much traffic if the staging is located outside of the area. He stated that there will be 1-2 trucks on a daily basis with no weekend activity. He stated that the neighborhood is being remediated and there is no way to eliminate the activity. The Chair stated that the applicant needs to present a complete record so that the Board can make a decision. Linda Moiron stated that 2 staging areas would extend the amount of time that is needed to complete the remediation. The Chair asked for more information to further explain why the alternate locations are not viable. M. Gorete Crowe is a resident in the area. She stated that the residents want the remediation to be done quickly. She asked about the duration of the remediation project. Jennifer Lobato-Church responded that the Board needs to consider what they can control (traffic, noise, etc). Victor Miles responded that the applicant must comply with the Village Ordinances regarding traffic and noise. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board can place additional conditions on the variance. Michael Wernick asked about the hours of operation. Victor Miles responded normal business hours. The Chair stated that the Board is trying to make the record as solid as possible. He stated that the work plan should be reviewed by the Board. Victor Miles gave a timeline regarding the approval process and the start of work. He stated that the work plan cannot be released before DEC approves the work plan. He stated that releasing �the work plan before the DEC approval would violate the court order. He stated that the work plan cannot be submitted to the DEC until the staging area is known. Michael Wernick asked if there was a timeframe on the approval. Sean McCarthy responded 1-year. The Chair stated that all of the information is still not being presented to the Board. Victor Miles asked if the variance could be granted with conditions. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sean McCarthy spoke about the ZBAs approval and the Planning Board review. There was an open discussion on conditions and concerns that can be placed on the approval as well as ensuring that these conditions are included in the DEC approved work plan. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant should also be allowed to meet with the Planning Board so that the Planning Board can schedule the public hearing. The Chair opened the public hearing. Patricia Daley of 20 Andrews Lane stated that this needs to be remediated ASAP. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair adjourned the public hearing. Linda Moiron stated that the closer the staging area is to the site, the better the benefit to the Village. Jennifer Lobato-Church agreed. She stated that the Board should approve the variance tonight so the application can continue. The Chair stated that the use of the property is not fully known. Linda Moiron stated that the Board's concerns can be noted in the variance. Sean McCarthy reviewed the conditions that can be placed on a temporary use variance. There was an open discussion on conditions for the variance. The Chair made a motion to grant a temporary use variance for the fence subject to Planning Board approval, DEC approval and DOH approval. Linda Moiron seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 3) Minutes for June 2010 and January 2011 - �The minutes for the June 2010 and February 2011 meetings will be reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned 9:31 pm. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2011-03-16 Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2011 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/b6020f16c6c507c66590196d19f9425b.pdf 714ae604d834e2df57a473c00082e4fa PDF Text Text The meeting was called to order by Peter Koffler, Chairman at 8:08 pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: M. Gorete Crowe Timothy Judge Michael Wernick Jennifer Lobato-Church Peter Koffler, Chairman Absent : Linda Moiron Sherry Bishko Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village of Sleepy Hollow/Building Inspector) Janet Gandolfo (Village Attorney) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Laurentino Rodrigues 172 Valley Street Construct a mixed-use building 2) Minutes for June 2010, February 2011 and March 2011 Announcements: None. 1) Laurentino Rodrigues 172 Valley Street Construct a mixed-use building- The Chair read the public notice aloud for the record. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings was submitted. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair stated that if an application is denied, the applicant cannot be heard again for a 6month period if the application is substantially similar. William Simeonfrides is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owner. He stated that the previous application required more variances. He stated that the residential portion was reduced by 1000sf. He stated that the building was redesigned. The Chair checked the zoning code to verify that the application can be presented to the Board within a 6-month period. He asked the applicant to highlight the differences in the applications. William Simeonfrides stated that the commercial area remained the same size at 1000sf. He stated that the residential portion of the building was shifted over 2-feet. He stated that the area near Chestnut Street is now open and undeveloped. He stated that the residential units were reduced to only 1-bedroom units from the original 2-bedroom layouts. He stated that the parking �requirements were also reduced. The Chair stated that the new application shows that the application was altered. He stated that although the application has been modified, the new application does not appear to be substantially different from the previously rejected application. He noted that the substantial wall fronting the street. He stated that the public is being inconvenienced because they have to keep coming out every time the applicant makes a change. Timothy Judge stated that the application does not have enough information to make a decision. Jennifer Lobato-Church stated that she does not want to open the public hearing because the application does not seem to be substantially different from the previously rejected application. William Simeonfrides stated that the new application does not resemble the previous application. Michael Wernick stated that the public should have the enough time to review the application again. He stated that the 6-month timeframe should stand. The Chair stated that pursuant to §62-47 of the Village Zoning code, the application is substantially similar to the previously denied application. He asked the Village Attorney if the Boards refusal to hear the application restarts the 6-month timeframe. Janet Gandolfo responded no. She said that the applicant was denied in January 2011 and can reapply in July 2011. The Chair made a motion to determine that the application is substantially similar to the previously denied application. Jennifer Lobato-Church seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 2) Minutes for June 2010, February 2011 and March 2011 The minutes for the June 2010 meeting will be reviewed at the next meeting. The February 2011 minutes were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the February 2011 minutes as amended. Timothy Judge seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). The March 2011 minutes were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the March 2011 minutes as submitted. Timothy Judge seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). Adjourned 8:43 pm. