https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/27f45c2d55e7cb8738c7ca74750b9af1.pdf d00e0535445fa77ac106882595ca2e12 PDF Text Text A regular meeting was held by the Planning Board on Nay 20, 1993 at 8:00 PM in village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York 10591 Members Present: Also Present: Absent: James Galgano, Chairman Edward McCarthy Roman Windas James Donovan Steven Salman Ellen Tsangaris Janet Gandolfo, Esq. Joseph Gulino, CAMCE, Consulting Engineers Susan Portman, Frederick P. Clark Associate Mr. Richard Ayers IN THE MATTER OF PHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL. 701 NORTH BROADWAY. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK Mr. Galgano stated that Phelps Memorial application expires in June and they are not ready to apply for a building permit. They would like to extend the site plan review permit for one year. A motion was made by Mr. McCarthy to extend the site plan review permit for one year, seconded by Mr. Donovan. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Galgano stated that the incinerator is not a part of the office building, and was not part of the site plan review. IN THE MATTER OF EMMA SERINA. 9 LAWRENCE AVENUE. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK Mr. Barstow who is representing the Serina's stated that the two story building on Lawrence Avenue would be a dispatching office and an apartment. The first floor would be the dispatching office for Mr. Serina's taxi service. There will only be one or two office employees. The second story would be an apartment most likely to be occupied by Mr. Serina. Now, the building is used as a garage. history of commercial use. The site does have a Mr. Galgano stated that there are some zoning variances needed. Ms. Gandolfo stated that it was suggested by Frederick P. Clark Associates that certain procedures should be completed, such as, the environmental review process, before going to the Zoning Board. �» The idea is to complete the planning process before going to the Zoning Board, so the applicant would not have to appear again before the Planning Board. Mr. Salman made a motion for a public hearing to be held on June 17, 1993 for a preliminary site plan review, seconded by Mr. Donovan. Motion carried unanimously. Ms. Gandolfo stated that and E.A.F. should be filed and reviewed by the Village consultant. Mr. Barstow stated that this is not a large scale project. client would like to upgrade the property. His IN THE MATTER OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN. BELLWOOD AND FARRINGTON AVENUES, (103 Farrinaton Avenue). NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK Mr. Galgano stated that a public hearing was scheduled, but the public hearing notices were not sent out on time and legally a public hearing cannot take place. Mr. Salman made a motion to set the public hearing date for June 17, 1993, seconded by Mr. McCarthy. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Donovan asked how thick would the riprap be and will it narrow the brook? Mr. Sohn stated that the riprap is approximately four feet and it will not narrow the brook. Mr. Sohn also stated that the riprap will replace the eroded soil and restore the banks. The riprap is made of stone. Ms. Tsangaris made a motion to declare the Planning Board as the lead agency seconded by Mr. Salman. Motion carried unanimously. Ms. Portman stated that the E.A.F. should also be signed by the Village. IN THE MATTER OF THE UPPERMILL PARKING, CONTINENTAL STREET. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK Ms. Portman stated that nothing has presentation. changed since the last Ms. Gandolfo stated that one of the requirement is to have wetlands permit application completed. Ms. Portman stated that a full E.A.F. is also needed. A motion was made by Mr. Donovan to declare the Planning Board as the lead agency, seconded by Mr. Salman. Motion carried unanimously. A motion was made by Mr. Windas to set a public hearing on June 17, 1993 seconded by Mr. McCarthy. Motion carried unanimously. �* IN THB MATTER OF CHARLES PATBMAM. TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK NORTH BROADWAY. MORTH Mr. Blancato, Esq. who is representing the applicant, submitted a check for escrow fees. Mr. Blancato stated that the Zoning Board set a public hearing to be scheduled next month. Mr. Blancato stated the the public's primary concern is traffic. Mr. Blancato introduced Mr. Bernard Adler who is their traffic consultant, is a registered, professional engineer. Mr. Adler stated that he is working with Michael Anthony from Frederick P. Clark Associates. Mr. Adlers goal is to look at the car wash, analyze the intersections and see how well the intersection will work during peak hours. The data has been collected and a report should be made within two weeks. Mr. Salman requested as a part of the traffic study that Route 448 and Route 9 be included. Mr. Donovan stated that he was concerned about having the car wash too close to the Philipse Plaza. A motion was made by Ms. Tsangaris to declare the Planning Board as lead agency seconded by Mr. McCarthy. Motion was not carried unanimously. Vote: 2-3. Discussion was ensued concerning zoning variances. Being no further business, Mr. Donovan made a motion to adjourn the meeting seconded by Mr. Salman. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, fadUxb&me Christine A. Yurkovi Recording Secretary �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, I N C . Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut David J. Portman, A,CP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP Jim Donovan, RLA. ASLA MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: May 12, 1993 Subject: Philipse Plaza Site Plan Application As stated in our March 12, 1993 memorandum, this is a Type I action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). After the Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) is submitted by the Applicant, the Planning Board may declare its intent to be Lead Agency in the review of this application. The notice of intent and a copy of the application, plan and EAF should then be circulated to the involved and interested agencies. Since this application will require variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) , the ZBA is an involved agency. According to the Village Attorney, the ZBA should not make a decision on the variances until it receives the completed application, including EAF, so that it can make an informed decision. We would also recommend that the ZBA defer its final decision until the SEQRA process is completed. Susan J. Portman, Associate/Planning cc: William T. Regan, Village Administrator Donal M. Walsh, Jr., Esq., Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Joseph A. Gulino, P.E. Village of North Tarrytown Zoning Board of Appeals Louis Contadino, AIA Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX • (914) 967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �FREDERICK P. CLARK A S S O C I A T E S , INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye. New York and Southport, Connecticut David J. Portman, A,CP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP Jim Donovan, RLA, ASLA MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: May 12, 1993 Subject: Philipsbura Manor Upper Mill Site Plan Application Jim Donovan, of our office, has conducted an inspection of the property and does not believe that the area of the proposed parking contains any wetland. The site plan application does, however, still need to be accompanied by an application to the Planning Board for a wetland permit, due to any proposed improvements to the path and any other areas within 100 feet of the Pocantico River, as this area is regulated under the Village of North Tarrytown Wetland/Watercourse Protection Law. Since the Village currently has no official wetland application form, the Applicant should refer to the Wetland Law, §61-10, for information on what needs to be submitted. As stated in our April 15, 1993 memorandum, this is a Type I action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). The Applicant must prepare a Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF). The EAF should discuss the proposals of both applications. Since there are no other involved agencies, after the EAF is submitted by the Applicant, the Planning Board may declare itself Lead Agency in the review of this application. The EAF, application and plan will also need to be formally referred to the Westchester County Planning Board for review pursuant to §239M of the General Municipal Law. Susan J. Portman, Associate/Planning cc: William T. Regan, Village Administrator Donal M. Walsh, Jr., Esq., Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Joseph A. Gulino, P.E., Village Engineer Robert M. Toole 500\not3-026.sjp Connecticut -(203)255-3100 FAX • (914)967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �FREDERICK P. CLARK A S S O C I A T E S , INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut David J. Portman, A,CP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP Jim Donovan, RLA. ASLA MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: May 12, 1993 Subject: Review of Revised Site Plan for Sleepy Hollow Car Wash As requested, we have reviewed the following revised site plan for the proposed Sleepy Hollow Car Wash on the former Pickwick Post property, which is located at the intersection of North Broadway and Gordon Avenue, in the C-l Highway Commercial District: "Site Development Plan Prepared for Charles M. Pateman, Frank Racanelli, Thomas J. Lupetin," dated March 2, 1993 and revised April 22, 1993, prepared by Cronin and Associates, P.E., P.C. REVIEW COMMENTS 1. Parking and Loading: A handicapped parking space has been added to the plan. All four parking spaces have been moved to the opposite side of the proposed building. It should be noted that the vehicles which will utilize these spaces (in either the current or original proposed location) will be parking with the driver-side door next to the building, unless these vehicles turn around on the property or enter through the bypass exit on North Broadway. The required loading space has been added to the plan. 2. Circulation: We anticipate that the storage capacity of the on-site vehicle waiting area will be included in the traffic study. 3. Landscaping: A grass area is shown on the plan between the car wash building and Gordon Avenue. The semi-circle portion of this grass area, which extends beyond the property line, should have a curb and be constructed of sidewalk materials. It is not clear what is to occur in the area between the proposed building and the five-foot wide planting strip near North Broadway. If this area is not to be used for parking or circulation, we would recommend the Applocant examine the feasibility of landscaping this area. Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX • (914) 967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation 4. Environmental Review: As stated in previous reports, this application is a Type I action under State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). We have completed Part 2 of the attached Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF). At this time, the Planning Board may declare its intent to be Lead Agency in the review of this application. Since this application will require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), the ZBA is an involved agency. Interested agencies include New York State Department of Transportation (Poughkeepsie and Valhalla), Westchester County Planning Board, Westchester County Health Department and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (Albany and New Paltz). The Planning Board's notice of intent to be Lead Agency will need to be circulated to the involved and interested agencies. Attached is a draft notice of intent for circulation. The ZBA will have a maximum of 30 days to respond to the notice. The Planning