https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/c931def4d48a9fd0280d767f903c8062.pdf 88f53fecf920bf0549aeac8ae4784e56 PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Meeting February 21, 2019 The regular meeting was called to order at 8:03 PM by Chairperson Marjorie Hsu. Present: Marjorie Hsu, Chairperson Ed McCarthy Kersten Harries Tom Andruss Matthew Brennan Erin Carney Also Present: Clinton Smith, Village Attorney David Smith, Village Planner James Natarelli, Village Engineer Sean McCarthy, Village Architect Alvaro Alfonzo-Larrain, Consulting Engineer Pamela Pengelski, Secretary to the Planning Board Absent: Lindsay Krakauer Agenda: 1) Mark Vaughn and Jill Parrella, 1 Ridge Street, Proposed one family residenceContinued public hearing 2) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, 199 Beekman Avenue, Phase IV filling and operations permit- Preliminary presentation 3) Jonathan Villani, 30 Andrews Lane, Proposed townhome development - Presentation 4) Landrock, LLC, 231 Webber Avenue, Proposed subdivision- Preliminary presentation 5) KWD Realty, LLC, 315 North Broadway, Amended site plan- Preliminary presentation 6) Approval of minutes- December 20, 2018, January 17, 2019 1. Mark Vaughn and Jill Parrella, 1 Ridge Street, Proposed one-family residenceContinued public hearing Motion was made to re-open the public hearing. Moved: Brennan Seconded: McCarthy Vote 6-0 Christina Griffin is the Architect representing the applicant. Ms. Griffin summarized her professional experience. Ms. Griffin stated that the proposed house has been designed as of right. According to the Sleepy Hollow Zoning Code, the proposed plan is less than the maximum footprint allowed and 5 feet below the maximum height of 35 feet. The lot coverage is at 21.8 percent, which is 8.2 percent of below the maximum 30 percent allowed; and the FAR is 25 percent, which is 16 percent below the allowable 40 percent. The proposed home is 2,031 square 1 (2/21/19) �feet with 3 bedrooms and 2 V baths. Ms. Griffin stated that her clients have very specific goals for the house to include a patio and attic space but no basement. Ms. Griffin stated that the proposed location of the house is sited to allow for enough space for a parking area and a driveway with access to Ridge Street on the south side, and have enough room for a patio on the north side. Ms. Griffin stated that the set-back to the patio is 25 feet and 35.6 feet to the house. On the east side, there is a generous distance of 15.25 feet from the garage to the property line and 19.6 feet from the main house to the property line to allow for more open space and privacy between the two houses. There is a total of 30.6 feet between the proposed home at 1 Ridge Street and the existing home at 3 Ridge Street. Ms. Griffin explained that the first floor elevation of the home was chosen in order to have a patio on one side with a 6 inch step down from the living room that meets the existing grade and to have windows on the east side that will provide view, natural light, and ventilation. Ms. Griffin stated that the grade is just about 14 to 18 inches below the sill heights on the east side due to the sloping grade. Lowering the house would degrade the quality of the interior space. Ms. Griffin stated that they reduced the height of the building slightly by lowering the house on the east side by 6 inches and lowering the garage by 1 foot. Ms. Griffin stated that lowering the garage by 1 foot will provide a slope of 5 percent from the garage door to the road. Ms. Griffin stated that if they reduced the slope to less than 5 percent, they would have an elevation difference of more than 3 feet from the house to the garage. Ms. Griffin presented an aerial view and a comparison of the elevations of the proposed house and the neighboring property at 3 Ridge Street based on site plans submitted to the Planning Board for Site Plan approval in 2016. Ms. Griffin stated that the (4) trees proposed for removal are in poor condition. A landscape plan including erosion control and ground cover with shrubbery around the perimeter of the hardscape will help enhance the property. Ms. Griffin described the proposed floor plans and the building sections. Ms. Griffin reviewed the proposed exterior finishes and the criteria from which choices were considered with neighboring homes. Chairperson Hsu solicited comments from the public. Donald Stever is an attorney representing Peter and Gina Gasperini from 3 Ridge Street. Mr. Stever objected to the proposed house at 1 Ridge Street and stated it will have a significant negative impact on the Gasperini's house. Mr. Stever stated that there is no reason why they can't lower the windows, and all they have to do is spend the money to put in a larger retaining wall. Mr. Stever stated that the Board clearly has the authority to do what Peter and Gina Gasperini really need them to do. Peter Gasperini is the owner of 3 Ridge Street. Mr. Gasperini objected to the elevations of the proposed house in relation to his home at 3 Ridge Street and how it will affect their views from all sides. Mr. Gasperini stated he was concerned about the proposed grid drain runoff going onto the Gelb-Domanski property instead of into the drywells. Mr. Gasperini stated