https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/12936417a51f27c2d52a7f595150c346.pdf 36f1a37098f89e98281683d0fd1fb665 PDF Text Text A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on Thursday, June 18, 1998 at 8:00 PM in Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, Sleepy Hollow, New York. Present: Nicholas Cicchetti- Acting Chairman Betsy Sawyer-Gaylin Edward Napoleon Edward McCarthy Also Present: Janet Gandolfo, Village Attorney David Schiff-Planning Consultant James Margotta Dan Pennella,, Consulting Engineer Absent: David Perlmutter Nicholas Robinson Benito Martinez In the absence of the Chairman, Nicholas Cicchetti called the meeting to order at 8:15 PM. Maria Graca. 143 New Broadwav-Site Plan Approval This matter was put over from last month. Ms. Graca is requesting site plan approval for a retaining wall in the back of her property. Members of the Board reviewed the site plan. The attached report from Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers, stated that there is a drainage problem on that property and Mr. Pennella commented that a dry well should be installed for proper drainage. Much discussion ensued between Ms. Graca and the Village Engineer regarding this problem. They suggested she discuss this further with her own engineers. Discussion ensued between Ms. Graca and the Board members. There were no comments from the public. Ms. Gaylin moved, seconded by Mr. Napoleon that site plan be approved conditionally not requiring Ms. Graca to return to the next meeting, provided that our Engineer finds the changes acceptable and in accordance with that information, motion carried. Janet Gandolfo commented that if there is any issue outstanding, Ms. Graca must come back to the next month's meeting to resolve the issue. Danfor Realty Co. 4 Fremont Rd.- Lot Line Adjustment Andrew Fiore, representing the owner of the above address presented the Board with plans for a lot line adjustment on that property in order to create a second lot and for more privacy, also for access from Fremont Road. 1 I �He commented that they are also presenting their plans to the Sleepy Hollow Taxpayers Association for their approval. David SchirT, Planning Consultant presented his memo regarding his suggestions, (copy of memo is attached) Discussion ensued on whether or not he should go before the Zoning Board at this time. Village Attorney commented that the Zoning Board should give the interpretation as to whether or not a variance is needed for the lot line and whether or not they want to grant the variance. She commented that if the Zoning Board gives the applicant approval, there is no need to return to the Planning Board. New York SMS A Limited Partngrship-701 N. Broadway-Site Plan Approval for Wireless Public Utility Installation Seth Mandelbaum, Attorney for the law firm of Snyder & Snyder stated they want referral to the Zoning Board for a use variance and two area variances and want to set up a Public Hearing for the next Planning Board. The proposed wireless public utility installation would consist of a 110 foot monopole with panel antennae and related equipment. They would like to put this into a wooded grove of trees on the Phelps property. He commented that the/ are before this Board tonight to request a referral to the Zoning Board for required variances as well as setting of a public hearing for the next Planning Board meeting. Mr. Mandelbaum commented that revised plans will be submitted to the Planning Board. David SchirT commented that the Board needs a map of the hospital property to show the exact site. The Engineer for SMS A showed drawings of the proposal, but David SchirT commented that larger, clearer drawings are needed. After much discussion, Ed Napoleon moved that it is the intent of the Planning Board to declare themselves as lead agency, seconded by Ed McCarthy and carried. Since there is no Zoning Board meeting in August, the representatives of SMS A requested that they go before the Zoning Board and Planning Boards in July. Janet Gandolfo stated that they must fully understand that even if the Zoning Board which meets on July 15th gives approval for the variance, the Planning Board which meets on July 16th is under no obligation to accept any approvals given by the Zoning Board. They commented that they fully understood and would take that chance. �Antonio Rodrigues-Philipse Plaza-Renew Site Plan Approval-358 -362 N. Broadway John Hughes, Attorney representing Mr. Rodrigues states that in February 1996 variances were approved. His client was not able to start building this Plaza due to the fact that another building owned by him burned down and he was occupied with that. Since the time limit has passed, Mr. Hughes commented that they are seeking reapproval of the original variances that were granted in 1996. His client has