<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="2095" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/items/show/2095?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-19T08:36:55+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="2095">
      <src>https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/80a6b3fae3f11acc148403d5bd4984e4.pdf</src>
      <authentication>e205fbbc60efb56a88ebff0e7c120545</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="20582">
                  <text>Village of Sleepy Hollow
Planning Board Meeting
June 16, 2016
The meeting was called to order at 8:14 pm by Chairwoman Lisa Santo.
Present:

Lisa Santo, Chairwoman
Hugh Jones
Ed McCarthy
Mathew Brennan
Gordon Swartz
Anthony DelVecchio
Carl Aridas

Also Present:

Sean McCarthy, Village Architect
Clinton Smith, Village Attorney
James Natarelli, Consulting Engineer
David Smith, Village Planner

Agenda:
1) Makan Land Development LLC, 545 North Broadway, single-family residence- Public
hearing
2) Local Development Corporation, 60 Continental Street, Sub-division- Public hearing
3) Philipse Manor Beach Club, Western end of Palmer Avenue, Dredge Permit- Public
hearing
4) Margaret Carroll, 5 Birch Close, Site improvements- Continued public hearing
5) The Reformed Church of the Tarrytowns, 430 North Broadway, Site improvementsContinued public hearing
6) Gina &amp; Peter Gasperini, 3 Ridge Street, Proposed single-family residence - Preliminary
presentation
7) Edge-on-Hudson, 199 Beekman Avenue, Filling operations permit amendmentsPreliminary presentation
8) Marcos Lozano, 30 Andrews Lane, Proposed townhouse development- Preliminary
presentation
9) Yvonne Adams 138 Webber Avenue, Tree removal appeal- Discussion
10) Environmental Advisory Committee- Presentation
11) Approval of Minutes, March 17, 2016, April 21, 2016, May 19, 2016
1) Makan Land Development LLC, 545 North Broadway, Single-family residence Continued public hearing
The project is a new single family home at 545 North Broadway. Chair Santo asked for a motion
to open the public hearing.

�Motion was made to open the public hearing.
Moved: Swartz
Seconded: Jones

Vote 6-0

Engineer, William E. Lachenauer from Hudson Engineering, represented the application. Mr.
Lachenaurer reviewed the history of the project and the prior application. He stated that the
utility easement between the two adjoining properties on Bellwood Avenue was found and
submitted to the Village. Mr. Lachenaurer also said that he answered all the comments from the
Village Engineer's memo. Mr. Lachenaurer requested approval from the Board.
Chair Santo questioned how the driveway would function; and if there would be enough area to
turn a large car around on the property.
Ed McCarthy questioned the width of the proposed driveway.
Mr. Lachenaurer responded that the driveway was 12 feet wide with a 6 foot turn around area;
providing enough area for a car to turn around.
Gordon Swartz questioned if a Suburban could turn around in the driveway without backing out
onto Route 9.
Mr. Lachenaurer replied that the driver would need to make a multiple turn K-turn and offered to
extend the driveway to provide more area for turning around.
Carl Aridas questioned who was responsible for removing the wall adjoining the neighbor's
property.
Mr. Lachenaurer replied that the contractor or Makan is responsible for removing the wall.
Ed McCarthy questioned the status of the Department of Transportation approval.
Mr. Lachenaurer replied that the application was submitted and they are waiting to hear back
from the State.
Chair Santo questioned if the exterior design drawings were submitted to the Board.
Mr. Lachenaurer replied that the design drawings will be submitted as part of the Building
Permit application.
Sean McCarthy stated that the Planning Board has the responsibility to review the Architectural
design and will need to approve the design as part of the Planning Board application.

�Carl Aridas questioned what piping will be installed through the easement.
Mr. Lachenaurer replied that both the water service and the sewer pipe will be installed in the
easement area.
Mr. Lachenaurer summarized by stating that the architects will submit the design drawings for
review next month, his office will revise the driveway, and add weep holes to the wall detail.
Chair Santo solicited comments from the public.
There were no public comments.
Motion was made to adjourn the public hearing.
Moved: Swartz
Seconded: Aridas

Vote 6-0

2) Local Development Corporation, 60 Continental Street, Sub-division - Public hearing
Motion was made to open the public hearing.
Moved: Santo
Seconded: McCarthy

Vote 6-0

David Schroedel stated that the Local Development Corporation submitted documentation as
requested at the previous meeting, including the licensing agreement with the MTA, the deed
restrictions, and the historical uses.
Attorney, David Rothman represented the applicant. Mr. Rothman asked the Board if they had
any questions regarding the uses of the rail siding property.
Clinton Smith questioned if the LDC made application to General Motors to relieve the
restrictions on the East Parcel.
David Schroedel responded no, because Metro North has not exercised their option. Mr.
Schroedel added that the LDC was seeking the sub-division which approval will trigger the
option.
Chair Santo questioned what the MTA is planning to use the site for.
David Rothman replied that the MTA will continue to use the property as they have historically
used it; including the storage and maintenance of rail cars.
Gordon Swartz questioned if the option to sell the property is exercised, would the historical uses
remain or would the MTA use the property for another use.

