<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="2039" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/items/show/2039?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-19T10:25:19+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="2039">
      <src>https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/7090f8ef3d7d78b6436dc488ac37a158.pdf</src>
      <authentication>2f788f81fe55f311a0ce4e4c8ec0efbe</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="20526">
                  <text>Village of Sleepy Hollow
Planning Board Meeting
September 19, 2019
The regular meeting was called to order at 8:00 PM by Chairperson Marjorie Hsu
Present:

Marjorie Hsu, Chairperson
Lindsay Krakauer
Kersten Harries
Tom Andruss
Ed McCarthy
Erin Carney
Matthew Brennan

Also Present:

Clinton Smith, Village Attorney
David Smith, Village Planner
James Natarelli, Village Engineer
Sean McCarthy, Village Architect
Pamela Pengelski, Secretary to the Planning Board

Agenda:
1) Landrock LLC, 231 Webber Avenue, Proposed subdivision- Continued public hearing
2) KWD Realty, Inc., 309-315 North Broadway, Amended site plan- Amended resolution
3) LL Parcel I LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, 199 Beekman Avenue,
Phase I, Block I site plan approval - Discussion
4) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development,
199 Beekman Avenue, Phase I amended site plan approval - Presentation
5) Approval of minutes - August 22, 2019
Chairperson Hsu read the agenda.
1. Landrock LLC, 231 Webber Avenue, Proposed subdivision- Continued public hearing
Motion was made to reopen the public hearing.
Moved: Andruss
Seconded: Krakauer

Vote 7-0

William Null is a Partner with Cuddy &amp; Feder LLP representing Landrock LLC for the proposed
subdivision application. Mr. Null stated that there a couple of points in which the grade of the
proposed secondary driveway is over 14 percent. Mr. Null stated that although the secondary
driveway on Gorey Brook Road has been identified as secondary means of emergency egress, it
is not necessary for emergency access purposes.
Donna Maiello is senior associate and landscape architect with Divney Tung Schwalbe LLP. Ms.
Maiello presented the locations on the existing Gorey Brook Road driveway to show where the
1

(9/19/19)

�grade changes range from 14 percent to 5.6 percent. Ms. Maiello stated that the existing widths
of the driveway are 10 feet and 12 feet.
William Null stated that the applicant proposes to loop the water main down the driveway and
north to what was formally known as David Rockefeller's property; subject to obtaining an
easement with New York State or the current owners of the property. Mr. Null stated that they
assume they will corporate and the Village will offer assistance. Mr. Null stated that he has been
provided with a draft of a resolution. There was a question at the last meeting as to why the plat
did not show a no boundary line between Gorey Brook Road and the Landrock parcel or the
Lyden parcel. Mr. Null stated that a hard property line was not shown because the underlined
fee is indisputably owned by Landrock as well as the corresponding section is owned by the
Lydens. Mr. Null stated that he would work with Clinton Smith to add an appropriate note on
the plat plan to state that the use of Gorey Brook Road and whether or not it is a public road is in
dispute. Mr. Null stated that the applicant is not comfortable stating the Gorey Brook Road is a
public right-of-way and does not want the road to be opened up for vehicular traffic. Gorey
Brook Road has not been maintained as a public right-of-way for decades but has been used for
vehicular traffic for 60-70 years. Mr. Null stated the applicant requests that the condition number
7 on the draft resolution be removed. Village standards would require for the road to be 24 feet
wide and be paved. Paving the road would require approvals for new drainage infrastructures and
further disturbance going down to the Croton Aqueduct. Gorey Brook Road has always been a
dirt road that has been used, on occasion as a driveway, for access to the Rockefeller properties
and the cost to improve it to Village standard as a public road should not be imposed on the
applicant.
Chairperson Hsu asked David Smith to read the specific language related to the Village standard.
David Smith read condition number 7 as stated on the draft resolution prepared and shared with
the applicant:
If Gory Brook Road is used for other than emergency purposes on an incidental basis for
access to or from any property covered by this subdivision, the owner of that property will
improve it to village standards.

