<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="238" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/items/show/238?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-19T10:31:35+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="238">
      <src>https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/da956164d9bdcb5aa9ee0eb822dd872d.pdf</src>
      <authentication>d27e16390eff7905269d10c04dee2321</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="18726">
                  <text>WEDNESDAY
AUGUST 27th, 2003

REGULAR MEETING

A regular meeting of the Sleepy Hollow Architectural
Review Board was held on August 27th, 2003 in the Village Hall,
2 8 Beekman Avenue, Sleepy Hollow, New York.
PRESENT:

James Nazemetz, Chairman
Carter Sachman
Paul Wichmann
Sean McCarthy
Barbara Fina

ABSENT:

Elvira Aloia

,

ALSO PRESENT: Robert Stiloski, In^pe&amp;£6
»•

Chairman Nazemetz called the meeting^
Chairman Nazemetz stated that the next
Board would be held on September 24th, 2003.
1.

WILIAN,

1 6 0 CORTLANDT STREET-SIGN

PERMIT.

Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann to postpone
the application until the September 24th, 2003 meeting. Carried.
2.

ORIENTACTION HISPANA, 115 CORTLANDT STREET-SIGN PERMIT.

Mr. Stiloski stated that the applicant had refiled
his application for a sign and he has tried several times
to contact him but apparently he is out of the country.
Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann to remove
the application from the agenda. Carried.
3.

VAN HENGEL, 2 EVERGREEN WAY-FENCE APPROVAL.

Mrs. Van Hengel presented affidavit of proof of mailings
to Mr. Stiloski.
Mrs. Van Hangel stated they were resubmitting their
application due to the fact they are applying for approval of
a five foot fence instead of a six foot high fence. She
presented plans and photograph and outlined the type of fencing
to be installed.
Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Mr. Nazemetz to open
the meeting for public comments. Carried.
There being no public comments, Mr. McCarthy moved,
seconded by Ms. Fina to close the meeting for public comments.
Carried.
After discussion as to type and style of fencing to be
installed, Mr. Wichmann moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to approve
the application for the erection of a five foot high fence as
submitted. Carried.

�-24.

MUTH, 16 POKAHOE DRIVE-ADD TWO DORMERS.

Applicant presented affidavit of proof of mailings to
Mr. Stiloski.
Applicant stated that the house was a ranch built in the
1960's and it was their plans to add two dormers on the front of
the house, rebuild the patio and add a railing to the patio and
presented photographs showing the existing house.
Mr. Nazemetz moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy to open the
meeting for public comments. Carried.
There being no public comments, Mr. Nazemetz moved,
seconded by Mr. McCarthy to close the meeting for public comments.
Carried.
After discussion as to type of materials to be used,
type of gutters Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann
that the application be approved as submitted. Carried.
Mr. Nazemetz instructed the applicant to submit another
set of plans to Mr. Stiloski for the Village's files.
5.

ORIENTACTION HISPANA, 115 CORTLANDT STREET SIGN PERMIT.

Applicant stated that he owns several businesses and
travel out of the country and he was not here at the time the
application was put on the agenda for the first time and asked
that the Board please consider his application tonight.
Mr. Nazemetz moved, stating that the applicant's
being out of the country at the time of the first filing,
felt that consideration should be given, seconded by Mr, McCarthy.
Carried.
Applicant stated that in his haste to come to the meeting
he forgot to bring the proof of affidavit of mailings, but he
would bring them to Mr. Stiloski's office tomorrow. The Board
agreed and stated they would hear his application.
Mr. Nazemetz moved, seconded by Mr. Sachman to open
the meeting for public comments. Carried.
There being no public comments, Mr. Nazemetz moved,
seconded by Ms. Fina to close the meeting for public comments.
Carried.
Discussion followed on the signs already installed at
the building.
Mr. Sackman stated he felt the application was not
complete enough and the Board should not consider it.
Mr. Nazemetz stated that the owner of the building,
Mr. Barstow was formerly a member of the Board and should
not allow the signs to be installed prior to their being
approved by Board.

