7 25 3689 https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/68a36f9a9e3bbf84c951a059e66c70ec.pdf 5bea2a2ddf977b18d1baa487fcdcac6e PDF Text Text ������������������� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_TRUST_2025-04-04_Res-73 Subject The topic of the resource Board of Trustees Minutes-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/6f7237d874fdf9ba83aa39f808636e4a.pdf a7f4a94397b41f1970c2c648aa505010 PDF Text Text �������������������������� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_TRUST_2025-03-11 Subject The topic of the resource Board of Trustees Minutes-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/c3af49fa1ef51d9d51b16d6ead1ae1bf.pdf bda0534b4bec755deaa9bcccd399d4bb PDF Text Text �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_TRUST_2025-03-25_RES-64-72 Subject The topic of the resource Board of Trustees Minutes-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/33947b0e1c030ef764487729af6c7538.pdf ebdb5c410dc169d2898ed0e0448566b0 PDF Text Text ����� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2025-02-19_131 Beekman Avenue Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/88aed91ded803e1bce8afac4aed93814.pdf 6080d6ab7eecda4ebb7a4cffe9643789 PDF Text Text ��� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2024-11-20_274 Kelbourne Avenue _Approved ZBA Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2024 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/ee740bd0dc3233412f615f2ce079f248.pdf 000216c8ad83f97663b3069b280612fb PDF Text Text ��� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2024-10-16_ 120 Gorey Brook Road- Approved ZBA Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2024 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/0de8f823d861ee0c8e2302b018a32287.pdf 2d81175aa22288df500f95b171ed396f PDF Text Text ���� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2024-10-16_30 Barnhart Avenue Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2024 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/2f6f17a57b2c8d911a48a340854182aa.pdf 0b37433c43aa744f857a91298edc13da PDF Text Text ���� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2024-09-18_1 Pleasant Street Approved ZBA Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2024 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/ec13431b65d0af821aac2156e2832525.pdf 98592782e4a6e4e22b33cb9977016974 PDF Text Text ��� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_2024-07-17_5 Farrington Avenue Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2024 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/11b5e0efa28472d3f2c019ecc201f183.pdf 037e80aa9d5192e33fd5bdae0957f4a2 PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes February 20, 2025 Chairperson Krakauer called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Chairperson Krakauer read the agenda and reviewed the adjournment requests. Present: Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson Chris Camia Richard Gross Jay Schulz Rachelle Gebler Ken Anderson Also Present: Joshua B. Subin, Village Attorney David Smith, Village Planner Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Absent: Benjamin Nielsen James Natarelli, Village Engineer Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Agenda: 1) SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block A Proposed medical office building, Site Plan and Architectural Review ApprovalPublic hearing, Pending ZBA Approval- Public hearing 2) 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan ApprovalContinued public hearing- requested adjournment. 3) Cortlandt Development LLC, 377 North Broadway, Proposed deli/market, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Public hearing 4) KWD Realty, LLC, 309-315 North Broadway, Proposed mixed-use building, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Discussion 5) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III- Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalDiscussion-requested adjournment 6) Marathon Development Group, LTD, 100 College Avenue, Proposed 105-unit mixed use development, Subdivision, Special Permit, and Site Plan Approval- Presentationrequested adjournment 7) Kendal-on-Hudson, 1010 Kendal Way, Proposed Emergency Generator, Amended Site Plan Approval- Preliminary Presentation 1 (2/20/25) �8) 50 on Hudson Street LLC, 50 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary Presentation 9) Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed 14-unit apartment building, Site Plan Approval extension- Preliminary Presentation 10) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 332-338 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) unit townhome building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary Presentation 11) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 340-350 Legend Drive, Proposed (6) unit townhome building, Architectural Review Approval-Preliminary Presentation 12) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 349-355 Hollows Pass 13) Approval of minutes, November 21, 2024, December 19, 2024, January 16, 2025 1. SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development Block A Proposed medical office building, Site Plan & Architectural Review- Public Hearing, pending ZBA approval- Public Hearing Richard Gross moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Gross Seconded: Schulz Vote 6-0 Chairperson Krakauer invited the applicant to present the application. Janet Giris is a partner with the law firm of DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP presenting on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Giris stated that the revised plan presented in October included modifications to the exterior of the medical office building and a request to add additional parking spaces to the site. The application was referred to the Zoning Board of Appeals to request variances for the height of the parking structure and the required number of parking spaces. The Zoning Board of Appeals granted the requested variances at last night’s meeting. Brooks Slocum, the project architect from G3 Architecture Interiors Planning, presented and summarized the revised Site Plan drawings for the proposed medical office building and attached parking structure. Chairperson Krakauer requested that the applicant modify the concrete roof façade materials to match the precast finish of the garage structure. Mr. Slocum stated that he would make the changes to the materials of the garage structure roof. The Board and Mr. Slocum discussed the landscaping proposed along the 8-foot barrier between the parking structure and the utility easement. The Board and Mark Gratz discussed the locations of the existing landscape screening and utility boxes installed to serve the proposed medical office building and the market retail building. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public. There were no public comments. 2 (2/20/25) �Rachelle Gebler moved to adjourn the public hearing and to direct staff to prepare a draft resolution for review at the March 20, 2025, meeting. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Camia Vote 6-0 Ms. Giris stated that there is a draft resolution from June that would need to be reworked for approval. No action was taken. 2. 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan Approval -Continued public hearing Richard Gross moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Gross Seconded: Gebler Vote 6-0 Chairperson Krakauer stated that the applicant requested an adjournment so there will not be any new presentations. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board. Richard Gross moved to adjourn the public hearing to the March 20, 2025 meeting. Moved: Gross Seconded: Gebler Vote 6-0 No action was taken. 3. Cortlandt Development, LLC, 377 North Broadway, Proposed deli/market, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Public hearing- Public hearing Jonathan Merheb, an engineer from JMER Engineering P.C., representing the property owner. Mr. Merheb stated that the revised plan includes eliminating the curb cut on Pocantico Street, adding a raised sidewalk and curb, redirecting downspouts, adding cultech detention systems in the rear parking area to capture water runoff, adding building mounted lighting, adding a landscape buffer between the adjacent building, and a curb planting bed on North Broadway. He will address vehicle maneuverability concerns by eliminating (1) parking spot near the trash enclosure while still providing (9) spaces where (8) are required. He will revise the proposed trash enclosure from chain link to vinyl. Mr. Merheb stated the proposed fiberglass planters would not serve as a vehicle buffer and because there are gas tanks in that location, they cannot set anything in a footing. The only option would be to remove the seating and move the planters up to the sidewalk. Rachelle Gebler moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Anderson Vote 6-0 Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public. 3 (2/20/25) �Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board received two written comment letters. (See attached Exhibit #s 1 and 2) There were no other public comments. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board. Rachelle Gebler asked Sean McCarthy for suggestions for a structure protecting the sitting area. Chris Camia agreed that the applicant should consider something more substantial than planters. Sean McCarty stated that he could work with Mr. Merheb to provide a better solution for the proposed seating area. Rachelle Gebler moved to adjourn the public hearing to the March 20, 2025 meeting and direct staff to draft a resolution. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Schulz Vote 6-0 4. KWD Realty LLC, 309-315 North Broadway, Proposed 4-story self-storage facility Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Discussion Karl Dibble is the property owner and developer of the project. Mr. Dibble stated that his attorney and architect could not attend the meeting. Mr. Dibble described the changes made to the site plan, including the proposed setbacks, grade changes, and building height. Mr. Dibble provided examples of neighboring buildings that do not provide landscaped sidewalk buffers. Mr. Dibble stated that shrinking the size of the building is not financially feasible due to the high material costs. Mr. Dibble presented the renderings and described the views from different village areas. Mr. Dibble requested that the Planning Board recommend the application to the Zoning Board for review of the requested variances for lot coverage and height. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Dibble to describe the purpose for the curb cut going up the hill and asked if he could streamline the access off Route 9 Mr. Dibble stated that the curb cut would be used for access during the building's construction. After they finish, that entrance could be used by a van or by Westerly Storage to store and rent out vans as a service of the storage facility. The self-storage use would decrease the amount of traffic off Route 9. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Dibble for the proposed hours of operation. Mr. Dibble stated that the self-storage facility would operate during normal business hours and that gates would be installed at all three access points. David Smith stated that the curb cuts are subject to the approval of the Department of Transportation (“DOT”). He suggested that when the Planning Board is ready to schedule a public hearing, the application should be forwarded to the New York State DOT for review. 4 (2/20/25) �Chairperson Krakauer stated that Mr. Dibble considered moving the tower feature. Since the proposed building is over the allowable height and coverage requirements, the Board would like to compare a building in compliance with what a building in compliance would look like on the site and neighboring property renderings. Mr. Dibble described how the property slopes affect the ability to meet the compliance requirements in some areas. Chris Camia suggested eliminating the top floor and pushing the square footage into the setbacks. Mr. Dibble requested a referral to the Zoning Board of Appeals to receive feedback from the Board and the public before making any additional changes. Chairperson Krakauer requested that Mr. Dibble prepare renderings for comparison purposes that incorporate their suggestions regarding the height and coverage requirements. No action was taken. 5. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III –Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit Approval – Discussion Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board received a request to adjourn the application to the March 20, 2025 meeting. No action was taken 6. Marathon Development Group LTD, 100 College Avenue, Proposed 105-unit mixed-use development, Subdivision, Special Permit, and Site Plan ApprovalPreliminary presentation Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board received a request to adjourn the application to the March 20, 2025 meeting. No action was taken. 7. Kendal on Hudson, 1010 Kendal Way, Proposed emergency generator, Amended Site Approval Plan approval- Preliminary Presentation Mami Kitmaura is an associate with Walter T. Gorman Engineers, representing the applicant. Ms. Kimatura summarized the application and stated that no changes have been proposed since the approval granted in 2022, which expired before they could obtain contractor costs. Richard Gross moved to waive the public hearing requirement. Moved: Gross Seconded: Camia 5 (2/20/25) �Chairperson Krakauer- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Chris Camia- yes Richard Gross- yes Jay Schulz- yes Ken Anderson- yes Vote 6-0 Richard Gross moved to approve the draft resolution. Moved: Anderson Seconded: Camia Chairperson Krakauer- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Chris Camia- yes Richard Gross- yes Jay Schulz- yes Ken Anderson- yes Vote 6-0 8. 