https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/85fd0504906fff6ad965dd24b12ada96.pdf 6d943bf059ac13229989b8660cae4258 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW PLANNING BOARD MEETING - APPROVED May 22, 2003 The meeting was called to order at 8:04 pm by Nicholas Robinson, Chairman. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Nicholas Robinson, Chairman George Tanner David Perlmutter Ed Napoleon Nicholas Cicchetti Ed McCarthy Absent: Dorota Szwem-Kopczynski Also Present: Angie Kahn (Saccardi & Schiff/Village Planner) Dave Schiff (Saccardi & Schiff/Village Planner) Dan Pennella (Charles A. Manganaro/Village Engineer) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Ed Lammers (Murphy, Stecich & Powell/Village Attorney) Mike Musso (Lawler, Matusky & Skelly/Village RF Engineer) Announcements: The Chair stated that Omnipoint has requested an adjournment to the next meeting. Agenda: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) GEIS/Wireless Location Study Laurentino Rodrigues CFF Reality Monopole permit application status Dan Beaton Lighthouse Landing Fremont Property/Pokahoe Drive Minutes George Tanner made a motion to adopt the revised agenda. David Perlmutter seconded. It was unanimous (5-0) (Napoleon absent). 1) GEIS/Wireless Location Study The Chair stated that all interested agencies have been notified. He also stated that the �GEIS is available to the public at Village Hall and is on file at the Warner Library. The Chair gave a summary of the reasons for the GEIS. He stated that this plan would provide adequate cellular coverage throughout the Village. Mike Musso gave a presentation on the Draft GEIS. He reviewed such locations as Village Hall, Phelps Hospital, etc. The presentation showed that the potential sites were divided into two tiers: municipal and private. He briefly reviewed all of the potential the tier 1 locations (9 in total). He spoke about the criteria for evaluating the sites and how they were rank on the matrix-scoring table. Mike Musso spoke about tier 2 sites (7 in total). He showed a topography map of the 7 sites. He also spoke about possible mitigative measures that included flagpoles, silos, church steeples, and streetlights. The Chair thanked Mike Musso for his presentation. He stated that the GEIS should identify the locations with maximum coverage with the least intrusiveness. The Chair asked the Board members and consultants if there were any other comments. Dan Pennella asked what software was used. Mike Musso spoke about two software packages. The Chair asked Mike Musso to submit his qualifications into the record. Since there were no other comments, the Chair opened the public hearing for comments from the public. Jeffrey Anzevino spoke. He is a regional planner for Scenic Hudson. He submitted a two-page letter (see attached). He read the letter aloud for the record. Nicholas Cicchetti spoke about the number of antenna arrays in the GEIS. Mike Musso responded that no design analysis was performed. Nicholas Cicchetti stated that the GEIS should be more thorough concerning the maximum number of users that a particular facility can allow. Mike Musso agreed. He stated that he would try to expand this topic in the GEIS. The Chair asked if there were any other comments. Shelley Robinson, President of the Phillipse Manor Garden Club spoke. She asked when the proposed site would be unable to accommodate any further cellular providers. Mike Musso responded that the public drives the need for more antennas. Ed McCarthy stated that four of the seven sites are within a 2-block area. APPROVED - Planning Board Meeting, May 22, 2003 2 �Mike Musso agreed. The Chair asked if there were any further public comments. There was none. The Board agreed that the public written comment period would be left open until June 5, 2003. David Perlmutter made a motion to close the public hearing. George Tanner seconded. It was unanimous (5-0) (Napoleon absent). 2) Laurentino Rodrigues Sean McCarthy is the project architect and will represent the application. He spoke about the mixed-use commercial building. He spoke about the proposed parking plan and the proposed five apartments. David Perlmutter asked about the number of apartments that is allowed under the current zoning. Sean McCarthy responded that the zoning allowed is mixed-use, commercial or 3-family residential. David Perlmutter asked if there are any variances needed. Sean McCarthy responded that a front yard variance would be needed. George Tanner asked about parking. Sean McCarthy responded that there are 14 proposed parking spaces. Sean McCarthy spoke about the proposed layout in detail. He stated that the lot coverage has been reduced from 90% down to 70%. David Perlmutter asked if there would be any lost parking on Valley Street. Sean McCarthy responded no. He stated that the existing curb cut would be kept. He also stated that two parking spaces would be lost on Depeyster Street. David Perlmutter stated that he would like to see something designed that is consistent with the zoning in the area. This was adjourned to the next meeting. APPROVED - Planning Board Meeting, May 22, 2003 3 �3) CFF Reality Victor Solarik is the project architect and is representing the applicant. He summarized the site plan for the Board. The Chair read the site plan Resolution aloud. The Board made a few minor changes. David Perlmutter made a motion to adopt the Resolution as amended. Ed Napoleon seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 4) Monopole permit application status Ed Lammers provided an update to the Board. He stated that he has been in contact with AT&T concerning posting a bond for the removal of their equipment and on submitting a RF emissions study. He explained that in 2001, AT&T was issued a building permit to make some minor corrections. He stated that AT&T should have come before the Planning Board at that time. Ed Lammers also stated that there are several issues with the monopole. He stated that there is no bond posted for this structure. He also stated that it is too high. He also spoke about camouflaging the monopole due to the visibility of the monopole from Kykuit. Mike Musso responded that the monopole might not be able to structurally support camouflaging techniques. There was an open discussion on the code requirements concerning alterations to the monopole. No action was taken. 5) Daniel Beaton This is a continuation of previous meetings. Dan Beaton summarized his application at the last Planning Board meeting. He responded to two (2) things: 1) variances that would be required because of this sub-division. He submitted a letter from Jim Margotta indicating that no variances would be required. 2) Waterfront Advisory Committee (WAC) findings. He stated that the Committee did not meet last month. Dan Beaton stated that his application would be on the agenda at the WAC’s next meeting. APPROVED - Planning Board Meeting, May 22, 2003 4 �Ed Lammers read the letter fro Jim Margotta dated May 02, 2003. It stated that no variances are needed for lots 1 and 2. David Perlmutter made a motion to schedule the public hearing for the Planning Board’s next meeting. Ed Napoleon seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). 6) Lighthouse Landing The Chair stated that the Board had until June 06 to submit further comments. Nicholas Cicchetti stated that comments should be added to include a recreational facility. Dave Schiff responded that the need for a recreational facility would be studied under community facilities. No action was taken. 7) Fremont Property/Pokahoe Drive The Chair spoke about the apparent sub-division that was completed several years ago. He spoke about the wetlands impact. The Chair stated that the Village Code should be checked concerning wetlands. 8) Minutes The minutes for the January 2003 meeting were reviewed. George Tanner made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. David Perlmutter seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). The minutes for the February 2003 meeting were reviewed. George Tanner made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. David Perlmutter seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). The minutes for the March 2003 meeting were reviewed. George Tanner made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. David Perlmutter seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). APPROVED - Planning Board Meeting, May 22, 2003 5 �David Perlmutter made a motion to adjourn. Ed Napoleon seconded. It was unanimous (6-0). Adjourned at 10:03 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Anthony Del Vecchio APPROVED - Planning Board Meeting, May 22, 2003 6 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2003 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2003-05-22 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2003 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2003