https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/7e3f3f7a2c9058c44aec5517af3da624.pdf a1b6c08bc901f4b0a474fed9dde08b40 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW PLANNING BOARD MEETING February 21,2002 J/\ , /^//O The meeting was called to order by Nicholas Robinson, Chairman at 8:00 p.m. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Nicholas Robinson, Chairman Ed McCarthy Dorota Szwem-Kopczynski Ed Napoleon George Tanner MAR - 4 2002 VILLAGE CLERK Absent: David Perlmutter Nicholas Cicchetti Also Present: Dave Smith (Saccardi & Schiff/Village Planner) Dan Pennella (Charles A. Manganaro/Village Engineer) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Ed Lammers (Murphy, Stecich & Powell/Village Attorney) Bob Stiloski (Department of Fire and Life Safety) Jerome Fine (J. Robert Folchetti/ Village Engineer) Don Ruggerio (Charles A. Manganaro/Village Engineer) Tom Pease (Lawler, McTusky & Shelly/Village RF Engineer) Announcements: The Chair stated that the George Raymond would be at the next meeting to discuss economic stabilization within the Village. Agenda: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) Michael Doorley Omnipoint Kendal-On-Hudson Verizon Karl Dibble Antonio Rodriguez Fremont Pond Dredging Minutes George Tanner made a motion to adopt the revised agenda. Ed Napoleon seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). ^ �a) Michael Doorlev Geraldine Tortanello is the attorney representing this application on behalf of Michael Doorley. She summarized the application to date. She stated that the planning firm of Ferrandino & Associates has performed an analysis of how the subdivision would impact Phillipse Manor. She stated that it is not inconsistent with the LWRP relative to policies 23, 25 and 25b. Vince Ferrandino summarized his analysis for the Board. It included simulating potential impacts to the surrounding properties and the view shed. He stated that policy #23 is not relevant. He stated that policies #25 and 25b are relevant but the application does not violate them. Geraldine Tortanello stated that this house is not part of the original development of Phillipse Manor. She stated that the sub-division proposes three lots with 75' frontage. She stated that the sub-division would place the existing house on a lot that is larger than what was part of the original development of Phillipse Manor. She stated that there are 344 homes in Phillipse Manor and 53% have houses of 75' of frontage. The Chair stated that as per the Waterfront Advisory Committee's findings, this property is considered to be critical to the Village. Geraldine Tortanello stated that the Waterfront Advisory Committee was not detailed in their findings. She stated that no place in the LWRP does in refer to this property as an area of great significance. There was an open discussion on whether or not to refer the application back to the Waterfront Advisory Committee with the Ferrandino & Associates report or go through a full EIS. Geraldine Tortanello requested to refer the application back to the Waterfront Advisory Committee. The Board agreed to refer the applicant back to the Waterfront Advisory Committee for re-consideration. b) Qmnipoint Mike Peters is representing this application for Omnipoint along with Donna Marie Stipo (Omnipoint's planner) and Rich Conroy (Omnipoint's RF Engineer). Mike Peters reviewed the DEIS. He summarized the proposed antenna extension and its Planning Board Meeting, February 21,2002 2 �physical characteristics. He spoke on the benefits of the proposed stealth array. He submitted an affidavit listing the people who were noticed for this public hearing. The Chair stated that the public comment period would be kept open for 30 days. Rich Conroy (Omnipoint RF Engineer) gave an overview of his credentials. He gave a detailed summary of the RF analysis via an exhibit showing Omnipoint's coverage gaps and their need for coverage within the Village. He detailed 9 other locations where other antennas are operational. He showed an illustration at 80' above sea level. The existing users are: 1) Nextel - 86' 2) Verizon-100' 3) Sprint - 105' He provided an analysis of why Omnipoint's coverage area would not be sufficient to meet coverage needs at 80 feet. Rich Conroy showed his analysis at 122 feet. He stated that this is favorable to the alternatives. The Chair asked about the alternatives. Mike Peters responded that there are photo simulations in the DEIS that show the alternatives. The Chair referred to Appendix P, Figure 7. He stated that it should be mentioned as to why the alternatives are not viable. Rich Conroy showed a third illustration for a future application within the Village and its coverage map. This