�-3Applicant stated he did not know he had to have a
permit to install the various signs, and since he travels
so much he could not appear in Court after a summons was issued.
After discussion regarding the many signs that would
probably be installed on the front of the building the Board
felt that Mr. Barstow should appear before the Board to seek
permission to install the signs.
Mr. Nazemetz moved, seconded by Mr. Sachman that Mr.
Stiloski be instructed to write to Mr. Barstow regarding the
placement of various signs on the front facade of the building.
Carried.
Ms. Fina stated that a complete application should be
submitted for the Board to review.
6.

RUBICK, 12 SPRUCE STREET-RENOVATION, ADDITION, DECK &amp; PORCH.

Mr. Rubick presented Affidavit of Proof of Mailings to
Mr. Stiloski.
Mrs. Rubick stated they had purchased the house three
years ago and have been doing quite a lot of repairs to the
interior of the building, including the removal of asbestos.
It was their intention to fix up the first floor, adding a
bathroom, remodel the kitchen, repair the porch and install an
overhang over the basement door, and to install a dry well for
drainage purposes.
Mr. Rubick presented pictures of the house and garage
which was built over fifty years ago, and was in need of repair.
He stated that originally the house was a one-family dwelling
but many years ago was converted into a two-family dwelling. He
stated the house was stucco and the new construction would be made
to match the rest of the house.
Mr. Wichmann moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy to open the
meeting for public comments. Carried.
There being no public comments, Mr. Nazemetz moved,
seconded by Ms. Fina £o close the meeting for public comments.
Carried.
Discussion followed with Board members agreeing that the
construction would be a good improvement to the property and the
area.
Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann to approve
the application as submitted. Carried.
7.

VOLPE, 2 6 HUDSON TERRACE-ALTERATION AND ADDITION.

Applicant presented Affidavit of Proof of Mailings to
Mr. Stiloski.

�-4Mr. McCarthy recused himself from participating in
this application as a relative of his lives next door.
Gemmola &amp; McWilliams, Architect's representing Mr.
Volpe stated they had appeared before the Zoning Board and
several variances have been granted. He stated that the house
is a small house next to the Sleepy Hollow High School property,
and the rear of the property abuts the acqueduct.
Architect outlined the project and presented plans
and drawings for the Board to review. He stated that the
present house has three bedrooms and they would be adding a
fourth bedroom and renovating the garage.
Mr. Nazemetz moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to open the
meeting for public comments. Carried.
There being no public comments, Mr. Nazemetz moved,
seconded by Mr. Sachman to close the meeting for public comments.
Carried.
Discussion followed regarding type of garage door to
be installed, type of construction of addition and windows
on the garage door.
Ms. Fina moved, seconded by Mr. Sackman that the
application be approved as submitted, with the addition of adding a
panel door detailed and the garage door to include windows.
Carried.
8.

POCANTICO HOMES, LOT #9-NEW CONSTRUCTION.

Mr. Kelly presented Affidavit of Proof of Mailings to
Mr. Stiloski.
Mr. Kelly and Mr. Nemeth representing the applicant
presented plans and drawings and pictures of the proposed
house.
Mr. Kelly stated that the plans for this application is
quite different then the previous plans for houses that have been
approved. He stated the house would be three stories in height,,/
with a wrap around porch, color of house will be white, and pine
trees will be planted as a buffer to Bedford Road.
Mr. Nazemetz moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy to open the
meeting for public comments. Carried.
Mr. David Fisher, 3 Birch Close, Sleepy Hollow Manor,
asked how large was the lot, how big was the area of the house
and how high was the house going to be.
Mr. Kelly answered the questions and presented the plans
for review.
There being no further public comments, Mr. McCarthy
moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to close the meeting for public comments.
Carried.

