1 25 10 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/4f009f3fe186f9a99c36c8e70d865177.pdf 73e3f9ff47b03c798c5b67065f7dd25b PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED January 26, 2005 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chairman at 8:04 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Elvira Aloia Carter Sackman Paul Wichmann Ana Maria McGinnis Absent: Barbara Fina Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Berkowitz 45 Hemlock Drive 2) Pagano 35 Hudson Terrace 3) Yeung 254 Harwood Avenue 4) Diaz 168 Cortlandt Street 5) Walters 11 Irving Place 6) Southern 19 Pokahoe Drive 7) Phipps 22 Farrington Avenue 8) Savino 26 Fremont Road 9) Chang 139 Devries Avenue 10) Vilanova/Beekman Ave Laundromat 113-115 Beekman Avenue 11) Derby 8 Kendall Avenue 12) Minutes of the November 2004 meeting Announcements: The Chair explained the Board’s procedures for the public. 1) Berkowitz Jack Berkowitz is representing his application. Jack Berkowitz stated that the original fence was installed at the wrong height. He stated that the fence height would be reduced to the proper height once the Board approves the fence. Sean McCarthy stated that a 3-foot high fence is required for the front yard and a 5-foot fence is required in the side and rear yards. He stated that the fence was installed on the Village right-of-way. He stated that once the fence is moved back to the property line, all of the fire hydrant concerns would be satisfied. �The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Elvira Aloia made a motion to approve the fence with the following conditions: 1) Fence must be painted white 2) Fence must be moved to the property line 3) Fence height in the front yard must be reduced to 3-feet. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0) (Sackman absent). 2) Pagano The Chair summarized the previous application. Ester Pagano is representing this application. She stated that ivy would be planted on the side and front yards in order to screen the existing chain link fence. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair asked the Board for comments. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that ivy would not grow fast enough. She stated that hedges should be installed. The Chair stated that a specific commitment must be made as to what type of landscaping would be used. Ester Pagano responded that she would accept an approval with specific landscaping direction from the Board. Paul Wichmann suggested that a 1 ½” – 2” caliper arborvitae would properly screen the fence. There was an open discussion on the location of the landscaping relative to the property line. It was agreed that the Village Architect would work with the applicant to come up with an acceptable landscaping plan. The Chair made a motion to approve the evergreen screening subject to Village Architect approval. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 3) Yeung Wai Yeung is the applicant and is representing this application along with Grace Yeung. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 26, 2005 2 �and architect, Radoslav Opacic. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Wai Yeung stated that the proposed modifications reflect a custom designed house that would meet the specific needs of his family. He stated that the architectural features reflect his tastes in aesthetics. Radoslav Opacic spoke about the three requirements of the applicant. They are: 1) Expanded entrance 2) Expanded master bedroom 3) Add a home office Radoslav Opacic described the entrance renovations. He discussed the relocation of the master bathroom. He spoke about the creation of a home office in the attic. He stated that the sloped roof eliminates the visual impact from the street. He stated that extra efforts were made to minimize the massing effects. He stated that the style is modern and compared the design to another modern house in Philipse Manor. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the exterior surfaces. Radoslav Opacic responded that the roof is a zinc-copper product, limestone stucco would be used and that all of the windows proposed are made of steel construction. He provided some samples for the Board. Carter Sackman asked about the garage. Radoslav Opacic responded that the garage is a one-car detached garage in the rear of the property. The Chair asked Sean McCarthy if the attic space was habitable. Sean McCarthy responded that a fire suppression system is required. He stated that the applicant has proposed a fire suppression system as part of the renovations. Radoslav Opacic stated that all existing trees would remain. He stated that extensive additional landscaping is proposed. He submitted photos of neighboring houses to the Board to illustrate other architectural styles. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the garage is existing. Radoslav Opacic responded no. He stated that a shed currently exists. Carter Sackman asked about the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) requirements. Radoslav Opacic responded that the numbers were not available for the meeting. There was an open discussion to calculate how much additional square footage is being added. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 26, 2005 3 �Sean McCarthy stated that as per the FAR 4200 square feet is allowed. Radoslav Opacic responded that the structure would not be larger than 4200 square feet. The Chair opened the public hearing. John Bogus (266 Harwood Ave) stated that he was concerned with a modern style house in a historic neighborhood. He stated that he is also concerned with the height of the roof and the appearance of enclosing in his adjacent property. Radoslav Opacic responded that the side of the house closest to 266 Harwood has been reduced in height by 13-feet. Amy Bogus (266 Harwood Ave) stated that she is concerned with the appearance of enclosing her rear yard as well as the landscaping between the houses. There was an open discussion on the existing house and the proposed house. Carter Sackman stated that the roofline would appear more massive from the street. He stated that the materials and designs are impressive. He noted a modern style home on Bellwood Ave. He stated that the style would not fit into the neighborhood due to the closeness of neighboring homes. Mary Ellen Joy (533 Riverside Ave) stated that the historic design is predominant in the area. She stated that are no other contemporary houses in the area. She is concerned with the style in the community specifically with the height of the structure. She stated that the proposed structure seems large for the property and the neighboring houses. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman made a motion to discuss this application further at the next meeting. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was decided that the applicant would take digital photos of the mass model and send the photos to Sean McCarthy for distribution to the Board members. It was unanimous (5-0). 4) Diaz – This is a continuation from previous meetings. Jon Turnquist is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owner. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 26, 2005 4 �Jon Turnquist summarized the application from the previous meetings. He stated that the backlit sign as been removed. He stated that the applicant would install an awning and shutters on the upstairs windows. Carter Sackman questioned the use of marble tiles. Jon Turnquist responded that the owner wanted to spend money to renovate the exterior as well. The Chair stated that the Village is concerned with so many similar style awnings on Beekman Ave. He also stated that the applicant should re-address the use of marble in the front of the building. Carter Sackman suggested that the applicant install an old-fashion hand-crank awning. Jon Turnquist stated that the applicant would return with a revised design for the awning and store front without marble tiles. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 5) Walters Jon Turnquist is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owner. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Jon Turnquist stated that the project included replacing a dilapidated garage. He stated that the roof would be replaced as well as the garage door. He stated that a larger door would be installed to accommodate a larger vehicle. Paul Wichmann asked if wood siding would be installed. Jon Turnquist responded that wood siding is not in the applicant’s budget. Carter Sackman asked if this would be visible from the street. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair questioned how much of the garage is visible from the street since the lot is only 30-feet wide and the garage is in the rear. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 26, 2005 5 �6) Southern – Jean Southern is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Jean Southern submitted proof that letters were provided to the neighbors. Sean McCarthy stated that adequate notice was provided. Jean Southern spoke about the proposed window replacement. She stated that the kitchen window would be replaced with a bow window. She stated that two other windows would be replaced with bow windows. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. Elvira Aloia asked why two different kinds of windows were proposed. Jean Southern responded that the windows would be the same. The submitted sample is only a catalog cut sheet. It was unanimous (5-0). 7) Phipps – George O’Reilly is the builder and is representing this application on behalf of the owner. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. George O’Reilly discussed the proposed project. He stated that the siding and exterior trim would remain. Paul Wichmann asked why the windows are different. George O’Reilly responded that the owners would eventually change all of the windows to match. The Chair asked if the side door is visible from the street. George O’Reilly responded not much of the side door is visible. Carter Sackman asked if the North elevation is the only view from the street. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 26, 2005 6 �George O’Reilly responded yes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Elvira Aloia stated that she was concerned that the new windows are not matching the existing windows. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application with the condition that mutton bars are installed on the casement windows in order to match the appearance of the existing windows. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 8) Savino Vincent Savino is the owner and is representing his application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Vincent Savino submitted drawings to the Board. He stated that the work was started but stopped by the Building Department. He stated that the purpose of the work was to remove the incline of the master bedroom and square off the room. The Chair stated that more details are needed on the drawings. Vincent Savino stated that the house is a fixer-upper and that extensive cosmetic improvements have already been made. He stated that in the future, they would be performing some additional work. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve this application as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 9) Chang – Joe Bertilino is the project architect and is representing this application along with owner Judith Chang. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 26, 2005 7 �Joe Bertilino spoke about the proposed renovations. He stated that the existing porch would be removed and a library would be added. He stated that the roof on the side entry would be removed. He stated that a larger kitchen would be added. He also stated that the rear addition would be re-done in order to make the space more usable. He stated that the 2nd floor would have a master bedroom and master bath added as well. He also stated that the existing garage would be removed. Lastly, he stated that a new roof, shutters and double hung windows would be provided. He also stated that the garage would be designed to match the house. Ana Maria McGinnis questioned the alignment of the upper windows. Judith Chang responded that she wants to preserve the windows and not break open any more walls. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Elvira Aloia made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 10) Vilanova/Beekman Ave Laundromat – Steve Chon is the project architect and is representing this application along with owners, Jose and Dave Vilanova. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Steve Chon spoke about the views of the building from Kendall Ave. There was an open discussion on the location of the building. Paul Wichmann asked if the business would be 100% coin-operated. Steve Chon responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the changes to the facade. Steve Chon responded that the windows would be changing. He also stated that louvers would be added. Sean McCarthy stated that the exhaust system would be moved as far to the rear of the property as possible. Elvira Aloia asked about the noise from the dryers. Steve Chon responded that the exhaust system would act like a chimney. The Chair opened the public hearing. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 26, 2005 8 �Ralph Derby (8 Kendall Ave) asked about the exhaust system. Steve Chon responded that only hot air would be exhausted. He stated that the dryers would catch all of the lint. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Paul Wichmann asked if a new awning was proposed. Jose Vilanova responded yes. He stated that the colors would match the existing awning. There was an open discussion on the location of the gooseneck exhaust and the possibility of relocating it to eliminate its visibility. Carter Sackman asked if there would be a program in place to maintain the exhaust system so that lint does not escape. Jose Vilanova responded yes. Carter Sackman stated that he would like to see a brick veneer on the exterior instead of the metal paneling. There was an open discussion on possible exterior systems that could be used. Carter Sackman stated that the applicant should return with a revised design based on the Board’s comments. He stated that the awning and sign submissions should be revised. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant needs to resolve the West elevation in order to continue the interior work. He stated that a sign is proposed on the West elevation. There was an open discussion on possible signs. It was agreed that the applicant would work with the Village Architect to resolve. Paul Wichmann made a motion to grant a conditional approval for the West Elevation without the sign. He stated that the South elevation would be adjourned to the next meeting. The sign issues would be worked out with the Building Department. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 11) Derby Ralph Derby is the owner and is representing his application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 26, 2005 9 �Ralph Derby stated that he wants to install new doors and windows on the exterior of the building. He stated that he wants a more uniform appearance. