https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/24b60e807e31556d7c6953571978cf1c.pdf 31c7d85f06e5e818b2803451dcbaf816 PDF Text Text REGULAR MEETING NORTH TARRYTOWN, N.Y. DECEMBER 14th, 1989 A Regular Meeting of the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown was held on the above date. PRESENT: James Galgano, Chairman Ellen Tsangaris John O'Leary Richard Ayers Alan Kaplan ABSENT: Roman Windas Frank Rey ALSO PRESENT: John Hughes, Jr. Village Attorney Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8 P.M. J. Tornello -254-256 No. Broadway- Alterations to Service Station. Mr. Wiedle of Frederick P. Clark Associates, Consultants for the Village of North Tarrytown presented a Draft memorandum for their perusal regarding the Tornello Project. (Copy of memo in Official Minutes) A discussion followed regarding screening, entrance and exitways, canopy etc. Chairman Galgano stated that the matter should be referred to the Zoning Board. Mr. O'Leary moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris t hat the Tornello Project be referred to the Zoning Board. CARRIED. MASSARO and PALUETTI Proposed Dwelling Unit Addition- 6 family to 7 family dwelling. (Corner of Valley Street and Chestnut Street) Mr. Wiedle presented a Memorandum to the Board Members regarding the proposed changes. (Copy in Official Minutes) A discussion followed regarding minimum lot size, setbacks, maximum height and parking. Mr. O'Leary moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris that the matter be referred to the Zoning Board. CARRIED. JOYNER PROJECT-Cinton Street Proposed Residential Development Mr. Wiedle presented a Memorandum to the Board Members regarding the Joyner Project. (Copy in Official Minutes) A discussion followed regarding parking spaces, floor plans, conversion of the existing residence to a two-family residence, and the new three proposed dwelling units.- It was �-2bited that the existing building is non-conforming with regard to front and side yard setbacks, and a variance may be required. The applicant was directed to submit more complete utility plans including water, sewer, gas and electric, sidewalk improvements etc. Mr. O'Leary moved, seconded by Ms. Tsangaris that the applicant be referred to the Zoning Board. Carried. AMENTA PROJECT - PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING - Northeast Corner OF Broadway (Route 9) and Chestnut Street. Mr. Wiedle presented a Draft Resolution for Final Site Plan/Sub-Division Approval for the Board's perusal. After a discussion Mr. O'Leary moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers that the Resolution be adopted after approval by the Village Attorney. CARRIED. (COPY IN OFFICIAL MINUTES). Mr. Joseph Gulino, Representing Charles Manganaro, Consulting Engineers for the Village presented a memorandum regarding various items which need to be addressed. (COPY OF MEMO IN OFFICIAL MINUTES). WAYNE JEFFERS, (UNCLE JERRY'S RESTAURANT) - 410 North Broadway The following items were discussed by the Board: Curb cuts, sidewalk along Gordon Avenue, unstable rock, on-site parking, loading zone, canopy in service station area, utilities, storm drainage, water supply and sewage disposal facilities, landscaping, buffers, signs and lighting. The Village Attorney was instructed to prepare a Final Site Plan Resolution to be presented*to the Board at their next meeting. Mr. O'Leary moved, gecon^ed by Mr. Ayers that the Minutes of November 16th, 19 89 be approved as submitted. CARRIED. It was noted that the Minutes of the October, 1989 meeting had not been received by the Board members. Chairman Galgano stated that due to the complexity of the proposed Halpern Project he felt that the Planning Board should appoint a sub-committee to meet separately from the regular Planning Board. There being no further business to come before the Board, Mr. O'Leary moved, seconded by Mr. Ayers that the meeting be duly adjourned. CARRIED. Respectfully spectruiiy submitted, supmitted,j Irene i ^ ^ A ^ n T ^ e r T �tlJ/^PJ PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN RESOLUTION: FINAL SITE PLAN/SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PROPOSED: PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING OWNER: SEBASTIAN AMENTA & SONS LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF BROADWAY (ROUTE 9) AND CHESTNUT STREET WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for final subdivision approval and final site plan approval (the Application) pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article VIII, Site Plan Review, and the Village Subdivision Regulations, to construct a professional office building, including related off-street parking, landscaping, storm drainage and other supporting utilities and facilities, on a site approximately 37,104 square feet in size; and WHEREAS, said property is proposed to be subdivided into two separate parcels; one containing the existing office building on approximately 17,035 square feet, hereinafter known as Parcel A; the other parcel hereinafter known as Parcel B, to contain the proposed professional office building on the remaining 20,069 square feet, as shown on one drawing (S-l) prepared in the offices of David Graham Architects in conjunction with a perspective sketch prepared in the office of James Piccone and Associates, identified as follows: 1. S-l "Site Development Plan Prepared for S. Amenta", dated 2/16/89, last revised 6/22/89; and 2. Perspective Sketch entitled: Armonk Office Building, undated; filed "Armonk Office Building," prepared in the office of James Corrado Piccone & Associates, Architects, Ossining, New York. WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead Agency, in site plan and subdivision review, pursuant to provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, (SEQR) the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 1. Billed and received a site plan application fee of $910 for the action under site plan review, $25 for the action under subdivision review for a combined initial fee of $935; still to be paid is the SEQR review fee, noted below. 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property under review and its surrounding areas, pursuant to Article VIII of the Village Zoning Ordinance. �3. Requested, received and reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR; 4. Held a duly noticed public hearing in on July 20, 1989 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to comment and be heard on the proposed site plan and subdivision. 5. After the review of field conditions, recommendations and EAF, as well as other matters noted herein, has determined that the proposed Action of site plan review and related subdivision is an Unlisted type and hereby issues a "Negative Declaration," determination of non-significant environmental impact; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have received from the Zoning Board of Appeals: 1) a variance for provision of parking spaces, which do not meet the definition under Article 2, Section 62-4 of the Zoning Code; 2) a variance for the provision of 39 parking spaces for the proposed professional office building, when 40 such spaces are required in accordance with Article 3, Section 62-14 of the Zoning Ordinance and; 3) a variance for Article 4, Section 62-8 for the proposed use of the site for a professional office building which is not specifically listed in the Schedule of permitted or accessory uses for the C-l Highway Commercial Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the small parking lot for the existing building on proposed Parcel A, located off Chestnut Street, is proposed to be expanded to add 4 additional parking spaces which will involve relocating and reconstructing the existing stone retaining wall on the east side of said parking area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and site plan drawings noted above be and hereby are granted site plan approval and subdivision approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman, or his designated agent, as authorized by the Planning Board, on a copy of the site plan and subdivision plat, when revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the office of the Village Building Department and Westchester County Clerk (for subdivision purposes) for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire six (6) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the 2 �satisfaction of the Planning Board and the Applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1. Utilities - Storm drainage, water supply and sewage disposal facilities shall have been approved in writing on the site plan and subdivision plat by the Village Engineer as designated by the Village Board of Trustees, including but not limited to the following: 1.1 Storm water runoff provisions shall comply with the Planning Board's policy of "zero" increase in rate of runoff. 1.2 The Applicant shall submit a written report, with back-up calculations to the satisfaction of the Village Engineer, indicating his intention to provide adequate fire flow, water supply and water pressure for the site development. 