that the elevation calculations used to compare his home with the proposed home were based on drawings submitted to the Planning Board for preliminary site plan approval and are not the final construction drawings approved by the Building Department. Mr. Gasperini stated that there is an issue with the proposed location of the propane tank. Mr. Gasperini stated he was concerned about the effect the regrading work on the east side could have on the trees they planted along the right side of their property. Mr. Gasperini suggested that the applicant change the design 2 (2/21/19) �plans to build a retaining wall on the east side, bring the grade down to lower the house, and lower the pitch of the roof. Mr. Gasperini requested it be confirmed for the record that the house is planned as a stick built building on site and not a modular design. Michael Gelb, who lives a 120 Gorey Brook Road read a letter that he submitted to Planning Board on February 22, 2019 as follows: Preserving the Magic... by Michael J. Gelb The Sleepy Hollow website offers these delightful words by our Village Historian: Defying the passage of time, this magical area has managed to preserve much of the history and natural beauty which have always drawn people to it. We were drawn to move here by this magical natural beauty. My wife Deborah is an opera singer. Some of you may have enjoyed her concert at the Union Church last Spring or maybe you heard her sing at the benefit for the Rockefeller Preserve a couple of years ago. When she was a student at Juilliard she would often come up this way on the weekends to sing at church services. She explained to me that she dreamt about the possibility of living here someday and we are blessed to have made that dream come true. I'm an author. I've written sixteen books thus far, two of them here in our beautiful village. My desk is positioned so that I can see the vista that now includes our magnificently illuminated new bridge. We look forward to welcoming our neighbors at One Ridge Street and we feel that a well-positioned dwelling will enhance the sense of harmony in our community. We took a stroll around the neighborhood the other day and observed many homes with brick chimneys, but we didn't see any black industrial style smokestacks such as the one that is proposed in this matter before the Board. We respectfully request that this feature be removed from the plan and replaced with something that is in harmony with the community standard. We are also profoundly concerned about the current plan to place this structure in a position and at an elevation that will block out the view of our neighbors at 3 Ridge. Although this doesn't directly impede our view it is nevertheless deeply disturbing to contemplate the prospect of something so disproportionate and unnecessary. The Roman architect Vitruvius who inspired Leonardo da Vinci's famous Vitruvian Man drawing stated: Nothing requires the architect's care more than the due proportions of buildings. This applies not only within a structure, but also in the way a structure is positioned. We watched our neighbors at 3 Ridge build their dream home with remarkable care, diligence, and attention to quality. We look forward to watching a similar process as our neighbors at 1 Ridge pursue their dream. But on a fundamental human level it seems a sickening prospect to have to witness a process in which one neighbor diminishes the vista and the value of anothers's dream. We believe it would be a tragic mistake to allow a structure to be placed in such a disproportionate fashion. 3 (2/21/19) �To paraphrase architect Renzo Piano (b.1937): Architecture is very dangerous job. If a writer makes a bad book, eh, people don't read it. But it you design something that is poorly places, you impose ugliness on a community for a hundred years. Earlier today I looked out of our window at the same woodlands that inspired Washington Irving. I experienced what Irving described as: a serene and settled majesty... .that enters into the soul and delights and elevates it, and fills it with noble inclinations. We appeal to the noble inclinations of all involved in this matter. We request that the elevation be lowered and the structure moved back to protect the serenity and soul of our neighborhood and to preserve its magic. Thank you. Chairperson Hsu solicited additional comments from the public. There were no additional comments from the public. Chairperson Hsu solicited comments from the Board. Thomas Andruss asked if there is a proper solution to the location of the propane tank. Sean McCarthy stated that the current placement of the propane tank shown on the engineering drawings does not meet the minimum set-back requirements and there are other solutions for the location but must be in conjunction with the ability for the tank to be filled. Mr. McCarthy stated that there are set-back requirements from the house, set-back requirements from the property line, set-back requirements from other ignition sources, and the access for the service company. Thomas Andruss asked Mr. McCarthy is there is any prohibition in regards to the construction of modular homes in the Village of Sleepy Hollow. Sean McCarthy stated that there is no prohibition for a modular home. A modular home would require that specific details are incorporated into the requested construction logistics plan to detail where cranes would be located, where boxes would be dropped off, where construction trailers would be located, where materials would be stored, and locations of staging areas and other related items. Thomas Andruss asked if this information would be required before a building permit is issued. Sean McCarthy stated that the construction logistics plan would need to be provided before a building permit is issued. Chairperson Hsu asked if there is any indication that there are plans for the house to be modular construction. 