https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/550fee253f64930ce64124f2118567f1.pdf acbc7fdc01b124abf2b677f0472deac4 PDF Text Text The meeting was called to order at 8:09 pm by George Tanner, Chairman. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: George Tanner, Chairman Glenn Rosenbloom Hugh Jones John Whysner Ed McCarthy Absent: Nicholas Cicchetti Isabel Mendez Also Present: Janet Gandolfo (Village Attorney) Owen Wells (Saccardi & Schiff/ Village Planners) Shailesh Naik (Charles Manganaro/Village Engineer) Sean McCarthy (Building Inspector/ Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements None. Proposed Agenda: 1) AECOM 30 Andrews Lane 2) Larry Rodriguezs 172 Valley Street 3) 34 Clinton Street Corp 34 Clinton Street 4) Approval of minutes for February 2011 Proposed facilities staging area Proposed mixed use building Proposed parking lot 30 Andrews Lane Proposed facilities staging area 1) AECOM This is a continuation from previous meetings. Victor Miles is presenting this application along with Scott McDown. Victor Miles reviewed the Zoning Board temporary conditional approval. The Chair stated that the trailers were not relocated on the recent plans. Scott McDown presented the site plan. �The Chair stated that the 1st roll-off on the left near the entrance is an issue for egress. There was an open discussion on the number of dumpsters. Victor Miles agreed that the 4th dumpster will be eliminated to address the Board's concerns. Ed McCarthy asked about the parking spaces. Victor Miles responded that the owner of the Andrews Lane property attended the last Planning Board meeting. He stated that the owner stated that he would address the parking relocation. Ed McCarthy stated that he is concerned with the parking impacts to the neighborhood if the cars would need to be relocated from the parking lot. It was agreed that a public hearing would be scheduled for the Board's next meeting. 2) Larry Rodrigues 172 Valley Street Proposed mixed use building - William Simonfrides is the project architect and is presenting this application along with the owner, Larry Rodrigues. William Simeonfrides gave an overview of the proposed project. He stated that the lot is triangular. He stated that parking would be provided on the site and would be located under the building. He stated that the lower lever would be a small commercial office and the remaining units would be residential. William Simeonfrides showed the elevation views of the proposed building. He discussed the exterior materials and some of the landscaping. He also spoke about the parking access underneath the building. Lastly, he stated that a loading space is not being provided but is required but there are two loading spaces in the immediate area. John Whysner asked about the parking and the required loading space. William Simeonfrides responded that there is a mix of compact and full size spaces. He stated that 3 compact spaces are proposed. Owen Wells added that in the inner village, this is a common issue. He stated that any office space from 0sf to 20,000sf has a requirement for a loading space. William Simeonfrides stated that the parking area is not fully covered. He stated to eliminate the FAR variance, the parking area was partially uncovered to reduce the proposed FAR. The Chair asked if the Board had any questions, there were none. �Hugh Jones asked if the uncovered section in the parking area was proposed to reduce the FAR. William Simeonfrides responded yes. He stated that the ZBA did not approve of the project with the request for a variance for FAR. It was agreed that a public hearing would be scheduled for the Board's next meeting. 3) 34 Clinton Street Corp 34 Clinton Street Proposed parking lot Robert Barstow is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the applicant owned the property. Robert Barstow responded yes. The Chair asked if the access to the property was available thru a lease. Robert Barstow responded that he has a 1-year lease with the MTA. He stated that the lease is renewable for 1-year terms. The Chair asked if the applicant was interested in building on the lot. Robert Barstow responded that since the lease is only for 1-year, he would not want to invest significant monies into it. The Chair stated that the applicant should contact the MTA to see if they could extend the lease or contribute monies towards improving the MTA property. Robert Barstow responded that he has already tried to contact the MTA for the same reasons. The Chair asked if the parking lot is currently rented. Robert Barstow responded no. He stated that the vehicles on the site were notified that they needed to vacate the property. The Chair stated that Sean McCarthy cited the property and it needs to be cleaned up. He stated that the occupants needs ample notice to have their cars removed. He suggested a 10-day notice. Hugh Jones stated that the parking spaces appear to all be for compact spaces. Robert Barstow responded yes. He stated that it was reviewed by a professional parking consultant. John Whysner asked for a history on the property. Robert Barstow gave a history of the right-of-way property. He stated that his property is landlocked. Sean McCarthy stated that the improvements are not major. He stated that the public hearing APPROVED - Planning Board Meeting, March 17, 2011 �would be scheduled for the next meeting. He stated that the details can be worked out thru the process. The Chair asked for copies of the notices to the tenants regarding removing their cars from the parking lot. Sean McCarthy responded that improvements include cleaning up the garbage and debris on the site. The Chair asked if the applicant has control of the MTA property. Robert Barstow responded yes but he does not intend to spend monies to improve it. The Chair stated that the applicant either needs to block off the MTA property or improve it. Robert Barstow responded that he would like to discuss possible options with the Building Inspector. The Board agreed to hold a public hearing on this application at their next meeting. 4) Approval of minutes for February 2011 John Whysner made a motion to approve the February 2011 minutes as amended. Ed McCarthy seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). The meeting was adjourned at 9:04pm. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2011-03-17 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2011 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2011 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text