https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/869cca8d1dbfba369e30b1c7876cdec8.pdf b6670ab01e7bbb9dbe99d297aa96c309 PDF Text Text A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on February 15, 1996 at 8:00 PM in the Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York 10591 Members Present: Absent: George Hritz, Chairman Joanne Becker Donald Caetano Betsy Sawyer Gaylin David Perlmutter Edward McCarthy Nicholas Cicchetti James Margotta, Building Inspector Janet Gandolfo, Esq. Christian Miller, Frederick P. Clark Assoc. Mark DiGennaro, CAMCE IN THE MATTER OF ALBERT PECK, BARNHART AVENUE, NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK. Also Present: Mr. Peck stated that all the members of the Board have received a copy of the proposed sub-division on Kendall Avenue which is self explanatory. There are two homes on one lot and in order for them to be marketable each needs to be on its own lot. Mr. Hritz stated that Barnhart Avenue was supposed to be on the agenda this evening and that Kendall Avenue has already been approved. In accordance with the Frederick P. Clark report, are required and the whole area is nonconforming. some variances This matter will be on the agenda for next month. IN THE MATTER OF ANTONIO RODRIQUES, BROADWAY, NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK. PHILIPSE PLAZA, NORTH Mr. Hughes who is representing Mr. Rodriques stated that he would review and answer any final questions relating to the latest reports submitted by CAMCE and Clark Associates. Mr. Hughes stated that he would hope for a preliminary approval which would allow his applicant to take the next step by meeting with the Architectural Review BoardMr. Contandino the applicants architect stated that a report dated January 18, 1996 states concerns with walls and inconsistencies which were corrected. There were also concerns with the final grades. there were no problems with the grades. At this point �I A retaining wall for a draining system should be placed in the plan. A different type could be used in the wall. There was nothing showing drainage to a retaining wall. There is loose sand/soil behind the wall. Mr. Contandino stated that placing a double wall is just a coordination issue. Some areas are steep and there should be some kind of fence on top of the wall as a safety barrier. The ARB would review this type of fence. A condition of a variance for a fence needs to be provided. Mr. Caetano asked what the height standards are in the code? Mr. Margotta stated that there is a maximum of 6ft. The fence is also a concern of the owner. The Board would like three final copies of the plan, signed and sealed with no provisions. Mr. Contandino stated that this would not be a problem. Landscaping could be approved through the Tree Commission. The Tree Commission can consult with Frederick P. Clark Associates and go ahead with recommendations, it should not hold the project up at the preliminary hearing stage. Mr. Hritz stated that the project could benefit from the Tree Commission. Mr. Contandino stated that minor points have to be addressed which are only due to lack of coordination. Mr. Miller stated that the retaining wall may reduce the possible number of parking spaces, and this is being modified in the final plan. Ms. Gandolfo asked if the County or the State Department of Transporation have approved curb cuts in order to grant final drawings. Mr. Contandino state that this process comes in after the plans are in place. Ms. Sawyer Gaylin made a motion to open the public hearing seconded by Mr. Caetano. Motion carried unanimously. Ms. Gloria Esteves of 15 Holland Avenue stated that she was concerned about land erosion and the obstruction of the view. The top of the building is a full ten feet below the elevation. The fence would have to be 10 feet high to obstruct the view. These items v/ill go before the Architectural Review Board. Ms. Sawyer-Gaylin made a motion to close the public hearing which seconded by Mr. Caetano. Motion carried unanimously. �Mr. Caetano made a motion to grant a negative declaration on the preliminary site plan seconded by Ms. Sawyer Gaylin. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Caetano made a motion on behalf of the Planning Board to grant preliminary site plan approval subject to the following provisions: 1) To install an additional wall for drainage purposes. 2) The landscaping scheme should be referred to the Tree Commission. 3) Subject to the approval of the Village engineer. 4) Subject to the results of the submission of the final plan. Seconded by Ms. Gaylin. Motion carried unanimously. IN THE MATTER OF CHESTNUT RIDGE, NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK 10591 Mr. Hritz stated that he has not seen any applications on the above project. MINUTES Mr. Perlmutter made a motion to approve the January, 1996 minutes with a correction of deleting Mr. McCarthy's name as it was listed twice, seconded by Mr. Caetano. DISCUSSION Dr. Sweet stated that he attended the Planning Board meeting in Tarrytown. There were approximately 2-3 hundred people that attended and no one spoke in favor of the project. The FEIS was incomplete. The Hudson Recycling Corp. needs to submit a new FEIS. If it is not completed the Village of Tarrytown will complete it. Mr. Hritz stated that he presented the Village's Riverfront Park model and the report from Arthur Andersen. Being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Christine Zambrano Recording Secretary �DRAFT RESOLUTION Adopted at the February 15,1996 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board