David Smith stated that there are Village standards for roads and there are also Village
standards for driveways. Mr. Null has indicated that Gorey Brook Road is to be used as a
driveway so perhaps the Village driveway standards could be specified directly.
Mr. Null asked for an explanation of the Village driveway standards.
Sean McCarthy stated that the road would be required to have the same standards proposed for
the driveway coming off of Webber Avenue.
Mr. Null stated that if the driveway is required to have a grade no greater than 10 percent and a
width of 12 feet, the existing Gorey Brook road fits the requirements.
Kersten Harries asked what section of the Gorey Brook Road access is in question.
William Null stated that the condition applies to the section of Gorey Brook Road from where
2

(9/19/19)

�the chain is located and north of the Landrock property. Mr. Null stated that this section of
Gorey Brook Road also includes land that is owned by the Lydens and is not subject to the
proposed subdivision.
Chairperson Hsu asked if the Gorey Brook Road incidental driveway access would be used
more frequently than the current uses once the property has been developed.
William Null stated they propose to use Gorey Brook Road as an alternative driveway for Lot 3
but does not anticipate a significant change in the volume of vehicular traffic. Mr. Null
believes the condition number 7 should be eliminated from the draft resolution since the current
conditions of the road meet Village standards. Gorey Brook Road is a private driveway and he
doesn't believe the grade can be changed to less than 10 percent on a hill without significant
work.
Sean McCarthy stated that the existing driveway path off Gorey Brook Road does not meet the
standards of a driveway. In order to provide driveway access, Gorey Brook Road would have
to be improved as per the standards provided for the driveway off Webber Avenue if it is to be
used for vehicular purposes on a regular basis. Mr. McCarthy stated that the current condition
of Gorey Brook Road from the chain, north to the Landrock property, would have to be
confirmed that it meets Village driveway standards. Mr. McCarthy stated that there are several
areas where the road is eroded and the width does not allow for two cars to pass.
Discussion ensued on the verbiage alternatives to the condition number 7 on the draft resolution
relating to the use of Gorey Brook Road.
Chairperson Hsu directed Clinton Smith and David Smith to work with William Null to revise
the condition verbiage to align with the intentions of Board.
William Null asked if the Board approves changing condition number 4 on the draft resolution
by adding a note to the subdivision plat that states "There is a dispute regarding whether Gorey
Brook Road is a public right-of-way" or "This plat shall not be deemed to indicate that Gorey
Brook Road is not a public right-of-way".
Chairperson Hsu directed Clinton Smith and David Smith to work on verbiage changes on
condition numbers 4 and 7 of the draft resolution.
William Null consulted with the Lyden's attorney and requested that the Board remove
condition number 4 and the notes on the plat and postpone the discussions of the Gorey Brook
Road right-of-way until future site plan approval applications, as to not affect the marketability
of the property.
Clinton Smith stated that it was the Boards intention to confirm and identify how the ownership
of the land and the public use of the roadway on Gorey Brook Road is presented on a filed
3

(9/19/19)

�subdivision plat.
William Null stated that the proposed note on the plat would affect property that is owned by
Landrock and the Lydens and is not a subject of the subdivision application.
David Steinmetz is a Partner at Zarin &amp; Steinmetz Attorneys at Law representing Dr. John and
Carol Lyden. Mr. Steinmetz thanked William Null for sharing the draft resolution with them
tonight. Mr. Steinmetz stated that the Lydens do not object to the Landrock subdivision
application and that they share the objections from William Null regarding the conditions
discussed. Mr. Steinmetz requested, on behalf of his clients, that conditions number 4 and 7 be
removed from the draft resolution and that Gorey Brook Road should remain as it is. Mr.
Steinmetz requested that the Board does not adjudicate the rights of his clients.
Discussion ensued on the appropriate language for conditions 4 and 7 on the draft resolution in
efforts to address the ownership, use, and required improvements of Gorey Brook Road.
William Null asked for the Board to approve the preliminary plat tonight and be permitted to
come back for final plat approval at the next meeting with intentions to resolve the condition
issues and to include the water main looping on the plat.
Motion was made to close the public hearing.
Moved: Krakauer
Seconded: Andruss