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2011-04-20 Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2011 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/c06d5dd65ee4169c1a4b8e1fa173819d.pdf abbc306e3f54d6a8b1c95b604cd5959e PDF Text Text The meeting was called to order by Peter Koffler, Chairman at 8:08 pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Peter Koffler, Chairman M. Gorete Crowe Timothy Judge Michael Wernick Jennifer Lobato-Church Linda Moiron Sherry Bishko Absent None Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village of Sleepy Hollow/Building Inspector) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Thomas Walek 532 Bellwood Ave 2) Minutes for June 2010 and April 2011 3) Other Front entrance portico Announcements: None. 1) Thomas Walek 532 Bellwood Ave Front entrance portico - The Chair read the public notice aloud for the record. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings was submitted. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair stated that the Board had received the following: 1) Application 2) Survey received April 13, 2011 Thomas Walek stated that they want to extend the porch over the front entryway. He stated that the existing landing would covered by the portico. The Chair stated that the portico would be a 4-foot projection. Timothy Judge asked if the front steps count in the calculation. Sean McCarthy responded that the steps count if they are covered. �The Chair asked if the Board had any questions. There were none. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair made a motion to close the public hearing. Jennifer Lobato-Church seconded. It was unanimous (7-0). The Chair stated that this is not a self-created hardship. He also stated that this change would not be detrimental to the community. Lastly, he stated that this is the minimal variance that can be approved in order to accommodate the needs of the applicant. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Michael Wernick seconded. It was unanimous (7-0). 2) Minutes for June 2010 and April 2011 The June 2010 minutes were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the June 2010 minutes as amended. Timothy Judge seconded. It was unanimous (7-0). The April 2011 minutes were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the April 2011 minutes as amended. Timothy Judge seconded. It was unanimous (7-0). 3) Other There was an open discussion on a letter received from the Moon River Grill. No action was taken. Adjourned 8:25 pm. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2011-05-18 Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2011 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/66b01e4d4fece17eb2d7df2cf3fe14ca.pdf 034d3fceba50a395a0d9a76fa97347e8 PDF Text Text The meeting was called to order by Peter Koffler, Chairman at 8:02 pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Peter Koffler, Chairman M. Gorete Crowe Timothy Judge Michael Wernick Linda Moiron Sherry Bishko Absent : Jennifer Lobato-Church Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village of Sleepy Hollow/Building Inspector) Janet Gandolfo (Village Attorney) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) David Beaton 2) Minutes for May 2011 167 Millard Ave Construct deck and stone terrace 167 Millard Ave Construct deck and stone terrace Announcements: None. 1) David Beaton The Chair read the public notice aloud for the record. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings was submitted. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair stated that the Board had received the following: 1) application 2) drawing dated 4-13-11 Sergio Marin is the project architect and is representing this application along with owner, Rebecca Beaton. He stated that 20% of their property is unusable due to the steep grade changes. Rebecca Beaton spoke to the Board. She stated that they want to capitalize on the most used part of their home. She stated that the proposed deck would allow their family to spend more time outside in a safer manner. �Sergio Marin reviewed the proposed changes for the Board. He stated that the proposed addition would not be detrimental to the community. He reviewed the proposed variances for the Board. He stated that the side yard setback variance will be for a deck that is only 6" above the grade. He asked for clarification regarding the combined side yard setback variance requirement. Sean McCarthy explained the combined side yard setback calculation. Sergio Marin stated that the proposed terrace will be at grade level. Sean McCarthy explained that the calculations are correct and the variance is still required. Sergio Marin stated that he would reduce the number of variances by reducing the deck on the east side. He stated that variance #2 would be eliminated and variance #3 would be reduced. The Chair stated that the proposed combined side yard setback would be reduced to 8-foot. The Chair asked if this is the original application. Sean McCarthy stated that the previous application was withdrawn. Linda Moiron asked about the letters received from the public for this application. Sean McCarthy responded that the Village has received 3 letters on this application. He stated that one letter is dated June 11, 2011 and 2 letters dated July 26, 2010. Sergio Marin summarized the proposed variances for the Board. The Chair asked the applicant to discuss the criteria for approving the variances. Sergio Marin stated that the applicant is undergoing a hardship because they cannot fully use their property. The Chair asked if the Board had any questions. There were none. The Chair opened the public hearing. Ken Anderson from 275 Millard Ave stated that he is in favor of the proposed application. Shelley Robinson of Kelbourne Ave stated that she opposes the application. She likes the shady environment. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair made a motion to close the public hearing. Timothy Judge seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). Sergio Marin stated that no trees will be removed as part of this application. Sherry Bishko asked about the proposed materials. �Sergio Marin responded that Trex® materials are proposed. He presented photos of the existing conditions to the Board. The Chair stated that the streetscape will be impacted by the columns. Sergio Marin responded that the owners will install some additional landscaping around the posts to make it blend in with the surroundings. Timothy Judge asked if there were any other approvals required. Sean McCarthy responded that ARB approval is also required. M. Gorete Crowe asked about the view in the wintertime. Sergio Marin responded that the columns will be visible. The Chair stated that it was hard to visualize the potential impacts of the application since it was hard to see the property from the street. He stated that the application has been amended to eliminate 3 of the 6 proposed variances. He stated that he would like to see a clear diagram of the revised application and also see the site up close to visualize where the proposed columns would be installed. Sherry Bishko agreed. The Chair stated that the Board should see the site up close. Janet Gandolfo stated that if the Board would visit the site as a group, the public should be made aware so that they can attend if they want. Sergio Marin requested an adjournment to the next meeting. The Board unanimously agreed (6-0). 2) Minutes for May 2011 The minutes for the May 2011 meeting were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the May 2011 minutes as submitted. Timothy Judge seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). Adjourned 8:45 pm. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2011-06-15 Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2011 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/3dabf42bc7683e9210d33e4abde695af.pdf 186fef3b39d2b5f126bd4004dc783a00 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING - APPROVED July 20, 2011 The meeting was called to order by Peter Koffler, Chairman at 8:02 pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Peter Koffler, Chairman M. Gorete Crowe Michael Wernick Sherry Bishko Absent : Jennifer Lobato-Church Timothy Judge Linda Moiron Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village of Sleepy Hollow/Building Inspector) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) David Beaton 2) M/M Araujo - Luigi Rogliano 3) Sean Flatley 4) Other 167 Millard Ave 68 Beekman Ave 125 New Broadway Construct deck and stone terrace New mixed use residential bldg Covered wood deck 167 Millard Ave Construct deck and stone terrace 5) Minutes for June 2011 Announcements: None. 1) David Beaton Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant has requested an adjournment to the September 2011 meeting. 2) M/M Araujo - Luigi Rogliano 68 Beekman Ave New mixed use residential bldg The Chair read the public notice aloud for the record. The Chair asked if the proof of public notice was received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Luigi Rogliano is the contract vendee and is representing this application. Luigi Rogliano stated that the application is for a parking variance. He stated that this application was previously approved 2 years ago but the owners were not financially able to start �the project. He stated that this application is only seeking to reinstate the same approval without any deviations. Sean McCarthy stated that this building was destroyed by a fire and the use was grandfathered. The Chair asked the applicant to describe the proposed building. Luigi Rogliano responded that there will be a commercial business on the 1st floor and two residential units above as indicated in the approved plans. M. Gorete Crowe asked if anything can be built behind the property. Sean McCarthy stated that there can be 5 parking spaces built but the applicant has allowed the area to be open as an easement for access to adjacent properties. Luigi Rogliano stated that none of the other businesses on Beekman Ave have parking. The Chair stated that nothing can be built on the property that can provide the required parking. Luigi Rogliano stated that at a time in the future when the adjacent properties are developed, some parking can be provided in the rear of the property. The Chair opened the public hearing. Angelo Guzzo stated that there was never a 3-story building on the site. He stated that his building was totally renovated and if there is a parking area near his property, his property would smell the automotive exhaust. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair made a motion to close the public hearing. M. Gorete Crowe seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Luigi Rogliano stated that the future parking plan is something that the Village is requesting. He stated that there is no current plan to put parking in the rear of the property. The Chair stated that the lot needs to be developed but the variance is substantial. He stated that he would like to see the site plan as well as the approved minutes of the meeting when the original application was approved. He made a motion to adjourn the application until this information is provided. Michael Wernick seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) Sean Flatley 125 New Broadway The Chair read the public notice aloud for the record. The Chair asked if the proof of public notice was received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sean Flatley is the owner and is representing this application. Covered wood deck - �The Chair stated that the Board has received the following: 1) Application dated June 13, 2011 2) survey dated June 13, 2011 Sean Flatley stated that he is the new owner of the property. He stated that the existing deck is non-conforming. He stated that he wants to remove the 2-story deck and replace it with a more functional deck that will extend out to the rear property line. The Chair asked if the existing deck is usable. Sean Flatley stated that he is a carpenter. He stated that the existing deck is unsafe. He stated that the posts are rotted and the footings are incorrect. The Chair asked if the new deck would have the same elevation. Sean Flatley responded yes. Sherry Bishko asked if there are stairs on the existing deck. Sean Flatley responded yes. The Chair asked what is on the rear property line. Sean Flatley responded that there is a hedge on the rear property line. The Chair asked if the existing decks are visible from Crane Ave. Sean Flatley responded yes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. M. Gorete Crowe stated that there is no rear yard on the property. Sean Flatley responded that it is steep but there is about 25-feet to the rear property line. He stated that underneath the new deck, the lawn will remain. M. Gorete Crowe asked if the stairs will be on the outside of the deck. Sean Flatley responded yes. The Chair asked if ARB approval is also required. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair asked if this is the minimal space needed to make the deck functional. Sean Flatley responded yes. The Chair made a motion to approve the variance as requested. He stated that the application is for the minimal variance possible to meet the needs of the applicant. He also stated that it is not detrimental to the neighborhood. Michael Wernick seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). �4) Other a) Moon River Grill - Bob Ronan spoke to the Board regarding his one-year probation. He requested that the probation be lifted. The Chair asked when the applicant opened their doors. Bob Ronan responded that the variance was approved in July 2010 but he opened for business on December 14, 2010. The Chair stated that an application needs to be filed so that the public can be noticed and can attend. He stated that it is part of the process. 5) Minutes for June 2011 The minutes for the June 2011 meeting were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the June 2011 minutes as amended. Michael Wernick seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Adjourned 8:45 pm. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2011-07-20 Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2011 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/69c350d6406b3994a5a6b856ef9a8498.pdf 15203a9ad48e012bd311fa0dfcde9f9f PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING -APPROVED September 21, 2011 The meeting was called to order by Jennifer Lobato-Church, Acting Chair at 8:07 pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Michael Wernick Sherry Bishko Linda Moiron Jennifer Lobato-Church, Acting Chair Absent : Peter Koffler, Chairman M. Gorete Crowe Timothy Judge Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village of Sleepy Hollow/Building Inspector) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) David Beaton 2) M/M Araujo - Luigi Rogliano 3) Moon River Grill 4) Laurentino Rodrigues 5) Carl Colasacco 6) Minutes for July 2011 167 Millard Ave 68 Beekman Ave 222 Beekman Ave 172 Valley Street 169 Webber Ave Construct deck and stone terrace New mixed use residential bldg Variance Review Mixed use bldg Detached garage and addition Announcements: The Chair stated that since there were only 4 members present, the Board would have to be unanimous to approve an application. 1) David Beaton 167 Millard Ave Construct deck and stone terrace This is a continuation from the previous meeting. Sergio Marin is the project architect and is presenting this application along with the owner, David Beaton. Sergio Marin stated that the deck has been reduced significantly. He stated that the front yard fence is being requested at 42" tall instead of 36" tall to ensure the safety of the Beaton's small children. He also stated that the front yard, side yard and combined yard setback variance requests have all been reduced. David Beaton stated that the deck is significantly scaled back. He stated that the revised application does not request the removal of any trees. �The Chair asked if there are any trees impacted by the proposed deck. David Beaton responded not one tree will be impacted. Michael Wernick asked about the number of beams that will be needed to support the deck. Sergio Marin responded that there are 2 beams on the ends and 2 beams in the center. Since the Board did not have any additional questions, the Chair opened the public hearing. Pat Piereson of 264 Millard Ave asked about the height of the posts. Sergio Marin responded that the post will sit on rock and will not sit on the ground. He stated that the post height will vary but will be about 7 or 8 feet tall. The Chair asked if a survey needs to be done to make sure the structural integrity of the deck is acceptable. Sean McCarthy responded that the project architect or structural engineer will have to certify that the deck is structurally sound. Pat Piereson reviewed 2 of the 5 reason for granting a variance. She stated that this property is not unique and that the Board might be setting a precedent for other similar 8 houses in the neighborhood that have similar site conditions. She also spoke about the rocks being an attractive nuisance. She stated that by building a man-made structure on the rock, the Board and Village would be liable if someone got hurt on the rocks. She stated that the applicants should consider a structure that is solid and not climbable. She stated that they should have the right to build their deck but conditions should be granted so that the entire deck is not build on stilts. Since there were no additional public comments, the Chair adjourned the public hearing. The Chair referred to Pat Piereson's submitted photos of the following properties: 264 Millard, 225 Highland Ave, 2 Highland Ave and 270 Millard Ave. David Beaton stated that his application is for a variance in the front yard. He stated that the houses referenced were not a true comparison. Sherry Bishko asked the applicant to review the previous application to see the changes that were made from the original application. Sergio Marin reviewed the changes in the revised plan. Sherry Bishko stated that the revisions are the direct result of ZBA comments from the previous meeting. The Chair stated that the last meeting the Board asked to see a rendering of the deck and that insufficient notice was provided to the Board to view it ahead of the meeting. No one on the Board felt that they needed more time to see the site. David Beaton stated that he made a simple construction of the deck projection. He stated that Sean McCarthy viewed the deck projection. �Sherry Bishko stated that she has reviewed the area variance conditions and she feels that the applicant has met the conditions. The Chair reviewed the public comments from the last meeting. She also stated that the application is not an undesirable change in the neighborhood and cannot be accomplished by any other means. She also stated that this is not a self-created hardship. Linda Moiron asked about the liability. Sean McCarthy responded that the liability questions should be directed to the Village attorney. Pat Piereson stated that the posts should be covered so that kids cannot climb the posts. She stated that she is not opposed to the applicant's deck. The Chair commented on the visual impacts of enclosing the posts stating they would be more obtrusive is enclosed. Sean McCarthy asked about the elevation of the deck to the 1st floor. Sergio Marin responded that it is 4" below the 1st floor. Linda Moiron stated that the 5 variances do not have to be all satisfied. She stated that the application is not detrimental to the neighborhood. The Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair asked if the Board wants to recommend that the applicant lower the deck to match the elevation of the stone wall. The Board agreed that the deck should not be lowered. The Chair stated that the proposed application is not detrimental to the neighborhood. She stated that this is not a self-created hardship and cannot be accomplished by any other means. She made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Michael Wernick seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 2) M/M Araujo - Luigi Rogliano 68 Beekman Ave New mixed use residential bldg There was nobody present for this application. It was adjourned to the next meeting. 