1 25 3689 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/ad2a838e1f173b696c14f71f99672f54.pdf 8d18402d6d8dfad3dab95f3588c5f9f8 PDF Text Text ����� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2022 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource 2022-07-20 231 Webber Avenue Approved ZBA Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2022 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2022 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/cb36d43299b4077c8926f49f247e19fe.pdf 15ee26742fb8346a4cd6aa3badb79b84 PDF Text Text ���� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2022 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource 2022-09-22 231 Webber Avenue Approved Amended Site Plan Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2022 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2022 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/735731a5c8b78a339174f0b401089282.pdf a6bd39a399a3db5ed1c7574115383435 PDF Text Text Meeting Date: 04/22/2025 Resolution #: 04/80A/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Adopt the Water Fund Budget for the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that the 2025-2026 Budget concerning the Water Fund be adopted in the amount of $4,599,021. Said adoption being pursuant to the Provisions of Chapter 809 of the Laws of 1954 and the Budget Manuals for Villages and the Uniform System of Accounts as set forth in the Manuals issued by the Division of Municipal Affairs, Albany, New York. Moved: Trustee Sheeran Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Seconded: Trustee Connell Vote: 4-2-1 Aye: Trustee Sheeran, Trustee Connell, Deputy Mayor Scaglione, Mayor Rutyna Nay: Trustee Andruss, Trustee Husselbee Meeting Date: 04/22/2025 Resolution #: 04/80B/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Approve the Water Consumption Rates for the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow confirms that the Rates per cubic feet for Water for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 shall be as follows: 2025-2026 Water Rates Cubic Feet 0-500 501-3,000 3,001-4,500 4,501-6,000 6,001-9,000 9,001-12,000 12,001 and over Per Thousand Cubic Feet $37.40 minimum $67.65 $84.98 $99.55 $114.35 $150.98 $200.00 Moved: Trustee Sheeran Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Seconded: Trustee Connell Vote: 4-2-1 Aye: Trustee Sheeran, Trustee Connell, Deputy Mayor Scaglione, Mayor Rutyna Nay: Trustee Andruss, Trustee Husselbee �Meeting Date: 04/22/2025 Resolution #: 04/80C/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow Authorizing the Mayor to Execute the Tax Warrant for the Collection of Taxes for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that the Mayor be authorized to sign the Tax Warrant in the amount of $19,100,000 for the collection of the 2025-2026 taxes, and that the same be presented to the Treasurer and Tax Collector with the Assessment Roll. Moved: Deputy Mayor Scaglione Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Seconded: Mayor Rutyna Vote: 4-2-1 Aye: Trustee Sheeran, Trustee Connell, Deputy Mayor Scaglione, Mayor Rutyna Nay: Trustee Andruss, Trustee Husselbee Meeting Date: 04/22/2025 Resolution #: 04/80D/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Set Due Dates for the First and Second Village Tax Installment for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that the tax payments be in two installments, the first installment is payable on June 1, 2025 continuing up to and including June 30, 2025, and the second installment is payable up to December 31, 2025. Moved: Deputy Mayor Scaglione Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Seconded: Trustee Andruss Vote: 5-1-1 Aye: Trustee Andruss, Trustee Sheeran, Trustee Connell, Deputy Mayor Scaglione, Mayor Rutyna Nay: Trustee Husselbee �Meeting Date: 04/22/2025 Resolution # 04/80E/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Set the Rate of Penalty for Unpaid Taxes for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that the taxes and other assessments, if any, are due in full by June 1, 2025. The first installment may be paid without penalty from June 1, 2025 through June 30, 2025. The second installment may be paid without penalty through December 31, 2025. Penalties are 5% for the month of July with each month thereafter at a rate established annually by the State Tax Commissioner. On the second installment, penalties are 5% for the month of January with each month thereafter at the State established rate. All penalties apply to a month or any fraction thereof. Moved: Trustee Andruss Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Seconded: Deputy Mayor Scaglione Vote: 6-0-1 Meeting Date: 04/22/2025 Resolution #: 04/80F/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Adopt the Total Assessed Valuation for the Homestead and Non-Homestead Portions of the Tax Roll for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that for the 2025-2026 fiscal year, the Total Taxable Assessed Valuation for the Homestead portion of the tax roll is $265,990,417 and the Total Assessed Valuation for the Non-Homestead portion of the tax roll is $77,756,178 Moved: Trustee Andruss Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Seconded: Deputy Mayor Scaglione Vote: 6-0-1 �Meeting Date: 04/22/2025 Resolution # 04/80G/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Adopt the Fire Department Budget within the General Fund Budget for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that the 2025-2026 Fire Department Budget, found within the General Fund Budget, be adopted in the amount of $392,050. Said adoption being pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 809 of the Laws of 1954 and the Budget Manuals for the Villages and the Uniform System of Accounts as set forth in the manuals issued by the Division of Municipal Affairs, Albany, New York. Moved: Trustee Connell Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Seconded: Trustee Husselbee Vote: 5-1-1 Aye: Trustee Sheeran, Trustee Connell, Deputy Mayor Scaglione, Trustee Husselbee Mayor Rutyna Nay: Trustee Andruss Meeting Date: Resolution # 04/22/2025 04/80H/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Adopt the General Fund Budget for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that the 2025-2026 Budget concerning the General Fund, less the Fire Department Budget previously and separately adopted, be adopted in the amount of $26,830,360. Said adoption being pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 809 of the Laws of 1954 and the Budget Manuals for the Villages and the Uniform System of Accounts as set forth in the manuals issued by the Division of Municipal Affairs, Albany, New York. Moved: Trustee Connell Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Seconded: Mayor Rutyna Vote: 4-2-1 Aye: Trustee Sheeran, Trustee Connell, Deputy Mayor Scaglione, Mayor Rutyna Nay: Trustee Husselbee, Trustee Andruss, �Meeting Date: 04/22/2025 Resolution # 04/80J/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Adopt the Tax Rate for Homestead and NonHomestead Properties for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that the tax rate be levied pursuant to law and that the rate be $46.2524 per thousand of assessed value for Homestead properties and $87.4182 per thousand of assessed value for Non-Homestead properties, for Fiscal Year June 1, 2025 through May 31, 2026. Moved: Trustee Sheeran Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Seconded: Trustee Connell Vote: 4-2-1 Aye: Trustee Sheeran, Trustee Connell, Deputy Mayor Scaglione, Mayor Rutyna Nay: Trustee Husselbee, Trustee Andruss, Meeting Date: Resolution # 04/22/2025 04/80K/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Adopt The Budget for the Parking Fund for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that the 2025-2026 Budget for the Parking Fund is herein set at the amount of $378,024. Said adoption being pursuant to the Provisions of Chapter 809 of the Laws of 1954 and the Budget Manuals for Villages and the Uniform System of Accounts as set forth in the Manuals issued by the Division of Municipal Affairs, Albany, NY. Moved: Trustee Sheeran Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Seconded: Trustee Connell Vote: 5-1-1 Aye: Trustee Andruss, Trustee Sheeran, Trustee Connell, Deputy Mayor Scaglione, Mayor Rutyna Nay: Trustee Husselbee �Meeting Date: Resolution # 04/22/2025 04/80L/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Approve the Parking Permit Rates for All Lots for a Fee of $500/year for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow confirms that the rates for parking permits in all lots shall be $500/year for the fiscal year 2025-2026, which can be paid in two installments due June 30, 2025 and/or December 31, 2025; except for Continental Street Parking, which shall be $200/year. Permits are sold for a 12-month period (June to May), or on a pro-rated basis for non-renewals at a rate of $50/month for all lots. There will be an annual cost of $50 for an additional shared space permit (or $25 for a 6month period). Moved: Deputy Mayor Scaglione Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Seconded: Trustee Andruss Vote: 6-0-1 Meeting Date: 04/22/2025 Resolution # 04/80M/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Adopt the Sanitation Fund Budget for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that the 2025-2026 Budget concerning the Sanitation Fund be adopted in the amount of $895,130. Said adoption being pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 809 of the Laws of 1954 and the Budget Manuals for the Villages and the Uniform System of Accounts as set forth in the manuals issued by the Division of Municipal Affairs, Albany, New York. Moved: Deputy Mayor Scaglione Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Seconded: Trustee Andruss Vote: 5-1-1 Aye: Trustee Andruss, Trustee Sheeran, Trustee Connell, Deputy Mayor Scaglione, Mayor Rutyna Nay: Trustee Husselbee �Meeting Date: Resolution # 04/22/2025 04/80N/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Approve the Rates for Sanitation for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow confirms that the Rates for Sanitation for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 shall be as follows: (see attached rate schedule). Moved: Trustee Andruss Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Meeting Date: Resolution # Seconded: Deputy Mayor Scaglione Vote: 6-0-1 04/22/2025 04/80P/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Adopt the Sewer Fund Budget for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that the 2025-2026 Budget concerning the Sewer Fund be adopted in the amount of $800,092. Said adoption being pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 809 of the Laws of 1954 and the Budget Manuals for the Villages and the Uniform System of Accounts as set forth in the manuals issued by the Division of Municipal Affairs, Albany, New York. Moved: Trustee Andruss Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Seconded: Deputy Mayor Scaglione Vote: 5-1-1 Aye: Trustee Andruss, Trustee Sheeran, Trustee Connell, Deputy Mayor Scaglione, Mayor Rutyna Nay: Trustee Husselbee �Meeting Date: Resolution # 04/22/2025 04/80R/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Approve the Sewer Consumption Rates for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow confirms that the Sewer Consumption Rates for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 shall be as follows: $4.50 Minimum; 18.0% of Water Usage. Moved: Trustee Connell Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Meeting Date: Resolution # Seconded: Deputy Mayor Scaglione Vote: 6-0-1 04/22/2025 04/80S/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Set the Rate of Penalty for Unpaid Water, Sewer, and Sanitation Usage for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that penalties shall accrue against water, sewer, and sanitation usage fees for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 as follows: There shall be charged a penalty on past due water, sewer, and sanitation usage at a rate of 10% following the thirty (30) days from the date of the billing, with each month thereafter charged at a rate of 1%. Moved: Trustee Connell Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Meeting Date: Resolution # Seconded: Deputy Mayor Scaglione Vote: 6-0-1 04/22/2025 04/80T /2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Approve Annual Salaries for Mayor and Board of Trustees for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Be it Resolved, that the Board of Trustees does hereby approve the following annual salaries for the Mayor and members of the Board of Trustees for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 as follows: Trustees: $10,000 Mayor: $15,000 Moved: Trustee Husselbee Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Seconded: Trustee Andruss Vote: 6-0-1 �Meeting Date: Resolution # 04/22/2025 04/80V/2025 Resolution of the Mayor & Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow to Approve Annual Salaries for Non-Union Staff for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Whereas, the Tentative Budget has been amended as specified in the Summary of Changes to FY2025-26 Tentative Budget Schedule and is now final; Now Therefore Be it Resolved, that the Board of Trustees does hereby approve the annual Non-Union salaries and wages for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 as shown in the Personal Services Schedule of the 2025-2026 budget as amended, and notes that said salaries and wages are fixed amounts and are effective June 1, 2025. Moved: Trustee Sheeran Absent: Trustee Rodriguez Seconded: Deputy Mayor Scaglione Vote: 4-2-1 Aye: Trustee Sheeran, Trustee Connell, Deputy Mayor Scaglione, Mayor Rutyna Nay: Trustee Husselbee, Trustee Andruss, � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Adopted Operating Budget Resolutions 2025/2026 Subject The topic of the resource Board of Trustees Minutes-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/114e32da0b17fdace9951b21494d5e37.pdf 0cc6bffd89d06249ac7b9c4209387219 PDF Text Text ��� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Approved Resolution, 2 Lighthouse Landing, Block-H ARB Approval Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/6aad01460bdb876b1194852331078466.pdf a9649bb414072cf0529c97edb064244e Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes & Resolutions-2026 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Board of Trustees Work Session for Operating Budget Resolutions_2026-04-21 Subject The topic of the resource Board of Trustees Minutes-2026 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2026 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/626ff3bfc52474b036330e9f4d02d374.pdf b5a04a71aa89a7f06e576dede59cef17 PDF Text Text 1988 �%/ -r-fa /f/3- 6K- fi/O / ? 60 ~fA*«J~ fa**"^t (ycrc^J^ OCauc �/AS amended 1/4/bB fe LOCAL LAW ESTABLISHING ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Section 1. Findings, Purpose % The Board of Trustees of the Village of Tarrytown hereby finds that excessive uniformity, dissimilarity, inappropriateness, or poor quality of design in the exterior appearance of buildings or other structures erected, reconstructed, or altered in any area in the Village of Tarrytown adversely affects the desirability of the immediate area and the neighboring area within the community for residential, business, or other purposes and by so doing impairs the benefits of occupancy or use of property in such areas, impairs the stability and value of both improved and unimproved real property in such areas, prevents the most appropriate development of such areas, produces degeneration of propertv in such areas, with attendant deterioration of conditions affecting the health, safety, comfort, and general welfare of the inhabitants of the community, and destroys a proper relationship between the taxable value of real property in the areas and the cost of municipal services provided therefor. It is the purpose of this"local law to prevent these and other harmful effects of such exterior appearances of such buildings or other structures and thus to promote and protect the health, safety, comfort, and general welfare of the community, to conserve the value of buildings, and to encourage the most appropriate use of land within the Village of Tarrytown. Section 2. Creation; Membership; Terms of Office There is hereby created an Architectural Review Board, which shall consist of five members, who shall serve without compensation. All members of the Board shall be residents of the Village of Tarrytown and shall be specially qualified, by reason of training or experience in art, architecture, landscape architecture, community planning, land development, real estate, or other relevant business or profession, to judge the effects of a proposed building or other structure, or alteration thereof, upon the desirability, property values, and development of surrounding areas. At least one member of the Board shall be a registered architect licensed by the State of New York; at least one other member of the Board shall be experienced in the real estate business; and at least one other member of the Board shall be appointed from a list of three or more persons recommended by the official governing Board of the Historical Society of the Tarrytowns. The members of the Board shall be appointed by the Mayor, with the approval of a majority of the Trustees present and voting, for a term of three years, except that, of the members first appointed, one shall hold office for a term of one year, two for a term of two years, and two for the term of three years from and after their appointments. & �# # ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Page Two Members of the Board shall continue to hold office until their successors have been appointed and qualified. The Mayor shall appoint from among the members of the Board a Chair, Acting Chair, and Secretary. The Village Clerk or Deputy Clerk shall act as the Clerk of the Board. If a vacancy on the Board shall occur otherwise than by expiration of term, it shall be filled by the Mayor for the unexpired term, provided that that appointment shall maintain on the Board at least one architect, one other person experienced in real estate, and one other person picked from a panel proposed by the Historical Society, as set forth above. The Board of Trustees shall have power to remove any member of the Architectural Review Board for cause and after public hearing. Architectural Review Board members shall be required to recuse themselves from voting on any project in which their own financial interests are directly involved. Section 3. Meetings, Rules, Records, Expenditures Meetings of the Architectural Review Board shall be open to the public and shall be held at the call of the Chair and at such times as the Board may determine. Three members of the Board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Actions of the Board may be taken by a vote of a majority of members present and voting, except that the affirmative vote of at least three members shall be required for (1) the approval, approval subject to specified conditions or modifications, or disapproval of an application for a building permit, pursuant to Section 5 below; or (2) the refusal to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness, the grant of a Delayed Certificate of Appropriateness, or the grant of a Certificate of Appropriateness conditioned upon specific structural performance, pursuant to the Landmark and Historic District Act (Local Law No. 3-1978 and 16-1979) and Section 10 below. The Board shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote of each member upon each question, or, if absent or failing to vote, indicating that fact, and shall also keep records of its examinations and other official actions. The Board shall have power from time to time to adopt, amend, and repeal rules and regulations, not inconsistent with law or the provisions of this local law, governing its procedure and the transaction of its business and for the purpose of carrying into effect the standards outlined in Section 4 below. Every rule or regulation, every amendment or repeal thereof, and every order, requirement, decision, or determination of the Board shall immediately be filed in the offices of the Board and the Village Clerk and shall be a public record. The Board shall have the power to employ consultants and to pay for their services and such other expenses as may be necessary and proper, not exceeding in �lW\i BOARD ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Page