4 (2/21/19) �Sean McCarthy stated that based on the current designs submitted, it doesn't appear to be modular construction. Chairperson Hsu asked if the applicant would like to comment. Christina Griffin confirmed that the proposed house will be stick built. Ms. Griffin stated that the house is moved forward to allow room for the patio, not for modular construction. Kersten Harries stated that she found the elevation comparisons presented between the proposed house and the house at 3 Ridge Street helpful. Ms. Harries asked if there was any comment about the discrepancy with the elevations drawings that may have inadvertently been used in the consideration for the elevation comparisons between the two homes. Christina Griffin stated that the information she used was based on the documents and drawings found in the Building Department files. Peter Gasperini stated that the preliminary site plans must have been used for the comparison and that elevations were changed on the approved building permit set of drawings. Chairperson Hsu stated that the public hearing should be closed and that the Board should move to a draft a resolution. Motion was made to close the public hearing. Moved: Andruss Seconded: McCarthy Vote 6-0 Clinton Smith asked Chairperson Hsu what the conclusion of the resolution should be. Chairperson Hsu stated that the Board should move forward with a draft resolution for approval. Motion was made to draft a resolution of approval for consideration at the March 21, 2019 meeting. Moved: Andruss Seconded: McCarthy Vote 6-0 2. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, 199 Beekman Avenue, Phase IV filling and operations permit- Preliminary presentation Craig Tompkins is the Construction Manager for Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC for the Edge-on-Hudson project. Mr. Tompkins presented the Phase IV filling plan and summarized the phases and the current project status. Mr. Tompkins stated that he is there to request the approval for a fill permit in order to raise the site approximately 5 to 8 feet. In efforts to consolidate the fill below the existing ground, from the old river organics, it is planned to be surcharged by adding additional fill upwards of 5 feet on top on the existing ground. The consolidation process can take approximately 6 to 10 months and past experience identifies settlement from 2 to 12 inches for a time period of 4 to 10 months. The plan is to remove the existing fill from the 5 (2/21/19) �settled surcharge on the Phase III area and start the fill operations for the Phase IV area. It is planned to overbuild the road areas in order to stay or match the infrastructure road grid as approved by the Riverfront Concept Development Plan in 2011. Mr. Tompkins stated that the fill that will be used exists on site and should not require or increase any deliveries to the Village in the form of barges or trucks. Approximately 80,000 yards are needed for the Phase IV filling and will be taken from the surcharge areas of Phase II and Phase III. Kersten Harries asked for confirmation that onsite fill will be taken from other areas for the future roads of Phase IV. Craig Tompkins confirmed that surcharge from Phase II and Phase III will be moved to create the fill and surcharge for Phase IV. Kersten Harries asked if over building the roads refers to putting fill where road construction was planned in the original RDCP plan. Craig Tompkins stated Ms. Harries is correct. Kersten Harries asked how long it is anticipated for the fill to settle. Craig Tompkins stated that the engineers estimate that 4-10 months. Sean McCarthy asked if they will be installing the wick drains as part of this process. Craig Tompkins explained that wick drains will be installed throughout the site to accelerate the consolidation of the organic materials in order to squeeze the water out. Mr. Tompkins explained that a wick drain is a 70 foot long straw that is placed 5 foot on center, driven 70 feet deep in the areas which act as a wick to allow the water to escape as they compress the organic materials. This operation is completed before the fill is brought in. Chairperson Hsu asked if once the fill is down to a specified level, does the surcharge go on top of the fill. Craig Tompkins stated that the surcharge aids in the weight of the compression, and once the engineers see a static line for no movement, the surcharge fill is then removed and moved to other places on the site where fill is required. Clinton Smith stated that one of the roads had a grass median and he doesn't see it on this plan. Craig Tompkins stated that the original RDCP showed a grass median at Horseman's Boulevard and was eliminated in Phase II, but they have over built and over settled the road area if the need to accommodate the median is required. David Smith asked if there will be a subdivision contemplated with this action. 