https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/4ebb70540f243c38e36803165bac9bfb.pdf 39b0a0e45155f267ea7f9544c52b3c66 PDF Text Text REGULAR MEETING NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK November 17, 1994 A regular meeting of the North Tarrytown Planning Board was held on November 17, 1994 at 8:00 p.m. at Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT:- George Hritz, Chairman Donald Caetano Edward McCarthy David Perlmutter ALSO PRESENT:; Janet Gandolfo, Attorney James Margotta, Building Inspector Susan J. Portman, Assoc;/Planning Mark A. DiGennaro, CAMCE 7 Chairman Hritz called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m. 1. CONTINUATION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION RE: CHESTNUT RIDGE Applicant requested that application review be adjourned to December meeting. 2. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION BY JAMES AND MARTHA BICK, 3 TERRACE CLOSE Frederick P. Clark Assoc, raised the issue of whether a paper street was located on the premises in question and this issue was addressed by John Hughes, the attorney for the applicant. Mr. Hughes stated that he researched the title and there did not appear to be a paper street located in that area. Chairman Hritz asked Susan Portman whether she had any further outstanding issues and she replied that she did not. Chairman Hritz asked for a motion to declare the Planning Board's intent to be lead agency in this application. Donald Caetano made the motion, seconded by David Perlmutter. Motion approved unanimously. Chairman Hritz asked for a motion to make a negative declaration for SEQR at the December Meeting. David Perlmutter mad the motion, seconded by Donald Caetano. Motion approved unanimously. 3. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION BY AL PECK, IRVING PLACE The applicant distributed newly revised surveys of the premises to the Board members. A discussion ensued with regard to the parking available to the property. �PAGE #2 Chairman Hritz asked for a motion to declare the Planning Board lead agency for SEQR. Donald Caetano made the motion, seconded by David Perlmutter. Motion carried unanimously. Chairman Hritz asked for a motion to make a negative declaration for SEQR. David Perlmutter made the motion, seconded by Donald Caetano. Motion carried unanimously. Donald Caetano made a motion to approve the application for subdivision. Seconded by David Perlmutter. Motion carried unanimously. 4. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: APPLICATION OF AL PECK SUBDIVISION OF PREMISES AT BEDFORD ROAD Mr. Peck addressed the Board and stated that the existing lot is 200 feet by 50 feet with one house. In order to sell the property, he has to subdivide the lot. The required area size for a lot in that district is 50 feet by 100 feet. Mr. peck stated that this was a simple subdivision with no variances needed. Chairman Hritz asked Susan Portman if she had any comments or objections to the application. She indicated that she had no additional comments other than the ones listed in her Memorandum to the Board. The Chairman asked for a motion to declare the Planning Board lead agency. Edward McCarthy made the motion, seconded by Donald Caetano. Motion carried unanimously. The Chairman asked for a motion to make a negative declaration for SEQR. Edward McCarthy made the motion, seconded by Donald Caetano. Motion carried unanimously. 5. CONTINUATION OF A PUBLIC HEARING RE; PHILIPSE PLAZA BY ANTONIO RODRIGUES FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, N. BROADWAY Chairman Hritz asked the applicant's architect if there were any substantial changes made from the previously submitted plans. The architect answered that he had redesigned the parking configuration in respect to the Antonio Carpentry building. He explained in more detail the changes that he made to the parking. A discussion followed regarding the parking spaces and the applearance of the project area. The Chairman asked if there was any member of the public who wished to address the Board. �PAGE #3 Mr. Landi, a member of the public, came forward and stated that he was very concerned about the retaining wall and how the traffic was going to be affected by this project. He owns the property adjacent to the project and he doesn't want to see any increased traffic. The architect explained the flow of traffic by referring to the site plans. A lengthy discussion followed with regard to the traffic impact on Old Broadway and the entire area as a result of this project. The Board adjourned the public hearing in this matter to the December meeting. Chairman Hritz asked for a motion to have the Planning Board declare its intent to be lead agency in this application for SEQR. David Perlmutter made the motion, seconded by Donald Caetano. Motion carried unanimously. Chairman Hritz asked for a report from David Perlmutter with regard to his research into the issue of the validity of requiring recreation fees from applicants. Mr. Perlmutter reported that he had reviewed the Dolan case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court and it is his opinion that the Supreme Court only addressed the "taking" of property rather than the payment of a fee into a particular fund. He stated that North Tarrytown should continue to enforce its requirement for a recreation fees until this requirement is determined to be invalid by the courts, if that be the case. Chairman Hritz asked the rest of the Board members to take this discussion under advisement until the next meeting. The minutes of the October 20, 1994 meeting were approved as submitted. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Carmen G. Mariano Recording Secretary �RESOLUTION Adopted at the November 17, 1994 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PROPOSED ACTION: SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY INTO TWO (2) LOTS OWNER: LEVY ESTATE APPLICANT: ALBERT PECK LOCATION: 15 SLEEPY HOLLOW ROAD TAX DESIGNATION: SECTION 17, BLOCK 8, LOT 13 ZONING: R-3 RESIDENTIAL WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for subdivision approval (the application) pursuant to the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown, Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown and other requirements of the Village Code considered pertinent to the application, which application is to subdivide property located on the westerly side of Sleepy Hollow Road and the easterly side of Amos Street at 15 Sleepy Hollow Road into two (2) lots for residential development; and WHEREAS, Lot A would be 5,000 square feet in size and Lot B would be 5,000 square feet in size and would contain the existing dwelling, as shown on the drawing prepared by John J. Muldoon, Professional Land Surveyor, and further identified as follows: "Preliminary Subdivision Map Prepared For Levy Est., Situate Village of No. Tarrytown, Town of Mt. Pleasant, Westchester Co., N.Y.," scale not shown (1" = 20'), date not shown; and WHEREAS, all references to the "Applicant" shall include the Applicant's successor and assigns; and WHEREAS, the site has been visited by the Village's Planning Consultant and the Planning Board is thoroughly familiar with the site and all aspects of the proposed subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board noted that the existing dwelling has a deficient front yard setback and noted that this existing non-conformity would not be aggravated by the proposed subdivision; and WHEREAS, on October 25, 1994, the Westchester County Planning Board informed the Village's Planning Consultant that they had no comments to offer on this application; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held at the Village Hall on November 17, 1994, at which time those wishing to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard; and �« WHEREAS, the Planning Board considered this a minor subdivision and treated the preliminary and final as a single approval; and WHEREAS, in the course of this review and acting as Lead Agency pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 1. Received an application fee; 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property and of the surrounding areas; 3. Requested, received and considered comments from the Village Planning Consultant, the Village Engineering Consultant and the Building Inspector; 4. Requested, received and reviewed a short Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); 5. After review of said field conditions, recommendations and EAF, as well as other materials and matters noted above, the Planning Board has determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action and made a Negative Declaration on November 17, 1994, and noted on the EAF its determination of nonsignificance of environmental impact. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said application for subdivision approval for a two (2) lot subdivision, as shown on the drawing entitled "Preliminary Subdivision Map Prepared For Levy Est. , Situate Village of No. Tarrytown, Town of Mt. Pleasant, Westchester Co., N.Y.," scale not shown (1" = 20'), date not shown, prepared by John J. Muldoon, Professional Land Surveyor, be and is hereby granted subdivision approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or, as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of this subdivision resolution and upon the final mylar copy of the subdivision plat drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions and the Applicant may obtain the endorsement of the Westchester County Department of Health on the final mylar subdivision plat which endorsements shall permit filing in the offices of the Westchester County Clerk, provided, however, that this subdivision approval shall expire within one hundred eighty (180) days from the date of this resolution if the following conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board: 2 �The Applicant shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown the reimbursement of all application review fees as noted and required in Section 62-3OF of the Village Zoning Code. Revision of the above noted plat to demonstrate the following: 2.1 The plat shall be revised and titled "Final Subdivision Plat;" 2.2 The date and scale of the plat, the date of the survey, and the names of all of the neighboring property owners shall be provided on the plat; 2.3 The final plat shall comply with the requirements of Section 11 of the Village of North Tarrytown Subdivision Regulations; 2.4 The signature block for the endorsement of the Planning Board Chairman shall be revised to comply with Section ll.A(l)(c)(14c); 2.5 The date of this resolution shall be noted on the final subdivision plat. PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN By: ^— fcP-^k Iritz, Chairman (f^North Tarrytown Plann^Rg-^Board 500\not4-036.sjp:ev 3 Date: /*/'>'JV �RESOLUTION Adopted at the November 17, 1994 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PROPOSED ACTION: SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY INTO TWO (2) LOTS OWNER: LEVY ESTATE APPLICANT: ALBERT PECK LOCATION: 21 AND 23 IRVING PLACE TAX DESIGNATION: SHEET 78, BLOCK 15, LOT 21 ZONING: R-5 RESIDENTIAL WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for subdivision approval (the application) pursuant to the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown, Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown and other requirements of the Village Code considered pertinent to the application, which application is to subdivide property located at 21 and 23 Irving Place into two (2) lots for residential development; and WHEREAS, Lot A would be 3,096 square feet in size and would contain the existing dwelling at 23 Irving Place and Lot B would be 3,419 square feet in size and would contain the existing dwelling at 21 Irving Place, as shown on the drawing prepared by John J. Muldoon, Professional Land Surveyor, and further identified as follows: "Preliminary Subdivision Map Prepared For Albert Peck, Situate Village of No. Tarrytown, Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester Co., N.Y.," scale 1" = 2 0 ' , dated July 15, 1994; and WHEREAS, all references to the "Applicant" shall include the Applicant's successor and assigns; and WHEREAS, the site has been visited by the Village's Planning Consultant and the Planning Board is thoroughly familiar with the site and all aspects of the proposed subdivision; and WHEREAS, on November 16, 1994, the Zoning Board of Appeals granted all area variances which that Board determined were necessary for the application; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held at the Village Hall on November 17, 1994, at which time those wishing to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board considered this a minor subdivision and treated the preliminary and final as a single approval; and �The Applicant shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown reimbursement of all application review fees as noted required in Section 62-3OF of the Village Zoning Code. the and Revision of the above noted plat to demonstrate the follow^ ng: 2.1 The plat shall be revised and titled "Final Subdivis. ion Plat;" 2.2 The final plat shall comply with the requirements of Section 11 of the Village of North Tarrytown Subdivision Regulations; 2.3 The signature block for the endorsement of the Planning Board Chairman shall be revised to comply with Section ll.A(l)(c)(14c); 2.4 The date of this resolution shall be noted on the fi^nal subdivision plat. The Building Inspector or Village Attorney shall confirm tt^at, during the 30-day circulation period, none of the involved agencies objected to the Planning Board becoming the I^ead Agency. PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN By: hi Date: Chairman Tarrytown P 500\not4-042.sjp:ev 3 Board ll^SX / *" �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. David J. Portman, AICP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914)967-6540 Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP Jim Donovan, RLA. ASLA MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: November 11, 1994 Subject: Review of Bick Preliminary Subdivision As requested, we have reviewed the preliminary subdivision application submitted by James and Martha Bick for an area comprised of five previously subdivided building lots and a paper street located on the northern and western sides of the Terrace Close cul-de-sac in the R-2A Residence District. Tax Lots 1 (Bick), 2 (LoMascolo) and 4 (Golodetz) contain existing singlefamily dwellings. Lots 8 (owned by Bick) and 9 (ownership not known) are presently undeveloped. The Applicant is proposing to break up Lot 9 and distribute the pieces to Lots 2, 4 and 8, resubdivide Lot 8 to subtract a small triangular piece (the "new" Lot 8 is shown as "Lot B") , and add the small triangular piece from Lot 8 and the paper street to Lot 1 (the "new" Lot 1 is shown as "Lot A") . As a result, one building lot will be eliminated from the subdivision. The Applicant has submitted the following plan: "Subdivision Map Prepared For James A. & Martha A. Bick, ReSubdivision of Lot 1 - Block 3, An Unnumbered Parcel, Lot 8 Block 2 and a Portion of Lot 9 - Block 2 As Shown On Revised Map of Sleepy Hollow Manor - Filed in Westchester County Division of Land Records On June 23, 193 0 As Map No. 3621, Located in the Village of North Tarrytown, Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester County, N.Y.," scale 1" = 20', dated October 28, 1994, prepared by Charles H. Riley, Land Surveyor. REVIEW COMMENTS 1. Subdivision Regulations Compliance: The subdivision plan should be revised to show the area of all of the properties involved in the subdivision, the names of the property owners of all of the involved properties and the location of the other two existing dwellings. The names of all involved property owners and their addresses should be added to the Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX • (914)967-6615 Long Island -(516)364-4544 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/ Development/Environment /Transportation plan and the application. The existing and proposed lot sizes and dimensions of all involved properties should be shown on the plan. T h ^ names of all adjoining property owners should be shown on thxe plan. In addition, the existing and proposed subdivision lines should be labeled as such. The subdivision plan should that the subject properties 2A (not R-2) ctxid to make the the tax map number is shown 3, Lot 1). 