<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="2395" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/items/show/2395?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-19T08:57:42+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="2395">
      <src>https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/672bcd1a0bbbb324725ff78b6cffb780.pdf</src>
      <authentication>e75c559547703848334610c11913e2e4</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="20882">
                  <text>/

MINUTES OF THE NORTH TARRYTOWN PLANNING BOARD
VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK

October 29, 1987

Present:
Chairman James Galgano
Miguel Jimenez
Frank Rey
Ray Windas
R. Thomas Homan, Village Administrator
James Margotta, Building Inspector
John Hughes, Village Attorney

Chariman Galgano called the meeting to order at 8:10 P.M..
1.

PROPOSED CHESTNUT STREET DEVELOPMENT-FRANK MANGIERI'S SITE PLAN
Mr. Walsh, representing Mr. Mangieri, approuched the board with the

matter of parking. It was noted that the variances are all ready in place,
and- that parking has now been removed and four (4) designated spaces have
been set aside in the adjoining lot. This is the only matter that will
require an additional variance which the board will have to recommend to
the DZA.
The developers have the buildings, parking, and the designated number
of parking places as were agreed upon. They also have the agreement on the
easement, from

Crass Realty. This is contingent on The Village providing

the exact size and George Lackowitz will be meeting with them on this
matter. Right now, it runs parallel to the parking and about ten (10) feet
in.

Mr. Walsh said that this is land that we are turning over to The Village

with a permanent easement.
It was asked for the record what remaining areas the board was
concerned with. Chairman Galgano stated that the main concern was
over sanitation, sewers, and rainfall run-off. Chairman Galgano asked
how much run-off would there be. George replied 1.2 CFS storm water run-off
under existing conditions. Hydraulic rainfall run-off calculations are
being performed by the developer, per Georges' request. The board requested
that at post development

that the developers maintain 1.2 CFS. The developers

are proposing to put in one hundred forty (140) feet of thirty six (36) inch
diameter pipeline which will act to retain storm water. This will meter

(1)

�(2)

the water into the North Tarrytown drainage system. George pointed out

*

that this is the problem of the adjoining properties and the sewers' downstream, particularly Gestner Place, whether they can handle all the drainage
as it exists right now. It was noted that the Public Works crew will look
into this matter, and see if there is enough capacity on Gestner Place.
They will take elevation measurements to determine the slope and capacity
of the Gestner and Chestnut sewers. Mike stated that he half expected to
resolve this matter today, and have all the figures available.
Now that it is known how much water they are putting into the system,
we need to know whether or not the system can take it. It was also stated
that before any new sewers were hooked up, the board wanted to be sure that
they weren't being overloaded.
The main concerns are therefor:
1. Getting a consensus for the use of the adjoining property, approved by
the Zoning Board.
2'. An amended plan, dealing with two (2) separate easements, one (1) of which
will be used for parking.
3. A resolution or findings was asked for dealing with the landscaping,
dimensions on driveway, parking both on-site and on the adjoining site.
Mr. Walsh asked for guidance from the board, so that he may go back
to th ZBA, showing that he moved the four (4) spaces into the adjoining
property.
Chairman Galgano asked for any comments. Mr. Mangieri noted the
variance for the curb cut was not used for access, but will keep it and it
meets all citizens comments. Chairman Galgano stated that more water work
be performed by George, and also to review those facts prior to preliminary.
The board agreed to the preliminary layout.
Let the record show that without the drainage, it meets concerns, and
the easement will be donated and the use of the land on the adjoining property.
Approved by-Chaiman Galgano.

2.

PHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL-ROBINS NEST DAYCARE

Chairman Galgano asked if they have the Resolution. Tom Homan said that
it was sent out and proceeded to hand out copies to all concerned. Chairman
Galgano stated that the final site plan approval for The Robins Nest Daycare

�w

^

(3)

I
Center at Phelps needed minor changes on the final resolution. (See Attached).
Chairman Galgano read The Public Notice regarding Robins Nest Daycare Center,
and that a hearing will be held by The Planning Board of The Village of
North Tarrytown on

October 29, 1987 for the application submitted by

Phelps Memorial regarding The Robins' Nest Daycare. Tonight we met for the
final approval of Robin's Nest. The premises are known as North Broadway,
Route 9, North Tarrytown, and are also known as Tax map Section 11, Block 1,
Map 3A.
George noted that the following additions were to be made to the Resolution
(See Attached Resolution).
George stated that we have a survey performed by Wine &amp; Grade South of
100 Mitchell Drive, Somers, New York. This drawing contains the documentation
requested on the drainage from The Robins' Nest Site.
Mike Amatto asked about the proposed fire protection system. George
said that it was 1.8 on the attached resolution. "Three sheets titled "Site Plan"
by Perillo Associates dated October 16, 1987.
Tom Homan asked if there were any outstanding issues for the satisfactory
site plan. George stated that all the information

for the fire protection

system, including;
1. A layout in plan of the proposed water main, fire hydrants, fire pumps, and
tanks,
2. The dimensions of the tanks, flow and pressure rating of the fire pumps,
3.The hydraulic calculations of the proposed water distribution system showing
that it would meet the required volume and duration of flow,
have all been provided.
A stamped set of drawings was provided for Jim Margottas' file.
The required reading of the resolution was WAIVED. There was a motion to
approve the changes in the resolution. It was unanimously approved by all members
present.

3.

NORTH TARRYTOWN ASSOCIATES SITE PLAN

Chairman Galgano reviewed what had been discussed at the last meeting;
1. The possibility of emergency exits, (A Public Hearing will have to take place
on this ) ,

�(A)

2. The sanitary sewers and there possible problems.
George was asked to give a run down on this, and he found that the sanitary
sewer has had a history of cronic back-ups on New Broadway, a build up of roots
in the sewer system, even though it had been cleaned out four (4) years ago.
It was noted that it ran well for a period of three (3) years, but after that time
the roots seemed to be coming back again, clogging the sewer. George stated that
cleaning it out again would be a "Band-aid" solution, meaning that the problem
would only reappear in a matter of time. The preferred solution would be to
go in and renovate (re-build) that portion of the sewer. Slope information
was obtained on that protion of the sewer and it was noted to have the lowest
capacity of the system. Until we have this problem completely corrected, there
is concern over adding any additional load.
George reccomended putting in a new line at a cost of approximately
$75,000.00. The cost to clean it would run about $1000.00. It was also noted
that the problem of the back-up could be caused by the slope of the New Broadway
sewer. George

was concerned over adding any additional load to the sewer, until

it was certain that the problem was due only to the roots. The capacity of the
New Broadway sewer was about 2.5 CFS, whereas the capacity of the Webber Ave. sewer
was about 3.5 CFS. George said that he will personally check the slopes himself,
because he is concerned about the conditions and the 1% difference in the capacity.
Mr. Kroco prepared an overlay

showing fourteen (14) units in all. Mr. Kroco

added an additional unit, bringing the total number of units to fifteen (15).
The additional unit would have one (1) parking space and one (1) garage. The
developers will make a catch contribution to the Village of $24,000.00, on
the condition that they can proceed from here as planned and not waste any more
time. More firm language was asked for, and a Public Hearing was asked for on the
entire matter, to be held within two (2) weeks.

4.

VALLEY STREET SITE-LARRY RODRIQUES* SITE PLAN

Chairman Galgano stated that we needed a flow sink, water and sewer, etc.
Mr. Turnquist, speaking for Mr. Rodrigues,
parking

stated that ther would be additional

off-site on Valley St. What they are propossing is a multi-dwelling

building:
1. Level one (1) Office space
2. Level two (2) The ingress and egress from Depyster would have additional

