https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/cbdac051e4b596019c5df4f1b4c7c853.pdf f320dd41855ee73447eb1aaec2b4d5e1 PDF Text Text f PUBLIC HEARING October 19, 1989 North Tarrytown, N.Y. A Public Hearing was held before the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown on the above date. PRESENT: James J. Galgano, Chairman Ellen Tsangaris Richard Ayers Roman Windas Frank Rey ABSENT: John O'Leary Miguel Jimenez Also present: John Hughes, Village Attorney James Margotta, Village Building Inspector Dan Wery, Frederick P. Clark Associates A motion to approve the minutes of the September 21, 1989 meeting was made by Mr. Ray Windas and seconded by Ellen Tsangaris. Motion carried. IN THE MATTER OF EARL & MARIE JOYNER. 17-21 CLINTON STREET, NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK The acting clerk read the public notice to hear and consider an application of Earl C. and Marie Joyner for final site plan approval of plans for subdivision of property at 17-21 Clinton St. North Tarrytown, N.Y., known and designated on Village Tax Assessment Map as Section 16, block 8, Lots 26 & 28. The Joyners were not present, and matter adjourned until the next public meeting. A motion to continue the public hearing was made by Ray Windas, seconded by Richard Ayers, motion carried. IN THE MATTER OF THE AMENTA PROJECT. NORTH BROADWAY. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK. This was a continuation of a public hearing from last month. Mr. Paul Amenta addressed the Board and discussed the relocation of the proposed loading zone, from Route 9 to Chestnut Street. It was stated that he must appear before the Board of Trustees and then the NYS DOT for approval of loading zone site. He also stated that the Zoning Board of Appeals make the following recommendations: a) That better visability be provided for in the parking lot for spaces #13 and 14 north and spaces #38 & 39 south. b) That there would be no left turn onto Route 9 when exiting the parking lot. 3 �Mr. Rey asked if the new building would be complimentary to the existing building. Mr. Amenta answered in the affirmative and stated that the sprinklers in the new building would be up to code. Mr. Hughes, Village Attorney stated that a resolution to approve the site plan would be prepared for the next public meeting.He also noted that Mr. Amenta will be required to appear before the Architectual Review Board to certify the drawings of the proposed project. IN THE MATTER OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH - MULTI-FAMILY at the former Methodist Church on Depevster Street. This was a continuation of a Public Hearing from last month. Mr. Duo Dickinson, Architect, stated that the removal of surface water would be collected in one area and carried out by a storm drain. He stated there would be a 1,000 gallon capacity catch basin. He also noted that the parking fence questioned was addressed. Mayor Gandolfo asked that the Planning Board give adequate time for the Village engineers to look over the plan. She also asked about the drainage from the site, and if it would be harmful to the historic tree that is on the site. Mrs. Washburn of 180 North Washington Street felt that many of her concerns were answered when Nolan Associates indicated that the new hedges planted would provide a 5 ft x ft screen . Mr. Nolan, Planner for the project, requested the Board to give site plan approval based on the engineers report. John Hughes, Village Attorney, asked that their proposal with changes be presented to the Board in writing. Mr. Hughes stated that a resolution well be prepared for the next Board Meeting. IN THE MATTER OF UNCLE JERRYS DELI. NORTH BROADWAY. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK This was a continuation of last month's Public Hearing. Mr. Donal Walsh, attorney for Mr. Jeffers, appeared before the Board. Mr. Galgano, Chairman, ased if anyone on the Board had any objections to the opening of the new Uncle Jerry's Deli. Mr. Windas addressed the pressure that the Board has been under due to the many rumors that Uncle Jerry would be going out of business if the site plan approval was not given. 4 �Dan Wery of Frederick P. Clarke Associates was asked to make recommendations regarding sidewalks, curb cuts, and the rock situation behind the property. A motion to continue the Public Hearing until next month was passed unamiously. IN THE MATTER OF THE KRINGAS DEVELOPMENT. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK Mr. Ron Turquist, architect for the project announced that he would not be presenting his proposal in view of the unfavorable report he received from Clarke Associates. Barbara Quinn, of the Briggsville Neighborhood Association, addressed the Board and said a petition with 25 signatures was presented to the Board against the new development. Being no further business, Frank Rey made a motion to close the public meeting. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, ^ /Ubu ton &^JJY SU<* / Francesca Lorenz Village Administrator's Office 5 �As •r :>g^r-^ t^w D R A F T PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN RESOLUTIONS FINAL SITE PLAN PROPOSED: PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING OWNER: SEBASTIAN AMENTA & SONS LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF BROADWAY (ROUTE 9) AND CHESTNUT STREET WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarry town has reviewed an application, for final subdivision approval and final site plan approval pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article VIII, Site Plan Review to construct a professional office building, including related off-street parking, landscaping, storm drainage and other supporting utilities and facilities, on a site approximately 37,104 square feet in size; and WHEREAS, said property is proposed to be subdivided into two separate parcels; one containing the existing office building on approximately 17,035 square feet, the other parcel to contain the proposed professional office building on the remaining 20,069 square feet, as shown on one drawing prepared in the offices of David Graham Architects in conjunction with James Piccone and Associates, identified as follows: 1. S-l "Site Development Plan Prepared for S. Amenta", dated 2/16/89, last revised 6/22/89. WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead Agency pursuant to provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 1. Billed an application fee of %r\*Xt /c' for the action under review; ^ ^ c /V\jy* ^ 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property under review and surrounding areas; 3. Acting as Lead Agency, requested, received and reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR; 4. As Lead Agency for site plan and subdivision review in the Village of North Tarrytown, the Planning Board, after the review of such field conditions, recommendations and environmental assessment form, as well as other matters noted herein, has determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted type and hereby issues a "Negative Declaration," �determination of non-significant this Unlisted action; and environmental impact for WHEREAS, the Applicants have received from the Zoning Board of Appeals: A variance for provision of parking spaces, which do not meet the definition under Article 2, Section 62-4 of the Zoning Code; a variance for the provision of 39 parking spaces for the proposed professional office building, when 40 such spaces are required in accordance with Article 3, Section 62-14 of the Zoning Ordinance and; a variance for Article 4, Section 62-8 for the proposed use of the site for a professional office building which is not specifically listed in the Schedule of permitted or accessory uses for the C-l Highway Commercial Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the proposed loading zone for Parcel B was located on Chestnut Street near Route 9 since there was no suitable location for an on-site loading space; and WHEREAS, the small parking lot for the existing building on proposed Parcel A, located off Chestnut Street, is proposed to be expanded to add 4 additional parking spaces which will involve relocating and reconstructing the existing stone retaining wall on the east side of said parking area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and site plan drawings noted above be and hereby are granted site plan approval and final subdivision approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman, or as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of this plan drawing, revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the office of the Village Building Department for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire six (6) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and the Applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1. Utilities - Storm drainage, water supply and sewage disposal have been approved by the Planning Board's engineering consultant. 1.1 Storm water runoff provisions shall comply with the Planning Board's policy of "zero" increase in rate of runoff. 1.2 The Applicant has submitted a written report, with back-up calculations indicating his intention to 2 �provide adequate fire flow, water supply and pressure for the site. 1.3 All final utilities including conditions noted above shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Board's designated engineering consultant. Exterior Lighting - All exterior light structures shall be screened so as to prevent glare upon adjacent properties. All driveways and parking areas shall be contained poured-in-place reinforced concrete or cut stone curbs. by The four easternmost parking spaces located along the north side of the existing office building on proposed Parcel A, shall be designated as "small cars only", as shall be the two parking spaces on the southwestern corner of the proposed professional office building on proposed Parcel B, indicated on the site plan as spaces 38 and 39. The parking space indicated as #19 on Parcel B, in the proposed underground parking area for the proposed professional office building, shall be designated as "handicapped parking only," as shall the parking space opposite the entry on the north side of the existing office building on proposed Parcel A, indicated on the site plan as space #21. The parking access and drainage and landscaping approvals at the New York State Route 9 entrance are contingent on the approval of the State Department of Transportation. By acceptance of this resolution, the Applicant agrees that should the Village determine the presently approved parking and traffic flow plan causes a future severe traffic problem, said determination to be made by the Village of North Tarry town, with input from the New York State Department of Transportation, then the Village may require the Applicant to amend and, if necessary, reconstruct the approved parking plan and traffic flow pattern controls. Review Fees - The Applicants shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 7.1 An inspection fee for the construction inspection of the proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage system, sewage, landscaping, lighting and other site plan elements, for compliance with the approved site plan in the amount of $ . 