2. be corrected to reflect the fact are located in Zoning District Rtax map numbers consistent (i.e., as both Block 1A, Lot 1 and Block Zoning Compliance: The Applicant should supply information regarding t h e current ownership of the 40-foot wide "unnumbered jparcel" which the Applicant has previously indicated is a "paper street." If that parcel is indeed a paper street, further research should be done in order to determine its status. The Applicant should research the history of th.e original subdivision, determine whether the parcel was ever dedicated to the Village or offered to the Village for dedication, and obtain the agreement of the Village (or any other involved party) stating that no party, other than t h e Bicks, has any right to improve the parcel. Although we aire not attorneys, based upon our experience, the matter of the paper street should be settled before allowing the creation o f Lot A, which would include existing Lot 1, the paper street and a triangular piece of existing Lot 8. Otherwise, at some point in the future, the Phelps Memorial Hospital property could be redeveloped for residential use and whoever has trie right to improve that parcel as a road (even though the wiclth of the parcel is probably substandard for a road right-of—way) would be creating a "left-over" triangular piece of land (approximately 6,075 square feet in size) which could not be used for residential development. If it is deter-mined that the parcel is a paper street, it may simplify the i_ssue to keep the triangular piece as a part of proposed Lot E3. Due to its lo-t width, proposed Lot B could probably not be subdivided in the future without a variance due to the fact that the lot -width would be insufficient for two lots. The Bicks have informally offered to restrict the property from further subdivision. If that is their intent, this offer should be statred on the subdivision plan. Other than t h e matters mentioned above concerning the paper street, the proposed subdivision appears to comply with the Zoning Ordinance. 2 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation 3. Environmental Review; According to Part 617.12 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR), the subdivision of the subject property constitutes a Type I Action because the property is located within the Hudson River Shoreline Critical Environmental Area. The Applicant has submitted a Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF). We have reviewed the EAF and have enclosed a copy containing our recommended changes for your consideration. The Planning Board may declare its intent to be Lead Agency in the review of this action. A notice of intent to be Lead Agency should then be circulated to the involved agencies (i.e., the Westchester County Department of Health) and interested agencies (e.g., agencies, such as the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, which maintain an interest in the application but do not have direct approval authority). After 30 days or receipt of the responses from the other agencies, whichever comes first, the Planning Board may declare itself Lead Agency, provided no other involved agency objects, and make a Determination of Significance. The Lead Agency's preparation of a Negative Declaration or Findings Statement (following a Positive Declaration and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement) will complete the SEQR review process. Under coordinated review, involved agencies may not make final decisions until the SEQR process is completed. 4. Other Issues: It does not appear that the public hearing notice correctly reflected the proposed subdivision since it stated that Lot 8 would be increased in size from 46,368 square feet (when it is actually approximately 28,660 square feet) to 58,331 square feet [which is the total area of both proposed Lots A (developed) and B (undeveloped), not a single undeveloped lot to be known as Lot 8 ] . Susan J. Portman, AICP, Associate/Planning Enclosure cc: Sean Treacy, Mayor Linda E. David, Village Administrator Janet A. Gandolfo, Esq., Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Mark A. DiGennaro, Village Engineer John Hughes, Esq. James and Martha Bick 500\not4-031.sjp:aj 3 �14-16-2 (2/87)-7c 617.21 . _ Appendix A Stale Environmental Quality'Review SEQR . FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an Impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentiallylarge impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF S I G N I F I C A N C E - T y p e 1 a n d Unlisted A c t i o n s Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: D Part 1 D Part 2 DPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (?2rts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magituc'e and importance of e2ch impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [^ A. The project will not result in any large and important impacts) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. D B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared." D C. The project may result in one or more large 2nd important impacts that m2y have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions James Bick and Martha Bick £+ ^\ P l a n n i n g Board - V i l l a g e of North _ f2£j<^bdn,. jicv\ Name of Action Tarrytown Name of Lead Agency ^^P Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signatured Preparer (If different from responsible office:er) October 3 , 1994 Date 1 �PART 1-PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor .NOTICE: This d o c u m e n t is designed to assist in determining whether jhe action proposed may have a significant effect |On the environment. Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considei as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any a d d i t i o n s information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION JAMES BICK and MARTHA BICK LOCATICN CF ACTION (Include Street Addftss, Municipality and County) 3 Terrace Close, North Tarrytwon, New YOrk BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME CF ArPUCANT/SPONSCR ( 914, 631-8855 James Bick and Martha Bick ADDRESS CITY/PO 3 Terrace Close, STATE North Tarrytown ZJPCODE NY 10591 BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER (If different) ( same ) ADDRESS same STATE CITY/PO ZIP CODE same DESCRIPTION CF ACTION Cj^a-fc-rGn o f o n e b u i l d i n g lot **<$ r-6 K ^ V ^ C . ** ^ j ' * ' * * 1 - '*** Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site D e s c r i p t i o n Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: DUrban Glndustrial GCommercial [^'Residential (suburban) CForest GAgriculture GCther 2. Total acreage of project area: ^ • -^ acres. APPROXIMATE ACREACE Meadow or Erushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fiil) ~ Roads, buildings and ether paved surfaces Residential Other (Indicate :ype)_ PRESENTLY acres IZ 1+ acres acres acres acres acres acres acres GRural (non-farm) AFTER COMPLETION acres i- £ 1±_ acres acres acres acres acres acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type{s) on project site? '. a. Soil drainage: £ W e l i drained \QQ % of site DModerately well drained % of site CPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the N Land Classification System? N/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? a. What is depth to bedrock? 10-15+ A CXYes DNo (jn feet) �5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: CO-10% E l 5 % or greater % DlO-15% _Q % _% 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site-.'or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? DYes CSs'o '/. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 8. What is the depth of the water table? 20+ DYes t$No (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? DYes ENo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? DYes DNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes ENo According to . Identify each species ., _ 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) DYes -?No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an' open space or recreation area? DYes E&s'o If yes, explain , __ 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes ONo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary N 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name y / A # ' b. Size (In acres) Is the site served by existing public utilities? __Yes DNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? EYes b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? C?Ves DNo DNo IS. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? DYes ENo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? j^Yes DNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes ENo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: 1+ acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped d. Length of project, in miles: N/A. 1.5+ 1+ (If appropriate) f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A %; ; proposed fl/_\ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: ' One Family Two Family Ultimately acres ultimately. acres. e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed Initially acres. Multiple Family Condominium i . 1 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure ' • height; j . Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 3 width; 60+ length. ft. �2. How much natural material (i.e.. rock, earth, etc.) will be removecffrom the site? _____ tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? GYes ENo DN/A NA a. If yes, for what intends- purpose is the site being reclaimed? ' b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes G5No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes _5No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes C&lo ' 6. If single phase project Anticipated period of construction . months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). N A b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 / month c. Approximate completion date of final phase N/A month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? DYes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes year, (including demolition). year. uNo ENo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete —_L_A N A TO. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ' 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? DYes DSNo 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes ENo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged |13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes {_&Jo If yes. explain N/A N/A Type 14. Will surface area of 2n existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain . 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? DYes DYes _JNO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? EYes GNo a. If yes. what is the amount per month N/A tons b. If.yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes DNo c. If yes, give name : : ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes. what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? _$Yes DNo tons/month. ENo 19. Will project routinely produce oc'crs (mere than one hour per cay)? DYes __No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DYes 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 23. Total anticipated water usage per day DYes years. DYes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? If yes , indicate type's) (3No ' 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? If Yes, explain r_/A DYes ©No ' gallons/minute. gallons/day. DYes _DNo S , ENo ENo �25. Approvals Required: Submittal Date Type City. Town, Village Board lity. Town. Village Planning Board DYes £iYes CNo GNo •' Subdivision City. Town Zoning Board DYes CNo «6ity. County Health Department EYes CNo I***'*"-*'"^ Other Local Agencies DYes CNo m Other Regional Agencies DYes CNo State Agencies DYes CNo Federal Agencies DYes CNo " 10-3-1994 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? EYes CNo If Yes. indicate decision required: Dzoning amendment Czoning variance Cspecial use permit CSsubdivision Dnew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R^Hk Gsite plan ^ : 3. What is the maximum poten* ?l development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? h b u i l d i n g lot- 2~ QJ^lliVyj i (Ctie en 1/iLh u"d€vtlcped /cf-^ 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? R-T5- NO Cy^^^K^ 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 1 bun dim lut- *Lh •. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? CSYes DNo 7. What are the predominant land use{s) and zoning classifications within a V* mile radius of proposed action? R e s i d e n t i a l s i n g l e f a m i l y , JOJfr-fabc/)«.I ; fl-l , K--2.fr, H . 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V* mile? £)Yes DNo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? - 1 (£€S«hA4*. s \cv\ - r€^tt^CJ c^ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authcrization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? OYes BDNo 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? CYes KS'o a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? N ^ C$Yes CNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes, is the existing read network adequate to handle the additional traffic? CYes CYes £JNO CNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or. may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. A p p l i c a n t / S p o n s o r Name JAMES BICK AND MARTHA BICK signature ^77 rlr-YJ^ry^ Title Date O c t o b e r 3 , 1994 Attorney If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. �Part 2— PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) k In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. " Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impzets and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1 . d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by changes) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in c o l u m n 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND W i l l the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? fiKO DYES Examples that w o u l d a p p l y t o c o l u m n . 2 • Any construction on slopes of 1 5 % or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 f o o t of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed "0%. 1 2 S m a l l to Moderate Impact Potential Larg9 Impact D D DYes QN< D D GYes DN< n DYes DYes GNo D D n DNO • D DYes DNO D D DYes DNO D D D D D DNO • DYes DYes DYes D D D Y es DN< C a n I m p a c t Be M i t i g a t e d By Project C h a n g e 1. • Construction on land w h e r e the depth to the w a t e r table is less than 3 feet. • Construction ci paved p a r k i n g 2rea for 1,000 or more vehicles. • Construction en land w h e r e bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing g r o u n d surface. • Construction that w i l l c o n t i n u e for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that w o u l d remove more than 1,000 tens of natural m a t e r i e l (i.e., rock or soil) per year • Construction or expansion of a sanitary l a n d f i i l . • Construction in a designated f l o o d w a y . • Other impacts DNO DNO . W i l l there be an e f f e c t t'.. _.iy unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological f o r m a t i o n s , etc.)j3^NO DYES Specific land forms: �1 2 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact D D D D DYes DYes DNo D D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNO DNO D D DYes DNo D D D D DYes DNo DYes DNO D D D D DYes DNo DYes DNo • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. D D DYes DNo • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. D D D D DYes DYes DNo DNo • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. D D DYes GNo • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. D D DYes GNo • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1.100 gallons. D DYes GNo IMPACT ON WATER Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15. 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ®NO GYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. • • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. • Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? QNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. • Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? SNO Examples that would apply to column 2 Can Impact Be Mitigated Sy Project Change DNO DNO DYES • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. 0 a D DYes DNo • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. a D C'Yes CNO • Other D D DYes DNo D D D Y es DNO • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. impacts: . Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? OMO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows. - •• 7 �1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact D D D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DYes DNO DNo DNo DNo a DYes DNo • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. • • D DYes DNo • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million 3TU's per hour. D D DYes DNo • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land.committed to industrial use. • D DYes DNo • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial. development within existing industrial areas. D D DYes DNo • Other impacts: • D DYes DNo • • D GY es DNo Proposed Action may C2use substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. • Other impacts: 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change IMPACT ON AIR 7 . Will proposed action affect air quality? CNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? GSNO Examples that would apply to column 2 GYES • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site cr found on the site. • Application cf pesticide or herbicide mere than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. D D D DYes DYes DNo DNo • Other D D D Y es DNc • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident cr migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. D D DYes D.No • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres cf mature forest (over 100 years of age) cr other locally important vegetation. D D DYes D'No D D D Y es • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. impacts- 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? CSN'O Examples that would apply to column 2 GYES IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 1 0 . Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? 3DNO DYES _ Examples that would apply to column 2 ^ B j T h e proposed action would sever, cress or limit access to agricultural ^ ^ l a n d (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 G DNC �^ ^ J r o p o s e d Action may C2use substantial erosion. • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. • Other impacts: D D IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? jCxO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. • D • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than TO million 3TU's per hour. D • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land.committed to industrial use. D • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial. development within existing industrial areas. D • Other impacts: D IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS fWill Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? £j,NO Examples that would apply to column 2 GYES • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. D • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. a • Cther D impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect ncn-threatened CT non-er.car.gered species? ,££NO Examples that would applv to column 2 GYES • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. D • Proposed Action requires the removal cf more than TO acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important '•egetst.cn. D IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES TO. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? J2JNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ^ ^ T h e proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ^ ^ p n d (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) D �(Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: , IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 1 1 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? KJNO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different fro'm or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their -Enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Other impacts: . IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? KJNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly cr partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites en the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing cr future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO DYES . The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Other impacts: I . 1 2 Small t o Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNO a D DYes DNo D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D LJYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo D Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change �Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large • Impact D D D D D D PYes GYes DYes DNo DNo DNo D D DYes DNo a D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo • Blasting w i t h i n 1,500 f e e t of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. D D D Y es DN« • O d o r s w i l l o c c u r r o u t i n e l y (more than one hour per day). D D D D DYes DYes DNo DNo • Proposed A c t i o n w i l l r e m o v e natural barriers that w o u l d act as a noise screen. D D DYes DNo • Other D • DYes DNo • Proposed A c t i o n m a y cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. o i l , pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of a c c i d e n t or upset c o n d i t i o n s , or there rr.2y be a chronic low level discharge or emission. D D DYes DNo • Proposed A c t i o n may r e s u l t in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any f o r m (i.e. t o x i c , p o i s o n o u s , highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, i n f e c t i o u s , etc.) D D• DYes C.No • Storage facilities for o n e m i l l i o n or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other f l a m m a b l e l i q u i d s , D D DYes DNo • Proposed a c t i o n m a y result in the excavation or other disturbance w i t h i n 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. D D DYes DNO • ' D DYes DNo IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 1 4 . W i l l there be an e f f e c t t o existing transportation systems? K'NO Examples t h a t w o u l d a p p l y t o column 2 "' DYES • A l t e r a t i o n of present patterns o f movement of people and/or goods. • Proposed A c t i o n w i l l result in major traffic problems. • O t h e r impacts: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Can Impact Be Mitigated By project Chang- I M P A C T O N ENERGY 15. W i l l proposed a c t i o n a f f e c t the community's sources of f u e l or energy supply? ©NO DYES Examples t h a t w o u l d a p p l y t o column 2 • Proposed A c t i o n w i l l cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any f o r m of energy in t h e municipality. • Proposed A c t i o n w i l l r e q u i r e the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system t o serve more than 50 single or t w o f a m i l y residences or t o serve a m a j o r commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: N O I S E A N D ODOR IMPACTS 1 6 . W i l l there be o b j e c t i o n a b l e odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed A c t i o n ? • BONO DYES Examples t h a t w o u l d a p p l y t o column 2 • Proposed A c t i o n w i l l p r o d u c e operating noise exceeding the local a m b i e n t noise levels ior noise outside of structures. impacts: I M P A C T O N PUBLIC H E A L T H 17. W i l l Proposed A c t i o n a f f e c t public health and safety? _NO Examples t h a t w o u l d a p p l y t o column 2 • O t h e r impacts: 10 DYES �IMPACT O N GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD , p. W i l l proposed action affect the character of the existing community? £JNO DYES 1 Small t o Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large . Impact Can Impact Be M i t i g a t e d By Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 D D DYes DNo D D D Y es DNO D D D D D D DYes DNO DYes DNO DYes DNO Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) D D D Y es DNo Proposed Action will set- an important precedent for future projects. D D D D D D DYes DNO DYes DNO DYes DNO The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year, as a result of this project Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals." Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment Other impacts: ___ • 1 9 . Is there, or is there likely to be, pubjic controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ^ 3 N O DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how ;he impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change-'*). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring . — • The duration of the impact • • • • • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value Whether the impact can or will.be controlled The regional consequence of the impact Its potential divergence from local needs and goals Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut David J. Portman, A,CP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 Michael A Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP (914) 967-6540 Jim Donovan, RLA, ASLA MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: November 10, 1994 Subject: Annual Report on Operation of Zoning Ordinance As requested at the last Planning Board meeting, I have asked other staff members if they have come across a requirement for an annual report from a Planning Board to a Village or Town Board in other municipalities. The only one we came across was in the Town/Village of Harrison, where that community's Planning Board prepares an annual summary of applications, approvals and denials. It is our opinion that the Planning Board has the right to make recommendations to the Village Board of Trustees regarding the operation of the Zoning Ordinance and other related legislation at any time. Having the Zoning Ordinance make this report mandatory is highly unusual and we therefore recommend that Section 62-48D of the Village Code either be removed or the term "shall prepare" should be changed to "may prepare" in order to ensure that the Planning Board is not prohibited from making recommendations as necessary. Assuming the Planning Board will be preparing a report of their recommendations to the Village Board, we have assembled a preliminary list of recommended Code amendments for your consideration (see attachment). Susan J. Portman, AICP, Associate/Planning Attachment cc: Sean Treacy, Mayor Linda E. David, Village Administrator Janet A. Gandolfo, Esq., Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Mark DiGennaro, Village Engineer 500\not4-0A6.sjp:ev Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX * (914) 967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN PRELIMINARY LIST OF ITEMS TO CONSIDER RECOMMENDING TO VILLAGE BOARD FOR AMENDMENT Zoning Ordinance §62-29: Re-examine and clarify issue of when a site plan application shall be required. §62-34: Verify that the entire Section 62-34 was not repealed in 1992 (only Section 62-341 was to have been amended). Reexamine the recreation fee requirements and also determine whether a fee shall be required for site plan and/or subdivision approvals. May also want to remove building permit fees from Section 62-34 and add a reference to a separate fee schedule (would be easier to update fees in the future if not part of the Zoning Ordinance). §62-29 or 62-30: Add a list of materials and information to be submitted as part of a complete site plan application and a deadline for submission prior to Planning Board meeting. §62-3OF: Revise language to be consistent with application form and Village Code section regarding fees. Add a reference to a separate fee schedule. §62-14: Reevaluate parking standards (including number of spaces required per use, size of spaces, provide standards for compact and angled parking, add standards for aisle width, and add provision to give Planning Board the authority to revise number of spaces required under certain circumstances, as appropriate). Revise the definition of parking space in Section 62-4 (it is not appropriate to have regulations within definition). §62-30: Consider adding a requirement for a public hearing for site plan applications. Add and/or revise time frames for holding a public hearing, making a decision and filing of approval to be consistent with Village Law. §62-48D: Either change "shall prepare" or remove Part D altogether. The Planning Board should be able to make recommendations to the Village Board as appropriate without this section requiring it. §62-4: Simplify definition of "corner lot." Revise definition of "setback" so that it does not apply solely to front yard. �Subdivision Regulations Add a provision for a simplified, one-stage review process for minor subdivisions (two-lot subdivision and lot line realignment). Add definitions of major and minor subdivisions. Revise time frames for holding a public hearing, making a decision and filing of approval to be consistent with Village Law. §12B(2)(b): reservation. Revise the requirement Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. November 10, 1994 500\not4-046.sjp:ev from dedication to �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. David J. Portman, AICP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914)967-6540 Jim Donovan, RLA, ASLA MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: November 11, 1994 Subject: Review of Bick Preliminary Subdivision As requested, we have reviewed the preliminary subdivision application submitted by James and Martha Bick for an area comprised of five previously subdivided building lots and a paper street located on the northern and western sides of the Terrace Close cul-de-sac in the R-2A Residence District. Tax Lots 1 (Bick), 2 (LoMascolo) and 4 (Golodetz) contain existing singlefamily dwellings. Lots 8 (owned by Bick) and 9 (ownership not known) are presently undeveloped. The Applicant is proposing to break up Lot 9 and distribute the pieces to Lots 2, 4 and 8, resubdivide Lot 8 to subtract a small triangular piece (the "new" Lot 8 is shown as "Lot B") , and add the small triangular piece from Lot 8 and the paper street to Lot 1 (the "new" Lot 1 is shown as "Lot A"). As a result, one building lot will be eliminated from the subdivision. The Applicant has submitted the following plan: "Subdivision Map Prepared For James A. & Martha A. Bick, ReSubdivision of Lot 1 - Block 3, An Unnumbered Parcel, Lot 8 Block 2 and a Portion of Lot 9 - Block 2 As Shown On Revised Map of Sleepy Hollow Manor - Filed in Westchester County Division of Land Records On June 23, 1930 As Map No. 3621, Located in the Village of North Tarrytown, Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester County, N.Y.," scale 1" = 20', dated October 28, 1994, prepared by Charles H. Riley, Land Surveyor. REVIEW COMMENTS 1. Subdivision Regulations Compliance: The subdivision plan should be revised to show the area of all of the properties involved in the subdivision, the names of the property owners of all of the involved properties and the location of the other two existing dwellings. The names of all involved property owners and their addresses should be added to the Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX • (914) 967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation plan and the application. The existing and proposed lot sizes and dimensions of all involved properties should, be shown on the plan. The names of all adjoining property oyners should be shown on the plan. In addition, the existing and proposed subdivision lines should be labeled as such. The subdivision plan should that the subject properties 2A (not R-2) and to make the the tax map number is shown 3, Lot 1). 2. be corrected to reflect the fact are located in Zoning District Rtax map numbers consistent (i.e., as both Block 1A, Lot: 1 and Block Zoning Compliance: The Applicant should supply information regarding the current ownership of the 4 o-foot wide "unnumbered parcel" which the Applicant has previously indicated is a "paper street." If that parcel is indeed a paper street, further research should be done in order to determine its status. The Applicant should research the history of the original subdivision, determine whether the parcel was ever dedicated to the Village or offered to the Village for dedication, and obtain the agreement of the Village (or any other involved party) stating th.at no party, other than the Bicks, has any right to improve the parcel. Although we are not attorneys, based upon our experience, the matter of the paper street should be settled before allowing the creation of Lot A, which would include existing Lot 1, the paper street and a triangular piece of existing Lot 8. Otherwise, at some point in the future, the Phelps Memorial Hospital property could be redeveloped for residential use and whoever has the right to improve that parcel as a road (even though the width of the parcel is probably substandard for a road right-of-way) would be creating a "left-ovet" triangular piece of land (approximately 6,075 square feet in size) which could not be used for residential development. If it is determined that the parcel is a paper street, it may simplify the issue to keep the triangular piece as a part of proposed Lot B. Due to its lot width, proposed Lot B could probably not be subdivided in the future without a variance due to the fact that the lot width would be insufficient for two lots. The Bicks have informally offered to restrict the property from further subdivision. If that is their intent, this offer should be stated on the subdivision plan. Other than the matters mentioned above concerning the paper street, the proposed subdivision appears to comply with the Zoning Ordinance. 2 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation 3. Environmental Review: According to Part 617.12 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR), the subdivision of the subject property constitutes a Type I Action because the property is located within the Hudson River Shoreline Critical Environmental Area. The Applicant has submitted a Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) . We have reviewed the EAF and have enclosed a copy containing our recommended changes for your consideration. The Planning Board may declare its intent to be Lead Agency in the review of this action. A notice of intent to be Lead Agency should then be circulated to the involved agencies (i.e., the Westchester County Department of Health) and interested agencies (e.g., agencies, such as the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, which maintain an interest in the application but do not have direct approval authority). After 30 days or receipt of the responses from the other agencies, whichever comes first, the Planning Board may declare itself Lead Agency, provided no other involved agency objects, and make a Determination of Significance. The Lead Agency's preparation of a Negative Declaration or Findings Statement (following a Positive Declaration and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement) will complete the SEQR review process. Under coordinated review, involved agencies may not make final decisions until the SEQR process is completed. 