appeared before the Boards numerous times in the past year and is very anxious to move forward. Brief discussion ensued. Janet Gandolfo stated that the address should be designated as 358-362 North Broadway for the whole parcel. Ed Napoleon moved that the attached resolution for 358 N. Broadway be approved, seconded by Betsy-Sawyer Gaylin and motion carried. Ed Napoleon moved, seconded by Ed McCarthy that the resolution for the renewal of the site plan for Philipse Plaza be approved, motion carried. Wavne Jeffers-Headless Horseman Garage-410 N. Broadway-Renew Site Plan Approval John Hughes, Attorney representing Wayne JefFers gave a brief background commenting that in 1990 Mr. Jeffers received site plan approval but forfinancialreasons could not move forward. Mr. Badali, Architect, commented that Mr. Jeffers received variances for a restaurant/deli at the gas station but has not found a tenant yet and would like to extend the approval for mixed use. The Zoning Board has given them approval. He showed drawings for parking spaces, landscaping, etc. Discussion ensued among the Board members and Ms. Gaylin moved, seconded by Mr. Napoleon that the Board would like to review the plans and this should be continued at the next meeting in July, motion carried. There being no further business, Mr. McCarthy moved to close the meeting, seconded by Ms. Gaylin and carried. Respectfully submitted, Angela Everett Village Clerk 3 �JUN-13-1?9S SACCARDI Z SCHIFF 13:50 914 761 3759 P.02/G2 Saccardi & Schiff, Inc. Planning anij Development Consultants 245 Mam Street White Plains New Yort 10601 Tel; 914-761-3582 FA* 914-761-3759 John J Saccardi, AJCP David B. Schiff, AlCP, P? Syrette Oym. AICP Josn A Moremis, AJCP Mariorie Samuels. AlCP. PP Oav.d 8. Sm.'tft. AICP viargara! H. Uhle, AiCP 3onitaJ Vgn Ohlsen, RLA Isaba Teglas, AICP MEMORANDUM DATE: June 11, 1998 TO* Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board FROM: David Schiff, AICP RE: Danfor Realty Co., 4 Fremont Rd. I have reviewed the application of Danfor Realty Co. for a tot line adjustment on the property at 4 Fremont Road. The property is 1.57 acres, divided between two lots, and contains a single family house. It is zoned R-2A Residential, which requires a minimum lot size of 15,000 s.f. Thus, the property is large enough to accommodate two legally sized lots, if other zoning requirements can be met. The purpose of the adjustment would be to create a second lot, also with access from Fremont Road. This is necessary since access cannot be provided from Albany Post Road, which borders the property on the east. My comments on the application are as follows; 1. The survey does not include all of the information requested by the Planning Board's application form Although some of the items are probably unnecessary given the nature of the application, the survey should indicate: (1) the names of all owners of record of adjacent properties; (2) the location of the existing lot line, clearly labeled; and, (3) an area map showing nearby streets and properties. 2. The Sleepy Hollow Zoning Ordinance does not specifically refer to a "flag lot," which the newly created lot would be, based on its configuration. However, the ordinance defines "lot width" as, "The horizontal distance between the lot lines, measured at right angles to the lot depth." In the R-2 A district the minimum lot width is 100 feet, while the narrow part of the new lot is only 40* wide. Therefore, the application should be referred to the Zoning Board of Appeals for an area variance relative to the lot width. * W f l -javsiosnient Comprehensive Planning Zon;iig Seal estate Economics E-,vironm«ntal Services Hcusing Community Development The Planning Board may also wish to consider whether or not specific zoning regulations regarding flag lots should be adopted. These would be designed to provide the Board with specific criteria relative to conditions under whichflaglots are deemed to be appro vable, such as lot size, location of existing residences on adjacent parcels, sharing of driveways, etc. The definition of lot width might also be examined to clarify where on the lot the measurement is mad« �C H A R L E S A. C O N S U L T I N G M A N G A N A R O E N G I N E E R S A ?TOFESSJONAl CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO; Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board FROM: Shailesh R. Naik, P.E. "*—Charles A. Manganaro Consulting Engineers, P.C. DATE: June 17, 1998 RE: Maria L. Graca 139 & 143 New Broadway Sleepy Hollow, New York CAMCE No. 800-45 In response to our memorandum dated March 16, 1998, regarding the above-mentioned project we have received a plan dated May 18, 1998, and drainage calculations dated May 18, 1998, both as prepared by Keane Coppelman Engineers, P.C. The initial concept of a stone wall has been changed. The proposed