1.3 The written approval of the Village Engineer regarding all concerns expressed in a memorandum to James T. Margotta, Village Building Inspector, from Joseph A. Gulino of Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers, entitled "Proposed Professional Office Building - Amenta & Sons, Village of North Tarrytown, NY, AMCE #1340", shall be obtained for his file. (Copy attached). 2. Exterior Lighting - All exterior light structures shall be screened so as to prevent glare upon adjacent properties and shall be of the halide or incandescent variety. 3. All driveways and parking areas shall be contained by pouredin-place reinforced concrete or cut stone curbs. The wall proposed to be reconstructed adjacent to the southerly side of parking space #8 on Parcel A shall be limited to 2' in height above grade and shall be parallel and abutting the adjacent property boundary to facilitate vehicular entrance to parking space #4. 4. The proposed loading zone for Parcel B shall be located on Parcel B in the general vicinity of parking spaces numbered 510 in a specific location which minimizes any possible conflict with vehicle movements; and 5. The four easternmost parking spaces located along the north side of the existing office building on proposed Parcel A, shall be designated as "small cars only", as shall be the two parking spaces on the southwestern corner of the proposed professional office building on proposed Parcel B, indicated on the site plan as spaces 38 and 39. The parking space indicated as #19 on Parcel B, in the proposed underground parking area for the proposed professional office building, shall be designated as "handicapped parking only," as shall 3 �the parking space opposite the entry on the north side of the existing office building on proposed Parcel A, indicated on the site plan as space #21. A screened trash collection facility shall be shown on the site plan and maintained at the northerly end of the parking lot on Parcel A, adjacent to the building. The parking access, drainage and landscaping approvals at the New York State Route 9 entrance are contingent on the approval of the State Department of Transportation (DOT). The large tree located immediately to the north of the proposed driveway access to Parcel B shall be maintained in a healthy growing condition until such time as the Applicant is directed to remove said tree, in writing, by the the New York State Department of Transportation, or the DOT removes said tree of its own volition. The Applicant shall submit a Final Plat subdivision pursuant to Section 11 of the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown for Planning Board review and approval, which plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and shall show all data listed therein as deemed pertinent by the Planning Board. The site plan shall be amended to show "no left hand turn" from the northerly parking lot, shared by Parcel and Parcel B, onto Broadway (Route 9). The Applicants shall revise the plan to indicate the appropriate signage to control the restriction of such movement. By acceptance of this resolution, the Applicant agrees that should the Village determine the presently approved parking and traffic flow plan causes a future severe traffic problem, said determination to be made by the Village of North Tarrytown, with input from the New York State Department of Transportation, then the Village may require the Applicant to amend and, if necessary, reconstruct the approved parking plan and/or traffic flow pattern controls. Review and Recreation Fees - The Applicant shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 10.1 An inspection fee for the construction inspection of the proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage system, sewage, landscaping, lighting and other site plan elements, for compliance with the approved site plan in the amount of $1,000. 10.2 The site plan escrow amount pursuant to SEQR and in the amount of $10,000 or 4% of the total project cost, whichever is less, which shall be used for consulting services rendered in the review of the project. 4 �10.3 A recreation fee of $14,000, based upon the sum of $1,000 per theoretical building lot. 10.4 The above fees shall be paid prior to the signing of the final site plan and subdivision plat by the Chairman. Signage on the premises shall be subject to the approval of the Architectural Review Board, which agency's recommendations shall be a condition of this Site Plan/Subdivision resolution of approval. The Applicant shall submit an easement agreement in recordable form to the satisfaction of the Village Attorney for the common use of the entrance way and parking spaces accessed from Broadway (Route 9) by both the existing office building on Parcel A and the proposed office building on Parcel B. All easements shall be noted on the final site plan and final subdivision plat. The site plan shall be amended to revise the bulk regulations schedule for Parcel B to correct the provided side yard notations of 5 feet and 20 feet to 0 feet and 20 feet, to correct the provided building height from 34 feet to the revised elevation, to correct the required parking calculation and to indicate the correct net rentable square footage of 12,000 feet as opposed to the 11,700 as indicated on the plan. Revise the site plan to reference and note the dates (and the appropriate sections of the Zoning Code) of the variances which have been granted for the subject application. The site plan shall be revised to indicate the provision of catch basins and the appropriate pitch to the underground parking area, so as to collect and remove any water which may enter the garage through the various windows and openings, the foregoing to be approved by the Village Engineer or his designated agent. A note shall be added to the site plan indicating that the "finished" side of the wood fence surrounding Parcel B shall face towards the adjacent properties. The site plan shall receive approval from the Architectural Review Board, which agencie's recommendations shall be a condition of this resolution. The site plan shall be revised as appropriate to indicate the widening or redesign of the garage entrance so as to permit improved visibility of the outdoor parking area and vehicles. 5 �19. The Applicant shall obtain the signed professional seal of architect James Piccone on that portion of the site plan and notations for which Mr. Piccone is responsible. 20. The Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities, upon notice by the Building Inspector but before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to parking, landscaping, signs, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details, as built drawings of same, which do not comply with the approved plan. The Applicant shall maintain all elements of the approved site plan, including landscaping in a neat and healthy condition so as to retain an approved Certificate of Occupancy. 21. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall submit to the Village Building Inspector a mylar reproduction of the site plan, as constructed, and subdivision plat, as filed in the County Clerk's office, to be filed in the office of the Village Building Department for reference by the Village. 22. This resolution of site plan/subdivision approval is conditional upon the execution of a lease agreement between the Village of North Tarrytown and the Applicant for four (4) parking spaces on the site. The four (4) parking spaces are numbered and designated as Numbers 10, 11, 12 and 13 on the Site Development Plan referred to above. This lease shall be satisfactory, with respect to both form and substance, to the Village Attorney, prior to execution by the appropriate Village Official. Of*. e Date James Galgano 0 Planning Board Chairman 500\not0-003.dkw:rr 12/8/90 12/14/90 6 �MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board From: Frederick P. Clark Associates Date: December 12, 1989 Subject: Tornello - CITGO Service Station Canopy - Sketch Site Plan Review As requested, we have reviewed the application for sketch site plan approval for the construction of a proposed canopy over three existing gas pumps for the CITGO gasoline service station located on the southeast corner of Broadway/Route 9 and Hudson Street. The Applicants have submitted one sheet of plans entitled "Survey of Property Prepared for John Tornello Situate Village of North Tarrytown, Town of Mount Pleasant", prepared by John J. Muldoon, dated November 4, 1989. REVIEW COMMENTS The Applicants have not shown adequately review this application. sufficient information to The Applicants should be required to submit a revised site plan indicating at least the following information: A location map, existing zoning, the proximity to public/quasi-public uses, all information necessary to indicate compliance with Section 62-19 of the Zoning CodeGasoline Service Stations, existing site contours, drainage, curbs, sidewalks, existing landscaping, tank locations, parking, location of nearby traffic diagram/compliance schedule. lights and a zoning bulk �In general, we do not recommend any action on the part of the Village Planning Board or Zoning Board of Appeal which would allow further investment and strengthening of such automotive uses along the Route 9 corridor, in particular, along this most important intersection of