4. Other Issues; It does not appear that the public hearing notice correctly reflected the proposed subdivision since it stated that Lot 8 would be increased in size from 46,368 square feet (when it is actually approximately 28,660 square feet) to 58,331 square feet [which is the total area of both proposed Lots A (developed) and B (undeveloped), not a single undeveloped lot to be known as Lot 8]. Susan J. Portman, AICP, Associate/Planning Enclosure cc: Sean Treacy, Mayor Linda E. David, Village Administrator Janet A. Gandolfo, Esq., Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Mark A. DiGennaro, Village Engineer John Hughes, Esq. James and Martha Bick 500\notA-031.sjp:aj 3 �14-16-2 (2/87)-7c 617.21 . _ Appendix A State Environmental Quality'Review SEQR FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an Impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentiallylarge impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF S I G N I F I C A N C E - T y p e 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: D Part 1 D Part 2 DPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 2nd 3 if appropriate), 2nd 2ny other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: \3 A. The project will not result in any large and important i m p a c t s ) and. therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. D B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be p r e p a r e d . ' D C. The project may result in one or more large 2nd important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions J a m e s B i c k a n d M a r t h a B i c k f£"-f* ^ f P l a n n i n g Board - V i l l a g e of N o r t h _ f2&jivbd»w. j i c v \ Name of Action Tarrytown N'2me of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency . >nsible officer) S i g n a&t u r e&d Preparer (If different from respons October 3, 1994 Date 1 �PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This d o c u m e n t is designed to assist in determining whether }he action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers t o these questions will b e considei as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any a d d i t i o n s information you believe will be needed t o complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION JAMES BICK a n d MARTHA BICK LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and Cotjnty) 3 T e r r a c e C l o s e , N o r t h T a r r y t w o n , New YOrk NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR 3USINESS TELEPHONE ( 914, James Bick and Martha Bick ADDRESS 0 ,_ 631-8855 • „n 3 Terrace Close, STATE North Tarrytown ZIP CODE NY 10591 BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER {If dllferent) same ( ) ADDRESS same STATE CITY/PO ZIP CODE same DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Cr£*t-rr5n of one b u i l d i n g lot A\A<& r-e/i, Jod'ViJi'e'"'! a h c.£j* c*>^t- 'o*~£ . Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N'.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: GUrban Dlndustrial DCommercial CSResidential (suburban) GForest DAgriculture QOther 2. Total acreage of project area: 2. , 3 acres. APPROXIMATE AC RE ACE Me2dcw or Srushiand (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fiil) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Residential Other (Indicate type). 1.2. 1+ GRural (non-farm) PRESENTLY acres AFTER COMPLETION acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres 1±_ 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? [ a. Soil drainage: ©Well drained J Q Q % of site DModerately well drained % of site GPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the N" Land Classification System? N/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? a. What is d e p t h t o bedrock? 10-15+ QYes ONo (in feet) �5. A p p r o x i m a t e percentage of proposed project site w i t h slopes: C0-10% % DlO-15% E l 5% or greater __% __ % 6. Is project substantially c o n t i g u o u s to. or contain a building, site-.'or district, listed on the St'ate or the N a t i o n a l Registers of Historic Places? CYes Grfco '"/. Is project substantially c o n t i g u o u s to a site listed on the Register of National N a t u r a l Landmarks? 8. What is the depth of the water table? 20+ DYes SNo (in feet) 9. is site located over a p r i m a r y , principal, or sole source aquifer? CYes C_No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? DYes DNo 1 1 . Does project site c o n t a i n any species of plant or animal life that is i d e n t i f i e d as threatened or endangered? DYes CXNo According to .. I d e n t i f y each species , ,. — _ — . _— . 12. Are there any u n i q u e or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other g e o l o g i c a l f o r m a t i o n s ) DYes C_>No Describe . - . _ 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as 2n open space or recreation area? DYes 14. C?No If yes, explain Does the present site i n c l u d e scenic views k n o w n to be important to the c o m m u n i t y ? DYes _*No 15. Streams w i t h i n or c o n t i g u o u s to project area: Nope a. N a m e of Stream and name of River to w h i c h it is tributary ' 16. Lakes, ponds, w e t l a n d areas w i t h i n or contiguous to project area: a. N a m e y/A -*• Size (In acres) 7 ' . Is the site served by existing public utilities? SYes DNo a) If Yes, does s u f f i c i e n t c a p a c i t y exist to allow connection? EYes b) If Yes, w i l l i m p r o v e m e n t s be necessary to allow connection? GNo _?Ves DNo 13. Is the site l o c a t e d in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, A r t i c l e 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? DYes KJNo 19. Is the site l o c a t e d in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to A r t i c l e 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ^Yes DNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes _jNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions 2S appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage to be d e v e l o p e d : 1+ c. Project acreage to r e m a i n undeveloped d. Length of p r o j e c t , in miles: N/A 1 • 5+ acres initially; ~ acres. H~ acres u l t i m a t e l y . acres. (If appropriate) e. If the project is 2n expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A f. Number of off-street p a r k i n g spaces existing K/A ; proposed g. M a x i m u m v e h i c u l a r trips generated per hour (upon c o m p l e t i o n of project)? h. If residential: N u m b e r a n d type of housing units: O n e Family T w o Family Initially i Ultimately J i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure %• N/A / M u l t i p l e Family . height; j . Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project w i l l occupy is? Condominium width; length ft. �2. How much natural material (i.e.. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed'from the site? ____ 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? DYes ENo tons/cubic yards DN/A a. If yes. for what i n t e n d s purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes ___ ______ CXNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes G&No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes -JMO 6. If single phase p r o j e c t Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated months, (including demolition). (number). b. Anticipated d a t e of commencement phase 1 N /A month c. Approximate completion date of final phase . N A month / d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes year, (including demolition). year. DYes DNo BNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete __A 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ____________ 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes DYes G_No CSNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount 2L___ b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid w a s t e disposal involved? DYes L— C?No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 16. Will the project generate solid waste? EYes a. If yes, what is the a m o u n t per month DYes DYes CSNo _)No DNo N/A tons b. If.yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? c. If yes, give n a m e If yes, explain ; QYes : DNo ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes _No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? (_Yes DNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? years. DYes ENo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per cay)? DYes ENo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? DYes DYes SNo If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 23. Total anticipated w a t e r usage per day ' gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local. State or Federal funding? If Yes. explain gallons/minute. DYes w/A 4 _DNo , , ENo �25. Approvals Required: Submittal Type City. Town. Village Board DYes CNo &Yes CNo City, Town Zoning 3oard DYes CNo •ettv. County Health Department EYes CNo $**&«'* *Qr\ Other Local Agencies DYes CNo « Other Regional Agencies DYes CNo State Agencies DYes CNo Federal Agencies DYes CNo :ity. Town, Village Planning Board Date Subdivision 10-3-1994 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? EYes CNo If Yes. indicate decision required: Dzoning amendment Czoning variance Dnew/revision of master plan Cspecial use permit Cresource management plan 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R^S- QSsubdivision Dsite plan Dother ^ 3. What is the maximum poten*'?! development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? ^-building lo£— 2. dyJtttin^S 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? (Cri€ a R-P>. £*tcK undeveloped, NO /cf) jv^ 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 1 bull dim lvfr (L*. "•. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? 0Yes DNo 7. What are the predominant land use{s) and zoning classifications wiihin a V* mile radius of proposed action? Residential single f a m i l y , ioJfl'ftttfg Q& f j $--\ t iL^Zflr f H. 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V* mile? £)Yes CNo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? - 1 (K-€Suk>^4y-'i,cv\ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? If d t i - e - o^a>A. l r o f a u < _ Q*e. b ^ I t W ^ _ r€w*cJor/ c ^ j 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? DYes IS)No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? C'Yes ES'o a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? A^" C^Yes CNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes. is the existing read network adequate to handle the additional traffic? CYes CYes ?]No DNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or. may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name JAKES BICK AND MARTHA BICK i-gnature :: <= ^lf71 ^ ^ l l Q ^ Date October 3, 1994 Title Attorney If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a stale agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 �Part 2-PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) f In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. ~ Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact w i l l occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change{s) in the project t o a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 2 S m a l l to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact O D DYes DNo D D D Y es DN( n DYes . DYes DNo D D D DNO D D DYes DNO • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. D • DYes DNO • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. D D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNO DNO D D D Y es DN< IMPACT ON LAND 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? JBNO DYES Examples that would apply to column-2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. » • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. • Construction in a designated floodway. • Other impacts # C a n Impact Be M i t i g a t e d By Project Change '. DNO Will there be an effect tt. _.iy unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.JJ^NO DYES Specific land forms: �2 1 I M P A C T ON WATER 3. W i l l proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15. 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ®NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Small to Moderate Impact D D D D DYes DYes DNo DNo D D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo DYes DNo • Dredging more than TOO cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. • Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? E5N0 DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or mere than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated By Impact " Project Change D D D D D DYes DYes DNo DNo D D D D DYes DYes DNo DNo • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. D D DYes DN6 • Construction or operation causing 2ny contamination of a water supply system. D D DYes DNO • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. D D D D DYes DYes DNO • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. D D DYes DNO • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. D D DYes ' DNO • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. D D DYes DNO • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. D D DYes DNO • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. D D DYes DNO • Other D D D Y es DNc D D DYes DNo • Construction of a body o f W2ter that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. • Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? $NO Examples that would apply to column 2 DYES • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ,• Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to itrve proposed (project) action. 0 impacts: ". Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface ' water runoff? UNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. - .. 7 DNO �Proposed A c t i o n may C2use substantial erosion. • Proposed A c t i o n is i n c o m p a t i b l e w i t h existing drainage patterns. • Proposed A c t i o n w i l l a l l o w development in a designated f l o o d w a y . • Other impacts: I M P A C T O N AIR 7 . W i l l proposed a c t i o n a f f e c t air quality? CNO DYES Examples that w o u l d a p p l y t o c o l u m n 2 • Proposed A c t i o n w i l l i n d u c e 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. D • Proposed A c t i o n w i l l result in the incineration of more than 1 t o n of refuse per hour. D • Emission rate of t o t a l c o n t a m i n a n t s will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source p r o d u c i n g m o r e than 10 million 3TU's per hour. D • Proposed action w i l l a l l o w an increase in the a m o u n t of l a n d . c o m m i t t e d t o industrial use. D • D Proposed action w i l l a l l o w an increase in the density of i n d u s t r i a l . d e v e l o p m e n t w i t h i n existing industrial areas. D • Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND A N I M A L S W i l l Proposed A c t i o n a f f e c t any threatened or endangered species? ©NO Examples that w o u l d a p p l y to column 2 DYES • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • • Removal of any p o r t i o n of a critical or significant w i l d l i f e h a b i t a t . D D • A p p l i c a t i o n of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for a g r i c u l t u r a l purposes. • Other D impacts: 9. W i l l Proposed A c t i o n substantially affect non-threatened cr non-endangered species? CSN'O Examples that w o u l d a p p l y to column 2 DYES Proposed A c t i o n w o u l d substantially interfere w i t h any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or w i l d l i f e species. D • Proposed A c t i o n requires the removal of more than 10 acres cf mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other l o c a l l y i m p o r t a n t vegetation. D • IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 1 0 . W i l l the Proposed A c t i o n affect agricultural land resources? £)NO DYES Examples that w o u l d a p p l y to c o l u m n 2 |* The proposed action w o u l d sever, cross or l i m i t access t o a g r i c u l t u r a l land (includes c r o p l a n d , hayfields, pasture, v i n e y a r d , orchard, etc.) D �1 Small to Moderate Impact ^ ^ P r o p c s e d Action may C2use substantial erosion. • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. • Other impacts: D D D D IMPACT ON AIR £'NO DYES 7 . Will proposed action affect air quality? Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse p^r hour. D D • Emission rate cf total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a he2t source producing more than TO million 3TU's per hour. D • Proposed action will 2II0W an increase in the amount of land.committed to industrial use. D • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial. development within existing industrial areas. D • Other impacts: D IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS L Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? £'NO Examples that would apply to column 2 GYES • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. D • Removal cf any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. a • Application of pesticide or'herbicic'e more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. • • Other impacts: D 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened cr non-endangered species? Z—TN'O Examples that would appiv to column 2 GYES • PrcDcsed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wiic'Iife species. a • Proposed Action requires the removal cf more than 10 acres cf mature forest (over ICO years of age) or other locally important a IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES ".0. