https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/328f82da38226151975a0b7a16a62469.pdf 35136c0e8491630ac5723d72cb34455f PDF Text Text REGULAR MEETING NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK APRIL 28th, 1994 A regular meeting of the North Tarrytown Planning Board was held on April 28th, 1994 at 8:00 P.M. in the Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: George Hritz, Chairman Donald Caetano Ellen Tsangaris James Donovan David Perlmutter ABSENT: Steve Salman Edward McCarthy ALSO PRESENT: Janet Gandolfo, Attorney Barnes Margotta, Building Inspector Joe Gulino, CAMCE Tom Gissen, Clark Assoc. Mr. Hritz called the meeting to order at 8:00 P.M. and thanked outgoing Board member, Ray Windas whose term has expired.and stated that he will be missed. He welcomed Mr. David Perlmutter, a resident of the Village for many years. 1. Rock of Salvation, Cortlandt Street-Continuation. Ron Turnquist, Architect for the Project addressed and the Board and presented drawings for the Board to review. Mr. Turnquist described the building as it now is and outlined the proposed projects. He stated the building would be completed in stages with the first stage to be the completion of a Sanctuary with a capacity of 300 people. He also stated that eventually meeting rooms, day care center and kitchen would be added. Ms. Gandolfo stated that the Union Hose Fire House, which is adjacent to the proposed project is concerned about the increased flow of traffic and would like to review the plans before the Public Hearing. After a discussion regarding the Day Care Center, Rev. San Diego stated that application will be made to the State and they will determine the number of children and the size of the center. Mr. Gissen stated that a Full Environmental Assessment Form will have to be submitted for their review. Mr. Gulino, Engineer for the Village stated he has reviewed the proposed site plan dated December 6th, 1993 and offerred several comments in a memo dated April 28th, 1994. (Copy in Official Minutes). �-2Mr. Hritz suggested that the Architect submit site plan to the Police and Fire Departments for their comments. Mr. Caetano moved, seconded by Mr. Donovan that a Public Hearing be set for the meeting to be held on May 19th, 1994. Carried. 2. Petry Subdivision, Amos Street-Two Lots. Mr. Hritz read the notice of Public Hearing for the application of John and Maureen Petry seeking a subdivision for a parcel of land located at 41 Amos Street, North Tarrytown, N.Y. The applicants are proposing to subdivide the property into two lots. Lot one would be 6,567.4 square feet in size and lot two would be 6,013.4 square feet in size. Mr. Hritz asked if there was anyone present who would like to address the Board. Mrs. Petry stated she had submitted a revised plot plan to show present house, driveway and the garage that will be torn down. It is their intention to create another lot, and to erect a new house on the new lot. Glen Weeks, 174 Webber Avenue stated he would like to be able to review the Site Plan as submitted and asked several questions regarding drainage, asbestos on the old garage and the removal of same, erosion and stated he would like assurances from the owners and the village that his property would be protected during construction. Mr. Hritz stated that the Building Inspector would inspect and make sure that necessary precautions were taken to protect his property. Mr. Gulino stated he has reviewed the subdivision plan dated April 7, 1994 and offered several comments regarding drainage and water and sewer locations. (Copy in official minutes) Mr. Gissen stated he has reviewed the subdivision plans dated April 7th, 1994 and offered several comments regarding parking and curb cut on Webber Avenue. (Copy of memo in offical minutes) . Mr. Weeks asked for further information regarding the size of the proposed house and its location on the new lot. Mr. Hritz stated that the Zoning Board will be meeting on the matter at their May meeting and the couples should meet to discuss the matter before then. He stated the Planning Board would meeting after the Zoning Board meeting and would review the matter. Discussion followed regarding the retaining wall and the Building Inspector stated it was in poor condition and will have to be repaired or replaced. �After a discussion, Mr. Perlmutter moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris that the matter be adjourned to the May meeting. Carried. 3. Viscogliosi-176-178 North Washington Street.-Subdivision» Mr. John Hughes, Attorney stated that the property at 176 North Washington Street was a 4-family residence and , the 178 North Washington Street was a 1-family residence. He stated it was the intent of his client to sub-divide the property and sell one or both buildings. He stated the four family residence has been there many years and the one family residence was built in the 1950's. Mr. Hughes stated he would submit a survey and an EAF for the Board to review. Mr. Gissen stated they have reviewed the application and stated the Zoning Board of Appeals has granted the necessary variances and submitted a memo with their comments. (Memo in official minutes). CAMCE memo in official minutes. Ms. Tsangaris moved, seconded by Mr. Perlmutter to declare the Planning Board the Lead Agency. Carried. Mr. Caetano moved, seconded by Mr. Perlmutter that a Public Hearing be held at the May 19th meeting to discuss the matter. Carried. 4. Phelps Memorial Hospital Office Building Discussion. Mr. Gulino reported CAMCE had received a letter from Phelps Memorial Hospital stated they have negotiated the reduction of flow from the IBM forced main at their World Trade Center Pump Station. (Copy in official minutes). Discussion followed regarding the six foot fence to be installed. Mr. Hritz stated the hospital would like the fees waived and the matter was referred to the Village Board. Discussion followed regarding variances that would be needed to erect a six-foot fence. Also discussed was the significant number of fees that the Hospital has not paid. There being no further business to come before the meeting Mr. Caetano moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris that the same be duly adjourned. Carried. ctfully submitted submitted ne Amato ing Clerk /j \ �s C H A R L E S A . M A N G A N A R O C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S MEMORANDUM TO: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board FROM: Mr. Joseph A. Gulino, P.E. Project Engineer DATE: April 28, 1994 RE: DeCarip/PetQLSubdivision on Amos Street Village of North Tarrytown, New York CAMCE No. 800-22 As requested, we have reviewed the latest revised subdivision plan dated April 7, 1994 by John J. Muldoon, L.S. and offer the following comments or recommendations. Court Pla^a North. 