1 25 28 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/114e32da0b17fdace9951b21494d5e37.pdf 0cc6bffd89d06249ac7b9c4209387219 PDF Text Text ��� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Approved Resolution, 2 Lighthouse Landing, Block-H ARB Approval Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/97d0459f8e6f62d4d55e16d1a9c07f72.pdf 26e13aadbf498e8abb7ac5256e63c76d PDF Text Text ��������� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-01-19_135 Beekman Approved Site Plan Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/ee20e24e2c24f6e01898bbb74ab53940.pdf 34c42b8d5345c4026ecd0cdf5472dd74 PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes January 19, 2023 The regular meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Acting Chairperson Gebler. Acting Chairperson Gebler summarized the agenda. Present: Rachelle Gebler, Acting Chairperson Benjamin Nielsen Kersten Harries Erin Carney Also Present: Joshua Subin, Village Attorney Anthony Catalano, Consulting Engineer David Smith, Village Planner Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Absent: Lindsay Krakauer James Natarelli, Village Engineer Agenda: 1) Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed multi-family building, Site plan approval- Continued public hearing 2) Marcello Poguio, 95 College Avenue, Proposed one-story rear addition, Amended Site Plan approval- Draft resolution 3) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block H, Amended Site Plan and Final ARB Approval- Draft resolution 4) Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval- Presentation 5) Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Amended Site Plan approval - requested adjournment 6) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan approval- requested adjournment 7) LL Parcel F, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, DeCicco & Sons supermarket, Amended Site Plan & ARB approval - Preliminary presentation 8) 46 Hudson St., LLC, 46 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval- Status presentation 9) Approval of minutes, November 17, 2022, December 22, 2022 1. Franceso Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed multi-family building, Site Plan Approval- continued public hearing Motion was made to open the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: Nielsen 1 Vote 4-0 (1/19/23) �Maximillian Mahalek stated that he is an attorney with Cuddy + Feder LLP representing the applicant. Mr. Mahalek stated that he met with the Village’s staff and consultants on January 5, 2023. Mr. Mahalek stated that they submitted minor changes to the Site Plan and the parking layout. Mr. Mahalek stated that the applicant is open to the condition of the affordability of three of the units having comparable rents to the existing units with the flexibility for inflation and utility increases as documented by Westchester County. Mr. Mahalek stated that the applicant acknowledges that there are technical comments that need to be addressed for the Site Plan approval and that the applicant is required to come back to the Planning Board for Architectural Review Board approval. Mr. Mahalek requested that the Planning Board close the public hearing and approve the draft resolution for Site Plan approval. Acting Chairperson Gebler solicited comments from the consultants. David Smith requested that the architect provide a review of the changes made since the last meeting. Christopher Barbagli stated that on behalf of Vassalotti Associates Architects, LLP he is representing the applicant. Mr. Barbagli presented the revised site plan and stated that they eliminated the post lights and replaced them with bollards along the driveway. They added building lights at the garage entrance and the trash recycling area. They reduced the driveway width to 12 feet and added a landscaped area. Mr. Smith asked Mr. Barbargli to explain the difference between the pole lighting and the bollard lighting. Mr. Barbargli stated that the pole lighting was originally 14-foot high downlights. The proposed bollard lighting will be 3 feet, 6 inches high, and will reduce the visibility of the light sources. Acting Chairperson Gebler asked Mr. Barbargli to confirm if the the building lights are hooded, and if there will be lighting on the front porch. Mr. Babargli stated that the added building lights are downlights that will provide more aesthetics than light. Mr. Barbargli stated that there is lighting proposed on the front porch. They have revised the vehicle turning tracks plan to correct parking and site circulation issues. The revised plan includes directional signage for the site. They have revised the northeast corner building setbacks to maintain the setbacks along the landscaped area. They relocated one of the handicapped accessible parking spaces in order to provide the 8-foot access aisle. They added the work scope related to the sidewalks and curb cuts to the site plan. Acting Chairperson Gebler solicited comments from the public. There were no comments received from the public. Motion was made to close the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: Carney Vote 4-0 Acting Chairperson Gebler requested that David Smith read the highlights of the draft resolution. 2 (1/19/23) �Mr. Smith read the resolve clause conditions of the draft resolution for Site Plan approval. Motion was made to approve the resolution. Moved: Carney Seconded: Nielsen Acting Chairperson Gebler - yes Erin Carney - yes Kersten Harries- yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED 2. Marcelo Poguio, 95 College Avenue, Proposed one-story rear addition, Amended Site Plan approval - Draft resolution Marcelo Poguio stated that he is the owner of 95 College Avenue and stated that he is there for the approval of the resolution. Acting Chairperson Gebler solicited questions from the Board. There were no questions from the Board. Acting Chairperson Gebler asked David Smith to read the highlights of the draft resolution. Mr. Smith read the resolve clause and the conditions of the draft resolution. Motion was made to approve the resolution. Moved: Harries Seconded: Carney Acting Chairperson Gebler - yes Erin Carney - yes Kersten Harries- yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED 3. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block H, Amended Site Plan & Final ARB approval - Draft resolution Michael Miller stated that he is the Vice President of Hines representing Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC for parcel H, or also known as the Daymark building. Mr. Miller stated that the revised engineering report prepared by Kimley Horn updated the unit bedroom count relative to Parcel H and the flows for the diversion of Parcel F that bifurcated some of the flows from WC1 on Beekman Avenue, and the WC2 that went to the County manhole behind the railroad tracks. Mr. Miller requested that the Planning Board acknowledge that the calculated sewer flows from the adjustments are below the approved Phase II estimate and that the calculations include the new unit counts and showcase that the diversion of flow from WC1 and WC2 will not exceed the flows approved in the previous report. 3 (1/19/23) �Anthony Catalano stated that there are concerns relative to increased density in Phase IV and the inconsistency in previous reports. He has discussed the concerns with the Village Engineer handling the Will Serve process with the Department of Health and it was determined that the Applicants engineer should complete the analysis for the pipe capacity that considers the increased density for Phase IV. Mr. Miller stated that they will complete an analysis of pipe capacities for future phases and the flows as necessary, but they are asking the Board to accept that Phase II is in compliance, to accept the engineering reports, and give them approval for the Building Permit as it relates to Phase II. Mr. Catalano stated that they have not be able to conduct a full review of the submitted report and that although it seems that the calculations are correct, there are concerns for including conditions in the approval without confirming that there are not capacity issues. Mr. Miller stated that they are willing to work with the Village’s engineering teams to validate the flows similar to what was required with Block F sewer capacities. Mr. Catalano suggested that they need more time to review the latest engineer’s report and to consider the language of the approval resolution. Mr. Miller requested that the engineers review the report and then communicate with Sean McCarthy and the Department of Health as to when they are satisfied so that Mr. McCarthy can issue the Block H Building Permit. Peter Chavkin is a Managing Member of Biddle Real Estate Ventures on behalf of Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC. Mr. Chavkin stated that it was his understanding that the acceptance of the engineering report was not a condition of the resolution approval but rather a condition that has to be satisfied for the issuance of the Building Permit. The submitted engineering report shows that the Phase II flow, as it relates to Block H building, is neutral or less than the previous approvals. Benjamin Nielsen asked Peter Chavkin if Phase IV would be under their control as it relates to flow calculations and if this approval would interfere with other current construction from other developers. Mr. Chavkin stated that the density for the Edge-on-Hudson Development will not change, and there will still be 1,177 units. There are two sewer connections on the site and based on the latest report, the planned density will want to flow to one of the manholes. There are concerns from the engineers that the pipe flows are near capacity. The calculations will show either that there is adequate capacity for the flows or that they will need to divert the flows between the connections in future phases. Kersten Harries asked Mr. Chavkin if there is a possibility that the number of bathrooms and bedrooms proposed in future units could change and effect the calculations and the demand on the sanitary sewer lines. 4 (1/19/23) �Mr. Chavkin stated that they would be required to stay within the sewer capacity flow at two connections based on the approved density of the development. Acting Chairperson Gebler solicited comments from the consultants. David Smith stated that Mr. Catalano and Mr. Natarelli need time to complete a full review of the engineering report. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Smith if the engineering report is a condition of the resolution or the Building Permit. Mr. Smith stated that the engineering report is a condition of the resolution that needs to be satisfied before the issuance of the Building Permit and that some of the related permits have already been issued. Sean McCarthy stated that in efforts to expedite the construction progress, the Building Department has issued permits for the piles, foundation, slabs, and underground plumbing. Mr. Smith stated that the Village has allowed them to start the construction while they are waiting for the engineering report. Acting Chairperson Gebler stated that the Village staff needs more time to review the reports. Mr. Chavkin requested that they work through the draft resolution with the conditions as discussed at the January meeting. Mr. Smith stated there is not a draft resolution before the Planning Board. Now that the Board has received the engineering report, he can finalize the draft resolution for the next meeting. There was a discussion between the Board and Elizabeth Darby regarding the conditions of the resolution as they relate to submission requests and time constraints for screening, signage, and parking agreements. No action was taken. 4. Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence Site Plan approval- Presentation Gregory Caccioppoli stated that he is the engineer representing the Applicant. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the revised application proposes a two and a half story structure with three twobedroom units. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that changes to the proposed site plan include eliminating the three curb cuts and garage entrances on Howard Street, and proposes one curb cut on North Washington Street to relocate the driveway entrance to the parking lot on the side of the building. The parking area will provide the six required parking spaces on site. In order to provide the parking on site, the plan proposes to shift the building structure outside of the required front yard setback based on the average setback of the existing homes on Howard Street and North Washington Street. The new plan would allow for 20% of the lot to be open green space. Walkway entrances on Howard Street will provide access to the parking area and a 5 (1/19/23) �walkway in the rear of the building will provide access to the parking spaces and the garbage collection area. Mr. Caccioppoli presented a rendering of the building and stated that he has revised the exterior elevations to mix-in different materials and to add some dimension and separation to the units. Mr. Caccioppoli asked if the Board had questions. Kersten Harries asked Mr. Caccioppoli if he has considered having the curb cut on Howard Street and converting the proposed driveway running along the north border of the property into open green space in the backyard, while also reducing the impermeable surfaces. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that there are site distance issues to consider in putting the driveway on Howard Street, and that access to exit the property would be a problem because they have to measure 15 feet back from the curb and need to be able to see 200 feet in each direction. Acting Chairperson Gelber asked Sean McCarthy if the 200 feet distance is normal to provide in each direction. Sean McCarthy stated Howard Street is a one-way street. The 200-foot distance relates more to a New York State DOT requirement that would not be applicable for this application. It is at the Boards discretion to reduce the distance. Ms. Harries stated that the split rail fencing proposed is not in keeping with the neighborhood and suggested changing the style of the fence. Ms. Harries suggested that Mr. Caccioppoli provide pedestrian access to each unit entrance from Howard Street and suggested that he consider adding front porches for each unit. Benjamin Nielsen stated that he agrees with Kersten Harries’ suggestion and stated that having the curb cut on Howard Street for access would be less expensive, reduce the amount of paved surface on site, and provide for additional greenspace. Mr. Nielsen suggested utilizing the area between the fence and sidewalk on North Washington Street for additional landscaping since the owner will be required to maintain the space. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that he was not aware that the applicant is permitted to plant in the Village Right-of-Way. Mr. Caccioppoli asked the Board to confirm that the applicant cannot install the fencing in the Right-of-Way. Mr. McCarthy stated that the applicant could not install the fencing in the Village Right-of-Way. Ms. Harries stated that although larger street trees would not be suitable for the Right-of-Way, the Board encourages the applicant to consider large growth trees and native plantings for the site landscaping. Mr. Caccioppoli asked the Board if they are in favor of the placement of the building using the average setbacks, or would this be something the Board would refer to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Ms. Harries stated that the Board supports the efforts taken to use the average setbacks for the placement of the proposed building. 6 (1/19/23) �Erin Carney stated that the suggestion of adding entrances to each of the units from the sidewalk would help the building integrate with the neighborhood. Ms. Carney requested that Mr. Caccioppoli distinguish how they will design the open spaces in terms of communal common space or private space for each unit. Gabriel Arango stated that he is part of the Real Estate Company with his father. Mr. Arango agreed that having the entrance and exit drive on Howard Street would give them the opportunity to create more green space in the back of the property. Mr. Nielsen asked Sean McCarthy if he sees any code design standard issues with having the curb cut on Howard Street. Mr. McCarthy stated that the applicant should pursue the use of Howard Street for the driveway access, as it would eliminate a lot of pavement. Because there is a driveway to the west of the property, there may not be room for another parking space in between the driveways so this would eliminate some of the site concerns. Mr. Nielsen suggested that the applicant could align the parking spaces parallel to Howard Street in lieu of the fence in order to open up more space. Mr. Nielsen suggested adding screening for parking space #6. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that if the driveway entrance were on Howard Street, he would relocate parking spaces #5 and #6 and incorporate green space. Ms. Harries asked Mr. Caccioppoli for the proposed square footage of each unit. Mr. Arango stated that each unit is 1,100 square feet. Ms. Harries suggested that the applicant consider having one unit per floor and providing a continuous staircase for access to all three units might allow them to have more usable space for each unit. Alfie Muoio stated that he is a consultant with Westchester Modular Homes. Mr. Muoio stated that they are seeking to provide townhouse style living by having three separate staircases and not having tenants living above each other. Mr. Caccioppoli shared an updated rendering, prepared to address the recent comments, and stated that they added an overhang over the front of the building. They bumped out the center unit further from the side units. The width of the dormers was increased and the gable accent was changed. Ms. Harries asked if there would be usable attic space. Mr. Muoio stated that there would be storage only in the attic space. Ms. Harries suggested that the applicant consider mirroring the interior layout of the east side unit on the west side in order to provide more windows and natural light into the living room and 7 (1/19/23) �bedrooms. Ms. Harries asked why they propose to bump out only the second floor on the rear elevation. Mr. Muoio stated that they were trying to stay within the building footprint when the driveway was proposed in the back and they did not have room. Mr. Muoio stated that he would add the first floor to be flush with the second floor. The intention of the proposed layout of the west side was to avoid the car lights. Ms. Harries asked Mr. Muoio if the front porch overhang is continuous. Mr. Muoio stated that the rooflines for the center bump out and overhangs are staggered in and out. Ms. Harries suggested that they design the front porches and overhangs so they delineate as separate townhouses. Mr. Muoio stated that the front porches will be close to grade with one step-up and there will be walkways from the sidewalk to the units. The setbacks limit the front porches and overhangs to 3 feet wide. Erin Carney provided the Applicant’s team with a location where they could view examples of narrow front porches in Tarrytown that provide the feeling of private space. There was a discussion with the Board and the Applicant’s representatives regarding the options and additional suggestions for the project design based on the relocation of the driveway entrance to Howard Street. No action was taken. 5. Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Amended Site Plan approval-Preliminary Presentation The applicant has requested an adjournment to the February 16, 2023 meeting. No action was taken. 6. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development Phase II Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit Approval Presentation The applicant has requested an adjournment to the February 16, 2023 meeting. No action was taken. 7. LL Parcel F, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, DeCicco & Sons Supermarket, Amended Site Plan & ARB Approval- Preliminary presentation 8 (1/19/23) �Lucio DiLeo stated that he is the Principle of Studio Rai Architects representing the Applicant and stated that the application proposes to make two changes to the DeCicco & Sons supermarket building. Changes to the plan include the elimination of the third floor, attaching the main entrance tower to the west of the building, and relocating the staircase and the elevator to inside of tower. They will incorporate the original square footage of the third floor into the second floor and the footprint of the building would not change. They propose to eliminate the walkway along the covered roof area on the side of the building, and propose to replace it with an open trellis to provide more green space. Mr. DiLeo presented a comparison of the renderings from the previously approved plan and the proposed exterior building façade and stated that that the building height is reduced approximately 5 feet. The entire roof surface will consist of hidden solar energy cells that can produce 450 KW of power for the mechanical systems. Mr. DiLeo described the materials proposed for the exterior and interior of the building. Mr. DiLeo described the interior layout for the building. Acting Chairperson Gebler asked Mr. DiLeo to describe the programming for the food court. John DeCicco is the owner of the supermarket and stated that they propose to include indoor event space and food court space, and possibly specialty restaurant space. Kersten Harries asked Mr. DiLeo if the new design would combine the beer garden and the food court on the same level. Mr. DiLeo stated that reducing the volume of the building and combining the levels allows the building to be more energy efficient. Ms. Harries asked Mr. DeCicco to describe the sustainable energy solutions proposed for the heating and cooling systems. Mr. DeCicco stated that using solar energy is the main sustainable solution and that they are considering the possibilities for geo-thermal as well as incorporating natural refrigerants methods for the store. Mr. DiLeo stated that they plan to expose the mechanical room equipment behind glass in order to show the public the buildings heating and cooling systems consumption. Ms. Harries asked Mr. DiLeo why they propose the material change on the tower element from brick to metal. Mr. DiLeo stated that the incorporation of the galvanize steel at the tower element is intended to reduce the massing appearance of the building and to accent the historical factory look. Mr. DiLeo stated that the new façade design would improve the views from the Beekman Avenue elevation. Benjamin Nielsen asked Mr. DiLeo if there would be a connective walkway from the Beekman Avenue stairs to the main entrance. Mr. DiLeo stated that there would be painted crosswalks from the parking lot and they can use the covered walkway entrance as a seasonal event space. 9 (1/19/23) �Erin Carney requested that the applicant consider how they will manage the planting scheme as it relates to invasive species along the steep slope from Beekman Avenue. Mr. DiLeo stated that that his firm did not design the approved landscape plan. Craig Tompkins is the Construction Manager for Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC. Mr. Tomkins stated that the approved site plan includes an aggressive new planting scheme for that location that considers the steep slope and appropriate management. Acting Chairperson Gebler solicited comments from the consultants. There were no comments from the consultants. Motion was made to waive the public hearing for the Amended Site Plan application. Moved: Carney Seconded: Harries Acting Chairperson Gebler - yes Erin Carney - yes Kersten Harries- yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED Motion was made to direct staff to prepare a draft resolution for the February 16, 2023 meeting. Moved: Harries Seconded: Nielsen Acting Chairperson Gebler - yes Erin Carney - yes Kersten Harries- yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED 8. 46 Hudson St., LLC, 46 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval – Status presentation Brian Hopkins stated that he is the architect representing the applicant. Mr. Hopkins stated that when they presented the application the Zoning Board of Appeals last night, there were only four members of the Board present and there were concerns received from residents of Hudson Street related to parking. The Zoning Board adjourned the public hearing to next month. Mr. Hopkins stated that the revised application propose to increase the side yard setback on the north side of the building by 6 inches. This will provide a full 3 feet between the property line and the building, reduce the requested variance, eliminate the requirement for fire-rated walls, and allow the addition of windows. Mr. Hopkins stated that the application still proposes three units but they eliminated the third bedroom for the duplex unit and reduced the parking requirement from seven space to six spaces. No action was taken. 10 (1/19/23) �9. Approval of minutes- November 17, 2022, December 22, 2022 Motion was made to approve the minutes from the November 17, 2022 and the December 22, 2022 meetings. Moved: Harries Seconded: Carney Acting Chairperson Gebler - yes Erin Carney - yes Kersten Harries- yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED Sean McCarthy asked Acting Chairperson Gebler if she has the confirmed meeting date for the DPW presentation. Acting Chairperson Gebler stated she has not confirmed the meeting date. She polled the Board members and the consultants for their availability for February 8, 2023. Motion was made to adjourn the meeting at 8:57 PM. Moved: Harries Seconded: Carney Vote 4-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 11 (1/19/23) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-01-19_Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/d32328e260af27143782974e785cd2e8.pdf 305c8621efbd6254632e3e839fb84187 PDF Text Text �� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-01-19_Approved Resolution_95 College Avenue Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/13835e4f4939ead0308e1c03c2b4c961.pdf fa2cc80e6da007d79659a1c97c6eb027 PDF Text Text ������� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-02-16_Approved Block A Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/76a0da063eafeaf3e18f716a147a79f4.pdf 19321523d859dab4ae9eb36556d42873 PDF Text Text ������ Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-02-16_Approved Block H Amended Site Plan & ARB Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/74fc58c21773117c54f280f984665d7b.pdf 09a355aa3474ccb7cb886e21b184ee07 PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes February 16, 2023 The regular meeting was called to order at 7:05 PM by Acting Chairperson Carney. Acting Chairperson Carney summarized the agenda. Present: Erin Carney, Acting Chairperson Benjamin Nielsen Kersten Harries Rachelle Gebler Also Present: Joshua Subin, Village Attorney Anthony Catalano, Consulting Engineer David Smith, Village Planner James Natarelli, Village Engineer Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Absent: Lindsay Krakauer Agenda: 1) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block H, Amended Site Plan and Final ARB Approval- Draft resolution 2) LL Parcel F, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, DeCicco & Sons supermarket, Amended Site Plan & ARB approval - Draft resolution 3) 46 Hudson St., LLC, 46 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval- Status presentation 4) Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval- Presentation 5) Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Amended Site Plan approval - Preliminary presentation 6) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan approval- Presentation 7) Approval of minutes, January 19, 2023 1. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block H, Amended Site Plan & Final ARB approval - Draft resolution Elizabeth Darby is the Vice President of Construction for Hines representing the applicant. Ms. Darby stated that they submitted the finalized sanitary sewer report for Phase II. Benjamin Nielsen asked Anthony Catalano if the engineering issues have been resolved. 