Board can declare itself Lead Agency after it receives a response from the ZBA stating that it does not object to the Planning Board being Lead Agency or after the 30 day period has expired, whichever comes first. Within 20 days of declaration of Lead Agency, the Lead Agency must make a positive or negative determination of significance. Copies of the proposed site plan, EAF and application should be circulated with the notice of intent. The Applicant should provide additional copies of the site plan for circulation. According to the Village Attorney, the ZBA should not make a decision on the variance until it receives all of the relevant materials (e.g. EAF, application, site plan) so that it can make an informed decision. We would also recommend that the ZBA defer its final decision until the SEQRA process is completed. It is our understanding that the Applicant is currently preparing a traffic study. Susan J. Portman, Associate/Planning Attachments cc: William T. Regan, Village Administrator Donal M. Walsh, Jr., Esq., Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Joseph A. Gulino, P.E., Village Engineer Westchester County Planning Board, w/o attached New York State Department of Transportation (Valhalla), w/o attached Village of North Tarrytown Zoning Board of Appeals, w/o attached Charles M. Pateman 2 �FREDERICK P. CLARK A S S O C I A T E S , INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut David J. Portman, A,CP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914) 967-6540 Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP jjm Donovan, RLA, ASLA MEMORANDUM To: V i l l a g e of North Tarrytown Planning Board Date: May 1 3 , 1993 Subject: Preliminary Review of Serina Site Plan As requested, we have reviewed the site plan application for a property which is 2,207 square feet in size and is located on the western side of Lawrence Avenue, in the R-5 Residential District. The site presently contains a one-story dilapidated garage and has some broken paving and grass. The Applicant is proposing the demolition of the existing garage and construction of a two-story 1,320 square foot office and apartment building. The Applicant has submitted the following plan: "Proposed Mixed-Use / 2 Story, Emma B. Serina, 9 Lawrence Ave., N. Tarrytown, N.Y.," scale 1" = 10', dated April 15, 1993, prepared by Barstow Architects. REVIEW COMMENTS 1. Site Plan Contents: The site plan should have a north arrow, and should show sidewalks, curb cuts and opposite side of the street and an area map showing all streets and property within 1,000 feet of the Applicant's property at a scale of 1" = 400'. If a dumpster will be placed on the property its location should be shown on the plan. 2. Parking and Circulation: We assume that half of the proposed building (or 660 square feet) is to be used for office and half for one residential apartment. Two parking spaces are required for the office use and one for the apartment. As shown on the plan, all four of the spaces would require the vehicles to back out onto Lawrence Avenue, which we do not support. Spaces number 1 and 2 are undersized and should be redesigned to 9 * by 20' as required in the Code of the Village of North Tarrytown. The Applicant should indicate how the area labelled "driveway" will be used. According to the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) , one of the spaces shown on the plan should be designed and designated Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX • (914) 967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation as a handicapped space with an accessible route to the building. Section 4.1.1(5a) of ADA states the following: "In new construction, a person or entity is not required to meet fully the requirements of these guidelines where that person or entity can demonstrate that it is structurally impracticable to do so. Full compliance will be considered structurally impracticable only in those rare circumstances when the unique characteristics of terrain prevent the incorporation of accessibility features. If full compliance with the requirements of these guidelines is structurally impracticable, a person or entity shall comply with the requirements to the extent it is not structurally impracticable." The Applicant should either provide the handicapped space or, if the Applicant believes it is impracticable, demonstrate why it is impracticable. Section 62-14.B(2) of the Code states, "In R Districts. The required off-street parking space for more than two (2) vehicles may not be located in a required front yard." The proposed location of the parking area within the required front yard area will require an area variance from the Village Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA). Section 62-22.A states that, for commercial uses, "Entrance and exit driveways shall be not less than fifteen (15) feet nor more than twenty-five (25) feet in width, measured along the street line." The entrance to the parking area is shown along the entire frontage of the property, which measures over 43 feet. Consequently, a variance from this standard will also be required. Section 62-22.B. states, "Entrance and exit driveways shall be located not less than fifteen (15) feet from a side lot line, measured along the street line." The entrance driveway does not conform to this requirement either. In addition, §62-14.C "No access drive or driveway in any RDistrict shall be used to provide access to uses other than those permitted in such R-Districts." The plan must either be redesigned or multiple variances obtained in order to comply with these requirements. A loading space is required for an office use but one is not shown. A variance waiving this requirement will need to be requested when the Applicant applies for the other variances. 