<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="2322" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/items/show/2322?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-20T09:58:37+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="2322">
      <src>https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/6c10ae26e1ee934ae9e55b0841ac17ab.pdf</src>
      <authentication>6939c48f661a489b4292af917a602235</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="20809">
                  <text>PLANNING BOARD MEETING
January 20,2000

&amp;-^fi^j&lt;7^-*-+L^
jf/~)/o &amp;

The meeting was called to order by Nicholas Robinson, Chair at 8:05 p.m.
Present:

Nicholas Robinson
David Perlmutter
George Tanner
Edward McCarthy
Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary)

Absent

Nicholas Cicchetti
Edward Napoleon

Also Present: Don Pennella (Charles A. Manganaro)
James Margotta
Ed Lammers (Village Attorney)
David Smith (Saccardi &amp; Setoff, Inc)
Announcements: Two items will be added to this month's agenda. It will be revised as
follows:
Original Agenda:
a) County House &amp; Bedford Road, LLC
b) Philipsburg Manor
c) Board discussion on proposed Riverfront Development text changes

Revised Agenda:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)

Conceptual ideas to revise the historic preservation components of the Village Code.
County House &amp; Bedford Road, LLC.
Philipsburg Manor.
Board discussion on proposed Riverfront Development text changes.
Recreation fee discussion.

Public hearing on the re-zoning of the areas East of the old Croton Aqueduct will be on
February 8, 2000 at 8:00 p.m.
George Tanner made a motion to accept the revised agenda. Ed McCarthy seconded.
It was unanimous.
a) Historic preservation of the Village CodeJody Match was introduced. She presented a memo that she prepared from the existing
Architectural Review Board Ordinance, which specifically contains the Historic

�Preservation content. She stated that although the Architectural Review Board provides
for Historic Preservation, it does not have any real power of preserving the historical
attributes of the community. The memo calls for a Historic Preservation Commission.
Local government certification would allow the Village to receive grants for historic
preservation activity. Also, the proposed Ordinance would have jurisdiction over
Historic landmarks and scenic designations.
Nicholas Robinson stated that the Village could stabilize many of the landscapes on the
Rockefeller property.
Nicholas Robinson stated that the main concern for the Planning Board is the historic
landscape on the Rockefeller Property as well as protection for the property owners
around the old GM plant.
Nicholas Robinson stated that the Planning Board will meet with the Architectural
Review Board to discuss.

b) County House &amp; Bedford Road, LLC. Nicholas Robinson discussed the resolution that was adopted at the December 16, 1999
Planning Board meeting. The expanded EAF would be circulated to a distribution list
and made available to the public. At the Planning Board's February 17, 2000 meeting,
final comments will be received. A public hearing will also take place on this date.
The Planning Board and the applicant agreed that the public hearing should also include
the sub-division hearing.
The Chair added a resolve clause to give notice for a public hearing on February 17,2000
to receive comments on the expanded EAF and also convene a public hearing on subdivision approval.
George Tanner made a motion to adopt the draft resolution. Ed McCarthy seconded.
It was unanimous.
Jim Margotta stated that the notice must be circulated to all properties within 200 feet.
The Chair asked the applicant how they intended to handle the pond.
The applicant responded that they are trying to work it out with the Village Engineers to
do what is practical. As far as ownership was concerned, the applicant stated that they
would like to establish a separate escrow account for the pond.
Ed Lammers stated that 20 days notice is needed.

Planning Board Meeting, January 20, 2000

�c) Philipsburg Manor This is a continuation of the public hearing on the dredging of the Philipsburg Manor
pond.
The applicant has been in contact with the DEC and Army Corps of Engineers.
The restoration has two parts:
1) Restoring and getting it back to how it looked before. No permits are needed for this
work.
2) Providing some protection against future occurrences. This was broken down into
two parts.
a) An overflow structure would be added. It would be about 12'x8' that would be 1'2' above the existing water level.
b) In addition, a sub-surface diversion wall would also be added. This would divert
any high floods.
They stated these methods would provide flood relief in a controlled manner.
The Chair stated that this didn't require any actions by the Planning Board. The Chair
stated that the applicant needed approval by the Planning Board of the revision of the
EAF and a conclusion that the Planning Board adopts the resolution approving the
nrr»ir»rt
i

J

Dave Smith stated that the applicant needed to circulate the proposals for comment with
the DEC, Parks &amp; Recreation, County, Army Corps of Engineers and State.
The applicant stated that the Army Corps of Engineers wants them to restore wetlands.
The applicant stated that it is not possible to restore wetlands. The Chair stated that the
wetlands in question are where that sedimentation basin would be. It is currently used as
an overflow parking lot.
The applicant displayed a drawing that displayed the wetlands. They discussed replacing
the wetlands at another site.
The Chair stated that the Planning Board needs an amended document for circulation to
see if any comments come in and to hold a final public hearing. Once the Planning Board
approves the resolution, other required approvals would be conditional for the applicant.
d) Riverfront text changes The Chair stated that a meeting needs to be scheduled with the Waterfront Revitalization
Committee since they are an advisory committee to the Planning Board.