SUBDIVISION APPROVAL FOR TWO RESIDENTIAL LOTS. PROPOSED: 2-LOT SUBDIVISION OF EXISTING SINGLE LOT SUPPORTING TWO FREESTANDING RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES. OWNER/APPLICANT: ALBERT PECK LOCATION: 38 AND 40 KENDALL AVENUE TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 15, BLOCK 11, LOT 17 ZONING: R-5 RESIDENCE DISTRICT �* RESOLUTION Adopted at the February 15, 1996 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board RESOLUTION: SUBDIVISION APPROVAL FOR TWO RESIDENTIAL LOTS. PROPOSED: 2-LOT SUBDIVISION OF EXISTING SINGLE LOT SUPPORTING TWO FREESTANDING RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES. OWNER/APPLICANT: ALBERT PECK LOCATION: 38 AND 40 KENDALL AVENUE TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 15, BLOCK 11, LOT 17 ZONING: R-5 RESIDENCE DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for subdivision approval (the Application) pursuant to the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown, Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown and applicable laws and regulations considered pertinent to the application, which application is to subdivide an existing 3,629 square foot lot supporting two freestanding residential structures into two individual lots, with each lot supporting one of the existing freestanding residential structures; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has reviewed the following materials: 1. A drawing entitled "Final Resubdivision Plat Lot Line Change Prepared for Albert Peck in the Village of North Tarrytown, Town of Mt. Pleasant, Westchester County, N.Y.", prepared by William H. Free, Jr., Licensed Land Surveyor dated September 29, 1995 drawn at a scale of 1" = 10'. 2. A subdivision application for the subject site, undated and signed by Albert Peck. 3. A short Environmental Assessment Form (EAF); and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held at the Village Hall on January 18, 1995, at which time those wishing to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard; WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead Agency pursuant to Part 617 of the Implementing Regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 1. Received an application fee; 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property and the surrounding areas; 3. Requested, received and considered commentsfromthe Village Planning Consultants and the Building Inspector about the proposed project; �4. Requested, received and reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); 5. After review of the field conditions, public comments, recommendations and environmental assessment form as well as other matters noted above, has determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action and issued a Negative Declaration dated February 15, 1996, in which the Planning Board stated its determination of non-significance of environmental impact for this Unlisted Action; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the said subdivision application and subdivision plat as shown on the subdivision plat entitled "Final Resubdivision Plat Lot line Change Prepared For Albert Peck in the Village of North Tanytown, Town of Mt. Pleasant, Westchester County, N.Y." prepared by William H. Free, Jr., Licensed Land Surveyor, dated September 29,1995 be and hereby are granted subdivision approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or as an alternate the Village Administrator, on a copy of this subdivision plat resolution and upon final mylar copy of the subdivision plat drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the offices of the Village Building Department for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire 90 days from the date of this resolution if the following conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board: 1. The Applicant shall pay the Village of North Tanytown all application review fees as noted and required in Section 62-30(f) of the Village Zoning Code, as approved by the Village Attorney. 2. The Plat shall be revised and titled "Final Subdivision Plat." 3. The date of this resolution shall be noted on the Final Subdivision Plat. 4. The Applicant shall obtain all necessary variances to permit this 2-lot subdivision from the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of North Tarrytown. PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN : Georgp F. Mritz, Chairman / J Village^o^North Tarrytown Phtftmng Board Date 500\not6-006.ckm.crc 2 ,A*A �OCT-03 97 1^:03 FFOMrFP CLAFK ASSOCIATES 9149676615 TO:9146315880 PAGE:OS DRAFT RESOLUTION Adopted at the February 15,1996 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board RESOLUTION: SUE PLAN APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A 12,000 SQUARE-FOOT RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDING. PROPOSED: CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDING TOTALING 12,000 SQUARE FEET, REMOVAL OF EXISTING DELICATESSEN AND MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR BUILDING, AND CONTINUATION OF THE EXISTING 6,800 SQUARE FOOT MANUFACTURING USE ALSO LOCATED ON THE LOT. OWNER/APPLICANT: ANTONIO RODRIGUES LOCATION: 358 NORTH BROADWAY TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 17, BLOCK 21, LOTS 15 - 37 ZONING: C-l HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL n �16:03 FFOn:FF CLARK H550CIRTE5 5143676613 TC: 31^63178SO PAGE:03 RESOLUTION Adopted at the February IS, 1996 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board RESOLUTION: SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A 12,000 SQUARE-FOOT RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDING. PROPOSED: CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY RETATL AND OFFICE BUILDING TOTALING 12,000 SQUARE FEET, REMOVAL OF EXISTING DELICATESSEN AND MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR BUILDING, AND CONTINUATION OF THE EXISTING 6,800 SQUARE FOOT MANUFACTURING USE ALSO LOCATED ON THE LOT. OWNER/APPUCANT: ANTONIO RODRIGUES LOCATION: 358 NORTH BROADWAY TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 17, BLOCK 21, LOTS 15 - 37 ZONING: C-l HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for site plan approval (the Application) pursuant to Article VII of the Zoning Code of the Village of North Tarrytown for the construction of a two-story retail and office building totaling 12,000 square feet, removal of an existing delicatessen and motor vehicle repair building and continuation of the existing 6,800 square foot manufacturing use also located on the lot; and WHEREAS, as part of its review, the Planning Board has reviewed numerous documents, statements and plans, including the following: 1. Topographic map prepared for Antonio and Linda Rodrigues situate Village of No. Tarrytown Town of Mt. Pleasant Westchester Co., New York," prepared by John H. Muldoon, dated April 5,1993, last revised February 5, 1995. 2. "Site Plan" fox Philipse Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and last revised February 4,1996. 3. "Site Grading Plan" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and last revised February 4, 1996. 4. "Deli Operation Plan" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and last revised May 8, 1995. 5. "View Analysis" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and as last revised May 8,1995. �16:03 FPOM:FP CLARK ASSOCIATES 9149676615 TO:9146315880 PAGE:3* 6. "Floor Plan" for Philips* Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and as last revised May 8, 1995. 7. "Building Elevations" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Contadino Architects, AIA, and last revised May $, 1995. 8. "Retaining Walls plan" for Pbflipse Plaza, prepared by Bruno Leitenberger, P.E., State of New York license No. 053849, and dated August 199S. 9. "Drainage Layout Plan, Philipse PUoa Village of North Tarrytown Town of Mt Pleasant Westchester County, New York", prepared by Donald A. Benrie, PJL, Stale of New York License No. 062787-1, of Tectonic Engineering Consultants, P.C and as last revised December 27, 1995. 10. Detail sheet "Philipse Plaza Village of North Tarrytown Town of Mt Pleasant Westchester County. New York", prepared by Donald A. Benvte, PJL, State of New York License N o , 062787-1, of Tectonic Engineering Consultants, P.C and dated October 20, 1995, 11. "Planting Plan" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Studer Design Associates, and as last revised December 8, 1995. 12. "Cross Sections" for Philipse Plaza, prepared by Studer Design Associates, and dated November 28, 1995. 13. A full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF). WHEREAS, on July 19, 1995 the Zoning Board of Appeals granted all area variances, including those for required number of parking and loading spaces, buffer strip and rear yard setback, which that Board determined were necessary for the application. WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held at the Village Hall on July 21,1994, which hearing was continued and closed on February 15,1996, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given the opportunity to be beard; and WHEREAS, the site has been visited by the Village's planning and engmeering consultants and the Planning Board is thoroughly familiar with the site and all aspects of the proposed project; and WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead Agency pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 2 �16:04 FR0M:FP CLARK ASSOCIATES 9149676615 TO:9146315880 PAGE:05 1. Received an application fee; 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property and of the surrounding areas; 3. Requested, received and considered comments from the Village planning and engineering consultants and the Building Inspector about the proposed project; 4. Requested* received and reviewed a full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEORA); 5. After review of the field conditions, public comments, recommendations and environmental assessment form as well as other matters noted above, has determined that the proposed action is a Type I action and issued a "Negative Declaration," dated February 15, 1996, in which the Planning Board stated its determination of non-significance of environmental impact for this Type I action; and WHEREAS, in accordance with a condition of the resolution for site plan approval for the application known as "Antonio Cabinetry," and located on the same lot as said site plan application, traffic circulation has been revised and coordinated; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and plan noted above as amended herein be and hereby are granted site plan approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or, as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of this site plan resolution and upon the final mylar copy of the site plan drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the offices of the Village Building Department for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire twelve (12) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and/or the Applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1. FteS - The Applicant shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 1.1 An inspection fee for construction inspection of the property for compliance with the approved site plan in accordance with the Village of North Tarrytown Zoning Code. 1.2 Payment of all remaining application review costs as noted and required in Section 62-30(f) of the Village Zoning Code, as approved by the Village Attorney. 