�David Rothman responded that there are deed restrictions on the property that will continue with
the land.
Gordon Swartz asked what the deed restrictions are.
David Rothman replied that the historical uses would continue and that the MTA could do
whatever they wanted with the land; they would use the side rails for rail cars and maintenance.
Gordon Swartz asked if repairing the rail cars was included and if there are hours of operation
stated in the restrictions.
David Rothman replied that hours of operation are not in the restrictions.
Gordon Swartz stated that the restrictions are not spelled out and questioned what the scope of
maintenance included.
David Rothman responded that the uses will be consistent with the former uses and that he will
clarify what the restrictions are.
Chair Santo questioned if the LDC planned on constructing a buffer between the rail sidings and
the new development.
David Rothman replied that a fence will be constructed along the western border.
Planner, Chris Reale from WSP described the buffer, stating that the area will be 10-50 feet of
landscaped buffer with a 12 foot wide path and a fence 8-10 feet tall creating a physical barrier
between the East Parcel.
Chair Santo questioned the material planned for the space between the rails and the path.
Chris Reale replied that the space is not designed yet but the buffer will consist of native grasses,
shrubs, trees and maybe a bioswale.
Chair Santo stated her concern for the potential for fires due to the type of material proposed for
the buffer in relationship to the train tracks.
David Schroedel explained the deed restrictions imposed by the DEC and the conditions required
by General Motors.
Gordon Swartz stated his concern that once the East Parcel property is developed with new ball
fields and recreation space that the Metro North Parcel will not be an industrial type use.
Carl Aridas questioned the provision in the deed to exempt the MTA from restrictions on the
property.

�Mayor Ken Wray stated his support for the application. Mayor Wray indicated that the MTA
parcel is very valuable to the LDC and Village. Mayor Wray explained that the rails will be used
to temporarily park a train until it can be moved to another location to be fixed. Mayor Wray
added that the MTA property is only accessible from the railroad and the LDC could deny the
MTA access through their property.
Gordon Swartz stated that the MTA currently has an access easement through the East Parcel.
Chair Santo questioned if the MTA can proceed with eminent domain to gain access through the
East parcel.
Clinton Smith replied that the MTA can use super authority to facilitate what they want.
Motion was made to close the public hearing and direct Village staff to prepare a draft
resolution.
Moved: Swartz
Seconded: Aridas
Vote 6-0
3) Philipse Manor Beach Club, Western end of Palmer Avenue, Dredge permit - Public
hearing
Motion was made to open the public hearing.
Moved: Santo

Seconded: Swartz

Vote 6-0

Tim Judge represented the application.
The project is to dredge the marina at the Philipse Manor Boat Club and de-water the dredged
material on the East Parcel.
Chair Santo questioned where the dredge material will be stored.
Tim Judge replied that the exact location has not been determined but the material will be stored
on north side of the East Parcel and used in accordance with the fill plan developed by the LDC.
Chair Santo asked if there were any public comments.
There were no public comments.
Clinton Smith stated that a disposal plan will be required prior to issuing a Wetlands Permit.
Tim Judge explained the process of dewatering and storing the dredged material.

�Clinton Smith stated that dredging will not be permitted until a storage site is approved and the
Planning Board will retain jurisdiction for review and approval of the storage of the dredge
material within the Village.
Chair Santo questioned if there are optional sites to take the material.
Tim Judge replied that the Edge-on-Hudson property was an alternate site but was not the first
choice because it would cost more to transport the material.
Anthony DelVecchio arrived at 8:57 PM.
Motion was made to close the public hearing and direct Village staff to prepare a draft
resolution.
Moved: Swartz
Seconded: McCarthy
Vote 7-0
4) Margaret Carroll, 5 Birch Close, Site improvements - Continued public hearing
Chair Santo asked for a motion to open the public hearing.
Motion was made to open the public hearing.
Moved: Swartz