Planning Board Meeting, January 20, 2000

�There has been one discussion already on the Cooney property and the Waterfront
Rcvitalization Committee was not involved. The Planning Board determined that the
scale of the development was too dense. The entire discussion occurred without the
Waterfront Revitalization Committee having any input.
The Planning Board will reach out to the Waterfront Revitalization Committee to get
them involved.
Dave Smith stated that the density on the Cooney property should not be applied to the
GM property. There should be a very dense residential portion.
The Chair stated that there should be a recommendation to the Village Board to adopt the
changes.
David Perlmutter made a motion to adopt. George Tanner seconded. It was approved
unanimously.
e) Review and Recreation fees Review fees
The Chair stated that the current level of $2500 is too low. The accounts need to be
replenished or the review process would stop. The Chair stated that the Mayor agreed.
Ed Larimers sia^d ^bat the ^'^in'n** Board \yr&gt;,,'f' r&lt;&gt;cr*rr,rrier,d ^° *i»*» Villor*e Board to
adopt revised review fees. This must be done before the new budget is passed in April.
The Board discussed the need for different fees for different sized projects. The Board
agreed that a graduated scale is needed. It was decided that a proposal would be
developed at the next meeting and the results would be brought to the Village Board for
approval.
Recreation fees
The Village's recreation fees were compared to other similar areas such as Briarcliff
Manor and Rye Brook. The recreation fees for these areas were much higher than Sleepy
Hollow's. The Chair stated that the recreation fees need to be brought up to match these
comparable areas.
Recommendations will be made to the Village Board.
Jim Margotta stated that plumbing fees, electrical fees, etc need to be brought up as well.
The Chair stated that a list would be generated of all fees. This list will be given to the
Mayor for the purpose of reviewing and possibly bringing these fees in line with other
comparable areas.

Planning Board Meeting, January 20, 2000

�Ed McCarthy made a motion to adopt a new fee structure. George Tanner seconded.
Other Topics:
There was a discussion on the Rodriguez property. The fees have not been paid as of yet.
Another letter will be written to the owner informing him to come into the next meeting
or the Village will place a lien on the property for the unpaid amounts. Also, there is not
a Certificate of Occupancy issued on this property.

The minutes from last months meeting (December 1999) will be reviewed at the next
meeting.
George Tanner made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Ed Napoleon seconded. It was
unanimously approved.
Adjourn to next meeting.

Planning Board Meeting, January 20, 2000

�Resolution of Recommendation
From the Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board
to
The Village of Sleepy Hollow Board of Trustees

WHEREAS, the Village of Sleepy Hollow Board of Trustees (the Village Board) has proposed
specific zoning text changes to the RF Riverfront Development District; and
WHEREAS, the Village Board has referred this matter to the Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning
Board (the Planning Board) for their review and recommendation consistent with Section 62-53.B.
of the Village Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board, at its regularly scheduled meeting of January 20,2000, did review
in detail the proposed rezoning including an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) prepared by
Saccardi &amp; Schiff, Inc., Village Planning Consultants; and
NOW THERE FOR BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Board does positively recommend to the
Village Board's the proposed zoning text changes to the R-F Riverfront Development District.

Nicholas Robinson, Chairman
Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board

\\Ntserm4 U\M-720\Resolutions\R-3 Recommciulalion-rezomng - M-720 11 wpd

Date

�«-w_*_niM&gt; • c

M_riirr

31M

fOl

Ji-&gt;3

RESOLUTION
Adopted at the January 20,2000 Meeting
of the Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board
RESOLUTION:

Circulation of Expanded Environmental Assessment Form

PROPOSED

Subdivision of 11.9± acres of land to accommodate 11residentiallots and open
space component.

APPLICANT:

County House Road, LLC

LOCATION:

County House Road and Bedford Road

TAX MAP
DESIGNATION:

Section 115.12, Block 2, Lots 35 and 36

ZONING:

R-l, One Family Residence/Open Development with Cluster Authorization

WHEREAS, on October 12,1999, the Village of Sleepy Hollow Board of Trustees did approve
the rezoning of 11.9± acres of land in the vicinity of County House Road and Bedford Road from R-3,
One Family Residence/Moderate Density to R-l, One Family Residence/Open Development; and
WHEREAS, the Village Board did also authorize the Planning Board to use the clustering
provisions afforded under Section 7-738 of the New York State Village Law; and
WHEREAS, an application for preliminary subdivision approval was submitted to the Village
of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board (the Planning Board) by County House Road, LLC (the Applicant) for
the subject U9± acres of land; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board has reviewed the following materials:
1.
2.