6 (2/21/19) �Craig Tompkins stated there is no subdivision with this action. Craig Tompkins requested that the Board set a public hearing. Motion was made to schedule a public hearing for the March 21, 2019 meeting. Moved: Harries Seconded: Andruss Vote 6-0 3. Jonathan Villani, 30 Andrews, Proposed townhome development -Presentation Frank Cerqueira stated he is the owner of 30 Andrews Lane. Mr. Cerqueira stated that his Architect is on vacation and that he was asked to appear in his absence. Mr. Cerqueira asked Sean McCarthy to confirm that he had been in touch with his Architect regarding tonight's meeting. Sean McCarthy stated the designer, Jonathan Villani, emailed the Building Department to indicate that he was not available to attend tonight's meeting. Mr. McCarthy responded to Mr. Villani's email and requested that the engineer of record and the actual architect come to the meeting so they could move this application further by answering the outstanding questions that the Building Department, the Village Planner, and the Village Engineer have. Chairperson Hsu stated that there has been multiple presentations to the Board as well as correspondence between the Village Architect with suggestions on how to move this application forward with recommendations for design adjustments as well as feedback on the engineering side. Chairperson Hsu asked Mr. Cerqueira is he acknowledges what needs to be provided in order to move forward. Frank Cerqueira asked if they would schedule a public hearing for the next meeting. Sean McCarthy stated that due to the number of outstanding items that are unresolved, he does not believe the Board is at the point where a public hearing should be scheduled. Mr. McCarthy stated that if the Board does not have the answers to the outstanding issues, they will not be able to answer questions that may arise from the public. David Smith stated that for the record, Mr. Cerqueira is the contract/vendee, not the owner of the property. Mr. Smith stated that the issue involving the interior layout design and how the rooms are called out as a den or a study where they can be in fact become a bedroom still exist. Based on the input provided from the Village, it is expected that the applicant prepare a design plan that is a true representation of the building as it would be in the market place. Mr. Smith stated that the applicants design team should incorporate, on the plans, the comments received from the Planning Board and the consultants for the next submission. The Village would like to see this project move forward but it must move forward in the correct way. Clinton Smith asked that interior layouts for the units in the B Building and the C Building be provided on the next submission. Mr. Smith requested that the street parking spaces that would be lost by fire engine access be identified. Mr. Smith stated his concerns on the number of units 7 (2/21/19) �and asked the applicant to review the design plans as it relates to space constrictions for garbage removal and fire truck access. Chairperson Hsu stated that there is still an open item relative to the lot coverage as it relates with the Sleepy Hollow Zoning Code. If the plan is going outside the Zoning Code guidelines, the applicant would have to go before the Zoning Board first before coming back to the Planning Board. No action was taken. 4. Landrock, LLC, 231 Webber Avenue, Proposed subdivision, Preliminary presentation William Null is a partner at Cuddy + Feder LLP. Mr. Null stated that he is there on behalf of Landrock, LLC to present the application for a preliminary subdivision of the 35.5 acres that is one acre zoned. The application proposes a three lot subdivision that is well conforming within the density requirements of the district. Preliminary plat sketches and designs schemes for the application were presented to the Village Architect in December of 2018. The proposed primary access for the subdivision is from Webber Avenue and the land does have frontage on Gorey Brook Road. Gorey Brook Road is proposed for emergency access purposes. The proposed subdivision will consist of three lots with frontage on Webber Avenue with one shared single driveway. There will be a maintenance association created so that the shared driveway could be maintained by the three homes. During the design of this development, it was sought to address the items practiced in the Villages' Green Infrastructure Planning Guidelines. The design plan fully conforms to the Village Zoning Code requirements. Donna Maiello is a Senior Associate and Landscape Architect from Divney Tung Schwalbe LLP. Ms. Maiello stated that the 35.5 acre site is located at the north end of the Village near the intersection of Webber Avenue and Sleepy Hollow Road. The site is one third wooded and two thirds open meadow and lawn areas. There are some paved trails and driveways that crisscross in all directions with an existing driveway on Webber Avenue. Mr. Maiello stated that the application