retaining wall is to be constructed with precast concrete units Pisa II as manufactured by Unilock, the top of the wall being at a constant elevation of 89.50. The site grades have been modified to accommodate the proposed new dwelling 26'-0" x 50*-0". Due to the proposed dwelling, as well as the driveways and parking lots, an increase in the storm water surface runoff is expected. Review of setback requirements for this dwelling as well as adequacy of parking lot including turning radii, have been assumed to be performed by the planning consultant. Based upon our review, the following comments are offered: (1) The proposed wall drainage pipe located at the base of the wall appears to drain into the adjacent property. A suitable onsite means ( dry well ) should be provided to dispose of this water and relieve the pressure on wall as required by the wall manufacturer. (2) In absence of a submittal on retaining wall design calculations, the structural capability of the wall and grid has not been performed; hence it is recommended that the wall be built in strict adherence to the wall manufacturer's requirements and the design should be verified by the Design Engineer. The Owner shall be responsible for the maintenance of the wall in accordance with the manufacturer requirements. �C H A R L E S A. CONSULTING M A N G A N A R O ENGINEERS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION (3) * Pre and post drainage calculations including storm water disposal design for 25 year storm have been submitted for both lots under the same ownership. Four dryweils have been proposed at the site. The calculations based upon the percolation rate of 20 minute/inch are found to be adequate, in spite of the discrepancies detected in the calculations. The assumed percolation rate should also be field verified. (4) The soil capacity as indicated on the plan shall be field tested and be acceptable to the design Engineer prior to construction. (5) The unsuitable debris including asphaltic remains dumped at the site was observed during our inspection of the property on March 6, 1998. The same should be removed off the site prior to issuance of any permits. Based upon the requirement that the above-mentioned responsibilities be borne by the Design Engineer, ic is recommended that the proposed work be approved. c: James Margotta, Building Inspector Keane Coppelman Engineers, P.C, Applicant's Engineer R;\5eCRTAKYUW$H\*^SWNa6i7«.Wl>D �RESOLUTION Adopted at the June 18,1998 Meeting of the Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board RESOLUTION: SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROPOSED: Construction of two story retail/office building OWNER: Antonio Rodrigues LOCATION: 358 North Broadway TAXMAP DESIGNATION: Section 17, Block 21, Lots 32-37 ZONING: C-l Highway Commercial WHEREAS, the Planning Board ofthe Village of Sleepy Hollow has reviewed an application for site plan approval (the Application) pursuant to the Village Zoning Ordinance, Article VIE, Site Plan review, and to applicable laws and regulations considered pertinent to the Application, which Application is for the construction of a two story building containing retail stores on the first floor and offices on the second floor; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has reviewed the following materials: 1. Site plan application, dated 6/10/97. 2. Site plan for the subject site, dated 8/15/97, revised 9/18/97 and 10/9/97, prepared by Contadina Architects. 3. Drainage Plan and drainage calculations, dated 11/14/97, prepared by Agostino G. Paese, P.E. 4. Letter, dated 10/11/97, from Agostino G. Paese, P.E., regarding the capacity of available water, sanitary and stormwater lines. 5. Elevation details for concrete crib walls, dated 10/8/97, prepared by Agostino G. Paese, P.E. 6. Landscape Plan, dated 10/5/97, revised 11/4/97, prepared by John De Feo. 7. Full Environmental Assessment Form, dated 4/6/98, signed by John IHughes, Jr., Esq.w 8. Coastal Assessment Form, dated 4/7/98, prepared by John IHughes, Jr., Esq. 9. Traffic Impact Study, dated 4/13/98, prepared by Adler Consulting. �10. Review memorandafromDavid Schh% AICP, Village Planner, dated 6/20/97,9/6/97, 10/16/97 and 4/8/98. WHEREAS, the proposal was discussed by the Planning Board at public meetings held at the Village Hall on 6/19/97, 9/18/97, 11/20/97 and 4/16/98, at which times those wishing to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead Agency pursuant to Park 617 of the Implementing Regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 1. Received an application fee; 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property and the surrounding areas; 3. Requested, received and considered comments from the, Village Planner, Village Engineering Consultants and Building Inspector about the proposed project; 4. Requested, received