https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/ffca824e74e4c8949e6c3345caf86109.pdf 546fc14eb6cc5a3f99d186747fd4ebc6 PDF Text Text r REGULAR MEETING NORTH TARRYTCWN, NEW YORK August 1 7 , 1995 A regular meeting of the North Tarrytown Planning Board was held on August 17, 1995 at 8:00 P.M. in the Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: George Hritz, Chrairman Joanne Becker Edward McCarthy David Perlmutter ABSENT: Donald Caetano ALSO PRESENT: Janet A. Gandolfo, Attorney James Margotta, Building Inspector Mark A. DiGennaro, CAMCE Susan J. Portman, Assoc.Planning Chairman Hritz called the meeting to order at 8:10 p.m. PRELIMINARY HEARING - COLABELLA WETLANDS This item was not a scheduled agenda item. Mr. John Hughes came forward and stated that this application had to do with a permit application for the wetlands. He said that he wasn't sure what was required to be done or how the Planning Board reacts under this local law. He asked for help from the Board. Chairman Hritz stated that this was a project that required at least a short EAF form. Ms. Gandolfo stated that the Code reads that the buffer is supposed to be 100 ft. from the wetlands. The architect or engineer includes as part of the property the buffer area. The question to the Board was to look at the wording as to where the buffer was permitted to start. Ms. Gandolfo said that the question was if the buffer was part of the property. Mr. David Christmas, the architect didn't know how far it extended. Chairman Hritz pointed out the following observations: 1. looks like the 100 ft. buffer is drawn in such a way that it doesn't follow the line of the river. 2. How many of the homes in the area will be 2 family homes. 3. There are a number of questions regarding the EAF, page 3, paragraph 13 and 14. 4. There are several items missing from the application which must be included. The architect stated that the site itself was not going to be used by the community. �f Chairman Hritz told the architect that he needed to go through the EAF. Mr. Hughes commented that they will revise the EAF. Ms. Gandolfo suggested that he should look at £ 61-8 and see if any of those activities should be marked on the plans. Chairman Hritz asked if there were any further questions. Mr. DiGennaro said that he would like to look at the criteria of dry wells, 2 to 5 years and 10 years. 10 to 25 years. He explained to the applicant what he wants to see on the plans. L. RODRIGUES, CHESTNUT RIDGE - Continuation. Re-Review of site plans for 2 apartment houses Chairman Hritz noted for the record that the Chestnut Ridge applicant has asked to be removed from the agenda on numerous times. He noted that this was the 4th or 5th time that this applicant has taken himself off the agenda. He stated that it wasn't fair for the Board members to attend when this was the only agenda item and not have Mr. Rodrigues attend. Mr. Perlmutter suggested that Mr. Rodrigues should let the Board know in time if he was not going to attend. Ms. Portman read the Wetland regulations. There being no further business, Mr. Perlmutter moved to adjourn the meeting. Ms. Becker seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, CARMEN G. MARIAMD Recording Secretary -2- �f ? FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut David J. Portman, A,CP Howard I. Reynolds PE David H. Stolman, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 Michael A. Galante F . Meder> AICP Jim Donovan, RLA. ASLA Joanne MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: July 13, 1995 Subject: Review of Chestnut Ridae/Hillside Court Site Plan Plans: Site plan sheets SD1 and SD2 prepared by Turnquist Architects, revised 6/8/95. 1. Project Description: Two 3-story buildings containing a total of 18 dwelling units (32 bedrooms). 2. Plan Revisions: Additional planting details (not to scale) were shown on the plan. Evergreens added at a few locations along new retaining wall on easterly side of site. 3. Parking and Circulation: Two handicap parking spaces are shown. According to the Department of State, «each of the spaces should have a loading aisle of eight feet in width. Clearance height for the parking garage off of Depeyster Street is only proposed to be 6 feet 8 inches and the State Code requires a minimum of 9 feet 6 inches for access to handicap parking spaces (see enclosure). The curb radius for the driveway onto Depeyster Street should be increased. 4. Landscaping and Buffers: A shade tree should be added to the parking between spaces #2 0 and 21. island Item E on the planting schedule, Pink Flowering Dogwood, should be changed. The surrounding pavement will make Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX • (914) 967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation the area too hot for that species. Honey locust or other similar species may be substituted. 