2 25 43 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/c04d57105fb0acfec01fcea173659899.pdf ff2e0e716d339b5e5eb58fb0bf77b835 PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes June 12, 2025 Chairperson Krakauer called the work session to order at 6:30 PM. Sean McCarthy reviewed the items for discussion. Present: Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson Richard Gross Jay Schulz Rachelle Gebler Benjamin Nielsen Ken Anderson Chris Camia Also Present: James Natarelli, Village Engineer Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Natalie Burke, McCarthy Fingar Absent: Agenda: 1) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalDiscussion 2) 50 on Hudson Street, LLC, 50 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan & ARB Approval- Discussion 1. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III, Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit Approval, Discussion Peter Chavkin presented the plans that were presented to the Board in November 2024. Mr. Chavkin stated that John Tatro of Nelson Byrd Woltz Landscape Architects is also present. Mr. Chavkin requested the Board’s input on the proposed changes before developing a full site plan submission. Mr. Chavkin presented an area site plan study and elevation sketches. He described the proposed changes to the boathouse structures, the seasonal lawn area, kayak storage, the fire pit, and the boat launch ramp. Mr. Chavkin stated that the proposed locations of the boathouse structures would allow for adjustments to the grading and improve the ADA pathway. He described the proposed uses of the two boathouse structures and presented illustrations for architectural ideas for a covered breezeway between the two buildings. Mr. Chavkin provided precedent images to demonstrate how the lawn area could be utilized as a seasonal splash pad in the summer and an ice-skating rink in the winter. He described the concept drawings for the proposed fire pit circle. 1 (6/12/25) �Mr. Chavkin described the lighthouse plaza area and stated that the originally proposed area was approximately 3,800 square feet, which could accommodate 400 to 500 people. He presented seating area studies and described options for adding more seating. He presented options for reducing the number of segments for the colonade art piece. The Board provided their questions and suggestions regarding the connectivity of pathways from different locations, loading areas, and parking for individuals bringing their kayaks, as well as additional seating areas, a hand-carry boat ramp, the colonnade art piece, the lighthouse plaza, an elevated water engagement area, and firepit operations and fuel sources. James Natarelli requested that Peter Chavkin provide a plan that shows the double-barrel drainage pipe. Peter Chavin requested that the Planning Board discuss fire pit operations with the Board of Trustees to determine whether they prefer the fire pit to be fueled by gas or wood, and whether they would like a fireplace hearth or pit. His team will study location options based on the Board's decision. Mr. Chavkin stated that he will study the connectivity of the pathways and how to provide more direct access around the lighthouse plaza and the boathouse. He will look into tying the boat launch into the path and provide details on the bulkhead materials. He will study areas where additional seating could be added. The Board agreed that Mr. Chavkin should prepare sketches incorporating all the changes discussed for review. 2. 50 on Hudson Street LLC, 50 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval – Discussion, Pending ZBA Approval Brian Hopkins presented the design progression illustration and rendered views for Version 4, describing the proposed changes. Benjamin Nieslen asked Mr. Hopkins to explain why there are different corner details. Mr. Hopkins stated that the difference in the corner details is due to the location of the stairs and utilities. Jay Schulz asked Mr. Hopkins if you could see through the fourth-floor cornice. Mr. Hopkins stated that the overhang is designed as an open trellis-type sunshade. The Board agreed that the changes to the canopy and the addition of the second-floor porch are big improvements to the project. Chris Camia suggested having open railings and balusters on the front stairs and suggested stepping back the fourth-floor overhang. 2 (6/12/25) �Richard Gross and Chairperson Krakauer agreed to support the project if it included a gable-style roof. Mr. Nielsen stated that the cornice size seems aggressive. Mr. Hopkins stated that the cornice details need revisions. Ken Anderson suggested that Mr. Hopkins angle the roof canopy. Rachelle Gebler stated that she agrees with the suggestions for open stair railings and stepping back the fourth-floor overhang. There was a discussion regarding the driveway, turning radius, and the possibility of adding a curb on the 48 Hudson Street side for protection. The Board discussed landscaping suggestions for different areas of the property. Chairperson Krakauer asked Sean McCarthy if a barrier is required at the back of the property. Sean McCarthy stated that the barrier requirement depends on the slope of the rear yard. Mr. Hopkins stated that he proposes a fence barrier, but will install a retaining wall if necessary. James Natarelli stated that the percolation test was completed and went well. There are still drainage issues that need to be addressed, as well as a discussion regarding the need for a drainage easement between 50 Hudson Street and 48 Hudson Street. Mr. Nieslen asked if there are site lighting requirements and asked Mr. Hopkins to describe where fencing is proposed. Mr. Hopkins described his proposals for lighting, fencing, and the proposed gate design between 48 Hudson Street and 50 Hudson Street. Mr. Nielsen asked if Mr. Hopkins is considering solar. Mr. Hopkins stated that he plans to construct the house to be solar-ready. Mr. Hopkins stated that he will complete revisions and requested that the application be approved at the next meeting. He will be sending someone to represent him at the July meeting. Chairperson Krakauer adjourned the work session at 8:36 PM. Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 3 (6/12/25) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-06-12 Approved Planning Board Work Session Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/fdb14ff58a1b48d69d145d498b34b031.pdf 09c9d0227adc900e29ae741a32caf4de PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes May 22, 2025 Chairperson Krakauer called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Chairperson Krakauer read the agenda. Present: Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson Richard Gross Jay Schulz Rachelle Gebler Benjamin Nielsen Chris Camia Ken Anderson Also Present: Joshua B. Subin, Village Attorney David Smith, Village Planner James Natarelli, Village Engineer Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Absent: Pamela Kroll, Secretaty to Planning Board Agenda: 1) 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan ApprovalContinued public hearing 2) 50 on Hudson Street, LLC, 50 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan & ARB Approval- Public hearing, pending ZBA continued public hearing 3) 188 Wyatt, LLC, 188 Cortlandt Street, Amended Site Plan Approval- Discussion 4) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 300-306 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 5) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 352-358 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 6) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 360-370 Legend Drive, Proposed (6) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 7) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 372-378 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 8) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 329-337 Hollows Pass, Proposed (5) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 9) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 339-347 Hollows Pass, Proposed (5) Unit Townhome, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 10) Approval of minutes, April 24, 2025 1 (5/22/25) �1. 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan, and Architectural Review Approval- Continued public hearing Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board has not received the engineering drawings for the application. Benjamin Nielsen moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Gross Vote 7-0 Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public. There were no public comments. Chairperson Krakauer moved to adjourn the public hearing to the June 26, 2025 meeting. Moved: Krakauer Seconded: Nielsen Vote 7-0 2. 50 on Hudson Street LLC, 50 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval – Discussion, Pending ZBA Approval Richard Gross moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Gross Seconded: Anderson Vote 7-0 Brian Hopkins is the owner and architect of the property. Mr. Hopkins stated that he reviewed the comments from the May 16, 2025 work session. Mr. Hopkins stated that houses on Hudson Street are a mix of single, two, three, and multi-family buildings that contain a variety of different roof types, porches, railings, columns, and windows. There is no defined character on Hudson Street as character is developed when buildings are repetitive in the styles and elements. Mr. Hopkins presented the design progressions and stated that the proposed building is modern with articulate architectural elements, scaled for the neighborhood with intentional designs for functionality. The proposed building will submstantially improve and add continuing value to the neighborhood as a way forward for Hudson Street. Mr. Hopkins requested that the Board draft a resolution to approve the project. Joshua Subin stated that it is within the Board’s discretion to decide things such as excessive dissimilarity or what the overall look and feel of the neighborhood is. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public. Jeff White stated that he is the owner of 42 Hudson Street. Mr. White stated that he is concerned about parking. He stated that there are (38) families on the block and (14) street parking spaces. There are (12) spaces available to rent from the Village. Many houses have no driveway and Bridgview Tavern is not permitting residents to use his lot. There are other three-family residences without driveways and he is concerned about permitting a three-family residence 2 (5/22/25) �without having the required number of parking spaces. When the Zoning Code was changed to increase tax revenue, it created a problem without a solution. William White stated that he representing 48 Hudson Street. Mr. White stated that the Zoning Board approved the requested variances. He said the the design of the building with the flat roof is commercial looking, retains heat longer, and is visually unappealing. A gable roof would be more efficient for solar panel installation and more appropriate for the character of the street. Mr. White requested that the Planning Board force the developer to come up with a design that would enhance the street. Clara Teagle stated that she lives at 38 Hudson Street. Ms. Teagle stated that the proposed design is too modern and big for Hudson Street and would align with the buildings on the street. The proposed building will create a problem with parking as there should be seven parking spaces. She has a shared driveway with one parking space but often doesn’t use it during the winter months. Toby White stated that she is the owner and trustee of 48 Hudson Street. Ms. White stated that the proposed development project and shared driveway will provide a benefit to her property by providing her with a parking space that doesn’t currently exist. Ms. White stated that the building design will set a precedent for what the new generation will want. Jeff White stated the long time residents of Hudson Street are not leaving. It should not be up to the developer to decide what homes will eventually look like. Clara Teagle stated that she is a lifelong resident and although there may be someone else who wants to tear down and construct a modern building, it is not the case now. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board. Mr. Nielsen stated that the Neighborhood Streetscape illustration shows the proposed building in context with the other houses on the street. Chris Camia asked Mr. Hopkins is he is proposing solar panels. Brian stated that solar panels are not currently planned but that the roof will be solar ready. Chairperson Krakauer stated that she was hopeful that Mr. Hopkins would consider the Boards comments relating to the style of the roof, front porch, and railings. The proposed building is excessively dissimilar and doesn’t fit the character of the street. The Zoning Board granted the variances for parking, setbacks, and lot coverage. The Planning Board is reviewing the application for site plan and architectural review approval. She requested that Mr. Hopkins work on the design to get it to a place where the Board can move forward. Mr. Hopkins stated that he is proposing a modern building with a flat roof. He is proposing a custom beautiful building and the Board is requesting a generic design with no character, similar to 46 Hudson Street. 3 (5/22/25) �David Smith stated that they will agree to disagree. Rich Gross stated the application is not ready for a draft resolution. Hudson Street has an identity, and the proposed building does not fit into the characteristics of Hudson Street. He would like to see a gabled roof and different design. Jay Shulz stated that Hudson Street has a character with consistent architectural elements across the block and varies with 1800’s architecture. More could be done to integrate the design into the neighborhood. Mr. Hopkins stated that this is how neighborhoods evolve. The design for 34 Hudson Street was traditional. His next building design will be different from this current design. The proposed building fits in with the scale of the neighborhood. The 46 Hudson building is out of scale. Hudson Street is not landmarked. Rachelle Gebler stated that there is no reason to replicate 46 Hudson Street. A more traditional custom design could be more traditional. Mr. Gross stated that the Board has the final approval and it has to fit into the neighborhood. Chris Camia stated the he agrees that the stepping back of the fourth floor reduces the visual impact of the massing. He stated that the roof continuation in the V3 design adds to the architectural dissimilarity and functionality in comparison to the V2 design. Chairperson Krakauer agreed that the V3 design was intended to show how the covered roof structure would appear visually, and that the V2 design is preferable. Ms. Krakauer stated that the Board is not in favor of the design and doesn’t plan to vote on the application or draft a resolution. She requested that the Mr. Hopkins work the the Board on their requests in order to move forward. Mr. Hopkins stated that he doesn’t agree with the Board’s comments. The application proposes a great building that would be a boon to the neighborhood. David Smith told Mr. Hopkins that his statements are his opinion. Mr. Hopkins stated that his statements are subjective. Chairperson Krakauer stated that Mr. Hopkins is not hearing what they are saying. Mr. Hopkins stated that he has described the reasons why the proposed architecture is not excessively dissimilar. Benjamin Nieslen stated that the Board has been consistent with their comments. The Board provided examples as an opportunity for Mr. Hopkins to consider in order to design a building that is more integrated with the character of the street. There is no expectation for cookie cutter homes. 4 (5/22/25) �Benjamin Nieslen moved to continue the public hearing to the June 26, 2025 meeting. Moved: Neislen Seconded: Gebler Vote 7-0 3. 188 Wyatt, LLC, 188 Cortlandt Street, Amended Site Plan Approval- Discussion Mark Blanchard stated that he is an attorney with Blanchard & Wilson, LLP representing the applicant. Mr. Blanchard stated that the applicant has no issues with decommissioning of the existing floor drains in the garage. He requested that the Board approve to amend the resolution to delete the condition related to the oil and water separator requirement, and to add a condition to decommission the floor drains. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Blanchard to clarify the current use of the site and to confirm if the storefront tenant has use of the garage. Mr. Blanchard stated that the garage and the office is operating as the same commercial use granted to Barrier Contracting. The Cortlandt Street storefront is leased for permitted uses. The storefront tenant does not have use of the garage. Benjamim Nielsen asked Mr. Blanchard if the condition of the original approval for the oil and water separator was specific to the use. Mr. Blanchard decribed why the condition for the oil and water separator was included in the orginal approval. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Blanchard if the office and the garage are being used by the owner or if a change of use is required for the office space. Mr. Blanchard stated that the office use is connected to the use of the garage. Chairperson Krakauer asked Sean McCarthy to describe the current uses. Sean McCarthy stated that the original site plan was approved for Barrier Contracting employess to occupy the office space and park two commercial vans in the garage. The tenant for the storefront space has changed. Barrier Contracting is no longer occupying the office space and the garage.There is an HVAC contractor using the garage, independent of the office space. Mr. Blanchard requested to meet with Sean McCarthy to discuss who is currently using the spaces. Mr. Nielsen asked if any drain that connects into the sanitary sewer requires an oil and water separator. Mr. McCarthy stated that use of the buiding dictates the requirement for a oil water separator. Removing the drain restricts the use of the space where no automotive repairs or washing of vehicles would be permitted. 5 (5/22/25) �Mr. Blanchard agreed to confirm the occupancy use of the office, garage, and storefront spaces and present documentation that shows that an oil and water separator is not necessary. Mr. Nieslen requested that Mr. Blanchard determine how the current uses impact the intended use of the property as it relates to more than one business using the office and garage space. No action was taken. 4. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 300-306 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 5. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 352-358 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 6. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 360-370 Legend Drive, Proposed (6) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 7. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 372-378 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 8. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 329-337 Hollows Pass, Proposed (5) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 9. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 339-347 Hollows Pass, Proposed (5) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion Guy Mazzola is a Managing Member of Sun Homes and stated that he doesn’t have anything new to present. Mr. Mazzola stated that the third brick color will be incorportated into the the six unit Building O at 308-318 Legend Drive and Building U at 360-370 Legend Drive. Architectural details will be added to the high visibility end units of Building U at 360-370 Legend Drive. Chairperson Krakauer asked Chris Camia if he had any comments on the third brick color. Chris Camia stated that the third brick color is a good idea. Mr. Mazzola stated that he just received updated renderings for Building O and Building T. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board will review the renderings and asked Mr. Mazzola for the status of the way-finding signage. The descriptions of the utility placements seem correct. Mr. Mazzola stated that a permit application was filed with the Building Deparement for the way-finding signage, and that they have started to install some of it. Way-finding signage is being designed for preliminary review. He will submit signage designs and the locations for the mailboxes to the Board for review. 6 (5/22/25) �Chris Camia provided examples where there are similar street number on opposing streets which causes residents to exchange packages contantly. He suggested that coloring for way-findage signage would be helpful for emergency vehicles as well delivery carriers. He asked that consideration also be made to avoid duplicating street numbers within addresses if possible. Richard Gross stated that the way-finding sign is important for emergency services. Mr. Mazzolas stated that they are designing decorative private signage. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board needs time to review the revised documentation. Due to the number of residents, the Board has decided that a public hearing is needed in order to give the public an opportunity to comment or ask questions related to the designs. Mr. Mazzola stated that the site plan approval included a kit of parts. They have already submitted the offering plan to the New York State Attorney General’s Office. Changes to the the publicized offering plan would require an amendment and cause a major disruption to the flow of the project. The public is aware of what is happening because there are eight buildings under construction. Mr. Mazzola stated that he would share the renderings with the Board and requested that they allow him to work with the Building Department to work out the signage for the Board’s review. Josh Subin stated that according to ARB Law there is a notice requirement for ARB approvals, and that regardless of a public hearing that it’s already being satisfied. Mr. Subin read the law. “ In addition to any notice that may be required by law, the applicant shall cause notice of such application to be mailed atleast 10 days prior to the date scheduled for review of such an application to the owners of the property directly abutting or boundary line of property subject to the matter of the application” Mr. Subin stated that so when the applicant noticed it, notices went out. Chairperson Krakauer stated that if the public has been made aware of the applications, they know that the adjustments were made to the existing kit of part to further improve the overall aesthetics of the site. Chairperson Krakauer polled the Planning Board members on whether there should be public hearings for the current applications. Jay Schulz stated that if the changes are for aestectic purposes, a public hearing isn’t necessary. Richard Gross stated that the changes should be open for public comment. Ken Anderson asked Chris Camia to explain why he thought it was important to hold a public hearing. Mr. Camia stated that a reason for waiving public hearings in the past was because there were no residents next door. The public doesn’t approve the applications, the Planning Board does. If the 7 (5/22/25) �Board schedules a public hearing, they would consider mitigating the impacts of the changes to the applicants timeline. Since the applications are not in the resolution phase, a public hearing could possibly be opened and closed at the next meeting date and there would be no impact to the timeline. David Smith stated that if the Board is comfortable with the concepts that have been shown and progressed to this point, with the understanding that additional information is going to be submitted, the Board could direct staff to open and close a public hearing and have resolutions prepared for the applications. Josh Subin stated that the ARB Law notice requirements are in effect whether there is a noticed public hearing or an ARB hearing. Mr. Mazzola stated the project has already been delayed significally. Mr. Camia stated that he doesn’t see a risk in hearing public comments. The applicants timeline is not a strong enough argument against allowing the public to comment. David Smith stated that the public was notified under the code for these applications. Meetings are broadcasted and the information is available online. He is concerned that the Board would be setting a precedent for a project that already has Site Plan approval with preliminary design concept for the kit of parts already established, where now every unit or every block of units requires a public hearing. The site plan public hearing process which included the discussion with the kit of parts. Ken Anderson asked David Smith if those who bought homes have already reviewed the approved site plan and know whats coming. Mr. Smith agreed and stated that when the applicant comes in with a new block, a public hearing will be required for Site Plan and ARB approval. Given the notice requirements, most of the residents would be notified. The Village has full transparency with respect to these applications and the process that has been followed. Mr. Mazzola stated that they have wiggle room with the Attorney General’s approval and will continue to work with the Board to incorporate design changes. Chris Camia and Richard Gross agreed that based on David Smith’s statement, they agree that a public hearing isn’t necessary for the applications. Ken Anderson and Rachelle Gebler agreed that a public hearing isn’t necessary for the applications. Mr. Nielsen stated that transparency and public involvement is paramount to what the Planning Board does. Given the history David provided, and that the Site Plan and the envelope for the kit of parts was previously approved, he doesn’t think a public hearing is necessary. 8 (5/22/25) �Chairperson Krakauer stated that the public has been noticed per ARB Law. The Board has not received corresponce regarding the applications. The Board is comfortable moving forward without public hearings. Mr. Nielen stated that the applications are in the discussion phase. The earliest they could review and approve the applications is next month. Mr. Mazzola requested that the Board approve the applications tonight so he can file permit applications. He requested to work with the Building Department on the way-finding signage. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Mazzola if detailed architectural drawings are ready for permit review eventhough the changes have not be approved. Mr. Mazzola said they would file for pile and foundation permits while they are finalizing the Building Permit drawings. Chairperson Krakauer said that she is comfortable reviewing the recent submissions and directed staff to start drafting the resolutions. The Board is not in a position to vote before the next meeting. Josh Subin stated that the Board could direct David Smith to prepare confirmatory resolutions and vote on the approvals based on the meeting and conditions that were outlined tonight and in the submission. Chairperson Krakauer listed the applications submitted by the applicant and requested that David Smith draft six separate confirmatory resolutions with pending conditions. Mr. Nielsen described the definition of the “Kit of Parts” as the agreed upon architectural elements of the buildings, including color, elements for high visibility end units, and sections. A public hearing was held to discuss the Site Plan and architectural review in which the “Kit of Parts” is a template of how the buildings will be. The information was in the public realm for comments. These applications are moving forward with that. Richard Gross moved to approve the (6) applications for the buildings on Legend Drive and Hollows Pass. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Schulz Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes Richard Gross- yes Chris Camia- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Benjamin Nielsen- yes Jay Schulz- yes Ken Anderson- yes Vote 7-0 9 (5/22/25) �10. Approval of minutes, April 24, 2025 Rachelle Gebler move to approve the minutes from the April 24, 2025 meeting. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Schulz Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes Richard Gross- yes Chris Camia- abstained Rachelle Gebler- yes Benjamin Nielsen- yes Jay Schulz- yes Ken Anderson- yes Vote 6-0-1 Benjamin Nielsen moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:27 PM. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Schulz Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 10 (5/22/25) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-05-22 Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/16f50e00ec4843effb98a17f6ee7d96f.pdf 8ca5f30a5966d51816a86eb37aec4850 PDF Text Text ����� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-05-22_372-378 Legend Drive Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/2d2a8563a070b1e483ab20c579c6cf08.pdf 79c9f7bfca115edf76a9d068daf09c7d PDF Text Text ����� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-05-22_360-370 Legend Drive Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/ca2e3e75b1f42f3b97d55e9bcd89c7c8.pdf e81da6e46ff366e338938365262f031e PDF Text Text ����� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-05-22_352-358 Legend Drive Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/2eedd3044293b1c077a8c5d01b1d40e5.pdf 9604f6d1a517dcd9a084ee3fa1774b21 PDF Text Text ����� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-05-22_339-347 Hollows Pass Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/7becf24b1de849afd0283cc18c26623d.pdf afc613b1053edf61093330bbbc642d98 PDF Text Text ����� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-05-22_329-337 Hollows Pass Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/0d78faf453122ee3d36ee312ba1868e1.pdf cba6f8be31c1c6888ff26d294cbf6598 PDF Text Text ����� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-05-22_300-306 Legend Drive Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/0015c6b4552d52b4b4f27dc11737c280.pdf 853a691f6431272936e163d4ec7c917a PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes May 15, 2025 Chairperson Krakauer called the work session to order at 6:30 PM. Chairperson Krakauer read the agenda. Present: Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson Richard Gross Jay Schulz Rachelle Gebler Benjamin Nielsen Ken Anderson Also Present: Joshua B. Subin, Village Attorney David Smith, Village Planner James Natarelli, Village Engineer Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Absent: Chris Camia Agenda: 1) 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan ApprovalContinued public hearing 2) 50 on Hudson Street, LLC, 50 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan & ARB Approval- Public hearing, pending ZBA continued public hearing 3) 188 Wyatt, LLC, 188 Cortlandt Street, Amended Site Plan Approval- Discussion 4) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 300-306 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 5) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 352-358 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 6) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 360-370 Legend Drive, Proposed (6) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 7) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 372-378 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 8) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 329-337 Hollows Pass, Proposed (5) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 9) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 339-347 Hollows Pass, Proposed (5) Unit Townhome, Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 10) Approval of minutes, April 24, 2025 1 (5/15/25) �1. 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan, and Architectural Review Approval- Continued public hearing Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board has not received the engineering drawings or new correspondence for the application. 2. 50 on Hudson Street LLC, 50 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval – Discussion, Pending ZBA Approval The Board reviewed the revised submission received on May 15, 2025 and discussed their comments related to the architectural plans. James Natarelli stated that he would be reviewing the revised engineering plans that he received before the meeting. The Board discussed the possibility of a municipal parking lot at 212 Beekman Avenue. 3. 188 Wyatt, LLC, 188 Cortlandt Street, Amended Site Plan Approval- Preliminary presentation The Board discussed whether the existing floor drains are required for the current use. 4. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 300-306 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation 5. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 352-358 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation 6. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 360-370 Legend Drive, Proposed (6) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation 7. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 372-378 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation 8. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 329-337 Hollows Pass, Proposed (5) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation 9. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 339-347 Hollows Pass, Proposed (5) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation The Board discussed the proposed alternate plan for architectural features of the end units of building U located at 360-370 Legend Drive and the proposed third brick color. The Board discussed that outstanding items related to the proposed utility locations, way-finding signage, side elevation treatments. 