3) Moon River Grill 222 Beekman Ave Variance Review Sean McCarthy stated that there was an issue with the proof of mailings so this application will be adjourned to the next meeting. �4) Laurentino Rodrigues 172 Valley Street Mixed use bldg The Chair read the public notice aloud. The Chair asked if proof of the public mailings was received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. William Simeonfrides is the project architect and is representing this application. William Simeonfrides reviewed the new application. He stated that the original application needed a variance for FAR since the parking was covered and needed to be included in the calculation. He stated that the application has been revised to propose four 1-bedroom units and a 900 sf commercial office that will be used by the owner. Sean McCarthy asked the applicant to review the parking plan. William Simeonfrides stated that some parking spots on Valley Street will be realigned. He spoke about the covered parking spaces and the FAR requirements. The Chair opened the public hearing. Jose Chevere of 70 Depeyster Street spoke about the bulk of the application. He stated that the neighborhood consists of colonial style homes. He stated that this is out-of-character with the neighborhood. He stated that his property would face a large stucco wall and would impact his property value. He stated that although changes were made, the size of the structure is an issue. The Chair adjourned the public hearing. Sean McCarthy asked about the location of the structural beams and their potential impacts on the parking plan. William Simeonfrides reviewed the location of the proposed columns on the plan. He stated that the beams will not impact the parking plan. Sean McCarthy stated that the columns cannot be located inside of any parking spaces. Michael Wernick asked if anything can be done for the bulk of the wall. William Simeonfrides responded that he can put more windows in the wall. Linda Moiron asked about the size of the commercial space. William Simeonfrides responded about 1000sf. Michael Wernick asked if the commercial office space is sub-divided, will that change the parking requirements. Sean McCarthy responded no. He stated that a condition could be placed on the approval to limit the use of the commercial space. �The Chair asked if the Board had any other questions. Linda Moiron asked to see the minutes of the previous meetings. Michael Wernick asked to see any additional options to decrease the bulk of the wall on Depeyster Street. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 5) Carl Colasacco 169 Webber Ave Detached garage and addition The Chair read the public notice aloud. The Chair asked if proof of the public mailings was received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Frank Tanfreddy is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owners. Frank Tanfreddy presented photos to the Board of the current property. He stated that the original garage was a 2-car garage. He stated that the garage was removed without a permit. He stated that the new 2-car garage is a little larger than the original and that it was also started without a building permit. He presented photos of what is currently on the property. He reviewed the interior layout of the property. The Chair asked about the variances requested. She stated that the only variance before the Board is for the garage and not for the 2-family status. Sean McCarthy responded that the 2-family status is a pre-existing non-conforming use. There was an open discussion on the Boards review of the application and how they will approach the requested variances. Sean McCarthy reviewed the requested variances. The Chair asked to know what variances are required as a result of the unapproved work. Sean McCarthy responded that it is noted on the public notice. Sean McCarthy stated that the Building Dept does not recognize the new garage since the original garage was removed without a permit over a year ago. Carl Colasacco spoke about the original garage. He spoke about the history of the garage removal and the reconstruction. He stated that the new garage is a little smaller that the original garage. Michael Wernick asked about the garage height. He stated that he was concerned with the 21foot garage height. �Frank Tanfreddy reviewed the interior layout of the property. The Chair asked how many families are occupying the house. Carl Colasacco responded two families. The Chair opened the public hearing. Kerry Dahl from 171 Webber Ave stated that the work done at the property is fantastic. He stated that the garage size is unappealing. He stated that the property abuts the Rockefeller property. Sherry Bishko asked if the original garage had a storage space. Kerry Dahl responded there was a small space for his tools and maintenance tools like a lawn mower. Sean McCarthy stated that the garage height is measured from the midpoint of the ridge point and not the peak of the structure. Gale Saldas from 167 Webber Ave stated that she remembers the original garage. She stated that the house is very well maintained. She stated that the garage will be too large and she is concerned that it will eventually be living space. Sherry Bishko asked for the size of the storage space. Frank Tanfreddy responded 270sf. The Chair adjourned the public hearing. Carl Colasacco stated that the original garage was in serious disrepair. He stated that he started to remove the garage in his spare time. He stated that he knew he needed a Bldg Permit to remove the garage so he hired an architect. He stated that he never filed for a permit. Sean McCarthy stated that his first introduction with this property was when he issued a stop work order when it was discovered that the footings and foundation were completed on the new garage. He stated that the owner continued and installed the walls. He stated that a 2 nd stop work order was issued. The Chair made a motion that the Board adjourn the application so that the Board can visit the property. Linda Moiron seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) Minutes for July 2011 The minutes for the July 2011 meeting will be reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned 10:12 pm. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2011-09-21 Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2011 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/730491aa918b79cf9ce9f5b8018ef971.pdf 2a49b857a8e05ec5896c4a5404032ad4 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING - APPROVED October 19, 2011 The meeting was called to order by Peter Koffler, Chairman at 8:05 pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Michael Wernick Linda Moiron Timothy Judge M. Gorete Crowe Peter Koffler, Chairman Jennifer Lobato-Church Sherry Bishko Absent : None Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village of Sleepy Hollow/Building Inspector) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) M/M Araujo - Luigi Rogliano 68 Beekman Ave 2) Moon River Grill 222 Beekman Ave 3) Laurentino Rodrigues 172 Valley Street 4) Carl Colasacco 169 Webber Ave 5) Minutes for July and September 2011 New mixed use residential bldg Variance Review Mixed use bldg Detached garage and addition Announcements: None. 1) M/M Araujo - Luigi Rogliano 68 Beekman Ave New mixed use residential bldg Luigi Rogliano is the contract vendee and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair read the public notice aloud for the record. Luigi Rogliano stated that the previous application was approved. He stated that the approved variances have expired and they are only seeking to obtain the same approvals. The Chair asked why the variances expired. Sean McCarthy stated that the variances are only good for 1-year unless a building permit is filed. Luigi Rogliano stated that the previous owners did not have the financing in place to proceed with the work. He stated that the original meeting minutes have been provided to the Board along with the original ZBA approval. The Chair asked about the occupants of the space. �Luigi Rogliano responded that he did not know yet. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair reviewed the approved ZBA minutes from the January 21, 2009 meeting. The Chair asked about the interior floor plans. Luigi Rogliano responded that he did not know yet. He stated that the proposed tenants would need to get approval from the Village. Linda Moiron asked if the applicant knew that 2 off-street parking spaces were required as a condition for the residential units. Luigi Rogliano responded that they will comply. The Chair stated that the application is the same application that was previously approved. He stated that it is not detrimental to the neighborhood and is not a self-created hardship. He made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Linda Moiron seconded. It was unanimous (7-0). 2) Moon River Grill 222 Beekman Ave Variance Review Robert Ronan is the business owner (tenant) and is representing this application. The Chair read the public notice aloud for the record. The Chair asked is the proof of mailings was received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Robert Ronan stated that he is seeking to lift the conditions on the previous approval. He stated that one-year has passed and there have been no issues with his business and the Village. He also stated that there have been no complaints. The Chair stated that the area variance conditions can be lifted or replaced. He reviewed the conditions. Robert Ronan stated that the restriction of bar stools should also be eliminated. The Chair stated that the bar stools are not part of the conditions. He stated that the bar stools were part of the determination for the interpretation of a restaurant within the Village and are part of the use variance. There was an open discussion regarding the ability of the Board to re-evaluate the decision to interpret the definition of a tavern or restaurant. The Chair asked the applicant to clarify if he wants the Board to re-evaluate their interpretation of the code. He stated that the public notice will need to be re-issued. �Sean McCarthy stated that the public has come to the meeting so the notice is correct. The Chair opened the public hearing. Mark Frye (41 Hudson Terrace) stated that he has 33 years in the restaurant business. He stated that a change in the Boards previous interpretation is needed. He stated that other municipalities have different interpretations. He reviewed the code interpretations for restaurant/ tavern for Peekskill and Lewisboro. He stated that all restaurants that have a bar area all have bar stools. He stated that the elimination of bar stools is overly restrictive. Jennifer Lobato-Church asked if these other municipalities specifically define beverages or specifically define a bar or tavern. Mark Frye responded no. Mark Frye stated that the restaurant should be allowed to have stools at the bar so that he can operate like any other restaurant in the area. He also stated that all restaurants be allowed to use curbside tables. Jeff Foyer (124 Cedar Lane) stated that it is inappropriate for the restaurant not to have bar stools for patrons. Fay Granada (Tarrytown) stated that the restaurant is losing money by not having a place to sit at the bar. She stated that every other restaurant in the area has a bar with stools. She said that she does not understand the problem with the interpretation. Gary Serina is the owner of 222 Beekman Ave. He stated that the applicant runs a great business. He stated that the nearby residents have no complaints against the restaurant. He stated that the tenant is not looking for a bar crowd. He stated that the definition should be reinterpreted and the bar stools should be permitted. The Chair made a motion to close the public hearing. Linda Moiron seconded. It was unanimous (7-0). The Chair asked how many bar stools would the applicant need. Robert Ronan responded 10 stools. The Chair asked about the number of seats in the restaurant. Robert Ronan responded 75 seats. The Chair stated that the building sits in a very specific zoning district that excludes taverns and bars but allows restaurants. He stated that previously the distinction was never needed. He stated that the Board made their determination on the proposed use. He stated that the applicant can apply for a use variance. Robert Ronan stated that without the bar stools, he won't last past the end of the year. He stated that he needs the additional business to keep the restaurant open. Sean McCarthy stated that a condition should be placed on this application that could permit bar stools. APPROVED - Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting, October 19, 2011 3 �Timothy Judge referred to the NYS Liquor Authority application definitions for a restaurant and bar/tavern. He stated that a hybrid of tavern-restaurant can be created. The Chair responded that the Board does not have the authority to change the code. He stated that a condition can be placed on the prior variance to permit bar stools. Michael Wernick stated that the Board should re-interpret the definition of a restaurant and tavern. He stated that the bar/taverns primary purpose is to serve alcohol. M. Gorete Crowe stated that the use