A subdivision application dated September 19, 1999, prepared by Bruce Lozito,
Community Planning Development Consultant;
Large Scale Plans
a.
Illustrative Site Plan prepared by Robert Lamb Hart, last revised January 7,2000;
b.
Preliminary Subdivision Plat prepared by Robert S. Johnson, P.L.S. last revised
August 31,1999;
c.
Area Map for preliminary subdivision plat, no author, undated;
d.
R-3 Zoning Preliminary Subdivision Map prepared by Stephen T. Johnson,
PL.S dated June 3, 1999;
e.
Sketch Layout R-1 Zoning prepared by Stephen T Johnson, P.L.S. dated July 12,
1999;
f.
Site Utility Plan prepared by Michael Wein, P.E. dated September 1, 1999;
g
Site Grading Plan prepared by Michael Wein, P.E. dated September 1, 1999;
h.
Erosion Control Plan prepared by Michael Wein, P.E. dated September 1,1999;
i.
Road and Sewer Profile, prepared by Michael Wein, P.E. dated September 1,
1999;
j
Detail and Notes, prepared by Michael Wein, P.E. dated September 1, 1999;

�JIM

lOl

J I J 3

r.W-VOM

k.

3.
4
5.
6.
7.
8.
9

Erosion Control Details, prepared by Michael Wein, P.E. dated September 1,
1999;
1.
Conceptual Tree Preservation and Landscape Plan, prepared by Robert Lamb hart,
dated January 7,2000;
m.
Conceptual Design Guidelines, prepared by Robert Lamb Hart, dated January 7,
2000; and
n.
Master Plan Studies, prepared by Robert Lamb Hart, dated January 7,2000.
Coastal Assessment Form dated September 3,1999 prepared by Bruce R. Lozito, AlCP
on behalf of County House Road, LLC;
Preliminary Full Environmental Assessment Form, parts 1,2 and 3 signed by T.G. Julius
on behalf of County House Road, LLC, last revised, January 8,2000;
Preliminary Environmental Analysis prepared by Jay Fair&amp; Associates, dated September
2,1999;
Traffic Impact Evaluation prepared by John Collins Engineers, P.C. dated August 20,
1999, addendum dated January 5,2000;
Stormwater Management Report prepared by Michael Wein, P.E. undated; and
Stage 1A Literature Review, prepared by CITY/SCAPE: Cultural Resource Consultants,
dated October 1999.
Preliminary Subsurface Investigation, prepared by Tectonic Engineering Consultants,
dated November 3, 1999 and Addendum dated December 1, 1999.

WHEREAS, on October 21, 1999, the Planning Board did declare their intent to act as Lead
Agency in this matter and did duly circulate the required Notice of Intent to all potential interested and
involved agencies as per SEQR; and
WHEREAS, on December 16,1999, after the statutory time had passed, the Planning Board did,
declare themselves to be the Lead Agency for the proposed action; and
NOW THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED, on January 20,2000, the Lead Agency did cause to be
circulated a draft expanded full EAJF to all interested and involved agencies (see attached list) and made
such EAF available to the public for their review and comment; and, be it further
RESOLVED, that a comment period has been established by the Lead Agency until February 17,
2000, in which members of the public are encouraged to provide comments to the Lead Agency on the
proposed action; and, be it further
RESOLVED, that the Lead Agency will give notice for a public hearing to be held on February
17, 2000, to receive comments on the draft expanded full EAF and preliminary subdivision approval;
and, be it further
RESOLVED, that the Lead Agency requests that any comments on the proposed action to be
directed to James Margotta, Building Inspector, Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, Sleepy Hollow, New
York 10^91

Nidnolas Robinson, Chairman

Date

�_&gt;!**

IU1

J U - '

' - t M « l/~»

This Resolution and Full Environmental Assessment Form and Analysis have been circulated to the
following:
Hon Philip Zegarelli, Mayor
Village Hall
28 Beekman Avenue
Sleepy Hollow, NY 10591

Mr. Paul Feiner, Supervisor
Town Hall
320 Tarryrown Road
Elmsford, NY 10523

Angela Everett, Village Clerk
Village Hall
28 Beekman Avenue
Sleepy Hollow, NY 10591

John Cahill, Commissioner
NYSDEC
SO Wolf Road
Albany, NY 12233-0001

Hon. Paul Janos, Mayor
Village Hall
21 Wildey Street
Tarrytown, NY 10591

Marc Moran
NYSDEC, Region 3
New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation
21 South Purr Comers Road
New Paltz, NY 12561-1696

Mr. Robert Meehan, Supervisor
Town Hall
1 Town Hall Plaza
Valhalla, NY 10595

County House Road. LLP
c/o Schulman Realty Group
Mr. Tom Julius
SOO Mamaroneck Avenue
Harrison, NY 10S28

Westchester County Planning Board
432 County Office Building
148 Martine Avenue
White Plains. NY 10601

Tarrytowns Union Free School District
200 North Broadway
Sleepy Hollow, NY 10591

Howard Adel, Commissioner
West. Co Dept. of Health
145 Hugenot Avenue
NewRochelle.NY 10801

A. Bauman, Regional Director
NYSDOT, Region 8
Poughkeepsic. NY 12603

...... .

UNucrvcM OUD- 720\Xao4uuaaVCouMT HouW RnohOM wpd

TOTAL P.04

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="141">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14844">
                <text>Planning Board Minutes &amp; Resolutions-2000</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14141">
              <text>MINS_PLAN_2000-01-20</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14142">
              <text>Planning Board Minutes &amp; Resolutions-2000</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14143">
              <text>2000</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
