1 25 10 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/cde04b6ecef0752adc020dcc64d616da.pdf c42232f8e7550a2e440226bbbb2b9b2e PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING January 23, 2008 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:11 p.m. The Chair noted that a quorum is present Present: David Pysh, Chairman Sandra Tripp Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Donato Pennella (Charles A. Manganaro/Village Engineer) Announcements: The Chair amended the agenda to include the operating procedures of the Board. David Pysh proposed that the Board hold a work session from 7:30pm to 8:00pm before every Board meeting. There were no comments on the proposed work session. Agenda 1) Matthew Linn 12 Fremont Road 2) Lansch 30 New Broadway 3) Schroedel 487 Munroe Avenue 4) Zifchock 15 Pine Street 5) Smith 85 Merlin Avenue 6) KWD Realty 309-313 North Broadway 7) Philipsburg Manor 381 North Broadway 8) Kennedy Pokahoe Drive 9) Minutes for November 2007 Replace walkway Exterior renovations Fence Fence Walkway, walls Signage Signage Amended approval 1) Matthew Linn Replace walkway– 12 Fremont Road This is a continuation from the previous meeting. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis recused herself from this application. �Matthew Linn is the owner and is representing this application. Matthew Linn stated that the existing walkway will be changed to improve the aesthetics. He presented photos of the existing walkway. He stated that the new walkway will have 3 steps added to reduce the existing pitch. He also stated that the walkway will be widened by 1-foot. He spoke about the proposed landscaping improvements. Sandra Tripp asked if a railing is required. Sean McCarthy responded that a railing is needed under the new building code. The Chair asked if the Board had any questions. There were none. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. There was an open discussion on the required railing. Matthew Linn stated that the railing would not be very visible. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the risers shown from the driveway to the main entrance be adjusted to eliminate the railing. A wrought iron railing can be installed for the front of the entranceway. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) McGinnis abstained. 2) Lansch 30 New Broadway Exterior renovations - Joe Paiva is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owners James and Fanny Lansch. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Joe Paiva gave an overview of the proposed project. He submitted photos to the Board. He stated that the gable window would be replaced. He stated that two dormers would be added in the attic space since the attic space is habitable. The Chair asked if the roof was being raised. Joe Paiva showed where the roof was being raised on the presented plan. Ana Maria McGinnis asked how the brick would be matched once the dormers are added. James Lansch responded that the brick would be matched. Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 23, 2008 2 �The Chair asked if the chimney is new. Joe Paiva responded that the chimney is existing. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the entire plan needs to be presented to the Board. The Chair stated that the roof plan is needed to fully understand the extent of the addition. The Chair asked if the Board had any other questions. Pat Piereson stated that the new dormer window should be squared off. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair asked if there were any other approvals required. Sean McCarthy responded no. Pat Piereson stated that the Board wants to have final plans as well as material samples in order to make a decision. Joe Paiva responded that the presented drawing is to demonstrate design intent. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to adjourn this application to the next meeting. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). The Board provided more clarification on exactly what material should be submitted to the Board for the next meeting. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 3) Schroedel 487 Munroe Avenue Fence - David Schrodel is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. David Schrodel submitted a package to the Board. It included a site survey with the fence shown on it. He also submitted photos of the existing house to show where the fence would be installed. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the fence would be seen from the Munroe Avenue side since there is an existing landscape hedge. Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 23, 2008 3 �David Schroedel responded that the fence would not be shown. He gave an overview of where the proposed gates would be installed. Sean McCarthy stated that the fence needs to be installed 30-feet back from the front yard. He stated that this property has two front yards since it is located on a corner. The Chair asked if the Board had any other questions. Pat Piereson stated that the new window should be squared off. The Chair opened the public hearing. Mario Schapini (owns the house behind the applicant) stated that there are trees that are on the property line. He asked where the fence will be installed. David Schroedel responded that the fence will be installed 1.5-feet from the rear property line. He stated that the fence will not harm the trees. Mario Schapini stated that he has an existing fence that will be installed next to the proposed fence. He stated that the vegetation between the fences will not be maintained. He asked for a survey to be performed showing the location of the fence line. Pat Piereson stated that the Board has also received a letter from the adjacent neighbor expressing a concern about the installation of the fence and the existing vegetation. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted using the black painted aluminum fence and with the conditions: On the west edge, the fence will be installed 18” from the existing chain link fence. On the south edge, the fence will be installed 18” from the property line. In the front yard, the fence will be installed at the rear façade line of the house. The north edge will have the fence installed 15-feet from the rear property line. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Zifchock 15 Pine Street Fence - Jeremy Zifchock is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Jeremy Zifchock stated that he has a small child as well as 2 dogs. He would like to install the proposed fence to keep everyone within the property bounds. He submitted photos of the existing property to the Board. Sandra Tripp asked the owner to show where the fence would be installed. Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 23, 2008 4 �Jeremy Zifchock showed where the proposed fence would be installed. Pat Piereson stated that the fence does not seem strong enough. Jeremy Zifchock responded that the dogs are not large dogs and they do not expect them to get out. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the fence does not look aesthetically appealing. Jeremy Zifchock responded that he is open to suggestions. There was an open discussion on what could be installed. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application with the condition that the section between the house and the garage would be a wood picket fence to match the pickets on the front porch and the remaining fence be a post and rail fence. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (40). 5) Smith 85 Merlin Avenue Walkway, walls - Ty Carsto is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ty Carsto stated that the owners currently have tandem parking. He stated that the existing large retaining walls would be lowered and tiered in order to add some landscaping. He presented a sample of the proposed stone that would be used for the new retaining walls. He stated that the existing flagstone walkway would be renovated to include larger pieces of bluestone. He stated that the existing railing style will be extended. Sandra Tripp asked if the plan could be reworked to eliminate the railing. Ty Carsto responded that he does not think that the plan can be re-worked to eliminate the railing. The Chair asked if the Board had any other questions. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about turning the stairs. Ty Carsto responded that the location of the stairs were difficult. There was an open discussion on relocating the steps. Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 23, 2008 5 �The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that the front base wall could be moved to the property line. He also stated that front steps and the wall should be integrated. The Chair asked about the fence. Ty Carsto responded that the fence is exiting. The Chair asked if any other approvals are required. Sean McCarthy responded no. The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the condition that the retaining wall nearest the sidewalks to the west of the front steps will be eliminated and the retaining wall to the west of the walk near the residence will be installed to eliminate the front jog. The wall will integrate with the front steps. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) KWD Realty 309-313 North Broadway Signage - Karl Dibble is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Karl Dibble stated that this application is to add a privacy fence as well as some additional signs and a small roof alteration. He spoke about the proposed signs. Sean McCarthy stated that the original application included gates that were previously approved by the Board. He wants to change the type of the gate from wrought iron to tubular steel. He also stated that the office roof will be changed to cedar shakes. He stated that the roof will match the roof over the sign. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the proposed sign above the gate is not attractive. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board would have to grant a variance if they approve the sign. The Chair asked about the privacy fence. Karl Dibble responded that the fence is a PVC privacy fence. He asked the Board if they Were in favor of the fence, he could re-appear for the fence. He stated that the fence is intended to promote sales. Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 23, 2008 6 �The Chair opened the public hearing. Don Catano (43 Lawrence Ave) stated that there are too many signs on this property. He stated that Village Ordinances were changed to limit the amount of signs on commercial properties. He stated that a dangerous precedent might be sent. Sean McCarthy stated that every commercial property can have one commercial sign and a secondary sign. He stated that this is a large piece of property and the size of the property needs to be taken into consideration. He stated that the size of the sign cannot exceed 20-feet. Karl Dibble stated that there are 3 pieces of property and 3 businesses operating at this location. He stated that the Board should review the wood carved signs first and leave the signs on the gates to last. The Chair stated that the application needs to be reviewed as a whole. Pat Piereson stated that the carved signs could be reviewed first and the number of signs should be reviewed second. She stated that she does not have a problem with the secondary sign but she wondered if they could be combined. Karl Dibble responded that there are different businesses operating at this location and each business does different things. Sandra Tripp agreed. She stated that there are too many signs proposed. She stated that the number of signs should be reduced. Pat Piereson stated that although the applicant wants to advertise his business, too many signs can confuse the public. The Chair stated that the current fence is better than what is proposed. Pat Piereson stated that the existing open fence is acceptable for the proposed use. Don Catano asked if there are 3 different properties or is this parcel one property. Sean McCarthy responded that this is one property. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that a secondary sign can be installed. Karl Dibble asked if the Board could approve the existing steel tube fence, office roof structure and signs for the site development and stone landscaping businesses. The Chair stated that the applicant can add wood panels onto the existing tubular steel fence to soften the aesthetics. The Chair stated that he does not have a problem with the proposed 3 signs. Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 23, 2008 7 �Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the sign over the garage bay needs more information for the Board to make a decision. Sean McCarthy stated that if the Board approves the hanging sign, a variance needs to be granted. The Chair stated that more information is needed on the signs in order to make a decision. He made a motion to adjourn this application to the next meeting. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 7) Philipsburg Manor 381 North Broadway Signage - Tom Danaker is representing this application along with Chris O’Hara. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Tom Danaker stated that this application is proposing to replace the existing sign at the Philipsburg Manor Restoration. He stated that the new sign will include the address. He reviewed the additional signs for overview parking as well as the new sign proposed on Route 9. He stated that the signs on the flagpole will be removed and replaced with a new sign. He submitted renderings to the Board of all of the proposed signs. Pat Piereson asked about the size of the signs. Sean McCarthy responded that the proposed signs are too big. Chris O’Hara responded that the proposed signs are approximately the same size as the existing signs. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board can consider a variance for this application. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about special events. Tom Danaker responded that for special events a banner is used for the event. Sandra Tripp asked about the proposed colors of the signs. Chris O’Hara responded that the colors are highway approved colors. He stated that the colors were selected to minimize confusion. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair asked for clarification on the proposed variance. Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 23, 2008 8 �Sean McCarthy responded that the variance is needed for the sign on Route 9 only. He read the sections of the Board’s jurisdiction applicable to variances. Ana Maria McGinnis asked for the dimensions of the existing sign. Chris O’Hara responded that the sign is 40” tall and 128” wide. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. He stated that the proposed signs will be reducing the amount of signage on Route 9. He stated that this application is a unique case. He made a recommendation to grant the variance. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Kennedy Pokahoe Drive Amended approval - Emilio Escalades is the project architect and is representing this application. Emilio Escalades stated that this project is already completed. He gave an overview of the proposed changes and how they differed from the original approval. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded no. The Board agreed that no action can be taken unless the public is noticed. 9) Minutes for November 2007 The minutes will reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned at 10:51 p.m. Architectural Review Board Meeting, January 23, 2008 9 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-01-23 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/8ebaf5b5372854f47ed1be45636b12ed.pdf 2a847c48da4e2e583dec39ff9a8771f9 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING February 27, 2008 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:04 p.m. The Chair noted that a quorum is present Present: David Pysh, Chairman Sandra Tripp Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Carter Sackman Absent: None Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None Agenda: 1) Lansch 30 New Broadway 2) KWD Realty 309-313 North Broadway 3) Cusanelli/Waters 203 Webber Avenue 4) Gayle 114 Palmer Ave 5) Kennedy Pokahoe Drive 6) Ferrarin dba Hair Conn. 78 Beekman Avenue 7) Cras Realty 38 Beekman Avenue 8) Peter Castro 335 North Broadway 9) Villeda dba Amer Latino 185 Valley St 10) Minutes for January 2008 Exterior Alterations New Signage Amended approval Sunroom Addition Amended approval New Signage New Signage New Signage New Signage 1) Lansch Exterior Alterations - 30 New Broadway This is a continuation from the previous meeting. Joe Paiva is the project architect and is representing this application. Joe Paiva summarized the revisions to the plans. He stated that the round window was added based on feedback from the Board. He stated that the revised drawings show the new dormer more clearly. He stated that the chimney was also relocated. He stated that mullions would be added on the new front windows so that all of the windows on the front elevation will have mullions. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. There were none. �The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 2) KWD Realty 309-313 North Broadway Signage - This is a continuation from previous meetings. Karl Dibble is the owner and is representing this application. Karl Dibble summarized the newly submitted photos. He stated that a new cedar roof structure is proposed over the office. He summarized the new PVC gate and new proposed lettering. He also described the relocation of the Mountain View Scapes sign. He also stated that a new River Rock sign is proposed in the location of the current Mountain View Scapes sign. He also stated that he is proposing a 6-foot privacy fence along the side of the property adjacent to the C.A.R.S. property. He also stated that he wants to install an awning over the garage. He stated that the Board would need to grant a variance for the number of signs that he is proposing. The Chair asked if the awning was also considered a sign. Sean McCarthy responded that each property is permitted to have one main sign and a secondary sign. He stated that the size of the sign is based on the frontage of the property. He also summarized the types of signs that are permitted. Karl Dibble stated that there are three properties. Sean McCarthy responded that there are two legal building lots but there are three tax lots. He stated that the property at 315 Broadway is approved for 2 businesses. He stated that 315 Broadway can have signs for 2 businesses. He stated that the garden center would also be permitted to have a sign. There was an open discussion on the number of businesses and number of signs. The Chair asked Sean McCarthy for clarification on the size of the permitted signs. Sean McCarthy reviewed the Village Code sections regarding the sizing of signs. Sean McCarthy summarized the entire application and all of the requested signs at both properties. Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 27, 2008 2 �Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the existing gate is more appealing than the proposed PVC. Pat Piereson stated that the existing fence could remain and a sign could be added on the existing fence in addition to the proposed hanging sign. She questioned why he wanted to change the fence. Karl Dibble responded that he wanted to bring some color to that section of his property. The Chair stated that the attached sign ordinance is not practical to this property since there is adequate street frontage. He stated that the gate proposal is acceptable. He asked if the Board had any comments. Carter Sackman asked about the swing of the new gate. Karl Dibble responded that the gate swings out. Carter Sackman stated that he has a problem with the proposed garden center sign. He also stated that the location of the privacy fence is elevated. He would like to visit the site to see the location of the proposed fence. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted without installing the proposed 6-foot white PVC gate and the 6-foot privacy fence. Karl Dibble stated that the privacy fence is only an extension of the existing fence. He stated that the fence is being extended by 40-feet. Sean McCarthy asked for clarification on the awning for the garage. Karl Dibble responded that it is not an awning. Sean McCarthy stated that it has the appearance of a pan sign. He stated that pan signs are not permitted. He stated that a variance would be needed. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair amended his motion to exclude the 6-foot white PVC gate. He also stated that the location of the metal sign is so removed from the street that it would not be visible. He amended his motion to include the metal sign as part of the approval with the required variance. The 6-foot privacy fence is approved subject to the Board visiting the site and performing a visual inspection. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board has 45 days to submit their written findings for the variance. 3) Cusanelli/Waters 203 Webber Avenue Amended approval - Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 27, 2008 3 �Pat Cusanelli is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Pat Cusanelli submitted photos to the Board. He stated that the original approval was to include stucco. He stated that due to site conditions and financial limitations, the stucco exterior was replaced with siding. The Chair asked if the proposed changes are all completed changes. Pat Cusanelli responded yes. The Chair asked if the Board has any comments. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board had some original concerns about the number of exterior materials. He stated that the revisions eliminate one exterior material. Pat Piereson stated that she has no objections to the changes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman stated that he had no problems with the revisions. Pat Cusanelli stated that the stone will not be installed. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the originally approved stone will be eliminated and the existing masonry will remain. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 4) Gayle 114 Palmer Ave Sunroom Addition - Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sam Vieira stated that the two screened openings are being closed. He stated that the exterior materials will match existing. He stated that the kitchen on the east side of the house is being re-done. He stated that a shower stall is being added on the 1st floor. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 27, 2008 4 �The Chair asked if the Board had any questions. There were none. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 5) Kennedy Pokahoe Drive Amended approval - Emilio Escalades is the project architect and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Emilio Escalades stated that this project is already completed. He gave an overview of the proposed changes and how they differed from the original approval. He stated that the garage doors were changed to a square shape. He stated that the eyebrow window is larger than what was proposed. He also stated that the front columns are smaller than what was proposed. He stated that more windows were added to the back to enhance the Hudson views. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that this is consistent with the original application. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 6) Ferrarin DBA Hair Connection 78 Beekman Avenue New Signage - Lucy Ferrarin is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Lucy Ferrarin stated that she wants to get approval for an existing neon sign. She submitted photos to the Board. Carter Sackman asked why this application needs a variance. Sean McCarthy stated that the Village Code does not permit neon signs to exceed 18” on any one side. Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 27, 2008 5 �The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted and grant the variance. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 7) Cras Realty 38 Beekman Avenue New Signage – Robert Solari is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Robert Solari gave an overview on the proposed sign. He stated that the proposed hanging sign will help him change names on the sign when tenants move in and out. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 8) Peter Castro 335 North Broadway New Signage – Peter Castro is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair asked if this is the only sign. Peter Castro responded that the existing BP sign will remain. He stated that the proposed sign will be for the convenience store only. The Chair asked if the colors would match the BP colors. Peter Castro responded yes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 27, 2008 6 �9) Villeda DBA Amer Latino Rest 185 Valley St New Signage– Adam Villeda is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the restaurant is new. Adam Villeda responded that the restaurant is existing but the sign is new. He stated that the application is for two awnings. Pat Piereson stated that a sign would be better instead of the corner awning. Sean McCarthy responded that the awning would have to be raised based on its location. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if one of the awnings could be eliminated and replaced with a sign. There was an open discussion on the actual location of the restaurant and the location of the proposed awnings. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there was no public present, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that the front awning is acceptable. He stated that the applicant can reapply for a sign on the lower portion. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the following conditions: the front awning is approved. The awning on the side is not approved. The applicant can return for a sign on the smaller portion. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0) 10) Minutes for January 2008 The January 2008 minutes were reviewed. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). Adjourned at 9:51 p.m. Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 27, 2008 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-02-27 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/da5c95458e958a6aec10cf8db60ea904.pdf 0d36a37d77a14ef974778877acc98e12 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING March 26, 2008 The meeting was called to order by Ana Maria McGinnis, Acting Chairman at 8:02 p.m. The Chair noted that a quorum is present Present: Sandra Tripp Ana Maria McGinnis, Acting Chairman Pat Piereson David Pysh, Chairman Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None Agenda: 1) Edwards 41 College Avenue 2) Bedell 122 Van Tassel Avenue 3) KWD Realty 309-313 North Broadway 4) Minutes for February 2008 1) Edwards Fence Fence New Signage 41 College Avenue Fence Lillian Edwards is the owner and is presenting this application. The Chair asked if the proof of public mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Lillian Edwards stated that she wants to install a new fence and where the existing hedges area located. She stated that the fence is needed so that her dogs do not escape. She stated that the new fence will replace the existing chain-link fence. She stated that the fence will be installed in the front of the house and where the existing swinging gate is located. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Sandra Tripp seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) (David Pysh not present.) �2) Bedell 122 Van Tassell Avenue Fence - David Bedell is the owner and is presenting this application. The Chair asked if the proof of public mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. David Bedell stated that he recently purchased the house and wants to install a more secure fence to keep his children within the property. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the proposed 5-foot high fence will be used only for a 16-foot section and the remainder of the fence would be 3-foot high and will comply with the Village Zoning Code. The fence will be natural cedar. Sandra Tripp seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) (David Pysh not present.) 3) KWD Realty 309-313 North Broadway Signage - This is a continuation from previous meetings. Karl Dibble is the owner and is representing this application. Sean McCarthy stated that there is a dispute on the public notices. He stated that one notice was sent to the wrong address. He stated that the decisions recently approved by the Board are not valid. The Board referred to the minutes from the February 2008 meeting to see exactly what was approved. Karl Dibble summarized the application for the record. He summarized the 8 requested items from the original application. The Chair summarized the items that were approved by the Board. Karl Dibble submitted photos to the Board. The Chair opened the public hearing. Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 26, 2008 2 �Don Catano (43 Lawrence Avenue) stated that this application should be brought to the Planning and Zoning Boards. Pat Piereson asked if any items on the agenda require a zoning variance. Sean McCarthy responded no. He stated that sign variances are granted by the ARB. There was an open discussion on the approvals granted at the last meeting. Don Catano stated that he is trying to help the Village look better. He stated that there are too many signs proposed for this property. Pat Piereson asked about the number of signs on the property. Karl Dibble responded that there are 4 signs on the property. The Chair stated that the Board took a lot of time analyzing the size and number of signs that were approved Dan Torena (333 North Broadway) summarized the number of signs on his property. Sean McCarthy stated that there are some signs on the other adjacent property. David Garcia is an attorney representing Dan Torena. He stated that his client has not had an opportunity to address the Board since he was not properly noticed. He stated that there are some safety issues about the proposed gates. He stated that the approvals are not fully understood. He referred to his letter that was sent to the Board. Dan Torena stated that he is not concerned with the signs. He stated that when he purchased the property, he had to relocate his electrical service as a result of the applicant’s new retaining wall. He stated that the wall is an issue since it has heavy equipment parked on the top. He stated that there is a safety concern if the equipment falls off. He stated that there are tires located at the corner of the site to protect his property from having the windows broken. He stated that the proposed fence will eliminate light from entering his property. Karl Dibble responded that the tires are on his property. He offered to install a chain-link fence to allow sunlight to pass through. Sandra Tripp asked the applicant if he had a survey. Karl Dibble responded that he has a survey but not with him. The Chair stated that a survey is needed in order to properly locate the fence. David Pysh arrived at the meeting. Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 26, 2008 3 �Dan Torena stated that this matter should go back to the Planning Board. Sean McCarthy responded that the applicant is not in violation of his approved site plan. David Garcia stated that there is still a safety issue with the wall. Sean McCarthy responded that a survey is needed to dispute the location of the wall. He stated that the Building Department has an as-built on file from the applicant. David Garcia stated that this matter should be sent to the Planning Board. Dan Torena stated that this wall is 22-inches from this building. He stated that a 6-foot fence will allow kids to access his roof. He stated that the fence would be over the top of his roof. It was agreed that the Building Inspector would take the as-built and field verify whether the as-built is accurate. Don Catano stated that the wall also impacts his property. He stated that he gets water in his basement as a result of the wall. Dan Torena stated that he is concerned with the safety and the aesthetics of the wall and the impacts to his property. Pat Piereson stated that the location of the property line in relation to 333 North Broadway cannot be changed and is not the applicants fault. She asked Dan Torena how this can be resolved. Dan Torena responded that he tried to work things out with the applicant but the applicant was unwilling to work things out. Pat Piereson asked if other fences can be used. Dan Torena responded that the fence can be installed on the 2-foot section of the wall. Karl Dibble stated that he wants the Board to make a decision on the application tonight. He stated that he has a right to install a fence on his property. David Pysh stated that the application was not approved last month due to the lack of graphical material. Don Catano stated that the Board could make this a fire zone. Karl Dibble stated that he wants the Board to act tonight. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that the previous approvals on the signage are still valid. She stated that there is more information needed from the applicant so that a decision can be made. Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 26, 2008 4 �David Pysh stated that there is no graphical evidence provided by the applicant to support the fence. Pat Piereson stated that there is not enough information available to make the decision. She stated that the issue regarding a solid or chain-link fence needs to be further evaluated. Pat Piereson made a motion to uphold the previous approvals on the signage. She also stated that a property survey is needed to make a decision on the fence. She stated that the fence should be installed on the lower stepped-back wall. Karl Dibble requested that the fence be removed from the application. The Board agreed to remove the fence from the application. The Chair made a motion to approve the 5 items that were approved last month. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). (David Pysh abstained.) 4) Minutes for February 2008 The February 2008 minutes were reviewed. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) (David Pysh abstained). Adjourned at 9:51 p.m. Architectural Review Board Meeting, March 26, 2008 5 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-03-26 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/d04ee800d2685fdbf954346bc2725834.pdf ca4baa57a3e0a79a85079977c7ee5845 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING April 23, 2008 Since there was not a quorum present, the Board did not hold their regular meeting. Present: Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Absent: David Pysh, Chairman Carter Sackman Sandra Trip Also Present: Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None. Agenda: 1) Mahopac Bank 2) Peter Grotto 3) Minutes for March 2008 Beekman Avenue 300 North Broadway Sign Amended application The Board informally provided comments to the applicants who were present. Adjourned at 8:51 p.m. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-04-23 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/331939618bdb6b19d13f9fe0708ef70f.pdf 27e6a7e5af06dafeac381779b75ca87b PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING May 28, 2008 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:02 p.m. The Chair noted that a quorum is present Present: Ana Maria McGinnis David Pysh, Chairman Pat Piereson Sandra Trip Carter Sackman Absent: None Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect / Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None Agenda: 1) Rodrigues 2) Mahopac Bank 3) Peter Grotto 4) Scuderia, LLC 5) Sarris 6) Sullivan 7) Sleepy Hollow Cemetery 8) Sudol 9) Cummings 10) AP Petroleum 11) Minutes for March 2008 12) McGinnis 1) Carlos Rodrigues 7 Hudson Street Beekman Avenue 300 North Broadway 8 Kendall Avenue 7 Francis Street 59 Fremont Road 540 Broadway 50 Fremont Road 537 Bellwood Avenue 410 North Broadway New awnings Sign Additions & alterations Exterior renovations Fence Porch Addition Stained glass window Driveway & pavers New fence Exterior alterations - 12 Birch Close New fence- 7 Hudson Street New awnings - Dan Burke is representing this application on behalf of the owners The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Dan Burke stated that the awnings have a 2-foot projection off of the structure. He gave an overview of the proposed awnings. �Ana Maria McGinnis asked if this property was residential. Dan Burke responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the awnings are currently installed. Dan Burke responded yes. He stated that the owner did not know that a permit was needed. The Chair asked if there was lettering on the awnings. Dan Burke responded that the property address is on the awning. The Chair asked about the height of the lettering. Dan Burke responded 3-inch. Sean McCarthy stated that the Village Code requires that lettering for buildings be at least 4-inches high. He stated that the lettering on the awning can remain if additional lettering is added to the structure. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the lettering not be used for building identification. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0) Sackman absent. 2) Mahopac National Bank 49 Beekman Avenue New sign Robinson Morrell is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Robinson Morrell spoke about the proposed changes to the building. He stated that the window is being removed to keep people from looking into the property. It would also allow a larger sign to be installed. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the trees in front should be pruned. Robinson Morrell responded that the trees are owned by the Village. The Chair stated that the reasons for removing the windows should be more compelling than what is being presented. Robinson Morrell responded that many of the temporary signs will be removed. Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 2 �Robinson Morrell stated that as an option, the Sleepy Hollow Division can be eliminated. There was an open discussion on what signs exists on the property. Robinson Morrell presented the type of lettering that will be installed on the sign. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the proposal that does not remove the existing windows. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 3) Grotto Holding Corp 300 North Broadway Amended application - David Barbuti is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owner. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. David Barbuti gave an overview on the proposed changes. He showed the original 2story plan and the revised 1-story plan. He stated that the changes are only needed to reduce the proposed construction costs since the owner is financially struggling. Sandra Tripp asked about the exterior materials. David Barbuti responded that the building exterior will be stucco. David Barbuti spoke about the existing Planning Board application. He stated that the changes would be presented to both the Planning and Zoning Boards at their June meetings. The Chair stated that the Planning Board’s application would not be impacted by the ARB’s decision. There was an open discussion on whether to eliminate the mansard on the commercial side only. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman asked about the location of the air-conditioning units. David Barbuti responded that the units would be packaged units and would not be visible from either Route 9 or New Broadway. Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 3 �The Chair asked about the parapet. David Barbuti responded that there is no current parapet but a 3-foot parapet is proposed. The Chair stated that the sub-divided residential element should be maintained. He stated that the mansard should be eliminated on the New Broadway side. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the west elevation and not the east elevation which was previously approved. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). The Chair asked if these changes would impact the Zoning Board application. Sean McCarthy reviewed the proposed variances that the applicant is seeking. 4) Scuderia, LLC 8 Kendall Avenue Exterior renovations - Roger Pelleton is the project architect and is representing this application along with Chris Munch. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Roger Pelleton spoke about the proposed application. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if this would be a repair shop. Roger Pelleton responded that this is a private garage. He stated that there will be no signage on the property. He briefly reviewed the Zoning Board’s approval. Roger Pelleton reviewed the changes to the first floor. He reviewed the changes to the second floor. He stated that the hip roof would be extended to offset the porch that was removed several years ago. He reviewed the proposed exterior finishes. He stated that the owner wants a very plain look to the building so that it would not stand-out. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the doors were 6-8” doors. Roger Pelleton reviewed the proposed doors. The Chair summarized the proposed changes to the existing structure. The Chair asked if the doors can be centered. Chris Munch responded that he would have to check with the structural engineer but the owner would not be opposed. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the doors could be raised to 8-feet and some awnings to provide some character to the exterior. Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 4 �Roger Pelleton responded that the owner is not looking to have this building stand out. Pat Piereson stated that she agrees with the owner that the building should be one color. Chris Munch gave an overview on the owners need to keep the building un-noticed. Carter Sackman stated that the building can have some cost-effective improvements to make the structure more attractive for the neighborhood. The Board had an open discussion on what exterior improvements can be made. Roger Pelleton responded that the owner wants the building to be very simple. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that something should be added to bring the front façade together. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Roger Pelleton stated that a planter can be installed on the side yard. Ana Maria McGinnis provided input on some possible landscaping improvements. Pat Piereson stated that the building exterior should be one color. The Chair agreed. The Chair stated that the applicant should revise the plans to reflect: 1) One exterior color 2) Greenway on the west elevation. Landscaping should be cut into the sidewalk and should not be proposed as planters. 3) Some addition of a thru window for the proposed man-doors. 4) Glass block in-fill should be reconsidered. Carter Sackman stated that the building is a block building. Pat Piereson stated that the building should have some trim. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 5) Sarris 7 Francis Street Fence - James Sarris is the owner and is representing this property. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 5 �Ana Maria McGinnis asked if there was a survey of the property. James Sarris responded that he did not have on available. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the chain-link fence would be removed. James Sarris responded no. He stated that the chain-link fence belongs to the Village and will remain. Pat Piereson stated that debris will accumulate between the gap between the fences. The Chair asked about the length of the fence. James Sarris responded about 25-feet. The Chair made a motion to approve this application as submitted with the condition that the chain-link fence is keep at the same height as the existing fence with new metal posts and that the fence is installed as tight as possible to the Village’s existing fence. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 6) Sullivan 59 Fremont Road Porch Addition - Jon Turnquist is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Jon Turnquist gave an overview of the proposed porch addition. He stated that the porch would project outward by 8-feet. He stated that the trim would be white and the flooring would be mahogany. He also stated that no variances are required. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the trim board can be added to hide the posts. Jon Turnquist agreed. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if a railing is proposed. Jon Turnquist responded that the railing would have regular balusters. Sean McCarthy asked about the width of the stairs. Jon Turnquist responded about 4-feet. Sean McCarthy recommended that the width of the stairs be extended to the first column. Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 6 �Sandra Tripp asked about the louver. Jon Turnquist responded that it is ornamental. The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: 1) Fascia board is added below the porch 2) The front stairs be extended to the first bay 3) Continue the turn balusters down the right side of the stairs The Board also recommended: 1) Replicate the scallop detail proposed over the new pediment onto the existing pediment 2) Omit the vent over the new pediment 3) Fascia of the new pediment should be extended to receive a gutter 4) Add a beam under the soffit-line of the new porch The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sandra Tripp seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 7) Sleepy Hollow Cemetery 540 Broadway Stained glass windows - Kyle McGovern is an attorney and is representing this application along with Cemetery Board president Dave Logan The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Kyle McGovern reviewed the original approval which did not include any stained glass windows. He stated that the stained glass window would be installed behind a glass as a safety measure. Dave Logan stated that the glass would be tempered glass. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Sandra Tripp seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 8) Sudol 50 Fremont Road Driveway & pavers - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 7 �Jean Sudol is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Jean Sudol gave an overview of the application. She stated that the driveway needs to be repaved. She also stated that she wants to install 10-foot apron at the beginning of the driveway. The apron would consist of 8” Belgium block pavers. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 9) Cummings 527 Bellwood Avenue New fence - Sherry Cummings is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sherry Cummings stated that she has a deteriorated fence on her property. She is looking to replace it with a lattice fence. There was an open discussion on the location on the fence in the front yard. It was mentioned that the fence needed to be installed 30-feet from the front property line. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Sandra Tripp seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 10) AP Petroleum 410 North Broadway Exterior alterations - Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 8 �Sam Vieira gave an overview of the application. He stated that the ownership did not secure any permits for the initial renovations. He gave an overview of the proposed renovations. He reviewed changes to the garage doors. He also spoke about the future relocation of the diesel gas pump. He spoke about the removal of the storage tanks and the cinderblock walls. He stated that the rear of the property will have a 6-foot stockade fence installed to hide some of the equipment in the rear. He stated that the roof shingles will remain the same color. He also stated that the applicant wants to install cedarlooking vinyl siding. The Chair asked if the garage bays can somehow incorporate the window element. Carter Sackman stated that some improvements can be included that are relatively inexpensive. Sean McCarthy stated that the owner will need to get site plan approval from the Planning Board. He stated that the applicant cannot receive a building permit without getting site plan approval. The Board provided some feedback to the applicant for the next meeting. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there was no public present, the Chair closed the public hearing. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 11) Minutes The minutes for March 2008 were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the March 2008 minutes as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 12) McGinnis 12 Birch Close New fence- Ana Maria McGinnis recused herself from this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that she wants to install a deer mesh fence in the rear of her property to keep out deer. She presented photos to the Board. She indicated what would be seen from the street. Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 9 �The Chair noted that there was no public present. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0) McGinnis abstained. Adjourned at 10:14 p.m. Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 28, 2008 10 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-05-28 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/f7b488c7fe48aaf514c1164bb7838bda.pdf d5bf6877d22144f186005d55e96426f8 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED June 25, 2008 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:03pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Ana Maria McGinnis David Pysh, Chairman Pat Piereson Sandra Tripp Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None Agenda: 1) Anderson 275 Millard Avenue Retaining walls 2) AP Petroleum 3) Scuderia 4) Bearman 5) Yugui Express 6) Cawley 7) Minutes 410 North Broadway 8 Kendall Avenue 515 Bellwood Avenue 110 Beekman Avenue 30 Fremont Avenue Exterior alterations Exterior Alterations Fence Signage Addition and alteration 275 Millard Avenue Retaining walls - 8) Other 1) Anderson Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owners The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sam Vieira stated that the application consists of replacing existing railroad-tie retaining walls. He gave an overview of the current application before the Planning Board. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the Planning Board issues. Sam Vieira responded that the slope of the property requires Planning Board review. Pat Piereson asked if the heights of the new walls are higher than the existing. Sam Vieira responded that the end result is the same. He stated that there are 3 existing walls that will be replaced with 2 new walls. Pat Piereson asked how the property connected with the adjacent property. �Sam Vieira responded that the walls will return onto themselves. Sam Vieira stated that the existing walls are decaying and need to be replaced. He stated that the 2 retaining walls will allow the owners will be able to better utilize their yard. He stated that the walls will be made of inter-locking masonry blocks. Pat Piereson asked about how the neighbors feel about the work. Ken Anderson responded that he has letters from the neighbors endorsing the proposed work. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that this is a practical solution to the retaining wall problem. She stated that the proposed landscaping plan needs work. Sam Vieira responded that the landscaping plan on the plans is not what is proposed. He stated that the plantings were put on the plans by the engineer. He stated that the landscaping will eventually obscure the wall. Sandra Tripp stated that the choice of materials needs to be better selected. Ken Anderson responded that the landscaping will hide the walls. Sandra Tripp responded that the Board can only review what is presented. There was an open discussion on maintaining any landscaping as part of the application. Sean McCarthy stated that if the landscaping is part of the site plan approval, it must be maintained in perpetuity. He also stated that as part of the site plan approval, a landscape plan will be required. The Chair asked about the need for railings on the wall. Sam Vieira responded that a railing will be installed only on the upper wall. The Chair stated that the wall should be hidden in greenery. Ana Maria McGinnis agreed but wanted to see the landscape plan. Pat Piereson stated that the proposed structure should also be aesthetically pleasing. She stated that the landscaping can grow and die. She asked if another material can be used. Sam Vieira responded that there are other engineering issues with the existing bedrock. He stated that the existing railroad tie system is failing as a result of the unique site conditions. The Chair asked if the property can be re-graded to eliminate one of the retaining walls systems. APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 2 �Sam Vieira responded that the existing rock ledge will not permit re-grading. He stated that the walls stabilize the site. The Chair asked if the applicant can explore possibly eliminating the lower wall and plant on the slope to hide the upper wall. Ken Patterson responded that he would investigate. Pat Piereson asked the applicant to evaluate stone facing in front of the existing wall. This was adjourned to the next meeting. No action was taken. 2) AP Petroleum 410 North Broadway Exterior alterations - Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners Sam Vieira gave an overview of the revised application. He stated that there are still issues with the site plan but he wanted to get the Board’s feedback. The Chair asked if the property has a second floor. Sam Vieira responded no. Pat Piereson stated that she likes the window treatments. Sam Vieira stated that the lanterns on the façade can be removed. He stated that the Planning Board’s review will take additional time so the Board does not have to provide comments this evening. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Board provided positive feedback on the scheme on drawing A2. The Chair made a motion to recommend the following revisions to the Planning boardthe application (drawing A2) with the following conditions: roofing material be upgraded to an architectural shingle (not green) and that the down-light be eliminated. If there are existing brackets under the soffit, that they be re-used. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) Scuderia 8 Kendall Avenue Exterior Alterations - Roger Pelleton is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owner. 3 APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 �Roger Pelleton gave an overview on the proposed changes. He spoke about the exterior colors and the canopy. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sandra Tripp stated that the stainless steel door should be eliminated. Roger Pelleton agreed. He stated that it is an error on the plans. The Chair asked about the use of glass block. Roger Pelleton responded that the glass block will bring in light but will hide the view of the cars from the exterior. The Chair asked about the adjacent properties. Roger Pelleton responded that one side abuts the Van Tassel garage. The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: 1) The owner can omit the glass block and install translucent panels. 2) Canopy over the doors be painted to match the doors below. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Bearman 515 Bellwood Avenue Fence - Jeremy Bearman is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Jeremy Bearman stated that there is an existing fence on the property that will remain. He stated that a proposed chain-link fence is proposed to keep-in his dog. He summarized the proposed fence. He stated that the property is on a corner lot and a 5foot high fence is permitted based on his setback conditions. Jeremy Bearman stated that a cedar fence is proposed where the property line can be seen from the road. He stated that a chain-link is proposed elsewhere. Pat Piereson stated that an aluminum fence should be explored as an effective alternative. Jeremy Bearman responded that he is open to alternatives. The Chair opened the public hearing. APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 4 �Dan Lorenzini (114 Kelbourne Avenue) stated that there are 2 issues. He stated that he is concerned with the chain-link fence and the dog. He stated that the dog could be an issue. He stated that a wooden fence is preferred for aesthetic reasons. He noted on the survey where the two properties join. There was an open discussion on what fences the applicant is proposing to install. The Chair noted that since the 5-foot fence is permitted, the Board does not oppose. He stated that the materials are the issue. Elizabeth Lorenzini asked where the cedar fence is proposed. Jeremy Bearman responded that the Bellwood Avenue side should be solid to prevent the dog from seeing other dogs and barking. Pat Piereson stated that the aesthetics of the neighborhood should be maintained. She stated that the responsibility of the owner to prevent their dog from being a nuisance. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the applicant should return with a revised proposal. Jeremy Bearman asked the Board for advice on what he can install. Sandra Tripp responded that the applicant should look at other neighboring property owners for fence types. Pat Piereson noted a fence that is installed on Merlin Avenue. She stated that the fence would meet the applicant’s needs as well as be more aesthetically pleasing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 5) Yugui Express 110 Beekman Avenue Signage - Mercedes Yugui is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the proposed color. Mercedes Yugui responded that she just likes the color. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the type of business. Mercedes Yugui responded that the company is a multi-service company. APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 5 �The Chair asked about the sign requirements. Sean McCarthy reviewed the Village sign requirements. There was an open discussion on the lettering size. The Chair asked the applicant if she would paint the lettering on the window instead of installing a new sign. Mercedes Yugui responded that she is ok with the revision. Sean McCarthy responded that a revised plan should be reviewed by the Board before granting an approval. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sandra Tripp stated that the applicant should return with a revised plan. This was adjourned to the next meeting. No action was taken. 6) Cawley 30 Fremont Avenue Addition and alteration - Sonja and Chris Cawley are the owners and are representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sonja Cawley gave an overview of the application. She stated that the proposed application involves installing family space. She stated that she has no handicapped accessible facilities to accommodate Chris Cawley’s handicapped brother. She also stated that porch front was added to keep with the house style. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the house is currently vinyl siding. Sonja Cawley responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the shutters are real wood. Sonja Cawley responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the casement windows on the side of the house. Sonja Cawley responded that the windows are proposed for privacy. She stated that the adjacent neighbors also have the same windows on the side yard. The Chair stated that the porch piers should be hidden by extending the frieze board. APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 6 �The Chair stated that the exterior materials proposed are new stucco, roof and clapboard to match the existing finishes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sandra Tripp asked if the dimensions shown on the drawings are the zoning setbacks. Sonja Cawley responded yes. Sandra Tripp stated that the massing appears to be leaning towards one neighbor. Sonja Cawley responded that the extension is in keeping with the layout of the house. There was an open discussion on the widow selections and spacing on the side of the house. The Chairman provided a sketch of the windows that the applicant could use on the side of the house. The applicant stated that they would consider the revisions. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 7) Minutes – The May 2008 meeting minutes were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Other – It was agreed that the Board would meet in August. Adjourned at 10:06 p.m. APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-06-25 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/d890aa7a117521d4efdd148f49983f97.pdf 03665f943686a31e7d37011ceb600df8 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING - APPROVED July 23, 2008 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 7:58pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Ana Maria McGinnis David Pysh, Chairman Pat Piereson Carter Sackman Absent: Sandra Tripp Also Present: Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Rae Lee (Village Building Department) Announcements: None Agenda: 1) Anderson 275 Millard Avenue Retaining walls 2) Bearman 3) Yugui Express 4) Cabrera Residence 5) Forman Residence 6) Beristain Residence 7) Rodrigues Residence 8) Strasser Residence 9) Stoecklein Residence 10) Minutes 515 Bellwood Avenue 110 Beekman Avenue 296 North Washington Street 12 Francis Street 2 County House Road 33 Hudson Terrace 17 Pokahoe Drive 21 Lakeview Avenue Fence Signage Fence Fence Fence Addition & alteration Addition & alteration Addition & alteration 1) Anderson 275 Millard Avenue Retaining walls - This is a continuation from previous meetings. Mike McGarvey is the project engineer and is representing this application along with the owners Mike McGarvey spoke about the proposed application. He stated that a stone wall cannot be installed in its existing location due to the steep grade. He stated that there are no drawings of plans on the existing lower retaining wall. He stated that as a result, no additional loading can be placed on the existing wall. Carter Sackman asked if a poured concrete wall with a stone face could be constructed. Mike McGarvey responded yes but it would be more costly. Carter Sackman stated that landscaping should not be used to screen a retaining wall �since the landscaping can be changed or could die and not be replaced. The Chair asked for the technical justification why the proposed wall system is needed. Mike McGarvey spoke about the existing retaining wall and the proposed load from the new wall. He stated that the new wall system will be constructed 6-foot below grade to compensate for the additional loading. Carter Sackman stated that there is existing loading on the lower stone wall from the existing railroad-tie wall. He stated that the stone would be a better material to use. Mike McGarvey responded that the applicant is trying to stop the existing wall from failing. He stated that the end product will only result in a gain of a 4-feet increase to the rear yard. The Chair asked if one of the proposed walls could be eliminated. Mike McGarvey responded yes. Carter Sackman asked about the cost for installing the wall. Mike McGarvey responded $37.50/sf installed. He stated that a poured concrete wall would be more expensive. The Chair stated that the vertical amount of the wall should be an issue for the Board to address. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Mike McGarvey asked if one wall was proposed, would the Board approve the application. The Board was more favorable to the one wall proposal. Carter Sackman stated that the applicant should still return with stone samples. He also stated that one of the proposed walls could be raised up one foot and the upper portion would be bermed. There was an open discussion on a conditional approval. Mike McGarvey stated that since the Planning Board does not meet in August, he will return to the Board’s August meeting with one poured concrete wall with a stone face. This was adjourned to the next meeting. No action was taken. 2) Bearman 515 Bellwood Avenue This was a continuation from previous meetings. Fence - APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 23, 2008 2 �Jeremy Bearman is the owner and is representing this application. Jeremy Bearman submitted a plan showing where the proposed fence will be installed. He also presented photos of the property and the existing fence. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the applicant will paint the fence. Jeremy Bearman responded no. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) Yugui Express 110 Beekman Avenue Signage - This was a continuation from previous meetings. Mercedes Yugui is the owner and is representing this application. Mercedes Yugui discussed the changes to the proposed signage. She stated that the name of the business will be installed on the glass. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Cabrera residence 296 North Washington St Fence - Vincent Cabrera is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Rae Lee responded yes. Vincent Cabrera stated that he wants to install a fence to prevent kids from removing the flowers from the front of his house. The Chair stated that the Building Department would have to make sure that the proposed fence will comply with the Building Code. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 23, 2008 3 �The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application of a new front fence in the front yard with the condition that it complies with the Building Code. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 5) Forman Residence 12 Francis Street Fence – Matthew Forman is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Rae Lee responded yes. Matthew Forman stated that he recently purchased the property. He stated that the existing fence is deteriorated. He stated that the proposed fence is 2’-8” tall. He stated that the proposed fence is antique. He also stated that the side yard is currently a grass pathway. He would like to install a flagstone walkway but instead he is proposing stamped concrete. He spoke about the stamped concrete walkway in more detail. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) Beristain Residence 2 County House Road Fence - Robert Welsch is the landscape architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Rae Lee responded yes. Robert Welsch gave an overview of the proposed fence and pergola. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 23, 2008 4 �7) Rodrigues Residence 33 Hudson Terrace Addition and Alteration - Rudy Variano is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Rae Lee responded yes. Rudy Variano gave an overview of the proposed application. He stated that the property is a 2-family residence. He stated that the owners need more room for themselves and their teenage daughters. He reviewed the variances that were obtained as part of this application. He stated that the dormers were added to the south. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the shape of the dormer on the south side. Rudy Variano responded that the dormer was altered for egress. The Chair stated that if the dormer was brought out, the applicant could gain some interior space. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis asked why the dormers do not line up. Rudy Variano responded that the dormers alignment is minor. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the recommendation that the 4 new dormers have some ridge height consistency and the tower design be considered. Carter Sackman asked about increasing the size of the dormers. Rudy Variano responded that the FAR was an issue. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8. Strasser Residence 17 Pokahoe Drive Addition & Residence - Robert Barstow is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Rae Lee responded yes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 23, 2008 5 �Robert Barstow stated that the addition is needed to increase the home office and to increase the interior area for the applicant’s grandchildren. He stated that the same exterior materials will be used. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about removing the shutters. Robert Barstow responded that the applicant would be willing to remove the existing shutters. Pat Piereson asked if the applicant was replacing the garage doors. Robert Barstow responded no. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman asked about the railing on the south elevation. Robert Barstow responded that the deck would be removed and replaced with a flagstone transition. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the exterior materials match the existing. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 9) Stoecklein Residence 21 Lakeview Avenue Addition & Alteration - Ed Stoecklein is the owner and is representing this application along with architect, Roger Goodhill. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Rae Lee responded yes. Ed Stoecklein spoke about the proposed renovations. He stated that the existing material will be matched. He stated that the addition includes a large family room as well as expanding the bedrooms to include closets. Roger Goodhill stated that the owners wanted to change the existing 1950s appearance. He stated that the owners wanted the addition to have the appearance of the original house. Ed Stoecklein stated that the roofline is being raised. He spoke about the interior renovations in more detail. The Chair asked if the eave could extend outward. Roger Goodhill responded agreed. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 23, 2008 6 �The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there was no public present, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 10) Minutes – The June 2008 meeting minutes will be reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned at 9:32 p.m. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, July 23, 2008 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-07-23 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/def2b5b510144f277f6f28af3191229c.pdf fb4bf4e877731db15b3b55eacba64662 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING -APPROVED September 24, 2008 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:08pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Ana Maria McGinnis David Pysh, Chairman Sandra Tripp Absent: Pat Piereson Carter Sackman Also Present: Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Sean McCarthy (Village Building Department) Announcements: None Agenda: 1) Anderson 275 Millard Avenue Retaining walls 2) Wompa 3) Enterprise Rent a Car 4) Roventini Residence 5) Minutes 122 Bedford Road 347 North Broadway 67 Sleepy Hollow Road Deck Addition Signage New patio awnings 1) Anderson 275 Millard Avenue Retaining walls - This is a continuation from previous meetings. Mike McGarvey is the project engineer and is representing this application. Mike McGarvey submitted revised plans on the rear property retaining walls. He stated that the proposed materials have been changed to another type of interlocking block system. Sean McCarthy stated that the Planning Board has approved of this project at their last meeting. He also stated that the Waterfront Advisory Committee has also found this application consistent with the LWRP. The Chair asked why one wall cannot be installed. Mike McGarvey responded that the proposed wall would need to be much thicker. He stated that more concrete would be needed to deflect the additional load. He stated that the 2 wall system breaks up the visual impacts of the wall. The Chair submitted photos of the adjacent properties and their retaining walls. He asked why the applicant cannot install the retaining walls in a similar manner. �Mike McGarvey responded that there are differences in the adjacent properties and the applicants. The Chair stated that the existing 13-foot high retaining wall was installed illegally. Sean McCarthy responded that the retaining wall was legally installed. The Chair asked if the Board had any questions. Mike McGarvey stated that the applicant could install the same retaining wall system in kind. He stated that the applicant is making an improvement to the property. Sean McCarthy asked about the distances between the wall systems. Mike McGarvey responded that there is approximately 10 feet between each wall system. Mike McGarvey discussed the landscaping plan. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that the Village Engineer should review the calculations for the proposed retaining wall system. Sean McCarthy responded that the Village Engineer has reviewed the one-wall retaining wall system and found that there is not enough information available on the existing lower retaining wall to make a decision. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the proposed wall is too monolithic. Sean McCarthy stated that once the construction starts, the existing lower retaining wall can be further evaluated to see if a one wall system can be constructed. This was adjourned to later in the meeting. 2) Wompa 122 Bedford Road Deck Addition - Ronaldo Garcia is the project architect and is representing the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ronaldo Garcia described the proposed application. He stated that the deck addition will be about 300sf of additional deck. He stated that the columns would be pressure treated wood, the decking would be a TimberTech© product and the trellis would be natural cedar. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 24, 2008 2 �Sean McCarthy stated that this property is very difficult to see from the street. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the following conditions: The lower level posts will be pressure treated wood with white cladding. The deck and handrail material will be TimberTech©. The trellis and posts are cedar and stained to match the TimberTech© product. Sandra Tripp seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 3) Enterprise Rent a Car 347 North Broadway Signage - Frank Veina is the representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Frank Veina discussed the proposed sign. He stated that the Enterprise Corporate office would like to replace the sign. He also stated that an additional 2’ x 10’ sign will be added on the building. He stated that the sign will be the same size as the existing sign. He also stated that the building exterior was also painted. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted and to also grant a variance to install the sign above the roof. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 4) Roventini Residnece 67 Sleepy Hollow Road New patio awnings - Edel Paulsen is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Edel Paulsen stated that this application involves replacing the aluminum awnings that are currently on the house. Sean McCarthy stated that the house is not very visible from the street. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 24, 2008 3 �The Chair asked about the location of the 2 awnings. Sean McCarthy supplied the Board with the site plan. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the size of the awnings. Edel Paulsen responded 8’x17’ and 8’x21’. Edel Paulsen stated that the existing awnings are being replaced. He presented material samples to the Board. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sandra Tripp asked about the color of the awning. Edel Paulsen responded white. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Sandra Tripp seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 1) Anderson – Continued Mike McGarvey stated that once the construction starts, the existing lower retaining wall can be further evaluated to see if a one wall system can be constructed. The Chair stated that the applicant should make a real effort to try and install one retaining wall. Mike McGarvey stated that the thickness of the wall, the footing material and footing size need to be determined in the field. The Chair stated that the Board should be given proof that this solution is acceptable. Mike McGarvey responded that he can provide an engineers report. Sandra Tripp stated that the galvanized railing should be re-evaluated. The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: That an engineers report be submitted to the Village Building Department to clarify why one option was selected over another. He stated that 2-3 test probes should be done to evaluate the structural capabilities of the existing lower retaining wall to determine if a one wall solution can be installed. Also that the landscape plan be submitted when the applicant returns for the railing. Sandra Tripp seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 24, 2008 4 �5) Minutes – The June 2008 meeting minutes were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). The July 2008 meeting minutes will be reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned at 9:16 p.m. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, September 24, 2008 5 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-09-24 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/3cc905e3f5b8c3ae562a67b8ce5f7763.pdf 6a0de220f28c32a158807677b9f1b0f8 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING -APPROVED October 22, 2008 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:05pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Carter Sackman David Pysh, Chairman Sandra Tripp Absent: Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Also Present: Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Sean McCarthy (Village Building Department) Announcements: None Agenda: 1) Harney 4 Highland Ave New fence 2) Marco Araujo 68 Beekman Ave 3) CRAS Realty 38 Beekman Ave 4) M&S Party Supplies 173 Cortlandt Street 5) Finalmente Trattoria 31 Beekman Ave 6) Minutes for July and September 2008 New mixed-use bldg New awning New signage New signage 1) Harney New fence - 4 Highland Ave Pat & Tom Harney are the owners and are representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Tom Harney stated that they are proposing to install a split-rail fence in the side yard of their property. Sean McCarthy stated that a copy of the property survey was submitted in the application package. Tom Harney stated that the fence will be 4-foot for most of the distance but will be reduced to a 3-foot fence in accordance with the 30-foot front yard setback requirement. He stated that currently the area is open. He stated that they also intend to plant some trees and shrubs. Carter Sackman asked about the location of the fence. Tom Harney clarified the location of the fence on the survey. �The Chair opened the public hearing. Bill Hammer (10 Highland Ave) stated that he lives adjacent to the property. He stated that the wooded lot was cleared without warning. He stated that the area near the applicants’ house was not cleared. He stated that there are other natural barrier solutions other than a fence. Thomas Finn (49 Highland Ave) stated that the applicant wants to install the fence on the paper street. He stated that the entire lot was cleared without warning. He stated that he is opposed to the fence. He stated that this fence is being installed because of an argument with the adjacent neighbor. Olga Bluminfeld (Highland Ave) stated that she did not see a reason to remove the landscaping and install a fence. Mr. McGoff (12 Highland Ave) asked about the type of fence being installed. He was concerned with the height. He questioned the need for the fence. He stated that there are better natural methods that can be proposed. He stated that several years ago, another owner wanted to build a house on the vacant lot but the Village Trustees did not permit development on the paper street. The Chair asked for further clarification on the clearing of the lot. Sean McCarthy responded that numerous trees were removed without Tree Commission approval. He stated that there were less than 5 trees removed without Village approval. He stated that there is no Village requirement for clearing vegetation from a lot. Carter Sackman asked about the paper street ownership. Sean McCarthy responded that there is a deed restriction for developing on the paper street. Tom Harney responded that there are 2 lots in question. The Chair asked for clarification on the paper street. Sean McCarthy responded that he would check with the Village Attorney regarding the installation of the fence on the paper street. Carter Sackman stated that if there are any violations, this matter should be held over. Sean McCarthy responded that he cannot withhold a building permit application for a violation. Lorie Gellinick (37 Highland Ave) stated that she is in agreement her neighbors. She stated that the lot was decimated within a few hours. She also stated that the portion of the property that was cleared was only on the Hammer property side and not on the applicants’ side. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 22, 2008 2 �Carter Sackman stated that the Board has never approved a split-rail fence in Philipse Manor. He stated that the submitted survey is illegible. Sean McCarthy responded that the Building Department does not verify surveys. He stated that the property has the survey stakes located on the property boundaries. Tom Harney stated that the adjacent lot was overgrown. He stated that there were animals living in the vacant lot. He stated that the lot was cleared to eliminate the overgrown lot. He stated that the fence is natural wood and conforms with the neighborhood. He stated that the lot was purchased at auction and there was an incident with the neighbors at the auction. Carter Sackman asked why the westside of the lot needs the fence. Tom Harney responded that the Westside of the property is the largest open portion of the lot. He submitted a list of houses in Sleepy Hollow that also have split-rail fences installed. Sandra Tripp stated that having the fence installed on one-side of the property does not make much sense. She stated that the fence will look odd. Carter Sackman stated that a 3-rail fence is proposed in the rear portion and a 2-rail fence is proposed in the front yard area. He stated that the fence will be unusual. He stated that the remainder of the property is not being considered. Tom Harney asked what should be approved. The Chair stated that there is no compelling reason for the fence. He stated that the neighbors are extremely opposed to the fence. He stated that if there is a need for a fence, it should be presented. The Chair made a motion to deny the application. There was no second. Sandra Tripp stated that the application should be adjourned to the next meeting so that the applicant can proposed a better plan for the fence. Carter Sackman asked if the applicants would propose some landscaping along with the fence. Tom Harney responded yes. He stated that he would keep the landscaping at 3-feet. There was an open discussion on whether a fence should be installed on the property. Leslie Hammer stated that she has spent over $1000 in landscaping on her property. She stated that they were trying to maintain the landscaping border. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair adjourned the public hearing. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 22, 2008 3 �The application was adjourned to the next meeting so that the applicant can prepare a planting plan and a more comprehensive plan for the fence. No action was taken. 2) Marco Araujo 68 Beekman Ave New mixed-use bldg Luigi Demasi is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owner, Marco Araujo. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Luigi Demasi stated that the property recently had a fire. He stated that the application is proposing 2 stores and 3 apartments above the stores. Sean McCarthy stated that this application is also before the Planning Board and the Zoning Board. Luigi Demasi stated that the building will have brick on the upper portion. He stated that the side yards spacing is small. He stated that the building is a little longer than the original. The Chair asked if another awning can be proposed so that the brick detailing is not covered. There were some discussions on the parapet wall and front elevations. The Chair asked about installing true-divided lights in the front windows. Luigi Demasi responded yes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair stated that the applicant should consider some of the Board’s comments and return with a revised rendering and front elevation drawing. He also stated that a sample of the brick should be presented. This was adjourned to the next meeting. No action was taken. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 22, 2008 4 �3) CRAS Realty 38 Beekman Ave New awning Rob Solari is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Rob Solari presented a sample fabric to replace the existing fabric on the awning. He stated that the awning would be put on the existing frame. He stated that the remaining awnings will also be eventually replaced with the same blue fabric. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sandra Tripp stated that there are 5 existing arches but only one arch has the awning one it. Carter Sackman made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Sandra Tripp seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 4) M&S Party Supplies 173 Cortlandt Street New signage Mayra Cuenca is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Mayra Cuenca presented photos of a temporary sign. They stated that this application is for a permanent sign. The Chair questioned the size of the sign and if it is permitted under the Village code. Sean McCarthy responded that the drawing does not appear to be scaled. Mayra Cuenca stated that the sign will be red and blue with one red and one blue balloon. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Carter Sackman stated that the proposed sign is confusing with the mullion. He stated that the sign can be laid out better. Marya Cuenca asked if the sign can be illuminated. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 22, 2008 5 �The Chair responded that an illuminated sign would be a different application. The applicant asked for an adjournment so that the sign can be revised. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 5) Finalmente Trattoria 31 Beekman Ave New signage Dan Belliamo is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Dan Belliamo asked if a perpendicular sign can be installed so that the sign can be viewed from Route 9. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board can grant a perpendicular sign through a variance. Sandra Tripp asked about the proposed antique lights. Dan Belliamo responded that the antique lights will be single stem lights down onto the sign. Carter Sackman responded that the Board wants to see the light fixtures. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Dan Belliamo asked for an approval for the sign and he will return for the antique lights. Carter Sackman made a motion to grant a variance for the perpendicular sign. The applicant needs to return for approval on the lighting. Sandra Tripp seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). 6) Minutes The minutes for the July meeting were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (3-0). The minutes for the September meeting will be reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned at 9:40 p.m. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, October 22, 2008 6 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-10-22 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/445d416cc08987b0953918df8a06e246.pdf 8e3c674ce53817d4b3f493f73721fed6 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING - APPROVED November 24, 2008 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:05pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson David Pysh, Chairman Sandra Tripp Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Sean McCarthy (Village Building Department) Announcements: None Agenda: 1) Harney 2) Marco Araujo 3) M&S Party Supplies 4) Finalmente Trattoria 5) Carlos Siguenza 6) Acacio Riberio 7) Grotto Holding Corp 8) Minutes 4 Highland Ave 68 Beekman Ave 173 Cortlandt Street 31 Beekman Ave 260 North Washington Street 56 Howard Street 300 North Broadway New fence New mixed-use bldg New signage New signage New siding New fence amended application 1) Harney 4 Highland Ave New fence - This is a continuation from the previous meeting. Jack Goldstein is an engineer and is representing this application. Jack Goldstein stated that the proposed post and rail fence will be installed along the side property line to define the property line to the street. The Chair asked about the removal of the aluminum fence on the Hammer’s property. Jack Goldstein responded that a fence was inadvertently installed on the applicant’s property by the adjacent neighbor. He stated that the aluminum fence will be removed. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the fence needed to be moved for 2.5 inches. Jack Goldstein responded that the fence is installed on the applicant’s property. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the lot would be developed. �Jack Goldstein responded that he did not know. Pat Piereson asked when the aluminum fence was installed. Jack Goldstein responded he did not know exactly but it was recent. The Chair opened the public hearing. Bill Hammer (10 Highland Ave) stated that he lives next to the property. He stated that he would investigate the survey issue. He read a prepared statement. He stated that the wooded lot was cleared without regards to the neighbors. He stated that the proposed fence is a spite fence. He stated that the revised plan does not propose any landscaping and is a resubmission from the last meeting. Thomas Finn (49 Highland Ave) stated that the applicant wants to install the fence on the paper street. He stated that the property was purchased about 11 years ago and nothing was done with the property during that time. He stated that this fence is being installed because of an argument with the adjacent neighbor. He stated that the fence is offensive to the neighbors (Hammers). Janet Gunderman (131 Millard Ave) stated that this post and rail fence would not blend into the neighborhood. She stated that a greenway solution would be more consistent. Jim McGoff (12 Highland Ave) stated that the property boundary is a matter of fact. He questioned the need for the fence. Leslie Hammer (10 Highland Ave) stated that the fence was installed because they have a dog. She stated that the fence will be relocated if necessary but will not be removed. She stated that she needed to install landscaping because of her dog. Ana Maria McGinnis asked when the fence was installed. Leslie Hammer responded June 2008. John Maltby (10 Millard Ave) stated that to move a fence 2 inches is ludicrous. Lorie Gellnick (37 Highland Ave) stated that having 2 fences bordering the same boundary is unnecessary. She stated that a landscaping plan was mentioned at the last meeting. Olga Blumenfeld (11 Highland Ave) stated that the boundary should be landscaped without a fence. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the owner wants to respond. Tom Harney stated that the fence is a legal fence. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 24, 2008 2 �Jack Goldstein stated that the fence approval was granted to the adjacent neighbor. He stated that the Village Code is being followed. He stated that if another fence is preferred, the applicant can modify the proposed fence. Sean McCarthy asked if the fence would be stained. Jack Goldstein responded whatever the Board prefers. Pat Piereson asked about installing landscaping as a boundary. Jack Goldstein responded that the landscaping is not a structure. He stated that stone walls or fences are used to demark property lines. Pat Piereson asked if a low stone wall could be installed with landscaping behind it. Jack Goldstein stated that the adjacent neighbor received an approval for a 4-foot high fence. He stated that the applicant is requesting the same. The Chair stated that the Board spends a lot of time reviewing fences and signs. He stated that the fence should not be allowed to be installed to the sidewalk. He stated that the neighbor installed a fence 100-feet from the street. Jack Goldstein asked if there were any fence that could be installed that the Board would approve. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the existing fence style should be extended with landscaping. She stated that the Board does not approve 2 fences back to back. Jack Goldstein responded can the applicant extend the existing style. Pat Piereson responded not to the sidewalk. This was adjourned 5 minutes to give the applicant time to revise their proposed fence. Jack Goldstein stated that the applicant would like to adjourn this application to the next meeting. Joseph Willis (Bellwood Ave) stated that the landscaping boundary should be re-installed. Bill Hammer stated that he would be in favor of the 1-foot stone wall. Tom Harney responded that he is not in favor of installing the stone wall. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that if the applicant is going to return with the same application, it will be denied. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to adjourn the application to the next meeting. Pat Piereson seconded. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 24, 2008 3 �Sandra Tripp asked what would be changed in the application. The Chair closed the public hearing. The motion to adjourn the application was passed 3-1 (Chair). 2) Marco Araujo 68 Beekman Ave New mixed-use bldg This is a continuation from the previous meeting. Luigi Demasi is the project architect and is representing this application. Luigi Demasi stated that the Board requested that the applicant remove the parapets and to provide samples of the proposed brick. He also stated that the Planning Board recommended that the 3rd floor be removed from the proposal. He provided a sample of the brick. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the windows are not symmetrical on the front elevation. Luigi Demasi responded that the window placement is based on the interior layout. Pat Piereson asked if the windows could be enlarged to present some alignment. Luigi Demasi responded that it could not be done. Sandra Tripp asked if the angle of the roof would change with the lowering of the building. Luigi Demasi responded no. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) M&S Party Supplies 173 Cortlandt Street New signage This is a continuation from previous meetings. Mayra Cuenca is the owner and is representing this application. Mayra Cuenca presented sketched of a permanent sign. Ana Maria McGinnis asked where the signs would be located. Mayra Cuenca showed where the signs will be installed. She stated that the signs will be neon. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 24, 2008 4 �Ana Maria McGinnis asked why the signs need to be neon. Mayra Cuenca responded that the signs are more colorful. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the sign sketches are boring. There was an open discussion on the proposed signs. This was adjourned to later in the next meeting. 4) Finalmente Trattoria 31 Beekman Ave New signage This is a continuation from the last meeting. Dan Damiano is the owner and is representing this application. Dan Damiano stated that the antique lights will illuminate the previously approved sign. The Chair responded that the required electrical conduits and boxed will be obtrusive. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted with the condition that the proposed supplied light fixtures are wired thru the bottom stem of the bracket so that there is no exposed wiring. Sandra Tripp seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Continued 3) M&S Party Supplies 173 Cortlandt Street New signage Mayra Cuenca presented a revised sketch of the proposed signs. Sandra Tripp made a motion to approve the left-side of the sketch (side with the M & S sign). The lettering underneath is vinyl and the M & S will be neon. The other sign will be reviewed at the next meeting. The Chair seconded. It was approved (3-1) (McGinnis). APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 24, 2008 5 �5) Carlos Siguenza 260 North Washington Street New siding - Carlos Siguenza is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the notices were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Carlos Siguenza stated that the existing house has asbestos siding and has 2 different colors. He is proposing to install vinyl siding to improve the exterior appearance. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if there is a photo of the front of the house. Carlos Siguenza responded no. The Chair stated that the Board should see the front of the house since it falls within the Board’s jurisdiction. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the Board should see the front of the house to see the architectural details of the house. Pat Piereson agreed. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 6) Acacio Riberio 56 Howard Street New fence - Acacio Riberio is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the notices were received. Sean McCarthy responded no. He stated that the Board can hear the application but could not take action. Acacio Riberio stated that he wants to install a new vinyl fence in the front of the house. Sean McCarthy asked if a gate would be installed for the driveway. Acacio Ruberio responded no. He stated that the driveway would remain open. Sandra Tripp stated that photos should be provided. This was adjourned to the next meeting. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 24, 2008 6 �7) Grotto Holding Corp 300 North Broadway amended application- David Barbuti is the project architect and is representing this application. David Barbuti gave an overview of the revisions to the application. He stated that all but one door in the rear has been eliminated. He stated that 2 garage doors will be used for parking. The remaining garage spaces will be replaced with double hung windows. He stated that there are no changes to the front of the building. Sean McCarthy summarized the May 2008 ARB approval. He stated that the west elevation was approved. He stated that the east elevation was not approved. David Barbuti submitted material samples to the Board. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there was no public present, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Minutes The minutes for the September meeting were reviewed. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). The minutes for the October meeting will be reviewed at the next meeting. The Board agreed that there will not be a December 2008 meeting. Adjourned at 9:56 p.m. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, November 24, 2008 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-11-24 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text