50 on Hudson Street LLC, 50 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval Brian Hopkins is the owner and the architect of the property. Mr. Hopkins summarized his experience, including two completed projects on 34 and 46 Hudson Street. The application proposes constructing a three-unit building where the top unit is a duplex. The recorded easement with 48 Hudson Street allows both properties to have on-site parking spaces. The proposed application will require variances for the front and side yard setbacks and building coverage. Mr. Hopkins presented a neighboring lot coverage analysis, site photographs, and described the views from the other houses on Hudson Street, and a rendering depicting the scale of the proposed building maintaining the street line. He presented the site plan and landscaping plan. He said that he would ensure all plantings are native species. The garbage and recycling collection would be in the rear yard and include bicycle racks. The application proposes (3) parking spaces where the residents would be required to back out of the driveway. He proposes installing a 5-foot high fence around the property's perimeter, including an operable fence and gate on the right side for the owner of 48 Hudson Street. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Hopkins if parking configurations could enable vehicles to turn around. Ms. Krakauer asked Sean McCarthy if tandem parking is permitted to provide more parking spaces. Mr. Hopkins stated that he has investigated all vehicle maneuverability options. Mr. McCarthy stated that the tandem parking could be permitted depending on the relationship of the parking spaces to the unit. Mr. Hopkins described the proposed wood building façade and fencing materials, windows, decking, railings, and lighting. He presented the unit layout plans including the decks and 6 (2/20/25) �interior renderings. He presented a side-by-side bulk comparison between 46 and 50 Hudson Street. He presented a study of land use zoning and parking availability for the surrounding area. He described the intention to use the panelized system to construct a building with high R-values and performance. He plans to use heat pump technology for heating and cooling. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board. David Smith requested that Mr. Hopkins submit a copy of the recorded easement agreement with 48 Hudson Street and the parking analysis. Rachelle Gebler stated that the building's architectural style is excessively dissimilar to others on Hudson Street and requested that the design be more in line with the street. She suggested that Mr. Hopkins consider a gable roof design to reduce the building's visual bulk and height. Mr. Hopkins said he addressed the height concerns by stepping back into the building. Jay Schulz asked Mr. Hopkins if there would be storage under the stairs to the second level. Mr. Hopkins stated that the room under the stairs would be the utility room. Sean McCarthy stated that this is a model preliminary application for applicants and that the quality of the proposed work is above what the Board has been seeing. Mr. Shulz stated he is concerned about backing out of the driveway and asked if there are examples where this occurs safely. Mr. Hopkins stated that 46 Hudson has the same parking configuration Sean McCarthy suggested the Board consider referring the application to the Zoning Board of Appeals for the April meeting and allow the applicant to present updated material at the March Planning Board meeting. Mr. Camia asked Mr. Hopkins to compare the non-conforming conditions of the existing structure with the self-created variances he will be requesting. Mr. Hopkins stated that the existing structure is over the property line at the side and front yard setbacks. Although he is seeking variances for the setbacks and coverage, the new structure would improve these setbacks. The existing two-family residence includes one parking space, whereas the proposed three-family residence proposes (3) parking spaces, where (6) spaces are required by code. The Planning Board referred the application to the Zoning Board of Appeals and adjourned it to the March 20, 2025, Planning Board meeting to discuss architectural review concerns. 9. Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed 14-unit apartment building, Site Plan Approval extension- Preliminary Presentation 7 (2/20/25) �Maximillian Mahalek stated that he is an attorney from Cuddy + Feder LLP who is representing the applicant. Mr. Mahalek stated that the applicant is requesting a second extension for the Site Plan and Architectural Review approval granted in 2024. The applicant has completed boring tests, and is working on the construction drawings. Richard Gross moved to approve the draft resolution. Moved: Gross Seconded: Anderson Chairperson Krakauer- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Chris Camia-yes Richard Gross-yes Jay Schulz- yes Ken Anderson- yes Vote 6-0 10. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 332-338 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary Presentation Peter Chavkin stated that he is a managing partner of Sun Homes and that they have contracted Appel Design Group Architects for the project balance. Matthew Martinque is an architect with Appeal Design Group representing the applicant. Mr. Martinque stated that the building is four stories tall and has four units. He summarized the floor plans for the 20-foot wide interior units and exterior building materials, and stated that the rooftop condensers would include screening. He presented renderings of views from the alleyway between the two buildings and stated that there is 24 feet between the buildings. An additional architectural feature at the north elevation is unnecessary, as the corner would be well landscaped. Solid entry doors are proposed with unit numbers that would include downlights. Mr. Chavkin stated that glass windows are proposed on the sides of doors in the 28-foot wide units not included in this building. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Martinque to describe the landscaping at the north corner. Mr. Chavkin said he would provide a more detailed landscape plan for the next meeting. Chris Camia suggested shifting the spacing of the rooftop condenser units and screening from the ends of the building to improve views. Mr. Chavkin requested that the Board approve the preparation of a draft resolution for the next meeting, subject to submission of revised plans addressing the landscaping, rear lighting, rooftop condenser locations and screening. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board and the consultants and polled the Board on their approval to prepare a draft resolution. 8 (2/20/25) �There were no additional comments or objections from the Board. Chairperson Krakauer directed David Smith to prepare a draft resolution for review at the March 20, 2025 meeting. 11. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 340-350 Legend Drive, Proposed (6) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary Presentation Matthew Martinque is an architect with Appeal Design Group representing the applicant. Mr. Martinque stated that the four-story building contains six units and includes a similar architectural style and floor plans to the adjacent four-unit building at 332-338 Legend Drive. Gas and electric meters will be located on the ends or in-between the buildings with landscape screening. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board and the consultants. David Smith requested that the applicant provide a summary of the approved and built blocks and what is being proposed. Mr. Chavkin said he would submit a key plan summarizing the progression. Mr. Chavkin requested that the Board approve the preparation of a draft resolution for the next meeting, subject to submission of revised plans addressing the landscaping, rear lighting, rooftop condenser locations and screening. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board and the consultants and polled the Board on their approval to prepare a draft resolution. There were no additional comments or objections from the Board. Chairperson Krakauer directed David Smith to prepare a draft resolution for review at the March 20, 2025 meeting. 12. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 349-355 Hollows Pass, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome Building, Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary Presentation Matthew Martinque is an architect with Appeal Design Group representing the applicant. Mr. Martinque stated that the four-story building contains four units and has a similar architectural style and floor plan to the buildings at 332-338 Legend Drive and 340-350 Legend Drive. This building includes two 28-foot-wide end units with a sidelight at the entrance door. Mr. Martinque presented a rendering and stated that two brick colors are proposed for the building units. Peter Chavkin stated that they prefer to deliver the building as rendered. If the Planning Board prefers, they will alternate the brick colors for each unit. Mr. Martinque stated that the down lighting would appear softer with the lighter color brick. 9 (2/20/25) �Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Martinque if this building is wider than the buildings on Legend Drive. Mr. Martinque stated that this building includes two 28-foot wide end units and two 24-foot wide interior units. Mr. Chavkin stated that the buildings on Legend Drive include 22-foot wide end and 20-foot wide interior units. Chairperson Krakauer polled the Board members for their comments regarding the articulation of the brick colors The Board agreed to be comfortable with the exterior design and brick colors. Peter Chavkin requested that the resolution language for the fourth-floor penthouses and end units be the same for the three buildings and not include the language for the high-visibility end units. Chairperson Krakauer asked Peter Chavkin if rooftop pergolas are proposed for the two buildings on Legend Drive or the building on Hollows Pass. Peter Chavkin stated that rooftop pergolas are not proposed on the three buildings. Chairperson Krakauer directed David Smith to prepare a draft resolution for review at the March 20, 2025 meeting. 13. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II- Waterfront Open Space- North Buffer- Amended Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit Approval- Preliminary Presentation Peter Chavkin stated that he is from Biddle Real Estate Ventures, representing Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, and is requesting amended site plan approval for the North Buffer area of the Phase II Waterfront Open Space. Mr. Chavkin stated that they should change the name to the North Meadow. The Board previously approved the North Buffer and the third leg of Tappan Zee Park. A condition of the approval required them to determine if flood surveys would allow them to raise the grade of the North Buffer. The studies determined that the flood levels at the maximum water elevation flooding are a foot lower than the maximum the overall site could accommodate, where no residences would be flooded. The amended plan includes raising the bottom of the channel approximately 2 feet. No changes have been proposed for the approved pathways and depressed areas. This area will serve as infrastructure and open space. Chris Camia asked Mr. Chavkin to describe the emergency access area. Mr. Chavkin stated that the emergency access area was approved as a grassed pathway with a rubberized system underneath. The pathway will serve as a permanent pedestrian connection and emergency vehicle service connection. 10 (2/20/25) �Questions related to the vehicle weight that the path could support and whether there would be signage indicating its emergency use. Mr. Chavkin said he would confirm with the engineers and provide information to the Planning Board. There was a discussion regarding an Intermunicpal Agreement with Westchester County related to the operations and maintenance of Kingsland Point Park, whether or not the fence and concrete that border the park entrance from the North Buffer should be removed or remain, and suggestions for keeping a part of the original foundation. Mr. Chavkin requested that the Board approve preparing a draft resolution for the next meeting. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board and the consultants and polled the Board on their approval to prepare a draft resolution. There were no additional comments or objections from the Board. Chairperson Krakauer directed David Smith to prepare a draft resolution for review at the March 20, 2025 meeting, including language for keeping a part of the original foundation. 14. Approval of minutes, November 21, 2024, December 19, 2024, January 16, 2025 Richard Gross moved to approve the November 21, 2024 meeting minutes. Moved: Gross Seconded: Gebler Chairperson Krakauer- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Chris Camia- yes Richard Gross- yes Jay Schulz-yes Ken Anderson-abstain Vote 5-0-1 Chris Camia moved to approve the December 19, 2024 meeting minutes. Moved: Camia Seconded: Gross Chairperson Krakauer- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Chris Camia- yes Richard Gross- yes Jay Schulz-yes Ken Anderson-yes Vote 6-0 Chris Camia moved to approve the January 16, 2025 meeting minutes. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Camia 11 (2/20/25) �Chairperson Krakauer- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Chris Camia- yes Richard Gross- yes Jay Schulz-yes Ken Anderson-yes Vote 6-0 Richard Gross moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:50 PM. Moved: Gross Seconded: Anderson Vote 6-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 12 (2/20/25) �Exhibit #1 Chairperson Lindsay Krakauer c/o Village of Sleepy Hollow Department of Architecture, Land Use Development, Buildings and Building Compliance 28 Beekman Avenue, Sleepy Hollow, New York 10591 Re: Cortlandt Development LLC Application for 377 North Broadway February 20, 2025 Dear Chairperson Krakauer, Historic Hudson Valley (“HHV”) is a not-for-profit cultural organization that owns and operates several National Historic Landmarks, including Philipsburg Manor at 381 North Broadway in Sleepy Hollow. The Manor also serves as a Visitor Center for visitors to Kykuit, the Rockefeller Estate, also a National Historic Landmark in Sleepy Hollow. HHV provides significant positive economic impact for Sleepy Hollow and its businesses as it welcomes tens of thousands of visitors each year at Philipsburg Manor through educational programs, tours of two historic sites, and popular events. We have reviewed the application for the property at 377 North Broadway, just across Pocantico Street from Philipsburg Manor. We welcome this project. If it is completed with sufficient attention paid to architectural character and site planning enhancements, we believe the final result has the potential to improve the appearance of the existing property and be an enhancement to our neighborhood overall. The site is currently a sea of asphalt and concrete surfaces. Landscaping along its Pocantico Street frontage, even freestanding planters that are well maintained, would be an aesthetic improvement and provide a visual buffer for the proposed parking area. We ask the Planning Board to require this as part of any approval granted. Our chief concern is the provision of adequate on-site parking for the proposed uses (deli with seating/market/gas station). We notice that there appears to be a discrepancy between the area proposed to be outdoor seating in the color renderings submitted in comparison with the site plan, with the former depicting a much larger area that projects all the way out from the garage bay facade to meet the stone facade of the southern portion of the existing building. On the site plan, a much narrower area is depicted as the proposed outdoor seating area. The size of the seating area and whether the proposed use is intended as “grab and go” or “sit and eat” has significant implications for our property. If customers are dining in, there will be slow turnover of the limited parking on site, creating the potential for deli customers to attempt to use the Philipsburg Manor parking lot instead of the site’s own parking. In addition to this discrepancy, we have not been able to identify how the off-street parking requirement from Section 450-41.E of the Village Zoning Law is being applied to the proposed use, and what size outdoor dining area, with what number of seats, was used as part of that calculation. �Based on the multiple activities proposed for the site, it can also be expected that more vehicular and pedestrian activity will be generated than in the past. What area on the site is proposed to be used for unloading deliveries to the building and the underground gasoline storage tanks? How can the Planning Board ensure that these deliveries will not block access to the proposed parking spaces and, in so doing, increase the possibility that customers will not find sufficient parking on-site and begin to search for parking elsewhere, such as on the nearby Philipsburg Manor parking lot? Until these variables, and the applicable math to set the required number of on-site parking spaces, are made clear in the application, we respectfully request that the Planning Board hold open this Public Hearing so that we can react to this aspect of a clarified application. As you know, parking is at a premium in the Village, and Philipsburg Manor needs every one of its parking lot’s spaces available to support its own business uses. Should the Planning Board grant an approval for this project, HHV asks that it include measures and stipulations that preclude the possibility that the Manor’s parking lot will be used by customers of the business at 377 North Broadway. We believe this project has the potential to improve the aesthetics of a property in direct view of Phillipsburg Manor, and to add a desirable amenity. We ask that the Board pay careful attention to its parking requirements and insist in any approval that the applicant take all necessary measures to mitigate any adverse parking impact on its neighbor. Best regards, Waddell Stillman, President Rob Schweitzer, Vice President, Communications & Commerce Historic Hudson Valley �Exhibit #2 ALL-FLEET SERVICE INC. 3S7 North Broadway Sleepy Hollow, N.Y. 10S91 914-366-0688 . By email and By Band Smccarthy@sleepyhollowny.gov Chairperson Krakauer, C/O Village of sleepy Hollow, D e partment of Architecture Land Use Development Building & Buildings Compliance 28 Beekman Avenue Sleepy Hollow, N.Y. 110591 •.· February 18, 2025 RECEIVED FEB 1 9 2025 BUILDING DEPT: VILLAGE O F SLEEPY HOLLOW Re: Application o f Cortland development L L C f I, Jorge Berenguer, as the owner o f All Fleet Services, located at 357 N. Broadway, Sleepy Hollow, a gas station and deli less than 200 feet from the proposed request by Cortland Development LLC, seeking approval to convert an auto repair shop into a delicatessen. I object to their application, since there is already a deli in place here at 357 N. Broadway, Sleepy Hollow Taxi � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-02-20 Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/8f357ec5731bfee466d49ac92a96212d.pdf 0ee69aa29f1e68fad95d5836a1d6abe2 PDF Text Text �� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-02-20_1010 Kendal Way Approved Resolution 2-20-25 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/6e22c555cd8caa34d7471e20dbca4cb7.pdf 0236d8477e83310efc7981b1f712448b PDF Text Text �� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-02-20_135 Beekman Avenue Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/8ae5b0adc240796e6f94e14a17356d73.pdf 7604e91d91abc97907bc8fbf4830719c PDF Text Text ���� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-01-16_405 Legend Drive Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/a15b8336cff57bf8af412ecb0998e592.pdf afa12a0d126858edd92bfa4b18656f41 PDF Text Text ��������� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2024-11-21_308-318 Legend Drive Approved Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2024 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/417a182421c0dcb8a642481ed4eac8bb.pdf 6e8affc0faf30c14229bf3977bf118e9 PDF Text Text ��� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2024-11-21_120 Gorey Brook Road Approved Planning Board Resolution Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2024 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/a14c182182b5032009d2a782866da0f4.pdf 19074a5ee4291d75b0c93b0c7c7fa4e5 PDF Text Text ��� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_TRUST_2025-03-04_WS Subject The topic of the resource Board of Trustees Minutes-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/cd5b2ad8ac882597224d9e72a44199f7.pdf 805a8b66ce1f6a20c654e0180220e1d4 PDF Text Text �� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_TRUST_2025-02-18_WS Subject The topic of the resource Board of Trustees Minutes-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/0cc62e2df67c48a6adeedcff5c08c577.pdf 8714c7226cdaf509ff4c45387d70a2a7 PDF Text Text ��������������������������������������������������� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_TRUST_2025-03-11_RES-49-62 Subject The topic of the resource Board of Trustees Minutes-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/d900b78df79c84088467257da6f3fc13.pdf b6f35a4e2f308fe31b0bf75cfba15b1d PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes January 16, 2025 Chairperson Krakauer called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Chairperson Krakauer read the agenda and reviewed the adjournment requests. Present: Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson Chris Camia Richard Gross Jay Schulz Rachelle Gebler Also Present: Joshua B. Subin, Village Attorney David Smith, Village Planner James Natarelli, Village Engineer Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Absent: Ken Anderson Benjamin Nielsen Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Agenda: 1) SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block A Proposed medical office building, Site Plan and Architectural Review ApprovalPublic hearing, Pending ZBA Approval- requested adjournment 2) 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan ApprovalPublic hearing 3) Cortlandt Development LLC, 377 North Broadway, Proposed deli/market, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Public hearing- requested adjournment 4) KWD Realty, LLC, 309-315 North Broadway, Proposed mixed-use building, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Presentation 5) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III- Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalDiscussion 6) One Kingsland Owner LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, 405 Legend Drive- Block N, Amended Site Plan & ARB Approval- Preliminary Presentation 7) Marathon Development Group, LTD, 100 College Avenue, Proposed 105- unit mixed use development, Subdivision, Special Permit, and Site Plan Approval- Preliminary Presentation 1 (1/16/25) �8) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, 2 Lighthouse Landing, Proposed pergolas, Special Permit- Discussion 9) Approval of minutes, November 21, 2024, December 19, 2024 1. SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development Block A Proposed medical office building, Site Plan & Architectural Review- Public Hearing, pending ZBA approval- requested adjournment. The Board received an adjournment request from the applicant’s attorney on January 16, 2025, to adjourn the public hearing to the February 20, 2025 meeting. Rachelle Gebler moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Schulz Vote 5-0 Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public. There were no public comments. Rachelle Gebler moved to continue the public hearing to the February 20, 2025, meeting. Moved: Gelber Seconded: Gross Vote 5-0 2. 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan Approval -Public Hearing Sam Vieira stated that he is the project architect. The project engineers didn’t complete the stormwater prevention and site work designs. Mr. Vieira stated that a section of the retaining wall along the property line was removed. The applicant intends to store the garbage behind the gate and fencing, and it will be brought to the curb for village pick up or handled by a private carting company. The applicant will maintain a 3-foot clearance around the fire hydrant. The existing curb on the northwest side will be replaced with a standard curb and sidewalk, and a new sidewalk will be extended to the southern border. Mr. Vieira said that the applicant is concerned about creating a sidewalk with a utility pole, guy wire, and traffic sign on the right-ofway and at the interruption on the southern side of the right-of-way. Mr. Vieira stated that the applicant proposes to use a steel frame screen with 6-foot-high horizontal synthetic decking material for the fence and gate. The retaining wall is proposed to be 6 feet tall at its highest point with a 42-inch high guardrail. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Vieira how the gate would operate. Mr. Vieira stated that the double gate will swing inward to the rear of the site. He asked the Board to consider eliminating the request for the additional landscaped area along the sidewalk and curb cut, as the owner is seeking enough flat area to move customer cars. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board. 2 (1/16/25) �Chris Camia suggested that the Board further discuss solutions for the sidewalks and the existing obstructions. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board feels the sidewalks are a priority for pedestrian safety. Chris Camia moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Camia Seconded: Gross Vote 5-0 Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public. Christopher Diaz stated that his father owns 20 Hudson Street. Mr. Diaz asked Mr. Vieira to describe the plan for the space between the properties if the retaining wall would be an obstruction, and how long it would take to complete the project. Mr. Vieira stated that the applicant's property line is approximately 3 feet from the 20 Hudson Street building. The retaining wall is proposed 12 feet from the house and will be at grade with guardrails on top. Landscape screening is proposed as per the Board’s suggestion. The project shouldn’t take more than a couple of months to complete. Mr. Vieira asked the Board to confirm directions relating to the sidewalk. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board would like to see a curve in the sidewalk. Mr. Vieira said the applicant agrees to build and maintain the sidewalk. There was a discussion regarding the proposed sidewalk location. Aniello Ricchiuti stated that he is the property owner and would appreciate the village getting ConEdison to move the pole. Mr. Vieira asked Chairperson Krakauer where the Board stands on the additional landscaped areas at the parking area. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the landscaped area would create a buffer between the sidewalk and the internal turning area. Mr. Ricchuiti stated that adding a landscaped area would restrict the area he has to store and turn larger vehicles. Rachelle Gebler moved to continue the public hearing to the February 20, 2025, meeting. Moved: Gelber Seconded: Gross Vote 5-0 3. Cortlandt Development, LLC, 377 North Broadway, Proposed deli/market, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Public hearing- requested adjournment 3 (1/16/25) �Chairperson Krakauer stated that the applicant requested an adjournment to the February 20, 2025 meeting. 