Three all the appropriations that may be provided for such purposes by the Board of Trustees. Section 4. Referral of Applications for Building Permits Except where an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness must be submitted to the Architectural Review Board pursuant to the Landmark and Historic District Act (Local Law No. 3-1978 and 16-1979) , every application for a building permit shall be referred by the Building Inspector to the Architectural Review Board provided that there will be: (A) Construction, reconstruction or alteration of any building or structure that: (1) affects the exterior appearance of the building or other structure; and (2) is visible from any public street. Or, the proposed plans include: (B) Construction, reconstruction or alteration of any deck or uncovered porch that: (1) affects the exterior appearance of the building or other structure; and (2) is visible from any public street; and (3) exceeds twenty-five (25) square feet, including steps. Or, the proposed plans include: (C) Construction, reconstruction or alteration of existing/new windows or security grills, that: (1) affect the exterior appearance of the building or other structure; and (2) are visible from any public street. Or, the proposed plans include: (D) Construction, reconstruction or alteration of any fence or wall exceeding three (3) feet in height or twenty (20) feet in length that is visible from any public street. Construction of swimming pools shall not be subject to review by the Architectural Review Board. The application shall not be referred to the Architectural Review Board unless and until it conforms in all other respects to all other applicable laws and ordinances, �ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Page Four including but not limited to necessary approvals from the Zoning Board of Appeals and/or the Planning Board. Section 5. Referral of Applications for Variances to Sign Ordinances Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 6B herein regarding signs, all variances from the provisions of Ordinance 5.4 Signs shall be submitted to the Architectural Review Board. In review of a request for a sign variance, the Board shall be subject to the same requirements included herein in regard to building permit requests. The applicant for a sign variance shall be required to prove to the Architectural Review Board that the strict application of Village Ordinance 5.4 "Signs" will render a hardship to the applicant. The applicant in supplying proof of a hardship to the Architectural Review Board shall demonstrate that there are special circumstances or conditions specific to the property and the sign related thereto that warrants the variance. The Architectural' Review Board in granting a variance shall grant the minimum variance necessary so that the sign will be in harmony with the surrounding buildings and signage and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or the Village. In granting any variance the Architectural Review Board shall prescribe any appropriate safeguards and conditions applying thereto that it may deem to be necessary or desirable in the public interest and such determination shall be recorded on the sign permit or the Certificate of Appropriateness. Section 6. A. Approval, Disapproval, Certificates of Appropriateness Approval, Disapproval The Architectural Review Board may approve, approve subject to specified conditions or modifications, or disapprove any application for a building permit referred to the Board pursuant to Section 4 above, provided, however, that the Board shall not disapprove any application unless the Board finds that the construction, reconstruction, or alteration for which the permit was applied would, if permitted, be so detrimental to the desirability, property values, or development of the surrounding area as to provide one or more of the harmful effects set forth in Section 1 above, by reason of: (1) Excessive similarity to any other existing building or other structure, or to any other building or other structure for which a permit has been issued, or to any other building or other structure included in the same permit application, facing the same street and within �ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Page Five two hundred fifty (250) feet of the proposed site, in respect to one or more of the following features of exterior design and appearance: apparently identical facade; substantially identical size and arrangement of doors, windows, porticoes, or other openings or breaks in the facade facing the street, including reverse arrangement; or other significant identical features, such as material, roof line, and height. (2) Excessive dissimilarity in relation to any other existing building or other structure, or to any other building or structure for which a permit has been issued, or to any other building or other structure included in the same permit application, within two hundred fifty (250) feet of the proposed site, in respect to one or more of the following features: cubical contents; gross floor area; height of building or height of roof; other significant design features, such as material or quality or architectural design. A finding of excessive similarity or dissimilarity shall not be based on personal preference as to taste or choice of architectural style. Any determination disapproving an application for a building permit shall set forth: (1) the specific grounds for finding excessive similarity or excessive dissimilarity; and (2) the specific harmful effects, as set forth in Section 1 above, produced by that excessive similarity or excessive dissimilarity. B. Certificates of Appropriateness (1) Notwithstanding any inconsistent ordinance, code, rule or regulation concerning the issuance of building, sign, or other permits, no material change of appearance in any designated feature of a structure in a designated Historic District or of a designated Landmark and no new construction in a designated Historic District, and no demolition in such District or of a Landmark, shall be commenced without issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness having first been issued. The Certificate of Appropriateness required by this section shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any building, sign, or other permit that may be required by any state or local law or regulation. (2) Applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness shall be submitted to the Board in such form and including such information as the Board may require �ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Page Six (3) Issuance of Certificate (a) The Board shall consider the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness and shall determine whether the proposed material change will be appropriate to the preservation of the District or the Landmark in view of the purposes of the Landmark and Historic District Act. In passing upon appropriateness, the Board shall consider, in addition to any other pertinent factors, the historical and architectural style, general design arrangement, texture, material and color of the building component or sign involved and the relationship thereof to other structures in the immediate neighborhood or District. (i) With respect to construction, the Board shall take into consideration the visual relationship between the property in question and existing structures and' the character of the District and the extent to which a new or altered structure would be harmonious with or incongruous to the historic, quaint, picturesque, or distinctive aspect of the surroundings. (ii) With respect to demolition in whole or in part, the Board shall consider whether (a) the building is of such architectural or historical interest that its removal would be to the detriment of the public interest, (b) whether the building is of such interest that it could be made into an historic shrine, (c) whether the building is of such old or unusual or uncommon design, texture or material that it could not be reproduced or reproduced only with great difficulty, (d) whether retention of the building would help preserve and protect an historic place or area of historic interest in the Village, and (e) whether retention will promote the general welfare by maintaining and increasing real estate values and encourage interest in history and architecture. (b) If the Board approves a material change proposed, the Board shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness, which shall specify the work to be done. In issuing such Certificate the Board may prescribe any conditions that it deems to be necessary to carry out the intent �REVIEW BOARD and purposes of this law. A Certificate issued pursuant to this section shall relate solely to proposed plans accompanying the application or otherwise submitted to the Board for official consideration prior to issuance of said Certificate. It shall be unlawful to deviate from the plans, including any modifications required as a condition of the issuance of such Certificate unless and until an amended Certificate shall be applied for and issued. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board shall not issue any such Certificate unless and until it has been advised by the Building Inspector that there is no impediment to the issuance of any building, sign, or other permit as may be required by applicable state or local law or regulation, for said work. With respect to an application to raze aLandmark or a structure located in an Historic Zone, the Architectural Review Board shall have the right to issue a Delayed Certificate of Appropriateness. Such Certificate shall not permit demolition or razing for a period of up to ten (10) months from the date of application therefor, during which time the Board and the applicant shall undertake serious and continuing discussion for the purpose of finding a method to save such property. During such period, the applicant and the Board shall cooperate in attempting to avoid demolition of the property. At the end of this ten month period, if no mutually agreeable method of saving the subject property bearing a reasonable prospect of eventual success is underway or if no formal application for funds from any governmental unit or nonprofit organization to preserve the subject property is pending, the Building Inspector may issue the permit to demolish the property without the approval of the Board. If such mutually agreeable method for saving the subject property is not successful or no such funds to preserve the subject property have been obtained and available for disbursement within a period of two months following the end of such ten month period, the Building Insepctor may issue the permit to demolish the property without the approval of the Board. If the Board determines that a Certificate of �ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Page Eight Appropriateness should not be issued, or that a Delayed Certificate or a Certificate contingent upon specific structural performance should be issued, the Board shall notify the applicant in writing of such determination, and of the Board's reasons therefor and shall file such notice with the Village Clerk. (e) The Building Inspector shall refuse to grant a building permit or sign or demolition or other permit in an Historic District or involving a Landmark where a Certificate of Appropriateness has been denied or where the grant of such permit is not within the terms and conditions of such Certificate of Appropriateness which has been granted. (4) Nothing contained in this ordinance shall be construed as authorizing the Architectural Review Board in acting with respect to an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness or in adopting regulations in relation thereto, to waive any regulation or laws relating to the Zoning Board of Appeals or the Planning Board. The Board may, in exercising its powers and performing its functions under this law, with reference to an Historic District or Landmark, apply or impose with respect to the construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition or use of any structure or sign, determinations or conditions which are more restrictive than those prescribed or made by or pursuant to the applicable regulations contained herein or to any other applicable provisions of law. (5) Any Certificate of Appropriateness and any permit to raze a building issued pursuant to these rules and regulations shal expire of its own limitation twelve (12) months from the date of issuance, if the work authorized thereby is not commenced by the end of such twelve-month period; and further, any such Certificate and permit shall also expire and become null and void if such authorized work is suspended and abandoned for a period of twelve (12) months after being commenced. Any period or periods of time during which the right to use any such Certificate or permit is stayed pursuant to these rules and regulations or to any statutory or judicial rule or order shall be excluded from the computation of the twelve months. �ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Page Nine C. Maintenance; Removing Dangerous Conditions (1) Every owner or other person in charge of a Landmark building or struct-ure or a building or structure in an Historic District shall keep in good repair all of the exterior portion? of such improvements and all interior portions thereof which, if not so maintained, may cause or tend to cause the exterior portions of such improvements to deteriorate, decay or become damaged or otherwise to fall into ?. state of disrepair. (2) In any case where the Building Inspector shall order or direct the construction, removal, alteration or demolition of any improvement on a Landmark site or in an Historic District for the purpose of remedying conditions determined to be dangerous to life, health or property, nothing contained herein shall be construed to make it unlawful for any person, without prior issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness, to comply with such order or direction. The Building Inspector shall give the Architectural Review Board notice of any such proposed order or direction, and the Board shall have the power to require that the work not materially change the exterior appearance where the danger of life, health or property may be abated without detracting from the exterior appearance. Section 7. Refusal of Permit, Issuance of Permit, Failure of Board to Act The Building Inspector shall refuse any building permit application that has been disapproved by the Architectural Review Board pursuant to Section 6 above. The Building Inspector shall forthwith issue a building permit, the application for which has been approved by the Architectural Review Board pursuant to Section 6 above, provided that all other requirements of law for the issuance of that permit have been met and further provided that the permit shall set forth all conditions or modifications to which the approval by the Board is subject. If the Architectural Review Board fails to render a decision pursuant to Section 6 above on an application for a building permit within seventy-five (75) days after the first consideration of the application by the Architectural Review Board, the Board shall be deemed to have approved the application; and the Building Inspector shall forthwith issue the building permit, provided that all other requirements of law for the issuance of that permit have been met. That seventy-five (75) day period may be extended by mutual consent of the applicant and the Board. �ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Page Ten The Building Inspector shall determine compliance with the decision of the Architectural Review Board prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Should the Building Inspector determine that compliance has not occurred, a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the applicant complies with the decision of the Architectural Review Board. Section 8. Fees The following fee schedule is established for all applications before the Architectural Review Board: Filing Fee Additional Fee Section 9. $10.00 $ 1.00 per $1,000.00 for any construction over $10,000.00. Consultation with Planning Board; Zoning Board of Appeals Upon the reguest of the Planning Board and/or the Zoning Board of Appeals, the Architectural Review Board shall consult with and advise the requesting Board with respect to any site plan that the Planning Board is required by law to review or with respect to zoning appeals that the Zoning Board of Appeals is required by law to review. Section 10. Historical Architectural Review Board The Historical Architectural Review Board established by the Landmark and Historic District Act (Local Law No. 3-1978 and 16-1979) is hereby abolished; and the powers, duties, and functions of that Board are hereby vested in the Architectural Review Board created by Section 2 above. Section IIIA of the Landmark and Historic District Act (Local Law No. 3-1978) is hereby repealed. Section 11. Separability If any section, sub-section, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Local Law is declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect any other portion of this Local Law. The Village Board hereby declares that it would have adopted every section, sub-section, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase of this Local Law regardless of the fact that any other section, sub-section, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase be delcared invalid. Section 12. Effective Date This local law shall take effect immediately. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1988 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1988-01-04 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1988 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1988 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/fe2765fa5238ba6ea55d21accaca737b.pdf feedf57b26127442ba9c5437d7cd2d6e PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN SIGN ORDINANCE September 12, 1988 �VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN SIGN ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 2.0-2.6 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 Page Title & Purpose Definitions General Regulations Prohibited Signs Exempt Signs Signs in Commercial...Districts General Regulations Number of Permitted Signs Colors Dimensions Placement Temporary Signs Sign Directories Awning Signs Illuminated Signs Structural & General Safety Regs. Non-conforming Signs Permit Application Action & Appeals Permit Fees Permit Void Conditions for Bona Fide Display Removal of Certain Signs Revocation of Permit Penalties Validity Publication & Effective Date 1 1-3 3 3-4 4-6 6 6-7 7 7 7-8 8 8-9 9 9 9-11 11 11-12 12 13 13-14 15 15 15 15 15-16 16 16 16 �VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN SIGN Ordinance Section 1.0 1.1 TITLE: This Ordinance shall be known as the Village of North Tarrytown Sign Ordinance, and may be cited as such, and will be referred to herein as "this Ordinance". PURPOSE: The purpose of this Ordinance is to promote the public health, welfare and safety by regulating existing and proposed exterior signs and interior signs placed for external observation. It is intended to protect property values and create a more attractive economic climate, to protect and enhance the physical and natural beauty of the village by ensuring that signage is appropriate to the character of North Tarrytown as a residential village; to reduce sign distractions and obstructions that may contribute to traffic accidents; to reduce hazards which may be created by signs projecting over sidewalks and streets; and to regulate signs in a manner consistent with the legislative intent and purposes set forth in Section 62-2 of the Zoning Code of the Village of North Tarrytown. Section 2.0 2.1 Page 1 DEFINITIONS SIGN. Any material, structure, or device which is composed of letters, pictures, or symbols; designed or used for the purpose of attracting, or which does attract, the attention of the public to the subject matter thereof; and either located out-of-doors on the exterior of a building or inside the building within 5 feet of the window or in a manner to be viewed principally by passersby. The following are definitions of specific sign types: 1. AWNING SIGN. Any visual message incorporated into an awning attached to a building 2. COPY-CHANGE SIGN. A sign on which the visual message may be periodically changed. 3. DIRECTIONAL SIGN. A sign limited to providing information on the location of an activity, business or event. 