�(5)

outside parking.
3. Level three (3) would be a two (2) story dwelling,
It was noted that the off-site parking would be metered parking. On-site
there will be

thirty-two (32) spaces. Off-site the additional three (3), required by

the board.
The calculations for the ISO (required 2700 gallons for fire fighting).
It was suggested to install a sprinkler system.
Chairman Galgano asked what the height of the building would be. It was
noted that from Valley Street it was 42-43 feet (which is just under the
maximum for zoning, which is 45 feet). The back is two (2) stories. Chairman
Galgano stated that the presentation tonight is just a repitition of past meetings.
The developers stated that they have met with the Village Engineers and
the Planning Consultant, and that they were just bringing the Board up to date
on the finalization on the site work. They have the ISO calculations.
It was asked if the gas station was now out of service. Tom responded
by saying that the tanks are to be removed.
Tom stated that the parking was tight. From curb to curb it was 44 feet,
with an 18 foot ingress and egress.
Chairman Galgano asked if there was going to be any excavating.

He expressed

concern about digging into the bank. It was stated that the excavation would be
six (6) feet behind the building to about eighteen (18) feet

to the north end

of the property.
It was also

noted that the site consists of various lots, all owned

by one (1) owner. (Lots 6A-8, as per Zoning). There is no need to sub-divide
the properties.
Chairman Galgano stated that until we get more figures, The Planning Board
cannot even give a preliminary approval of the site plan.
Chairman Galgano also said that we are going to get a motion from a
Lead Agency. The resolution was read ; It is hereby resolved, pursuant to
Section 617.6 of The Code of The Rules and Regulations that the Planning Board
of The Village of North Tarrytown designated itself to be the Lead Agent to consider
the environmental

impacts of the Rodrigues - Valley St. project. There was a

motion by Mr. Rey, seconded by Mr. Jimenez.

(Motion approved.)

There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 P.M.,
until November 18, 1987.

�(6)

Respectfully submitted,

(jLAA-T^
Ann D'Incecco

VAJ&amp;UIA^

�c-

y?-r&gt;
PLANNING BOARD
VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN
RESOLUTION:

SITE PLAN APPROVAL
PROPOSED CBILD CARE CENTER AT PHELPS
APPLICANT: PHELPS COMMUNITY CORPORATION
ARCHITECT: PELLATON 6 CHAPMAN
SITE ENGINEERS: DOLPH ROTFELD, ENGINEERING
LOCATION: PHELPS HOSPITAL GROUNDS
APPLICATION #:

WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Village of North Tarry town
has reviewed an application for site plan approval of a
not-for-profit day care center to be located on a portion of the
Phelps Memorial Hospital grounds east of the Hospital and west of
Route 9; and
WHEREAS, in the course of its review and acting as Lead
Agency in this site plan review, the Planning Board has conducted
the following activities and made the following findings and
determinations in accordance with Article 8 of the Environmental
Conservation Law (SEQR):
1.

The application consists of the following documents:
1.1

A topographic and property boundary map entitled Total
Site Plan Locating Project, The Robin's Nest Child Care
Center, Phelps Memorial Hospital, North Tarrytown, New
York, by Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, Tarrytown, New
York, Scale 1" * 50*, dated Pebruary 25, 1987;

1.2

A site plan entitled "Site Grading/Utilities Plan, The
Robin's Nest Child Care Center at Phelps, North
Tarrytown, New York", prepared in the office of Dolph
Rotfeld Engineering, P.C., 555 White Plains Road,
Tarrytown, New York 10591, dated 3/2/87, Sheet 1 of 1;

1.3

Schematic (Building) Elevations, The Robin's Nest Child
Care Center at Phelps, North Tarrytown, New York, Owner
Approved Schematic, Scale 1/8" » 1', dated 11/20/86,
last revised 12/3/86, Drawing #32, Job 8667;

1.4

A 2-page letter to Jim Galgano, Chairman of the
Planning Board, Village of North Tarrytown, dated March
10, 1987 and signed by Victoria Miller, Assistant Vice
President, Planning, for Phelps;

�1.5

A packet of written material including:
1. Standard Village application;
2. Project narrative;
3. Various letters of support from
social services agencies involved;

insurance

and

1.6

The 13-page(+) statistical appendices (traffic impact
study) prepared by Raymond Parish Pine &amp; Weiner, Inc.,
dated March 1987;

1.7

Several additional drawings entitled Total Site Plan,
Project Site Plan, Schematic Floor Plans, Elevations,
Schematic Elevations and two views;

1.8

Three sheets titled "Site Plan" by Perillo Associates
dated October 16, 1987;

1.9.