Vote 7-0

Motion was made to adopt the preliminary plat resolution as amended to delete condition number
four and amend condition number seven to read:
If Gory Brook Road is used by vehicles for other than emergency purposes on or other than
on an incidental basis for access to or from any property covered by this subdivision, the
owner of that property will improve it to village standards.
Moved: Krakauer

Seconded: Andruss

Chairperson Marjorie Hsu - yes
Tom Andruss - yes
Ed McCarthy - yes
Lindsay Krakauer - yes
Kersten Harries- yes
Eric Carney - yes
Matthew Brennan - yes
Vote 7-0

APPROVED

William Null requested for the Board to schedule a public hearing for the final subdivision plat
for the next meeting. Mr. Null stated that they need to design the water main looping for the
Westchester County Health Department to review.
4

(9/19/19)

�James Natarelli stated that they should submit the plat to include the water main work for his
endorsement before it is submitted to the Westchester County Board of Health for their review.
Mr. Natarelli requested that they include the location of the easements, the status of the
easements, and who they benefit on the final plat.
William Null stated that there will be a municipal water easement and that the utility easements
will be bundled.
James Natarelli stated that there are access easements, public easements, and private utility
easements. All easements should be called out on the map for water, sewer, and all utilities
specifying the uses and limits.
Motion was made to schedule a public hearing for a final subdivision plat approval for October
17, 2019
Moved: Harries
Seconded: Krakauer
Vote 7-0

2. KWD Realty, Inc., 309-315 North Broadway, Amended site plan- Amended resolution
Karl Dibble is the owner of the property located at 311-315 North Broadway. Mr. Dibble
requested that the language using the word residential be removed from the resolution adopted at
the May 16, 2019 meeting for the amended site plan approval. Mr. Dibble stated his business is
open for residential and commercial customers and that it would be hard to monitor whether or
not job spoil materials are from a commercial or residential project.
Chairperson Hsu solicited comments from the Board.
Tom Andruss asked if the wording refers to the material in the recyclable storage bins and
requested that someone read the sections where it appears in the resolution.
Clinton Smith read the sections of the approved resolution where the word residential job spoils
is written.
Matthew Brennan asked what type of materials are typically received from a commercial verses
a residential job.
Karl Dibble stated that commercial and residential materials are often the same materials
whether they are from a commercial Village property, a multi-family residence, or a singlefamily residence. Material is checked and monitored when it comes in for any possible
containments.
Motion was made to amend the resolution as discussed.
Moved: McCarthy
Seconded: Krakauer
Chairperson Marjorie Hsu - yes
Tom Andruss - yes
5

(9/19/19)

�Ed McCarthy - yes
Lindsay Krakauer - yes
Kersten Harries- yes
Eric Carney - yes
Matthew Brennan - yes
Vote 7-0

APPROVED

3. LL Parcel, I LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, 199 Beekman Avenue,
Phase I, Block-I - Discussion
Andrew Tung is an associate from Divney Tung Schwalbe representing the Applicant. Mr. Tung
stated that he is there to satisfy the conditions of the site plan approval of Block-I. At the last
meeting it was proposed to use a corrugated metal panel under the windows and wood tiles on
the side of the penthouse stair towers and at the building entries. Based on the concern raised by
a member of the Board, the architect has reconsidered and redesigned the proposed fa9ade
materials to include flat metal panels under the windows, fiber cement boards at the stair towers,
and brick at the entries.
Kersten Harries stated that she believes that the new fa9ade materials proposed will provide a
better design and stated that she appreciates the efforts from the applicant.
Chairperson Hsu stated that there had been discussions regarding the shielding of the utilities and
the Con-Ed transformers.
Andrew Tung stated that the Con-Ed transformer boxes are proposed to be set back from the
road and installed so they open towards the rear allowing screening in front of them. A row of
plantings is proposed for additional screening of the transformer boxes. Mr. Tung stated that he
received the suggestions from David Smith to install a 'greenscreen' trellis system in order to
provide additional depth and height to the screening of the utility boxes. Mr. Tung stated that
this product will not provide a better screening solution due to the seasonal weather conditions of
the site. He presented exhibits to show examples and to demonstrate why the proposed
evergreen shrubbery plantings will provide better screening for the transformer boxes.
Chairperson solicited comments from the Board and consultants.
There were no comments from the Board or consultants.
Chairperson Hsu stated that that the larger concern was protecting the Verizon communications
cabinet from harm.
Andrew Tung stated that the applicant proposes to install wooden guard rails in front of the line
of hedges behind the curb, to provide additional protection for the Verizon communication
cabinet.
Chairperson Hsu asked how much force are the wood guard rails designed to sustain.
6