the Village. This proposal is an example of why the Village should proceed with their long range planning central goals to business hasten area and the rejuvenation surrounding of the residential Village's areas, not prolong the existence of inappropriate and unattractive uses in critical areas. This proposal is, however, in compliance with the permitted uses within the Zoning District, but is one that is detrimental to the Village as a whole. The zoning is this area should be changed from C-l Highway Commercial to a new zone that would prohibit automotive related businesses and would allow a limited range of non-residential uses that do not generate much traffic, such as certain professional offices, as well as multifamily uses districts. that would help buffer the Such a limited commercial adjacent residential zone would further the planning objectives of the Village of improving the visual image of the Village, the traf^rc situation at Beekman and Route 9 and improve the compatibility ^«/surrounding residential areas. fi' Although no rezoning this area has occurred, we feel that such a rezoning and improvement of the existing uses in this critical area for the Village is inevitable and essential rejuvenation of the Village of North Tarrytown. to the The Village �Board of Trustees, the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Planning Board should be encouraging such new uses and improvements in anticipation of these legislative acts. The Planning Board should be concerned with more than the issue of a canopy for this gas station, but with the overall improvement and conformity of the property with the zoning code and the long term planning goals and objectives of the Village of North Tarrytown. The impact of this proposal goes far beyond the limits of the property boundaries. This property is one of the most visible properties within the Village, as it signals the entrance to the central business district and Beekman Avenue, the heart of the Village, and as it terminates the view along the Beekman Avenue corridor. The Master Plan for census tract 116 of the Village of North Tarrytown, New York, prepared by RPPW, Incorporated states "The impression gained by travelers from the north as they pass the intersection of Broadway and Beekman Avenue, the major entrance to the business area, is negative and uninviting. present, some main features of this intersection At are service station signs, large paved areas, and a vacant building. Not an inviting scene for motorists driving through the Beekman Avenue shopping district." (Page 7). That plan continues on to recommend the beautification of the intersection of Beekman and Broadway to serve as an inviting entrance point to the central 3 �business area. A subsequent study of the Broadway/Beekman Avenue/Bedford Road intersection area was prepared for the Zoning Committee of North Tarrytown by Frederick P. Clark Associates back in September of 1988. conclusions rezoning of of automotive the this This plan essentially agrees with the 1980 RPPW critical related uses in Master Plan, area and for the Village this area and proposes to the prohibit to permit limited commercial development on this property as discussed above. The Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals should consider the recommendations of these two Village documents when considering such proposals. ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS It appears that this application /"^~7\ is non-conforming^6o the existing zoning in several respects: 1. 62-14C Access. The curb cuts exceed the maximum 25 foot measurement along the property line. 2. 62-14D. A^~^\ No screening of the parking l o / ^ r institutional uses is indicated on the site plan. 3. 62-22A. Entrance and exitways exceed the 25 foot maximum width. 4. 62-22B. Entrance and exitways are less than 15 feet from the side lot line. 5. 62-22C. Entrance and exitways are less than the 25 foot minimum from a street intersection. 6. 62-19. Specifies that no gas station shall within 300 feet of any public/quasi-public use. be located �7. The Planning Board and Zoning Board should study closely Article VII of the Zoning Code regarding non-conforming uses, their continuation, alteration or extension. 8. The proposed canopy would not conform with the required front yard setbacks. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS With regard to this particular application, the Planning Board has no alternative but to deny the application for *L leant, for the violations of the Zoning Code as noted above and to require the information requested at the beginning of this memo if any and all such variances are granted by the ZBA. However, we do not recommend any action which would promote further investment in automotive related uses in this area or in uses or proposals which are contrary to Village planning goals and objectives. This concludes review comments at this time. Daniel K. Wery Associate Planner DKW:rr 5 �Frederick P. Clark Associates. Consultants ^ / • j 'je'.v /Off art.; Souircc" - '"•>.'•,:':..: •-> ' * • .•'•.•;-'••.- .. /.eu'-e ••.< 3,~ *;e.v ''or* '0530 December 14, 1989 John Hughes, Jr., Esq. 49 Beekman Avenue North Tarrytown, New York 10591 Subject: Final Site Plan Resolution - Amenta & Sons Dear John: As a result of the Planning Board meeting of 12/14/89, I submit herewith the final version of the subject resolution. Please note that I have added all your comments of 12/8/89, plus those of the Village Engineer, dated 12/13/89 which we discussed with the Planning Board at last night's meeting. Sincerely, Frederick E. Wiedle, AICP FEWrrr cc: Mayor Janet Gondalfo James Galgano, Planning Board Chairman l/James Margotta, Building Inspector Joseph Gulino, Village Engineer Irene Amato, Planning Board Secretary Amenta & Sons �*. M E M O R A N D U M TO: James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM: Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: December 13, 1989 RE: Proposed Professional Office Building - ^enta t» Sons Village of North Tarrytown, NY wAMCE #1340 As per my recent telephone conversation with Mr. Amenta, it was agreed that the items or comments listed below would be addressed: A) The existing and proposed sanitary sewer connections, as well as the potable water system should be shown. Show all utilities on Broadway (Route 9). B) The calculations of sewage flow from the proposed building should be submitted. C) The proposed domestic water connection and sprinkler system should have separate line connections with backflow prevention systems. D) Confirmation of the existence of a curb/wall isolating the site drainage is to be submitted. In addition, a letter from Lackowitz Engineering confirming their recommendation of the storm drainage system was submitted to us. Accordingly, final recommendation will be made to the Planning Board once the necessary items have been addressed. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. cc: Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Associates Mr. Paul Amenta, V.P. - ATC Travel, Inc. (via Facsimile) �D R A F T PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN RESOLUTION: FINAL SITE PLAN/SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PROPOSED: PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING OWNER: SEBASTIAN AMENTA & SONS LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF BROADWAY (ROUTE 9) AND CHESTNUT STREET WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for final subdivision approval and final site plan approval (the Application) pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article VIII, Site Plan Review, and the Village Subdivision Regulations, to construct a professional office building, including related off-street parking, landscaping, storm drainage and other supporting utilities and facilities, on a site approximately 37,104 square feet in size; and WHEREAS, said property is proposed to be subdivided into two separate parcels; one containing the existing office building on approximately 17,035 square feet, hereinafter known as Parcel A; the other parcel hereinafter known as Parcel B, to contain the proposed professional office building on the remaining 20,069 square feet, as shown on one drawing (S-l) prepared in the offices of David Graham Architects in conjunction with a perspective sketch prepared in the office of James Piccone and Associates, identified as follows: 1. S-l "Site Development Plan Prepared for S. Amenta", dated 2/16/89, last revised 6/22/89; and 2. Perspective Sketch entitled: Armonk Office Building, undated; filed "Armonk Office Building," prepared in the office of James Corrado Piccone & Associates, Architects, Ossining, New York. WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead Agency, in site plan and subdivision review, pursuant to provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, (SEQR) the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 1. Billed and received a site plan application fee of $910 for the action under site plan review, $25 for the action under subdivision review for a combined initial fee of $935; still to be paid is the SEQR review fee, noted below. �2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property under review and its surrounding areas, pursuant to Article VIII of the Village Zoning Ordinance. 