and reviewed a Full Environmental Assessment form (EAF) in compliance with the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and a Coastal Assessment Form; 5. After review ofthefieldconditions, public comments, recommendations and the EAF as well as other items noted above, has determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action and issued a Negative Declaration dated April 16,1998 in which the Planning Board stated its determination of non-significance of environmental impact for this Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has previously received a variance from the "Village of Sleepy Hollow Zoning Board of Appeals permitting a 10 foot front yard setback and, subsequently, has cut back the steel frame to meet that setback requirement; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has received approval for the proposed building from the Architectural Review Board; and WHEREAS, the Applicant is seeking a renewal of his lapsed application for the expired approval of the adjacent Philipse Plaza development and all plans regarding traffic access to the intersection of Route 9, Old Broadway and Pocantico Street for Philipse Plaza which were approved previously are subject to approval by the NYSDOT; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the said Application for site plan approval relative to construction of a two-story building with retail stores as shown on thefirstfloorand offices on the second floor as shown on the site plan, as revised on 10/9/97 is hereby granted approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or as an alternate the Village Administrator, on a copy of this resolution and upon the site plan drawings, as and when revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the Office of the Village Building Department for purposes of obtaining a building �914 761 3759 r TUN-19-1993 09=10 P.02/32 SACCAPDI 8. Su-UK- permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire one (1) year after the date of this resolution if thefollowingmodifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and the Applicant has not obtained the required building permit or permits for construction in accordance with the approved plan (s): 1. The Applicant shall pay the Village of Sleepy Hollow all application and review fees as required by the Village Zoning Code, aa approved by the village attorney. Z Landscaping shall be provided as shown on the approved landscape plan dated 11/4/97. Trees to be provided as part of the landscape plan shall be a minimum of 3" caliper. 3. Recreation fees shall be paid to the Village in an amount to be calculated by the Village Attorney and the Village Planner and approved by the Board of Trustees. 4. Erosion control measures to be utilized during construction shall be detailed on the final plan drawings and shall be provided in accordance with Westchester County Best Management Practices. 5. Traffic access shall be provided as shown on the approved site plan dated 10/9/97. j? .• 6. The seven parking spaces shown to the north of the proposed building are dedicated specifically for its use. In the event of a subdivision of this project and Philipse Plaza, the seven parking spaces must remain as part of this project and not be allocated to the Philipse Plaza parcel. 7. If any parking spaces provided for the proposed building are located on a different tax lotfromthe building, an easement shall befiledwith the County Clerk providing fbr the continued use of those spaces by the tenants of the proposed building. 3. Final site plan and building plans, including the design of the retaining wall, shall be subject to review and approval by the Building Inspector and/or the Village Engineer, as appropriate. 9. The Village's Department of Public Works shall review and approve the installation and finish schedule for sidewalk* and fbr curbs, which shall be granite-faced. PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW , Chairman Date �0CT-Q3 97 16:03 FFOMrFP CLARK ASSOCIATES 9149676615 TO:9146315880 FHGE:85 DRAFT RESOLUTION Adopted at the February 15, 1996 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board RESOLUTION: SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A 12,000 SQUARE-FOOT RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDING. PROPOSED: CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDING TOTALING 12,000 SQUARE FEET, REMOVAL OF EXISTING DELICATESSEN AND MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR BUILDING, AND CONTINUATION OF THE EXISTING 6,800 SQUARE FOOT MANUFACTURING USE ALSO LOCATED ON TOE LOT. OWNER/APPLICANT; ANTONIO RODRIGUES LOCATION: 358 NORTH BROADWAY TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 17, BLOCK 21, LOTS 15 - 37 ZONING: C-l HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL �RESOLUTION Adopted at the