4. FREE-STANDING SIGN. A sign not permanently attached to or part of any building but separate and permanently affixed by any other means, in or upon the ground. Included are pole signs, pylon signs, and masonry wall-type signs. �• # Page 2 ILLUMINATED SIGN. Any sign, including but not limited to neon, in or upon which an artificial light source is utilized in a manner to illuminate the information and graphics of the sign. There are four types: A. Self-illuminated, wherein the light source itself is shaped and utilized to form the sign (e.g. neon or and array of individual lamps). B. Self-illuminated—internal—wherein a translucent or opaque material which forms the sign is backlighted by the light source and the light source is enclosed from direct view. C. Externally illuminated—direct—wherein the sign is illuminated by a light source placed in a manner to cast light upon the sign. D. Externally illuminated—indirect—wherein the sign is illuminated by ambient light. OFF-PREMISES SIGN. A sign unrelated to a business or profession conducted, or to a commodity or service sold or offered, upon the premises where such sign is located. PORTABLE SIGN. A sign, whether on its own trailer, wheels, or otherwise, designed to be movable and not structurally attached to the ground, a building, structure, or other sign. PROJECTING SIGN. A sign which is attached to the building wall or structure and which extends horizontally from the plane of such wall, or a sign which is perpendicular to the face of such wall or structure, extending more than 15 inches. REPRESENTATIONAL SIGN. A three-dimensional sign built so as to physically represent the object advertised. TEMPORARY SIGN. A sign related to a single activity or event having a duration of no more than 30 days. WALL SIGN. A sign which is painted on or attached to the outside wall of a building with the face of the sign in the plane parallel to such wall. �Page 3 12. WINDOW SIGN. A sign visible from a sidewalk, street, or other public place, painted or affixed on glass or other window material, or located inside within 5 feet of the window. 13. SIGN DIRECTORY. A listing of two or more business enterprises, consisting of a matrix and sign components. 2.2 SIGN STRUCTURE. The supports, uprights, bracing and framework for the sign. In the case of a sign structure consisting of 2 or more sides where the angle formed between any two of the sides or projections thereof exceeds 30 degrees, each side shall be considered a separate sign structure. 2.3 SIGN SURFACE AREA. The entire area within a single, continuous perimeter enclosing all elements which form an integral part of the sign. The structure supporting a sign shall be excluded unless the structure is designed in a way to form an integral background for the display. Both faces of a double-faced sign shall be included as surface area of such sign. 2.4 ERECT. When used with respect to signs, means to paint, build, construct, alter, display, relocate, attach, hang, place, suspend, or affix. Such term does not include maintenance and repair, but does include the repainting or refinishing of a sign in a manner which changes the color or design of a sign or any of its components. 2.5 BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENT. Any premises, either separate or defined by permanent party walls within a building, with a common entrance or entrances for one or more businesses conducted therein 2.6 STREET. road. Section 3.0 3.1 Any public or private way, street, avenue, or GENERAL REGULATIONS. PROHIBITED SIGNS: 1. No off-premises sign shall be allowed other than as permitted under the Exempt Sign provision of this Ordinance. 2. No sign shall be illuminated by or contain flashing, intermittent, or rotating or moving lights. �3. Page 4 No sign shall emit smoke, vapors or particles, sound or colors. 4. No sign shall impair or cause confusion of vehicular or pedestrian traffic, in its design, color or placement. No sign shall impair visibility for the motorist, at a street corner or intersection by placement and location within 25 feet of the intersection of the street. 5. No sign or sign supports shall be placed on the roof of any building. 6. No sign or exterior display shall consist of banners, pennants, flags, ribbons, streamers, spinners, or similar moving, fluttering, or revolving devices. 7. Illuminated signs which are located closer than 5 feet from any point to a display window or elsewhere within the interior in a manner to be viewed principally by passersby, are prohibited. 8. Signs affixed to exterior glass are prohibited. 9. No free-standing signs, except informational signs erected by a governmental body, or those specifically described herein. (See Page 9,#10) 10. Signs located in or projecting over a street, except those erected by a governmental body, are prohibited. 11. Exterior signs containing product or service advertising, trade names, or logotypes separate from the name of the business are prohibited. 12. Temporary real estate and other tradesmen's signs erected on a property for sale or under renovation are prohibited. 13. Self-illuminated signs on the exterior building facade are prohibited. 14. The use of plastic and plastic laminate material of any type is prohibited. 15. Portable signs, as defined by Section 2-1 herein, are prohibited. EXEMPT SIGNS. The following types of signs may be erected and maintained without permits or fees, �Page 5 providing such signs comply with the general requirements of this Ordinance and other conditions specifically imposed by this Ordinance. 1. Historical markers, tablets and statues, memorial signs and plaques; names of buildings and dates of erection when cut into any masonry surface or when constructed of bronze, stainless steel or similar material; and emblems installed by governmental agencies; religious or nonprofit organizations, not exceeding 6 square feet. 2. Flags and insignia of any government, except when displayed in connection with commercial promotion. 3. ; On-premise directional signs for the convenience of the general public, identifying public parking areas, fire zones, entrances and exits and similar signs, internally or externally illuminated. Business names shall be allowed, excluding advertising messages. 4. Non-illuminated warning, private drive, posted or no trespassing signs, not exceeding 2 square feet. 5. One on-premise sign, either free-standing of the masonry wall-type or attached, in connection with any residential building in any zoning district for permitted professional offices, not exceeding 2 square feet and set back at least 15 feet from the highway right-of-way. Such sign shall state name and profession only. 6. Number and name plates identifying residents, mounted on house, apartment or mailbox, not exceeding 1 square foot in area. 7. Lawn signs identifying residents, not exceeding 1 square foot, or 2 square feet if double-faced, Such signs are to be non-illuminated except by a light which is an integral part of a lamp post if used as a support, with no advertising message thereon. 8. Private-owner merchandise sale signs for garage sales and auctions, not exceeding 4 square feet for a period not exceeding 7 days. 9. Temporary, non-illuminated window signs and posters. Placement shall not exceed 30 days. 10. Holiday decorations, including lighting, are exempt from provisions of this Ordinance and may be displayed in any district without permit until 10 �Page 6 days after the holiday. 11. At gasoline stations: a. Integral graphics or attached price signs on gasoline pumps. b. Two auxiliary signs per station, each not exceeding 2 square feet. 12. Directional signs for meetings, conventions, and other assemblies. 13. One sign, not exceeding 6 square feet in residential districts nor 12 square feet in the business districts, listing the architect, engineer, contractor and/or owner, on premises where construction is in progress. 14. Political posters not exceeding 4 square feet in the residential district nor 9 square feet in the business district, providing: a. Placement shall not exceed 30 days. b. The names and addresses of the sponsor and the person responsible for removal are identified. c. Such signs are not affixed to public property or public utility poles. SIGNS IN COMMERCIAL—INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS: GENERAL REGULATIONS. 1. Except as otherwise provided, no person shall erect, or relocate any sign without first obtaining a permit from the Building Inspector. Within 6 months of the effective date of this Ordinance, a permit shall also be obtained for any sign in existence as of the effective date of this Ordinance, unless specifically excluded by the Exempt Signs provisions under Section 3.2. �Page 7 Signs shall be in keeping with the architectural design of the building upon which they are placed, the design of neighboring properties and adjoining signs, and the character of North Tarrytown. Each business establishment shall be limited to: A. One principal sign per facade identifying the name and type of business, with a maximum of two signs in the case of a building fronting on two or more rights-of-way, except for signs for which no permit is required under Section 3.2 of this Ordinance. B. One secondary sign identifying the name and type of business located either on the front flap of an awning or on the front door, and one such secondary sign in one window of a second floor business. Signs shall be limited to 3 colors. Black, white, natural finish, and tints of the same color shall be considered separate colors. The return edge of letter forms and graphic symbols shall be the same color as that of the face. Metallic, iridescent, and day-glo bright colors are prohibited. Use of natural bronze, aluminum, and stainless steel metals, and genuine gold and silver leaf, is permitted. Dimensions of permitted signs. A. The maximum vertical dimension or height of any sign affixed to a building facade shall be 18 inches and the maximum horizontal dimension or length shall not exceed 90% of the street frontage of the business establishment upon which such sign is erected or maintained. In any case, however, the maximum horizontal dimension or length of such sign shall not exceed 50 feet on any street frontage for the same business establishment. B. For circular, oval, square, or other nonrectangular signs, the total sign area shall not exceed 9 square feet. C. The maximum overall height of letter groups (including upper and lower case letters) and graphic symbols shall be 12 inches. Where there �Page 8 is more than one line of letters and symbols, the combined height of letters and symbols shall not exceed 12 inches including the space between the lines. D. Where the design of an existing building facade incorporates a specific area for signs, the height and length of the signs shall be restricted to the dimensions of this area. Such signs may not, however, exceed maximum dimensions as stated above. Placement of signs. A. Signs shall be placed parallel to the facade of the building; and, except for marquees of theater in operation and awnings, no part of the sing shall project more than 4 inches beyond the face of the surface to which it is applied, nor extend beyond the building in any direction. B. The lower edge of a sign placed on a facade shall not be located above the level of the floor of the second story of the building upon which the sign is placed. Temporary signs, advertising display panels, posters, and similar graphic materials relating to general sales and information, special events and offerings, and sales promotions may be displayed without permit, provided: A. B. C. D. E. F. No dimension exceeds 3 0 inches by 30 inches They are neatly and professionally rendered and displayed and are mounted on firm material. They are individually supported on easels, mounted on a wall, or suspended from the ceiling in a true and square manner. They are located at least 12 inches back of the window glass. Not more than one such sign per 20 linear feet of storefront and a maximum of 4 such signs per facade may be displayed at any one time. All such signs in this category must be dated. �• 8. • Page 9 Not more than two posters concerning an event sponsored by a not-for-profit group, with dimensions not exceeding 1 foot by 1-1/2 feet, may be displayed without displaying a permit on the door of a business establishment. 9. Signs on accessory buildings or buildings incidental to the principal building in which the business is located shall be allowed as a portion of the total allowable sign area computed using the frontage of the principal building only. 10. Sign directories will be permitted provided A. The character and size of the sign matrix and of the individual sign components comprising the directory shall be in accordance with design guidelines provided by the Ordinance. B. Sign directories shall contain identification of the business establishments located in the building and the building name but shall contain no promotional advertising. C. Such sign directories may be of the free-standing masonry wall-type located not less than 15 feet from the front property line nor 4 feet from the side property line and not less than 50 feet from any other free-standing sign. D. The overall dimensions of such sign, including base, shall not exceed 20 square feet. 11. Awning signs will be permitted in accordance with the Appendix, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 12. FUTURE AND PROPOSED ILLUMINATED SIGNS—EXTERIOR A. The use of self-illuminated signs, as defined in Section 2.1.5 (A) and (B), on the exterior facade of a building is prohibited. B. One(l) externally illuminated sign, as defined in Section 2.1.5 (C), identifying the name and description of the business shall be permitted on each street facade for the ground floor use of a business establishment. For a business located on two or more rights-of-way, a maximum of two (2) such illuminated signs, one on each facade, shall be permitted. �• C. • Page 10 The light sources providing the illumination may be one of two types: (1) Ornamental incandescent fixture mounted to the building facade with a maximum projection fifteen inches. (2) Concealed continuous strip with incandescent or fluorescent lamps mounted immediately adjacent to the plane of the building facade and enclosed, with minimum projection of four inches. D. The design and appearance of light fixtures shall be fitting and appropriately integrated with the architectural character of the building facade and that of its neighbors. FUTURE AND PROPOSED ILLUMINATED SIGNS—INTERIOR A. Self-illuminated signs, as defined in Section 2.1.5 (A) and (B) are prohibited in the window of a business establishment if located within 5 feet of the glass or within the interior when arranged in a manner so as to be seen by passersby. B. Externally illuminated signs, as defined in Section 2.1.5 (C) are permitted in the windows of a business establishment if located within 5 feet of the glass and if designed to identify the name and type of business. Such sign(s) may not be in addition to a sign on the building exterior except that the name of the business may also be located on the front valance of an awning or on a front door in accordance with these regulations. FUTURE AND PROPOSED ILLUMINATED SIGN—EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR A. Light sources shall be shielded or screened in a manner not to be seen by passersby from a normal viewing angle. Intense or glaring light is to be avoided. B. Light sources shall be limited to natural white incandescent or fluorescent lamps. C. Light fixtures and sources shall be designed to cause a reasonably uniform distribution of light on the full extent of the sign(s). �Page 11 Section 4.0 1. All signs, together with all their sup^rts, races, hooks, guys, and anchors, shall be kept in good repair, and shall be painted or cleaned as often as necessary to maintain a clean, neat, safe and orderly appearance. The time period for correction of disrepair shall not exceed 10 days from the date of service of notice of violation, pursuant to Chapter 41 of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown entitled "Property Maintenance". 2. Any sign shall be designed and constructed to withstand a wind pressure load consistent with environmental conditions in the Village of North Tarrytown and shall comply with all applicable building code ordinances of the Village of North Tarrytown. 3. All signs shall be erected, relocated, or maintained so as to allow free ingress to or egress from any door, window, or fire escape. No sign shall be attached to a stand pipe or fire escape. Section 5.0 5.1 STRUCTURAL AND GENERAL SAFETY REGULATIONS NON-CONFORMING SIGNS 1. All signs and supporting structures which do not conform to the provisions of this Ordinance upon the date of adoption, or as subsequently amended, shall be brought into compliance within three (3) years from the effective date of this Ordinance. 2. Upon and after the expiration of such three(3) years, the property and/or sign owner of such sign shall be in violation of this Ordinance until it is removed. The Village of North Tarrytown may, with thirty (30) days prior written notice to the property and sign owner(s), remove such sign without further notice or further proceedings at the expense of the property and/or sign owner. The expense may be recovered by the Village in an action on this Ordinance, which shall be instituted in the appropriate court having jurisdiction over this matter. EXISTING ILLUMINATED SIGNS Those existing before the effective date of this Ordinance and for which a valid permit was issued: 1. One illuminated sign as defined in Section 2.1.5 of this Ordinance identifying the name of the business and/or service provided will be permitted per street �Page 12 facade whether on the exterior of the building or located in the window at least 5 feet from the glass or within the interior arranged so as to be viewed by passersby. On buildings located on two or more public rightsof-way, a maximum of two illuminated signs, with no more than one per right-of-way 2. Businesses with more than one existing illuminated sign per street facade shall remove the excess sign(s) within six (6) months of the effective date of this Ordinance. 3. Self-illuminated product and brand-name advertising signs are prohibited on the building exterior or in the window within 5 feet of the glass or within the interior arranged in a manner intended to be seen by passersby. Such signs shall be removed from the premises within a period of six (6) months of the effective date of this Ordinance. 4. Existing self-illuminated signs, as defined in Section 2.1.5(A) and (B), do not conform to the intent of this Ordinance for the future. Thus, they may not be replaced in kind after the effective date of this Ordinance. Once removed, they may be replaced only with a sign conforming to this Ordinance. 