variance should be re-interpreted. Sherry Bishko stated that the definitions should be re-evaluated so that other applicants do not have this same issue. Timothy Judge asked if there have been any complaints. Sean McCarthy responded that there was one complaint but it was unfounded. There was an open discussion on the Board's ability to re-interpret the definition of a restaurant or bar/tavern. The Chair made a motion to remove condition (c) from the definition and adding the condition about the use of 10 bar stools. Linda Moiron seconded. It was unanimous (7-0). Robert Ronin also asked to increase the operating time to 12 midnight to compete with Tarrytown. He stated that last call is 11:30pm and the restaurant would still close at 12 midnight. The Chair made a motion to changing the restaurant definition so that the restaurant can operate until 11pm and still close at midnight. He stated that the Board will reserve the right to re-evaluate the conditions in 12-months. Linda Moiron seconded. It was unanimous (6-0 Lobato-Church abstained). 3) Laurentino Rodrigues 172 Valley Street Mixed use bldg This is a continuation from previous meetings. The Chair read the public notice aloud. William Simeonfrides is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. William Simeonfrides provided drawings of some recent revisions. He reviewed the application for the Board. He stated that an additional window was added to the Valley Street side. He also stated that the roof elevations were changed. He stated that the required parking is being provided. He stated that the loading space variance is needed. He stated that the commercial space does not require any deliveries since it will be used by the owner to operate his properties. The Chair opened the public hearing. �Jose Chivera (70 Depeyster St) stated that he is still opposed to the project. He stated that currently there is a single family house on the property. He stated that this will create a 30-foot wall in front of his house. He stated that Depeyster St is a residential neighborhood. He stated that is it out of character with the neighborhood. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Michael Wernick asked about the aesthetics of the proposed application. He stated that are the aesthetics enforceable. Sean McCarthy responded yes. William Simeonfrides stated that the property is located in a commercial zone. He also stated that the neighbors property is also located in a commercial zone. He stated that the residential zone does not start until further up on Depeyster Street. Sean McCarthy asked if the architect evaluated a complete residential development. William Simeonfrides responded no. He stated that the owner wants the commercial space so that he can move into it. He stated that it is going to be an office space and not retail space. There was an open discussion on possibly eliminating the commercial office space and make the property completely residential. The Chair stated that the development is a large structure and he feels that all of the options have not been explored to meet the applicants needs. There was an open discussion about removing the tower. The Chair asked about the impacts if the commercial space was removed and the project was just residential. Sean McCarthy responded that the parking requirements are less and the commercial loading space is no longer needed. Linda Moiron stated that the presented plans no not vary much from the previously rejected plans from about 1 year ago. William Simeonfrides responded that the plans have changed significantly. He presented a copy of the original application for a comparison. The Chair asked the applicant to re-evaluate the tower portion and the commercial space location. Linda Moiron also wanted the applicant to evaluate the 1BR duplex feature to reduce the bulk. William Simeonfrides responded ok. This was adjourned to the next meeting. No action was taken. 4) Carl Colasacco 169 Webber Ave Detached garage and addition This is a continuation from previous meetings. APPROVED - Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting, October 19, 2011 5 �The Chair read the public notice aloud. Frank Tancredi is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owner. Frank Tancredi summarized the application to date. He stated that at the last meeting, the neighbors voiced some concerns about the size of the garage. He stated that the revised plans have reduced the proposed storage in the original application. He stated that the ridge was reduced. The Chair asked if the design would be a standard 2-car garage. Frank Tancredi responded yes. He stated that new garage is slightly smaller that the proposed garage. The Chair asked about the height of the original garage. Frank Tancredi responded that he did not know. Sherry Bishko asked if the dormer and cupola were removed. Frank Tancredi responded yes. He stated that the proposed storage area above the garage has been removed. The Chair asked if the proposed garage is in the same location as the original garage. Frank Tancredi responded yes. Since there was no public present, the Chair opened and closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. He stated that the garage would not change the essential character of the neighborhood and is the minimal variance that can be granted to meet the applicants needs. Jennifer Lobato-Church asked if there is any parking on Webber Ave. Carl Colasacco responded no. Michael Wernick seconded the motion. It was unanimous (7-0). 5) Minutes for July and September 2011 The minutes for the July and September 2011 meetings will be reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned 10:32 pm. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2011-10-19 Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2011 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/492a6a86f569cfb33caf711336cd26d1.pdf b5fbafe8829893aa4df6e89976acef3b PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING November 16, 2011 The meeting was called to order by Timothy Judge , Acting Chairman at 8:15 pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Michael Wernick Linda Moiron Timothy Judge, Acting Chairman M. Gorete Crowe Jennifer Lobato-Church Sherry Bishko Absent : Peter Koffler, Chairman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village of Sleepy Hollow/Building Inspector) Janet Gandolfo (Village Attorney) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Laurentino Rodrigues 172 Valley Street 2) Minutes for July, September and October 2011 Mixed use bldg Announcements: None. 1) Laurentino Rodrigues 172 Valley Street Mixed use bldg This is a continuation from previous meetings. William Simeonfrides is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the William Simeonfrides reviewed the recent revisions to the plans. He stated that the commercial office space was reduced by 