1 (2/16/23) �Mr. Catalano stated that he has consulted with the applicants engineers and James Natarelli, and that they are comfortable moving forward with the resolution. David Smith stated that the draft resolution reflects the submission of the amended sanitary sewer report last dated February 8, 2023. Acting Chairperson Carney requested that the applicant address the concerns related to the wayfinding signage condition. Peter Chavkin is a Managing Member of Biddle Real Estate Ventures on behalf of Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC. Mr. Chavkin stated that they have reviewed the draft resolution and that there is a condition in the resolution requiring that the applicant submit the application for way-finding signage by the March meeting. Mr. Chavkin requested that the finalized wayfinding signage be a condition of the Certificate of Occupancy since the operators for the commercial uses have not be identified. David Smith asked Mr. Chavkin if the way-finding signage is only for the commercial use parking. Mr. Chavkin stated that there would be four to six zoning required residential parking spaces located in the Northlight garage. Mr. Chavkin suggested that the Board could make the wayfinding signage a condition of the first residential or commercial temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Daymark building. Members of the Board agreed with the condition change. Mr. Chavkin requested the condition of the landscape screening for the electrical equipment by Ichabod’s Landing in the Village Green Park be a condition of the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy since they have already submitted the landscape plan, and a field test is required upon completion. David Smith asked Peter Chavkin to confirm if the way-finding signage would direct patrons to parking and the use of the commercial space. Sean McCarthy stated the way-finding signage is required for parking designations only. Restaurants would have identifying signage on their building or may require signage to inform patrons where offsite parking is available if necessary. The Planning Board and the consultants discussed the suggested changes to the conditions of the draft resolution. David Smith read the proposed changes to the conditions of the draft resolution. Benjamin Nielsen asked Mr. Chavkin for the timing of the garage construction and the field test. Mr. Chavkin stated that they could complete the slab work for the garage ramp within the next six months so the Building Department can conduct the field test. 2 (2/16/23) �Motion was made to approve the resolution as amended. Moved: Harries Seconded: Nielsen Acting Chairperson Carney - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Kersten Harries- yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED 2. LL Parcel F, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, DeCicco & Sons Supermarket, Amended Site Plan & ARB Approval- Draft resolution Lucio DiLeo stated that he is the Principle of Studio Rai Architects representing the Applicant for the proposed changes to the DeCicco & Sons Supermarket and asked if the Board had questions since the last meeting. Acting Chairperson Carney solicited comments from the Board. There were no comments from the Board. Acting Chairperson Carney stated that the Board has reviewed a draft resolution prepared by David Smith. David Smith stated the Planning Board waived the requirement for a public hearing at the January meeting and that the conditions of the March 21, 2021 Site Plan approval remain as part of the requested amended site plan approval. Motion was made to approve the resolution. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Harries Acting Chairperson Carney - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Kersten Harries- yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED 3. 46 Hudson St., LLC, 46 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval – Status presentation The application has been adjourned to the March 23, 2023 meeting pending approval at March 15, 2023 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. No action was taken. 4. Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence Site Plan approval- Presentation The applicant has requested an adjournment to the March 23, 2023 meeting. 3 (2/16/23) �No action was taken. 5. Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Amended Site Plan approval-Preliminary Presentation Kimberly Martelli stated that she is the Principle of KTM Architect representing the applicant. Ms. Martelli stated the application proposes to expand the previously approved conservatory building to the Main House structure from 300 square feet to 400 square feet and to enlarge the garage by approximately 5 feet in depth, from 18.75 feet deep to 21.25 feet deep. Underground propane tanks are proposed to serve the heating, cooling, and cooking equipment for the Main House, the Carriage House, and to serve two emergency generators. The original application proposed the generators as enclosed structures. The revised application proposes to regrade the property and remove the generator enclosures. The generators would be open to air, have enclosures build around them with two separate tiered retaining walls to provide sound attenuation for the residence structures. Kersten Harries stated that the Board has concerns on how the applicant will screen the generators from the public right-of-way and if the existing fencing will act as a visual screen. Ms. Martelli stated that the original Planning Board approval for the Main House included a landscape plan that would be applicable to this application where a condition of the resolution requires that they submit a final planting plan to the Building Department prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Ms. Martelli suggested that she could submit the final as-built plan to the Planning Board. Ms. Harries asked Ms. Martelli if the plantings would screen the generators from the public right-of-way. Ms. Martelli stated that the generators would sit low on the property within the grading and will be set back approximately 77 feet back from the property line and 95 feet back from public rightof-way, where the buffer dimensions will allow for landscaping to screen the generators. Acting Chairperson Carney asked Ms. Martelli if they have considered the screening within the line of site from public road since it is a historical district. Ms. Martelli stated that their engineers evaluated several generator and propane tank locations in terms of the zoning requirements, topography of the site, service availability, and functionality for the structures they will serve. Ms. Martelli stated that she is confident that they will be able to provide sufficient landscaping to screen the generators from the public right-of-way. Benjamin Nielsen asked Ms. Martelli to confirm that the existing access road is 6 to 8 feet below the proposed generator elevations. Mr. Nielsen stated that the access road reduces the ability to screen views from Bedford Road. Mr. Nielsen suggested they utilize four season evergreen plantings for screening and suggested bringing the retaining walls around and moving the access way to the left side of the generators. 4 (2/16/23) �Ms. Martelli provided the grade elevations as they relate to the proposed generator locations. Ms. Martelli stated that the existing access road is a walking path and that she will submit 3D models that provide the passage way and the access to the site from Bedford Road. Mr. Nielsen asked Ms. Martelli was color the generators will be. Ms. Martelli stated that the generators will be grey and that they will submit details for the sound attenuation enclosures with the Building Permit submissions. Acting Chairperson Carney asked Ms. Martelli to describe the testing schedules for the generators. Ms. Martelli stated that the generators would be tested alternately one a week and run for approximately 20-25 minutes. Mr. Nielsen asked Ms. Martelli to confirm what type of vegetation would be surrounding the propane tanks. Ms. Martelli stated that there will be full grass coverage over the propane tanks and the 14 filling ports at the top of each tank will be green to blend in with the landscaping, and will be perpendicular with the grade drop. Mr. Nielsen asked Ms. Martelli if there are plans to add additional landscaping behind the propane tanks. Ms. Martelli stated that the applicants requested that they keep the hillside as a cleared opening for recreational activities. Motion was made to waive the public hearing for the Amended Site Plan application. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Acting Chairperson Carney - yes Erin Carney - yes Kersten Harries- yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED Motion was made to direct staff to prepare a draft resolution for the March 23, 2023 meeting. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Harries Acting Chairperson Carney - yes Erin Carney - yes Kersten Harries- yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED The Board requested that Ms. Martelli submit revised landscape plans and renderings to detail the views from Bedford Road for the March 23, 2023 meeting. 5 (2/16/23) �6. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development Phase II Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalPresentation Andrew Tung is an associate with DTS Provident Engineering representing the applicant. Mr. Tung stated that the recent submission included the first full set of engineering and landscape drawings. Mr. Tung stated that they received the engineering comments from Woodard & Curran. Mr. Tung provided an update on the Army Corp DEC permitting for the waterfront activities and stated that the initial repairs to the riprap along frontage as well as outfall repairs from the former existing outfalls and some new outfall piping. The second set of permits granted for the fishing pier and dine and dock structure have a limited time schedule for when the work the in water can occur, and will commence this upcoming September and October. Mr. Tung stated that Lanie McKinnon will continue the discussion related to the elements Phase II relating to the future interpretive center and the kayak launching. Lanie McKinnon is a landscape architect from Nelson Byrd Woltz Landscape Architects representing the applicant. Ms. McKinnon stated that the presentation focuses on the ice-skating rink, the Overlook, and the access to the Cove for kayak launching. Ms. McKinnon indicated on the site plan the location for the proposed temporary ice-skating rink. Their research indicated that the appropriate size for a community rink is 40 x 60 and it will accommodate 50 people. The proposed lawn area would allow the Village to use the space as an ice-skating rink in the winter, a recreational lawn area in the summer, and limit the amount of hardscape on the waterfront. Kersten Harries asked Ms. McKinnon to confirm that the proposed rink does not include a mechanical system that will keep it cold when it is above freezing temperatures. Ms. McKinnon stated that Ms. Harries is correct and that the ice-skating rink will only be useable in freezing conditions. Ms. Harries stated that she is concerned that the trending warmer winters will limit the use of the proposed ice-skating rink and that the yearly installation costs would outweigh the benefits. Ms. McKinnon stated that staff could complete the rink installation within two days and the cost is minimal as detailed in the submission Figure No. 30. A hardscape option would have implications with the water runoff on site. Benjamin Nielsen asked if there are ice-skating rinks systems with an underground membrane that would improve the appearance and fit-in with the quality of the park. Ms. McKinnon suggested that the Village could install include a temporary railing and that the photograph submitted represent the size and not the full aesthetics of the rink. Mr. Chavkin stated that the rink product specified is in use in another river town and that Briarcliff Manor uses the same system on a tennis court. Mr. Chavkin stated that they would agree to supply the protective boards that rise up around the ice-skating rink as part of the first year’s installation. 6 (2/16/23) �Kersten Harries asked Mr. Chavkin if there are ice-skating rinks that can keep the ice frozen even when the outside temperature is not below freezing. Mr. Chavkin stated that ice-skating rink systems that are capable of keeping the ice frozen are permanent structures. They were encouraged not to install a permanent structure because keeping the lawn during the summer is important for water runoff. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Chavkin where the idea for the temporary structure came from. Mr. Nielsen stated that the original concept plan included a four-season feature where a water fountain converted into an ice-skating rink. Ms. McKinnon stated that the play fountain still exists and will be more in line with the boathouse and it was determined that the area isn’t large enough to put the ice-skating rink system over it. David Smith stated that as part of the Riverfront Concept Plan, there was an opportunity to create a water feature in the third portion of Tappan Zee Park where during the seasonal winter months, the area would be flooded to create an area for ice-skating. The concept to having a more formal skating rink was a suggestion from a member of the Board of Trustees and the Recreation Department. Mr. Nielsen asked Ms. McKinnon if the skating rink system could be customized and suggested that they explore adding a seat wall that could be used in the winter and summer months Ms. McKinnon stated that the rink could be set up in a different shape and that they focused more making sure that the size of the rink fit in the proposed space. Mr. Chavkin stated that they are willing to explore the seat wall options for the rink area. Anthony Catalano suggested that they consider a permanent fountain type feature for the summer months that converts into a skating rink in the winter where there is seating around it. Mr. Chavkin stated that they are happy to explore the idea in a Work Session. Conversations they have had indicated that the Village did not want the responsibility of maintaining mechanical equipment to maintain freezing and that preserving the lawn area for three seasons was important. Mr. Nielsen asked Ms. McKinnon to walk through the programing and the proposed uses for the different park spaces. Ms. McKinnon provided a summary of the different landscapes, topography, and the proposed uses for the elements of the Phase II Waterfront Space and how the pathways connect to other locations on the site. Mr. Chavkin stated that in the last meeting they received a request to consider having terraced riprap for easier access to the river. Mr. Chavkin stated that the group that obtains the water board permitting consulted with various regulatory authorities. The response was that if a terraced riprap stays at above the mean high water line, it would not require an additional permit. 7 (2/16/23) �Since the river is tidal, the terraced riprap may not be useful for kayak users. Mr. Chavkin stated that they do not want to commit to something that requires an additional permit review where timing could be nine to twelve months for approval since they need to complete the riprap work prior to construction. Mr. Chavkin requested that the Board does not required for them pursue the terraced riprap in order to prevent construction delays. Mr. Nielsen stated that the fundamental part of the waterfront development is to get residents and visitors down to the water and asked Mr. Chavkin to explain how the plan would accomplish that. Mr. Chavkin stated that the plan gets people down to the water at the existing beach on the cove, the floating dine and dock structure, and the areas of the riprap at the southern faces where it is less steep. Mr. Nielsen stated that the plan appears, as an upland park next to the river and that there should be discussions on providing opportunities for getting down to the water and integrating the “Green Crescent” concept within the Edge-on-Hudson Development and Kingsland Point Park. While he understand the reasons avoiding the in river work-permitting process, there is already a dock that was eliminated from the plan. Mr. Chavkin stated that he is happy to discuss these concerns when the time is appropriate. In their first permit application for the water work, they tried to expand sandy beach area and the regulatory authorities told them that it was a non-start. Rachelle Gebler stated that if they will not be installing ramps into the river to launch a kayak, then she would like to see the larger boulders in the riprap to allow people to get closer to the water. Acting Chairperson Carney stated that as part of the Waterfront Linkage Study prepared in the 2002, it is very clear in the photos presented that there were discussions about seamless access to the water. The larger stones would bring an opportunity for people to sit and be close to the water in a less formal way than the park features. Acting Chairperson Carney stated that the Planning Board is discussing scheduling a Work Session with Public Space Council on March 1, 2023 to discuss the connections of this phase of the Waterfront. Ms. Harries asked Peter Chavkin if there are any updates related to grants and funding resources and pending approval, when do they anticipate starting the work. Mr. Chavkin stated that they are pursuing the grant opportunities but there are no resolutions. Their intention is to start construction as soon as possible. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Chavkin to confirm that the boathouse is not part of the current plan. Mr. Chavkin stated that the boathouse is not part of the current plan and he outlined the area on the plan that will be part of a future submission. Mr. Nielsen asked Ms. McKinnon how they plan to avoid the congestion from the beach area to Kingsland Point Park. 8 (2/16/23) �Ms. McKinnon stated that the intention is to keep people heading to Kingsland Point Park on the higher elevation pathways. Mr. Nielsen asked Ms. McKinnon is there are seating amenities proposed at the beach area. Ms. McKinnon stated that the beach area is also a flood way channel area so they can’t install benches. There was a discussion between the Planning Board and the applicant team regarding Kingsland Point Park, the beach area, and the pathway connections as they relate to the coordination of approvals and permissions with Westchester County and the Village of Sleepy Hollow. No action was taken. 9. Approval of minutes- January 19, 2023 Motion was made to approve the minutes from the January 19, 2023 meeting as amended. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Acting Chairperson Gebler - yes Erin Carney - yes Kersten Harries- yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED Motion was made to adjourn the meeting at 8:30 PM. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Harries Vote 4-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 9 (2/16/23) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-02-16_Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/91231cdc6175c22929b6dced6ddee88f.pdf de64ae478f7248dbeb29a9d4e4180760 PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes March 23, 2023 The regular meeting was called to order at 7:05 PM by Acting Chairperson Harries. Acting Chairperson Harries summarized the agenda. Present: Kersten Harries, Acting Chairperson Erin Carney Benjamin Nielsen Benjamin Sirota Rachelle Gebler Also Present: Joshua Subin, Village Attorney Anthony Catalano, Consulting Engineer James Natarelli, Village Engineer Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Absent: Lindsay Krakauer David Smith, Village Planner Agenda: 1) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block H, Amended Site Plan and Final ARB Approval- Presentation 2) Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Amended Site Plan approval - Draft resolution 3) 46 Hudson St., LLC, 46 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval- Public hearing 4) Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed multi-family building, Architectural Review Approval- Presentation 5) Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval- Presentation 6) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit approvalPresentation 7) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block O/P & N Townhomes Phase II, Architectural Review approval - Presentation 8) Approval of minutes, February 16, 2023 1. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block H, Amended Site Plan & Final ARB approval - Draft resolution 1 (3/23/23) �Elizabeth Darby is the Vice President of Construction for Hines representing the applicant. Ms. Darby presented a rendering of the proposed mechanical screening along Westwood Drive and solicited comments from the Board. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Ms. Darby to confirm the color of the proposed mechanical screening. Ms. Darby stated that the color of the mechanical screening would be a custom charcoal grey color that will match the railings. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Ms. Darby if the other exterior materials will remain as originally proposed. Ms. Darby stated that there are no other material changes. Acting Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board. There were no comments from the Board. Acting Chairperson Harries made a motion to waive the public hearing and to direct staff to draft a resolution for the April 20, 2023 meeting. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Acting Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Erin Carney- yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Benjamin Sirota - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED 2. Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Amended Site Plan approval - Draft resolution Kimberly Martelli stated that she is the Principle of KTM Architects and the architect representing the applicant. Ms. Martelli presented the landscape plan and stated that they proposed to plant Rhododendrons along Bedford Road and the gravel access path. There a (9) Traditional American Holly trees proposed to surround the generators and (5) Shade-Grown Hollies along the outer edges of the road. At the time of planting the Hollies, the trees will be 12 to 14 feet high and will be above height of the generators. They will use the gravel access road to service the propane tanks and the generators. Ms. Martelli presented photographs and a video to demonstrate the views from Bedford Road passing by the proposed generator locations, and stated that the applicant has finalized the color for the generator surrounds as stone grey. Ms. Martelli stated that they received the stormwater drainage questions. James Natarelli stated that all of the stormwater and sanitary sewer issues have been resolved with the latest submission. 2 (3/23/23) �Benjamin Nielsen asked Ms. Martelli what the site would look like when there is no leaf coverage. Ms. Martelli showed the Planning Board recent photographs of the site and stated that the generator locations are marked out on the site, and that even during the winter, there is a lush landscape buffer. Acting Chairperson Harries requested that Ms. Martelli stake out the corners of the generator heights so that the Board could schedule a site visit to see the visibility from Bedford Road. Benjamin Sirota asked Ms. Martelli for the height of the generator boxes. Ms. Martelli stated that the generator boxes are eight feet high and require sound attenuation jackets to satisfy the Village decibel requirements. Ms. Martelli stated that the existing transformer is well screened from Bedford Road. Mr. Nielsen asked if the original application proposed to construct a full enclosure structure for the generators. Ms. Martelli stated that they eliminated the bunker structures because it was cost effective by reducing the amount of disturbance needed for installing the generators, and the sound attenuation jackets will serve the purpose for decibel requirements. Mr. Nielsen asked Ms. Martelli why the retaining walls do not curve around the three sides of the generators. Ms. Martelli stated that building another retaining wall would require a variance and due to the grade, it would not provide benefits of screening or sound attenuation. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Ms. Martelli to explain why the elimination of the generator bunker structure would cause less disturbance on site. Ms. Martelli stated that less trees would need to be removed there will be less impervious surface. Ms. Martelli presented the site plan and described the proposed storm water system. Mr. Nielsen asked Ms. Martelli if they proposed to cover the propane tanks. Ms. Martelli stated that there will be full grass coverage over the propane tanks and that the green filling caps will be the only item exposed at 6 inches above grade. Acting Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board. There were no further comments from the Board. Acting Chairperson Harries adjourned the application until the April 20, 2023 meeting pending a site visit. No action was taken. 3 (3/23/23) �3. 46 Hudson St., LLC, 46 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval - Public hearing Alex Tseng is the owner of 46 Hudson Street and stated that he received approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Tseng stated that the revised application proposes to increase the setback from 48 Hudson Street from 2.7 feet to 3 feet. The required number of parking spaces has been reduced from (7) to (6) by removing one of the bedrooms from the third floor. The application proposes to supply (3) parking stalls and the variance was granted for (3) parking stalls. Acting Chairsperson Harries asked Mr. Tseng to provide a summary of the application and the proposed changes since the last presentation. Mr. Tseng stated that the application proposes to construct a three-family building that will maintain the same massing as the existing two-family building. The proposed building is slightly smaller and will provide (3) onsite parking stalls at the back of the property. Mr. Tseng presented the site plan and stated that the proposed building shifts to the North side of the property in order to allow for the installation of windows and to provide natural light into the apartments. Acting Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board. Benjamin Nielsen asked Mr. Tseng if there were other driving factors for the site plan layout on the north side of the property. Mr. Tseng stated that the additional lighting was the reason for shifting the building layout to the north side of the property. Motion was made to open the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: Nielsen Vote 5-0 Acting Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the public. Clara Tiegel is the owner of 38 Hudson Street stated that she grew up with the owners of 48 Hudson Street. Ms. Tiegel stated that the applicant originally proposed a 2.7 feet side yard setback from 48 Hudson and then changed it to propose a 3-foot setback. Ms. Tiegel stated that required setback is 5 feet. Ms. Tiegel stated that the Board should require a minimum of 3 feet, 10 inches to allow for safe repairs to the 48 and 46 Hudson Street buildings. Ms. Tiegel submitted a letter to the Board (See attached Exhibit #1). William White stated that he grew up at 48 Hudson Street. Mr. White provided a history of the occupancy of 48 Hudson Street. Mr. White stated that shifting the building to the north setback would block three windows on the side of 48 Hudson Street. Mr. White stated that he attended the Zoning Board meeting and stated that it was unacceptable to allow the removal of the usable space between the buildings. Mr. White stated that the value of a house is effected by the space in between neighboring houses. Mr. White requested that the Planning Board review the 5-foot 4 (3/23/23) �setback requirements and the errors in the proposed application. Approval of the application will cause impact to his family and the community. A letter was received from Mr. White (See Exhibit #2). Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Tseng to provide the distances between the 48 Hudson Street and the 46 Hudson Street buildings, at the narrowest point. Mr. Tseng stated that the building at 48 Hudson Street is located approximately 1 foot from the property line and there is 3 feet from the property line to the building at 46 Hudson Street at the narrowest location. Acting Chairperson Harries stated that the application has evolved four times since the first presentation to the Planning Board in June of 2022. Originally, the applicant proposed to utilize the original foundation. The Planning Board had suggested that the applicant set the building back to be similar to the neighboring buildings, and to find a way to provide parking on the site. Relocating the building to the north side allows the applicant to provide a driveway width that permits access to the parking at the rear of the property. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Tseng to describe why the parking maneuverability would not work unless they shift the building to the north. Mr. Tseng presented the site plan and stated that because the property line jogs on the south side, it would not allow for easy driveway access at the rear of the property. An easement agreement was negotiated with the attorney’s for 48 Hudson Street so that they have enough space to fit the (3) parking spaces at the rear of the building. Sean McCarthy stated that the 48 Hudson Street building is located one foot from their property line so there will be a total of 4 feet between the proposed 46 Hudson Street building and the existing 48 Hudson Street building. Acting Chairperson Harries suggested that the Board adjourn the public hearing to the next meeting in order to allow the new Planning Board member to review the current application. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Tseng if there have been discussions for maintenance access agreements between the property owners. Mr. Tseng stated that the easement agreements include stipulations for access to maintain both of the properties. Motion was made to adjourn the public hearing to the April 20, 2023 Planning Board meeting. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Vote 5-0 4. Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Aenue, Proposed multi-family building, Architectural Review approval - Presentation Maximillian Mahalek is the attorney with Cuddy + Feder, LLP representing the applicant. Mr. Mahalek stated that the application received Site Plan approval from the Planning Board in 5 (3/23/23) �January. As per the conditions of the Site Plan approval resolution, the applicant submitted revised site plans and engineering drawings to address the items required for the Building Permit process. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Mahalek if the applicant submitted the landscape plan to the Building Department. Mr. Mahalek stated that the landscape plan is being prepared as part of the condition of the Site Plan approval. James Natarelli requested that the engineer submit the revised civil drawings and the lighting plan to the Building Department for the records. There was a discussion between James Natarelli and the applicants’ representatives as to what what plans are required for review by staff as it relates to the Site Plan and the Architectural Review approval by the Planning Board. Christopher Barbagli is an associate with Vassoltti Architects representing the applicant. Mr. Barbagli presented a revised roof plan to detail the approximate locations of mechanical equipment, screening, and roof fans. Rachelle Gebler asked Mr. Barbagli if there is a rendering of the proposed roof top mechanical screening. Mr. Barbagli presented a street view prospective from the building and stated that the mechanical screening would not be visible from the across the street. Ms. Gebler stated that the residents of the building would see the mechanical screening. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Barbagli if there are updated renderings that show the elevator tower as drawn in the elevations. Mr. Barbagli stated that the elevator tower would not be visible as it is 30 feet back from the street face, and there will be landscaping around it. Acting Chairperson Harries stated that the elevator tower would be a predominant vertical element that will be visible by neighboring properties. Ms. Harries requested to see a rendering updated with the current design and elevations, and that depicts the final colors of the finished materials. Acting Chairperson Harries asked if the street trees included in the renderings are accurate in scale. Mr. Barbagli stated that the renderings are accurate. The tree in the front of the building is existing and the other tree is a neighboring property owner’s tree. They will confirm all of the plantings as part of the final landscape plan. Sal Alesci is one of the applicants. Mr. Alesci presented samples of the proposed Hardie Plank siding and the Fypon materials proposed for trim, railings, and columns. Mr. Alesci also 6 (3/23/23) �provided a sample of the proposed slate roof material and solicited comments from the Board on color selections. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Alesci to describe the shutters and the windows. Mr. Alesci stated that the windows would be black with white trim and black shutters. Benjamin Nielsen suggested providing more architectural elements on the front façade. There was a discussion regarding the front façade and possibilities of providing more architectural elements, how the size of the shutters relate to the window sizes, and the window heights and spacing from the first and second floor. Sean McCarthy suggested that the architects check the balconies on the roof level as the rendering shows them flush and the elevation shows them as extended out. Erin Carney suggested that the applicant determine the programming of the roof top amenity space as it relates to landscaping, water access, and screening from the sun. Mr. Nielsen asked if the applicant is considering solar energy. Frank Alesci stated that they are considering the possibility of roof top solar panels. Sean McCarthy suggested that the applicant could consider making the building solar ready with electrical conductors. Sal Alesci asked if the Board requires a rendering for the roof top amenity space. Ms. Gebler stated that since it is an amenity space that would be visible to neighboring properties, it is important to provide a rendering for the programming of the space and a detail for the mechanical screening. Frank Alesci is the applicant and stated that since they have modified the plans several times, not all the renderings incorporate with the current design. Mr. Alesci requested that the Board provide them with all of their requests with the hopes that they will not have to revise the plans again. Sal Alesci asked the Board if they should enlarge the roof top amenity space and include a pergola. Ms. Carney stated that an option for sun screening would be a good design feature for a roof top amenity space and that they should decide what items would be attractive for the residents to enjoy the space. The application was adjourned to the April 20, 2023 Planning Board meeting No action was taken. 7 (3/23/23) �5. Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence Site Plan approval- Presentation Gregory Caccioppoli is the engineer representing the applicant. Mr. Caccioppoli stated the revised plans address the comments received from the Board related to the front porches, dormer details, and roof and door overhangs. The structure would be a multi-family dwelling with one main water meter and sub meters for each of the units. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that his intention is to get approval to move forward with the building design before updating the mechanical and utility plans. The proposed exterior materials are Hardie Plank siding, white Anderson windows with white PVC trim, and columns wrapped in PVC. Mr. Caccioppoli presented the site plan and stated they propose an unfinished basement space with laundry machines. Each unit will contain two bedrooms and two bathrooms on the second floor. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Caccioppoli if there are windows proposed in the basement, if the attic space is accessible, and if they have determined the sources for utilities. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that there will be windows in the rear of the basement and that the attic space will be accessible storage space for each unit. The applicant proposes to use electrical heat pump units for the heating and cooling systems, and they would utilize the existing gas service for cook tops and other appliances as necessary. Acting Chairperson Harries suggested that the applicant consider all electric for utilities and asked Mr. Caccioppoli if he has sited the locations for the condensers units. Mr. Cacioppoli stated that he has not completed the utilities plan yet. Mr. Caccioppoli summarized the proposed parking layout and stated that it may need adjustments based on the current design. Sean McCarthy asked Mr. Cacioppoli if he provided a basement plan. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that Westchester Modular Homes did not provide a basement plan because the basement is an unfinished space with laundry machines. Mr. McCarthy stated that a basement plan is required to build the foundation, show where the utilities will be located, how to access the basement, and to confirm if there will be one large basement space or three individual areas for each unit. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that he has not finalized the parking layout with how to balance open space with parking back up space, and the property setbacks that will require a variance. Mr. McCarthy suggested that they locate the parking spaces behind the property line and create a landscaped buffer area. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that they also added a walkway from Howard Street to the door entrances for each unit. Mr. McCarthy asked Mr. Caccioppoli for the width of the front porches. 8 (3/23/23) �Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the front porches would be 4 feet wide. Mr. McCarthy stated that 4 feet is not wide for seating when you incorporate the railings and columns. David Delardi is a landscape architect with Natureview Design Group representing the applicant. Mr. Delardi summarized the locations of the proposed native street trees and plantings. Mr. Delardi stated that the plan proposes a 6 x 6-privacy wall in between each unit patio, to match the siding on the house, and to provide a private green space for each unit. Mr. Delardi stated that the plan proposes to install 6-foot high white vinyl fencing with vines that will grow on it. Mr. Delardi stated that the plan proposes to use Cambridge type paver stones for the walkways and patios. Acting Chairperson Harries asked if this is the first time, the Planning Board is seeing the proposed landscape plan. Mr. Delardi stated that they did not submit the landscape plan to the Board. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Caccioppoli to confirm that the variances would be required for setbacks only. Mr. Cacciopolli stated that variances would only be required for the property setbacks. Acting Chairperson Harries stated that the application has shown improvement and suggested that the applicant meet with Village staff and consultants prior to the next Planning Board meeting to resolve outstanding issues. Mr. Caccioppoli asked Ms. Harries to recap the outstanding issues. Acting Chairperson Harries stated that he should confirm the parking space layout, the landscape buffer, and the mechanical equipment layouts. Ben Nielsen suggested that the applicant review the impervious surface calculations and the parking spaces as they relate to the proximity of the building, and how much backup space is required. Mr. Caccioppoli asked when the application goes before the Zoning Board. Joshua Subin stated that meeting with Sean McCarthy and Village staff would advance the progress of the application. The Planning Board will make a positive recommendation to the Zoning Board for the proposed variances when they feel the Site Plan is ready. Gabriel Arango stated that he is the owner of the property. Mr. Arrango stated that he appreciates their help and that he wants the best for Sleepy Hollow. No action was taken. 6. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, 9 (3/23/23) �Phase II –Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalPresentation Acting Chairperson Harries stated that the applicant has requested an adjournment until the April 20, 2023 meeting. No action was taken. 7. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development Block O/P & N Townhomes Phase II, Architectural Review approval- Presentation Bill McGuiness is the founder of Sun Homes and stated that they are doing Blocks O & P and N. Mr. McGuiness stated that they are seeking approval for the “Kit of Parts” for the block of units that include two 24-foot wide interior units and two 28-foot wide end units. Mr. McGuiness summarized the approved Kit of Parts for the first group of townhomes. Mr. McGuiness stated that all four sides of the building would be brick in lieu of Hardie Plank siding on the back of the building. Mr. McGuiness presented a front perspective for the proposed block of townhome end units and stated that the different elements he is proposing for this building include changes to the window mullion patterns and the stepping out of the bay window proportions to be larger and more animated. The end units will have a colony of French doors with transoms and 11-foot high ceilings in lieu of 10 feet high. The French doors will open against the columns and click shut against the column to for views of the park. The bay windows on the end units will be stepped back to create a balcony off the master bedroom. The ends are stepped back 10 feet to allow for larger rooftop terraces. The interior unit bay elements will step down in proportion to provide a balcony on the main living level. The units will have limestone sills and lintels in lieu of the specified pre-cast materials. Mr. McGuiness presented renderings of the proposed building, the Block N pool, and a rendering of the first approved building block prepared by their marketing company. Mr. McGuiness stated that Sun Homes design the buildings, and they build them as the General Contractor so they have more control over the construction than most people do. The benefit of this is that they are able to coordinate everything through construction. Mr. McGuiness stated that they are proposing to install (2) double 3-foot tall condenser units for the heat pumps clustered as far in from the edge of the roof as possible. All penetrations required for bathroom exhaust fans, pressure intake, and exhausts for ranges, and all plumbing vents will be through the roof by using web wood floor joists so they can run everything without chases. All of the meters would be located in less prominent locations and clustered together on one side of the building. There will not be meters installed on the building elevations that face the train circle or in the front or backs of the building. Fire alarm strobes and truss diagrams will be located underneath the bottom of the bay windows. The percentage of the fourth floor as related to the floor below it will be at 50 percent of the reduced third floor level and 46% percent of the footprint of the level below. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness if the plan will comply with the conditions of the of the original resolution approval Mr. McGuiness stated that he originally designed the building as five unit building by mistake. After receiving the mirroring comment, he realized it was not as much that he was trying to mirror the building next door but more of a vertical verses horizontal thing. Mr. McGuiness stated that he received the comments on the vertical garden opportunities and stated that he will 10 (3/23/23) �be coming back with details for the planters and drainage as well as incorporating the landscaping from the drawings onto the renderings. Acting Chairperson Harries summarized the conditions of the approved resolution and asked Mr. McGuiness to describe if and how the proposed plan will comply. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness if the plans include roof pergolas. Mr. McGuinness stated that the plans do not include roof pergolas. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness if there is a chance that owners will want to install their own temporary shading devices. Mr. McGuiness stated that there will be pre-approved awning designs and that they will not allow it as part of the limited common property rules. There will be optional door treatments with built-in sunshades that the owners can have. Benjamin Nielsen asked Mr. McGuiness if having the highly visible white building material would be appropriate for the interaction of Edge-on-Hudson with the open space and the Kingsland buffer. Mr. McGuiness stated that the white is subjective and that he designed the white bay window elements to step up and down to be a visible signature part of the design. Mr. McGuiness stated that they agreed to come in for ARB approval on every building and that are supposed to vary the building designs as they go. Mr. McGuinness stated that if it feels overpowering, they will adjust as they go. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness to confirm what the white material is. Mr. McGuiness stated that the white material is large Azek panels that is a PVC material. Mr. McGuiness stated that Hardie Plank connections are difficult to install correctly. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness if the Azek panels came in other colors and suggested it may tone down the façade and not be so white. Mr. McGuiness stated that he prefers and likes the panels in white and says that UV rays have less effect on white. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness if the same material is proposed for the enclosed roof area. Mr. McGuiness stated that the enclosed roof area materials is white Versatex, which is a PVC material similar to Fypon, with a high density and flashing on top. Benjamin Sirota asked Mr. McGuines where the limestone is proposed Mr. McGuiness stated that the windowsills and lentils will be limestone and that the windows will be recessed with 2 x 4 jamb details and full brick return. Mr. McGuiness stated that the 211 (3/23/23) �foot stepping in of the buildings and the window depths create shadow lines and definition between the units. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness what material is proposed for the low wall at the crown molding along the base of the building. Mr. McGuiness stated that the plans specifies pre-cast materials, but he hopes to change to limestone. Mr. Sirota asked Mr. McGuiness how the mechanical equipment is accessible. Mr. McGuiness stated that a ladder from the roof terrace would provide access to the mechanical equipment. Mr. McGuiness stated that the flat roof on the fourth level will have internal roof drains and the roof terrace and decks below will have scuppers and leaders. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. McGuiness if they have considered solar energy. Mr. McGuiness stated that they are awaiting a proposal for a solar system. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness if his intention is to come back before the Board with a better reiteration of the building with a non-mirroring façade. Mr. McGuiness stated that he will back in April with a revised submission and welcomes any opportunity to work with the Village Architect. Mr. McGuiness requested that the Board provide him with any comments of serious concern. No action was taken. 9. Approval of minutes- February 16, 2023 Motion was made to approve the minutes from the February 16, 2023 meeting. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Carney Acting Chairperson Gebler - yes Erin Carney - yes Kersten Harries- yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Benjamin Sirota - abstained Vote 4-0-1 APPROVED The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 PM. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Harries Vote 6-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 12 (3/23/23) �Exhibit #1 �Exhibit #2 Date : To March 20, 2023 : Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board From : William C. White Subject : 46 Hudson Street I am writing to formally request an expeditious reversal of the determinations rendered by the Zoning Board concerning the construction endeavor situated at 46 Hudson St. As an authoritative agency, the Zoning Board bears a vital responsibility to uphold zoning regulations and ordinances that safeguard the health, welfare, and security of the community, in addition to ensuring the protection of property values. It is untenable that in this particular instance, the Zoning Board has failed to uphold its obligations by authorizing the reduction of the northern setback from 5 feet to 30 inches. This decision will have a destructive impact on the structural value of 48 Hudson Street, which has maintained a 10-foot expanse between edifices for over 120 years while being owned by an African American family. Furthermore, I must direct your attention to the evident economic disparity that this authorization would engender amongst neighboring properties. While the value of the property owned by my African American family would decrease precipitously, the property of the white neighbor at 42 Hudson St. would undergo a substantial appreciation in value due to the expansion of the gap between structures. This is an insupportable result that the Zoning Board must not permit. It is pertinent to recall recent investigative news reports that have spotlighted the unfair devaluation of residences owned by minorities on the grounds of their ethnicity. I would like to underscore that there are fewer than a dozen African American homeowners in the Village of Sleepy Hollow, underscoring the imperative for the Zoning Board to act with impartiality. The optics of this circumstance are unfavorable, and the determination made by the Zoning Board raises serious doubts about its objectivity and motivations. In summation, I implore you to scrutinize the factual information articulated in Ms. Clara Teagle's memorandum to the board along with my technical concerns raised in my previous memorandum. I urge you to take swift action and rescind the authorization granted by the Zoning Board for the construction undertaking at 46 Hudson St. This determination must be rectified to guarantee the equitable treatment of all members of this community and the safeguarding of their rights. Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-03-23_Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/c7020bdba26a05d02c103dfbec45b0b8.pdf 43225a993d47b0c55bec4cfb3e5c4fea PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes April 20, 2023 The regular meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Acting Chairman Nielsen. Acting Chairman Nielsen summarized the agenda and stated which applicants that have requested an adjournment to the May 18, 2023, meeting. Present: Benjamin Nielsen, Acting Chairman Erin Carney Kersten Harries Benjamin Sirota Rachelle Gebler Lindsay Krakauer Also Present: Joshua Subin, Village Attorney Steve Lauria, Consulting Engineer James Natarelli, Village Engineer David Smith, Village Planner Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Agenda: 1) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block H, Amended Site Plan and Final ARB Approval - Draft resolution 2) Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Amended Site Plan approval - Draft resolution 3) 46 Hudson St., LLC, 46 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval- Continued public hearing 4) Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed multi-family building, Architectural Review Approval- Presentation- Requested adjournment 5) Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval- Presentation 6) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit approvalPresentation 7) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block O/P & N Townhomes Phase II, Architectural Review approval – Presentation 8) SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Proposed medical office building, Site Plan and Architectural Review ApprovalPreliminary presentation 9) Approval of minutes, March 23, 2023 1. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, 1 (4/20/23) �Block H, Amended Site Plan & Final ARB approval - Draft resolution Acting Chairman Nielsen stated that a draft resolution was prepared for the Amended Site Plan and Final ARB approval and solicited comments from the Board. There were no comments from the Board. David Smith requested that Sean McCarthy review comments related to the outstanding issue. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant has agreed to work with the Building Department to keep the screening height as low as possible and reduce the width of the access gate openings along the meters on Westwood Drive to allow for landscaping along the Village right-of-way. David Smith that the draft resolution was prepared to address a condition from the February 16, 2023 approval. Mr. Smith suggested the following amendment to the draft resolution. “ The Applicant will work with the Village Building Department to finalize the screening height and the gate width layout based on a service layout plan provided by Con Edison consistent with the discussions and presentation made at the April 20, 2023 meeting.” Mr. Smith read the resolve clauses of the draft resolution. Acting Chairman Nielsen solicited comments from the Board. There were no comments from the Board. Acting Chairman Nielsen made a motion to approve the draft resolution as amended. Moved: Krakauer Seconded: Carney Acting Chairman Nielsen - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Erin Carney- yes Kersten Harries - yes Benjamin Sirota - yes Lindsay Krakauer- yes Vote 6-0 APPROVED 2. Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Amended Site Plan approval - Draft resolution Acting Chairman Nielsen stated that there is a draft resolution before the Board for Amended Site Plan approval to add generators on the site. As requested by the Board, the applicant submitted a detailed landscape plan and visualizations of how the generators would be viewed from the public right-of-way. The Board is concerned that the landscaping will achieve the applicants' intentions for screening. Acting Chairman Nielsen requested that David Smith read the conditions of the draft resolution. David Smith read the conditions of the draft resolution. 2 (4/20/23) �Acting Chairman Nielsen made a motion to approve the draft resolution. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Harries Acting Chairman Nielsen - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Erin Carney- yes Kersten Harries - yes Benjamin Sirota - yes Lindsay Krakauer- yes Vote 6-0 APPROVED 3. 46 Hudson St., LLC, 46 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval - Public hearing Acting Chairman Nielsen stated that the applicant received variance approvals from the Zoning Board of Appeals for side yard setbacks and parking in March. The applicant was before the Planning Board last month for the initial public hearing in which comments were received from the public, and there was a review of the proposed site plan and architectural elements. A motion was made to open the public hearing. Moved: Carney Seconded: Harries Vote 6-0 Brian Hopkins stated that he is the architect representing the applicant. Mr. Hopkins stated that he received the comments from the Planning Board and that he has submitted proposed changes. The revised submission proposes to drop the building height by one foot. The roofline has been altered to have a gable roof with two shed roofs off of the east side. The proposed changes will put the building in scale with the street line and the taller buildings on Hudson Street. The only change to the proposed floor plan is at the lowest level where it will be dropped by one foot, two inches. One of the bedrooms was removed in the last revision to reduce the required parking variance from four parking spots to three parking spots. Kersten Harries asked Mr. Hopkins if reducing the building height and roof line change causes a reduction at all floor elevations. Mr. Hopkins stated that the entire building's height dropped by one foot and the first-floor elevation by one foot, two inches due to the gable roof plane and required ceiling heights. Ms. Harries asked Mr. Hopkins if the unit layouts would change. Mr. Hopkins stated that the unit layouts have not changed. Sean McCarthy asked Mr. Hopkins if the upper floor plan changes with the new roof configuration. Mr. Hopkins stated that the upper floor plan would not change because of the incorporation of the shed roofs. 