2 (5/15/25) �Guy Mazzola is a Managing Member of Sun Homes and stated that renderings are being prepared to show how the proposed third brick color will look incorporated on the buildings with six units. Chairperson Krakauer suggested that the Planning Board name Deputy Chairperson who would have signing power in her absence. The Board suggested that Benjamin Nielsen be the Deputy Chairperson. Mr. Nielsen agreed to accept the position. Chairperson Krakauer moved to approve Benjamin Nielsen as Deputy Chairperson of the Planning Board. Moved: Gross Seconded: Gebler Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes Richard Gross- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Benjamin Nielsen- yes Jay Schulz- yes Ken Anderson- yes Vote 6-0 Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board is looking for new candidates to join the Planning Board as members or alternates and stated that interested residents should contact her or the Mayor to discuss. The Board discussed the requirements for the role of alternate members and voting capabilities. Chairperson Krakauer adjourned the work session at 7:50 PM. Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 3 (5/15/25) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-05-15 Approved Planning Board Work Session Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/619a44971ccfca1d8e0171c556d93781.pdf 086d5518db507a7ec3fa32b2d0f9b6fa PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes April 24, 2025 Chairperson Krakauer called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Chairperson Krakauer read the agenda. Present: Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson Richard Gross Jay Schulz Rachelle Gebler Benjamin Nielsen Ken Anderson Also Present: Joshua B. Subin, Village Attorney David Smith, Village Planner James Natarelli, Village Engineer Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Absent: Chris Camia Agenda: 1) 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan ApprovalContinued public hearing 2) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III- Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalDiscussion 3) 50 on Hudson Street, LLC, 50 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan & ARB Approval- Presentation 4) Marathon Development Group, LTD, 100 College Avenue, Proposed 105-unit mixeduse development, Subdivision, Special Permit, and Site Plan Approval- Presentation 5) 188 Wyatt, LLC, 188 Cortlandt Street, Amended Site Plan Approval- Preliminary presentation 6) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 300-306 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation 7) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 352-358 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation 8) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 360-370 Legend Drive, Proposed (6) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation 9) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 372-378 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation 1 (4/24/25) �10) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 329-337 Hollows Pass, Proposed (5) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation 11) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 339-347 Hollows Pass, Proposed (5) Unit Townhome, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation 12) Approval of minutes, March 20, 2025 1. 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan, and Architectural Review Approval- Continued public hearing Richard Gross moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Gross Seconded: Anderson Vote 6-0 Sam Vieira stated that he is the Project architect representing the owner. Mr. Vieira stated that the testing requirements for the stormwater management system and the engineering drawings have not been completed. Mr. Vieira summarized the application and described the changes made per the Board’s requests regarding the landscaping, curb cut, sidewalk, proposed gate and garbage/storage area screening. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public. There were no comments from the public. Chairperson Krakauer adjourned the public hearing to the May 22, 2025, Planning Board meeting. 2. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III- Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit Approval- Discussion The Board adjourned the application to the May 22, 2025, meeting. 3. 50 on Hudson Street LLC, 50 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval – Discussion, Pending ZBA Approval Brian Hopkins is the owner and architect of the property. Mr. Hopkins presented photographs and renderings of the proposed house in combination with the homes approved and constructed at 46 and 34 Hudson Street. Mr. Hopkins presented photographs of buildings along Hudson Street and described the similarities in architectural bulk and size. He presented photographs of buildings on neighboring streets to compare the features of multi-story buildings with adjacent two-and-a-half-story buildings on Andrews Lane, Beekman Avenue and Clinton Street. Mr. Hopkins stated that these buildings include flat roofs. Mr. Hopkins presented photographs of homes on Ridge Street and stated that combining traditional and modern houses works well together. He presented a rendering view from the street and stated that pushing the fourth story back would bring down the scale of the building and align the third story with the other smaller houses on Hudson Street. Changes to the Site Plan include reorientation of the parking spots and adding a green area and a tree. The trash collection area was moved up front. Mr. Hopkins 2 (4/24/25) �presented renderings and perspective views and described the architectural changes to the façade colors, window and railing details, and batten spacing. Mr. Hopkins solicited comments from the Board. Benjamin Nielsen asked if the proposed porch is functional and if he considered covering it. The proposed building appears vertical and flat. Mr. Hopkins stated that the proposed porch would be functional, and he did not consider covering it. The different elements at the window heads and sills capture horizontal breaks. The depth of the recessed areas and the window insets would make the building less flat than neighboring properties. Jay Shulz asked Mr. Hopkins if he would consider adding two or three additional parking spaces behind the 48 Hudson Street building. Ken Anderson asked Mr. Hopkins about the proposed fence between 50 Hudson Street and 48 Hudson Street and asked him to describe the current rear yard conditions of 48 Hudson Street. Mr. Hopkins agreed to discuss the options of a second parking spot and the location of the fencing with the owner of 48 Hudson Street. The owner may want to maintain the trees and plantings in the rear yard. Chairperson Krakauer noted that a covered front porch is a common feature for many of the houses on Hudson Street and asked Mr. Hopkins if he is proposing a pergola or other shade structures. The building seems square, and most of the roofs on the street are gabled. Richard Gross suggested the porches have structural covers. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Hopkins to consider the Board’s suggestions. Mr. Hopkins requested that the Board schedule a public hearing. James Natarelli requested that Mr. Hopkins submit the civil engineering drawings. Chairperson Krakauer agreed to schedule the public hearing for the May 22, 2025 meeting. 4. Marathon Development Group LTD, 100 College Avenue, Proposed 105-unit mixed-use development, Subdivision, Special Permit, and Site Plan ApprovalPresentation Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board has not received additional information regarding the application. A Notice of Intent was circulated to the required agencies, declaring the Planning Board as the lead agency. The application was adjourned to the next Planning Board meeting. 3 (4/24/25) �5. 188 Wyatt, LLC, 188 Cortlandt Street, Amended Site Plan Approval- Preliminary presentation Mark Blanchard stated that he is an attorney with Blanchard & Wilson, LLP representing the applicant. He represented the applicant on the site plan approval granted in 2018. The applicant is requesting amended approval to eliminate the resolution condition, which requires the applicant to install an oil and water separator in the garage so that an updated certificate of occupancy may be issued. The applicant was told that an oil and water separator device could not be designed for the site. The applicant is the owner of Barrier Contracting, LLC. Although it is an environmental mediation business, the owner does not use the garage for vehicles that transport and contain oil drums or contaminated soil. Chairperson Krakauer asked if the approved site plan use has changed since 2018, and asked Mr. Blanchard to describe the two existing drains in the garage. Mr. Blanchard stated that the approved use from 2018 has not changed. The applicant has other yards where he stores his excavation equipment and materials used for environmental mediation. Mr. Blanchard believes the existing drains prevent flooding in a rain event, and if the Board would like them removed, he could speak to the Applicant. There was a discussion regarding the use and necessity of the existing drains and whether or not they tie into the sanitary sewer system. Chairperson Krakauer asked Sean McCarthy if the drains are necessary. Sean McCarthy stated that the drains should be disconnected and plugged if they are not used for commercial purposes and not connected to an oil and water separator. Automotive repairs are prohibited in the C-2 Zoning District. Disconnecting the drains would restrict the washing of vehicles in the building. Mr. Blanchard requested that the application be adjourned to the May meeting so that he may consult with the applicant about the drains. Jay Schulz requested that Mr. Blanchard check for a water source and a hose in the garage. No action was taken. 6. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 300-306 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation 7. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 352-358 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation 8. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 360-370 Legend Drive, Proposed (6) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation 4 (4/24/25) �9. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 372-378 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation 10. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 329-337 Hollows Pass, Proposed (5) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation 11. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 339-347 Hollows Pass, Proposed (5) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary presentation Chairperson Krakauer invited the applicant to present the applications for the different buildings in one presentation. Guy Mazzola stated that he has partnered with Peter Chavkin and Bill McGuinness to be the managing partner of SunHomes, taking over the company operations and heading up construction and design. Mr. Mazzola stated that his presentation includes revisions to address the comments from the April 10, 2025 Work Session. Mr. Mazzola presented an illustration and described the phases of the Block O/P & N Townhomes Phase II approvals and pending applications using color and letter building identifications. Chairperson Krakauer requested that Mr. Mazzola use the street address to describe the location of the buildings. Chairperson Krakauer asked if the presentation includes signage for roadways and alleys. Mr. Mazzola stated that they are working on the plan for wayfinding signage for the site. Mr. Mazzola presented a rendering of the 300-306 Legend Drive building, labeled as Building P and stated that the rendering includes the previously approved Building O and Building N on Legend Drive. Per the Board’s comments, high visibility bay elements were added to the side of the building and to the front of one of the units. Mr. Mazzola described the architectural features that break up the building units and compared them with adjacent approved building. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Mazzola to confirm that they are two distinct colors proposed on the main façade and asked if there are any shade coverings proposed for the rooftop or the Juliet balconies. Mr. Mazzola stated that they are working on designs for retractable awnings for the rooftop. If proposed, they will submit revised plans to the Board. Awnings are proposed over the Juliet balconies and some of the windows and doors. Jay Schulz asked Mr. Mazzola if the same color scheme are proposed for all 14 units in the building applications seeking approval. Mr. Mazzola described the proposed building façade color palettes and materials and stated that the same design scheme is proposed for the 14 units. 5 (4/24/25) �The Board agreed that applicant should consider different color pallets for each building and suggested adding a third brick color to avoid having mirrored facades. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Mazzola to describe the rooftop utilities screening. Mr. Mazzola stated that jogging of the building bays in the alleyway would provide screening of the rooftop utilities. Benjamin Nielsen asked if the gas meters are proposed in the alleyways between the buildings on Legend Drive. Mr. Mazzola stated that the gas meters are located on the other side of the building’s alleyway/walkways. Mr. Mazzola presented an illustration, described the locations of the gas meters and the proposed landscaping for the six buildings, and described the space dimensions between the buildings and units. Mr. Shulz asked where the residents of the interior units of Buildings Q, U, and T could access additional parking spaces for guests. Mr. Mazzola stated that there would be additional spaces at the amenity area parking lot and stated that he would confirm the availability. There was a discussion on how visitors would get to the interior building units through alleyways. Mr. Mazzola presented a rear view rendering from the interior courtyard of the building located at 352-358 Legend Drive, labeled as Building Q. Mr. Mazzola presented a rendering from the interior courtyard of the buildings located at 360370 Legend Drive, labeled as Building U, and 372-378 Legend Drive, labeled as Building T. Mr. Mazzola stated that the four end units for these buildings have the high visibility bay features. Benjamin Nielsen stated that there is minimal articulation at the downspouts in-between the building. Mr. Mazzola stated that the setback regulations limit the possible the articulation between the units. The Board suggested the applicant consider adding a third brick color to articulate the interior units. Mr. Shulz asked Mr. Mazzola if the six buildings are at the same elevations. Mr. Mazzola stated that the buildings are not at the same elevations and vary between two and four steps at the entry. 6 (4/24/25) �Mr. Mazzola presented park view renderings the buildings located at 329-337 Hollows Pass, labeled as Building J, and 334-347 Hollows Pass, labeled as Building K including the building approved on Hollows Pass, labeled as Building L. Mr. Misola stated that they propose right-hand doors at Building K and left hand doors at Building J. Building K’s center unit is inset where Building J’s center unit is proud. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Mazzola is the proposed street trees and landscaping would be uniform at the terrace levels. Mr. Mazzola stated that the intention is for the landscaping to be the same. David Smith and Sean McCarthy agreed that tree species should be different for the buildings based on the street locations. There was a discussion regarding the articulations of the penthouse and parapets. Mr. Mazzola asked if the Board would consider permitting them to file for permits to start the buildings’ piles and foundations. The Board agreed that they would discuss the possibility of conditional approvals. No action was taken. 12. Approval of minutes, March 20, 2025 Chairperson Krakauer tabled the March 20, 2025, minutes to the May 22, 2025 Planning Board meeting. Benjamin Nielsen moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 PM. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Anderson Vote 6-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 7 (4/24/25) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-04-25 Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/81cf314a2f5690a374d5a66c7e532b84.pdf e66697ad5358fd8b5616b8bbc090ac2e PDF Text Text ���������������� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-03-20_5 Legend Drive Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/85c3756cf0a45f73883d1664a9225428.pdf 3a5c25fbc6ebcc0cb44d655e90acaf14 PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes March 20, 2025 Chairperson Krakauer called the meeting to order at 7:23 PM. Chairperson Krakauer read the agenda. Present: Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson Chris Camia Richard Gross Jay Schulz Rachelle Gebler Benjamin Nielsen Ken Anderson Also Present: Joshua B. Subin, Village Attorney David Smith, Village Planner James Natarelli, Village Engineer Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Absent: Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Agenda: 1) Cortlandt Development LLC, 377 North Broadway, Proposed deli/market, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Continued public hearing 2) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 332-338 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Draft resolution 3) SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block A Proposed medical office building, Site Plan and Architectural Review ApprovalPublic hearing, Continued public hearing 4) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 340-350 Legend Drive, Proposed (6) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Draft resolution 5) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 349-355 Hollows Pass, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Draft resolution 6) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II- Waterfront Open Space- North Buffer, Amended Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit Approval- Draft resolution 7) 50 on Hudson Street, LLC, 50 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan & ARB Approval- Presentation 8) Marathon Development Group, LTD, 100 College Avenue, Proposed 105-unit mixeduse development, Subdivision, Special Permit, and Site Plan Approval- Presentation 1 (3/20/25) �9) 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan ApprovalContinued public hearing 10) KWD Realty, LLC, 309-315 North Broadway, Proposed 4-story self-storage facility, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 11) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III- Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalDiscussion 12) Approval of minutes, February 20, 2025 1. Cortlandt Development, LLC, 377 North Broadway, Proposed deli/market, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Continued public hearing Benjamin Nielsen moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Gebler Vote 7-0 Jonathan Merheb is the engineer from JMER Engineering P.C., representing the property owner. Mr. Merheb stated that the revised plans include changing the fence from chain link to vinyl, adding a landscape strip along Pocantico Street, adding surface-mounted bollards for pedestrian safety, and moving the planters to the sidewalk in front of the building. Mr. Merheb described the drainage improvements and stated that a vehicular maneuverability diagram demonstrates safe access from all parking spots. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public. There were no public comments. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board and consultants. Benjamin Nielsen suggested that large planters anchored in the pavement would be more aesthetic and provide better safety than bollards. The Board discussed the options using bollards instead of planters along the storefront. Mr. Merheb agreed to use decorative steel bollards that incorporate bike racks. James Natarelli requested that Mr. Merheb revise the civil plans to wrap the front drainage leader to the rear of the property, address the system overflow, and confirm that the proposed lighting plan complies with the foot-candle requirements along the property lines. Mr. Merheb stated that he would address the front leader drain if the elevations permit it, would provide an open grate instead of a solid cover for overflow, and would relocate or provide fixtures with less wattage where they are close to the property lines. David Smith read the conditions of the draft resolution. Richard Gross moved to close the public hearing and approve the resolution. 2 (3/20/25) �Moved: Gross Seconded: Anderson Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes Richard Gross- yes Chris Camia- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Benjamin Nielsen- yes Jay Schulz- yes Ken Anderson- yes Vote 7-0 2. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 332-338 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Draft resolution Craig Tompkins is the VP of Landing Development of Biddle Real Estate Ventures, representing One Kingsland Owner, LLC. Mr. Tompkins stated that the revised plans include a revised cover sheet, a planning board endorsement block, representation of the previous approvals, addition of address numbers on the back of the buildings, and revised locations of the rooftop mechanical equipment. David Smith asked if the architect determined that the rooftop coverage on the fourth floor is more than limited to 75% of the area below it. Mr. Tompkins said he would submit revised calculations showing that the fourth-floor rooftop complies with the 75% coverage condition. Mr. Tompkins stated that an enlarged detail of the previously approved landscape plan was provided to demonstrate the area at the corner of the block. David Smith requested that future applications include graphics that show comparisons of the townhome groupings on either side of the proposed building to give the Board a sense of how the blocks are laid out and avoid excessive similarity in the Kit of Parts. Mr. Tompkins said he would submit revised application submissions for the upcoming applications, including comparison graphics, for the next meeting. David Smith read the draft resolution, design requirements, and approval conditions. Rachelle Gebler moved to approve the resolution. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Nielsen Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes Richard Gross- yes Chris Camia- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Benjamin Nielsen- yes Jay Schulz- yes 3 (3/20/25) �Ken Anderson- yes Vote 7-0 3. SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development Block A Proposed medical office building, Site Plan & Architectural Review- Continued public hearing Richard Gross moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Gross Seconded: Anderson Vote 7-0 Janet Giris is a partner with the law firm of DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP, presenting on behalf of the applicant. Ms. Giris stated at the February meeting that the Board directed staff to prepare a draft resolution. Modifications were made to the draft resolution that they reviewed. Mr. Giris stated that the rooftop finish will match, and landscaping would be corrected on the final site plan drawings. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public. There were no public comments. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board or the consultants. There were no comments from the Board. Chairperson Krakauer requested that David Smith read the draft resolution and call out the changes. David Smith stated that the revisions received from the Building Department were to reorganize the conditions related to the general site plan approval, signing of the resolution, issuance of permits, and the temporary or permanent Certificates of Occupancy. David Smith read the amended resolve clauses and conditions of the draft resolution. Ms. Giris requested changes to the wording of the condition related to the required performance bond for the pedestrian connection in connection with the signing of the resolution. Ms. Giris asked David Smith to repeat the condition related to the Block A parcel remaining a taxable lot and to review the dates of the consultant reviews. Ms. Giris stated that the revised draft resolution conditions are acceptable. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board discussed the time limits for calling the bond if the pedestrian stair connection from Beekman Avenue is not completed by September 30, 2025. The Planning Board shall approve the final construction logistics plan instead of the Building Inspector. There was a discussion regarding the conditions for approving the eastern garage elevation mural and the curb adjustments on Beekman Avenue. 4 (3/20/25) �Janet Giris requested time to review the revised resolution conditions with the applicant. Rachelle Gebler moved to close the public hearing. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Camia Vote 7-0 Ms. Giris stated that the Construction Logistics plan is typically prepared when a contractor is on board and is part of the issuance of the Building Permit. Ms. Giris stated that the professionals are the appropriate experts to determine the logistics of construction sequencing, and the Planning Board does not have expertise in that area. Mr. Giris asked what the process for the Planning Board approval would entail. Mr. McCarthy stated that the Planning Board typically reviews a conceptual logistics plan. The submitted logistics plan is insufficient in detailing what will need to happen on the site about closing sidewalks, parking spaces, pedestrian traffic detours, possible road closures, and temporary curb cuts. The material staging areas will be located two blocks from the construction site and will be reduced due to residential properties and the supermarket. Ms. Giris asked if the logistics plan could be approved as an administrative procedure. David Smith re-read the resolution conditions related to requiring Planning Board approval. He proposed modifying the language to read that a conceptual logistics plan will be submitted for the Planning Board review, with the final plan approval by the Building Department. Chris Camia agreed that the Board should be able to review the logistics plan and make suggestions, while Sean McCarthy can provide the enforcement and final review. Chairperson Krakauer stated she was open to scheduling a work session to review the logistics plan. Ms. Giris stated that the applicant is not comfortable with the tax conditions. Ms. Giris stated that while there is no intention for the property to come off the tax rolls at this time, it is neither appropriate nor within the Board’s power to require that a property be on the tax rolls in perpetuity, and questions the legality of it. Joshua Subin suggested that the Board seek counsel's advice to hear his opinion on the tax condition. At 8:33 PM, Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board would hold an advice of counsel session and resume the meeting. At 8:51 PM, the Board resumed the meeting. Chairperson Krakauer requested that David Smith read the alternative proposal to address the applicants’ concern. 5 (3/20/25) �David Smith stated that the Board proposes adding two separate whereas clauses to the draft resolution and agreed to remove condition #10 related to the taxes as follows: “Whereas the Village of Sleepy Hollow is part of a rezoning of the former General Motors North Tarrytown Assembly plan that envisioned significant economic redevelopment associated with the development of the site, and Whereas the applicant has made representations that the proposed use would be beneficial to the Village’s economic redevelopment.” Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board is comfortable with the requests. Ms. Giris stated that she is okay with the revisions based on what she reviewed. Ms. Giris stated that the last-minute changes to the draft resolution were unsettling. If there are issues, they will come back before the Board. Rachelle Gebler moved to approve the resolution. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Gross Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes Richard Gross- yes Chris Camia- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Benjamin Nielsen- yes Jay Schulz- yes Ken Anderson- yes Vote 7-0 4. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 340-350 Legend Drive, Proposed (6) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Draft resolution Craig Tompkins is the VP of Landing Development of Biddle Real Estate Ventures, representing One Kingsland Owner, LLC. Mr. Tompkins stated that the revised plans include a revised cover sheet, a planning board endorsement block, and representation of the previous approvals, addition of address numbers on the back of the buildings, and revised locations of the rooftop mechanical equipment. David Smith stated that the conditions and requests for the draft resolution are the same as those detailed for the approval of 332-338 Legend Drive. Mr. Tompkins said he would submit revised calculations showing that the fourth-floor rooftop complies with the 75% coverage condition. Rachelle Gebler moved to approve the resolution. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Schulz Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes Richard Gross- yes Chris Camia- yes 6 (3/20/25) �Rachelle Gebler- yes Benjamin Nielsen- yes Jay Schulz- yes Ken Anderson- yes Vote 7-0 5. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 349-355 Hollows Pass, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Draft resolution Craig Tompkins is the VP of Landing Development of Biddle Real Estate Ventures, representing One Kingsland Owner, LLC. Mr. Tompkins stated that the revised plans include the same revisions submitted with the other buildings. David Smith stated that the conditions and requests of the draft resolution are the same as detailed for the approvals of 332-338 Legend Drive and 340-350 Legend Drive, with additional conditions as follows: The fourth floor's enclosed/ roofed areas shall be limited to less than 75% of the floor below for interior units. Fourth-floor enclosed/ roofed areas shall be limited to 50% or less of the floor below for end units generally open to view or for higher visibility units as may be determined by the Planning Board. After due consideration, based on documentation provided to the Planning Board dated 2/6/25, the Planning Board determines that Units #63 and #66 are high visibility units given their frontage on Hollow Pass and limits the enclosed/roofed area to 50% percent or less for the end units (#63 and #66) presented as part of the Proposed Action. Rachelle Gebler moved to approve the resolution. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Anderson Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes Richard Gross- yes Chris Camia- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Benjamin Nielsen- yes Jay Schulz- yes Ken Anderson- yes Vote 7-0 6. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II –Waterfront Open Space- North Buffer, Amended Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit Approval – Draft resolution Craig Tompkins stated that no revisions have been made to the plans presented in February. Mr. Tompkins requested to work with the Building Department to find a solution to identify the vehicle's emergency access path from Legend Drive to the park. The proposed path will be a 7 (3/20/25) �grass material that provides stability to hold fire trucks and to be used by pedestrians. Mr. Tompkins stated that the North Buffer work and the water line extension from Legend Drive to the Park are proposed to start in May. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments and suggestions from the Board. Benjamin Nielsen suggested using landscape edging as a natural border to delineate the emergency pathway and asked if Woodard & Curran reviewed the revisions. Sean McCarthy said that Woodard & Curran has open items that need to be addressed. Mr. Tompkins stated that Woodard & Curran and WSP are working through the discrepancies between the engineers and requested that they be allowed to resolve them prior to filing the Building Permit. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Tompkins to provide a status of the balance of the waterfront park, as the completion of the buffer channel is part of the Phase III Waterfront Open Space Park. Mr. Tompkins stated that the certificates of occupancy for the buildings along Hollows Pass rely on the completion of the North Buffer, landscape, and public parkland in front of them. The Waterfront Open Space Phase III is tied to the development of Block Q, which is years away. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Tompkins for the estimated completion date of the North Buffer. Mr. Tompkins stated they are committed to completing the North Buffer before Building M on Hollows Pass is occupied. Chris Camia asked if the completion of the North Buffer would trigger access from Legend Drive up to the circle. Mr. Tompkins stated that the road would be open to the circle except for Hollows Pass when the first Building M seeks occupancy. He estimates that it should be completed by the end of the year. David Smith read the resolve clauses and the conditions of the draft resolution. The Board discussed the conditions of the draft resolution. Richard Gross moved to approve the resolution. Moved: Gross Seconded: Camia Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes Richard Gross- yes Chris Camia- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Benjamin Nielsen- yes 8 (3/20/25) �Jay Schulz- yes Ken Anderson- yes Vote 7-0 7. 50 on Hudson Street, LLC, 50 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval – Presentation Brian Hopkins is the owner and architect of the property. Mr. Hopkins stated that the proposed changes to the building façade materials include using a lighter color board and batten fiber cement siding with wood accents, decking and window separations. Mr. Hopkins presented an alternative slanted parking layout, described how it would provide larger parking spaces, and allow for possible tandem parking. The Board suggested architectural design changes to the stair risers and railings, window trims, roof style, front porch, and color schemes to resemble the adjacent properties. Mr. Hopkins stated that there is a strong precedent for modern building architecture elements created from the Edge-on-Hudson Development and neighboring properties. The Planning Board approved a similar parking arrangement at 46 Hudson Street. Mr. Hopkins described how the proposed front stoop provides a better solution than a front porch and reduces the size of the building from the streetscape. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Hopkins if a variance is required for the proposed wall along the driveway. Mr. Hopkins stated that he removed the proposed retaining wall. There was a discussion between Mr. Natarelli and Mr. Hopkins regarding the proposed stormwater calculations of the shared driveway impervious surfaces, whether a drainage easement will be required, regulations for compact parking spaces, and the maximum driveway grade percentages. No action was taken. 8. Marathon Development Group LTD, 100 College Avenue, Proposed 105-unit mixed-use development, Subdivision, Special Permit, and Site Plan ApprovalPresentation Brian Sinsabaugh stated that he is an attorney with Zarin & Steinmetz on behalf of the applicant, Marathon Development Group, LTD. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that the team met with the consultants and the Building Inspector on February 25, 2025, the Board of Trustees on March 4, 2025, and the Local Development Corporation (LDC) on March 10, 2025. Meetings were held with LDC on March 24, 2025, and the Board of Trustees on March 25, 2025. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that the submitted parking surveys prepared by Kimley Horn determined that, based on the studies, 172 parking spaces are needed for the residential units and 8 spaces are required for the retail per Code, for a total of 180 spaces, where they propose to provide 200 parking spaces. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that a hydrant flow test was conducted on March 5, 2025. 9 (3/20/25) �They are working with the LDC on the citing criteria for the Special Permit, in which the Village of Sleepy Hollow must have an ownership stake in the property. They are reviewing and executing a proposed joinder agreement with the LDC to take an ownership stake in the property. He stated that the application is complete and requested that the Planning Board circulate intent as the declared lead agency. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board and consultants. David Smith stated that the issue regarding density arose during the work session. Mr. Smith asked the applicant to describe how density and the proposed unit count were determined. Ed Vogal is the project architect from Warshaurer Mellusi Washaurer Architects. Mr. Vogal stated that the requested increase in density was calculated for a viability function, more than a formula from the Zoning Code or the underlying zoning code. Part of the request is for the Village Board to allow the proposed density to occur. Chairperson Krakauer asked how the density was calculated. Mr. Vogel stated that the density calculation was based on unit count, not unit bedroom counts. Mr. Smith asked Mr. Vogel how they determined to propose 105 units. Mr. Vogel stated that the 105-unit count is based on the proposed lot area. The calculation is based on 10,000 square feet of lot area for the first 15 dwelling units, an additional unit for every 500 square feet of lot area, and applying a 20% bonus. The maximum density for the new lot is calculated as the permitted density count of 130 units, whereas they are proposing 105 units. Mr. Vogel asked Sean McCarthy if the Village of Sleepy Hollow Zoning code calculations differ. Sean McCarthy stated that his calculations per the Village of Sleepy Hollow Zoning Code differ. David Smith stated that the differences in calculating the proposed density should not necessarily hold up the circulation of the Notice of Intent action and the days. Chris Camia asked Mr. Sinsabaugh where those who park in the lot now would park during construction of the new lot. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that it is a continued analysis they are working on, and they have reached out to some surrounding properties that may be beneficial and are expanding the approach where they are looking to provide temporary parking and shuttles. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board is concerned about traffic flow and requested that the construction plan identify local parking areas. The Board discussed properties that could be used for temporary parking. 10 (3/20/25) �Mr. Smith reviewed the State Environmental Quality Review Act criteria and stated that his preliminary findings will classify the proposed application as a Type I action. Chris Camia stated that the parking study significantly differs from the Zoning Code and does not accurately depict real time conditions. He is concerned about the reliance of utilizing (9) public street parking spaces. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that the parking studies were based current conditions and that affordable housing is a unique use. Benjamin Nielsen moved to direct staff to circulate a Notice of Intent to all interested parties for the Planning Board to be the Lead Agency for the State Environmental Quality Review process Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Camia Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes Richard Gross- yes Chris Camia- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Benjamin Nielsen- yes Jay Schulz- yes Ken Anderson- yes Vote 7-0 9. 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan Approval -Continued public hearing Chairperson Krakauer stated that the applicant has requested an adjournment of the public hearing to the April 24, 2025 meeting. 10. KWD Realty LLC, 309-315 North Broadway, Proposed 4-story self-storage facility Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Discussion Karl Dibble is the property owner. Mr. Dibble described the revised site plan and renderings. Mr. Dibble stated that Cronin Engineering is working on the stormwater plans. There was a discussion between the Board and Mr. Dibble regarding the variances required for the current plan related to coverage, height, and setbacks in relation to the property grades and perspective street views. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Dibble if he had consulted with the Department of Transportation regarding the three curb cuts. Mr. Dibble stated that there are currently three curb cuts. The application proposes to relocate and reduce two of them. The gate will be open from 7:00 AM to 11:00 PM and locked when the establishment is closed. There will be signage to identify the entrance uses. 11 (3/20/25) �James Natarelli asked Mr. Dibble to provide details that determine if the driveway to the back of the building and the adjacent retaining walls in the setback would require a variance. Mr. Dibble stated that he would confirm if the retaining walls and fencing height would require a variance, and if he can manipulate the grade to reduce the height without affecting the driveway slopes. Mr. Natarelli requested that Mr. Dibble submit the topographic property survey. There was a discussion between the Board and Mr. Dibble regarding concerns about the proposed massing of the building, its visual impact on the neighborhood, and the significance of the variances that he is seeking to construct a non-compliant building. Rachelle Gebler polled the Board and stated they agree that they are not comfortable making a positive recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Planning Board agreed that it is appropriate for Mr. Dibble to apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals, given their concerns regarding the massing, so that the Zoning Board and the public could weigh in on the requested variances. The Planning Board provided suggestions that would improve the compliance of the proposed building. Sean McCarthy stated that the Planning Board’s comments are part of the record and would be submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Dibble stated that he will apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals. 11. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III –Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit Approval – Discussion Chairperson Krakauer stated that the discussion has been adjourned. 12. Approval of minutes, February 20, 2025 Rachelle Gebler moved to approve the February 20, 2025 meeting minutes. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Anderson Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes Richard Gross- yes Chris Camia- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Benjamin Nielsen- abstained Jay Schulz- yes 12 (3/20/25) �Ken Anderson- yes Vote 6-0-1 Richard Gross moved to adjourn the meeting at 10:58 PM. Moved: Gross Seconded: Gebler Vote 7-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 13 (3/20/25) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-03-20 Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/8e69847fdc9dc5e5519c1b1a47807749.pdf 91902e1294bd4d19921584a54423eada Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-03-20_332-338 Legend Drive approved resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/11b5e0efa28472d3f2c019ecc201f183.pdf 037e80aa9d5192e33fd5bdae0957f4a2 PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes February 20, 2025 Chairperson Krakauer called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Chairperson Krakauer read the agenda and reviewed the adjournment requests. Present: Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson Chris Camia Richard Gross Jay Schulz Rachelle Gebler Ken Anderson Also Present: Joshua B. Subin, Village Attorney David Smith, Village Planner Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Absent: Benjamin Nielsen James Natarelli, Village Engineer Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Agenda: 1) SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block A Proposed medical office building, Site Plan and Architectural Review ApprovalPublic hearing, Pending ZBA Approval- Public hearing 2) 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan ApprovalContinued public hearing- requested adjournment. 3) Cortlandt Development LLC, 377 North Broadway, Proposed deli/market, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Public hearing 4) KWD Realty, LLC, 309-315 North Broadway, Proposed mixed-use building, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 5) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III- Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalDiscussion-requested adjournment 6) Marathon Development Group, LTD, 100 College Avenue, Proposed 105-unit mixed use development, Subdivision, Special Permit, and Site Plan Approval- Presentationrequested adjournment 7) Kendal-on-Hudson, 1010 Kendal Way, Proposed Emergency Generator, Amended Site Plan Approval- Preliminary Presentation 1 (2/20/25) �8) 50 on Hudson Street LLC, 50 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary Presentation 9) Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed 14-unit apartment building, Site Plan Approval extension- Preliminary Presentation 10) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 332-338 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) unit townhome building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary Presentation 11) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 340-350 Legend Drive, Proposed (6) unit townhome building, Architectural Review Approval-Preliminary Presentation 12) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 349-355 Hollows Pass 13) Approval of minutes, November 21, 2024, December 19, 2024, January 16, 2025 1. SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development Block A Proposed medical office building, Site Plan & Architectural Review- Public Hearing, pending ZBA approval- Public Hearing Richard Gross moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Gross Seconded: Schulz Vote 6-0 Chairperson Krakauer invited the applicant to present the application. Janet Giris is a partner with the law firm of DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP presenting on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Giris stated that the revised plan presented in October included modifications to the exterior of the medical office building and a request to add additional parking spaces to the site. The application was referred to the Zoning Board of Appeals to request variances for the height of the parking structure and the required number of parking spaces. The Zoning Board of Appeals granted the requested variances at last night’s meeting. Brooks Slocum, the project architect from G3 Architecture Interiors Planning, presented and summarized the revised Site Plan drawings for the proposed medical office building and attached parking structure. Chairperson Krakauer requested that the applicant modify the concrete roof façade materials to match the precast finish of the garage structure. Mr. Slocum stated that he would make the changes to the materials of the garage structure roof. The Board and Mr. Slocum discussed the landscaping proposed along the 8-foot barrier between the parking structure and the utility easement. The Board and Mark Gratz discussed the locations of the existing landscape screening and utility boxes installed to serve the proposed medical office building and the market retail building. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public. There were no public comments. 2 (2/20/25) �Rachelle Gebler moved to adjourn the public hearing and to direct staff to prepare a draft resolution for review at the March 20, 2025, meeting. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Camia Vote 6-0 Ms. Giris stated that there is a draft resolution from June that would need to be reworked for approval. No action was taken. 2. 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan Approval -Continued public hearing Richard Gross moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Gross Seconded: Gebler Vote 6-0 Chairperson Krakauer stated that the applicant requested an adjournment so there will not be any new presentations. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board. Richard Gross moved to adjourn the public hearing to the March 20, 2025 meeting. Moved: Gross Seconded: Gebler Vote 6-0 No action was taken. 3. Cortlandt Development, LLC, 377 North Broadway, Proposed deli/market, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Public hearing- Public hearing Jonathan Merheb, an engineer from JMER Engineering P.C., representing the property owner. Mr. Merheb stated that the revised plan includes eliminating the curb cut on Pocantico Street, adding a raised sidewalk and curb, redirecting downspouts, adding cultech detention systems in the rear parking area to capture water runoff, adding building mounted lighting, adding a landscape buffer between the adjacent building, and a curb planting bed on North Broadway. He will address vehicle maneuverability concerns by eliminating (1) parking spot near the trash enclosure while still providing (9) spaces where (8) are required. He will revise the proposed trash enclosure from chain link to vinyl. Mr. Merheb stated the proposed fiberglass planters would not serve as a vehicle buffer and because there are gas tanks in that location, they cannot set anything in a footing. The only option would be to remove the seating and move the planters up to the sidewalk. Rachelle Gebler moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Anderson Vote 6-0 Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public. 3 (2/20/25) �Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board received two written comment letters. (See attached Exhibit #s 1 and 2) There were no other public comments. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board. Rachelle Gebler asked Sean McCarthy for suggestions for a structure protecting the sitting area. Chris Camia agreed that the applicant should consider something more substantial than planters. Sean McCarty stated that he could work with Mr. Merheb to provide a better solution for the proposed seating area. Rachelle Gebler moved to adjourn the public hearing to the March 20, 2025 meeting and direct staff to draft a resolution. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Schulz Vote 6-0 4. KWD Realty LLC, 309-315 North Broadway, Proposed 4-story self-storage facility Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Discussion Karl Dibble is the property owner and developer of the project. Mr. Dibble stated that his attorney and architect could not attend the meeting. Mr. Dibble described the changes made to the site plan, including the proposed setbacks, grade changes, and building height. Mr. Dibble provided examples of neighboring buildings that do not provide landscaped sidewalk buffers. Mr. Dibble stated that shrinking the size of the building is not financially feasible due to the high material costs. Mr. Dibble presented the renderings and described the views from different village areas. Mr. Dibble requested that the Planning Board recommend the application to the Zoning Board for review of the requested variances for lot coverage and height. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Dibble to describe the purpose for the curb cut going up the hill and asked if he could streamline the access off Route 9 Mr. Dibble stated that the curb cut would be used for access during the building's construction. After they finish, that entrance could be used by a van or by Westerly Storage to store and rent out vans as a service of the storage facility. The self-storage use would decrease the amount of traffic off Route 9. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Dibble for the proposed hours of operation. Mr. Dibble stated that the self-storage facility would operate during normal business hours and that gates would be installed at all three access points. David Smith stated that the curb cuts are subject to the approval of the Department of Transportation (“DOT”). He suggested that when the Planning Board is ready to schedule a public hearing, the application should be forwarded to the New York State DOT for review. 4 (2/20/25) �Chairperson Krakauer stated that Mr. Dibble considered moving the tower feature. Since the proposed building is over the allowable height and coverage requirements, the Board would like to compare a building in compliance with what a building in compliance would look like on the site and neighboring property renderings. Mr. Dibble described how the property slopes affect the ability to meet the compliance requirements in some areas. Chris Camia suggested eliminating the top floor and pushing the square footage into the setbacks. Mr. Dibble requested a referral to the Zoning Board of Appeals to receive feedback from the Board and the public before making any additional changes. Chairperson Krakauer requested that Mr. Dibble prepare renderings for comparison purposes that incorporate their suggestions regarding the height and coverage requirements. No action was taken. 5. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III –Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit Approval – Discussion Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board received a request to adjourn the application to the March 20, 2025 meeting. No action was taken 6. Marathon Development Group LTD, 100 College Avenue, Proposed 105-unit mixed-use development, Subdivision, Special Permit, and Site Plan ApprovalPreliminary presentation Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board received a request to adjourn the application to the March 20, 2025 meeting. No action was taken. 7. Kendal on Hudson, 1010 Kendal Way, Proposed emergency generator, Amended Site Approval Plan approval- Preliminary Presentation Mami Kitmaura is an associate with Walter T. Gorman Engineers, representing the applicant. Ms. Kimatura summarized the application and stated that no changes have been proposed since the approval granted in 2022, which expired before they could obtain contractor costs. Richard Gross moved to waive the public hearing requirement. Moved: Gross Seconded: Camia 5 (2/20/25) �Chairperson Krakauer- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Chris Camia- yes Richard Gross- yes Jay Schulz- yes Ken Anderson- yes Vote 6-0 Richard Gross moved to approve the draft resolution. Moved: Anderson Seconded: Camia Chairperson Krakauer- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Chris Camia- yes Richard Gross- yes Jay Schulz- yes Ken Anderson- yes Vote 6-0 8. 50 on Hudson Street LLC, 50 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval Brian Hopkins is the owner and the architect of the property. Mr. Hopkins summarized his experience, including two completed projects on 34 and 46 Hudson Street. The application proposes constructing a three-unit building where the top unit is a duplex. The recorded easement with 48 Hudson Street allows both properties to have on-site parking spaces. The proposed application will require variances for the front and side yard setbacks and building coverage. Mr. Hopkins presented a neighboring lot coverage analysis, site photographs, and described the views from the other houses on Hudson Street, and a rendering depicting the scale of the proposed building maintaining the street line. He presented the site plan and landscaping plan. He said that he would ensure all plantings are native species. The garbage and recycling collection would be in the rear yard and include bicycle racks. The application proposes (3) parking spaces where the residents would be required to back out of the driveway. He proposes installing a 5-foot high fence around the property's perimeter, including an operable fence and gate on the right side for the owner of 48 Hudson Street. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Hopkins if parking configurations could enable vehicles to turn around. Ms. Krakauer asked Sean McCarthy if tandem parking is permitted to provide more parking spaces. Mr. Hopkins stated that he has investigated all vehicle maneuverability options. Mr. McCarthy stated that the tandem parking could be permitted depending on the relationship of the parking spaces to the unit. Mr. Hopkins described the proposed wood building façade and fencing materials, windows, decking, railings, and lighting. He presented the unit layout plans including the decks and 6 (2/20/25) �interior renderings. He presented a side-by-side bulk comparison between 46 and 50 Hudson Street. He presented a study of land use zoning and parking availability for the surrounding area. He described the intention to use the panelized system to construct a building with high R-values and performance. He plans to use heat pump technology for heating and cooling. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board. David Smith requested that Mr. Hopkins submit a copy of the recorded easement agreement with 48 Hudson Street and the parking analysis. Rachelle Gebler stated that the building's architectural style is excessively dissimilar to others on Hudson Street and requested that the design be more in line with the street. She suggested that Mr. Hopkins consider a gable roof design to reduce the building's visual bulk and height. Mr. Hopkins said he addressed the height concerns by stepping back into the building. Jay Schulz asked Mr. Hopkins if there would be storage under the stairs to the second level. Mr. Hopkins stated that the room under the stairs would be the utility room. Sean McCarthy stated that this is a model preliminary application for applicants and that the quality of the proposed work is above what the Board has been seeing. Mr. Shulz stated he is concerned about backing out of the driveway and asked if there are examples where this occurs safely. Mr. Hopkins stated that 46 Hudson has the same parking configuration Sean McCarthy suggested the Board consider referring the application to the Zoning Board of Appeals for the April meeting and allow the applicant to present updated material at the March Planning Board meeting. Mr. Camia asked Mr. Hopkins to compare the non-conforming conditions of the existing structure with the self-created variances he will be requesting. Mr. Hopkins stated that the existing structure is over the property line at the side and front yard setbacks. Although he is seeking variances for the setbacks and coverage, the new structure would improve these setbacks. The existing two-family residence includes one parking space, whereas the proposed three-family residence proposes (3) parking spaces, where (6) spaces are required by code. The Planning Board referred the application to the Zoning Board of Appeals and adjourned it to the March 20, 2025, Planning Board meeting to discuss architectural review concerns. 9. Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed 14-unit apartment building, Site Plan Approval extension- Preliminary Presentation 7 (2/20/25) �Maximillian Mahalek stated that he is an attorney from Cuddy + Feder LLP who is representing the applicant. Mr. Mahalek stated that the applicant is requesting a second extension for the Site Plan and Architectural Review approval granted in 2024. The applicant has completed boring tests, and is working on the construction drawings. Richard Gross moved to approve the draft resolution. Moved: Gross Seconded: Anderson Chairperson Krakauer- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Chris Camia-yes Richard Gross-yes Jay Schulz- yes Ken Anderson- yes Vote 6-0 10. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 332-338 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary Presentation Peter Chavkin stated that he is a managing partner of Sun Homes and that they have contracted Appel Design Group Architects for the project balance. Matthew Martinque is an architect with Appeal Design Group representing the applicant. Mr. Martinque stated that the building is four stories tall and has four units. He summarized the floor plans for the 20-foot wide interior units and exterior building materials, and stated that the rooftop condensers would include screening. He presented renderings of views from the alleyway between the two buildings and stated that there is 24 feet between the buildings. An additional architectural feature at the north elevation is unnecessary, as the corner would be well landscaped. Solid entry doors are proposed with unit numbers that would include downlights. Mr. Chavkin stated that glass windows are proposed on the sides of doors in the 28-foot wide units not included in this building. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Martinque to describe the landscaping at the north corner. Mr. Chavkin said he would provide a more detailed landscape plan for the next meeting. Chris Camia suggested shifting the spacing of the rooftop condenser units and screening from the ends of the building to improve views. Mr. Chavkin requested that the Board approve the preparation of a draft resolution for the next meeting, subject to submission of revised plans addressing the landscaping, rear lighting, rooftop condenser locations and screening. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board and the consultants and polled the Board on their approval to prepare a draft resolution. 8 (2/20/25) �There were no additional comments or objections from the Board. Chairperson Krakauer directed David Smith to prepare a draft resolution for review at the March 20, 2025 meeting. 11. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 340-350 Legend Drive, Proposed (6) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary Presentation Matthew Martinque is an architect with Appeal Design Group representing the applicant. Mr. Martinque stated that the four-story building contains six units and includes a similar architectural style and floor plans to the adjacent four-unit building at 332-338 Legend Drive. Gas and electric meters will be located on the ends or in-between the buildings with landscape screening. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board and the consultants. David Smith requested that the applicant provide a summary of the approved and built blocks and what is being proposed. Mr. Chavkin said he would submit a key plan summarizing the progression. Mr. Chavkin requested that the Board approve the preparation of a draft resolution for the next meeting, subject to submission of revised plans addressing the landscaping, rear lighting, rooftop condenser locations and screening. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board and the consultants and polled the Board on their approval to prepare a draft resolution. There were no additional comments or objections from the Board. Chairperson Krakauer directed David Smith to prepare a draft resolution for review at the March 20, 2025 meeting. 12. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 349-355 Hollows Pass, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary Presentation Matthew Martinque is an architect with Appeal Design Group representing the applicant. Mr. Martinque stated that the four-story building contains four units and has a similar architectural style and floor plan to the buildings at 332-338 Legend Drive and 340-350 Legend Drive. This building includes two 28-foot-wide end units with a sidelight at the entrance door. Mr. Martinque presented a rendering and stated that two brick colors are proposed for the building units. Peter Chavkin stated that they prefer to deliver the building as rendered. If the Planning Board prefers, they will alternate the brick colors for each unit. Mr. Martinque stated that the down lighting would appear softer with the lighter color brick. 9 (2/20/25) �Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Martinque if this building is wider than the buildings on Legend Drive. Mr. Martinque stated that this building includes two 28-foot wide end units and two 24-foot wide interior units. Mr. Chavkin stated that the buildings on Legend Drive include 22-foot wide end and 20-foot wide interior units. Chairperson Krakauer polled the Board members for their comments regarding the articulation of the brick colors The Board agreed to be comfortable with the exterior design and brick colors. Peter Chavkin requested that the resolution language for the fourth-floor penthouses and end units be the same for the three buildings and not include the language for the high-visibility end units. Chairperson Krakauer asked Peter Chavkin if rooftop pergolas are proposed for the two buildings on Legend Drive or the building on Hollows Pass. Peter Chavkin stated that rooftop pergolas are not proposed on the three buildings. Chairperson Krakauer directed David Smith to prepare a draft resolution for review at the March 20, 2025 meeting. 13. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II- Waterfront Open Space- North Buffer- Amended Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit Approval- Preliminary Presentation Peter Chavkin stated that he is from Biddle Real Estate Ventures, representing Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, and is requesting amended site plan approval for the North Buffer area of the Phase II Waterfront Open Space. Mr. Chavkin stated that they should change the name to the North Meadow. The Board previously approved the North Buffer and the third leg of Tappan Zee Park. A condition of the approval required them to determine if flood surveys would allow them to raise the grade of the North Buffer. The studies determined that the flood levels at the maximum water elevation flooding are a foot lower than the maximum the overall site could accommodate, where no residences would be flooded. The amended plan includes raising the bottom of the channel approximately 2 feet. No changes have been proposed for the approved pathways and depressed areas. This area will serve as infrastructure and open space. Chris Camia asked Mr. Chavkin to describe the emergency access area. Mr. Chavkin stated that the emergency access area was approved as a grassed pathway with a rubberized system underneath. The pathway will serve as a permanent pedestrian connection and emergency vehicle service connection. 10 (2/20/25) �Questions related to the vehicle weight that the path could support and whether there would be signage indicating its emergency use. Mr. Chavkin said he would confirm with the engineers and provide information to the Planning Board. There was a discussion regarding an Intermunicpal Agreement with Westchester County related to the operations and maintenance of Kingsland Point Park, whether or not the fence and concrete that border the park entrance from the North Buffer should be removed or remain, and suggestions for keeping a part of the original foundation. Mr. Chavkin requested that the Board approve preparing a draft resolution for the next meeting. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board and the consultants and polled the Board on their approval to prepare a draft resolution. There were no additional comments or objections from the Board. Chairperson Krakauer directed David Smith to prepare a draft resolution for review at the March 20, 2025 meeting, including language for keeping a part of the original foundation. 14. Approval of minutes, November 21, 2024, December 19, 2024, January 16, 2025 Richard Gross moved to approve the November 21, 2024 meeting minutes. Moved: Gross Seconded: Gebler Chairperson Krakauer- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Chris Camia- yes Richard Gross- yes Jay Schulz-yes Ken Anderson-abstain Vote 5-0-1 Chris Camia moved to approve the December 19, 2024 meeting minutes. Moved: Camia Seconded: Gross Chairperson Krakauer- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Chris Camia- yes Richard Gross- yes Jay Schulz-yes Ken Anderson-yes Vote 6-0 Chris Camia moved to approve the January 16, 2025 meeting minutes. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Camia 11 (2/20/25) �Chairperson Krakauer- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Chris Camia- yes Richard Gross- yes Jay Schulz-yes Ken Anderson-yes Vote 6-0 Richard Gross moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:50 PM. Moved: Gross Seconded: Anderson Vote 6-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 12 (2/20/25) �Exhibit #1 Chairperson Lindsay Krakauer c/o Village of Sleepy Hollow Department of Architecture, Land Use Development, Buildings and Building Compliance 28 Beekman Avenue, Sleepy Hollow, New York 10591 Re: Cortlandt Development LLC Application for 377 North Broadway February 20, 2025 Dear Chairperson Krakauer, Historic Hudson Valley (“HHV”) is a not-for-profit cultural organization that owns and operates several National Historic Landmarks, including Philipsburg Manor at 381 North Broadway in Sleepy Hollow. The Manor also serves as a Visitor Center for visitors to Kykuit, the Rockefeller Estate, also a National Historic Landmark in Sleepy Hollow. HHV provides significant positive economic impact for Sleepy Hollow and its businesses as it welcomes tens of thousands of visitors each year at Philipsburg Manor through educational programs, tours of two historic sites, and popular events. We have reviewed the application for the property at 377 North Broadway, just across Pocantico Street from Philipsburg Manor. We welcome this project. If it is completed with sufficient attention paid to architectural character and site planning enhancements, we believe the final result has the potential to improve the appearance of the existing property and be an enhancement to our neighborhood overall. The site is currently a sea of asphalt and concrete surfaces. Landscaping along its Pocantico Street frontage, even freestanding planters that are well maintained, would be an aesthetic improvement and provide a visual buffer for the proposed parking area. We ask the Planning Board to require this as part of any approval granted. Our chief concern is the provision of adequate on-site parking for the proposed uses (deli with seating/market/gas station). We notice that there appears to be a discrepancy between the area proposed to be outdoor seating in the color renderings submitted in comparison with the site plan, with the former depicting a much larger area that projects all the way out from the garage bay facade to meet the stone facade of the southern portion of the existing building. On the site plan, a much narrower area is depicted as the proposed outdoor seating area. The size of the seating area and whether the proposed use is intended as “grab and go” or “sit and eat” has significant implications for our property. If customers are dining in, there will be slow turnover of the limited parking on site, creating the potential for deli customers to attempt to use the Philipsburg Manor parking lot instead of the site’s own parking. In addition to this discrepancy, we have not been able to identify how the off-street parking requirement from Section 450-41.E of the Village Zoning Law is being applied to the proposed use, and what size outdoor dining area, with what number of seats, was used as part of that calculation. �Based on the multiple activities proposed for the site, it can also be expected that more vehicular and pedestrian activity will be generated than in the past. What area on the site is proposed to be used for unloading deliveries to the building and the underground gasoline storage tanks? How can the Planning Board ensure that these deliveries will not block access to the proposed parking spaces and, in so doing, increase the possibility that customers will not find sufficient parking on-site and begin to search for parking elsewhere, such as on the nearby Philipsburg Manor parking lot? Until these variables, and the applicable math to set the required number of on-site parking spaces, are made clear in the application, we respectfully request that the Planning Board hold open this Public Hearing so that we can react to this aspect of a clarified application. As you know, parking is at a premium in the Village, and Philipsburg Manor needs every one of its parking lot’s spaces available to support its own business uses. Should the Planning Board grant an approval for this project, HHV asks that it include measures and stipulations that preclude the possibility that the Manor’s parking lot will be used by customers of the business at 377 North Broadway. We believe this project has the potential to improve the aesthetics of a property in direct view of Phillipsburg Manor, and to add a desirable amenity. We ask that the Board pay careful attention to its parking requirements and insist in any approval that the applicant take all necessary measures to mitigate any adverse parking impact on its neighbor. Best regards, Waddell Stillman, President Rob Schweitzer, Vice President, Communications & Commerce Historic Hudson Valley �Exhibit #2 ALL-FLEET SERVICE INC. 3S7 North Broadway Sleepy Hollow, N.Y. 10S91 914-366-0688 . By email and By Band Smccarthy@sleepyhollowny.gov Chairperson Krakauer, C/O Village of sleepy Hollow, D e partment of Architecture Land Use Development Building & Buildings Compliance 28 Beekman Avenue Sleepy Hollow, N.Y. 110591 •.· February 18, 2025 RECEIVED FEB 1 9 2025 BUILDING DEPT: VILLAGE O F SLEEPY HOLLOW Re: Application o f Cortland development L L C f I, Jorge Berenguer, as the owner o f All Fleet Services, located at 357 N. Broadway, Sleepy Hollow, a gas station and deli less than 200 feet from the proposed request by Cortland Development LLC, seeking approval to convert an auto repair shop into a delicatessen. I object to their application, since there is already a deli in place here at 357 N. Broadway, Sleepy Hollow Taxi � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-02-20 Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/6e22c555cd8caa34d7471e20dbca4cb7.pdf 0236d8477e83310efc7981b1f712448b PDF Text Text �� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-02-20_135 Beekman Avenue Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/8f357ec5731bfee466d49ac92a96212d.pdf 0ee69aa29f1e68fad95d5836a1d6abe2 PDF Text Text �� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-02-20_1010 Kendal Way Approved Resolution 2-20-25 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/d900b78df79c84088467257da6f3fc13.pdf b6f35a4e2f308fe31b0bf75cfba15b1d PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes January 16, 2025 Chairperson Krakauer called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Chairperson Krakauer read the agenda and reviewed the adjournment requests. Present: Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson Chris Camia Richard Gross Jay Schulz Rachelle Gebler Also Present: Joshua B. Subin, Village Attorney David Smith, Village Planner James Natarelli, Village Engineer Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Absent: Ken Anderson Benjamin Nielsen Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Agenda: 1) SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block A Proposed medical office building, Site Plan and Architectural Review ApprovalPublic hearing, Pending ZBA Approval- requested adjournment 2) 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan ApprovalPublic hearing 3) Cortlandt Development LLC, 377 North Broadway, Proposed deli/market, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Public hearing- requested adjournment 4) KWD Realty, LLC, 309-315 North Broadway, Proposed mixed-use building, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Presentation 5) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III- Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalDiscussion 6) One Kingsland Owner LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, 405 Legend Drive- Block N, Amended Site Plan & ARB Approval- Preliminary Presentation 7) Marathon Development Group, LTD, 100 College Avenue, Proposed 105- unit mixed use development, Subdivision, Special Permit, and Site Plan Approval- Preliminary Presentation 1 (1/16/25) �8) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, 2 Lighthouse Landing, Proposed pergolas, Special Permit- Discussion 9) Approval of minutes, November 21, 2024, December 19, 2024 1. SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development Block A Proposed medical office building, Site Plan & Architectural Review- Public Hearing, pending ZBA approval- requested adjournment. The Board received an adjournment request from the applicant’s attorney on January 16, 2025, to adjourn the public hearing to the February 20, 2025 meeting. Rachelle Gebler moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Schulz Vote 5-0 Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public. There were no public comments. Rachelle Gebler moved to continue the public hearing to the February 20, 2025, meeting. Moved: Gelber Seconded: Gross Vote 5-0 2. 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan Approval -Public Hearing Sam Vieira stated that he is the project architect. The project engineers didn’t complete the stormwater prevention and site work designs. Mr. Vieira stated that a section of the retaining wall along the property line was removed. The applicant intends to store the garbage behind the gate and fencing, and it will be brought to the curb for village pick up or handled by a private carting company. The applicant will maintain a 3-foot clearance around the fire hydrant. The existing curb on the northwest side will be replaced with a standard curb and sidewalk, and a new sidewalk will be extended to the southern border. Mr. Vieira said that the applicant is concerned about creating a sidewalk with a utility pole, guy wire, and traffic sign on the right-ofway and at the interruption on the southern side of the right-of-way. Mr. Vieira stated that the applicant proposes to use a steel frame screen with 6-foot-high horizontal synthetic decking material for the fence and gate. The retaining wall is proposed to be 6 feet tall at its highest point with a 42-inch high guardrail. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Vieira how the gate would operate. Mr. Vieira stated that the double gate will swing inward to the rear of the site. He asked the Board to consider eliminating the request for the additional landscaped area along the sidewalk and curb cut, as the owner is seeking enough flat area to move customer cars. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board. 2 (1/16/25) �Chris Camia suggested that the Board further discuss solutions for the sidewalks and the existing obstructions. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board feels the sidewalks are a priority for pedestrian safety. Chris Camia moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Camia Seconded: Gross Vote 5-0 Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public. Christopher Diaz stated that his father owns 20 Hudson Street. Mr. Diaz asked Mr. Vieira to describe the plan for the space between the properties if the retaining wall would be an obstruction, and how long it would take to complete the project. Mr. Vieira stated that the applicant's property line is approximately 3 feet from the 20 Hudson Street building. The retaining wall is proposed 12 feet from the house and will be at grade with guardrails on top. Landscape screening is proposed as per the Board’s suggestion. The project shouldn’t take more than a couple of months to complete. Mr. Vieira asked the Board to confirm directions relating to the sidewalk. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board would like to see a curve in the sidewalk. Mr. Vieira said the applicant agrees to build and maintain the sidewalk. There was a discussion regarding the proposed sidewalk location. Aniello Ricchiuti stated that he is the property owner and would appreciate the village getting ConEdison to move the pole. Mr. Vieira asked Chairperson Krakauer where the Board stands on the additional landscaped areas at the parking area. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the landscaped area would create a buffer between the sidewalk and the internal turning area. Mr. Ricchuiti stated that adding a landscaped area would restrict the area he has to store and turn larger vehicles. Rachelle Gebler moved to continue the public hearing to the February 20, 2025, meeting. Moved: Gelber Seconded: Gross Vote 5-0 3. Cortlandt Development, LLC, 377 North Broadway, Proposed deli/market, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Public hearing- requested adjournment 3 (1/16/25) �Chairperson Krakauer stated that the applicant requested an adjournment to the February 20, 2025 meeting. 4. KWD Realty LLC, 309-315 North Broadway, Proposed 4-story self-storage facility Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Presentation Mark Constantine stated that he is an attorney representing the Applicant. Mr. Constantine stated that revisions have been made to address some of the comments received from the Planning Board. He requested that the process be continued and stated that the proposed storage facility would complement the transit-oriented high-density development the Village is fostering. Bruno Pietrosanti is the architect representing the owner, Mr. Karl Dibble. Mr. Pietrosanti stated that although they didn’t reduce the proposed lot coverage and building mass, visual techniques were added to reduce the visual appearance of the building by setting part of the building back 5 feet. The height of the tower element was reduced but still requires a variance. Diagrams were submitted to show vehicle maneuverability and sight lines from the upper loading area and lower parking area. Renderings will be completed for the next meeting to show views from the south. Iron safety railings are proposed on the front retaining walls. The loading area will be screened from the street by a gate, fencing, and landscaping. The interior loading area walls were set back 10 feet into the property. The sliding gate style will not intrude on the village right-of-way. Mr. Pietrosanti said they will complete the landscape and drainage plans after the Zoning Board of Appeals renders decisions for the requested variances. He requested that the Planning Board refer the application to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Pietrosanti stated that the roof area was reduced by 3,000 square feet and summarized the façade material specifications. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Pietrosanti to summarize the requested variances. Mr. Pietrosanti stated that the variance requests for building height and lot coverage have not changed. Mr. Constantine stated that the applicant seeks to maintain the proposed square footage to be economically viable. The proposed facility will have very little impact on municipal services. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board requested that they work to design a project that fits more within the zoning code requirements without excessive variances for height and coverage. The Planning Board is not reviewing the proposed use. She requested that comparisons to adjacent buildings be submitted and diagrams showing where the building would be over the height requirements. Rachelle Gebler and Ken Anderson agree that the proposed massing and coverage remain a concern. Mr. Constantine stated that the proposed height of the facility would not cause a significant visual impact and requested a referral to the Zoning Board of Appeals to address the concerns. Sean McCarthy suggested that the proposed loading area could be utilized for storage facility square footage and eliminate the need for a height variance. He suggested the applicant consider 4 (1/16/25) �combining the loading and parking areas and eliminating one curb cut to provide one entrance point. Mr. Pietrosanti stated that the loading area requires 14 feet height for box truck access. Mr. McCarthy stated that providing 14 feet of height would work well on the lower side of the property. Karl Dibble is the owner of the property. He stated that the loading area would be well screened from the road. As a business strategy, he would prefer to keep the office and customer parking separate from the loading area. Comparisons to the adjacent mechanical buildings built in the 1920s are irrelevant to his project. Mr. Dibble stated that site work is difficult on the property and that the proposed storage facility would meet the needs of a high-density development. Richard Gross asked why the open space from the initial proposal was replaced with the tower element. Mr. Gross asked Mr. McCarthy for the permitted coverage percentage. Mr. McCarthy said the applicant proposes 83.7% coverage, where 60% is permitted. Mr. Petrosanti stated that the original proposal with the drive-through café complied with the lot coverage. Eliminating the drive-through café resulted in the request for more square footage so that the storage facility would be economically feasible. Mr. Dibble requested a referral to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Chairperson Krakauer requested that the applicant consider the Board’s comments and suggestions regarding excessive height and coverage for the next meeting. No action was taken. 