(9/19/19)

�Andrew Tung stated that they are designed to take a straight-on blow from a garbage truck, but
that is not likely to happen.
Chairperson Hsu stated that her concern is that if an accident happens 1,177 residents will be
without broadband communications and television. Chairperson Hsu asked if Mr. Tung feels
that the guard rails are sufficient protection for this type of single point failure.
David Sands is the Senior Project Manager for Toll Brothers Apartments Living and stated that
Verizon will own and install the equipment. Mr. Sands stated that Verizon is comfortable with
the location and will be responsible for repairs or replacement.
Andrew Tung stated that the equipment will be well protected as the area will be curbed and
have a rail in front of it.
Andrew Tung stated that the proposed exterior facades and landscape changes satisfy the
conditions of the resolution and requested approval from the Board.
David Smith stated that the Board has a draft resolution indicating that the applicant has satisfied
conditions number 2 and 23 from the previously approved site plan approval resolution. The
draft resolution also indicates that the conditions that were identified as a part of the Village
Board's Special Permit, adopted in 2011, and the Planning Board's approval of the May 2018,
site plan application remain in full force and effect.
Chairperson Hsu asked David Smith if the draft resolution incorporates the change from
tonight's meeting.
Andrew Tung stated that the most recent presentation submission was submitted to James
Natarelli to satisfy an earlier review memo.
David Smith stated that the resolution approval will be based on the documents presented at
tonight's meeting.
Chairperson Hsu solicited comments from the Board and consultants.
There were no comments from the Board or the consultants.
Motion was made to approve the resolution as amended.
Moved: Brennan
Seconded: McCarthy
Chairperson Marjorie Hsu - yes
Tom Andruss - yes
Ed McCarthy - yes
Lindsay Krakauer - yes
Kersten Harries- yes
Eric Carney - yes
Matthew Brennan - yes
7

(9/19/19)

�Vote 7-0

APPROVED

4. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, 199
Beekman Avenue, Phase I amended site plan - Presentation
Andrew Tung is an associate from Divney Tung Schwalbe representing the Applicant. Mr. Tung
stated they propose to amend three site work components of the Phase I Site Plan. The first
proposed amendment is at the east end of the Tappan Zee Park that extends to the open
waterfront space. The original concept plan, approved in 2015, included a plaza and an
accessory structure to provide storage of movable furniture and restroom facilities. In
progression of the design of the open water space, a reorganization of the amenities is proposed.
Peter Chavkin from Lighthouse Landing Communities presented a proposed waterfront public
open space plan and stated most of the residents and general public will be drawn to the
waterfront open spaces verses the interior parks and that a public restroom will not be needed in
the Tappan Zee Park. The Boathouse structure is planned to have a public restroom facility. It is
also the expectation that the hotel interphase area of Block-R will have publicly accessible
restrooms. Peter Chavkin presented an overview of the preliminary plans being discussed with
the Open Space Committee for the promenade area, the overlook area, and the Palisades Green
area.
Chairperson Hsu asked if there will still be a storage structure in the Tappan Zee Park plaza.
Andrew Tung stated that the building structure is planned to be eliminated and replaced with an
additional tree for a total of 6 trees with benches.
Peter Chavkin stated that the plaza area is proposed to be constructed entirely of the decomposed
granite or gravel in lieu of lawn and granite pathways allowing for a different type of Village
gathering in the park.
Chairperson Hsu asked what happened to the movable furniture storage and the bike rack.
Peter Chavkin stated the bike rack remains and the movable furniture storage will be eliminated
at this space. Future plans may include movable furniture storage at the promenade.
Kersten Harries asked what is planned for the other sides of the Tappan Zee Park.
Peter Chavkin stated that convenience retail spaces are expected to be located in Block A-B at
the corner end of the park along at the edge at Legend Drive.
Kersten Harries asked where the nearest public restroom would be located in relation to the park.
Peter Chavkin stated that he expects that a grocery store would provide public restrooms.
Restrooms may also be available in the lobby of the Block-F multi-family residence building.