proposes to subdivide the 35.5 acre parcel into three parcels. Parcel one will be 12.3 acres and occupies most of the east half of the site. Parcel two is 13.1 acres at the north west corner of the site, and parcel three is 10.1 acres located at the south west corner of the site. There will be a shared driveway for the three parcels and it is outlined with the easement on the plan submitted. All three parcels will have frontage on Webber Avenue and parcels two and three will also have frontage on Gorey Brook Road. The site is zoned R-1, 1 acre lots, so the three lots proposed are significantly larger than what is allowed to be built as per the Code. Ms. Maiello stated that the site plan shows the house locations and driveway locations for the three lots. Ms. Maiello stated that the proposed shared driveway from Webber Avenue would wind its way up along the side of the ridge, maintaining its current rural character, branching off for separate driveways for the three lots. The driveway will be 20 feet wide with 100 feet long turnouts for fire truck access, as well as room as the T-intersection at the end for fire trucks to turn around. William Null stated that in previously approved single family residence site plans, the access point on Webber Avenue has a stone bridge like structure which is proposed to remain and be 8 (2/21/19) �utilized for this application. Mr. Null stated that having the driveway 20 feet wide with 100 feet long turnouts also allows for people passing one another in the event of two way traffic. Keeping the rural character of the road avoids additional grading, tree, and rock removals, and is more sensitive to the environment. The proposed locations of the homes limit their view from the public. Chairperson Hsu solicited comments from Sean McCarthy. Sean McCarthy stated that he had no comments. Chairperson Hsu solicited comments or questions from the Board. Ed McCarthy asked if the stone driveway would hold the weight of the fire truck. Donna Maiello stated that tractor trailers went over it in order to install the utilities so it has had a significant amount of truck traffic demonstrating its strength. Clinton Smith asked for the required frontage for the three lots on Webber Avenue. Donna Maiello stated that each lot has a frontage of 50 feet. Clinton Smith asked if this meets the Village Code requirements. Donna Maiello stated that the Village Code specifies the width of the lot and that the lots are oddly shaped. The minimum frontage is 50 feet but it is not the actual width of the lot. The lot dimensions are clarified in the submitted Zoning Compliance Table. Clinton Smith pointed out a discrepancy with the proxy statement signature provided with the application. William Null stated that he would correct and resubmit as requested. William Null asked the Board to schedule a public hearing for the next meeting. Motion was made to schedule a public hearing for the March 21, 2019 meeting. Moved: McCarthy Seconded: Andruss Vote 6-0 5. KWD Realty, LLC, 315 North Broadway, Amended site plan, Preliminary presentation Karl Dibble introduced himself as the owner and developer of the property located at 315 North Broadway. Chairperson Hsu requested that before Mr. Dibble go into the specifics of the application, she stated that she understands there is pending lawsuit and asked Mr. Dibble to explain what it is about. 9 (2/21/19) �Karl Dibble gave a brief summarization of the problems he has had with the Village Local Development Corporation, the Village Board of Trustees, the Mayor and the Police Department. Mr. Dibble stated that he hopes that the Planning Board will take on a totally separate roll in the review of the proposed application request. Chairperson Hsu thanked Mr. Dibble for providing background information and invited him to proceed with his presentation. Karl Dibble stated that he would like to make some changes and amendments to his previously approved site plan. It is a mixed use property on where he resides and has tenants who reside on the property who would also benefit from the requested changes. Mr. Dibble stated that one request is to extend an existing concrete deck on the building in the back. The existing deck is constructed of concrete and steel and located on the west side. The proposed application would extend the deck by wrapping it around the building to the south using the same materials. It is proposed to add a carport on the east side of the building constructed of the same asphalt shingle roof with skylights to match the existing building. It is proposed to move the tenant parking lot due to the existing steep grade on the hill along the west side of the property. It is proposed to move the tenant parking lot to the front of the house, level the existing parking area, and built a retaining wall and a stockade fence to expand the business. The changes will also give the neighbors more room and a better buffer zone from the business area. The stone retaining wall will have a maximum height of 6 feet and match other existing retaining walls on the property. The top of the wall will have a 4 to 6 foot fence and match the existing fence on the property. The deck would not be visible to the public from Route 9. The carport may be visible from the