"Site Plan and Details for the Robin's Nest" by Roger
A. Pellaton, dated October 12, 1987;

After study of the above maps and information the Planning
Board has caused, found and determined that, among other
matters:
2.1

There is a need for day care facilities in Westchester
County as expressed by the following statistics:
2.1.1

In recent years women from all social and
economic levels have entered the labor force in
record numbers;

2.1.2

If current trends continue, within a few years,
64 percent of all families with children will
include working mothers and nearly 20 percent of
these children will live in single parent
families;

2.1.3

Currently in Westchester
there are 50,000
children under the age of 12 whose mothers work.
The County's 97 day care and family care centers
serve less than 5,000 of these children. There
is a strong need for child care facilities in
Westchester•

2.1.4

The child care center proposed will be a
not-for-profit operation to primarily support
the greater North Tarrytown community.

2

�2.1.5

The center will operate year-round, Monday
through Friday, from 6:45 AM to 6:45 PM. The
center will be licensed by the State of New York
and have an initial capacity for 100 children.

2.1.6

Enrollment
follows:

priority

Phelps employees
Corporate supporters
Community residents
(with priority to
North Tarrytown)

will

be

allocated

as

50 percent
25 percent

25 percent;

and
3.

Conducted or caused field inspections to be made of the site
so as to ascertain field conditions; and

4.

Requested and received reports from Village authorities
and/or the applicant on such matters as water supply, sewage
disposal, drainage, fire safety and police protection and
traffic impact; and

5.

Recognized that the Board of Trustees of the Village of North
Tarrytown has recently amended the Village Zoning Ordinance
to permit the construction of a child care center as an
accessory use within the Hospital H zone; and

6.

Acting as Lead Agency, requested, • received and reviewed an
Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with SEQR;
and

7.

As Lead Agency for site plan review in the Village of North
Tarrytown, the Planning Board, after review of said field
conditions and Environmental Assessment Form and other
matters noted above, has determined that the proposed action
is an unlisted
type and
hereby
issues a "Negative
Declaration", determination of non-significant environmental
impact for this unlisted action; and

8.

As a result of the above and after public hearing granted
preliminary site plan approval with conditions, by resolution
dated July 30, 1987; and

9.

Received an application for final site plan review from the
applicant which was presented before the Planning Board on
October 29, 1987; and

3

�WHEREAS, in the opinion of the Planning Board the applicant
has complied with the Village's development regulations except as
may be noted below;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan
application and site plan be and hereby is granted approval and
that the applicant may obtain the endorsed approval of the
Planning Board Chairman or, as an alternate, the Village
Administrator, on a copy of said site plan resolution and upon the
final site plan drawing revised as necessary to show compliance
with the following conditions, which endorsement shall permit
filing in the Village Building Department office for purposes of
obtaining a Building Permit in accordance with this resolution and
all Building Code requirements provided, however, that this
approval shall expire six (6) months from the date of this
resolution if the following modifications and conditions have not
been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board and/or
the applicant has not obtained a Building Permit:
1.

The building is approved for a use or uses permitted in the
Hospital H District as a child day care center. Any revised
use, or change in accessory use will require further site
plan approval.

2.

All conditions of the Planning Board's resolution of
preliminary approval shall remain in effect as deemed
appropriate by the Planning Board.

3.

A recreation fee of $5,000 shall be submitted to the Village
for the acquisition or maintenance of recreation facilities
in the vicinity of the project and available for use by users
of the housing facilities.

4.

The Planning Board reserves the right to make a final field
inspection of the site after construction of the facilities
but before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The
purpose of this final inspection is to review the development
for compliance with this resolution and the Village Site Plan
Regulations and to require any modifications to parking,
landscaping, signs, drainage, access, paving, and other site
plan details in the interest of safety, convenience,
enjoyment of peace and quiet of adjacent neighbors and
aesthetics. The applicant shall maintain all elements of the
approved site plan including landscaping in a neat and
healthy condition so as to retain an approved Certificate of
Occupancy.