3. Requested, received and reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR; 4. Held a duly noticed public hearing in on July 20, 1989 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to comment and be heard on the proposed site plan and subdivision. 5. After the review of field conditions, recommendations and EAF, as well as other matters noted herein, has determined that the proposed Action of site plan review and related subdivision is an Unlisted type and hereby issues a "Negative Declaration," determination of non-significant environmental impact; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have received from the Zoning Board of Appeals: 1) a variance for provision of parking spaces, which do not meet the definition under Article 2, Section 62-4 of the Zoning Code; 2) a variance for the provision of 39 parking spaces for the proposed professional office building, when 40 such spaces are required in accordance with Article 3, Section 62-14 of the Zoning Ordinance and; 3) a variance for Article 4, Section 62-8 for the proposed use of the site for a professional office building which is not specifically listed in the Schedule of permitted or accessory uses for the C-l Highway Commercial Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the small parking lot for the existing building on proposed Parcel A, located off Chestnut Street, is proposed to be expanded to add 4 additional parking spaces which will involve relocating and reconstructing the existing stone retaining wall on the east side of said parking area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and site plan drawings noted above be and hereby are granted site plan approval and subdivision approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman, or his designated agent, as authorized by the Planning Board, on a copy of the site plan and subdivision plat, when revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the office of the Village Building Department and Westchester County Clerk 2 �(for subdivision purposes) for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire six (6) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and the Applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1- Utilities - storm drainage, water supply and sewage disposal facilities shall have been approved in writing on the site plan and subdivision plat by the Village Engineer as designated by the Village Board of Trustees, including but not limited to the following: 1.1 Storm water runoff provisions shall comply with the Planning Board's policy of "zero" increase in rate of runoff. 1.2 The Applicant shall submit a written report, with back-up calculations to the satisfaction of the Village Engineer, indicating his intention to provide adequate fire flow, water supply and water pressure for the site development. 1.3 The written approval of the Village Engineer regarding all concerns expressed in a memorandum to James T. Margotta, Village Building Inspector, from Joseph A. Gulino of Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers, entitled "Proposed Professional Office Building Amenta & Sons, Village of North Tarrytown, NY, AMCE #1340", shall be obtained for his file. (Copy attached). 2. Exterior Lighting - All exterior light structures shall be screened so as to prevent glare upon adjacent properties and shall be of the halide or incandescent variety. 3. All driveways and parking areas shall be contained by poured-in-place reinforced concrete or cut stone curbs. The wall proposed to be reconstructed adjacent to the southerly side of parking space #8 on Parcel A shall be limited to 2' in height above grade and shall be parallel and abutting the adjacent property boundary to facilitate vehicular entrance to parking space #4. 4. The proposed loading zone for Parcel B shall be located on Parcel B in the general vicinity of parking spaces numbered 5-10 in a specific location which minimizes any possible conflict with vehicle movements; and 5. The four easternmost parking spaces located along the north side of the existing office building on proposed Parcel A, 3 �shall be designated as "small cars only", as shall be the two parking spaces on the southwestern corner of the proposed professional office building on proposed Parcel B, indicated on the site plan as spaces 38 and 39. The parking space indicated as #19 on Parcel B, in the proposed underground parking area for the proposed professional office building, shall be designated as "handicapped parking only," as shall the parking space opposite the entry on the north side of the existing office building on proposed Parcel A, indicated on the site plan as space #21. A screened trash collection facility shall be shown on the site plan and maintained at the northerly end of the parking lot on Parcel A, adjacent to the building. The parking access, drainage and landscaping approvals at the New York State Route 9 entrance are contingent on the approval of the State. Department of Transportation (DOT). The large tree located immediately to the north of the proposed driveway access to Parcel B shall be maintained in a healthy growing condition until such time as the Applicant is directed to remove said tree, in writing, by the the New York State Department of Transportation, or the DOT removes said tree of its own volition. The Applicant shall submit a Final Plat subdivision pursuant to Section 11 of the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown for Planning Board review and approval, which plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and shall show all data listed therein as deemed pertinent by the Planning Board. The site plan shall be amended to show "no left hand turn" from the northerly parking lot, shared by Parcel and Parcel B, onto Broadway (Route 9). The Applicants shall revise the plan to indicate the appropriate signage to control the restriction of such movement. By acceptance of this resolution, the Applicant agrees that should the Village determine the presently approved parking and traffic flow plan causes a future severe traffic problem, said determination to be made by the Village of North Tarrytown, with input from the New York State Department of Transportation, then the Village may require the Applicant to amend and, if necessary, reconstruct the approved parking plan and/or traffic flow pattern controls. Review and Recreation Fees - The Applicant shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 10.1 An inspection fee for the construction inspection of the proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage system, sewage, landscaping, lighting and other site 4 �plan elements, for compliance with the approved site plan in the amount of $1,000. 10.2 The site plan escrow amount pursuant to SEQR and in the amount of $10,000 or 4% of the total project cost, whichever is less, which shall be used for consulting services rendered in the review of the project. 10.3 A recreation fee of $14,000, based upon the sum of $1,000 per theoretical building lot. 10.4 The above fees shall be paid prior to the signing of the final site plan and subdivision plat by the Chairman. 11. Signage on the premises shall be subject to the approval of the Architectural Review Board, which agency*s recommendations shall be a condition of this Site Plan/Subdivision resolution of approval. 12. The Applicant shall submit an easement agreement in recordable form to the satisfaction of the Village Attorney for the common use of the entrance way and parking spaces accessed from Broadway (Route 9) by both the existing office building on Parcel A and the proposed office building on Parcel B. All easements shall be noted on the final site plan and final subdivision plat. 13. The site plan shall be amended to revise the bulk regulations schedule for Parcel B to correct the provided side yard notations of 5 feet and 20 feet to 0 feet and 20 feet, to correct the provided building height from 34 feet to the revised elevation, to correct the required parking calculation and to indicate the correct net rentable square footage of 12,000 feet as opposed to the 11,700 as indicated on the plan. 14. Revise the site plan to reference and note the dates (and the appropriate sections of the Zoning Code) of the variances which have been granted for the subject application. 15. The site plan shall be revised to indicate the provision of catch basins and the appropriate pitch to the underground parking area, so as to collect and remove any water which may enter the garage through the various windows and openings, the foregoing to be approved by the Village Engineer or his designated agent. 16. A note shall be added to the site plan indicating that the "finished" side of the wood fence surrounding Parcel B shall face towards the adjacent properties. 5 �17. The site plan shall receive approval from the Architectural Review Board, which agencie's recommendations shall be a condition of this resolution. 18. The site plan shall be revised as appropriate to indicate the widening or redesign of the garage entrance so as to permit improved visibility of the outdoor parking area and vehicles. 