https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/f24351b90f9d1b521d8e2c165304a86a.pdf 94670d96b0e1c16694f8ad04e54c9497 PDF Text Text REGULAR MEETING NORTH TARRYTOWN, N.Y. OCTOBER 20, 1994 « A regular meeting of the North Tarrytown Planning Board was held on October 20, 1994 at 8:00P.M. in the Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: George Hritz, Chairman Donald Caetano Ellen Tsangaris James Donovan Edward McCarthy David Perlmutter ALSO PRESENT: Janet Gandolfo, Attorney James Margotta, Building Inspector Susan J. Portman, Assoc./Planning Mark A. DiGennaro, CAMCE Chairman Hritz called the meeting to order at 8:00P.M. 1. Public Hearing - James Hoqan, Ex., 19 Maple St. James Hogan came forward and stated that he was present at the last meeting and is resubmitting a site plan dividing the property at 19 Maple St. into 2 parcels instead of 3. Chairman Hritz then asked Ms. Susan Portman if she had a chance to look at the revised plans. Ms. Portman answered that she had. She said that they looked fine. The existing garage is on the same lot with the house. She didn't have any other issues. Before going any further, Chairman Hritz asked for a motion to declare the board as a lead agency. Ms. Tsangaris moved. Mr. McCarthy seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Chairman Hritz inquired as to whether we had to circulate the lead agency status forms within 30 days and Mr. Margotta answered that he will send the plans to the County the day after this meeting. He did not send the plans before this because he did not receive a complete and final plan until today. Chairman Hritz asked if there was any member of the public who had anything more to say on this application. There was no answer. He asked if any member of the board had any further thoughts or ideas. He stated that the applicant did a good job to come within the recommendations of the planners. He also stated that they needed to decide if they could make a negative declaration and ask for a motion. �PAGE # 2 Mr. Perlmutter motioned that the board make a negative declaration. Mr. Donovan seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Chairman Hritz told Mr. Hogan that he had their approval on the condition that the County had no objections to the plan. Mr. Hogan asked for an explaination of the mechanics of the procedures from this point and Mr. Margotta explained the procedures to him. 2. Prelim Hearing - V & M Shroba, Sleepy Hollow Rd. Subdivision Applic Ms. Gandolfo stated that V & M Shroba would like to withdraw without prejudice subject to their re-submitting when they figure out what they want to do with the vacant lot. Board agreed to discontinue until further notice. Mr. Margotta explained that the applicant has 1 year from this date to re-activate the application. 3. Prelim Hearing - Al Peck, Irving Place Subdivision Chairman Hritz asked Mr. Peck to give a report about the project. Mr. Peck explained that Irving Place was a street created by the Van Tassel Apartments considered a private street. To the best of his knowledge, it used to be closed once a year because it was considered a private street. He doesn't He doesn't know whether they still close the street. The surveyor told him that Irving Place is a small by-pass connected with Teresa Street, and it's not marked on the survey. He will have it marked on the survey if the board reguests it. The surveyor signed the survey and corrected the lot numbers on it. Discussion as to who owns Teresa Street followed. Ms. Gandolfo stated that it is owned by the Van Tassel Apartments and it is a private way, it is not Village owned. Mr. Margotta pointed out that the Van Tassel pays taxes on it. Mr. Peck said that in any event they have to put on the survey where Irving Place is a through-way and where Teresa Street adjoins it. The History of the property is that it's been in the family for close to a hundred years or more and when the property was purchased, there were 2 lots on it and it's been that way ever since. Now that they have to dispose of the Estate, they're going to find it difficult to sell somebody 2 houses on one lot. It would be much easier to sell each lot and each house separtly. Chairman Hritz asked what year the houses were built. �PAGE #3 Mr. Peck answered over a hundred years. Mr. Margotta commented that they're very old houses. Mr. Caetano pointed out that the law reads that the street has to be closed once a year in order to keep it a private street. Discussion on Teresa Street being a private street ensued. Chairman Hritz pointed out that this is on for a preliminary' hearing this week and that he'll have to come back next month. Mr. Peck: "What do you want me to do?" "Are you going to consider the letters that were written or is that part of the Zoning Board problem?" Chairman Hritz said that it's our job. A variance is needed. Ms. Portman pointed out that several variances are needed. Discussion on the variances followed. The variances needed are lot size, lot width, side yard and total side yard. Chairman Hritz: "We are not going to resolve any of this tonight. We should send you to the Zoning Board." Mr. Margotta pointed out that he can't go to the Zoning Board until December. He told Mr. Peck that he will send him a letter telling him that he has to go before the Zoning Board and why. He will write u p a legal notice and set it up for the December meeting. Chairman Hritz ask for a motion to declare our intent to be the lead agency. Mr. Donovan motioned. Mr. McCarthy seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Ms. Portman pointed out that they should wait until the Planning Board makes a negative declaration. Ms. Gandolfo: "We'll schedule it for a public hearing here and a public hearing before the Zoning Board." Chairman Hritz: "We'll send it to the Zoning Board and ask them to review it for Zoning purposes and to see if they'll grant the variances. If they do grant the variances, they will be subject to our overall review of the enviromental process." He asked for a motion to defer the Zoning issues to the Zoning Board. �PAGE # 4 Mr. Caetano motioned. Mr. Donovan seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Prelim Hearing - Al Peck, Bedford Road Subdivision Chairman Hritz asked Mr. Peck to tell the board what the Bedford Road was about. Mr. Peck: "This property has also been in the family longer than a hundred years." He went on to explain about the lots and that he is spliting up the lots in order to sell them. Chairman Hritz pointed out that he didn't need a variance, Ms. Portman said that it was an unlisted action so he didn't need to circulate for lead agency. Discussion followed. Chairman Hritz asked Ms. Portman if there was anything in her report that she wanted to point out. Ms. Portman answered that just some corrections. Mr. McCarthy moved to schedule this for a public hearing and set up notices. Mr. Donovan seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Public Hearing - James & Martha Bick, 3 Terreace CloseMerge Vacant Lot Chairman Hritz read the Public Hearing Notice. Mr. Hughes came forward and informed the board that they had just gotten the survey done and it wasn't complete. He wanted to pass the maps out so that at the November meeting he would be prepared. Chairman Hritz asked if there were any members of the public who wanted to speak on this application. There were none. Mr. Hughes explained the figures on the drawing of the maps and answered questions by the board. Discussion followed. Chairman Hritz asked if there was motion to continue this public hearing to the next month. Mr. Donovan motioned. Ms. Tsangaris seconded. Motion carried unanimously. t �PAGE # 5 6. Laurentino Rodrigues 7. Rock of Salvation Church Request for a reduction in Recreation Fees Laurentino Rodrigues $9,600.00 in Fees Rock of Salvation Church $32,000.00 in Fees Chairman Hritz began by saying that both'Mr. Rodrigues and the Rock of Salvation Church asked for a review and the Trustees had asked for a recommendation regarding the fees in light of a recent Supreme Court decision. Chairman Hritz went on to say that it was an issue that is dependent on the law and suggested that a sub-committee be appointed to look at this. Mr. Caetano: "I think it should go through the whole board as a committee." Discussion followed on the use of recreation fees and their validity. Chairman Hritz stated that he personaly felt that they shouldn't take the time of all the board members but should ask two or three people to look at the issue and get back to the board and have a full discussion in front of the board. Mr. Caetano, Mr. Perlmutter, Ms. Tsangaris and Mr. Hritz agreed to be on the committee. The committee will discuss a plan of action, then meet with the applicants and then report back to the board with a possible solution. a. Chestnut Ridge - Continued Chairman Hritz commented to he was here, he asked for a spaces in order to get some asked Mr. Rodrigues to give Mr. Rodrigues that the last time preliminary waiver of the parking construction done. The Chairman the board an update. Mr. Rodrigues answered that they have tried to get in touch with Clark Assoc, to review the parking lot for 185 Valley St. and Chestnut Ridge. The plan was approved only for excavating. Mr. DiGennaro: "What we are looking at is the retaining wall. The board gave an approval based on the retaining wall just for the begining of phase one which is the construction of the wall and the parking lot. Also, in order to perform a thorough review, we need all the components of the designs and the criteria of the conditions. We haven't gotten these items from Mr. Rodrigues and there are some questions that remain unanswered." �PAGE #6 Chairman Hritz asked if Mr. Rodrigues knew what was missing. Mr. DiGennaro answered yes. Mr. Rodrigues stated that it's not fair to him because he's has waited one month and hasn't gotten anywhere. Discussion followed. Chairman Hritz told Mr. Rodrigues that his application was continuing to next month and he was welcome to take it up with the Village Engineer in the interim. Chairman asked for a motion to approve the minutes from September 22, 1994. Mr. Perlmutter motioned. Ms. Tsangaris seconded. Motion Garried unanimously. Chairman Hritz pointed out that Ms. Portman has mentioned the provision of the Village Code that calls for an annual report on whether the codes are working. He asked Susan to ask around the organization and see if she seen any other reports that other Zoning Boards or Planning Boards have done around the County and bring it back to us. Mr. Perlmutter moved that the committee has noted that the Planning Board is down to 6 members and would like a 7th member appointed as quickly as possible. Mr. Donovan seconded. Motion carried unanimously. There being no further business, motion to adjourned was made by Mr. Perlmutter and seconded by Mr. Donovan. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully subm,it^ed, Carmen G. Mariano Recording Secretary �AGREEMENT The undersigned does hereby agree to the following. 1. I (We) am (are) the owner(s) of premises located at 3 Terrace Close North Tarrytown, New York 10591 for which an application is being submitted to the Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board for she plan review. 