2 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation 3. Buffer: Section 62-14.D of the Code states, "Off-street parking areas for three (3) or more vehicles ... shall be effectively screened by a fence or hedge as provided in §62-9.C. The screening shall be on the side or sides which adjoin or face premises situated in any RDistrict ..." Section 62-9.C requires a five-foot wide buffer area to be provided in addition to any side or rear yard. The buffer is to include a fence and landscaping. The Applicant would need an area variance for the width of the buffer area. A hedge should be provided along the side yards to screen the parking area. 4. Zoning Compliance: According to the Building Inspector, the site plan should comply with the bulk standards identified in the Schedule of Regulations for the use "Other" in the R-5 District, but when and if a use variance is approved, the ZBA will need to determine which bulk standards should be used. The plan conforms with the requirements for maximum lot coverage, minimum lot width and one of the minimum side yard setbacks. The required minimum lot size is 4,000 square feet and the existing lot is only 2,207 square feet. The minimum front, rear and one of the side yard setbacks shown on the plan are smaller than the size required by the Village Code, which would also require the granting of additional multiple variances in order to proceed. The site plan could be redesigned in order to reduce the intensity of the nonconforming features. A few alternatives may be: •Rotate the location of the proposed building 90 degrees and center the building on the property behind the parking area. This may lessen the nonconformity of the side and rear yards and would permit the parking spaces to conform to the required size. Moving the building location could also prevent any interference of the proposed two-story building with the trees on the adjacent property to the south. •Redesign the parking area so that the spaces are all the required size and will not force drivers to back out onto the street. Spaces 1 and 2 could be rotated 90 degrees, the area where spaces 3 and 4 are shown could be used as the driveway area and spaces 3 and 4 could be moved to the area labelled "driveway." This could also alleviate the nonconforming oversized curb cut along the entire 3 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation frontage of the property by reducing the size of the driveway entrance. •The building could be built to three stories, with parking at grade level under the building. Alternatively, the building could be designed to overhang a portion of the parking area. The proposed office use is not a permitted use in the R-5 District. Moreover, §62-12.B of the Code states: "In any R-District, only a single-family detached dwelling may be erected on a nonconforming lot, provided that the front, side and rear yards of any such lot shall comply with the normal requirements for the district within which the lot is located." A use variance from the ZBA would be needed for the office use. Environmental Review; The Applicant has submitted a short Environmental Assessment Form (EAF). According to Part 617.12 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), this is a Type I action because the property is located within the Hudson River Shoreline Critical Environmental Area (CEA) . The Applicant is required to submit a full (long form) EAF for a Type I action. After review of the full EAF, the Planning Board may declare its intent to be Lead Agency in the review of this action. A notice of intent to be Lead Agency should then be circulated to the involved (i.e. ZBA) and interested (e.g. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation) agencies. After 30 days or receipt of the responses from the other agencies, whichever comes first, the Planning Board may declare itself Lead Agency, as long as no other involved agency objects, and make a determination of significance. The Lead Agency's preparation of a negative declaration or a findings statement (following a positive declaration and the preparation of an environmental impact statement) would complete the SEQRA review process. We recommend that the ZBA defer its final decision until the SEQRA process is completed. 4 �FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation 6. Further Information; In addition to the items mentioned above, further information is needed regarding the proposed building height, the proposed number and size of the office spaces and the proposed number and size of the residential apartments. Susan J. Portman, Associate/Planning cc: William T. Regan, Village Administrator Donal M. Walsh, Jr., Esq., Village Attorney James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Joseph A. Gulino, P.E. Village of North Tarrytown Zoning Board of Appeals Robert Barstow 500\not3-027.sjp �14-16-2'(2/87)-7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review SEQR FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM 'urpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project *br action may be significant The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentiallylarge impact The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE-Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ft Part 1 tf Part 2 DPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that D A. The project will not result in any large and important impacts) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. D B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* D C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions SLEEPY HOLLOW CAR WASH Name of Action Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Name of Lead Agency James Galgano Chairman Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) X Date * ~ ' �PART 1-PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OP ACTION Sleepy Hollov Car Wash LOCATION OP ACTION (Inctud* Stmt Address, Municipality and County) Cox nf Mnrf.h Broadway & Gordon Ave., North Tarrytown, Westchester County NAME OP APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE (914) Franic Pacanelll, Charles Pateman, Thomas Lupetin 332-1400 ADDRESS rhagp ttidq. - 2nd F l o o r / 