�-5Discussion followed regarding the dormer on the third
floor of the house with members agreeing they would like to see
it eliminated, and members felt that more landscaping could be
installed on the right of the house and more chimney work planned.
Ms. Fina stated she would like to see a more detailed
plan of the sides of the house as to type and amount of windows
to be installed.
Mr. McCarthy stated he felt the house should be facing
Bedford Road and felt that the rest of the community shouldn't
have to look at the side of the house, which will be quite large.
Board members discussed the size of the property and the
placement of the garage, and the stone wall that has been built.
Ms. Fina stated that the house is situated on the large
lot and felt that the house was underdesigned, and the sides
should be as beautiful as the front of the house.
Mr. Nazemetz called for a five minutes recess at 9:45 P.M
and the Board reconvened at 9:55 P.M.
After the recess, the Board members and Mr. Kelly and Mr.
Nemeth made various sketches on the plans, regarding shifting
windows, installing panelled shutters, eliminating corner and
several other minor changes.
Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to approve the
plans with the various sketches made by Board members, and that a
new submission, outlining the various changes be presented for
the Board to review at the September 24th meeting. Carried.
9. KENNEDY, HEMLOCK-NEW CONSTRUCTION-CONTINUED.
10. KENNEDY, POKAHOE DRIVE-NEW CONSTRUCTION-CONTINUED.
Mr. Escalades, Architect for the project stated they had
reviewed the items requested by the Board at the last meeting, and
have made changes as requested.
Mr. Escalades presented a larger composite of various
houses in the Manor, some of them larger than the houses proposed.
He stated that the Board had requested changes to the proposed
plans. He presented the original drawings and new drawings showing
various changes as requested by the Board. He stated that the new
drawings show height and elevations and how they compared to the
existing "Fremont House".
Mr. Escalades stated that materials would be wood shingles,
pre-painted and repainted on site and the foundations would be
concrete.
Mr. Nazemetz moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy to open the
meeting for public comments. Carried.
Mr. Nazemetz stated that the public could come forward and
review the plans, sketches and information as prsented by Mr.
Escalades.

�-6Mr. Arthur McKmly, lb Kingsland Road, representing
the Sleepy Hollow Manor Improvement Association presented a
Petition as follows:
••We the undersigned, support the recent Waterrront
Advisory Board's unanimous findings that it is inappropriate
to build 2 new houses on 1/3 acre lots subdivided on either
side of John "the Pathfinder" Fremont's historic "Pokahoe"Mansion.
We agree such development would adversely impact this remarkable and
historic property, restrict and degrade scenic views to and from
the Hudson Kiver, and rail to protect increasingly scarce open
space and plant/wildlife habitats. We call on the Village
Trustees and the Planning/Zoning/Architecture Review Boards to
enforce its Local Waterfront Revitalization Policies and to
reject improper overdevelopment of this kind."
Said petition was signed by approximately 180 residents
stated Mr. McKinly.
Mr. McKinley stated that the dast few meetings of the
Board have been a "circus" and felt that the building of these
houses was totally inappropriate.
Mr. Nazemetz stated that the sub-division had taken
place thirty years ago and that various documents had been
filed with and approved by the County of Westchester and the
Sleepy Hollow Manor Improvement Association.
Mr. McKinley stated that the Sleepy Hollow Manor
Improvement Association totally disapproves of the building
of these houses.
M|&lt;-. Trent haa previous Instated he has the original letter
sent to him by the Village ClerK dated August, 1974 stating that
the area was legally sub-divided.
Ms. Fina asked how many people in the Manor signed the
Petition.
Mr. McKinley stated that approximately 183 signatures
had been obtained but some people did not.
Suzanne Fisher -* 3 Birch Close stated that the plans
are separate issues and should be done separately. She stated
the Pokahoe house has been reduced and questioned whether the
Hemlock house has been reduced. She felt it was very confusing.
She also stated that no houses in the Manor have three car garages.
Mr. Nazemetz stated that three car garages are allowed
according "to the Zoning and Building Codes.
Mr. Kennedy stated that the comments being made a r e
repeated at every meeting.

being

Mr. Nazemetz stated that this is a public hearing and they
have the right to be heard.