February 15, 1996 Meeting of the Village of North Tanytown Planning Board RESOLUTION: SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A 12,000 SQUARE-FOOT RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDING. PROPOSED: CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDING TOTALING 12,000 SQUARE FEET, REMOVAL OF EXISTING DELICATESSEN AND MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR BUILDING, AND CONTINUATION OF THE EXISTING 6,800 SQUARE FOOT MANUFACTLTRING USE ALSO LOCATED ON THE LOT. OWNER/APPUCANT: ANTONIO RODRIGUES LOCATION: 358 NORTH BROADWAY TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 17, BLOCK 21, LOTS 15 - 37 ZONING: C-l HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tanytown has reviewed an application for site plan approval (the Application) pursuant to Article VII of the Zoning Code of the Village of North Tarrytown for the construction of a two-story retail and office building totaling 12,000 square feet, removal of an existing delicatessen and motor vehicle repair building and continuation of the existing 6,800 square foot manufacturing use also located on the lot; and WHEREAS, as part of its review, the Planning Board has reviewed numerous documents, statements and plans, including the following: 1. Topographic map prepared for Antonio and Linda Rodrigues situate Village of No. Tarrytown Town of Mt. Pleasant Westchester Co., New York," prepared by John H. Muldoon, dated April 5, 1993, last revised February 5, 1995. 2. "Site Plan" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and last revised February 4, 1996. 3. "Site Grading Plan" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and last revised February 4, 1996. 4. "Deli Operation Plan" for Philipse Pla2a, prepared by Contadino Architects, ALV and last revised May 8, 1995. 5. "View Analysis" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and as last revised May 8, 1995. �6. "Floor Plan" for Philips* Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and as last revised May 8, 1995. 7. "Building Elevations" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and last revised May 8, 1995. 8. "Retaining Walls Plan" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Bruno Leitenberger, P.E., State of New York License No. 053849, and dated August 1995. 9. "Drainage Layout Plan, Philipse Plaza Village of North Tarrytown Town of Mt. Pleasant Westchester County, New York", prepared by Donald A. Benvie, P.E., State of New York License No. 062787-1, of Tectonic Engineering Consultants, P.C. and as last revised December 27, 1995. 10. Detail sheet "Philipse Plaza Village of North Tarrytown Town of Mt Pleasant Westchester County, New York", prepared by Donald A. Benvie, P.E., State of New York License No. 062787-1, of Tectonic Engineering Consultants, P.C. and dated October 20, 1995. 11. "Planting Plan" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Studer Design Associates, and as last revised December 8, 1995. 12. "Cross Sections" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by SrudeT Design Associates, and dated November 28, 1995. 13. A full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF). WHEREAS, on July 19, 1995 the Zoning Board of Appeals granted all area variances, including those for required number of parking and loading spaces, buffer strip and rear yard setback, which that Board determined were necessary for the application. WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held at the Village Hall on July 21, 1994, which hearing was continued and closed on February 15, 1996, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the site has been visited by the Village's planning and engineering consultants and the Planning Board is thoroughly familiar with the site and all aspects of the proposed project; and WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead Agency pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 2 �16:04 -RGM:FP CLPPK H S S O C I A T E S 9149676615 TC: 91-16315680 C MSE 1. Received an application fee; 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property and of the surrounding areas; 3. Requested, received and considered comments from the Village planning and engineering consultants and the Building Inspector about the proposed project; 4. Requested, received and reviewed a full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); 5. After review of the field conditions, public comments, recommendations and environmental assessment form as well as other matters noted above, has determined that the proposed action is a Type I action and issued a "Negative Declaration,'' dated February 15, 1996, in which the Planning Board stated its determination of non-significance of environmental impact for this Type I action; and WHEREAS, in accordance with a condition of the resolution for site plan