5. Lighthouse Landing Communties, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III –Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit Approval – Discussion Chairperson Krakauer stated there is no new information to discuss. 6. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, 405 Legend Drive, Block N- Amended Site Plan & ARB Approval- Preliminary presentation Peter Chavkin stated he is a Managing Member of One Kingsland Owner LLC. Mr. Chavkin stated that sales efforts were initially expected to be made from the clubhouse building. Based on the timing of the construction of the building versus when he expects the offering plan to be approved at the Attorney General’s office to begin sales, he is requesting to install a temporary trailer adjacent to the amenity complex parking lot. Mr. Chavkin presented the Block N approved Site Plan and stated that the temporary sales trailer would be located behind the curb of the parking lot with construction fencing surrounding a smaller temporary parking area for sales operations expected to start in April. 5 (1/16/25) �Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board and the consultants. There were no questions from the Board. David Smith asked if they plan on using the existing Toll Brothers trailer. Mr. Chavkin said they plan to relocate the Toll Brothers construction trailer from the south parcel. Chris Camia asked Mr. Chavkin to describe how the sales trailer would be decorated. Mr. Chavkin stated that this is the facility from which they intend to sell 90 townhomes. Plans will be submitted to the Building Department detailing the exterior and interior renovations needed for a sales office with landscaping. James Natarelli asked how long the trailer would be on site. Mr. Chavkin stated that the draft resolution stipulates a condition related to issuing Certificates of Occupancy. He estimates that the trailer would be on site for three years. Jay Schulz asked Mr. Chavkin to confirm that the site would conform to the approved site plan after the trailer is removed. Mr. Chavkin stated that the parking lot serves two purposes: parking for the amenity building and parking for the townhouse units that do not have a driveway, as required by the Zoning Code for a third parking space. There is a difference between what the market and the zoning code require. Chris Camia asked Mr. Chavkin to confirm that the sales trailer won't impede access to the amenity building. Mr. Chavkin stated that having the sales trailer will give residents access to the clubhouse sooner than how it was approved in the site plan. Mr. Natarelli asked Mr. Chavkin to confirm where the water and sewer utilities will come into the trailer and how they will tie into the street and asked if the owners of the sales trailer and the amenities building be separate. Mr. Chavkin detailed the plan, including where temporary water and sewer connections are proposed and where they will tie into the street. Mr. Chavkin stated they do not intend to create public water and sewer mains, and will work around the ownership implications. Chairperson Krakauer asked David Smith to read the draft resolution. David Smith read the conditions of the draft resolution. 6 (1/16/25) �Richard Gross moved to waive the public hearing requirement and approve the resolution. Moved: Gross Seconded: Camia Chairperson Krakauer Rachelle Gebler Chris Camia Richard Gross Jay Schulz Vote 5-0 7. Marathon Development Group LTD, 100 College Avenue, Proposed 105-unit mixed-use development, Subdivision, Special Permit, and Site Plan ApprovalPreliminary presentation Brian Sinsabaugh stated that he is an attorney with Zarin & Steinmetz on behalf of the applicant, Marathon Development Group LTD. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated the property is also known as College Arms, is adjacent to the Reverend Sykes Park, and is 2.36 acres in the R-6 zoning district. There is an existing 10-story building with 164 affordable housing units and an on-grade parking lot with 154 parking spaces. The application proposes constructing a 6-story building over the existing parking area with 200 parking spaces, ground-level retail and 4 stories of affordable housing with 105 units. A subdivision is proposed to divide the property into two parcels and a lot line adjustment that would give the Reverend Sykes Park additional space. The applicant also requests a Zoning map amendment petition relating to the Stategic Property Redevelopment Area Floating Zone and Special Permit approval which will define new requirements for off-street parking, front yard setback, and increased building coverage. Mr. Sinsabaugh requested that the SEQRA review process be initiated with the Planning Board as the Lead Agency so a notice of intent may be circulated. As requested by the Village Planner, an updated Environmental Assessment Form and a signed Coastal Assessment Form were emailed. A comprehensive response to the Village Planners’s review memo will be submitted before the next meeting. Mark Soja stated that Marathon Development Group is an affordable housing developer in Westchester County. Mr. Soja stated that in the 16 years they have owned 100 College Avenue, there has been little turnover, no vacancies, and a waiting list for units. The Floating Zone would allow them to add 105 residential apartments, including 65 one-bedroom units, 32 two-bedroom units, and 8 three-bedroom units, that would remain affordable for at least 30 years. Edmund Vogel is the project architect from Warshauer Mellusi Warshauer Architects, P.C. Mr. Vogel stated that the proposed six-story building includes four stories of residential above two stories of the parking structure. Mr. Vogel described the building's architectural features and façade designs. Mr. Vogel stated that an elevated plaza on the second story is proposed to provide green space and amenities for the tenants. Mr. Vogel presented views from the public streets into the site and stated that the existing parking lot is underutilized. Mr. Vogel presented unit floor plans and provided the square footage for one, two, and three-bedroom units. Brian Riley stated that he is the civil engineer from Catizone Engineering, P.C. Mr. Riley described the site's existing conditions. The lot with the existing building is 47,000 square feet, 7 (1/16/25) �and the proposed development lot 2 is 57,000 square feet. He described the existing and proposed easement areas and stated that 11,000 square feet, or 20% of the development lot two, is proposed to be given to the park. The existing driveway, two-way entrance, and curb cut on Valley Street are proposed to remain. A second curb cut is proposed on Valley Street to access the lower-level parking. An exit-only driveway is proposed on Cortlandt Street. Mr. Riley described where utility connections are proposed and stated that the existing drainage culvert would need to be re-routed around the southeast corner of the proposed building. The current parking lot drains into the culvert and terminates at the Hudson River. The stormwater management plan includes providing water quality treatment units. Mr. Riley described that the landscape plan focuses on the third-floor amenity deck space and includes the small area along Valley Street frontage. The easement area south of the building was left as a grass area. He will ensure that the landscape plan includes native plantings. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that the applicant is seeking subdivision and site plan approval from the Planning Board and Board of Trustees to approve the proposed zoning map amendment and Strategic Property Redevelopment Floating Zone and Special Permit. The Local Development Corporation is involved in having a leaseholder or ownership stake within the property as part of the SPR. All submissions will be shared between the boards involved. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board requires a complete application before circulating a Notice of Intent. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that he received a memo stating the application was complete. Sean McCarthy said he would review the application and determine if it is complete before the next meeting. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board. Richard Gross asked Mr. Sinsabaugh what was planned for the existing vehicle parking during the development construction and how they intended to handle the flooding in the parking garage on Valley Street. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that a parking plan detailing the timing of the construction and where existing tenants' vehicles will be relocated will be submitted. Mr. Riley stated that the proposed development and expanded easement area will reduce the impervious surface. Although the area is in a 100-year storm flood zone, FEMA does not provide a base flood elevation map, so mitigation is unclear. The lower level of parking is above the grade of Valley Street. Peter Catizone is the engineer from Catizone Engineering, P.C. Mr. Catizone stated that the lower parking level is in a flood zone and is designed to accept flood waters in and out. Reducing impervious surfaces, improving stormwater, and installing a green roof will decrease runoff. Chris Camia stated that there are issues with parking availability on Cortlandt and Valley Street. He requested that the applicant prepare a parking analysis that details the proposed retail square 8 (1/16/25) �footage, calculations for the required number of parking spaces under the existing Zoning Code, and the expectations for the reduction in the required parking re-zoning request. The application proposes 200 parking spaces between the two buildings, where approximately 430 parking spaces would be required under the existing zoning code and approximately 322 spaces at 75% of that value per the floating zone. Mr. Camia asked if the proposed grass area easement would affect the park infrastructure. Mr. Riley stated that the proposed relocation of the drainage culvert would require removing the park restrooms and the swing set. The swingset can be replaced in the same location, but replacing the restrooms requires further discussion. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the bathrooms should be replaced. She requested that the applicant provide an analysis of how it was determined that the existing parking lot is underutilized. She asked if parking spaces were designated for each unit. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that based on current ownership and experience with the existing building, they determined that the parking is not always utilized and that affordable housing units tend not to have multiple vehicles per unit. They will provide a detailed parking study. The plans include .75 parking spaces per unit, where the zoning code requires one space per dwelling unit and a half space per bedroom. Mr. Camia asked if residents are charged additional fees per parking space and if public parking spaces are required for the proposed retail space. Sean McCarthy stated that there are public parking requirements for retail spaces. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that residential parking spaces will not be charged an additional fee. The application proposes approximately 2,500 square feet of retail, requiring up to 13 public parking spaces. Rachelle Gebler requested plans be made to relocate the restrooms instead of eliminating them and suggested they provide temporary services during construction. She asked how the parking space would be configured and how traffic in the surrounding intersections would be impacted by the new building. Chairperson Krakauer suggested that the applicant consider alternative options for the building design and easement area regarding setbacks and views from the park and the train station. She also suggested that they consider relocating the bathrooms to an area of the building that is accessible from the outside. Richard Gross asked Mr. Catizone how they plan on handling flood waters where the elevation is close to sea level. Mr. Catizone stated that they expect the lower level to accept flood waters, recede, and flow out by gravity. They do not want to fill it or eliminate flood storage volume. They have completed other developments designed to flood parking lots. FEMA regulations require that habitable spaces be provided 2 feet above the flood zone. 9 (1/16/25) �Mr. Gross suggested that the Village Engineer and Building Inspector review the plans There was discussion regarding an existing “Pilot,” the payment in lieu of taxes agreement with the Local Development Corp, and how a portion of the park is located in Tarrytown. James Natarelli, Mr. Riley, and Mr. Castizone discussed the proposed stormwater practices and how they comply with the New York State DEC stormwater retention requirements and the Board’s policy, which requires that all runoff volume be retained on the property in a 100-year storm event. Mr. Natarelli suggested that the applicant consider additional stormwater mitigation practices. There was a discussion regarding where the portion of the Reverend Skyes Park is located in the Village of Tarrytown. David Smith described how the notice of intent would establish the Planning Board as the lead agency to initiate the SEQR review process and coordinate with the involved agencies, which have the authority to review and make decisions on the proposed development. No action was taken. 8. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, 2 Lighthouse Landing, Proposed pergolas, Special Permit- Discussion Rachelle Gebler asked if the Board of Trustees directed the Planning Board to provide suggestions for the proposal. Josh Subin stated that the Board of Trustees requests input from the Planning Board and a referral back to them. Chairperson Krakauer asked Peter Chavkin to summarize the request. Peter Chavkin stated that requests were received for shade structures on the four Daymark Building units with large rooftop terraces. Pergolas are considered part of the building structure and must comply with the building height requirements. The Village Board can grant a height variance in exchange for an incentive. They proposed to set aside 15 parking spaces in the south parcel parking lot for the residents along Hudson Street to park in the evening hours until the parcel is developed. Ms. Gebler asked Mr. Subin if the Board of Trustees is leaning towards allowing the pergolas and requesting feedback from the Planning Board. Mr. Subin stated that the Board of Trustees is interested in approving the agreement and is asking for the Planning Board’s input regarding the architectural review of the pergolas and whether they conform to the Board’s requirements. 10 (1/16/25) �Chairperson Krakauer requested that Mr. Chavkin confirm that the proposed pergolas conform with the Board’s definition and restrictions on coverage and openness. Mr. Chavkin stated that the proposed pergolas would be open on four sides with non-operable louvers, with no intentions for additional screening. They would be approximately 10 feet high by 12 feet long, 20 to 24 feet wide, and will cover less than 50 percent of the rooftop terrace area. Ms. Gebler recommended that the Board of Trustees treat this as a one-off approval for pergolas that haven't already been designed and approved with the buildings. She suggested that the Board of Trustees look at the number of parking spots being offered on Hudson Street and make sure they are adequate. Since the pergolas are permanent structures, she suggested that the Board of Trustees make the parking spots available in perpetuity. There was a discussion on the visibility of the proposed pergolas. David Smith stated that a portion of the parking on the south parcel is designated for the Bridgeview Tavern under the agreement. David Smith asked Mr. Chavkin if parking spaces would be marked with signed as Village Permit Parking. Mr. Chavkin said there is a license agreement with the Bridgeview Tavern for customers to park on the south parcel during the day. He requested that the Village Board issue permits or hang tags to residents, and they would ensure that there is no overnight towing enforcement for that area of their property. Chairperson Krakauer requested that David Smith prepare the Planning Board’s recommendations to the Board of Trustees. 9. Approval of minutes, November 21, 2024, December 19, 2024 meetings Chairperson Krakauer tabled the approval of minutes to the February 20, 2025 meeting. Richard Gross moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:30 PM. Moved: Gross4 Seconded: Gebler Vote 5-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 11 (1/16/25) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-01-16 Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/8ae5b0adc240796e6f94e14a17356d73.pdf 7604e91d91abc97907bc8fbf4830719c PDF Text Text ���� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-01-16_405 Legend Drive Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text