2 I understand and agree that there are certain fees for which I am responsible in conjunction with said application. 3 I understand that the application fee is $500.00 per site plan submitted, plus an additional $10 00 per required parking space, as described in Section 62-3OF. I also understand that the Planning Board may seek the consultation of professional planners, engineers, surveyors, etc. and I will be responsible for any and all costs incurred by the Planning Board for such consultations and professional opinions at the prevailing hourly rate agreed upon by the Planning Board and the consultants. 1 understand that no employee of the Village nor any member of the Planning Board can advise me, in advance, of what the total consulting fees might be. I also understand that I may be obligated to pay recreation fees based upon the number of parking spaces required for site plan approval at the rate of $1,200.00 per parking space. 4 I shall provide a retainer of $2,500.00 to the Village of North Tarrytown to be held in escrow and applied towards the payment of consultation and professional fees incurred by the Village with regard to my application. When the balance of the escrow account is $1,000.00 or less, I shall deposit additional retainer funds into the escrow account so that the minimum balance in said account is never less than $1,000.00. The Village Treasurer's office shall provide me with a monthly statement indicating expenses incurred and the amount of monies withdrawn from said account. 5. I understand that if I withdraw my application prior to any action being taken by the Planning Board f am still responsible for any expenses incurred by the Village with regard to my application prior to such withdrawal. 6 I understand that if at any time the minimum balance in said escrow account falls below $1,000,00 the Planning Board may suspend the review of my site plan and/or the Building Inspector may refuse to issue any permits and/or certificates with regard to the premises. �7 If, at the termination of the Planning Board process, I still am indebted to the Village of North Tarrytown for any fees mentioned hereinabove, 1 undei stand that the amount of money still owed will be added to my property tax bill and become a lien against the property or the Village of North Tarrytown may take whatever legal action necessary against each owner, either individually or jointly, to collect such funds *- ier Owner Owner Dated; October 3 , 1994 �^ . ^P VILLAGE Of NORTH TARRYTOWN 28 Beekman Avenue North Tarrytown, New York .10591 * PLANNING BOARD 1. Subdivision Name/Planning Board Review: Matter of James and Martha Bick 2. Location (Tax section, block and lot number or other specific information) Section 11 Block IS, Lot 9 and 8 3. Property owner's name and address James and Martha Biick, 3 Terrace Close, North Tarrytown, New York 10591 A. Engineer or Surveyor's Name and Address CharlesaRiley, 61 Main Street, Tarrytown, New YOrk 5. Size in acres 1+ Proposed number of lots 1 6. Pee: $500.00 Date Paid: October 3, 1994 7. Is the entire parcel involved to be subdivided at this time? yes 8. Is any land to be dedicated to public use? No Acres N/A 9. Will any zoning changes or subdivision regulation waivers be requested? No Describe: N/A 10. Date of preliminary layout submission: O c t o b e r 3 ' 11. Conditions to be met in plat submission: 199 ^ None Note:Eleven(11)copies of all submissions are required with this application. ENCLOSED PLEASE BIND CHECK IN THE AMOUNT 0B' $500.00 PLUS A CHECK FOR $ BOR SITE PLAN SUH^TTTED, BOR EACH REQUIRED PARKING SPACE. . Signature: < A,M,™„. Address ^ ^ ^ ^ , / K ^ y , 3 Terrace Close North Tarrytown, New York �Additional pertinent information may be determined necessary or appropriate in addition to the below: Project: Matter of James and Martha Bick Date: October 3, 1994 Location: 3 Terrace Close, North Tarrytown, New York Architect/Engineer/Surveyor: Charles Riley Check list to be completed by applicant prior to submission to the Planning Board. If any item on this check list is not applicable to the site plan, please make a written notification on the site plan to this effect. 1. The name and address of the Owner of Record or the property and the name, address and professional seal of the individual preparing the site plan. 2. The names of all owners or record of adjacent properties. 3. The location of all existing structures and other man-made features of the site, as well as those on adjacent properties, including existing utility lines (gas and electric). < 4. The location and design of the proposed water supply sewage disposal and storm water drainage systems, including the locations, sizes, invert and rim elevations to the existing water supply, sewage disposal, and storm water drainage systems. 5. Existing and proposed topography map of the subdivision, extending at least twenty (20) ft. beyond the site boundaries with contour intervals not greater than five (5) ft. and referenced to USGS or other approved bench mark and scale. 6. The nature and location of all other existing site features, including wetlands, water courses, wooded areas and rock outcrops. 7. The plan shall clearly indicate which site features are existing and proposed and which will be removed. 8. Owner's endorsement. 9. Planning Board Chairman's endorsement per subdivision regulations, Part IV, Page 7817 (14 10. The locations of nearest fire hydrants. 11. The widths of streets and avenues encompassing the site. 12. An area map showing all streets and property within one thousand (1,000) ft. of the applicant's property, at a scale of one (1) inch to four hundred (400) ft. All property owned by the applicant shall be clearly indentified. 