19. The Applicant shall obtain the signed professional seal of architect James Piccone on that portion of the site plan and notations for which Mr. Piccone is responsible. 20. The Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities, upon notice by the Building Inspector but before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to parking, landscaping, signs, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details, as built drawings of same, which do not comply with the approved plan. The Applicant shall maintain all elements of the approved site plan, including landscaping in a neat and healthy condition so as to retain an approved Certificate of Occupancy. 21. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall submit to the Village Building Inspector a mylar reproduction of the site plan, as constructed, and subdivision plat, as filed in the County Clerk's office, to be filed in the office of the Village Building Department for reference by the Village. 22. This resolution of site plan/subdivision approval is conditional upon the execution of a lease agreement between the Village of North Tarrytown and the Applicant for four (4) parking spaces on the site. The four (4) parking spaces are numbered and designated as Numbers 10, 11, 12 and 13 on the Site Development Plan referred to above. This lease shall be satisfactory, with respect to both form and substance, to the Village Attorney, prior to execution by the appropriate Village Official. Date James Galgano Planning Board Chairman DKW:rr 12/8/89 12/14/89 6 �M E M O R A N D U M TO: James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM: Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: December 13, 1989 RE: Proposed Addition and Alterations to 410 North Broadway Restaurant/Gasoline Station Village of North Tarrytown, NY CAMCE #1329 Per our review of the drawings submitted to us on December 11, 1989 by Donal M. Walsh, Esq., it was determined that the required items of the CAMCE Memorandum of September 5, 1989 (copy attached) were substantially addressed. Accordingly, we have no significant objections to the proposed plan. If you should have any questions or require further information, please let us know. enc. cc: Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Associates (via Facsimile) Donal M. Walsh, Esq. Mr. Mohammad R. Badaly - Badaly & Badaly Architects �M E M O R A N D U M TO: James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM: Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: December 13, 1989 RE: Proposed Redevelopment of Townhouses and Conversion to a Two-Family Dwelling on Clinton Street Village of North Tarrytown, NY CAMCE #1332 As per our review of the drawings submitted to us on December 7, 1989, there have been substantial changes from what was originally proposed. Therefore, all the necessary items listed below should be addressed: A) The interior floor plans should be included for review. B) The names of the adjacent property owners should be included on dwg. C) The existing and proposed sanitary sewer connections should be shown, as well as potable water system. Show all utilities on Clinton St. D) Any proposed drainage lines and connections should be shown all the way to the existing storm drainage system. E) The owner's signature of approval should be on the drawing. F) The Planning Board endorsement should be placed on the drawing from Subdivision Regulations Part IV, Page 7817 (14C). 6) The location of the nearest fire hydrants should be indicated on dwg. Accordingly, final recommendations will be made to the Planning Board once the necessary items have been addressed. If you should have any questions or require further information, please let us know. enc. cc: Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Associates (via Facsimile) Mr. Robert Stanziale - Robert Stanziale, AIA �M E M O R A N D U M TO: James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM: Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: December 13, 1989 RE: Proposed Professional Office Building - Amenta & Sons Broadway (Route 9) and Chestnut Street Village of North Tarrytown, NY CAMCE #1340 As per my recent telephone conversation with Mr. Amenta, it was agreed that the items or comments listed below would be addressed: A) The existing and proposed sanitary sewer connections, as well as the potable water system should be shown. Show all utilities on Broadway (Route 9). B) The calculations of sewage flow from the proposed building should be submitted. C) The proposed domestic water connection and sprinkler system should have separate line connections with backflow prevention systems. D) Confirmation of the existence of a curb /wall isolating the site drainage is to be submitted. In addition, a letter from Lackowitz Engineering confirming their recommendation of the storm drainage system was submitted to us. Accordingly, final recommendation will be made to the Planning Board once the necessary items have been addressed. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. cc: Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Associates Mr. Paul Amenta, V.P. - ATC Travel, Inc. (via Facsimile) �M E M O R A N D U M i TO: James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM: Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: December 13, 1989 RE: Proposed Canopy for Tornello Service Station on corner of Hudson Terrace & Broadway Village of North Tarrytown, NY CAMCE #1343R Per our review of the following site plan dated November 4, 1989 from John J. Muldoom, Licensed Surveyor (New York State), for the abovementioned project, our comments or questions concerning water, sewage and drainage facilities only are as follows: A) The interior floor plans should be included for review. B) The names of the adjacent property owners should be included on dwg. C) The existing and proposed sanitary sewer connections should be shown, as well as potable water system. Show all utilities on Broadway and Hudson Terrace. D) Any proposed drainage lines and connections should be shown all the way to the existing storm drainage system. E) The owner's signature of approval should be on the drawing. F) The Planning Board endorsement should be placed on the drawing from Subdivision Regulations Part IV, Page 7817 (14C). G) The location of the nearest fire hydrants should be indicated on dwg. H) The situation may have been previously addressed; however, no mention was made of bringing the underground tanks and fuel pumps into accordance with current Federal regulations. In summary, once the above-mentioned comments are addressed, final recommendations can be made to the Planning Board. cc: Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Associates (via Facsimile) �MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board From: Frederick P. Clark Associates Date: December 12, 1989 Subject: Clinton Street Proposed Residential Development Sketch Plan Review As requested, we have reviewed the plans submitted for sketch plan approval of the conversion of an existing single-family dwelling to a two-family dwelling and the construction of three attached dwelling units on the adjacent property located along the east side of Clinton Street. The applicants have submitted one sheet of plans for review entitled "Proposed Three Family Dwelling and Conversion to a Two-Family Dwelling - Site Plan, Driveway Elevation" prepared by Robert Stanziale, AIA, undated. Although the plans have changed somewhat from the original proposal back in October, most of the comments of our October 19, 1989 memo (attached) still apply, specifically review comments 1 and 3 through 12. We have the following additional review comments: 1. The applicants should prepare a schedule indicating the required compliance with the standards. bulk zoning compliance standards and proposal 2. The applicants should provide floor plans for both the proposed conversion of the existing residence to a twofamily residence and for the three new proposed attached dwelling units. 3. The revised plans should always be clearly identified and dated. 4. The three open parking spaces on Lot 27 are indicated as 9 feet wide each. However, the total width of the three spaces is only 24 feet wide, i.e., each space can only be eight feet wide. These spaces should be redrawn to comply with the Village standard. 5. The applicants indicate a total of six packing spaces, which would satisfy the minimum for three twxrbedroom dwelling units. Any additional bedrooms or "sleeping areas" will require additional parking spaces. 6. It should be noted that the existing building on Lot 26 is non-conforming with regard to the front and side yard setbacks. The applicant should be aware that conversion of �the building variance. resulting in any expansion may require a 7. The maximum coverage for a "Multiple Dwelling on a Single Lot'* is 30%, however the maximum coverage for a "Planned Residence Development" on a single lot is 20%. The existing proposal would result in a coverage of approximately 27% or 28% on Lot 27. The Village Attorney should determine whether this proposal qualifies as a "Multiple Dwelling" on a single lot or as a "Planned Residence Development". 8. The applicant should be required to indicate the names of the adjacent property owners abutting this property. 