3 (4/20/23) �Ms. Harries asked if the ceiling height of the upper floor would change. Mr. Hopkins stated there would be some angling in the ceiling, but it will not be substantial. Ms. Harries asked if additional windows were added to the south elevation. Mr. Hopkins stated that windows were added to the north elevation when the side yard setback was increased to three feet. Mr. Hopkins stated that additional windows were added to the southern elevation when the building location was shifted. Mr. Hopkins presented comparison renderings from the previous and current building design and renderings to show the previously existing building compared to the proposed building. Mr. Harries stated that the change in the roof ridge line is a good improvement. Action Chairman Nielsen solicited comments from the Board. Ms. Harries asked Mr. Hopkins to confirm the proposed exterior building materials and if there have been considerations for solar roof panels. Mr. Hopkins stated that Hardie Board siding and Azek trim are proposed for the entire building. Mr. Hopkins stated that solar panels had not been considered and that it would be up to his client. Electric heat pumps are proposed for heating and cooling. Acting Chairman Nielsen asked Pamela Kroll if the Building Department has received any comments. Pamela Kroll stated that a letter was received from Clara Teagle and was submitted to the Board. (See Exhibit #1) Acting Chairman Nielsen solicited comments from the public. Clara Teagle is the owner of 38 Hudson Street. Ms. Teagle stated that she has an issue with the three-foot north-side setback. Ms. Teagle stated that the Zoning Code requires a minimum of five feet and that the five-foot setback should be enforced. Although the applicant can put the driveway on either side, there was originally more room between the 46 and 48 Hudson Street buildings. If the building design is approved, the five-foot required setback should be enforced. Three feet will not allow enough room for a ladder to be used. The proposed building will impact the owners of 48 Hudson Street. William White stated that he is a resident of 48 Hudson Street. Mr. White stated that he concurs with Ms. Teagles' objection to the three-foot north setback. Mr. White stated that the Zoning Board gave no reason as to why they accepted the three-foot setback between the buildings. Five feet is the Zoning Ordinance, and it should be enforced. The impact on 48 Hudson Street will be substantial. Mr. White asked the Planning Board to reject the Zoning Board’s approval. Jeff White stated that he is the owner of 42 Hudson Street. Mr. White stated that he expects that there will be problems in the future as the development of Hudson Street continues because the 4 (4/20/23) �houses are so close together and often with little to no setbacks. Mr. White stated that he is unsure of the solution because he, too, would not want a building so close to his property. Joshua Subin stated that certain things are in the purview of the Planning Board, and there are certain things which a Zoning Board may constrain the Planning Board when it relates to approved variances. The Planning Board does not have the authority to overrule the variances granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Ms. Harries asked Mr. Hopkins for the width of the lot. Mr. Hopkins stated that the width of the lot is thirty-five feet. Ms. Harries stated that the comments had been acknowledged. Ms. Harries stated that the existing conditions are tight on Hudson Street and that the restrictions of the Zoning Code are difficult to balance with the width of the lots and the desire to provide parking on the site. David Smith stated that as part of the evaluation, the zoning makes sense because the area was re-zoned from district R-4A to R-5, which allows for greater density in an area that is already constrained. Mr. Smith suggested an alternative to the R-5 designation may be appropriate given the existing conditions and constraints on the lot width and parking. Acting Chairman Nielsen stated that the Planning Board is deciding on granting Site Plan and Architectural Review approval. The Zoning Board of Appeals completed a review of the variances. Acting Chairman Nielsen stated that the architectural components of the proposed building had come a long way and requested that David Smith draft a resolution. Acting Chairman Nielsen stated that the Board will keep the public hearing open until the May meeting and continue to accept public comments. Clara Teagle asked if the five-foot minimum side yard setback is required in the R-5 Zoning district or if it was required for the R-4A district. Ms. Harries stated that the R-5 district requires a five-foot side yard setback, but the R-4A district required a three-foot side yard setback. Joshua Subin stated that the area variances granted by the Zoning Board are a judicial act that changed the side yard setback for the property to be three feet. Clara Teagle stated that she had provided suggestions to the Zoning Board that they didn’t follow. Ms. Teagle asked what options the owners of 48 Hudson have to change the decision. Joshua Subin stated that variances approvals are not before the Planning Board. Mr. Subin stated that he represents the Village and that the owners of 48 Hudson may seek advice from an attorney. A motion was made to adjourn the public hearing to the May 18, 2023, Planning Board meeting and to direct staff to draft a resolution. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Vote 6-0 5 (4/20/23) �4. Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed multi-family building, Architectural Review approval - Presentation Acting Chairperson Nieslen stated that the applicant requested an adjournment until the May 18, 2023 meeting. The application was adjourned to the May 18, 2023, Planning Board meeting. No action was taken. 5. Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence Site Plan approval- Presentation The application was adjourned to the May 18, 2023 Planning Board meeting. No action was taken. 6. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II –Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalPresentation The applicants have requested an adjournment to the May 18, 2023 meeting. The application was adjourned to the May 18, 2023 Planning Board meeting. No action was taken. 7. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development Block O/P & N Townhomes Phase II, Architectural Review approval- Presentation Peter Chavkin is a Managing Member of Biddle Real Estate Ventures. Mr. Chavkin stated that modifications for the proposed building design and architecture were submitted to the Board. Mr. Chavkin stated that they received the questions from the Building Department and requested that the Board provide any additional concerns. Acting Chairman Nielsen stated that this would be the first building in the Kingsland buffer and that the Board is interested in what is planned on a broader scale and how the buildings will comply with the requirements of the previous approvals as they relate to the variations for threestory and four-story buildings and open space. Mr. Chavkin stated that the proposed design complies with the findings for a variation of three and four-story townhomes because while there are no units entirely at three stories, the proposed buildings articulate between three and four stories. Mr. Chavkin stated that the intent of the requirements 2011 SEQR findings for the buildings along Hollows Pass was to prevent a monolithic look or have people in the Kingsland Point Park buffer area feel separated. Mr. Chavkin stated that although habitable square footage is proposed on the fourth floor on the end cap 28’ foot wide units, a substantial setback is proposed between the second and third floors to break down the building façade. Mr. Chavkin stated that in response to the questions regarding 6 (4/20/23) �open space from the Riverfront Concept Development Plan, the orientation of the space was discussed with the Village Board and was part of the Site Plan approved by the Planning Board. Kersten Harries stated that although there are variations proposed to break up the façade design for the four townhomes, the elevations read as one single mirrored rectangular building. Ms. Harries stated that she is concerned that if the future blocks are similarly designed, they will be repetitive and feel more monolithic. Rachelle Gebler stated that the Board is not holding the applicant to the full design of the Riverfront Concept Development Plan but that an articulation of the roof lines would provide a more broken-out feeling. It is important to consider how the building will interact with its proximity to Kingsland Point Park. Lindsay Krakauer requested that Bill McGuiness present the view from the north elevation. Mr. Krakauer stated that when seen from far away, she agrees the building looks monolithic. Mr. Chavkin stated they will consider design alternatives and requested that the Planning Board schedule a Work Session before the next meeting to review the revised submission and keep the progress moving. Ms. Harries suggested that the applicant provide renderings that provide a view from inside Kingsland Point Park looking across the development. Acting Chairman Nielsen stated that the Board is concerned about the overall intent for the other blocks of buildings and their interpretation of the articulation of the difference between three and four stories. Bill McGuiness is the designer for Sun Homes. Mr. McGuiness requested that he be permitted to start with one building and then work together with the Board to vary the buildings in the other blocks. Mr. McGuiness asked if the Board is looking for a submission that details intentions that will provide visual satisfaction to show that there will be enough variation proposed for future building designs. Mr. McGuiness stated that the next submission would also address the Board’s concerns regarding the current proposed building. Mr. Chavkin stated that they would revisit the design and contact Sean McCarthy to schedule a working group session. Acting Chairman Nielsen asked Mr. McGuiness if he wanted to address the recent comments. Mr. McGuiness stated that he would prefer not to debate issues that may or may not be a part of the ultimate submission but stated that he had prepared responses to the twelve comments received. Acting Chairman Nielsen stated that the responses could be discussed during the Work Session. Acting Chairman Nielsen stated that this is an important block in the development because of the interaction there will be with public open spaces. 7 (4/20/23) �Mr. McGuiness stated that he understands the importance of the elevation along the street. Mr. McGuiness said he takes it seriously and wants the Board to be happy with the design. Mr. Chavkin stated that he had explained his rationale for why the design complies with the requirements for the three and four-story buildings. Mr. Chavkin requested that if the Board disagrees with the characterization, they consult Village Council and send them to the Board of Trustees for approval. David Smith asked Sean McCarthy if what is proposed for the end units constitutes a building story as defined in the Code. Sean McCarthy stated that the upper level is considered a building story. David Smith stated that the applicants are presenting a four-story building as a three-story building which is not compliant with the code definition. This approach should go to the Village Board for their consideration. Acting Chairperson Nielsen asked Mr. McGuiness if this approach was intended for the other buildings. Mr. McGuiness stated that they hadn’t designed the other buildings. This is their design for this building. The design proposes stepping back four to three stories within ten feet of the end of the building and three to two stories across the front of the end unit. The massing relief comes in more than one step back. The massing steps back six feet from the front and ten feet from the end of the building, creating a two to three to four-story variation. Mr. Chavkin demonstrated the stepping details on the elevation drawing and stated that the intention was to break down the scale of the buildings while preserving the amount of square footage needed to attract buyers. Rachelle Gebler stated that if the intent is to design the buildings with four stories as described, then the Board of Trustees should decide if they want to see actual three-story and four-story buildings. There was a discussion between the Board and applicants regarding the open green space detailed in the Riverfront Concept Design Plan and the Approved Site Plan for Blocks O/P & N, and the intentions of the Concept Plan as they relate to variations of the building stories along Hollows Pass. There was a discussion between Bill McGuiness and the Board on suggestions for the interior unit bay and façade designs. There was a discussion with the Board and the Consultants as to whether or not the Board of Trustees needs to make a decision relating to the three and four-story variations for the designs of the blocks on Hollows Pass. No action was taken. 8 (4/20/23) �8. SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block A, Proposed medical office building, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Preliminary presentation Janet Giris stated that she is a partner with DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP representing the applicant. Ms. Giris stated that Site Plan for Block A was initially approved in March of 2021 to include the 34,000-square-foot DeCicco’s Market, and 1,800square-foot liquor store, a 9,500-square-foot retail building, and a land area for a North Retail building with related parking. The applicant is seeking approval to construct a 37,500-squarefoot four-story medical office building in lieu of the north retail building. Megan Guy is the Senior Vice President of Development at Simone Development Companies. Ms. Guy provided a summary of the company’s portfolio and stated that they are very excited to present the plans for the proposed medical building. Mark Gratz is an Engineer with DTS Provident Design Engineering, LLP representing the applicant. Mr. Gratz stated that the 9,200-square-foot north retail building was removed from the approved Site Plan in March of 2021. Mr. Gratz stated that there are existing conditions and development constraints that impact the proposed site plan. The Westchester County trunk sewer forces the proposed building to have a hard-defined edge. Mr. Gratz presented the approved Site Plan and stated that the North Retail building was removed and labeled as a grassed area for future development. Mr. Gratz stated that the proposed medical office building would share a common driveway with DeCicco’s Market. The approved Site Plan included 274 surface parking spaces. The proposed plan increases the number of parking spaces from 274 to 349 parking spaces with the addition of a two-story parking garage. The proposed medical building is a twostory building atop the garage. Mr. Gratz stated that an entry circle had been designed at the lobby entrance fronting Legend Drive to facilitate patient drop-offs. The entrance to the garage is designed as a one-way entry with the intent that after dropping someone off at the circle, the vehicle would continue into the garage. The garage exit will be located at the back of the site. The Metro-North access easement has been moved south without affecting the access to the railroad tracks. In 2022 the site was turned into three commercial condominium lots, including one lot for DeCicco’s Market, the second lot for the Retail building, and the third lot encompasses the medical office building and the balance of the site. Mr. Gratz presented the drainage plan and stated that they haven’t made any changes to the previously approved plan for DeCicco’s Market but they are planning on tieing into it so that everything will drain down to the main access drive and extend down Maxwell Drive and out. Mr. Gratz stated that Legend Drive is the main access through the development. In 2016 water and sewer services were extended right across from Maxwell Drive. They intend for all of the connections for Block A to take advantage of the service stubs. There were comments received suggesting the possibility of extending the lines and connecting to the street. Since the sanitary sewer line runs right down the middle of Legend Drive, the applicant believes any work involving connections to the sewer would disrupt the residents living there now and future marketing. Mr. Gratz presented the landscape plan and stated that the low garden Washington Wall along Legend Drive would mimic the walls constructed in front of the townhomes and the Block I apartment buildings. Mr. Gratz presented the emergency service vehicle maneuvering plan and stated that the proposed plan could accommodate emergency vehicles throughout the site. Mark Gratz stated that based on the Zoning calculations, 373 parking spaces are required. The proposed plan includes 349 9 (4/20/23) �parking spaces. Based on their shared parking analysis during peak hours, medical office rates, and retail uses, they calculated that 349 parking spaces would be sufficient. Anthony Stark stated that he is an architect with Perkins Eastman. Mr. Stark stated that the proposed building would be located against the sewer easement, the edge of the adjacent residential parking, the entry drive from Maxwell Drive, and the existing parking that was planned for the space. Mr. Stark stated that their studies show that the drop-off circle will work best for traffic flow. Mr. Stark provided renderings to show different views from the site. The parking garage levels will be screened, and there will be a water table knee around the perimeter similar to other areas and will match the adjacent wall on the DeCicco’s property. Mr. Stark stated that a dark Ironspot brick is proposed for the building exterior, and there would be wood texture vertical fins to provide screening for the parking garage. The entry tower and elevator lobby will be the only part of the building that touches the street frontage. Since they do not have tenants, they have not completed the interior fit-out drawings. Each floor will be a little over 17,000 square feet. Mr. Stark stated that the drop-off circle provides two car lengths under the canopy to allow for short-term deliveries. Mr. Stark described the proposed façade materials. Kersten Harries asked Mr. Stark for the permitted building height and the proposed height of the medical office building. Mr. Stark stated that the permitted building height is 42 feet and the proposed building height is 53 feet. Lindsay Krakauer asked if the term medical offices include only healthcare professional offices, patient exam rooms, and waiting rooms or if it can possibly be an ambulatory site where scans and imaging are offered. Janet Kiris stated that the building could be occupied by ambulatory services that offer scans and imaging. Ms. Krakauer asked if they had considered how imaging equipment would be brought into the building. Ms. Guy stated that they are experienced with healthcare facility development and that as the program for a tenant is finalized, they will coordinate the build-outs accordingly. Ms. Krakauer stated that a two-car drop-off canopy is not enough and will create traffic issues. Ms. Krakauer suggested that they consider valet parking services. Ms. Krakauer stated that the building design with the mirrored windows reads like a corporate park and doesn’t seem to fit in with the community. Rachelle Gebler agreed with Ms. Krakauer. Erin Carney stated that when looking down on the building from the Beekman Avenue approach, it looks very uniform. Mr. Stark stated that they feel the building design is appropriate for a medical office building. 10 (4/20/23) �Acting Chairman Nielsen stated that the DeCicco’s building speaks to past industrial use of the site while the proposed building is very modern. Acting Chairman Neilsen asked Mr. Stark if other designs were considered for configuring the building and the parking garage on the pedestrian level. Mr. Stark stated that the only part of that building that interfaces with the street front is the lobby area. Ms. Guy stated that if they were to backload the parking, more ramps would be needed, and the parking would become inefficient. Benjamin Sirota asked Mr. Start if they anticipate ambulances accessing the one-way street. Mr. Start stated that ambulances would not be a daily occurrence. Ms. Harries asked Mr. Stark for the width of the building. Mr. Start stated that the proposed building is sixty feet wide. Ms. Harries asked Mr. Stark if they considered landscape screening methods to minimize the view of the parking garage from Beekman Avenue. Ms. Harries requested that they provide a rendering of the view from Barnhart Park. Peter Chavkin stated that Lighthouse Landing Communities is the seller of this property. Mr. Chavkin stated that as part of the original Block A approval, the area was proposed as a 10,000square-foot single-story retail building. At that time, the Board expressed that it was an underutilization of the site. Mr. Chavkin stated that prior to this submission, he discussed the parking situation with them, and they determined that the site constraints drove the proposed design. Janet Giris stated that the proposed building height is fifty-three feet and is located in the reduced height zone. Although the applicant has been before the Zoning Board three or four times for a variance, the reason the reduced height zone restriction was imposed no longer exists because what was initially proposed for the East Parcel development has changed. Ms. Giris stated that site constraints do not allow for them to locate the building where the height is permitted to be sixty-five feet. Ms. Giris requested that the Board refer them to the Zoning Board of Appeals while they work to address the comments received from the engineers. Ms. Carney requested that they evaluate and consider the impact the building will have on Barnhart Park. David Smith stated that the Village’s revised Local Waterfront Revitalization Program designates Barnhart Park as an important view shed. Mr. Smith suggested that the applicant complete an evaluation. Mr. Sirota asked if the zoning height requirements are calculated from the main body of the roof. Mr. McCarthy stated that the height is based on the main roof deck. 11 (4/20/23) �Mr. Sirota stated that the proposed height would be sixty feet in certain areas of the building. Ms. Harries asked if below-grade parking is not possible due to site constraints. Mr. Chavkin stated that below-grade parking is not possible. There was a discussion between the Board and the applicants’ team on alternate configurations for the drop-off circle location, the building façade, and traffic circulation. James Natarelli stated that it might be helpful for the Board to see a traffic circulation study. Mr. Natarelli asked how long it would take to connect to the street from Legend Drive and how the electric, gas, and communication utilities would be brought to the site. Mr. Gratz stated that it would take approximately a week and that a trench across the street would have a significant impact on the residents. Craig Tomkins is the Construction Manager for Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, and stated that water and sewer connections were stubbed in 2017. At the time, electricity was run across the street from Tappan Zee Park. They have one gas service line tapped for the site. Mr. Tompkins asked James Natarelli which utilities he would suggest cutting into Legend Drive. Mr. Natarelli suggested running all of the utilities through Legend Drive. The Village would be liable for any extensions to the main on private property. There was a discussion with James Natarelli and Mr. Gratz about what utility connections will need extensions for private services and the options for making new connections along Legend Drive. There was a discussion with Mr. Natarelli and Mr. Tompkins about mitigating the stormwater erosion issue on Beekman Avenue. Ms. Carney requested that the applicant consider community solar overhead awnings for the south side of the building. Ms. Harries requested that the applicant consider a vegetation system to screen the parking garage. Mr. Gratz stated that they will present the landscape plan in more detail at the next meeting. Acting Chairman Nielsen stated that the Board wants to confirm the view shed requirements from Barhardt Park before referring the applicant to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Acting Chairman Nielsen requested that the applicant prepare an evaluation and renderings detailing the view impacts of adjacent properties with the requirements of the Villages’ revised Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. No action was taken. 12 (4/20/23) �9. Approval of minutes- March 23, 2023 A motion was made to approve the minutes from the March 23, 2023, meeting as amended. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Harries Acting Chairman Nielsen - yes Erin Carney - yes Kersten Harries- yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Sirota - yes Lindsay Krakauer - abstained Vote 5-0-1 APPROVED The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 PM. Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 13 (4/20/23) �Exhibit #1 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-04-20_Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/5ba72fedf0def56a4fce35bb2497c840.pdf f9e6a2f537c996889cfa8970379eb81b PDF Text Text ���� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-04-20_Approved Resolution 180 Bedford Road Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/a0b752a0fee0fe48edf685d048ad847d.pdf 4d0ca0ddd26beb9870740b2e130c9fa1 PDF Text Text ����� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-05-18 _46 Hudson Street Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/910acd9f4922234d8b7fc9d56a6a5f8a.pdf 9b4c28b6654ed252798b335c7cd1cba9 PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes May 18, 2023 The regular meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Acting Chairperson Harries Acting Chairman Harries summarized the items on the agenda. Present: Kersten Harries, Acting Chairperson Erin Carney Benjamin Nielsen Benjamin Sirota Rachelle Gebler Also Present: Daniel Pozin, Acting Village Attorney James Natarelli, Village Engineer David Smith, Village Planner Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Absent: Lindsay Krakauer Agenda: 1) 46 Hudson St., LLC, 46 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval- Continued public hearing, Draft resolution 2) Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed multi-family building, Architectural Review Approval- Presentation 3) Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval- Presentation 4) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit approvalPresentation- Requested adjournment 5) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block O/P & N Townhomes Phase II, Architectural Review approval - Presentation 6) SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Proposed medical office building, Site Plan and Architectural Review ApprovalPreliminary presentation- Requested adjournment 7) Vinay Gupta and Vanina Schick, 1 Kelbourne Avenue, Proposed addition and alterations, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval – Preliminary presentation 8) Approval of minutes, April 20, 2023 1 (5/18/23) �1. 46 Hudson St., LLC, 46 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval - Continued public hearing, Draft resolution A motion was made to open the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Vote 5-0 Brian Hopkins is the architect representing the applicant. Mr. Hopkins stated that the design was adjusted based on recommendations from the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Planning Board, and no changes have been proposed since the last meeting. Acting Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board. Benjamin Sirota asked Mr. Hopkins if asphalt roofing shingles are proposed and to confirm the style of the gutters and downspouts, and if they are proposed on the garage side of the house. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Hopkins if gutters and downspouts are proposed on the north and south elevations. Mr. Hopkins stated that the roofing would be asphalt shingles and that gutters and downspouts are proposed in K-style or six-inch seamless, and they are proposed on the north and south elevations. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Hopkins where the gas meters would be located. Mr. Hopkins stated that the utilities are proposed as all-electric. Sean McCarthy asked Mr. Hopkins how gutters are proposed for the decks. Mr. Hopkins stated that gutters would be built within the deck. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Hopkins if the base of the building would be concrete. Mr. Hopkins stated that the exposed areas of the building just above the grade would be stucco. Benjamin Sirota asked Mr. Hopkins if the upper porch gable roof would be an open triangle without accessible space. Mr. Hopkins stated that the gable roof is an open triangle, and drainage will be designed for the porch. Acting Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the public. Clara Teagle is the owner of 38 Hudson Street. Ms. Teagle stated that she opposes the 3-foot setback approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals on the north side because the Zoning Code states that the setback should be a minimum of 5 feet. William White stated that he lives at 48 Hudson Street and that there has always been sunlight, ventilation, and privacy on all four sides of the house. The proposed application would dwarf the 2 (5/18/23) �single-family homes on both sides of 46 Hudson Street. Mr. White requested that the Planning Board send the application back to the Zoning Board of Appeals to modify the approval resolution to enforce the five-foot setback Zoning Code regulation. Correspondence was received from William White on May 15, 2023, and from Clara Teigle on May 18, 2023 (See attached Exhibits #1 and #2) There were no other public comments received. A motion was made to close the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Vote 5-0 Acting Chairperson Harries asked David Smith to read the conditions of the draft resolution. David Smith read the resolve clauses and the conditions of the draft resolution. Benjamin Nielsen stated that the application is before the Planning Board for Site Plan and Architectural Review approval and asked the Village Counsel to confirm that the comments related to the variances granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals are not within the Planning Boards’purview to discuss. Daniel Pozin stated that the area variances granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals are not within the Planning Board’s purview to dispute or to send back to the Zoning Board of Appeals for revision. The Zoning Board of Appeals has adopted the resolution. Acting Chairperson Harries asked if the variances grant the property to be developed as approved. Sean McCarthy stated that the approved variances permit the construction of the proposed project and supersede the Code requirements for the R-5 Zoning District. A motion was made to approve the resolution. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Nielsen Acting Chairperson Harries - yes Erin Carney - yes Rachelle Gebler -yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Benjamin Sirota - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED 2. Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed multi-family building, Architectural Review approval - Presentation Christopher Barbagli is an associate with Vassalotti Architects representing the applicant. Mr. Barbagli presented updated renderings that incorporated the colors, sizes, views, and utility locations. Mr. Barbagli stated that they submitted an updated landscape plan and site lighting 3 (5/18/23) �plan, including photometric details for the wall lights outside the building. A revised roof plan was submitted to include the mechanical equipment and railings. Acting Chairperson Harries suggested that Mr. Barbagli display the full site plan for comments or questions. Mr. Barbagli presented the revised lighting plan. James Natarelli stated that the lighting levels in the back-angled parking area and the central island may be low and not meet the code foot-candle requirements. Mr. Natarelli suggested they consider ambient lighting to increase the photometric levels in those areas. Mr. Barbagli stated that they would calculate how ambient lighting would affect the photometric levels in the suggested areas and asked if any changes could be part of permit approvals. Mr. Natarelli stated that he would be comfortable with working out the final lighting solutions during the permit approvals. Mr. Barbagli presented the roof plan and stated that updates include the addition of fencing and planters. Rachelle Gebler asked if screening is proposed around the rooftop mechanical equipment. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Barbagli for the height of the mechanical screening. Mr. Barbagli stated that mechanical equipment screening is proposed at five feet high. Benjamin Sirota stated that the egress stairs are not code-compliant for one-third of the diagonal distance. He requested that the applicant consider if shifting the stairs would affect the floor plans and the elevator. James Vassalotti is the architect for the application and stated that he would recalculate the stair distance. Mr. Vassalotti stated that the application has been before the Board for two years and questioned why this issue is just being discovered. Sean McCarthy addressed Mr. Vassalotti and stated that he is the architect for the project and is required to provide code-compliant drawings to the Planning Board. Mr. McCarthy stated that Mr. Vassalotti should verify his calculations because if the stair or the elevator has to be moved, the application would be required to come back before the Planning Board for approval. Benjamin Sirota stated that the proposed exterior elevation details are architecturally similar in proportion to the adjacent residential buildings. James Vassalotti stated that the Board encouraged them to blend in the building with the existing streetscape. Rachelle Gebler stated that the Board had requested that the applicant design the building similar to the surrounding buildings. 4 (5/18/23) �Sal Alesci stated that he is part of the development team. Mr. Alesci stated that Mr. Sirota’s comments had been discussed, and the design has changed multiple times during the Planning Board reviews. Frank Alesci is the property owner and stated that the Planning Board abused them for two years, and they aren’t going to make any more changes. Sean McCarthy directed that the applicant team permit the Board members to ask their questions so they can move forward. Mr. McCarthy suggested that Mr. Barbagli present all the changes made for this submission in hopes that comments will be resolved. Mr. McCarthy suggested that Mr. Barbagli present the additional renderings that will promote the rooftop amenity. Mr. Barbagli presented the updated renderings to show the rooftop amenity, where the smaller landscaping was added, the elevator bulkhead, and the rear yard common area. Mr. Barbagli presented the revised landscape plan to include all native plantings. Acting Chairperson Harries stated that she appreciates the updated renderings and views. Allowing their newest Board member to ask questions was not intended to be an attack or to delay the approval. The proposed project will be seen by many and will have a big impact on the downtown Village. Benjamin Nielsen stated that the outdoor spaces and the revised landscape plan are big improvements to the project. Erin Carney thanked the applicant team for working with the Planning Board during the long process. Ms. Carney suggested that the applicant consider shading options for the rooftop amenity space. Acting Chairperson Harries stated that she encourages the architect to evaluate the code compliance of the egress to determine if changes are required that will affect the elevations and require Board approval. Acting Chairperson Harries requested that David Smith draft a resolution for the June 22, 2023, Planning Board meeting. 3. Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence Site Plan approval- Presentation Greg Caccioppoli stated that he is the engineer representing the applicant. Mr. Caccioppoli presented a revised site plan drawing and stated that a three-foot wide land strip was added to the perimeter of the parking area for proposed landscaping. The revised plan proposes to shift the building toward North Washington Street to allow sufficient backup room behind the compact spaces labeled #1 and #2 and to create more green space. The revised plan includes replacing the concrete sidewalks along North Washington Street and Howard Street and adding a crosswalk. The revised plan proposes a curb cut that eliminates the two parking spaces on Howard Street. Egress window wells were added to the rear of the building. The size of the rear patios was reduced to create a separation from the rear property line. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that he intends 5 (5/18/23) �to address the engineering comments prior to the next meeting. Mr. Caccioppoli presented the revised landscape plan and stated that additional plantings were added to the area surrounding the parking lot. Acting Chairperson Harries requested that Mr. Cacciopolli present the floor plans and elevations. Mr. Cacciopolli presented elevation drawings and stated that the proposed changes include eliminating the rear dormers and changing the rear porches roof style from gable to shed. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Cacciopolli to indicate which building elevation would face North Washington Street. Mr. Cacciopolli indicated which building elevation is proposed to face North Washington Street and stated that the proposed landscaping would provide screening. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Cacciopolli where the proposed utilities will be located. Mr. Cacciopolli stated that domestic water and sewer lines are proposed at the front end of the building, and the fire water service is proposed to come in from North Washington Street but, may be revised based on the Village Engineers’ comments. The air conditioning condensers are proposed on the North Washington Street elevation. Since the building is proposed as electric, they do not require gas meter locations. Acting Chairperson Harries suggested that Mr. Cacciopolli consider moving the air conditioning condensers to the parking lot side or the rear of the building to avoid visibility on a corner lot. Acting Chairperson Harries suggested Mr. Cacciopolli consider having the end unit facing North Washington Street. Mr. Cacciopolli stated that condensers are not proposed near the parking area to avoid cars backing into them. Mr. Caccopolli stated that he would address alternate options for the next submission. Acting Chairperson Harries requested that renderings be provided that incorporate the landscaping with the proposed elevations. Mr. Cacciopolli stated that changes to the floor plans include mirroring the unit to provide windows on the side, a basement layout, and extending the front porches from three feet to four feet in length. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Cacciopoli to describe the basement plan. Mr. Cacciopolli stated that a playroom is proposed in the rear of the basement with egress windows. The utilities are proposed underneath the staircases. The waterline is proposed to come in from North Washington Street for the backflow prevention device, and the domestic water lines would be extended to each unit for the bathrooms and the tankless hot water heaters in each unit. 6 (5/18/23) �Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Caccioppoli why there are two doors proposed for each bathroom. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that he was unsure why two doors were proposed and that he will remove them if unnecessary. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Caccioppoli if the window wells are considered a second means of egress for the proposed playroom. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the window wells are code-compliant means of egress. Benjamin Nielsen asked Mr. Caccioppoli how many bedrooms are proposed in each unit and how many parking spaces are required. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the plan proposes (3) two-bedroom units and requires six parking spaces. Benjamin Sirota asked Mr. Caccioppoli to provide the plan that shows the variances that will be requested. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that he calculated the average distance from the curb to each home on North Washington Street and Howard Street. The average setback on North Washington Street is 23.5 feet, and the average setback on Howard Street is 13.5 feet. The minimum required setback on North Washington Street is 20 feet, and the proposed setback is 6.5 feet. The minimum required setback on Howard Street is 10 feet, and the proposed setback is 7.6 feet. Acting Chairperson Harries asked how the proposed building location compares to the averages of the neighboring buildings. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the proposed building location is within 3 to 4 feet of the average. Benjamin Sirota asked if the 23.5 feet setback on North Washington Street was calculated from front porches or the building façades. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the 23.5-foot setback was calculated from the front porch foundations on North Washington Street. Benjamin Nielsen asked Sean McCarthy to explain the Code defined difference between a playroom and a bedroom. Mr. McCarthy stated that if a room is designed where you could use it for sleeping purposes, it would be considered a bedroom. Chairperson Harries stated that if the basement room is considered a bedroom, it affects the parking requirements. Mr. McCarthy stated that since there is a closet, bathroom, and separate doorway, it is preferred that the applicant decides on the proposed use for the room in the basement, even if a bedroom 7 (5/18/23) �would trigger an additional variance request. Using the room as a bedroom would cause enforcement issues if a Certificate of Occupancy is issued as a recreation room. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that he would determine the applicant’s proposed use of the basement prior to submitting their application to the Zoning Board of Appeals. There was a discussion between the Board and Mr. Caccioppoli regarding the proposed site parking versus the amount of impervious surface. The Board suggested designing a better site plan may include seeking a variance for the required parking. James Natarelli asked Mr. Caccioppoli why there is a gap between the parking space labeled number #6 and why the curb is offset. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that there are two feet of pavement in between the curb and parking space number #6 because of an existing drain inlet. Mr. Natarelli suggested that if the spacing could be shifted, it may allow for more space for parking space #1 to turn around. Mr. Natarelli requested that Mr. Caccioppoli submit the vehicle tracking for review. Acting Chairperson Harries asked if the back patios will be separated. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that a six-foot length privacy fence and plantings are proposed in between the patios. The Board suggested that Mr. Caccioppoli consider moving the air conditioning condenser units to the back elevation or splitting them so they are not all located at the North Washington elevation. Mr. Natarelli requested that Mr. Caccioppoli review the code requirements for screening parking spaces that are on the Village right-of-way and coordinate the site plan and landscaping plan accordingly. Mr. Caccioppoli requested that the Board refer the application to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Acting Chairperson Harries stated that the Board wants to be sure that the variances they will be requesting are accurate. Gabriel Arango is the owner of the property. Mr. Arango stated he is proposing to use the basement as storage space and that he could eliminate the closet, and separate the space into half storage and half recreation room. Mr. Arango stated they would also eliminate the shower in the bathroom. Benjamin Sirota asked if a variance is required for the two compact parking spots. Mr. McCarthy stated that the two compact parking spots would not require a variance as long as the parking spot labeled #1 had the proper backup space. If the parking space can’t be counted as a legal space, the applicant would be required to request a variance for one space. 8 (5/18/23) �Mr. Sirota asked if the compact space on the street, proposed for elimination, could be counted as a parking space. Mr. McCarthy stated that the compact street space would not be a part of the variance request and that when the driveway is located, the Village can determine if there is a viable compact spot available. A motion was made to refer the application to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Nielsen Vote 5-0 A motion was made to schedule a public hearing for the July 20, 2023 Planning Board, meeting pending ZBA approval. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Carney Vote 5-0 4. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II –Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalPresentation The applicants have requested an adjournment to the June 22, 2023 meeting. The application was adjourned to the June 22, 2023 Planning Board meeting. No action was taken. 5. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development Block O/P & N Townhomes Phase II, Architectural Review approval- Presentation Bill McGuiness is the Founder of Sun Homes. Mr. McGuiness presented a rendering to illustrate the proposed massing and composition of townhome buildings on the site. Mr. McGuines stated that the changes submitted include scaling down the white façade element on the west and interior elevations. The buildings are proposed to jog at every party wall with alternating brick materials. The window shapes and mullion patterns are proposed to vary between the end and the interior elevations. Mr. McGuiness stated that he would be happy to prepare a more photorealistic rendering of the proposed changes. Rachelle Gebler stated that she appreciates the changes proposed to tone down the white façade elements and the articulations added to the front of the buildings. Ms. Gelber stated that she is comfortable referring the application to the Board of Trustees to make the final call regarding the three to four-story interpretation. Acting Chairperson Harries stated she is comfortable endorsing the revised interpretation and recommending the revised plan to the Board of Trustees for a discussion at the next work session. Acting Chairperson Harries directed David Smith to prepare a draft resolution for the June 22, 2023, meeting pending approval from the Board of Trustees. 9 (5/18/23) �6. SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block A, Proposed medical office building, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Preliminary presentation The applicants have requested an adjournment to the June 22, 2023 meeting. The application was adjourned to the June 22, 2023 Planning Board meeting. No action was taken. 7. Vinay Gupta and Vanina Schick, 1 Kelbourne Avenue, Proposed addition and alterations, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Preliminary Presentation Niall Cain stated that he is the architect representing the applicants. Mr. Cain presented photographs of views of the existing house and stated that the house is located on North Broadway and is the first house on Kelbourne Avenue on the north side of the street. Mr. Cain presented renderings of the proposed house and stated that the existing house is non-conforming. The front of the current house is 28 feet back from the property line. The proposed third-story addition will require a variance for additional height within the setback. The proposed front portico/vestibule addition will require a variance. Mr. Cain stated that the proposed plan would open up the side of the house to the east, eliminate the asphalt and replace it with raised planting beds. Mr. Cain stated that a covered car structure is proposed at the back east end of the house. The proposed two-story addition on the back of the house will require a variance. Mr. Cain stated that the proposed picket fencing will require a variance and be reinstalled entirely within the property lines. Mr. Cain stated that the applicant proposes to keep the existing curb cub and reuse the existing foundation. Mr. Cain described the proposed siding material as a rain screen technology bamboo product that is more durable than IPE. The proposed wrap-around driveway will consist of impervious brick materials that could handle 500 inches of rain per hour. Mr. Cain stated that he added the turning radius diagrams to the site plan and that the data is not included on the copies submitted to the Board. The proposed windows will be Weathershield black aluminum with zinc metal trim. Grass pavers are proposed at the vehicle turnaround area. Covered walkway canopies will connect the carport to the main house. Internal gutters will disappear into the structure, and downspouts will be hidden in the lattice. Air-source heat pumps are proposed for utilities, and they are investigating to the possibility of geothermal. There are three trees proposed for removal that are between six and eight inches in diameter. Fir trees are proposed for planting to increase the buffer along North Broadway. Mr. Cain described the proposed lighting and plantings for the site. Mr. Cain stated that although the plan includes black bamboo, it would be contained in a raised platform in the front of the house. Acting Chairperson Harries solicited comments and questions from the Board. David Smith stated that the Board has been clear with all past applicants that invasive species are not permitted and that all native species are to be included in the landscape plan. Benjamin Nielsen asked if the applicants have considered alternative options for the driveway or putting the entry on the west side of the property. 10 (5/18/23) �Mr. Cain stated that removing the existing asphalt would be a benefit to the adjacent neighbors, the applicants don’t want to enter from North Broadway, and there will not be a curb cut safety issue. Vanina Schick is an owner of the property and stated that it will be more attractive to have the front of the house facing Kelbourne Avenue and the North Broadway road side isn’t the side they want to spend the most time on. They are proposing to reinvent the west side of the house. Benjamin Sirota asked the applicants if using the existing foundations is a cost decision and if they considered pushing the house back with new foundations. Vinay Gupta is an owner of the property and stated they are keeping the existing foundation because they don’t want to cut down the two large oak trees in the rear yard. Erin Carney requested that the applicants revise the landscaping plan to include the native planting from the provided list and stated that the Village and Westchester County are struggling with invasive plants in public spaces and along the river. James Natarelli asked Mr. Cain to provide details regarding the proposed grading along the western property line and the driveway side. Mr. Cain stated that there is an 8 percent slope at the western property line and less than 5 percent in certain areas of the driveway. Mr. Natarelli requested that Mr. Cain submit revised drawings to indicate the grade lines better. Mr. Natarelli asked Mr. Cain to describe the existing wall conditions. Mr. Cain stated that there is a concrete block wall that is proposed for replacement with a stone wall. Mr. Natarelli requested that Mr. Cain consider drainage and weep holes coming from the property to the west when designing the proposed walls. Mr. Cain stated that he will investigate what is required to install the proper drainage for the proposed walls. Mr. Natarelli requested that Mr. Cain investigate if there are maximum slope restrictions for installing the driveway pavers when there is a slope greater than 5 percent. Mr. Natarelli requested that Mr. Cain perform the percolation tests and stormwater calculations for the next submission. Mr. Natarelli requested that Mr. Cain submit the driving turning movement calculations to the Planning Board and that also includes vehicles coming out of the driveway. There was a discussion between the Board and the applicants on how residents enter and exit homes on Kelbourne Avenue. A motion was made to refer the application to the Zoning Board of Appeals for the June 21, 2023, meeting pending receipt of a revised application. 11 (5/18/23) �Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Carney Vote 5-0 A motion was made to schedule a public hearing for the June 22, 2023 Planning Board, meeting pending ZBA approval. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Carney Vote 5-0 8. Approval of minutes- April 20, 2023 A motion was made to approve the minutes from the April 20, 2023 meeting as amended. Moved: Carney Seconded: Nielsen Acting Chairperson Harries - yes Erin Carney - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Benjamin Sirota - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED A motion was made to adjourn the meeting at 9:30 PM. Moved: Harries Seconded: Carney Vote 5-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 12 (5/18/23) �Exhibit #1 ��Exhibit #2 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-05-18_Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/bb0317c24fc669cc1b3dc334e5d214e7.pdf c229f728f1912a12567fbf85d0a83d7f PDF Text Text ��� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-06-22_1010 Kendal Way Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/48658ed8fd5349c5da6bf0baeab022a5.pdf fb6cfc56ffa6a718557363524616467d PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes June 22, 2023 The regular meeting was called to order at 6:49 PM by Chairperson Harries. Chairperson Harries listed the Board members present and summarized the items on the agenda. Present: Kersten Harries, Chairperson Benjamin Nielsen Benjamin Sirota Rachelle Gebler Also Present: Joshua Subin, Village Attorney James Natarelli, Village Engineer David Smith, Village Planner Anthony Catalano, Consulting Engineer Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Absent: Lindsay Krakauer Erin Carney Agenda: 1) Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed multi-family building, Architectural Review Approval- Draft resolution - Requested adjournment 2) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block O/P & N Townhomes Phase II, Architectural Review approval - Draft resolution 3) Vinay Gupta and Vanina Schick, 1 Kelbourne Avenue, Proposed addition and alterations, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Public hearing, pending ZBA approval 4) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit approvalPreliminary presentation, revised application 5) Kendal-on-Hudson, 1010 Kendal Way, Proposed site alterations at cooling towers, Amended Site Plan - Preliminary presentation 6) 61 Howard St. Realty LLC, 61 Howard Street, Proposed conversion to two-family residence, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Preliminary presentation 7) Approval of minutes, May 18, 2023 1 (6/22/23) �1. Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed multi-family building, Architectural Review approval - Draft resolution. The applicant has requested an adjournment to the July 27, 2023 Planning Board meeting. The application was adjourned to the July 27, 2023 Planning Board meeting. 2. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block O/P & N Townhomes Phase II, Architectural Review Approval - Draft resolution Chairperson Harries stated that a Board member has recused themself from voting on the application, so there is not a quorum to vote on the prepared draft resolution. The application was adjourned to the July 27, 2023 Planning Board meeting. 3. Vinay Gupta and Vanina Schick, 1 Kelbourne Avenue, Proposed addition and Alterations, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval – Public Hearing, pending ZBA approval The application was adjourned pending approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals. 4. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II –Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalPresentation Peter Chavkin is a Managing Member of Biddle Real Estate Ventures on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Chavkin stated they are working with the Village and Westchester County on issues the Board raised about access to the beach area adjacent to Kingsland Point Park. Mr. Chavkin stated they are proposing to hold off on advancing the plan for the section of Palisades Green Park until they resolve the Boards concerns. Mr. Chavkin stated that an application was submitted to incorporate the comments related to Tappan Zee Park, Phase III, and an area they refer to as the North Buffer between Hollows Pass and Kingsland Point Park. Andrew Tung is an Associate of DTS Provident Design Engineering, LLC representing the applicant. Mr. Tung stated that the changes made to Tappan Zee Park, Phase III, include adjusting the curb cut at the northeast corner to align with the crosswalks of the adjacent blocks. Lighting has been adjusted at the west end, where it will cross over to the Waterfront Open Space. Mr. Tung stated that this phase of Tappan Zee Park is proposed to be consistent with Parts 1 and 2 for plantings, pathways, benches, lighting, and the lawn area. An open lawn area is proposed toward the Waterfront Open Space connection at Hollows Pass. Mr. Tung stated that the North Buffer area was graded in coordination with the WSP study conducted to revise the flood maps related to the East Parcel. Mr. Tung stated that a wide flat bottom channel slopes up at the edges to meet Kingsland Point Park and Hollows Pass. Planting options are limited in the 2 (6/22/23) �area to maintain flow capacity and are proposed as low meadow grasses. A grass path was added along the edge of Hollows Pass in lieu of the requested gravel walkway through the middle of the channel. The mown grass path will include bump-outs with boulders for sitting. Additional plantings are proposed along the path and the Kingsland Point Park boundary. The work includes the removal of the existing fence and the wall that runs along a portion of the property. Mr. Chavkin stated that the location of the grass path loop is proposed because the channel lies very low and catches rainwater in that area, so even during non-flood conditions, the bottom of the channel may be wet. A decomposed granite walkway through the middle would often be wet and not serve the community well. The walking loop path would connect to the parking lot in Kingsland Point Park. David Smith asked Mr. Tung if a pedestrian connection between the townhouse portion of the development and Kingsland Point Park could be constructed similarly to the emergency connection path at the north end. Mr. Smith asked Mr. Tung to describe the specific limitations of the planting plan for the North Buffer and if pollinator plantings could be incorporated. Mr. Chavkin stated that the intention is to plant meadow mix grasses that are pollinator friendly, similar to other sections of the Waterfront Open Space. They are constrained to use materials that can be mowed once or twice a season. Mr. Chavkin stated that they would explore adding an informal cross-pathway connection. Mr. Chavkin stated that there are points where the grade is higher than the channel in Kingsland Point Park, and they would not be able to regrade the park areas. Anthony Catalano requested that the applicant provide supporting documentation detailing the proposed design related to storm events, planting limitations, and maintenance perspectives. Mr. Chavkin stated that the floodplain analysis report conducted by WSP assumed the roughest coefficient of friction. Mr. Catalano stated that he would further review the report. Benjamin Nielsen stated that the study is unclear where the roughness areas are and the channel shape changes. The beach area is sensitive to flood waters, and the report was submitted as a grade comparison. Mr. Nielsen stated that the plan is considered a part of the infrastructure. He asked Mr. Chavkin if a sensitivity analysis was completed to determine if the grade could be bumped out or have more roughness in the wider channel areas. The trail to the beach areas should be higher than the channel. Mr. Chavkin stated that he is less concerned about the paved connection pathway to Kingsland Point Park being wet. Since they haven’t finalized the design for the Cove area, they have not studied opportunities to add incremental roughness into the floodway. Mr. Chavkin promised to have WSP re-evaluate the study to see if more roughness can be tolerated after they develop the final design for the second section of the Palisades Green and the Cove Area. Mr. Chavkin stated that more roughness is not ideal because it would push water to the Cove instead of straight through the park. Mr. Chavkin requested that the Planning Board approve the partial plan with the promise that after they have buy-in from the County and the Village for what the grading 3 (6/22/23) �would be for the next section, they would enhance the level of plantings. Mr. Chavkin stated that this is why they have put the (“LOMR”) Letter of Map Revision application on pause. Chairperson Harries requested that the applicant consider revising the plan to soften the channel grade along the Kingsland Point Park connections. Chairperson Harries stated that the Board requested the applicant submit the design plans for the entire Waterfront Open Space instead of moving forward with a partial plan. Chairperson Harries stated that the Board is comfortable with the applicant phasing the construction but requests to see plans for the overall design. Mr. Chavkin stated that if the Board of Trustees is willing to waive the requirement to deliver the North Buffer and Tappan Zee Park as a condition of Certificate of Occupancy for Block O/P & N townhomes, they could work out the issues with the Kingsland interface and present everything comprehensively. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Chavkin to detail the schedule because she understands that although the Pile Permits have been issued for Block O/P & N, work has not started. Chairperson Harries stated that there seems to be time to work out the issues and present a complete plan. Mr. Chavkin stated that market fluctuations have delayed the process. They intend to have them resolved and to start driving the piles for the first and second buildings in Block O/P N before the end of the summer and complete the townhomes in a year. Mr. Chavkin stated that planting season limitations are involved in completing the work required for the Certificates of Occupancy. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Chavkin if the plan for the proposed areas includes the plantings going in for Fall. Mr. Chavkin stated they intend to start working on the North Buffer and the section of Tappan Zee Park right away and have the plantings in by Fall. Chairperson Harries stated that holding off on the discussions for the balance of the Waterfront Open Space Park designs may cause delays in moving forward with areas requiring amended DEC approvals, and the timeframes for the amenity sections discussed may run out. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Chavkin to explain how the grading comparisons and flood modeling was conducted. Mr. Chavkin stated that the original WSP analysis used the grades that included the existing pathway connection to Kingsland and brought the flood waters through the park. Mr. Chavkin stated that WSP was instructed to conduct the analysis using the design grade of what they intended to propose to the Planning Board. Mr. Chavkin said WSP ran through two different design grade options. The first option proposed the building 9 1/4 feet above the base flood elevation. Mr. Chavkin stated that after looking at Village Code, they determined that the buildings would require two feet of freeboard above the base flood elevation, which would require to be at 11 feet. The plans that Planning Board reviewed included the area for the 4 (6/22/23) �Interpretive Center building having a finished floor at 11 1/4 feet, 2 feet of freeboard above the base floor elevation. Terry Fitzpatrick is an associate with Nelson Byrd Woltz Landscape Architects, representing the applicant. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that they preformed a detailed analysis with WSP. They pushed WSP to pull the floodway north from the road to achieve the planted buffer pathway designs. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the North Buffer area would be compatible with what was proposed at the Cove area. Mr. Fitzpatrick described the proposed plantings and stated that once the meadow is established, it would create a valuable habitat that could be maintained once a year. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Fitzpatrick how the meadow would be maintained to prevent invasive species. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that mowing and spot treatment would prevent invasive species during the first two years of meadow establishment. Mr. Neilsen asked Mr. Fitzpatrick if there are options to flatten out the slope of the bump-out along the edge of the park. Mr. Chavkin stated that to create the current design, they worked with two diametrically opposed sources. Based on the WSP flooding analysis, they wanted a channel, and Nelson Bryd Woltz wanted to design the space to be beautiful and comfortable for people to utilize. The two sources worked through various iterations to get the buffer area where it will perform as needed for the flood waters. Mr. Nielsen requested Mr. Fitzpatrick to describe the proposed plantings for the buffer area and the surfacing material for the grass pathways related to durability and maintenance. Mr. Fitzpartick described the native proposed plantings and the material proposed for the grass pathways. David Smith requested that the applicant provide examples of other areas where they have successfully used grass pathways. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated they would submit some precedent images of other locations where similar grass pathways have succeeded. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Fitzpatrick to submit the rendering of the proposed design. Chairperson Harries requested that the applicant design the crosswalk at the end of the Tappan Zee Park to prioritize its use for pedestrian traffic. Ms. Harries suggested the applicant consider raising the grade and using specialty pavers to slow traffic down since it would be used as a drop-off area for the cove. Mr. Chavkin stated they intended to include the crosswalk design with the future Palisades Green section. Mr. Chavkin stated that although he understands the desire to use a specialty paver material, it would require the Board of Trustees to agree to lose parking spaces and convert the area to loading zones. 5 (6/22/23) �Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Chavkin if the decoupling of the plans requests that the review ends at the park edge. Mr. Chavkin stated that they are trying to advance the Palisades Green section by five years and that this is significantly before the Special Permit requires them to even talk about a plan. They can not talk about accelerating the plan for the rest of the park until the issues have been resolved with the relationship between the Village and the County regarding Kingsland Point Park and permanent access to the Cove. Mr. Chavkin stated that they incur significant costs between each monthly meeting with their consultants to address the Boards comments. Mr. Chavkin stated that he doesn’t know what they will be able to do to accelerate the balance of the Waterfront until they have resolved the questions related to Kingsland and the Cove. They cannot accelerate the plans without significant cost implications. If they cannot provide access to the cove, they will be in a position to meet some of the other requests that will result in a significate expense to what they were proposing in the rest of the park. Mr. Chavkin stated that the scale and the scope of the proposed work at the Palisades Green section are significantly beyond what was contemplated in the Riverfront Design Concept Plan. What they completed in the Palisades Green and the Overlook was significantly more than initially contemplated. Mr. Chavkin stated that they have a limited budget and cannot advance the remaining sections of the plan. Chairperson Harries stated that the Village has been clear in their written responses and during public meetings that water access below the median water line and through the beach is an important requirement. Mr. Nielsen stated that having a sidewalk that ends at the sand would not meet water access requirements. Physical improvements must be made, and discussions on leveraging the cove access and required permits must continue. Mr. Chavkin stated that they would meet with the participating parties, but they can’t spend money on designing the cover area until the issues have been resolved. Chairperson Harries requested that scenarios be designed for alternative ways to provide water access if the access to the cove is unattainable. Mr. Chavkin stated that they have a limited budget and can’t design multiple iterations of plans for water access. Chairperson Harries stated that the Board prefers that the applicant submit a design concept plan for the entire space to move forward with phased sections. Mr. Chavkin stated that he could not submit a plan for the entire space. Rachelle Gebler requested that the applicant provide a way to connect the existing walkway while they are designing the plan. Mr. Chavkin stated that they intend to preserve the pathway that connects Kingsland Point Park to the County’s easement on the river side of the wall between the Promenade and the Overlook. 6 (6/22/23) �The path to the Kingsland entrance will remain available, with fencing installed to protect it from construction zones. Mr. Chavkin said they would prepare a submission for next month detailing the areas requiring temporary fencing. Mr. Nielsen requested that the applicant work out the design details for the crosswalk area for this phase. Mr. Chavkin requested that the Planning Board speak with the Board of Trustees to approve using the area as a loading zone. Mr. Chavkin stated that he would submit a plan for specialty pavers between the bump outs for a clear pedestrian connection but that he will not be able to raise the grade due to stormwater management. James Natarelli asked Mr. Tung why drainage is challenging in that area and why the grade can't be raised. Mr. Tung stated it would be difficult to have specialty pavers only on the waterfront side and suggested that the pedestrian crosswalk extends to one point at 20 feet wide. Mr. Chavkin stated that they would submit plans to show the temporary conditions that would be put in place while the Palisades waterfront section is on hold. Mr. Nielsen requested that they submit precedent examples of the grass pathways and provide additional flood modeling to include additional slope modifications. Mr. Chavkin stated that he would review the flood modeling if there are opportunities for modifications in future designs. Mr. Natarelli asked Mr. Chavkin if the materials for the emergency access path from the circle to Kingsland differ from the proposed grass pathway. Mr. Chavkin stated that rubberized mats would be under the grass path to support the emergency vehicles. Mr. Natarelli requested that the details be included in the plan. Mr.Natarelli asked Mr. Tung about the permanent plan for the low point area between the emergency access path and the train tracks and how that area drains. Mr. Tung stated there is no way to raise the existing low point without extensive work. Mr. Tung said he would speak with Mark Gratz and provide more details. Mr. Chavkin requested that the Planning Board schedule a public hearing for next month, pending the updated submission. David Smith stated that the application is not ready for a public hearing. No action was taken. 5. Kendal-on-Hudson, 1010 Kendal Way, Proposed site alterations at cooling towers, 7 (6/22/23) �Amended Site Plan approval - Preliminary presentation Alvaro Larrain stated that he is an engineer from A2L Engineering representing the applicant. Gjekote Curanaj, the Senior Facilities Manager for Kendal-on-Hudson, was also present on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Larrain presented a photograph showing the location of the existing retaining walls and the area that houses the facility’s chilling equipment. Mr. Larrain stated that there is evidence that the retaining wall supports are failing and the drainage system is not functioning correctly. The application proposes to remove the retaining walls, rebuild them at a lower elevation with cast-in-place reinforced concrete walls, and move the access to the chilling equipment to the rear. The chilling equipment's water supplies and electrical panels will be relocated as needed. Mr. Larrain stated they propose to relocate the backflow device and surface hot box to a constructed underground pit on the slope. The retaining walls are proposed at two and a half feet lower and will help to soften the slope to the road. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Larrain if there are opportunities to add plantings to the proposed graded lawn area. Gjekote Curanja stated that they intended to maintain the area as a mowed area to match the other lawns at the facility. Chairperson Harries stated that the Village has a two-to-one ratio policy for replacing the trees proposed for removal. Mr. Curanja stated that planting trees in the erosion area shades the property and prevents grass from growing. Their intention is to provide a view of green space from the apartments facing the slope. Mr. Curanja stated that the proposed landscape plan would satisfy the two-to-one ratio. Mr. Larrain suggested that incorporating flowers would help enhance the proposed landscape plan. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board. Benjamin Nielsen asked Mr. Larrain if the proposed application would create sound attenuation issues. Mr. Larrain stated that the equipment is outside and far from the facility’s interior. The equipment would sit below grade from the access road. James Natarelli stated that he received the responses to his questions and is comfortable working out the open details during a future milestone. Chairperson Harries requested that David Smith read the draft resolution. David Smith read a condition he proposes to add to the draft resolution regarding landscape requirements and the Village Tree Ordinance. David Smith read the resolve clauses and the conditions of the draft resolution. A motion was made to waive the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: Nielsen 8 (6/22/23) �Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Benjamin Sirota - yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED A motion was made to approve the resolution as ameneded. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Nielsen Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Benjamin Sirota - yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED 7. 61 Howard St. Realty LLC, 61 Howard Street, Proposed conversion to a two-family Residence, Site Plan, and Architectural Review Approval -Preliminary presentation John Lentini is the architect representing the applicant. Mr. Lentini stated that although he doesn’t have much experience with flood performance in the area, it seems there will be a big problem because the property is surrounded by concrete. Mr. Lentini stated that they are willing to remove all of the pavement and park tandems on the side of the building. The back of the property runs down quickly. The application proposes to remove the garage. Mr. Lentini stated they propose adding a retaining wall and planting a row of evergreen trees to hold the grade. Mr. Lentini said they would add a strip drain at the end of the driveway. There are underground pipes, but he is unsure where they go and where the water drains off the roof. Mr. Lentini stated that the house is a balloon-frame structure with a rear extension. The awkward floor plan makes it easier to convert to a two-family residence. Mr. Lentini asked if the Board is requesting to remove the amount of proposed paving. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board requests that he indicate how the stormwater will be accommodated with the proposed plan. Mr. Lentini asked if installing permeable gravel in lieu of the pavement is permitted. Benjamin Nielsen stated that a stormwater analysis related to the proposed impervious surface is required as part of Site Plan approval. Mr. Lentini described a method he uses to calculate materials by weighing their performance on a scale of zero to ten. Mr. Lentini stated that the existing driveway is not performing like grass. Mr. Lentiti stated that the application is more compliant because even though the actual square footage of impermeable surfaces will increase, the actual weight for soaking water has decreased. The proposed planting strip along the lot line will stop the water from entering the neighboring property. Mr. Lentini stated that the owner is willing to change the proposed rear parking area to a green space because his family will occupy the house where tandem parking won’t be an issue. 9 (6/22/23) �Mr. Nielsen asked James Natarelli if he will work with Mr. Lentini to resolve stormwater matters. James Natarelli agreed to work with Mr. Lentini on the stormwater plan. Mr. Lentini stated that the envelope of the building would not change. The balloon framing would be corrected, fire stops will be added, and the interior layout will be reconfigured. The roofing and windows will be replaced. A motion was made to refer the application to the Zoning Board of Appeals and schedule a public hearing for the July Planning Board meeting, pending ZBA approval. Moved: Gelber Seconded: Sirota Vote 4-0 8. Approval of minutes- May 18, 2023 A motion was made to table the minutes from the May 18, 2023, meeting to the July meeting. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Vote 4-0 A motion was made to adjourn the meeting at 8:30 PM. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Sirota Vote 4-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 10 (6/22/23) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-06-22_Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/d3f8046f6d7b3486354cfb57550eb48b.pdf 351204dc2a99b5032046a8f442a471f1 PDF Text Text ���� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-07-27_1 Kelbourne Avenue Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/0466d5f7d80f095956853ec61e92a1d2.pdf b07d9c5cb6a91e110ccd6c7c2cabfed5 PDF Text Text ���� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-07-27_135 Beekman Avenue Approved ARB Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/c03257cbb85cc3faf81d63cd2dc00049.pdf 279e33a1d5670997815e6bb1426a5b8a PDF Text Text ������ Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-07-27_357-363 Hollows Pass Approved ARB Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/78fa10fb49b20adc886b17ce5be5d0b2.pdf 02b81268262b9afe048e3f0049b3ad75 PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes July 27, 2023 The Planning Board held an executive session from 7:00 PM to 7:17 PM. Chairperson Harries called the regular meeting to order at 7:17 PM. Joshua Subin stated that the Planning Board will hold a separate work session to discuss the Edge-On-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II Waterfront Open space application at the end of the meeting. Chairperson Harries listed the Board members present, summarized the applications on the agenda, and which applications were removed or adjourned to the next meeting. Present: Kersten Harries, Chairperson Benjamin Nielsen Benjamin Sirota Rachelle Gebler Caroline Chen Also Present: Joshua Subin, Village Attorney James Natarelli, Village Engineer David Smith, Village Planner Anthony Catalano, Consulting Engineer Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Absent: Lindsay Krakauer Erin Carney Agenda: 1) Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed multi-family building, Architectural Review Approval- Draft resolution 2) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block O/P & N Townhomes Phase II, Architectural Review approval - Draft resolution 3) Vinay Gupta and Vanina Schick, 1 Kelbourne Avenue, Proposed addition and alterations, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Public hearing 4) 61 Howard St. Realty LLC, 61 Howard Street, Proposed conversion to a two-family residence, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Public hearing 5) Approval of minutes, May 18, 2023, June 22, 2023 1 (7/27/23) �1. Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed multi-family building, Architectural Review approval - Draft resolution. Maximillian Mahalek stated that he is an attorney with the law firm of Cuddy + Feder, LLP, representing the applicant. Mr. Mahalek presented a drawing that compared the proposed structure's height with the surrounding buildings. Mr. Mahalek stated that the existing structure is 42 feet six inches tall. The proposed building height includes 42 feet at the flat roof, 43 feet, 6 inches at the cornice, 47 feet at the rooftop mechanical screening, and 56 feet, 8 inches at the top of the tower element. Mr. Mahalek stated that the average building height lines up with the neighboring structures. Mr. Mahalek presented a rendering and stated that the stair/elevator tower on the property's southern edge would line up with the rear half of the residential structures going southeast on Beekman Avenue. Mr. Mahalek presented photographs of homes along Kendall Avenue and stated that the visual impact of the tower element would be minimal. Mr. Mahalek presented the rendering and stated that the tower element would be set back from the street and that the cornice and existing landscaping would minimize the visual impact from Beekman Avenue. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board. There were no comments from the Board. Chairperson Harries requested that David Smith read the draft resolution. David Smith read the resolve clause and the conditions of the draft resolution. A motion was made to approve the resolution as amended. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Nielsen Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Benjamin Sirota - yes Caroline Chen - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED 2. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block O/P & N Townhomes Phase II, Architectural Review Approval - Draft resolution Bill McGuiness is the founder of Sun Homes and stated that although he doesn’t have a presentation, he will answer any questions the Board may have. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board. There were no comments from the Board. Chairperson Harries requested that David Smith read the draft resolution. David Smith read the resolve clauses and the conditions of the draft resolution. 2 (7/27/23) �A motion was made to approve the resolution as amended. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Gebler Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Benjamin Sirota - abstained Caroline Chen - yes Vote 4-0-1 APPROVED 3. Vinay Gupta and Vanina Schick, 1 Kelbourne Avenue, Proposed addition and Alterations, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval – Public Hearing, pending ZBA approval Chairperson Harries read the public notice and stated that the applicants received approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals at the July 26, 2023, meeting. Chairperson Harries moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: Nielsen Vote 5-0 Niall Cain stated that he is the architect representing the applicants. Mr. Cain stated that per the Zoning Board of Appeals comments, the revised application proposes re-installing 48 linear feet of 6-foot high fencing along North Broadway. Mr. Cain stated that (4) 24” by 36” boulders and hedges are proposed along the property line in lieu of fencing. Mr. Cain stated that the proposed planting beds will be 30 inches high. The width of the driveway entrance to the front property line was reduced, and the landscape buffer was expanded. Mr. Cain presented the renderings and described the proposed additions and retaining walls. Mr. Cain described the materials proposed for the exterior facade and walls. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Cain if the existing sidewalk will remain. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Cain to describe the proposed changes to the landscaping. Mr. Cain stated that the public sidewalk will remain. Mr. Cain stated that the originally proposed bamboo would be replaced with Holly shrubs. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board, consultants, and the public. Benjamin Nielsen questioned if the proposed application results in an increase in impervious surfaces. Mr. Cain stated that the application results in more impervious surfaces due to the carport and the additions. Mr. Cain stated that they have completed the stormwater management calculations to confirm that stormwater can be handled on-site. James Natarelli stated that stormwater management is proposed on-site. 3 (7/27/23) �There were no comments from the public. Correspondence was received from the owner of 5 Kelbourne Avenue in support of the revised application ( See Exhibit #1). Rachelle Gebler moved to close the public hearing. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Harries Vote 5-0 Chairperson Harries requested that David Smith read the draft resolution. David Smith read the draft resolution. A motion was made to approve the resolution as amended. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Sirota Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Benjamin Sirota - yes Caroline Chen - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED 4. 61 Howard St. Realty LLC, 61 Howard Street, Proposed conversion to a two-family Residence, Site Plan, and Architectural Review Approval -Preliminary presentation Chairperson Harries read the public notice. Chairperson Harries moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Vote 5-0 John Lentini stated that he is the architect representing the applicant. Mr. Lentini stated that he received a letter from the Building Department requesting that additional items be submitted. Mr. Lentini stated that the existing landscaping includes one tree in front of the house and some bushes next to the fence. Mr. Lentini presented photographs of the existing conditions. Mr. Lentini stated that the applicant proposes to plant a flowering perennial tree in the front yard and Taxus Hatfield bushes along the side strip along the driveway to the back of the property. The other side of the building is six inches from the property line and will remain. Mr. Lentini provided a photograph of the existing garage and stated that the applicant proposes to remove the garage. Mr. Lentini proposed keeping the garage foundation for grade stabilization and adding landscaping in the rear yard. Mr. Lentini proposed flowering trees in the rear yard that grow 2025 feet tall. Mr. Lentini stated that he specified Red Dogwood trees but that the applicant would plant the tree species requested by the Village. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Lentini how much the property drops off at the rear property line. Mr. Lentini stated that the steep slope at the rear property line immediately drops six to eight feet. Mr. Lentini presented the property survey and stated that the applicant proposes leveling the existing garden area to create lawn space. Mr. Lentini presented the revised site plan and stated that the impervious surface area would be reduced by 100 square feet. 4 (7/27/23) �Benjamin Nielsen asked if the driveway is proposed as gravel. Mr. Lentini stated that the driveway is proposed to extend to the back of the patio as pavement. Mr. Lentini presented a parcel map of the neighboring property lots on Howard Street and stated that the buildings are on the front lot lines and have no side yards. Mr. Lentini stated that the building is unhabitable in its current condition and needs to be renovated before occupancy. The applicant does not propose to increase the footprint of the building to create a two-family residence. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Lentini to share the elevation drawings and floor plans. Mr. Lentini presented the existing and proposed elevation and floor plan drawings and described the improvements proposed to create a habitable two-family residence in the existing structure. Chairperson Harries stated that an automatic sprinkler system would be required for the building. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Lentini how the building will be heated and cooled. Mr. Lentini stated that there is currently oil and gas in the building but acknowledges that the trend seems to be moving toward electric utilities. Kristjan Lelcaj is the property owner and proposed replacing the boilers with hydraulic ondemand units that recirculate the water, take up less space, and can be fueled by gas or electricity. Chairperson Harries stated that the Board favors using electricity over gas for utilities. Mr. Nielsen suggested that the applicant consider solar energy. Chairperson Harries asked James Natarelli to confirm that the site plan proposes less impervious surfaces. James Natarelli stated that a decrease in the impervious area is proposed, there are no existing drainage issues on the property, and the structures’ drainage can be maintained on-site. Mr. Nielsen suggested that the applicant consider planting a canopy tree instead of evergreen trees in the rear yard to provide shade. Chairperson Harries stated that Mr. Lentini could consult with the Village Tree Officer if he needed suggestions on appropriate trees for the site. Chairperson Harries requested that David Smith prepare a draft resolution for the September 21, 2023, Planning Board meeting. Chairperson Harries moved to adjourn the public hearing and to draft a resolution for the September 21, 2023, Planning Board meeting. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Vote 5-0 5 (7/27/23) �8. Approval of minutes- May 18, 2023 Chairperson Harries moved to approve the minutes as amended from the May 18, 2023 meeting. Moved: Harries Seconded: Neilsen Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Benjamin Sirota - yes Caroline Chen - abstained Vote 4-0-1 APPROVED Chairperson Harries moved to approve the minutes as amended from the June 22, 2023, meeting. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Benjamin Sirota - yes Caroline Chen - abstained Vote 4-0-1 APPROVED Chairperson Harries moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:15 PM. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Vote 5-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 6 (7/27/23) �� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-07-27_Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/1c1334034a8e3bce7860870843ab81ad.pdf ded52153dc2f20055aa3d7c3f853566e PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes September 21, 2023 Chairperson Harries called the regular meeting to order at 7:12 PM. Chairperson Harries listed the Board members present. Chairperson Harries said this would be Erin Carney’s last meeting and thanked her for her service to the Planning Board. Chairperson Harries summarized the applications on the agenda. Present: Kersten Harries, Chairperson Benjamin Nielsen Rachelle Gebler Erin Carney Lindsay Krakauer Also Present: Joshua Subin, Village Attorney James Natarelli, Village Engineer David Smith, Village Planner Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Absent: Caroline Chen Clare Trapasso Agenda: 1) 61 Howard St. Realty LLC, 61 Howard Street, Proposed conversion to a two-family residence, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Continued public hearing, draft resolution 2) Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Public hearing 3) Pokahoe Riverview Manor LLC, 17 Pokahoe Drive, Proposed single-family residence, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Preliminary presentation 4) Connor and Elizabeth Ginley, 5 Evergreen Way, Single-family residence, Amended Site Plan approval 5) Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Amended Site Plan approval 6) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II- Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalDiscussion 7) Approval of minutes, July 27, 2023 1 (9/21/23) �1. 61 Howard St. Realty LLC, 61 Howard Street, Proposed conversion to a two-family residence, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval- Continued Public hearing, draft resolution Chairperson Harries moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: Krakauer Vote 5-0 John Lentini is the architect representing the applicant. Mr. Lentini stated that he worked with the Village Tree Officer and has selected landscaping that would tolerate potential flooding on the property. Both the applicants' and the neighboring properties are level and impermeable. The existing Lilac tree will remain in the front yard. Mr. Lentini stated that he was advised to plant Inkberry Hollys three feet on center along both sides of the property line. Three flowering Dogwood trees are proposed in the rear yard. One Evergreen Hicks Yew is proposed at the end of the driveway. Mr. Lentini stated that there are no proposed changes to the bulk of the building. The proposed project requires approval for the change of use from a single-family to a twofamily residence. Chairperson Harries stated that the applicant received approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 26, 2023. Chairperson Harries stated that the proposed site plan will be an asset to the applicant and an improvement for the neighboring properties. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the public. There were no public comments. Eric Carney requested Mr. Lentini indicate a native Dogwood tree species on the final Site Plan. Chairperson Harries moved to close the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: Nielsen Vote 5-0 Chairperson Harries requested that David Smith read the highlights of the draft resolution. David Smith read the resolve clauses and the conditions of the draft resolution. Rachelle Gebler moved to approve the resolution. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Carney Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Lindsay Krakauer - yes Erin Carney - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED 2 (9/21/23) �2. Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval- Public hearing Chairperson Harries read the public notice. Lindsay Krakauer moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Krakauer Seconded: Nielsen Vote 5-0 Greg Caccioppoli stated that he is the engineer representing the applicant. The applicant received variance approvals from the Zoning Board of Appeals for the front yard setback and parking. The changes submitted include relocating the air conditioning units between the window wells at the rear of the building and eliminating one parking space on the property. Chairperson Harries requested that Mr. Caccioppoli provide details of the proposed floor plans for the public. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the application proposes a three-unit residential dwelling with two bedrooms in each unit. The bathroom was removed from the lower level, and the basement will be used for storage, laundry, and utilities. Chairperson Harries stated that the Planning Board intended for the applicant to acknowledge that the basement level could be used as a bedroom if they kept the bathroom and requested the required variance. Chairperson Harries stated that the Zoning Board granted the required variance so the applicant could proceed with the basement bathroom as long as the window well and emergency egress were constructed per Code requirements. Chairperson Harries requested that revised plans represent what they intend to build for the next meeting. James Natarelli requested that the window well details include an accommodation for drainage. Mr. Caccioppoli and James Natarelli agreed to discuss the drainage system to determine the solution. Mr. Caccioppoli described the second-floor and attic plans. Chairperson Harries asked if each unit would have a separate attic storage space. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that each unit would have a separate attic storage space. Benjamin Nielsen asked Mr. Caccioppoli why the parking lot is asymmetrical and has different widths along the building and the property line. Providing more width in the buffer area may allow for more plantings and reduce the impervious surface area. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the parking lot width is designed to provide proper backup space, and the buffer area prevents the cars from hitting the building. David Delardi stated that he is the Landscape Architect for the project. Mr. Delardi suggested using structural soil under the asphalt and planting three or four trees in the buffer area with drip irrigation and porous pavers. 3 (9/21/23) �Rachelle Gebler asked Mr. Caccioppoli if space number one could be a regular-sized parking space. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that he could shift the space to accommodate a regular-sized parking space. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Caccioppoli to describe the function of the paved space in the corner of the buffer. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the paved space in the corner would be used for snow removal. The Board suggested that the applicant eliminate the asphalt in the corner buffer area and add a tree. Erin Carney asked Mr. Caccippoli to describe where the garbage and recycling collection area is located. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that a 10-foot by 4-foot garbage collection area is proposed along the back of the parking area near the patio area. The enclosure could be enlarged to provide for recycling. Chairperson Harries suggested providing an area for bicycle parking. Mr. Caccioppoli said he would try to incorporate bicycle parking in the corner buffer area. Mr. Caccioppoli requested to discuss the letter received from the Westchester County Planning Department. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the owner asked that he convey that there needs to be a minimum of six units proposed to qualify for affordable housing. There will not be an impact on the County Sewer because they are proposing three units where originally there were five dwelling units. Stormwater management is being addressed on-site. James Natarelli stated that some calculations and changes are required for the size of the drainage systems to accommodate stormwater management. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Caccioppoli if the applicant has considered green building technology methods. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the applicant is considering making the units solar ready and he will check to confirm that the current electric loads in the parking lot would allow for electrical vehicle charging. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Caccioppoli to confirm the proposed heating and cooling systems. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the proposed utilities would all be electric except gas for stoves. 4 (9/21/23) �Mr. Natarelli requested that Mr. Caccioppoli provide more detail for the grading on the western side of the property. Mr. Natarelli requested that Mr. Caccioppoli confirm that the location of the air conditioning units between the patios works with the landscape plan. Mr. Delardi said he would revise the landscape plan to show the plantings relocated. The plantings can be easily pruned to provide the required clearance to access the equipment. Mr. Natarelli asked Mr. Caccioppoli to describe the electrical service to the house. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the plan is to utilize the electricity on the opposite side of Howard Street by pulling the power line overhead to a private utility pole on the property and running underground to the structure as recommended by Con Edison. Mr. Natarelli asked if there were options to bring the electricity underground from the opposite side of the street to the house. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that he would discuss the options with Con Edison. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the public. Patricia Minchalo stated that she owns 16 Howard Street and asked if overnight parking could be provided in front of the driveway on the street for the neighbors. Mr. Caccioppoli stated they are providing a net gain of three spaces with the parking on the site. There were no other public comments. Mr. Nielsen requested that Mr. Caccioppoli provide the specifications for site lighting requirements related to the proposed bollards. Chairperson Harries moved to adjourn the public hearing to the October 19, 2023 meeting and directed staff to draft a resolution. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Nielsen Vote 5-0 3. Pokahoe Riverview Manor LLC, 17 Pokahoe Drive, Proposed single-family residence, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Preliminary presentation Chairperson Harries stated that the applicant met with the Board during a special work session earlier in the month, where they presented the initial plans and neighborhood studies. Chairperson Harries stated that the Building Department has continued to work with the applicant regarding floor area ratio calculations and to address the comments from the Board. The Board has not had the opportunity to review the submission they received yesterday. Chairperson Harries requested that the applicant highlight the changes made to the Site Plan since the work session. Ronald Pohl stated that he owns the property and thanked the Board for meeting with him. Mr. Pohl stated that he met with Sean McCarthy to discuss the board's comments and the floor area ratio calculations. 5 (9/21/23) �Greg Caccioppoli stated that he is the engineer representing the applicant. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the changes submitted relate to his Site Plan drawings, the Landscape Plan, and the floor area ratio. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the proposed pool structure has been shifted so the base of the wall is within the required 10-foot side yard setback. The wall is proposed to jog out to support the pool equipment. The pool and the surrounding walls were lowered by 1 foot. The rear walkways were reconfigured. A staircase is proposed off the deck to meet landings on the left and right sides to a lower platform with stone steps that offer access to the pool or the rear yard. Pavers were added to the perimeter of the driveway. The pavers are 2 feet wide in some areas, 6 feet wide at the driveway, and 5 feet wide at the entrance to the garage. The wall on the north side of the property was reconfigured to curve and be graded up to reduce the wall height to 1-1/2 feet tall at the curved portion and the highest point of 3 feet. The wall is offset 1-1/2 feet from the property line for stormwater runoff. The front walkways were reduced to one walkway leading to the driveway. The staircase was eliminated from the south side of the property, and the existing grade will remain. Specifications for the air conditioning units were submitted. Two condensers will be located on the lower tier to provide the correct separation requirements, and one condenser will be on the lower tier. Mr. Pohl stated that because they lowered the pool and the retaining walls, the fencing on the side of the property was eliminated. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that he didn’t finalize the stormwater design for this submission. James Natarelli witnessed them perform the soil tests, and it was apparent that the site would support an infiltration-type system. David Delardi stated he is the Landscape Architect from Nature View Design Group representing the applicant. Mr. Delardi stated that some of the plantings have changed due to the reconfigurations of the Site Plan. A guard rail has been added on top of the wall along the driveway for vehicle protection. Chairperson Harries asked for the height of the guard rail and the total height when added to the top of the wall. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the guard rail is 27 inches high, and when added to the top of the wall, the total height will be 5 feet, 7 inches. Sean McCarthy stated that a maximum height of five feet is permitted to comply with the Zoning Code. Mr. Caccioppoli asked if the walls around the pool have the same height requirements. Mr. McCarthy stated that pool enclosures have separate requirements. Mr. Delardi stated that the goal was to maintain a natural feel with rock outcroppings and natural slab stones. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Delardi to describe how the patio and low wall on the site plans coordinate with the landscape plan. 6 (9/21/23) �Mr. Delardi stated that the patio and low wall will be removed and replaced with landscaping. Benjamin Nielsen asked Mr. Caccioppoli if the stonework around the pool would be dark gray. Mr. Pohl stated that the stone will blend with the natural rock on the site and the brick proposed for the house's exterior. Rachelle Gebler suggested they consider using a brick color similar to the other brick houses in the neighborhood to provide some dark accents. Michael Finelli is the architect representing the applicant and stated that they avoided the darker brick colors so that the house size would better match the surrounding neighborhood and not be overpowering. Chairperson Harries said she visited the site and noticed how many trees have already been cut down. The application proposes to remove two more trees. Chairperson Harries strongly advocates that no more trees be cut down. The requested tree removal within 10 feet of the proposed house is a self-created problem because it is for a new house. Keeping the larger oldgrowth trees is important to help the house blend in and avoid massing the house standing alone from the street. They should aim to preserve the remaining trees. Mr. Pohl stated that one of the trees hangs over the neighbor's house. Mr. Pohl stated that he is concerned that the other tree will fall in a storm and damage the other canopy trees because it is on a shallow ridge with no soil. Mr. Pohl stated that he plans on contributing a nice sum of money to the Village to plant trees. Ms. Gelber stated there are a lot of trees that overhang houses in the neighborhood. The tree in the middle of the south side of the property should remain if it is healthy. Mr. Delardi provided more details about the proposed landscaping and how it would help integrate the house into the neighborhood. Mr. Nielsen stated that the plan has improved from the previous version. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the consultants. Sean McCarthy stated if the Board is comfortable, they can schedule a public hearing. Any additional comments regarding the recent submission can be forwarded to the applicant. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McCarthy if the application complies with the floor area ratio requirements. Mr. McCarthy stated that the calculations are under the maximum permitted FAR. Rachelle Gebler moved to schedule a public hearing for the October 19, 2023 meeting. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Krakauer 7 (9/21/23) �Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Lindsay Krakauer - yes Erin Carney - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED 4. Connor & Elizabeth Ginley, 5 Evergreen Way, Single-Family residence, Amended Site Plan Approval- Preliminary presentation Mike Doebbler stated he is an associate with Ralph Mastromonaco Engineering, representing the applicants. Mr. Doebbler stated that the original site plan was approved in 2021. The applicants have completed most of the construction and live in the house under a temporary Certificate of Occupancy. The applicants seek minor site plan amendments related to the approved Landscape Plan and fencing. Based on conversations with Peter Strom, the Village Tree Officer, there were changes made to some of the plantings on the site. Due to minor grading issues, a retaining wall was constructed around the backyard to the side of the house to level the rear yard. Two fence returns with gates are proposed along the east and west property boundaries. Chairperson Harries stated that the Board received two letters from neighboring property owners supporting the requested changes. (See Exhibits #1 and #2) Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board and consultants. There were no comments from the Board or consultants. Chairperson Harries said she visited the site and has no objections to the proposed changes. Benjamin Nielsen moved to waive the public hearing and direct staff to draft a resolution for the October 19, 2023 meeting. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Gebler Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Lindsay Krakauer - yes Erin Carney - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED 5. Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Amended Site Plan Approval - Preliminary presentation Kimberly Martelli stated that she is the principal of KTM Architect, representing the applicant. Ms. Martelli stated that the prior Site Plan approval was granted on April 20, 2023. The application proposes constructing retaining walls with tiered landscaping to act as a buffer between the structures known as the Carriage House, now called the Sports Complex, and the 8 (9/21/23) �Music Room. Ms. Martelli presented the last approved plan highlighting the area of impervious surfaces proposed for the plaza and courtyard between the two structures. The application proposes a modified courtyard plan to allow access between the Sports Complex and the Music room and to provide cross-access from the main house to a patio. The proposed retaining walls will connect closest to Bedford Road corners at the natatorium attached to the Sports Complex. They will curve to the existing retaining wall and tie into the corner of the Music Room. There are two retaining walls proposed as tiered walls where one wall would sit lower on the site to allow for a service walkway for staff to travel from the Sports Complex to the lower level of the Music Room. Plantings are proposed along the tiered walls and will provide for level grading around the base. Ms. Martelli presented the sections for the proposed retaining wall locations and described the proposed wall heights in relation to the property grades. Ms. Martelli stated that Landscape Plans were prepared by Christopher Thorp, Landscape Architect, to size the retaining walls to create the planting tiers properly. Chairperson Harries asks if the proposed plantings are intended to screen the buildings visible from the Road. Ms. Martelli stated that the planting tiers at the retaining walls are further in the property. The plantings proposed between Bedford Road and the buildings were previously approved. Ms. Martelli presented renderings to show the proposed height of the walls from different views of the site. Benjamin Nielsen asked if the function of the tall wall is for privacy. Ms. Martelli stated that the walls are intended for privacy and to provide screening and connections between the two buildings with a steep slope. The garden wall is proposed as an attractive backdrop feature to the courtyard. Mr. Nieslen asked Ms. Martelli to describe the current conditions of the proposed wall locations. Ms. Martelli stated that there is an existing retaining wall and steep grade drop where the garden wall is proposed. Ms. Martelli stated that although the application will increase the impervious surface by 313 square feet, they intend to take a small portion of the plaza area and replace it with impervious pavers. Chairperson Harries stated that having a site visit will make it easier for the Board to understand the context of her presentation. Mr. Nielsen stated that Bedford Road is a historical road for the community, so screening is important. Chairperson Harries asked Ms. Martelli what is proposed to soften the view of the structures currently seen from Bedford Road. Sean McCarthy said he will coordinate a Site Visit with the Planning and Zoning Board of Appeals. 9 (9/21/23) �Ms. Martelli stated that she would provide a mock-up with stakes and construction taping of the wall heights on the site. Ms. Martelli requested that the Board refer the application to the Zoning Board of Appeals for the October meeting. Ms. Martelli stated that approval to construct the walls would allow them to start the planting between the buildings and Bedford Road. Christopher Thorp, the Landscape Architect, stated that they could start planting some of the evergreen plantings in the fall if the walls were completed, which would soften the view from Bedford Road. There was a discussion between the Board and the consultants regarding referring the application to the Zoning Board. Chairperson Harries stated that the Board prefers a site visit before referring the application to the Zoning Board. 6. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II, Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit approvalDiscussion Chairperson Harries stated that the Board held a Special Work Session at the end of July’s Planning Board meeting in which there was a lengthy discussion regarding FEMA maps and the buffer zone as a floodway. The Board received a report from WSP on Wednesday that will be reviewed by Woodard & Curran. The Board requested that the applicant have an agreement that ensures that the water access requirements will be fulfilled in a supplemental design submission for the remainder of the Park. Chairperson Harries requested that the applicant provide updates and present the plan discussed in July for public record. Peter Chavkin is a Managing Member of Biddle Real Estate Ventures on behalf of Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC. Mr. Chavkin stated that on August 7, 2023 there was a follow-up conversation with WSP Engineers and Woodard & Curran. WSP prepared responses to Woodard & Curran’s technical memo and circulated it on September 8, 2023. Additional questions were submitted by Woodard & Curran, and WSP submitted modeling information on September 20, 2023. They hoped that the modeling calculations would result in a smaller volume of flood water coming across the Metro-North railroad tracks. The models showed a raised amount of flood water over the tracks and raised the base flood elevation by a couple of inches. Mr. Chavkin stated that the results are well within the tolerances they were designed for. Mr. Chavkin stated that there is a draft agreement addressing the water access requirements being reviewed by the attorneys and the Mayor. Mr. Chavkin stated that they have been conducting studies with their maritime engineers on modifying the water access point by the cove to meet the Planning Board's ten-point objectives. They are making progress and hope to have something they could share in a work session in a month and a half. Mr. Chavkin presented the plans and described the changes requested by the Planning Board. The changes for the North Buffer area include expanding the Planting area to make it feel lusher and adding a secondary pathway to Kingsland Point Park. There are changes to the green pathway materials, between the shrub area, and boulder seating was added along the path. The grading of the slope for the channel area was eased. The changes for the third section of Tappan Zee Park include raising the crosswalk area as an additional traffic route and integrating the open 10 (9/21/23) �space areas. Loading zones for future park uses were added for dropping someone off or unloading a kyack. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Chavkin to confirm that he seeking approval for the final leg of the Tappan Zee Park and the Buffer zone only at this point and that there will be a legal agreement forthcoming referring to the water access requirements in the remaining part of the park that is not included in this submission. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Chavkin to confirm that there will also be a forthcoming report to address the comments related to the buffer zone and the floodway. Mr. Chavkin stated that they are seeking approval for the portions of the park included in the submission and that an agreement for the water access requirements will be finalized. Mr. Chavkin stated that it is productive to consider the issues of Pocantico River flood waters separate by the physical drainage solutions and the regulatory issue as to whether this area has to be mapped as a floodway. The regulatory question continues to exist. Mr. Chavkin stated that his understanding is that Woodard & Currans' review of the modeling prepared by WSP will address the drainage issue and not the regulatory issue. Mr. Chavkin stated that resolving the drainage questions is important. As of today, the area is not in a flood zone, and it would be either Zone X, which is not in the 100-year flood zone or an unmapped area. Chairperson Harries asked if the area would function in a 100-year storm event, even if unmapped. Mr. Chavkin stated that the modeling work completed by WSP in response to Woodard & Currans' comments shows that the flood waters rose very slightly in the buffer area, but the drainage works. The Planning Board should be able to approve the application because it is not a mapped regulatory area, and the drainage works. James Natarelli stated that Woodard & Curran is reviewing the model submitted by WSP and recommends that they weigh-in on the regulatory requirements. Mr. Nielsen requested that Mr. McCarthy ask Woodard and Curran to investigate the regulatory requirements of the FEMA process. Mr. Nielsen stated that he is concerned about the Board approving the buffer area without knowing if there may be requirements that will affect the design if they determine the area needs to be a mapped floodway. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Chavkin to confirm that if regulatory changes are required for the buffer area, they would return for amended site plan approval and make the changes. Mr. Chavkin stated that it is possible that a regulatory agency may disagree with a calculation and determine that the buffer area is at a Flood Level and doesn’t work; then they would change the site as required at their expense. WSP has significant experience in dealing with FEMA, and when the area was designed, the model showed that the drainage works. Mr. Chavkin stated that in his experience, while the East Parcel has flooded, water has never come over the train tracks. Chairperson Harries moved to schedule the public hearing for the October 19, 2023 Planning Board meeting. Moved: Harries Seconded: Krakauer 11 (9/21/23) �Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Lindsay Krakauer - yes Erin Carney - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED Chairperson Harries stated that the progress of the waterfront agreement and the floodway information needs to be satisfactory for them to approve the application in October. 