8

(9/19/19)

�Ed McCarthy asked if the concerns related to providing extra available parking for the retail
stores have been considered.
Peter Chavkin stated that the on and off-street parking requirements will be further discussed
when the retail spaces come before the Planning Board for site plan approval.
Ed McCarthy stated that retail stores will not survive unless there is enough parking for residents
outside of the Edge-on-Hudson community.
Peter Chavkin stated the second item proposed for a revision is the Roundabout at Beekman
Avenue and River Street. Mr. Chavkin stated that what has been built is as per the original
approved site plan.
David Smith stated that it was built to the approved specifications but that there was always an
understanding that the Board could go back and revisit how the area could be enhanced in
design.
Peter Chavkin presented the proposed design change to the roundabout including a rendering of
the prospective view driving from Beekman Avenue.
Matthew Brennan asked if these are cosmetic changes only and do they provide a function or
affect traffic flow.
Peter Chavkin stated that the design changes are for aesthetics and do not change the traffic flow.
Erin Carney asked if the wall is higher on one side.
Peter Chavkin stated that the renderings show how the wall feathers into the ground.
Tom Andruss asked who would be responsible for maintaining the green space.
Peter Chavkin stated the Village would be required to maintain public spaces as per the Special
Permit.
Chairperson Hsu stated that she doesn't see the visual "Wow" factor in the proposed design as
the first thing you see when coming into the development.
Peter Chavkin stated the concept was to be integrated into the community and that the center of
the traffic circle should be elegant and understated. The "Wow" factor of the development will
be the buildings and the river views.
David Smith asked Peter Chavkin how much of an investment is being made into this site.
Peter Chavkin stated that the investment is hundreds of millions of dollars.

9

(9/19/19)

�David Smith stated that is it over a billion dollars and asked if the best they could come up with
was locally sourced rocks and some wild flowers.
Peter Chavkin stated that they are very happy with the design.
David Smith stated that he thinks that they could come up with something better and does not
think they have made a statement coming from Beekman Avenue. Perhaps the meeting with the
Public Space Committee to come up with design concepts in conjunction with the Beekman
Avenue Bridge didn't happen. Mr. Smith stated that he has provided examples of other
roundabout designs and he thinks they are falling short with this design.
Peter Chavkin stated that the design has been presented to the Public Space Committee and
believes they have their vote of confidence and approval on the design presented. The stone
work is being tied to the stone on the bridge and the village green of which provided an elegant
continuity that attracted them to this design.
Andrew Tung stated that there was a temporary turnaround on Legend Drive that passes through
Block-I cul-de-sac on the approved Phase I Site Plan that has not been constructed. It is not
required for access to the parking lot and may not be needed for infrastructure connections to
Phase III. It is requested that it be eliminated from the Phase I Site Plan approval.
Peter Chavkin stated that they will address the need for the roundabout connectivity during the
first phase of the Phase III infrastructure once that plan is approved.
Chairperson Hsu asked if there is anything preventing you from extending the road to the
permanent roundabout location as part of Phase I.
Peter Chavkin asked Craig Tompkins if there was also a surcharge reason that would prevent the
extension to be completed in Phase I.
Craig Tompkins stated that where the roundabout it proposed in Phase III, there is a need for
eight feet of fill required to create the road. They anticipate having the roadway extension
completed in conjunction with the completion of the I-Buildings.
Sean McCarthy stated that the anticipated construction time for the three I-Buildings completion
is within the next 20 months and that the Board would request the final spot for the cul-de-sac to
be built by then or at least the temporary roundabout so that residents would not have to go
through the parking lot. At the current stage of the project, the connection is not necessary until
the buildings are completed.
Peter Chavkin stated that if they were given site plan approval to complete the portion of the
Phase III roads and infrastructure, they could start the process during Phase I.
Chairperson Hsu asked if any action is required by the Board at this presentation.