13. Plow and pressure requirements for the fire sprinkler system and backflow preventers. 14. Cover letter to the Planning Board, including brief summary of proposed action in letter form, indicating scope of project, purpose and plans for development. �14-16-2 ( 2 / 8 7 ) - 7 c 617.21 . _ Appendix A S t a t e Environmental Quality Review SEQR FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The f u l l EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project o r action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a p r o j e c t that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those w h o determine significance m a y have l i t t l e or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be t e c h n i c a l l y expert in e n v i r o n m e n t a l analysis. In a d d i t i o n , m a n y w h o have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns a f f e c t i n g t h e question of significance. The f u l l EAF is i n t e n d e d t o provide a m e t h o d whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the d e t e r m i n a t i o n process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to f i t a project or action. Full EAF Components: The f u l l EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1 : Provides o b j e c t i v e data and i n f o r m a t i o n about a given project and its site. By identifying basic p r o j e c t data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses o n i d e n t i f y i n g the range of possible impacts t h a t may o c c u r f r o m a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an I m p a c t is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a p o t e n t i a l l y large i m p a c t . The form also identifies whether an i m p a c t can be m i t i g a t e d or reduced. Part 3: If any i m p a c t in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the i m p a c t is a c t u a l l y important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE-Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: D Part 1 D Part 2 DPart 3 U p o n review of the i n f o r m a t i o n recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting i n f o r m a t i o n , and considering b o t h the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the l e a d agency that: G$ A. The p r o j e c t w i l l not result in any large and important i m p a c t s ) and, therefore, is one w h i c h will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration w i l l be prepared. D B. A l t h o u g h the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there w i l l not be a significant e f f e c t for this Unlisted A c t i o n because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a C O N D I T I O N E D negative declaration w i l l be prepared.* D C. The p r o j e c t m a y result in one or more large and i m p o r t a n t impacts that may have a significant i m p a c t on the e n v i r o n m e n t , therefore a positive declaration w i l l be prepared. * A C o n d i t i o n e d N e g a t i v e Declaration is o n l y valid for Unlisted Actions James Bick and Martha Bick Planning Board - Village of North Name of Action Tarrytown N a m e of Lead Agency i Print or Type N a m e of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible O f f i c e r Signature of Responsible O f f i c e r in Lead Agency responsibl officer) Si iiggnnaattuurree^df Preparer (If different f r o m responsible October 3 , 1994 Date 1 �PART 1-PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor .NOTICE: This d o c u m e n t is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant e f f e c t o n the environment. Please c o m p l e t e the entire f o r m . Parts A through E. Answers to these questions w i l l be considei as part of the a p p l i c a t i o n for approval and may be subject to further verification and p u b l i c review. Provide any a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n y o u believe w i l l be needed to c o m p l e t e Parts 2 and 3. It is expected t h a t c o m p l e t i o n of the full EAF w i l l be dependent on i n f o r m a t i o n currently available and w i l l not i n v o l v e new studies, research or investigation. If i n f o r m a t i o n requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION JAMES BICK a n d MARTHA BICK LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) 3 T e r r a c e C l o s e , N o r t h T a r r y t w o n , New YOrk BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR ' James Bick and Martha B i c k ADDRESS 0 CITY/PO XT rj, ( 914, 631-8855 -,, 3 Terrace Close, fc, STATE m North Tarrytown ZIP CODE NY 10591 BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER (It different) same ( ) ADDRESS same STATE CITY/PO ZJPCODE same DESCRIPTION OF ACTION C r e a t i o n of one b u i l d i n g l o t - —• Please Complete Each Q u e s t i o n — I n d i c a t e N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of o v e r a l l project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1 . Present land use: DUrban Dlndustrial DForest DAgriculture DCommercial (ZlResidential (suburban) 2. Total acreage of p r o j e c t area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE M e a d o w or Brushland (Non-agricultural) PRESENTLY acres AFTER COMPLETION acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres Forested acres A g r i c u l t u r a l (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres W e t l a n d (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres W a t e r Surface Area acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or f i l l ) - acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres Other (Indicate t y p e L Residential 1+ 3. W h a t is p r e d o m i n a n t soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: D R u r a l (non-farm) DOther © W e l l drained J Q Q D P o o r l y drained acres 1±_ ', % of site D M o d e r a t e l y w e l l drained % of site % of site b. If any a g r i c u l t u r a l l a n d is involved, h o w many acres of soil are classified w i t h i n soil group 1 through 4 of the N Land C l a s s i f i c a t i o n System? N/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock o u t c r o p p i n g s on project site? a. W h a t is d e p t h t o bedrock? 