7. Approval of minutes, July 27, 2023 Chairperson Harries moved to approve the minutes. Moved: Harries Seconded: Kakauer Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Lindsay Krakauer - yes Erin Carney - abstained Vote 4-0-1 APPROVED Chairperson Harries moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:20 PM. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Vote 5-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 12 (9/21/23) �Exhibit #1 �Exhibit #2 Subject: Date: 5 Evergreen -Support Correspondence from 47 Hemlock Drive Thursday, September 21, 2023 10:17:22 AM From: Contact form at Sleepy Hollow NY <cmsmailer@civicplus.com> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 10:04 AM To: Pamela Kroll <pkroll@sleepyhollowny.org> Subject: [Sleepy Hollow NY] Site Plan Amendment, 5 Evergreen Way (Sent by Edward Barbour, litig8tour@gmail.com) Edward Barbour (litig8tour@gmail.com) has sent you a message via your contact form (https://www.sleepyhollowny.gov/user/1243/contact) at Sleepy Hollow NY. Message: Attached please find our letter of support relative to this site plan amendment. Said letter details that my wife and I own the property located at 47 Hemlock Drive in Sleepy Hollow. The applicant Connor Ginley is our rear yard neighbor. He has informed us that he desires to make minor adjustments to a previously filed Site Plan relating to landscaping, fence and wall, Please be advised that we have no objections to said amendment and, in fact, fully support this application. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-09-21 Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/5a86cb7928cfb411494d6764db0dfd3d.pdf 14bbc824b7bc405cb7a88af93a8f31d6 PDF Text Text ��� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-09-21_61 Howard St Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/bbfa1598fba5d8a6c9e23fcab2605337.pdf ab1bf657ccfa567ba3300e7494dcfaf3 PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes October 19, 2023 Chairperson Harries called the regular meeting to order at 7:02 PM. Chairperson Harries listed the Board members present and read the list of applications on the agenda. Present: Kersten Harries, Chairperson Benjamin Nielsen Rachelle Gebler Caroline Chen Clare Trapasso Also Present: Daniel Pozin, Village Attorney James Natarelli, Village Engineer David Smith, Village Planner Anthony Catalano, Consulting Engineer Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Absent: Lindsay Krakauer Agenda: 1) Connor and Elizabeth Ginley, 5 Evergreen Way, Single-family residence, Amended Site Plan Approval -Draft resolution 2) Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Continued public hearing, Draft resolution 3) Pokahoe Riverview Manor LLC, 17 Pokahoe Drive, Proposed single-family residence, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Public hearing 4) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II- Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalPublic hearing 5) Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Amended Site Plan Approval- Presentation 6) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, One Kingsland Owner LLC, Contract/Vendee, Block O/P Townhome Phase II, 320-330 Legend Drive, Amended Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary Presentation 7) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, One Kingsland Owner LLC, Block O/P Townhomes Phase II, 357-363 Hollows Pass, Amended Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Preliminary Presentation 8) Approval of minutes, September 21, 2023 1. Connor & Elizabeth Ginley, 5 Evergreen Way, Single-family residence, Amended 1 (10/19/23) �Site Plan Approval- Draft resolution Connor Ginley stated that the requested site plan amendment was presented last month. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board. There were no comments from the Board. Chairperson Harries requested that David Smith read the highlights of the draft resolution. David Smith read the conditions of the draft resolution. Rachelle Gebler moved to approve the resolution. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Nielsen Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Caroline Chen - yes Clare Trappaso - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED 2. Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval- Continued public hearing, Draft resolution Chairperson Harries moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: Nielsen Vote 5-0 Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Caccioppoli to describe the changes made to the site plan drawings since the September meeting. Greg Caccioppoli stated that he is the engineer representing the applicant. Mr. Caccioppoli summarized the changes included in the revised site plan drawings. Chairperson Harries suggested that the applicant eliminate gas for cooking and consider electric induction ovens. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the public. There were no comments from the public. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board and consultants. James Natarelli asked Mr. Caccioppoli to clarify the proposed grading on the west side of the property and to confirm that stormwater runoff will be contained on the property. 2 (10/19/23) �Mr. Caccioppoli stated that a driveway is adjacent to the applicant's property on Howard Street. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that a 2-foot tall retaining wall supports the 305 North Washington Street property at the sidewalk. Mr. Caccioppoli described the gradual slope elevations along the property line along Howard Street and stated that the grading should contain the stormwater runoff. Chairperson Harries asked David Smith if a draft resolution was prepared. Mr. Smith stated that if the Board wishes to approve the application, a confirmatory resolution could be prepared for the next meeting. Benjamin Nielsen asked Mr. Caccioppoli why the basement area was labeled as storage when the approved variances allow for bedrooms. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the owner was not planning on using the basement space as bedrooms and requested that the areas be labeled as storage. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Caccioppoli to confirm the basement is egress compliant for future bedroom occupancies. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the basement is egress compliant for occupancy. Mr. Nielsen asked Sean McCarthy if there would be issues using the spaces as bedrooms. Mr. McCarthy stated if the site plan is approved as unfinished storage space in the basement, permit approvals and compliance with the Energy Code would be required to convert the space into bedrooms. Mr. McCarthy stated that the windows are egress compliant and sized to meet the emergency escape and rescue requirements. Benjamin Nielsen moved to approve the application and direct staff to draft a confirmatory resolution for the November 16, 2023 meeting. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Gebler Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Caroline Chen - yes Clare Trappaso - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED 3. Pokahoe Riverview Manor LLC, 17 Pokahoe Drive, Proposed single-family residence, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Public hearing Chairperson Harries read the public notice. Rachelle Gebler moved to open the public hearing. 3 (10/19/23) �Moved: Gebler Seconded: Harries Vote 5-0 Michael Finelli stated that he is the architect representing the applicant. Mr. Finelli stated that the applicant demolished a 1-1/2-story split-level house. The proposed house is designed around the natural topography of the lot. The proposed house is sited to allow for the construction of a driveway on the right side of the property leading to a two-car garage underneath the house. Mr. Finelli described the floor plans for the first and second floors and stated that the rooms are designed to optimize the views of the river. Mr. Finelli described the floor plan for the walk-up attic and stated that the applicant intends to use the rear dormer area as storage, but the space could be permitted as an additional bedroom or finished space. Mr. Finelli summarized the materials proposed for the exterior facades. Mr. Finelli stated the proposed size of the house is 5,192 square feet and includes measuring from the outside perimeter of the house. The proposed height is 29 feet, 11 ¼ inches, where 35 feet is allowed. Sean McCarthy requested that Mr. Finelli describe the proposed basement level and the pool. Mr. Finelli described the proposed room and uses in the basement level. Mr. Finelli described the proposed rear patio areas and stairs leading to a pool in the backyard. Greg Caccioppoli stated that he is the engineer representing the applicant. Mr. Caccioppoli described the changes to the Site Plan related to the proposed retaining walls. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that he is working with James Natarelli to resolve grading concerns in the front yard. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Finelli if the back of the house is proposed to extend further back than the demolished house. Mr. Finelli stated the proposed house would sit 14 feet further back than the original. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the public. Mel Lederman stated that he lives at 14 Pokahoe Drive. Mr. Lederman questioned how the clearance on the south side of the proposed house compares to the previous house. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the clearance on the south side of the previous house was approximately 20 feet, and the proposed setbacks on the south side are 11.5 feet to 13 feet. Sean McCarthy stated that the original south setback was 27.4 feet. Chairperson Harries stated that the clearance on the south side was reduced by more than half. Ronald Pohl stated that the proposed location of the house is to accommodate the driveway. Chairperson Harries asked if the applicant considered reducing the width of the driveway to provide more space on the south side of the property and to keep the 44” diameter Oak tree. There was a discussion between the Board and the applicant team regarding the width and slope of the driveway and the backup space required for the garage. 4 (10/19/23) �Rachelle Gebler requested that the applicant provide a turning radius study for the garage. Rubert Cox stated that he lives at 21 Pokahoe Drive. Mr. Cox asked how the proposed house height of 29 feet, 11 inches, was measured. Mr. Finelli stated that the height was measured using the average curb and the mean roof height. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Finelli to provide the ridge height. Mr. Finelli stated that the total ridge height is 37 feet and is in conformance with the Code. Mr. Cox asked Mr. Finelli how the 37 foot ridge height compares with other houses on the street. Chairperson Harries stated that the Board discovered discrepancies in the neighborhood elevation study and the accuracy of the proposed house height. Mr. Caccioppoli requested that a specific example be provided. There was a discussion between Mr. McCarthy and Mr. Caccioppoli regarding the ridge height calculations provided on the elevation study as compared with the architectural drawings. Benjamin Nielsen stated that the Board requested the elevation study to determine the massing of the proposed building related to the neighboring properties. Chairperson Harries requested that Mr. Caccioppoli revise the elevation study to show the proposed ridge height accurately and provide a balloon test on the property to demonstrate the proposed ridge height on site. Ann Cox stated that she lives at 21 Pokahoe Drive. Mrs. Cox stated that the proposed three-story house would be out of place with the other houses on the street due to its size and height. Mr. Finelli provided examples of the other residences on the street and stated that the existing homes were built in the 50’s and 60’s and that there would be bigger houses constructed as properties are sold. Rachelle Gebler stated that the job of the Planning Board is to look at the neighborhood as it is now and not to predict the future. Ms. Gebler stated that the light-colored brick makes the bulk of the house appear larger. Mr. Gebler requested that the applicant stake the corners of the proposed house. Mr. Nielsen provided examples of the homes on Pokahoe Drive that were recently constructed or renovated and stated that all of the houses are two stories or less. There have been a lot of investments and significant projects in the area that did not request the maximum height permitted by the code. Mr. Finelli stated that they designed the house within the code requirements. If the Board feels there is a different way they would like them to go, it would have been helpful to hear the comments months ago. 5 (10/19/23) �Chairperson Harries stated that the Board had expressed their concerns about the size of the house and that it is why they requested the elevation studies. The comments received from the public are in line with the Board’s original comments. Mr. Pohl stated that the proposed house will fit into the neighborhood, and the materials will be rustic. Rachelle Gebler stated that the first public hearing is not the time for the applicant to rebut every comment the Board or the public provides. Ms. Gebler stated that they should be listening and considering the comments provided. Having the balloon test and the corners staked on the property will give the public a sense of the proposed project. Mr. Finelli stated that the Board seems to have issues with the proposed height, width, location on site, and depth of the house. Mr. Finelli requested that the Board provide him with direction for moving forward other than starting over. Caroline Chen suggested that incorporating wood materials and having more large trees in the front yard setback would allow the design of the house to blend better with the neighborhood's character within the nature preserves. Mr. Nielsen stated that the applicant should provide the correct information on the massing comparison studies and the ground slope elevations. Mr. Pohl stated that the proposed brick design and landscaping will be soft and uniform. Mr. Pohl stated that the project has been going on for a long time and that he will not build a smaller house. Mr. Pohl requested that the Board provide direction for moving forward. Sean McCarthy stated that a public hearing was scheduled because this was the first time the application was deemed complete for review. Chairperson Harries stated the next steps are for the applicant to set up the balloon test, stake out the perimeter of the building on the site, and consider the comments received. The public hearing will be continued next month. Ms. Chen requested that the applicant address the drainage issues raised by the owners of 15 Pokahoe Drive. Correspondence was received from Roy and Joan Behren, dated 10/19/23 ( See Exhibit #1) James Natarelli requested that Mr. Caccioppoli describe how the drainage will be handled along the driveway and the north property line. Mr. Natarelli asked if improvements are proposed at the base of the wall along the property line. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that soil testing was completed and confirmed that percolation rates can support infiltration. The driveway runoff will be captured via a drain inlet in the driveway and brought to the infiltration system. The curbing on the driveway will contain stormwater runoff. 6 (10/19/23) �Mr. Caccioppoli stated that swales are proposed at the base of the wall to help convey the runoff along the property line to the rear. Mel Lederman stated that many trees were removed before filing for the site plan. Mr. Lederman requested that the tree on the southwest side of the property along the river remain because the eagles and the hawks use it, and trimming it has already disturbed their patterns. There was a discussion regarding the proposed tree removals and suggestions for canopy trees in the front yard. Correspondence was received from Rupert Cox, owner of 21 Pokahoe Drive, dated 10/18/23, and Ryan Demler, owner of 19 Pokahoe Drive, dated 10/19/23 (See Exhibits #2 and #3) Rachelle Gebler moved to adjourn the public hearing to the November 16, 2023 meeting. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Trapasso Vote 5-0 4. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II –Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalPublic hearing Chairperson Harries read the public notice. Benjamin Nielsen moved to open the public hearing Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Gebler Vote 5-0 Andrew Tung is an associate with DTS Provident, representing the applicant. Mr. Tung stated they are requesting approval for two of the Phase II Waterfront Open Space areas. The areas include the third section of Tappan Zee Park and the North Buffer between Hollows Pass and Kingsland Point Park. The designs have been refined for connectivity and landscaping between Tappan Zee Park, the future waterfront open space, Kingsland Point Park, and adjoining features such as the Lighthouse. Terry Fitzpatrick is an associate with Nelson Byrd Woltz Landscape Architects. Mr. Fitzpatrick presented the proposed plan and stated that refinements were made to include expanded planting areas and eased slopes along the North Buffer. A secondary path was added to Kingsland Point Park through the North Buffer. A raised pedestrian crosswalk and loading areas were added along Hollows Pass for park access. Mr. Fitzpatrick presented precedent images to illustrate the proposed meadow plantings and the lawn pathways. Benjamin Nielsen asked Mr. Fitzpatrick to provide details on how drainage and infiltration will be managed for the pathways in the North Buffer area and to describe how planting choices were considered for a wetland area. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the proposed species of plantings would adapt to the wet and low line conditions of the North Buffer and would stabilize the soil. 7 (10/19/23) �Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Fitzpatrick to describe how the Westchester County bulkhead area and trail at the beach area will integrate with their plan and how the social pathway running through Kingsland Point Park will be incorporated for future circulation. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the pathway alignment has been updated to align with the Kingsland Point Park bulkhead. Peter Chavkin is the President of Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC. Mr. Chavkin stated that the proposed pathway would meet the sidewalk bulkhead and the social pathway. The existing pathway going to the Lighthouse is unchanged in the current plan. Mr. Chavkin stated that there will be a future submission that will improve the access and connectivity. Chairperson Harries stated that there has been a lot of work and conversations during work sessions related to the North Buffer and how the last leg of the Waterfront Open space will be designed. The agreements and studies must come together for the Board to pass a resolution. Mr. Chavkin stated they are working on the agreement to commit to an accelerated time frame for submiting a plan for the balance of the Waterfront Open Space. Mr. Chavkin stated that the agreement should be finalized with the Village Attorney for the next meeting. Mr. Chavkin stated that the contour of the North Buffer was designed to accommodate water and drainage events that may come from the East Parcel. He acknowledges that the Village Engineer has remaining questions about the completed modeling studies. Their team is working to address their questions and is scheduling a meeting to discuss further. He is confident they can provide the information to show that the contours designed would provide an adequate drainage solution before the next meeting. Mr. Nielsen stated that integrating the drainage infrastructure needs is an essential part of the proposed plan. Since the amount of water drives the contours, if the engineers determine the inputs change regarding the amount of water that may come through the East Parcel during a storm event, the current plan would need refinements to the channel before the Board considers the space as “theirs forever.” Mr. Chavkin stated that he doesn’t see the concern as controversial. If the models developed by the team indicate that more drainage is coming across the site, they agree to put in more plantings or make other adjustments to make it feel less like infrastructure and more like a park. There were no public comments. Mr. Nielsen moved to adjourn the public hearing to the November 16, 2023, meeting and directed staff to prepare a draft resolution. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Gebler Vote 5-0 5. Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Amended Site Plan Approval - Presentation Chairperson Harries stated that the Board members visited the site and that she appreciates Ms. Martelli for setting up the displays to show the proposed height of the wall. 8 (10/19/23) �Kimberly Martelli stated that she is the principal of KTM Architect, representing the applicant. Ms. Martelli presented renderings and summarized the details and locations for the proposed site retaining and garden walls, grading, landscaping, and pathway as viewed from Bedford Road. Ms. Martelli stated that she would address the concerns of James Natarelli related to impervious surfaces and utilities in an amended submission. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board. Benjamin Nielsen asked Ms. Martelli to confirm the height of the proposed elevated garden wall and to describe the purpose of the 12-foot wide area at the corner between the terraced wall area and if more significant plantings could be incorporated. Ms. Martelli stated the highest peak of the garden wall above the courtyard is 12 feet, 1 inch high in the center, with a planted buffer. There will be ground plantings on either side of the service pathway that are not shown on the landscape plan. The non-residential service pathway is proposed for the workers who maintain the site. Chairperson Harries stated that the Board suggests adding more plantings to screen the view of the wall and in front of the chain link fence in the right-of-way along Bedford Road. Ms. Martelli stated that she would have to consult with the Department of Transportation and the owner’s property manager on the permitted plantings and required maintenance in the right-ofway. David Smith asked Ms. Martelli if the service pathway pavers could be shifted north and closer to the wall in the corner to allow for more plantings on the other side. Ms. Martelli stated that she could discuss with the landscape architect to check if additional plantings would be an issue with the depth required to construct the retaining wall footings. Chairperson Harries moved to refer the application to the Zoning Board of Appeals with the recommendations received regarding plantings and to schedule a public hearing for the November 16, 2023 Planning Board meeting, pending ZBA approval. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Vote 5-0 6. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, One Kingsland Owner, LLC, Contract/Vendee, Block O/P Townhome Phase II, 320-330 Legend Drive, Amended Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary Presentation William McGuiness presented as Contract/Vendee for the application. Mr. McGuiness stated that he is accustomed to building under the New York Residential Code. He recently discovered that he must comply with the New York Building Code because the townhomes are four stories. Mr. McGuiness stated that the New York Building Code states that when an elevator is installed, the entire home must be a Type A Accessible unit. Chairperson Harries stated that elevators were discussed when Block J townhomes were being constructed, and it was determined that because the units were single-family residential 9 (10/19/23) �townhomes, not multi-family dwellings, elevators were not required in all of the units. So the question would be if the site easily allows for accessibility and if it is required for all units. Mr. McGuiness stated that he would like to offer elevators for all of the units. The interior townhome units are easy to accommodate, and the issues arise with the units that front municipal space. The goal of the townhome design is to keep an “entry front stoop feeling” so there is a vertical separation between the home and the sidewalk. Mr. McGuiness presented two options for providing accessibility in the units located at 320-330 Legend Drive, which are 20 feet or 22 feet wide. Mr. McGuiness presented two options for providing accessibility in the units located at 357-363 Hollows Pass, which are 24 feet wide. Mr. McGuiness stated that he prefers to alter the primary front entrance on all of the townhome units and add a stair lift inside the home for access to the first-floor level. Chairperson Harries stated that her preference would be eliminating the need for an interior chair lift if an elevator is installed. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness to provide a breakdown of the units requiring an interior lift for the three stairs. Mr. McGuiness stated that all Type A units require all the rooms, such as the bathroom and bedroom, to be accessible. Benjamin Nielsen asked Mr. McGuiness to confirm that all of the units on Hollows Pass and the exterior units on Legend Drive could be altered to have a secondary accessible entrance without changes to the front entry stoop. Mr. Nieslen stated that offering accessibility for most of the units seems acceptable. Mr. McGuiness stated that Mr. Nielsen is correct. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness if the entry be altered to locate the elevator at the entry to eliminate the need for a lift for the three stairs. Peter Chavkin stated that the elevators can not be constructed near the front entry. Mr. Chavkin said they prefer to drop the front doors down and move the three steps to the unit's interior. Chairperson Harries stated that the Board will not decide tonight as they need to weigh in on whether accessibility is necessary in all the units and the best option for providing it. Mr. Chavkin stated that they expect the potential buyers to be on the older side of the spectrum, and the ability to offer an elevator is critical. They finished driving the piles on Legend Drive and are interested in finalizing the construction plans where two model units will be used for sales. Lowering the walkway with the capability of adding the interior stair lift enables them to sell the units as code-compliant accessible. Sean McCarthy asked Mr. Chavkin if they are proposing the installation of the elevator without the interior stair lift. 10 (10/19/23) �Mr. Chavkin stated that the proposal would include a rough-in for the stair lift and provide it as an option. The elevator would be installed without the lift as required by Type B. Mr. McCarthy stated that the requirements for Type B compliance are triggered when you offer the elevator option. Mr. McGuiness stated that his Code Consultant stated that Type B requires that the blocking and the power be installed for the lift option, similar to bathroom grab bar blocking requirements. There was a discussion with the Board and the applicants regarding the options. Mr. McGuinnes stated that the decision is urgent for construction and sales efforts. Mr. McGuiness agreed to schedule a meeting with the Building Department to discuss the requirements. No action was taken. 7. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, One Kingsland Owner, LLC, Contract/Vendee, Block O/P Townhome Phase II, 357-363 Hollows Pass, Amended Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary Presentation This application was discussed in the presentation for 320-330 Legend Drive. 8. Approval of minutes, September 21, 2023 Clare Trapasso moved to approve the minutes as amended. Moved: Trapasso Seconded: Gebler Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Caroline Chen - yes Clare Trapasso - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED Benjamin Nielsen moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:33 PM. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Trapasoo Vote 5-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 11 (10/19/23) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-10-19 Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/5a54eb5d7140d1a99325985594d7cb2e.pdf 1d1bb416e397a6e021ab452e12177ae5 PDF Text Text �� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-10-19_5 Evergreen Way Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/5f08fe2a617044c7cd6c2803eff5293f.pdf 023903685b94a4b4833c9e638d74d0b8 PDF Text Text ��� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-12-21_1010 Kendal Way Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/5a5ef9d42d3730361716625e1c0e894a.pdf f6368f782b654126e788f1916581768b PDF Text Text ������� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-12-21_17 Pokahoe Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/c472117155dec852461046636d4490cf.pdf 45f0939eff36a519d2f5a20dcd17819b PDF Text Text ���� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-12-21_180 Bedford Road Approved Planning Board Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text