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? J-5NO GYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) D �1 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change Small to Moderate Impact D DYes DNo D DYes DNo D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D • DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNc D D DY es DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g.. subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: D IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 1 1 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ENO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply t o column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different fro'm or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their •enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? ENO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 .« • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantiallycontiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO DYES . The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. • Other impacts: I D D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNO �1 2 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact D D D D D D DYes DNO DYes DNo DYes DNo D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. D D DYes DNo • Other impacts: D D DYes DNo • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. D D DYes DNc • Odors will occvr routinely (more than one hour per day). D D D D DYes DNo DYes DNo a D CYes DNo D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge cr emission. D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action may result in the burial cf "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) D D DYes CNO • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. D D DYes DNo D DYes DNO D DYes DNo IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. W i l l there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ENO Examples that would apply to column 2 '' DYES • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. • Other impacts: Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Chanc; IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? &NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? • ENO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. • Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action aiiect public health and safety? £'NO Examples that would apply to column 2 DYES • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of so'id or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: a • 10 �IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD " "*. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? £3NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals.' • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment • Other impacts: • I i Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Can Impact Be Large - Mitigated By Impact Project Change D D DYes DNo G D DYes DNo D D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo D D DYes DNo D D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNO DNO DNo DNo 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? >&NO DYES if Any Action in Part 2 Is identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Pari 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change's). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring — • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will.be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 �F R E D E R I C K P. CLARK A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut David J. Portman, AICP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP Jim Donovan, RLA, ASLA MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: November 17, 1994 Subject: Review of Philipse Plaza Site Plan As requested, we have reviewed the revised site plan drawings for the application known as "Philipse Plaza" located along the east side of North Broadway, opposite Philipsburg Manor and the intersection of North Broadway and Pocantico Street, in the C-l Highway Commercial District. The Philipse Plaza site plan application was most recently put on the July 1994 meeting agenda, at which time the application was not discussed by the Planning Board since the Applicant was unable to attend. The property currently contains two buildings. One building houses Antonio Cabinetry (a manufacturing use) and the other contains Uncle Jerry's Italian Deli (a delicatessen use) and Julio's Auto Repair (a motor vehicle repair shop). Antonio Cabinetry was the subject of a site plan application which was approved February 20, 1992 and received use and area variances. The Code will only allow more than one principal building on a property when it is designed as a "planned development group." This application should be considered an application for amended site plan approval for the entire lot. The Applicant is proposing to remove the existing delicatessen and motor vehicle repair shop building, replace it with a two-story commercial building (containing retail uses on the first floor and office on the second) and continue the manufacturing use of the Antonio Cabinetry building. The proposed building will contain 11,680 square feet of floor area, including 5,040 square feet of retail space and 6,640 square feet of office space. The Applicant has submitted the following plans: 1. Sheet CA, Sketch of Proposed Facade, "Philipse Plaza, Village of North Tarrytown, New York," dated February 22, 1993 and most recently revised April 26, 1994, prepared by Contadino Architects; Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX • (914) 967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation 2. Sheet 1, "Site Survey, Topographic Map Prepared For Antonio & Linda Rodrigues, Situate Village of No. Tarrytown, Town of Mt. Pleasant, Westchester Co., New York," scale 1" = 20', dated April 5, 1993 and roost recently revised April 26, 1994, prepared by Contadino Architects and John J. Muldoon; 3. Sheet SK-1, "Site Plan, Philipse Plaza, Village of North Tarrytown, New York," scale 1" = 2 0 ' , dated October 7, 1994 and most recently revised November 7, 1994, prepared by Contadino Architects; 4. Sheet 3, "Site Grading Plan, Philipse Plaza, Village of North Tarrytown, New York," scale 1" = 20', dated April 26, 1994 and most recently revised November 7, 1994, prepared by Contadino Architects; 5. Sheet 4, "Deli Operation Plan, Philipse Plaza, Village of North Tarrytown, New York," scale 1" = 20', dated April 26, 1994, prepared by Contadino Architects; 6. Sheet 5, Visual Impact, "Philipse Plaza, Village of North Tarrytown, New York," scale 1" = 10', dated April 26, 1994, prepared by Contadino Architects; 7. Sheet 6, "Ground Floor Plan, Second Floor Plan, Philipse Plaza, Village of North Tarrytown, New York," scale 1/8" = 1', dated April 26, 1994, prepared by Contadino Architects; and 8. Sheet 7, Elevations, "Philipse Plaza, Village of North Tarrytown, New York," scale 1/8" = 1', dated February 22, 1993 and most recently revised April 26, 1994, prepared by Contadino Architects. REVIEW COMMENTS 1. Zoning Compliance: The site plan states that the maximum permitted lot coverage is 60%. This should be changed to reflect the fact that the maximum permitted lot coverage for a planned development group is 3 5%. As noted in our June 10, 1994 memorandum to the Planning Board, the proposed building does not comply with the required minimum rear yard setback of 20 feet as only 15 feet is provided. The plan will either need to be revised or a variance obtained from the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA). 2. Parking and Loading: We assume that the entire first floor of the proposed building will be retail and service business uses and not contain other uses (such as a restaurant with seats, 2 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation which has a potentially more restrictive parking standard). Based on the parking standards for office and retail uses, a minimum of 47 parking spaces are required in addition to the eight spaces required for the manufacturing use, for a total of 55 required spaces. However, only 48 spaces are shown on the plan. In addition, the Zoning Code requires spaces to be 9' X 20• and most of the spaces on the plan are smaller than that. The deficient number and size of the parking spaces should either be corrected or variances obtained from the ZBA. As noted in our June 10, 1994 memorandum, we would prefer a 24-foot wide aisle rather than the 20-foot aisle shown. However, if the aisle is widened, the extra few feet will have to be taken from the building and/or the rear yard. The Applicant should consider using angled parking and one-way traffic flow. In addition, the aisle in the area shown in the "Compact Car Area" should be widened to at least 22 feet. As requested, a handicapped-accessible ramp from the parking area to the walkway arcade has been added to the plan. As required by the Zoning Code, a second loading space has been added to the plan. 3. Circulation and Traffic: 10, 1994, we recommend prepared to evaluate the Broadway in the vicinity and two-way access plans As noted in our memorandum of June that a limited traffic study be impact of this development on North of the site and to evaluate one-way for the site. The plan has been revised to show that the proposed northern access drive has been widened to 22 feet in width (not to scale). The ends of some of the parking islands should be cut back in order to allow for improved circulation. The plan shows the location of the proposed sidewalk, planting strip and relocated curb within the right-of-way of Route 9. The Board may recall that in August, as per the request of the Village, we sent a letter and a concept plan to the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) to suggest modest improvements to the intersection and to provide area for a sidewalk to serve this project. The Applicant should followup with NYSDOT regarding both the modifications proposed by the Applicant and the concept plan. In any case, the Applicant will need approval from NYSDOT for a Highway Work Permit. 3 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation 4. Landscaping and Buffers: We recommend that the outstanding comments under Review Comment #5 in our memorandum to the Planning Board dated June 10, 1994 be addressed. 5. Environmental Review: We recommend that the outstanding comments under Review Comment #6 in our memorandum to the Planning Board dated June 10, 1994 be addressed, in particular the submission of a full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF). 6. Referral: As per the Westchester County Planning Department's recommendation, the Village should send a copy of the proposed site plan, visual impact and elevation drawings (and the previously submitted area map) to the New York State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) for comment due to the site's proximity to Philipsburg Manor. 7. Further Information: As requested in our June 10, 1994 memorandum, if any freestanding signs are proposed, information regarding the dimensions and locations of the signs should be provided. Also, the Applicant should indicate whether the auto repair use will continue on the site during construction. Susan J. Portman, AICP, Associate/Planning cc: Sean Treacy, Mayor Linda E. David, Village Administrator Janet A. Gandolfo, Esq., Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Mark A. DiGennaro, Village Engineer Louis Contadino, AIA 500\not4-039.sjp.crc 4 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut David J. Portman, AICP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP (914) 967-6540 Jim Donovan, RLA, ASLA MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: November 4, 1994 Subject: Recreation Fees I am writing in connection with the discussion recently regarding recreation fees and the U.S. Supreme Court case, Dolan v. Citv of Tiaard. As you may know, the New York State Village Law was amended (effective July 1993) concerning reservation of parkland and fees in lieu of parkland for residential site plan and subdivision approvals (see attachment). The State enabling legislation now requires planning boards to evaluate: "the present and anticipated future needs for park and recreational facilities in the village based on [the] projected population growth to which the particular [residential] site plan [or subdivision plat] will contribute." Other communities have prepared studies in accordance with the enabling legislation of their existing facilities and future needs in order to determine the amount of park and recreation land needed and the appropriate amount of fees-in-lieu of land. A study such as is required by Village Law would appear to be consistent with the "rough proportionality" test from the Dolan case. Susan J. Portman, AICP, Associate/Planning Attachment cc: Sean Treacy, Mayor Linda E. David, Village Administrator Janet A. Gandolfo, Esq. Donal M. Walsh, Esq. James T. Margotta, Building Inspector 500\not4-0A5.sjp Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX • (914) 967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �APPENDIX: VILLAGE LAW (EFFECTIVE JULY I. 19931 Relerrats o! matters to planning boards rower to make Investigations and reports Planning commissions APPENDIX: VILLAGE LAW (EFFECTIVE JULY 1. 19931 a The village board of trustees may by resolution provide lor the relerence ol any matter or class ol matters, other than those referred lo In subdivision ten ol this section, to the planning board before Pinal action Is taken thereon by the village board ol trustees or other office or officer of said village having final authority over said matter The village board of trustees may further stipulate that final action thereon shall not be taken until the planning board has submitted Its report thereon, or has had a reasonable time to be fixed by the village board of trustees In said resolution, to submit the report b In addition, the planning board shall have the fuH power and authority to make such Investigations, maps, reports, and recommendations In connection therewith relating to the planning and development ol the village as It seems desirable, providing the total expenditures of said board shaft not exceed the appropriation provided therefor proval with modifications or disapproval ol site plans submitted for approval. Any such waiver, which shal be subject lo appropriate conditions sel forth in the local taw adopted pursuant to this section, may be exercised in the event any such requirements are found not to be requisite In the interest of the pubic health, safely or general welfare or inappropriate to a particular site plan y (a) Before such authorized board may approve a site plan contorting residential units, such site plan shal also show, when required by such board, a park or parks suitably located for playground or other recreational purposes. Required findings |b) Land lor park, playground or other recreational purposes may not be required until the authorized board has made a finding thai a proper case exists for requiring that a part or parks be suitably located for playgrounds or other recreational purposes within the vilage. Such timings shal include an evaluation of the present and anticipated future needs for park and recreational laclties in the vilage based on projected population growth lo which the particular site plan wM contribute. 