�-7Ms. Fisher stated that drainage from the property
would be going into her yard and then down the ravine and
they have not considered the problem of drainage and run-off.
Mr. Escalades stated that dry wells would be installed
to help' ease the problem of drainage.
Maria Ricchiuti, 34 Hemlock Drive istated she had
spoken to the applicant and he was interested in selling
her some
property and asked that she not attend the meeting
and if she did he would not sell her the property. She stated
that the legend house is on an acre of property and felt that
the lots are too small for the size of the houses, and she does
not like the stucco finish of the houses.
Mr. Escalades stated that both houses will be shingled.
Ms. Fina stated she would like to know who Mr. Kennedy
is.
Mr. Kennedy came forward and introduced himself to the
Board.
Discussion followed regarding the placement of the
driveways and the width of the driveways.
Mr. Nazemetz stated that the house and driveway meet
all requirements of the Zoning Board.
Discussion followed regarding the winter months when
snow would be falling and members of the audience felt that
the placement of the driveways would create a nuisance when
they were plowed, they felt that snow would be plowed into the
neighbors driveways.
Mr. David Fisher, 3 Birch Close asked what the effect
of the north elevation of the house would have on the neighbors.
Mr. McKinly stated it is on a slope going down to the
river and would liku to see new elevations.
Mr. Escalades stated they have lowered the houses, the
garage is in the basement and there is a drop of over nine feet.
There being no further comments, Mr. Nazemetz moved,
seconded by Mr. McCarthy to close the meeting for public comments.
Carried.
Discussion followed regarding F A K and Mr. McCarthy stated
that FAR does not include garages, basements, stairway only living
space.
Mr. Elio DeChecchis, Real Estate Broker stated that only
living space is included in square foot area of a house.

�-8At 11:20 P.M. Mr. Nazemetz called for a five minutes
recess.
Mr. Nazemetz reconvened the meeting at 11:25 P.M.
Mr. Sackman stated he was concerned with the driveway
being so close to the other driveway.
Mr. Escalades stated they would move the driveway and.
the edge of the paving will be no closer than five feet of the
other property.
Discussion followed regarding the three car garage and Mr.
Nazemetz asked if the applicant would consider a two-car garage.
Mr. Escalades stated they felt there was a need for a
three-car garage, due to the fact that many families have three
or more cars and sometimes trucks which should be garaged.
Mr. Nazemetz moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy to approve
the application for the Hemlock Drive house with the following
comments: that the paved driveway be at least five feet from
the neighbors driveway and that the area between be landscaped.
Carried. The Board voted unanimously 4-0 to approve the Hemlock
Drive house with the Chairman not voting. Carried.
Mr. Nazemetz again stated that the construction of the
Hemlock Drive house meets all conditions of the Zoning Code.
Mr. Nazemetz moved, seconded by Mr. McCarthy to approve
the plans and application for the Pokahoe Drive house as revised
and reduced in size and that maple trees be planted as discussed.
The Board voted unanimously 4-0 to approve the Pokahoe Drive
house with the Chairman not voting. Carried.
Mr. Nazemetz again stated that the construction of the
Pokahoe Drive house meets all conditions of the Zoning Code.
It is noted that at this time the entire public exited
the Board meeting.
The Chairman commented that these houses as revised would
enhance the existing views of the Fremont House, and that all of
the revisions, in the Board's opinion, are consistent with
the policies, as outlined, by the Waterfront Advisory Board.
10.

PETER GUZY-132 BEDFORD ROAD-ADDITION AND RENOVATION.

Mr. Guzy submitted revised drawings to his application
that was submitted several months ago. He stated he has changed
the gable and extended the wood siding and is proposing a bay
window and a bigger garage.
Mr. Wichmann stated this is a major change and felt the
applicant should come back at the September meeting, in order for
the Board to review the plans and drawings.

�-9Mr. Stiloski stated that Mr. Guzy should submit a new
application, with new plans and drawings, ten days prior to
the September meeting in order for the Board to review them.
MINUTES
Mr. Nazemetz stated that the Board would review the
minutes of the.July 23rd, 2003 at the September meeting.
There being no further business to come before the
Board, Ms. Fina moved, seconded by Mr. Sachman that the same be
duly adjourned. Carried.
Respectfully
Irene Ama
Acting Clerk
11:55 P.M

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="37">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6039">
                <text>Architectural Review Board Minutes-2003</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1430">
              <text>MINS_ARB_2003-08-27</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1431">
              <text>Architectural Review Board Minutes-2003</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1432">
              <text>2003</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1433">
              <text>Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1434">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