9. The applicant should be required to submit complete utility plans (i.e. sewer, water, gas and electric, etc.). These plans should include the location and depth of existing utility lines within the Clinton Street right-of-way. 10. The applicant should be required to indicate the appropriate facilities and screening for trash collection. 11. The applicant should be required to include street tree and sidewalk improvement details as part of their next submission. Respectfully submitted, DKW:crc Daniel K. Wery Associate Planner 2 �MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown From: Frederick P. Clark Associates Date: December 12, 1989 Subject: Massaro and Paluetti Proposed Dwelling Unit Addition Sketch Plan Review As requested, we have reviewed an application for site plan approval for the conversion of an existing basement garage to a proposed basement "handicap" dwelling unit within a three-story frame apartment building containing six existing dwelling units located on the corner of Valley Street and Chestnut Street in a C-2 General Commercial Zoning District. The applicants have submitted a plan entitled "Proposed Handicap Dwelling Unit Floor Plan - Site Plan" dated December 4, 1989, prepared by Julius Twyne, Jr., Architect. Review Comments The Planning Board has no alternative application for the following reasons: but to deny the 1. Minimum Lot Size. This residential development is regulated under the R-5 Residence District Standards which requires a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet for the first three dwelling units and 1,500 square feet for each additional unit. The existing site area is presently somewhat less than 4,000 square feet in area yet contains six existing dwelling units which require a minimum lot size of 9,500 square feet. The proposal would make this property further non-conforming and that it would add an additional dwelling unit and require a minimum lot size of 11,000 square feet. 2. Maximum Coverage. Again under R-5 Standards, the maximum coverage of the site is 30%. The existing structure presently covers approximately 45% of the site area. 3. Yard Setbacks. The existing building is currently nonconforming with regard to the rear, front and side yard setback requirements. 4. Maximum Height. The maximum permitted height for a building in this zoning district is 45 feet. The applicants have not indicated the existing height of the building. 5. Parking. The existing building presently contains an existing two-car basement garage with no additional offstreet parking. The existing six dwelling units within this structure presently require a minimum of nine (and most �likely twelve) off-street parking spaces, and is therefore non-conforming due to a shortage of between 7 and 10 parking spaces. The proposal would remove the existing two-car garage for conversion to a handicap apartment and additionally require three more parking spaces, thereby eliminating all off-street parking spaces on the property and increasing the lack of required off-street parking spaces to between 12 and 15 parking spaces depending on the number of bedrooms in the existing units. Respectfully submitted, crc Daniel K. Wery Associate Planner 2 �D R A F T PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN RESOLUTION: FINAL SITE PLAN/SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PROPOSED: PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING OWNER: SEBASTIAN AMENTA & SONS LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF BROADWAY (ROUTE 9) AND CHESTNUT STREET WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for final subdivision approval and final site plan approval (the Application) pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article VIII, Site Plan Review, and the Village Subdivision Regulations, to construct a professional office building, including related off-street parking, landscaping, storm drainage and other supporting utilities and facilities, on a site approximately 37,104 square feet in size; and WHEREAS, said property is proposed to be subdivided into two separate parcels; one containing the existing office building on approximately 17,035 square feet, hereinafter known as Parcel A; the other parcel hereinafter known as Parcel B, to contain the proposed professional office building on the remaining 20,069 square feet, as shown on one drawing (S-l) prepared in the offices of David Graham Architects in conjunction with a perspective sketch prepared in the office of James Piccone and Associates, identified as follows: 1. S-l "Site Development Plan Prepared for S. Amenta", dated 2/16/89, last revised 6/22/89; and 2. Perspective Sketch entitled: Armonk Office Building, undated; filed "Armonk Office Building," prepared in the office of James Corrado Piccone & Associates, Architects, Ossining, New York. WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead Agency, in site plan and subdivision review, pursuant to provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, (SEQR) the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 1. Billed and received a site plan application fee of $910 for the action under site plan review, $25 for the action under subdivision review for a combined initial fee of $935; still to be paid is the SEQR review fee, noted below. �2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property under review and its surrounding areas, pursuant to Article VIII of the Village Zoning Ordinance. 3. Requested, received and reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR; 4. Held a duly noticed public hearing in on July 20, 1989 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to comment and be heard on the proposed site plan and subdivision. 5. After the review of field conditions, recommendations and EAF, as well as other matters noted herein, has determined that the proposed Action of site plan review and related subdivision is an Unlisted type and hereby issues a "Negative Declaration," determination of non-significant environmental impact; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have received from the Zoning Board of Appeals: 1) a variance for provision of parking spaces, which do not meet the definition under Article 2, Section 62-4 of the Zoning Code; 2) a variance for the provision of 39 parking spaces for the proposed professional office building, when 40 such spaces are required in accordance with Article 3, Section 62-14 of the Zoning Ordinance and; 3) a variance for Article 4, Section 62-8 for the proposed use of the site for a professional office building which is not specifically listed in the Schedule of permitted or accessory uses for the C-l Highway Commercial Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the small parking lot for the existing building on proposed Parcel A, located off Chestnut Street, is proposed to be expanded to add 4 additional parking spaces which will involve relocating and reconstructing the existing stone retaining wall on the east side of said parking area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and site plan drawings noted above be and hereby are granted site plan approval and subdivision approval and that the Applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman, or his designated agent, as authorized by the Planning Board, on a copy of the site plan and subdivision plat, when revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the office of the Village Building Department and Westchester County Clerk 2 �(for subdivision purposes) for purposes of obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution and all building code requirements, provided, however, that this approval shall expire six (6) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and the Applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1. Utilities - Storm drainage, water supply and sewage disposal facilities shall have been approved in writing on the site plan and subdivision plat by the Village Engineer as designated by the Village Board of Trustees, including but not limited to the following: 1.1 Storm water runoff provisions shall comply with the Planning Board1s policy of "zero" increase in rate of runoff. 1.2 The Applicant shall submit a written report, with back-up calculations to the satisfaction of the Village Engineer, indicating his intention to provide adequate fire flow, water supply and water pressure for the site development. 1.3 The written approval of the Village Engineer regarding all concerns expressed in a memorandum to James T. Margotta, Village Building Inspector, from Joseph A. Gulino of Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers, entitled "Proposed Professional Office Building Amenta & Sons, Village of North Tarrytown, NY, AMCE #1340", shall be obtained for his file. (Copy attached). 2. Exterior Lighting - All exterior light structures shall be screened so as to prevent glare upon adjacent properties and shall be of the halide or incandescent variety. 3. All driveways and parking areas shall be contained by poured-in-place reinforced concrete or cut stone curbs. The wall proposed to be reconstructed adjacent to the southerly side of parking space #8 on Parcel A shall be limited to 2' in height above grade and shall be parallel and abutting the adjacent property boundary to facilitate vehicular entrance to parking space #4. 