Seconded: Aridas

Vote 7-0

Chair Santo stated that the applicant requested an adjournment.
Chair Santo solicited comments from the public. There were no comments.
Gordon Swartz asked if the applicant contacted the next door neighbor about the proposed work
on their property.
Sean McCarthy responded that the applicant has made contact with the neighbor.
Motion was made to adjourn the public hearing.
Moved: DelVecchio
Seconded: Aridas

Vote 7-0

5) The Reformed Church of the Tarrytowns, 430 North Broadway, Site improvements Continued public hearing
The scope of the project is to improve the front entrance to the Old Dutch Church and to make it
handicap accessible. Also included in the project are a new water line and the construction of a
path through the Old Dutch Church burial ground.
Chair Santo asked for a motion to open the public hearing.

�Motion was made to open the public hearing.
Moved: Aridas
Seconded: DelVecchio

Vote 7-0

Jeff Gargano, Pastor of the Old Dutch Church of Sleepy Hollow, introduced himself and thanked
the members that attended the site visit earlier in the day. Pastor Gargano introduce Joanne Tall
as the architect for the project and explained that her firm specializes in historic preservation
projects and that she won an award for the preservation project at the Philipse Manor Train
Station.
Architect, Joanne Tall presented plans, a rendering and pictures of the Church and proposed
work. Ms. Tall showed the landscape plan and described the material used for the paths. Ms.
Tall outlined the review process and jurisdiction of the State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO). Ms. Tall stated that the project was reviewed by Stacey Matson-Zuvic who issued a
letter indicating that the project would have no adverse impacts on the National Landmark listed
property and therefore no additional review by SHPO was required.
Carl Aridas questioned how many paths are being constructed and which path will be used for
wheelchair access.
Joanne Tall described the proposed foot path to the drop off area near Lincoln Avenue and the
topographical change at the front entrance.
Chair Santo questioned if the paths could be constructed so they are less intrusive to the land and
if the paths could be constructed without any excavation.
Joanne Tall stated that originally the path material was specified as Poly-Pave, which has the
appearance like dirt but is impervious, making compliance with the stormwater regulations
difficult. The path material was revised to Flexi-Pave, a pervious surface which placement
requires excavation of six inches. The path will be 36-40 inches wide to comply with
accessibility requirements.
Chair Santo questioned if two stairs were required from the new entrance platform.
Joanne Tall replied that one stair would be asymmetrical and not complement the existing
Church architecture.
Clinton Smith questioned where the path to Lincoln Avenue is located.

�Joanne Tall referred to the site plan and pointed out the location of the proposed path starting
from the Church entrance, passing through the cemetery and connecting to Lincoln Avenue.
Clinton Smith asked for clarification if the path crosses over grave sites or headstones.
Joanne Tall confirmed that the path crosses over graves only.
Gordon Swartz asked if gravel could be installed as path material for the connection up the hill to
Washington Irving's plot since it is not anticipated that wheelchairs will use that route.
Joanne Tall stated that the slope is steep but people may access Irving's plot using the path
anyway.
There was an open discussion regarding the maximum slope of the path to meet accessibility
requirements.
Gordon Swartz questioned if there are any other materials that could be used for the paths.
Joanne Tall stated that they searched for a good-looking, durable, permeable, hard surface and
the Poly-Pave material is the best option. Ms. Tall added that the material is used at the Medical
College in Valhalla and at Arlington National Cemetery.
Chair Santo questioned if a machine will be needed to excavate the ground. Ms. Santo said she
was concerned that the old grave stones would get damaged.
Engineer, William Lachenauer of Hudson Engineering &amp; Consulting, P.C. replied that the
machines used to install the paving will be small, rubber tire machines, operated by a person
standing or walking behind the equipment. He added that a backhoe will not be necessary.
Jim Logan, Superintendant of Sleepy Hollow Cemetery, stated that the cemetery workers use a
small John Deer machine to dig graves which can be maneuvered around the tight spaces in the
cemetery and suggested a similar machine can be used to install the path. Mr. Logan added that
he is in favor of the path connecting the Church property to Irving's site because it will reduce
foot traffic on the grass and keep visitors on the path instead of wandering around the grave sites.
Mr. Logan said it is important in a historic church yard to direct pedestrians where you want
them to traverse in order to minimize foot traffic around the grave sites.
Gordon Swartz reviewed the attachments received from the applicant, specifically the article,
"Making Structures Accessible". Mr. Swartz stated that the project is a balancing test; how to
provide accessibility to a historic structure using the smallest footprint. Mr. Swartz asked if the

