https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/b1db58789376bd6bf40965ba433a67c0.pdf 21af147e3c6639df50bc72e9565d0775 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW PLANNING BOARD MEETING - APPROVED April 24, 2003 Mayor Zegarelli apologized for the delay in the start of the meeting. Mayor Zegarelli stated that he met with the Planning Board privately in order to review their roles and to make sure that all of the members were sworn in. He stated that no applications were discussed. Mayor Zegarelli swore in Nicholas Cicchetti. The meeting was called to order at 8:12 pm by Nicholas Robinson, Chairman. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Nicholas Robinson, Chairman George Tanner David Perlmutter Ed McCarthy Nicholas Cicchetti Absent: Ed Napoleon Dorota Szwem-Kopczynski Also Present: Dave Smith (Saccardi & Schiff/Village Planner) Dan Pennella (Charles A. Manganaro/Village Engineer) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Ed Lammers (Murphy, Stecich & Powell/Village Attorney) Jim Margotta (Building Inspector, Village of Sleepy Hollow) Phil Zegarelli (Mayor, Village of Sleepy Hollow) Mike Musso (Lawler, Matusky & Skelly/Village RF Engineer) Announcements: There were none. Agenda: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) Antonio Rodrigues Laurentino Rodrigues CFF Reality Kendal-on-Hudson Fremont House Omnipoint GEIS/Wireless Location Study County House Road �9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) Draft Scope for the GM site Dan Beaton Karl Dibble Minutes Organization of Planning Board Monopole permit application status George Tanner made a motion to adopt the revised agenda. Nicholas Cicchetti seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 1) Antonio Rodrigues Sean McCarthy is the project architect and is representing this application. Sean McCarthy stated that most of the concerns of the Village Planner and Village Engineer have been met. Dave Smith stated that he has tried to set up a meeting with the Village Board of Trustees concerning the closing of Old Broadway. He stated that it is on the agenda of their next meeting. Dan Pennella stated that the Engineering questions concerning the retaining walls would be answered on the final construction documents. The Chair asked if the Board had any other comments. Ed Lammers circulated a draft Resolution to the Board which, the Chair read aloud. David Perlmutter made a motion to approve the application with minor changes and with the condition that Old Broadway be dealt with closed and the proposed retaining wall meets the satisfaction of the Village Engineer. George Tanner seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 2) Laurentino Rodrigues Sean McCarthy is representing this application. He stated that GBA Architects and Larry Rodriguez have parted their ways. Sean McCarthy stated that his firm would be representing the application. He stated that it would be scaled down and revised. He requested that the Board keep this application on their agenda until the next meeting. The Board agreed. APPROVED - Planning Board Meeting, April 24, 2003 2 �Dave Smith referred the Board to a memo from Jim Margotta regarding the front yard and side yards for this property. 3) CFF Reality Victor Solarik is the project architect and is representing the applicant. He stated that the notices were submitted to the Village. Victor Solarik summarized the site plan for the Board. The Chair asked if the Board had any questions. Since there were none, the Chair opened the public hearing. Dave Smith stated that there were some previous concerns on parking. There was an open discussion on employee parking and visitor/customer parking at the site. It was determined that employees will park on site and that there is still enough parking for visitors. Since there was no further public comment, Nicholas Cicchetti made a motion to close the public hearing. George Tanner seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). Dave Smith stated that he would have the draft Resolution prepared for the next meeting. He stated that applicable language would be added for parking. 4) Kendal-on-Hudson The Chair acknowledged a letter from Al DelBello. No action was taken. 5) Fremont House The Chair discussed the previous approval for a sub-division of the site that it is claimed was granted by the Village Planning Board. Dave Smith provided a package including a map illustrating the sub-division. APPROVED - Planning Board Meeting, April 24, 2003 3 �The Chair stated that only Architectural Review Board approval may be required. Ed Lammers responded that Waterfront Advisory Committee approval was also required. There was an open discussion on the wetlands in the area. Further discussion was adjourned until the wetlands issue is resolved. 6) Omnipoint Noelle Kinsch is the attorney representing Omnipoint. She submitted the mailings to the Board. The Chair opened the public hearing. Noelle Kinsch reviewed the application. She explained the proposed project in detail. Since there were no public comments, the Chair asked if the Board had any questions. Nicholas Cicchetti asked about a conflict in the structural analysis of the building’s ability to support the equipment. Noelle Kinsch responded that more information would be provided. The Chair referred to the Village Consultants. Dave Smith stated that he was concerned with the visual impact. He asked if the applicant has considered stealth technology. Noelle Kinsch responded that she was not sure if it was considered or not. Dan Pennella asked about the frequency of visits to the roof to maintain the cabinets. He stated that the Village is concerned with security. He also stated that the cabinets could be placed next to the Verizon cabinets in the rear of the building. Noelle Kinsch responded that the option would be considered. Mike Musso stated that he has requested three items: 1) full structural analysis 2) elevations of south and west sides of the building 3) propagation maps Dave Smith stated that Waterfront Advisory Committee approval is also required. He also recommended that the applicant contact the Village administrator concerning roof access. APPROVED - Planning Board Meeting, April 24, 2003 4 �The public hearing was left open to the next meeting. 