<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="259" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/items/show/259?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-19T10:31:52+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="259">
      <src>https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/0767a583caa82f1a979c620d072336fc.pdf</src>
      <authentication>789f0b9eea72bacf1ec848e3cd6368a4</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="18747">
                  <text>VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED
June 22, 2005
The meeting was called to order by Don Stever, Chairman at 8:03 p.m.
Present:

Don Stever, Chairman
Paul Wichmann
Ana Maria McGinnis
Elvira Aloia
Barbara Fina

Absent:

Carter Sackman

Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow)
Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary)
Agenda:
1) Sendon (Sendon Homes)
38 Beekman Avenue
2) Sendon
295 North Washington Street
3) Garvey
20 Hemlock Drive
4) Rodrigues
33 Hudson Terrace
5) Freire
42 Howard Street
6) Jeton
152 Depeyster Avenue
7) Ichabod’s Landing
8) Barros
15 Anderson Avenue
9) Panachak
44 Beekman Avenue
10) Dimovski
150 Millard Avenue
11) Minutes of the April and May 2005 meetings
12) Other
Announcements:
The Chair stated that the Board is now a 5-member Board.
The Chair spoke about the proposed rules and regulations for electronic recording of public
meetings. He stated that the Planning Board has adopted similar rules. He read the Planning
Board’s Resolution to the Board members.
The Chair made a motion the Board adopt an identical set of rules. Barbara Fina
seconded. It was unanimous (5-0). (See attached).

1) Sendon (Sendon Homes) This is a continuation from the previous meeting.

�Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application along with the
owner, Martha Sendon.
Sam Vieira summarized the events of the last meeting. He spoke about the previously
proposed flat metal pan sign. He stated that the proposal has been revised based on the
Board’s guidance. He stated that the sign would be the same size with a yellow
background and same graphics as previously presented. The proposed sign is a wood
carved and will have raised lettering.
Barbara Fina asked if the sign had a border.
Sam Vieira responded no.
The Chair asked if there were any public comments.
There was none.
The Chair asked if the Board had any comments.
There was none.
Barbara Fina made a motion to approve the application as revised. Ana Maria McGinnis
seconded. It was unanimous (5-0).

2) SendonSam Vieira is representing this application along with owner Martha Sendon.
The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted.
Sam Vieira responded that the mailings were not mailed out in time.
Sam Vieira spoke about the proposed project. He spoke about the challenges with the
roofline in creating the addition. He stated that the addition would be a one-story
addition. He compared the proposed addition with the prior approved plans. He stated
that the revised pitched roof would keep with the existing architecture.
The Chair asked if there were any public comments.
There was none.
The Chair asked if the Board had any comments.
Barbara Fina asked about the second story windows.
Sam Vieira responded that the windows were recessed in order to keep the addition
below the required threshold so that the entire house would not have to be sprinklered.
Paul Wichmann asked if the exteriors would be matched.
Sam Vieira responded yes.
APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 22, 2005

2

�Paul Wichmann asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village.
Sean McCarthy responded yes.
Elvira Aloia made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Barbara Fina
seconded. It was unanimous (5-0).

3) Garvey –
Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application along with owner,
James Garvey.
Sam Vieira spoke about the proposed project. He stated that Zoning Board has approved
the required variances. He spoke about the approved variances. He stated that the
existing garage would be replaced with a larger two-car garage. He stated that the
submitted drawings do not reflect the changes from the Zoning Board meeting. The
garage was reduced from 21.75-feet to 21.0-feet.
The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village.
Sean McCarthy responded yes.
Sam Vieira spoke about the proposed two-story addition in the front of the structure and
the one-story addition that encroaches on the side yard setback. He described how the
proposed addition would maintain the existing roof pitches in the areas of the existing
house.
The Chair asked about changing the façade in the front.
Sam Vieira submitted photos to the Board. He stated that the existing architecture in the
front does not extend the masonry to the garage.
Paul Wichmann asked about the octagonal window.
Sam Vieira responded that the window is in a hallway and the window would bring more
light into the area.
Barbara Fina expressed concerns about the shape of the octagonal window.
Sam Vieira responded that a larger window would be out of place in this section of the
house.
There was an open discussion on other window options that could be used. The Board
spoke about making the window more vertical.
The Chair asked if there were any public comments.
There was none.
The Chair asked if the Board had any comments.
APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 22, 2005

3

�There was none.
Barbara Fina made a motion to approve the plans as submitted with the octagonal
window changed to a rectangular window with diagonal mullions. Paul Wichmann
seconded. It was unanimous (5-0).