12 Planning commission In any village In which there is a planning commission created under article twelve A ol the general municipal law, the board of trustees, instead of authorizing the appointment of a planning board under this article, may provide that the existing commission shall continue, the members thereof thereafter to be appointed in accordance with the provisions ol such article twelve A. and to have the powers and duties as specified for a planning board appointed under this article, provided, however, that In such village section two hundred thirty-eight of the general municipal law shal not be in force. Cash In leu of parkland S 7 725-a. Site plan review Definition ot "site plan" 1 Definition of site plan As used in this section the term "site plan" shall mean a rendering, drawing, or sketch prepared to specifications and containing necessary elements, as sel forth In the applicable zoning local law. which shows the arrangement, layout and design of the proposed use of a single parcel of land as shown on said plan Plats showing lots, blocks or sites which are subject to review pursuant to authority provided for the review of subdivisions under section 7-728 ol this article shal continue to be subject to such review and shall not be subject to review as site plans under this section 2 Approval of slle plans Approval by planning bond or other administrative body Ordinance or local law to specify uses subject to site plan approval, and to specify etements to be included on site plans Issuance of building perm! Area variances Conditions (a) The village board of trustees may. as part of a local law adopted pursuant to this article or other enabling taw. authorize the planning board or such other administrative body that it shal so designate, to review and approve, approve with modifications or disapprove site plan prepared lo specifications set forth in the local law and/or in regulations of such authorized board. Site plans shal show the arrangement, layout and design of the proposed use of the land on said plan. The local taw shal specify the land uses that require site plan approval and the elements to be included on plans submitted for approval. The required slle ptan etements which are included In the local law may include, where appropriate, those related to parking, means of access, screening, signs, landscaping, architectural features, location and dimensions ol buildings, adjacent land uses and physical features meant to protect adjacent land uses as w e l as any additional elements specified by the village board ol trustees in such local taw. Credit for land or cash In approved subdivision plat Procedures; notice and hearing; decision (b) When an authorization to approve site plans Is granted by the vilage board ol trustees pursuant to this section, the terms thereof may condition the issuance of a building permit upon such approval 3 Application lor area variance Nolwithatanolng any provisions ol law lo the contrary, where a proposed site plan contains one or more features which do not comply with the zoning regulations, applications may be made lo the zoning board of appeals for an area variance pursuant to section 7-712-b of this article, without the necessity ol a decision or determination of an administrative official charged with the enforcement of the zoning regulations 4 Conditions attached lo the approval of site plans The authorized board shal have the authority to impose such reasonable conditions and restrictions as are directly related to and incidental lo a proposed site plan. Upon Its approval ol said site plan, any such conditions must be met in connection with the issuance of permits by applicable enforcement agents or officers of the vMage 5 Waiver of conditions. The village board ol trustees may lurther empower the authorized board to. when reasonable, waive any requirements for the approval, ap- 6. Reservation of parkland on site plana containing residential units. Parkland or cash In leu for residential site plans deferral under General Municipal Law. section 239m Complance with Stale Environmental Quetty Review Act (c) In the event the authorized board makes a finolng pursuant to paragraph (b) ol this subdivision that the proposed site plan presents a proper case lor requiring a park or parks suitably located lor playgrounds or other recreational purposes, but that a suitable park or parks of adequate size to meet the requirements cannot be property located on such site ptan, the authorized board may require a sum of money In leu thereof to be established by the vilage board of trustees. In making such determination of suilabaty, the board shal assess the size and suitaoSry of lands shown on the site ptan which could be possible locations lor park or recreational facaWes. as wel as practical factors inducing whether there is a need for additional fadaHe* In the Immediate neighborhood. Any monies required by the authorized board In leu of land for park, playground or other recreational purposes, pursuant to the provisions of this section, shal be deposited Into a trust fund lo be used by the vilage exclusively for park, playground or other recreational purposes, Inducing the acquisition ol property (d) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this subdivision, if the land Included in a site plan under review is a portion of a subdrvision plat which has been reviewed and approved, the authorized board shal credit the appScant for any land set aside or money donated in leu thereof under such subdrvision ptat approval. In the event ol resubdnrision ol such ptal, nothing shal preclude the additional reservation ol parkland or money donated in leu thereof. 7. Public hearing and decision on site plans. In the event a public hearing Is required by local taw adopted by the vilage board of trustees, the authorized board shal conduct a pubic hearing within sixty-two days from the day an apptcation is received on any mailer referred lo M under this section. The authorized board shal mal notice of said hearing to the applicant at least ten days before such hearing, and shal give pubac notice ol said hearing in a newspaper of general circulation in the vttage at least five days prior to the dale thereof and shal make a decision on the apptcation within sixty-two days after such hearing, or after the day the apptcation is received if no hearing has been held. The time within which the authorized board must render its decision may be extended by mutual consent of the apptcanl and such board. The decision of the authorized board shal immedtalery be fled In the office of the vatage clerk and a copy thereof mailed to the apptcanl Nothing herein shal preclude the holding ol a pubac hearing on any matter on which a pubic hearing is not so required. 8 Notice lo metropolitan, regional or county planning agency. At least tan days before such hearing, the authorized board shal mal notices thereof lo the county, metropolitan or regional planning agency, as required by section two hundred thirtyrune m ol the general municipal taw. which notice shal be accompanied by a lul statement of the matter under consideration, as defined in subdrvision one of section two hundred thirty nine-m of the general municipal taw In the event a pubac hearing is not required, the matter shal be referred to the metropoMan. county, or regional planning agency before final action Is taken thereon, il required by section two hundred thirty nine-m of the general municipal taw. 9. Complance with stale environmental qualty review act. The authorized board shal comply with the provisions of the state environmental qualty review act under article eight of the environmental conservation law and its implementing regulations as codHled m 0 NYCRR 6 1 7 . 121 �\ A P P E N D I X . V I L L A G E LAW I E I T E C T I V E JULY 1. I99J) APPENP>X= VRiAQE LAW (EfFECT-VE m v a final plat shall expire wilhln one hundred eighty days after Ihe dale of Ihe resolution granting conditional approval unless such requirements have been certified as completed 8 Extension ol time Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions ol this section, the planning board may extend the time In which a conditionally approved plat in final form must be submitted for signature If. In Its opinion, such extension is warranted by Ihe particular circumstances thereof, which time shall not exceed two additional periods of ninety days each Approval In sections fererraY pursuit Miction 239-n to General Municipal Law, 9 Approval of plat In sections. In granting conditional or final approval of a plat In final form, the planning board may permit the plat to be subdivided and developed in two or more sections and may in Its resolution granting conditional or final approval state that such requirements as It deems necessary to Insure the orderly development of the plat be completed before said sections may be signed by the duly authorized officer ol the planning board. Conditional or final approval ol Ihe sections of a final plat may be granted concurrently with conditional or final approval ol Ihe entire plat, subject to any requirements Imposed by the planning board. 10 Notice to county planning agency. When a county planning agency has been authorized to review subdivision plals pursuant to section two hundred thirty-nine-n ol the general municipal law, Ihe clerk ol the planning board shall refer a l applicable preliminary and final plats to such county planning agency as provided in that section. 11 Expiration ol approval. The signature of the duty authorized officer of the planning board constituting final approval by the planning board of a plat as herein provided, or the approval by such board of Ihe development of a plat or plats already filed In the office ol Ihe county dark or register of the county In which such plat or plats are located If such plals are entirety or partialy undeveloped; or Ihe certificate ol the vMage clerk as to the date ol Ihe submission ol the final plat and the failure of the planning board to take action within Ihe time herein provided, shall expire within sixty-two days from the date ol such approval, or from the dale such certificate la issued, unless within such sixty-two day period such plat or a section thereof shaft have been duly filed or recorded by Ihe owner in the office of the county clerk or register In the event Ihe owner shall file only a section ol such approved plat in Ihe office of the county dark or register, the entire approved plat shall be filed within thirty days of the Rang of such section with the vMage clerk in each visage In which any portion ol the land described in the plat Is situated. Such section shall encompass at least ten percent of the total number of tola contained in the approved plat, and the approval ol the remaining sections of the approved plat Shad expire unless said sections are fled before the expiration of the exemption period to which such plat la entitled under the provisions of section 7-708 ol this article. (b) suitable monuments be placed al block corners and other necessary points as may be required by the board and the location thereof is shown on Ihe map of such pial. Required Improvements y Reservation ofparkJand or cash In leu thereof Required findings Cash In leu of parkland 'So *t original—probably should read "auttabWy" ll (a) the streets and highways be of sufficient width and suitable grade and thai ba suitably located to accommodate the prospective traffic, to afford adequate Rght and air. to lacaHale Are protection, and to provide access ol nrefightJng equipment to buildings If there be an official map. vMage comprehensive plan or functional/master plans, such streets and highways shad ba coorrjnated so as to compose a convenient 126 3 Compliance with zoning regulations. Where a zoning ordinance or local law has been adopted by the vHage. the lots shown on said plat shal al least comply with the requirements thereof subject, however, to the provisions of section 7-738 of this article. 4. Reservation of parkland on subdivision plats containing residential units. (a) Before Ihe planning board may approve a subdivision plat containing residential units, such subdrvision pial shal also show, when required by such board, a park or parks suitably located for playground or other recreational purposes. (b) Land lor park, playground or other recreational purposes may not be required until the planning board has made a finding thai a proper case exists lor requiring thai a park or parks ba suitably located for playgrounds or other recreational purposes within the vttage. Such findings aha* Include an evaluation of the present and anticipated future needs for park and recreational fadttea In the vMage based on projected t'jputatton growth to which Ihe particular subdivision plat wM contribute. (c) In the event the planning board makes a Nrwang pursuant to paragraph (b) of this subdivision thai the proposed subdrvision plat presents a proper case for requiring a park or parka suitably located for playgrounds or other recreational purposes, but that a suitable park or parks of adequate aha to meet the requirement cannot ba property located on such aubdMslon plat, the planning board may require a sum of money in leu thereof. In an amount to be estabtahed by the vOege board of trustees. In making such determination of auHablMy. the board shal assess the size and suitably* of land shown on the subdMalon plat which could ba possfct* locations lor park or recreaUonai tecMlM. as w a l as practical factor* fnckjdkig whether there I* a need for additional facxWes in Ihe kwnedtete neighborhood. Any moneys required by the planning board In l e u of land for park, playground or other recreational purposes, pursuant to the provisions of (his (action, shal ba deposited into a trust fund to ba used by the vHage exclusively lor park, playground or other recreational purpose*. IncfcjrJng the acquisition of properly. S. Character of the development, in making such determination regarding streets, highways, parks and required Improvements, the planning board t h a i take Into consideration the prospective character of the development, whether dense residence, open residence, business or Industrial. Area variances 1. Purpose. Before the approval by the planning board of a plat showing lots, blocks or sites, with or without streets or highways, or the approval ol a plat already fled In the office of the clerk ol the county wherein such plat la situated II the plat Is entirely or partialy undeveloped, the planning board t h a i require that the land shown on the plat be ol such character that it can be used safety for bu»c*ng purposes without danger to hearth or perl from fire, flood, drainage or other menace to neighboring properties or the puofic health, safety and welfare. 2. Additional requirements The planning board shall also require that: (c) all streets or other pubHc places shown on such plats be suitably graded and paved: street signs, sidewalks, street lighting standards, curbs, gutters, street trees, water mains, fire alarm signal devices (Including necessary ducts and cables or other connecting facilities), sanitary sewers and storm drains be Installed a l in accordance with standards, specifications and procedures acceptable to the appropriate vttage departments except as hereinafter provided, or alternatively that a performance bond or other security be furnished to the vWage. as hereinafter provided. Compliance with zoning 13 Compliance with state environmental quaWy review act. The planning board shal comply with the provisions ol the stale environmental qualty review act under article eight ol the environmental conservation law and Its Implementing regulation" as codified In 6 NYCRR 6 1 7 . | 7-730. Subdivision review; approval of plals; additional requisites General reoutremerHs \m} system conforming to the official map and properly related to the proposals shown in the comprehensive plan of the village: 12. Subdrvision abandonment. The owner of an approved subdivision may abandon such subdivision pursuant to the provisions ol section five hundred sixty of the real property tax law. Comptmnca with State Environment* Quality Review Act -, Waivers 6 Applcatton for area variance. Notwithstanding any provision o' law to the contrary, where a pial contains one or mora lota which do not comply with the zoning local law regulations, appacatlon may ba mad* to the zoning board of appeal* for an area variance pursuant to section 7-712-b of thia article, without the necessity of a decision or determination of an adrnW*lr*tiv* official charged with the enforcement of the zoning regulations. In reviewing such appkcafJon the zoning board of appeal* shal request the planning board to provide • written recorrvnendetton cortcerrtng the proposed variance. 7 Waiver of requirementa. The planning board may waive, when reasonable, any requirement* or Improvements lor the approval, approval with modWcaaon* or Disapproval of subdrvision* submitted for K* approval. Any such waiver, which shal ba subject to appropriate conoloon*. may ba *x*rcfsad In th* event any such requirements or Improvements are found not to be requisite In t h * inter**! of t h * pubic health, safety, and general welfare or ln*ppropn*l* because of inadequacy or lack of connecting (acmes adjacent or in proximity to the subdrvision. 127 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. David J. Portman, AICP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914)967-6540 70. Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP Jim Donovan, RLA. ASLA V i l l a g e of North Tarrytown Planning Board DATE: 10/31/94 Sean Treacy, Mayor PROJECT: 520.037/Hogan S u b d i v i s i o n Linda E. David, Village Administrator FAX NO.: J a n e t A.-Gandolfo, E s q . , James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Mark A. DiGennaro, V i l l a g e Engineer WE TRANSMIT HEREWITH: VIA: (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) As requested As per conversation Per request of ( ) ( ) ( ) First Class Mail Express Delivery Telefax - # of Pages (including cover sheet) Our Messenger Your Messenger Hand Delivery FOR YOUR: ( ) (*) ( ) Approval Review Distribution File Information ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Use Comnlent THE FOLLOWING: Description Date No. of Copies 1 10/20/94 Nee a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n 1 10/31/94 Draft Resolut i o n REMARKS: 0 n October 2 8 , 1994, County Planning Department. I spoke with Ed Hoffmeister a t t h e Westchester He said the County Planning Board d i d not have any comments on t h i s subd i v i s i o n . cc: James F. Hogan 192 Webber Avenue North Tarrytown, NY 10591 Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 gy Susan J . Portman, AICP Associate /jfiannmg FAX • (914) 967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �SEQR 617.21 Appendix F State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance K ' Project Number Date October 20. 