https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/e56fc92f8302ae73ea0a8e131032134a.pdf 7e0b44908daa59b4ee4be4c9f069c218 PDF Text Text _•' v .. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK May 26, 1988 Present: Jim Galgano, Chairman, John O'Leary, Frank Rey, Miguel Jiminez Jim Margotta, Building Inspector, John Hughes, Jr. Village Attorney Chairman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8:00 P.M. 1. Matter of Sosa Construction Company, 40 Church Street, Tarrytown, N.Y. The notice of public hearing, attached hereto, was read by the Secretary of the Board. Mr. Brian Slavin owns property north on Hudson terrace and he is concerned about the subdivision. The sewer line and water line cross his property without easement. He would like to know if the developer is going Jbo remove the line. The sewer line is totally shot and goes across his iront lawn. Mr. Sam Vieira, President of Sosa Construction Company, said "his company wants to connect new sewer lines into Hudson Terrace. A copy of the plans were given to all Board members. There were questions on the parking. There will be four parking spaces per house. Mrs. Slavin wanted to know the side yard requirements of the proposed residences. Mr. Vieira said 12' total will be provided. There will be 10 bedrooms and 8 parking spots. There being no further comments, Mr. Galgano moved to close the public hearing. Mr. Frank Rey moved to approve the subdivision. The motion was seconded by Mr. O'Leary and passed unanimously. A resolution pursuant to SEQR was also approved and is attached hereto. 2. Matter of Demetrio's Kringas. Mr. Kringas represented by Mr. Tom McKenna, Attorney and Mr. Michael R. Sterlacci, P.E. The property is within the R-3 Zone. The property has an area which will be split into 2 lots. Lot 1 is 5 Condos in the front with access off of Webber Ave. and 1 1/2 parking spaces per unit. Lot 2 becomes a flag lot with 12 1/2' driveway. Mr. Galgano asked about zoning variances. They said none were needed and that is all one lot. They are only utilizing one lot. Mr. Galgano asked how many bedrooms in each unit? They answered there will be approximately 10 bedrooms. In the 2 story condo, they are proposing three 2 bedroom units. There was a big concern for providing the proper amount of parking. Jim Margotta, the Building Inspector, said that �r • he plans show no dimensions for the front, side and rear yards and that here is no indication as to the lot coverage. In order to determine the number of required parking spaces, the number of bedrooms should be indicated. Mr. Margotta asked where the sewer and water lines go, and whether they need easements for this. Mr. Sterlacci said utilities run to Webber Avenue. The new condos will have their own sewers. It was suggested that they go before the Zoning Board. There was a motion made to have the Building Inspector review the plans. The motion was carried. 3. Matter of Country Manor Homes. Walsh, Esq. • The applicant was represented by Donal A preliminary meeting was held to show the proposed plan going through the Zoning Board. Thirteen units were granted variances. They had requested variances for sixteen units but only 13 were granted. They have retained a landscape architect to do a plan for this lot. The parking should be kept as if it were for sixteen units but there would only be thirteen. Mr. Thomas P. Marsala, the owner, was introduced to give a conceptional plan of the building. Each unit will have a garage and a utility room in the back. There were concerns about fire, the fire trucks ability to get in. A letter was read about the fire hazards, the major concern being the fire hydrants and sprinkler system. There was also concern about the removal of one parking space. They have already had a fire flow test on Pocantico and there doesn't seem to be a problem with the fire flow. Mr. Walsh said they had received their variances from the 2BA. Mr. Galgano wanted to have all the information when they hold a public Rearing. The landscaper, Mr. Steve Yarabek, gave an overview of the landscaping, which was a concern of the people in the area. The proposal was to create a buffer and enclose the entire area with a 6' screen fence and plant trees. Mr. Galgano asked how many entrances there will be. There will be one entrance. Mr. Walsh asked for a public hearing before the next meeting. Mr. Galgano suggested June 16, 19 88, for the public hearing. The motion for the public hearing was passed for June 16, 1988. 4. Matter of La Caruba Restaurant. Walsh, Esq. The applicant was represented by Donal There were a number of issues discussed. There was a concern in the last meeting about the parking for handicap and the loading zone parking. There was also concern about the parking on the upper level the last two spaces on Bedford Road. It was suggested to keep these two spaces for employees. The board members all received copies of the plans. The building inspector wants an adequate loading area. Mr. Walsh asked the board to approve the parking subject to DOT's approval. They said they would watch the handicap and loading zone parking. Also the building would be brick red with the proper lighting. The signage would be subject to approval of the appropriate Village agency. Mr. O'Leary wanted to know about the landscaping. Mr. Yarabek described the shrubbery he is going to use and the flowering pear trees along Beekman Ave. His goal is to create tiers of green along Beekman Ave. Mr. Walsh read a letter from the Department of Transportation. There were questions about parking areas, ^^there were no provisions of off street loading, the applicant will set ^jaside parking space #11 for that. Mr. Galgano brought up a question about the cooking odors. Mr. Walsh said they were working on this but nothing is �iool proof yet. Mr. Walsh said this restaurant was mainly for breakfast ind lunch and that the odors would not be a problem. Mr. O'Leary has another question about the landscaping. There will be a short wall with a fence on top. Mr. O'Leary also wanted to know the exact color red the restaurant will be. The board would like a sample of the color. Mr. Walsh agrees to provide this. Jim Margotta asks a question about the traffic flow problem. What happens if there is a parking problem is that parking will be suspended and that matter will be referred back to the Planning Board. Mr. Margotta wants the Village of North Tarrytown to have some say about the parking not just the police department. There was a request by Mr. Rey for a "No Left Turn" sign on Hudson Terrace. Mr. Walsh said this was brought up to DOT and they will do what DOT suggests. the plan the board is studying is over one year old and they requested a new one. Mr. Walsh said he will have the architect draw up a correct plan for the administrator or Mr. Galgano. There are two big things that are holding up the restaurant: The health department and the DOT Report. Frank Rey wants to prohibit a left hand turn on Hudson Terrace. Mr. Walsh agrees to work with them on anything they want. Mr. Hughes wants to add that the signage is subject to approval of the Village Board. That the exterior of the building will be