25 Main Street A) A storm drainage design for the house and driveway should be submitted for review consisting of a dry well and piping. This will require a percolation test signed and sealed by a New York State licensed engineer. B) The house connections sizes for water and sewer and location should be shown on the drawing. The 4-inch water line should be replaced with a minimum of 6-inch pipeline, preferably an 8-inch pipeline as per the "Ten States Standards" for water supply. C) A fire flow test should be performed to ascertain fire flow capacities for this area. Once the above information is submitted, final recommendations will be made to the Board. If you should have any questions, please let us know. Hackensack, NJ 07601-7032 201 342 4200 lax 201 342.0790 JAG/jr 120E 75thSI.Suite8C New York. NY10O21 212 683 7712 PO Box io07 East Stroudsburg. PA 18301 717 421 1499 cc: Ms. Linda David, Village Administrator Janet A. Gandolfo, Esq., Village Attorney Mr. James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Ms. Susan J. Portman, Associate, Frederick P. Clark Associates Mr. and Mrs. John Petry, Owner VNT\800-22\JG042H4M.JR I �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut David J. Portman, A,CP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP Jim Donovan, RLA. ASLA MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: April 22, 1994 Subject: Review of Petrv/DeCarlo Subdivision As requested, we have reviewed the subdivision application submitted by John and Maureen Petry, as contract vendee, for a property which is approximately 0.29 acres in size, located at 41 Amos Street on the western side of Amos Street and the eastern side of Webber Avenue in the R-3 Residence District. The site (a "through lot") presently contains a two-story dwelling and a detached garage with a short macadam driveway off of Amos Street. The Applicants are proposing to subdivide the property into two lots. Lot 1 would be 6,554.4 square feet in size and would contain the existing dwelling. Lot 2 would be 5,999.7 square feet and would contain the existing garage. The Plan shows that the garage would be removed from Lot 2 and a new macadam driveway is proposed to be constructed off of Webber Avenue to serve Lot 1. The Applicants have submitted the following plan: "Subdivision of Lands of the Estate of Anna DeCarlo Situate at North Tarrytown, Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester County, N.Y.," scale 1" = 2 0 ' , dated April 7, 1994, prepared by John J. Muldoon, Professional Land Surveyor. REVIEW COMMENTS 1. Application Status: The Planning Board made a negative declaration regarding the potential environmental impacts of this subdivision and approved the preliminary subdivision at the meeting in March. We distributed the draft resolution of preliminary subdivision approval by mail on April 1, 1994. 2. Subdivision Regulation Compliance: The recent submission generally complies with the requirements of information to be supplied for a final subdivision plan. 3 Parking: The issue of the provision of parking for Lot 1 has been resolved with the location of a proposed 12 ' wide macadam driveway off of Webber Avenue. Since Webber Avenue is a - Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX • (914) 967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation County road, approval of a curb-cut along Webber Avenue will be subject to the Westchester County Department of Public Works. Additional comments were provided by the Department of Public Works in the March 30, 1994 letter from the Westchester County Planning Board to James T. Margotta. 4. Dedication: The Applicants' plan indicates that Webber Avenue is 49.5 feet in width. In compliance with Section 12B(2)(b) of the Village Subdivision Regulations, a strip of land 0.25 feet in width has been shown on the plan for dedication along Webber Avenue on both lots. Susan J. Portman, AICP Associate/Planning cc: Linda David, Village Administrator Janet A. Gandolfo, Esq., Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Joseph A. Gulino, PE, Village Engineer John and Maureen Petry John J. Muldoon 500\notA-005.sjp 2 �V x 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR t : The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project n may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequenti are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine inificance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental aalysis In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting * question of significance The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination •ocess has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. «fl EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentiallylarge impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE-Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: IS Part 1 B Part 2 QPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting nation, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the agency that: • "B A. The project will not result in any large and important impacts) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. D B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* 0 C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions M a t t e r of V l s c o g l i o s l ~T\MQ LOt Name of Action J*ubd«^»^ioA P l a n n i n g Board - V i l l a g e of North Tarrytown Name oi Lead Agency . f ResponsibleOfficuJriUaidAgency tfeof ' Title of Responsible Officer iature of Responsible Officer in LeadXgepcy Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) ' JOHN J. HUGHES, JR. May 16, 1994 Date �i Ap PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor fc NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significantd