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the exterior colors. Ralph Derby responded that the exterior would remain a white stucco exterior. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 12) Minutes of the November 2004 meeting – The minutes for November 2004 were reviewed. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). Adjourned at 10:22 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 26, 2005 10 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2005-01-26 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2005 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/5c24be07b84e1fe863554738460343d4.pdf 2c8e616472d53ffe609937567e0ffdbf PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED February 23, 2005 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chairman at 8:25 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Carter Sackman Ana Maria McGinnis Sean McCarthy Absent: Elvira Aloia Paul Wichmann Barbara Fina Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Minutes of the January 2005 meeting 2) Yeung 3) Vilanova/Beekman Ave Laundromat 4) Gunnison 5) Lighthouse Landing 254 Harwood Avenue 113-115 Beekman Avenue 12 Millard Avenue Preliminary discussions Announcements: The Chair apologized to the public for the delayed start. 1) Minutes of the January 2005 meeting – The minutes for January 2005 were reviewed. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 2) Yeung This is a continuation from last meeting. Wai Yeung is the applicant and is representing this application along with Grace Yeung. and architect, Radoslav Opacic. Wai Yeung stated that he has met with most of his neighbors and the neighbors are in favor of the proposed project. He submitted a petition to support this statement. �Radoslav Opacic spoke about the proposed changes. He submitted renderings and spoke about the ridgeline. He spoke about the style of the house. He stated that the finishes would blend into the neighborhood. He reviewed the proposed finishes. Grace Yeung spoke about the different styles of homes in Philipse Manor. She reviewed (via photos) the different styles of homes in the immediate area (Harwood Avenue). The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Carter Sackman commended the applicant on their efforts. He asked about the visible roofline. Radoslav Opacic responded that the house sits 9-feet above the street level. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the adjacent neighbors at 266 Harwood Avenue signed the petition. Wai Yeung responded that the neighbors were away this week. He spoke about the changes to the property that would affect the neighbor. The changes included removing the existing rear deck and lowering the roofline about 13-feet on the neighbor’s side. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) Vilanova/Beekman Ave Laundromat – The Chair summarized the application to date. Lester Harrison is the building owner and is representing this application along with Jose and Dave Vilanova. There was an open discussion on the exteriors. Lester Harrison stated that brick could not be used. Carter Sackman proposed that the applicant use a wood laminate on the exterior. He stated that he would like to see the exterior change from the bronze-aluminum exterior. Lester Harrison used photos to show the existing exteriors. There was an open discussion on the possible exteriors that could be used. Lester Harrison submitted renderings for the proposed sign. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 23, 2005 2 �1) Awning and sign on South elevation approved as submitted. Fonts and colors approved as presented on exhibit A. 2) Sign on west elevation to include lettering, color and background color as per exhibit A. 3) Village Architect will provide raised panel mahogany panel detail for exteriors. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Gunnison There was nobody present to represent this application. There was an open discussion on the previous approval. The Board agreed that the applicant must submit proof of public notice before the Board will act on the application. 5) Lighthouse Landing This is a preliminary discussion on the Lighthouse Landing project. Jonathan Stein is representing this application along with Andy Tung and the firm of Streetworks. Jonathan Stein introduced himself and his team to the Board. He spoke about Beekman Place. He stated that it was an extension of Beekman Avenue and would be the main road through the development. Doug Hamilton (Streetworks) spoke about his firm. He spoke about the guidelines used to develop the mixed-use area streetscape design. He spoke about the existing building heights, street widths and street parking. He spoke about the proposed exteriors and how the exteriors relate to the developed design guidelines. He spoke about how the hotel and supermarket would deviate from the regular streetscape. He also spoke about the 16-18-foot sidewalk area on each side. Jonathan Stein spoke about the linkage study and areas that were researched because of the study. He spoke about how different exteriors and heights give appearances that buildings were built over time. Andy Tung spoke about getting Architectural Review Board input early in the process. Jonathan Stein spoke about another Roseland development in New Jersey. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 23, 2005 3 �Ana Maria McGinnis asked if large retail stores were needed to make the retail areas succeed. Jonathan Stein responded that a mix of local and chain stores are needed. He stated that no large retail stores are included in the plan. Carter Sackman asked if about the loading areas for the larger retail units. Jonathan Stein explained the proposed loading area for the retail stores. Carter Sackman asked about the number of residential units. Jonathan Stein responded that 1562 units are proposed including 200 efficiency-housing units. Carter Sackman asked about the number of parking spaces proposed. Jonathan Stein responded that about 1.5 parking spaces/unit are proposed. He stated that the proposed density is consistent with the existing density in the inner Village. Carter Sackman stated that he liked the eclectic appearance of the proposal. Sean McCarthy spoke about turning around the townhouses located near Kingsland Point Park. Jonathan Stein responded that Roseland did not want to create the appearance of a private development. The Chair stated that he was concerned with the view looking down towards the Hudson River. Doug Hamilton responded that the proposal tries to get views from the skyline. Sean McCarthy stated that the roof structures should have some useful set-up space for mechanical equipment or some other useful purpose. The Board unanimously agreed that the applicant is on the right track with the proposal. There were open discussions on the train station, soccer fields and open spaces to be donated to the Village. Adjourned at 10:23 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 23, 2005 4 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2005-02-23 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2005 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/f53609585d85a152af3f6f60534b1c32.pdf 3cefa07d27c7af22d7ca544b7a3cfb7c PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED March 23, 2005 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chairman at 8:00 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Paul Wichmann Elvira Aloia Barbara Fina Ana Maria McGinnis Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Lis 2) Federle/Schrader 3) Galgano 4) Gunnison 5) Higgins 6) Flynn 7) Marmo 8) Lighthouse Landing 9) Minutes of the February 2005 meeting 2 Kelbourne Avenue 39 Evergreen Way 59 Sleepy Hollow Road 12 Millard Avenue 4 Harwood Avenue 127 Harwood Avenue 225 North Broadway Announcements: None. 1) Lis Craig and Erin Lis are representing this application. Craig Lis spoke about the proposed changes. He stated that he has two children and requires more room. He described the proposed changes, which included an additional bathroom and small office on the first floor and a master bedroom and closets on the second floor. The Chair asked if the windows are changing. Craig Lis responded no. The Chair asked why the applicant would not want to continue the existing roofline to keep a uniform look. �Erin Lis responded that the master bedroom would not have the required height. The Chair asked if a second floor plan was submitted. Sean McCarthy responded that neither a first nor a second floor plan was submitted. Erin Lis produced a rendering of the proposed addition. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGuiness asked about the exterior finishes. Craig Lis responded that the exterior finishes would be matched. Sean McCarthy asked about the roof. Erin Lis responded that the roof materials would be matched as well. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Barbara Fina made a motion to approve as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 2) Federle/Schrader Mary Scott is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. Mary Scott spoke about the proposed changes. They included relocating the side entrance, addition of four windows and the addition of a porch. Sean McCarthy stated that the Zoning Board approved a front yard variance at the March 2005 ZBA meeting. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 23, 2005 2 �3) Galgano Vinny Galgano is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Vinny Galgano spoke about the changes to the exterior of the property. The changes included adding stone on the lower half and cedar shingles on the upper portion. He stated that the stones are real stones that are milled down. Ana Maria McGuiness asked if the windows would be changed. Vinny Galgano responded no but the shutters would be replaced. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis asked why the applicant would not be continuing the stone in to the courtyard. There was an open discussion with the applicant on the use of stone and how it blends into the windows. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that more details should be provided. Vinny Galgano submitted renderings of the proposed renovations. Paul Wichmann stated that the stone strip above the garage should be removed. The stone should continue across the entire front of the house at the same elevation. There was an open discussion on the stone columns on both sides of the garage and whether they should be omitted to keep a uniform appearance. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: the bluestone sills and stone run across the entire front at the same elevation. Garage stone will remain as submitted. Barbara Fina asked the Village Architect for his opinion. Sean McCarthy responded that the stone around the garage would not be a detriment to the neighborhood. He stated that the bluestone sill is needed. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 23, 2005 3 �4) Gunnison – Jane Gunnison is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sean McCarthy presented the Board with the previously approved application. He spoke about the roof window that was originally approved and later removed. Ana Maria McGinnis asked why it was removed. Jane Gunnison responded that it looked bad. She stated that the drawings did not reflect the roof pitch and the overall appearance of the window. The Chair made a motion to approve the as-built plans. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (5-0) 5) Higgins Susan Higgins is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Susan Higgins spoke about the proposed addition. The Chair asked about the setback on the eastside addition. Sean McCarthy responded almost 42 –feet. Sean McCarthy stated that there was a previous application to build this addition closer to the paper street that exists. The plans were revised to locate the addition farther away from the paper street. Susan Higgins spoke about the exterior finishes. She stated that the finishes would match the existing finishes. She stated that the roof would also match. The Chair stated that the addition is an elegant addition. He stated that the chimney in the rear is too short and could cause problems. Susan Higgins responded that a gas fireplace could be installed. The Chair opened the public hearing. Anthony Marmo (225 North Broadway) stated that gas fireplaces emit large amounts of APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 23, 2005 4 �carbon monoxide. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing, Ana Maria McGinnis to approve as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (5-0) 6) Flynn Julie Evans is representing this application along with owner, Michael Flynn. Julie Evans spoke about the proposed alterations, which included winterizing the sun porch. She stated that casement windows would be installed. Paul Wichmann stated that the colors scheme would improve the appearance. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the exterior has stucco. Julie Evans responded yes. Elvira Aloia asked if the door would be removed. Julie Evans responded yes. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Barbara Fina made a motion to approve with the following conditions: On the first floor, window casings to match throughout. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 7) Marmo Anthony Marmo is the owner and is representing this application. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant has appeared before the Waterfront Advisory Committee and received site plan approval from the Planning Board. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Anthony Marmo spoke about the landscaping changes to the property. He stated that APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 23, 2005 5 �several trees were removed and two trees are proposed to be added. He spoke about the proposed changes to the garage. He stated that the elevation is 4-feet higher that the existing garage. Elvira Aloia asked if the garage would be used for his business. Anthony Marmo responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked why the garage doors are so large. Anthony Marmo responded that the garage must accommodate a box truck. Sean McCarthy stated that the property is commercially zoned. Barbara Fina asked about the roof. Anthony Marmo stated that the roof would be a shingle roof. He stated that he does not want to match the green roof on the main house. Barbara Fina stated that the two structures should have a matching roof. Anthony Marmo stated that the main house roof would be replaced within the next 10 years. He stated that he would like to restore the house to its original condition. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Paul Wichmann stated that something should be added on the garage front to break-up the appearance. Anthony Marmo proposed to add a light on the front of the garage. There was an open discussion on the possibility of adding either a light or an awning on the exterior. Barbara Fina made a motion to approve with the following conditions: 1) Roof is slate blend shingle. When main house roof is replaced, it should be consistent with garage 2) Awning over the side door. Awning to extend minimum of 18-inches and a maximum of 36-inches. Awning to match gable line. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 8) Lighthouse Landing This is a continuation on the Lighthouse Landing project. Andy Tung is representing this application. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 23, 2005 6 �The Chair stated that the DEIS is still in the public comment period. He stated that the Board could make comments on the DEIS regarding the design visual impact of the project. The Chair stated that the main streetscape needs to look like individual buildings. Barbara Fina stated that the layout of the plaza on Beekman Place needs to be more elegant. Andy Tung stated that the layout follows the Village’s open space plan. Elvira Aloia stated that it is hard to move forward while the drawings presented are still the original plans. Sean McCarthy responded that drawings would be updated to reflect comments. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the process. The Chair explained the DEIS and review process. No action was taken. 9) Minutes of the February 2005 meeting – The minutes for February 2005 were reviewed. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). Adjourned at 9:42 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 23, 2005 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2005-03-23 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2005 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/c3bcb48d60e383972319d6fa4ecb4dcd.pdf 3720e5293f25f4cc2840e25d65ae272f PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED April 27, 2005 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chairman at 8:04 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Paul Wichmann Ana Maria McGinnis Carter Sackman Elvira Aloia Barbara Fina Absent: None Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Executive Session 2) Larry Doyle 3) Ojito 4) Ginsburg Development Corp 5) Dawley 6) Lomanto 7) Beyl 8) Minutes of the March 2005 meeting 9) Election of Chairman 16 New Broadway 27 Barnhardt Street Ichabod’s Landing 483 Munroe Avenue 14 Anderson Avenue 22 Fremont Avenue Announcements: The Chair stated that the Kennedy application is off the agenda for tonight’s meeting. 1) Executive Session The Board entered into executive session at 8:05pm to discuss matters of litigation. The Board returned to the regular agenda at 8:14pm. No action was taken. 2) Larry Doyle Kyle McGovern is representing this application along with owner Larry Doyle. �The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Kyle McGovern submitted a copy of a similar awning as an example of what will be installed. He stated that the Planning Board has approved the location of the sign as part of the site plan. He stated that the submitted photos would only differ in color. He submitted some color samples for the Board. The Chair asked about the post colors. Kyle McGovern responded that the posts would be red. Carter Sackman asked for a picture of the building. A picture was not available. Barbara Fina stated that the darkest gray color should be used with knockout lettering in order to be visible. The Board agreed that ducksberry gray should be used. Kyle McGovern stated that the owner would like to illuminate the sign. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve as submitted with ducksberry gray with knockout lettering, red posts, background to match house exterior (yellow). Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 3) Ojito Sean McCarthy stated that the owners want to continue the siding on the remainder of the house. He stated that the owners have made many improvements. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, April 27, 2005 2 �4) Ginsburg Development Corp – Bruce Lozito is representing this application along with architect, John Karhu. Bruce Lozito stated that the storefronts and signage, weather vane, and railing treatments all require separate approval from the Board’s original approval. The Chair stated that each item should be approved individually before moving onto the next item. Bruce Lozito spoke about the storefronts. He stated that the storefront colors were simplified. He showed the proposed color scheme via rendered drawings. He spoke about the signage color scheme. Barbara Fina asked about the details for the signage lettering. Bruce Lozito provided the details to the Board. Barbara Fina stated that the proposed businesses should be consistent but propose individuality. She stated that the fonts should vary based on the business. She also stated that the scale should be uniform as well. Carter Sackman asked about the size of the retail spaces. Bruce Lozito responded just over 2500 square feet. Carter Sackman stated that the tenants have not been identified as of yet. Bruce Lozito stated that parameters would be provided to the tenants for storefronts. The Chair asked why the roof color was not brought down to the storefronts. Bruce Lozito responded that the color schemes did not work well together. Barbara Fina stated that the green awning and the blue storefronts could be better selected. Sean McCarthy asked when the decision needs to be final. Bruce Lozito responded that the applicant has some time before the storefront colors need to be finalized. The applicant was directed to return with specific color samples to be used for the storefronts. Barbara Fina expressed concerns about the retail area being able to be seen by the public. The Chair stated that the Board needs to give direction to the applicant. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, April 27, 2005 3 �Barbara Fina stated that she agrees with the raised lettering signs. She stated that the look of the signs would provide an upscale look. She stated that the proposed 4-foot sign should not be the dominant sign. Paul Wichmann asked if a marquis sign could be used. Sean McCarthy responded that the Village code does not allow it. There was an open discussion on the location of the property address and the name of the business. Barbara Fina stated that the raised lettering signage is the best option. The Board unanimously agreed. Barbara Fina stated that the address numbers need to be resolved. It was agreed that 6” brass numbers would be installed over the doors. Bruce Lozito presented the proposed railing. He presented a sample for the Board. The Board agreed that the proposed railings were acceptable. Lastly, Bruce Lozito presented the weather vane. He stated that the eagle has a 4-foot wingspan. The Board agreed that the proposed weather vane was acceptable. The Chair stated that the Board would need to capture all of the supplemental changes in a formal action. 5) Dawley Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application along with Carol Dawley. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sam Vieira spoke about the location of the proposed fence. The Chair asked about the height of the fence. Sam Vieira asked how the Board determines the fence height. The Chair responded that a line is drawn from the highest picket to the highest picket. He also stated that the fence height is beyond this Board’s jurisdiction. Sean McCarthy responded that the Building Department could make a judgment. Sam Vieira stated that the owners have a dog and the fence would help keep the dog contained in the yard. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, April 27, 2005 4 �The Chair stated that if containing the dog is an issue, an invisible fence should be installed instead of a physical fence. Barbara Fina stated that she is concerned about the prevalence of fences in Phillipsburg Manor. Sam Vieira stated that fences are permitted in the Village Code. The Chair stated that the invisible fence should address the applicant’s needs without installing the fence. Carol Dawley responded that she is not in favor of shock collars. The Chair stated that he is opposed to having a fence installed because it could set further precedents. The Chair opened the public hearing. Mario Bellanich (Washington Street) stated that the fence would keep intruders out. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing, Carter Sackman stated that there are other fences in Phillipsburg Manor that are very attractive. Paul Wichmann stated that the fence should have some character. He stated that a spike and rail fence would be a nice addition. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve as submitted in accordance with the Village Zoning code. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was approved (5-1) (Stever). 6) Lomanto – SamVieira is representing this application along with owner. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sam Vieira spoke about the Zoning Board approvals. He stated that a small addition is proposed to the 2nd-story. He stated that the house is an existing stucco exterior. The Chair asked why the applicant is not keeping the stucco exterior. Sam Vieira responded that the applicants are trying to keep costs down. He also stated that the applicant is willing to keep the exterior stucco if the Board desires. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, April 27, 2005 5 �The Board agreed that the exterior should maintain a stucco finish. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Barbara Fina made a motion to approve with the following conditions: Stucco exterior maintained on exterior instead of clapboard siding. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 7) Beyl Greg Beyl is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Greg Beyl spoke about the changes. He stated the garage door is going to be replaced. He also stated that the stone veneer would be continued at 30” high up to the base of the windows. He also stated that the Board on a previous approval recommended the front porch overhang but the applicant never completed the work. He requested that the Board to allow him to not construct the front porch overhang that was previously approved. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 8) Minutes of the March 2005 meeting – The minutes for March 2005 were reviewed. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 9) Election of Chairman Carter Sackman made a motion to re-elect Don Stever as Chairman. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). Adjourned at 9:39 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, April 27, 2005 6 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2005-04-27 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2005 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/eb30b8d03235cdb5491a4fc6b936e891.pdf b4ea1bf370535ebaf6d45a997de4185b PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED May 25, 2005 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chairman at 8:07 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Paul Wichmann Elvira Aloia Barbara Fina Absent: Ana Maria McGinnis Carter Sackman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Robert Ponzini (Village Attorney) Agenda: 1) Executive Session 2) Fernandez 3) Sendon (Sendon Homes) 4) Sendon 5) Toreno, CARS, Inc 6) Clayton 7) Cummins 8) Minutes of the April 2005 meeting 9) Other 21 Anderson Avenue 38 Beekman Avenue 295 North Washington Street 333 North Broadway 114 Farrington Avenue 537 Bellwood Avenue Announcements: None. 1) Executive Session The Chair made a motion to enter into executive session to discuss matters of litigation. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). The Board entered into executive session at 8:08pm. The meeting resumed at 8:17 pm. No action was taken. Robert Ponzini read the draft Resolution aloud for the record (see attached). The Chair made a motion to adopt the Resolution. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). �The Chair submitted a video taping policy for the Board regarding the NYS Open Meetings Law. He summarized the policy for the Board. It was agreed that the Board would discuss this matter at the next meeting. 2) Fernandez Rhonda Fernandez is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Rhonda Fernandez submitted photos of the existing house showing the exteriors. She stated that the garage would match the rear part of the house. She also submitted samples of the proposed light fixtures. The Chair asked if there were any required variances. Sean McCarthy responded no. Sean McCarthy stated that this is a replacement garage. The original garage has collapsed. Elvira Aloia asked if the garage exterior would match the stucco of the house. Rhonda Fernandez responded no. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Barbara Fina made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) Sendon (Sendon Homes) Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owner, Martha Sendon. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair asked if the rendering is an accurate visual representation of the proposed sign. Sam Vieira responded that the submission is a digital rendering of the proposed sign on top of an actual picture of the building. Barbara Fina stated that the sign is not scaled correctly. Sam Vieira responded that the border could make up some of the size. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 25, 2005 2 �Sean McCarthy stated that the Board had to approve a variance to approve the sign since it is a metal sign. Barbara Fina stated that she is not willing to approve a metal sign. Sean McCarthy stated that metal signs with 3-D lettering are permitted. He read the applicable Village Code sections. Barbara Fina stated that the Code should be followed. Paul Wichmann agreed with Barbara Fina. He suggested that the sign type be changed. Sam Vieira asked for guidance. Sean McCarthy stated that a copy of the Village Codes applicable to signs will be provided to Sign Extreme (sign contractor). Barbara Fina asked about the number of colors. Sean McCarthy responded that the colors up to the Board’s discretion. Martha Sendon responded that the colors are important since they represent the company’s logo. There was an open discussion on whether a metal sign is acceptable. Barbara Fina stated that the revised submission should eliminate the border and raise the lettering. The Board agreed that the typeface is acceptable. Sean McCarthy asked if a carved sign is acceptable. The Board responded yes. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 4) SendonSam Vieira is representing this application along with owner Martha Sendon. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted. Sam Vieira responded that the mailings were not mailed out in time. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 5) Toreno, CARS, Inc Danny Toreno is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted. Sean McCarthy responded yes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 25, 2005 3 �The Chair asked if a flashing neon sign was approved. Sean McCarthy responded no. Danny Torena stated that the application is for approval of the two banners. Barbara Fina stated that the storefront is getting filled with too many signs. Danny Torena stated that the only additional signs that he wants to keep are the signs on the pole. He stated that the existing sign is out of scale with the pole. He stated that the additional banners fill-out the pole. Barbara Fina stated that the entire front needs to be evaluated. Danny Torena responded that he receives many compliments on the exterior. The Chair stated that the pole should be reduced. Sean McCarthy responded that the pole must remain at a certain height since it projects over the road. Paul Wichmann asked if there was anything else that could be placed on the flagpole. Barbara Fina stated that the banners should be removed. Danny Torena asked what could be put on the pole to make the company sign appear more in scale. Barbara Fina responded that there is too much advertising on the front of the business. The Chair agreed with Barbara Fina. Paul Wichmann stated that the signs take away from the building itself. Barbara Fina stated that the size of the sign in relation to the size of the building is out of scale. The Chair stated that the pole needs to be masked. He stated that the sign would look better on top of the building. Danny Torena stated that every gas station on Route 9 has a similar pole with a larger sign and banners beneath the sign. The Chair stated that these businesses are non-conforming and those signs cannot be changed. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Board agreed that the signs would be removed until a different design is resubmitted. The applicant agreed. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 25, 2005 4 �Sean McCarthy read the Village Code section regarding illuminated signs. 6) Clayton Bruce Clayton is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Clayton spoke about replacing an existing deteriorated brick retaining wall with a similar wall with a fieldstone veneer. He stated that the wall would be the same dimension at the existing wall. He stated that they would also be replacing entrance steps with a bluestone and replacing the walkway leading to the house with flagstones. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 7) Cummins Pat Steinschneider is the project architect and is representing this application along with owner Chris Cummins. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Pat Steinschneider described the proposed addition in detail. The changes include a covered porch, enlarged dining area, new entrance foyer and driveway relocation. He submitted several photos of the existing house and of some other houses in the area. Barbara Fina stated that a railing is missing. Pat Steinschneider responded that a railing is not required since the structure is less than 18” above grade. Barbara Fina asked about bringing the siding down to the first floor. Pat Steinschneider responded that the proposed exterior should blend in better with the landscaping. He wanted to avoid bringing the siding down to the first floor to avoid making the house look like a typical ranch. Pat Steinschneider submitted exterior color samples for the Board. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant has already received approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 25, 2005 5 �The Chair opened the public hearing. Bruce Clayton (114 Farrington Avenue) stated that he is in favor of the application. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that this application is a good example of a property owner who is taking a house and making changes that are more in character with the neighborhood. Paul Wichmann asked if there was a window schedule. Pat Steinschneider responded no. He reviewed the windows in the dining area. He explained that the window is recessed back. Barbara Fina asked if a landscape plan was available. Pat Steinschneider responded not for tonight’s meeting. He spoke about some of the proposed plantings. Barbara Fina asked about the window styles. Pat Steinschneider responded that the wood windows that will be painted. Barbara Fina made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Minutes of the April 2005 meeting – The minutes for April 2005 will be reviewed at the next meeting. 9) Other There was an open discussion on the condition of the property and the signage at 315 North Broadway. There was an open discussion on the Village’s efforts to regulate illegal signs in the Village. Adjourned at 9:39 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 25, 2005 6 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2005-05-25 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2005 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/0767a583caa82f1a979c620d072336fc.pdf 789f0b9eea72bacf1ec848e3cd6368a4 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED June 22, 2005 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chairman at 8:03 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Paul Wichmann Ana Maria McGinnis Elvira Aloia Barbara Fina Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Sendon (Sendon Homes) 38 Beekman Avenue 2) Sendon 295 North Washington Street 3) Garvey 20 Hemlock Drive 4) Rodrigues 33 Hudson Terrace 5) Freire 42 Howard Street 6) Jeton 152 Depeyster Avenue 7) Ichabod’s Landing 8) Barros 15 Anderson Avenue 9) Panachak 44 Beekman Avenue 10) Dimovski 150 Millard Avenue 11) Minutes of the April and May 2005 meetings 12) Other Announcements: The Chair stated that the Board is now a 5-member Board. The Chair spoke about the proposed rules and regulations for electronic recording of public meetings. He stated that the Planning Board has adopted similar rules. He read the Planning Board’s Resolution to the Board members. The Chair made a motion the Board adopt an identical set of rules. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). (See attached). 1) Sendon (Sendon Homes) This is a continuation from the previous meeting. �Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owner, Martha Sendon. Sam Vieira summarized the events of the last meeting. He spoke about the previously proposed flat metal pan sign. He stated that the proposal has been revised based on the Board’s guidance. He stated that the sign would be the same size with a yellow background and same graphics as previously presented. The proposed sign is a wood carved and will have raised lettering. Barbara Fina asked if the sign had a border. Sam Vieira responded no. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. There was none. Barbara Fina made a motion to approve the application as revised. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 2) SendonSam Vieira is representing this application along with owner Martha Sendon. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted. Sam Vieira responded that the mailings were not mailed out in time. Sam Vieira spoke about the proposed project. He spoke about the challenges with the roofline in creating the addition. He stated that the addition would be a one-story addition. He compared the proposed addition with the prior approved plans. He stated that the revised pitched roof would keep with the existing architecture. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Barbara Fina asked about the second story windows. Sam Vieira responded that the windows were recessed in order to keep the addition below the required threshold so that the entire house would not have to be sprinklered. Paul Wichmann asked if the exteriors would be matched. Sam Vieira responded yes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 22, 2005 2 �Paul Wichmann asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Elvira Aloia made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 3) Garvey – Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application along with owner, James Garvey. Sam Vieira spoke about the proposed project. He stated that Zoning Board has approved the required variances. He spoke about the approved variances. He stated that the existing garage would be replaced with a larger two-car garage. He stated that the submitted drawings do not reflect the changes from the Zoning Board meeting. The garage was reduced from 21.75-feet to 21.0-feet. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sam Vieira spoke about the proposed two-story addition in the front of the structure and the one-story addition that encroaches on the side yard setback. He described how the proposed addition would maintain the existing roof pitches in the areas of the existing house. The Chair asked about changing the façade in the front. Sam Vieira submitted photos to the Board. He stated that the existing architecture in the front does not extend the masonry to the garage. Paul Wichmann asked about the octagonal window. Sam Vieira responded that the window is in a hallway and the window would bring more light into the area. Barbara Fina expressed concerns about the shape of the octagonal window. Sam Vieira responded that a larger window would be out of place in this section of the house. There was an open discussion on other window options that could be used. The Board spoke about making the window more vertical. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 22, 2005 3 �There was none. Barbara Fina made a motion to approve the plans as submitted with the octagonal window changed to a rectangular window with diagonal mullions. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 4) Rodrigues Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application along with owners. Sam Vieira spoke about the proposed changes. He stated that the garage includes a stucco finish with asphalt shingles. He stated that the proposed garage keeps with the existing architecture of the house. He spoke about the proposed porch and the one-story addition. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Ana Maria McGinnis asked why the front door is not centered. Sam Vieira responded that the interior of the house do not allow the front door to be centered without major interior changes. Elvira Aloia asked if the columns are going to take away from the house. Sam Vieira responded that the columns add to the architectural features of the house. Elvira Aloia made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 5) Freire Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application along with owners. Sean McCarthy stated that this application has been approved from the Zoning and Planning Boards. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sam Vieira spoke about the proposed development. He discussed how the three-families would sit on the lots. He spoke about the proposed changes to the existing house. He APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 22, 2005 4 �spoke about the proposed exterior finishes. They included double-hung windows and siding. The Chair asked if the window A/C units would be removed. Sam Vieira responded that the house would have central A/C. Sean McCarthy asked if the chimney would be taken down. Sam Vieira responded yes. He stated that the direct vent units would be used. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Elvira Aloia asked about the shared areas. Sam Vieira responded that each unit would have its own entrance. Sean McCarthy asked if the windows would be large enough for egress. Sam Vieira responded yes. Paul Wichmann stated that the house is very large. He stated that the vinyl siding should be replaced with more natural materials. He stated that the finishes should have more details. Barbara Fina agreed. There was an open discussion on the possible changes to the exterior. Paul Wichmann expressed concerns about many new developments using all vinyl siding on the exteriors. He stated that the exterior should have some texture of contours that would give the house more character. The Board gave some guidance to the applicant on what details could be used to enhance the mass of the structure. The Chair stated that the proposed house fits into the neighborhood but the façade needs some minor architectural detail improvements. The applicants agreed to return next meeting with some revisions. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 6) Jeton Manuel Jeton is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 22, 2005 5 �Sean McCarthy responded yes. Barbara Fina asked if this work was in progress. Sean McCarthy responded that the photos submitted show work being performed by a neighbor. The existing conditions were shown by photos. The proposed work included 4-foot columns. The Chair stated that the Board could only approve a 3-foot high column. He stated that a variance would be needed. Barbara Fina asked if the columns would be stone. Manuel Jeton responded yes. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Sean McCarthy stated that since the house exterior is brick, then brick piers should be used. The Board agreed. The applicant stated that he would withdraw his application since he could not construct a 4-foot high column made out of stone. 7) Ichabod’s Landing – This is a continuation from a previous meeting. Bruce Lozito is the project planner and is representing this application along with architect, John Karhu. Bruce Lozito spoke about the proposed storefronts at the Ichabod’s Landing site. He spoke about the guidance that the Board provided at the last meeting. He submitted a revised storefront via a rendered drawing. Barbara Fina stated that the revised plans are greatly improved. Paul Wichmann agreed. The Chair made a motion to approve the storefronts subject to the individual shop owners coming into the Board to get approvals for their respective signs. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 22, 2005 6 �8) Barros Alberto Barros is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant has a permit to construct a second story addition on the house. He stated that the owner was told to stop work since the changes differed from the permit. He stated that the application is to approve exterior finishes, windows, and roofing. Albert Barros stated that the siding would be stucco. He showed photos to the Board to illustrate the existing structure. Sean McCarthy stated that the house has undergone several renovations over the years so the Board could try to unify the exteriors. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. There was none. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 9) Panachak Michael Panachak is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owner, Li-Wei Choi. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Michael Panachak stated that the business has been sold and the new owners want to renovate the front portion of the store. Li-Wei Choi stated that there are challenges in trying to keep the existing character of the original store. Michael Panachak spoke about the proposed changes. The Chair stated that in order for the doors to work, the tree would have to be removed. Michael Panachak responded that the tree would not have to be removed. Barbara Fina stated that the proposed storefront would fit nicely into Beekman Avenue. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 22, 2005 7 �Barbara Fina asked if the tiles would be brought out into the entryway. Michael Panachak responded yes. He stated that the owners are trying to work with the existing architectural features of the wood framed building. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Barbara Fina stated that there are many changes proposed. The Chair stated that the Board should approve the basic concepts (windows, etc). He stated that the actual colors and materials would be approved by a sub-committee consisting of Barbara Fina, Ana Maria McGinnis, and Sean McCarthy. The Chair stated that the applicant would need to bring color samples to the sub-committee meeting. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 10) Dimovski The Chair stated that this item is off the agenda since the proposed work is not visible from the street. 11) Minutes of the April and May 2005 meetings – The minutes for April 2005 were reviewed. The Chair made a motion as amended. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). The minutes for the May 2005 meetings were reviewed. Paul Wichmann made a motion as amended. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 12) Other Sean McCarthy stated that the Board had requested nameplates. He stated that the original nameplates were not of a good quality. He stated that another type of nameplate is being evaluated. Adjourned at 9:55 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 22, 2005 8 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2005-06-22 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2005 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/8481975ad97bac4bae0da90c34d6c6f6.pdf b1d3ef0f3e54111f0294b7d49d8fd487 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED July 27, 2005 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chairman at 8:03 p.m. The Chair noted that a quorem was present. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Paul Wichmann Ana Maria McGinnis Elvira Aloia Absent: Carter Sackman Barbara Fina Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Freire 2) Sasidhar 3) Yunga 4) Ryan 5) Holladay 6) Carissimo 7) Varricchio 8) Song 9) Frank’s Home Improvements 10) Straus 11) Doyle 12) Minutes of the June 2005 meeting 42 Howard Street 275 Farrington Avenue 230 North Washington Street 117 New Broadway 24 Harwood Avenue 256 Farrington Avenue 38 Beekman Avenue 84 Depeyster Avenue 361 North Broadway 26 Palmer Avenue 48 Beekman Avenue Announcements: The Chair spoke about the procedures for the Board. 1) Freire This is a continuation from a previous meeting. Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. Sam Vieira spoke about the exterior materials. He stated that the exterior would not have all vinyl siding. He stated that the roof pitches are to remain the same. He stated that the proposed changes should address the concerns that were expressed by the Board at the last meeting. Paul Wichmann asked if the property was a 3-family residence. �Sam Vieira responded yes. Paul Wichmann asked about the location of the meters. Sam Vieira responded that the proposed utility meter location has not been worked out with Con Edison as of yet. Ana Maria McGinnis asked why the scallop was not brought down. Sam Vieira responded that he was trying to maintain the scale of the structure. The Chair asked if the Board had any questions. There was none. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 2) Sasidhar Jay Sasidhar is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair stated that he does not understand the need for a retaining wall with a large fence on top of it. He stated that the fence would seem to be a spite fence. Sean McCarthy responded that the fence is a 3-foot fence. Jay Sasidhar stated that the property slopes to the left and the owners want to level the property. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. There was none. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the retaining wall. Jay Sasidhar responded that the wall would help to level the slope on the property. 3) Yunga Manuel Yunga is the owner and is representing this application. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 27, 2005 2 �The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sean McCarthy stated that this is an awning replacement. The Chair stated that the awning is an identical replacement in material and the only change is for the change in font and adding the phone number on the awning. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Paul Wichmann stated that the color rendering is acceptable. Elvira Aloia asked how the lettering is to be applied. Sean McCarthy responded that the lettering would be applied to the awning. It was discussed that the awning lettering should be painted onto the awning. It was also agreed that the lettering should be installed on the face only. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Ryan – Tina Ryan is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair asked about the height of the fence. Tina Ryan stated that since her property is located on a corner lot, the fence is restricted to 3-feet on one side and 4-feet on the other. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. There was none. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 5) Holladay – Paula Holladay is the owner and is representing this application. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 27, 2005 3 �The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair asked the applicant to explain the difference in window layout. Paula Holladay responded that the windows are existing. She stated that there has been some work performed on the house and some of the muttons have been removed. The Chair stated that the windows are proposed to be replaced with casement windows. Paula Holladay responded yes. Paula Holladay spoke about the specific windows that are proposed to be replaced. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the windows on the second floor should be replaced to match the proposed new windows. Paula Holladay responded that one of the windows is located in a bathroom window and the window is tiled in. She stated that the additional windows should be replaced in the near future. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) CarissimoAlessandro Carissimo is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Alessandro Carissimo submitted some photos of the existing house. The Chair stated that it appears that a side yard variance is required. Sean McCarthy responded that a variance was granted in April 2004. There was an open discussion on whether the variance has expired. Sean McCarthy read Village Code section 62-45 that indicated that the variance expires within one year. The Chair stated that if the Zoning Board needs to grant an extension of the variance. It was agreed that the application would be held over to the September meeting. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 27, 2005 4 �No action was taken. 7) Varricchio Paul Varricchio is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Paul Varicchio submitted a photo rendering to the Board. The Chair asked about the colors of the sign at the adjacent property. Sean McCarthy responded yellow and blue with red lettering. It was agreed that the signs should be located at the same height to provide uniformity to the building. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Paul Wichmann asked if the signs could be looked at in the same scale. Sean McCarthy responded that the recent approval for the property next door will be reviewed and this sign will conform to the dimensions of the other sign for uniformity. Paul Varricchio stated that he is looking to keep the antique look of the salon. He stated that the sign will have a weathered look. Sean McCarthy asked if the sign would have carved lettering. Paul Varricchio responded that the proposed colors do not have a pleasant appearance. He stated that if he changed the colors to gold, the price of the lettering is much higher. Elvira Aloia responded that the proposed sign is acceptable. Ana Maria McGinnis agreed. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Song Michelle Song is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village. Sean McCarthy responded yes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 27, 2005 5 �Michelle Song stated that the application is proposing to add a fence on one side yard of the house. Sean McCarthy stated that the fence in the front yard was approved when the house was originally constructed. He stated that the applicant was installing the same fence on the side yard when the work was stopped. Sean McCarthy stated that the fence would match the existing fence. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. There was none. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 9) Frank’s Home Improvements Mr. Haran is representing this application on behalf of the owner. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village. Sean McCarthy responded no. This application was not heard by the Board since the applicant did not properly notify the public. The Chair stated that the Board would not be very receptive to an awning on this building. No action was taken. 10) Straus Roberta Straus is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair asked if this was an application for a post and rail fence. Roberta Straus responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the fence as already installed. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 27, 2005 6 �Roberta Straus responded no. The Board stated that there are no plans received for this application. Sean McCarthy indicated on the submitted photos, where the location of the fence is proposed. Ana Maria McGinnis asked what was the purpose of the fence. Roberta Straus responded that the purpose would be for a dog. She stated that the fence would have a black mesh installed with it. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. There was none. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 11) Doyle Brian Doyle is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Brian Doyle stated that he took over Casey’s Place several years ago. He stated that the phone number of the business was added on the awning. He stated that he did not know that the phone number was not supposed to be posted on the awning. He stated that awning has a classic look similar to the previous awning. There was an open discussion on how to handle phone numbers on signs and awnings. It was agreed that the Board should adopt a Resolution that could be enforced throughout the Village. Sean McCarthy stated that there are restrictions on signs but phone numbers are not included in the current restrictions. The Chair stated that he would draft the Resolution with specific input from the Board. The Chair asked if there were any public comments. There was none. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 27, 2005 7 �Elvira Aloia stated that she did not have any problems with the proposed sign. The applicant was informed that only one fluorescent sign was allowed in the front window. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 12) Minutes of the June 2005 meeting The minutes for the June 2005 meetings were reviewed. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Adjourned at 9:35 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 27, 2005 8 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2005-07-27 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2005 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/f937058e56aa4f699bba96a1856209c8.pdf 200df897e8941ec8b6f51b2270657845 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED September 28, 2005 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chairman at 8:03 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Ana Maria McGinnis Elvira Aloia Carter Sackman Barbara Fina Absent: Paul Wichmann Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Minutes of the July 2005 meeting 2) Frank’s Home Improvements 3) Gerstner 4) Emma 5) Antonio Rodrigues 6) Van Hengel 7) Leary 8) Savino 9) Pichardo 10) Yang Yeoh 11) William Cai 361 North Broadway 544 Bellwood Avenue 62 Depeyster Avenue 362 North Broadway 2 Evergreen Way 23 Fremont Road 26 Fremont Road 26 Hudson Street 279 North Broadway 21 Fremont Road Announcements: The Chair stated that he was adding William Cai to the agenda. 1) Minutes from July 2005 meetingThe minutes for the July 2005 meetings were reviewed. Elvira Aloia made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 2) Frank’s Home Improvement This is an application for a sign. Kim Chapetto is representing this application along with the contractor. She submitted a sample of the lettering and the logo material (foam). �Sean McCarthy stated that a 2-line sign can only be 24-inches in height overall. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the “and siding, Inc” could be removed from the sign. The applicant agreed to remove the additional wording. The Chair stated that the length of the sign exceeds the Village Code. He also stated that phone numbers are not allowed on the signage. Barbara Fina stated that the sign is 21-feet 9 inches which exceeds the Village Code. She asked if the sign could be centered. Kim Chapetto responded yes. Barbara Fina asked about the thickness of the lettering. Kim Chapetto responded ¾” thick. Carter Sackman stated that the submitted rendered photo compared to the actual lettering is not to scale. He stated that the sign might appear too small compared to the façade. Barbara Fina asked about the length of the building. Kim Chapetto responded 41.4-feet. Barbara Fina stated that the raised lettering should include a shadow map to make the lettering appear larger. The Board agreed that the logo should be placed on the transom above the door. The Board also agreed that the sign should be installed above the windows as proposed and not centered on the building exterior. Sean McCarthy stated that the building address should be included on the sign. There was an open discussion on the logo location and the property address. The Board agreed that the application would be approved as follows: 1) Eliminating “and siding co, Inc” 2) Eliminating the telephone number 3) The width of sign is no longer than 20-feet. 4) The sign will be installed in the center of the space above the windows 5) The logo will be installed over the door with a white backing. 6) Building number will be installed on the glass transom above the door. The Chair stated that the presence of the 2 electrical meters needs to be addressed by the owner prior to having the sign installed. Barbara Fina made a motion to approve the application as amended. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 28, 2005 2 �3) Gerstner – This is an application for a front yard renovation. Robert Gerstner is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair noted that the Board had received the following: 1) rendered photo 2) landscape plan The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair asked if there were any questions. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the new stone steps. Robert Gerstner responded that Pennsylvania bluestone will be used for the steps. Sean McCarthy asked about the height of the new stone landing. Robert Gerstner responded that it would be flush to the ground. Sean McCarthy responded that the drawing indicates a raised platform. There was an open discussion on the accuracy of the submitted sketch. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. It was agreed that if railings are needed, the applicant would have to return. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 4) Emma This is an application to change the exterior of the building from brick to vinyl siding. Kathy Emma is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair asked why the applicant would be covering the brick with vinyl siding. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 28, 2005 3 �Kathy Emma responded that the brick work is deteriorated and requires extensive repair. She stated that the cost involved to install brick face or re-point the bricks far exceed the costs of installing vinyl siding. She also stated that the house is poorly insulated and the siding would help insulate the house. Elvira Aloia stated that the house would be ruined with the vinyl siding. Barbara Fina responded that the Board is trying to stay away from projects of this type. Carter Sackman stated that there are alternatives to repairing the brick exterior that are more financially viable. Kathy Emma responded that the deteriorated brick exterior negatively sticks out in the neighborhood. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman stated that the brick could be restored. He stated that he would like to see more information on the other houses in the neighborhood. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that she is opposed to the project. The Chair stated that he needs more information on other houses in the neighborhood. He stated that he is opposed to the application. Barbara Fina stated that she is opposed to the project. Elvira Aloia stated that she is opposed to the project. The Chair stated that the application could be adjourned to the next meeting so that the applicant could provide more information. 5) Antonio Rodrigues This is an application for a sign. Antonio Rodrigues is the applicant and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair asked if the sign is aluminum. Antonio Rodrigues responded yes. Barbara Fina asked if there was horizontal metal in the sign. Antonio Rodrigues responded no. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 28, 2005 4 �The Chair stated that he has no problem with the sign. Barbara Fina asked if the background would be frosted white. Antonio Rodrigues responded yes. There was an open discussion on the lettering color to be gold or green. Barbara Fina asked about raised lettering. Antonio Rodrigues responded that the raised lettering is more money. The Chair responded that the sign will allow the applicant to change the sign easier if a tenant changes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman stated that he has no problem with the proposed application. The Board unanimously agreed that the application was approved (5-0). 6) Van Hengel This is an application for new siding and portico. Robert Barstow is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Robert Barstow stated that the applicants are looking to replace the existing siding and install a new portico. The Chair asked about the depth of the portico. Robert Barstow responded about 3-feet deep to keep out of the weather. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair asked the Board if they had any comments. There were none. The Board unanimously agreed that the application was approved (5-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 28, 2005 5 �7) Leary This is an application for a one-story addition with a deck. Susan Riordan is the project architect and is representing this application along with owner, John Leary. Susan Riordan discussed the proposed addition. She stated that they are going to extend the existing gable to the exterior. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Nick Lianini (25 Fremont Road) requested to review the plans up close. He stated that he had no problems with the proposed project. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair asked the Board if they had any comments. There were none. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve as submitted. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 8) Savino This is an application for one window replacement and siding replacement. Vincent Savino is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Vincent Savino spoke about the existing siding. He presented the existing and proposed siding materials for the Board. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair asked the Board if they had any comments. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 28, 2005 6 �There were none. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve as submitted. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 9) Pichardo – This is an application for a renovation. Rose Pichardo is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings had been received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sean McCarthy stated that this application received Zoning Board approval 2-months ago. He stated that the majority of the work involves enclosing the two front porches. Rosa Pichardo provided some photos of other houses in the area with similar styles. The Chair stated that the rear work is partially visible from the street. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the entire house will be re-sided. Rose Pichardo responded yes. The Chair reviewed the proposed window replacements. He asked about the new steel door. Rose Pichardo responded that the existing front steel door will be replaced. She stated that the house is a two-family house and the new door will separate the two units. The Chair opened the public hearing. Clara Teagle (38 Hudson Street) requested to review the plans up close. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Barbara Fina inquired about a proposed window in the rear of the house that is not centered. Rose Pichardo responded that the drawing is incorrect and the window is centered. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (5-0) 10) Yang Yeoh This is an application for a sign. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 28, 2005 7 �Yang Yeoh is representing this application on behalf if the owner. He described the proposed sign. Barbara Fina asked if the sign is illuminated. Yang Yeoh responded that the sign is existing but the lettering is changing. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Board unanimously agreed that the application was approved (5-0). Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant wants to install imitation grass inserts in the existing chain link fence to separate the parking area from the neighbor. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the applicant would consider using bamboo fencing instead of the inserts. The Board agreed that more information is needed on the proposed fence for the Board to make a decision. 11) Cai This is an application for an extension and a garage renovation. William Cai is the owner and is representing his application. The Chair summarized the Zoning Board application. William Cai submitted rendered photos of the current house. He stated that the living room window would be changed to a bow window. He stated that two dormers are proposed in the upper floor. He also stated that the addition of the room in the rear would allow easier access to the garage. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the exterior of the house would be changed. William Cai responded that the exterior would be painted. Barbara Fina asked if the driveway area would be changing. Sean McCarthy responded that the driveway area would be less. Barbara Fina asked about the brick in the front. William Cai responded that the natural brick would be power-washed to try and restore the brick. Sean McCarthy asked about the style of the garage doors. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 28, 2005 8 �William Cai responded that the garage doors would be raised panel doors with no lights. He stated that the garage doors could be made out of wood depending on the price. Sean McCarthy asked about the top of the bow window. William Cai responded probably copper flashing. There was an open discussion on the possible methods that could be used to properly cover the bow window. The Chair stated that if there are any material alterations on the deck as a result of the Zoning Board, the applicant needs to re-appear before the Architectural Review Board. The Board unanimously agreed that the application was approved with the understanding that the top of the window will be terminated under the roofline. It was approved (5-0). Adjourned at 9:44 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 28, 2005 9 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2005-09-28 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2005 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/2be04fe306ee95538c52d8cf51afeaf1.pdf ca77d5e2bac4475f200a646279957ae9 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED October 26, 2005 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chairman at 8:07 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman Ana Maria McGinnis Carter Sackman Paul Wichmann Barbara Fina Absent: Elvira Aloia Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Approval of Minutes 2) Emma 3) Carissimo 4) Aloia 5) Miller 6) Planned Community Living 7) Sleepy Hollow Design 8) Garcia 9) Marino’s Italian Bistro 10) Other 62 Depeyster Street 256 Farrington Avenue 11 Evergreen Way 24 Lakeview Avenue 1 Evergreen Way 35 Beekman Avenue 10 Gory Brook Road 56-60 Clinton Street September meeting Siding Addition, new front porch and rear deck New walkway, steps, window Spa Alterations Sign Retaining Wall Sign Announcements: None. 1) Minutes from September 2005 meetingThe minutes for the September 2005 meetings were reviewed. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 2) Emma This is a continuation from previous meetings. Kathy Emma is the owner and is representing this application along with her husband and the contractor Tom Musack from Garden State Brickface and Stucco. �Kathy Emma submitted letters from her neighbors in support of her application. The Chair stated that alternatives were requested. Kathy Emma responded that the proposed siding is the only alternative that will fit into their budget. She stated that many other houses in the area have vinyl siding. Sean McCarthy confirmed that many other houses in the area have vinyl siding. He stated that the mortar joints are in poor shape and many of the bricks have already been patched. He stated that it does not appear that the joints can be repointed. Carter Sackman asked if there is currently any water penetration into the house. Kathy Emma responded no. Tom Musack stated that the mortar joints are very bad in some areas. He stated that his company has performed many siding projects. He wanted to know why the Board was opposed to this application. Carter Sackman disagreed with the contractor’s statement. He stated that different municipalities have different rules. Paul Wichmann asked if the company has done stucco parchment projects. Tom Musack responded yes. Paul Wichmann asked if his company had done any brick repair work. Tom Musack responded yes but only on commercial buildings. Sean McCarthy asked if the siding would be Dutch lap with shutters. Kathy Emma responded yes. Carter Sackman stated that he thought that the application did not represent other homes in the area. The Chair referred to the minutes regarding what the Board requested at the last meeting. He stated that the applicant has not provided sufficient additional information to the Board. Tom Musack stated that his company can perform stuccowork but the owner’s budget cannot afford the stucco. The Chair responded that the Board does not consider economic hardship as part of the approval process. Carter Sackman asked about the age of the house. Kathy Emma responded 1846. The Chair opened the public hearing. Chuck Lancaster (54 Fremont Road) stated that the age of the house something worth noting. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 26, 2005 2 �Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman stated that based on the information presented, he is not in favor of the application. Paul Wichmann stated that vinyl siding reduced the property value of the house. Carter Sackman stated that the price differential should not be that great. Tom Musack responded that he is not a mason contractor, he is a plasterer. Barbara Fina responded that the information needs to be presented to the Board as stated in the last meeting. Tom Musack asked the Board what additional informational is required. Paul Wichmann responded that a drawing could be presented to the Board to show the level of detail that is proposed. The Chair stated that there are alternatives that the applicant can explore. He stated that the applicant could preserve the brick that is visible from the street and install vinyl in the parts of the house that are not visible from the street. The Chair stated that alternatives should be presented. Tom Musack asked the Board for alternatives. Carter Sackman responded that the front facade should try and be preserved. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 3) Carissimo Sandro Carissimo is the owner and is representing this application along with contractor George Reilly. The Chair stated that the applicant has obtained the required zoning variances. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Since this application was submitted to the Board a few months ago, Sandro Carissimo summarized the application for the Board. He submitted photos of the existing structure. He spoke about the proposed application. He described the proposed addition and new front porch. He spoke about the proposed handrails. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the applicant would drop the windows in the front. Sandro Carissimo responded that those windows are existing. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 26, 2005 3 �The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Barbara Fina asked if the applicant had any information on the adjacent houses. Sandro Carissimo submitted a photo to the Board of the adjacent houses. He stated that a 4-foot walkway would remain between the proposed addition and the property line. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Barbara Fina asked for details on the front door. Sandro Carissimo responded it would be a raised panel wood door. Carter Sackman asked if the proposed windows were double hung. Sandro Carissimo responded that he would check. Barbara Fina asked for details on the garage door. Sandro Carissimo responded it would be a raised panel door with windows. The Chair stated that too many details are still needed. He stated that the Board could approve the basic application subject to receiving and approving a submittal on the front door and the garage door. Also, the applicant will add a watermark underneath the new bay window. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 4) Elvira Aloia – Ana Maria McGinnis is representing this application on behalf of the owner. She recused herself from this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the front landing would be changed. She stated that the existing bay window is proposed to remain. She stated that a much larger landing area would be created as a result. The Chair stated that there is no information on the bay window in relation to the house. Ana Maria McGinnis submitted a picture of the house for the Board. She stated that the landing would be made of brick and bluestone. She stated that the width of the landing would remain the same. Barbara Fina asked if the sides are brick and the top would be bluestone. Ana Maria McGinnis responded the sides and risers would be brick and the top would be bluestone. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 26, 2005 4 �Sean McCarthy asked if the roof was new. Ana Maria McGinnis responded that the roof is existing and will not be altered. Carter Sackman asked if the owner is proposing New York Bluestone. Ana Maria McGinnis responded that New York Bluestone is proposed. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. There was an open discussion on the proposed bay window. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. The approval stipulates that the proposed window must be the same size as the existing. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0) Ana Maria McGinnis abstained. 5) Miller – This is a continuation from previous meetings. Marcus Luck is representing this application on behalf of the applicant. He described the proposed project and associated retaining walls and fence. He discussed the proposed landscaping plan. Sean McCarthy asked about the location of the proposed fence. Marcus Luck indicated the location of the proposed fence on the drawings. Paul Wichmann asked about the visibility from the street. Sean McCarthy responded that the proposed work is visible from the lake. Marcus Luck spoke about the proposed landscaping plan. Sean McCarthy asked if the fence would be stained. Marcus Luck responded yes. Paul Wichmann asked if there were any details on the proposed waterfall. Marcus Luck responded no. Carter Sackman asked about the elevation around the base of the spa. Marcus Luck responded 89-feet. Carter Sackman asked about the height of the waterfall. Marcus Luck responded that it is really a water-wall that is 6-feet high. It is a backdrop of the spa. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 26, 2005 5 �Carter Sackman asked about the material to be used behind the water-wall. Marcus Luck responded a rough bluestone. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. There was an open discussion on the location of the spa equipment. Barbara Fina asked how the equipment would be concealed. Marcus Luck responded that the same fencing could be used to conceal the equipment. Paul Wichmann stated that the area below the spa is all grass. Marcus Luck responded that the landscaping in the area is pretty dense. Carter Sackman asked if the spa would be in grade with the basement. Sean McCarthy responded that the spa would be below the basement. Carter Sackman stated that he had a concern with the proposed pad. He stated that the pad should be consistent with the retaining wall. Barbara Fina stated that the planter should be continued so that the fence is not so bare. She stated that the extreme elevation should be softened with a more year-round planting. Chuck Lancaster (54 Fremont Road) stated that there is an easement along the lake. Sean McCarthy responded that the proposed work is not in the easement. Chuck Lancaster was concerned with the view from the lake. He stated that no other house in the area have fences facing the lake. He stated that plantings are used. Marcus Luck responded that the fence is needed for safety and security. He stated that plantings are proposed. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: Install adequate screening around the equipment pad and the extend the retaining wall that surrounds the spa area in addition to the fence that surrounds the spa area to encompass the equipment pad as well as the plantings. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 6) Planned Community Living Timothy Fogerty is representing this application along with project architect Dennis Suraci. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 26, 2005 6 �Timothy Fogerty stated that the existing house needs to be brought up to American with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance. Dennis Suraci presented the proposed floor plan. He spoke about the interior handicapped lift. He also spoke about the proposed changes to the garage to accommodate the handicapped vehicles. He spoke about the added wrought iron railings and proposed dormer addition. He presented a rendering to further illustrate the proposed changes. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair opened the public hearing. He spoke about the Board’s jurisdictional limitations. Chuck Lancaster (54 Fremont Road) stated that when the home was presented to the Village about 15 years ago, the owners stated that the parking was adequate. He stated that the number of bedrooms is increasing. He asked about the number of residents of the property. He stated that cars are never parked in the garage but cars are parked in the driveway. He stated that the proposed structure is very wide. He stated that the drawings do not properly reflect the existing trees on the site. Gabe Loredo (4 Kingland Road) stated that the proposed addition is too large for the neighborhood. He stated that the additional bedrooms cannot accommodate the number of residents and workers. James West (4 Evergreen Way) asked if other ideas were presented. Dennis Suraci discussed the other options that were explored. Mark Delaurentis (3 Webb Road) asked about the number of bedrooms Dennis Suraci responded that the population is not increasing. There was an open discussion on whether these issues are relevant to the Board. Sean McCarthy responded that the applicant must comply with the zoning codes of the Village. He stated that this is not a Planning Board application. Timothy Fogerty stated that the license to operate the home is limited to 10 persons. He also stated that by increasing the number of bedroom, he cannot increase the number of residents. He stated that the entry into the garage will be relocated in order to keep the existing trees. He spoke about the handicap-accessible garage. Dave Logan (1 Fremont Road) stated that the public notice was for a one-car garage. Dennis Suraci responded that only one vehicle can fit into the garage. Dave Logan asked about the architectural design of the exterior. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 26, 2005 7 �Dennis Suraci responded that in keeping with the exterior of the house, the extension would have vinyl siding and brick. He spoke about the proposed windows. Chuck Lancaster asked about the proposed plantings. Dennis Suraci responded that there are plantings proposed for the site. Chuck Lancaster noted for the record that ten (10) residents are proposed to occupy the house and that this is the maximum number that the planned living unit will accommodate at this property. Gabe Lopedo (4 Kingland Road) stated that the exterior should be improved with proper materials. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Paul Wichmann stated that the exterior should be revised to include more brick and stone instead of the proposed vinyl siding. He stated that the roofline could be modified to soften the appearance. Barbara Fina stated that the proposed changes do not seem to be in keeping with other houses in the area. Paul Wichmann asked about the proposed brick. Dennis Suraci submitted a sample of the proposed brick. There was an open discussion on the layout of the windows. Dennis Suraci responded that the windows are set to accommodate the residents and to prevent injury. Paul Wichmann asked about the width of the porch. Dennis Suraci responded that the porch is 5-foot wide. Carter Sackman stated that if the recreation room window was changed to a bow window, it might take away from the sidewalk distance around the house. He suggested that two double hung windows and a fixed unit be used instead. The applicant will return with revised plans based on the Board’s feedback. The applicant was advised that visual material would help the Board in understanding exactly what is proposed. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 7) Sleepy Hollow Design Robert Barstow is the project architect and is representing this application along with Gus APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 26, 2005 8 �Montero. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Robert Barstow submitted photos of the property. He also submitted a rendering of the proposed sign with the proposed color scheme. Barbara Fina asked about the thickness of the panels. Robert Barstow responded about 1-inch thick. Carter Sackman asked if there is lighting proposed for the sign. Robert Barstow responded that lighting is proposed. There was an open discussion on whether phone numbers would be allowed on the sign. Sean McCarthy responded that phone numbers are not restricted in the Village Ordinance. Sean McCarthy asked about the sign material and posts. Robert Barstow responded that the proposed sign is aluminum and the posts are pressuretreated lumber painted burgundy. Barbara Fina questioned the use of burgundy in the color scheme. Gus Montero stated that the colors were chosen by driving around the Village. Carter Sackman suggested that the applicant use two black steel posts and use a huntergreen and a beige color combination. Sean McCarthy stated that each sign must be a maximum of 3 square-feet. He stated that the signs should be raised higher from the ground. Barbara Fina stated that the lettering “Construction Services” is close to the post. She also stated that the phone number is large. Ana Maria McGinnis questioned the typeface for each sign. She stated that the fonts should be consistent. Robert Barstow agreed. Barbara Fina stated that the phone numbers should be reduced. Robert Barstow asked if the application could be conditionally approved. Carter Sackman stated that the presented colors are not correct, the fonts are not correct, and the scale of the sign should be corrected. Sean McCarthy stated that temporary signage is already present. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 26, 2005 9 �This was adjourned to the next meeting. 8) Garcia Deidre Carsto is the contractor representing the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Deidre Carsto stated that this is a retaining wall that is replacing an existing deteriorated retaining wall. She submitted photos of other houses in the area that have retaining walls. Carter Sackman asked why this is before the Board since it appears to be a straight replacement. Sean McCarthy responded that the materials needed to be approved. Deidre Carsto stated that she had proposed constructing a garden stonewall but the costs are a factor in the applicant’s decision. Sean McCarthy stated that the two railroad ties are installed in the Village right-of-way and should be removed. Carter Sackman asked how long the existing railroad ties were in place. Deidre Carsto responded about 5-8 years. Barbara Fina asked Sean McCarthy for his opinion. Sean McCarthy responded that the railroad ties along the curb-line need to be replaced and eliminate as much of the wall in the driveway as possible as well as landscape the area. Ana Maria McGinnis asked for some perennials to be planted. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Barbara Fina to approve with the stipulation that the railroad ties in the front of the property is removed. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 9) Marino’s Italian Bistro Sean McCarthy stated that there is a new business at this location and needs a new sign. He stated that there was an existing aluminum sign from the previous business. He stated that when the new owner opened the business, he replaced the sign. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 26, 2005 10 �Barbara Fina stated that the clip art icons are not appropriate on the sign. Carter Sackman asked about the colors. Sean McCarthy responded off-white. Paul Wichmann stated that the Board should go and visit the site and return to the next meeting The Board unanimously agreed. 10) Other – The Board agreed that the next meeting would be held on 30 November 2005 instead of 23 November 2005. Carter Sackman made a motion to adjourn. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (5-0) Adjourned at 10:51 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 26, 2005 11 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2005-10-26 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2005 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/7ab7e8068633390165f7e66273c67274.pdf 81b9e7373b5b8eda7c91f4c1e4f58435 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED November 30, 2005 The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chairman at 8:11 p.m. Present: Don Stever, Chairman David Pysh Ana Maria McGinnis Absent: Carter Sackman Paul Wichmann Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Emma 2) Carissimo 3) Planned Community Living 4) Mendaz 5) Sleepy Hollow Design 6) Marino’s Italian Bistro 7) DiBase 8) Kenyon 9) Doyle 10) Elliott 11) Mateus/Tappan Car Wash 12) Weltig 13) Kennedy 14) Cortese Construction 15) Approval of Minutes 62 Depeyster Street 256 Farrington Avenue 1 Evergreen Way 20 Francis Street 35 Beekman Avenue 56-60 Clinton Street 202 N. Washington Ave 259 Hunter Ave Siding - continued Addition/alteration-cont. Alterations-cont. New fence Sign-continued Sign New siding New garage 16 New Broadway 60 Hemlock Drive New awning Retaining wall 205 Valley Street 14 Merlin Ave Pokahoe Drive Terrace Close New sign New addition New Single Fam. Residence New Single Fam. Residence October meeting Announcements: The Chair stated that although the Board has a quorum, the Board must be unanimous for it to take action since only 3 members are present. The Chair stated that Cortese Construction is off of the agenda since the applicant was unaware that the neighbors were required to be noticed. He stated that the item would be put off until the next meeting. 1) EmmaThis is a continuation from previous meetings. Kathy and David Emma are the owners and are representing this application. �David Emma presented the Board with photos of the existing house to show the deteriorated condition of the dwelling exterior. The submitted photos also showed other houses in the neighborhood that have a vinyl exterior. The Chair reviewed the application to date. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if other alternatives were explored. David Emma responded that they received estimates of about $12,000 to install a new brick face exterior. He stated that re-pointing was even more costly. Sean McCarthy spoke about the existing exterior. He stated that if the exterior were to be re-pointed, many of the bricks would have to be replaced anyway. David Pysh stated that there are many reasons to install vinyl siding but the deteriorated brick also serve as a structural component. Sean McCarthy responded that the joints are going to have to be properly secured to the building exterior. David Pysh stated that some re-pointing would need to be done in order to stabilize the installation of the new vinyl siding. He asked the applicant if they priced other options. Kathy Emma responded that the cost to install a brick face product on the house would $60,000. She stated that to re-point the exterior was more costly. David Pysh responded that the brick face and vinyl options are only superficial solutions. He stated that if someone wanted to restore the exterior to the original brick, it could not be done. The Chair stated that although the brick exterior is deteriorated, the applicant makes a good argument to install vinyl siding. David Pysh asked if there was any evidence to support the estimates. Kathy Emma responded that she did not bring the estimates. The Chair stated that Paul Wichmann and Carter Sackman both did not agree with the presented estimates to re-point the brick exterior. David Emma stated that he gave a $4000 non-refundable deposit on the vinyl siding before he knew that ARB approval was required. There was an open discussion on the financial hardship presented to the Board. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2005 2 �2) Carissimo This is a continuation from the previous meeting. Sandro Carissimo is the applicant and is representing this application. Sandro Carissimo submitted cut sheets of the proposed front door. He reviewed the front elevation drawing on the recently approved plans. There was an open discussion on the different door features that could be used. The Board unanimously approved the application as submitted with the condition that the front door would either be a solid door or have a rectangular/square glass. The garage door was unanimously approves as submitted. 3) Planned Community Living This is a continuation from the previous meeting. Dennis Suraci submitted several photos to the Board as was requested at the last meeting. He reviewed the changes to the plans based on the Board’s feedback at the last meeting. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the area would be re-landscaped. Dennis Suraci responded yes. There was an open discussion on the proposed colors for the exterior. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the Hunter Green would not be appropriate on this house. She stated that more subtle colors should be selected. David Pysh stated that there are many different types of exteriors on the building. He stated that the number of materials should be reduced. Dennis Suraci responded that he was trying to stay away from using more vinyl siding on the exterior. The Board unanimously approved the application as submitted with the following conditions: 1) Bring the brick over to the front of the porch is recommended. 2) Use a bay window and not a bow window in the front. 3) Use a lighter green from the proposed Hunter Green. 4) Mendaz Fredi Mendaz is the owner and is representing this application. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2005 3 �The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sean McCarthy stated that the existing fence is a chain link fence. He stated that the applicant wants to replace the chain link fence with a new 3-foot high wood picket fence. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Board unanimously approved the application (3-0) with the condition that the existing posts for the chain link fence be removed as well. 5) Sleepy Hollow Designs This is a continuation from the last meeting. Robert Barstow is one of the applicants and is representing this application. Robert Barstow submitted a revised sign to the Board. He stated that the sign is a metal sign with wood posts. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the colors. Robert Barstow responded that the proposed colors are on the submitted rendering of the sign. The Chair stated that the Village has separate standard for signs. He stated that the considerations include the incompatibility of colors. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the sign is improved from the last meeting. She stated that the sign is still too busy. Sean McCarthy stated that the each panel is only 12” high. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the panels contain a lot of information. The Board unanimously agreed to approve the sign and the door as submitted (3-0). 6) Marino’s Italian Bistro There was nobody present to represent this application. This was adjourned to the next meeting. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2005 4 �7) DiBase Armand DiBase is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Armand DiBase spoke about the existing exterior. He stated that the exterior of the building is currently brick veneer and cedar siding. He stated that years ago, the cedar siding portion of the exterior was painted but over the years, the paint keeps peeling away. He stated that the project was 50% completed when the building inspector stopped the job. He stated that he did not know that ARB approval was needed. The Chair asked if the brick face on the first floor will remain. Armand DiBase responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the garage doors. Armand DiBase responded that the garage doors will be painted. David Pysh stated that a convention spec should be followed regarding wrapping the entire house. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Board unanimously approved the application as submitted (3-0). 8) Kenyon Brad Kenyon is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Brad Kenyon spoke about the existing and proposed garage. He submitted photos of the existing garage for the Board. The Chair opened the public hearing. Hugh Jones (253 Hunter Avenue) stated that the height of the garage is an issue. He stated that he is not opposed to the width, length or square footage of the proposed garage. He stated that the proposed garage would block his views of the Hudson River from his home. He showed a copy of the recent Zoning Board public notice for replacing an existing 2-car garage. He showed a picture of the existing garage. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2005 5 �Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the height of the structure. Brad Kenyon responded that the existing garage is 12’-9” and the proposed garage is 15’ tall. The Chair stated that the applicant can build the garage to 15-feet tall as of right. Hugh Jones stated that the proposed garage is over 17-feet tall. He showed examples of other garages in the area. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the location of the blocked view. Hugh Jones responded that his existing view line of the Hudson River would be blocked Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant has an existing non-conforming lot. He stated that the maximum height of an accessory structure is measures to the mid-point of the gable. He stated that the proposed garage conforms to the zoning code. David Pysh asked about reducing the height of the garage. Brad Kenyon stated that the architect indicated that reducing the height of the garage would take away from the architectural character of the house and the neighborhood. The Chair discussed the Board’s standards. He stated that the zoning code has been met and the Board’s jurisdiction is limited. He stated that if views of the Hudson River were blocked from a public street, then a Waterfront Advisory Committee would need to review the application. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board could review whether the proposed garage is in keeping with the neighborhood. David Pysh asked if the proposed garage roofline was proposed in order to match the roofline of the main structure. Brad Kenyon responded that the architect was concerned that the garage would seem dissimilar from the main structure if the roofline was lowered. Sean McCarthy asked about the height of the garage walls. Brad Kenyon responded that he did not know. He questioned the appearance of the garage if the walls were reduced. The Chair responded that the Board has not been provided with any elevations. He asked if the applicant were able to reduce the height of the garage by 18-inches, would the applicant be opposed. Brad Kenyon asked the Board for a decision since he would not be able to attend the Board’s meeting in January, February and March. David Pysh offered to approve the application with the condition to reduce the height of the ridge is at 15-feet which would be an 18-inch reduction. He stated that the reduction would APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2005 6 �not take away from the garage. Sean McCarthy added that the overhang should be limited by the Board. He also stated that the overhangs could be extended to compensate. Hugh Jones asked about the protection of his river views. The Chair stated that the protection of river views does not include private views. Marion Kenyon stated that recently some trees were removed in the rear yard that created Hugh Jones’ river views. She stated that the garage is not taking something away that always existed. The Board unanimously approved the application as submitted with the following condition that the bottom eve of the garage roof is at the same height of a standard garage door opening. 9) Doyle Larry Doyle is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Larry Doyle spoke about the proposed awning in the rear of the property. He stated that the awning would let visitors that they could enter the property in the rear. Larry Doyle spoke about the lettering. He stated that the proposed lettering on the awning was modeled after his lettering. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair expressed concerns with the addition of an awning in the rear. Larry Doyle stated that he is trying to draw attention for people to use the rear entrance of the building. David Pysh recommended that the rear entrance would look better by adding a permanent structure with the logo in the pediment or install a sign on the side of the door. This item was adjourned so that the applicant could submit architectural drawings to the Board. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2005 7 �10) Elliott James Elliott is the applicant and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. James Elliott spoke about the proposed retaining wall and the materials to be used. He spoke about the height of the retaining wall. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the property is being leveled. James Elliott responded that some fill will be used but the property will still be sloped. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the wall could be built on the property line. Sean McCarthy responded that the wall could be built up to the property line. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Board unanimously approved the application as submitted (3-0). 11) Mateus/Tappan Car Wash – Miguel Mateus is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Miguel Mateus spoke about the existing sign and the need to replace it. He spoke about the proposed sign. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the sign seems too cartoonish. The Chair stated that the sign is out-of-character with the neighborhood. He stated that the sign contractor should attend the meeting to hear the Board’s input. Sean McCarthy will relay the Board’s concerns to the sigh contractor. Miguel Mateus asked if the colors are acceptable. The Board agreed that the colors are fine but the graphics need to be changed. This was adjourned to the next meeting. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2005 8 �12) Weltig Keith Atkin is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Keith Atkin spoke about the proposed addition. He stated that the addition is mainly proposed in the rear of the property. He stated that only a small portion of the addition is visible from the street. He stated that all of the exterior finishes would match the existing finishes. He spoke about the Zoning Board of Appeals approval. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Board unanimously approved the application as submitted (3-0). 13) Kennedy This is a continuation of previous meetings. Richard Blancato is the attorney representing this application along with architect, Emilio Escalades. Richard Blancato summarized the application to date. He stated that the current house is at 4500 square feet. He spoke about the proposed driveway. The Chair asked what the applicant is asking of the Board at tonight’s meeting. Richard Blancato asked the Board for a conditional or un-official approval for a court appearance tomorrow. Emilio Escalades spoke about the proposed changes to the garage. He stated that the grades are not changing. He also stated that the roof was lowered on the neighbors (Len Andrews) side. David Pysh asked about the colors of the concrete pavers. Richard Blancato responded that the neighbor wanted to minimize the appearance of the driveway. There was an open discussion on the Board’s jurisdiction on the driveway material. It was decided that the Board does typically review stone walls, pavers, etc. The Chair summarized the application history for the Board. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2005 9 �The Chair noted that John Dauer had submitted his objections of this application. John Dauer (8 Pokahoe Drive) stated that this application is still before the Planning Board. He also stated that Mr. Andrews has not signed any paperwork ending his litigation. He also spoke about the proposed materials used. He stated that the proposed shingles are out-of-character with the neighborhood. He also stated that Pokahoe Drive will be part of the Hudson River trail way. He stated that the trail way should be considered in the approval of this house. Richard Blancato responded that that shingles proposed are the same shingles that were previously presented to the Board. Sean McCarthy asked about the material proposed for the garage doors. Emilio Escalades responded mahogany. Richard Blancato spoke about the wetlands on the site and the Planning Board application. David Pysh asked about the windows proposed above the garage. Emilio Escalades responded that he would take the comments into consideration. The Chair asked how much of the garage would be viewed from the street. Sean McCarthy responded all of it. Sean McCarthy asked if perfection shingles are proposed. Emilio Escalades responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis expressed concerns with the proposed grass pavers. Emilio Escalades responded that alternatives would be explored. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 14) Cortese Construction – Richard Blancato is the attorney representing this application along with project architect, Dennis Rubic and owner, Andrew Cortese. The Chair stated that this item was originally removed from the agenda but the applicant asked to present the application to the Board to get some feedback from the Board. Dennis Rubic spoke about the proposed changes to the site plan. He spoke about the removal of the third garage bay. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2005 10 �Richard Blancato spoke about the Waterfront Advisory Committee’s request to push the house further back onto the site. He stated that the current location of the proposed house is at the maximum setback. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that she was concerned with the amount of stone. She stated that more brick should be used instead of stone. David Pysh stated that the design is pretty well considered. He stated that the overall plan is nicely done. 15) Minutes The minutes from the October meeting will be reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned at 11:06 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2005 11 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2005-11-30 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2005 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text