https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/e338213e917e8f8d191362906dca2384.pdf 3e57e48c8b4773b64811a794ca33e88e PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED January 28, 2004 The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman McCarthy, at 8:05 p.m. Present: Don Stever Elvira Aloia Paul Wichmann Barbara Fina Carter Sachman Sean McCarthy, Acting Chairman Absent: None Also Present: Dave Smith (Saccardi & Schiff/ Village Planner) Nicholas Ward-Willis (Keane & Beane/Village Attorney) Mr. McCarthy stated that several matters had to be discussed with the Attorneys and Planners and asked that the audience save the room in order for the Board members to meet in Executive Session. The meeting reconvened at 8:30 P.M. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to revise the Agenda and to take up the matter of the Kennedy construction application. Carried. 1) KENNEDY CONSTRUCTION APPLICATION.POKAHOE DRIVE & HEMLOCK DRIVE After discussion Ms. Aloia moved, seconded by Mr. Sachman that the following resolution be adopted: WHEREAS, an application for the construction of two—single family houses on two separate lots (”the Proposed Action”) that were sub—divided from a lot that holds a locally historic structure known as “the Fremont House” was submitted to the Village of Sleepy hollow on April 8, 2003 by James Kennedy Construction Company, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the Applicant appeared before the Architectural Review Board (“the ARB”) at their regularly scheduled meeting of May 28, 2003, at which time the application was referred to the Village of Sleepy Hollow Waterfront Advisory Committee (“the WAC”) in order to determine the application’s consistency with the goals and objectives contained within the Village’s Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP); and WHEREAS, the WAC considered the application at their regularly scheduled meeting of June 4, 2003, and unanimously concluded that the Proposed Action would be inconsistent with LWRP Policies 23, 23B, 25, and 25A; and WHEREAS, the Applicant again appeared before the ARB at their regularly scheduled meeting of June 25, 2003, at which time those wishing to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard, and the Applicant’s representatives provided additional information on the Proposed Action, including the elimination of the second floor above the garage for one house, a reduction in overall mass, the placement of the garage under one house, and various revisions to the materials and �WHEREAS, the Applicant appeared before the ARB at their regularly scheduled meeting of July 23, 2003, and presented additional information on the Proposed Action, including a reduction in roof height for one house, a reduction in overall mass and square footage for both houses, and various revisions to the windows and materials; and WHEREAS, on or about November 20, 2003, the Applicant was requested by the Planning Board to confirm the existence of an on-site wetland and associated buffer area as it relates to the proposed lots and make a determination that the Proposed Action does not impact wetlands, to date, that information is still outstanding; and WHEREAS, the ARB has reviewed and considered all materials presented to them by the Applicant up to and including all materials presented at the August 27, 2003, meeting; and WHEREAS, the ARB has reached a general consensus that the Proposed Action, as modified by the Applicant in response to the initial consistency review, generally meets the criteria for approval from the Architecture Review Board as per Chapter 6 of the Village of Sleepy Hollow Code; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the ARB herein formally refers the revised plans back to the WAC for either a consistency determination regarding the proposed project as now modified, or specific recommendations as to how the Proposed Action can be modified in order to conform to the Village LWRP, to the extent practicable, in order for the ARB to make its final approval decision; and be it further RESOLVED, that the ARB herein formally requests a definitive determination from the Planning Board as to their jurisdiction relative to Village’s wetland protection law and be it further RESOLVED, that the ARB hereby directs the Office of Fire and Life Safety to circulate copies of this resolution to the Applicant the WAC, Planning Board, Village Administrator and Mayor and Board of Trustees. UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. 2) ICHABOD’S LANDING-INFORMAL PRESENTATION Representative for Ichabod’s Landing presented Plans, drawings and pictures of the proposed Riverfront Development at the foot of Beekman Avenue and outlined the project, stating there would be a Promenade along the riverfront connecting with the Promenade on the G.M. property and Kingsland Point Park. He stated there would be identical units and retail stores. He stated they have appeared before the Planning Board and have made some changes since their last submission and would like the Board to review them. A Site Plan has been submitted to the Planning Board and will be submitted to the ARB later. Discussion by Board members regarding type of buildings, number of apartments, location of parking areas’ and walkways and amount of property to be dedicated for public use. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, January 28, 2004 2 �Mr. McCarthy asked if there was anyone who would like to speak. There being no comments, Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Ms. Aloia that the matter be taken up at another time. Carried. 