RRe ( o n the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be conui ^as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addrtf Is Information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3 i Wl It is expected that completion of the full EAF w i l l be dependent on information currently available and will notiml new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate andsp ' ' $ each instance. IQ Q 11 D NAME OF ACTION Matter of V l s c o g l i o s i Tuud lo-f- i u b c W t ^ C M LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Strefll Address, Municipality and County) 1 7 6 - 1 7 8 North Washington S t r e e t , North Tarrytown, W e s t c h e s t e r County NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR Marcello Visjpogliosi 12 Ai BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( 9 1 4 ) 631-8855 AOORESS c / o J . Hughes, J r . , Esq. 49 Beekman Avenue CTTY/FO STATE North Tarrytown, NY ZIP CODE 10591 NY NAME OF OWNER (If different) 14 BUSINESS TELEPHONE same as owner ( •) :„„ C N/A AOORESS 15 St: N/A crrv/po N/A STATE ZIP CO0E N/A N/A 16 La DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Subdivision - 2 lots 17 Is a) b) 18 Is Se Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: OUrban DIndustrial •Commercial CSResidential (suburban) DForest OAgriculture 2. T o t a l acreage of project area: \ ^ 0>\5 19 Is of • R u r a l (non-ft 20 Ha -DOther acres. PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION arres arm Forested acres arm Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc acre* arm W e t l a n d (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL)) acres arm W a t e r Surface Area acres acre? Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres APPROXIMATE ACREAGE M e a d o w or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces\A\nAS£apiA<i(A.C)2.J J Other (Indicate type! R e s i d e n t i a l 3. W h a t is predominant soil type(s) on project site? 0« l i s -J** U rlo&n IflrtrJ - f" htor\-ton • • B. Pr Phys a. b c. d *cr«* acres acres ; & acre (bw\(ikA a. Soil drainage: B W e l l drained 100 % of site DModerately well drained % of site • Poorly drained % of site If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of theN Land Classification System' acres (See 1 NYCRR 370) N/A 4. A r c there bedrock outcroppings on project site? a. W h a t is depth to bedrock' A p p r o x . 1 0 - 1 5 r *r DYes (in (£;No feet) In V i. 1 I I �slopes. #0-16% D15% /oft or greater _ % !s project substantially contiguous to. or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National icant effec Registers of Historic Places? DYes 2lNo consider DYes IS No addition Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? What is the depth of the water tahlp?APP.10- {in feet) otHBfoto DYes QNo a n d specif Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? i Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? DYes CSNo Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes BNo According to Identify each species Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) DYes ®No Describe : 20DE ) Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes ©No If yes, explain _ ^ _ > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ » _ _ _ _ 4 Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes ®No :OOE 5 Streams within o r contiguous t o project area: None a. N a m e o f Stream a n d name of River to which it is tributary I Lakes, ponds, w e t l a n d areas within or contiguous t o project area: a. N a m e None N/A b. Size (In acres) N/A 7 Is the site served by existing public utilities? OYes DNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? DYes DNo b) If Yes, w i l l improvements be necessary to allow connection? S9Yes DNo I Is the site located in a n agricultural district certified pursuant t o Agriculture a n d M a r k e t s Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? DYes K)No ' Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? @Yes DNo ( n o n - f a n * Has the site ever been used for the disposal o f solid or hazardous wastes? LETION DYes CSNo (J, Project Description Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled b y project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: ']^ 0*\* acres initially; y ^ O ' * ^ u c.'-Project acreage to remain undeveloped acres. acres ultimately. acn d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent o f expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing -frMaxmium-wmetHai^rips^enerated -per hopr — 6 N ," ^ h. If residential: Number and tyt&of housing; units;) *&. One Family '*• Two Family oftl Initially * Ultimately 1 ... %v 6 -fQfo.1 ; proposed (upon completion of 'project)? N^" CM&totf& Multiple Family 1 Condominium _ J. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 35 height; 20* j Jffi lehgth. width j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy u?APP iwfabit 3 �2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? DYes DNo N/A tons/cub 0N/A a. If yes. for what intend., purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes • ©No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes ENo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? None ac 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this pre DYes 0No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction N/A months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated N ^A (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 N /A month N c. Approximate completion date of final phase N A month N/A / d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 0. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction .10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project /A DYes yssr, (including derr y^. QNo EJNo N/A ; after project is complete . N/A N/A 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes DYes 0No (SNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? I yes, explain DYes N/A , N/A QNo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 16. Will the project generate solid waste? DYes a. If yes, what is the amount per month DYes (SNo C&Nc 03No N/A tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? c. If yes, give name OYss No a d d i t i o n a l waste GO Yes N/A DNo ; location N /A d. Will any wastes not go into a sewa'ge disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? LYes ©No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? DYes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? K)No No a d d i t i o n a l N/A N/A tons/month years. DYes QSNo 1g, Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes KJNo 20. W i l l project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? 