1994 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Village of North Tarrvtown Planning Board . as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: SEQR Status: Hogan Two-Lot Subdivision Type I Unlisted X Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes X No Description of Action: Two-lot subdivision of a property 0.4 acres in size. Location: (Include street address and the name of the municipality/county. A location map of appropriate scale is also recommended.) 19 Maple Street, Village of North Tarrvtown, Westchester County. Tax Map Sheet 17, Block 9, Lot 2-A. �6EQR Negative Declaration Page 2 ^measons Supporting This Determination: See 617.6(g) for requirements of this determination; see 617.6(h) for Conditioned Negative Declaration) The proposed action will not cause a significant adverse impact on land, water, air, plants and animals, agricultural land resources, aesthetic resources, historic and archaeological resources, open space and recreation, transportation, energy, public health, growth and character of the community or cause significant adverse noise and odor. For Further Information: Contact Person: Linda E. David, Village Administrator Address: Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York 10591 Telephone Number: (914) 631-1440 �D R A F T RESOLUTION Adopted at the October 20, 1994 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PROPOSED ACTION: SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY INTO TWO (2) LOTS OWNER: ESTATE OF VICTORIA M. HOGAN APPLICANT: JAMES F. HOGAN LOCATION: 19 MAPLE STREET TAX DESIGNATION: SHEET 17, BLOCK 9, LOT 2-A ZONING: R-4 RESIDENTIAL �RESOLUTION Adopted at the October 20, 1994 Meeting of the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PROPOSED ACTION: SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY INTO TWO (2) LOTS OWNER: ESTATE OF VICTORIA M. HOGAN APPLICANT: JAMES F. HOGAN LOCATION: 19 MAPLE STREET TAX DESIGNATION: SHEET 17, BLOCK 9, LOT 2-A ZONING: R-4 RESIDENTIAL WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for subdivision approval (the application) pursuant to the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown, Chapter 62, Zoning, of the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown and other requirements of the Village Code considered pertinent to the application, which application is to subdivide property located on the northern side of Maple Street at 19 Maple Street into two (2) lots for residential development; and WHEREAS, Lot A would be 5,625 square feet in size and Lot B would be 11,250 square feet in size and would contain the existing three-family dwelling and detached garage, as shown on the drawing prepared by John J. Muldoon, Professional Land Surveyor, and further identified as follows: "Subdivision Map Prepared for the Estate of Victoria M. Hogan, Situate Village of No. Tarrytown, Town of Mt. Pleasant, Westchester Co., N.Y.," scale 1" = 2 0 ' , dated August 7, 1994 and most recently revised September 28, 1994; and WHEREAS, all references to the "Applicant" shall include the Applicant's successor and assigns; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has stated that the Zoning Board of Appeals previously granted a use variance for the existing threefamily dwelling on Lot B; and WHEREAS, in the original application, the Applicant proposed a three-lot subdivision and the Applicant subsequently revised the application to propose a two-lot subdivision; and WHEREAS, the site has been visited by the Village's Planning Consultant and the Planning Board is thoroughly familiar with the site and all aspects of the proposed subdivision; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 1994, the Westchester County Planning Board informed the Village's Planning Consultant that they had no comments to offer on this application; and �WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held at the Village Hall on October 20, 1994, at which time those wishing to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board considered this a minor subdivision and treated the preliminary and final as a single approval; and WHEREAS, in the course of this review and acting as Lead Agency pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 1. Received an application fee of $580; 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property and of the surrounding areas; 3. Referred the application to the Westchester County Planning Board pursuant to Sections 239-1, m and n of the General Municipal Law because the subject property is within 500 feet of the Old Croton Railway State Park; 4. Requested, received and considered comments from the Village Planning Consultant, the Village Engineering Consultant and the Building Inspector; 5. Requested, received and reviewed a short Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); 6. After review of said field conditions, recommendations and EAF, as well as other materials and matters noted above, the Planning Board has determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action and made a Negative Declaration on October 20, 1994, and noted on the EAF its determination of nonsignificance of environmental impact. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said application for subdivision approval for a two (2) lot subdivision, as shown on the drawing entitled "Subdivision Map Prepared for the Estate of Victoria M. Hogan, Situate Village of No. Tarrytown, Town of Mt. Pleasant, Westchester Co., N.Y.," scale 1" = 2 0', dated August 7, 1994 and most recently revised September 28, 1994, prepared by John J. Muldoon, Professional Land Surveyor, be and is hereby granted subdivision approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or, as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of this subdivision resolution and upon the final mylar copy of the subdivision plat drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions and the Applicant may obtain the endorsement of the Westchester County 2 �Department of Health on the final mylar subdivision plat which endorsements shall permit filing in the offices of the Westchester County clerk, provided, however, that this subdivision approval shall expire within one hundred eighty (180) days from the date of this resolution if the following conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board: 1. The Applicant shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown the reimbursement of all application review fees as noted and required in Section 62-3OF of the Village Zoning Code. 2. Revision of the above noted plat to demonstrate the following: 2.1 The plat shall be revised and titled "Final Subdivision Plat;" 2.2 The final plat shall comply with the requirements of Section 11 of the Village of North Tarrytown Subdivision Regulations; 2.3 The signature block for the endorsement of the Planning Board Chairman shall be revised to comply with Section ll.A(l)(c)(14c); 2.4 The date of this resolution shall be noted on the final subdivision plat. PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN By: Date: George F. Hritz, Chairman Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board 500\not4-006.sjp:ev 3 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. David J. Pcrtman. AICP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman. AICP Plahning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Metier, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye. New York 1058C "(914)967-05-^ JO: Jim Donovan. RLA.ASLA Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board D^jg. 10/21/94 Sean Treacy, Linda David, James Margotta, Janet Gandolfo, Mark DiGennaro, PR0JECT: 520.040/Levy E s t ; , FAX NO.: Albert Peck WE TRANSMIT HEREWITH: VIA: (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) As requested As per conversation Per request of ( ) ( ) ( ) First Class Mai .Express Delivery Telefax-# of Pages (including cover sheet) Our Messenger Your Messenger Hand Delivery FOR YOUR: ( ) ( ) ( ) Approval Review Distribution ( ) W ( ) ( ) ( ) File Information Use Comment THE FOLLOWING: No. of Copies 1 Description Date 10/21/94 Notice of Intent to be Lead Agency, Circii l a t i o n L i s t and EAF REMARKS: ;-" ... - ' cc: Involved and Interested^"Agencies Connecticut -(203)255-3100 By_Susan J. Portman, AICP Associate/Planning FAX • (914)967-6615 Long Island • (516) 3.64-4§44l Ir �VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK LEAD AGENCY SELECTION FORM Project Name or Description Levy Estate Subdivision, Irving Place The s i t e p r e s e n t l y contains two single-family dwellings. A two-lot subdivision i s proposed ( i n order t o provide one building per l o t ) . Project Location 21 and 23 Irving Place, North Tarrytown, NY 10591 Name of Applicant Albert Peck for the Levy Estate Village Agency Intending to Act as Lead Agency Planning Board Address Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, NY 10591 Contact Person Linda David, Village Administrator Date Mailed 10/21/94 Telephone Number (914) 631-1440 Type off Action (Check A or B) H A. TYPE I • UNLISTED B. Lead agency must be chosen within 30 days of above date. Deadline Reply Date November 21, 1994 (preferably by Planning Board meeting 11/17/94) II. Required Approvals and Reviews (Check all permits, waivers, or other actions which may be required) D Rezoning $ . Subdivision Approval • - • , - Site Development Plan Approval Special Permit Eel . - Variance • Wetlands Permit D Stream Discharge Permit - New York State Department of Environmental Conservation • Sewage Disposal/Water Supply Approval - Westchester County Health Department D Review by Westchester County Department of Planning • •, r - •-•- Curb Cut Approval - New York State Department of Transportation/Westchester County Department of Public Works Other."'Specify: _-_ �VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK LEAD AGENCY SELECTION FORM - PAGE 2 Hi. IV. Environmental Significance of Action: Initial Review of Environmental Assessment Form indicates that: (Check A, B, or C - To be done by initiating agency) D A. The proposed action appears likely to have a significant effect on the environment; a positive declaration is likely. Q B. The proposed action appears not likely to have a significant effect on the environment; a negative declaration is likely. • No opinion has been made yet as to whether a positive or negative declaration is likely for this action. C. A Copy of this Form and the Environmental Assessment Form Has Been Sent to the Agencies Indicated on the Attached List. Attachments: Lead Agency Selection Reply Form List of Involved or Interested Agencies Environmental Assessment Form �VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK LEAD AGENCY SELECTION REPLY FORM Reply Form to be FiHed Out by Involved Agencies The O'st agency) has examined this form and accompanying documentation for the application known as Levy Estate Subdivision, Irving Place • and: (Check A or B) A. Does not want to be Lead Agency. D B. Wants to be Lead Agency for this action. Additional comments or concerns (Attach additional pages if necessary): Reviewed by: Signature Name Title Date PLEASE RETURN TO THE AGENCY INITIATING THIS PROCESS (LISTED ON THE FIRST PAGE OF THIS FORM) BY THE DATE INDICATED. IF NO REPLY IS RECEIVED BY THE DATE INDICATED, THE VILLAGE AGENCY INDICATED WILL ASSUME THAT YOU CONCUR WITH ITS DESIGNATION AS LEAD AGENCY. 500/nol3-030.jd �LIST OF INVOLVED OR INTERESTED AGENCIES (only those marked with an "X") • 0 Planning Board Village elf North Tarrytown 28 Beekman-Avenue North Tarrytown, New York 10591 D Westchester County Department of Planning 432 County Office Bulding White Plains, New York 10601 Zoning Board of Appeals Village of North Tarrytown 28 Beekman Avenue North Tarrytown, New York 10591 EI Westchester County Department of Health 112 East Post Road White Plains, New York 10601 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 21 South Putt Corners Road New Paltz, New York 12561 D New York State Department of Transportation 4 Burnett Boulevard, Region 8 Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 50 Wolf Road Albany, New York 12233-0001 • New York State Department of Transportation Saw Mil River Road Valhalla, New York 10595 (Other Agencies) 500\not3-O30.jd �14/16-2 (2/87)-7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review SEQR FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. , />_•• The full EAF is intended "to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information'to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentiallylarge impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF S I G N I F I C A N C E - T y p e 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: £D Part 1 J3 Part 2 DPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: D A. The project will not result in any large and important impactfs) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. D B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be "prepared.* D C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions LeV^ BifK-H. JvJedi^Ji't* Name of Action Name of Lead Agency * Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature jre of Preparer (If different from responsible off leer) Date 1 �r/.:.i - i - i r . o j t c i INF OI.I/.ATION ,! '-.01iC£ ~it»- • - ' X ^ " . i . : . • . « . . . - . ; . • : . - • ' . ' pre ; C M C r ;•> f.e>- <-i,- :"\ :•-.: c f{ t c •. on the envijor ••.<r-r>t PJc-JU-f-" c c ; • : • ( • • • . . '. •: ,'• ; '..••••:•: to ) ( , ( « qui >:;cr.<. * . ' , :c cor.nr.a .. e s p a r t o ' the ripplicetiori for app.'o-.fii «»:£ rue'. U ^ L ' ; i c t to further verii<cat. on and public review Pio\ic"t an> a d d i t i o n ^ information you b c i i t \ c will be ncccitc' to'corr.p!itc Pens 2 and 3 It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve r c iv !•'.-»*'.c>. it : c.":: t*. C" :r \ i >: t . . ; • . ii i'i : t ' • ' . . -.'<_. >. • • : . . . . ' < • 1 <. '. • " . • • . • a : 1 r.:-.- • K* *.•! C'-"*- /V." ' ... ^ u e - o i v ( s ) W - le^j £***& LOCATION OF ACTION (include St;«l AdCess. Municipality trxJ County) BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF APPLICANTVSPONSOr? ADDRESS ft PnO€* £T> CITY/PO M. TXigJg-VTSWM NAME OF OWNER (II different) ZIP CODE K/,V. Ito^ i BUSINESS TELEPHONE eg. f| Ug.\/f T ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE 2\& . krsrkiAo^T - 621-"Wil STATE Z:F CODE LA/J^J « £ 9 / IA£>^K>WN>,... j / , Yl DESCRIPTION C? ACTIOS ) ' /£ Please Complete Each Question —Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: DUrban Dlndustrial DCommercial Efoesidential (suburban) CForest ^Agriculture 2. Totaf acreage of project area: . * J^ APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 7 COther acres. Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECU Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) '. 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. boil drainage; ^ W e l l drained \ O Q % of site OPoorly drained DRural (non-farm) PRESENTLY acres acres acres AFTER COMPLETION acres acres : acres ^acres acres acres acres s/S? acres '. DModerately well drained acres L <l** acres 1 acres acres [acres % of site % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? a. What is depth to bedrock? DYes JsSfNo (in feet) % » • �( •« . nfr::'i-: » • * - . • •• r • •••••• . r." :c •: c " - . . ! '.. 1 -- •• *.:• <• c . ' ' ••• :•' '. '.'• f-: '•• c ',! • S . ;. Is project sut i;cr.'.::-:., tosi;-^--: - : \i- c SJU . i : ; c : o:. i.\«. i . i r .:«.: ;:'»»'».; :.r.;.' '*;•...•. ' 1 tr:'.6. What is the depth o? the *a:er tar't. : 9 !• «.:'.r fo'r.'.'d o"v. ••' "• - " . v *•; '.•;• hu-v. rg f i«. .. • „ c : i},i"- "i ; L<t>. . J.' . . • • - . ^.".t *L= (in feci) :*"'• " ' r r <r'< ! ' i " ; f r r v : ' -• •. . : : -: " . v " : " • : ••• •"'.'•) u- •'*>•' f*Vr« 2*>*Co **:«•• \r, :'r- <•.•••(.;'. a r c j " Z '*o; L^isLo , DYes Zfco According to Identify each species '.—1 '—1 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) CYes O&to Describe . 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes E$No If yes, explain .. , _ _ 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes @K'o #A 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary lb L?.'f.c-f, pcr.df, v. f.i?.r-d are2S v.;'.* .*. o: CO.v..gjc.-,_> to p:c-;CC. a:vi b. Si2e (In acres) a. Name 17, Is the site served by existing public utilities? £?¥es GNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist t o allow connection? JSS'es b) If Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DYes DNo DNo IS. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant t o Agriculture and Markets Lav., Arf.de 2S;AA Section 303 and 304? DYes CJNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 617? ElVes DNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes E2Ko B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage t o be developed: 'J**? acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped d., Length of project, in miles: ' * ' ^ -acres. ' t<5~ (»f appropriate) e . l f the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ' g..Maximum vehicular trips generated per Knur ; proposed K//A h. if residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Initially _2 acres ultimately. acres. %; ~~Z~~ (upon completion of project)? M u l t i p l e Family Condominium - Ultimately &. i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; j . Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? * ^ ^ - •-- 3. 1 ft. 7 length �2 Ho* much natu'al material (i e 'cc^. earth, etc ) * i l l be r c m o u d from the s:ie' 3. Will d'sturbed areas be recla<med> DYes i$No ^-(0 tons.'cuttc >2rds DN.'A a. If yes. for what i n t e n d . , purpose is the site being reclaimed' b. Will topsotl be stockpiled for reclamation? GYes . l£No c. W i l l upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes £QNo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres 5. Will any mature forest (over TOO years old) or other locally-important vegetation be- removed by this project? DYes [?No j 6/---Jf single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. if multi-phased: i/ a. Total number of phases anticipated N/rT __ ''\ (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase DYes 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project year, (including demolition) month a d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? months, (including demolition) year. DYes DNo l^lo r\//f ; after project is complete * 1 1 . Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes DYes G3^jo If yes. explain G^No a. If yes. indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes BNo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 16. Will the project generate solid waste? DYes DYes DYes JQNO _5No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, w i l l an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes c. If yes. give name DNo ; location d. W i l l any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes DNo e. If Yes. explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? DYes LBNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 1 8 . Will project use herbicides or pesticides? years. DYes ENo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes DNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? 23.-Will project result in an increase in energy use? DYes DYes ESNo If yes , indicate type(sj '_ 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity £: 23. Total anticipated water usage per day - : gallons/minute. gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? If Yes. explain _JNo DYes 4 J!_No • ---. �25. Approvals Requited: Submittal T>pe City. Town. Village Board CYes CNo Qiiy Town, Village Planning Board EYes EJYes DNo D NO City, Toww Zoning Board _<Yes _5Yes DNo DNO €-tty. County Health Department EYes CN'o CN'O Other Local Agencies DYes • No Oiher Regional Agencies GYes CNO State Agencies DYes DN'o Federal Agencies CYes • No Date 5«-^*^ > ^ ^ n ____, C •Q/i/l.UCEcJ Vz/MiiS ISCPI- f/<IG l&j- \\M***'W\ C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? _7¥es DNo If Yes. indicate decision required: • zoning amendment t^zoning variance Especial use permit ^subdivision • new/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother 2. What is the zoning c!assification(s}of the site? Dsite plan . jL""^ 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Q\nt -'A-fav*\>'»iD"g!l>rM <_—-—-^e'C r ~~ C*o<3- cr>ltM£l-eh-W 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? K & $ lfl<£ U T U U - (**& C ^ ^ 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? >E$Yes DNo 7. What are the predominant land use{s) and zoning classifications within a V* mile radius of proposed action? 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V* mile? Q-. 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? _ __3Yes DNo CYes _5NO a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? _ 10. Will proposed action require any authorizations) for the formation of sewer or water districts? 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police. fire protection)? DYes EZfNo a. If yes. is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DYes DNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes DYes ©No DNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name . % Signature XZ\\ J&-fcifa(&Cr~ T'itlp A&Ct{\Xl*<ir If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessrvjnt Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 �p s r i 2—PROJECT IMPACTS A N D 1 H L i R N'.AGNuUDL Responsibility of Lead Agency C e n t r a l I n f o r m a t i o n (Read Carefully) • In c o m p l e t i n g the f o r m the reviewer should be guided by the question Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected t o be an expert e n v i r o n m e n t a l analyst • • I d e n t i f y i n g t h a t an i m p a c t w i l l be potentially large (column 2) does not mean th2t it is also necessarily significant. A n y - l a r g e i m p a c t m u s t be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance I d e n t i f y i n g an impact in c o l u m n 2 s i m p l y asks t h a t it be l o o k e d at further. • The Examples p r o v i d e d are t o assist the reviewer by showing types of i m p a c t s and wherever possible the threshold of m a g n i t u d e that w o u l d trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and f o r most situations. But. for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be a p p r o p r i a t e f o r a Potential Large I m p a c t response, thus requiring e v a l u a t i o n in Part 3. • The impacts of e a c h project, on each site, in each locality, w i l l vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative a n d have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question • The number of examples per question does not indicate t h e j m p o r t a n c e of each question • In i d e n t i f y i n g i m p a c t s , consider long term, short term and c u m l a t i v e effects. Instructions (Read c a r e f u l l y ) a. Answer each of t h e 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there w i l l be any i m p a c t . b. M a y b e answers s h o u l d be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes t o a question then check the appropriate box ( c o l u m n 1 or 2) t o indicate the p o t e n t i a l size of t h e i m p a c t . If i m p a c t t h r e s h o l d equals or exceeds any example p r o v i d e d , check c o l u m n 2. If i m p a c t w i l l occur but t h r e s h o l d Is lower t h a n e x a m p l e , check c o l u m n 1. d . If reviewer has d o u b t a b o u t size of the i m p a c t then consider t h e i m p a c t as p o t e n t i a l l y large and proceed t o PART 3. e. If a p o t e n t i a l l y large i m p a c t checked in c o l u m n 2 can be m i t i g a t e d by change(s) in the project to a small to m o d e r a t e i m p a c t , also c h e c k the Yes box in c o l u m n 3. A No response indicates t h a t such a reduction is n o t possible. This m u s t be e x p l a i n e d in Part 3. I M P A C T ON L A N D 1 . W i l l the proposed a c t i o n result in a physical change to the project site? 0NO DYES Examples t h a t w o u l d apply t o column 2 • A n y c o n s t r u c t i o n o n slopes of 1 5 % or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 f o o t of length), or w h e r e the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • C o n s t r u c t i o n o n l a n d where the depth to the water table is less than 3 iect 1 2 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact D D DYes D D DYes DN< n GYes DYes CNO Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change DNo • C o n s t r u c t i o n o n l a n d where bedrock is exposed or generally w i t h i n 3 f e e t of existing g r o u n d surface. D G D • C o n s t r u c t i o n t h a t w i l l c o n t i n u e for more than 1 year or i n v o l v e more t h a n one phase or stage. D D DYes DNO • Excavation for m i n i n g purposes that w o u l d remove more t h a n 1,000 tons of n a t u r a l m a t e r i a l (i.e.. rock or soil) per year. D D DYes DNO • C o n s t r u c t i o n or expansion of a sanitary l a n d f i l l . D D D D D D DYes.. DYes DYes DNO DNO D D D Y es DN< • C o n s t r u c t i o n c i p a v e d parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. • C o n s t r u c t i o n in a d e s l g n a t e d f l o o d w a y . • Other impacts DNO DNO 2 . W i l l there be an e f f e c t t-' ...iy un.que or unusual land f o r m s f o u n d on t h e site? (i.e.. c l i f f s , dunes, geological formations, etc.)J3_J>'0 DYES • Specific --• i land forms: �1 2 Small to Moderate Impact Potenlial Large Impact D D D D DYes DN'O DYes DNo D D D D D D DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo D. D DYes DNo D D D D DYes DNo DYes DNo D D D D DYes DNo DYes DNo • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. D D DYes DNo • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. • Liquid effluent will be conveved off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. D D D D DYes DYes DNo DNo • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action will like'v ca .^ siltation or other discharge into an .existing body of water t o ti o ex;*-'*: that there will be an obvious visual .contrast to natural conditions. D D. _^es D.So • Proposed Action w i l l require the storage of petroleum or chemical , products greater than 1,100 gallons. D D DYes " DNo • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. D D DYes DNo' • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste tieatment and/or storage facilities. D D DYes DNo • Other D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected' (Under Articles 1 5, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law. E t l ) <&NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. • Dredging more than TOO cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. • Other impacts: Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ,0HO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Can Impact Be l i t i g a t e d By Project Change 4 • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. • Other impacts: 5. W i l l Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? E&s'O Examples that would apply to column 2 DYES • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. impacts: 6 . W i l l proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? B&O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 V �Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact D D D D D D D D D • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. 1 Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change DYes DNO DYes DNo DYes CNo DYes DNo D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. D D DYes DNo • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. D D DYes DNo • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. D D DYes DNo • Other impacts: D D DYes DNo • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. D D DY es DNo • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. D D D D DYes DNo DYes DNo D D DYes DNo • • D DYes DNo D DYes DNo D D DY es # • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. • Other impacts: _____ IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? _&0 DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? _?NO Examples that would apply to column 2 DYES • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. • Other 9 impacts: : Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? >__SO " Examples that would apply to column 2 DYES • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. -- - IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? $NO DYES v Examples that would apply to column 2 ;'•<:* The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural !••'" land (includes cropland, hayfields-, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 Ti~- DN< �• Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or. if located in an Agncultutsl District, more than 2.5 acres o£''agncultural Und. The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g.. subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches. strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) Other impacts : • IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 1 1 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ®NO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B ) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will resuit in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontologica) importance? 0NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to an\ facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site inventory. • Other impacts. IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE A N D RECREATION Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apj?ly to column 2 ^$NQ DYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreationTTopponunrty.*" • A major reduction of an open space important to the community • Other impacts: . 1 2 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact. D D DYes DNo D D DYes CNO D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes Dsv» D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo. D D D ' D D D DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo ' DNo Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change 13 �1 Small l o Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact D D D D D D DYes DN© DYes DNO D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. D D DYes DNo • Other impacts: D "D DYes DNo • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. D D DYes DN( • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). D D D D DYes DYes DNO • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. D D DYes DNO • Other D D DYes DNO D D EZlYes . ' D N o a. D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNO D DYes IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. W i l l there be an effect to existing transportation systems* Ek'O Example* that would apply to column 2 CY.ES • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. • Other impacts: __ Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change DYes D N O IMPACT O N ENERGY 15. W i l l proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? 0NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. W i l l there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ,0NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside o f structures. impacts: . DNo IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. W i l l Proposed Action affect public health and safety? jSbJO Examples that would apply to column 2 .DYES • Proposed Action may cause a risk o f explosion or release of hazardous subsfances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of • accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any f o r m (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive; radioactive, irritating, infectious**etc.) """' .".""" .'"" '."' . . . " . * . • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance w i t h i n 2.000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. " • Other impacts: ^ '. 10 DNo �IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18 . Will proposed action affect the character of the existing communis ? #*0 DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 1 2 3 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact- Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future project. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. • Other impacts: n L_> D DYes DNo G D GYes DNO D D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo D D DYes DNo D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo D 19. Is there, or is there likely to be. public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? xSSiO DYES If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Prnceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following tor e2ch impact identified in Column 2 of Pan 2. 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project changes). 3 . Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled . .. . . . . _ _ • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) - 11 �F R E D E R I C K P. CLARK A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut David J. Portman, A,CP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP Jim Donovan, RLA, ASLA MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: October 14, 1994 Subject: Bick Preliminary Subdivision Application As we have received a copy of the application for preliminary subdivision approval but have not received a plan, we do not have any substantial comments to offer at this time. If the plan is submitted in advance of the November meeting (a minimum of 10 days before the meeting is required in the Subdivision Regulations), we will review it for that meeting. Susan J. Portman, AICP, Associate/Planning cc: Sean Treacy, Mayor Linda E. David, Village Administrator Janet A. Gandolfo, Esq., Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building inspector Mark DiGennaro, Village Engineer John Hughes, Esq. James and Martha Bick Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX • (914) 967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �/) Approved ^ith respect to substance and form: h Li./ Village /Attorney Approved by the/PTaVining Board Filed with Village Clerk Clerk or Deputy Clerk Dated: Oct. £d }\??y Date of Meeting � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1994 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1994-11-17 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1994 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994