5. Each business which retains an illuminated sign in accordance with this Ordinance shall submit a 3-1/2" X 5" photograph or Polaroid illustrating the sign and thereby defining its location to the Building Inspector within a period of three(3) months of the enactment of this Ordinance for record of its existence and should be affirmed as to date and existence by the Building Inspector and filed in the records of the Building Inspector. ion 6.0 PERMIT Except as specifically exempted by Section 3 hereof, no sign may be erected or displayed on a building facade, awning, or on or within a window without first obtaining a permit from the Building Inspector after a formal review by the Village Sign and Facade Committee. �• • Page 13 ion 7.0 APPLICATION An application for a sign permit shall be made to the Building Inspector and shall comply with these regulations. The Building Inspector shall forward all complete applications to the Sign and Facade Committee for review and report. An application for a sign permit shall comply with the following requirements. A drawing of the signs, accurately showing dimensions, with a scale of not less than 1"=1'0. The size and layout of the letter forms and graphics and materials, colors, and thickness shall be indicated. Samples of each material and color to be used in the sign. Photographs clearly showing the building facade in its entirety and that of the immediately adjacent building. One photograph should be a close-up of where the proposed sign will be erected. Consent to the erection of the sign by owner of the premises on which the sign is to be erected, if applicant is not the owner. Any additional documents as the Sign and Facade Committee may request. A $5.00 application fee must accompany each application. Applications and all related documentation subsequent to approval of sign permits shall be kept on file in the office of the Building Inspector. ion 8.0 A. ACTION AND APPEALS The Sign and Facade Committee shall review each permit application and shall approve, disapprove or approve subject to modifications or conditions, being guided by the purpose and intent of this Ordinance and other laws of the Village of North Tarrytown. The Building Inspector shall, within five working days of approval or within five working days of compliance with any modifications or conditions required for approval, as the case may be, issue a permit for the erection of the proposed sign. �• • Page 14 6. Appeals under this Ordinance shall be to the Zoning Board of Appeals (hereinafter referred to as "Board"). C. Right of Appeal. Any applicant for a permit, any person who has ordered by the Building Inspector to incur expense in connection with a sign and any person dissatisfied with any refusal order, or decision of the Sign and Facade Committee or the Building Inspector, may appeal to the Board within fifteen (15) days from the date of such refusal, order, or decision. A public hearing on any appeal shall be warned by posting notice in a newspaper, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. Such notice shall contain the time, location, and date of the hearing and a reasonable description of the appeals hearing. D. Variance considerations. The Board may vary the provisions of the Ordinance when in specific cases it finds that enforcement would 1) cause unnecessary hardship to the appellant due to the unusual topography, building features or locations, traffic features, or other such characteristics, and 2) provided that the variance is the minimum relief required, and 3) that the intent of this Ordinance is not substantially altered. The Board may attach such safeguards and conditions as it considers necessary and appropriate to implement the purpose and intent of this Ordinance in rendering its decision. E. Decisions on Appeal In rendering a decision or in rejecting an appeal the Board shall issue findings of fact within fortyfive (45) days of the final hearing on the appeal. �Page 15 Section 9.0 PERMIT FEES The permit fees shall be determined by resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Village of North Tarrytown. Section 10.0 PERMIT VOID A sign permit shall be void if the sign authorized thereunder has not been erected within one hundred eighty days from the date of issuance. The owner or applicant of said sign shall be responsible for establishing the date of erection in the issued sign permit. Section 11.0 CONDITIONS FOR CONTINUED BONA FIDE DISPLAY OF SIGNS A. The applicant shall be responsible for the occurrence of all dimensions relating to the building and the sign. In cases where the actual sign does not conform to the approved design, the applicant may be required at his/her own expense to remove, correct, or replace the sign. B. Signs shall be maintained in good and complete condition, with panels, letter forms, and graphics firmly mounted and in true alignment and finishes in good repair. Section 12.0 REMOVAL OF CERTAIN SIGNS Any sign which at any time no longer advertises a bona fide business or activity other than one being conducted on the premises on which such sign is located, or a product or service other than those offered on such premises, or which does not comply with the regulations established for the issuance of a permit pursuant to this Ordinance shall be deemed prohibited and shall be brought into compliance with this Ordinance. If necessary, the Village of North Tarrytown may remove such sign(s) and the expense may be recovered by the Village in action on this Ordinance, which shall be instituted in the appropriate court having jurisdiction over this matter. Section 13.0 REVOCATION OF PERMIT The Building Inspector at any time may revoke a sign permit where the sign erected or maintained thereunder violates this Ordinance. �Page 16 Notice of such revocation and the reason therefore shall be given in writing by the Building Inspector to the person named in the application by mailing the same to him/her at his/her address as given in the application, and to the last known owner of the premises on which the sign is placed by mailing the same to said owner as the address as shown on the assessment roll of the Village, and by filing- a copy of said notice in the Office of the Village Clerk. Section 14.0 PENALTIES Any person(s) violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be subject to penalties not to exceed $50 per day per violation. Section 15.0 VALIDITY Ordinance shall supersede all previous sign ordinances and/or section of The Village Code dealing therewith. The invalidity of any section or provision of this Ordinance, and its application to any sign, shall not invalidate any other section or provision, or application of this Ordinance. Section 16.0 EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect immediately. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1988 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1988-09-12 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1988 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1988 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/6577aba153440813e02ec4479b571b56.pdf b98d6c115937b6abf297d705245fdb8a PDF Text Text On July 28, 1989 a regular meeting of the Architectual Review Board was held at 7:30 PM in Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. Present: Frank Arvan, Chairperson Lou Falasca Robert Barstow Elena Nalunis Annegret Rice Also present: John Hughes, Village Attorney Jim Margotta, Building Inspector In the matter of Glenn Weeks. 174 Webber Avanm. North Tarrvtown. New yorE. Mr. Weeks plans to renovate the second story of his home and presented his plans to the Board for approval of the design. After a very short discussion, a motion to approve the plans was made by Lou Falasca, seconded by Elena Malunis. Motion was passed unamiously. In the matter of Jim Tarrvtown. New York. Nazemetz, 14 3 Hunter Avenue. North Mr. Nazemetz plans to enlarge the second floor of his home by raising the dormers. Bob Barstow asked if the second floor was visible to the street, and applicant indicated it would be more so in the winter than in summer. Mr. Barstow also commented that drawings presented to the Board should have the name of the person or firm doing the drawings. Ms. Malunis agreed. At this point, a discussion took place among the board as to what procedures should be followed. Mr. Falasca suggested that plans should be received by the ARB prior to meetings for review and the applicant should come before the ARB as the first step before appearing before any other boards such as the Planning or Zoning Board. Mr. Barstow suggested that someone from the ARB should also look at the structure when it is completed and before the CO is issued. After the discussion, Mr. Nazemetz was asked to sign the drawings. A motion to approve the drawings for design as submitted was made by Mr. Barstow, seconded by Ms. Rice. Motion was passed unamiously. in the matter of James D'Orio. T a r m p w P i New Yorfr, 71 Chestnut Street. North A preliminary hearing was held with regard to the proposed design of a 10 unit condominium to be built on Chestnut Street. 1 �Mr. D'Orio presented a colored sketch of the design and indicated that site approval for the project had been given by the Planning Board last year. He planned to start building after the approval was granted, but was asked to wait to appear before the Architectual Review Board. The drawings indicated a three story, light stucco colored structure with staircases leading up to individual doorways and canopies over each door. The drawings also showed a horizontal wood border that went the length of the building and a mansard roof. A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the use of the mansard roof. It was suggested that a pitched or gabled roof with dormers be used in a colonial design. It was also suggested that a staggered roof line be used. Because of zoning requirements, certain window styles could not be used, however, it was also suggested to Mr. D'Orio that archways could be used in the doorways. Mr. D'Orio reiterated that approval already had been given for the project and that he has waited patiently to start construction, however, if the Board was unhappy with the design, he would be opened to suggestions. In addition to previous ideas, the Board suggested that a smaller complex be built. Mr. Barstow and Mr. Arvan both prepared brief sketches for Mr. D'Orio with ideas that they thought the Board would go along with. Mr. D'Orio was asked to come before the Board again with revisions of his original design. Mr. Arvan announced that the next meeting of the ARB would be August 23, at 7:30 PM. A brief meeting was held to discuss the agenda for the ARB hearing. Being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:30 Respectfully submitted, Francesca Lorenz Village Administrator's Office 2 PM. �* AGENDA ^ ^x^yv JL^J^^t A r c h i t e c t u r a l Review Board August 2 3 , 1989 1. 1-ulgencio Pena White P l a i n s - 2. L e s t e r H a r r i s o n Hartsdale - Store front S t o r e f r o n t awning and s i g n . (Corclandt & Depeyster St, N/E corner 3. Kostas Panapakioes - Siding Ossining 4. Manuel Arbelaze Mt. Kisco 5 . Michael Kane Larchmont 7:30 P.M. (115 Beekman Ave. Photographer) - (251 No. Washington St.) - Aluminum siding. - Aluminum s i d i n g . (10 Lawrence Ave.) (27 Clinton St.) 6. Nikolaos Patias - free standing sign. 276 N. Broadway 7. Nick fucci 39 Elm St. - second story addition 8. Architonics, Inc. A5 Beekman Ave. - addition on to house. 9. Laurentino Rodrigues 56 Clinton St. 10. James D'lorio Thornwood - Valley Street project. - Chestnut Street project. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1989 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1989-07-28 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1989 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/7058ef7e773eb673100f4f7981f2ecd0.pdf 52177d6050d31d04d222b1111a29ce01 PDF Text Text Pa 9 e One A regular meeting of the Architectual Review Board was held on Wednesday, August 23, 1989 at 7:30 PM in Village Hall, North Tarry town, New York. Present: Also Present: Absent: Frank Arvan, Chairperson Elena Malunis Louis Falasca Jim Margotta, Building Inspector John Hughes, Village Attorney Annegret Rice Robert Barstow In the matter of Fulaenoio Pena, Cortlandt fc Depevster Streets. (N. E. Corner)North Tarrvtown. New YorX Mr. Pena plans to change the sign and awning in front of his store. He submitted sample of the material used in the awning, however, the board will discuss the sign at a later date. A motion to certify the awning design was made by Elena Malunis, seconed by Louis Falasca. Motion was passed unamiously. %n the matter of Lester Harrison, U ? Be«*ma,n Avenge, yprtft Tarrvtown, New York Mr. Harrison submitted a sample of the siding to be used on his storefront. A motion to certify plans for re-siding was made by Elena Malunis, seconded by Louis Falasca. Motion was passed unamiously. In the matter of Kostas Panapakios. 251 No. Washington Street, North Tarrvtown. Mr. Panapakios plans to change the siding of his house and submitted color samples of siding. A short discussion ensued regarding a window on the third floor. After he agreed to keep the window intact, a motion to certify plans for re-siding was made by Louis Falasca, seconded by Elena Malunis. Motion was passed unamiously. In the matter of Manuel Arbelaze, 10 Lawrence Street. North Tarrvtown. Mr. Arbelaze plans to change the color of aluminum siding of his house to light blue. A motion to certify plans for re-siding was made by Frank Arvan, seconded by Elena Malunis. Motion was passed unamiously. 3 �Page c3 s In the matter of Michael Kane. 27 Clinton Street. North Tarrvtown. N. Y. Mr. Kane would like to change the siding of his apartment house and submitted a sample of same. A motion to certify plans for re-siding was made by Lou Falanca, seconded by Frank Arvan. Motion was passed unamiously. In the matter of Nikolaos Patias. rvtown. N. Y. 276 N. Broadway. North Tar- Mr. Donal Walsh represented Mr. Patias, in his request for a free standing sign for his new restaurant called the Horseman. The dimensions of the sign requested is 4 ft by 8' double faced free standing sign. Because of the location of the restuarant (corner of Broadway and Bedford Rd), the board felt it would look more like a gasoline sign rather than a restuarant sign . It was suggested by the Board that perhaps Mr. Patias could use the type of sign that is in front of the Amenta building. However, after some discussion it was decided that the sign would impede vision for drivers driving on Route 9. Mr. Walsh & Margotta will discuss the NYS DOT regulations regarding signs, and the Board decided to table request for certification of the sign until the next meeting. In the Matter of Architonics. Inc.45 Beekman Avenue. North Tarrvtown. New York An addition is planned on the above property and the architect appeared before the Board to asked for approval of concept of the design. A motion to approve the concept was made by Lou Falasca and seconded by Elena Malunis. Motion was passed unamiously. In the matter of Laurentino Rodriguez. Valley Street Project. North Tarrytown. N. Y. Mr. Ron Turnquist, Architect, appeared before the Board and gave a brief history of the project and why the project has been shut down for a period of time. He asked that the board consider certifying the plans as the design of the roof had been changed since the original plans were submitted to the building inspector. Lous Falasca moved to certify the change of roof design. Motion was seconded by Frank Arvan. Motion was passed unamiously. 4 �* Page 5 In the matter of James D'Orio. 71 Chestnut Street. North Tar- eytown, New YorK Donal Walsh, Attorney appeared before the Board on behalf of Mr. D'Orio and the Chestnut Street project. Mr. D'Orio appeared before the Board on July 28, 1989 with a design for the proposed condos he plans to build on Chestnut. At that time he was asked to consider changes in design and to bring them before the Board. The Board certified the proposed changes in design with some conditions, i. e. dumpster area in rear of property, provide screening for residents around project, eliminate fence in front of property. Lou Falsca moved to certify plans as submitted with conditions, seconded by Frank Arvan. Motion was passed unamiously. A motion to approve the minutes as sumbitted was made by Frank Arvan, seconded by Elena Malunis. Motion to adjourn was made by Frank Arvan and seconded by board. Meeting adjourned at 9:05PM Respectfully submitted, Francesca Lorenz Village Administrator's Office � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1989 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1989-08-23 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1989 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/6c8fda4b8f18c07cd92efd098040dea2.pdf bdfdf0e274377f4fdae995532df7b8d5 PDF Text Text A regular meeting of the Architectural Review Board was held on Wednesday, September 27, 1989 at 7:50 PM in Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York. Present: Robert Barstow Annegret Rice Elena Malunis Also Present: Absent: James Margotta, Building Inspector John J. Hughes, Village Attorney Frank Arvan Louis Falasca In the absence of Frank Arvan, Chairman, Robert Barstow acted as Chairman. In the matter of Freyler Realty* 232 North Washington Street, North Tarrytown. New York Mr. David Freyler submitted a sample of the sign he planned to erect. The Board felt the sign was not acceptable as presented and that it needed more depth, perhaps three dimensional. Robert Barstow made a motion to have Mr. Freyler come back next month with more particulars, seconded by Elena Malunis and motion carried. In the matter of Larry Brostoff. Tarrvtown. New York 358 No. Broadway. North Mr. Larry Brostoff wants to change the existing McCall Frandsen sign to his own company name. After much discussion on all the existing signs in and around the dealership, Robert Barstow made a motion that Mr. Brostoff come back with an alternate plan for all of the signs in question, seconded by Annegret Rice and motion carried. In the matter of Signature Graphics, to erect signs at 185 & 186 Cortlandt Streets and 60 Beekman Avenue.North Tarrytown. N.Y. The owner of Signature Graphics presented samples of the signs to be erected in front 185 Cortlandt Street (Salon). Robert Barstow made a motion to approve the sign as presented, but that the two existing signs on the lower bulkhead be removed, seconded by Annegret Rice and motion carried. The owner presented a sample of a sign for 186 Cortlandt Street (Four Star Services). Annegret Rice made a motion to approve this sign with the exception that the stars be removed, seconded by Robert Barstow and motion carried. The owner presented the sample of a sign for 60 Beekman Avenue (formerly Sleepy Hollow Restaurant). 1 �After a brief discussion, Annegret Rice made a motion to allow the sign as presented if the wording Spanish American Food be eliminated from the sign, motion seconded by Robert Barstow and motion carried. They also recommended that the owner remove the current awning. The Review Board suggested that they would take a look at the building. In the matter of Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Finn, 163 Millard Avenue, North Tarrytown. New York Mr. & Mrs. Finn were not present at the meeting. In the matter of Joseph Kellv. 14 Maple Street. North Tarrytown, New York Mr. Kelly submitted a sample of the vinyl siding to be used on his house. A motion to certify plans for re-siding was made Malunis, seconded by Annegret Rice and motion carried. In the matter of Eugene Buonanno. Tarrytown. New York by Elena 29 Gordon Avenue. North Mr. Buonanno submitted plans for a one room addition to his home. Robert Barstow made a motion to certify these plans, seconded by Elena Malunis and motion was carried. In the matter of Nikolas Patlias. 276 North Broadway. North Tarrytown. New York Mr. Donal Walsh represented Mr. Patlias in his request for an awning to be erected on his new restaurant called The Horseman. Mr. Walsh stated that a drawing of the awning had been asked for at the last meeting and one had been sent. Mr. Walsh asked that the Board look at that drawing tonight to determine if that it is the type of awning that would be permitted with the lettering shown. Mr. Patlias would then come back with a design of the lower outside sign. After a brief discussion, Elena Malunis moved that the Board take a look at the building before they decide about the wrap around awning, seconded by Annegret Rice and motion carried. Matter to be continued at the next meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 PM. Respectfully submitted, Angela Everett, Deputy Clerk 2 �a—^ AGENDA Architectural Review Board Sept. 27, 1989 7:30 P.M. 1. Nikolas Patlias - continued discussion for signs at restaurant 276 N. Broadway. 2. freyler Realty - sign in front of 232 N. Washington St. 3. Larry Brostoff - sign in front of 358 No. Broadway A. Signature Graphics - signs at 186 Cortlandt St., 185 Cortlandt St. and 60 Beekman Ave. 5. Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Finn, 163 Millard Ave. (close in screened-in porch) �Janet Gandolfo, Mayor Sean Treacy, Deputy Mayor TRUSTEES Anthony Apollonio Nicholas Gcchetti Timothy Coon Allison Fine Michael Hyland William T.Regan John Hushes, Jr. VniafB Oratuel Angela Everett Deputy Vfflasje Clerk Frank Anzovino VUkgt Treajurer fflSTORIC PAST - GREAT FUTURE 21 Septjsmbfir:JL98&— r— •">. r~ * * Horseman family Restaurant 276 North Broadway North Tarrytown, N.Y. 10591 Re: Horseman Cooking Air Filtration System Dear Sir: I am enclosing a copy of a report on the review of the cut sheets of Chemtool, Inc., Mxlel Nos. 4400 and 2200 Industrial Electronic Air Cleaners for use at the Horseman Family Restaurant. You are to install a properly sized charcoal filter as reconmended by the manufacturer, in addition to the electrostatic filter as shown on your submittals. The manufacturer recommends a double pass ESP unit. We will allow a single pass unit with the understanding that this will require frequent cleaning. If there are any problems, you will be required to install a twostage dual pass unit. Please note the manufacturer's recommendations. This office is to be notified at the time of completion of this system in order for us to inspect the units. Please note, second paragraph, the word "instead" has been dropped and we have replaced the word "addition". incerely, Enc. cc: Mayor Gandolfo / W. Regan, Ackn. J United f i r e & Safety s /y. Margotta Building Inspector 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York 10591 (914) 631-0113 �* VILDTGE LW( OF NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEWTORK 2 8 BEEKMAN AVENUE JANET GANDOLFO WILLIAM T REGAN ADMINISTRATOR MAYOR kLEXANOER FUDALI OEPUTY MAYOR JOHN HUGHES JR VILLAGE COUNSEL TRUSTEES N I C H O L A S CICCHETTI TIMOTHY C O O N A L L I S O N FINE MICHAEL HYLAND S E A N TREACY 19141 6 3 1 ANGELA EVERETT DEPUTY VILLAGE CLERK FRANK ANZOVINO VILLAGE TREASURER OM3 INCORPORATED 1 8 7 4 19 September 1969 Horseman family Restaurant 276 North Broadway North Tarrytown, N.Y. 10591 Re: Horseman Cooking Air filtration System Dear Sir: I am enclosing a copy of a report on the review of the cut sheets of Chemtool, Inc., Model Nos. 4400 and 2200 Industrial Electronic Air Cleaners for use at the Horseman family Restaurant. Your are to install a properly sized charcoal filter as reconmended by the manufacturer, instead of the electrostatic filter as shown on your submittals. Ihe manufacturer recommends a double pass ESP unit. We will allow a single pass unit with the imderstanding that this will require frequent cleaning. If there are any problems, you will be required to install a twostage dual pass unit. Please note the manufacturer' s recommendations. This office is to be notified at the time of completion of this system in order for us to inspect the units. Sincerely, Margotta Inspector Enc. cc: Mayor Gandolfo / W. Regan, Acta. 1/ United Fire & Safety "where the Headless Horseman rode" �0 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Janes T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of Tarrytown, NY FROM: Eugene Tetter DATE: September 15, 1989 RE: HORSEMAN FAMILY RESTAURANT Cooking Air Filtration System CAMCE # 1*533 At your request, we have reviewed the attached cut sheets for the Cleantron Division of Chemtool, Inc., Model Nos. 4400 and 2200 Industrial Electronic Air Cleaners intended for use at the Horseman Family Restaurant. a) We have However, not Be advised that: specified this particular manufacturer the manufacturer's catalog cuts indicate to date. a quality industrial product, i.e., sheet metal is all 16 and 14 gauge bonderized epoxy-coated steel; motors are all totally enclosed, fan-cooled, ball bearing type, fully isolated from the sheet metal for low noise transmission; the system employs dual ionization with high voltage in the range of 10,000 to 12,000 volts rather than most commercial units using 4,000 volts; the unit also incorporates removable pre and post removable filters. although available, has not been included. Charcoal filtration �• • ) As for this air filtering system, we have not performed any engineering studies, and, therefore, can only suggest that it appears that with proper preventive maintenance (cleaning) and the addition of charcoal filtration, this unit would be satisfactory. However, in the future a dual pass air cleaner should be considered. ) The "Code 96" hood by definition includes grease filters which would remove the heavy grease from the air, the electronic air filter would remove the smoke and most odors, but, a charcoal filter is necessary to remove remaining odors. ) Details of the type of cooking, type of grease, temperatures, etc. are required to determine the loading to fully evaluate a system of this type. In the future this should be provided to the town for review/approval purposes. The hood details should also be provided to the Village to assure that the air handling/filtration units do what is intended. ) Also, please manufacturer. see also the attached correspondence from the �•••! • • • •••I »•••••• CHEMTOOL eilAIUARIIVITIMI 0€MT(X)L INC0RP0RATEO 250 ST JOHN ST.. LOHETTO. MN 5535? FAX. 612/479-3133 TEL 813/479-3131 89-0354 September 14, 1989 Fax Letter C. Manganaro Consulting Engineering Attn: Mr. C. Yetter Dear Mr. Yetter: This letter is to confirm our telephone discussion of this date in regards to electrostatic filter application to kitchen exhaust. Electrostatic filters have been used in kitchen hood systems for some time. The ESP unit is placed downstream from the grille hood. ESP units are highly effective in removing cooking grease smoke as ESP units can remove particulate as small as .01 micron. Grease particles will also be removed. However, for the ESP unit to be effective with a high degree of efficiency it must be cleaned regularly. As the ESP unit removes smoke and grease particulate removes the greater portion of odor in the air stream. it also Single pass ESP units will function but will require frequent cleaning. A dual pass unit will stay on line longer as the second pass will not load up at the same time as the first stage. When the first stage is fully loaded the second will still provide air filtration. A two stage (dual pass) unit is recommended for any system having charcoal. Charcoal filters must always be placed downstream from the air filters to prevent them from plugging up. The frequency of cleaning and/or the life of charcoal can only be determined from known load factors. Without known loads the system must be checked regularly to determine cleaning and charcoal replacement schedule. (continued) �Doth the pre and after filters, located at the ESP cell, roust also be checked and cleaned as necessary. These filters are provided to protect the ESP cell and keep particulate from blowing off the cell and getting into the duct system. Generally speaking, one ESP unit will provide effective air filtration in restaurant applications. A dual pass system is better. A dual pass with charcoal is the bast. However, whatever is installed, must be serviced to maintain efficient operation. I can not overstate this fact. Regards, Marty Fleming Sales Manager^ Clean Air Systems MP/lp cc: J.Millstein �VILLAGf OF NORTH TARRWOWN ' INTERNAL MEMORANDUM /f Jo Architectural Review Board From Subject James Margotta A PP- for si 8n Date 7/12/89 Enclosed is an application for a 4'0 x 8'-0 double-faced free standing sign for the new restaurant at the corner of Broadway and Bedford Road. The Sign is Lexan with raised letters. The word "Horseman" is red, background is white, Family Restaurant f> Donut Shop, horse and rider are black. Edging is brown. I am enclosing an application for a permit, black and white copy of the sign and a portion of the plot plan, full-sized plot plan is to follow. This application will be heard at the July 26th meeting. cc: Mayor Gandolfo Counsel Hughes Administrator �OFFICE OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN, N.Y. Application for Building Permit Permit No Date. 7:./9.~M. Application is hereby made for permit to . . . a building or part of a building O « (move, <ny>ve, demolish, demolish, erect, erect, altar, altar, repair, repair, add ad to, evacuate tor) The building one-family dwelling, two-family dwelling, apartment bouse, store, office building, factory, warehouse, garage. or other classifies tlort) The dan of construction is to be (fireproof, non-fireproof, frame) ».t^76.M£i??^«f4^ and number) r SECTION .1.7... BLOCK V*. <****i!2L ' '"*'"' LOT / . . The following information is to be supplied wherever applicable to the work proposed: 1. Area of lot or plot the building is to occupy sq. ft. 2. Total combined area of all buildings on tot or plot including the one for which a permit is requested. tq.lL 3. Least width of street on which building faces ft 4. Height of building for which permit is requested ft 5. Least distance from building to street line ft 6. Distances from nearest point of building to lot lines: To side lot line ft To side lot line ft. To side lot line ft. 7. Distances from required windows to lot lines: To side lot line ft. To side tot line ft. To side tot line ft. 8. Building area (sec definition on Page 17 of Zoning Ordinance) sq. ft. 9. Lowest percentage of living room floor area to its window area 10. Manner of ventilating bathrooms 11. Kind of exits, number provided, and where they lead to 12. Maximum number of people occupying entire building at any one time 13. Maximum number of people in the one storv having largest occupancy at any one time �14 Is there an outside basement entrance? 15. Dead loads assumed for floors and roof 16. Live loads assumed for floors and roof 17. Combined live and dead load on the footings after allowing for live-load reduction ma. per sq. ft fee. per sq. ft fee. per sq. ft 18. Nature of ground upon which footings will net 19. In case of frame construction, what method of Areetopping will he employed? . . (See Section 11, of the Building Code) 20. In case of a 'public or private garage, h is attached to any other building? in law ai^jasMaHahf^ute nature In case of moving, stale disposition and method of moving " Note: When a building is to be moved over any highway, permission of the Superintendent of Public Works and Chief of Police must also be obtained. In case only excavation work is to be done, state the reason for such excavation Give estimated cost (value) of work, exclusive of real estate $ In case of an apartment bouse, state number of families OFFICE BOX ADDRESS NOT ACCEPTABLE Owner's Name tviK*i.ftor tffm.j.*/ Address?/?6....rV*..Mft<Mx.ftx *>...T**lY.X**r^r(*&^ 6 7 / : ? . 1 / ^ Architect's or Engineer's Name .. / ? # * . ? . T . A 5 . 1 . . $.. fHS.S.9.^. \ .*?. Xc'J Address .7.T.7.. .5£KtTrV.rrr.... ^/General Contractor's Name .. $£.T$. fitf.ft fit J.. .I.O.V'.fl Tekphona^tJ^.flZ.I.-.H ' O I .G.KL0.?). • ^Address jU*ekphone(7?< f).. Worrk to be superintended by C f t f .. . P.G.If £ * . « # / • * £ * I Address W . C . ^ : . ? . ^ . f . ^ . * > . ^ D f l . . l0lG»fl.hAfi. f.ls £?. .\ I % ** l.ft'.C&*...*<? f.c.»Telephone^*>) ^UrS.TM do hereby agree that the provisions of the Building Code of the Village of North Tarrytown shall be complied with whether the same are specified herein or not. Home Improvement License No. (Signature of Owner or his Agent) This application is accompanied by: sets of plans of structure. sets of specifications. sets of plot plans. sets of boring or test-pit data. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BUILDING CODE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MUST BE APPLIED FOR AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK FOR WHICH THIS PERMIT WAS ISSUED ^ ^ �LEXAN " / a£,& ORSEHW TAM1LJ HESTAUMH & DONUT SHOP APPROVED NOTE: LAYOUT AT DISCRETION OF ART DEPT. ©1886 Gtftf C^tf DEVELOPMENT, INC. TORRANCE, CA. �^ » . | » 0 icx-, •*—S- *Hfc. |-Hu*u ^ '.* mmf^pn -ibsm*- ^owp, �I � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1989 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1989-09-27 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1989 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/b72433f438f25130e261b96432c2fcc4.pdf af6a2de2f5e7592c0d0b9e28ddfb6060 PDF Text Text Page /-A regular meeting of the Architectual Review Board was held on Wednesday, October 25, 1989 at 8:00 PM In Village Hall, 28 Beekman, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: Frank Arvan, Chairman Lou Falasca Robert Barstow Elena Malunis Also present: Absent: James Margotta, Bldg. Inspector John Hughes, Village Attorney Annegret Rice A motion to approve the minutes from the last two meetings was made by Frank Arvan, and seconded by Elena Malunis. Motion passed unamiously. IN THE MATTER OF FREYLER REALTY, 2 32 N. WASHINGTON ST.. NORTH TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Mr. Freyler was not present, matter tabled till next meeting. IN THE MATTER OF THE FAMILY RESTAURANT. 276 NO. BROADWAY. NORTH TARRYTOWN. N. Y. This was a continuation of a hearing from last month. Mr Donal Walsh, Esq., represented the owners. He presented the board with color swatches and fabrics along with a drawing showing the size of the new planned canopy around the restaurant. The owners had decided upon a fire retardant gray fabric, with a burgundy border, (Gulfstream fabric S 73 and 74) and white silk screened letters 18 inches high. It was also decided that the metal backdrop behind the canopy would be painted the same color gray as the canopy's fabric. Elena Malunis moved to certify the plans as presented. was seconded by Lou Falasca and was passed unamiously. BROSTOFF CADILLAC. Motion 358 N. Broadway. North Tarrytown. New York This was a continuation of last month's hearing. Mr. John Fitzgerald, General Manager, for Brostoff Cadillac appeared before the board and stated that all the neon signs on the front of the building were gone, and all non-conforming signs 6 �Page ^ were down. He asked for temporary approval for a 30' wide sign with 18" inch high white silk screening lettering be allowed to indicate that the dealership was now known as Brostoff Cadillac. He also stated that he would be before the Board regarding planned renovations of the agency once the lease expired at the Deli located on the property. Frank Arvan made a motion to certify the plans on the condition that the lettering be 18" high (as shown) , that the two product signs in the windows be removed, and the northern free standing sign be removed. It was also requested that the "for sale signs" on the car windows and windshields be eliminated. Temporary approval to be given for one year from this date. Motion was seconded by Lou Falasca. Motion passed unamiously. IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS D. FINN, MILLARD AVENUE. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK This was a continuation of last month's hearing. A motion to certify the plans on the addition as shown was made by Frank Arvan, seconded by Elena Malunis. IN THE MATTER OF UNCLE JERRY'S DELI. North Broadway, North Tarrvtown. N. Y. Donal Walsh, attorney for the project, appeared before the Board for a preliminary discussion regarding the proposed restaurant and new BP gas station slated for the old Headless Horseman Garage. He asked the board to consider what type of canopies should go over the pumps, the signage, and where the product signs should be located. He could then go back to BP and tell them what the Board requirements are. OLD BUSINESS IN THE MATTER OF FULGENCIA PENA, CORTLANDT ST., NORTH TARRYTOWN Bob Barstow stated that minutes of August 23, 1989 reflected that the awning drawing was approved: however, the signage was tabled. He presented the Board with drawing of the sign which indicated that the lettering would be 13" feet wide. Motion to certify the sign with the understanding that the lettering will go to the edges of the store front was made by Frank Arvan, and seconded by Lou Falsaca. Motion was passed unamiously. NEW BUSINESS Next meeting will be held November 29, 1989 at 8:00 PM. Being no other business, meeting adjourned at 9:50 PM 7 �Page a Respectfully submitted, Francesca Lorenz Village Administrator's Office fl � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1989 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1989-10-25 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1989 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/65baf5b54ec15d6c8c05bd2b5d056953.pdf 7394bda4aee9035e69f178551f469abf PDF Text Text * Page A regular meeting of the Architectual Review Board was held on Wednesday, November 29, 1989 at 8:00 PM in Village Hall of North Tarrytown. Present: Frank Arvan, Chairman Lou Falasca Robert Barstow Elena Malunis Also Present: J. Margotta, Building Inspector Absent: Anagret Rice IN THE MATTER OF PEHLAN DEVELOPMENT CORP. POKAHO DRIVE & LAKEVIEW AVENUE, NO. TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK Plans call for a new house to be built on the subdivision of the Friender property. Mary King, architect, and Art Phelan, developer, the board and presented plans for the new house. cate a two story and attic structure with 2,200 living space. No variances will be required as all the requirements. appeared before The plans indisquare feet of structure meets Mr. Phelan stated that the cedar shake shingle will be finished in "Willow Mist" made by Keystone siding. The trim will be finished in a darker shade, but same color as the siding. A question arose as to the style of the attic floor window, and the width between the bathroom and bedroom windows. It was suggested that the attic window be changed into diamond shape, and that the second floor windows (bedroom and bathroom)be placed closer together and the trim made wider between the two windows. A motion to certify the plans with the above revisions was made by Lou Falasca, and seconded by Frank Arvan. Motion was passed enormously. IN THE MATTER OF PEDRO LOPEZ, 30 NEW BROADWAY, NORTH TARRYTOWN, N. Y. This was Mr. Lopez's second appearance before the Board. He has a new addition on the back of his house that is currently covered by tarpaper, while the rest of the building has absbestos siding. He would like to take down the old siding and he is asking the board to approve a new type of brickface siding on the first floor exterior along with a new vinyl siding to be placed on the second floor exterior to achieve a half brick and half clapboard look. He presented the board with pictures of different buildings with the type of look he wished to achieve. He described the new product and how it is put onto styrofoam board and held with pins and clips. He mentioned that the product was guaranteed for 50 9 �Page years. When it was mentioned to him that the Board wanted a closer look at the materials and other pictures of old homes with this type of product he asked to be excused and said he would return shortly with more documentations. At that point, Donal Walsh, Attorney for Wayne Jeffers, approached the Board with preliminary drawings of the proposed new BP station on Rte. 9. He asked the Board to give him some ideas and recommendations regarding canopies to take back to BP. He also mentioned that he would be back before the Board with exterior drawings for the new restaurant that will be built next to the garage. Mr. Lopez returned with pictures and an example of the brick and pins that would be used for the new siding he plans to put on his house. Mr. Arvan said he had to visit the house before making any decisions. Mr. Barstow retorted that Mr. Lopez has been before the Board twice, and the ARB should have made arrangements to visit the house before his second appearance. It was decided that each of the members of the Board will visit the property, look at the design of the house, and will hold a special meeting on Monday, December 4th, at 7:30 PM to make a final decision. A motion to approve the minutes of the October 25, 1989 was made by Elena Malunis, seconded by Lou Falasca. Respectfully submitted, Francesca Lorenz Village Administrator's Office fl 10 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1989 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1989-11-29 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1989 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/7b21de3e3ef4d61aa7288db877722a10.pdf 6a45ec5879391698fd14220a77728488 PDF Text Text Page J _, On Monday, December 4, 1989 a Special Meeting of the Architectual Review Board was held at 8:00 PM in Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York. Present: Frank Arvan, Chairperson Lou Falasca Robert Barstow Also Present: Absent: James Margotta, Building Inspector Anagret Rice Elena Malunis IN THE MATTER OF THE VILLAGE WINE ESPIRITS SHOPPE & VIDEO VISIONS. 32-43 BEEKMAN AVENUE. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK Temporary sign approval was requested by Mr. Rodriquez, owner of the new liquor store. His sign will be in accordance with the new video store's sign, both of which will be 3' x 3' on white backgrounds with burgundy letters. Motion to certify the temporary signs was made by Lou Falasca and seconded by Frank Arvan. IN THE MATTER OF PEDRO LOPEZ. 30 NEW BROADWAY. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK At the ARB meeting of November 29, it was decided that each of the board should visit the house and consider Mr. Lopez's request to put the new brick siding and half vinyl siding as replacement for the current asbestos siding. Mr. Arvan commented that he visited the site, and felt that it would be inappropriate for the half and half look, and it should be completely re-sided with the brick veneer. Both Mr. Falasca and Mr. Barstow agreed with him. It was decided that a letter should be sent to Mr. Lopez telling him of the Board's decision and he should have new plans submitted in time for the next ARB meeting to be held in January, (copy of letter is attached). Being no further business, meeting adjourned at 8:45PM. Respectfully submitted, Francesca Loreire Village Administrator's Office �SSftJSSt*. AT / - ^ fan T1UHBBS AtfhaeyApottooio Monk Altar » i m ^ i n I f S B f e ^ I1 I I J^^^^m^ IJ \\*^M^r JJ \ \ ^^r / / VSsC^2-^/^^ MCMMCSOCMII TfaBflAyCooa MIchaelHyUnd ""SaLSr John Hufbe*. Jr. *•*•' Aatcla Dirtr^iMiCiA Frank Anjorlno Vlnii, HISTORIC PAST - GRBAT FUTURE December 7 , 1989 Mr. Pedro Lopez 30 New Broadway North Tarrytown,New York 10591 Dear Mr. Lopez: After reviewing your request and visiting the site, the Board, in unanimous agreement, feel that the house should be completely resided with the imitation brick veneer. The half brick , half clapboard siding design is not acceptable. In addition, we will require detailed plans of the siding at the windows and frieze board. Please submit this information 10 days prior to the next meeting in January. The next meeting date is January 24, at 8:00 PM. Sorry for the delay. Sincerely yours, Frank Arvan -%^ Chairman Q Architectual Review Board /] / yoames Margotta/ ^/Building Inspector 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tkrrytown, New York 10591 (914)631-0113 �'*/<//*? JEK&iufrfc^ ^i(pQ ?*- 3S fiuJv^*— •} .1HE i �xS OF NORTH TARRYTOWN VILLAGE INTERNAL MEMORANDUM Architectural Review Board James T. Margotta, Bldg. Inspector # From Subject Video Visions - 32-34 Beekman Ave. Date 12/1/89 I have asked Video Vissions to appear at the meeting of the Architectural Review Board to be held on December A,1989 at 8:00 P.M. ' J> �Video Visions 32-34 Beekman Ave. North'Tarrytown,N.y.10571 James Margotta Building Inspector 28 Beekman Ave. North Tarrytown,N.Y. Dear r.'.r. Margotta, Video Visions is occupying the retail store at 32-34 Beekman Ave. and is planning to opsn on January 2,1990 for buisness.I realize it will take time to coordinate with the town,landlord,and other occupants of 32-34 Beekman Ave. to put up our permanent signs for our buisness. I am asking your permission to put up a temporary sign in the window, so that I will have some type of advertisement with my name Video Visions for my opening on January 2,1990. The sign will be professionally done and I have enclosed a layout of the sign. If you need any more information about this matter please call me at 914-963-2133 (day) or 914-941-6857 (evening). Thank You, t^imf Coulee Robert Cuozzo P �7^/tf/fc*/ Sf^tf Hut. 32 3*/ ?ee */»**> &<*. . T t H 3' «r VIDFO VISIONS 631- 3fS^ (O mcwie SALES B<-Ai4fc Tp»pts T.\J. o^d RMO "t£«*JTft«.S ftroO lAC.R Accessoe«e^ 'RapRiCS • A^#' Qo*joy �VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN MEMORANDUM TO: Mayo>r & Trustdesy FROMI: W i l l i a m iMraejgan, V i l l age Administrator DATE: Apr i l 4[I LI89 RE: Architectural Review Board Enclosed please find proposed legislation for the Architectural Review Board for which there is a Public Hearing scheduled April 18th. WTR/fl cc: John Hughes �VILLAG#OF NORTH TARR^TOWN INTERNAL MEMORANDUM to Members of P l a n n i n g & ^p/iing/j^Board From J a n e t Gandolfo, Mayor Subject A r c h i t e c t u a l Review Board £>ate 5 / 1 8 / 8 9 Effective immediately, please advise all applicants for any new alterations or new construction that their approvals are contingent upon approval before an Architectual Review Board. Members of the Architectual Review Board have not been appointed as yet, but we are planning to do so soon. Thank you. WTR/fl cc: Board Administrator Building Inspector � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1989 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1989-12-04 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1989 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/b59f6b0472afb119f56d45decfc3be63.pdf fcfff782661a122234fb920a7ff3b7f5 PDF Text Text Page A regular meetng of the Architectual Review Board was held on Wednesday, January 24, at 8:00 PM in the Village Hall of North Tarrytown, New York. Present: Frank Arvan, Chairman Louis Falasca Robert Barstow Also Present: Absent: James Margotta, Bldg. Inspector Anagret Rice Elena Malunis IN THE MATTER OF MIGUEL JIMENEZ, 66 Beekman Avenue, No. Tarrytown, N. Y. 10591 Mr. Jimenez is requesting certification for a new awning sign at the above location. The sign would have a 3 ft. projection over the storefront. It will have white lettering on a Lupin (6417) background. Lettering will be 6" high and 80" long and will read "Jimenez's Intimates". A motion to certify the sign was made by Frank Arvan and seconded by Lou Falasca. Motion passed unamiously. IN THE MATTER OF UNCLE JERRY'S RESTAURANT, 410 North Broadway, North Tarrytown, New York. Mr. Nima Badaly of Badaly & Badaly, Architects represented Uncle Jerry's before the Board. He presented a sketch indicating a new addition which would give the new restaurant a green house look on the south west corner of the building. The new addition would have the same color roof as the present mansard roof has, but would be of different design. The Board asked where the air conditioning unit would go, and a discussion was held as to changing the design concept and relocating the green house addition to the front of the building. Other suggestions were made to draw the all the previous additions and the proposed one into one smooth flowing unit. Mr. Badaly presented the proposed 12ft. sign with 16 inch letters which would be on a turquoise background attached to the stucco with the name "Uncle Jerry's". Discussion took place regarding recommended changes to the design by Bob Barstow and Frank Arvan. Mr. Arvan was reluctant to approve any design without the full board present. He also added he would like to see some of the recommeded changes in the design be incoporated into new drawings. 12 �Page A motion to certify the sign was made by Frank Arvan and seconded by Lou Falasca. Motion passed unamiously. A Motion to table the request to certify the building plans until the next meeting on February 28, was made by Frank Arvan and seconded by Lou Falasca. As there was no other business meeting adjourned at 9:15PM. Next meeting will be February 28, 1990 at 8:00PM. Respectfully submitted, Francesca Lorenz Secretary to the Board fl 13 �%* « Approved with respect to substance and form: Village Attorney Dated: Approved by the ARB X y w •...• v <• »• •• (Jfhairijrtan or A c t i n g Chai rman bated: &f.'jf / ^.\ Filed with Deputy Village Clerk l e r k ortfDeputy C l e r k ated: *f/Xl <f0 /litA^D**- l/af/to � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1990-01-24 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1990 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/e68b2c5a4f45ca301a05d6ba18ee64f7.pdf fff3ac1a334b0713808ac59691b0cf21 PDF Text Text Page A Regular Meeting of the Architectual Review Board was held on Wednesday, November 28, 1990 at 8:00 PM in the Village Hall of North Tarrytown, New York. Present: Frank Arvan, Chairman Lou Falasca Annegret Rice Robert Barstow Absent: Elena Malunis Also Present: James Margotta, Building Inspector Francesca Lorenz, Recording Secretary IN THE MATTER OF THERESE M. VALVANO. 52 HEMLOCK DRIVE, NO. TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK This is a continuation from last month's hearing. Applicant was advised to submit revised drawing- of a proposed new home. New drawings contained suggestions made by Board ie frieze board and dental molding around the building, larger windows and panels on garage door. Lou Falasca moved to approve revised plans. Motion was seconded by Robert Barstow. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF JULIE MIRSBERGER. 137 VALLEY ST.. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. (C & M SIGN CO.) Mr. Margotta stated that this item should not have appeared on the agenda as it was decided to approve the sign request at last month's meeting. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN JANDRUCKO. 192 CORTLANDT ST. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Applicant appeared before the Board asking approval for a new sign design. New sign will be 10 ft. long, 2 ft. high with a white background and 15 inch high black letters, centered over door. Mr. Falasca moved to approve the sign request. Motion was seconded by Annegret Rice. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF TAPPAN CAR WASH. 205 VALLEY ST. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Mr. Bueti, owner of the Tappan Car Wash, appeared before the board to ask for suggestions regarding signage. The Board discussed the free standing sign that currently exists at the car wash and stated that this has become a landmark in the Village, and they would consider granting a variance for a free standing sign, if no other signs were put up. It was also discussed that 38 �Page the Board has already given its approval for a sign over the garage door. It was suggested that each member of the board go to the car wash and look at the sign in question. Matter was tabled until the January meeting. IN THE MATTER OF JAMES T. CARLIN. JR. 36 PALMER AVENUE. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. This is a request for approval of the design for a new addition. Mr. Lou Falasca excused himself from the discussion. After much discussion, a motion to disapprove the plans was made by Mr. Robert Barstow and seconded by Annegret Rice. Item tabled until next month. IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES SHIBETTI. 144 NEW BROADWAY. NO. TARRYTOWN. N.Y. This is a continuation from last month's hearing regarding terations and an added kitchen. al- Mr. Shibetti presented new blueprints with greater detail as requested by the Board. A move to approve the revised plans with contingency that there will be five quarter trim all around the windows was made by Robert Barstow. Motion was seconded by Annegret Rice. Motion passed unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion to approve the minutes of the October 24,1990 meeting with corrections was made by Lou Falasca and seconded by Robert Barstow. Corrections: Under S. Amenta, sign will be mounted without lighting. Under C & M Sign, request for signage was granted however, without phone numbers. A move to approve the minutes of September 12, 1990 with corrections was made by Annegret Rice. Motion was seconded by Lou Falasca. Being no further business, meeting was adjourned 9:35 PM. Respectfully submitted, Frauicesca Lorenz, Recording Secretary 39 �• William T. Regan Janet Gandolfo, Mayor Sean Treacy, Deputy Mayor TRUSTEES Morris Alter Nicholas Cicchetti Michael Hyland Seane D. Marren Frank Rey AntHnllltWtOf John Hughes, Jr. Angela Everett Deputy VUlafi Clark Frank Anzovino Village Treasurer HISTORIC PAST - GREAT FUTURB NO MEETING WAS HELD OF THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD DURING THE MONTH OF DECEMBER, 1990. I / 7fi R a c l r m a n A i r a n n a James T. Margotta Nni4k Tbrmrfnum N a u r Vrtrlr 1ACQ1 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1990-02-28 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1990 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/88b58d55cc548444a754317931f2ec88.pdf 4e4a481ef65cd6f58439639171087e40 PDF Text Text Page _^ A regular meeting of the Architectual Review Board was held on February 28, 1990 at 8:00PM in Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. Present: Frank Arvan, Chairman Elena Malunis Robert Barstow Lou Falasca Also Present: James Margotta, Bldg. Inspector Absent: Annagret Rice Mr. Arvan started the meeting at 8:15 PM. He made a motion to approve the minutes from the meeting of January 24, motion was seconded by Robert Barstow. Motion carried. IN THE MATTER OF rytown . N. Y. ADMAC REALTY, 32-34 Beekman Avenue. North Tar- Mr. John Oliva represented Video Vision and Village Wine and Spirits Liquor store. He presented two different signs for the storefronts of each store which would be in neon. Members of the board did not like the concept for the Video Vision storefront, and felt that the Wine and Spirit sign should be more creative. Board made recommendations to Mr. Oliva for creative signage, and asked that he submit new designs before the next meeting. The discussion was tabled for the next meeting. IN THE MATTER OF CANDIDA P. CORTESI. 203 Valley Street, North Tarrytown. N. Y. Ms. Cortesi wishes put up white vinyl siding with gray trim on the outside of her house. A dead chimney on the side of the house would also be removed from the roof to the top of the first story. Mr. Falasca suggested that removing the whole chimney from the side of the house would give the new siding a cleaner look. Frank Arvan made a motion to approve the new siding and was seconded by Elena Malunis. Motion carried. IN THE MATTER OF MR. MARIO SCAPPATICCI. 49 Dell Street. North Tarrytown. N. Y. Mr. Scappaticci would like to replace the cedar siding on the front of his house with white vinyl siding, replace 3 windows and two doors. Mr. Arvan asked about the color siding on the sides and rear of the house, and he stated that they were stained cedar, and he planned to keep them at that color. 14 �Page ^ The Board suggested that Mr. Scappaticci replace the whole house with the white vinyl siding and he explained that it was too expensive. The reason why he wanted to do only the front was that the sun dried and bleached out the color of the front siding. Board felt the look he would achieve with the white front siding and beige cedar shingles would not be aesthetically pleasing to the area. Lou Falasca made a motion to approve the request as it, however, it was not seconded by anyone. Board denied Mr. Scappaticci's request. IN THE MATTER OF VINCENT BUONANNO. 132 Van Tassel1 Avenue. North Tarrytown. N. Y. Mr. Buonanno presented the board with addition to his house. He received a Board earlier. He plans to extend the porch. The exterior will have siding house and around the sides to meet the plans for a second story variance from the Zoning addition over the present up to the chimney of the existing siding. Frank Arvan made a motion to certify the plans as approved . Motion was seconded by Elena Malunis. Motion carried. IN THE MATTER OF RINALDO EUEVAS. 269 No. Washington Street. North Tarrytown. N. Y. Mr. Euevas has requested approval for new siding on his Plans are for a Navajo white siding with white trim. house. Frank Arvan made a motion to approve the Navajo white siding with white trim. Motion was seconded by Lou Falasca. Motion carried. IN THE MATTER OF PEDRO LOPEZ. 30 New Broadway. North Tarrvtown. N. Y. Mr. Lopez has agreed to re-side his lated brick siding. whole house with the simu- Lou Falasca made a motion to approve the new brick siding with aluminum around the trim, suffits and frieze board, with the brick returning at the windows. Motion was seconded by Elena Malunis. Mr. Lopez also stated he wanted approval for the new railing around the porch which would have horizontal bars as discussed with the vertical rungs 6 inches apart, which would be finished in white. 15 �Page 3 Lou Falasca made a motion to approve the handrailing. seconded by Frank Arvan. Motion carried. Motion was IN THE MATTER OF GENERAL MOTORS SIGNS AT THE BROSTOFF CADILLAC DEALERSHIP. NORTH BROADWAY. North Tarrytown N. Y. Mr. Mark Garro of General Motors Corporation presented the Board with 4 free standing signs advertising GM products. He stated the signs would be put in at 4 different locations on the property. Elena Malunis asked if GM had a copy of the Village Sign Ordinance and he assured her that someone in their legal department was aware of the Code. She stated that GM and the Board would be wasting each other's time to discuss the matter of the free standing signs as they were not in the code. A motion to deny the signs as submitted was made by Elena Malunis and seconded by Frank Arvan. Motion carried. IN THE NATTER OF UNCLE JERRY'S RESTAURANT. No. Broadway. North Tarrytown. N. Y. Mr. Nimi Badaly of Badaly and Badaly architects, as requested by the Board at their last meeting, presented new plans for the renovation of the proposed new restaurant. He presented the original plans, together with alternative 2 and 3. The Board nominated alternative 3 as the favored plan which showed a wraparound type green house, mansard roof with matching shingles as that are presently on the existing roof. A motion to certify the plans as approved was made by Lou Falasca and seconded by Elena Malunis. IN THE MATTER OF BROSTOFF BUICK-CADILLAC. No. Broadway. North Tarrytown. N. Y. Mr. John tion as problems not have Fitzgerald appeared before the Board to ask for directo signage. He stated that he has been experiencing because his dealership cannot be located because he does the proper signs. One problem is the existing sign on the roof of the Old Pickwick restaurant. The sign blocks the view of the dealership when people drive north. Mr. Margotta will notify Tappan Motors (who owns the property) to have the sign removed within 3 0 days. A number of suggestions were made to Mr. Fitzgerald as to the type of advertising he could use on the building. Discussion will continue some time in the future. 16 �Page U Meeting adjourned at 10:15 PM Respectfully submitted, 6 -/Uuu*e*i Francesca Lorenz Recording Secretary 17 �Mr &den SIGNATURE* ^Me.^-t^r Graphics ^£cm Sit'rxcieU ^ B Q ^ T C.U3ZZO, 3UAG —-> • 631-3952 T V Y S '^S Cgs^jynaj C \ iSmrtaiva b^WzJo^* 23 Storm Street Tanytown. N. Y. 10591 G^c^cprou^l (NIBON VI0SO VilSO^JS 32.-3d- B S t f W ftwe:. «2oRaS^D N E O N 5toW �^IGNATUR^ Graphics 631-3952 W Woi |ohn Ollva 23 Storm Street Tarrytown. N. Y. 10591 c; 0 0 Mi k • ][fH© i l IKfl Worn® an o>nt LrlilM � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1990-03-28 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1990 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/9c6d608aabece76181e59be671a90022.pdf bdcfd47b34cbd36da1786e3051bf9409 PDF Text Text Page A regular meeting of the Architectual Review Board was held on Wednesday, March 28, 1990 at 8:00 PM in Village Hall, North Tarry town , N. Y. Present: Robert Barstow, Acting Chairman Lou Falasca Annegret Rice Elena Malunis Also Present: Absent: James Margotta, Bldg. Inspector Francesca Lorenz, Recording Secretary Frank Arvan Mr. Barstow started the meeting at 8:05 PM. Lou Falasca made a motion to approve the minutes of February 28, 1990. Elena Malunis seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously IN THE MATTER OF MAMIE BOYD. 58 HUDSON STREET. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK Mr. Julius Twine, Architect for the project appeared before the Board and stated he neglected to bring photographs as reguired by Code. The Board allowed him to leave the meeting to collect the photographs. In the meantime other matters were heard, however, when he returned he stated he could not find them. Matter was tabled until next month. IN THE MATTER OF ADMAC REALTY. 32-34 BEEKMAN AVENUE. NORTH TARRYTOWN, N. Y. Mr. Rodriguez, owner of the Village Wine and Spirits stated that the signs for both the Wine and Spirits shop and Video Visions have been before the ARB a number of times, and he would like to resolve whatever problems they have with the signs. According to the minutes, the six inch high lettering in neon was approved, however, the Board felt both signs could be more creative. A discussion followed amongst the members of the Board offering different suggestions. It was decided to have both signs done in blue neon with 6" lettering. A motion to approve both signs was made by Lou Falasca and seconded by Annegret Rice. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF THE FRIEDNER PROPERTY. 28 LAKEVIEW AVENUE. NORTH TARRYTOWN.N. Y. Mr. Julius Twine, architect, appeared before the board with plans for a detached garage on the property. Mr. Twine presented samples of cedar siding which would be the same color of the house on the property. 18 �Page Motion to certify the plans for the detached garage was made by Elena Malunis, seconded by Lou Falasca. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF THE AMERCIAN FRENCH CLUB. 178 BEEKMAN AVENUE. NORTH TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Mr. Ed Belliveau appeared before the Board and presented samples of awning material. The building is brick and the awning would be a brick color with 4 inch white lettering and would go over the door of the Club. Motion to certify sample and color of the awning was made by Lou Falasca and seconded by Elena Malunis. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF THE RODRIGUEZ BUILDING. CLINTON STREET. NORTH TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Mr. Ron Turnquist appeared before the Board and gave a brief history of the project. He appeared once before this Board and was given approval for modular units, however, it has been decided by the property owner to use concrete block type 4 construction. The design has been dropped to one story and the 4 end units will be designated for the handicapped. Building will be beige stucco and the roof will have asphalt shingles. Motion to certify plans was made by Elena Malunis and seconded by Lou Falasca. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF THE VAN TASSEL APARTMENT. 95 BEEKMAN AVENUE. NORTH TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Mr. Ron Turnquist, architect, presented the board with plans for the renovation of the exterior of the Van Tassel apartment building where the commercial stores are located. The and and the the plans call for the rehabilitation of some of the store fronts doors of the building. Canopies would have a staggered line the choice of color would be blue with white lettering for stores names. Twenty five new light fixtures are planned for exterior of the building, (copy of design attached) Elena Malunis made a motion to certify plans as presented with the blue colored awnings. Lou Falasca seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Being no further business, meeting adjourned at 9:35 PM. 19 �Page Respectfully sumbitted, / Francesca Lorenz Recording Secretary 0 encl. 20 �LCOME LIGHTS Jitional lanterns have been >rites throughout the years and vays will be in style. Handsomely st, these lanterns light a hospitable slcome, for friends and family, >ng your walks and at your door. t f % P5662 Wall torch Cathedral acrylic P5408-31 Black post lantern. Frosted 'w1 panels 8V2" sq., 27V2" ht Extends l0'/ 2 " glass chimney Shatter-resistant One © bulb, 100w max. @ cathedral acrylic panels lift out for easy relampmg. Fits 3" postforder separately) low* sq., 22" ht One W bulb, 100w max, Posts and other mounting accessories on page 141 ® P5661 Wall lantern. Cathedral acrylic panels. 8Vi" sq., 20" ht. Extends 10V4". One ® bulb, 100w max. @ P5663 Open bottom wall lantern. Cathedral acrylic panels. 8Vz" sq., 1 4 Vi" ht. Extends lO'/a". One ® bulb. 100wmax. @ *~*: A , . � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1990-04-25 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1990 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/fdbb5606ed4722188c517d43dabf7796.pdf 8e9aefa26674fb55b38d2bc8210cfa35 PDF Text Text «%. Page A Regular Meeting of the Architectual Review Board was held on Wednesday, April 25, 1990 in Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. Present: Frank Arvan, Chairman Robert Barstow Lou Falasca Also Present: Absent: James Margotta, Building Inspector Francesca Lorenz, Recording Secretary Annegret Rice Elena Malunis Meeting started at 8:15 PM. Approval of minutes was tabled due to the lack of a quorum. IN THE MATTER OF RJM BODY SHOP, 95 COLLEGE AVENUE. NO. TARRYTROWN. N. Y. Ms. Julia Mersberger appeared before the board on behalf of RJM Auto Body. She stated that the owners would like to restore the building as it appeared in the 1928-1930 period. She presented colored photographs and a drawing of the sign advertising RJM in three colors, (two different blues and white) 72" wide, 31" high. The letters would stagger in height, 17" 11" and 7" high. Sign would be mounted on existing post. Motion to approve the temporary sign for one year was made by Lou Falasca, seconded by Frank Arvan. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF THE JOYNER PROPERTY. CLINTON STREET. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Mr. George Toper, attorney for the Joyners, appeared before the Board and gave a brief history of the project. The Planning Board has given site plan approval and the Zoning Board has granted the required variances. The last step in the procedure was to appear before the Architectual Review Board. Basically, the drawings indicated three townhouses of modular design to be constructed on the property. The original existing one family house will be converted into a two family unit. After reviewing the drawings, Mr. Falasca suggested that a new front be designed for the town houses, in keeping with architectual look of the neighborhood (i.e. covered porches). The Board asked the contractor if a porch could be added to the townhouses with too much of an additional cost to the Joyners. He would consult with the Joyners and return next month with new plans for the exterior of the front porches. 21 �Page Mr. Lou Falasca moved to approve plans as presented except for the front of the building facing Clinton Street which is not acceptable to the Board. Revisions should be presented at the next meeting. Mr. Margotta will issue permit for foundation construction only. Motion was seconded by Frank Arvan. Passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF BROSOFF CADILLAC. NORTH BROADWAY. NORTH TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Due to the fact the Mr. Barstow was the architect for the signs, he had to excuse himself from the discussion and the voting . Therefore, being there was no quorum, matter was table until the next month. ROSETTA & JUAN PICHARDO. 36 HUDSON STREET. NORTH TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Applicants would like to install aluminum siding (dover grey with white trim). Upon further discussion, it was learned application was wrong, the Pichardo's want vinyl siding instead. Board discussed with the Pichardos that due to the fact they lived in a R-3 district, aluminum siding was required. They agreed to install aluminum siding in place of the vinyl. Frank Arvan moved to certify plans for the installation of aluminum siding. Motion was seconded by Lou Falasca. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF MAMIE BOYD. 54 HUDSON STREET. NORTH TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Mr. Julius Twine, architect for the project, appeared before the Board and gave a brief history of the project. He also stated that Zoning Board had granted required variances. The addition will be a one story stucco building with white asphalt shingles and white trim with a gray roof. A suggestion was made by the Board to change pitch on the roof. Mr. Barstow made a motion to approve the plans as submitted with the contingency that the roof line has a salt box profile. Motion was seconded by Frank Arvan. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF THE AMENTA ADDITION. NORTH BROADWAY. NORTH TARRYTOWN. N. Y. This was a preliminary meeting. Mr. Amenta presented sketches and samples of granite that will be issued on the new addition. It was suggested he bring colored renderings when he appears before the board again. No date has been set for the next hearing. 22 �J Page EXECUTIVE SESSION Mr. Arvan asked Board members to call him or Mr. Margotta if they do not plan to attend a meeting. Mr. Barstow commented that he would like to see the Board's membership be increased to 7 members, 5 regular and 2 alternates, so there will also be enough votes for a quorum. Mr. Arvan stated he would pass that suggestion on to the Mayor. Being no other business, meeting adjourned at 9:45 PM. Respectfully submitted, Francesca Lorenz Recording Secretary 23 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1990-05-23 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1990 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/9333fbe64ae83ae3067af8814f614e0c.pdf 396a149b425efbdf96847af9f4fbca29 PDF Text Text Page A Regular Meeting of the Architectual Review Board was held on May 23, 1990 at Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. Present: Robert Barstow, Acting Chairman Elena Malunis Annegret Rice Also Present: Absent: James Margotta, Building Inspector Francesca Lorenz, Recording Secretary Frank Arvan Lou Falasca A motion to approve the minutes of the last meeting was tabled due to lack of a quorum. IN THE MATTER OF THE SALVATION ARMY. BEEKMAN AVENUE. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK A representative from the Salvation Army appeared before the board with a design for a new sign to replace the one they took down due to dry-rot on the outside of the frame. Elena Malunis discussed the fact that as it stands now the building has too many signs. She counted 7. She also asked what were the plans regarding the marquee in front of the building. After a brief discussion, it was decided to table the discussion until the next meeting. It was also suggested that the Building Inspector write a letter to Mr. Larry Rodriquez, owner of the building, and ask him to remove the marquee. IN THE MATTER OF LOUISE CARTER. 54 HUDSON STREET. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK The applicant had the existing porch torn down, and replaced with a new one. After a brief discussion with the contractor,a motion to approve the design was made by Bob Barstow, and seconded by Elena Malunis. IN THE MATTER OF THE JOYNER PROPERTY. CLINTON STREET. NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK Mr. George Topper, attroney for the Joyner, and an architect submitted new plans for the exterior of the town house. New plans indicated fluted columns, and entrance canopy above the door, double hung windows, and changed the staircase. Railroad ties would be used as a planter border. Motion to approve was made by Elena Malunis, seconded by Bob Barstow. Motion pass unanimously. 24 �Page ^ IN THE MATTER OF BROSTOFF CADILLAC. NORTH BROADWAY. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK Mr. Fitzgerald appeared before the board and asked for approval for signs as presented to the Board. Signs will be gray with block letters. Elena Malunis made a motion to approve the design of the sign, Annegret Rice seconded. An informal discussion then took place regarding signs on used cars, and it was agreed that just the year, model and price written on the windows of the cars would be allowed. IN THE MATTER OF THE TORNELLO GAS STATION. NORTH BROADWY. NORTH TARRYTOWN Mr. Tornell and his architect presented Plans to the board showing the size and diminsions of the planned gasoline canopy. Both again indicated the safety features of the canopy. Elena Malunis questioned all the other signs at the station, and felt that the logo signs and other advertisements were too many. A motion to approve the Citgo signs and the canopy was made by Annegret Rice, seconded by Bob Barstow. Elena Malunis voted no. Mr. Margotta wanted the minutes to indicate that approval was granted only for the 3 Citgo signs and the canopy. IN THE MATTER OF THE AMENTA PROJECT. NORTH BRODAWAY. NORTH TARRYTOWN. N. Y. 10591 As requested at the last meeting of the ARB, Mr. Amenta returned with detail drawings of the proposed new building together with samples of the materials to be used on the building. Building will be red brick with grey limestone, anodozied bronze windows, and parking under the building. Elena Malunis made a motion to approve the design of building as presented, Annegret seconded motion. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Francesca Lorenz Recording Secretary & 25 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1990-06-27 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1990 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/185b4d5ffa0375f899f0d2cf8259647c.pdf 7c4384c2f351fdcd76905dc6fa682269 PDF Text Text North Tarrytown, N.Y. June 27th, 1990 A Regular Meeting was held before the Architectural Review Board of the Village of North Tarrytown on the above date. PRESENT: Frank Arvan, Chairman Robert Barstow Elena Malunis Louis Falasca James Margotta, Building Inspector ABSENT: Annegrett Rice Chairman Arvan called the meeting to order at 8 P.M. 1. R. Pichardo, 111 Cortlandt Street-Hidalgo Grocery-Sign Mr. Pichardo submitted drawings of the sign and a picture of the building at 111 Cortlandt Street. After a discussion Mr. Pichardo was directed to return to the next meeting with more information and drawings showing more detail. 2. Catherine & Emmett Wolfe, 226 Kelbourne Avenue-Addition Chairman Arvan stated that Mr. Falasca would not participate in this matter as he would be employed by the Emmett's in the construction of the addition. Mr. Falasca presented plans and explained the addition to be erected. He also presented pictures outlining the building at the present time. After a discussion Mrs. Malunis moved, seconded by Mr. Barstow that the plans for the addition of the residence located at 226 Kelbourne Avenue be approved as submitted. Carried. 3. James Yosifides, 60 Beekman Avenue-Restore storefront Mr. Barstow stated that he represented Mr. Yosifides and would not vote on the issue. Mr. Barstow explained to the Board what Mr. Yosifides planned to do in restoring the building. They wanted to use vinyl / if approved by the Board, or they would have to consider aluminum siding. After a discussion Mr. Falasca moved, seconded by Mrs. Malunis that the Board approve the vinyl siding as stipulated on the plan, and if vinyl is not acceptable to New York State the alternative would be to go to aluminum siding, only if not accepted by New York State. Carried. Chairman Arvan stressed the fact that the area where the sign will be installed iinot up for approval at the present time. �-24. Brostoff Buick-Cadillac, 356 No. Broadway-Signs and New and Used cars. Continued Discussion Mr. Brostoff stated that the Village should have an ordinance regarding signs for car dealers and presented to the Board various pictures of signs and storefronts. Chairman Arvan asked Mr. Brostoff to prepare a list of suggestions for the board to study. 5. Laurentino Rodrigues, Beekman Avenue-Sign and Canopy-Discussion A discussion followed regarding the sign and canopy. It appears that the Salvation Army would like a new sign installed. Mr. Falasca stated that he felt that the canopy should be repaired and that Mr. Rodrigues be invited to a meeting of the Board to discuss the matter. It was reported that the Board had received a letter from the Deputy Clerk that the Architectural Review Board recommend that the canopy be removed. Mr. Falasca moved, seconded by Mrs. Malunis that the Board recommend that the canopy be repaired and that Mr. Rodrigues be invited to the next meeting to discuss the matter. Carried. 6. John Tornello, 256 No. Broadway-Signs-Continued Discussion Chairman Arvan stated that the Board had not received plans and specifications for the signs and canopy to be installed at 2 56 No. Broadway. After a discussion Mr. Falasca moved, seconded by Mrs. Malunis that Mr. Tornello be sent a letter directing him to submit a set of plans, signed by an architect, for his gas station located at 256 No, Broadway. Carried. The plans that were submitted were plans for another location and if Mr. Tornello submits plans for his location they will reconsider their decision. Plans were to be submitted at least ten days before the next meeting. BUSINESS DISCUSSION A discussion followed regarding the "Canopy Ordinance". Chairman Arvan instructed the members to examine the information submitted by Mr. Brostoff which will be discussed at the next meeting. �-3Mr. Barstow questioned the powers and duties of the Board. It was decided that the Board would meet with Mr. Hughes, Village Attorney for clarification of their powers. There being no further business to come before the Board, Mr. Falasca moved, seconded by Mr. Barstow that the same be duly adjourned. Carried. Respectfully submitted, Irene Amato Acting Clerk � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1990-07-25 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1990 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/cf22f94860232e659cba2609e859ce87.pdf 4c038023da5b0b7d3fb98a00184f372b PDF Text Text Page A Regular Meeting of the Architectual Review Board was held on Wednesday, July 25,1990 at 8:00 in Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. Present: Frank Arvan, Chairman Lou Falasca Elena Malunis Annegret Rice Robert Barstow Also Present: James Margotta, Building Inspector Francesa Lorenz, Recording Secretary IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES SHIBETTI. 144 NEW BROADWAY, NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Mr. Shibetti appeared before the ARB and explained he would like to replace the garage doors with overhang doors and put gray siding with white trim. He also wanted to know why he had to appear before the Board, and was informed that new ordinances have been past over the last two years, and in that time, the ARB was created. Lou Falasca made a motion to approve his request to replace siding and motion was seconded by Elena Malunis. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF NORMAN BEAMER & DIANE TASCA. 150 MILLARD AVENUE. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Peter Cole, Architect, appeared before the Board on behalf of the applicants. They are adding a family room and deck. After a brief discussion regarding variances, also that a pier would be added under the foundation. Elena Malunis made a motion to approve the plans for the addition, Annegret Rice seconded motion. Motion was passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF R. PICHARD. Ill CORTLANDT STREET. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. This is a request for a sign approval for Hidalgo Grocery. This is a continued discussion from last month. The sign would be a painted red background, 8 ft. long, with 8" high white letters, centered over the window. A motion to approve the sign was made by Lou Falasca, seconded by Robert Barstow. Elena Malunis and Annegret Rice abstained. Frank Arvan voted yes. Motion passed 3-2. 26 �Page IN THE MATTER OF THE NORTH TARRYTOWN VARIETY STORE. 76 BEEKMAN AVENUE. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Elda Lillo, owner of the store, appeared before the board, she paid $700.00 for store front window decoration. It was decided to give her a 6 month approval for store front, and she must resubmit application for approval of window decoration. Current window decoration must come down before January 1, 1991. A motion to let the window decoration stay up until January 1 and that she must reapply for approval in late December, 1990 was made by Lou Falasca, seconded by Annegret Rice. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF THE LATINO RESTAURANT. (MANUEL & MARTHA PIEDRA) 68 BEEKMAN AVENUE. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. The hearing concerns a store front decoration done without prior approval. Applicants were not present. Elena Malunis made a motion to send a letter to the applicants requesting that they remove the window decoration 15 days after receiving notice. Motion was seconded by Annegret Rice. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF IRENE CALLAS. 66 BEEKMAN AVENUE. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. (Hispanic Advancement Program) This hearing involves two matters. One is the unfinished window decoration, and the second one is for a storefront sign. Elena Malunis made a motion to ask the owner to have the window decoration border removed. Motion was not seconded. Robert Barstow made a motion to approve the sign on three lines), and that the border be removed time table. A letter will be sent tomorrow to vancement Program. Lou Falasca seconded the Malunis abstained. Motion carried. (3" high letters within a certain the Hispanic Admotion. Elena IN THE MATTER OF F. MULTARI. 347 NO. BROADWAY. NO. TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK (JAYMAR LEASE CORP.) Applicant appeared before the Board and stated he wished to remove all plastic inserts on the free standing signs on his property. He was told all signs on his property were currently in non-compliance with Village Code. Elena Malunis made a motion to grant a temporary permit for 60-90 days , and at the end of that time, signs will have to be removed (November 1st, 1990). Motion was seconded by Annegret Rice. Robert Barstow opposed motion. Motion was passed. 27 �Page IN THE MATTER OF THE SLEEPY HOLLOW MOTORS. 300-310 NO. BROADWAY. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. This was a preliminary hearing regarding signs for the awnings. Mr. John Crouch, architect for Sleepy Hollow Motors appeared before the Board and provided drawings for the Board to review regarding signage. Several suggestions were made by the Board as to advertising on the proposed awning. The Village Code does not allow automobile logos on signs. The product name of the cars would have to appear on the awning along with the dealership's logo. Mr. Crouch will present new signage plans next month. Mr. Crouch also presented several new drawings regarding changes to the various buildings on the property and asked the Board to allow Sleepy Hollow Motors to erect railroad ties on the property of the used car lot together with new plantings to prevent further erosion along the property. Mr. Falasca made a motion to allow Sleeply Hollow Motors to put in railroad ties together with plantings at the used car lot on North Broadway. Elena Malunis seconded motion. Being no further business meeting at 9:40 PM. Resjpectfully yours Francesca Lofcenz Recording Secretary / � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1990-09-12 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1990 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/46e6743bb882673b72da6a9cf5285f47.pdf d44a24aae765b55766046869d928318b PDF Text Text Page A Regular Meeting of the Architectual Review Board was held on Wednesday, September 12, 1990 at 8:00PM in the Village Hall of North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: Frank Arvan, Chairman Lou Falasca Robert Barstow Elena Malunis Annegret Rice Also Present: James Margotta, Building Inspector Francesca Lorenz, Recording Secretary IN THE MATTER OF BRIANS JEWELRY STORE. 113 BEEKMAN AVENUE. NO. TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK. This was a request by the merchant for approval of the existing sign on his window. Lou Falasca and Frank Arvan agreed that the existing sign does not adhere to the Village's sign code. Mr. Falasca made a motion to deny the request. Elena Malunis seconded motion. Motion passed unanimously. It was agreed that the merchant will submit a new design. Item tabled until the next meeting. IN THE MATTER OF THE CHESTNUT STREET CONDOS. CHESTNUT STREET. NO. TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK. Mr. Arvan asked the the builder Mr. D'Orio why the modulars were not built according to the plans as submitted and certified by the ARB. Mr. D'Orio stated they weren't aware of the error until the modulars were in place. Mr. Gismonano the architect for the project stated it was too late to install the bay windows at this /^^^t^t^JuL point. A lengthy discussion ensued in which several suggestions were made as to how to correct the situation. Item was tabled for next month's meeting. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN MINARDI. 89 NEW BROADWAY. NO. TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK Mr. Minardi the property. submitted a drawing for a brick wall around After a lengthy discussion concerning size and style of design, item was tabled for the next meeting to be held September 26,1990. �Page -' -2IN THE MATTER OF FRANK FERRERA. 19 CHESTNUT ST.. NO. TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK Mr. Ferrera submitted a sign design for his store front. Board felt the design was not within the code and made several suggestions as to improve the design. Item was tabled for the next meeting to be held September 26, 1990. IN THE MATTER OF EDWARD MASSARO. 190 VALLEY STREET. NO. TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK Plans were submitted by co-owner Ms. Palliti for the planned conversion of a garage to a handicapped apartment. After a brief discussion concerning the brick veneer, Mr. Lou Falasca moved to approve the design and drawings. Motion was seconded by Robert Barstow. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF MR. & MRS. CHEPIGA. 25 PINE STREET. NO. TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK Mr. Barstow removed himself from the discussion on this project as he is the architect who designed drawings. Mr. Chepiga is building a one story addition to the rear of the existing house, which will include a family room, bedroom and laundry room. The new vinyl siding will match existing vinyl siding. Mr. Falasca made a motion to approve drawings, motion was seconded by Elena Malunis. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF JAMES HUVANE. 127 HIGHLAND AVENUE. NO. TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK Applicant presented plans to the Board regarding a new addition to rear of present structure. Mr. Lou Falasca made a motion to approve the plans, seconded by Elena Malunis. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN ARCATE. 225 WEBBER AVENUE. NO. TARRYTOWN. NO. TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK This is a request to replace an existing shed on the applicant's property. New shed will be approximately the same size as the current one and the exterior will match the vinyl siding on the applicant's home. �Page Mr. Falasca moved to approve the plans for the new shed contingent on the Zoning Board's approval. Annegeret Rice seconded motion. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF SLEEPLY HOLLOW MOTORS. NO. BROADWAY. NORTH TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Mr. John Crouch, architect, presented new drawings. will cover the roof air conditioning system. A parapret At 310 No. Broadway the outside brick will be cleaned and awnings will be placed over the door. Elena Malunis moved to approve sign on the awning and also recommends that sign on wall be changed to Sleepy Hollow Motors and letters should be same size as on the awnings. She later amended resolution to exclude the wall sign, as the letters would not be large enough. Added to the motion was the contingent that brand names be eliminated. It was also suggested that the horse's legs used on the logo be corrected to include the whole leg and hoof. After a long discussion it was concluded that the phone number be eliminated from all signs. Motion was seconded by Bob Barstow. Motion passed unanioumsly. Mr. Crouch asked to come before the Board at some future date concerning a variance regarding the phone number on the signs, motion was tabled. Being no further business, public meeting adjourned. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Regarding signs on the used cars, it was decided that white stick on letters should be placed on the windshields of the cars indicating just the year of the car. Respectfully submitted o Francesca Lorenz Recording Secretary � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1990-09-26 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1990 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/c64ab94b2dc07f08277d23fb62727877.pdf b13e3362baebce7ab40ef83b00411dba PDF Text Text Page / A Regular Meeting of the Architectual Review Board was held on Wednesday, September 26, 1990 at 8:00 PM in Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: Frank Arvan, Chairman Robert Barstow Elena Malunis Annegret Rice Lou Falasca Also present: James Margotta, Building Inspector Francesca Lorenz, Recording Secretary IN THE MATTER OF TAPPAN CAR WASH. 2 05 VALLEY STREET. NO. TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK Mr. Edward Bueti, applicant appeared before the Board and requested sign approval. Currently there is a roof sign over the building advertising "Car Wash". Mr. Lou Falasca moved that the sign request be granted provided that the sign is placed over the garage door and the roof sign removed. Also that a letter be sent to the owner of the building advising him to notify Mr. Bueti that the roof sign must be removed. A motion to approve the request was made by Mr. Lou Falasca and seconded by Annegret Rice. Motion passed 3 in favor, one against. IN THE MATTER OF AMELIA BURTON. 2 30 NO. WASHINGTON ST.. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Applicant wishes to renovate store front and presented plans to the Board. After a brief discussion, Mr. Lou Falasca made a motion to approve the request and motion was seconded by Annegret Rice. Motion pass unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF JULIE MIRSBERGER. 137 VALLEY STREET. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. This matter is a sign request for the "Foreign Car Emporium" and "All Points Towing", separate businesses operating at the same location. After a lengthy discussion with Mr. Olivera, who designed sign, the Board felt that the design was inappropriate and tabled item for next month's agenda. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN MINARDI. 89 NEW BROADWAY. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. �Page J^ This is a continuation of last month's hearing. Mr. Minardi submitted a new drawing for fence design around the property , and after a brief discussion, Mr. Robert Barstow made a motion to approve the plans. Lou Falasca seconded the motion. Motion was passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF FRANK FERRARA. 19 CHESTNUT ST.. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. This is a continuation of last month's hearing. Mr. Ferrara presented a new design for proposed sign, which indicated a six foot long white sign with 10" high black letters. Elena Malunis made a motion to approve the design, motion was seconded by Annegret Rice. Motion was passed unanimously. BRIAN'S AUTO BODY. 249 NO. BROADWAY. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Applicant is before the Board to request approval of the existing sign. After a brief discussion, it was decided by the board to deny his request. It was also noted that the phone number was included on existing sign which is not allowed in the Code. Matter was tabled until next month. IN THE MATTER OF TORNELLO GAS STATION. NO. BROADWAY. N. Y. Mr. Gary Raniolo attorney represented Mr. Jack Tornello. Mr. Raniolo proceeded with a brief background on the above request for a canopy over the gasoline pumps and applicant's request to keep the pedestal sign presently located at that site. Mr. Lou Falasca made the following motion: Citgo canopy sign 24' x 24' with color band should be on Broadway facing north and internal illumination should be confined to each individual letter. Also background of canopy sign should be white. Tri-color strips which are Citgo's logo on the front only. The pedestal sign could remain, however the credit sign logos would have to be covered with a^^b^fc^plastic sheet. Approval of sign request is contingent upon the removal of all excess signs. Motion was seconded by Annegret Rice. Motion passed 3-1. OLD BUSINESS: Elena Malunis voted no. �Page^ IN THE MATTER OF THE CHESTNUT STREET CONDOS. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. The Board has decided to deny Mr. D'Orio's request for relief concerning the Chestnut Street condo's architectual plans. ^J^=>A^AA wilj^^fcave to rrrert a mtmm§mmm% rgtga»ce__a-s-Jspeoi-£ied b y tehu jfTSns'y^'^ previously submitted and approved by the Board. j _/cu Motion was* seconded -by Mr. Falasca and motion was passed unanimously. Being no further business meeting was adjourned at 9:30 PM. Respectfully submitted. u Francesca Lorenz Recording Secretary ' • > � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1990-10-24 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1990 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/7c1bf912e66e8a82cdf3be6da479116c.pdf d55512d06d72d413c98fcd5e6197661b PDF Text Text Page A Regular Meeting of the Architectual Review Board was held on Wednesday, October 24, 1990 at 8:00 PM in the Village Hall of North Tarrytown, New York. Present: Frank Arvan, Chairman Lou Falasca Annegret Rice Robert Barstow Absent: Elena Malunis Also Present: James Margotta, Building Inspector Francesca Lorenz, Recording Secretary Meeting was called to order at 8:10 PM. Mr. Margotta reviewed the agenda and in the matters of Carole's Kitchen, 171 Cortlandt Street, No. Tarrytown, N. Y. and John Jandrucko, 192 Cortlandt Street., No. Tarrytown, N. Y. , applicants were not present and these mattery were tabled until next month's meeting. IN THE MATTER OF SUN GLO CLEANERS (TIN YUAN REALTY) 52 BEEKMAN AVENUE. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. This is a request for approval of a sign application. Applicant addressed the Board and stated he wished to put an additional sign in the window of his establishment listing his services in both English and Spanish. During the discussion, he was advised that his sign request was not within the code, and that he must present a picture of store front and a rendering of a new sign designed within the Code. Mr. Falasca moved to deny the sign request. Motion was seconded by Annegret Rice. Motion was passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF THESESE M. VALVANO. 52 HEMLOCK DR.. NO. TARRYTYOWN. NEW YORK This is a request to approved architect's building plans for a new home. A motion to approve the plans was made by Lou Falasca, seconded by Annegret Rice. Discussion followed: Mr. Barstow discussed the issue of windows. A frieze board was suggested together with dental molding around the building. Also panels on the garage doors and flat trim around windows. An option was suggested to grant the permit for pouring the foundation only, and that new plans be submitted to the Board within the week based on the above suggestions. 35 �Page A second motion to certify plans based on suggestions of the Board to be submitted within the week, and to issue a permit for the foundation only was made by Mr. Falasca, seconded by Annegret Rice. Motion passed unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF JULIE MERSBERGER fC & M SIGN CO.) 137 VALLEY ST. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. This is a continuation of last month's hearing on a sign request for "All Points Towing" and "All International Motor Car Emporium". Mr. Oliva presented sketches of sign request. Board held a discussion and a motion to approve was made by Mr. Falasca. Motion was not seconded and it was decided to table discussion temporally. IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES SHIBETTI. 14 4 NEW BROADWAY, NO. TARRYTOWN, N. Y. Applicant presented photographs and blueprints outlining alterations, and an added kitchen. Board discussed the lack of details on the blueprints and discussed locations of windows. The Board asked that new plans with requested changes be submitted within the week and board will consider approval. Mr. Shibetti requested approval to cover the shed area, and Mr. Margotta gave his OK, based on the assumption the new plans will be submitted within the time frame set by the Board. Tabled until next meeting. S. AMENTA, 2 39 NO. BROADWAY. NO. TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK Mr. Paul Amenta, applicant, presented new sign design for Amenta Travel Agency. He is replacing neon sign. New sign will have individual brushed aluminum letters mounted onto the brick and would be illuminated by fluorescent light covered by a shield. A motion to approve sign was made by Annegret Rice and seconded by Robert Barstow. Motion passed unanimously. At this point, Mr. Oliva was asked to come before the board for a second discussion on the signs for "All Points Towing" and "All International Motor Car Emporium". A very long discussion ensued regarding whether a phone number should be allowed to appear on sign, and whether services that are provided by each business should also go on to the sign. 36 �Page 3 Mr. Rice stated that these items were not permitted by the Code, and therefore felt the Board should not approve the sign requests. She moved to disapprove request and was seconded by Mr. Barstow. Motion carried. Being no further business, meeting was adjourned at 9:50 PM. Respectfully submitted, // -/"/£<£*. G^C * •'. / i ^ t w Francesca Lorenz Recording Secretary 37 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1990-11-28 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1990 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1990 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/e39cc97b6e3991b8cacdff2a83b1e5c6.pdf 651221192421dfdb67cb40ecf1246fa2 PDF Text Text Page A Regular meeting of the Architectual Review Board was hold on January 23, 1991 at 8:00 PM in Village Hall, North Tarrytown, New York. Present: Frank Arvan, Chairman Lou Falasca Robert Barstow Annegret Rice Also Present: James Margotta, Building Inspector Francesca Lorenz, Recording Secretary Absent: Elena Malunis IN THE MATTER OF ACCURATE AUTO. 249 N. Y. NO. BROADWAY. NO. TARRYTOWN. This is a sign request; the sign is already in place. Mr. Falasca moved to deny the sign request, as the sketch showed that the businesses' phone number was on the sign. Mr. Margotta stated that he agreed to allow the sign to be erected and that the owner would have to take his chances on the sign being rejected. Several design suggestions were presented to the applicant by the Board. Mr. Margotta asked the applicant to submit a new sign design for approval by the ARB. Tabled until next month. IN THE MATTER OF THE AMENTA BUILDING. NO. BROADWAY. NO. TARRYTOWN. N.Y. Mr. Amenta appeared before the Board and stated that the sign he previously had approved by the Board could not be seen from the street, and wanted the Board's approval to have it painted white. Lou Falasca made a motion to approve that the sign be painted white, Robert Barstow seconded the motion. Motion passed. IN THE MATTER OF LAURENTINO RODRIOUES. 180 VALLEY ST. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. (SLEEPY HOLLOW PLAZA) Mr. Rodriques appeared before the board to ask for approval of the sign concept for the canopies over the store windows. As none of the stores have been rented as yet, the Board could only approve a concept. Mr. Rodriques agreed to stiplulate to store tenants that the sign would have to follow pre-approved concept. The letters would be white and 10 inches high on all signs. It was also suggested that the letters be three dimensional. 40 �Page Mr. Falasca made a motion to approve the store sign request. Ms. Rice seconded request. Motion passed. Mr. Rodriques then asked for approval of the building's logo and was given several suggestions by the Board. Sign design is round with 5" high 3 dimensional brown or burgundy letters. After some discussion, Mr. Falasca moved to approve the sketch for the sign, seconded by Mr. Barstow. Motion passed. IN THE MATTER OF JOA DA SILVA. 270 NO. WASHINGTON STREET. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Mr. L. Rodriques appeared on behalf of the applicant. This is a renovation request. The alteration will alter the view of the house. Mr. Barstow moved to approve the design. After a discussion the motion was amended to enlarge the column to 9 inches. A new design will be mailed to the Board for their approval. Ms. Rice seconded motion. Motion passed. IN THE MATTER OF LEE ABDUL. 270 NO. WASHINGTON ST.. NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Y. Mr. Barstow spoke on behalf of the applicant. This is a request to approve the design for a porch. The porch is being reduced by 3 ft., to gain parking. The new design will have only a 6 ft. porch. A motion to approve the design was made by Mr. seconded by Mr. Rice. Motion passed. Falasca and IN THE MATTER OF CLARA TEAGLE. 38 HUDSON ST. . NO. TARRYTOWN. N. Yj. This is a request to approve vinyl siding. Mr. Falasca made a motion to approve the request. seconded by Robert Barstow. Motion passed. Motion was At this point in the meeting, Mr. Jim Mooghan from the Rockefeller Park Preservation came before the Board to discuss the renovation of a house that is part of a land donation from David Rockefeller. He passed around pictures and discussed the removal of the porch. A motion to approve the plans for renovation with the suggestion that the porch stay intact was made by Lou Falasca and motion was seconded by Ms. Rice. Motion passed. CORRECTION OF MINUTES; 41 �Page A motion to approve the April, 1990 minutes was made by Annegret Rice and seconded by Robert Barstow. Motion carried. A motion to approve the May, 1990 minutes with corrections was made by Annegret Rice and seconded by Robert Barstow. Motion carried. A motion to approve the June, 1990 minutes with corrections was made by Lou Falasca and seconded by Robert Barstow. Motion carried. A motion to approve the July, 1990 minutes with corrections was made by Annegret Rice and seconded by Lou Falasca. A motion to approve the November, 1990 minutes with corrrections was made by Lou Falasca and seconded by Robert Barstow. BUSINESS MEETING: Mr. Arvan suggested sending a letter to the Board of Trustees regarding used car lettering and appointing two additional members to the ARB to insure quorums at monthly meetings. He also suggested that the ARB send letters to merchants whose signs have not been approved requesting that the signs be removed within 5 working days. Being no further businees, meeting adjourned at 9;40 PM. Respectfully submitted, Francesca Lorenz Recording Secretary i fl 42 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1991 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_1991-01-23 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-1991 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1991 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text