�size of the platform was designed to accommodate tourists or could it be smaller if it was only
used by the congregation.
Jim Logan stated that he is in favor of increasing tourism to the site as well as providing access
for the congregation.
Joanne Tall stated that she has followed the National Parks briefs which address how to deal with
changing conditions at Historic Sites. Ms. Tall added that the project is needed so that the
Church can adapt to the need for accessibility for the continued use as a church. Ms. Tall stated
that the proposed work is reversible; the work can be removed and restored to the original
condition and not change the historic fabric.
There was an open discussion regarding the path material; the possible use of gravel and the
proximity to the graves.
Chair Santo stated that the path material does not look like it would be found in a 17th century
Church yard.
Gordon Swartz stated that the path material appears alien.
Aubrey Hawes read an article by Village Historian Henry Steiner.
Pastor Jeff Gargano handed out historic pictures of the Church. Pastor Gargano stated that the
main reason for the path is to provide accessibility to the Church. The path leading to Irving's
grave was added to the project to contribute to the Village and to make it easier for tourists
making their way to the site. Pastor Gargano stated that the path to Irving's site can be eliminated
from the project if the Board doesn't want it.
Debra McHugh is a Deacon, parishioner, and a resident of Yonkers. Ms. McHugh described the
mission of the Church and stated that worship is not limited to Sundays only; 50-100 people visit
the Church each week.
Clifton Steurer, 415 North Broadway, Sleepy Hollow, is a parishioner and stated that the existing
path creates a bottleneck near the Church when tourists visit the site. Mr. Steurer stated that the
new path in the Church yard will provide a way for visitors get through the property without
interfering with Church services.
Sara Mascia, Executive Director of the Historical Society serving Sleepy Hollow and Tarrytown
addressed the Board. Ms. Mascia stated that she would like to review all the documents
submitted to SHPO and contact Stacey Matson-Zuvic directly to review the status of the

�application. Ms. Mascia stated that the proposed front of the building looks overwhelming for a
17th century church. She also stated she is an archeologist and is concerned about digging a
trench for the path so close to the graves. Ms. Mascia suggested that the path leading up the hill
could be eliminated.
George Kuntz is a parishioner and in charge of the properties committee. Mr. Kuntz stated that
the Church is well aware of the historic nature of the property and how the property is supposed
to look. Mr. Kuntz stated that the property has been appropriately maintained long before this
project started.
Jane Kuntz is a parishioner and stated that she remembers how the church looked like before the
Department of Transportation changed Route 9 and took away the front of the property. Ms.
Kuntz stated that the proposed entrance looks more like the building used to be.
Wayne Yang Young is a parishioner and stated that size of the proposed entrance is based on the
need and safety.
Chair Santo confirmed with the applicant that they will be looking to receive a review letter from
Sara Mascia, other options for the path material, and have the proposed platform staked out prior
to the next meeting.
Motion was made to adjourn the public hearing to the July 21, 2016 meeting.
Moved: Aridas
Seconded: Swartz

Vote 7-0

6) Gina &amp; Peter Gasperini, 3 Ridge Street, Proposed single-family residence - Preliminary
presentation
John Whalen of McCarthy LePage Architects represented the applicant. Mr. Whalen stated that
the project is a proposed single family home located at 3 Ridge Street. The house is a modern
design, two stories high and about 2,500 square feet. The garage is in the basement, bedrooms on
the first floor and kitchen and living space on the second floor.
Anthony DelVecchio asked what the lot size was.
John Whalen replied that the lot is 6,671 square feet and the proposed house meets all of the
zoning requirements.
Chair Santo asked what materials will be used on the exterior of the house.

�John Whalen replied that they are still researching the materials but he is leaning towards using
composite siding. Mr. Whalen stated that all the materials and colors will be selected and
presented at the next meeting.
Carl Aridas asked if the garage is for two vehicles.
John Whalen replied that the house will have a one car garage with a wide door.
Carl Aridas asked if cars will need to back out of the property and how is the visibility entering
onto Ridge Street.
John Whalen stated that cars will need to back out of the driveway; the lot is only 50 feet wide
which is too narrow to turn around. Mr. Whalen said there is no problem with sign visibility
since Ridge Street is a dead end and there isn't much traffic.
Carl Aridas asked if a tree survey was submitted.
John Whalen responded that a survey will be completed and that there is one large oak tree that
exists in the middle of the property that will have to be removed to construct the house.
Motion was made to schedule a public hearing for July 21, 2016.
Moved: DelVecchio
Seconded: Swartz

