2 25 241 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/d890aa7a117521d4efdd148f49983f97.pdf 03665f943686a31e7d37011ceb600df8 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING - APPROVED July 23, 2008 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 7:58pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Ana Maria McGinnis David Pysh, Chairman Pat Piereson Carter Sackman Absent: Sandra Tripp Also Present: Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Rae Lee (Village Building Department) Announcements: None Agenda: 1) Anderson 275 Millard Avenue Retaining walls 2) Bearman 3) Yugui Express 4) Cabrera Residence 5) Forman Residence 6) Beristain Residence 7) Rodrigues Residence 8) Strasser Residence 9) Stoecklein Residence 10) Minutes 515 Bellwood Avenue 110 Beekman Avenue 296 North Washington Street 12 Francis Street 2 County House Road 33 Hudson Terrace 17 Pokahoe Drive 21 Lakeview Avenue Fence Signage Fence Fence Fence Addition & alteration Addition & alteration Addition & alteration 1) Anderson 275 Millard Avenue Retaining walls - This is a continuation from previous meetings. Mike McGarvey is the project engineer and is representing this application along with the owners Mike McGarvey spoke about the proposed application. He stated that a stone wall cannot be installed in its existing location due to the steep grade. He stated that there are no drawings of plans on the existing lower retaining wall. He stated that as a result, no additional loading can be placed on the existing wall. Carter Sackman asked if a poured concrete wall with a stone face could be constructed. Mike McGarvey responded yes but it would be more costly. Carter Sackman stated that landscaping should not be used to screen a retaining wall �since the landscaping can be changed or could die and not be replaced. The Chair asked for the technical justification why the proposed wall system is needed. Mike McGarvey spoke about the existing retaining wall and the proposed load from the new wall. He stated that the new wall system will be constructed 6-foot below grade to compensate for the additional loading. Carter Sackman stated that there is existing loading on the lower stone wall from the existing railroad-tie wall. He stated that the stone would be a better material to use. Mike McGarvey responded that the applicant is trying to stop the existing wall from failing. He stated that the end product will only result in a gain of a 4-feet increase to the rear yard. The Chair asked if one of the proposed walls could be eliminated. Mike McGarvey responded yes. Carter Sackman asked about the cost for installing the wall. Mike McGarvey responded $37.50/sf installed. He stated that a poured concrete wall would be more expensive. The Chair stated that the vertical amount of the wall should be an issue for the Board to address. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Mike McGarvey asked if one wall was proposed, would the Board approve the application. The Board was more favorable to the one wall proposal. Carter Sackman stated that the applicant should still return with stone samples. He also stated that one of the proposed walls could be raised up one foot and the upper portion would be bermed. There was an open discussion on a conditional approval. Mike McGarvey stated that since the Planning Board does not meet in August, he will return to the Board’s August meeting with one poured concrete wall with a stone face. This was adjourned to the next meeting. No action was taken. 2) Bearman 515 Bellwood Avenue This was a continuation from previous meetings. Fence - APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 23, 2008 2 �Jeremy Bearman is the owner and is representing this application. Jeremy Bearman submitted a plan showing where the proposed fence will be installed. He also presented photos of the property and the existing fence. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the applicant will paint the fence. Jeremy Bearman responded no. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) Yugui Express 110 Beekman Avenue Signage - This was a continuation from previous meetings. Mercedes Yugui is the owner and is representing this application. Mercedes Yugui discussed the changes to the proposed signage. She stated that the name of the business will be installed on the glass. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Cabrera residence 296 North Washington St Fence - Vincent Cabrera is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Rae Lee responded yes. Vincent Cabrera stated that he wants to install a fence to prevent kids from removing the flowers from the front of his house. The Chair stated that the Building Department would have to make sure that the proposed fence will comply with the Building Code. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 23, 2008 3 �The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application of a new front fence in the front yard with the condition that it complies with the Building Code. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 5) Forman Residence 12 Francis Street Fence – Matthew Forman is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Rae Lee responded yes. Matthew Forman stated that he recently purchased the property. He stated that the existing fence is deteriorated. He stated that the proposed fence is 2’-8” tall. He stated that the proposed fence is antique. He also stated that the side yard is currently a grass pathway. He would like to install a flagstone walkway but instead he is proposing stamped concrete. He spoke about the stamped concrete walkway in more detail. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) Beristain Residence 2 County House Road Fence - Robert Welsch is the landscape architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Rae Lee responded yes. Robert Welsch gave an overview of the proposed fence and pergola. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 23, 2008 4 �7) Rodrigues Residence 33 Hudson Terrace Addition and Alteration - Rudy Variano is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Rae Lee responded yes. Rudy Variano gave an overview of the proposed application. He stated that the property is a 2-family residence. He stated that the owners need more room for themselves and their teenage daughters. He reviewed the variances that were obtained as part of this application. He stated that the dormers were added to the south. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the shape of the dormer on the south side. Rudy Variano responded that the dormer was altered for egress. The Chair stated that if the dormer was brought out, the applicant could gain some interior space. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis asked why the dormers do not line up. Rudy Variano responded that the dormers alignment is minor. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the recommendation that the 4 new dormers have some ridge height consistency and the tower design be considered. Carter Sackman asked about increasing the size of the dormers. Rudy Variano responded that the FAR was an issue. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8. Strasser Residence 17 Pokahoe Drive Addition & Residence - Robert Barstow is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Rae Lee responded yes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 23, 2008 5 �Robert Barstow stated that the addition is needed to increase the home office and to increase the interior area for the applicant’s grandchildren. He stated that the same exterior materials will be used. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about removing the shutters. Robert Barstow responded that the applicant would be willing to remove the existing shutters. Pat Piereson asked if the applicant was replacing the garage doors. Robert Barstow responded no. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman asked about the railing on the south elevation. Robert Barstow responded that the deck would be removed and replaced with a flagstone transition. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the exterior materials match the existing. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 9) Stoecklein Residence 21 Lakeview Avenue Addition & Alteration - Ed Stoecklein is the owner and is representing this application along with architect, Roger Goodhill. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Rae Lee responded yes. Ed Stoecklein spoke about the proposed renovations. He stated that the existing material will be matched. He stated that the addition includes a large family room as well as expanding the bedrooms to include closets. Roger Goodhill stated that the owners wanted to change the existing 1950s appearance. He stated that the owners wanted the addition to have the appearance of the original house. Ed Stoecklein stated that the roofline is being raised. He spoke about the interior renovations in more detail. The Chair asked if the eave could extend outward. Roger Goodhill responded agreed. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 23, 2008 6 �The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there was no public present, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 10) Minutes – The June 2008 meeting minutes will be reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned at 9:32 p.m. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 23, 2008 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-07-23 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/f7b488c7fe48aaf514c1164bb7838bda.pdf d5bf6877d22144f186005d55e96426f8 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED June 25, 2008 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:03pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Ana Maria McGinnis David Pysh, Chairman Pat Piereson Sandra Tripp Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None Agenda: 1) Anderson 275 Millard Avenue Retaining walls 2) AP Petroleum 3) Scuderia 4) Bearman 5) Yugui Express 6) Cawley 7) Minutes 410 North Broadway 8 Kendall Avenue 515 Bellwood Avenue 110 Beekman Avenue 30 Fremont Avenue Exterior alterations Exterior Alterations Fence Signage Addition and alteration 275 Millard Avenue Retaining walls - 8) Other 1) Anderson Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owners The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sam Vieira stated that the application consists of replacing existing railroad-tie retaining walls. He gave an overview of the current application before the Planning Board. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the Planning Board issues. Sam Vieira responded that the slope of the property requires Planning Board review. Pat Piereson asked if the heights of the new walls are higher than the existing. Sam Vieira responded that the end result is the same. He stated that there are 3 existing walls that will be replaced with 2 new walls. Pat Piereson asked how the property connected with the adjacent property. �Sam Vieira responded that the walls will return onto themselves. Sam Vieira stated that the existing walls are decaying and need to be replaced. He stated that the 2 retaining walls will allow the owners will be able to better utilize their yard. He stated that the walls will be made of inter-locking masonry blocks. Pat Piereson asked about how the neighbors feel about the work. Ken Anderson responded that he has letters from the neighbors endorsing the proposed work. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that this is a practical solution to the retaining wall problem. She stated that the proposed landscaping plan needs work. Sam Vieira responded that the landscaping plan on the plans is not what is proposed. He stated that the plantings were put on the plans by the engineer. He stated that the landscaping will eventually obscure the wall. Sandra Tripp stated that the choice of materials needs to be better selected. Ken Anderson responded that the landscaping will hide the walls. Sandra Tripp responded that the Board can only review what is presented. There was an open discussion on maintaining any landscaping as part of the application. Sean McCarthy stated that if the landscaping is part of the site plan approval, it must be maintained in perpetuity. He also stated that as part of the site plan approval, a landscape plan will be required. The Chair asked about the need for railings on the wall. Sam Vieira responded that a railing will be installed only on the upper wall. The Chair stated that the wall should be hidden in greenery. Ana Maria McGinnis agreed but wanted to see the landscape plan. Pat Piereson stated that the proposed structure should also be aesthetically pleasing. She stated that the landscaping can grow and die. She asked if another material can be used. Sam Vieira responded that there are other engineering issues with the existing bedrock. He stated that the existing railroad tie system is failing as a result of the unique site conditions. The Chair asked if the property can be re-graded to eliminate one of the retaining walls systems. APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 2 �Sam Vieira responded that the existing rock ledge will not permit re-grading. He stated that the walls stabilize the site. The Chair asked if the applicant can explore possibly eliminating the lower wall and plant on the slope to hide the upper wall. Ken Patterson responded that he would investigate. Pat Piereson asked the applicant to evaluate stone facing in front of the existing wall. This was adjourned to the next meeting. No action was taken. 2) AP Petroleum 410 North Broadway Exterior alterations - Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners Sam Vieira gave an overview of the revised application. He stated that there are still issues with the site plan but he wanted to get the Board’s feedback. The Chair asked if the property has a second floor. Sam Vieira responded no. Pat Piereson stated that she likes the window treatments. Sam Vieira stated that the lanterns on the façade can be removed. He stated that the Planning Board’s review will take additional time so the Board does not have to provide comments this evening. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Board provided positive feedback on the scheme on drawing A2. The Chair made a motion to recommend the following revisions to the Planning boardthe application (drawing A2) with the following conditions: roofing material be upgraded to an architectural shingle (not green) and that the down-light be eliminated. If there are existing brackets under the soffit, that they be re-used. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) Scuderia 8 Kendall Avenue Exterior Alterations - Roger Pelleton is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owner. 3 APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 �Roger Pelleton gave an overview on the proposed changes. He spoke about the exterior colors and the canopy. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sandra Tripp stated that the stainless steel door should be eliminated. Roger Pelleton agreed. He stated that it is an error on the plans. The Chair asked about the use of glass block. Roger Pelleton responded that the glass block will bring in light but will hide the view of the cars from the exterior. The Chair asked about the adjacent properties. Roger Pelleton responded that one side abuts the Van Tassel garage. The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: 1) The owner can omit the glass block and install translucent panels. 2) Canopy over the doors be painted to match the doors below. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Bearman 515 Bellwood Avenue Fence - Jeremy Bearman is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Jeremy Bearman stated that there is an existing fence on the property that will remain. He stated that a proposed chain-link fence is proposed to keep-in his dog. He summarized the proposed fence. He stated that the property is on a corner lot and a 5foot high fence is permitted based on his setback conditions. Jeremy Bearman stated that a cedar fence is proposed where the property line can be seen from the road. He stated that a chain-link is proposed elsewhere. Pat Piereson stated that an aluminum fence should be explored as an effective alternative. Jeremy Bearman responded that he is open to alternatives. The Chair opened the public hearing. APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 4 �Dan Lorenzini (114 Kelbourne Avenue) stated that there are 2 issues. He stated that he is concerned with the chain-link fence and the dog. He stated that the dog could be an issue. He stated that a wooden fence is preferred for aesthetic reasons. He noted on the survey where the two properties join. There was an open discussion on what fences the applicant is proposing to install. The Chair noted that since the 5-foot fence is permitted, the Board does not oppose. He stated that the materials are the issue. Elizabeth Lorenzini asked where the cedar fence is proposed. Jeremy Bearman responded that the Bellwood Avenue side should be solid to prevent the dog from seeing other dogs and barking. Pat Piereson stated that the aesthetics of the neighborhood should be maintained. She stated that the responsibility of the owner to prevent their dog from being a nuisance. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the applicant should return with a revised proposal. Jeremy Bearman asked the Board for advice on what he can install. Sandra Tripp responded that the applicant should look at other neighboring property owners for fence types. Pat Piereson noted a fence that is installed on Merlin Avenue. She stated that the fence would meet the applicant’s needs as well as be more aesthetically pleasing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 5) Yugui Express 110 Beekman Avenue Signage - Mercedes Yugui is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the proposed color. Mercedes Yugui responded that she just likes the color. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the type of business. Mercedes Yugui responded that the company is a multi-service company. APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 5 �The Chair asked about the sign requirements. Sean McCarthy reviewed the Village sign requirements. There was an open discussion on the lettering size. The Chair asked the applicant if she would paint the lettering on the window instead of installing a new sign. Mercedes Yugui responded that she is ok with the revision. Sean McCarthy responded that a revised plan should be reviewed by the Board before granting an approval. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sandra Tripp stated that the applicant should return with a revised plan. This was adjourned to the next meeting. No action was taken. 6) Cawley 30 Fremont Avenue Addition and alteration - Sonja and Chris Cawley are the owners and are representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sonja Cawley gave an overview of the application. She stated that the proposed application involves installing family space. She stated that she has no handicapped accessible facilities to accommodate Chris Cawley’s handicapped brother. She also stated that porch front was added to keep with the house style. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the house is currently vinyl siding. Sonja Cawley responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the shutters are real wood. Sonja Cawley responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the casement windows on the side of the house. Sonja Cawley responded that the windows are proposed for privacy. She stated that the adjacent neighbors also have the same windows on the side yard. The Chair stated that the porch piers should be hidden by extending the frieze board. APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 6 �The Chair stated that the exterior materials proposed are new stucco, roof and clapboard to match the existing finishes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sandra Tripp asked if the dimensions shown on the drawings are the zoning setbacks. Sonja Cawley responded yes. Sandra Tripp stated that the massing appears to be leaning towards one neighbor. Sonja Cawley responded that the extension is in keeping with the layout of the house. There was an open discussion on the widow selections and spacing on the side of the house. The Chairman provided a sketch of the windows that the applicant could use on the side of the house. The applicant stated that they would consider the revisions. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 7) Minutes – The May 2008 meeting minutes were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Other – It was agreed that the Board would meet in August. Adjourned at 10:06 p.m. APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-06-25 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/331939618bdb6b19d13f9fe0708ef70f.pdf 27e6a7e5af06dafeac381779b75ca87b PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING May 28, 2008 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:02 p.m. The Chair noted that a quorum is present Present: Ana Maria McGinnis David Pysh, Chairman Pat Piereson Sandra Trip Carter Sackman Absent: None Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect / Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None Agenda: 1) Rodrigues 2) Mahopac Bank 3) Peter Grotto 4) Scuderia, LLC 5) Sarris 6) Sullivan 7) Sleepy Hollow Cemetery 8) Sudol 9) Cummings 10) AP Petroleum 11) Minutes for March 2008 12) McGinnis 1) Carlos Rodrigues 7 Hudson Street Beekman Avenue 300 North Broadway 8 Kendall Avenue 7 Francis Street 59 Fremont Road 540 Broadway 50 Fremont Road 537 Bellwood Avenue 410 North Broadway New awnings Sign Additions & alterations Exterior renovations Fence Porch Addition Stained glass window Driveway & pavers New fence Exterior alterations - 12 Birch Close New fence- 7 Hudson Street New awnings - Dan Burke is representing this application on behalf of the owners The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Dan Burke stated that the awnings have a 2-foot projection off of the structure. He gave an overview of the proposed awnings. �Ana Maria McGinnis asked if this property was residential. Dan Burke responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the awnings are currently installed. Dan Burke responded yes. He stated that the owner did not know that a permit was needed. The Chair asked if there was lettering on the awnings. Dan Burke responded that the property address is on the awning. The Chair asked about the height of the lettering. Dan Burke responded 3-inch. Sean McCarthy stated that the Village Code requires that lettering for buildings be at least 4-inches high. He stated that the lettering on the awning can remain if additional lettering is added to the structure. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the lettering not be used for building identification. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0) Sackman absent. 2) Mahopac National Bank 49 Beekman Avenue New sign Robinson Morrell is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Robinson Morrell spoke about the proposed changes to the building. He stated that the window is being removed to keep people from looking into the property. It would also allow a larger sign to be installed. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the trees in front should be pruned. Robinson Morrell responded that the trees are owned by the Village. The Chair stated that the reasons for removing the windows should be more compelling than what is being presented. Robinson Morrell responded that many of the temporary signs will be removed. Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 2 �Robinson Morrell stated that as an option, the Sleepy Hollow Division can be eliminated. There was an open discussion on what signs exists on the property. Robinson Morrell presented the type of lettering that will be installed on the sign. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the proposal that does not remove the existing windows. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 3) Grotto Holding Corp 300 North Broadway Amended application - David Barbuti is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owner. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. David Barbuti gave an overview on the proposed changes. He showed the original 2story plan and the revised 1-story plan. He stated that the changes are only needed to reduce the proposed construction costs since the owner is financially struggling. Sandra Tripp asked about the exterior materials. David Barbuti responded that the building exterior will be stucco. David Barbuti spoke about the existing Planning Board application. He stated that the changes would be presented to both the Planning and Zoning Boards at their June meetings. The Chair stated that the Planning Board’s application would not be impacted by the ARB’s decision. There was an open discussion on whether to eliminate the mansard on the commercial side only. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman asked about the location of the air-conditioning units. David Barbuti responded that the units would be packaged units and would not be visible from either Route 9 or New Broadway. Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 3 �The Chair asked about the parapet. David Barbuti responded that there is no current parapet but a 3-foot parapet is proposed. The Chair stated that the sub-divided residential element should be maintained. He stated that the mansard should be eliminated on the New Broadway side. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the west elevation and not the east elevation which was previously approved. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). The Chair asked if these changes would impact the Zoning Board application. Sean McCarthy reviewed the proposed variances that the applicant is seeking. 4) Scuderia, LLC 8 Kendall Avenue Exterior renovations - Roger Pelleton is the project architect and is representing this application along with Chris Munch. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Roger Pelleton spoke about the proposed application. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if this would be a repair shop. Roger Pelleton responded that this is a private garage. He stated that there will be no signage on the property. He briefly reviewed the Zoning Board’s approval. Roger Pelleton reviewed the changes to the first floor. He reviewed the changes to the second floor. He stated that the hip roof would be extended to offset the porch that was removed several years ago. He reviewed the proposed exterior finishes. He stated that the owner wants a very plain look to the building so that it would not stand-out. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the doors were 6-8” doors. Roger Pelleton reviewed the proposed doors. The Chair summarized the proposed changes to the existing structure. The Chair asked if the doors can be centered. Chris Munch responded that he would have to check with the structural engineer but the owner would not be opposed. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the doors could be raised to 8-feet and some awnings to provide some character to the exterior. Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 4 �Roger Pelleton responded that the owner is not looking to have this building stand out. Pat Piereson stated that she agrees with the owner that the building should be one color. Chris Munch gave an overview on the owners need to keep the building un-noticed. Carter Sackman stated that the building can have some cost-effective improvements to make the structure more attractive for the neighborhood. The Board had an open discussion on what exterior improvements can be made. Roger Pelleton responded that the owner wants the building to be very simple. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that something should be added to bring the front façade together. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Roger Pelleton stated that a planter can be installed on the side yard. Ana Maria McGinnis provided input on some possible landscaping improvements. Pat Piereson stated that the building exterior should be one color. The Chair agreed. The Chair stated that the applicant should revise the plans to reflect: 1) One exterior color 2) Greenway on the west elevation. Landscaping should be cut into the sidewalk and should not be proposed as planters. 3) Some addition of a thru window for the proposed man-doors. 4) Glass block in-fill should be reconsidered. Carter Sackman stated that the building is a block building. Pat Piereson stated that the building should have some trim. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 5) Sarris 7 Francis Street Fence - James Sarris is the owner and is representing this property. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 5 �Ana Maria McGinnis asked if there was a survey of the property. James Sarris responded that he did not have on available. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the chain-link fence would be removed. James Sarris responded no. He stated that the chain-link fence belongs to the Village and will remain. Pat Piereson stated that debris will accumulate between the gap between the fences. The Chair asked about the length of the fence. James Sarris responded about 25-feet. The Chair made a motion to approve this application as submitted with the condition that the chain-link fence is keep at the same height as the existing fence with new metal posts and that the fence is installed as tight as possible to the Village’s existing fence. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 6) Sullivan 59 Fremont Road Porch Addition - Jon Turnquist is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Jon Turnquist gave an overview of the proposed porch addition. He stated that the porch would project outward by 8-feet. He stated that the trim would be white and the flooring would be mahogany. He also stated that no variances are required. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the trim board can be added to hide the posts. Jon Turnquist agreed. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if a railing is proposed. Jon Turnquist responded that the railing would have regular balusters. Sean McCarthy asked about the width of the stairs. Jon Turnquist responded about 4-feet. Sean McCarthy recommended that the width of the stairs be extended to the first column. Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 6 �Sandra Tripp asked about the louver. Jon Turnquist responded that it is ornamental. The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: 1) Fascia board is added below the porch 2) The front stairs be extended to the first bay 3) Continue the turn balusters down the right side of the stairs The Board also recommended: 1) Replicate the scallop detail proposed over the new pediment onto the existing pediment 2) Omit the vent over the new pediment 3) Fascia of the new pediment should be extended to receive a gutter 4) Add a beam under the soffit-line of the new porch The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sandra Tripp seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 7) Sleepy Hollow Cemetery 540 Broadway Stained glass windows - Kyle McGovern is an attorney and is representing this application along with Cemetery Board president Dave Logan The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Kyle McGovern reviewed the original approval which did not include any stained glass windows. He stated that the stained glass window would be installed behind a glass as a safety measure. Dave Logan stated that the glass would be tempered glass. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Sandra Tripp seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 8) Sudol 50 Fremont Road Driveway & pavers - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 7 �Jean Sudol is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Jean Sudol gave an overview of the application. She stated that the driveway needs to be repaved. She also stated that she wants to install 10-foot apron at the beginning of the driveway. The apron would consist of 8” Belgium block pavers. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 9) Cummings 527 Bellwood Avenue New fence - Sherry Cummings is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sherry Cummings stated that she has a deteriorated fence on her property. She is looking to replace it with a lattice fence. There was an open discussion on the location on the fence in the front yard. It was mentioned that the fence needed to be installed 30-feet from the front property line. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Sandra Tripp seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 10) AP Petroleum 410 North Broadway Exterior alterations - Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 8 �Sam Vieira gave an overview of the application. He stated that the ownership did not secure any permits for the initial renovations. He gave an overview of the proposed renovations. He reviewed changes to the garage doors. He also spoke about the future relocation of the diesel gas pump. He spoke about the removal of the storage tanks and the cinderblock walls. He stated that the rear of the property will have a 6-foot stockade fence installed to hide some of the equipment in the rear. He stated that the roof shingles will remain the same color. He also stated that the applicant wants to install cedarlooking vinyl siding. The Chair asked if the garage bays can somehow incorporate the window element. Carter Sackman stated that some improvements can be included that are relatively inexpensive. Sean McCarthy stated that the owner will need to get site plan approval from the Planning Board. He stated that the applicant cannot receive a building permit without getting site plan approval. The Board provided some feedback to the applicant for the next meeting. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there was no public present, the Chair closed the public hearing. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 11) Minutes The minutes for March 2008 were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the March 2008 minutes as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 12) McGinnis 12 Birch Close New fence- Ana Maria McGinnis recused herself from this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that she wants to install a deer mesh fence in the rear of her property to keep out deer. She presented photos to the Board. She indicated what would be seen from the street. Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 9 �The Chair noted that there was no public present. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0) McGinnis abstained. Adjourned at 10:14 p.m. Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 10 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-05-28 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/d04ee800d2685fdbf954346bc2725834.pdf ca4baa57a3e0a79a85079977c7ee5845 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING April 23, 2008 Since there was not a quorum present, the Board did not hold their regular meeting. Present: Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Absent: David Pysh, Chairman Carter Sackman Sandra Trip Also Present: Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None. Agenda: 1) Mahopac Bank 2) Peter Grotto 3) Minutes for March 2008 Beekman Avenue 300 North Broadway Sign Amended application The Board informally provided comments to the applicants who were present. Adjourned at 8:51 p.m. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-04-23 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/da5c95458e958a6aec10cf8db60ea904.pdf 0d36a37d77a14ef974778877acc98e12 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING March 26, 2008 The meeting was called to order by Ana Maria McGinnis, Acting Chairman at 8:02 p.m. The Chair noted that a quorum is present Present: Sandra Tripp Ana Maria McGinnis, Acting Chairman Pat Piereson David Pysh, Chairman Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None Agenda: 1) Edwards 41 College Avenue 2) Bedell 122 Van Tassel Avenue 3) KWD Realty 309-313 North Broadway 4) Minutes for February 2008 1) Edwards Fence Fence New Signage 41 College Avenue Fence Lillian Edwards is the owner and is presenting this application. The Chair asked if the proof of public mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Lillian Edwards stated that she wants to install a new fence and where the existing hedges area located. She stated that the fence is needed so that her dogs do not escape. She stated that the new fence will replace the existing chain-link fence. She stated that the fence will be installed in the front of the house and where the existing swinging gate is located. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Sandra Tripp seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) (David Pysh not present.) �2) Bedell 122 Van Tassell Avenue Fence - David Bedell is the owner and is presenting this application. The Chair asked if the proof of public mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. David Bedell stated that he recently purchased the house and wants to install a more secure fence to keep his children within the property. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the proposed 5-foot high fence will be used only for a 16-foot section and the remainder of the fence would be 3-foot high and will comply with the Village Zoning Code. The fence will be natural cedar. Sandra Tripp seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) (David Pysh not present.) 3) KWD Realty 309-313 North Broadway Signage - This is a continuation from previous meetings. Karl Dibble is the owner and is representing this application. Sean McCarthy stated that there is a dispute on the public notices. He stated that one notice was sent to the wrong address. He stated that the decisions recently approved by the Board are not valid. The Board referred to the minutes from the February 2008 meeting to see exactly what was approved. Karl Dibble summarized the application for the record. He summarized the 8 requested items from the original application. The Chair summarized the items that were approved by the Board. Karl Dibble submitted photos to the Board. The Chair opened the public hearing. Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 26, 2008 2 �Don Catano (43 Lawrence Avenue) stated that this application should be brought to the Planning and Zoning Boards. Pat Piereson asked if any items on the agenda require a zoning variance. Sean McCarthy responded no. He stated that sign variances are granted by the ARB. There was an open discussion on the approvals granted at the last meeting. Don Catano stated that he is trying to help the Village look better. He stated that there are too many signs proposed for this property. Pat Piereson asked about the number of signs on the property. Karl Dibble responded that there are 4 signs on the property. The Chair stated that the Board took a lot of time analyzing the size and number of signs that were approved Dan Torena (333 North Broadway) summarized the number of signs on his property. Sean McCarthy stated that there are some signs on the other adjacent property. David Garcia is an attorney representing Dan Torena. He stated that his client has not had an opportunity to address the Board since he was not properly noticed. He stated that there are some safety issues about the proposed gates. He stated that the approvals are not fully understood. He referred to his letter that was sent to the Board. Dan Torena stated that he is not concerned with the signs. He stated that when he purchased the property, he had to relocate his electrical service as a result of the applicant’s new retaining wall. He stated that the wall is an issue since it has heavy equipment parked on the top. He stated that there is a safety concern if the equipment falls off. He stated that there are tires located at the corner of the site to protect his property from having the windows broken. He stated that the proposed fence will eliminate light from entering his property. Karl Dibble responded that the tires are on his property. He offered to install a chain-link fence to allow sunlight to pass through. Sandra Tripp asked the applicant if he had a survey. Karl Dibble responded that he has a survey but not with him. The Chair stated that a survey is needed in order to properly locate the fence. David Pysh arrived at the meeting. Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 26, 2008 3 �Dan Torena stated that this matter should go back to the Planning Board. Sean McCarthy responded that the applicant is not in violation of his approved site plan. David Garcia stated that there is still a safety issue with the wall. Sean McCarthy responded that a survey is needed to dispute the location of the wall. He stated that the Building Department has an as-built on file from the applicant. David Garcia stated that this matter should be sent to the Planning Board. Dan Torena stated that this wall is 22-inches from this building. He stated that a 6-foot fence will allow kids to access his roof. He stated that the fence would be over the top of his roof. It was agreed that the Building Inspector would take the as-built and field verify whether the as-built is accurate. Don Catano stated that the wall also impacts his property. He stated that he gets water in his basement as a result of the wall. Dan Torena stated that he is concerned with the safety and the aesthetics of the wall and the impacts to his property. Pat Piereson stated that the location of the property line in relation to 333 North Broadway cannot be changed and is not the applicants fault. She asked Dan Torena how this can be resolved. Dan Torena responded that he tried to work things out with the applicant but the applicant was unwilling to work things out. Pat Piereson asked if other fences can be used. Dan Torena responded that the fence can be installed on the 2-foot section of the wall. Karl Dibble stated that he wants the Board to make a decision on the application tonight. He stated that he has a right to install a fence on his property. David Pysh stated that the application was not approved last month due to the lack of graphical material. Don Catano stated that the Board could make this a fire zone. Karl Dibble stated that he wants the Board to act tonight. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that the previous approvals on the signage are still valid. She stated that there is more information needed from the applicant so that a decision can be made. Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 26, 2008 4 �David Pysh stated that there is no graphical evidence provided by the applicant to support the fence. Pat Piereson stated that there is not enough information available to make the decision. She stated that the issue regarding a solid or chain-link fence needs to be further evaluated. Pat Piereson made a motion to uphold the previous approvals on the signage. She also stated that a property survey is needed to make a decision on the fence. She stated that the fence should be installed on the lower stepped-back wall. Karl Dibble requested that the fence be removed from the application. The Board agreed to remove the fence from the application. The Chair made a motion to approve the 5 items that were approved last month. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). (David Pysh abstained.) 4) Minutes for February 2008 The February 2008 minutes were reviewed. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) (David Pysh abstained). Adjourned at 9:51 p.m. Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 26, 2008 5 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-03-26 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/8ebaf5b5372854f47ed1be45636b12ed.pdf 2a847c48da4e2e583dec39ff9a8771f9 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING February 27, 2008 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:04 p.m. The Chair noted that a quorum is present Present: David Pysh, Chairman Sandra Tripp Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Carter Sackman Absent: None Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None Agenda: 1) Lansch 30 New Broadway 2) KWD Realty 309-313 North Broadway 3) Cusanelli/Waters 203 Webber Avenue 4) Gayle 114 Palmer Ave 5) Kennedy Pokahoe Drive 6) Ferrarin dba Hair Conn. 78 Beekman Avenue 7) Cras Realty 38 Beekman Avenue 8) Peter Castro 335 North Broadway 9) Villeda dba Amer Latino 185 Valley St 10) Minutes for January 2008 Exterior Alterations New Signage Amended approval Sunroom Addition Amended approval New Signage New Signage New Signage New Signage 1) Lansch Exterior Alterations - 30 New Broadway This is a continuation from the previous meeting. Joe Paiva is the project architect and is representing this application. Joe Paiva summarized the revisions to the plans. He stated that the round window was added based on feedback from the Board. He stated that the revised drawings show the new dormer more clearly. He stated that the chimney was also relocated. He stated that mullions would be added on the new front windows so that all of the windows on the front elevation will have mullions. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. There were none. �The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 2) KWD Realty 309-313 North Broadway Signage - This is a continuation from previous meetings. Karl Dibble is the owner and is representing this application. Karl Dibble summarized the newly submitted photos. He stated that a new cedar roof structure is proposed over the office. He summarized the new PVC gate and new proposed lettering. He also described the relocation of the Mountain View Scapes sign. He also stated that a new River Rock sign is proposed in the location of the current Mountain View Scapes sign. He also stated that he is proposing a 6-foot privacy fence along the side of the property adjacent to the C.A.R.S. property. He also stated that he wants to install an awning over the garage. He stated that the Board would need to grant a variance for the number of signs that he is proposing. The Chair asked if the awning was also considered a sign. Sean McCarthy responded that each property is permitted to have one main sign and a secondary sign. He stated that the size of the sign is based on the frontage of the property. He also summarized the types of signs that are permitted. Karl Dibble stated that there are three properties. Sean McCarthy responded that there are two legal building lots but there are three tax lots. He stated that the property at 315 Broadway is approved for 2 businesses. He stated that 315 Broadway can have signs for 2 businesses. He stated that the garden center would also be permitted to have a sign. There was an open discussion on the number of businesses and number of signs. The Chair asked Sean McCarthy for clarification on the size of the permitted signs. Sean McCarthy reviewed the Village Code sections regarding the sizing of signs. Sean McCarthy summarized the entire application and all of the requested signs at both properties. Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 27, 2008 2 �Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the existing gate is more appealing than the proposed PVC. Pat Piereson stated that the existing fence could remain and a sign could be added on the existing fence in addition to the proposed hanging sign. She questioned why he wanted to change the fence. Karl Dibble responded that he wanted to bring some color to that section of his property. The Chair stated that the attached sign ordinance is not practical to this property since there is adequate street frontage. He stated that the gate proposal is acceptable. He asked if the Board had any comments. Carter Sackman asked about the swing of the new gate. Karl Dibble responded that the gate swings out. Carter Sackman stated that he has a problem with the proposed garden center sign. He also stated that the location of the privacy fence is elevated. He would like to visit the site to see the location of the proposed fence. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted without installing the proposed 6-foot white PVC gate and the 6-foot privacy fence. Karl Dibble stated that the privacy fence is only an extension of the existing fence. He stated that the fence is being extended by 40-feet. Sean McCarthy asked for clarification on the awning for the garage. Karl Dibble responded that it is not an awning. Sean McCarthy stated that it has the appearance of a pan sign. He stated that pan signs are not permitted. He stated that a variance would be needed. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair amended his motion to exclude the 6-foot white PVC gate. He also stated that the location of the metal sign is so removed from the street that it would not be visible. He amended his motion to include the metal sign as part of the approval with the required variance. The 6-foot privacy fence is approved subject to the Board visiting the site and performing a visual inspection. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board has 45 days to submit their written findings for the variance. 3) Cusanelli/Waters 203 Webber Avenue Amended approval - Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 27, 2008 3 �Pat Cusanelli is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Pat Cusanelli submitted photos to the Board. He stated that the original approval was to include stucco. He stated that due to site conditions and financial limitations, the stucco exterior was replaced with siding. The Chair asked if the proposed changes are all completed changes. Pat Cusanelli responded yes. The Chair asked if the Board has any comments. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board had some original concerns about the number of exterior materials. He stated that the revisions eliminate one exterior material. Pat Piereson stated that she has no objections to the changes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman stated that he had no problems with the revisions. Pat Cusanelli stated that the stone will not be installed. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the originally approved stone will be eliminated and the existing masonry will remain. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 4) Gayle 114 Palmer Ave Sunroom Addition - Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sam Vieira stated that the two screened openings are being closed. He stated that the exterior materials will match existing. He stated that the kitchen on the east side of the house is being re-done. He stated that a shower stall is being added on the 1st floor. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 27, 2008 4 �The Chair asked if the Board had any questions. There were none. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 5) Kennedy Pokahoe Drive Amended approval - Emilio Escalades is the project architect and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Emilio Escalades stated that this project is already completed. He gave an overview of the proposed changes and how they differed from the original approval. He stated that the garage doors were changed to a square shape. He stated that the eyebrow window is larger than what was proposed. He also stated that the front columns are smaller than what was proposed. He stated that more windows were added to the back to enhance the Hudson views. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that this is consistent with the original application. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 6) Ferrarin DBA Hair Connection 78 Beekman Avenue New Signage - Lucy Ferrarin is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Lucy Ferrarin stated that she wants to get approval for an existing neon sign. She submitted photos to the Board. Carter Sackman asked why this application needs a variance. Sean McCarthy stated that the Village Code does not permit neon signs to exceed 18” on any one side. Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 27, 2008 5 �The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted and grant the variance. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 7) Cras Realty 38 Beekman Avenue New Signage – Robert Solari is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Robert Solari gave an overview on the proposed sign. He stated that the proposed hanging sign will help him change names on the sign when tenants move in and out. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 8) Peter Castro 335 North Broadway New Signage – Peter Castro is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair asked if this is the only sign. Peter Castro responded that the existing BP sign will remain. He stated that the proposed sign will be for the convenience store only. The Chair asked if the colors would match the BP colors. Peter Castro responded yes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 27, 2008 6 �9) Villeda DBA Amer Latino Rest 185 Valley St New Signage– Adam Villeda is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the restaurant is new. Adam Villeda responded that the restaurant is existing but the sign is new. He stated that the application is for two awnings. Pat Piereson stated that a sign would be better instead of the corner awning. Sean McCarthy responded that the awning would have to be raised based on its location. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if one of the awnings could be eliminated and replaced with a sign. There was an open discussion on the actual location of the restaurant and the location of the proposed awnings. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there was no public present, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that the front awning is acceptable. He stated that the applicant can reapply for a sign on the lower portion. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the following conditions: the front awning is approved. The awning on the side is not approved. The applicant can return for a sign on the smaller portion. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0) 10) Minutes for January 2008 The January 2008 minutes were reviewed. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). Adjourned at 9:51 p.m. Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 27, 2008 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-02-27 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/cde04b6ecef0752adc020dcc64d616da.pdf c42232f8e7550a2e440226bbbb2b9b2e PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING January 23, 2008 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:11 p.m. The Chair noted that a quorum is present Present: David Pysh, Chairman Sandra Tripp Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Donato Pennella (Charles A. Manganaro/Village Engineer) Announcements: The Chair amended the agenda to include the operating procedures of the Board. David Pysh proposed that the Board hold a work session from 7:30pm to 8:00pm before every Board meeting. There were no comments on the proposed work session. Agenda 1) Matthew Linn 12 Fremont Road 2) Lansch 30 New Broadway 3) Schroedel 487 Munroe Avenue 4) Zifchock 15 Pine Street 5) Smith 85 Merlin Avenue 6) KWD Realty 309-313 North Broadway 7) Philipsburg Manor 381 North Broadway 8) Kennedy Pokahoe Drive 9) Minutes for November 2007 Replace walkway Exterior renovations Fence Fence Walkway, walls Signage Signage Amended approval 1) Matthew Linn Replace walkway– 12 Fremont Road This is a continuation from the previous meeting. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis recused herself from this application. �Matthew Linn is the owner and is representing this application. Matthew Linn stated that the existing walkway will be changed to improve the aesthetics. He presented photos of the existing walkway. He stated that the new walkway will have 3 steps added to reduce the existing pitch. He also stated that the walkway will be widened by 1-foot. He spoke about the proposed landscaping improvements. Sandra Tripp asked if a railing is required. Sean McCarthy responded that a railing is needed under the new building code. The Chair asked if the Board had any questions. There were none. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. There was an open discussion on the required railing. Matthew Linn stated that the railing would not be very visible. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the risers shown from the driveway to the main entrance be adjusted to eliminate the railing. A wrought iron railing can be installed for the front of the entranceway. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) McGinnis abstained. 2) Lansch 30 New Broadway Exterior renovations - Joe Paiva is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owners James and Fanny Lansch. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Joe Paiva gave an overview of the proposed project. He submitted photos to the Board. He stated that the gable window would be replaced. He stated that two dormers would be added in the attic space since the attic space is habitable. The Chair asked if the roof was being raised. Joe Paiva showed where the roof was being raised on the presented plan. Ana Maria McGinnis asked how the brick would be matched once the dormers are added. James Lansch responded that the brick would be matched. Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 23, 2008 2 �The Chair asked if the chimney is new. Joe Paiva responded that the chimney is existing. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the entire plan needs to be presented to the Board. The Chair stated that the roof plan is needed to fully understand the extent of the addition. The Chair asked if the Board had any other questions. Pat Piereson stated that the new dormer window should be squared off. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair asked if there were any other approvals required. Sean McCarthy responded no. Pat Piereson stated that the Board wants to have final plans as well as material samples in order to make a decision. Joe Paiva responded that the presented drawing is to demonstrate design intent. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to adjourn this application to the next meeting. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). The Board provided more clarification on exactly what material should be submitted to the Board for the next meeting. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 3) Schroedel 487 Munroe Avenue Fence - David Schrodel is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. David Schrodel submitted a package to the Board. It included a site survey with the fence shown on it. He also submitted photos of the existing house to show where the fence would be installed. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the fence would be seen from the Munroe Avenue side since there is an existing landscape hedge. Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 23, 2008 3 �David Schroedel responded that the fence would not be shown. He gave an overview of where the proposed gates would be installed. Sean McCarthy stated that the fence needs to be installed 30-feet back from the front yard. He stated that this property has two front yards since it is located on a corner. The Chair asked if the Board had any other questions. Pat Piereson stated that the new window should be squared off. The Chair opened the public hearing. Mario Schapini (owns the house behind the applicant) stated that there are trees that are on the property line. He asked where the fence will be installed. David Schroedel responded that the fence will be installed 1.5-feet from the rear property line. He stated that the fence will not harm the trees. Mario Schapini stated that he has an existing fence that will be installed next to the proposed fence. He stated that the vegetation between the fences will not be maintained. He asked for a survey to be performed showing the location of the fence line. Pat Piereson stated that the Board has also received a letter from the adjacent neighbor expressing a concern about the installation of the fence and the existing vegetation. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted using the black painted aluminum fence and with the conditions: On the west edge, the fence will be installed 18” from the existing chain link fence. On the south edge, the fence will be installed 18” from the property line. In the front yard, the fence will be installed at the rear façade line of the house. The north edge will have the fence installed 15-feet from the rear property line. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Zifchock 15 Pine Street Fence - Jeremy Zifchock is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Jeremy Zifchock stated that he has a small child as well as 2 dogs. He would like to install the proposed fence to keep everyone within the property bounds. He submitted photos of the existing property to the Board. Sandra Tripp asked the owner to show where the fence would be installed. Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 23, 2008 4 �Jeremy Zifchock showed where the proposed fence would be installed. Pat Piereson stated that the fence does not seem strong enough. Jeremy Zifchock responded that the dogs are not large dogs and they do not expect them to get out. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the fence does not look aesthetically appealing. Jeremy Zifchock responded that he is open to suggestions. There was an open discussion on what could be installed. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application with the condition that the section between the house and the garage would be a wood picket fence to match the pickets on the front porch and the remaining fence be a post and rail fence. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (40). 5) Smith 85 Merlin Avenue Walkway, walls - Ty Carsto is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ty Carsto stated that the owners currently have tandem parking. He stated that the existing large retaining walls would be lowered and tiered in order to add some landscaping. He presented a sample of the proposed stone that would be used for the new retaining walls. He stated that the existing flagstone walkway would be renovated to include larger pieces of bluestone. He stated that the existing railing style will be extended. Sandra Tripp asked if the plan could be reworked to eliminate the railing. Ty Carsto responded that he does not think that the plan can be re-worked to eliminate the railing. The Chair asked if the Board had any other questions. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about turning the stairs. Ty Carsto responded that the location of the stairs were difficult. There was an open discussion on relocating the steps. Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 23, 2008 5 �The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that the front base wall could be moved to the property line. He also stated that front steps and the wall should be integrated. The Chair asked about the fence. Ty Carsto responded that the fence is exiting. The Chair asked if any other approvals are required. Sean McCarthy responded no. The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the condition that the retaining wall nearest the sidewalks to the west of the front steps will be eliminated and the retaining wall to the west of the walk near the residence will be installed to eliminate the front jog. The wall will integrate with the front steps. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) KWD Realty 309-313 North Broadway Signage - Karl Dibble is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Karl Dibble stated that this application is to add a privacy fence as well as some additional signs and a small roof alteration. He spoke about the proposed signs. Sean McCarthy stated that the original application included gates that were previously approved by the Board. He wants to change the type of the gate from wrought iron to tubular steel. He also stated that the office roof will be changed to cedar shakes. He stated that the roof will match the roof over the sign. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the proposed sign above the gate is not attractive. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board would have to grant a variance if they approve the sign. The Chair asked about the privacy fence. Karl Dibble responded that the fence is a PVC privacy fence. He asked the Board if they Were in favor of the fence, he could re-appear for the fence. He stated that the fence is intended to promote sales. Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 23, 2008 6 �The Chair opened the public hearing. Don Catano (43 Lawrence Ave) stated that there are too many signs on this property. He stated that Village Ordinances were changed to limit the amount of signs on commercial properties. He stated that a dangerous precedent might be sent. Sean McCarthy stated that every commercial property can have one commercial sign and a secondary sign. He stated that this is a large piece of property and the size of the property needs to be taken into consideration. He stated that the size of the sign cannot exceed 20-feet. Karl Dibble stated that there are 3 pieces of property and 3 businesses operating at this location. He stated that the Board should review the wood carved signs first and leave the signs on the gates to last. The Chair stated that the application needs to be reviewed as a whole. Pat Piereson stated that the carved signs could be reviewed first and the number of signs should be reviewed second. She stated that she does not have a problem with the secondary sign but she wondered if they could be combined. Karl Dibble responded that there are different businesses operating at this location and each business does different things. Sandra Tripp agreed. She stated that there are too many signs proposed. She stated that the number of signs should be reduced. Pat Piereson stated that although the applicant wants to advertise his business, too many signs can confuse the public. The Chair stated that the current fence is better than what is proposed. Pat Piereson stated that the existing open fence is acceptable for the proposed use. Don Catano asked if there are 3 different properties or is this parcel one property. Sean McCarthy responded that this is one property. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that a secondary sign can be installed. Karl Dibble asked if the Board could approve the existing steel tube fence, office roof structure and signs for the site development and stone landscaping businesses. The Chair stated that the applicant can add wood panels onto the existing tubular steel fence to soften the aesthetics. The Chair stated that he does not have a problem with the proposed 3 signs. Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 23, 2008 7 �Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the sign over the garage bay needs more information for the Board to make a decision. Sean McCarthy stated that if the Board approves the hanging sign, a variance needs to be granted. The Chair stated that more information is needed on the signs in order to make a decision. He made a motion to adjourn this application to the next meeting. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 7) Philipsburg Manor 381 North Broadway Signage - Tom Danaker is representing this application along with Chris O’Hara. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Tom Danaker stated that this application is proposing to replace the existing sign at the Philipsburg Manor Restoration. He stated that the new sign will include the address. He reviewed the additional signs for overview parking as well as the new sign proposed on Route 9. He stated that the signs on the flagpole will be removed and replaced with a new sign. He submitted renderings to the Board of all of the proposed signs. Pat Piereson asked about the size of the signs. Sean McCarthy responded that the proposed signs are too big. Chris O’Hara responded that the proposed signs are approximately the same size as the existing signs. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board can consider a variance for this application. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about special events. Tom Danaker responded that for special events a banner is used for the event. Sandra Tripp asked about the proposed colors of the signs. Chris O’Hara responded that the colors are highway approved colors. He stated that the colors were selected to minimize confusion. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair asked for clarification on the proposed variance. Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 23, 2008 8 �Sean McCarthy responded that the variance is needed for the sign on Route 9 only. He read the sections of the Board’s jurisdiction applicable to variances. Ana Maria McGinnis asked for the dimensions of the existing sign. Chris O’Hara responded that the sign is 40” tall and 128” wide. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. He stated that the proposed signs will be reducing the amount of signage on Route 9. He stated that this application is a unique case. He made a recommendation to grant the variance. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Kennedy Pokahoe Drive Amended approval - Emilio Escalades is the project architect and is representing this application. Emilio Escalades stated that this project is already completed. He gave an overview of the proposed changes and how they differed from the original approval. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded no. The Board agreed that no action can be taken unless the public is noticed. 9) Minutes for November 2007 The minutes will reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned at 10:51 p.m. Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 23, 2008 9 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-01-23 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/f4f55c7a841797c13ff452a8df7a271c.pdf 44ea5db1995123936ec5551a093303f7 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED November 28, 2007 The meeting was called to order by Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman at 8:11 p.m. The Chair noted that a quorum is present Present: Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Absent: Carter Sackman David Pysh, Chairman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: The Chair stated that since only three members were present, the Board needed to be unanimous to approve an application. Agenda 1) Minutes for September and October 2007 2) Other 3) Grotto Holding Corp 300 North Broadway 4) Campbell 52 Fremont Road 5) Miller 137 Gordon Avenue 6) Fanelli 109 Bedford Road 7) Castro 335 North Broadway 8) Linn 12 Fremont Road New exterior façade New exterior Renovate steps, enclose front porch Portico Renovate service station Replace walkway 1) Minutes – The minutes for the September 26, 2007 minutes were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). The minutes for the October 2007 meeting will be reviewed at the next meeting. 2) Other The Chair made a motion to cancel the December 26, 2007 meeting. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). �3) Grotto Holding Corp 300 North Broadway New exterior façade Greg Kuczinski is an attorney and is representing this application along with project architect, David Barbuti. Greg Kuczinski stated that his client has prepared a few different options based on the Board’s feedback at the last meeting. He stated that time is becoming a factor for his client. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the Board was concerned with the massiveness of the structure. Pat Piereson asked about the other approvals required. Sean McCarthy gave a summary of the application with the Planning Board and Zoning Board. Pat Piereson stated that the Board would have to give a conditional approval since the Zoning and Planning Board’s may alter this application. Pat Piereson asked about the dormers. David Barbuti responded that the dormers were added to add some architectural elements to the upper floor. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the revised proposal is an improvement. The Chair re-opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the rectangular windows be used for the transoms. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 4) Campbell 52 Fremont Road New exterior George Henschel is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the applicant. The Chair asked if the returns had been received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. George Henschel described the proposed project. He stated that there are currently no windows on the second floor. He stated that the existing skylights would be removed. He stated that dormers would be constructed to provide more natural light. He also stated that the bathroom would be relocated. He also stated that the exterior finishes would match the existing exterior finishes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 28, 2007 2 �The Chair asked if cedar shakes would look better instead of the proposed stucco. George Henschel responded that the existing stucco exterior would be matched. He stated that the owners did not want to install a new exterior material. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 5) Miller 137 Gordon Avenue Renovate steps, enclose front porch Salvatore Triano is the project engineer and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the returns had been received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Salvatore Triano stated that the project involves replacing the front entrance steps and enclosing the front porch. He stated that the 2 side windows would be replaced. He stated that all of the exterior finishes would match the existing. He stated that the wrought iron rail would be maintained. He stated that the steps would be made from bluestone and the risers would be made out of stucco. He stated that the proposal would be keeping with the character of the other houses in the neighborhood. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 6) Fanelli 109 Bedford Road Portico Dominick Fanelli is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns had been received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Dominick Fanelli stated that he wants to install a portico on his house. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 28, 2007 3 �The Chair asked if the proposed ridge vent was needed. Sean McCarthy responded that the space below was unheated space so it would not be needed but the applicant could install it if they wanted to. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the columns were wood or phypon. Dominick Fanelli responded phypon. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 7) Castro 335 North Broadway Renovate service station Jim Simmons is an attorney and is representing this application along with project architect, John Lentini and the owners. The Chair asked if the returns had been received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Jim Simmons stated that this application will close the existing garage bays and construct a convenience store. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the applicant was keeping the coin-operated air and vacuum machines. Peter Castro responded yes. Pat Piereson asked if the applicant would install any plants along the perimeter. Peter Castro responded that he currently installs plants along the property line. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant should plant species that would hold-up to the salt that is spread on Route 9 in the wintertime. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that this application would be an improvement to the gasoline alley area. She asked if the front windows would be reduced to gain some additional interior wall space as well as to reduce the size of the window. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 28, 2007 4 �Pat Piereson stated that she does not have a problem with the window size. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the proposed sign is also before the Board for approval. Peter Castro responded that he would return for the sign since he did not know what he would rename the property. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted without the sign. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 8) Linn 12 Fremont Road Replace walkway There was nobody present for this application. This was adjourned to the next meeting. Adjourned to the next meeting. Adjourned at 9:07 p.m. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 28, 2007 5 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2007-11-28 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2007 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/3d571f8f9080528d6f69e062d48d636a.pdf 2e957bdb2b0a517f04bd7df9aae10c98 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED October 24, 2007 The meeting was called to order by Carter Sackman, Acting Chairman at 8:08 p.m. Present: Carter Sackman, Acting Chairman Ana Maria McGinnis Paul Wichmann Absent: David Pysh, Chairman Pat Piereson Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Dan Pennella (Charles A. Manganaro/Village Engineer) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None. Agenda 1) Rodrigues 189 Cortlandt Street 2) Legends Realty 358 North Broadway 3) Shaw 151 Highland Ave 4) Lomanto 14 Anderson Ave 5) Plutario Ilagone 180 Valley Street 6) Penaloza 170 Corlandt St 7) Grotto Holding Corp 300 North Broadway 8) Approval of the September 2007 Minutes Signage, continued New awning/signage Porch renovation Driveway, walkway renovations New signage & awning, continued Signage New exterior façade, continued 1) Rodrigues Signage, Continued - 189 Cortlandt Street This is a continuation from previous meetings. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sean McCarthy stated that this building was recently renovated and the awning was also renovated. He stated that the new awning is similar to a previous awning on the building. Elizabeth Rodrigues submitted renderings of the proposed signs. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if there were any additional signs proposed for the windows. Elizabeth Rodrigues responded no. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing �The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 2) Legends Realty 358 North Broadway New awning/signage - Elvira Aloia is the applicant and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Elvira Aloia presented the Board with a rendering of a projected awning that will extend out from the building. Carter Sackman asked if this awning was on the western exposure. Elvira Aloia responded that the awning is proposed on the northern exposure. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 3) Shaw 151 Highland Ave Porch renovations - Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sam Vieira stated that a porch on the side of the house that will be converted into a bedroom to accommodate the owners handicapped son. He stated that there are also some interior modifications that will also be done to accommodate the son’s needs. He also stated that the finishes will match the existing finishes. Sam Vieira submitted photos of the existing house to the Board. He further discussed the scope of the renovations. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the following conditions: match all existing finishes and add shutters on side windows. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 24, 2007 2 �4) Lomanto 14 Anderson Avenue Driveway, walkway renovations– Maria Lomanto is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Maria Lomanto stated that the entire driveway, sidewalk and side apron will be replaced with a locking stone system. The Chair asked if the applicant has 2 separate garages. Maria Lomanto responded yes. Maria Lomanto stated that the existing stone on the property will be supplemented with Yonkers Stone. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the colors of the driveway pavers. Maria Lomanto responded antique gray blocks are proposed. She stated that some red blocks will be used to break-up the gray. Maria Lomanto stated that additional planters will be constructed and integrated with the existing planters. She stated that the apron would use Belgium block. The Chair asked about the design of the sidewalk. Maria Lomanto responded that it would be herringbone. The Chair asked about the width of the sidewalk section. Maria Lomanto responded 3-feet. There was an open discussion on the use of Belgium block with the other materials. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing Maria Lomanto asked if the area near her garbage cans can also be improved with these materials. Sean McCarthy responded that this area is within the Village right-of-way. He stated that any approval will need to be verified so that the improvements are limited to the property boundaries. Maria Lomanto stated that the area is only 1 ½’ x 6’. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the following conditions: 1) Blue stone treads for the main stairs 2) Belgium block curb 3) Existing stone for the planters APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 24, 2007 3 �4) Antique pavers (red and gray) for the driveway (rear and front) 5) All pavers will have a herring bone design except for the Belgium block apron. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 5) Plutario Ilagone 180 Valley Street Signage - There was nobody present for this application. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 6) Penaloza 170 Cortlandt Street Signage There was nobody present for this application. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 7) Grotto Holding Corp 300 North Broadway New exterior façade - This is a continuation from previous meetings. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. David Barbuti presented the revised plans to the Board. He presented the color samples of the proposed finishes. He reviewed the proposed changes to the Board. He noted the changes from the previous plans. The Board reviewed the proposed exterior finishes. David Berbuti gave an overview of the proposed project for the public. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing Rosemary McMannis (32 New Broadway) asked about the proposed use of the property. David Berbuti responded that professional office is proposed. Rosemary McMannis expressed concerns about the parking in the area. The Chair responded that the applicant must meet certain requirements. He stated that the ARB only reviews aesthetics. Rosemary McMannis stated that the front of the property seems too tall. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 24, 2007 4 �Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the structure appears massive. She stated that the Board wants something prominent at this corner. The Chair stated that he would like to see a different rendering. He stated that he would like to see the view heading north on Route 9. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair adjourned the public hearing. There was an open discussion about the exterior finishes. The Chair stated that the railings in front of the balcony windows break-up the massing. The Chair asked if the utilities can be brought underground. Sean McCarthy responded that the prior applicants were required to place the utilities underground. He stated that the underground utilities are under the authority of the Planning Board. The Chair asked about the curb cuts on Route 9. Sean McCarthy responded that the line-of-sight is a Planning Board issue. There was an open discussion on the height of the front portion of the proposed development. The Chair stated that the applicant will re-design the NW façade facing the parking lot, the proposed brick wall will not be included existing stone retaining wall. On the New Broadway elevation, the elevation will be corrected. The porch columns will line up with the existing brick piers. The west elevation upper dormer will be re-presented. The garage doors will be faux wood. The north prospective will also be provided. It will be overlaid on the existing streetscape. There was an open discussion on having a work session before the next meeting. No decision was made. The Chair made a motion to continue this item to the next meeting. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 8) Minutes – The minutes for the September 26, 2007 minutes will be reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned to the next meeting. Adjourned at 9:27 p.m. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 24, 2007 5 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2007-10-24 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2007 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/948c4c95780ddf9d797801177c4df2fd.pdf 8f27e41d39a4606564deba26a0265118 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED September 26, 2007 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:00 p.m. Present: David Pysh, Chairman Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Paul Wichmann Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Donato Pennella (Charles A. Manganaro/Village Engineer) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None. Agenda 1) Ken Steurer 415 North Broadway 2) George Samaras 175 Valley Street 3) James Ford 132 Bedford Road ` 4) Plutario Ilagone 180 Valley Street 5) Kenya’s Unisex 99 Cortlandt Street 6) Grotto Holding Corp 300 North Broadway 7) Gibson 58 Hemlock Drive 8) Petta 109 Gordon Avenue 9) Cardenas 22 New Broadway 10) Penaloza 170 Cortlandt Street 11) Bell 11 Elm Street 12) Restaurant Latino 68 Beekman Avenue 13) Approval of the August 2007 Minutes 1) Steurer New Fence Renovate storefront Fence Signage New Signage New exterior façade Window replacement Enclose porch New siding Signage Fence Signage 415 North Broadway Fence - This is a continuation from previous meetings. Kathy Steurer presented samples of the proposed materials. Ken Steurer presented photos of several locations where the fence is installed to demonstrate what the proposed fence will look like. The Chair asked if the required variances had been obtained. Ken Steurer responded yes. �The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing The Chair acknowledged that 6 images on the applicants laptop along with the Locust wood and White Oak wood samples. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the fence remains in its natural condition. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 2) George Samaras 175 Valley Street Renovate storefront – This was a continuation from previous meetings. Joe Pavia stated that the owner is proposing to stucco the exterior of the building and add a material awning in lieu of the previously proposed exterior. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the existing signs in the window are permitted. Sean McCarthy responded that he would check the property folder. There was an open discussion on how to center the awning. The Chair asked if the metal exterior door can be changed. George Samaras responded that the exterior door will be recessed and changed to wood. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the color of the stucco. Joseph Pavia responded that the color would be off-white. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the light fixtures should be changed since the fixture and background are both white. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that the revisions are a big improvement. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that she would like to see more detail on the bump-outs. Sean McCarthy asked if both bump-outs are necessary. He suggested that two awnings might be better since two businesses operate there. Pat Piereson stated that the existing awnings look better than the proposed awning. She stated that the awning for the restaurant could be made larger. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 26, 2007 2 �The Chair stated that the awning should be curved around the brick detail. Pat Piereson agreed. Joe Pavia stated that the applicant could change the colors on the existing awnings and install the stucco as an alternative. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: 1) Keep the old awning as described on the submitted photo. 2) The awning fabric color will be ocean blue. 3) Make the light fixtures more prominent and indirect light. 4) Bump out the awning over the door of the restaurant Pat Piereson seconded. It was approved (3-0) Ana Maria McGinnis abstained. 3) James Ford 132 Bedford Road Fence - The applicant requested an adjournment. 4) Plutario Ilagone 180 Valley Street Signage - There was nobody present for this application. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 5) Kenya’s Unisex 99 Cortlandt Street New Signage – Joe Scigliano of New York Signs is representing this application. Joe Scigliano presented a rendering of the proposed sign. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that phone numbers are not permitted on the sign. She also stated that the address should be centered. She stated that the phone number should be removed from the door as well There was an open discussion on the amount of lettering on the door. Pat Piereson stated that all of the lettering in the window should be removed. She also stated that the top sign should be oval to match the window. Pat Piereson asked about the sign material. Joe Scigliano stated that the sign is a vinyl covered pan sign. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 26, 2007 3 �The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: 1) The top sign be enclosed in an oval shape. 2) Bottom signs are limited to oval signs. 3) Eliminate the lettering of services. 4) Eliminate the phone number on the door. 5) Eliminate all pasted signs in the window. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board needs to approve this sign as a variance for a commercial pan sign since the sign is only a flat panel sign. There was an open discussion on whether to adjourn this application to the next meeting. The Chair added another item to Pat Piereson’s approval 6) “Kenya’s” on the storefront will be embossed lettering. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) Grotto Holding Corp 300 North Broadway New exterior façade - This is a continuation from previous meetings. David Barbuti presented the revised plans to the Board. He gave an overview of the proposed changes to the Board. He noted the changes from the previous plans. The Chair asked if the attic space was useable space. David Barbuti responded no. He stated that he does not have the parking to have an occupied second floor space. The Chair stated that the dormers could be removed. David Barbuti noted that the balconies were added to break-up the massing. David Barbuti summarized the exterior materials and colors for the Board. The Board agreed that the door will be white. Since the public was not noticed, this was adjourned to the next meeting. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 26, 2007 4 �7) Gibson 58 Hemlock Drive Window replacement Kia Hymark is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Kia Hymark stated that several windows are going to be replaced. She reviewed the windows that are going to be removed. She stated that the kitchen window would be replaced with a bay window. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: 1) The window alteration in the kitchen to the right shall be a bay window. 2) The roofing material above the bay window is slate. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Petta 109 Gordon Avenue Enclose porch Armand Degandis is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owner. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Armand Degandis stated that the applicant wants to enclose the existing porch and make a 3season room. The proposed application will match the existing windows and siding. Pat Piereson asked why the room would not be a 4-season room. Armand Degandis responded that the cost would increase. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 9) Cardenas 22 New Broadway New siding Joseph Gouva is representing this application along with the owner. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 26, 2007 5 �The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Joseph Gouva stated that the applicant has installed new siding on an extension. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the trim would be painted. Joseph Gouva responded yes. Paul Wichmann stated that the project is a good improvement. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 10) Penaloza 170 Cortlandt Street Signage Maria Penaloza is the tenant and is representing this application. Ana Maria McGinnis translated for the applicant. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Maria Penaloza stated that she wants to install a sign on the property for her dry cleaning business. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the building façade is deteriorated and should be repaired prior to installing a new sign. Maria Penaloza stated that the existing sign is a temporary sign. Sean McCarthy stated that the building is in violation of many issues with the Building Department. He stated that this might impact the applicant’s ability to get an approval until the outstanding violations are resolved. Maria Penaloza stated that the landlord told her that the violations will be corrected. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 11) Bell 11 Elm Street Fence Jason Bell is the owner and is representing this application. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 26, 2007 6 �The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Jason Bell stated that he wants to replace the existing fence with the proposed fence. He submitted several renderings to the Board. He stated that he is adding a gate at the entranceway. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 12) Restaurant Latino 68 Beekman Avenue Signage Mark Brower is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Mark Brower submitted 2 photos to the Board. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that it is hard to understand what is proposed without photos or drawings. She stated that the menu signs should be removed. Sean McCarthy reviewed what the applicant was using for signage prior to being in violation. Mark Brower stated that he wants to keep the dry erase boards in each window. He would also like to keep one neon sign in each window. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. It was agreed that this application would be adjourned to the next meeting so the applicant can reconsider what signs they want to keep in the window of the restaurant. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 13) Minutes – The Chair made a motion to approve the August 22, 2007 minutes as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0) Adjourned at 9:52 p.m. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 26, 2007 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2007-09-26 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2007 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/e9c72cd6b163c33344d2bc6c47e07ab5.pdf 2c32c15ce51a5a15f086b0cab52a8da1 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED August 22, 2007 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:00 p.m. Present: David Pysh, Chairman Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Absent: Carter Sackman Paul Wichmann Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Dan Pennella (Charles A. Manganaro/Village Engineer) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None. Agenda 1) Steurer 2) James Ford 3) Plutario Ilagone 4) Scazafave 5) Rodrigues 6) Cortese Construction 7) Kenya’s Unisex 8) Fuller 9) Poguio 10) Grotto Holding Corp 11) Zoppo 12) George Samaras 13) Approval of Minutes 415 North Broadway 132 Bedford Road 180 Valley Street 132 Palmer Ave 89 Cortlandt Street Terrace Close 99 Cortlandt Street 548 Munroe Avenue 95 College Avenue 300 North Broadway 278 Harwood Avenue 175 Valley Street July 25, 2007 meeting New Fence Fence Signage Fence New Signage New Construction New Signage Two Story Addition New Fence New exterior façade Addition & Alteration Renovate storefront 1) Steurer 415 North Broadway Fence - There was nobody present for this application. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 2) James Ford 132 Bedford Road Fence – This was a continuation from previous meetings. Donna Maiello stated that the deer fence had a height variance that has expired. She stated that the zoning application will be sought simultaneously with the ARB’s approval. She presented views �of the property from Bedford Road. She stated that the proposed stockade fence is proposed at 5foot high to keep some privacy in the rear yard. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson asked about the zoning application. Sean McCarthy responded that the application is a new application for the 8-foot high deer fence. Pat Piereson asked if other residents have an 8-foot high deer fence in the Village. Sean McCarthy responded no. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that approving a deer fence would set a precedent. Pat Piereson agreed. Sean McCarthy responded that the proposed visual impact of the fence could be mitigated with an effective landscape plan. The Chair stated that the Zoning Board should be aware that the ARB is concerned with setting a precedent with the height of the proposed fence. It was agreed that the Board would wait until the Zoning Board takes action on the application. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 3) Plutario Ilagone 180 Valley Street Signage - This is a continuation from previous meetings. Plutario Ilagone is the owner and is representing this application along with contractor Ziggy Bober. Ziggy Bober presented a rendering of the sign to the Board. The Chair stated that the white outline should be eliminated. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the lettering should be closer together. Sean McCarthy stated that this new awning is proposed over an existing retractable awning. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the other awnings on the adjacent stores are the same color. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair stated that the awning should be consistent with the adjacent businesses. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, August 22, 2007 2 �Sean McCarthy stated that the lettering is proposed on the sloped portion of the awning and will not be very visible as proposed. The Chair opened up the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson stated that the proposed awning is not very effective. The Chair stated that this application is very dissimilar to the adjacent businesses. Pat Piereson stated that the applicant needs to re-evaluate the proposed lettering and decals. She made a motion to adjourn this application to the next meeting. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). This was adjourned to the next meeting. 4) Scazafave 132 Palmer Ave Fence – This is a continuation from previous meetings. Anna Scazafave is the owner and is representing this application. Anna Scazafave submitted a rendering of the revised fence. The rendering showed a black steel gate in the area where the fence will be visible. There was an open discussion on the proposed stone. The Chair opened up the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the following conditions: The presented fence style in the front is acceptable. The east side of the fence will end at the back end of the house. The stone refinishing is approved as a more regular rectangular pattern. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 5) Rodrigues 89 Cortlandt Street New Signage – There was nobody present for this application. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 6) Cortese Construction Terrace Close New Construction Sean McCarthy noted that this is a new application. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, August 22, 2007 3 �The Chair asked if the proof of mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Andrew Cortese is the owner and is representing this application along with attorney, Richard Blancato. Since the Board only had 3 members, Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the applicant had any objections if she listened to the applicant’s presentation as opposed to recusing herself. Richard Blancato stated that he did not object. The Chair opened the public hearing. Andrew Cortese described the proposed changes from the previous meeting. He stated that the roof above the garage was lowered. He also stated that the roof pitch above the garage matches the roof pitch on the main house. He also stated that the house depth was reduced primarily in the rear of the house. He stated that the structure size was reduced by 600sf. The Chair asked about the ridge height. Andrew Cortese responded that the ridge is 32-feet 10-inches. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the structure has the same width as the previous application. Diane Bruni (6 Birch Close) asked about the height of the basement. Andrew Cortese responded that the basement height was reduced 1-foot. He stated that the basement is a walk-out basement. Andrew Cortese presented a rear elevation of the previous plan to show the changes. Mr. Mingla (12 Birch Close) asked about the trees that would be removed as a result of the construction. Andrew Cortese responded that the Tree Commission and the Planning Board have permitted certain trees to be removed as a result of the proposed construction. He presented a copy of the site plan. Richard Weiss (2 Birch Close) stated that other houses in the area do not have the frontage that this application is proposing. Andrew Cortese responded that if the house is made narrower, it would be built deeper into the site and would appear more massive. Pat Piereson asked the applicant to summarize the reduction in the rear of the house. Andrew Cortese reviewed the changes in the rear. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the proposed changes are a big improvement. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, August 22, 2007 4 �Pat Piereson stated that the applicant has made a genuine effort to reduce the scale of the proposed structure. The Chair asked if the applicant would object to having a follow-on meeting to review the specific materials. There was an open discussion on the review of the materials. Sean McCarthy stated that a building permit cannot be issued until the materials are finalized. Richard Weiss stated that the façade should be more homogenous. He also stated that the cupola should also be reviewed. Diane Bruni stated that the house is still very large. The Chair stated that he does not want to approve the entire application this evening. Richard Blancato responded that if the application is not approved tonight, the applicant will be faced with a decision of pursuing the legal options available from the recent rejection of the previous application and the withdrawing the new application. He stated that the deadline for filing the legal actions will not allow this item to be carried over to another meeting. Andrew Cortese stated that his lot is much larger than many of the lots in the area (34,000sf) and based on the larger lot size, a larger house can be built. Sean McCarthy stated that on a lot of 15,000sf, a 6,000sf size structure can be built. Joan Levy-Weiss (2 Birch Close) stated that this proposed structure will impact 2 neighborhoods. There was an open discussion on the approval of the materials. This was adjourned to later in the meeting so that material samples can be reviewed. The public hearing was kept open. 7) Kenya’s Unisex 99 Cortlandt Street New Signage – There was nobody present for this application. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 8) Fuller 548 Munroe Avenue Two Story Addition – Sean McCarthy stated that a rear yard variance was obtained by the applicant at the last ZBA APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, August 22, 2007 5 �meeting. Frank Tancredy is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owner. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Frank Tancredy summarized the proposed addition. He stated that the entire house is going to be updated. He stated that the garage is currently a 1.5 car garage. He stated that this will be increased to a 2 car garage. He stated that the entire roof will be re-shingled and the windows will match the previous addition. Pat Piereson asked about the existing square footage. Frank Tancredy responded 3293sf. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that he wants a more detailed understanding of the material selection. Pat Piereson asked if the applicant is matching the existing brick. Frank Tancredy responded yes. He stated that the stucco will match and the trim will be new. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the materials match the existing. He stated that the proposed new slate style roof is approved as an approved alternative. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 9) Poguio 95 College Avenue New Fence – Richard Blancato is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Richard Blancato stated that the applicant recently purchased the property. He stated that the owners want to install a fence to keep people from parking on the site off-hours. Pat Piereson asked if there are any photos of the property. Richard Blancato responded no. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the proposed height of the fence. Sean McCarthy responded that a 6-foot fence is allowed since this is a commercial property. Sean McCarthy asked if the ramp is going to be used. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, August 22, 2007 6 �Richard Blancato responded no. Sean McCarthy stated that the gate for the ramp is not needed and the fence should be continued across the ramp. Richard Blancato responded that he did not object. Pat Piereson stated that it is hard to understand the potential impacts of the fence without photos of the site. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson stated that the proposed fence should be less ornamental since it is for a parking lot. Richard Blancato agreed. There was an open discussion on the landscaping plan. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the following conditions. The gate on the ramp will be changed to part of the continuous fence. The proposed gate style will eliminate the presented ornamental element. Also, there will be plantings added where indicated on the revised plans. A planter will also be added in front of the fence. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 10) Grotto Holding Corp 300 North Broadway New exterior façade - There was nobody here to represent this application. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 11) Zoppo 278 Harwood Avenue Addition & Alteration - Joanne Tall is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owners. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Joanne Tall gave an overview of the proposed project. She stated that the proposed driveway would be excavated to allow for the construction of the new driveway. She stated that a 7-foot high retaining wall would be build around the driveway. The Chair asked the applicant to summarize the zoning variances obtained. Joanne Tall reviewed the variances that the applicant received as a result of the proposed work. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the retaining wall would be tiered to offset the massing. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, August 22, 2007 7 �Gian Zoppo responded that there are other houses in the neighborhood that have similar walls. He stated that some plantings are proposed to offset the appearance of the wall. There was an open discussion on the proposed retaining walls. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Joanne Tall submitted color samples to the Board. The Chair made a motion to approve this application as submitted with the following conditions. A planting bed will be included on the South side of the driveway (north side of the wall). The height of the planting bed would be approximately 2-feet. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 12) George Samaras 175 Valley Street Renovate storefront – George Samaras is the owner and is representing this application along with architect, Joseph Paver. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Joseph Paver stated that the owner wants to construct a Greek restaurant on the lower floor. He stated the existing two green awnings will be removed and replaced with a new awning for both businesses. He stated that a portico would be constructed in the front. He described the new storefront for the Board. He stated that the building is a stand alone building. The Chair expressed concerns about the projection of the proposed awning. Ana Maria McGinnis asked the applicant to review the proposed materials. Joseph Paver spoke about the proposed storefront roof and stone veneer. George Samaras showed photos of the restaurant interior. He stated that the exterior colors were specifically chosen to match the interior. Pat Piereson stated that the color of the stone should be lighter. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the exterior does not match the other finishes of the building. George Samaras stated that the Guadalajara restaurant in Briarcliff has the same style storefront. The Chair stated that he is concerned with the projection onto the street. He asked what projection would be needed to eliminate the tie wires. Joseph Paver responded that if the awning was reduced to 4-feet, the tie wires will not be needed. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, August 22, 2007 8 �The Chair asked about the front door. He stated that the entrance looks too institutional. Joseph Paver stated that the opening is too small to have a double door. The Chair opened up the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that other details could be proposed to enhance the building exterior and promote the restaurant. This was continued to the next meeting. 6- continued) Cortese Construction Terrace Close New Construction This is a continuation from an earlier agenda item. Pat Piereson asked if the brick would be carried thru the lower level. Andrew Cortese reviewed the proposed brick and stucco sections of the house. The lower level is brick and the upper level is stucco. Richard Weiss stated that the proposed materials rear of the house blends better than the front. He stated that the materials in the front of the house should blend better. Jennifer Miles (3 Terrace Close) stated that there are many elements in the front of the house. There was an open discussion on the use of brick and stone. The Chair asked about the stone product to be used. Andrew Cortese responded that real stone is proposed. He stated that the stone would be large, irregular stone. There was an open discussion on the size and pattern of the stone. There was an open discussion on the proposed brick. It was agreed that the stone should be installed in a more rectangular pattern with the stone size not to exceed four courses of brick. It was also agreed that the applicant would select a neighboring house to use as a sample for the type of brick to be used. Joan Levy-Weiss stated that the color scheme should be changed to better blend in the neighborhood. Richard Weiss stated that the roof should be a lighter color. Andrew Cortese responded that the proposed roof color is charcoal. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, August 22, 2007 9 �The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions. Gray granite stone, molded dark red brick that will approach to appearance of 2 Terrace Close. All the brackets, moldings and trim will be wood (gray color). The roof will be either dark gray or black slate. The windows will be wood widows. The front door and garage doors will be stained with a mahogany stain. The shutters will be wood and will have with operating hardware (gray color). The Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded the motion. It was unanimous (3-0). 13) Minutes – The Chair made a motion to approve the July 25, 2007 minutes as amended. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) Adjourned to the next meeting. Adjourned at 11:40 p.m. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, August 22, 2007 10 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2007-08-22 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2007 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/5d8bb6fdd0a512a5b91ed8b75a2637c2.pdf f1b95003b582eca5310ba29b2310ed39 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING -APPROVED July 25, 2007 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:04 p.m. Present: David Pysh, Chairman Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Paul Wichmann Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None. Agenda 1) James Ford 2) JFS Realty 3) Patricia Quezada 4) Plutario Bagone 5) Tripp 6) Scazafave 7) Cortese Construction 8) Grotto Holding Corp 9) Approval of Minutes 132 Bedford Road Fence 83 Cortlandt Street Fence 185 Valley Street Signage 180 Valley Street Signage 34 New Broadway Fence 132 Palmer Ave Fence Terrace Close New Construction 300 North Broadway New exterior façade June 27, 2007 and July 12, 2007 meeting 1) James Ford 132 Bedford Road Fence – This was a continuation from previous meetings. There was nobody present for this application. 2) JFS Realty 83 Cortlandt Street Fence - There was nobody present for this application. 3) Patricia Quezada 185 Valley Street Patricia Quezada is the owner and is representing this application. Signage – �The Chair asked if the proof of mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Patricia Quezada stated that she wants to install a new awning at for her business. Sean McCarthy stated that there is additional signage that needs to be approved in addition to the awning. The Chair opened up the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Plutario Bagone 180 Valley Street Signage - Plutario Bagone is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Plutario Bagone presented renderings to the Board. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the type-face on the awning is too complicated to read. There was an open discussion on how to make the awning comply with the Village Code. The Board provided the applicant with feedback on how to make the sign easier to understand. They also discussed the font size and type. The Chair opened up the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. This was adjourned to the next meeting so that the applicant can provide a revised submission. No action was taken. 5) Tripp 34 New Broadway Fence - Sandra Tripp is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 25, 2007 2 �Sandra Tripp described the different fence types that she wants to install. She stated that the application lists installing a 3-foot fence and a 5-foot fence on the property. She stated that there are three different fences in total. The Chair asked if there are other wood fences installed in the area. Sandra Tripp responded that there are other homes that have similar fences. Sean McCarthy added that there is a blend of all types of fences in the area. The Chair opened up the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) Scazafave 132 Palmer Ave Fence – Anna Scazafave is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Anna Scazafave described the proposed fence. She stated that the fence will close off the back of the house. She stated that the fence would be a black chain-link fence. The Chair asked if the applicant is open to other materials instead of a chain-link fence. Anna Scazafave responded yes. There was an open discussion on the proposed materials and possible alternative materials. The Chair opened up the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Anna Scazafave stated that her fence would be installed adjacent to the neighbor’s fence. The Chair stated that the applicant should consider using alternative materials in the area that is visible from the street. Anna Scazafave responded that she is not opposed to alternative fence materials. The Chair stated that the proposed material is the lowest grade of material available. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application for installing the chain-link fence around the perimeter of the property but the aluminum fence would be used for the area that is visible from the street. He stated that the applicant should re-appear with an additional submittal. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 25, 2007 3 �There was no second. The Chair stated that the applicant needs to provide alternative solutions. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 7) Cortese Construction Terrace Close New Construction This is a continuation from previous meetings. Ana Maria McGinnis recused herself from this application. The Chair summarized the history of this application. He stated that at one of the public meetings, the Board had requested information on the square footage of the neighboring houses. He continued to review the previous meetings including the Waterfront Advisory Committee and Planning Board meetings. He submitted a square footage of the neighboring properties and submitted these results to the Board members. The Chair stated that the request of the public to have the applicant provide square footage of the surrounding properties was never presented to the Board. He also summarized the exterior material changes of the Board. Paul Wichmann stated that the meeting minutes are only a summary not a transcription of the meeting. The Chair asked if the applicant uses a steep slope deduction for FAR calculations. Richard Blancato responded no. The Chair stated that if the public had requested information and that information was not provided, the application was not properly reviewed. Chris Pateman stated that the original application presented a 6500sf structure. He presented an alternative to the Board. He compared the alternative to the original submission to show the reductions that the applicant has made. The Chair asked for the revised square footage of the structure. Chris Pateman responded that the current proposal is 4930 sf. The Chair opened up the public hearing. Jim Leaper (10 Birch Close) stated that at the last meetings, it was stated that the neighbors are not as concerned about the application. He asked to see the rear elevation of the revised plans. Chris Pateman showed the rear elevation of the revised plan. He stated that the ridge line has been reduced. He stated that some of the dormers have also been eliminated. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 25, 2007 4 �The Chair stated that the recent changes do not reduce the interior square footage. He referred to the summary of neighboring homes he submitted earlier. Richard Blancato stated that the Building Department and Tax Assessor’s data can be inaccurate. Pat Piereson stated that the data for 10 Birch Close shows a house of 2900sf. The Chair stated that the slope of the house projects a 4-story house from the rear. He stated that he measured the size of the proposed structure from the grade to the ridge and from the grade to the eave. He stated that the proposed structure is approximately 37% larger than other homes in the area. Chris Pateman stated that Village Code permits a structure larger than 6000sf. Sean McCarthy stated that the FAR permits 5800sf and the proposed structure is 5619sf. Chris Pateman responded that the current size is 4930sf. He stated that other houses in the neighborhood will probably be renovated and made larger than the proposed structure. He stated that the chart on the drawings have not been updated since the original application back in 2005. Pat Piereson stated that the fact that since the lot is larger does not automatically permit the applicant to build a larger house in the community. She stated that the homes need to fit together. The Chair stated that the Board needs to consider what the applicant is permitted to build under the zoning ordinance. Jim Leaper stated that the applicant made a statement that their proposal is justified since other houses in the neighborhood will eventually be renovated and become larger than the proposed structure. Since there was no further public comment, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that the proposed house is dissimilar to other homes in size and scale. He also stated that the Board has had ample opportunities to make corrections to the project. He made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Paul Wichmann seconded. Pat Piereson stated that the size of the house has not changed. Chris Pateman responded that the square footage of the livable space has not changed but the massing has been reduced by 14%. Paul Wichmann stated that if the project would devalue homes in the area, the Board needs to take that into account. Pat Piereson asked if the roofline could be reduced further. Chris Pateman responded that the architectural features of the house would be negatively impacted. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 25, 2007 5 �There was an open discussion on altering the roof pitch to reduce the massing of the structure. The Chair amended the motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition to reduce the rear ridgeline of the house to match the ridgeline of the garage. Paul Wichmann seconded. Pat Piereson stated that the massing is still an issue. The motion did not pass (2-1) (Piereson). Ana Maria McGinnis re-joined the meeting. 8) Grotto Holding Corp 300 North Broadway New exterior façade - David Barbuti is the project architect and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sean McCarthy stated that this is only an informational item. He stated that this application is before the Planning Board and Zoning Board. He stated that this item was not noticed to the public. The Chair stated that the Board needs to follow proper procedures. Sean McCarthy stated that this is part of the review process. He stated that the Planning Board and Zoning Boards need the input of the Architectural Review Board so that they can conduct proper reviews of the application. The Chair asked why the center of the structure is the largest portion. David Barbuti responded that the existing structure is set-up this way. He stated that the New Broadway side shows a residential appearance. The Chair responded that the center massing gives the commercial appearance on New Broadway. He stated that the applicant should try to match the residential scale of New Broadway. David Barbuti discussed the rear elevation and the proposed materials. He stated that the garages are still needed to meet the parking requirements. He reviewed the parking plan for the property. The Chair asked about the height of the existing masonry base. David Barbuti responded that the height is not changing. Pat Piereson asked about the square footage of the garage areas as compared to the main floor level. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 25, 2007 6 �David Barbuti responded that the garage level is only 5400sf and the 2nd floor is 6761sf. Pat Piereson expressed concerns about having the visiting public park on Broadway and walk around to the main entrance on New Broadway. The Board asked the applicant to investigate a more central access method to the 2nd floor office space as well as moving the focal point of the property from the center to the New Broadway/Broadway point. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 9) Minutes – Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the June 27, 2007 minutes as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the July 12, 2007 minutes as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) McGinnis abstained. Adjourned to the next meeting. Adjourned at 10:20 p.m. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 25, 2007 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2007-07-25 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2007 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/dcb34c9a8d90dd5bac17605acf3fec87.pdf 952bf6e9ceac538b9cf0b84385bcb2bd PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD SPECIAL MEETING -APPROVED July 12, 2007 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:33 p.m. Present: David Pysh, Chairman Pat Piereson Paul Wichmann Absent: Carter Sackman Ana Maria McGinnis Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: The Chair stated that since there are only three members present, if the Board makes a decision, it must be unanimous. Agenda 1) Cortese Construction Terrace Close New single family residence - 1) Cortese Construction Terrace Close New single family residence - This is a continuation from previous meetings. Richard Blancato is representing this application along with project architect, Chris Pateman and owner Andrew Cortese. Sean McCarthy stated that the proof of mailings has been received by the Village. Richard Blancato gave a brief history on this application. He spoke about the Planning Board’s review and the Architectural Review Board’s previous reviews. Richard Blancato stated that many changes have been made on this application since the original application was submitted to the Village. There was an open discussion on how the application should proceed. It was agreed that the public hearing would be left open while the Board asks questions of the applicant. Chris Pateman stated that the proposed dwelling is currently a 4,900sf structure. He described the front elevation to the Board. He spoke about the removal of one of the �garages and the reduction of the massing in the front of the house. He stated that the roof pitch was also reduced significantly. The Chair asked about the changes made as a result of previous reviews of the Architectural Review Board. Chris Pateman responded that there have been so many revisions made from the original plans, he could not remember which Village Board requested which changes. The Chair asked if there was a plot plan available. Chris Pateman showed a plot plan to the Board. The Chair asked the Board if there were any comments. Pat Piereson asked about the drainage issues that might exist on the site. Richard Blancato responded that the site drainage issues has been addressed by the Planning Board. Pat Piereson stated that the Board’s jurisdiction needs to be clarified. Pat Piereson stated that the scale of the proposed structure seems to be a 3-story structure. Chris Pateman responded that the proposed structure is a 2 ½ story structure. Pat Piereson asked if a survey of neighboring homes was performed to determine how the size of the proposed structure relates to other homes. Richard Blancato responded that the applicant has spent a lot of time analyzing the other homes in the neighborhood in order to design a house that would be in character with the other homes in the area. Andrew Cortese added that this lot is also 3/4 –acre which is larger than most of the lots in the area. The Chair opened the public hearing. Richard Weiss of 2 Terrace Close stated that other neighbors are frustrated with the application. He stated that this design is inconsistent with the neighborhood. He stated that this application squeezes a large house onto an odd shaped lot. He stated that many of the houses in the area are old brick houses. He stated that this house does not properly fit into this area. He stated that he is not opposed to the applicant building a house on the site but the structure should be properly designed to fit into the neighborhood and on the lot. Joan Levy-Weiss of 2 Terrace Close stated that this house would create a hazard to the neighborhood. She stated that no delivery trucks, fire trucks, etc can maneuver in this area without driving onto this property. She also stated that there is a utility pole on the site that will also been impacted. Chris Pateman responded that the utility pole is in the NYS right-of-way. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Special Meeting, July 12, 2007 2 �The Chair asked if the Fire Department acknowledged that they can maneuver through the area. Sean McCarthy read the letter from the Fire Department aloud. The Chair summarized the concerns from the public. He stated that the public has expressed concerns with the size of the proposed structure as well as the proposed architectural style of the house in relation to the rest of the neighborhood. Sean McCarthy read a section from the site plan approval. He read that the existing light pole would be removed and the utilities would be placed underground. He also read that a new light pole would be provided by the applicant and relocated to the center of the island. Richard Weiss responded that the new light pole would not provide sufficient light for the area based on its proposed location. Chris Pateman stated that these are Planning Board issues and have been accepted by the Planning Board. He stated that this application is for the aesthetics of the structure. There was an open discussion on the Fire Department access. Pat Piereson reviewed the massing of the house on the aerial plan. Chris Pateman reviewed the footprint of the houses in the neighborhood. The Chair stated that he feels that issues regarding massing and the structures impact to the neighborhood are applicable to this Board. Chris Pateman stated that any changes in the footprint of the house would require changes to the site plan approval. He stated that the Planning Board previously referred this application to the Architectural Review Board in order to eliminate the need for additional reviews. Pat Piereson asked if it is regular procedure for other Village Boards to send matters to the ARB before taking action. Sean McCarthy responded that other Village Boards send matters to the ARB for recommendations. There was an open discussion on the review procedures for the Board. Pat Piereson asked Richard Weiss if other neighbors are also unhappy with the aesthetics of the structure. Richard Weiss stated that the house should be reduced in size to become more in character with the other homes in the neighborhood. There was an open discussion on what issues that the Board will review. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Special Meeting, July 12, 2007 3 �Richard Blancato stated that the application is before the Board for aesthetics only. He stated that the size and scale of the house are not going to be reduced by the applicant. Pat Piereson stated that she is concerned with the paint color, the stone exterior and the massing of the structure. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. The Chair asked Paul Wichmann to consider amending his motion to include applying a clear stain to the cedar shingles instead of paint. He also stated that the brick or stone material selections could be interchanged. Paul Wichmann amended his motion to approve the application as submitted with the inclusion of a natural tone on the cedar shingles and keeping the stone exterior. Pat Piereson stated that if the applicant were to reduce the height of the structure, it would not require an additional Planning Board approval. Richard Blancato responded that the size of the proposed structure was already reduced from 5600sf to its current proposed size of 4900sf. He stated that the size of the structure will not be reduced further. The Chair asked the public if their comments were properly addressed from previous meetings. Joan Levy-Weiss stated that a written objection to this application was presented to the Planning Board. She stated that the written objection never received a response. The Chair made a motion to close the public hearing and he recommended that since the Board’s regular meeting will meet in 2 weeks, the Board should review the history of the application to make a proper decision. Paul Wichmann stated that the original plans should be made available to all members of the Board. Pat Piereson asked that the Board made a visit to the site. She asked the applicant to mark out the footprint of the proposed structure. The applicant agreed. The Chair made a motion to adjourn this application to the next meeting. He stated that this item will be taken up at the Board’s next meeting. The Board will review all of the applicable meeting minutes. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). Adjourned to the next meeting. Adjourned at 10:08 p.m. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Special Meeting, July 12, 2007 4 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2007-07-12 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2007 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/6f0d0a63321e80d476cacf61031afefc.pdf f7269648589da38d013ad582e9f74ede PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED June 27, 2007 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:01 p.m. Present: David Pysh, Chairman Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Paul Wichmann Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Rae Lee (Building Department/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None. Agenda 1) Tappan Car Wash 2) Silverman 3) Gibson 4) Ford 5) Steurer 6) Cortese Construction 7) JFS Realty 8) Approval of Minutes 9) Other 1) Tappan Car Wash 205 Valley Street Signage, continued 48 Fremont Road Continuation 58 Hemlock Drive Continuation 132 Bedford Road Fence 415 North Broadway Fence Terrace Close New Construction 83 Cortlandt Street Fence March, April and May 2007 meetings 205 Valley Street Signage, continued - This is a continuation from previous meetings. Miguel Mateo is the owner and is representing this application. He stated that he had appeared before the a few months ago. He stated that he wants to get the sign approved. He submitted a few sample signs for the Board to review. The Chair stated that the Board would have to vote on one of the signs presented by the applicant. The Chair opened up the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the black sign as submitted. Ana Maria McGiness seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). �2) Silverman 48 Fremont Road Continuation - This is a continuation form previous meetings. Jean Silverman is the owner and is representing this application. Jean Silverman stated that the original drawings showed a dormer above the garage. She stated that the window installed is different than what was approved. She also stated that the front door is also different. Lastly, she stated that a small window was also added above the garage. Paul Wichmann stated that homeowners are performing work and then coming to the Board for approvals after the work is completed. The Chair opened up the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the changes that were installed against the previously approved submission. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). There was an open discussion on amending the Board’s procedures on dealing with deviations from approved application. 3) Gibson 58 Hemlock Drive Continuation - Ana Maria McGiness recused herself from this application. Kaia Gibson is the owner and is representing this application. Kaia Gibson described the proposed fence and pergola. She stated that the pergola would be installed over the garage. She stated that the pergola is needed to create a safer environment. The Chair asked the applicant to summarize the application. Kaia Gibson summarized both applications that were before the Board. The Chair opened up the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson asked how the pergola would match up to the existing roof. Kaia Gibson responded that the existing flashing would be replaced in order to have the pergola match-up to the existing roof. The Chair stated that the roof that the fence is going to follow is very irregular. Kaia Gibson responded that the fence will be on the inside of the existing landscaping. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 27, 2007 2 �Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve both applications as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) McGiness abstained. 4) Ford 132 Bedford Road Fence – The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Rae Lee responded yes. Donna Maiello is representing this application on behalf of the owners. Donna Maiello spoke about the existing fences on the property. She talked about the existing 8foot deer fence. She stated that the applicant wants to install a 5-foot high stockade fence in addition to the existing 8-foot fence. The Chair opened up the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Gary McLean (63 Sleepy Hollow Road) stated that the area near the fence is not maintained properly. He stated that the property can be better maintained. He stated that he is opposed to the 5-foot stockade fence. He claims that he was not noticed about the Zoning Board meeting. Donna Maiello responded that the application is for the 8-foot deer fence as well as the 5-foot stockade fence. Gary McLean stated that the property should be maintained. He stated that the 5-foot fence is proposed on top of an 8-foot stone wall. Ana Maria McGiness stated that this fence is very visible from the road. Paul Wichmann stated that the 8-foot high fence was installed over 18 months ago. The Chair stated that the Building Department needs to research if the public was accurately noticed back in 2004. The Chair made a motion to continue this application to the next meeting. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). This was adjourned to the next meeting. 5) Steurer 415 North Broadway Fence - Kathleen and Ken Steurer are the owners and are representing this application. Ken Steurer stated that he wants to install a fence on Route 9 in order to avoid trimming the existing hedges. He stated that trimming the existing hedges on Route 9 is dangerous. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 27, 2007 3 �Kathleen Steurer stated that they are proposing to remove some of the hedges The Chair asked if the ZBA approved the variance. Anthony DelVecchio stated that the ZBA requested ARB’s feedback on the aesthetics of the fence prior to making a decision on the variance. The Chair opened up the public hearing. Since there was no public present, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson made a recommendation to the ZBA that the ARB is in favor of the proposed 4-foot fence that would match the fence currently installed at the Philipse Manor Restoration. 6) Cortese Construction Terrace Close New Construction - There was nobody present for this application. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 7) JFS Realty 83 Cortlandt Street Fence - There was nobody present for this application. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 8) Minutes – The Chair made a motion to approve the May 23, 2007 minutes as amended. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). The Chair made a motion to approve the April 25, 2007 minutes as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). The Chair made a motion to approve the March 28, 2007 minutes as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 9) Other – There was an open discussion on properly informing each applicant that all modifications will require the changes to be reviewed by the Board. Adjourned to the next meeting. Adjourned at 9:20 p.m. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 27, 2007 4 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2007-06-27 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2007 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/8a33ee6c6ec01e9d2af40021d2841a44.pdf a9abf7d659be8b46f1989a72abc4f2be PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED May 23, 2007 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:00 p.m. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: David Pysh, Chairman Paul Wichmann Ana Maria McGinnis Absent: Carter Sackman Pat Piereson Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None. Agenda: 1. Rea 2. Silverman 3. Serina 4. Ramirez 5. Tskesides 6. Jarane 7. Cortese Construction 8. Gibson 9. Approval of Minutes 1) Rea 148 Highland Avenue Façade renovation 48 Fremont Road Amended approval 222 Beekman Avenue Amended approval 172 Cortlandt Street Façade renovation 30 Elm Street Install siding 37 Evergreen Way Amended approval Terrace Close New single family residence 58 Hemlock Drive Pergola & fence March and April 2007 meetings 144 Highland Avenue New Dormer, windows and façade- This is a continuation from the last meeting. Carrie Rea is the owner and is representing this application. Carrie Rea stated that the window on the 1st floor has been removed. She presented samples of the proposed exterior finishes. The Chair asked about the existing exterior finishes. Carrie Rea responded aluminum siding. She stated that the aluminum siding would be removed and replaced with the vinyl siding. The Chair asked about the potential snow loading on the new roof. Carrie Rea responded that her husband is aware of the potential problems with the snow loading. �Paul Wichmann asked if the existing vent would be changed. Carrie Rea responded that the vent would be changed to match the vinyl siding. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sean McCarthy noted that the front door might not be installed in the same location as shown on the plans. Carrie Rea stated that her contractor indicated that the proposed front door might require some modification in order to have it installed as shown on the drawings. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted except that the current front door will remain in its current location. This is different from the presented plans. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 2) Silverman 48 Fremont Road Amended approval Joseph Ferrotta is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Joseph Ferrotta stated that the previous approval showed a small dormer. He stated that during construction, the owner enlarged the area. He stated that the approval is for an asbuilt condition. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the applicant should have come to the Board before the change was made. Joseph Ferrotta responded that this change was made in the field. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sean McCarthy added that the change was noted on the framing inspection. He stated that the owners were made aware of the deviation from the Board’s approval. Paul Wichmann stated that contractors should build what the architect presented on the drawings. He stated that the project would look better if it were built as presented on the drawings. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 23, 2007 2 �The Chair made a motion to adjourn this item to the next meeting so that the Board could discuss how to rule on this application. The Board indicated to the applicant that this work might have to be amended. This item was adjourned to the next meeting. 3) Serina 222 Beekman Avenue Amended approval – Gary Serina is the owner and is representing this application. The Chari asked if the proof of mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Gary Serina stated that he wants to add a deck on the upper level of the structure. He stated that the company logo would be added on an attached canvas panel. Sean McCarthy added that the applicant is looking to expand the service to the 2nd floor. He stated that the upper area would be accessed thru the interior space. The Chair stated that the railing should be mounted on the inside of the parapet wall and not on top of the parapet wall. The Chair asked if the logo on the proposed canvas panel would constitute a sign. Sean McCarthy responded yes. There was an open discussion on what type of materials the panels could be made from in order to keep them up year-round. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to make the amended drawing the record submission. The corrected drawing shows a post railing inset from the existing parapet and mounted to the deck. The proposed continuous railing in the front would be segmented into three pieces correspond with the architectural features of the façade crown. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 4) Ramirez 172 Cortlandt Street Façade renovation – Martin Ramirez is the owner and is representing this application. Martin Ramirez stated that the property used to have a store on the lower level. He is proposing to remove the store and install a 3-bedroom apartment in its place. He stated that the upper floors have apartments already and that these apartments would remain. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 23, 2007 3 �Sean McCarthy stated that this property has been vacant for over 1-year and needs substantial renovations. Martin Ramirez discussed the proposed exterior renovations. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the proposed garden box. Martin Ramirez responded that currently a staircase exists where the garden box is proposed. The Chair asked if the basement door would be preserved. Martin Ramirez responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the windows would be replaced. Martin Ramirez responded that all of the windows would be changed with replacement windows. The Chair asked about the exterior finishes. Martin Ramirez responded that the exterior would be stuccoed. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that a detail is needed to show the gap between the old and new stucco. Paul Wichmann stated that something should be added between the old and new material. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sean McCarthy asked why there were four different window styles in the front of the property. Martin Ramirez responded that the architect was trying to maintain the appearance of the upper floor. There was an open discussion on the proposed window layout. The Board amended the applicant’s plan. Ana Maria McGinnis suggested that the applicant should use low-growing evergreen plants for the garden box. The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions. The two proposed grade level windows will be consolidated into one window. The materials for the planter will be brick. The entire façade will be stucco. It is to be sub-divided at the existing break between the CMU and the framing above with a wood detail. There is to be a light glazing in the entrance door. The existing basement door will remain. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 5) Tskesides 30 Elm Street Install siding – Anthony Camillo is the architect and is representing this application along with the owner. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 23, 2007 4 �Anthony Camillo stated that the front exterior would be replaced with 4” vinyl siding. He stated that the existing exterior stucco has significantly deteriorated over the years. He stated that the owner wants to cover the deteriorated sections and replace it with a more aesthetically pleasing product. Paul Wichmann asked for clarification on the status of the deteriorated stucco exterior. Anthony Camillo responded that some maintenance and repairs have been done recently but the problem continues to persist. Paul Wichmann stated that the proposed drawing does not correct the problem. Mr. Tskesides responded that many other homes in the neighborhood have vinyl siding. Paul Wichmann stated that the entire house should be wrapped in vinyl siding instead of just one side. Anthony Camillo stated that there would be a financial hardship to deviate from the proposed submission. He also stated that the applicant needs to leave the country in a few weeks and he is trying to complete the project prior to departing. The Chair stated that more details are needed for the Board to make a decision. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that the proposed application is not a good solution. He stated that the proposed exterior should have some additional details. Paul Wichmann stated that the vinyl siding should be applied to the rest of the house. Ana Maria McGinnis agreed. Mrs. Tskesides stated that there are no problems with the rest of the house. She stated that there is no reason to require vinyl siding on the rest of the house. The applicant withdrew the application. 6) Jarane 37 Evergreen Way Amended approval – Andrew Druse is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owner. Andrew Druse stated that the rear elevation has slightly changed. He stated that the arches have been eliminated. He also stated that the glazing has been extended to provide additional depth. He reviewed all of the minor changes and briefly summarized the entire project. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 23, 2007 5 �Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the color samples for the stone. Andrew Druse presented the proposed color samples for the roof and stone. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if snow loading would be an issue. Andrew Druse responded that the proposed roof can be modified to allow for snow loading. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the amended application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 7) Cortese Construction Terrace Close New single family construction – Chris Pateman is the designer and presenting this application on behalf of the owners. Chris Pateman stated that there have been no changes to the application from the last presentation to the Board. He stated that all approvals have been secured from the other Boards. The Chair asked the applicant to review the application. Chris Pateman reviewed the proposed application. The Chair opened the public hearing. Richard Weiss (2 Terrace Close) stated that the size of the proposed house is too large for the neighborhood. He stated that the Waterfront Advisory Committee has rejected this application although the Planning Board overturned their decision. He stated that this house is out-of-character with the rest of the houses on the street. Joan Levy-Weiss (2 Terrace Close) stated that this house will present certain environmental issues. She stated that there would be utility poles that would require re-location. She stated that all of these issues were presented to the Village and have been ignored. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Chris Pateman responded that the proposed drainage was increased to comply with all applicable codes. He stated that the cul-de-sac is not being negatively impacted. He stated that all Zoning Codes are being complied with. He also stated that the telephone pole will not need to be relocated. Chris Pateman presented a rendering of the proposed structure. Paul Wichmann stated that the applicant has been very responsive. He stated that the proposed structure is very attractive. He stated that the owner has a right to build on his property. He stated that the proposed structure would be a benefit to the neighborhood. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 23, 2007 6 �Ana Maria McGinnis stated that she cannot vote on this application since she is a direct neighbor. She recused herself from this application. The Chair stated that a quorum is no longer present. He stated that the Board would be unable to act on this application. Chris Pateman requested an adjournment to the next meeting. This application was adjourned to the next meeting. 8) Gibson 58 Hemlock Drive Pergola & Fence – Ana Maria McGinnis is representing this application along with the owner. She recused herself from this application. The Chair stated that a quorum is no longer present. He stated that the Board would be unable to act on this application. Ana Maria McGinnis described the proposed application. She described the proposed fence. She described the proposed landscaping. She also spoke about the proposed pergola over the garage. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 9) Minutes for March and April 2007 meetings The minutes for the March and April 2007 meetings will be reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned at 10:02 pm to the next meeting. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 23, 2007 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2007-05-23 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2007 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/a041f825eea774b691f80b284be194dd.pdf 86b6299e14b40b85b6de690540a2d2a1 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED April 25, 2007 The meeting was called to order by Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman at 8:03 p.m. Present: Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Absent: Carter Sackman David Pysh, Chairman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None. Agenda: 1. Woltman 2. Silverman 3. Serina 4. Rea 5. Hille 6. Dibble 7. Approval of Minutes 1) Woltman 17 Devries Avenue 48 Fremont Road 222 Beekman Avenue 148 Highland Avenue 126 Merlin Ave 311-313 North Broadway March 2007 meeting 17 Devries Avenue Window Replacement Amended approval Amended approval Façade renovation New sidewalks, pillars and windows Discussion Window Replacement - Bobo Woltman is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant is seeking to replace all of the windows in the house with like-kind windows. He stated that one window in the front will be different. He stated that a bow window in proposed in the front. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). �2) Silverman 48 Fremont Road Amended approval There was nobody present for this application. This was continued to the next meeting. 3) Serina 222 Beekman Avenue Amended approval – There was nobody present for this application. This was continued to the next meeting. 4) Rea 144 Highland Avenue New Dormer, windows and façade- Carrie Rea is the owner and is representing this application along with architect, Jon Turnquist. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded no. He stated that this matter can be heard by the Board but no decision can be made until the public is properly noticed. Sean McCarthy summarized the proposed work. He stated that the project is primarily a dormer addition in the front of the house. He also stated that the applicant is changing the existing garage doors and siding. Carrie Rea spoke about the new window in the front of the house. The Board questioned why two double-hung windows were not proposed. Carrie Rea responded that her architect indicated that the two double-hung windows might not be approved. There was an open discussion on how to maximize the windows in the front yard while keeping in character with the neighborhood. The Chair asked about the style of garage doors. Carrie Rea responded that the style will be similar to the existing doors with a maintenance free material. The Board stated that 2-sets of double hung windows could be proposed with a minimum of 12inches between each set. Jon Turnquist responded that the proposed drawing is symmetrical with the second floor windows. He stated that by increasing the windows on the first floor, the symmetry will be lost. Pat Piereson asked if the exterior wall was brick or brick-faced. Carrie Rea responded brick-faced. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, April 25, 2007 2 �Sean McCarthy stated that the windows should be in-line as the door level. Jon Turnquist agreed. Pat Piereson asked for the drawings to be provided in scale. There was another open discussion on how to maximize the first floor window area. Pat Piereson asked if the applicant would prefer a full-height window. Carrie Rea responded that she has a small baby and she is concerned with his safety. Jon Turnquist stated that he will review the Board’s comments and revise the drawings. Pat Piereson made a motion to adjourn this item to the next meeting. The Board asked for a submittal on the garage doors, roof shingles and color selections on the vinyl siding. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 5) Hille 126 Merlin Ave New sidewalks, pillars and windows – Deidre Carstow is the landscape contractor representing this application along with owner, David Hille. The Chair asked if the proof of mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Deidre Carstow discussed the proposed project. She presented photos of the existing conditions to the Board. She stated that New York flagstone will be used for the walkway. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the width of the walkway. Deidre Carstow responded that the width is about 5-feet. Deidre Carstow presented a sample of the proposed stone. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 6) Dibble 315 North Broadway Discussion - Karl Dibble is the owner and is speaking to the Board on this as an informational item. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, April 25, 2007 3 �Karl Dibble submitted a photo of a steel fence on the top of the retaining wall facing the adjacent automotive shop. This will be in lieu of the previously approved split-rail fence. He stated that the fence would be a continuation of the steel gates in the front entranceway. He also stated that this would help with keeping his property secured. Sean McCarthy stated that the proposed fence is not safe. He recommended putting a cap on top of the fence. Karl Dibble agreed. He stated that the fence would be 5-feet tall. The Chair stated that the split rail fence would break-up the steel fence appearance. Karl Dibble responded that since this is set-back from the road, it would not be a long row of fence. It was agreed that the Board would go through some catalog cuts with the applicant and the Building Department to select a more appropriate fence style. It was agreed that the Board will act once a formal application is received. 7) Minutes for March 2007 meetings The minutes for the March 2007 will be reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned at 9:14 pm to the next meeting. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, April 25, 2007 4 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2007-04-25 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2007 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/ee8cd5b3e02ee1d0dfaf166ad034577f.pdf 00bf1e00926de780633fd84fa348a0e7 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED March 28, 2007 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:04 p.m. Present: David Pysh, Chairman Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Absent: Carter Sackman Paul Wichmann Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None. Agenda: 1. Henry Molina 49-51 Chestnut Street 2. John Stroligo 250 Kelbourne Avenue 3. Fernandez DBA D’John Barber Shop 85 Cortlandt St 4. Karl Dibble 311-313 North Broadway 5. Joan Waters/Pasquale Cusanelli 203 Webber Ave 6. Approval of Minutes February 2007 meeting 1) Henry Molina 49-51 Chestnut Street New 2-family dwelling Façade renovation New front door and window Amended sign approval 2nd floor addition New 2-family dwelling - This is a continuation from previous meetings. Jon Turnquist is the project architect and is representing this application along with owner, Henry Molina. Jon Turnquist summarized the changes. He stated that the roofline was changed to reflect the Board’s comments. He described the front entrance for the Board. He stated that the staircase and front door were not changed to be centered. He stated that the location of the fire hydrant and the entrance stairs were relocated to the other side of the house. He stated that the stairs should not be centered. Henry Molina stated that the other comments from the Board’s last meeting were incorporated. The Board had no comments on the revised application. The Chair stated that the presented drawing should be approved by the Board. �Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 2) John Stroligo 250 Kelbourne Avenue Façade renovation - This is a continuation from previous meetings. Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application along with owner, John Stroligo. Sam Vieira summarized the proposed color selections. He submitted a color board to the Board. He stated that the dentils have been removed. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the Board feels that the proposed work is too massive. Sam Vieira responded that it is difficult to connect the two front windows to the main door. Pat Piereson stated that if the front windows were grounded, the entryway would look better. Sam Vieira responded that the windows have a certain scale associated with the front of the house. He stated that he is concerned with filling in the extra spaces with too much trim and fill. The Chair stated that the Board would like to see some minor improvements that can be done quite easily. Sam Vieira responded that a lot of time went into the details of this project. John Stroligo stated that this is the design that he chose. The Chair stated that the applicant wants this style of entryway but the Board feels that there are changes that should be made. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 3) Fernandez DBA D’John Barber Shop 85 Cortlandt St New front door and window – John Fernandez is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. John Fernandez stated that he wants to change the front entrance door to resemble the adjacent business. He also wants to add a picture window in the front. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the applicant needs to return with a drawing to properly show the proposed store front window so that the Board can see what they are approving. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 28, 2007 2 �This was adjourned to the next meeting. 4) Karl Dibble 311-313 North Broadway Amended sign approval - Karl Dibble is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Karl Dibble stated that he wants to change the sign that was previously approved by the Board. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the Board would like to see the sign resemble the shape of the green “MountainView Scapes “sign. Karl Dibble responded that he wants to change the colors of the sign as well as the shape. The Chair asked why there were different companies operating on the same property all owned by one owner. Karl Dibble responded that there are different parcels of land and they are operating differently. Karl Dibble described the layout of property. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the sign would look like a wishing well. Karl Dibble responded that the sign would be a creative improvement compared to many of the existing signs in the area. Sean McCarthy asked if the area below the sign would be a planter. Karl Dibble responded that he would have to eliminate the roof of the structure. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson stated that the white background tends to weather faster. She stated that a light gray would blend better. The Chair asked about the size limitations of the sign. Sean McCarthy stated that the entire structure that holds the sign requires approval. The Chair made a motion to keep the original shape of the “River Rock Supply Corp” sign but allow changes to the color as submitted. The approval would allow for an increase in base dimension. Also, the proposed changes to the “Mountain View Scapes” sign are approved as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 28, 2007 3 �5) Joan Waters & Pasquale Cusanelli 203 Webber Ave 2nd floor addition – Dorota Szvem is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Dorota Szvem stated that the owners want to add a 2nd floor addition to the existing residence. She stated that some of the changes include adding a small sum room on the first floor and increasing the width of the driveway. The Chair asked if the brick was real brick or veneer. Pasquale Cusanelli responded real brick. Dorota Szvem described the exterior trim materials and colors. She stated that the finishes will be determined based on the price. Pat Piereson responded that the Board needs to understand the proposed materials before approving the application. The Chair asked about the window #10. Dorota Szvem responded that the window would give the owners a view of people approaching the house and will also provide additional sunlight. There was an open discussion on allowing the proposed materials while allowing the applicant to return once the colors are selected. Pat Piereson asked about the posts on the side elevation. Dorota Szvem stated that the post would be very simple post with a small amount of trim at the bottom. The Chair noted that there was no public present. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 6) Minutes for February 2007 meetings The minutes for the February 2007 were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). Adjourned at 9:35 pm to the next meeting. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 28, 2007 4 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2007-03-28 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2007 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/c018947707fd8efd079ba71fe529763b.pdf 82c45bdf11269f6258948d1b9892f17a PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED February 28, 2007 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:01 p.m. Present: David Pysh, Chairman Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Carter Sackman Absent: Paul Wichmann Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None. Agenda: 1. Approval of Minutes 2. Sleepy Hollow Cemetery Community Mausoleum 3. Sleepy Hollow Bank 4. Legends Realty 5. Molina 6. Stroligo November 2006, January 2007 meeting 520 North Broadway Amended façade approval 48 Beekman Avenue 358 No. Broadway 49-51 Chestnut Street 250 Kelbourne Avenue New fence Signage New 2-family dwelling Façade renovation 1) Minutes for November 2006 and January 2007 meetings The minutes for the November 2006 and January 2007 were reviewed. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) (McGinnis absent). 2) Sleepy Hollow Cemetery Ed Napoleon is representing this application on behalf of the cemetery. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ed Napoleon stated that the owners want to make a change from concrete to granite on the finish arches for the cloisters. �Pat Piereson asked about the original finishes. Ed Napoleon responded that the original finish was made of limestone. He stated that the limestone would not hold up as well over time. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if cost was a factor. Ed Napoleon responded that this is only based on aesthetics. The Chair asked the Board how they felt about the mausoleum and the chapel/office not being matching aesthetically as was presented in the original presentation. The Board agreed that the proposed change is aesthetically acceptable. Ed Napoleon stated that there are 10 arches in total that would be changed. Pat Piereson stated that the original application is more appealing. Ana Maria McGinnis agreed. The Chair stated that the thinner material makes the building appear less substantial. The Chair opened the public hearing. Dave Logan (Sleepy Hollow Cemetery Board member) stated that there were 3 original materials that were proposed. He discussed the existing limestone currently on the property. He stated that the existing maintenance is difficult. He stated that the granite product would last longer than the approved concrete product. Carter Sackman stated that concrete over time would also require patching. He stated that the granite is a more practical material over time. Tom Mullen (contractor) stated that a lighter color granite could be used to provide a more comparable match to the chapel/office. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sean McCarthy asked if the granite could be used with a keyed-in appearance in order to provide a more authentic arch. Carter Sackman stated that if the product was thicker, it would be a closer match. The Chair stated that the granite should be thicker, keyed-in and more contrasted. Ed Napoleon asked for an adjournment so that the applicant can provide more information. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 28, 2007 2 �This was adjourned to the next meeting. 3) Sleepy Hollow National Bank – There was nobody present for this application. It was agreed that this item would be adjourned to the next meeting. 4) Legends Realty Marcene Hedayati is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Marcene Hedayati stated that there is only one door on this side of the building. She stated that the awning would allow the entrance to the business to stand out since it is separate from the main lobby. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 5) Molina Henry Molina is the owner and is representing this application. Henry Molina summarized the application to date. He stated that the previous structure burned down and it is now an empty lot. He stated that the proposed structure is a 2family structure. He reviewed the proposed layout of the building. Ana Maria McGinnis asked why the front stairs would not be located in front of the main door. Henry Molina responded that a fire hydrant is located in that area. Henry Molina presented samples of the proposed siding and other exterior submittals. He proposed two colors for the shutters. He also spoke about the trim colors, roofing materials and building exterior products. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 28, 2007 3 �The Chair asked about the types of exteriors on the adjacent houses. Henry Molina responded that the adjacent houses have vinyl and aluminum siding. The Chair stated that the rear roofing configuration needs to change. Sean McCarthy responded that the gables are different. He stated that the roof pitches would be different. He stated that the proposed roof angles are attempting to keep the roof angles similar. The Chair opened the public hearing. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sean McCarthy asked if the lattice in the front would wrap around the front. Henry Molina responded yes. The Chair stated that the front porch steps should be moved to align with the front door. The Chair also stated that the roof line be amended so that the rear ridge line runs continuously from the west face of the house to the east face of the house and that the front roof line intersect it. Any detailing noted as wood would be substituted as Azek®. It was also agreed that the applicant will return with details on the front porch columns and railings. It was also noted that the windows would be trimmed in Azek® as well. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 6) Stroligo Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sam Vieira stated that the exterior of the house has deteriorated. He stated that the proposed exterior would be wood. He discussed the changes to the windows and shutters. He spoke about the widening of the driveway. He stated that the existing driveway is narrow and is bound by a retaining wall. He spoke about the changes to the front of the house. The changes included changes to the front door and associated trim as well as the area near the garage door. Lastly, he stated that the exterior would be a cut stone veneer. Carter Sackman asked about the pitch of the roof. Sam Vieira responded that the roof pitch shown is accurate. He stated that the existing roof is not changing. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 28, 2007 4 �Carter Sackman asked about the height of the new windows. Sam Vieira responded that the new windows are larger. He stated that the window sizes need to meet the new code requirements for egress. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the proposed colors. Sam Vieira responded that the Board did not usually require colors. He stated that the owners are not present to discuss the color selections. There was an open discussion on the color selections. Pat Piereson asked about the dentils on the main cornice. Sam Vieira responded that he wanted to add some dimensionality to the house. He discussed the changes that the owners want to make. Carter Sackman suggested adding white panels below the windows in the front elevation. Sam Vieira responded that this suggestion was explored. He also stated that the owners have made decisions regarding new and existing features. Pat Piereson asked about increasing the width of the windows in the front. Sam Vieira responded that the bathroom windows in the front cannot be made larger due to the configuration of the powder room. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there was no public present, the Chair closed the public hearing. This was adjourned to the next meeting so that the applicant can review the Board’s comments and provide sample materials, color schemes and additional information on the dentils. Adjourned to the next meeting. Adjourned at 9:20 p.m. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 28, 2007 5 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2007-02-28 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2007 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/33fc5a8f8ed2456b1ec96d65e1a350da.pdf c010b743824e5bc1112e6a2038aa87db PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED January 24, 2007 The meeting was called to order by Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman at 8:07 p.m. Present: Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Carter Sackman Absent: David Pysh, Chairman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None. Agenda: 1. Cepin – Lighthouse Realty 2. Duchi 3. Perez 4. Sleepy Hollow Bank 5. Feliciano 6. Cacanindin 7. Zachensky 8. Leavy 9. Molina 10. Lighthouse Landing 11. Approval of Minutes 224 Beekman Ave Amended sign approval 163 Depeyster Avenue Fence replacement 185 Cortlandt Street Signage 48 Beekman Avenue New fence 26 Kendall Ave Conditions of approval 16 Bedford Road Amended approval 27 Amos Street New Shed 4 Millard Avenue Addition and Alteration 49-51 Chestnut Street New 2-family dwelling Comments to the Village Trustees November 2006 meeting 1) Cepin - Lighthouse Realty This is a continuation from previous meetings. Irvin Ortiz is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owners. Irvin Ortiz described the Department of State requirements for signage. He stated that the phrase “of Westchester” will be added to the sign. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. �Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 2) Duchi This is a continuation from previous meetings. Joan Duchi stated that the fence was installed but taken down since it was installed without approvals. She presented photos for the Board. Sean McCarthy asked if the fence would be crossing the driveway. Joan Duchi responded that there would be a gate. The Chair stated that the fence needs to swing into the property and not out to the street. Joan Duchi responded that she understood. There was an open discussion on the height of the gate. It was agreed the gate can only be 3-feet high. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the application with the condition that the fence is 3-feet high and opens into the driveway. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) Perez There was nobody present for this application. It was agreed that since the applicant was not providing the Board with the required information, this item would be removed from the agenda. 4) Sleepy Hollow National Bank – There was nobody present for this application. It was agreed that this item would be adjourned to the next meeting. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 24, 2007 2 �5) Feliciano This is a continuation from previous meetings. Sean McCarthy stated that this application was approved in November 2006 with the condition that the applicant returns with siding samples. Mark Casis is representing this application along with the owners. Mark Casis presented exterior samples to the Board. They included siding samples with trim. Since this application was previously approved, the Chair stated that there is no need to open the public hearing. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) Cacanindin This is a continuation from the previous meetings. Richard Blancato is the attorney representing this application. Richard Blancato stated that during construction, the site needed to be stabilized. He submitted three photographs to the Board. He stated that the shale should remain to stabilize the site. He stated that the tree stump was never intended to be removed since it stabilized the area. He stated to remove the stump would be too costly. Lastly, he stated that the neighbor’s wall has not even been touched during construction. He presented photos of the site. The Chair stated that when the construction stated, he contacted the Building Department with concerns about soil erosion. Hernane Ve Almeida stated that the property line extends to the neighbors shed. Carter Sackman stated that the property line issue is not before the Board. Pat Piereson stated that she disagrees. She stated that the neighbor’s property concerns need to be addressed. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant is before the Board to address the issues about the wall. He stated that it has a visual impact to the road. Carter Sackman stated that the engineering aspect of the walls should not be before the Board. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant is here to address all of the issues. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 24, 2007 3 �Pat Piereson asked if the second wall was installed during construction. Richard Blancato responded yes. Emilio Escalades responded that the wall needed to be installed based on the type of soil on the site. He stated that the second-tier was created to break-up the height of the walls. Carter Sackman asked if the third-tiered wall structurally sound. Sean McCarthy responded that the applicant’s engineer has certified that the wall is sound. Richard Blancato stated that the wall needs to be looked at for aesthetics only. The Chair stated that he visited the site. He stated that there could be issues with the neighbor’s property. He stated that the fence is not shown on the photos. Richard Blancato responded that the photos show what is installed, what is proposed and what the property would look like with the second wall extended to the property line. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the location of the property line. Hernane Ve Almeida showed where the property line was located. The Chair opened the public hearing. Anthony DelVecchio (22 Bedford Road) stated that his property line extends 4-feet beyond the shed. He stated that he wants his property restored to the pre-construction condition. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant has been asked to produce an as-built topography survey to compare to the one on file with the Building Department. Sean McCarthy also noted that the issue regarding noticing the adjacent property owner from the last meeting has been resolved. Since there was no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman stated that the plantings should be used to hide the shale. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that pachysandra should be planted as well. She also stated that the arborvitae should be hedged in the front. Richard Blancato stated that the applicant needs to move in immediately. Sean McCarthy stated that a bond might be required in order to ensure that the applicant completes the required outstanding items. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the conditions that ground cover, arborvitae and pachysandra should be installed in lieu of extending the wall. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 24, 2007 4 �7) Zachensky Steve Zachensky is the owner and is presenting this application. The Chair asked if proof of mailings had been received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Steve Zachensky presented photos to the Board to show the proposed location of the shed. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the shed would be pre-built. Steve Zachensky responded that it would be pre-built. The Chair asked about the siding on the existing house. Steve Zachensky responded that the house has vinyl siding. He stated that the shed exterior would match the house siding. He stated that the roof would be shingled also. Carter Sackman asked about the use of the shed. Steve Zachensky stated that the shed would be used for personal storage. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Leavy John Leavy is the applicant and is representing this application. The Chair asked if proof of mailings had been received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. John Leavy described the proposed changes. He stated that the proposed addition is a two-story addition. Sean McCarthy stated that a bulk of the work is in the rear of the house since the lot is very wide. John Leavy stated that the house is a Tudor-style house and the existing finishes would be matched. The Chair opened the public hearing. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 24, 2007 5 �Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman stated that there is little impact to the street. He made a motion to approve as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 9) Molina The applicant was not prepared to make a presentation to the Board. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 10) Lighthouse Landing – Andy Tung is presenting this application along with developer, Jon Stein and project architect, John Jenkins. Andy Tung stated that the applicant is here based on a referral from the Village Trustees. Andy Tung discussed the amended riverfront development plan. He showed the relocation of the soccer field and the multi-use parking center. He also spoke about the reconfiguration of the Beekman Ave and River Street intersection. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the addition of a building on the entranceway of the parcel. Jon Stein stated that some people thought that there was a gap at the Beekman Avenue connection. He spoke about the proposed zoning amendment and its changes on the site. Andy Tung spoke about the new entrance into Kingsland Point Park. Carter Sackman asked about Building R. Andy Tung responded that Building R is the hotel. Pat Piereson stated that the waterside part of Building M are townhouses. Jon Stein responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked who would maintain the donated green space. Jon Stein responded that the Village would have to maintain. He stated that the applicant has performed a fiscal impact analysis of the development and according to their calculations, there would be a $630K surplus for the Village. Carter Sackman asked if the existing slabs would remain. Andy Tung responded that the existing slabs would be removed to create residential parking under the town homes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 24, 2007 6 �Pat Piereson asked if the applicant could open up the area near Building M. She stated that the restaurant would be abutting townhouses. Carter Sackman stated that the waterfront is not designed as a destination point for a long period of time. He also stated that there should be a residential component above the retail on the waterfront. Jon Stein responded that the DEIS contained that component but in response to Village comments on traffic and parking, this was modified. He stated that the retail has been reduced from 185,000sf to 130,000sf in response to public concerns. Carter Sackman stated that the shopping component on the waterfront should be memorable so that people want to return. He asked about the retail buildings. Jon Stein responded Building B, D, G, H, L, M and R. He stated that the original DEIS included many of the Board’s comments. There was an open discussion on the number of rentals and condo units. Carter Sackman stated that there should be more retail on the site. There was an open discussion on the potential traffic impacts Andy Tung spoke about the establishment of the design guidelines. He stated that the Board should comment on the proposed plan and the design guidelines. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board should provide comments and recommendations to the Village Trustees. There was an open discussion on the height of the buildings on the site. The applicant reviewed the building heights on the site. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board will provide comments on the design concepts. He stated that the specifics will be discussed at latter meetings. Carter Sackman stated that he would not want to see the tops of other buildings. He asked if the roofs would connect. Sean McCarthy responded that the roofs would vary throughout the parcel. The Chair stated that the South end of the parcel needs to have some improvements. The Chair asked about the elevation of the bridge. Sean McCarthy responded about 50-feet. The Chair stated that the views of the River would still exist at the bridge. Pat Piereson asked about the biggest concern with the DEIS. Jon Stein responded that traffic was the largest concern. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 24, 2007 7 �Carter Sackman asked about the square footage of residential space. Jon Stein responded 1.6 million square feet. Ana Maria made a motion for the Board to provide written comments to the Board by February 2, 2007. The Board agreed that a work session would be held to provide comments to the Village Trustees. It was agreed that a work session would be held on Saturday, January 28, 2007 at 8am. 11) Minutes for November 2006 meeting The minutes for the November 2006 meeting would be reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned to the next meeting. Adjourned at 11:01 p.m. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 24, 2007 8 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2007-01-24 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2007 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/568633f2a1af6e56d8ca8f933ec13a9c.pdf 475791b446e0f04d06699263ccb7374f PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED November 30, 2006 The meeting was called to order by Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman at 8:00 p.m. Present: Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman David Pysh Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Carter Sackman Absent: None Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: Sean McCarthy stated that the Henry Molina application will not be on the agenda this evening. Agenda: 1. Approval of Minutes 2. Election of a Chairman 3. Feliciano 4. Phillipse Professional Bldg 5. Sleepy Hollow Bank 6. D’John Barber Shop 7. Perez 8. Cepin 9. Duchi 10. Fina 11. Cacanindin 12. Jarane 13. Castro 14. Other Oct 2006 meeting 26 Kendal Avenue 358 North Broadway 48 Beekman Avenue 85 Cortlandt Street 185 Cortlandt Street 224 Beeman Avenue 163 Depeyster Avenue 23 Evergreen Way 16 Bedford Road 37 Evergreen Way 465 Munroe Avenue Alteration & addition New Awnings New fence New awning Signage Signage Fence replacement Amended approval Amended approval Alteration & Addition Screened in rear porch 1) Minutes for October 2006 meeting - David Pysh made a motion to approve the October 2006 minutes as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 2) Election of Chairman– The Board elected David Pysh as the Chairman. �It was agreed that Paul Wichmann would be the Chairman until December 30, 2006. The Board agreed that David Pysh would be Chairman effective January 1, 2007. 3) Feliciano – This is a continuation from previous meetings. Mark Casis is representing this application along with the owners. Mark Casis reviewed the changes to the plans. He stated that the original entrance was kept to coincide with other homes in the area. He stated that the dormers were added as per the Board’s suggestions. Carter Sackman asked about the depth of the change in the roofline. Mark Casis responded 1’-6” in the front and the back. Pat Piereson asked about the normal setbacks on a roof of this type. She questioned if 1’-6” is sufficient based on the size of the house. David Pysh asked if the projection of the eaves could be larger. Sean McCarthy responded that the eaves can be 18” before they are counted in the setback requirements. David Pysh asked if the applicant would object to increasing the lower eave projection from 1’-6” to 2’-0”. Mark Casis responded that the applicant would not object. There was an open discussion on adding some trim on the windows on the first floor. Mark Casis requested an approval to start the addition and return for the window trim before the siding work starts. The Board agreed. Carter Sackman stated that the applicant should return with sill details. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application with the condition that the setback on the front and rear roofline be increased to 2’-0” and the applicant is to return with window trim details prior to installing the siding. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2006 2 �4) Phillipse Professional Building Antonio Rodrigues is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Antonio Rodrigues stated that he wants to install fabric awnings on the building. He presented a color chart to the Board. The Chair asked about the projection of the awning. Antonio Rodriguez responded 18-inches. The Chair asked about the frame material. Antonio Rodrigues responded that the frame would be aluminum. Antonio Rodrigues stated that one of his tenants wants to put his name on the awning. There was an open discussion on whether to allow the applicant to install signage directly on the windows similar to the window signage on 362 North Broadway. Antonio Rodrigues stated that if the name is not allowed on the awning, he would not install the awnings. He stated that the tenant wants gold lettering also. Pat Piereson stated that if the gold lettering were installed on the front door, it would have a better appearance than having lettering on only one of the six proposed awnings. Carter Sackman stated that the application before the Board is only for awnings and not for lettering. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the awnings as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). The Board agreed that if lettering is proposed, the applicant should present lettering on the awning and the door in order to expedite the approval. 5) Sleepy Hollow National Bank Nicole Edlich is representing this application on behalf of the owners. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2006 3 �Nicole Edlich stated that the stockade fence is proposed to supplement the existing chain link fence. She stated that fence would be installed on both sides. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Pat Piereson stated that debris would accumulate in the gap between the fences. The Chair stated that a better proposal should be made. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. David Pysh stated that the proposed solution is not the best solution. Nicole Edlich asked the Board for recommendations. Carter Sackman stated that many vinyl fences will provide an attractive fence that will be low maintenance and easy to replace. The Chair stated that PVC fences would also be acceptable. The Board agreed that the applicant should return with new information. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 6) D’John Barber Shop/Fernandez This is a continuation from previous meetings. John Fernandez presented revised information to the Board. He also presented a sample of the proposed material and color. The Chair noted that the public hearing was held at the previous meeting. Pat Piereson stated that the lettering other than the barber shop lettering is to be removed. She also stated that the address 85 Cortlandt Street is centered. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 7) Perez – There was nobody present to represent this application. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2006 4 �8) Cepin Irving Ortiz is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Irving Ortiz stated that the owners are proposing a sign to promote their new business. He discussed the proposed signage fonts and colors. Pat Piereson asked about the height of lettering on a sign. Sean McCarthy responded 18-inches. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Irving Ortiz asked the Board to increase the lettering by ½” to round off the lettering. The Board agreed that the proposed sign is acceptable as proposed. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the amended sketch that was submitted to the Board at the meeting. The sketch is dated 11-27-06. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 9) Duchi George Duchi is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. George Duchi stated that a metal fence is being proposed above an existing stone wall. David Pysh stated that the submission is inadequate. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant was installing the iron fence without the Board’s approval. He stated that the fence was taken down. He stated that the proposed fence is 3-foot high. The Board stated that the applicant should provide photos of the proposed fence for the Board to better understand what is proposed. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to adjourn this application to the next meeting so the applicant can provide photos. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2006 5 �10) Fina Pat Steinschneider is the project architect and is representing this application along with Barbara Fina. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Pat Steinschneider stated that this is an amended approval. He stated that the scope of the project has been slightly reduced. He reviewed the changes. The changes included the reduction of size of the front dormer, eliminated the front porch and reduced the expansion in the rear of the property. He stated that all of the exterior finishes will remain the same except for the roofing materials. He stated that the house will have a new roof. Pat Piereson stated that the proposed roofline seems overwhelming. She stated that there is no break in the roofline. Pat Steinschneider responded that the other houses in the neighborhood have similar roofing styles. He stated that the proposed roof in is proportion to other neighboring houses. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. The approved materials are: Timberline shingles (architectural series) – weathered wood color. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 11) Cacanindin Hernane Ve Almeida is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded the mailings were not properly made. Hernane Ve Almeida stated that the mailings were attempted today but the owner was not available. There was an open discussion on how to move the application forward. It was agreed that the applicant would present the changes to the Board and not make a decision this evening so that the neighbor can be properly noticed. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2006 6 �Hernane Ve Almeida reviewed the proposed changes. He stated that the window grilles and shutters were installed. He stated that the door on the garage level was modified to accommodate site conditions. He spoke about the proposed stockade fence. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the fence should match the existing iron fence. Carter Sackman asked about the Planning Board’s direction on the fence. Sean McCarthy responded that Planning Board approval was not required under the Village code at the time of the application. The Chair stated that a 3-foot high railing is needed. He stated that any wall over 6-feet high should be fenced. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the exposed stone on the left side. She also stated that the landscaping is unkept. Hernane Ve Almeida responded that the area can be better landscaped in the spring. The Chair opened the public hearing. Choppi Alejandro of 15 Hudson Terrace stated that his property is negatively affected by the swale that the applicant created in the rear of the property. Hernane Ve Almeida responded that the stormwater issues are not before the Board. Sean McCarthy stated that these issues will be addressed prior to issuing a Certificate of Occupancy. Anthony DelVecchio of 22 Bedford Road stated that he is concerned with the erosion of his property that has resulted from the adjacent construction. He stated that his property needs to be restored to the pre-construction condition. He expressed concerns over the tiered retaining wall system. Carter Sackman stated that there are more than three items that need to be addressed. He stated that a larger retaining wall was originally approved. He stated that the retaining walls should be addressed by the Board since they were not part of the original approval. He stated that the engineering of the wall does not fall within the jurisdiction of this Board. The Chair asked about the authority of the Building Department on this matter. Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant has been notified of this problem. He stated that if the applicant does not follow the Board’s approval, he can issue a violation to the property owner. He stated that a Certificate of Occupancy cannot be issued without the applicant complying with the approval of this Board. Carter Sackman stated that it is the responsibility of the owner to not adversely impact the neighbor’s property. He stated that the Board should keep to matters that are within their jurisdiction. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2006 7 �Anthony DelVecchio stated that the appearance of the front of the property should be improved. He stated that there is a tree stump left in the front yard. He stated that there is some crushed shale in the front yard that is not appealing. Sean McCarthy stated that there is a large list of issues that the applicant needs to resolve prior to having a Certificate of Occupancy issued. Pat Piereson stated that the resolution of the presented issues should be part of the amended approval. Carter Sackman stated that the matter is before the Building Department and should not be before this Board. David Pysh stated that that the 3 presented issues could be addressed tonight and an additional two more issues should be added. He stated that the Board should not go beyond their limitations. The Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the louver as submitted. She also stated that the railings should match the existing. She stated that any issues on the eastern side of this property need to return to the Board to address the aesthetics. There was no second. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the door by the garage, the new louver and to submit plans to extend the east side retaining wall on the 2nd elevation to the eastern most property line which borders the 3rd elevation wall. He stated that the applicant must install a wrought iron fence on all retaining walls. Additionally, the tree stump in the front yard is to be removed, install arborvitae in the front yard at 3-feet on center between the 1st tier stone face retaining wall and 2nd tier retaining wall and remove the stone from the curb. The revised plans are to be presented to the Board. The Chair seconded subject to having Larry Doyle provide notice that he does not object to the proposed changes and revised plans. It was unanimous (4-0 Pysh absent). 12) Jarane Andrew Dreuse is the project architect and is presenting this application along with the owner. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Andrew Dreuse reviewed the proposed plans. He reviewed the existing house and compared it to the proposed addition. Carter Sackman stated that the application should read 15,000sf and not 1,500sf. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2006 8 �Andrew Druese spoke about the proposed materials. He stated that exterior would be stucco and cultured stone. He proposed a sample of the proposed roof material and color. He spoke about the garage doors and presented the proposed garage door color and finish. Pat Piereson asked about the color of the stucco. Andrew Dreuse indicated the proposed color on the submitted sample board. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the stone skirt is needed. Andrew Dreuse responded that the stone breaks-up the amount of stucco needed. There was an open discussion on the combination of the proposed materials. The Chair opened the public hearing. Carlo Vecchi (35 Evergreen Way) stated that he is only concerned that the existing Norway spruce remains. He stated that he approves of the proposed project. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. David Pysh asked if the material selection is what the applicant wants. Andrew Dreuse responded that the applicant is open to suggestions as a condition of the approval. The Chair made a motion to approve as submitted. There was no second. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the house would look better without the stone band. Miss Jarane stated that the stone band is used on many homes in the area. David Pysh made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the applicant returns to the Board with the specific samples of the materials to be used for the roof, stone, stucco and wood. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 13) Castro – Andrea Castro is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Andrea Castro stated that she removed the existing porch. She stated that the proposed porch would be constructed to blend in with the existing house. She discussed the proposed material selection. She presented photos of the proposed porch. She presented samples of the proposed roofing materials. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2006 9 �The Chair noted that there was no public present. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 14) Other The Board agreed that there would not be a December 2006 meeting. The Chair made a motion to adjourn. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). This was adjourned to the next meeting. Adjourned at 11:00 p.m. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 30, 2006 10 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2006 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2006-11-30 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2006 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2006 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/291f847bb4da2cfce664a15beaa3479d.pdf a4200c40669bc425e1fde36e83513177 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED October 25, 2006 The meeting was called to order by Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman at 8:05 p.m. Present: Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman David Pysh Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1. Approval of Minutes 2. Henman 3. Correia 4. Starkey 5. H. Molina 6. D’John Barber Shop 7. Feliciano 8. Ribeiro 9. Dugan 10. Sleepy Hollow Cemetery 11. Other 12. Election of a Chairman June and July 2006 meeting 126 Harwood Avenue Alter façade 2 Millard Avenue New retaining wall & driveway 199 Webber Avenue Window alteration 49-51 Chestnut Street New 2-family residence 85 Cortlandt Street New awning 26 Kendal Avenue Alteration & addition 56 Howard Avenue Alteration & addition 138 Merlin Avenue Alteration & addition 540 North Broadway Continuation Announcements: None. 1) Minutes for June and July 2006 meetings - David Pysh made a motion to approve the June 2006 minutes as amended. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). David Pysh made a motion to approve the July 2006 minutes as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 2) David Henman– David Henman is the owner and is presenting this application. Sean McCarthy stated that the mailings were received by the Village. �David Henman stated that the current windows are not appealing to him. He stated that the windows would all match. He stated that the second floor roof pitch would be slightly elevated to create an incline to help prevent leaks in the roof. He reviewed the proposed awning window that would be installed. David Pysh asked the applicant if the membrane roof would be visible from the street. David Henman responded that it should not be visible from the street. Sean McCarthy asked if the existing parapet would be lowered. David Henman responded that the parapet would be lowered by 10-inches. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the application as submitted. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) Correia Joe Bertilino is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. Sean McCarthy stated that the mailings were received by the Village. Joe Bertilino described the proposed project. He stated that the owners want to relocate the existing retaining wall to add an additional parking space in the driveway. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the standard parking space size. Sean McCarthy responded 9’ x 18’. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the amount of blacktop should be reduced. Pat Piereson asked if any of the neighbors had a problem with the proposed work. Joe Bertilino responded no. Sean McCarthy asked about the maximum height of the wall. Joe Bertilino responded 4-5 feet. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the asphalt should only be extended far enough to accommodate a car. David Pysh stated that the asphalt should only extend to the house. He stated that the remaining area should have pavers. The Chair opened the public hearing. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 25, 2006 2 �Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the condition that the asphalt extends to the end of the house. The remaining area would have flagstone pavers installed. The width of the proposed driveway is acceptable. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Starkey David Starkey is the owner and is representing this application. Sean McCarthy stated that the mailings were received by the Village. David Starkey stated that his bedroom only has one window. He stated that he is proposing to replace the bedroom window and add an additional window. He also presented an alternative rendering to the Board. The rendering showed a space between the two windows. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. David Pysh made a motion to approve the application as presented in the alternative rendering. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 5) Molina – There was nobody here to represent this application. 6) D’John Barber Shop John Fernandez is the owner and is presenting this application. Sean McCarthy stated that the mailings were received by the Village. John Fernandez stated that he owns the barber shop and wants to install a new awning. He presented a rendering to the Board. The Chair stated that phone numbers are not allowed on the awning. Sean McCarthy asked if the business would be a barber shop or a taxi service. He stated that only one business could operate at this address. John Fernandez responded that the barber shop would be the only business operating at this address. The Chair asked if the awning was a cloth awning. John Fernandez responded yes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 25, 2006 3 �The Chair asked if there were other awnings in the neighborhood. John Fernandez describes other awnings in the area. There was an open discussion on what materials that the Board needs from the applicant in order to make a decision. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that the Board would like to see an awning that is similar to other awnings in the immediate area. Pat Piereson stated that there are many different colors of awnings on Beekman Avenue. She stated that the awning shape is important. David Pysh stated that the awning shape should be an expression of ownership. The Chair stated that he would like to see the other awnings in the area. John Fernandez stated that he had digital photos of the awnings on his camera. He showed the Board the nearby awnings on his digital camera. The Board reviewed the digital images on the camera. Sean McCarthy stated that the awning on the opposite corner (89 Cortlandt Street) is in poor condition due to the excess wear and tear from being exposed to the high winds that exist at this intersection. Pat Piereson asked the applicant to provide a make-up of the proposed lettering, colors and materials for the Board to review. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 7) Feliciano Mark Casis is the project contractor and is representing this application along with owner. Sean McCarthy stated that the mailings were received by the Village. Mark Casis spoke about the proposed changes. He stated that the house will be squared off to make better use of the dwelling unit. He stated that the siding would match the existing. David Pysh asked if the ridge would be elevated. Mark Casis responded that the ridge would be extended by 5-feet. He stated that the height cannot he altered since the Zoning Board approved the application with the proposed height. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 25, 2006 4 �Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the roof pitch should be elevated to match other houses in the area. The Chair asked if the side walls would be lowered to raise the roof pitch. Mark Casis responded that the height is needed to maintain the living space in the attic. There was an open discussion on how to increase the roof pitch. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the exterior is too monolithic. Pat Piereson stated that the house is like a box. She stated that other houses in the area have a porch or some kind of architectural feature. She stated that the proposed renovations have taken all of that away. The Chair asked if there is an issue with a projection in the front. Sean McCarthy responded that a projection in the front would increase the building coverage and the front yard setback. David Pysh stated that the existing roofline should be maintained to keep in character with other houses in the neighborhood. He also stated that the applicants design would be enhanced by bringing the renovated attic space inward by 2-feet all around. He also stated that the windows in the attic space should be changed to allow more light to enter. He also stated that the addition of vestibule would enhance the front of the house. Mark Casis presented the vinyl siding and roof materials to the Board. He stated that the siding would be vinyl but have a clapboard appearance. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 8) Ribeiro Sam Vieira is the project contractor and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. Sean McCarthy stated that the mailings were received by the Village. Sam Vieira summarized the application to date. He spoke about the proposed additions. He stated that the roof pitches and height are not changing. He spoke about the existing cedar siding that would be replaced with vinyl siding to match the existing vinyl siding. He stated that the existing roofing would be replaced. He also spoke about the new side entrance. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 25, 2006 5 �The Chair stated that the siding hangs over the existing brick. He stated that the two should be separated. Sam Vieira responded that a frieze board would be added to differentiate from the two materials. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. David Pysh made a motion to approve the application with the condition that the applicant use wood for all of the soffits and fascias and add the frieze board to separate the vinyl and brick exteriors. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 9) Dugan Brian Dugan is the owner and is representing this application. Sean McCarthy stated that the mailings were received by the Village. Brian Dugan spoke about the proposed changes. He stated that all of the windows are going to be changed. He spoke about the changes to the roof. He spoke about the proposed changes to the front of the house. He stated that the color of the windows is important to match the existing trim. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson stated that the proposed changes are very well done. The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the following materials: 1) All existing exterior materials to remain. 2) Windows are casement style, clad exterior, simulated divided light. Color to be dark brown to match the existing trim. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 10) Sleepy Hollow Cemetery This is a continuation from previous meetings. Ed Napoleon is representing this application on behalf of the cemetery. Ed Napoleon stated that the drawings have been brought up to construction grade. He stated that all of the Board’s comments have been addressed. Ed Napoleon reviewed the crypt covers and other materials. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 25, 2006 6 �The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. David Pysh stated that the two low profile vents on the south elevation should be relocated to the east side of the roof. The Chair stated that the poured coping reference is vague. Ed Napoleon stated that the appearance of the coping would match the chapel office. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application with clear glass instead of the proposed art glass on the chapel window and the two low profile vents on the south elevation should be relocated to the east side of the roof. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 11) Other The November 2006 meeting date will be moved to November 30, 2006. 12) Election of a Chairman There was an open discussion on the responsibilities of being the Chairman. David Pysh stated that the Chairman should coordinate the Board’s views with the other Village Boards. There was an open discussion on the Board’s rules and procedures. The Board agreed to meet at 7:30pm for a work session on November 30, 2006. The Chair made a motion to adjourn. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). This was adjourned to the next meeting. Adjourned at 10:04 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 25, 2006 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2006 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2006-10-25 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2006 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2006 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/2f1853dd3a0c99abd285b14c2c21e51e.pdf 748f3af646a37614a82349e92189bc35 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED July 26, 2006 The meeting was called to order by Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman at 8:05 p.m. Present: Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman David Pysh Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Dwight Douglas (Village Administrator/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Announcements: Sean McCarthy stated that the Sleepy Hollow Cemetery will not be on the agenda this evening. Agenda: 1. Mountco Development Corp. 2. Seiler 3. Nuevo Financial Center 4. Wompa 5. Tappan Zee Dance Group 6. Approval of Minutes 7. Cai Valley Street Senior Housing 7 Millard Avenue 2-story addition & garage 76 Beekman Avenue Awning 539 Riverside Drive Window & door 362 North Broadway Sign March, May and June 2006 meetings 21 Fremont Road Amended approval 1) Mountco Development Corp.– This is a continuation from previous meetings. Kyle McGovern is representing this application along with Neil Connuck, project architect Hugo Subitowski and owner Joel Mounty. Hugo Subitowski presented the revised plans to the Board. He spoke about the changes that have been made to the parking layout, building location, and internal apartment layout. Pat Piereson asked if any apartments were lost in making these changes. Hugo Subitowski responded that the space was gained by modifying storage and mechanical equipment spaces. David Pysh asked if the mechanical equipment space on the 3rd floor would also have spandrel glass. �Hugo Subitowski responded yes. Pat Piereson made a motion to re-open the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. David Pysh asked if the applicant would consider changing the spandrel glass for the equipment rooms to bring in more natural light. Hugo Subitowski responded that the intention was to avoid seeing into the mechanical rooms at night. David Pysh stated that the issues regarding the bulk of the structure have been adequately addressed by the applicant. He made a motion to approve the application as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 2) Seiler Sean McCarthy stated that the mailings were received by the Village. Brian Seiler is the owner and is representing this application along with project architect, Bill Klineman. Bill Klineman stated that the owners want to expand the house to the rear. He stated that the original footprint of the house has never been altered. He presented the original 1925 drawings to the Board. He stated that the roof will be replaced with a Vermont slate roof. He spoke about the proposed 1-car garage. David Pysh asked if the proposed addition was to the rear of the property. Bill Klineman responded yes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Barry Johnston from 6 Kelbourne Avenue stated that he has no problems with the proposed work. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) Nuevo Financial Center Sean McCarthy stated that the mailings were received by the Village. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 26, 2006 2 �Gary Zambrano is the owner and is representing this application. Gary Zambrano stated that he wants to replace the existing awning with a new color and new lettering. He stated that the existing awning frame will be re-used. He presented two renderings for the Board. He stated that he prefers the blue awning. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board should review the lettering also. There was an open discussion on the type of lettering to be used on the awning. David Pysh asked if the existing fascia would be painted. Sean McCarthy responded that several changes have been made to the property already. David Pysh recommended that the fascia above and behind the awning be painted. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. David Pysh made a motion to approve the blue awning as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Wompa – Sean McCarthy stated that the mailings were received by the Village. Reynaldo Garcia is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. Reynaldo Garcia spoke about the proposed renovations. He stated that there are two new proposed windows in the front of the property. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the proposed stone is not cultured stone. She stated that the proposed work does not match the rest of the house. Pat Piereson asked if the owner would consider maintaining the existing stucco. Reynaldo Garcia responded that the owner would consider using stucco. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. David Pysh made a motion to approve the application with the condition that the proposed stone be APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 26, 2006 3 �omitted and replaced with stucco to match the existing. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 5) Tappan Zee Dance Group Sean McCarthy stated that the mailings were received by the Village. Larry Lenihan is the owner and is representing this application. Lenny Lenihan stated that his business just relocated to this address and he wants to install signs. He did not have any formal materials to present to the Board. He stated that the proposed vinyl lettering would be installed on the windows. David Pysh asked if there was a requirement on the actual size of lettering. Sean McCarthy responded that lettering could not exceed 18-inches in height. Pat Piereson asked if the existing sign for the medical group could be matched. Larry Lenihan responded that the sign would be matched. He stated that the same sign vendor would be making the sign. Pat Piereson asked if there was a requirement for signs on a corner. There was an open discussion on whether a sign is allowed on the side of the structure. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application with gold lettering to match the existing Heritage Medical Group sign. The Board recognized the inconsistency of the signage but granted an exception due to the size of the building and the proposed signage. The Board approved a total of three signs. Two signs in the front and one on the side of the building. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) Approval of Minutes David Pysh made a motion to approve the March 2006 minutes as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). David Pysh made a motion to approve the May 2006 minutes as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). The minutes for the June 2006 meeting will be reviewed at the next meeting. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 26, 2006 4 �7) Cai The Chair recused himself from the meeting. Sean McCarthy is presenting the changes to the Board since the applicant had a personal emergency. Sean McCarthy stated that the following changes were made and differs from the original approval: 1) a double hung window was added above the garage instead of the proposed louver. 2) The gable was sided with vinyl instead of wood. He stated that the drawings do not reference this area. 3) A stone wall planting bed was added to level off the area. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the amended application as submitted. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) (The Chair abstained). Adjourned at 9:05 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 26, 2006 5 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2006 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2006-07-26 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2006 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2006 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/67ee6e26e5a6b930ad57c07a78c52208.pdf c1cfa458fb642bdf50a5be0e7c8fca34 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED June 28, 2006 The meeting was called to order by Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman at 8:09 p.m. Present: Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman David Pysh Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Carter Sackman Absent: None Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: Sean McCarthy explained to the public that the Cortese Construction application will not be on the agenda this evening. Agenda: 1) Sleepy Hollow Cemetery 2) McLean 3) Mountco Development Corp. 4) Rodrigues 5) KWD Realty 6) Hodgson 7) Approval of Minutes 540 North Broadway North Broadway Valley Street 83 Valley Street 303 North Broadway 475 Munroe Ave May 2006 meeting Community Mausoleum New construction Senior Housing Roof change Signage Covered Front porch 1) Sleepy Hollow Cemetery This is a continuation from the last meeting. Ed Napoleon is representing this application along with architect, Jim Wong and contractor, Tom Mullen. Ed Napoleon spoke about the series of arches. He explained how the design was developed. He spoke about the crypts and their location. The Chair stated that the Board is concerned with the view of the structure in the wintertime. Ed Napoleon responded that the site would be landscaped. He presented the proposed landscape plan to the Board. The Chair asked which plantings were deciduous on the landscaping plan. �Ed Napoleon showed which plantings were deciduous. Carter Sackman asked for a site plan from Broadway. Ed Napoleon reviewed the view of the mausoleum from Broadway. The Chair showed the Board a photo of the mausoleum from Harwood Avenue. There was an open discussion on the views of the mausoleum from Broadway. Carter Sackman asked about the height of the proposed building. Tom Mullen responded 36-feet on the West elevation and 24-feet on the East elevation. The Chair opened up the public hearing. Don Catano from Lawrence Avenue stated that the Board needs to more information to make a proper decision. Karl Dibble from North Broadway stated that with the landscaping, the structure will not be seen from Broadway. Rufus Gerald from 15 Farrington Avenue stated that he will see the structure every morning. He stated that the structure is set back far enough so that it is not an impact. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair asked what stone would be used. Tom Mullen responded Vermont Slate. Ed Napoleon also presented a sample of the crypt covers. Carter Sackman asked about the areaway before you get to the crypts. Tom Mullen responded 8-feet. Carter Sackman asked about the design of the large window on the West elevation. Tom Mullen responded that the design is not completed yet. He stated that the window would have mullions but there are no details available yet. Carter Sackman asked if copper gutters would be used. Tom Mullen responded yes. David Pysh stated that no documentation exists regarding the proposed materials. Ed Napoleon responded that the Cemetery will not make a full set of drawings until the Board determines which finishes will be used. There was an open discussion on how to move the application forward. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 28, 2006 2 �It was agreed that the Board would approve the finishes and a full-set of drawings would be submitted to the Village. It was also agreed that at the next meeting, the applicant would have a full-set of drawings that incorporate all of the Board’s comments. The Chair summarized the application. It was agreed that a material list would be submitted along with a full-set of drawings at the next meeting. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 2) McLean This is a continuation from previous meetings. Dan Pennella is representing this application along with owner, Martha McLean. Martha McLean submitted revised drawings to the Board. Dan Pennella presented material samples board to the Board. He spoke about the proposed cultured stone. He spoke about the other exterior finishes and how they will integrate together. Dan Pennella stated that the house will be closed in on three sides and will not be very visible from Broadway. The Chair asked about the front yard setback. Dan Pennella responded that the Village Code requires 30-feet but the Code also allows the owner to take the average of the two adjacent properties in determining the appropriate front yard setback. He stated that based on the average of the adjacent properties, a 25-foot setback is proposed. The Chair asked if there was more information on the garage door. Dan Pennella responded that there would be plantings to screen the garage. He stated that the door would be textured aluminum. The Chair opened the public hearing. Christine Fextel from 3 Farrington Avenue asked about the location of the driveway. Dan Pennella reviewed the proposed driveway location as well as the location of the garage. Christine Fextel asked about the appearance of the garage door. The Chair described the garage door. Dan Pennella presented samples of the roof. The Chair marked-up a set of the presented drawings for the record. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 28, 2006 3 �Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair asked if the applicant is willing to provide a wood door at the entrance. Martha McLean responded that a wood panel door would be provided. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board should not note specific a manufacturer’s product in the approval. He stated that the Board should give a generic product approval in case the applicant decides to switch manufacturers. Carter Sackman responded that physical submittals like color boards should be part of the approval. The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the conditions 1) Verona Hillstone Eldorado w/stone finish 2) Aluminum gutters 3) Aluminum garage door 4) Vinyl clad double hung windows with snap-in grills 5) Raised panel wood door 6) Wrought iron railings 7) Copper clad roof above the dining room Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 3) Mountco Development Corp.– This is a continuation from previous meetings. Neil Connuck is representing this application along with NTHA executive Director, Ken Gentile and project architect, Hugo Subitowski and owner, Joel Mounty. Neil Connuck stated that the application has received approval from the Waterfront Advisory Committee. Hugo Subitowski presented a revised rendering and compared it to the original rendering. He summarized the changes. The changes included redesigning the windows and the creation of a central louver on the side view. He also stated that the Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems (EIFS) product would be applied above the third floor. David Pysh asked about the control joints. Hugo Subitowski responded that the control joints were used to break-up the design. Carter Sackman asked about the variances that the applicant needs. Sean McCarthy responded that the Village Trustees issued a special permit. He stated that there are a few variances still required. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 28, 2006 4 �Carter Sackman stated that it is pre-mature to review this application without Zoning Board approval. Sean McCarthy responded that this application is a referral from the Planning Board. Carter Sackman stated that he is concerned with the proposed bulk of the project. He stated that he is concerned with 100% lot coverage. Sean McCarthy responded that the lot coverage is before the Zoning Board. The Chair opened the public hearing. Don Catano from Lawrence Ave stated that the development will help the seniors in the Village. Since there was no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Neil Connuck stated that the project needs to start by October 1, 2006 or the NYS funding that was awarded to the applicant would be lost. He stated that the application is on a tight time frame. Carter Sackman asked about the width of the sidewalks. Neil Connuck responded 5-feet. Carter Sackman responded that the massing is too much for the area. Ken Gentile stated that the development would open up affordable housing for other larger families. There was an open discussion on the massing of the proposed structure. Carter Sackman asked if the applicant can build below grade. Hugo Subitowski responded that the existing water table will not allow below grade construction. He stated that the Village instructed the applicant to maximize the parking. Pat Piereson asked about the number of parking spaces proposed. Neil Connuck responded that the Village Trustees granted a waiver on the parking requirement under the special permit. He stated that the proposed parking will incorporate the current site parking for Margotta Courts. Sean McCarthy stated that this area of the Village is in need of redevelopment. He stated that the collapsing culvert in the area will also be corrected as part of this project. The Chair asked about the number of units. Neil Connuck responded 64 residential units and 1-superintendents unit are proposed. The Chair asked if the number of apartments is a requirement. Neil Connuck responded that the number of units is required to economically operate the building. He stated that the original proposal was reduced by the Village Trustees. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 28, 2006 5 �David Pysh asked if the lower level of stone could be used as seating. Joel Mounty stated that it would be a hazard. He stated that adequate seating for the residents is provided in lobby area. Pat Piereson asked if there is another way to provide parking. Hugo Subitowski responded that there is no other way to provide parking. He stated that all alternatives have been fully explored. Carter Sackman asked about the level of the water table. Sean McCarthy responded that the water table is 4-feet. David Pysh stated that a lot of planning went into this application. David Pysh made a motion to approve the application with the condition that some grade level pedestrian-friendly alteration be incorporated into the design. Carter Sackman stated that the Village Trustees should re-evaluate the parking. He stated that the parking should be sacrificed to offer a more aesthetically pleasing structure. Joel Mounty asked the Board for a vote in order to keep the application moving forward. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application with a reduction of 8 parking spaces. The Chair seconded. The motion failed by a 2-3 vote. Sean McCarthy stated that the parking is not in the Board’s jurisdiction. He stated that the Board should make a recommendation back to the Planning Board. Pat Piereson made a motion to enter into enter executive session to discuss the application. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). The Board entered into executive session at 10:21pm to discuss this application. The meeting resumed at 10:40pm. No action was taken. Neil Connuck stated that if construction doss not start by October 1, 2006, all NYS funding will be lost. Carter Sackman asked if the applicant could re-apply for the tax credits. Joel Mounty responded that the project could re-apply but it would be for 2008. Carter Sackman stated that the proposed architecture is dissimilar to the architecture in the area. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 28, 2006 6 �Ana Maria McGinnis agreed with Carter Sackman’s statement. Pat Piereson stated that some changes are needed. Sean McCarthy stated that the parking reduction will have to go back to the Village Trustees for approval. David Pysh stated that the Board could provide a recommendation to the other Board’s so that the application can proceed. Sean McCarthy stated that if the Board rejects the application, the project will not move forward. He recommended that the Board refer the application back to the Planning Board. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application subject to reducing the scope of the massing. There was no second. Carter Sackman made a motion to deny the application. There was no second. The Chair made a motion to defer this application back to the Planning Board with the Architectural Review Board’s comments. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 4) Larry Rodrigues Sean McCarthy stated that the mailings were received by the Village. Larry Rodrigues is the owner and is representing this application. Larry Rodrigues stated that the roof is flat and he wants to change it to a pitched roof. David Pysh stated that the parapet wall will have water problems. The Chair opened up the public hearing. Karl Dibble from 315 North Broadway stated that the structure would appear more like a house. He was in favor of the change. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the altered area would be a living space. Sean McCarthy responded no. David Pysh responded that the proposed change would be an improvement. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 28, 2006 7 �Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted subject to keeping the existing band. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 5) KWD Realty Corp – Sean McCarthy stated that the mailings were received by the Village. Karl Dibble is the owner and is representing this application. Karl Dibble stated that he has made changes based on the Board’s feedback at the last meeting. He briefly reviewed the application. The Chair asked about the rock that would be used. Karl Dibble responded that the existing rock wall would continue onto the new site. Ana Maria McGinnis asked the applicant for the revised site plan. Karl Dibble presented the revised site plan to the Board. He reviewed the proposed finished materials for the Board. Karl Dibble spoke about the items that would be sold onsite. He spoke about the proposed on-site parking layout. He also spoke about the proposed office. He spoke about the site landscaping. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair asked about the repair of the broken sidewalks. Karl Dibble responded that he would be repairing the sidewalk at his expense. The Chair stated that he was not in favor of the color and scripts of the sign. Karl Dibble responded that the rendering is not as clear as it should be. He stated that the lettering is gold leaf. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was approved 4-1 (McGinnis). 6) Hodgson Sean McCarthy stated that the mailings were received by the Village. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 28, 2006 8 �Brian Carr is representing this application on behalf of the owners. He stated that the applicants have received approval from the Zoning Board. He described the proposed renovation for the Board. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sean McCarthy stated that hand-rails are needed since there are two steps proposed. There was an open discussion on whether to add a platform or re-grade the area. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted without handrails subject to the Building Code. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 7) Other items The Chair asked if any fees were collected by the Village for the Benino application. Sean McCarthy responded no. He stated that the Board agreed that the work was satisfactory and did not require the Board’s review. The Chair stated that the work being performed at William Cai’s residence is not according to the Board’s approval. There was an open discussion on the work being performed at William Cai’s residence. Sean McCarthy stated that the Chair has a conflict of interest with the Cai application and should recuse himself. 8) Approval of Minutes The minutes for the May 2006 meeting will be reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned at 11:34 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 28, 2006 9 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2006 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2006-06-28 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2006 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2006 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/b338c3d11fa4e6fdb6ab0409a6ebbc12.pdf 55e3c1030b928a2ae6287d1accaafe75 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED May 24, 2006 The meeting was called to order by Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman at 8:06 p.m. Present: Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman David Pysh Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None. Agenda: 1) Cortese Construction 2) Mill Point Partners 3) Sleepy Hollow Cemetery 4) Carol Lyden 5) RSHM Life Center 6) Serina 7) Fina 8) Mclean 9) Carissimo 10) Davila 11) Mountco Development Corp. 12) Lent 13) Karl Dibble 14) Approval of Minutes Terrace Close 300 North Broadway 540 North Broadway 150 Gorey Brook Road 32-34 Beekman Avenue 222 Beekman Avenue 23 Evergreen Way North Broadway 256 Farrington Avenue 180 Valley Street Valley Street 151 Harwood Avenue 303 North Broadway March 2006 meeting New construction New townhouse develop. Community Mausoleum Horse stable Signage New façade and signage Front addition & dormers New construction Fence Signage Senior Housing Addition & alteration Signage 1) Cortese Construction – Sean McCarthy stated that this application was sent back to the Waterfront Advisory Committee. He stated that the Board needs to provide findings for the Waterfront Advisory Committee. No action was taken. �2) Mill Point Partners This is a continuation from previous meetings. Dan Beaton is representing this application on behalf of the owners. Dan Beaton stated that the proposed turret roof has been modified. He showed the previous standing seam metal roof and the revised asphalt shingle roof. Sean McCarthy asked about the other valley areas around the point. Dan Beaton responded that the proposed material is copper. Sean McCarthy asked about the architect’s recommendation for the flashing around the brick. Dan Beaton responded that his architect did not recommend anything. It was recommended that the applicant use copper for the flashing material. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, David Pysh made a motion to close the public hearing. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Pat Piereson asked if the asphalt material is common for such a steep roof. Sean McCarthy responded that the material can be used but typically, slate would be used. There was an open discussion on the material selection for the turret roof and flashing. Sean McCarthy stated that if the Board agreed on the material selection, the construction details could be worked out with the Building Department. The Chair made a motion to approve the amended application with lead coated copper on the intersecting valleys and asphalt Grand Manor shingles for the roof. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) Sleepy Hollow Cemetery This is a continuation from last meeting. Ed Napoleon is representing this application along with architect, Jim Wong. Jim Wong stated that the exterior material selection would blend into the landscape in the wintertime. He stated that the slate roof and stone façade will not be visible in the summertime due to the foliage. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 2 �Ana Maria McGinnis stated that a slate roof could be installed to make the building appear more interesting. Ed Napoleon responded that a $300,000 roof to a not-for-profit corporation is not economically feasible. The Chair stated that the proposed changes are trying to incorporate architectural features from the other buildings on the site. Ed Napoleon stated that the lower level contains the crypts. David Pysh asked about the details that the mausoleum is trying to match. Jim Mullen responded that the mausoleum is trying to match the appearance of the main office. David Pysh stated that the rendering does not properly reflect what is proposed. He stated that the profile would be a custom piece that should be matched. Jim Mullen responded that the profile could be matched. The Chair opened the public hearing. Sandro Carissimo (256 Farrington Avenue) stated that the slate roof should remain. Since there were no further public comments, David Pysh made a motion to close the public hearing. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). The Chair stated that the building is too symmetrical. He stated that more detail is needed. David Pysh stated that the profile of the arch should be made to match the office chapel. Sean McCarthy responded that the profile will be difficult to match in color and scale. David Pysh responded that this is what was presented by the applicant. David Pysh stated that the peaked façade on the existing office chapel is flanked by two flat elements. He stated that this would help match the architectural features on the main structure. The Chair asked the applicant to submit a sample of the actual element to be used. The Chair made a motion to adjourn this application to the next meeting. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Carol Lyden This is a continuation from previous meetings. Jonathan Miller is representing this application on behalf of the owners. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 3 �Jonathan Miller stated that the comments from the last meeting were incorporated into the drawings. He stated that the ridgeline was broken-up. He also presented a material board of the proposed materials. Jonathan Miller spoke about the landscape buffer. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, David Pysh made a motion to close the public hearing. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). David Pysh made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 5) RSHM Life Center This is a continuation from previous meetings. Sister Susan Gardello is representing this application. Sister Susan Gardello stated that over a year ago, RSHM Life Center received an approval to re-do the exterior and re-install the existing sign. She stated that the sign does not fit in with the current exterior. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. There were none. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair made a motion to close the public hearing. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) Serina Robert Barstow is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owner, Gary Serina. The Chair asked if the public notices were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 4 �Robert Barstow presented photos of the existing property. He spoke about the proposed renovations and the sign. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the residential portion would change. Robert Barstow responded that only the commercial area would be changing. He stated that just the street façade is being changed. He stated that the pediment is being changed. He stated that there is a 19-foot frontage and three French doors. He stated that there will be a café-type setting. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the siding would be wrapped around the three sides. Robert Barstow responded that the new siding would be separated from the old siding but would be wrapped around three sides. Ana Maria McGinnis reviewed the color scheme. She asked if there would be any contrast in the color scheme. Robert Barstow responded that there would be a color contrast. He stated that the doors and the crown molding would match. The Chair stated that he did not have any problems with the proposed signage. Sean McCarthy stated that the side signage is not allowed under the Village Code and requires a variance. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 7) Steinschneider Barbara Fina is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the public notices were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Barbara Fina submitted two letters from the Sleepy Hollow Manor Association and her adjacent neighbor. She referred to a calculation correction in the zoning table on the front page of the drawing package. She stated that a portico is proposed along with front dormers and a rear turret. She stated that the existing roofline would be lifted from 1-½ stories to 2-stories. Sean McCarthy asked if the ridgeline was being increased. Barbara Fina responded yes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 5 �Sean McCarthy responded that the non-conformity was not properly explained to the Zoning Board. Barbara Fina responded that the application is still below the allowable limits. Sean McCarthy responded that the application was not properly presented to the Zoning Board. The Chair asked about the exterior finishes. Barbara Fina responded that the new finishes would match the existing finishes. The Chair asked if the windows were changing. Barbara Fina responded that all of the windows would be changing. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson asked if the window over the garage could be enlarged. Barbara Fina responded that to enlarge the window would require alteration to three interior rooms. The Chair asked if the garage door would be changing. Barbara Fina responded no. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted with confirmation from the Zoning Board of Appeals. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Mclean Dan Pennella is representing this application along with owner, Martha McLean. The Chair asked if the public notices were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Dan Pennella spoke about the proposed project. He stated that this is a proposed single family house. He submitted a rendering of the proposed house to illustrate the proposed exterior finishes. Dan Pennella stated that the exterior material will be a cultured stone. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the material of the shutters. Dan Pennella responded that the shutters are going to be eliminated. Dan Pennella stated that the detail and trim pieces are Styrofoam. He stated that the panels are going to be placed on and stuccoed over. The Chair stated that other views from the road are needed. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 6 �There was an open discussion on the proposed cultured stone. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the material for the railings. Dan Pennella responded wrought iron. David Pysh questioned how the materials would stand-up over time. He stated that the stucco sections should be adjusted with different details. He also stated that the west elevation is very plain and is the most visible façade from the neighborhood. The Chair asked if the chimney finish could be changed from stucco to stone. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the garage door style. Dan Pennella responded that the final doors have not been selected yet. It was agreed that the applicant would make the necessary corrections and reappear at the next meeting. David Pysh asked the applicant to consider wood siding instead of stucco. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 9) Carissimo Sandro Carissimo is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the public notices were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sandro Carissimo stated that his house was renovated. He stated that he wants to relocate the existing vinyl fence to another area on the property. David Pysh asked if the The Chair opened the public hearing. Elizabeth Payti of 254 Farrington Avenue asked about where the fence could be installed. Sean McCarthy responded that the fence could be built on the property line. He also stated that the owner must provide an as-built survey based on the recent work. Elizabeth Payti asked about the proposed height. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 7 �Sean McCarthy responded that the fence could be 5-feet tall. Since there were no other public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve this application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 10) Davila – Manuel Davila is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. David Pysh asked if this sign was already erected. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair asked if the Board had any questions. There were none. The Chair opened the pubic hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 11) Mountco Development Corp.– Neil Connuck is representing this application along with NTHA executive Director, Ken Gentile and project architect, Doris Masen. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Neil Connuck discussed the proposed project. He discussed the overall project funding and tight schedule constraints. He spoke about the location of the proposed structure. He also spoke about the need for affordable senior housing in the area. Sean McCarthy gave an update on the status of this project in the Villages review process. He stated that the Village Trustees have issued a special use permit. Neil Connuck spoke about the proposed finish board that was submitted to the Village. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 8 �Doris Masen described the exterior finishes of the proposed structure. David Pysh asked about the parking for the project. Neil Connuck responded that there is a 2-tiered parking garage that will accommodate all of the residents of the building as well as some of the parking for Margotta Courts. David Pysh stated that the A/C opening should be better integrated with the window system. He stated that the expansion joints should be shown on the drawings. The Chair opened the public hearing. There were no public comments at this time. The public hearing was held open to the next meeting. The Chair asked the applicant to show where the proposed stone product is going to be used at the base. He asked for a detail to be provided. He also asked for a full-size set of plans. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 12) Lent – Jean Pieirre van Lent is representing this application along with architect, Roy van Lent. Roy van Lent spoke about the proposed project. He stated that the garage will be eliminated but will be expected to be proposed at a later date. He spoke about the exterior finishes. He stated that the wood shutters are proposed. He spoke about the proposed shingles and the Ana Maria McGinnis asked where a driveway would be located. Roy van Lent showed where the driveway would be located on the site. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. David Pysh stated that a lot of care went into the planning of the project. The Chair made a motion to approve as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 13) Karl Dibble – This is an informational item only. Karl Dibble is the owner and is presenting this information to the Board. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 9 �Karl Dibble spoke about the proposed garden center site plan. He spoke about the proposed retaining walls and proposed landscaping. He spoke about the new privacy wall in the front yard. He spoke about the proposed building. No action was taken. 14) Approval of Minutes The minutes for the March 2006 meeting will be reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned at 11:40 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 10 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2006 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2006-05-24 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2006 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2006 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/688b35db360beffdf20189acc0967806.pdf 31c6c550485681ba8145776c18738e21 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED March 22, 2006 The meeting was called to order by Carter Sackman, Acting Chairman at 8:06 p.m. Present: Carter Sackman, Acting Chairman Paul Wichmann David Pysh Ana Maria McGinnis Absent: None Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Agenda: 1) Santino Mitchell 2) Kenyon 249 North Broadway 259 Hunter Avenue Signage Garage/amended approval 3) Carol Lyden 4) Robin Bernacchia 5) Kennedy Construction 6) Elizabeth Payti 7) Sleepy Hollow Cemetery 8) Approval of Minutes 150 Gorey B rook Road 4 County House Road Hemlock Drive 254 Farrington Avenue 540 North Broadway Horse stable Pool fencing and walls New single family residence Reface house Community Mausoleum February meeting Announcements: None. 1) Santino Mitchell Santino Mitchell is the owner and is representing this application. Sean McCarthy stated that this is an application for approval of a sign on a residential property. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarty responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if signs were allowed on a residential building. Sean McCarthy responded yes. He asked the applicant if the property would be used as a mixed-use. Mitchell Santino responded that the business is a home-based business. Sean McCarthy stated that although the area is zoned for mixed-use, the proposed use is not allowed under the village code. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. �The Chair made a motion to allow the applicant to temporarily keep the sign up for 60 days to allow the applicant to apply for a zoning variance under the Village code. He also stated that the existing light be removed. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 2) Brad Keynon Merridth Trede is the co-owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Merridth Trede stated that this application had been previously received an approval with the condition that the applicant would investigate if the structure could be lowered by 18inches. She stated that the architect stated that the height cannot be lowered. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the issues with the neighbor were resolved regarding the neighbor’s previous objections to the garage. Marion Trede stated that the neighbor is present at the meeting. Paul Wichmann stated that he is familiar with the property. He stated that he does not see a compromise by either lowering the roof or switching the garage around. Sean McCarthy stated that there was a request to switch the gable. He stated that the neighbor’s views would be less impacted by looking at the gable instead of the ridgeline. The Chair asked how the garage is currently set-up. Sean McCarthy responded that the set-up is the same as what is proposed. The Chair stated that the impact from the street is minimal. The Chair opened the public hearing. Hugh Jones (253 Hunter Avenue) agreed that the impacts from the street are minimal. He stated that the view from his backyard is significant. He referred to previous conversations with his neighbor on the height of the proposed garage. He spoke about the height of the structure and the previous Board meeting. He spoke about the possibility of lowering the height of the walls to reduce the overall height of the garage. Marion Trede responded by stating that the neighbor’s statement concerning their loss of riverviews is not true. She stated that the neighbor’s riverviews were created by the removal of three large trees from her property that were removed to prepare for the construction of the new garage. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 22, 2006 2 �The Chair stated that issues under the Board’s jurisdiction are the views of the proposed work from public streets. There was an open discussion on the reasons of the public’s input into the Board’s decision process. David Pysh referred to the meeting minutes from the original conditional approval. He asked if the design professional thought that lowering the structure 18” was not achievable. Marion Trede responded that she did not know. Paul Wichmann stated that by turning the garage would allow the garage to align with the primary residence. The Chair stated that this is beyond the bounds of the Board. He stated that the applicant has a right to build the garage. He stated that the impacts from the street are minimal. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was approved by a 3-1 vote (Pysh). 3) Carol Lyden Jonathan Miller is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Jonathan Miller discussed the proposed stable. He presented elevations of the proposed structure. He stated that the elevation that is facing the street is the west elevation. He spoke about the changes in grade on the site. He stated that the stable would be cut into the slope. He stated that the structures would be connected by a breezeway. The Chair asked what are the side yard setbacks are. Sean McCarthy responded 22.5-feet. He also stated that the application is still before the Planning Board. He stated that the Planning Board could move the structure. He stated that the Board is under no obligation to make a decision this evening. Paul Wichmann asked about the proposed materials. Jonathan Miller responded that the color scheme would match the primary structure. Sean McCarthy stated that the maximum permitted height is 15-feet to the midpoint of the gable. Sean McCarthy asked about the height of the structure and the changing grades of the property. He expressed concerns over the proposed gradeline height of the slab as shown APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 22, 2006 3 �on the west elevation. Jonathan Miller stated that a retaining wall would be installed as required. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about breaking up the roofline at the breezeway to minimize the massiveness of the roof. David Pysh stated that the breezeway should be treated separately to break up the roofline. Jonathan Miller asked for clarification from the Board. David Pysh responded that the breezeway roofline should be lowered to break the ridgeline. The Chair opened the public hearing. Lawrence Borgess (friend of a neighbor) asked if the west elevation foundation wall would be exposed concrete. Jonathan Miller responded yes. Lawrence Borgess stated that the structure would be visible from Ridge Street (south elevation). He also stated that the ridgeline should be broken-up at the breezeway. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Paul Wichmann asked for the applicant to provide finishes, windows, exterior materials, etc to the Board. The Board unanimously agreed to continue this application to the next meeting. 4) Robin Bernacchia Kevin Ambrosio is the landscape architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owner. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Kevin Ambrosio summarized the proposed swimming pool. He spoke about the proposed retaining wall. He spoke about the proposed landscaping screening. The Chair asked about the proposed fence. Kevin Ambrosio responded that the fence is a standard 54” tall -aluminum fence. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 22, 2006 4 �Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the strange curve of the fence layout. Kevin Ambrosio responded that the fence was proposed that way to follow the property line. The Board agreed that the proposed layout angle of the fence is too acute. Paul Wichmann asked about the height of the wall. Kevin Ambrosio responded that the proposed wall is 54” high to meet the building code requirements for swimming pools. The Chair asked if the top of the fence would be flat. Kevin Ambrosio responded yes. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the proposed fence be installed at a 90 degrees angle from the west property line. David Pysh. It was unanimous (4-0). 5) Kennedy Construction Emilio Escalades is representing this application along with owner, James Kennedy. Emilio Escalades stated that the depth of the entrance porch as designed has changed based on the field construction. He stated that the façade would be changed from rectangular to a slight arch. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) Elizabeth Payti Elizabeth Payti is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Elizabeth Payti submitted photos of the existing house. She stated that the existing aluminum siding would be replaced with the proposed brickface. She stated that the stucco on the lower level would remain. The Chair asked if the brickface would be returning to the entrance. Elizabeth Payti responded that the entire entrance would be refaced. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 22, 2006 5 �The Chair opened the public hearing. Sandro Carissimo (256 Farrington Avenue) expressed concerns with the use of brickface instead of real brick. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that the house would better if the brickface would be installed on the lower level. He stated that the appearance of brickface above stucco is not typical of the area. Paul Wichmann asked if the applicant is in a rush to complete the proposed work. Elizabeth Payti responded that she has wanted to improve the exterior of the house for some time. Sean McCarthy stated that if the Board is willing to approve the concept of the brickface, the details could be worked out with the contractor. The Chair asked if the contractor could provide a rendering. Sean McCarthy responded that the applicant’s budget would limit that option. Several options were discussed to try and enhance the applicant’s proposal. The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: approve the brickface above the stucco but below the eave, returning back to the front entryway and treat the stucco garage elevation with an off-white color to differentiate from the siding. The applicant will return with a paint sample for the Board’s approval prior to painting the foundation. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 7) Sleepy Hollow Cemetery Ed Napoleon is presenting this application on behalf of the Sleepy Hollow Cemetery. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ed Napoleon spoke about the proposed structure. He spoke about the proposed materials to be used for the roof and exterior. He also stated that the windows would be stained glass. The Chair asked about the height of the structure in the rear elevation. Ed Napoleon responded 28-feet. Paul Wichmann asked if the coping would be stone or concrete. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 22, 2006 6 �Ed Napoleon responded concrete. The Chair asked about the distance from the street. Ed Napoleon responded that the proposed structure is about 250-feet from Route 9. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the design of the building is very simple and uncharacteristic of the existing chapel. David Pysh asked who would be noticed from the public for this application. There was an open discussion on noticing the public. The Chair opened the public hearing. Linda Neilson (2 Harwood Avenue) stated that she is concerned with the modern appearance of the proposed structure. Irvin Munchnick (541 North Broadway) asked about the size of the proposed project. Ed Napoleon stated that that proposed structure is about 107 long and about 28 feet high. Irvin Munchnick asked about the traffic impacts. David Logan (Sleepy Hollow Cemetery) stated that the cemetery does not expect the traffic impacts to be increased as a result of this structure. Irvin Munchnick asked about increased parking. Ed Napoleon responded that parking is available on site. Steve Biley (native of Sleepy Hollow) stated that the Planning Board had a public hearing to discuss the site plan. He stated that the cemetery needs the income from the mausoleum to maintain the property in the years to come. Irvin Munchnick stated that he did not receive a notice for the Planning Board’s public hearing. Sean McCarthy stated that the public was notified for the Planning Board’s meeting. He stated that the notices could be checked. Irvin Munchnick asked what would be seen from North Broadway. Ed Napoleon reviewed the West elevation. Irvin Munchnick asked if the mausoleum could be made to look like the existing structures in the cemetery. Ed Napoleon stated that the cemetery is on a limited budget but they are open to suggestions. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 22, 2006 7 �The Chair recommended that the application be adjourned to the next meeting so that the public notice could be expanded to include some of the property owners in the area. He also stated that the design needs some improvements. The Chair stated that on the South and North elevations, the coping should be extended as exists on the chapel. He also stated that he is concerned with the wall of granite. He suggested that the cemetery investigate some other architectural changes. Ed Napoleon responded that some of the changed might be cost prohibitive. David Pysh asked if the design professional could attend the meeting. He stated that there should also be documents for the public to view. Tom Mullen asked if the Board would be willing to visit other historic cemeteries in the area that have similar structures. Paul Wichmann recommended that the Board members visit the site. The Chair asked for some photos from Route 9 to show the location of the proposed structure. David Pysh stated that the proposed screening should be presented to the Board. Ed Napoleon responded that it would be presented at the next meeting. The Chair made a motion to adjourn the application to the next meeting. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). This was adjourned to the next meeting. 8) Approval of minutes The minutes for the February 2006 meeting were reviewed. David Pysh made a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Paul Wichmann seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Adjourned at 10:36 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 22, 2006 8 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2006 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2006-03-22 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2006 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2006 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text