2 1 . Will project result in an increase in energy use? If yes , indicate type(s) DYes Total anticipated water usage per day N/A N/A gallons/minute gallons/day 2 4 Does project involve Local. State or Federal funding? If Yes. explain E3No N/A 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 23 DYes DYes N/A 09No . 4 ENo �DYes ED No City. Town. Village Planning Board 3Yes 3 Yes DNo City. Town Zoning Board 0Yes DNo City, County Health Department DYes K)No DYes EJNo Other Regional Agencies DYes 09 No State Agencies DYes ©No federal Agencies DYes CSNo ^ City, ^own.. Village Board her Local Agencies Subdivision Variances - already granted 4794_ ion) c. Zoning and Planning Information I Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ©Yes DNo If Yes. indicate decision required: Dzoning amendment Qflzoning variance Dspecial use permit Bsubdivision Dnew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother R I What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? "5 Dsite plan ^ ) What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Five (5) r e s i d e n t i a l units fecijfi'yi«t l^/f^YtfOlflHCeTy? TIAJO hor2-FfLwiitu JfrtffliVgS CClie i What is the proposed zoning of the site? R-5 MO Clyanjg, ; pe.<r , / o 4 Q 5 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 5—s«cidantial units. /si A 6 Is the proposed action consistenfwith the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ED Yes DNo ^ What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a V* mile radius of proposed action? Residential - multi-family. Cinq/p-flwihlf CCMMencid | Cfrrfc., 'ft^fK-Hdyttl, (hAlt>licl$M'P*WC R . - J , p - t y g - ^ i Prbi C-ht-Z <-> r^ ' ' ** ' I Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V* mile? EDYes DNo 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 2 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ^lcnac ace attached-stag. AffftiX'Z-rfOO 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? S^-ft DYes BNo 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? DYes QNo HA< a. If yes. is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? GBYes DNo 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? A/A DYes a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? EYes GSNo DNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. j certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my k n ^ ) e c f | e / ^ Applicant/Sponsor Name Cant/bponSOr Name ture ^j/U , Marcello n a r c e x x o Viecogliosi VXBCUKXXOSX i&td&1<vfk , k fak**j fc H^i '"-' l h t Title . flats ; V / ^ v '''•'-'• 5/16/94 9BSJL action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding this assessment. 5 �I c-ii ^ - P R O J E C T I M P A C ' I S A N D I H h i H M A G U i ' i u U L Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) ' • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations b* reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily signifies Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 sim: asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State? for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropn<! for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative i have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each quest-: • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there'will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size off impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshc is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PARI e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by changes) in the project to a small to modern impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. V must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? G9NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1.000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. * Construction drlespaniion oi a ^anitaty-Undfilt- J * £ — • Construction in a'designated floodway."^fS^%:icv:--:";;' ""£: • Other'impacts • "r&lStqKr* - " 1 2 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact D D DYes DNc • D DYes DNc n D D DYes DNc DYes DNe D DYes DNc D D D ! D GYes -rQ- D Can Impact E; Mitigated By Project Chang •vG- DNOJ -G.Yes---{3Nc; • D DYes'"GNO 2. Will there be an effect V .iy uiii<|ui> or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)ONO DYES •W*A • Specific land forms: _. D —"Ves • GNo �IMPACT O N WATER WW proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15. 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law. ECU KNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 elopable area of site contains a protected water body. • Iging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. 1 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change Moderate Impact r oieMiai Large Impact D D D D DYes DNo DYes DNo D D D D D D DYes DNo D DYes DNo DYes DNo D DYes DNo D D D D DYes DYes DNO D D D D DYes DNo DYes DNo D D DYes DNO D D DYes DNO Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity D D D D DYes DYes DNO Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per day. D D DYes DNO Proposed Action will likely came siltation or other discharge into an existing body of waier io tue extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. D D DYes DNO Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. D D DYes DNo 'Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. D D DYes DNo Proposed Action locates commei_iai and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. D DYes DNo Other D QYes DNo DYes DNo Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. •Other impacts: ( Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? UNO DYES Eiamples that would apply to column 2 • A10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: i Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? QNO Examples that would apply to column 2 DNO DYES Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Proposed