https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/ef07afc19a7bd2c0b9d58abad3d0b9ca.pdf 8cadaa7ef00ddcd1cf5160b3f413cc67 PDF Text Text Sleepy Hollow Planning Board July 17, 1997 MINUTES OF MEETING Antonio Rodrigues. 344 N. Broadway (Retail and Commercial Office Building) The applicant for site plan review was represented at the meeting by his attorney, John Hughes, and by his architect. The chairman opened the session by informing the applicant that the application for site plan approval remained incomplete. The applicant suggested an adjournment of the public hearing, which was agreed-upon. Mr Hughes then addressed the Board. He informed the Board that the Zoning Board of Appeals had granted certain variances that had been requested by the applicant. There was a general discussion of the scope of the variances. With respect to the setback from Broadway, the applicant was given a variance of 10 feet from the 20 foot setback required by the zoning regulations. Mr. Perlmutter noted that the existing steel fram is setback less than 10 feet from Broadway and thus it remained in violation of the Village zoning code. There was a further discussion of setback and building orientation. The chairman noted that, in addition to a coastal consistency form, which had still not been provided, the applicant had not provided the Board with a landscape plan, a drainage plan, or a lighting plan. There was a discussion of the potential impacts of traffic exiting onto Glover Avenue and then turning south on Broadway at a dangerous point south of the traffic light. The applicant was told to conduct a traffic study that addressed both the impact of the commercial traffic load on Gordon Avenue and the safety issues associated with egress onto Broadway from Gordon Avenue. The chairman asked the Applicant what was the status of the "Philipse Plaza" building which the Planning Board had approved for the northern portion of the property over a year previously, and which had not been built. He asked whether the applicant intended to proceed with that project or abandon it in favor of the current project. Mr. Perlmutter pointed out that the approvals for Philipse Plaza had lapsed, and thus that the applicant had no existing authorization to build it. Mr. Stever noted that the applicant did not show Philipse Plaza on the site plan, and that if the applicant did not intend to abandon that project he should revise his site plan to show the relationship of the two contiguous buildings and associated parking lots. Fox Ridge Transportation. River Street No person representing Fox Ridge Transportation appeared before the Board. On motion made by Mr. Perlmutter and seconded by Ms. Gaylin, the Board instructed Mr. Margotta to contact the Village Prosecutor and proceed to terminate the unlawful use of the premises. �Miguel Jiminez.139 Cortland Street (Two Retail Stores and Four Residential Apartments) The applicant presented preliminary plans which required variances. He requested that action be deferred until he received variances he was seeking from the ZBA No action was taken. �Village of Sleepy Hollow, New York June 23, 1*997 LEAD AGENCY/COORDINATED REVIEW This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board is seeking Lead Agency status on the action listed below. The Planning Board will assume Lead Agency status 30 days after the date of this notice. Name of Action. SITE PLAN APPLICATION - 358 North Broadway SEQRAType: Unlisted Description of Action: Application to approve the site plan for a two-story, 13,000 square foot building containingfirstfloor retail and secondflooroffice space. Variances related to front and rear yard setbacks will be required from the Village's Zoning Board of Appeals. Location: 358 North Broadway Section 17, Block 21, Lots 32-37 Sleepy Hollow, Westchester County, NY 10591 For further information: Jim Margotta, Building Inspector Village of Sleepy Hollow Village Hall Sleepy Hollow, NY 10591 (914)631-0233 Copies of this notice have been sent to: Commissioner, NYSDEC, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, NY 12233 ^NYSDEC Region 3,21 South Putt Corners Road, New Paltz, NY 12561 Robert Anello, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Hon. Sean Treacy, Mayor and Board of Trustees - NYSDOT, 4 Burnett Blvd. Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 uLynn Oliva, Commissioner, Westchester County Planning Department John Hughes, Esq. Attorney for the Applicant, Janet Gandolfo, Esq. Village Attorney, 1 Central Avenue, Sleepy Hollow, NY 10591 Attachment: EAF Short Form �617.21 PROJECT I.O. NUMBER Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only IART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 2. PROJECT NAME Antonio Cabinetry 1. APPLICANT /SPONSOR Antonio Rodrigues 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality Sleepy Hollow County Westchester 4, PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road Intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) 358 N. Broadway Sleepy Hollow, NY 10591 f. IS PROPOSEO ACTION^ D New QExparwfon G^Modtflcatlon/alteratlon 8. DESCRJ8I PROJECT BRIEFLY: Construction of retail building and office building. 7. AMOUNT OF LANO AFFECTED: Initially acraa Ultimately 8. WILL PROPOSEO ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? 0 Y«s Q No II No, describe briefly >. WHAT IS PRESENT LANO USE IN VICINITY OF, PROJECT? 0 Residential Describe: 10. D Industrial U3 Commercial ~* . L J Agriculture ParkJFortsl/Op«n space Othtr DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEOEnAL, STATE OR LOCAU7 No \ 1. If yes, Hat acencyO) and permit/approvals DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTIC.S* HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? No If yea, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MOOIFICATION7 0Yes D No I CERTIFY INFORMATION rPROVIDED ABOVE IIS BEST KNOWLEDGE e r m r i THAT I H A I THE i n e ir<runMAiiUN H U Y i u t u AtsuYt S TRUE i n u t TO I U THE ir-tta t a i UOF C MMY T KNOWLcQGfc Applicant/sponsor name: Antonio Rodrigues Signature: ___^______ \ If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 I �. A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN a NYCnR, PART 6l7.ir? It yes. coc.-s.r.i-.a :-•• d e - ; --:t:s »"•- - •-' 8." WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN S NYCRR, PART 817.6? • may be superseded by another Involved agency. • DY.« G3NO •' " * If No, • n»citlv« <J»clt,»iion ' ' C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY AOVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, If l*clbl«) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal. potential (or erosion, drainage) or flooding problems? Explain briefly: • N o , • • - . _ • t \ : C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: j No C3. Vegetation or fauna, Man, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: No d. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change In use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly No C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be Induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. • No C8. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not Identified In C1-C5? Explain briefly. No C7. Other Impacts (Including changes In use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. No * V • D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATEO TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? DYM CD No If Yes, explain briefly PART III—DETERMINATION O F SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect Identified above, determine whether It Is substantial, large, Important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed In connection with its (a) setting (!>•. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (c; Irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse Impacts have been Identified and adequately addressed. D Check this box if you have Identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. | U Check this box If you have determined, based on the Information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result In any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: j i •Village of "'Sleepy Hollow - Planning Board, . Name ol Lead Agency Atcncv Print or Typ€ Name of Kctponuble Otlictr in K i d Aicncy v Sijmtuie of R«ipo«ibl« Ollfctr in lead At«ncy : »., 'V ' i • . \ " Title of Atiponnblc O/Uct/ Sijplturc of PiepTr«HlfdirTcic«vfroni lejpomibU ollUti) .nan > J U A ^ _ / O , )> i I -r— John J. Hughes, Jr., Esq., attorney for applicant Date 2 '' �\2 August 1997 To: Planning Board From: James Margotta THERE IS NO PLANNING BOARD AGENDA FOR THE MDNTH OF AUGUST, 1997. �OCTOBER 16,1997 TO ALL PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS: DUE TO A REQUEST FROM ANTONIO RODRIGUES, THE PLANNING BOARD MEETING FOR THURSDAY, OCTOBER 16, 1997 HAS BEEN ADJOURNED TO NOVEMBER 20,1997. <^Cz ES MARGOTTA, BLDG. INSPECTOR � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1997 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1997-07-17 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1997 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1997