280sf. He stated that the reduction in commercial space will result in a reduction in one parking space. He stated that the turret was reduced in height by 3 feet. He also stated that the laundry area was eliminated and the residential apartment entrance was also changed. Lastly, he stated that the size of the covered parking area was also increased. Sean McCarthy stated that it would not be feasible to have trucks on Valley Street back into the property. �William Simeonfrides also stated that there is another parking space on Valley Street that is not being used. Sean McCarthy responded that it is used for a pick-up/drop-off for the daycare. He stated that it could be used for both the daycare and the loading space for the commercial space. The Chair asked if any action by the Board of Trustees is required to make the parking space used for both the daycare and loading zone. Janet Gandolfo responded that the Board of Trustees would have to review and approve of the loading space use change. The Chair stated that the Board could make the variance conditional on the commercial uses that can occupy the commercial space in order to limit the use of the loading zone area. Jennifer Lobato-Church asked for clarification regarding the possibility that the owner will not occupy the commercial space. William Simeonfrides responded that the owner will probably move into the space. He stated that the property must be a mixed-use building so if the building is only a residential building, the applicant would need a variance for lot size instead of as a mixed-use property only needing a loading zone The Chair opened the public hearing. Jose Chevere (70 Depeyster St.) stated that the architect has worked hard making a lot of changes but he is still opposed to the turret. He stated that the turret would be an eyesore in front of his home. He also stated that this will impact the ability to sell his home. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Michael Wernick stated that he likes the changes that the architect has made. M. Gorete Crowe responded that the architect has made many improvements. She stated that the application looks more like a home instead of just a building. Jennifer Lobato-Church stated that the concerns of the Board are not being heard. She stated that many suggestions were made but most of them were ignored. The Chair stated that the application would not be an undesirable change to the neighborhood. He stated that it is a commercial zone and the property is a mixed-use building. He stated that this is not a self-created hardship. He stated that the requested variances are not substantial. He made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the commercial use be limited to a low traffic office use so that the traffic impacts for the commercial tenant is very limited. There will be no service orientated tenants, retail tenants or high traffic uses. Janet Gandolfo stated that she will research the correct verbiage to insert into the approval. Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting, November 16, 2011 2 �Linda Moiron seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 2) Minutes for July, September and October 2011 The minutes for the July, September and October 2011 meetings will be reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned 8:37 pm. Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting, November 16, 2011 2 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2011-11-16 Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2011 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/71172a7743faa7020894eda202fc239e.pdf cf242697d54fdd88ad4430b3d8ac0d88 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING -APPROVED December 21, 2011 The meeting was called to order by Timothy Judge , Acting Chairman at 8:05 pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Michael Wernick Linda Moiron Timothy Judge, Acting Chairman M. Gorete Crowe Jennifer Lobato-Church Absent : Peter Koffler, Chairman Sherry Bishko Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village of Sleepy Hollow/Building Inspector) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) William and Tina Ryan 117 New Broadway 2) Minutes for July, September, October and November 2011 Addition Announcements: None. 1) William and Tina Ryan 117 New Broadway Addition - This is an application for an area variance. The Chair read the public notice aloud for the record. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Frank Tancredi is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owners. Frank Tancredi stated that the proposed application will create a 2 nd floor addition. He stated that the proposed addition will be built within the same plane as the current structure. He stated that the owners considered shifting the addition but the shift would create a significant amount of work on the foundation and increase the actual construction costs. He stated that the addition will be built over the existing footprint. Michael Wernick asked if the height of the roof will change. �Frank Tancredi responded no. He stated that the roof plane will be broken up by the addition of a few eyebrow windows. He stated that it would be about 2-feet lower than the roof on the main structure. The Chair stated that the Board has received: 1) short EAF 2) Application 3) Plans 4) Photos-4 Linda Moiron asked why the requested front yard variance is less than what is original. Sean McCarthy explained that the front yard is listed twice. He also stated that the proposed addition is set back and is not parallel with the existing structure. Since there were no further Board questions, the Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that the application would not be an undesirable change to the neighborhood. He stated that this is not a self-created hardship. He stated that the requested variances are not substantial. He made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Michael Wernick seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 2) Minutes for July, September, October and November 2011 The minutes for the July, September, October and November 2011 meetings were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the July 2011 minutes as submitted. Jennifer Lobato-Church seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). The Chair made a motion to approve the September 2011 minutes as amended. Michael Wernick seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). The Chair made a motion to approve the October 2011 minutes as amended. Jennifer Lobato-Church seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). The November 2011 minutes were held over to the next meeting. Adjourned 8:28 pm. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2011-12-21 Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2011 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text