Action requires use of a sburce of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. « ed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 s per minute pumping capacity •Construction or operation causing any contamination ot a water supply system impacts: roposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface d ^ P runoff? ENO DYES Eiamples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows D D DNO �Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change D D D D D D D • DYes DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo GNo D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. D a DYes GNo • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. D D DYes DNO • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. D a DYes GNO • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. D a DYes GNO • Other impacts: D a GYes GNO a a a a a a a a GYes GNo GYes GYes GNO GYes GNO a a a GYes GNO G GYes GNO a a GYes GNO 'Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. * Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. * Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. * Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? BNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. _, IMPACT O N PLANTS A N D ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? El NO Examples that would apply to column 2 • DYES Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? E3NO Examples that would apply to column 2 GNO DYES • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. I M P A C T O N AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES LO Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? BNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields. pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 • I �» struction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of iultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. 1 The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g.. subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field t o drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: IMPACT O N AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 W i l l proposed action affect aesthetic resources? BONO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply t o column 2 1 Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different f r o m or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. ct components that w i l l result in the elimination or significant ning of scenic views known to be important to the area »Other impacts: » IMPACT O N HISTORIC A N D A R C H A E O L O G I C A L RESOURCES 12 W i l l Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? ENO DYES Examples that would apply t o column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. > Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory » Other impacts: _____ IMPACT O N O P E N S P A C E A N D RECREATION 13 Witt Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? mples that would apply t o column 2 CD NO DYES ermanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity, • i A major reduction of an open space important to the community • Other impacts: 9 # •m 2 1 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D CYes DNo .DYes DNo D Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change D D DYes DNo D D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo �IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ENO Examples that would apply to column 2 DYES • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact D D D D • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. • • Other impacts: D Can Impact Bt Mitigated By Project Change 18 DYes DYes DYes DNe DNJ DNC IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ENO^. DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: • T P • T w • P • P • P OI D D DYes D D DYes • D (e DNe • P • Pi • O D D DYes DNo • D DYes DNo D D D D DYes DNo DYes DNo • • DYes DNO D D DYes DNO NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable QfJors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ENO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Hasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. • Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? BNO Examples that would apply to column 2 DYES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. _ •-ProposedAction may result in^he burial x>f "hazardous ^vastes- in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) ^uStorage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural fleas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: _ _ _ _ D :g; D D a D DYes Part miti Instr Disc 1 F 2. C DNo 3 t B r — - © Y e s —QNo • C DYes DNo DYes Dm DYes DN« (C �IMPACT O N GROWTH A N D CHARACTER OF C O M M U N I T Y OR N E I G H B O R H O O D ,18 Will'proposed action affect the character of the existing community? I ENO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 1 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact • a DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo DYes DNo DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo , ^ V permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. 2 a a • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. • • • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. D D D • Other • a • Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) impacts: i 3 i Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? El N O DYES Iff Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 l Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be litigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: jl Briefly describe the impact. j! Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). J Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. ^•totinue on attachments) 11 7 ? ~««^tmmm~* ~~ ~^~^ ~:_T~__ir~ H �< V Approved/iwith r e s p e c t t o substance and form: Vifllage Attorney D<Jited: Approved^ by t h e planning Board > i< r Acting Chairroa F i l e d with V i l l a g e Clerk e%g£3T=e^- Deputy Clerk D^ted: Ifajiy � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1994 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1994-04-28 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1994 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994