3) HE SUSHI TOWN, 276 BROADWAY-SIGN PERMIT—CONTINUATION. Applicant presented Affidavit of Proof of Mailings to Mr. McCarthy. Discussion followed regarding the installation of the sign prior to final approval by the Board. Mr. Wichmann stated that the new sign, which is black lettering on a white background is a big improvement on the sign previously submitted for the Board’s approval. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. Mr. Galarza of Orient Courier questioned the installation of the sign with the telephone number listed on it. Ms. Fina stated that the sign had been erected prior to the Board’s approval. There being no further public comments, Mr. Wichmann moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to close the meeting for public comments. Carried. Discussion followed wherein Board members stated they had agreed to allow a temporary sign to be installed until the applicant came back with revisions to the original application, for the Board to review. Board members again stated they did not approve of the telephone numbers being listed on signs and they would review each sign application when presented as to whether they would allow a telephone number to be listed on the sign. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Ms. Fina that the sign be approved as erected but that the telephone number must be removed. Carried. Applicant agreed to remove the telephone number. 4) HERNANDEZ- 179 BEEKMAN AVENUE-NEW WINDOWS Mr. Hernandez stated that he would like to install new larger windows on the front of the building at 179 Beekman Avenue, which is a restaurant and bar; Mr. Wichmann moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. Mr. Charles Shebetti, owner of property at 181 Beekman Avenue, stated he had no objections to the windows but was concerned about the safety issue and questioned whether there would be a fire wall and sprinkler system installed. He stated his property is directly adjacent to the building and was greatly concerned about the safety of installing such large windows. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, January 28, 2004 3 �Mr. Wichmann stated that Mr. Shebetti‘s concerns were not for the ARB but was an issue for the Fire and Safety Board. Mt. McCarthy stated he would bring the matter to the attention of Mr. Stiloski. Ms, Esther Quendo questioned as to the whereabouts of the proposed application. Mr. McCarthy stated it was at the corner of Beekman Avenue and Barnhart Avenue the former Maria’s Tavern. There being no further comments, Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Ms. Aloia that the meeting be closed for public comments. Carried. Discussion followed regarding size, height of windows and canopy. Ms. Fina moved, seconded by Ms. Aloia that the application be approved as submitted with the condition that the height of the canopy conform with the Code and that approval be made by the Building Inspector prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Carried. 5) TEIXEIRA, 52 HOLLAND AVENUE-NEW WINDOW AND DOOR Applicant did not appear. Mr. McCarthy stated that the matter would be postponed until the February meeting. 6) GALARZA-ORIENT COURIER, 110 BEEKMAN AVENUE-SIGN PERMIT Mr. Galarza presented Affidavit of Proof of Mailings to Mr. McCarthy. Mr. Galarza presented pictures of the sign and stated that the sign would be approximately four by six and 3/4 inches thick and would be three signs. Ms. Fina moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. There being no public comments, Mr. Wichmann moved, seconded by Mr. Sachman to close the meeting for public comments. Carried. Discussion followed regarding the number of signs, the color of sign and placement of signs. Mr. Sachman stated he would like to see the size and color of the signs, which have already been ordered. Mr. Galarza stated he would go to his place of business and return with one of the signs. Mr. McCarthy stated that the Board would take the matter up when he returned with one of the signs. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, January 28, 2004 4 �7) GOLDFARB -55l RIVERSIDE DRIVE—2-STORY ADDITIONArchitect submitted Affidavit of Proof of Mailings to Mr. McCarthy. Ms. Aloia recused herself from participating in the matter. Applicant presented plans and drawings for the addition, which would be consisting of a study, master bathroom and would be added at the rear of the house, which is situated on a corner lot. Ms. Fina moved, seconded by Mr. Sachman to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. Mr. Urmas Wompa, 539 Riverside Drive stated he would like to view the drawings and the Architect presented the drawings and outlined the project to Mr. Wompa. There being no further public comments, Mr. Wichmann moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to close the meeting for public comments. Carried. Discussion followed regarding the type of materials to be used with members stating they felt that the stone on the left elevation facade should match the Farrington Avenue, or north side of the house. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann that the application be approved as submitted, with the condition they provide stone on the left elevation of the house up to and including the first floor and the band continue around all windows as discussed. 6) GALARZA-ORIENT COURIERMr. Galarza returned with actual sign. Ms. Fina stated that telephone numbers are not allowed, and stated that one sign would be sufficient. Ms. Fina stated that signs are not to be fabricated until they have received approval of the Board. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. There being no public comments, Ms. Aloia moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to close the meeting for public comments. Carried. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Ms. Fina that the applicant comes back next month with drawings, showing lettering, color of sign and accurate dimensions, with no telephone number on the sign, application to show lettering to be installed on window. Carried. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, January 28, 2004 5 �8) ESTHER QUENDO-86 BEEKMAN AVENUE-ONE STOP DELI-SIGN PERMIT Ms. Quendo stated the sign was to replace a sign that had been installed many years ago and was now “too dirty.” It would be exactly the same size and color as the previous sign. She stated that the awning was a previously approved awning under a Village sponsored program. Mr. McCarthy stated that many signs have been installed without approval of the Board and the Board is now trying to make these signs conform to the Code. Mr. Wichmann moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. There being no public comments, Ms. Fina moved, seconded by Ms. Aloia to close the meeting for public comments. Carried. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to approve the lettering on the awning as requested. Carried. Mr. McCarthy instructed the applicant to return to the February meeting with drawings for the signs to be installed on the windows. 9) NELSON ESPINOZA-SALON y PELUQUERIA, 185 CORTLANDT STREET SIGNS PERMIT-ALSO 110 BEEKMAN AVENUE Mr. Espinoza presented pictures of the building with the sign already erected. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. There being no public comments, Mr.Wichmann moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to close the meeting for public comments. Carried. Discussion followed regarding residents installing signs prior to their being approved by the Board. Mr. Sachman moved seconded by Mr. Wichmann that the application be approved as submitted. Carried. 10) POCANTICO HOMES, LOT #4 - NEW HOME CONSTRUCTIONMr. John Nemeth, Kevin McManus, John Sullivan, John Dolan, Mike Dignallo, and Tony Veneziano all appearing for the Applicant. Mr. Nemeth presented drawings and plans and samples material to be used in the construction of a home on Lot #4. Mr. Nemeth presented Site Plan for positioning the house on the lot. He stated the house would have a black roof, would be brick with APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, January 28, 2004 6 �white trim, and have black shutters. He stated there would be a portico type of roof with molding on the front entry. Mr. Sullivan spoke on the various setbacks to be followed. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. There being no public comments, Mr. Wickmann moved, seconded by Ms. Albia to close the meeting for public comments. Carried. Discussion followed regarding the height of the house and type of materials to be used. Mr. Wichmann moved, seconded by Ms. Fina to approve the application as submitted. Carried. LOT #2 — NEW HOME CONSTRUCTIONMr. Nemeth stated that several changes had been made and presented samples of materials to be used. He stated that the house would have a black roof, black shutters, brick chimney, vinyl siding and they have made changes in the ceiling line. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. There being no public comments, Mr. Wichmann moved, seconded by Ms. Aloia to close the meeting for public comments. Carried. Discussion followed regarding height and width of the house, the placement of the driveway and the height of the north Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann that the application be approved as submitted with several exceptions: 1) that the windows be double hung windows 2) that chimney be revised to a tapered chimney 3) that a Landscape Plan be submitted 4) that the driveway be placed as discussed and 5) that a Plan be resubmitted for the Board to review. Carried. Lot #5 - NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION. Mr. Nemeth presented Plans and drawings and outlined the type of construction to be used stating that the house would have a brown roof and have a st6ne front and would be constructed on a cul—de—sac. Mr. Sachman stated he felt that the house was too massive and felt that the Board was wasting time discussing the plans as they were not according to Code. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, January 28, 2004 7 �Discussion followed regarding the placement of the house on the lot, where it would face, and the height of the house, with members agreeing that the house would be too high and too massive for the size of the lot. Mr. Sachman moved, seconded by Mr. Wichmann to open the meeting for public comments. Carried. There being no public comments, Ms. Fina moved, seconded by Ms. Aloia to close the meeting or public comments. Carried. Mr. McCarthy stated that the matter should be discussed at another meeting in order for the applicant to change’ and resubmit the plans with the suggestions made by the Board. Mr. McCarthy moved, seconded by Mr. Sachman that the meeting be adjourned. Carried. (MIDNIGHT.) APPROVED - Architectural Review Board meeting, January 28, 2004 8 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2004-01-28 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2004 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2004 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text