7) GEIS/Wireless Location Study – The Chair stated that the Sleepy Hollow Taxpayers Association should be notified for the public hearing. The Chair asked if the Board had any questions. Nicholas Cicchetti asked if locating on the church steeple was feasible. Mike Musso responded that it is a viable option. The Chair noted some concerns on exhibits 10 and 11. The Chair asked for a glossary of terms to be added. The Chair asked if the Board had other comments. There was none. The Chair read the resolution for the Draft GEIS aloud along with the notice of completion and the notice of adoption for SEQRA. No action was taken. 8) County House Road Jim Margotta stated that at the last meeting, the Planning Board approved the naming of a street on the County House Road site. He stated that the Mayor has a special committee for naming streets. Nicholas Cicchetti made a motion to refer this item to the committee. George Tanner seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 9) Draft Scope for GM site The Chair stated that the documents need to be reviewed. David Perlmutter stated that the project should be reviewed before the scoping documents 5 APPROVED - Planning Board Meeting, April 24, 2003 �are reviewed. He stated that there are deficiencies in this project. The Chair referred to the draft scoping document. The Board reviewed the document and cited numerous deficiencies, inconsistencies, and errors throughout. David Perlmutter made a motion to submit the Board’s first scoping comments on May 5, 2003 and submit other comments at a later date. George Tanner seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 10) Dan Beaton Daniel Beaton is representing his application. He submitted several documents to the Board. He also noted receipt of a letter from the Village Planner (Saccardi & Schiff). Daniel Beaton spoke about the proposed sub-division. He stated that Saccardi & Schiff requested that the footprint be added on each proposed lot. The Chair asked about compact car parking. Daniel Beaton responded that it complies with the Village Code. Daniel Beaton explained the proposed easement and the plan to alleviate some of the parking concerns in the area. The Chair asked for an explanation on the paper road. Daniel Beaton gave an explanation. He stated that supporting documents would follow. Dave Smith stated that the applicant has provided some additional comments that need to be looked into. He stated that a review would be performed to see if any variances are needed. The Chair referred the applicant to the Waterfront Advisory Committee. 11) Karl Dibble The Chair asked if the applicant had received approval from the Architectural Review Board. Karl Dibble responded yes. APPROVED - Planning Board Meeting, April 24, 2003 6 �The Chair asked if all of the requirements have been met. Karl Dibble responded that he needs to submit structural drawings to the Building Department for review and approval. He stated that his architect is still working on the drawings. The Chair asked if the bond was submitted. Ed Lammers responded yes. David Perlmutter made a motion to refer this matter to the Village Trustees to take action and the action would be withdrawn if the work commences and progresses as stated. George Tanner seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 12) Minutes The minutes will be reviewed at the next meeting. 13) Organization of Planning BoardDavid Perlmutter made a motion to nominate Nicholas Robinson as Chairman. George Tanner seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). 14) Monopole permit application status Ed Lammers gave an update on the monopole. He stated that the AT&T facility was installed prior to the adoption of the Village Code. He also stated that an adjustment was made in 2001. Based on this adjustment, he stated that AT&T would be forced to comply with the Village Code. He also stated that he is working to have AT&T provide a bond. Lastly, he stated that AT&T wants to comply with the Village Code. Ed Lammers spoke about the monopole. He stated that there are three tenants on the monopole. They are Sprint, Bell Atlantic, and Nextel. He stated that Sprint and Bell Atlantic were installed prior to the adoption of the Village Code. Ed Lammers stated that the monopole remains not in compliance. He stated that a bond needs to be posted to remove and dispose of the facility. He also stated that the monopole is not in compliance and it is clearly visible. He stated that a lower array would force a change in arrays and that the top of the monopole would need to be reconfigured. APPROVED - Planning Board Meeting, April 24, 2003 7 �George Tanner asked if the monopole complies with the Village Code. Dan Pennella responded that the top of the original monopole is 109.3 feet, which would be in compliance but with the Sprint extension, the monopole is 110.7 feet, which is not in compliance. The Chair asked if the monopole could be camouflaged. Dan Pennella responded that this monopole might not be able to support camouflaging techniques. David Perlmutter made a motion to adjourn. George Tanner seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). Adjourned at 10:40 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Anthony Del Vecchio APPROVED - Planning Board Meeting, April 24, 2003 8 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2003 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2003-04-24 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2003 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2003