was labeled exhibit #1 (map 6). George Tanner asked what areas are important coverage areas to Omnipoint in regards to this application. Rich Conroy responded Routes 9 and 117. The Chair asked that the exhibits be left with the Village for the record. Rich Conroy discussed alternatives via Exhibit #2 using the Village pumping station at 122 feet. He stated that a new structure would be required. He discussed providing coverage via Route 117. His map (map #8) showed inadequate coverage at 122 feet. He also stated that a new structure would be required. He discussed providing coverage using Village Hall (map #9). He stated that the building was too low to provide adequate coverage. George Tanner asked what was the height of Village Hall. Rich Conroy responded 40 feet. Planning Board Meeting, February 21, 2002 3 �George Tanner referred to maps 8 & 9 and asked if they were both used, would it provide the same coverage as the Phelps monopole. Rich Conroy responded no. He stated that this proposal would lose coverage to the North. George Tanner stated that the applicant could use the Route 117rightof way and Village Hall proposals to provide coverage to the desired areas. Mike Peters responded that this is only an RF analysis. He stated that it might not be viable. Dave Smith asked if the pumping station at 80 feet and Village Hall proposal would suffice. Rich Conroy responded no. He stated that foliage would interfere. He stated that maps are an optimistic view of coverage. Dave Smith stated that the applicant should show the worst-case scenario under SEQRA. Rich Conroy discussed providing coverage via St Theresa's Church. His map (map #10) showed inadequate coverage. He discussed providing coverage via the Sleepy Hollow Cemetery. His map (map #11) showed coverage gaps to the North and he stated that this proposal would not be able to match up with future search rings. He discussed providing coverage via the old IBM Building. His map (map #12) showed adequate coverage to the North of the Village but inadequate coverage within the inner Village. He discussed providing coverage via the water tank. His map (map #13) showed adequate coverage to the North of the Village but inadequate coverage within the inner Village. He discussed providing coverage via using the Ambulance headquarters on Andrews Lane. His map (map #13) showed inadequate coverage within Omnipomt's desired area. Rich Conroy spoke about the stealth array antenna. He discussed repeater technology. He spoke on how RF and fiber-optic repeaters work. He briefly mentioned how these options are not viable for this application. He stated that it is addressed in the DEIS. Rich Conroy stated that a MPE (Maximum Permissible Emissions) study was performed. The Chair asked if the hospital submitted a letter stating that they agree with the report. Rich Conroy responded yes. The Chair asked if Omnipoint is planning to submit future applications to the Village. Mike Peters responded yes. He also stated that this information has been before the Board since the DEIS was presented in September 2001. Donna Marie Stipo started her presentation. She gave a history of the monopole. She Planning Board Meeting, February 21, 2002 4 �showed four (4) photos (exhibit #3) illustrating the visual analysis of the monopole. She pointed out the existing carriers and the potential impact of Omnipoint's proposed antenna. She showed nine (9) photos (exhibit #4). They included photos from various locations around the monopole showing pockets of visibility. She discussed the two balloon tests performed and the visual analysis from Kykuit. She showed eight (8) photos (exhibit #5). They included photos from Kykuit and the Hudson River. The Chair stated that this structure is the first structure to impede the view shed that the Rockefeller family has maintained for decades. Donna Marie Stipo discussed how the antenna array could be used to blend-in on other structures. George Tanner asked if the antenna could be disguised to look like a tree. Donna Marie Stipo responded no. She discussed alternative sites and alternative antenna structures. She also stated that it would not be feasible to construct a new monopole. Dorota Szwem-Kopczynski asked how much would it cost. Donna Marie Stipo responded about $150,000. Dorota Szwem-Kopczynski asked about the lease agreement with Phelps Hospital. Donna Marie Stipo responded that it was not made public. George Tanner asked if the monopole had any medical benefits. Donna Marie Stipo responded only in terms of communications. The Chair referred to Dave Smith for comments. Dave Smith responded that he would submit his comments in writing. He also stated that all questions must be answered by the applicant in