4. KWD Realty LLC, 309-315 North Broadway, Proposed 4-story self-storage facility Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Presentation Mark Constantine stated that he is an attorney representing the Applicant. Mr. Constantine stated that revisions have been made to address some of the comments received from the Planning Board. He requested that the process be continued and stated that the proposed storage facility would complement the transit-oriented high-density development the Village is fostering. Bruno Pietrosanti is the architect representing the owner, Mr. Karl Dibble. Mr. Pietrosanti stated that although they didn’t reduce the proposed lot coverage and building mass, visual techniques were added to reduce the visual appearance of the building by setting part of the building back 5 feet. The height of the tower element was reduced but still requires a variance. Diagrams were submitted to show vehicle maneuverability and sight lines from the upper loading area and lower parking area. Renderings will be completed for the next meeting to show views from the south. Iron safety railings are proposed on the front retaining walls. The loading area will be screened from the street by a gate, fencing, and landscaping. The interior loading area walls were set back 10 feet into the property. The sliding gate style will not intrude on the village right-of-way. Mr. Pietrosanti said they will complete the landscape and drainage plans after the Zoning Board of Appeals renders decisions for the requested variances. He requested that the Planning Board refer the application to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Pietrosanti stated that the roof area was reduced by 3,000 square feet and summarized the façade material specifications. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Pietrosanti to summarize the requested variances. Mr. Pietrosanti stated that the variance requests for building height and lot coverage have not changed. Mr. Constantine stated that the applicant seeks to maintain the proposed square footage to be economically viable. The proposed facility will have very little impact on municipal services. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board requested that they work to design a project that fits more within the zoning code requirements without excessive variances for height and coverage. The Planning Board is not reviewing the proposed use. She requested that comparisons to adjacent buildings be submitted and diagrams showing where the building would be over the height requirements. Rachelle Gebler and Ken Anderson agree that the proposed massing and coverage remain a concern. Mr. Constantine stated that the proposed height of the facility would not cause a significant visual impact and requested a referral to the Zoning Board of Appeals to address the concerns. Sean McCarthy suggested that the proposed loading area could be utilized for storage facility square footage and eliminate the need for a height variance. He suggested the applicant consider 4 (1/16/25) �combining the loading and parking areas and eliminating one curb cut to provide one entrance point. Mr. Pietrosanti stated that the loading area requires 14 feet height for box truck access. Mr. McCarthy stated that providing 14 feet of height would work well on the lower side of the property. Karl Dibble is the owner of the property. He stated that the loading area would be well screened from the road. As a business strategy, he would prefer to keep the office and customer parking separate from the loading area. Comparisons to the adjacent mechanical buildings built in the 1920s are irrelevant to his project. Mr. Dibble stated that site work is difficult on the property and that the proposed storage facility would meet the needs of a high-density development. Richard Gross asked why the open space from the initial proposal was replaced with the tower element. Mr. Gross asked Mr. McCarthy for the permitted coverage percentage. Mr. McCarthy said the applicant proposes 83.7% coverage, where 60% is permitted. Mr. Petrosanti stated that the original proposal with the drive-through café complied with the lot coverage. Eliminating the drive-through café resulted in the request for more square footage so that the storage facility would be economically feasible. Mr. Dibble requested a referral to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Chairperson Krakauer requested that the applicant consider the Board’s comments and suggestions regarding excessive height and coverage for the next meeting. No action was taken. 5. Lighthouse Landing Communties, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III –Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit Approval – Discussion Chairperson Krakauer stated there is no new information to discuss. 6. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, 405 Legend Drive, Block N- Amended Site Plan & ARB Approval- Preliminary presentation Peter Chavkin stated he is a Managing Member of One Kingsland Owner LLC. Mr. Chavkin stated that sales efforts were initially expected to be made from the clubhouse building. Based on the timing of the construction of the building versus when he expects the offering plan to be approved at the Attorney General’s office to begin sales, he is requesting to install a temporary trailer adjacent to the amenity complex parking lot. Mr. Chavkin presented the Block N approved Site Plan and stated that the temporary sales trailer would be located behind the curb of the parking lot with construction fencing surrounding a smaller temporary parking area for sales operations expected to start in April. 5 (1/16/25) �Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board and the consultants. There were no questions from the Board. David Smith asked if they plan on using the existing Toll Brothers trailer. Mr. Chavkin said they plan to relocate the Toll Brothers construction trailer from the south parcel. Chris Camia asked Mr. Chavkin to describe how the sales trailer would be decorated. Mr. Chavkin stated that this is the facility from which they intend to sell 90 townhomes. Plans will be submitted to the Building Department detailing the exterior and interior renovations needed for a sales office with landscaping. James Natarelli asked how long the trailer would be on site. Mr. Chavkin stated that the draft resolution stipulates a condition related to issuing Certificates of Occupancy. He estimates that the trailer would be on site for three years. Jay Schulz asked Mr. Chavkin to confirm that the site would conform to the approved site plan after the trailer is removed. Mr. Chavkin stated that the parking lot serves two purposes: parking for the amenity building and parking for the townhouse units that do not have a driveway, as required by the Zoning Code for a third parking space. There is a difference between what the market and the zoning code require. Chris Camia asked Mr. Chavkin to confirm that the sales trailer won't impede access to the amenity building. Mr. Chavkin stated that having the sales trailer will give residents access to the clubhouse sooner than how it was approved in the site plan. Mr. Natarelli asked Mr. Chavkin to confirm where the water and sewer utilities will come into the trailer and how they will tie into the street and asked if the owners of the sales trailer and the amenities building be separate. Mr. Chavkin detailed the plan, including where temporary water and sewer connections are proposed and where they will tie into the street. Mr. Chavkin stated they do not intend to create public water and sewer mains, and will work around the ownership implications. Chairperson Krakauer asked David Smith to read the draft resolution. David Smith read the conditions of the draft resolution. 6 (1/16/25) �Richard Gross moved to waive the public hearing requirement and approve the resolution. Moved: Gross Seconded: Camia Chairperson Krakauer Rachelle Gebler Chris Camia Richard Gross Jay Schulz Vote 5-0 7. Marathon Development Group LTD, 100 College Avenue, Proposed 105-unit mixed-use development, Subdivision, Special Permit, and Site Plan ApprovalPreliminary presentation Brian Sinsabaugh stated that he is an attorney with Zarin & Steinmetz on behalf of the applicant, Marathon Development Group LTD. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated the property is also known as College Arms, is adjacent to the Reverend Sykes Park, and is 2.36 acres in the R-6 zoning district. There is an existing 10-story building with 164 affordable housing units and an on-grade parking lot with 154 parking spaces. The application proposes constructing a 6-story building over the existing parking area with 200 parking spaces, ground-level retail and 4 stories of affordable housing with 105 units. A subdivision is proposed to divide the property into two parcels and a lot line adjustment that would give the Reverend Sykes Park additional space. The applicant also requests a Zoning map amendment petition relating to the Stategic Property Redevelopment Area Floating Zone and Special Permit approval which will define new requirements for off-street parking, front yard setback, and increased building coverage. Mr. Sinsabaugh requested that the SEQRA review process be initiated with the Planning Board as the Lead Agency so a notice of intent may be circulated. As requested by the Village Planner, an updated Environmental Assessment Form and a signed Coastal Assessment Form were emailed. A comprehensive response to the Village Planners’s review memo will be submitted before the next meeting. Mark Soja stated that Marathon Development Group is an affordable housing developer in Westchester County. Mr. Soja stated that in the 16 years they have owned 100 College Avenue, there has been little turnover, no vacancies, and a waiting list for units. The Floating Zone would allow them to add 105 residential apartments, including 65 one-bedroom units, 32 two-bedroom units, and 8 three-bedroom units, that would remain affordable for at least 30 years. Edmund Vogel is the project architect from Warshauer Mellusi Warshauer Architects, P.C. Mr. Vogel stated that the proposed six-story building includes four stories of residential above two stories of the parking structure. Mr. Vogel described the building's architectural features and façade designs. Mr. Vogel stated that an elevated plaza on the second story is proposed to provide green space and amenities for the tenants. Mr. Vogel presented views from the public streets into the site and stated that the existing parking lot is underutilized. Mr. Vogel presented unit floor plans and provided the square footage for one, two, and three-bedroom units. Brian Riley stated that he is the civil engineer from Catizone Engineering, P.C. Mr. Riley described the site's existing conditions. The lot with the existing building is 47,000 square feet, 7 (1/16/25) �and the proposed development lot 2 is 57,000 square feet. He described the existing and proposed easement areas and stated that 11,000 square feet, or 20% of the development lot two, is proposed to be given to the park. The existing driveway, two-way entrance, and curb cut on Valley Street are proposed to remain. A second curb cut is proposed on Valley Street to access the lower-level parking. An exit-only driveway is proposed on Cortlandt Street. Mr. Riley described where utility connections are proposed and stated that the existing drainage culvert would need to be re-routed around the southeast corner of the proposed building. The current parking lot drains into the culvert and terminates at the Hudson River. The stormwater management plan includes providing water quality treatment units. Mr. Riley described that the landscape plan focuses on the third-floor amenity deck space and includes the small area along Valley Street frontage. The easement area south of the building was left as a grass area. He will ensure that the landscape plan includes native plantings. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that the applicant is seeking subdivision and site plan approval from the Planning Board and Board of Trustees to approve the proposed zoning map amendment and Strategic Property Redevelopment Floating Zone and Special Permit. The Local Development Corporation is involved in having a leaseholder or ownership stake within the property as part of the SPR. All submissions will be shared between the boards involved. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board requires a complete application before circulating a Notice of Intent. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that he received a memo stating the application was complete. Sean McCarthy said he would review the application and determine if it is complete before the next meeting. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board. Richard Gross asked Mr. Sinsabaugh what was planned for the existing vehicle parking during the development construction and how they intended to handle the flooding in the parking garage on Valley Street. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that a parking plan detailing the timing of the construction and where existing tenants' vehicles will be relocated will be submitted. Mr. Riley stated that the proposed development and expanded easement area will reduce the impervious surface. Although the area is in a 100-year storm flood zone, FEMA does not provide a base flood elevation map, so mitigation is unclear. The lower level of parking is above the grade of Valley Street. Peter Catizone is the engineer from Catizone Engineering, P.C. Mr. Catizone stated that the lower parking level is in a flood zone and is designed to accept flood waters in and out. Reducing impervious surfaces, improving stormwater, and installing a green roof will decrease runoff. Chris Camia stated that there are issues with parking availability on Cortlandt and Valley Street. He requested that the applicant prepare a parking analysis that details the proposed retail square 8 (1/16/25) �footage, calculations for the required number of parking spaces under the existing Zoning Code, and the expectations for the reduction in the required parking re-zoning request. The application proposes 200 parking spaces between the two buildings, where approximately 430 parking spaces would be required under the existing zoning code and approximately 322 spaces at 75% of that value per the floating zone. Mr. Camia asked if the proposed grass area easement would affect the park infrastructure. Mr. Riley stated that the proposed relocation of the drainage culvert would require removing the park restrooms and the swing set. The swingset can be replaced in the same location, but replacing the restrooms requires further discussion. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the bathrooms should be replaced. She requested that the applicant provide an analysis of how it was determined that the existing parking lot is underutilized. She asked if parking spaces were designated for each unit. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that based on current ownership and experience with the existing building, they determined that the parking is not always utilized and that affordable housing units tend not to have multiple vehicles per unit. They will provide a detailed parking study. The plans include .75 parking spaces per unit, where the zoning code requires one space per dwelling unit and a half space per bedroom. Mr. Camia asked if residents are charged additional fees per parking space and if public parking spaces are required for the proposed retail space. Sean McCarthy stated that there are public parking requirements for retail spaces. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that residential parking spaces will not be charged an additional fee. The application proposes approximately 2,500 square feet of retail, requiring up to 13 public parking spaces. Rachelle Gebler requested plans be made to relocate the restrooms instead of eliminating them and suggested they provide temporary services during construction. She asked how the parking space would be configured and how traffic in the surrounding intersections would be impacted by the new building. Chairperson Krakauer suggested that the applicant consider alternative options for the building design and easement area regarding setbacks and views from the park and the train station. She also suggested that they consider relocating the bathrooms to an area of the building that is accessible from the outside. Richard Gross asked Mr. Catizone how they plan on handling flood waters where the elevation is close to sea level. Mr. Catizone stated that they expect the lower level to accept flood waters, recede, and flow out by gravity. They do not want to fill it or eliminate flood storage volume. They have completed other developments designed to flood parking lots. FEMA regulations require that habitable spaces be provided 2 feet above the flood zone. 9 (1/16/25) �Mr. Gross suggested that the Village Engineer and Building Inspector review the plans There was discussion regarding an existing “Pilot,” the payment in lieu of taxes agreement with the Local Development Corp, and how a portion of the park is located in Tarrytown. James Natarelli, Mr. Riley, and Mr. Castizone discussed the proposed stormwater practices and how they comply with the New York State DEC stormwater retention requirements and the Board’s policy, which requires that all runoff volume be retained on the property in a 100-year storm event. Mr. Natarelli suggested that the applicant consider additional stormwater mitigation practices. There was a discussion regarding where the portion of the Reverend Skyes Park is located in the Village of Tarrytown. David Smith described how the notice of intent would establish the Planning Board as the lead agency to initiate the SEQR review process and coordinate with the involved agencies, which have the authority to review and make decisions on the proposed development. No action was taken. 8. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, 2 Lighthouse Landing, Proposed pergolas, Special Permit- Discussion Rachelle Gebler asked if the Board of Trustees directed the Planning Board to provide suggestions for the proposal. Josh Subin stated that the Board of Trustees requests input from the Planning Board and a referral back to them. Chairperson Krakauer asked Peter Chavkin to summarize the request. Peter Chavkin stated that requests were received for shade structures on the four Daymark Building units with large rooftop terraces. Pergolas are considered part of the building structure and must comply with the building height requirements. The Village Board can grant a height variance in exchange for an incentive. They proposed to set aside 15 parking spaces in the south parcel parking lot for the residents along Hudson Street to park in the evening hours until the parcel is developed. Ms. Gebler asked Mr. Subin if the Board of Trustees is leaning towards allowing the pergolas and requesting feedback from the Planning Board. Mr. Subin stated that the Board of Trustees is interested in approving the agreement and is asking for the Planning Board’s input regarding the architectural review of the pergolas and whether they conform to the Board’s requirements. 10 (1/16/25) �Chairperson Krakauer requested that Mr. Chavkin confirm that the proposed pergolas conform with the Board’s definition and restrictions on coverage and openness. Mr. Chavkin stated that the proposed pergolas would be open on four sides with non-operable louvers, with no intentions for additional screening. They would be approximately 10 feet high by 12 feet long, 20 to 24 feet wide, and will cover less than 50 percent of the rooftop terrace area. Ms. Gebler recommended that the Board of Trustees treat this as a one-off approval for pergolas that haven't already been designed and approved with the buildings. She suggested that the Board of Trustees look at the number of parking spots being offered on Hudson Street and make sure they are adequate. Since the pergolas are permanent structures, she suggested that the Board of Trustees make the parking spots available in perpetuity. There was a discussion on the visibility of the proposed pergolas. David Smith stated that a portion of the parking on the south parcel is designated for the Bridgeview Tavern under the agreement. David Smith asked Mr. Chavkin if parking spaces would be marked with signed as Village Permit Parking. Mr. Chavkin said there is a license agreement with the Bridgeview Tavern for customers to park on the south parcel during the day. He requested that the Village Board issue permits or hang tags to residents, and they would ensure that there is no overnight towing enforcement for that area of their property. Chairperson Krakauer requested that David Smith prepare the Planning Board’s recommendations to the Board of Trustees. 9. Approval of minutes, November 21, 2024, December 19, 2024 meetings Chairperson Krakauer tabled the approval of minutes to the February 20, 2025 meeting. Richard Gross moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:30 PM. Moved: Gross4 Seconded: Gebler Vote 5-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 11 (1/16/25) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2025-01-16 Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/10cf01894d2773cb8f84594dd2c97a0c.pdf 7debc43214c84c7517b4518a540ee786 PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes December 19, 2024 Chairperson Krakauer called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Chairperson Krakauer stated that SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC has requested an adjournment. Since the public hearing was noticed, the Board will hear public comments. Chairperson Krakauer stated that Lighthouse Landing Communitiees, LLC, for the Edge-onHudson Riverfront Development, Phase III Waterfront Open Space, has requested an adjournment. A work session to discuss the application is scheduled for Thursday, January 9, 2024. Present: Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson Ken Anderson Benjamin Nielsen Rachelle Gebler Also Present: Joshua B. Subin, Village Attorney David Smith, Village Planner James Natarelli, Village Engineer Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Absent: Chris Camia Richard Gross Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Agenda: 1) SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block A Proposed medical office building, Site Plan and Architectural Review ApprovalPublic hearing, Pending ZBA Approval- requested adjournment 2) KWD Realty, LLC, 309-315 North Broadway, Proposed mixed-use building, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Presentation 3) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III- Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalDiscussion 4) 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan ApprovalPreliminary Presentation 5) Cortlandt Development, LLC, 377 North Broadway, Proposed deli/market, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary Presentation 6) Approval of minutes, November 21, 2024 1 (12/19/24) �1. SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development Block A Proposed medical office building, Site Plan & Architectural Review- Public Hearing, pending ZBA approval- requested adjournment. The Board received an adjournment request from the applicant’s attorney on December 17, 2024, to adjourn the public hearing to the January 16, 2025 meeting. Benjamin Nielsen moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Gebler Vote 4-0 Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public. There were no public comments. Benjamin Nielsen moved to continue the public hearing to the January 16, 2025, meeting. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Gebler Vote 4-0 Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board received and reviewed written comments. (See Exhibit #s 1-6) 2. KWD Realty, LLC, 309-315 North Broadway, Proposed mixed-use building, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval -Presentation Mark Constantine stated that he is an attorney representing the Applicant. Mr. Constantine stated that the proposed 100,000-square-foot self-storage facility in the C-1 zoning district would supplement and complement the ongoing high-density residential development in the Village. Mr. Constantine stated that the applicant had made changes to address concerns from the Planning Board. Mr. Constantine stated that the current proposal requires variances. Although the variance approvals are in the hands of the Zoning Board of Appeals, the applicant would like to proceed with the understanding that the Planning Board is in favor of the use, concept, and approach, and to the extent that the law tasks him in satisfying the requirements for the required variances. He requested to proceed to the Zoning Board to make the presentation. The applicant wants to satisfy the Planning Board regarding the benefit, viability, and overall enhancement the self-storage facility would provide to the Village without impacting municipal services. Benjamin Nielsen stated it is not the Board's purview to evaluate a permitted Zoning Code use of the property or the economic viability of the proposed project. The Board evaluates how the requested variances would impact the project's planning and architectural review components related to site plan development, stormwater, and traffic. The variances required for lot coverage and building height affect the architectural look of the building. The Board evaluates if the proposed building for excessive dissimilarity to adjacent properties. Mr. Constantine stated that the size of the building would have a significant impact on economic viability. 2 (12/19/24) �Bruno Pietrosanti is the architect representing the owner, Mr. Karl Dibble. He stated that the comments received from the Village Architect related to vehicle maneuverability, loading area, and landscaping will be adjusted during the site plan and engineering review. Changes were made to improve the view of the building along the streetscape, including a tower element and brick and precast façade materials. The proposed building mass is similar to the three and fourstory structures along Beekman Avenue and would not be noticeable from the street level due to the property elevations. Mr. Pietrosanti requested that the Board refer the current application and concept plan to the Zoning Board of Appeals. There was a discussion regarding the areas of the building that require a height variance. Chairperson Krakauer stated that no changes were made to the proposed height and massing. Outstanding items related to vehicular maneuverability, loading dock, stormwater, landscaping, signage, and curb cuts still need to be submitted. Mr. Pietrosanti described the design and intentions for the loading spaces. Mr. Nielsen said the original application proposed a mixed-use building that didn't request additional lot coverage. Mr. Pietrosanti said that eliminating the drive-thru café reduced the required parking calculations but created a need for more self-storage space to offset the desired income. Mr. Constantine stated that although including the food element would reduce the building FAR, the applicant would need more space for queuing vehicles, which may create a traffic burden. Adding the design elements and features results in higher building costs that will not contribute to a return on investment for a service where people look for a safe, efficient, and economical way to store goods. The proposed square footage is required to cover the development and construction costs. The applicant needs to determine the building height and coverage approvals to return to the Planning Board and address the outstanding items accordingly. Joshua Subin stated there is a recommendation process from the Planning Board, but the applicant may insist on going before the Zoning Board without it. The application would still need to return to the Planning Board to review the architectural review component. Sleepy Hollow is unique in that if the plans are determined before you go to the Zoning Board of Appeals, the applicant will not have to worry about it coming back to the Planning Board. Mr. Constantine stated that the Planning Board has stated that the Zoning Board grants requested variances, yet the Board’s two main concerns relate to the proposed building height and massing. Mr. Constantine requested a referral to the Zoning Board, as it is the law that while the items are being discussed with the Planning Board, the decision to grant the variances is up to the Zoning Board. The Zoning Board of Appeals may have valuable input. Regardless of the Zoning Board's decision, they will return to the Planning Board to discuss the outstanding concerns. He asked if the process requires the application to be at a point where the Planning Board says they would approve the project and then go to the Zoning Board. 3 (12/19/24) �Mr. Subin stated that the Planning Board focuses on excessive dissimilarity because it has an ARB component that overlaps with what the Zoning Board would consider. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board commonly requests items for other project reviews, including how proposed lot coverage compares with neighboring residences and commercial facilities, streetscape views, and renderings from all sides of the structure to provide a perspective on how the building would fit in the neighborhood's character. Ms. Krakauer suggested that the applicant consider reducing the building height and massing to better fit in the neighborhood. Mr. Nielsen requested that the applicant provide the heights of the adjacent buildings, including the Open Door building. He suggested considering architectural choices to reduce the scale of the building's massing. No action was taken. 3. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III-Waterfront Open Space- Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit Approval- Discussion, requested adjournment The Board received a request to adjourn the application to the next scheduled Work Session. 4. 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan Approval – Preliminary Presentation Sam Vieira stated that he is the Project Architect representing the owner, Aniello Ricchiuti. It was determined that Mr. Ricchiuti owns a small piece of land that the previous owner purchased from the Village of Sleepy Hollow, which was never included in the property survey. A Stop Work Order was issued for work started to extend the parking areas without the required permit approvals. Mr. Vieira presented the site plan, stated that they propose constructing a retaining wall, and paved parking area to store customer's cars waiting for service. Although the plan delineates three parking spaces, they should not be reviewed for required space size and maneuverability. Landscaping screening is proposed to screen the parking area from the neighboring house, along Hudson Street, and along the property line bordering the Village of Tarrytown. The height of the retaining wall is proposed to be 5 feet at the highest point. He will submit the requested railing details and ensure proper clearance at the existing fire hydrant. Mr. Vieira requested the Board’s approval to use a 6-foot high commercial chain link fence and gate with opaque barrier inserts to handle the repetitive business uses. Mr. Vieira asked the Board to reconsider the request to extend the sidewalk to the curb cut due to the obstacles of the existing utility pole, stabilizing wires, and street signage. Although the owner has retained Hudson Engineering to provide the stormwater management calculations, he asked the Board if they require the full engineered drawings to take action or if it could be a condition of the approval. Chairperson Krakauer asked James Natarelli what he requires to review stormwater retention. James Natarelli stated that the architect is asking if the Board is comfortable with the engineer designing the stormwater calculations based on the plan presented. 4 (12/19/24) �Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board. Benjamin Nielsen asked Mr. Natarelli if the applicant should complete a percolation test. Mr. Natarelli stated that previous applications on Hudson Street have illustrated that infiltration would not be an issue and that he does not see an issue with getting the engineer involved now. Ken Anderson asked if a sidewalk extension would affect the impervious surface calculations. Mr. Vieira stated that the sidewalk extension won't impact impervious surfaces because it is on Village property. Mr. Natarelli stated that sidewalks are pitched toward the street, and runoff is not collected. Mr. Nielsen stated that the landscaping should include Westchester County native species, suggested including larger trees on the southern strip, and asked Mr. Vieria if the retaining wall elevations have been studied for sidewalk compatibility. There should be more appealing options than a chain-link fence. Mr. McCarthy stated that the material used for an enclosure on Dell Street has proved to hold up well. Mr. Veira stated that the retaining wall is well within the property lines, and the return is being eliminated. All landscaping is proposed on the 16 Hudson Street property. The entrance is located at the southern property line, and larger trees would be an obstruction. Residential fencing material may not hold up to commercial use. Mr. Veira stated that they would review the options for using synthetic decking materials for the fence and gate. The Board agreed that the concept plan was acceptable and that the engineer should prepare the civil drawings. Rachelle Gebler moved to schedule the public hearing for the January 16, 2024 meeting. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Nielsen Vote 4-0 Chairperson Krakauer Rachelle Gebler Benjamin Nielsen Ken Anderson Vote 4-0 5. Cortlandt Development LLC, 377 North Broadway, Proposed deli/market, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Preliminary Presentation 5 (12/19/24) �Jonathan Merheb stated that he is an engineer from JMER Engineering P.C. representing the property owner. The lot is located on the corner of Pocantico Street and North Broadway, containing a Sunoco gas station and a mechanic shop. The application proposes to convert the building into a deli market/ convenience store. The existing gas station will remain operational with no proposed changes. The application proposes to reorganize and delineate the parking spaces, include a handicap parking space on the Pocantico Street side and relocate and enclose the dumpster area to the rear of the building. Other improvements include raising the sidewalk area in front of the garage bays and replacing the gravel transition to asphalt. Mr. Merheb presented the site plans and renderings. The owner plans to maintain and restore the buildings’ brick and stone façades, replace the garage bays with glass doors and storefront windows, and install a 3-foot-in-diameter sign on the roof over the middle bay. Although the interior layout is not finalized, a kitchen, seating area, and shelving displays are proposed. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Merheb to describe the proposed rear parking lot lighting and if there would be vehicular maneuverability issues with the spot proposed directly behind the building. Mr. Merheb stated that since they are proposing ten parking spaces, where eight are required, they could remove a parking space if it poses a maneuverability issue. He will complete a lighting plan based on requirements for building-mounted fixtures. They want to avoid excavation for bringing conduits to poles. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board is concerned about the downspouts discharging where pedestrians would be walking. Mr. Merheb stated that he is discussing the need for adding dry wells in the rear of the building with James Natarelli. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Merheb to describe if a landscaping plan is proposed. Mr. Merheb stated that there is no room to add landscaping. Chairperson Krakauer suggested using movable flowerpots to screen the seating area in front of the building, eliminating a curb cut on Pocantico Street, and adding low shrubbery along the front of the sidewalk. David Smith said he would provide Mr. Merheb with the native planting suggestions. Benjamin Nielsen suggested a decorative screen wall instead of bollards if there is no room for a planter. He asked if moving back the parking spaces along the northeast corner would allow room to create a landscape strip along the property line of the adjacent house. This would also assist in reducing the impervious surface and stormwater challenges. Mr. Natarelli agreed that since the main stormwater concern is the downspout discharging for pedestrian safety, he agrees that pulling the parking spaces back would increase the buffer between the rear parking spots and the property line. 6 (12/19/24) �Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Merheb to consider alternative fence options for the garage enclosure instead of chain link fencing and asked how the garbage truck would enter the site. Mr. Merheb stated that the garbage enclosure and fencing would not be visible. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the garbage truck would not enter the site and suggested Mr. Merheb consult with the owner regarding the approach for bringing garbage to the curb. Mr. Merheb stated that he would reconsider the size of the dumpster and discuss the enclosure options with the owner. Sean McCarthy asked Mr. Merheb to describe where the kitchen exhaust is proposed. Mr. Merheb stated that the kitchen exhaust location has not been finalized. Mr. Nielsen suggested adding a bike rack on site. Ken Anderson moved to schedule the public hearing for the January 16, 2024, meeting. Moved: Anderson Seconded: Gebler Vote 4-0 Chairperson Krakauer Rachelle Gebler Benjamin Nielsen Ken Anderson Vote 4-0 6. Approval of minutes, November 21, 2024 Chairperson Krakauer tabled the November 21, 2024, minutes to the January 16, 2024, meeting. Benjamin Nielsen moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:42 PM. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Gebler Vote 4-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 7 (12/19/24) �From: Benjie Sirota <beonjie@gmail.com> To: Subject: Sean McCarthy Medical Office Building Exhibit #1 Hi SeanI am writing about the medical office. The building height is actually taller at 57'-6 which is a 15' variance and the east facade should match the other facades with brick as it faces the whole village. Circulation doesn't look totally figured out and it's going to be a mess trying to get into and out of the parking area. They can easily have an entry/exit onto the road from the parking garage. There are also many parking spaces that are shown at 8'-6" in the parking lot. Why is the parking garage in the back? Is it municipal parking? Will the lot be open to anyone and will it cost money to park? These questions should be answered before any variance is granted. 1 �Benjamin Sirota Beonjie@gmail.com 2 �Exhibit #2 ���Exhibit #3 Chairman Timothy Church C/O Village of Sleepy Hollow Department of Architecture, Land Use Development, Buildings, and Building Compliance 28 Beekman Avenue Sleepy Hollow, NY 10591 Re: Zoning Board of Appeals Public Hearing December 18, 2024 Dear Mr. Church, We are writing to oppose the granting of height variances for the proposed medical office building and parking garage across the street from our Lofts condo residence at 100 Legend Drive in Sleepy Hollow. We understand a request has been made to increase the maximum building height from 42 to 52 feet, to accommodate a 5-level parking garage and office building structure. We feel strongly that height variances, especially for a parking garage, should not be allowed. We have lived in Sleepy Hollow since 2016, and spent the past 8 years watching the Edge on Hudson property develop from a cement wasteland to a vibrant residential community with a growing number of activities for residents and families. We looked forward to moving into this neighborhood and purchased a Loft unit in late 2023. We expected to buy into a suburban-like residential community with amenities such as a grocery store, restaurants, and offices, but we were not expecting it to include a 5-level parking garage that may not have aesthetics comparable to the rest of our community. As new proposals come forward for plan variances, the focus seems to be moving away from home ownership and residential appeal. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Joseph and Mary Louise Grotzinger �Exhibit #4 Sean McCarthy From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: chrispeulerbs@gmail.com Sean McCarthy Opposition to Height Variance for Medical Office Building Parking Garage - Zoning Board Public Hearing on December 18th/19th 2024 Dear Mr. McCarthy, I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed variance to increase the height of the parking garage for the medical office building from 3 levels (42 feet) to 5 levels (58 feet including the mechanical penthouse). This increase would have a significant negative impact on Loft 2 residents, particularly those with southeast-facing units, as it would obstruct views of the Beekman streetscape and reduce the overall aesthetic harmony of our low-profile residential area. The proposed height would make the parking garage nearly as tall as Northlight or the DeCicco tower, which seems incompatible with the surrounding structures and detrimental to our community. While I understand the need for a parking structure, I strongly believe that a 3-level garage is a more appropriate solution, preserving the character of the area and minimizing the adverse effects on residents. I urge you and the Zoning Board to carefully consider the impact of this variance and to deny the request for a 5-level garage. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, Christopher Peuler Resident, Loft 2 unit 204 1 �Exhibit #5 Sean McCarthy From: Xin Dai <daixin1225@gmail.com> To: Subject: Sean McCarthy Opposition to Medical Building’s Proposal Dear Mr. McCarthy, I am writing to formally express my opposition to the proposed variance to increase the height of the parking garage for the medical office building from 3 levels (42 feet) to 5 levels (58 feet, including the mechanical penthouse). As a resident of Loft Building 2, which faces both Decicco’s parking lot and the proposed medical building, we have significant concerns regarding the impact this change may have on our home and community. While we understand the need for additional parking spaces, we believe the height increase will negatively affect both the aesthetics of our views and the overall visual character of the surrounding area. Furthermore, we are particularly concerned about our privacy, as our bedroom is located on the 4th floor of our building. The proposed height increase could result in a direct line of sight into our living space, compromising our sense of privacy. We respectfully request that you consider these concerns as you evaluate the proposed variance. Thank you for your time and attention to this important matter. Sincerely, Xin Dai Resident, Loft 2 unit 301 1 �Exhibit #6 Sean McCarthy From: Kenneth Chan <chanken88@gmail.com> To: Subject: Sean McCarthy Concerned Resident Zoning Parking Dear Mr. McCarthy, I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed variance to increase the height of the parking garage for the medical office building from 3 levels (42 feet) to 5 levels (58 feet including the mechanical penthouse). This increase would have a significant negative impact on Loft 2 residents, particularly those with southeastfacing units, as it would obstruct views of the Beekman streetscape and reduce the overall aesthetic harmony of our low-profile residential area. The proposed height would make the parking garage nearly as tall as Northlight or the DeCicco tower, which seems incompatible with the surrounding structures and detrimental to our community. While I understand the need for a parking structure, I strongly believe that a 3-level garage is a more appropriate solution, preserving the character of the area and minimizing the adverse effects on residents. I urge you and the Zoning Board to carefully consider the impact of this variance and to deny the request for a 5-level garage. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Happy Holidays ! Sincerely, Kenneth Chan Resident, Loft 2 unit 203 1 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2024-12-19 Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/12e6811eb009edc27415b657ca0847ba.pdf e4ad2370bb76e94ff7bd7450502d2b9d PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes November 21, 2024 Chairperson Krakauer called the meeting to order at 7:04 PM. Chairperson Krakauer read the agenda and stated that Quality High LLC has withdrawn their application for the proposed cannabis dispensary at 36-38 Beekman Avenue. The applicant for 16 Hudson Sreet has also requested an adjournment. The public hearing procedure requirements for the application submitted by SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, were discussed. Present: Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson Richard Gross Ken Anderson Chris Camia Rachelle Gebler Also Present: Joshua B. Subin, Village Attorney David Smith, Village Planner James Natarelli, Village Engineer Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Absent: Benjamin Nielsen Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Agenda: 1) Joshua Egan and Jennifer Schwartz, 120 Gorey Brook Road, Proposed detached garage with accessory dwelling, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval 2) Quality High, LLC, 36-38 Beekman Avenue, Proposed cannabis dispensary, Site Plan & Architectural Review- Public hearing-Application withdrawn 3) SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block A Proposed medical office building, Site Plan and Architectural Review ApprovalPublic hearing, Pending ZBA Approval 4) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 308-318 Legend Drive, Proposed (6) unit townhome building, Amended Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Presentation 5) KWD Realty, LLC, 309-315 North Broadway, Proposed mixed-use building, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval- Presentation 6) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III- Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalPresentation 1 (11/21/24) �7) 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan ApprovalPreliminary Presentation-Requested adjournment 8) Approval of minutes, October 17, 2024 1. Joshua Egan and Jennifer Schwartz, 120 Gorey Brook Road, Proposed detached garage with accessory dwelling, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval- Public Hearing David Smith read the conditions of the draft resolution. Richard Gross moved to approve the resolution. Moved: Gross Seconded: Gebler Chairperson Krakauer- yes Richard Gross- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Chris Camia- yes Ken Anderson- abstained Vote 4-0-1 2. Quality High, LLC, 36-38 Beekman Avenue, Proposed cannabis dispensary Site Plan and Architectural Review – Public Hearing The Board received a request from the applicant to withdraw the application. 3. SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development Block A Proposed medical office building, Site Plan & Architectural Review- Public Hearing, pending ZBA approval Richard Gross moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Gross Seconded: Camia Janet Giris is a partner with the law firm DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP, and is presenting on behalf of the Applicant. Ms. Giris acknowledged that although the Board opened the public hearing, it will be adjourned and re-noticed for next month. At the June meeting, the Planning Board expressed concerns regarding the proposed parking spaces and architecture of the medical office building and parking structure. A new architect modified the architectural design of the medical office building and added a new parking structure with 52 parking spaces. This would provide 238 parking spaces in the structure and 426 parking spaces on the site. Ms. Giris stated that although the height of the parking structure requires a variance, it would not be higher than the building’s bulkhead and the DeCiccos Supermarket. Ms. Giris stated that the Zoning Board of Appeals requested additional information, which will be provided for the December meeting. Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public. 2 (11/21/24) �Ted Lai stated that he is the owner of 102 Legend Drive. He appreciates the applicant moving of the loading zone to the back of the building and that a variance request for parking is a compromise. Chairperson Krakauer adjourned the public hearing to the December 19, 2024 meeting. 4. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 308-318 Legend Drive, Proposed (6) unit townhome building, Amended Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval - Presentation Peter Chavkin stated that he is the Managing Partner of Sun Homes. Mr. Chavkin stated changes have been made to address the comments from the Planning Board and the Building Department. Changes include the removal of the planters and trees between the roof terraces on the proposed application and the previously approved buildings. Owners will have options for individual planter boxes. Unit designation numbers have been reduced from 8 inches to 4 inches in height. The precast concrete lintel material was thickened above and below the windows and on top of the door to match the brick at 3 ½ inches, and window boxes were added. Details were added to the plans to detail the locations of the gas meters, electric meters, and vapor mitigation system ports. Utility meters will be screened with perennial plantings to satisfy requests from the Building Department. Signage was added for the Fire Department as required. The rooftop mechanical equipment will be fully enclosed. He described the construction and proposed materials for the Washington Wall separating the front yards from the sidewalk. He said the wall would not exceed 24 inches or include horizontal seams. He presented the brick façade material samples to show how colors would delineate the units. Chris Camia asked if the same brick colors are proposed for all 90 townhome units and if underground utility lines will run from the front of the building to connect the meters on the sides of the building. Mr. Chavkin stated that the brick colors are for this building and may differ for the buildings facing the park. The utility lines are proposed to run around the building, not underground. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Chavkin if the design for the rooftop shade structures had been finalized. Mr. Chakin stated that they are not currently proposing rooftop shade structures. They do not intend to install rooftop pergolas but may develop an idea for some retractable awnings in a future application. Richard Gross stated that the Fire Department Sprinkler connection signage should be indicated correctly. Mr. Chavkin stated that the location for the signage will be confirmed with the Building Department during the Building Permit drawings review David Smith asked Mr. Chavkin to confirm the roof coverage on the end units. 3 (11/21/24) �Mr. Chavkin stated that they show approximately 72% coverage and the Board was previously comfortable with a condition to allow them to increase from the required 50% coverage on the low visibility end units. Chairperson Krakauer stated that she is comfortable with the coverage condition and polled the Board for their comments. The Board members were amenable to the additional coverage condition on the end units. Mr. Camia suggested backlighting the unit numbers for visibility. Mr. Chavkin stated that they intend to have the unit numbers lighted. Chairperson Krakauer requested that David Smith read the draft resolution David Smith read the conditions of the draft resolution. Rachelle Gebler asked if the condition regarding pergolas should be removed since it is not part of the proposed plan. There was a discussion regarding the applicability of some of the previously approved resolution conditions. The Planning Board agreed that approval was based on the current site plan drawings and agreed to keep conditions as limitation restrictions. Richard Gross moved to approve the amended draft resolution. Moved: Camia Seconded: Gebler Chairperson Krakauer- yes Richard Gross- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Chris Camia- yes Ken Anderson- yes Vote 5-0 5. KWD Realty, LLC, 309-315 North Broadway, Proposed mixed-use building, Site Plan & Architectural Review Approval -Presentation Bruno Pietrosanti stated that he is the project architect representing the owner, Mr. Karl Dibble. Changes to the application include removing the drive-through restaurant, shifting the building within 10 feet of the property line along North Broadway, and adding planter base retaining walls along the property line. The building structure was redesigned to step in and out to reduce the view impacts from the street, and the parking area is proposed to be covered. An architectural tower element and a combination of brick and precast façade materials were added. The current plan would require variances for a front yard setback of 10 feet where 20 feet is required, a 5-foot rear yard setback variance where 20 feet is required, limited height variance for the rear yard, and lot coverage for covering the parking area. Mr. Pietrosanti presented view renderings 4 (11/21/24) �of the proposed building and stated that architectural details are open for improvements. He plans to address the Village Engineers' stormwater comments upon approval of the concept plan. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the proposed building height and massing are viewed as excessive and asked Mr. Pietrosanti if they could design a structure that is as of right and in conformance with the Code and permitted uses. Mr. Pietrosanti stated that the applicant desired 100,000 square feet to be successful, where they would expect 60% occupancy and adequate rentable space availability. Providing the requested architectural details and covered parking area would increase construction costs. Approval of the requested variances would allow the applicant to address the Board’s concerns. Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Planning Board has the authority to recommend the application to the Zoning Board of Appeals and requested that the applicant consider a design for that meets the allowable requirements for the intended use. Karl Dibble, the property owner, stated that several changes have been made to the proposed structure's aesthetics to address the Board’s request to bring the building forward and to close the parking entranceways. Spaces are proposed with garage doors for car storage. Several variances for bulk and height have been approved for residential structures at the Riverfront Development, where he seeks to build a commercial building. Joshua Subin stated that the Zoning Board of Appeals reviews applications for variance approvals. The Planning Board can provide a positive or negative recommendation regarding the proposed site plan. The Planning Board is expressing concerns that the site plan is too massive. Comparisons to other Village properties, reasons why the applicant feels variances are warranted, and what the market would tolerate for what is needed for a return on investment for the structure should be presented to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Zoning Board of Appeals has the purview to make an independent determination. Mr. Dibble provided a history of his experience obtaining Planning Board approvals for this property and expressed how the village has discontinued utilizing his commercial and retail services with prejudice. Without a positive referral from the Planning Board, the Zoning Board may not approve the variance requests. The self-storage facility examples provided in David Smith’s review were from Somers and a rural area in Pawling, New York. Examples should have been provided to show self-storage facility designs from neighboring river towns in Westchester County. Height variances are required to provide the step-back design for a building when the property is situated on a hill. The current property use is approved as a general contracting yard, recycling facility, mixed-use with residential, and a material supply yard. A self-storage facility use would have the least impact on the school system, traffic, and the environment. If the approved recycling business were fully operational, a line of dump trucks would be waiting on North Broadway to get on site. A self-storage facility would greatly benefit the Village because the residential riverfront development provides very little storage and parking capabilities for extra vehicles. 