4

�BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that prior to a further approval for
any development on the Phelps Hospital property the Hospital shall
submit a plan for improvement and upgrading of the Hospital wat^r
supply facilities as recommended by the Village Water and Pi re
Department.

Datevl
ateU

Planning B&lt;ird Chairman
James JGalgano,
G

PEW/3:go
10/28/87

5

�PLANNING BOARD
VILLAGE OP NORTH TARRYTOWN
RESOLUTION:

SITE PLAN/CLUSTER SUBDIVISION APPROVAL
PROPOSED: 15 UNITS OP TOWNHOUSING
OWNER: NORTH TARRYTOWN ASSOCIATES
LOCATION:
BEDFORD ROAD ACCESS (AMOS STREET,
WEBBER AVENUE)
TAX DESIGNATION:
SECTION 1 7 , BLOCK 7 , LOTS 2 A - 1 ,
3 , 4 , 4A, 5 , 6, 7 and 8
ZONING:
APPLICATION #

WHEREAS, t h e P l a n n i n g Board o f t h e V i l l a g e o f North
Tarrytown h a s r e v i e w e d an a p p l i c a t i o n f o r s i t e p l a n approval
and r e l a t e d s u b d i v i s i o n a p p r o v a l p u r s u a n t t o Z o n i n g Ordinance
A r t i c l e V I I I , S i t e P l a n Review and A r t i c l e XIV, M o d i f i c a t i o n o f
Zoning i n C o n n e c t i o n w i t h S u b d i v i s i o n R e v i e w by t h e P l a n n i n g
B o a r d , and t h e V i l l a g e S u b d i v i s i o n R e g u l a t i o n s t o c o n s t r u c t 15
u n i t s o f s i n g l e - f a m i l y h o u s i n g i n t h r e e and f o u r u n i t a t t a c h e d
s t r u c t u r e s , including related o f f - s t r e e t parking, landscaping,
s t o r m d r a i n a g e and o t h e r s u p p o r t i n g u t i l i t i e s and f a c i l i t i e s ,
on a s i t e a p p r o x i m a t e l y two a c r e s i n s i z e , a s shown on f i v e
d r a w i n g s p r e p a r e d i n t h e o f f i c e s o f J o s e p h R. C r o c c o , A r c h i t e c t
and Howard L i e b e r m a n , C o n s u l t i n g E n g i n e e r , and i d e n t i f i e d a s
follows:
1.

S-1 S i t e Plan - l a s t r e v i s e d 1 1 / 4 / 8 7 ,

2.

Site
20 • ;

3.

S-3 S i t e P l a n , Landscaping - l a s t r e v i s e d

4.

S i t e P l a n , Grading, Preliminary
s c a l e of 1" = 2 0 ' , undated;

5.

D e t a i l s , undated, and

Plan,

Grading

-

last

WHEREAS, in the course of
agency pursuant to provisions of
Conservation Law, the Planning
findings
and
caused,
noted
activities:

revised

scale

8/7/87,

for

1" » 2 0 ' ;
scale

of

1" *

8/7/87;

Site

Plan

Review,

its review and acting as lead
Article 8 of the Environmental
Board has made the following
or
conducted
the
following

1.

Received an application fee of $250.00 paid for the
15 dwelling units and theoretical subdivision lots under
review;

2.

Caused field inspections to be made of the property under
review and surrounding area;

�3,

4„

Requested and reviewed a conventional
of the property, held a public hearing
Article XIV, Modification of Zoning
Subdivision Review by the Planning
determination that:

subdivision design
thereon pursuant to
in Connection with
Board and made a

1.

The proposed development will be consistent with the
Comprehensive Development Plan and with the Official
Map of the Village.

2.

The maximum population density will be no greater than
would otherwise be permitted by the regulations of the
district in which it is located.

3.

The land coverage will not exceed the coverage which
would otherwise be permitted by the regulations for
the district in which it is located.