Vote 7-0

7) Edge-on-Hudson, 199 Beekman Avenue, Filling operations permit amendments
Preliminary presentation
Peter Johnson represented the application. The project is to amend a previously approved fill
permit for 199 Beekman Avenue. The original plan was for the fill to be trucked onto the site.
The applicant now would like to bring some fill in by barge, approximately 50,000-100,000
cubic yards. Each barge can hold 2,700 cubic yards compared to 27 cubic yards per truck load.
Also being requested is permission to unload the barges starting at 7:00am. Mr. Johnson said
that bringing in fill by barge will create less of an impact on the community by reducing truck
traffic.
Gordon Swartz questioned where the material will be coming from and will it be inspected.
Peter Johnson replied that the material will be coming two sites in the City but they are searching
for material from multiple sources. Mr. Johnson said that the material is tested before it leaves
the source location and again while it's on the barge before it's off loaded.

�Gordon Swartz questioned what type of equipment will be used to off load the barges and will
the noise level impact the residents at Ichabod's Landing.
Peter Johnson replied that a backhoe excavator will be required to unload the barge. Mr. Johnson
referred to the site plan to show how far away the proposed barge operation will be located from
Ichabod's Landing.
Gordon Swartz questioned how long the barging will take.
Peter Johnson replied that it will take 20 weeks to bring in 100,000 cubic yards. Mr. Johnson
stated that the original permit specified that the concrete demolition would only take place in the
Phase I site area, however, the contractor would like to demolish, process, and stockpile all of the
existing concrete at one time.
Motion was made to schedule a public hearing for July 21, 2016.
Moved: Swartz
Seconded: McCarthy

Vote 7-0

8) Marcos Lozano, 30 Andrews Lane, Proposed Town house development - Preliminary
presentation
Jonathan Villani from Jonathan Villani &amp; Associates, Inc. is representing the applicant. Mr.
Villani described the scope of work which includes the demolition of the existing two-family
residence and the construction of 12 townhouses. Mr. Villani stated that the units will be twostories and approximately 1,200 square feet with a garage. The project complies with all zoning
requirements except building coverage.
Ed McCarthy questioned how many existing parking spaces are on the property that will be
eliminated due to the project.
Jonathan Villani replied that the project will have 24 spaces based on the zoning requirements.
Ed McCarthy stated he was concerned about where the existing cars will be relocated. Mr.
McCarthy stated that the parking in the neighborhood is a problem; a lot of people use Barnhardt
Park and the Senior Center causing street parking to be minimal.
Carl Aridas stated he was concerned with the density of the project; increasing the number of
residential units from 2 to 12, extra cars and traffic will be a challenge.
Clinton Smith stated that the Board may want to know where the existing off street cars will be
displaced.
Gordon Swartz stated that the project is very dense and suggested that the applicant come back to
the Planning Board with a revised plan before applying to the Zoning Board of Appeals.

�Jonathan Villani agreed to review the comments and return to the Planning Board at the next
meeting.
9) Yvonne Adams, 138 Webber Avenue, Tree removal appeal- Discussion
The applicant was not present.
Francois Rejeili addressed the Board and stated that he met with the property owner adjacent to
the requested tree to be removed. Mr. Rejeili stated that the owner agreed to trim the Maple tree
on their property that was harming the Pin Oak. Mr. Rejeili also met with Ms. Adams and said
she agreed to keep the Pin Oak and trim the trees to the south. Mr. Rejeili asked the Board to
deny the requested appeal.
Hugh Jones stated that the Norwegian Maple is an invasive species.
Motion to deny the requested tree removal appeal with the understanding that Ms. Adams and
the adjacent property owner are working on a program to trim or remove the invasive tree to
enhance the sustainability of the Pin Oak.
Moved: Aridas
Seconded: Jones
Vote 7-0
10) Environmental Advisory Committee- Presentation
Dave Arvin and James West made a presentation about National Resources Inventory.
No action was taken.
11) Approval of Minutes - March 17, 2016, April 21, 2016, May 19, 2016
The March 17, 2016, April 21, 2016 and May 19, 2016 minutes were tabled.
Motion was made to adjourn the meeting.
Moved: DelVecchio
The meeting was adjourned at 11:02 PM

Seconded: McCarthy

Vote 7-0

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="157">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14860">
                <text>Planning Board Minutes &amp; Resolutions-2016</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12981">
              <text>MINS_PLAN_2016-06-16</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12982">
              <text>Planning Board Minutes &amp; Resolutions-2016</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12983">
              <text>2016</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12984">
              <text>Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12985">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