360 S o u t h Broadway CITY/PO Tarrytown ZIP CODE N.Y. 10591 BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OP OWNER (If different) MOFBffnTAT? KFALTV, STATE TNC C/0 Ian (212) Tissot 883-8201 ADDRESS 330 Madison Avenue CITY/PO STATE ZIPCO0E New York N.Y. 10017 DESCRIPTION OP ACTION Construction of Full Service Car Wash Please Complete Each Question— Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. D Rural (non-farm) 1. Present land use: DUrban Dlndustrial XSCommercial DResidential (suburban) D Forest D Agriculture DOther .32 Total acreage of project area: acres. AFTER COMPLETION PRESENTLY APPROXIMATE ACREACE 0 acres Meadow or Brushiand (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces JL21 Other (Indicate type) What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? _ acres _ acres H .32 acres acres acres acres acres Charlton, Fine sandy loam-Type R ^(Moderately well drained J - 0 0 % of site GWell drained % of site % of site G Poorly drained b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). a. Soil drainage: Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? GYes }fXNo a. What is depth to bedrock' 6 F t ( A v q iin feet) 2 �5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 330.10% «K G15H or greater _ _ GlO-15% % .% 6. Is project substantially contiguous to. or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? GYes XBNo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? GYes jpNo 10+ 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? GYes 5ENo 10. Oo hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project,area? GYes £fr*o 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? GYes KJSlo According to « _ _ _ _ « — * Identify each species . ___«—__•-»-»__-___«-_-_»----____ 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e.. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) GYes 2D&o Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? GYes Z3No If yes. explain '„ 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? GYes 23No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project 5f«a: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary ' 16. Lakes, ponds, wet/and areas within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name _ • _ • _ - - — - - _ « « » - « _ - _ « « - - _ _ - - — » _ - _ » _ - b. Size (In acres) ~!7. Is the site served by existing public utilities? GSYes GNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? KJYes GNo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? GYes JSONo 8. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, . Section 303 and 304? GYes X2No 19.- Is the site located in or subscantiallvcantiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ZCl, and 6 NYCRR 617? ^Yes) ~ ^ S « £ 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? GYes j£lNo B. Project Description • 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor .32 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: *32 acres initially; «32 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: 0 (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A «,• f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing " ; prooosed 4 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 12 A v q . tnpnn cortipretiorr of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: " One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially «—_—————_ __».,«_-«-_----. Ultimately _ „_ _ - _ _ . - « • • — — i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 30 height: 35 width: 80 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 2 4 0 ft �2. How much natural material (i.e.. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? DYes C3No Q X3N/A a. If yes. for what intend., purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? tons/cubic yards DYes „ XBNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes XDSNO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes _5fco 3 6. If single phase project Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes year, (including demolition). year. DYes DNo 3_?No 8 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 8 ; after project is complete 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? •12. Is surface liquid'waste disposal involved? OYes DYes X&lo If yes, explain ENo a. if yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged *T3. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes _No Type , 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 16. Will the project generate solid waste? 30yes a. If yes, what is the amount per month DYes QJNo X&No DNo 1 tons b. If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used? c. If yes. give name QYes ElYes W e s t c h e s t e r County DNo location PeeksKill d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes 3_$No e. If Yes, explain __ 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? DYes 3&N0 a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? years. DYes XXNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ., . ,. X_>Yes Total anticipated water usage per day & •****' • I XJfJo DNo ___ gallons/minute. . gallons/day. [4. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? If Yes, explain DYes , , Normal Commercial Use f o r Car Wash F a c i l i t y lr yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 23. -§No DYes ENo �25. Approvals Required: Submittal Date Type City. Town. Village Board GYes XJNo City. Town. Village Planning Board City. Town Zoning Board V.^flLA€ OjTes ( ^ W . DNo Site ^QtNo City. County Health Department DYes XXNo Other Local Agencies DYes X3iNo Other Regional Agencies DYes ^QJ^o State Agencies DYes JQPo Federal Agencies DYes Plan Approval 3/18/93 V<y,v^ c w t g. . _ m fiNo __ C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? IclYes DNo If Yes. indicate decision required: Dzoning amendment Dzoning variance Dnew/revision of master plan Dspecial use permit Dresource management plan 2. What is the zoning classification^ the site? C - 1 Gsubdivision JOsite plan Dother _ HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted,by the present zoning? 