4.

The appropriate use of
adequately safeguarded.

adjoining

land

will

be

Conducted or caused field inspections to be made of the
site so as to ascertain field conditions and determined
that:
4. 1 The site is steeply sloped downwards from Bedford
Road northward toward Webber Avenue;
4. 2 The New York State Department of Transportation and
the Westchester County Department of Public Works
find the project's access to Bedford Road (County
Route 448) acceptable;
4.3

The frontage along Webber Avenue is extremely steep;

4.4

The access via Amos Street would put further traffic
burdens upon that already crowded street; and

4.5

In consideration of the above, the best access is via
the southwesterly frontage of Bedford Road.

5.

Requested and received reports from Village authorities
and/or the applicant on such matters as water supply,
sewage disposal, storm drainage, fire safety, police
protection, traffic impact and access safety.

6„

Referred the development proposal to the Westchester
County Department of Planning pursuant to Sections 239 1,
m and n of the General Municipal Law.

7,

Acting as lead agency, requested, received and reviewed an
Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in compliance with
SEQR.

2

�8.

As lead agency for site plan and subdivision review in the
Village of North Tarrytown, the Planning Board, after
review of said field conditions, recommendations and
environmental assessment form as well as other matters
noted above, has determined that the proposed action is an
Unlisted type and hereby issues a "negative declaration"
determination of non-significance and environmental impact
for this unlisted action; and

WHEREAS, in the opinion of the Planning Board the
applicant
has
complied
with
the Village's
Development
Regulations except as may be noted below;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said site plan
application and site plan drawings noted above be and hereby
are granted site plan approval and that the applicant may
obtain the endorsed approval of the Planning Board Chairman or,
as an alternate, the Village Administrator, on a copy of this
site plan resolution and upon the final linen copy of the site
plan drawing revised as necessary to show compliance with the
following conditions, which endorsement shall permit filing in
the offices of the Village Building Department for purposes of
obtaining a building permit in accordance with this resolution
and all building code requirements, provided, however, that
this approval shall expire one (1) year from the date of this
resolution if the following modifications and conditions have
not been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Board
and/or the applicant has not obtained a building permit:
1.

Use - The site plan is approved for a maximum of 15 units
of housing as shown on the site plan.
Accessory uses
shall be those permitted in the. zoning district within
which the property is located.

2.

Utilities - Storm drainage, water supply and sewage
disposal shall be approved by the Planning Board or its
design engineering representative:
2.1

Storm water runoff shall comply with the Planning
Board's policy of "zero" increase in rate of runoff.

2.2

The applicant shall submit a written report, with
back-up calculations indicating his intention to
provide adequate fire flow, water supply and pressure
for the site.

2.3

The applicant shall designate storm water catch
basins where and as approved by the Planning Board.

2.4

As suggested by the applicant, the applicant shall
contribute $75,000 at the time of issuance of the
building permit, to be used for improvements to the
Village's sanitary sewerage system below the site in
order to mitigate impacts of the proposal upon the
system.

3

�2.5

All utilities including conditions noted above shall
be reviewed and approved by the Planning Board or its
designated engineering consultant.

2.6

The applicant shall discuss with the New York State
Department of Transportation the feasibility of
providing a deceleration lane on Bedford Road for
vehicles traveling southeast wishing to enter the
site. Such deceleration lane shall be constructed if
approved by the New York State Department of
Transportation.

3.

Safety - The Village Fire Department has indicated the
desire for emergency access via Amos Street. For purposes
of safety, screening of vehicle lights and to restrict the
casual use of the emergency access, yet to make it
possible for emergency vehicles to gain entrance the
applicant shall install a five (5) foot tall cedar
stockade-type fence, with evergeen shrub plantings where
it can be viewed from Amos Street, to extend (finished
side out) along the entire easterly property line to
points approximately seventy-five
(75) feet in from
Bedford Road and Webber Avenue so as not to interfere with
traffic sight distances. The fence shall include a locking gate, capable of being opened at least ten (10) feet
wide, to make it possible for fire, police or ambulance
vehicles to gain access. The emergency access shall be
used only for emergency vehicles and neither the gate or
Amos Street shall be used for construction vehicles, site
workers vehicles or occupants of.the site during or after
construction.
A temporary fence may be provided during
construction but the permanent fence shall be in place
prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. No
trees greather than 6" caliper shall be removed during the
fence installation and the alignment of the fence may be
adjusted as reasonably necessary to achieve its purposes.

