https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/9d7a701cda33359aff2e9458396540a3.pdf dbf9bbd3522c5d971d4b62af261808f6 PDF Text Text MINUTES OF THE PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK April 21, 1988 Present: James Galgano, Chairman, Miguel Jiminez, Roman Windas, Frank Rey, James Margotta, Building Inspector, John Hughes Jr., Village Attorney Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8:00 P.M. 1. Matter of Robert Solari, ^7 New Broadway, North Tarrytown, New York (section 17, Block 19, Lots 14, 15, 16, & 17) This is an application for a subdivision. Mr. Solari was present. Mr. Galgano raised questions regarding coverage and the fact that there are three families residing in the existing house. Mr. Solari advised that when the new house is built, one of the existing tenants will be offered an apartment in the new house. A motion was passed and the matter is being referred to the zoning Board for the requisite variances. 2. Matter of the Hackley School, 45 New Broadway, North Tarry town, New York (Lots 373 and 27*0 Mr. Sam Lochins, attorney from Duffy and Watkins , was present representing the School and advised that the school is seeking to divide the property into two parcels. There is an existing house on the property, which is used for faculty housing, and Mr, Lochins stated that the Trustees of the School have not yet decided whether they will build another house for additional faculty housing or sell one parcel. The Board had difficulty reading the map presented by the School. Mr Wiedle suggested that Mr. Lochins furnish the Board with a current dated map within the specifications of a surveyor so that the matter could �be determined more accurately and, therefore, the matter was rescheduled for the next meeting. 3. Matter of Larry Rodrigues, 56 Clinton Street, North Tarrytown. New York (Section 16, Block 4, Lots 6A, 7 and 7A) Mr. Ron T»urnquist, Architect for the project, presented three drawings - one a subdivision map and other two for the proposed building. Mr. Turnquist stated that the subdivision is on Clinton Street where Mr. Rodrigues has his office and a parking lot next door. He stated that they wanted to create a separate parcel and put up a three-story fivefamily multliple dwelling. Mr. Turnquist stated that they had been before the Board previously and were sent to the Zoning Board because a variance was required. The Zoning Board denied the variance and the project was dropped at that point. Mr. Turnquist stated that minor revisions to the project were made and they are back with the same subdivision, which still requires variances minimum lot size, front yard requirement and maximum lot coverage. Mr. Galgano advised that the same urocedure would have to be followed as before and then raised a Question concerning the first floor on the on the site plan. Mr. Turnquist stated that at the first level, there's handicapped parking, a handicapped dwelling unit on the first floor, parking for ten cars and going up to the second level, there are four duplex units. Mr. Wiedle questioned Mr. Trunquist about the need for so many variances. Mr. Turnquist stated that the lot is not large enough by zoning and that to keep the project financially viable, they needed to get the number of units. Mr. Turnquist advised the Board that originally the project did get a variance for five units. (2) �He stated that there was a problem with the survey that was presented regarding minimum dimensions. When the minimum dimensions were checked, a period of time had gone by, and the owner decided not to build the project at that time. Mr. Turnquist stated that they then went back again to planning for a subdivision and then back to zoning for exactly the same number of units and same parking, and the Zoning Board decided not to grant the permit. Mr. Galgano stated that all the variances were needed, but that parking was not sufficient. Mr. Turnquist stated that they were required to have 9 1/2 spaces, and they have ten. A motion was duly made, seconded and passed to refer the application to the Zoning Board. 4.Matter of Dominick LaCaruba The Public Notice was read by the Secretary to the Board. Donald M. Walsh, Esq. of Walsh Maroney & Ponzini (H North Broadway, ^arrytown) stated that he was representing the family restaurant project to be located at the head of Beekman Avenue and gave an overview as to the status nf the project and the various concerns that the Board expressed at the last meeting. Mr. Walsh advised that Mr. Sterlacci, the Engineer for the project, Mr. Yarabek, landscaper, and Mr. Ed Walsh from the Environmental Consulting Group were present to address any concerns concerning the project. Mr. Sterlacci addressed the Board's concerns regarding runoff. He stated that they planned to limit the runoff onto the Route 9 catch basins after the project is completed. He stated that rough calculations show that there is presently 1 \ cubic feet per second running off (3) �the property and after paving is done and trees are put in, they expect something like 2.15 cubJc feet per second. He advised that the difference between those two will be retained or detained on site in large diameter pipes. A discussion ensued, and George Lackowitz, Village Engineer, requested that Mr. Sterlacci add the longest flow path to the drawing submitted, as he was a little confused as to the direction of the longest flow path. Mr. Sterlacci indicated where the longest flow path was and agreed to add it to the drawing. Mr. Wiedle raised a question concerning the sanitary Mr. sewer, and Lackowitz advised that they would use the existing sanitary sewer. Mr. Lackowitz also stated that they tested the water supply and that the water supply is no a problem on the site. Mr. Walsh stated that they were presenting an actual landscaping plan, which is subject to DOT making changes with respect to configuration of trees, etc. Mr. Stephen A. Yarabek presented the landscaping plan. the Mr. Wiedle questioned the need for parking spaces in front of proposed He restaurant. stated that handicapped spaces, but not the others. he could understand Mr. Walsh advised the that they needed to provide an area where people could pull in and get something on a"take-out" kind of basis. be used concern for deliveries regarding parking spaces. traffic and He advised that the spaces would also garbage pick-up. congestion which may Mr. Wiedle expressed be caused by these Mr. Walsh agreed to resubmit to jurisdiction of the Planning Board if there is a finding by the Police that this does cause a problem once the restaurant is in operation. (4) i �» Mr. Wiedle questioned Mr. Yarabek about the landscaping proposed near the upper parking lot, and a discussion ensued regarding the parking lot and the ability of cars to pull in and out. A discussion was held concerning traffic going in and out of the restaurant. Mr. Walsh advised that there will be a six-foot high retaining wall in order to meet the grade in the back with a safety fence on top. Mr. Margotta stated that it's up to the Planning Board on whether they want a solid fence. Mrs. Gallo, a neighborhood resident, expressed concerns regarding exhaust, hours of operation, liquor license, parking and noise. Mr Wash advised that they would be serving wine and beer and addressed her other concerns. A motion was duly made, seconded and passed to close the public Hearing until May 19, 1988. Mr. Walsh requested the Board's approval for the Building Inspector to issue his normal permits to start work on the interior of the building. After discussion, the Board was agreeable to this. 5. Matter of Samuel Vieira, 40 Church Street, to?feft Tarrytown, New York. Mr. Vieira was present and stated that they intend to demolish the existing building and build a new one more to the center of the property and would like to divide the property into two parcels. Mr. Galgano questioned Mr. Margotta concerning coverage, which was within the limits, and he advised Mr. Vieira to come in with the site plans and they would have a subdivision. A motion was duly made, seconded and passed to accept the minutes (5) �of the meeting of March 10th as written. A motion was duly made, second and passed to close the meeting, • (o) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1988 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1988-04-21 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1988 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1988