8,400 SquaRE Foot Building 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ( 2/800 SF Proposed) C - 1 NO CHANGE 5. What is die maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 8/400 Square Foot Building 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? DYes DNo 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a V* mile radius of proposed action? RETAIL A C T I V I T I E S RELATED PRIMARILY TO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC AND SERVICEING OF AUTUMUBILES • 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V* mile? HYes DNo DYes X3^o 9. If the proposed action is die subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? . 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? DYes 5QNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DYes DNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes QYes 59No DNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Appiicant/SopffSgprTme ignature * O T ^ U L & ^ SPEEPY 'h> yfiffiw CAR WASH l-*JUA*A.e»y™» Date March 30/ 1993 Partner C h a r l e s M. P a t e m a n ^ " " ^ , . _ - . . It the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. t L �Part 2-PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency Ceneral Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. if impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by changes) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact D D •Y.es •N< a • QYes DNO • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. n D DYes QYes DNo • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. D D • D DYes DNO • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. a a DYes DNO • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. D • Construction in a designated floodway. • D D DYes DYes DYes DNO a a a a DYes DNo IMPACT ON LAND 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ^NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. • Other impacts Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change DNO DNO ONO Will there be an effect t- ...iy urs.que or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e.. cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)SNO GYES Specific land forms: �IMPACT ON WATER Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15. 24. 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law. ECU ffl^O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? "ENO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. • Other impacts: . Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater , quality or quantity? HNO Examples that would apply to column 2 ' 1 2 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact D D • • • • D D D Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change DYes DYes D DYes D N O DYes DNo DYes DNo • D D Y es D D D D DYes • • D DYes DYes DYES Proposed Action will require a discharge permit Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. *. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. D D • • • • • • DYes DYes DYes OYes DYes • D DYes • Proposed Action will likely cauie siltation or other discharge into an existing body of wa«er to the extern that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. D • DYes • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1.100 gallons. D • DYes DNo • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo n G DYes DNo • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. other impart- &>-t ¥ ^ \: ^ *>rp,: n-. ^ •A ' f . f\i J> Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? Examples that would applv to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water fipws ^NO 7 — i I DYES �2 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact • D D D D DYes QYes DYes DYes DNO DNo DNo DNo a a a a a a D DYes DNo D DYes DNO D DYes DNO • DYes DNO D DYes DNO D DYes DNo a a a a D Y es D D DYes DYes DNo a D DYes DNO • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. a D DYes DNo • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. • a DYes DNo a D DYes ONo • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. • Other impacts: D D • IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? . TS(NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial . development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? &MO Examples that would apply to column 2 # DYES Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? jBNO Examples that would apply to column 2 DNO DYES IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? XNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 �• Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? QSjNO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. .• Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure ofiiistoric, prehistoric or paleontological importance? fflNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 BJNO DYES The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity A maior reduction of an open space important to the community. • Other impacts. 1 2 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact a D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo a D DYes DNo a D DYes DNo a D DYes DNo a D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo a a a D CYes DNO D DYes DNO D DYes DNO D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change 13 a a �1 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? CNO Examples that would apply to column 2 • DYES Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Can Impact Be Mitigated By Large Project Change Impact D D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo D D DYes DNo * Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. D D DYes DNo * Other impacts: D D DYes DNo • • D DYes DNo • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. D D DYes DYes DNo DNo Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. D D DYes DNo Other D D DYes DNo • • DYes DNo • D DYes DNo • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. D • DYes DNO • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2.000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. D D DYes DNO • Other impacts: D D DYes DNO • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. • Other impacts: A ^TOO^f cXp- T&MttC IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. W i l l proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? Ij^NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 * Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. , NOISE AND OOOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ENO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). impacts: ____ . IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ENO Examples that would apply to column 2 DYES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) , 10 �1 I 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD _ 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existinacommunitv? #NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Small to Moderate Impact • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. » Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment » Other impacts: • • D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo • D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo D D DYes DNo a a D D D DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo D Can Impact Be Potential Mitigated By Large Project Change Impact 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? JBJNO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or Iff You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impacts) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impacts) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project changed). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 �VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK LEAD AGENCY SELECTION FORM Project Name or Description Sleepy Hollow Car Wash Construction of Full Service Car Wash Project Location Corner of North Broadway and Gordon Avenue Name of Applicant Frank R a c a n e l l i , Charles Pateman and Thomas Lupetin Village Agency Intending to Act as Lead Agency Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board Address 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown. New York 10591 Contact Person William T. Regan, Village Administrator Date Mailed Telephone Number (914) 631-0113 Type of Action (Check A or B) OX A. TYPE I • UNUSTED B. Lead agency must be chosen within 30 days of above date. Deadline Reply Date II. Required Approvals and Reviews (Check all permits, waivers, or other actions which may be required) • Rezoning • Subdivision Approval QX Site Development Plan Approval • Special Permit I3X Variance • Wetlands Permit • Stream Discharge Permit - New York State Department of Environmental Conservation • Sewage Disposal/Water Supply Approval - Westchester County Health Department • Review by Westchester County Department of Planning • Curb Cut Approval - New York State Department of Transportation/Westchester County Department of Public Works • Other. Specify: �VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK LEAD AGENCY SELECTION FORM - PAGE 2 III. IV. Environmental Significance of Action: Initial Review of Environmental Assessment Form indicates that: (Check A, B, or C - To be done by initiating agency) D A The proposed action appears likely to have a significant effect on the environment; a positive declaration is likely. • B. The proposed action appears not likely to have a significant effect on the environment; a negative declaration is likely. Q X C. No opinion has been made yet as to whether a positive or negative declaration is likely for this action. A Copy of this Form and the Environmental Assessment Form Has Been Sent to the Agencies Indicated on the Attached List. Attachments: Lead Agency Selection Reply Form List of Involved or Interested Agencies Environmental Assessment Form �VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK LEAD AGENCY SELECTION REPLY FORM Reply Form to be Filled Out by Involved Agencies The (list agency) has examined this form and accompanying documentation for the application known as Sleepy Hollow Car Wash and: (Check A or B) • A. Does .not want to be Lead Agency. • B. Wants to be Lead Agency for this action. Additional comments or concerns (Attach additional pages if necessary): Reviewed by: Signature Name Title Date PLEASE RETURN TO THE AGENCY INITIATING THIS PROCESS (LISTED ON THE FIRST PAGE OF THIS FORM) BY THE DATE INDICATED. IF NO REPLY IS RECEIVED BY THE DATE INDICATED, THE VILLAGE AGENCY INDICATED WILL ASSUME THAT YOU CONCUR WITH ITS DESIGNATION AS LEAD AGENCY. 500/not3-030.ld �LIST OF INVOLVED OR INTERESTED AGENCIES Planning Board Village of North Tarrytown 28 Beekman Avenue North Tarrytown, New York 10591 D Westchester County Planning Board D c /oWestchester County Department of Planning 432 County Office Bulding White Plains, New York 10601 Zoning Board of Appeals Village of North Tarrytown 28 Beekman Avenue North Tarrytown, New York 10591 D Westchester County Department of Health 112 East Post Road White Plains, New York 10601 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 21 South Putt Comers Road New Paltz, New York 12561 D New York State Department of Transportation 4 Burnett Boulevard, Region 8 Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 50 Wolf Road Albany, New York 12233-0001 • New York State Department of Transportation Saw Mill River Road Valhalla, New York 10595 (Other Agencies) 500\not3-O30.jd �V Approved wi/fth respect to substance and form; Village Attorney Datyd: ^/ilj^ Approved by the Planning Board Q^*jt Chj&Trman or ActingiChairman baited: A ^^_ / 7, (4#j Filed with Village Clerk -Clerk-or Deputy Clerk Dated: G / I ^ (°I3 ze or Meeting 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1993 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1993-05-20 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1993 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1993