a real brick facade. A resolution shall be forwarded to the Department of Health as to the odors from the restaurant. The Westchester Board of Health will decide what to do about the previous gas tanks that were there. The site plan will be amended to show no left turn on to Hudson Terrace. A resolution incorporating all elements of the approval was read. Mr. Galgano moves grant site plan approval according to The resolution was carried hthe terms and conditions of the resolution. inanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 9:40 P.M. • �PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN RESOLUTION: SITE PLAN PROPOSED: OWNER: LOCATION: APPROVAL RESTAURANT DOMINICK LA CARUBA ROUTE 9 at BEDFORD ROAD 276 NORTH BROADWAY WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarrytown has reviewed an application for final site plan approval pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article VJII, Site Plan Review to construct a restaurant, including related off-street parking, landscaping, storm drainage and other supporting utilities and facilities, on a site approximately 2319 square feet in size, as shown on one drawing prepared in the offices of Anastasia & Associates and Hudson-Pacific Designs and identified as follows: 1. SP-1 Site & Location Plans With Notes & Legend - dated 7/16/87, Final Version filed 5/19/88; 2. Landscaping Plan WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as lead agency pursuant to provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, the Planning Board has made the following findings and caused, noted or conducted the following activities: 1. Billed an application fee of $380.00 for the unit under review; 2. Caused field inspections to be made of the property under review and surrounding area; 3. Requested and received reports from Village authorities and/or the applicant on such matters as water supply, sewage disposal, storm drainage, fire safety, and parking. iJ. Acting as lead agency, requested, received and reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR. 5. As lead agency for site plan and subdivision review in the Village of North Tarrytown, the Planning Board, after review of said field conditions, recommendations and environmental assessment form as well as other matters noted above, has determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted type and hereby issues a "negative declaration ," determination of non-significance and environmental impact for this Unlisted action; and WHEREAS, in the opinion of the planning Board the applicant has complied with the Village's Development Regulations except as may be noted below; �NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan application and site plan drawings noted above be and hereby are granted site plan approval and that the applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Scairman, or as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of this plan drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in the offices of the Village Building Department for purposes of obtaining a building code requirements, provided however that this approval shall expire six (4) months from the date of this resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and the applicant has not obtained a building permit: 1. Utilities - Storm drainage, water supply and sewage disposal have been approved by the Planning Board's consultant. 1.1 Storm water runoff complies with the Planning Board's policy of "zero" increase in rate of runoff. 1.2 The applicant has submitted a written report, with back-up calculations indicating his intention to provide adequate fire flow, water supply and pressure for the site. 1.3 All final utilities including conditions noted above shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Board's and its designated engineering consultant. 2. Exterior Lighting - All exterior light structures shall be screened so as to prevent glare upon adjacent properties. 3. All driveways and parking areas shall be contained by poured-inplace reinforced concrete curbs. *i. The Village PLanning Board approves the location of thirteen of the requested off-street parking spaces plus one loading zone space. The town northern most parking spaces in the upper lot shall be designated 'small cars' only. The two southeast spaces in the lower parking area shall be designated 'handicapped parking* only. The easternmost parking space on the lower lot shall be designated 'loading' only. 5- The parking, curb cuts and landscaping approvals herein are contingent on the approval of the State Department of Transportation. 6. The applicant agrees that should the Village determine the presentlyapproved parking and traffic flow plan causes a future severe traffic problem, said determination to be made by the planning Board or its designated agent, then the Planning Board may suspend such parking as is duly permitted in the lower lot ancl cause same to be removed in a manner approved by the Planning Board. This suspension shall not effect either state-mandated handicapped parking or the loading space. In the case of said suspension, applicant agrees to submit to the jurisdiction of this board for reconsideration of alternatives. �ft _ '. Review Fees - The applicant shallpay to the Village of North Tarrytown: 7.1 An inspection fee for construction inspection of the proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage system, sewage, landscaping, lighting and other site plan elements for compliance with the approved site plan in the amount of $2500.00 7.2 A site plan escrow account pursuant to SEQR and in the amount of $5,000.00 or four percent of the total project cost, whichever is less, which shall be used for consulting services rendered in the review of this project. 7.3 A recreation fee of $1,000.00 for the acquisition of recreation facilities pursuant to statute. 7.4 The above fees shall be paid prior to the signing of the final site plan by the Chairman. 8. The Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field inspection of the project after construction of the facilities upon notice of the Building Inspector but before the issuance of a certificate of occupany. The purpose of this final inspection is to review the development and to require any modifications to parking, landscaping, signs, drainage, access, paving and other site plan details as built if same do not comply with the approved plan. The applicant shal.i maintain all elements of the approved site plan including landscaping in a neat and healthy condition so as to retain an approved certificate of occupancy. 9. The final site plan review shall be accomplished by the Planning Board's engineering consultant and shall incorporate all applicable conditions of this resolution and the construction standards of the Village of North Tarrytown as they may be appropriate. 3a. /Iff / r W ^ ^ L J-£(Jj?g^ / u £ m e s Galgano, Planning/Board Chairman � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1988 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_1988-05-26 Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1988 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1988