10

(9/19/19)

�Sean McCarthy stated that it is at the Boards discretion to determine the degree of review for the
proposed changes, and if the Board would prefer breaking them up as individual decisions. The
Board will need to decide if they see cause to schedule another public hearing or to treat the
application as an amendment to the original Phase I Site Plan approval.
Chairperson Hsu stated that she agrees with extending the roundabout to its permanent location
in order to extend the streets to give residents a sense of the end state while also providing
greater access to Kingsland Point. Chairperson Hsu stated that if there is a public restroom
planned in Block-A, she agrees with the elimination of the accessory structure in the Tappan Zee
Park. Chairperson Hsu stated that the applicant has her opinion on the roundabout at Beekman
Avenue and River Street but she is not sure how the rest of the Board feels.
Kersten Harries asked how the natural slope of Beekman Avenue incorporates with how the
height of the roundabout walls are perceived upon approaching it.
Andrew Tung stated that the slope on Beekman Avenue down to the river is less than a foot.
Lindsay Krakauer stated that while she appreciates the natural elements proposed for the mixed
medium of the roundabout, the proposed design seems to be a missed opportunity.
Peter Chavkin asked the Board if they have any suggestion on what they would like to see
designed for the roundabout.
Lindsay Krakauer stated that she would like to see more height dimensions to draw a visual
interest without blocking the river view.
Chairperson Hsu asked if the design was created by Hart Howerton.
Peter Chavkin stated that Hart Howerton designed the proposed roundabout.
Andrew Tung asked the Board if they would consider the approval of the first two requested
changes and extend the discussion for the island design.
Clinton Smith asked if the Board is going to consider approval of the roadway in front of the IBuildings and the elimination of the structure in the Tappan Zee Park without a public hearing.
Chairperson Hsu stated that she is comfortable as long as Clinton Smith is comfortable.
Sean McCarthy agreed that the two changes are a minor amendment to the Phase I Site Plan.
David Smith stated that he will prepare a resolution to reflect the approvals.
4. Approval of minutes- August 22, 2019

11

(9/19/19)

�Chairperson Hsu suggested to review the meeting tape regarding the Landrock application to
clarify the statement from William Null about the ownership of Gorey Brook Road relevant to
the Croton Aqueduct.
Motion was made to approve the August 22, 2019 minutes as amended.
Moved: Andruss
Seconded: Krakauer
Chairperson Marjorie Hsu - yes
Tom Andruss - yes
Ed McCarthy - yes
Lindsay Krakauer - yes
Kersten Harries- yes
Matthew Brennan -abstained
Erin Carney - abstained
Vote 6-0-2

APPROVED

Motion was made to adjourn the meeting at 10:15 PM.
Moved: Harries

Seconded: Andruss

Vote 7-0

Respectfully submitted,
Pamela Pengelski
Secretary to the Planning Board

12

(9/19/19)

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="160">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14863">
                <text>Planning Board Minutes &amp; Resolutions-2019</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12645">
              <text>MINS_PLAN_2019-09-19</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12646">
              <text>Planning Board Minutes &amp; Resolutions-2019</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12647">
              <text>2019</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12648">
              <text>Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12649">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