writing. Lastly, he stated that he would address the Mayor and Village Administration's concerns. The Chair noted a letter from Lawler, McTusky and Shelly (Village RF Engineer). The Chair also noted a letter from Melvin Levinson dated February 19, 2002. The Chair opened the public hearing. Don Catano (45 Lawrence Ave) spoke. He stated that the hospital is not-for-profit. Jeffrey Ansavino (planner for Scenic Hudson) spoke. He stated that the monopole is substantially visible and is above the tree line. He stated that the expansion of the cell tower is inconsistent with the LWRP. He asked the Village to assess the cumulative impact of the entire tower. He wants the Village to have the applicant use smaller Planning Board Meeting, February 21, 2002 5 �methods in order to have the least impact to the Village's historic view shed. Don Swanzager (Sleepy Hollow Manor) spoke. He stated that he wants the Board to assess the cumulative impact. Kim Miller (Kykuit) spoke. She stated that she represents the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and they oppose the extension of the cell tower. She stated that it would increase the existing visual impact. She referred to her previous letter to the Board. The Chair asked if there were any other public comments. There were none. Mike Peters requested a copy of the letter from Kim Miller. The Chair responded that it is on file with the Building Inspector. Ed Napoleon made a motion to close the public hearing. Ed McCarthy seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). The Chair stated that public comments could be received until 3/22/02. c) Kendal on Hudson The Chair stated that the wetlands permit would be discussed with Joel Sachs. Andy Tung discussed the storm water management system. He provided drainage and sewage details to the drawings. He discussed some of the landscape details and some of the erosion control procedures. He also discussed the signage to be used. Jerry Schwalbe illustrated how the existing culvert was clogged and how it caused problems to the Metro North railroad. The Chair stated that there is a problem with the 100-year flood concept. Jerry Schwalbe stated that two systems were designed. He discussed the proposed drainage and the overflow methods for any excess of the one-year storm. The Chair asked if Metro North has participated in the site plan review. Jerry Schwalbe responded that they anticipate receiving a letter of approval from Metro North in a few days. The Chair read the recreation fee resolution for the record. Al DelBello stated that all fees up to the Certificate of Occupancy have been covered. He stated that the fees paid were the maximum fees allowed under the Village Code. Planning Board Meeting, February 21,2002 6 �The Chairman responded except the fee associated with the Tree Commission. Al DelBello stated that he would like to discuss this item with Joel Sachs. Andy Tung stated that an application to the Tree Commission has been submitted. The Chair stated that pedestrian access to Rockwood Hall should be provided from the parking area to the park while under construction. Andy Tung responded that the hospital would provide safe access to the North parking lot on weekends for Rockwood Hall. There was an open discussion on the Resolution with regards to the Tree Commission. The Resolution was not signed. It will be addressed with Joel Sachs. George Tanner made a motion to close the public hearing on the site plan. Dorota Szwem-Kopczynski seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). d) Verizon Wireless/SMS A Robert Gordioso is the attorney representing the applicant. He stated that they have appeared before the Architectural Review Board and the ARB had one comment. They requested that the flush mounted antennas be moved back inwards onto the Penthouse roof. He submitted a rendering to illustrate this. He also stated that he would be before the ARB again this month. Dorota Szwem-Kopczynski asked about the height of the antennas. Robert Gordioso detailed the antenna heights and locations. George Tanner asked if the antennas could be re-directed where the entire mechanism could be hidden. Robert Gordioso responded no. The Chair asked if the Board had any other comments. There were none. The Chair referred to the Village consultants for their input. Dave Smith stated that aesthetics are a concern. Tom Pease stated that the radiation levels are low and will not cause health risks. Yolanda Malory (95 Beekman Ave) spoke. She stated the following: 1) She was told the antennas would be below the parapet wall. 2) She stated that the landlord made tenants remove their TV antennas. Planning Board Meeting, February 21,2002 7 �3) She is concerned with other future carriers wanting to place antennas on the roof. 4) She is concerned with potential interference with other electronic devices. 