5. Environmental Review; The Planning Board may either ask for additional information or make a determination of significance. Susan J. Portman, AICP, Associate/Planning Enclosure cc: Sean Treacy, Mayor Richard Sweet, Trustee Linda E. David, Village Administrator Janet A. Gandolfo, Esq., Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Mark DiGennaro, Village Engineer Ronald Turnquist 500\not5-007.sjp:aj 2 �§ 1101.1 SUBTITLE S HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL PART 1101 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Statutory authority: Executive Law, §§ 375, 377) Sec. 1101.1 Sites, exterior facilities and parking 1101.2 Entrances 1101.3 Interior accessible routes Sec. 1101.4 Interior accessible facilities and elements 1101.5 Means of egress 1101.6 Assembly spaces Historical Note Part (§§ 1101.1-1101.6) filed Aug. 7, 1973; amd. filed Nov. 12, 1973; repealed by L. 1981, ch. 707, § 12. eff. Dec. 31.1983; new (§§ 1101.1-1101.7) filed Dec. 13,1983; repealed, new (§§ 1101.1-1101.6) filed April 1.1994 eff. April 20, 1994. S e c t i o n 1101.1 Sites, exterior facilities and parking, (a) At least one accessible route shall be provided within the site boundaries from public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, passenger loading zones, and public streets or sidewalks, to entrances of each accessible building a s required in section 1101.2 of this Part. (b) Where toilet facilities or bathing facilities are provided, each shall be accessible. (c) Where drinking fountains are provided, not less than 50 percent, but at least one, shall be accessible. (d) Parking areas or garages. Where parking a r e a s or garages are provided, accessible parking spaces shall be provided a s follows: (1) in group B l and B3 occupancies; in an amount equal to not less than five percent of the number of dwelling units but at least one; (2) in group B4 occupancies; not less than five percent of the total number of parking spaces but at least one; (3) in group B2, Cl, C2, C3, C4, C5 and C6 occupancies; accessible parking spaces shall be provided in conformity with table 1-1101 and shall be dispersed and located closest to the accessible entrances; (4) accessible parking spaces shall conform to reference standard RS 72, except that access aisles shall be at least 8'0" in width, and minimum vertical clearances at accessible spaces and vehicular access routes to and from such spaces in parking garages and open parking structures exceeding 1,000 square feet in area, shall be 9'6" on the entry level and 8'2" on other levels; and (5) passenger loading zones serving accessible entrances shall be accessible in conformity with reference standard RS 72. Such accessible loading zones shall be located in proximity to accessible building entrances. TABLE 1-1101 REQUIRED NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES Total parking spaces in lot or garage 1 to 25 26 to 50 51 to 75 ?6 to 100 101 to 150 Number '•2- 3 1 2 3 4 5 638.243 EX 4-30-94 �F R E D E R I C K P. CLARK A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut David J. Portman, A,CP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP Jim Donovan, RLA, ASLA MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: August 14, 1995 Subject: Colabella Wetlands Permit This is a supplement to the memorandum dated August 11, 1995. It is indicated on the wetlands permit application that a portion of the wetlands/watercourse buffer area (of the Pocantico River) will be disturbed in order to construct a two-family dwelling. The dwelling is shown on the plan as being located within a few feet of the wetlands/watercourse buffer area. The buffer area will be disturbed during construction of this dwelling. The amount of disturbance is not yet clear. In the previous memorandum we requested that the drawing be revised to specifically annotate the limit of the wetlands area and to note the date of the wetlands delineation and the name of the individual or firm who performed it. The delineation will clarify the location of the boundary of the buffer area and determine whether the dwelling itself is actually proposed to be located within the buffer area. Susan J. Portman, AICP, Associate/Planning cc: Sean Treacy, Mayor Richard Sweet, Trustee Linda E. David, Village Administrator Janet A. Gandolfo, Esq., Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Mark A. DiGennaro, Village Engineer David I. Christmas, RA 500\not5-022.sjp Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX • (914) 967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �R E V I S E D D R A F T RESOLUTION Adopted at the May 19, 1994 and Revised at the June 15, 1995 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board RESOLUTION: SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PROPOSED ACTION: SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY INTO TWO (2) LOTS OWNER: ESTATE OF ANNA DE CARLO APPLICANT: JOHN AND MAUREEN PETRY; PETER AND COLLETTE WEINSTEIN LOCATION: 41 AMOS STREET AND THE EASTERN SIDE OF WEBBER AVENUE TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 17, BLOCK 7, LOT 18 ZONING: R-3 