1 25 12 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/e338213e917e8f8d191362906dca2384.pdf 3e57e48c8b4773b64811a794ca33e88e PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED January 28, 2004 The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman McCarthy, at 8:05 p.m. Present: Don Stever Elvira Aloia Paul Wichmann Barbara Fina Carter Sachman Sean McCarthy, Acting Chairman Absent: None Also Present: Dave Smith (Saccardi & Schiff/ Village Planner) Nicholas Ward-Willis (Keane & Beane/Village Attorney) Mr. McCarthy stated that several matters had to be discussed with the Attorneys and Planners and asked that the audience save the room in order for the Board members to meet in Executive Session. The meeting reconvened at 8:30 P.M. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to revise the Agenda and to take up the matter of the Kennedy construction application. Carried. 1) KENNEDY CONSTRUCTION APPLICATION.POKAHOE DRIVE & HEMLOCK DRIVE After discussion Ms. Aloia moved, seconded by Mr. Sachman that the following resolution be adopted: WHEREAS, an application for the construction of two—single family houses on two separate lots (”the Proposed Action”) that were sub—divided from a lot that holds a locally historic structure known as “the Fremont House” was submitted to the Village of Sleepy hollow on April 8, 2003 by James Kennedy Construction Company, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the Applicant appeared before the Architectural Review Board (“the ARB”) at their regularly scheduled meeting of May 28, 2003, at which time the application was referred to the Village of Sleepy Hollow Waterfront Advisory Committee (“the WAC”) in order to determine the application’s consistency with the goals and objectives contained within the Village’s Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP); and WHEREAS, the WAC considered the application at their regularly scheduled meeting of June 4, 2003, and unanimously concluded that the Proposed Action would be inconsistent with LWRP Policies 23, 23B, 25, and 25A; and WHEREAS, the Applicant again appeared before the ARB at their regularly scheduled meeting of June 25, 2003, at which time those wishing to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard, and the Applicant’s representatives provided additional information on the Proposed Action, including the elimination of the second floor above the garage for one house, a reduction in overall mass, the placement of the garage under one house, and various revisions to the materials and �WHEREAS, the Applicant appeared before the ARB at their regularly scheduled meeting of July 23, 2003, and presented additional information on the Proposed Action, including a reduction in roof height for one house, a reduction in overall mass and square footage for both houses, and various revisions to the windows and materials; and WHEREAS, on or about November 20, 2003, the Applicant was requested by the Planning Board to confirm the existence of an on-site wetland and associated buffer area as it relates to the proposed lots and make a determination that the Proposed Action does not impact wetlands, to date, that information is still outstanding; and WHEREAS, the ARB has reviewed and considered all materials presented to them by the Applicant up to and including all materials presented at the August 27, 2003, meeting; and WHEREAS, the ARB has reached a general consensus that the Proposed Action, as modified by the Applicant in response to the initial consistency review, generally meets the criteria for approval from the Architecture Review Board as per Chapter 6 of the Village of Sleepy Hollow Code; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the ARB herein formally refers the revised plans back to the WAC for either a consistency determination regarding the proposed project as now modified, or specific recommendations as to how the Proposed Action can be modified in order to conform to the Village LWRP, to the extent practicable, in order for the ARB to make its final approval decision; and be it further RESOLVED, that the ARB herein formally requests a definitive determination from the Planning Board as to their jurisdiction relative to Village’s wetland protection law and be it further RESOLVED, that the ARB hereby directs the Office of Fire and Life Safety to circulate copies of this resolution to the Applicant the WAC, Planning Board, Village Administrator and Mayor and Board of Trustees. UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. 2) ICHABOD’S LANDING-INFORMAL PRESENTATION Representative for Ichabod’s Landing presented Plans, drawings and pictures of the proposed Riverfront Development at the foot of Beekman Avenue and outlined the project, stating there would be a Promenade along the riverfront connecting with the Promenade on the G.M. property and Kingsland Point Park. He stated there would be identical units and retail stores. He stated they have appeared before the Planning Board and have made some changes since their last submission and would like the Board to review them. A Site Plan has been submitted to the Planning Board and will be submitted to the ARB later. Discussion by Board members regarding type of buildings, number of apartments, location of parking areas’ and walkways and amount of property to be dedicated for public use. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, January 28, 2004 2 �Mr. McCarthy asked if there was anyone who would like to speak. There being no comments, Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Ms. Aloia that the matter be taken up at another time. Carried. 3) HE SUSHI TOWN, 276 BROADWAY-SIGN PERMIT—CONTINUATION. Applicant presented Affidavit of Proof of Mailings to Mr. McCarthy. Discussion followed regarding the installation of the sign prior to final approval by the Board. Mr. Wichmann stated that the new sign, which is black lettering on a white background is a big improvement on the sign previously submitted for the Board’s approval. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. Mr. Galarza of Orient Courier questioned the installation of the sign with the telephone number listed on it. Ms. Fina stated that the sign had been erected prior to the Board’s approval. There being no further public comments, Mr. Wichmann moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to close the meeting for public comments. Carried. Discussion followed wherein Board members stated they had agreed to allow a temporary sign to be installed until the applicant came back with revisions to the original application, for the Board to review. Board members again stated they did not approve of the telephone numbers being listed on signs and they would review each sign application when presented as to whether they would allow a telephone number to be listed on the sign. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Ms. Fina that the sign be approved as erected but that the telephone number must be removed. Carried. Applicant agreed to remove the telephone number. 4) HERNANDEZ- 179 BEEKMAN AVENUE-NEW WINDOWS Mr. Hernandez stated that he would like to install new larger windows on the front of the building at 179 Beekman Avenue, which is a restaurant and bar; Mr. Wichmann moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. Mr. Charles Shebetti, owner of property at 181 Beekman Avenue, stated he had no objections to the windows but was concerned about the safety issue and questioned whether there would be a fire wall and sprinkler system installed. He stated his property is directly adjacent to the building and was greatly concerned about the safety of installing such large windows. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, January 28, 2004 3 �Mr. Wichmann stated that Mr. Shebetti‘s concerns were not for the ARB but was an issue for the Fire and Safety Board. Mt. McCarthy stated he would bring the matter to the attention of Mr. Stiloski. Ms, Esther Quendo questioned as to the whereabouts of the proposed application. Mr. McCarthy stated it was at the corner of Beekman Avenue and Barnhart Avenue the former Maria’s Tavern. There being no further comments, Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Ms. Aloia that the meeting be closed for public comments. Carried. Discussion followed regarding size, height of windows and canopy. Ms. Fina moved, seconded by Ms. Aloia that the application be approved as submitted with the condition that the height of the canopy conform with the Code and that approval be made by the Building Inspector prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Carried. 5) TEIXEIRA, 52 HOLLAND AVENUE-NEW WINDOW AND DOOR Applicant did not appear. Mr. McCarthy stated that the matter would be postponed until the February meeting. 6) GALARZA-ORIENT COURIER, 110 BEEKMAN AVENUE-SIGN PERMIT Mr. Galarza presented Affidavit of Proof of Mailings to Mr. McCarthy. Mr. Galarza presented pictures of the sign and stated that the sign would be approximately four by six and 3/4 inches thick and would be three signs. Ms. Fina moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. There being no public comments, Mr. Wichmann moved, seconded by Mr. Sachman to close the meeting for public comments. Carried. Discussion followed regarding the number of signs, the color of sign and placement of signs. Mr. Sachman stated he would like to see the size and color of the signs, which have already been ordered. Mr. Galarza stated he would go to his place of business and return with one of the signs. Mr. McCarthy stated that the Board would take the matter up when he returned with one of the signs. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, January 28, 2004 4 �7) GOLDFARB -55l RIVERSIDE DRIVE—2-STORY ADDITIONArchitect submitted Affidavit of Proof of Mailings to Mr. McCarthy. Ms. Aloia recused herself from participating in the matter. Applicant presented plans and drawings for the addition, which would be consisting of a study, master bathroom and would be added at the rear of the house, which is situated on a corner lot. Ms. Fina moved, seconded by Mr. Sachman to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. Mr. Urmas Wompa, 539 Riverside Drive stated he would like to view the drawings and the Architect presented the drawings and outlined the project to Mr. Wompa. There being no further public comments, Mr. Wichmann moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to close the meeting for public comments. Carried. Discussion followed regarding the type of materials to be used with members stating they felt that the stone on the left elevation facade should match the Farrington Avenue, or north side of the house. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann that the application be approved as submitted, with the condition they provide stone on the left elevation of the house up to and including the first floor and the band continue around all windows as discussed. 6) GALARZA-ORIENT COURIERMr. Galarza returned with actual sign. Ms. Fina stated that telephone numbers are not allowed, and stated that one sign would be sufficient. Ms. Fina stated that signs are not to be fabricated until they have received approval of the Board. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. There being no public comments, Ms. Aloia moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to close the meeting for public comments. Carried. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Ms. Fina that the applicant comes back next month with drawings, showing lettering, color of sign and accurate dimensions, with no telephone number on the sign, application to show lettering to be installed on window. Carried. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, January 28, 2004 5 �8) ESTHER QUENDO-86 BEEKMAN AVENUE-ONE STOP DELI-SIGN PERMIT Ms. Quendo stated the sign was to replace a sign that had been installed many years ago and was now “too dirty.” It would be exactly the same size and color as the previous sign. She stated that the awning was a previously approved awning under a Village sponsored program. Mr. McCarthy stated that many signs have been installed without approval of the Board and the Board is now trying to make these signs conform to the Code. Mr. Wichmann moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. There being no public comments, Ms. Fina moved, seconded by Ms. Aloia to close the meeting for public comments. Carried. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to approve the lettering on the awning as requested. Carried. Mr. McCarthy instructed the applicant to return to the February meeting with drawings for the signs to be installed on the windows. 9) NELSON ESPINOZA-SALON y PELUQUERIA, 185 CORTLANDT STREET SIGNS PERMIT-ALSO 110 BEEKMAN AVENUE Mr. Espinoza presented pictures of the building with the sign already erected. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. There being no public comments, Mr.Wichmann moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to close the meeting for public comments. Carried. Discussion followed regarding residents installing signs prior to their being approved by the Board. Mr. Sachman moved seconded by Mr. Wichmann that the application be approved as submitted. Carried. 10) POCANTICO HOMES, LOT #4 - NEW HOME CONSTRUCTIONMr. John Nemeth, Kevin McManus, John Sullivan, John Dolan, Mike Dignallo, and Tony Veneziano all appearing for the Applicant. Mr. Nemeth presented drawings and plans and samples material to be used in the construction of a home on Lot #4. Mr. Nemeth presented Site Plan for positioning the house on the lot. He stated the house would have a black roof, would be brick with APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, January 28, 2004 6 �white trim, and have black shutters. He stated there would be a portico type of roof with molding on the front entry. Mr. Sullivan spoke on the various setbacks to be followed. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. There being no public comments, Mr. Wickmann moved, seconded by Ms. Albia to close the meeting for public comments. Carried. Discussion followed regarding the height of the house and type of materials to be used. Mr. Wichmann moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to approve the application as submitted. Carried. LOT #2 — NEW HOME CONSTRUCTIONMr. Nemeth stated that several changes had been made and presented samples of materials to be used. He stated that the house would have a black roof, black shutters, brick chimney, vinyl siding and they have made changes in the ceiling line. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. There being no public comments, Mr. Wichmann moved, seconded by Ms. Aloia to close the meeting for public comments. Carried. Discussion followed regarding height and width of the house, the placement of the driveway and the height of the north Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann that the application be approved as submitted with several exceptions: 1) that the windows be double hung windows 2) that chimney be revised to a tapered chimney 3) that a Landscape Plan be submitted 4) that the driveway be placed as discussed and 5) that a Plan be resubmitted for the Board to review. Carried. Lot #5 - NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION. Mr. Nemeth presented Plans and drawings and outlined the type of construction to be used stating that the house would have a brown roof and have a st6ne front and would be constructed on a cul—de—sac. Mr. Sachman stated he felt that the house was too massive and felt that the Board was wasting time discussing the plans as they were not according to Code. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, January 28, 2004 7 �Discussion followed regarding the placement of the house on the lot, where it would face, and the height of the house, with members agreeing that the house would be too high and too massive for the size of the lot. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. There being no public comments, Ms. Fina moved, seconded by Ms. Aloia to close the meeting or public comments. Carried. Mr. McCarthy stated that the matter should be discussed at another meeting in order for the applicant to change’ and resubmit the plans with the suggestions made by the Board. Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Mr. Sachman that the meeting be adjourned. Carried. (MIDNIGHT.) APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, January 28, 2004 8 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2004-01-28 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2004 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/b76830525188149f4624e454fce3fdc4.pdf 01b520c3e1d457836e69c41b9720db3a PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD SPECIAL MEETING-APPROVED February 4, 2004 A Special Meeting of the Sleepy Hollow Architectural Review Board was held on February 4th, 2004 in the Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, Sleepy Hollow, N.Y. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Elvira Aloia Paul Wichmann Barbara Fina Carter Sackman Sean McCarthy Absent: None Also Present: Nicholas Ward-Willis (Keane & Beane/Village Attorney) Dave Smith (Saccardi & Schiff/ Village Planners) Chairman Stever stated that the purpose of the meeting was to review the application of Spectrum Communities. John Slaker, Landscape Architect, presented Plot Plan showing landscape architecture for the house and how various items will be planted and stated he has studied Lots 1 and 2 and how the landscaping will be viewed from County House Road. Mr. Slaker stated that the house would be lowered into the ground in order for proper drainage that a retaining wall would be built to make the grade the same. A second wall about four feet high, another wall three feet high will also be built. He stated that Colorado Spruce trees would be planted along with evergreen shrubs and dog wood trees creating a buffer along County House Road. Mr. Sackman asked what they could do to make the house appear lower. Mr. Sullivan stated they had pivoted the house to make it appear to blend into the terrain, and give a lower appearance. He stated that once the landscaping was completed it would give a softer appearance and lower the height of the house. Mr. Sullivan stated they would be willing to lower the pitch of the roof if the project was allowed to proceed. Mr. Sullivan stated it was their intention to come back before the Board so they could show the various types of homes to be built. Mr. Sackman stated the Board was very concerned about the houses blocking views of other houses, the height of the house, the styles of the houses yet to be built and if they were similar to the houses already built. Mr. Su11ivan spoke about the various times they have �been before the Board regarding similarities of the houses and they felt they have made changes so that the houses are not alike. The following are the findings and determinations made by the ARB on the matter (see attached). There being no further business to come before the Board, Ms. Fina moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy that the same be duly adjourned. Carried. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Special Meeting, February 4, 2004 2 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2004-02-04 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2004 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/d1283d4e6bb02fb1df7e394ffc2ef295.pdf 6ecfc4686a6600ce5c8ef1fdd465e062 PDF Text Text *M ? 5 2004 VILLAGE O F SLEEPY HOLLOW \RCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD Minutes of Meeting February 25, 2004 u^ . W t L A Q f Ci.Eft|( fiPft C )f Members Present: Stever (Acting Chair), Aloia, Fina, Sackman and Wichman Village Staff Present: Sean McCarthy, Village Architect The meeting was called to order by the Chair at 8:00 PM. The minutes of the January 28, 2004 meeting were reviewed and on motion of Mr. Sackman and second by Mr. Stever approved unanimously by voice vote, subject to certain corrections noted by the Chair on the Chair's copy of the minutes which were tendered to Mr. McCarthy in the absence of the Board's Clerk. The minutes of the special meeting held on February 4, 2004 were reviewed, and, on motion of Ms. Aloia and second by Mr. Stever the minutes were approved unanimously by voice vote. Teixeira, 52 Holland Avenue-New Window and Door (Continuation) The applicant appeared and explained that the application was submitted for the purpose of seeking after-the-fact approval of a new window and door that had been installed on the first floor of the structure without the requisite authori2ation. O n motion by Mr. Sackman and second by Ms. Fina the Board by voice vote opened the session to public comment. N o comments heard, Mr. Sackman moved to close the public session on second by Ms. Fina and the Board by unanimous voice vote closed the public session. Following brief discussion, Ms. Fina moved that the application bye approved as submitted. Mr. Stever seconded the motion. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Galarza/ Orient Courier, 110 Beekman Avenue - Sign Pemit (Continuation) The applicant appeared and provided a letter-sbzed depiction of the proposed sign. Following discussion, Mr. Fina moved to open the session to public comment. O n Ms. Aloia's second the motion passed on unanimous voice vote. N o comments being offered by any member of the public, Mr. Stever moved to close the public session, and on second by Ms. Fina the motion was adopted by unanimous voice vote. Ms. Fina moved that the sign location and design be approved as submitted. Mr. Stever seconded the motion. The motion as adopted by unanimous voice vote. Esther Quendo, One Stop Deli - Sign Permit (Continuation) Neither the applicant no a representative of the applicant appeared before the Board. O n motion of Mr. Sackman and second my Mr. Wichman the Board continued the matter over until the next meeting and instructed Mr. McCarthy to so notify the applicant. CD �Karl Dibble, 315 North Broadway - Revision to Previously Approved Plan Mr. Dibble appeared and provided the Board with revised drawings of the exterior facade of the structure currendy under construction on the site. The applicant explained that he wished to change the windows from double hung windows to casement windows having true divided light grids. The applicant also requested approval to locate three skylights in a different location than shown on the drawing. On motion by Mr. Wichman and second by Ms. Fina the Board opened the session to public comment. There being none, the Board closed the public comment session on motion of Mr. Sackman and second by Ms. Fina. Following additional discussion, Ms. Fina moved that the revised application be approved subject to having the plan reformed to show the approved location of the skylights, and also to show stucco on the chimney. The motion was seconded by Ms. Aloia and was unanimously approved by voice vote. Following the approval, Mr. Dibble raised the issue of the wall located on the front elevation of the property, which is apparendy the subject of a dispute with the Planning Board. The Board informed the Applicant and Mr. McCarthy that the Board's recommendation is that the Applicant maintain the stone wall and not replace it with an interlocking front wall. Pocantico H o m e s - Lot # 2 ; Stone Wall at Entrance (Continuation) The applicant's architect provided the Board with revised drawings of the facade of the proposed house to be built on Ix>t #2. The revised drawings were prepared to respond to Board comments made at a prior meeting on the application. The applicant's revised drawings showed modifications to the dormers, windows, shutters, garage door windows and chimney. The session was opened to the public by voice vote on motion of Mr. Sackman and second by Ms. Fina. N o member of the public sought to comment and the public session was closed by voice vote on motion of Mr. Wichman and second by Ms. Aloia. Mr. Wichman then moved approval of the revised drawings. O n second by Ms. Aloia the motion was unanimously adopted. The applicant then presented drawings of its stone wall constructed without approval at the entrance of to the development. The applicant is seeking after the fact approval of the wall. The Board opened the matter to public comment on motion of Mr. Wichman and second by Mr. Stever. N o comments being offered, the Board voted to close the public session on motion of Mr. Stever and second by Mr. Wichman. Following brief discussion, the application was approved by unanimous voice vote on motion of Mr. Wichman and second by Ms. Fina. Linder, 74 Merlin - Screened Porch Enclosure Mr. linder appeared before the Board and explained his plans to enclosed the screened porch located on the gable end of his house. The enclosure will have glass double hung windows. The matter of the need to maintain conformity of color with the existing house was discussed. The matter was opened for public comment on motion of Mr. Sackman and second by Ms. Aloia. There being no proffered comment, the Board voted to close the public session on motion of Mr. Stever and second by Ms. Aloia. After additional �discussion, Mr. Stever moved that the application be approved as submitted. The Board unanimously adopted the motion following second by Mr. Wichman. Ferreira, 47 Holland Avenue - Railing The applicant seeks the Board's after-the fact approval of a metal railing constructed atop a masonry wall that runs across the front of the applicant's property. The Board members discussed with Mr. McCarthy the fact that the applicant had apparently received a building permit for the wall and railing in the absence of Board approval. Following further discussion on the merits, Ms. Fina moved to open the session to public comment with second by Ms. Aloia. The motion carried. No comment being offered, the Board closed the public session on motion of Ms. Fina and second by Mr. Wichman. Ms. Fina then moved that the application be approved as submitted. The Board unanimously adopted the motion following a second by Mr. Wichman. Goldfarb, 551 Riverside Drive - Addition (Continuation) The applicant appeared with his architect to discuss the Board's previous request that since the lot is on a corner, he extend some stone facade onto the addition, to provide continuity with the existing stone facade of the house facing Riverside drive. The applicant offered several reasons why he wished not to add stone to the facade of the addition, which were discussed in detail by members of the Board. Following a very lengthy discussion, the Board continued the matter and suggested to Mr. Goldfarb that he consider options for adding some stone or otherwise breaking up the facade of the otherwise monolithicaUy plain addition that faces the side street. Irorio, 215 Webber Avenue - 2 Storey Additoin; Front Entry; Windows & Siding The applicant is seeking re-approval of a rear yard addition and material changes to the front windows and front entrance to the house. Members of the Board commented on certain architectural treatments of the windows, and the location of the front door. The matter was opened to public comment on motion of Mr. Sackman and second by Ms. Aloia. The public session was closed without an comment being offered on similar motion and second. After some addition discussion with the applicant, on motion of Mr. Sackman and second of Ms. Aloia, the Board voted unanimous to approve the application as submitted with conditions noted on the official approved drawing pertaining to matching the second floor front right window layout to the second floor front left window layout, which is center double hung windows with grids flanked by two smaller double hung windows with grids. The meeting adjourned at 11:00 PM. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2004-02-25 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2004 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/0ebe44c15eced4876b5d9c44247d04e4.pdf e371b0f828e39c7c93f4aa3e1bd7d9b7 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED March 24, 2004 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chair at 8:00 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Elvira Aloia Paul Wichmann Barbara Fina Absent: Carter Sachman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect) Nicholas Ward-Willis (Keane & Beane/Village Attorney) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Minutes for November 24, 2003 and February 25, 2004 2) Announcements 3) Warren 217 Highland Avenue Addition and Carport 4) Quendo 86 Beekman Avenue Sign Permit 5) Ruivo 37 Fremont Road 2- story addition 6) Fiorito 12 Hudson Terrace 1 story addition and garage 7) Kennedy Pokahoe Drive-vacant lot New construction-cont 8) Alejandro 15 Hudson Terrace Front and rear yard fence 9) Pocantico Homes. Lot 5 County House Road Continued 10)Pocantico Homes. Lot 1 County House Road New Construction 11)Pocantico Homes. Lot 3 County House Road New Construction 12)Pocantico Homes. Lot 10 County House Road New Construction 1) Minutes for November 24, 2003 and February 25, 2004 Barbara Fina made a motion to approve the minutes of February 25, 2004 as submitted subject to any typographical errors and non-material corrections. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). The Chair made a motion to approve the minutes of November 24, 2003 as corrected. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0) 2) Announcements The Chair acknowledges a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Green requesting a postponement of their pending application until the April 2004 meeting. The Chair acknowledged a Notice of Intent to Act as the Lead Agency memo from the Planning Board. The application involves site plan improvements to Phelps Hospital. �The Chair acknowledged a memo from the Sleepy Hollow Manor Association on the Ruivo application. 