5 (11/21/24) �Mr. Subin stated it is his role to establish a good record and to avoid liability for the Village. There has been no animosity from the Planning Board or Mr. Smith. He requested that David Smith have the opportunity to address the comments directed at him. David Smith stated that he agrees with Mr. Dibble concerning his comments about the comparison with a self-storage facility in Pawling. His comments were intended to show that a storage facility doesn’t have to look like a storage facility. Huge is a term of art. The proposed building in its context is what the Board has to determine Rachelle Gebler stated that the Planning Board has concerns regarding the height variance of 52 ½ feet, where 35 feet is permitted, and the lot coverage of 83.7%, where 60% is permitted. Mr. Pietrosanti stated that the building's mass has been reduced. Bringing the building forward to the street line adds to the coverage impact with the covered parking. He asked the Board to consider the similarity of the Open Door facility in relation to its massing and parking structure. Sean McCarthy stated that the Board's intention was to suggest shielding the parking area from the street view. Enclosing the area isn’t necessary. Mr. Pietrosanti stated that they could revert to the 24-foot front setback and install landscape screening along the 10-foot setback line to eliminate the issue of covering the parking area. Mr. McCarthy asked Mr. Pietrosanti how increasing the setback would help with the coverage and desire to obtain 100,000 square feet of space. Mr. Pietrosanti said they could add square footage below grade. Mr. McCarthy suggested that aligning the building setback with the adjacent street-line structures would provide a more attainable variance than height or coverage. The Planning Board suggested the applicant consider making improvements to step down the building massing, relocate loading bays and the refuse area, and be conscious of impacts to the residences along Lawrence Avenue. Richard Gross asked Mr. Pietrosanti why the applicant removed the café use. Mr. Pietrosanti stated that they determined that the café would cause further traffic impact Mr. Camia stated that the Board suggested that the applicant evaluate the traffic impact of a drive-through café and did not instruct the applicant to remove it. James Natarelli requested that applicant considering stormwater management now so to be sure that the proposed site plan could provide 100% retainage of the 100 year storm on the site based on the new construction. 6 (11/21/24) �No action was taken. 6. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III-Waterfront Open Space- Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit Approval- Preliminary Presentation Peter Chavkin stated that he is representing Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC and has nothing new to present. Woodard & Curran and WSP have communicated regarding questions related to the North Buffer / North Meadow section. He attended a Board of Trustees work session, which some Planning Board members attended. He requested to be included in the upcoming Work Session to discuss the proposed uses of the Boat House. A work session was held with the Board of Trustees to discuss proposed uses of the Boat House. Mr. Chavkin said he would resubmit the operating cost study prepared for the proposed ice skating rink options. Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Chavkin if wall alternatives have been designed. Mr. Chavkin stated that the Art Colonnade is an important park design feature. He is willing to consider alternating its length or removing it at the Board's request. The design and material finishes could be discussed at the upcoming work session. No action was taken. 7. 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan Approval – Preliminary Presentation The Board received an adjournment request from the Applicant’s architect. The application was adjourned to the December 19, 2024 meeting. 8. Approval of minutes, October 17, 2024 Richard Gross moved to approve the October 17, 2024 meeting minutes. Moved: Gross Seconded: Gebler Chairperson Krakauer- yes Richard Gross- yes Rachelle Gebler- yes Chris Camia- yes Ken Anderson - abstained Vote 4-0-1 Chris Camia moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:00 PM. Moved: Camia Seconded: Gross Vote 5-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 7 (11/21/24) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2024-11-21 Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2024 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/f639a3cadb1790079d964157746419fc.pdf ea13d1952fbf7d48bd77243a4ac38dcd PDF Text Text ��������������������������������������������������������������� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_TRUST_2025-02-25_RES-34-45 Subject The topic of the resource Board of Trustees Minutes-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/5205e5ac7621eacbffaade0d43bafb63.pdf 00ddc22f72cd29c8aa46c08dfd4686a5 PDF Text Text ��� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_TRUST_2025-01-21_WS Subject The topic of the resource Board of Trustees Minutes-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/a9d8e5f888dc19c6a18e0dcff4cd5cf8.pdf 356b5fc73b48dab104d44ca57c190a53 PDF Text Text ��������������Meeting Date: 02/11/2025 Resolution #: 02/29/2025 Resolution of the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village Of Sleepy Hollow to Approve Posting of Motor Equipment Operator “MEO” Position Whereas, a vacancy in the Department of Public Works for the position of Motor Equipment Operator (MEO) has become available, and Whereas, Union contract requires that the Village post this position in English and Spanish for ten days in a location accessible to all Department of Public Works employees and, Whereas, any Department of Public Works employee who is interested in applying for said position, shall indicate such interest in writing to the Public Works Superintendent within the posting period, Now, Therefore, Be It resolved that the Mayor and the Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow approve the posting of the position for Motor Equipment Operator (MEO) for ten consecutive days effective February 12, 2025. Moved: Deputy Mayor Scaglione Seconded: Trustee Andruss Absent: Trustee Sheeran Vote: 6-0 ����Meeting Date: 02/11/2025 Resolution #: 02/31/2025 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW IN GENERAL SUPPORT OF AND DIRECTION TO THE TO THE SLEEPY HOLLOW LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (THE “SHLDC”) IN CONNECTION WITH THE EAST PARCEL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (PHASE III) WHEREAS, the Village of Sleepy Hollow, New York (the “Village”) is undertaking the comprehensive redevelopment and adaptive reuse of the East Parcel as a municipal public facilities and recreation complex (the “East Parcel Project”), such proposed East Parcel Project to include buildings and infrastructure to serve the Department of Public Works of the Village of Sleepy Hollow (the “DPW”), a bus garage and repair facility for the Union Free School District of the Tarrytowns, public recreation and community facilities to include multi-use fields and related improvements, and parking improvements for the Village, public and not-for-profit usage, and related utilities and infrastructure that may include a vehicle and/or pedestrian bridge to serve the East Parcel; and WHEREAS, the Sleepy Hollow Local Development Corporation (the “SHLDC”) owns a certain parcel of real estate commonly referred to as the “East Parcel” comprising approximately 28 acres identified by TMID No. 115.11-1-2, and is currently engaged in Phase II development contemplated under the East Parcel Project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Resolution # 12/09/2020, the SHLDC previously issued Sleepy Hollow Local Development Corporation Tax-Exempt Revenue Bonds (Village of Sleepy Hollow East Parcel Redevelopment Project – Phase II), Series 2020 (the “2020 Bonds”) not to exceed aggregate principal amount of $35,000,000; and WHEREAS, in connection with the issuance of the 2020 Bonds, the SHLDC and the Village entered into an Amended and Restated Lease Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2020 (the “2020 Lease Agreement”), pursuant to which the SHLDC leases the Facility to the Village in return for rent payments by the Village, subject to annual appropriation, in an amount sufficient to pay, among other things, the principal and interest on the 2020 Bonds; and WHEREAS, Phase II of the East Parcel Project is expected to be completed (or will be near completion) by the summer of 2025; and WHEREAS, in order to continue with Phase III of the East Parcel Project, additional project funding and other undertakings will be required; and WHEREAS, upon completion of the Phase III of the East Parcel Project, the existing DPW facility will be redundant and, therefore, the property will be available for sale or redevelopment; and 1 �NOW, THEREORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow believes it is important to provide general support and direction to the SHLDC in connection with the East Parcel Project as follows: i. Prior to approval of transfer and redevelopment of the existing DPW to the SHLDC, the Village will follow the public hearing and approval process under N-PCL 1411(d), and will complete SEQRA review process; ii. Once the 1411(d) process has been completed but before the SHLDC undertakes full marketing efforts, has identified and selected a developer, and executed an appropriate land disposition agreement (LDA), the Village will consider approval of an exclusive option to the SHLDC for the existing DPW property in order to allow the SHLDC and the selected developer to pursue all zoning, planning and SEQRA review steps for redevelopment during LDA contingency period; iii. Once contingencies are met, approvals secured and developer financing confirmed, actual title transfer could occur; and iv. Formal approval by the Village of another SHLDC bond issuance to finance construction of the new DPW would, by necessity, have to follow several steps by the Village and SHLDC, including: a. Update design and value engineering of the new DPW facility; b. Update construction cost estimates for consideration by the Board of Trustees and SHLDC; c. Review updated design and confirm whether existing site plan and SEQRA review are sufficiently broad in order to proceed, or whether any redesign would require re-opening Site Plan and/or SEQRA for the East Parcel; d. Engage a financial advisor and/or placement agent to assist with financial modeling and placement of bonds to refinance existing debt and new debt to be issued (which in turn would inform the Village regarding bond amortizations and long term lease payment requirements); e. Once project is redesigned, permitted and general financing needs understood, SHLDC would begin the bond issuance; f. As part of the bond issuance process, and once final principal amounts and project scopes are completed, SHLDC would require approval by the Board of Trustees to amend the existing lease agreement and formally approve the final terms of bond issuance; g. On a parallel track with marketing, underwriting and issuing of the bonds, SHLDC would need to procure a new design-build with Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) construction contract for the new DPW, and work with the Village to confirm what elements, if any, would be directly undertaken by the Village as tenant, the amount of this contract (with contingency amounts) being directly tied to the financing; 2 �h. Once new bonds are issued and GMP executed, the construction process would begin with an identifiable completion schedule that will inform the Village and SHLDC as to when DPW operations can move and how that process will dovetail with the developer LDA for sale of the existing DPW site. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Village Administrator of the Village are hereby authorized and directed to sign any documents and take any additional steps necessary to effectuate the foregoing, subject to review by the Village attorney. MOVED: Trustee Husselbee SECONDED: Trustee Andruss Roll Call by Mayor Rutyna: Trustee Husselbee - Yay Trustee Rodriguez - Nay Trustee Sheeran – Absent Deputy Mayor Scaglione – Yay Trustee Andruss – Yay Trustee Connell – Nay Mayor Rutyna – Nay Motion Failed. 3 VOTE: 3-3-1 �Meeting Date: 02/11/2025 Resolution #: 02/32/2025 Resolution of the Board of Trustees to Advertise Request for Proposal for Electronic Key System WHEREAS, The Village Board is desirous of soliciting proposals to update the Village’s electronic key system; and WHEREAS, The Village Administrator will prepare a request for proposal jointly with the Village of Hastings on Hudson to provide this service; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and the Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow authorizes the Village Administrator to advertise a request for proposal jointly with the Village of Hasting-on-Hudson for an electronic key system. Moved: Trustee Rodriguez Absent: Trustee Sheeran Seconded: Trustee Husselbee Vote: 6-0 �Meeting Date: 02/11/2025 Resolution #: 02/33/2025 Resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow Hiring Seasonal Workers for the Department of Public Works WHEREAS, the Department of Public Works has remaining funds in this current budget year to hire a seasonal employee, and WHEREAS, Public Works Superintendent, Kevin Smith has conducted several interviews and is recommending hiring Noel Gomez of Sleepy Hollow at a rate of $18.00 per hour. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Sleepy Hollow hereby approve Mr. Smith’s recommendation to hire Noel Gomez of Sleepy Hollow on a seasonal basis effective February 18, 2025, not to exceed four months; at an hourly rate of $18.00, and be under the supervision of the Public Works Superintendent, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED a background check for this applicant has been completed and is satisfactory. Moved: Trustee Connell Absent: Trustee Sheeran Seconded: Trustee Andruss Vote: 6-0 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_TRUST_2025-02-11_RES-22-33 Subject The topic of the resource Board of Trustees Minutes-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/1c319b553eb25a123734ad2b5b5ecf86.pdf 1881adcc6d7c926a7447c49e002bf1e9 PDF Text Text ���������������������������� Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes & Resolutions-2025 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_TRUST_2025-01-14 Subject The topic of the resource Board of Trustees Minutes-2025 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2025 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text