RESIDENTIAL �RESOLUTION Adopted at the May 19, 1994 and Revised at the June 15, 1995 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board RESOLUTION: SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PROPOSED ACTION: SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY INTO TWO (2) LOTS OWNER: ESTATE OF ANNA DE CARLO APPLICANT: JOHN AND MAUREEN PETRY; PETER AND COLLETTE WEINSTEIN LOCATION: 41 AMOS STREET AND THE EASTERN SIDE OF WEBBER AVENUE TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 17, BLOCK 7, LOT 18 ZONING: R-3 RESIDENTIAL WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for subdivision approval (the Application) pursuant to the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown, Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown and other requirements of the Village Code considered pertinent to the application, which application is to subdivide property located on the western side of Amos Street and the eastern side of Webber Avenue at 41 Amos Street into two (2) lots for single-family residential development; and WHEREAS, Lot 1 would be approximately 6,554.4 square feet in size and would contain the existing dwelling and Lot 2 would be approximately 5,999.7 square feet in size, as shown on the drawing prepared by John J. Muldoon, Professional Land Surveyor, and further identified as follows: "Subdivision of Lands of the Estate of Anna DeCarlo, Situate at North Tarrytown, Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester County, N.Y.," scale 1" = 2 0 ' , dated April 7, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Applicant proposes to remove the existing garage and driveway from Lot 2; and WHEREAS, the Applicant will provide a driveway and a parking space for the existing house on Lot 1; and WHEREAS, as per Section 12B(2)(b) of the Subdivision Regulations, the Applicant has agreed to show on the plat a strip of land to be dedicated which is 0.25 feet wide extending along the entire frontage of both Lots 1 and 2 along Webber Avenue; and WHEREAS, the site has been visited by the Village's Planning Consultant, Engineering Consultant and the Planning Board is thoroughly familiar with the site and all aspects of the proposed subdivision; and �WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held at the Village Hall on May 19, 1994, at which time those wishing to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, in the course of this review and acting as Lead Agency pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 1. Received an application fee of $2,510; 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property and of the surrounding area; 3. Referred the application to the Westchester County Planning Board pursuant to Sections 239-1, m and n of the General Municipal Law because the subject property is located on a County road (Webber Avenue); 4. Requested, received and considered comments from the Village Planning Consultant, the Village Engineering Consultant and the Building Inspector; 5. Requested, received and reviewed a short Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); 6. After review of said field conditions, recommendations and EAF, as well as other materials and matters noted above, the Planning Board has determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action and made a Negative Declaration on March 17, 1994, and noted on the EAF its determination of nonsignificance of environmental impact. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said application for subdivision approval for a two (2) lot subdivision, as shown on the drawing entitled "Subdivision of Lands of the Estate of Anna DeCarlo Situate at North Tarrytown, Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester County, N.Y.", scale 1" = 20', dated April 7, 1994, prepared by John J. Muldoon, Professional Land Surveyor, be and is hereby granted subdivision approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or, as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of this subdivision resolution and upon the final mylar copy of the subdivision plat drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, and the Applicant may obtain the endorsement of the Westchester County Department of Health on the final subdivision plat which endorsements shall permit filing in the offices of the Village Building Department, for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, and the offices of the Westchester 2 �County cl^rk, provided, however, that this subdivision approval shall empire within one hundred eighty (180) days from the date of this resolution if the following conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and the Applicant has not obtained a building permit for construction of the driveway and parking space on Lot 1: 1. A l l references to the "Applicant" Applicant's successor and assigns. shall include the 2. The Applicant shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 2.3. An inspection fee for construction inspection of the property for compliance with this resolution, including the provision of a driveway and parking space on Lot 1, in accordance with the Village of North Tarrytown Zoning Code; 2. 