3) David Warren - 217 Highland Avenue Sam Vieira is the project architect and is presenting this application along with David Warren. Sam Vieira spoke about the proposed additions. He stated that the project includes adding a mudroom, an enclosed porch addition, and a detached carport. He spoke about the Zoning Board’s approvals. He also stated that the proposed finishes are included on the drawings. Barbara Fina asked if the plywood would be unfinished. Sam Vieira responded that the plywood would be unfinished but painted. The Chair asked what part would be visible from the street. Sam Vieira responded that from the front of the house, none of the proposed work is visible from the street. He stated that while driving past the house, the proposed work could be seen at an angle. There was an open discussion on the proposed detached carport. David Warren stated that he did not want the carport to appear massive. Barbara Fina asked if the carport could be painted to match the house. David Warren responded yes. Elvira Aloia asked the applicant why they chose a carport and not a regular garage. David Warren responded that they wanted to minimize the possible massive effect of a garage. There as an open discussion on the easement. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Elvira Aloia made a motion to approve the application with the condition that the interior of the carport be finished and that the windows have a clean trim finish. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Ester Quendo - 86 Beekman Avenue This is a continuation from the previous meeting. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, March 24, 2004 2 �Tyler from Sign Extreme, Inc. is representing the applicant. Sean McCarthy summarized the discussions from the last meeting. There was an open discussion on the previous approval and what additional information is needed by the Board. It was stated that the Board had previously approved the awning and requested that the applicant remove the lettering on the inside of the window. The Chair stated that the lettering was installed without approval. There was an open discussion on what the Board would consider approving. This item was adjourned to later in the meeting so that the sign contractor could return with drawings that the Board could review and consider. 5) Arlindo Ruivo - 37 Fremont Road – The Chair noted that the Board had received a letter from the Sleepy Hollow Manor Association (see attached). Sam Vieira is the project architect. He is representing the application along with Arlindo Ruivo. Sam Vieira summarized the proposed changes for the Board. Paul Wichmann questioned the cost of $80,000 for the proposed renovation. There was an open discussion on the Village’s ability to have the professional designers responsible for submitting proper construction costs. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Elvira Aloia made a motion to approve the application as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) Kathleen Fiorito - 12 Hudson Terrace Sam Vieira is the project architect. He is representing the application along with Kathleen Fiorito. Sam Vieira summarized the proposed changes for the Board. He stated that the proposed project would remove an existing 11-foot wide one-story structure would be demolished APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, March 24, 2004 3 �and a 21-foot wide structure would be constructed. He also spoke about changes to the existing garage. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Elvira Aloia asked if the stucco would match the existing. Sam Vieira responded yes. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Continued 4) Ester Quendo - 86 Beekman Avenue Tyler from Sign Extreme submitted new sketches. The Board reviewed the sketches and expressed concerns with the banner style that was presented. At the request of the applicant’s representative, this was adjourned to the next meeting. 7) Kennedy Pokahoe Drive/Hemlock Drive - Elvira Aloia made a motion to enter executive session. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). The Board entered executive session at 9:13pm. The Board resumed the meeting at 9:41pm. No action was taken. The Chair gave a summary of the Kennedy project concerning the Waterfront Advisory Committee and Architectural Review Board reviews. He noted that the Board is in receipt of the consistency findings from the Waterfront Advisory Committee. He read the consistency findings aloud for the record. The Chair asked if there was anyone from the public that wished to speak. Len Andrews (7 Pokahoe Drive) distributed letters that summarized the application (see attached). There were no further public comments. The Chair noted that the applicant was informed about the meeting but was not present. No action was taken. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, March 24, 2004 4 �8) Alejandro - 15 Hudson Terrace Mr. Alejandro is the owner and is representing his application. Mr. Alejandro spoke about the proposed fence. He stated that the fence would be installed on the property once the adjacent construction is completed. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Elvira Aloia made a motion to approve as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) (Fina absent). 9) Pocantico Homes, Lot 5 County House Road John Dolan is the project executive representing this application along with John Slaker (landscape architect) and John Nemeth (project manager). John Dolan spoke about changes to the landscaping based on Village comments. He stated that for lot #5, 1) the roofline was lowered. 2) the finished floor in the basement was lowered. 3) the site was extensively landscaped. John Dolan showed renderings of lot #5. General discussions took place. The Board agreed that the applicant had complied with the Board’s requests for lot #5. Elvira Aloia made a motion to approve as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) (Fina absent). 10) Pocantico Homes, Lot 1 County House Road John Nemeth gave an overview of the changes to the existing house on lot #1. General discussions took place. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve as submitted subject to Village Building Department review to determine changes from the original submission. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) (Fina absent). There was a general discussion on the continuation of the wall into lot #3. The Board agreed by consensus to approve the entrance to lots #1 and #2. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, March 24, 2004 5 �11) Pocantico Homes, Lot 3 County House Road John Nemeth gave an overview of the changes to lot #3. General discussions took place on the elevations and the roof type. The Board agreed that the applicant had complied with the Board’s requests for lot #3. The Board agreed by consensus to approve the proposed changes to lot #3. 12) Pocantico Homes, Lot 10 County House Road John Nemeth gave an overview of the changes to the existing house on lot #10. He stated that the roofline was lowered and the house is brick with a brick chimney. General discussions took place. The Board expressed concerns on other nearby structures with similar architectural features. Several potential changes were discussed. The Board agreed by consensus to approve the application without the dormers. The Chair made a motion to adjourn. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) (Fina absent). Adjourned at 10:48 pm to the next meeting. Respectfully Submitted, Anthony DelVecchio Recording Secretary APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, March 24, 2004 6 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2004-03-24 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2004 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/62ef7d4938371ebd70c43e263c1dee14.pdf c9cecc4a96f27af0fb9f3b7f4cd7b8a1 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED April 28, 2004 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chairman at 8:17 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Elvira Aloia Paul Wichmann Sean McCarthy Absent: Carter Sackman Barbara Fina Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) Minutes for March 24, 2004 Ester Quendo 86 Beekman Avenue Justin Green 4 Lakeview Drive Marcello Viscogliosi 176 North Washington St Lois Hinman 126 Harwood Avenue Dan Torena 333 North Broadway Todd Boccabella 4690 Munroe Avenue Anna Brabazon 239 Kelbourne Avenue Other Sign Permit (Continued) Rear Yard retaining wall Walls and Walkways Garage Sign Permit Fence Porch Addition 1) Minutes for March 24, 2004 The Chair made a motion to approve the minutes of March 24, 2004 as corrected. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0) 2) Ester Quendo This is a continuation from previous meetings. Ester Quendo stated that she would remove the lettering from the front of her store. The Chair stated that at the last meeting, the Board stated that they would consider approving the sign if the solid band was removed. Paul Wichmann stated that he would speak to the sign contractor and try to resolve this issue before the next meeting. �This was adjourned to the next meeting. 3) Justin Green Justin Greene explained the proposed project. He stated that the retaining wall is in need of repair. The Chair asked about the height of the wall. Justin Greene responded that the wall would be 7-feet tall. The Chair asked if the applicant had received Planning board approval. Justin Greene responded no. Sean McCarthy stated that if the grade changes by more than 10%, Planning Board approval is required. There was an open discussion on the height of the wall as well as the storm water impacts and the structural features of the wall. This item was referred to the Planning Board. 4) Marcello Viscogliosi Marcello Viscogliosi spoke about the proposed project. Paul Wichmann questioned the easement. Marcello Viscogliosi stated that it was a pedestrian easement. The Chair stated that the Board had received a note from Jim Margotta on site drainage issues. Marcello Viscogliosi spoke about the drainage. Sean McCarthy asked the applicant if he possessed any other proof-of-mailing receipts since 22 Depeyster Street was not notified. Marcello Viscogliosi responded that according to Jim Margotta, 22 Depeyster Street is not bordering the property so no notice was required. The Chair opened the public hearing. Choppi Alejandro (178 N. Washington Street) asked if the applicant could extend the fence to separate the applicant’s property from his neighboring property. It was agreed by the Board that Mr. Alejandro could install a fence on his property under a separate application. There were no further public comments. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, April 28, 2004 2 �Elvira Aloia made a motion to approve this application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 5) Lois Hinman Lois Hinman is representing this application along with architect, Javier Delagarza. Javier Delagarza spoke about the existing garage. He described its aging condition. The Chair asked if ZBA approval was required. Sean McCarthy responded that the ZBA reviewed the application and a variance was not required. Paul Wichmann asked if the garage was currently used for cars. Lois Hinman responded that the existing garage doors could not open. Paul Wichmann asked if the applicant would use the garage for parking cars. Lois Hinman responded yes. Paul Wichmann recommended that 9-foot doors be used instead of 8-foot doors. The Chair opened the public hearing. There were no public comments on this application. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve this application as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) Dan Torena John Lentini is the project architect. He is representing this application along with the applicant Dan Torena. John Lentini spoke about the history of the property. He stated that the property was expanded at some point in the past. He stated that the new owner wants to reduce the building to its original size. He also stated that the building would be raised slightly in order to accommodate an A/C unit in the future. Paul Wichmann asked if the A/C unit was being proposed now. John Lentini responded no. Paul Wichmann stated that he has no problem reducing the square footage of the property. He asked about the garage doors. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, April 28, 2004 3 �Dan Torena responded that the doors would be made of aluminum and glass. Paul Wichmann asked if the people would be able to see thru the garage doors. Dan Torena responded not in the daytime. Paul Wichmann stated that he would like to see some definition on the garage doors. There was an open discussion on the different styles of garage doors that the applicant could use. Sean McCarthy asked if the glass would be clear or tinted. Dan Torena responded that the glass would be slightly tinted. The Board agreed that the applicant should return with submittals. The Chair opened the public hearing. Don Caetano (43 Lawrence Ave) stated that back in 1993, the Village issued a law that stated that once a business is closed for over one year, the use would lapse. He stated that this property has been closed for over one year. He also stated that he is concerned with parking on Lawrence Ave. Lastly, he stated that the property was never expanded. Karl Dibble (315 N. Broadway) stated that he has no problems with the proposed project. He stated that he is concerned that the building would not be fully sprinklered. He also stated that he is concerned with the drainage on the site. Lastly, he stated that the potential traffic flow could cause some problems. The Chair stated that in 1993, the area was re-zoned. He stated that abandonment is not within the ARB’s jurisdiction. He referred the use requirements, sprinklers, etc to the Village Building Department. There was an open discussion on the lapse of use at the property. Sean McCarthy responded that this project was presented to the Village several months ago and it was determined that the use had not lapsed. John Lentini spoke about the proposed sign on the property. He spoke about how the sign integrates with the building front. Elvira Aloia asked the applicant to have a rendering of the building for the next meeting. She also stated that the phone numbers are not allowed on signs by Village Code. There was an open discussion on the sign colors. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant should incorporate the building number into the sign as well. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, April 28, 2004 4 �This was adjourned to the next meeting. 7) Todd Boccabella Todd Boccabella spoke about the proposed fence. He stated that he is concerned with the safety of his children. He also stated that the fence is in front of an existing retaining wall. Sean McCarthy stated that the fence is only partially visible. The Chair opened the public hearing. There were no public comments on this application. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve this application as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Anna Brabazon Robert Barstow is representing this application along with Anna Brabazon. Robert Barstow spoke about the proposed project. It included adding an 18-foot wide porch in front of the house. He also stated that a bluestone deck would be added to match the bluestone patio. Sean McCarthy asked if a sprinkler system would be required. Robert Barstow responded that a sprinkler system currently exists. The Chair asked if lattice would be used. Robert Barstow responded that concrete would be poured. The Chair asked about the supports. Robert Barstow responded that the porch would be supported by concrete. The Chair opened the public hearing. There were no public comments on this application. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve this application as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 9) Other The Board entered into executive session at 9:44pm. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, April 28, 2004 5 �The meeting resumed at 9:50pm. No action was taken. The Chair made a motion to adjourn. Sean McCarthy seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Adjourned at 9:50pm to the next meeting. Respectfully Submitted, Anthony DelVecchio Recording Secretary APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, April 28, 2004 6 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2004-04-28 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2004 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/cc85fab7643816298cf34351f8013022.pdf fac124e91a5697ab42b5cbeb5b63a8d9 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED May 26, 2004 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chair at 8:17 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Paul Wichmann Carter Sackman Barbara Fina Absent: Elvira Aloia Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Nicholas Ward-Willis (Keane & Beane/ Village Attorney) Agenda: 1) Ester Quendo 86 Beekman Avenue 2) Dan Torena 333 North Broadway 3) Justin Green 4 Lakeview Drive 4) Frank Home Imprvmnts361 North Broadway 5) Barry Clarke 35 Elm Street 6) Maria Freire 42 Howard Street 7) Humphrey Newland 56 Hudson Terrace 8) Manuel Sendon 295 North Washington St 9) Anthony Marmo 37 ½ Amos Street 10)Corey D’Agostinis 14 Depeyster Street 11)Larry Rodrigues 83 Depeyster Street 12)Hiroshi Mitsumoto 165 Hunter Ave 13)Kennedy Construction Pokahoe & Hemlock Drive Sign Permit (Cont.) Sign Permit (Cont.) Retaining wall (Cont.) Revised plans Fence Fence Exterior renovations & walls Addition Garage and bsmt doors & shutters Fences New construction Addition New Construction 1) Ester Quendo This is a continuation from previous meetings. There was nobody present to represent this application. The Chair stated that the applicant would be informed that if an approval is not received at the next meeting, the sign in the window must be removed. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 2) Dan Torena This is a continuation from previous meetings. �John Lentini showed renderings of the front of the property. He submitted a revised logo with new colors. He presented a rendering of the logo and submitted a color scheme. It was discussed that the offset stone would be a few shades different from the building stucco color. Barbara Fina asked about the height of the sign. John Lentini responded that the sign starts at 12-feet above the ground. There was an open discussion on the sign design. There was an open discussion on the exterior colors. The Chair asked if there were public comments. Don Catano (43 Lawrence Ave) stated that the applicant could not use of this property as intended since the timeframe on the permitted use has expired. The Chair responded that the permitted use is beyond the jurisdiction of the Board. Don Catano asked if the Lawrence Avenue side of the property would be illuminated at night. John Torena responded no. There was no further public comment. Paul Wichmann stated that he was concerned with seeing cars inside at nighttime. He asked if the windows could be tinted. There was an open discussion on the appearance of the garage windows. It was decided that the glass on the garage would be colored. There were several open discussions on the exterior building finishes. Carter Sackman asked about the windows. John Torena responded that the window frames would be painted to match the building exterior. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application with the following amendments: 1) doors painted dark green 2) stucco would be almond color 3) band would be installed as a crown molding 4) band color (limestone) would match the keystone Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, May 26, 2004 2 �3) Justin Green This is a continuation from previous meetings. Jennifer Green stated that the Planning Board approval was not required for this application. Sean McCarthy stated that the Building Department has reviewed the drawings and feels that the wall is acceptable. John Green stated that the existing wall is rotting away. He stated that he is concerned with the safety of his children. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted using a gray or red stone. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Frank Home Improvements – Sean McCarthy stated that this application was previously approved with an overhead door. He stated that the applicant wants to make some changes Frank Cerqueira explained the proposed changes. It included replacing the originally proposed garage doors with a single entrance door with a transom. It would also include installing double hung windows. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: 1) In the front elevations - replace the garage door with a series of double hung windows and a single entrance door with a transom. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 5) Barry ClarkeBarry Clarke stated that he wants to install a vinyl fence on his property. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, May 26, 2004 3 �Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant has made numerous improvements at the property. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Barbara Fina made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) Maria Freire Maria Freire explained the proposed application. She stated that she wants to install a fence on her property. The Chair stated that the Board could not approve a 6-foot high fence. He stated that a variance is required. Maria Freire stated that she wants to step the fence down in the rear. She stated that if a 6foot fence were not permitted she would amend the application to request a 5-foot fence. Sean McCarthy stated that the fence could not exceed 3-foot in the front yard since the property is on a corner lot. The applicant was shown on the drawings where the fence must not exceed 3-feet in height. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: 1) approve rear yard fence at 3-feet in height and continue no less than 20-feet on the side yard (Pocantico Street). 2) fence will be a McKinley poplar fence 3) fence height will not exceed 5-feet. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 7) Humphrey Newland Humphrey Newland stated that he wants to remove the chain-link fence and install a stone wall/fence. Sean McCarthy stated that an amended approval is required since the applicant extended the building permit. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, May 26, 2004 4 �The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Manuel SendonSam Vieira is the project architect. He is representing this application on behalf of Manual Sendon. Sam Vieira explained the proposed project. He stated that a one-story addition is proposed. The addition would include renovating the kitchen, bathroom, and bedroom. He submitted photos of the existing residence. He also stated that the exteriors would match the existing. Lastly, he stated that the ballasts would be changed from the existing. The Chair asked about the proposed office included in the addition. Sam Vieira responded that the owner works from home. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Paul Wichmann asked about the size of the house. Sam Vieira responded 2500 square feet. Carter Sackman asked about the kitchen in the basement. Sam Vieira responded that the property is a legal 2-family house. Carter Sackman asked about the square footage in the basement. Sam Vieira responded about 1000 square feet. Paul Wichmann stated that he has some concerns with the roof. Sam Vieira responded that he had the same concerns and tried to re-design the roof. He stated that due to construction costs, zoning requirements, etc. the re-design was undesirable. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 9) Anthony Marmo Anthony Marmo submitted photos of the existing structure. He stated that he wants to APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, May 26, 2004 5 �change the color of the shutters. He stated that one shutter blew off so he wants to change them. He stated that the garage door would also be changed. Barbara Fina asked if the doors and shutters would be blue. Anthony Marmo responded that only the shutter would be blue. He submitted a color chart for the Board. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 10)Corey D’Agostinis Corey D’Agostinis spoke about the proposed fence. The Board stated that the fence to be installed could not be more than 3-feet tall in the front yard. There was an open discussion on what style of fence would go in front of the garage. It was agreed that the fence would be stockade fence. The fence would also have a gate with a lattice top. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve a 3-foot stockade fence in the front yard with a gate. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 11)Larry Rodrigues Joe Bertilino explained the proposed plan. He stated that the existing 3-family structure would be demolished and a new 3-family structure would be built. Carter Sackman asked about the extended porch. Joe Bertilino responded that the extended porch was not an extension. Paul Wichmann asked about the color of the siding. Joe Bertilino responded that the siding color would be olive. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, May 26, 2004 6 �There was none. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 12)Hiroshi Mitsumoto Joe Bertilino is representing this application on behalf of Hiroshi Mitsumoto. Joe Bertilino spoke about the application. He spoke about the Zoning Board’s approval. He spoke about the existing structure. He also spoke about the exterior colors. Lastly, he stated that the exteriors would match the existing. Carter Sackman asked if the garage goes under the addition. Joe Bertilino responded yes. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). The Board entered into executive session at 10:10 with counsel. The meeting resumed at 11:33pm. No action was taken. 13)Kennedy Construction The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: Pokahoe Drive: 1) orientation of the house to change. The floor plan is to be mirrored so that the garage and driveway face the north. 2) placement of vegetation screening on the south side establishing a minimum 10-foot buffer, subject to approval of the Village Architect. 3) reduce the floor-area-ratio – not to exceed 4,600 square feet. 4) minimum 5-foot vegetation buffer on the north side, subject to approval of the Village Architect. Hemlock Drive: 1) reduce the floor-area-ratio to 4500 square feet. 2) install landscaped screening buffer along northern property line at a minimum of five feet in depth, subject to approval of the Village Architect. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, May 26, 2004 7 �3) install landscaped screening buffer along the entire length of the southern property line to a depth of ten feet, subject to approval of the Village Architect. In each case, in satisfying the conditions of approval, there shall be no material deviations to the design of the house and materials from those presented to the ARB in the most recent plans submitted by the applicant, except as directed hereby. In a motion by the Chair, the Board found the action to be consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan goals and policies, provided that it is constructed in accordance with the conditions set forth in the Resolution. The Chair instructed special land use counsel to prepare the text of the Resolution and consistency determination in accordance with the Board’s decision, for circulation and approval as to form prior to the June 2004 meeting along with a consistency determination that the Board finds the proposed houses if constructed in accordance with the conditions, consistent with the LWRP. Carter Sackman seconded. Paul Wichmann stated that he would vote in favor of the Board’s conditional approval but that he would also have approved the applicant’s revised submission without conditions. It was approved unanimously (4-0). Adjourned at 11:35 pm to the next meeting. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, May 26, 2004 8 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2004-05-26 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2004 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/32afe70b968d8f061678590b213ee80e.pdf d3f0e2c3ec924bc1e1d5b5c6a8fe9991 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED June 23, 2004 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chair at 8:11 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Paul Wichmann Sean McCarthy Barbara Fina Absent: Elvira Aloia Carter Sackman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) Approval of Minutes for April and May 2004 meetings Ester Quendo 86 Beekman Avenue Sign Permit (Cont.) Thomas Walek 532 Bellwood Avenue Addition Jennifer Lema 55 Chestnut Street Front Porch Mr. Arevelo 38 Chestnut Street Porch Renovations Santo Favilla 551 Munroe Avenue Stone veneer Elaine Metcalf 127 Devries Avenue 2nd floor addition/new porch Marcelo Poguio 15 Sleepy Hollow Road Rear addition/roof alteration Ichabod’s Landing Announcements – The summer meeting schedule was discussed. The Chair stated that the summer schedule would have to be further discussed with absent members Elvira Aloia and Carter Sackman to check their availability. 1) Approval of Minutes for April and May 2004 meetings The minutes for the April 28, 2004 meeting will be reviewed at the next meeting. The minutes for the May 26, 2004 meeting were reviewed. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 2) Ester Quendo This is a continuation from previous meetings. �There was nobody present to represent this application. The Chair asked if the window sign is still installed in the front window. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair stated that this matter is an enforcement issue. It was agreed that the Village would proceed with enforcement action against the applicant. Barbara Fina made a motion to deny the applicant’s submission to install window signage. It was also noted that the window sign was installed without a permit. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) Thomas Walek – The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Leonard Weinberg is the project architect and is representing this application along with Thomas Walek. Leonard Weinberg stated that the owners want to expand the garage. He stated that the screened porch would be modified for usable space. He stated that the exteriors would match the existing. The Chair asked what was visible from the street. Leonard Weinberg responded that the garage expansion is visible. Barbara Fina asked if the garage would still be used for cars. Leonard Weinberg responded yes. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant has already received a variance for the proposed work. The Chair asked if there were any other Board comments. There was none. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Barbara Fina made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, June 23, 2004 2 �4) Jennifer Lema – The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Jennifer Lema described the proposed work. She stated that the existing porch would be replaced. She stated that the porch roof would be slightly different from the existing roof. She stated that the siding would match in style but the entire house would be completely painted to give a uniform appearance. Paul Wichmann stated that he is concerned with the 6x6 wood post as a structural component. He stated that he would rather see ornamental iron or steel supports. The Chair asked if there were any other Board comments. There was none. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Barbara Fina asked if there are risers on the stairs. Jennifer Lema responded that the stairs are not being changed. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application with the recommendation to change the wood supports to steel. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 5) Mr. Arevelo – The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Pete Ruchiano is representing the applicant. He stated that the application includes removing and replacing a brick wall in the sub-basement. He stated that the wall requires immediate structural repairs. He also stated that the top floor door would be converted to a window. He also stated that the top porch would be eliminated. Barbara Fina asked about the proposed roof. Pete Ruchiano responded that the existing roof structure is deteriorated and will be removed and replaced with concrete. Barbara Fina stated that the drawings are not detailed enough. Paul Wichmann agreed. The Chair asked if the property was a single-family residence. Pete Ruchiano responded yes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, June 23, 2004 3 �Barbara Fina stated that she wants to know all finishes, types of windows, materials, etc. She stated that without this information, she would deny the application. Pete Ruchiano stated that water is infiltrating the applicant’s basement and that structural repairs are needed immediately. Paul Wichmann responded that emergency matters should be directed to the Building Department. He stated that more information is needed on the proposed renovations. It was agreed that the applicant would return with drawings that are more detailed. 6) Santo Favilla – The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Domenic Rendina is representing the applicant. He described the existing stoop. He stated that the existing stoop would be changed to a stone veneer. He presented photos of the current house and renderings of the proposed work. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant currently has building permits for the walkway and the lawn sprinkler system. The Chair asked if there were any other Board comments. There was none. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 7) Elaine Metcalf – The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Lawrence Slate is representing the applicant. He discussed the proposed changes. He stated that the 2nd floor would be added. He spoke about the new wood porch. He also stated that the proposed finishes would match the existing. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant has received a variance for the front yard setback. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, June 23, 2004 4 �Barbara Fina stated that the widows are small on the proposed second floor addition. Lawrence Slate responded that the new windows are small for privacy and to accommodate the existing roofline. Barbara Fina stated that the colors are contrasting. Lawrence Slate responded that the trim is white and the stucco is celery. He stated that the roof is gray. He also stated that the fieldstone veneer would be added to the structure. Barbara Fina asked about the railing colors. Lawrence Slate responded that the railings would be painted wood and the color would be white. The Chair asked if there were any other Board comments. There was none. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Barbara Fina made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Marcelo Poguio – The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair asked if any variances were required because of the proposed work. Sean McCarthy responded no variances are required. Steven Costa is representing the applicant. He briefly described the proposed changes. He stated that the window locations would remain the same. He stated that the roof would be replaced. He also stated that the siding would be silver-gray in color. The Chair asked if there were any other Board comments. There was none. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. There was an open discussion on the location of the windows and the location of the dormers. Paul Wichmann asked if an 8” band could be installed at the roofline to enhance the appearance. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, June 23, 2004 5 �Steven Costa agreed that a band could be installed. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that an 8-10” band be installed on the underside of the roof eave and that the band continue around the entire house. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 9) Ichabod’s Landing Bruce Lozito is representing this application along with Architect, John Carver. Bruce Lozito presented the approved site plan to the Board. He discussed the details of buildings 1 thru 4. He presented the proposed materials for all buildings. He provided brick samples, stucco colors, trim, etc. He also spoke about the retail space. John Carver stated that each retail space would be different from the others. Barbara Fina asked if the facades would be uniform or unique. John Carver responded that the facades would be unique. Paul Wichmann asked about the previous suggestion for a conical roof. Bruce Lozito presented a drawing of a conical roof on Building E. The Board agreed that the conical roof is aesthetically preferred. Bruce Lozito discussed the Building 4 front elevations. Sean McCarthy asked about the Building 3 retail space ceiling heights. Bruce Lozito responded that the height ranges from 9-feet to 10 ½-feet. There was an open discussion on retail space signage. John Carver asked if there is a Village height restriction on signage. Sean McCarthy responded that the limitation was 7-feet above the floor. There was an open discussion on the use of marquis style signage for the retail space. Paul Wichmann suggested the use of gooseneck lighting in certain areas. Bruce Lozito reviewed the Building 4 proposed roofing materials. There was an open discussion on the appearance of the Slateline product. Barbara Fina asked if the applicant was providing planters. Bruce Lozito responded yes. He stated that the planters would be made of composite plastic. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, June 23, 2004 6 �Paul Wichmann questioned the powder coat railing. He stated that it should be made of ornamental iron. John Carver responded that the ornamental iron would be a maintenance issue. There was an open discussion on ways to further detail the railing and make it more decorative. The Chair asked if there were any other Board comments. There was none. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted subject to subsequent submittals on the following: a) storefront lighting b) railings c) storefront signage (separately submitted) d) installation of conical roof (E-unit on Building 4) The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). It was agreed that the developer would return for approval on signage for retail space as opposed to dealing with the individual tenants. Adjourned at 10:15 pm to the next meeting. Respectfully Submitted, Anthony DelVecchio Recording Secretary APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, June 23, 2004 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2004-06-23 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2004 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/7052a5e0324d0848c4b4eb287fdb40cb.pdf 0e4afc4ffc19d17daf626a4508831966 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED July 28, 2004 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chair at 8:06 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Paul Wichmann Elvira Aloia Carter Sackman Absent: Barbara Fina Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) CARS, Inc Baseseu Becker Glover Cabreja Rodrigues Galgano Arevelo Armster 333 North Broadway 37 Pierson Avenue 5 Millard Ave 35 Holland Avenue 42 Pocantico Street 72 Chestnut Street 59 Sleepy Hollow Road 38 Chestnut Street 54 Hudson Terrace Revised Sign Addition & Patio Front Portico Front renovation & addition Relocate retaining wall 2nd floor addition Garage Continued Renovations, additions & garage removal 10) Approval of Minutes for April & June 2004 meeting 11) Other business Announcements – The Chair stated that since only four members are present, a unanimous vote would be required for approval. 1) CARS, Inc Gino Torena is the applicant and is representing the application. Gino Torena stated that the previously approved sign is too small. He stated that he would like to change the sign from 3’ x 3’ to a larger 4’ x 6’. He also stated that he would like to add the text “Firestone/Bridgestone” on the sign. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. �Paul Wichmann noted that the increase is substantial. He stated that the proposed sign will be large on the existing pole. There was an open discussion on the location and the size of the existing sign. Gino Torena submitted photos to demonstrate the size of the existing sign. He spoke about installing bay banners that would be displayed in front of the property. Sean McCarthy stated that the banners will be permanent and need to be submitted to the Board for approval. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the increase in the size of the sign from 3’x 3’ to 4’ x 6”. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 2) Baseseu Elizabeth Baseseu is the applicant and is representing the application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant had received a variance from the ZBA. Elizabeth Baseseu stated that she is looking to expand the existing driveway. She stated that the neighbors expressed several concerns so the driveway will be moved in 8” into the property to address the neighbors concerns on the retaining wall. The Chair stated that the proposed 6-foot fence is not allowed under the Village Zoning Code. He stated that only a 5-foot fence is allowed in the rear and side yards up to the front yard setback. He also stated that only a 3-foot fence is permitted in the front yard. There was an open discussion on the fence height. Sean McCarthy read the appropriate Village Code section aloud. The Chair stated that only a minor portion of the proposed addition (open portico and fences) is within the Board’s jurisdiction. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Robert Ryan (25 Pierson Ave) stated that he has several concerns: 1) Existing fence between properties is a 6-foot high fence. He stated that by changing the fence height to 5-feet will open the views. He is opposed to the change is fence height. Architectural Review Board meeting, July 28, 2004-APPROVED 2 �There was an open discussion on the zoning code and the permitted fence height. 2) He stated that he is not proposed to the proposed work. He stated that the brick wall in the front would have to be shortened. 3) Each house has a green space on the side of the house. He stated that the proposed driveway would eliminate the applicants existing green space. 4) He stated that he is concerned with the driveway being located within 2-feet of his house. He expressed concerns about water infiltration into the basement of his residence. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. Paul Wichmann asked if the wall would be restored. Elizabeth Baseseu responded that it would be replaced. Paul Wichmann asked if there is blacktop on the existing driveway. Elizabeth Baseseu responded that there is some blacktop and some gravel. Paul Wichmann stated that he is concerned with drainage on the site. Elizabeth Baseseu responded that curtain drains will be installed around the driveway to maintain drainage on site. Carter Sackman stated that he would like to see the pillars in the front preserved. He stated that he is concerned with the fence and that the wall materials are not established. He stated that he would like to see samples. Sean McCarthy responded that the application calls for the fence to be replaces. He stated that the fence will be the same as existing. Elvira Aloia asked if there are any code requirements for the driveway. Sean McCarthy responded that since the driveway is for a residential purpose and that it is for no more than 3 cars, it is allowed. He stated that the wall will have to be moved to have some excavations done on the neighbors’ property. Carter Sackman stated that more information is needed on the stone wall materials. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the fence as submitted subject to meeting the Zoning Code, deferring action on the driveway and wall until the Building Department can obtain more information. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) Becker Robert Barstow is the project architect and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Architectural Review Board meeting, July 28, 2004-APPROVED 3 �Robert Barstow summarized the proposed changes. He stated that the existing stoop would be changed. He also stated that he would verify the setback dimensions. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Glover Robert Glover is the applicant and is representing the application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Robert Glover stated that the front porch will be changed to a cedar porch. He stated tat ha bay window would be installed in the front. He stated that the upstairs would be expanded. The Chair asked if the tree would remain. Robert Glover responded yes. The Chair asked if the rear elevation is visible from the street. Robert Glover responded no. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. Elvira Aloia stated that the addition appears to be completely different from the existing structure. Paul Wichmann noted the dissimilarities in the windows. Robert Glover stated that the architect selected the windows. Carter Sackman stated that he was concerned with the selection of a bay window in the front of the house. There was an open discussion on how the architect could make the proposed renovations more symmetrical. Paul Wichmann stated that the front elevation needs more detail. The Board unanimously agreed that the design architect would call the Village Architect to discuss. Carter Sackman made a motion to adjourn this application to the next meeting. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Architectural Review Board meeting, July 28, 2004-APPROVED 4 �5) Cabreja John Turnquist is the project architect and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. John Turnquist stated that the new poured concrete wall will replace the existing stone retaining wall. He stated that the existing finishes would be matched. He also stated that the parking would be created in the front yard. He also stated that the applicant has received a zoning variance for the proposed work. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Catherine Cappello (next-door neighbor) stated that she was concerned with her underground storage tank and the proposed work. She stated that she had no problems with the proposed parking in the front yard. John Turnquist responded that the new wall would be reinforced concrete with a stucco finish. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. Paul Wichmann stated that he was concerned with the construction methods for the retaining wall. There was an open discussion on the ARB’s jurisdiction. Elvira Aloia stated that she would like to see the stone all the way around. She did not like the stucco finish. John Turnquist stated that no work was being performed on the house itself. Several alternatives were discussed. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: 1) Replace the existing masonry stairs with rails to match the porch. 2) South elevation of stairs at the elevation of the parking area to be finished with stone. 3) Wall should be changed to poured reinforced concrete instead of originally proposed concrete block. 4) Planting bed between house and 9’ stone retaining wall. 5) Subject to obtaining a permit to remove trees from Village Tree Commission. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Architectural Review Board meeting, July 28, 2004-APPROVED 5 �6) Rodrigues John Turnquist is the project architect and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. He also stated that a variance was obtained for the proposed project. John Turnquist described the proposed project. He stated that the project would mimic the existing dwelling unit. He stated that the finishes would match the existing. He stated that two bedrooms would be added on the second floor. Paul Wichmann asked about the exterior finishes on the left-hand and right-hand sides of the house. John Turnquist responded that the exterior on the left side was stucco and on the right side was aluminum siding. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. Paul Wichmann stated that he would like to see more exterior diversity. Carter Sackman made a motion to adjourn this application to the next meeting. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 7) Galgano John Turnquist is the project architect and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. John Turnquist stated that the applicant wants to add a garage. He stated that the exterior finish of the house is clapboard siding. He stated that all exterior finishes would be matched on the garage. He stated that the garage would have windows and would have exterior brass lighting to match the house. He stated that the roof shingles would also match the house. He also stated that the garage is proposed to be constructed 1-foot back from the house to make the structure appear more uniform. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. Carter Sackman made a motion to adjourn this application to the next meeting. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Architectural Review Board meeting, July 28, 2004-APPROVED 6 �8) Arevelo This is a continuation from a previous meeting. Pete Ruchiano is representing this application on behalf of the applicant. Pete Ruchiano spoke about the proposed project. He stated that the project would remove the top door and replace it with a window. He showed photos of the current conditions property. The Chair asked why the porch roof was being eliminated. Pete Ruchiano responded that the owner wants to eliminate the current roof. Pete Ruchiano spoke about the exterior changes and the proposed railings. The Chair stated that he was concerned with the removal of the porch. Paul Wichmann stated that he was concerned with the structural loads. There was an open discussion on the submitted documents. The Board expressed concerns on the completeness of the submitted drawings and supporting documents. The Board unanimously agreed that they wanted to see all components together to make an aesthetic decision. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. Carter Sackman made a motion to deny the application. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 9) Armster – Svem Armster is the applicant and is representing this application. Svem Armster gave an overview of the proposed renovations via a mass model. He stated that the house is a 2-family house. He described the changes to the exterior and that the gable would be extended forward. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Tony Celente (owns house next door) stated that he supports the proposed project. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. Sean McCarthy asked about the roof materials Svem Armster responded asphalt shingles. Architectural Review Board meeting, July 28, 2004-APPROVED 7 �Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: 1) cedar tongue and groove exterior 2) trim to be semi-transparent stain 3) trim material to be white cedar 4) aluminum gutters 5) windows to be Marvin casement 6) rail construction to be 1”x4” with 4-inch spacing and a 1”x3” cap 7) garage to be demolished Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 10) Approval of Minutes for April & June 2004 meeting The Chair made a motion to approve the April 2004 meeting minutes as amended. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). The Chair made a motion to approve the June 2004 meeting minutes as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 11) Other business The Board entered into executive session at 10:20pm. The meeting resumed at 10:22pm. No action was taken. Adjourned at 10:26 pm to the next meeting. Respectfully Submitted, Anthony DelVecchio Recording Secretary Architectural Review Board meeting, July 28, 2004-APPROVED 8 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2004-07-28 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2004 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/b61a8073b8ae64e1a5b8dd9a79c747f7.pdf 0c119b6e8495655492e511f44a6ac2c7 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED August 25, 2004 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chair at 8:12 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Paul Wichmann Elvira Aloia Sean McCarthy (Village Architect - proxy for Carter Sackman) Absent: Barbara Fina Carter Sackman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Approval of Minutes for July 2004 meeting 2) Glover 35 Holland Avenue 3) CARS, Inc 333 North Broadway 4) Rodrigues 33 Hudson Terrace 5) Poguio 15 Sleepy Hollow Road 6) RHMS Life Center 34 Beekman Avenue 7) Altabef 240 Hunter Avenue 8) Other business Front renovation & addition Revised Sign Fence Revised Plans Facade Addition of sunroom Announcements – The Chair stated that since only three members are present, the Village Architect would serve as a proxy member. He also stated that a unanimous vote would be required for approval. 1) Approval of minutes Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the July 2004 meeting minutes as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 2) Glover This is a continuations from previous meetings. Robert Glover is the applicant and is representing the application. �Robert Glover asked if his architect’s letter was received by the Board. The Board acknowledged that it had received the letter. The Chair asked the Village Architect to summarize the changes in the revised plans. Sean McCarthy discussed the front and side elevation changes. They included a change to the roof peak, exterior finishes, and materials as well as changes to the windows on the lower level. The Chair asked if the rear of the house was visible from the street. Sean McCarthy responded no. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Elvira Aloia stated that the changes to the plans are an improvement. Paul Wichmann agreed. He inquired about the roof peak. Sean McCarthy responded that it complies with the Village Zoning Code. Elvira Aloia made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) CARS, Inc Dan Torena is the applicant and is representing the application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Dan Torena discussed the proposed bay banners that would be installed at his property. The Chair asked if the banners are visible when the doors are closed. Dan Torena responded that the banners would always be visible, The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Elvira Aloia asked if the proposed sign size was allowed under the Village code. There was an open discussion on whether the signs are allowed by the Code. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, August 25, 2004 2 �It was agreed that a sign variance would be required. The Board expressed a concern in keeping the banners looking new. Dan Torena agreed. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the bay banners application with the condition that the banners be maintained. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Dan Torena discussed changes to the windows that were previously approved by the Board. He explained how the window pivot would change. He also stated that all of the windows would match. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the change in windows as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Rodrigues Isabel Rodrigues is the applicant and is representing the application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Isabel Rodrigues discussed the proposed fence installation. She stated that a 5-foot high stockade fence would be installed. The Chair asked about the ownership of the existing chain-link fence. Isabel Rodrigues responded that the existing fence is owned by the high school. Elvira Aloia asked if the fence would be installed on the left side only. Sean McCarthy responded yes. He stated that the fence would not be installed in the front or rear yards. He also stated that the fence installation would not exceed the front yard setback. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 5) Poguio The Chair stated that the applicant is appearing before the Board due to deviations in the previously approved plans. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, August 25, 2004 3 �Steven Costa is representing this application on behalf of the applicant. He discussed the changes to the plans that the Board approved back in June 2004. The Chair asked if the changes were visible from the road. Sean McCarthy responded that the right side elevations are visible from the road. Steven Costa stated that the dormer in the front and the new attic window are the only changes from the original plans. The Chair asked if the retaining wall requires Planning Board approval. Sean McCarthy responded no. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Robert Barstow (39 Amos Street) stated that he is concerned with the rear elevation. He stated that there are four retaining walls that exist in series between the property and his backyard. Paul Wichmann asked about the Floor-Area-Ratio (FAR) for this project. Sean McCarthy responded that the proposed structure would be at the maximum value allowed under the Village code. He also stated that if the attic would be used for habitable space (since the dormers are now larger), the structure would exceed the allowable FAR. There was an open discussion on the definition of habitable space. The Chair stated that the increase in space reflects a potential to use the space for a habitable use. He stated that a variance needs to be secured prior to ARB approval. Stephen Costa stated that the owners might want to use this space in the future. The Chair stated that the variance is required now. He stated that the work was performed without a permit and without ARB approval. He stated that the work is illegal and he would not approve of the increase to the dormer size. Robert Barstow questioned the proposed 55% FAR. Stephen Costa responded that he would submit calculation to support. The Chair stated that if the allowable 55% is exceeded, then a variance is required. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair made a motion to adjourn this application to the next meeting so that the FAR issues can be resolved. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) RHMS Life Center - APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, August 25, 2004 4 �The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Rick Rasney is the contractor and is representing this application. He stated that the project would replace the existing stucco facade and replace it with a new brick facade. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. Paul Wichmann asked how the existing windows would join to the new exterior. Rick Rasney responded that the brick would abut to the existing windows. He stated that there would be a 2” return on the right and left sides. He also stated that the sign would be re-installed on the masonry face. Elvira Aloia stated that she wants detailed drawings that illustrate the proposed project. She stated that she is concerned that the windows will not fit with the new exterior. There was an open discussion on the submission of detailed plans so the Board could visualize the architectural details and aesthetic impacts to the building. Paul Wichmann made a motion to adjourn this application to the next meeting. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 7) Altabef The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair stated that the Board had received revised plans. He stated that he had investigated whether this project is visible from any public streets. There was an open discussion on whether the Board has jurisdiction over this application. The Chair stated that sufficient details have not been provided regarding views from public streets. Leonard Leo is the sunroom manufacturer/contractor and is representing the applicants. Leonard Leo stated that he would provide sufficient visuals for the Board to review at the next meeting. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, August 25, 2004 5 �Elizabeth Conners (238 Hunter Ave) stated that she is concerned with the trees that have been removed from the property. She also stated that she is concerned with the height of the proposed structure. She also stated that the proposed structure will be visible from Riverside Avenue in the wintertime. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair made a motion to adjourn this application to the next meeting so that the applicant can provide the necessary visuals. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Other business Ester Pagano (35 Hudson Terrace) requested to speak to the Board. She addressed the Board about a fence installation. The Chair referred her back to the Building Department. Adjourned at 9:53 pm to the next meeting. Respectfully Submitted. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, August 25, 2004 6 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2004-08-25 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2004 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/f38c105c5a880615fb1be4bd3db86ae9.pdf ba6b8512a3af35d0cc1fe0d649029870 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED September 22, 2004 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chair at 8:06 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Paul Wichmann Barbara Fina Carter Sackman Elvira Aloia Ana Maria McGinnis Absent: None Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Phil Zegarelli (Mayor, Village of Sleepy Hollow) Agenda: U 1) Jimmy Lovz Riverview 226 Beekman Avenue 2) Approval of Minutes for August 2004 meeting 3) Poguio 15 Sleepy Hollow Road 4) RHMS Life Center 34 Beekman Avenue 5) Basescu 37 Pierson Avenue 6) Altabef 240 Hunter Avenue 7) Pagano 35 Hudson Terrace 8) Dugan 138 Merlin Avenue 9) Occhipinti Webber Avenue 10)Aloia 11 Evergreen Way Sign Permit Revised Plans Facade Addition & Patio Addition of sunroom New chain link fence Gate Amended approval Driveway & retaining walls Announcements – U Mayor Zegarelli swore in new member Ana Maria McGinnis. 1) Jimmy Lovz Riverview U Steve Chester is representing this application on behalf of the applicant. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair stated that this application is for a new sign at the restaurant entrance on Beekman Avenue. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. �Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Carter Sackman asked about the color of the awning. Steve Chester submitted a color sample to the Board indicating the proposed color. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. Elvira Aloia asked about the size of the lettering on the sign. Sean McCarthy responded that the size of the lettering could not be larger than 16” as per Village Code. It was unanimously approved (6-0). 2) Approval of minutes U Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the August 2004 meeting minutes as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 3) Poguio U This is a continuation from previous meetings. The Chair summarized the application to date. Steven Costa is representing this application on behalf of the applicant. He stated that according to the Village Code, space that is under 7-feet in height is exempt from the Floor-Area-Ratio (FAR) calculations. He provided a revised drawing of the attic floor space. The drawing showed that most of the attic is below 7-foot. He stated that the FAR requirements are 2750 square feet and the proposed structure will have 2703 square feet. The Chair asked about methods of egress from the attic space. Steven Costa responded that the existing structure is fully sprinklered. He also stated that all fire code requirements have been satisfied. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. Sean McCarthy stated that Robert Barstow (neighbor) came in to the Building Department to look at the revised plans regarding the FAR. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, September 22, 2004 2 �The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Carter Sackman stated that some dimensions are missing from the drawing. Sean McCarthy responded that the drawing was scaled by the Building Department to verify the FAR calculations. Carter Sackman asked if a physical inspection was performed. Sean McCarthy responded that a framing inspection was done. There was an open discussion on the procedures of the Building Department regarding inspections and enforcement issues. Steven Costa stated that based on the prior approval, the applicant was not considering using the attic space but since the Village Code permits its use, the applicant is proposing to use the attic space. The Chair asked if there were any further comments. There was none. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimously approved (6-0). 4) RHMS Life Center U This is a continuation from previous meetings. Rick Rasney is the contractor representing this application along with owner Sister Susan Gardella. The Chair noted that the Board had received a new drawing. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Barbara Fina asked if there was a photo of the existing building. Rick Rasney responded no. He stated that only a rendering of the proposed work exists. Barbara Fina questioned the appearance of the keystones. It was discussed that sculpted stucco would be used as keystones. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, September 22, 2004 3 �Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application with a smooth stucco band on the top 12-inches of the building to simulate limestone with a center coin over the center window. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 5) Basescu U This is a continuation from previous meetings. The Chair summarized the application to date. Neil Basescu is the applicant and is representing this application. He stated that the plans have been revised to reflect the neighbors concerns. He stated that the proposed retaining wall was moved 8-inches inward from the property line. He stated that the proposed footing construction has also been revised. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. There was an open discussion on the front existing retaining wall and the proposed retaining wall. It was agreed that the stone and brick wall would not be effective in widening the driveway. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimously approved (6-0). 6) Altabef U This is a continuation from the previous meeting. The Chair summarized the application. The Chair referred to Sean McCarthy concerning views from the street. Sean McCarthy responded that based on the Board’s request at the last meeting, a post was mounted on the property in the proposed location of the structure. He stated that the proposed structure would be visible from Hunter Avenue. Jeff Altabef is the owner and representing this project along with Leonard Leo (contractor). The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, September 22, 2004 4 �Elizabeth Conners (238 Hunter Ave) stated that she has several concerns with this application. She stated that she is concerned with visibility. Elizabeth Conners referred to the recent amendments in the LWRP regarding 1-2 family homes. She stated that she is concerned with the property value of her home. She stated that when the foliage falls off the trees in autumn, their existing view of the Hudson River would be blocked by this proposed structure. She read a prepared statement opposing the project. She stated that the proposed structure is out-of-character with the neighborhood. Lastly, she requested that the Board refer the application to the Waterfront Advisory Committee for consistency findings with the LWRP. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if a survey of both properties side-by-side exists. It was agreed that this document did not exist. Jeff Altabef stated that the existing structure could not be expanded on either side or upwards. He stated that expansion could only occur towards the rear of the property. Barbara Fina asked about the protection of river views in the Village Code. The Chair responded that the Village Code does not recognize protecting private views. Sean McCarthy confirmed the Chair’s statement. Paul Wichmann stated that the Board should be set-up to protect river views. Jeff Altabef stated that his property value would decrease if the Village determined that he could not expand the house. There was an open discussion on whether or not to refer the application to the Waterfront Advisory Committee. The Chair stated that the Waterfront Advisory Committee could not consider this application since the impact is only related to a private view. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Carter Sackman asked about the proposed materials. Leonard Leo discussed the materials to be used in the proposed construction. Elvira Aloia asked how much of the structure would be visible. Jeff Altabef responded about two-to-three feet. Carter Sackman asked if the transom is operable. Leonard Leo responded no. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, September 22, 2004 5 �Carter Sackman stated that he has no problems with the application. Elvira Aloia asked if the property would be landscaped. Karen Altabef responded yes. Paul Wichmann noted a comment on the drawings regarding gutters and leaders. Sean McCarthy responded that the comment was an error and was corrected by the contractor in a letter. Elvira Aloia asked about the height of the structure. Leonard Leo responded that the structure would be 12 ½ -feet tall. Barbara Fina asked about the contents of the room. Jeff Altabef responded that a therapeutic hot tub would be installed. He stated that the additional space would allow the family to use a table in the kitchen area. Barbara Fina made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 7) Pagano U The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ester and Tino Pagano are the owners and are representing this application. Ester Pagano stated that the fence is needed to keep out neighboring children. Sean McCarthy stated that the property is one house removed from the high school. The Chair asked about the height of the fence. Ester Pagano responded 5-foot high. Sean McCarthy stated that the fence is already installed. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Barbara Fina stated that a chain-link fence is not appropriate. Carter Sackman agreed. Tino Pagano stated that other houses in the area have similar fences. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, September 22, 2004 6 �Barbara Fina made a motion to deny the application. Carter Sackman asked if the posts were in concrete. Tino Pagano responded no. He stated that the posts are only in the ground. Carter Sackman seconded the motion to deny the application. He stated that he would like to see an amended application. The application was denied by a vote of 5-0-1 (Wichmann abstained). The applicant was advised that the installed fence presented before the Board would have to be removed. There was an open discussion on the direction provided by the Village Building Inspector. 8) Dugan U The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Brian Dugan is the owner and is representing this application. Brian Dugan stated that the proposed fence would be 3-foot in height and would be a cedar pressure-treated fence to match the neighbors existing fence. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Barbara Fina asked about the need for the fence. Brian Dugan responded that the fence would keep his dogs enclosed and keep his small children safe. The Chair stated that based on the submitted plans, only the gate requires approval. Barbara Fina made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 9) Occhipinti – U The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, September 22, 2004 7 �Frank Occhipinti is representing this application. He stated that this application would be an amendment of a previous approval. He stated that the new application proposes to add 3 additional dormers to the structure. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. Frank Occhipinti stated that the original approval included a colored concrete foundation. He stated that the instead of a colored foundation, a stone face might be added. Barbara Fina asked if the siding on the base of dormers would match the rest of the structure. Frank Occhipinti responded yes. Barbara Fina made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 10) Aloia U Elvira Aloia recused herself from this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Elvira Aloia briefly described the proposed project. She stated that the new retaining wall would match the exterior of the house. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. There was none. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimously approved (5-0) (Aloia abstained). Adjourned at 10:50 pm to the next meeting. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, September 22, 2004 8 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2004-09-22 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2004 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/d4ec4036d980c15735d4ffaa3a21178d.pdf 45f569d6b252faefd5bc7420fbec3196 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED October 27, 2004 The meeting was called to order by Carter Sackman, Acting Chairman at 8:05 p.m. Present: Carter Sackman, Acting Chairman Paul Wichmann Barbara Fina Ana Maria McGinnis Absent: Don Stever, Chairman Elvira Aloia Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect, Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: U 1) Vieira’s Service Station 215 North Broadway 2) Ferriera 27 Fremont Road 3) Garcia 24 New Broadway 4) Berkowitz 45 Hemlock Drive 5) Rodrigues 83 Depeyster Street 6) Conklin 508 Bellwood Avenue 7) McGlynn 32 Fremont Avenue 8) Knapp 473 Bellwood Avenue 9) Tripp 34 New Broadway 10) Meeting schedules for November and December 11) Minutes for September 2004 meeting Façade Alterations Dormer Addition Front Awning & Door Fence Fence Front Entrance Renovations Addition Enlarge Driveway & Stone Walls Change front steps & railing Announcements – None. 1) Vieira’s Service Station U Linda Standley is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Linda Standley stated that one bay has been temporarily boarded up until Exxon Mobil completed their Network Plan. The Network Plan will convert the building from the existing service bays to a convenience store. �The Chair stated that the Board could grant temporary approval until the Network Plan is completed. Ana Maria McGinnis asked when the Network Plan is expected to be completed. Linda Standley responded that Exxon Mobil has stated that it might be completed in 2005. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Barbara Fina asked about the color of the new façade. Linda Standley responded gray. She stated that the color is an Exxon Mobil standard. Paul Wichmann stated that the appearance looks sloppy. Barbara Fina agreed. Paul Wichmann asked who owns the property. Linda Standley responded that Exxon Mobil owns the property. Paul Wichmann stated that the Village should send a letter to Exxon Mobil asking them to correct this deficiency. Barbara Fina stated that 2 years is not a temporary solution. The Chair made a motion to carry over this item to the next meeting. The applicant should return with a better plan or a letter will be sent to Exxon Mobil. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimously approved (4-0). 2) Ferriera U Joe Bertolino is the project architect and is representing this application of behalf of the applicant. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Joe Bertolino summarized the proposed project. He discussed the proposed addition of a dormer on the East side of the house. He stated that the new finishes would match the existing finishes. Sean McCarthy stated that only a portion of the rear addition is visible from the street. Barbara Fina asked if any photos of the existing house are available. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, October 27, 2004 2 �Joe Bertolino responded no. The Chair asked if the adjacent house was recently renovated. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Nick Lanima (25 Fremont Road) stated that he was concerned with the drainage on the site. Joe Bertolino responded that the drainage for the proposed addition would be addressed. Paul Wichmann stated that the owner could install curtain drains. Since there was no further public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. There was none. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the comment that the building department checks to the drainage issues. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimously approved (4-0). 3) Garcia U Carlos Garcia is the owner and is representing his application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Carlos Garcia stated that the application includes adding an awning and renovating the entry door and adding a new handrail. The Board agreed that wood columns would be better than the proposed steel columns. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. There was none. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimously approved (4-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, October 27, 2004 3 �4) Berkowitz U Jack Berkowitz is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded that there is an issue with the public notices but the applicant was present to explain. Jack Berkowitz stated that a 42-inch tall fence was installed on his property. He stated that the fence height was reduced to 36-inches to comply with the zoning code. He stated that notices were previously sent out twice for this application but since the application/public notice was revised at the last minute, notices for tonight’s meeting were not sent out in time. There was an open discussion on whether or not the public was properly noticed. Jack Berkowitz submitted photos to the Board. Barbara Fina asked if the fence would be lowered. Jack Berkowitz responded that the fence is currently 36-inches tall. Barbara Fina asked about the proposed color of the fence. Jack Berkowitz responded that the fence would be painted white. The Chair stated that this application should be adjourned to the next meeting so that the public could be properly noticed. This item was adjourned to the next meeting. 5) Rodrigues U Larry Rodrigues is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Larry Rodrigues stated that the existing chain like fence was replaced with a new wrought iron fence. He submitted photos to the Board. The Chair asked if this application was submitted to correct an illegally installed fence. Larry Rodrigues responded yes. Barbara Fina asked about the front gate. Larry Rodrigues responded that there is no front gate. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, October 27, 2004 4 �The Board discussed the existing building approval granted by the Architectural Review Board and whether the approvals were followed. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair stated that the applicant needs to better illustrate the location of the fence on the survey. The Board also requested that more details on the fence be provided. Barbara Fina stated that the Board would not approve an application based on photos and verbal changes. Larry Rodrigues stated that he would provide catalog cuts of possible designs. These would be provided for the next meeting. This item was adjourned to the next meeting. 6) Conklin U Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application of behalf of the applicant. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sam Vieira summarized the proposed project. He spoke about the proposed renovations to the entrance and the addition of columns. He stated that the roofing materials would match the existing roof. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 7) McGlynn U Joseph Paiva is the project architect and is representing this application of behalf of the applicants. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, October 27, 2004 5 �Joseph Paiva summarized the proposed project. He discussed the 2-story addition. He stated that there are no changes to the front of the house. He stated that the changes are to the rear of the structure. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the siding was changing. Joseph Paiva responded that the siding would match the existing siding. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair stated that there is little impact from Fremont Road. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if there is a privacy issue with the side neighbor. Joseph Paiva responded that the side neighbor would not be greatly impacted. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Knapp U Linda Knapp is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Linda Knapp spoke about the existing condition of the steps. She stated that this application proposes to expand the existing driveway to accommodate two cars. She stated that the steps would be re-constructed and that a wrought iron railing would be installed. She stated that the landscaping would remain. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the retaining wall would be re-built or just refaced. Linda Knapp responded that the wall would be re-built. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. There was none. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, October 27, 2004 6 �9) Tripp U Ty Castro (Castro Landscaping) is the contractor and is representing this application along with the owners, Sandy and Nick Tripp. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ty Castro stated that the project would replace the existing wooden steps to the porch with stone. He stated that the stone to be used would match the rear wall. He stated that the existing brick and retaining wall would remain. The Chair opened the meeting for public comments. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public comment period. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. He summarized the application as follows: replace the front wood risers, treads, and side cheek walls with stone. The stone will match the blue stone retaining wall located in the rear of the property. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 10) Meeting schedules for November and December U The Board agreed that the next meeting would be held on either November 22, 2004 or on December 8, 2004. This meeting would serve as the last meeting for the calendar year. Sean McCarthy stated that he would confirm the date. 11) Minutes for September 2004 meeting The minutes for the September 2004 meeting were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Adjourned at 9:30 pm to the next meeting. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, October 27, 2004 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2004-10-27 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2004 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/cc0dff0a732be8299ff76c1f097483ec.pdf 1777ee237e8446c7cdb69daac013c74a PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED November 22, 2004 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chairman at 8:06 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Elvira Aloia Carter Sackman Paul Wichmann Barbara Fina Ana Maria McGinnis Absent: None Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Cacandian 2) Berkowitz 3) Rodrigues 4) Vieira’s Service Station 5) Minutes of the October 2004 meetings 6) Other 16 Bedford Road 45 Hemlock Drive 83 Depeyster Street 215 North Broadway Announcements: None. 1) Romeo CacandianEmilio Escalades is the project engineer and is representing this application along with Romeo Cacandian. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Emilio Escalades spoke about the changes to the site plan. He stated that the change was due to site conditions. He spoke about the revised retaining wall system. He stated that larger blocks would allow the owner to install the required retaining wall with minimal excavating. He also stated that there was a concern about excavating so close to the adjacent property owners shed. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the height of the original wall. Emilio Escalades responded that the original wall ranged between 2’-6’ with plantings above the wall. �Paul Wichmann asked for clarification on the location of the wall. Emilio Escalades clarified the location via the revised site plan. Elvira Aloia asked about the retaining wall in the front of the house. Emilio Escalades responded that the front retaining wall would be installed as originally planned. Paul Wichmann asked about the number of feet of cut required for the retaining wall. Emilio Escalades responded that 8-feet of cut is required. He stated that the original wall was 8feet high but the revised wall is only 4-feet high. Carter Sackman asked why the design change was needed. Emilio Escalades responded that the change was required due to the location of the utility meters. Sean McCarthy produced the original site plan that illustrated the placement of the original wall. He questioned the applicants ability to provide the proposed two 14’-long parking spaces. Romeo Cacandian responded that only one parking space would be provided in the driveway under the proposed plan. He stated that three spaces would be provided in the garage. Paul Wichmann asked if the wall steps back. Emilio Escalades responded yes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Anthony DelVecchio (22 Bedford Road) submitted a letter to the Board. He summarized the letter. He stated that the construction at the site was eroding his property. He also stated that he was concerned with the safety of his young children. There being no further public comments, the public hearing was closed. Paul Wichmann spoke about the retaining wall system. He questioned the elevation of the wall that would effectively restore the neighbor’s property back to its original grade. Emilio Escalades stated that the wall could be constructed higher in order to restore the neighbor’s property. The Chairman responded that the applicant is obligated to restore the neighbor’s property. There was a suggestion that this application be referred to the Planning Board to make sure that it is a solid engineering solution. There was an open discussion on whether Planning Board review is required. Emilio Escalades stated that the wall would be built whether the Board liked it or not. He stated that the applicant is running out of money and needs to move into the house immediately. The Chair asked Emilio Escalades to leave the meeting. He was escorted from the room by Sean McCarthy. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 22, 2004 2 �Romeo Cacandian apologized for the comments made by Emilio Escalades. Elvira Aloia stated that she would like to see renderings of the wall and the house together. Romeo Cacandian spoke about the original retaining wall system and the construction benefits of using the revised retaining wall system. He stated that the revised retaining wall system will require very little excavating. Paul Wichmann asked about the size of the blocks. Sean McCarthy responded that the blocks are 2’ x 4’ and weigh 3500 lbs each. He stated that the revised retaining wall could be used as a temporary wall system so that the permanent stone retaining wall could be constructed in front of the temporary wall. Paul Wichmann stated that the blocks look very heavy. Carter Sackman stated that the blocks would be very visible. Barbara Fina stated that the proposed product is too industrial for a residential application. She asked why the utility meters could not be raised to the first floor. Romeo Cacandian stated that the location of the utility meters are based on Con Edison requirements. Carter Sackman stated that the applicant should contact Con Edison to coordinate the utility meter locations in the field. Paul Wichmann made a motion to deny the application. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 2) Berkowitz There was nobody at the meeting to represent this application. Sean McCarthy summarized the application for the Board. He stated that the fence was installed on the Village Right-of-Way. Paul Wichmann made a motion to deny the application. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 3) Larry RodriguesThis is a continuation from previous meetings. Larry Rodrigues showed photos of the installed fence. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 22, 2004 3 �The Chair asked why the fence was needed. Larry Rodrigues stated that the existing chain link fence needed to be replaced. He stated that the chain link fence was removed and replaced with a new steel fence. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there was no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the fence based on the photos submitted by the applicant. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 4) Vieira’s Service Station This is a continuation from previous meetings. Paul Wichmann summarized events from the last meeting. Linda Standley submitted an ExxonMobil color chart. She stated that the gray color is preferred since it hides dirt. She showed several photos of other gas stations that have gray exteriors. Paul Wichmann asked if the applicant could install a simulation brick product on the bay door to match the brick exterior. Linda Standley responded that she could install a simulation brick product. She stated that she would rather remove the wood and paint the doors silver until Exxon Mobil makes the renovations. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there was no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Barbara Fina made a motion to deny the application and ask that the door be visibly restored. In addition, the glass was to be visibly concealed with a solid surface on the inside so that products are not visible from the street. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 5) Minutes of the October 2004 meeting – The minutes for October 2004 were reviewed. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 6) Other The Chair stated that the Village Trustees have changed the structure of the Architectural Review Board from a 7-member board to a 5-member board. He stated that approval from the State is still pending. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 22, 2004 4 �There was an open discussion on the Yeung application. The possibility of a meeting in December was discussed. There was an open discussion on fence installations and surveys. Paul Wichmann made a motion to adjourn. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). Adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 22, 2004 5 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2004-11-22 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2004 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text