approval for the application known as "Antonio Cabinetry," and located on the same lot as said site plan application, traffic circulation has been revised and coordinated; NOW, THEREFORE, BE FT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and plan noted above as amended herein be and hereby are granted site plan approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or, as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of this site plan resolution and upon the final mylar copy of the site plan drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the offices of the Village Building Department for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval snail expire twelve (12) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and/or the Applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1- F*e$ - The Applicant shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 1.1 An inspection fee for construction inspection of the property for compliance with the approved site plan in accordance with the Village of North Tarrytown Zoning Code. 1.2 Payment of all remaining application review costs as noted and required in Section 62-30(f) of the Village Zoning Code, as approved by the Village Attorney. 1.3 A recreation fee of $ Board of Trustees. , subject to the approval of the Village 3 �GCT-03 97 16v05 1 FRCM:FP CLARK ASSOCIATES 9149676615 TO:9146315380 PAGE:36 Revision of the above noted site plan to demonstrate the following: 2.1 A signature block shall be added to the site plan for the signature of the Planning Board Chairman or, as an alternate, Village Administrator. 11 The final alignment of the retaining wall and die configuration of parking stalls within the immediate vicinity of the retaining wall. 3. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall submit to the Village Building Inspector a mylar reproduction of the site plan complete with the certification of a professional architect and/or a professional engineer attesting to the construction of the site plan and its improvements as shown thereon. 4. All elements of this approved site plan shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Village Building Inspector within a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the issuance of the building permit and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The Planning Board may issue an extension of this time limit or may modify any of the above conditions with respect thereto for good cause. 5. The Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities, upon notice of the Building Inspector, and before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to on-site parking, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details, which do not comply with the approved plan in the interest of safety, convenience, aesthetics and the enjoyment and peace and quiet of adjacent neighbors; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that approval of said site plan application and plans noted above be and hereby amends the site plan for the application known as "Antonio Cabinetry." originally approved by the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown on February 20, 1992. PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN By. George F, Hritz, Chairman Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board 50Q\acuW»3.<*nt:ev • Date �1 £ i "* 3> o COXC3^EOT30 C H A R L E S A. CONSULTING « n o MANGANARO ENGINEERS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: James Margotta, Building Inspector Village of Sleepy Hollow FROM: Donate R. PenneDa X^^ Charles A. Manganaro Consulting Engineers, P.C. DATE: May 19, 1998 RE: 139 & 143 New Broadway Sleepy Hollow, New York CAMCE No. 800-45 In reference to the project noted above, earlier this morning we received a plan for the construction of a retaining wall. This plan was updated to incorporate comments from die previous submission and is scheduled to be reviewed by the planning board on May 21, 1998. Thia plan has not been submitted ten days prior to the meeting as required by the Village. In an attempt to review the plan we still find that drainage and wall calculations had not been included. At this point we win be unable to review this submission for Thursday night's meeting and therefore suggest that this meeting be postponed to the next regular meeting. Additionally all information as per our 3/16798 Memorandum and per the Village checklist be made in a complete an timely fashion for review. Poat-it" Fax Note 7671 Da* Ff0W S/H/ftWl T^fJ Pg^^fSUuA Co. Phon* Fax* * \\* &>\o%i* I V S8SQ ph«w»^QV ^ 4 - L o i ^ e > Fax* � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1998 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1998-06-18 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1998 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1998