7.2 The site plan escrow amount pursuant to SEQR and in the amount of $ or 4% of the total project cost, whichever is less, which shall be used for consulting services rendered in the review of the project. 3 �7.3 A subdivision recreation fee of $ acquisition of recreation facilities statute. for the pursuant to 7.4 The above fees shall be paid prior to the signing of the final site plan by the Chairman. 8. The final site plan review shall be accomplished by the Planning Board's engineering consultant and shall Incorporate all applicable conditions of this resolution and the construction standards of the Village of North Tarrytown as they may be appropriate. 9. Signage on the premises shall be subject to the approval of the appropriate Village agency. 10. The Applicant shall submit an recordable form to the satisfaction for the common use of the entrance accessed from Broadway (Route 9) office building on proposed Parcel A building on Parcel B. 11. The site plan shall be amended to revise the bulk regulations schedule for Parcel B to correct the provided side yard notation of 5 feet and 20 feet to 0 feet and 20 feet, to correct the provided building height from 34 feet to the revised elevation, to correct the required parking calculation to indicate the correct net rentable square footage of 12,000 feet as opposed to the 11,700 as indicated on the plan. 12. Revise the site plan to reference the dates (and the appropriate sections of the Zoning Code) of the variances which have been granted for the subject application. 13. The site plan shall be amended to show no left hand turn from the northerly parking lot, shared by Parcel and Parcel B, onto Broadway (Route 9 ) . The Applicants shall revise the plan to indicate the appropriate signage to control the restriction of such movement. 14. The site plan shall also be revised to indicate the provision of catch basins and the appropriate pitch to the underground parking area, so as to collect and remove any water which may enter the garage through the various windows and openings. 15. A note shall be added to the plat indicating that the "finished" side of the wood fence surrounding Parcel B shall face towards the adjacent properties. 4 easement agreement in of the Village Attorney way and parking spaces by both the existing and the proposed office �16. The site plan shall be revised to show the existing or proposed trash dumpster for the existing building on Parcel A. 17. The site plan shall receive approval from the Architectural Review Board. 18. The site plan shall be revised to indicate the widening of the garage entrance to permit improved visibility of the outdoor parking area and vehicles. 19. The Planning Board reserves the right to make the final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities upon notice by the Building Inspector but before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to parking, landscaping, signs, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details, as built of same, do not comply with the approved plan. The Applicant shall maintain all elements of the approved site plan, including landscaping in a neat and healthy condition so as to retain and approve Certificate of Occupancy. Date James Galgano Planning Board Chairman DKW:rr 5 �* CAMCE CHARLES A. MANGANARO C0UOT*AtANO»TH» MAM tT.tUCKflOACK. «U !*•»*.»••» t«otaxMOTONM«.tum««r.MtwvoM.MTt«an CONSULTING ENGINEERS MEMORANDUM TOt FROMt DATEt RE i James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown Joseph A. Gulino, Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers September 5, 19 8 9 Review of Additions and Alterations to 410 N. Broadway Gas Station/Restaurant Village of North Tarrytown, NY CAMCE #1329 We have reviewed the following site plan and site detail prepared by Badaly & Badaly Architects, Drawing A-l dated May, 1989 and A-2 and A-3 dated June, 1989 for the above referenced project. The following items are necessary in order for us to proceed with our reviews A) The name, address and signature of the present owner of the property should be on the above referenced drawings • B) The names of the adjacent property owners should be included on the above referenced drawings. C) The street widths should be indicated on the site plan. D) The lot lines with accurate dimensions and bearings of angles are required. E) All existing utilities specifically locations of sanitary sewers, including house connections, drainage lines, water lines and the location, size and type of existing and proposed oil /grease /water separators. F) The Planning Board Endorsement, which can be found from the Subdivision Regulations Part IV on Page 7817(14C), should be shown on the drawing. In summary, once the above-mentioned comments are addressed, final recommendation can be made to the Planning Board. JAG:ab * cc: Mr. Mohammad R. Badaly - Badaly & Badaly Architects Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Engineers ••»•»•*• t w u * � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1989-10-19 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989