4. The proposed loading zone for Parcel B shall be located on Parcel B in the general vicinity of parking spaces numbered 5-10 in a specific location which minimizes any possible conflict with vehicle movements; and 5. The four easternmost parking spaces located along the north side of the existing office building on proposed Parcel A, 3 �shall be designated as "small cars only", as shall be the two parking spaces on the southwestern corner of the proposed professional office building on proposed Parcel B, indicated on the site plan as spaces 38 and 39. The parking space indicated as #19 on Parcel B, in the proposed underground parking area for the proposed professional office building, shall be designated as "handicapped parking only," as shall the parking space opposite the entry on the north side of the existing office building on proposed Parcel A, indicated on the site plan as space £21. A screened trash collection facility shall be shown on the site plan and maintained at the northerly end of the parking lot on Parcel A, adjacent to the building. The parking access, drainage and landscaping approvals at the New York State Route 9 entrance are contingent on the approval of the State Department of Transportation (DOT). The large tree located immediately to the north of the proposed driveway access to Parcel B shall be maintained in a healthy growing condition until such time as the Applicant is directed to remove said tree, in writing, by the the New York State Department of Transportation, or the DOT removes said tree of its own volition. The Applicant shall submit a Final Plat subdivision pursuant to Section 11 of the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of North Tarrytown for Planning Board review and approval, which plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and shall show all data listed therein as deemed pertinent by the Planning Board. The site plan shall be amended to show "no left hand turn" from the northerly parking lot, shared by Parcel and Parcel B, onto Broadway (Route 9). The Applicants shall revise the plan to indicate the appropriate signage to control the restriction of such movement. By acceptance of this resolution, the Applicant agrees that should the Village determine the presently approved parking and traffic flow plan causes a future severe traffic problem, said determination to be made by the Village of North Tarrytown, with input from the New York State Department of Transportation, then the Village may require the Applicant to amend and, if necessary, reconstruct the approved parking plan and/or traffic flow pattern controls. Review and Recreation Fees - The Applicant shall pay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 10.1 An inspection fee for the construction inspection of the proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage system, sewage, landscaping, lighting and other site 4 �plan elements, for compliance with the approved site plan in the amount of $1,000. 10.2 The site plan escrow amount pursuant to SEQR and in the amount of $10,000 or 4% of the total project cost, whichever is less, which shall be used for consulting services rendered in the review of the project. 10.3 A recreation fee of $14,000, based upon the sum of $1,000 per theoretical building lot. 10.4 The above fees shall be paid prior to the signing of the final site plan and subdivision plat by the Chairman. Signage on the premises shall be subject to the approval of the Architectural Review Board, which agency's recommendations shall be a condition of this Site Plan/Subdivision resolution of approval. The Applicant shall submit an easement agreement in recordable form to the satisfaction of the Village Attorney for the common use of the entrance way and parking spaces accessed from Broadway (Route 9) by both the existing office building on Parcel A and the proposed office building on Parcel B. All easements shall be noted on the final site plan and final subdivision plat. The site plan shall be amended to revise the bulk regulations schedule for Parcel B to correct the provided side yard notations of 5 feet and 20 feet to 0 feet and 20 feet, to correct the provided building height from 34 feet to the revised elevation, to correct the required parking calculation and to indicate the correct net rentable square footage of 12,000 feet as opposed to the 11,700 as indicated on the plan. Revise the site plan to reference and note the dates (and the appropriate sections of the Zoning Code) of the variances which have been granted for the subject application. The site plan shall be revised to indicate the provision of catch basins and the appropriate pitch to the underground parking area, so as to collect and remove any water which may enter the garage through the various windows and openings, the foregoing to be approved by the Village Engineer or his designated agent. A note shall be added to the site plan indicating that the "finished" side of the wood fence surrounding Parcel B shall face towards the adjacent properties. 5 �17. The site plan shall receive approval from the Architectural Review Board, which agencie's recommendations shall be a condition of this resolution. 18. The site plan shall be revised as appropriate to indicate the widening or redesign of the garage entrance so as to permit improved visibility of the outdoor parking area and vehicles. 19. The Applicant shall obtain the signed professional seal of architect James Piccone on that portion of the site plan and notations for which Mr. Piccone is responsible. 20. The Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities, upon notice by the Building Inspector but before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to parking, landscaping, signs, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details, as built drawings of same, which do not comply with the approved plan. The Applicant shall maintain all elements of the approved site plan, including landscaping in a neat and healthy condition so as to retain an approved Certificate of Occupancy. 21. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall submit to the Village Building Inspector a mylar reproduction of the site plan, as constructed, and subdivision plat, as filed in the County Clerk's office, to be filed in the office of the Village Building Department for reference by the Village. 22. This resolution of site plan/subdivision approval is conditional upon the execution of a lease agreement between the Village of North Tarrytown and the Applicant for four (4) parking spaces on the site. The four (4) parking spaces are numbered and designated as Numbers 10, 11, 12 and 13 on the Site Development Plan referred to above. This lease shall be satisfactory, with respect to both form and substance, to the Village Attorney, prior to execution by the appropriate Village Official. Date James Galgano Planning Board Chairman DKW:rr 12/8/89 12/14/89 6 �MEMORANDUM To: Village of North Tarrytown Planning Board From: Frederick P. Clark Associates Date: December 12, 1989 Subject: Tornello - CITGO Service Station Canopy - Sketch Site Plan Review As requested, we have reviewed the application for sketch site plan approval for the construction of a proposed canopy over three existing gas pumps for the CITGO gasoline service station located on the southeast corner of Broadway/Route 9 and Hudson Street. The Applicants have submitted one sheet of plans entitled "Survey of Property Prepared for John Tornello Situate Village of North Tarrytown, Town of Mount Pleasant", prepared by John J. Muldoon, dated November 4, 1989. GENERAL REVIEW COMMENTS The Applicants have not shown sufficient information to adequately review this application. The Applicants should be required to submit a revised site plan indicating at least the following information: A location map, existing zoning, the proximity to public/quasi-public uses, all information necessary to indicate compliance with Section 62-19 of the Zoning CodeGasoline Service Stations, existing site contours, drainage, curbs, sidewalks, existing landscaping, tank locations, parking, location of nearby traffic lights and a zoning bulk diagram/compliance schedule. In general, we do not recommend any action on the part of the Village Planning Board or Zoning Board of Appeals which would allow further investment, intensification and strengthening of such automotive uses along the Route 9 corridor, in particular, at this most important intersection in the Village. This proposal is another example of why North Tarrytown should proceed with its study of long range planning goals to hasten the rejuvenation of the Village's central business area and surrounding residential areas, and not prolong the existence of inappropriate and unattractive uses in critical areas. This proposal is in compliance with the permitted uses within the Zoning District, but is one that may be detrimental to the Village as a whole. The zoning in this area should be considered for change from C-l Highway Commercial to a new zone that would prohibit automotive related businesses and would allow a limited range of non-residential uses that do not generate excessive