5) She wanted to know the lease agreement with the landlord. Robert Gordioso responded that the lease agreement is fair market value. He also stated that the antenna would not cause interference with other electronic devices or televisions. He stated that aerial devices do not effect it. Don Catano (45 Lawrence Ave) spoke. He asked if there is any liability due the roof access. Robert Gordioso responded that the roof is always open. He stated that the antenna would be mounted 6' above the bulkhead and are not accessible. Ron Turnquist (Beekman Ave) asked if the applicant has considered using the garage facility. Robert Gordioso responded that the applicant has looked at using other buildings but this structure provides the desired coverage. Linda Leland (95 Beekman Ave) spoke. She stated that she does not want them all around the building. The Chair stated that this building is eligible for historic preservation. George Tanner asked if the antennas could be moved back inward on the roof. Robert Gordioso responded that coverage would be lost. The Chair asked if conditions could be place on the approval. Robert Gordioso responded if the conditions are reasonable. The Chair asked if the equipment is safe. Robert Gordioso responded that the equipment is secured, locked and monitored 24/7 by a central station company. Elaine Olivari (95 Beekman Ave) spoke. She requested additional information regarding the safety of cell towers. Robert Gordioso referred to the Village RF consultant. The Chair responded that the reports are on file. They would be provided upon request. Jeffrey Ansarvino (Scenic Hudson) spoke. He recommended three methods as alternatives to offset the visual impacts. Robert Gordioso addressed all three methods and spoke about why Verizon's desired coverage would not be achieved. Planning Board Meeting, February 21,2002 8 �Dave Smith stated that the Planning Board could send a recommendation to the ARB. The Board recommendation to the ARB would be to surface mount the antennas on the parapet wall and paint the antennas in limestone color to match. The Chair stated that the public hearing would be held open to the next meeting. e) Karl Dibble This is a continuation from a previous meeting. Richard Blancato is representing this application Karl Dibble and his engineer Tim Cronin. Richard Blancato stated that the drawings are completed and are under review by the Village consultants. Tim Cronin spoke briefly about the retaining walls in excess of 5 feet high (west side of property). He spoke about the existing trees. Although this is not a public hearing, the Chair allowed public comments. Don Catano (45 Lawrence Ave) spoke. He was concerned with the amount of trees that were removed from the property already. The Chair stated that the drawings need to be reviewed and approved by the Village consultants. Tim Cronin stated that he needs input from the Village consultants so that the drainage could be added as well as the proposed garage. This was adjourned to the March 21,2002 meeting. f) Antonio RodriguezRon Turnquist is the architect representing this application along with Antonio Rodriguez. Ron Turnquist submitted revised plans to the Planning Board. He stated that the drawings were revised as per Dave Smith's comments. He explained the minor comments for the Board. Ron Turnquist explained the revisions to the ingress/egress, plantings, etc. He also stated Planning Board Meeting, February 21,2002 9 �that the elevations are unchanged. He produced letters from Joe DeFeo and the Fire Chief approving the proposed project. Ron Turnquist spoke about warning lights and alarms for the parking gate. The Chair spoke about binding the two properties legally. Ed Lammers responded that this must be filed with the County. Dave Smith stated that the Board should schedule a public hearing for the site plan. Ed McCarthy made a motion to schedule a public hearing for the next meeting. Ed Napoleon approved. It was unanimous (5-0). g) Fremont Pond This will be discussed at the next meeting. h) Minutes The minutes will be reviewed at the next meeting. George Tanner made a motion to adjourn. Ed Napoleon seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). Adjourned at 11:56 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, 'ijbte 7>J/fi«Ji»> Anthony Del Vecchio Planning Board Meeting, February 21, 2002 10 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2002 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2002-02-21 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2002 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2002