10-15+ QKYes ( j n feet) 2 DNo �• 5 . A p p r o x i m a t e percentage of proposed project site w i t h slopes: CO-10% % DlO-15% E 1 5 % or greater % 4Q % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site-, or district, listed on the State or the N a t i o n a l Registers of Historic Places? DYes C3^o 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National N a t u r a l Landmarks? 8. W h a t is the d e p t h of the w a t e r table? 2 0 + DYes Lt$No (in feet) 9. Is site located over a p r i m a r y , principal, or sole source aquifer? DYes CBNo 10. D o hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? DYes DNo 1 1 . Does project site c o n t a i n any species of plant or animal life that is i d e n t i f i e d as threatened or endangered? DYes Q2No According to . Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) DYes $No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the c o m m u n i t y or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes [?No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site i n c l u d e scenic views k n o w n t o be important to the c o m m u n i t y ? DYes C3NO 15. Streams w i t h i n or contiguous t o project area: None N/ A a. Name of Stream and name of River to w h i c h it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, w e t l a n d areas w i t h i n or contiguous to project area: a. N a m e N/A b. Size (In acres) 7 "' . Is the site served by existing public utilities? SYes DNo a) If Yes, does sufficient c a p a c i t y exist to allow connection? EYes b) If Yes, w i l l i m p r o v e m e n t be necessary to allow connection? DNo C3Ves DNo 18. Is the site l o c a t e d in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, A r t i c l e 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? DYes ENo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant t o A r t i c l e 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? DYes DNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes ENo B. Project Description 1 . Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage to be d e v e l o p e d : 1+ acres initially; c. Project acreage t o r e m a i n undeveloped d. Length of project, in miles: N/A 1 »5+ acres. 1+ acres u l t i m a t e l y . acres. (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A f. Number of off-street p a r k i n g spaces existing ^/A ; proposed g. M a x i m u m vehicular trips generated per hour %• (upon c o m p l e t i o n of project)? h. If residential: N u m b e r a n d type of housing units: O n e Family Initially I Ultimately _L T w o Family i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure N/A M u l t i p l e Family height; j . Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project w i l l occupy is? 3 Condominium width; length. ft. �2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed'from the site? J _ _ 3. Wifl disturbed areas be reclaimed? DYes BNo DN/A a. If yes, for what intends, purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? tons/cubic yards DYes __* (3No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes _fNo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes d<No 6. If single phase project Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated months, (including demolition). (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 N A month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase N/A month year. / d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes DYes BNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete N 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ' DYes DYes l_No N/A b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged DYes L l3No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 16. Will the project generate solid waste? EYes a. If yes, what is the amount per month DYes DYes _3No N/A tons ; (_Yes : DNo ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain __Yes DNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? years. DYes ENo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? DYes ENo DYes ©No If yes . indicate type<s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity Total anticipated water usage per day ' 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? If Yes, explain DYes . 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? 23. LUNo DNo b. If,yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? c. If yes, give name If yes, explain BNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? N/A A 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DNo N/A ' gallons/minute. gallons/day. DYes BNo GDNo __No �25. Approvals Required: Submittal Date Type City. Town, Village Board DYes :ity. Town, Village Planning Board GNo • _Yes C N o Subdivision City, Town Zoning Board DYes DNo City, County Health Department DYes DNo Other Local Agencies DYes DNo Other Regional Agencies DYes DNo . State Agencies DYes DNo . Federal Agencies DYes DNo 10-3-1994 . _, C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? EYes DNo If Yes, indicate decision required: Dzoning amendment Dzoning variance Dnew/revision of master plan Dspecial use permit Dresource management plan 2. What is the zoning c!assification(s)of the site? -.subdivision Dsite plan Dother R-15 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 1 building lot 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? . R-15 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 1 building lot;_ '•. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? QJYes DNo 7. What are the predominant land use{s) and zoning classifications within a V* mile radius of proposed action? Residential single family 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V* mile? _]Yes D N o 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? _ J a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 1+ a c r e 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? DYes K)No 1 1 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? QYes ENo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? __Yes D N o 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes DYes _]No DNo D. informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or. may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. \pplicant/Sponsor Name JAMES BICK AND MARTHA BICK signature <^Q^LZZr^^/^^ Date October 3, 1994 Titlp Attorney If the action is in the Coastal Area, -nd you ire a. state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. �Part 2—PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General I n f o r m a t i o n (Read Carefully) • In c o m p l e t i n g the f o r m the reviewer should be guided by the questfon: Have my responses and d e t e r m i n a t i o n s b e e n reasonable? The reviewer is n o t expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • I d e n t i f y i n g that an impact w i l l be p o t e n t i a l l y large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily s i g n i f i c a n t . Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. I d e n t i f y i n g an i m p a c t in c o l u m n 2 s i m p l y asks t h a t it be l o o k e d at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the t h r e s h o l d of m a g n i t u d e that w o u l d trigger a response in c o l u m n 2. The examples are generally applicable t h r o u g h o u t the State a n d for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be a p p r o p r i a t e for a Potential Large I m p a c t response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, w i l l vary. Therefore, the examples are i l l u s t r a t i v e a n d have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long t e r m , short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there w i l l be any i m p a c t . b. M a y b e answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes t o a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) t o indicate the p o t e n t i a l size o f t h e impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check c o l u m n 2. If i m p a c t w i l l o c c u r b u t t h r e s h o l d is lower than example, check c o l u m n 1 . d. If reviewer has d o u b t about size of the i m p a c t then consider the impact as p o t e n t i a l l y large and p r o c e e d t o PART 3. e. If a p o t e n t i a l l y large impact checked in c o l u m n 2 can be mitigated by change{s) in the project t o a small t o m o d e r a t e impact, also check the Yes box in c o l u m n 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is n o t possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 IMPACT ON LAND 1 . W i l l the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? DNO DYES Examples that w o u l d apply to c o l u m n . 2 • Any construction on slopes of 1 5 % or greater, (15 f o o t rise per 100 f o o t of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. » • Construction t h a t w i l l continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that w o u l d remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary l a n d f i l l . • Construction in a designated f l o o d w a y . }• Other impacts '. Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change • D DYes DNo D D QYes DNo n D D DYes . DYes DNo GNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo DYes DNo • • D • D D • • • D • 2. W i l l there be an effect t'.. „.iy unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological f o r m a t i o n s , e t c . ) D N O DYES • Specific land forms: a D �IMPACT ON WATER 3\ Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24. 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ®NO GYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. 1 2 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact D D D D D D • D D D D Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change DYes DNO GYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo D DYes DNo D D D D DYes DNo DYes DNo • DYes DNo D D D D DYes DNo D DYes DNo • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. D D D D DYes DYes DNo DNo • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. D C DYes DNo • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo q D DYes DNo • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. • Other impacts: 4 . Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? 0NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. • Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? $NO Examples that would apply to column 2 DYES • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. tt k* Other impacts: . Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? C3NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 �2 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact D D D • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. • • • Other impacts: D D D DYes DYes DYes DYes D D DYes DNo • • • • DYes DNO D DYes DNO D DYes DNO • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial. development within existing industrial areas. D D DYes DNo • Other impacts: D D DYes DNO • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • D DYes DNo • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. D a DYes DYes DNo DNo D Y es DNo • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change DNo ONo DNo DNo IMPACT ON AIR 7. W i l l proposed action affect air quality? ENO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land.committed to industrial use. IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. W i l l Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? BSNO Examples that would apply to column 2 DYES • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. • Other • D impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? D8NO Examples that would apply to column 2 D D DYES • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • D DYes DNo • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. D D DYes DNo a D IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES ^ J O . Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? A ElNO DYES ^ ^ Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 DYes DNo �1 2 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact • • D D D Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change D D D DYes DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo DNo D D DYes DNo • D DYes DNo • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. D D DYes DNo • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land.committed to industrial use. D • DYes DNo • D DYes DNo D • DYes DNo D D D Y es DNo • • • DYes DNO D DYes DNO D D D Y es DNO • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important ve3et_t.cn. D D DYes DNo D D D Y es • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. • Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR • NO DYES 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial. development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? DNO Examples that would apply to column 2 DYES • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? DNO Examples that would apply to column 2 CYES IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? • NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 DNo �2 • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ^ _ _ _ IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 1 1 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ENO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different fro'm or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their •srijoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D D D D D Y es DYes DNo D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D • DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D CYes DNo IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? CNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO DYES The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. • Other impacts: I D D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo 9 �IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION *\4. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ENO Examples that would apply to column 2 DYES • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Small to Moderate Impact • • 2 Potential Large Impact D Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Chanc DYes DNo DYes DNo D DYes DNo • D DYes DNo • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. D • DYes DNo • Other impacts: D • DYes DNo D D DYes DNc • D D D DYes DYes DNo DNo • D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) D D DYes DNo • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. D D DYes DNo • • DYes DNO D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. • Other impacts: _ _ D • IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? gtlNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ENO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. • Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? £)NO Examples that would apply to column 2 DYES • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: 10 �1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. D D DYes DNo • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals.' D D DYes DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DYes DYes DNo DNo DYes • No nnn 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change nnn IMPACT O N GROWTH A N D CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD " * . W i l l proposed action affect the character of the existing community? £JN0 DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 DYes DYes DYes • Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) D DYes • Proposed Action will set- an important precedent for future projects. D a n n n • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment » Other impacts: • n D 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? DNO DYES If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring — • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will.be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections t o the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 �Approved w|th respect to substance and form Li fiM V i l i l a g e A£torn< T e d : itHrn Approved by the^BJLanning Board . i \y Chairm Dated: Chairman ^ Filed with Village Clerk Clerk or Deputy Clerk Dated: � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1994 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1994-10-20 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1994 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994