peak hour traffic, such as certain professional offices, as well as multi-family uses that would help buffer the adjacent residential districts. Such a limited commercial zone would further the �planning objectives of the Village of improving the visual image of the Village, easing the traffic situation at Beekman and Route 9 and adding to the compatibility the surrounding residential areas. Although no rezoning of this area has occurred, we feel that such a "cleansing" of the existing uses in this critical area for the Village is essential to the rejuvenation of the Village of North Tarrytown. The Village Board of Trustees, the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Planning Board should be encouraging such new uses and improvements in anticipation of these legislative acts. The impact of this proposal goes far beyond the limits of the particular property boundaries. This property is one of the most visible properties within the Village; it signals the entrance to the central business district and Beekman Avenue, the heart of the Village. The Master Plan for census tract 116 of the Village of North Tarrytown, New York, prepared by RPPW, Inc. states "The impression gained by travelers from the north as they pass the intersection of Broadway and Beekman Avenue, the major entrance to the business area, is negative and uninviting. At present, some main features of this intersection are service station signs, large paved areas, and a vacant building. Not an inviting scene for motorists driving through the Beekman Avenue shopping district." (Page 7). That Plan continues on to recommend the beautification of the intersection of Beekman and Broadway to serve as an inviting entrance point to the central business area. A subsequent study of the Broadway/ Beekman Avenue/ Bed ford Road intersection area was prepared for the Zoning Committee of North Tarrytown by Frederick P. Clark Associates back in September of 1988. This plan essentially agrees with the conclusions of the 1980 RPPW Master Plan, and proposes the rezoning of this critical area for the Village to prohibit automotive related uses in this area and to permit limited commercial development on this property as discussed above. The Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals should consider the recommendations of these two Village documents when considering such proposals. The Planning Board should be concerned with more than the issue of a canopy for this gas station, but with the overall improvement and conformity of the property with the zoning code and the long term planning goals and objectives of the Village of North Tarrytown. SPECIFIC REVIEW COMMENTS It appears that this application is non-conforming with respect to the existing zoning in several respects: 2 �1. 62-14C The curb cuts exceed measurement along the property line. the maximum 25 foot 2. 62-14D. No screening of the parking lot from institutional uses is indicated on the site plan. 3. 62-22A. width. 4. 62-22B. Entrance and exitways are less than 15 feet from the side lot line. 5. 62-22C. Entrance and exitways are less than the 25 foot minimum from a street intersection. 6. 62-19. This section specifies that no gas station shall be located within 300 feet of any public/quasi-public use. This property is located near several public/quais-public uses. 7. The Planning Board and Zoning Board should study closely Article VII of the Zoning Code regarding non-conforming uses, their continuation, alteration or extension. This proposal constitutes an expansion and alternatives of a nonconforming use in violation of the Zoning Code. 8. The proposed canopy front yard setbacks. Entrance and exitways exceed the 25 foot maximum does not conform with the required CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS With regard to this particular application, the Planning Board has no alternative but to deny the application for at least the violations of the Zoning Code as noted above and to require the information requested at the beginning of this memo if any and all such variances are granted by the ZBA. In general, we do not recommend any action by the Planning Board or the Zoning Board of Appeals which would promote further investment in automotive related uses in this area or in uses or proposals which are contrary to Village planning goals and objectives. Having said this, we must also caution against arbitrary or capricious actions which might deny an Applicant's rights under current zoning. Respectfully submitted, Daniel K. Wery Associate Planner DKW:rr 12/13/89 �DEC-13-'89 l b : 3 3 TEL MO:201-342-0790 ID:CfiMCE tt077 PilS M E M O R A N D U M TO: James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM; Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: December 13, 1989 RE: Proposed Professional Office Building - *.ni«&nta f* Sons Village of North Tarrytown, NY wAMCE #1340 As per my recent telephone conversation with Mr. Amenta, it was agreed that the items or comments listed below would be addressed; A) The existing and proposed sanitary sewer connections, as well as the potable water system should be shown. Show all utilities on Broadway (Route 9) . D) The calculations of sewage flow from the proposed building should be submitted. C) The proposed domestic water connection and sprinkler system should have separate line connections with backflow prevention systems. D) Confirmation of the existence of a curb/wall isolating the site drainage is to be submitted. In addition, a letter from Lackowita Engineering confirming their recommendation of the storm drainage system was submitted to us. Accordingly, final recommendation will be made to the Planning Board once the necessary items have been addressed. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. cc; Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Associates Mr. Paul Amenta, V.P. - ATC Travel* Inc. (via Facsimile) �M E M O R A N D U M TO: James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM: Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: December 13, 1989 RE: Proposed Redevelopment of Immaculate Church Building Depeyster Street Village of North Tarrytown, NY CAMCE #1328 As of this date, no further information has been received. Therefore, those items relating to the storm drainage, water and sanitary system have not been addressed. (See attached CAMCE memo of November 14, 1989). Final recommendations will be made to the Planning Board once the necessary information has been addressed. If you should have any questions or require further information, please let us know. enc. cc: Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Associates (via Facsimile) Mr. David Basilone - Duo Dickinson Architects �M E M O R A N D U M TO: James T. Margotta, Building Inspector Village of North Tarrytown FROM: Joseph A. Gulino Charles A. Manganaro, Consulting Engineers DATE: December 13, 1989 RE: Proposed Handicapped Dwelling Unit Addition 190 Valley Street Village of North Tarrytown, NY CAMCE #1344R Per our review of the following site plan dated December 4, 1989 from Julius B. Twyne, Jr., Architect, for the above referenced project, our comments or questions concerning water, sewage and drainage facilities only are as follows: A) The names of the adjacent property owners should be included on dwg. B) The existing and proposed sanitary sewer connections should be shown, as well as potable water system. Show all utilities on Valley St. C) Any proposed drainage lines and connections should be shown all the way to the existing storm drainage system. D) The owner's signature of approval should be on the drawing. E) The Planning Board endorsement should be placed on the drawing from Subdivision Regulations Part IV, Page 7817 (14C). F) The location of the nearest fire hydrants should be indicated on dwg. In summary, once the above-mentioned comments are addressed, final recommendations can be made to the Planning Board. cc: Mr. Dan Wery - Frederick Clark Associates Mr. Julius B. Twyne, Jr. - JT2 Architects (via Facsimile) �^tOtndolfo,M^or Sean Treecy, Deputy Mayor A f AtathooyApollonlo ^ ^ t o r i » Alter If I I TbaotliyCocm Michael Hyland / ^ >jfflL W^ttK^P J^^^^^^p \ \ ^^r V \ f ^ I I J I / / J nm—T • — William T.KegMi VBaftOomia' Angela Bverett Frank Ansovino Vfflafiltaaiuwr HISTORIC PAST - GREAT FUTURE December 7, 1989 Mr. Pedro Lopez 30 New Broadway North Tarrytown,New York 10591 Dear Mr. Lopez: After reviewing your request and visiting the site, the Board, in unanimous agreement, feel that the house should be completely resided with the imitation brick veneer. The half brick , half clapboard siding design is not acceptable. In addition, we will require detailed plans of the siding at the windows and frieze board. Please submit this information 10 days prior to the next meeting in January. The next meeting date is January 24, at 8:00 PM. Sorry for the delay. Sincerely yours, Frank Arvan - V ^ Chairman 0 Architectual Review Board // / yrfames Margotta/ ^/Building Inspector \ 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York 10591 (914)631-0113 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1989-12-14 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1989 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989