<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="2229" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/items/show/2229?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-19T09:44:49+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="2229">
      <src>https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/29df93bb8c3358a575bbf707d2af51f9.pdf</src>
      <authentication>fc2e50f834b2053fed77025afb4af6c5</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="20716">
                  <text>VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW
PLANNING BOARD SPECIAL WORKSESSION - APPROVED
February 12, 2005
The worksession was called to order at 8:30 am by Nicholas Robinson, Chairman.
Present:

Nicholas Robinson, Chairman
George Tanner
Ed Napoleon
David Perlmutter
Nicholas Cicchetti
Gary Malunis

Absent:

Ed McCarthy

Also Present:

Dave Smith (Saccardi &amp; Schiff/Village Planner)
Mike Stein (Dolph Rotfeld Engineers/Village Engineer)
Rae Lee (Building Department, Village of Sleepy Hollow)
Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary)
Phil Zegarelli (Mayor, Village of Sleepy Hollow)

Proposed Agenda:
1)

Lighthouse Landing

Announcements –
Mayor Zegarelli spoke about some of the previous meetings between the applicant and
the Village Trustees. He summarized the traffic and density discussions. He spoke about
the SEQRA process and the current land usage in the Village. Lastly, he spoke about the
sub-committees that would be established to handle different EIS issues.

1) Lighthouse Landing The Chair stated that the Planning Board would have discussions with the applicant on
culture and architecture, traffic, flooding and Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan
(LWRP) policies. He stated that this meeting would primarily focus on the traffic and
LWRP policy topics.
The Chair spoke about the possibility of sub-dividing the site plan into sections.
The Planning Board introduced themselves to the applicants.
The applicant introduced themselves to the Board. Representing the applicant was:
Jonathan Stein (Roseland Property Co)
Andy Tung (Divney, Tung, Schwalbe – Planning &amp; Engineering Consultants)

�Mark Weingarten (DelBello,Donnellan,Weingarten,Tartaglia,Wise &amp; Wiederkehr-Counsel)
Mark Chertock (Sive, Paget &amp; Riesel – Environmental Counsel)
The Chair started the discussion with Culture and Architecture. He stated that the
Historical Society should have a member on each sub-committee.
The Chair spoke about the eastern parcel. He stated that the former Village dump is
located on the eastern parcel and should be examined as part of the EIS.
Jonathan Stein spoke about several aspects of the south and west parcels. He spoke about
the waterfront landscaping plan. He spoke about the vehicular connection at Kingsland
Point Park.
The Chair spoke about the re-capturing of methane gas at the former Village dump.
George Tanner spoke about parking on the eastern parcel. He stated that the Village does
not have the infrastructure to support the proposed 400 car parking area. He stated that
the number should more likely be 200-250 cars.
Jonathan Stein responded that if Metro-North does not approve the new train station, then
the proposed parking lot would not be constructed.
Dave Smith stated that as per Metro-North’s letter to the Village, Metro-North’s future
parking demands by the year 2010 would be 1100 additional spaces.
The Chair stated that alternatives to Route 9 and Beekman Avenue need to be looked at
for access to the site.
George Tanner spoke about River Street as a possible alternative.
The Chair spoke about the Tappan Zee bridge study. He spoke about the fixed rail
transport and its possible connection to the Sleepy Hollow/Metro-North rail system.
Jonathan Stein responded that this topic has not been raised with Metro-North.
Mark Weingarten stated that as per recent discussions with the NYS Transit Authority, no
discussions have been made regarding a connection to the North. He stated all discussion
have mentioned a connection to the South.
There was an open discussion on the unavoidable traffic impacts to Route 9.
The Chair stated that the EIS must document phased traffic problems from when the GM
plant was active.
Mark Weingarten spoke about recent issues between neighboring Villages/Towns.
Andy Tung spoke about traffic and parking on the south and west parcels. He spoke
about the parking for residential units and the retail space.

APPROVED - Planning Board Special Worksession, February 12, 2005

2

�Jonathan Stein spoke about the number of parking spaces proposed and how residential
and retail parking would be separated.
George Tanner stated that the proposed parking plan is inadequate. He compared the
parking plan to the parking in the inner Village.
Dave Smith stated that the plan should be looked at separately from what currently exists
within the Village.
Mark Weingarten stated that the site would attract primarily non-families so the number
of cars would be less.
George Tanner responded that the parking density is still an issue. He stated that a
regular couple would still have two cars. He asked if the retail-parking plan meets the
Village parking requirements.
Andy Tung responded yes.
There was an open discussion on the proposed retail parking and traffic flow into the area
and its impact on the Village.
George Tanner asked about the parking for the proposed senior housing development.
Andy Tung responded that the senior housing development meets the Village’s parking
requirements.
There was an open discussion on the proposed senior housing parking.
The Chair allowed public comments.
Dan Dibon (Ossining, NY) stated that the consultants are making assumptions regarding
the possible occupants of the development. He stated that the consultants should
investigate whether this market will be dried-up once the development is completed.
The Chair spoke about energy efficiency. He spoke about the process used in the
Ichabod’s Landing site plan. He stated that the applicant should be able to develop an
acceptable design.
The Chair spoke about the Pocantico River. He spoke about the NYC Department of
Environmental Protection (NYCDEP) Shaft 9 blowoff analysis. He spoke about the
flood bypass system for the Mill Pond at Phillipsburg Manor.
The Chair spoke about the possibility of retaining floodwaters upstream and the plan to
release the floodwaters gradually.
Andy Tung spoke about each parcel and its flood control plan. He spoke about the
wetlands enhancements on the eastern parcel.
The Chair referred to Ray Curran (Scenic Hudson).

APPROVED - Planning Board Special Worksession, February 12, 2005

3

�Ray Curran thanked the Planning Board for the opportunity to present his information to
the Board. He gave a presentation on the flooding of the Pocantico River. He submitted
several reports on flooding to the Board. He showed a concept drawing that could
alleviate the possible flooding of the Pocantico River. He stated that the concept would
reduce the number of residential units in the Roseland proposal by 50 but it would create
a new waterfront component to the site.
Jonathan Stein stated that Roseland is currently working with Scenic Hudson. He stated
that the proposed development is not adding to the flooding issues of the Pocantico River.
He reviewed several issues including ecological, historical and flood control. He stated
that the analysis has not been performed regarding removing the contaminated fill from
the GM site. He stated that there is no funding in place for the Scenic Hudson proposal
and that there is no engineering analysis that would support the conceptual plan.
The Chair spoke about the applicable LWRP policies. He also spoke about the upcoming
joint Planning Board/Waterfront Advisory Committee meeting.
Adjourned at 11:03 am.

APPROVED - Planning Board Special Worksession, February 12, 2005

4

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="146">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14849">
                <text>Planning Board Minutes &amp; Resolutions-2005</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="13769">
              <text>MINS_PLAN_2005-02-12</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="13770">
              <text>Planning Board Minutes &amp; Resolutions-2005</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="13771">
              <text>2005</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