gate by the sidewalk. The addition of the retaining wall will serve as a buffer and screen for the parking area. It is proposed to remove the stairs from the front of the house, and remove a tree that was planted 20 years ago, since it is on top of the water and sewer lines. The proposal indicates the plan to plant (4) Arborvitaes in planting boxes in front of the house to provide some greenery. As per Cronin Engineering, the drainage will not change from the previously approved site plan. Sean McCarthy asked if anything on the amended site plan will increase the parking requirements or create additional traffic demand. Karl Dibble stated that the proposed plan should not bring any change to the regular homeowner and contractor clientele and who visit for a short time to pick up materials for orders. Sean McCarthy asked if there will any change in the hours of operation. Karl Dibble stated that the hours of operation will remain the same and include the normal seasonal changes such a being open at night for Christmas tree sales. Sean McCarthy asked if there will be any new impervious surfaces. 10 (2/21/19) �Karl Dibble stated that there are few changes to the cobblestone areas but nothing that will affect the drainage. Matthew Brennan asked if a rendering could be provided in order to visualize the site. Sean McCarthy suggested that Mr. Dibble take pictures of the existing deck and the retaining walls for a visual of the proposed materials that will be used. Ed McCarthy asked if there will be any variances required. Sean McCarthy sated that he did not recognize any variances based on the initial submission. Mr. McCarthy stated that he will verify compliance with the Village Zoning Code. David Smith requested that Mr. Dibble have his engineer fill out and submit the Zoning Compliance Form in order to help move the application along. Karl Dibble stated that he will have the Zoning Compliance Form completed. Thomas Andruss asked if there will be any change in the number of parking spaces along the Broadway side from the removal of pavement. Karl Dibble stated that the lower parking area will still accommodate the same number of licensed vehicles since the pavement removal work will only change the area by 6 inches or less. The actual parking spaces will not change. Thomas Andruss asked if the removal of the steps in the front of the stucco building will leave the side staircase as the only entrance point to the residence. Karl Dibble stated that there is a rear access door from a patio that is mostly used by his tenant. The plan is to extend the existing porch railing where the front steps are being removed. The house consists of two apartments and an office where three parking spaces are required and are addressed in the plan and shown in the front of the building. Chairperson Hsu asked Mr. Dibble if he would be ready for a public hearing. Karl Dibble stated that he will be ready and will submit a rendering and the completed Zoning Compliance Form. Sean McCarthy stated that upon receipt of the Zoning Compliance Form, if there is a conflict with the Zoning Code, the public hearing notice will be held back and the Board will be informed. James Natarelli requested that a response be submitted to his review memo dated February 20, 2019. 11 (2/21/19) �Motion was made to schedule a public hearing for the March 21, 2019 meeting subject to review by the Village Architect. Moved: Andruss Seconded: McCarthy Vote 6-0 6. Approval of minutes- December 20, 2018; January 17, 2019 Chairperson Hsu solicited comments from the Board on the December 20, 2018 minutes. There were no comments from the Board. Motion was made to approve the December 20, 2018 minutes. Moved: Harries Seconded: McCarthy Chairperson Marjorie Hsu - yes Tom Andruss - yes Ed McCarthy - yes Erin Carney -yes Matthew Brennan - yes Kersten Harries- yes Vote 6-0 APPROVED Chairperson Hsu solicited comments from the Board on the January 17, 2019 minutes. Clinton Smith stated that he sent suggested revisions to Pamela Pengelski. The first one to was to correct a misspelling of the word perc and the other was to change the word "We" to the "The Planning Board" in a statement made by Peter Chavkin. Pamela Pengelski stated that the typographical error to the word perc will be corrected in the January 17, 2019 minutes. The second suggestion was part of the December 20, 2018 minutes and was a quoted statement from Peter Chavkin in which he uses the word "we" as a reference to the development group for Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, not the Planning Board. Motion was made to approve the January 17, 2019 minutes as amended. Moved: Andruss Seconded: Brennan Chairperson Marjorie Hsu - yes Tom Andruss - yes Ed McCarthy - yes Erin Carney -yes Matthew Brennan - yes Kersten Harries- yes Vote 6-0 APPROVED Chairperson Hsu adjourned the meeting at 9:45 PM. 12 (2/21/19) �Respectfully Submitted, Pamela Pengelski Secretary to the Planning Board 13 (2/21/19) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2019 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2019-02-21 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2019 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2019 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text