2 3. The reimbursement of all application review fees as noted and required in Section 62-30(f) of the Village Zoning Code. Revision of the above noted plat to demonstrate the following: 3. i The plat shall be revised and titled "Final Subdivision Plat;" 3.2 A line shall be provided for the endorsement of the Westchester County Department of Health; 3.3 The date of this resolution shall be noted on the final subdivision plat. 4. Th.e Applicant shall comply with the requests of the Village Engineering Consultant as described in his memoranda to the North Tarrytown Planning Board dated April 28, 1994 and June I S , 1995. 5. Trie owners of the adjacent property shall be permitted to svabmit a report prepared by their consultant for review by the Village Engineering Consultant. 6. Trie driveway .and parking space on Lot 1 and any future improvements on Lot 2 shall be constructed so as to yield no n^t increase in stormwater runoff. The drainage plan for Lot 1 and, at that time that a house and driveway may be proposed for construction on Lot 2, the drainage plan for Lot 2 shall b<s prepared to the satisfaction of the Village Engineering Consultant. The driveway for Lot 2 shall be graded so as to sXope towards the south, away from the neighboring property to trie north. 3 �Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the driveway and parking space on Lot 1, the Applicant shall submit to the Village Building Inspector a reproduction of the construction drawing complete with the certification of a professional architect and/or professional engineer attesting to construction of the site improvements as shown thereon. The driveway and parking space on Lot 1 shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Village Building Inspector within eighteen (18) months from the date of the issuance of a building permit and prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The Planning Board may issue an extension on this time limit, or may modify any of the above conditions with respect thereto, for good cause. The Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field inspection of the project after construction of the improvements, upon notice of the Building Inspector, and before the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to parking, drainage, access, paving and other details, which do not comply with the approved plat and the interest of safety, convenience, aesthetics and the enjoyment and peace and quiet of adjacent neighbors. PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN 2L. ^ . /, i t z , Chairma o r t h Tarryto Date: lanning Board 500\not4-012.sjp.crc 4 10 idfiS �C H A R L E S A. CONSULTING MANGANARO ENGINEERS MEMORANDUM TO: Village of North Tarrytown FROM: Mark A. DiGennaro Charles A. Manganaro Consulting Engineers, P.C. DATE: October 19, 1995 RE: Chestnut Ridge/Hillside Court Village of North Tarrytown, NY CAMCE No. 800-24 We have received some structural information from the applicant's engineer in response to our memorandum of September 18, 1995, on October 11. This information consisted of structural retaining wall calculations transmitted for review via fax without any plan indicating the revisions. We attempted to contact the applicant with regard to the submittal on October 13, 1995 to discuss the submittal but were unsuccessful. Regretfully, we were unable to perform a review of the submittal due to the following reasons: • The submittal was received 3 business days before the Planning Board Meeting. • The submittal was incomplete and did not address all of the comments in our September 18, 1995 memorandum. • The Plan which was received on October 13, 1995, is not complete and does not clearly indicate any revisions. • From a review perspective, the project direction is unclear with respect to the retaining wall design and the fact that the Applicant has changed his structural engineer adds to the ambiguity. Based on the above, we recommend that the applicant clarify all of the relevant submittals and^ resubmit to the Village, three complete sets of plans and details clearly indicating any revisions. Once we receive a clarification from the Applicant and have a clear understanding of the proposed project improvements, we will advise the Planning Board accordingly. cc: Jim Margotta Ron Turnquist Susan Portman Janet Gandolfo F \AWN-ngOO-2-4\MDIOI95MJRi �« Approved with respect to substance and form: Village Dc/ted: Approved by the Planning Board ^r. I Acting Chairman Filed with Village Clerk a. a, Clerk or"'Deputy Clerk Dated: frfKJjf U^JZ /<rsi?<?<r DatsLtff Meeting + � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1995 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1995-08-17 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1995 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1995