1.3 A recreation fee of $ Board of Trustees. , subject to the approval of the Village 3 �OCT-03 97 16:05 # 2. t FROM:FP CLARK ASSOCIATES 9149676615 TO:9146315380 PAGE:06 Revision of the above noted site plan to demonstrate the following: 2.1 A signature block shall be added to the site plan for the signature of the Planning Board Chairman or, as an alternate, Village Administrator. 22 The final alignment of the retaining wall and the configuration of parking stalls within the immediate vicinity of the retaining wall. 3. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall submit to the Village Building Inspector a mylar reproduction of the site plan complete with the certification of a professional architect and/or a professional engineer attesting to the construction of the site plan and its improvements as shown thereon, 4. All elements of this approved site plan shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Village Building Inspector within a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the issuance of the building permit and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The Planning Board may issue an extension of this time limit or may modify any of the above conditions with respect thereto for good cause. 5. The Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities, upon notice of the Building Inspector, and before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to on-site parking, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details, which do not comply with the approved plan in the interest of safety, convenience, aesthetics and the enjoyment and peace and quiet of adjacent neighbors; and A> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that approval of said site plan application and plans noted above be and hereby amends the site plan for the application known as "Antonio Cabinetry." originally approved by the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown on February 20,1992. PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN By George F. Hritz, Chairman Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board J 500\ftoU5^D5j*m.cv 4 Date �J SEQR ErMronmental QuaBy Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION of DotomsnaSjon of I Project Number_ Dole March «. 1—6 This notkx to issued pursuant to Part 617 of tto i ^ ^ Environmental Quatty Review Act) of the Environmental Conaervanun Law. The VWaoa of North Ti action described below wft not have a be prepared. HI lead agency, has determined that the proposed on the envfronmws; and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement wM not Name of Action: 40 Kendal Avenue SuhdMeion SEQR Status: Type I Unlisted X Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes _JLNo Description of Action: The applicant is proposing to subdivid* an existing 3,629 square foot lot supporting twofreestandingresidential structures into two individual lots, wfth each lot supporting one of the existingfreestandingresidential structures. The application wW require several variances from Hie Zoning Board of Appeals, however, pursuant to the provisions of Part 617.5 of the State Environmental Quafty Review Act (SEORA), the gnvmng of area, setback and lot line variances for single lamay reaidances ant Type • Actions and are not subject to environmental review. Location: (Include street address and the name of the rnuricyafty/counry A location map of appropriate scale is also recommended.) 40 Kendall Avenue, VMage of North Tarrytown, W< County, New York. �3EQR. Negative Declaration Page 2 Supporting This Determination: 617.7(c) for requirements of this determination; see 617.7(d) for ConrJMoned Negative Declaration) Tilt proposed action wM not cause • significant adverse impact on land, ground or surface water quaWy or quantity, drainage) patterns, air quality, plants and animals, agricultural land resources, sssmsttc resources, historic and archaioologlcal resources), open specs snd recreation, traffic and transportation systems, soM production, energy, pubec hcolth, growth and character of the communlly, cause contact wMi communtty pJans or goals, or cause) significant adverse noise and odor. If Conditioned Negative Declaration, provide on attachment the specific mitigation measures imposed. For Further Information: Contact Person: Unds David, Village Administrator Address: Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue North Tarrytown, New York 10591 Telephone Number: 914-631-1440 For Type I Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a Copy of this Notice Sent to: Chief executive officer of the political subdivision in which the action wfll be principally located. Lead Agency AH Involved Agencies (if any) Applicant (if any) 500\not6-006.cKm �1^ Approved with Vespect to substance and form: Village Attorney g& Atstorney Dated U\ Approved-toy t h e Planning, Chairman or\ A c t i n g Chairman DateUi. J ) 4 u ^ W v |^> F i l e d w i t h V i l l a g e Clerk Clerlfl or-JDeputy iputy Clerk Dated: c/i£/^C* HJ21A Date of Meeting if ^—- WI^.I^M^lpi —T � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1996 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1996-02-15 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1996 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1996