4.

Landscaping - All landscaping shown on the site plan shall
Ee maintained in a healthy growing condition so as to
maintain the certificate of occupancy.
A typical landscaping plan around one of the buildings shall be
submitted for approval by the Planning Board or its
designated representative. Final review of tree cutting
shall be made by the Village Tree Committee.

5.

Exterior Lighting - All exterior light structures shall be
screened so as to prevent glare upon adjacent properties.

6.

All driveways and parking areas shall be contained by
stone set in concrete or poured-in-place reinforced
concrete curbs. All parking for occupants and users of
the project shall be confined to the site.

4

�7.

Review Fees - The applicant shall pay to the Village of
North Tarrytown:
7.1

An inspection fee for construction inspection of the
proposed site plan to include buildings, drainage
system, sewage, landscaping, lighting and other site
plan elements for compliance with the approved site
plan in the amount of $5,000.00.

7.2

A site plan escrow account pursuant to SEQR and in
the amount of $5,000.00 or such specific amount which
is billed to the Village and approved and paid for
consulting services rendered in the review of this
project, whichever is the greater amount.

7.3

A recreation fee of $1,000.00 per dwelling or
$15,000.00 for the acquisition or maintenance of
recreation facilities in the vicinity of the project
and available for use by occupants of the housing
facilities.

7.4

The above fees shall be paid prior to the signing of
the final site plan by the Chairman.

8.

Performance Guarantee - Prior to the issuance of a certif icate of! occupancy, the applicant shall complete the
construction of all facilities shown on the site plan to
the satisfaction of the Building Inspector. Alternatively,
the applicant shall post a bond in an amount to be
determined by the Building Inspector to ensure the satisfactory construction and
installation of driveways,
parking
areas,
drainage
facilities,
water
supply
utilities, sanitary sewers, and landscaping.
Such
guarantee shall be satisfactory to the Village Attorney as
to form, sufficiency, and execution, and shall be issueds
by a bonding or surety company approved by the village
Board or by the owner with security acceptable to the
Village Board. The term of the bond shall be fixed for a
period of three (3) years; however, the term may be
extended with the consent and agreement of all parties.
The guarantee shall extend for a period of one (1) year
beyond the date of completion of the required improvements
to ensure their satisfactory condition. Any defects in
construction or faulty equipment shall be repaired or
replaced by the applicant without cost to the Village.

9.

The Planning Board reserves the right to make and shall
make a final field inspection of the project after
construction of the facilities upon notice by the Building
Inspector but before the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy.
The purpose of this final inspection is to
review the development and to require any modifications to
parking, landscaping, signs, drainage, access, paving and

5

�other site plan details in the interest of safety,
convenience, enjoyment of peace and quiet of adjacent
neighbors and aesthetics.
The applicant shall maintain
all elements of the approved site plan including landscaping in a neat and healthy condition so as to retain an
approved certificate of occupancy.
10.

Prior to obtaining a building permit, four (4) copies of
this final site plan as revised to meet the above
conditions shall be submitted to the Planning Board office
for final approval. This final site plan review shall be
accomplished by the Village Engineering Department or
consultant and shall incorporate all applicable conditions
of this resolution and the construction standards of the
Village of North Tarrytown as they may be appropriate.

(pate ' ' !

Jamej^Galgano, Planning Board Chairman

DPF/22:crc
November 30, 1987

6

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="128">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14831">
                <text>Planning Board Minutes &amp; Resolutions-1987</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14433">
              <text>MINS_PLAN_1987-10-29</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14434">
              <text>Planning Board Minutes &amp; Resolutions-1987</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14435">
              <text>1987</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