4) Rodrigues Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application along with owners.
Sam Vieira spoke about the proposed changes. He stated that the garage includes a
stucco finish with asphalt shingles. He stated that the proposed garage keeps with the
existing architecture of the house. He spoke about the proposed porch and the one-story
addition.
The Chair asked if there were any public comments.
There was none.
The Chair asked if the Board had any comments.
Ana Maria McGinnis asked why the front door is not centered.
Sam Vieira responded that the interior of the house do not allow the front door to be
centered without major interior changes.
Elvira Aloia asked if the columns are going to take away from the house.
Sam Vieira responded that the columns add to the architectural features of the house.
Elvira Aloia made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Barbara Fina
seconded. It was unanimous (5-0).

5) Freire Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application along with owners.
Sean McCarthy stated that this application has been approved from the Zoning and
Planning Boards.
The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village.
Sean McCarthy responded yes.
Sam Vieira spoke about the proposed development. He discussed how the three-families
would sit on the lots. He spoke about the proposed changes to the existing house. He

APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 22, 2005

4

�spoke about the proposed exterior finishes. They included double-hung windows and
siding.
The Chair asked if the window A/C units would be removed.
Sam Vieira responded that the house would have central A/C.
Sean McCarthy asked if the chimney would be taken down.
Sam Vieira responded yes. He stated that the direct vent units would be used.
The Chair asked if there were any public comments.
There was none.
The Chair asked if the Board had any comments.
Elvira Aloia asked about the shared areas.
Sam Vieira responded that each unit would have its own entrance.
Sean McCarthy asked if the windows would be large enough for egress.
Sam Vieira responded yes.
Paul Wichmann stated that the house is very large. He stated that the vinyl siding should
be replaced with more natural materials. He stated that the finishes should have more
details.
Barbara Fina agreed.
There was an open discussion on the possible changes to the exterior.
Paul Wichmann expressed concerns about many new developments using all vinyl siding
on the exteriors. He stated that the exterior should have some texture of contours that
would give the house more character.
The Board gave some guidance to the applicant on what details could be used to enhance
the mass of the structure.
The Chair stated that the proposed house fits into the neighborhood but the façade needs
some minor architectural detail improvements.
The applicants agreed to return next meeting with some revisions.
This was adjourned to the next meeting.

6) Jeton Manuel Jeton is the owner and is representing this application.
The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village.
APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 22, 2005

5

�Sean McCarthy responded yes.
Barbara Fina asked if this work was in progress.
Sean McCarthy responded that the photos submitted show work being performed by a
neighbor.
The existing conditions were shown by photos.
The proposed work included 4-foot columns. The Chair stated that the Board could only
approve a 3-foot high column. He stated that a variance would be needed.
Barbara Fina asked if the columns would be stone.
Manuel Jeton responded yes.
The Chair asked if there were any public comments.
There was none.
The Chair asked if the Board had any comments.
Sean McCarthy stated that since the house exterior is brick, then brick piers should be
used.
The Board agreed.
The applicant stated that he would withdraw his application since he could not construct a
4-foot high column made out of stone.

7) Ichabod’s Landing –
This is a continuation from a previous meeting.
Bruce Lozito is the project planner and is representing this application along with
architect, John Karhu.
Bruce Lozito spoke about the proposed storefronts at the Ichabod’s Landing site. He
spoke about the guidance that the Board provided at the last meeting. He submitted a
revised storefront via a rendered drawing.
Barbara Fina stated that the revised plans are greatly improved.
Paul Wichmann agreed.
The Chair made a motion to approve the storefronts subject to the individual shop owners
coming into the Board to get approvals for their respective signs. Paul Wichmann
seconded. It was unanimous (5-0).

APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 22, 2005

6

�8) Barros Alberto Barros is the owner and is representing this application.
The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village.
Sean McCarthy responded yes.
Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant has a permit to construct a second story addition
on the house. He stated that the owner was told to stop work since the changes differed
from the permit. He stated that the application is to approve exterior finishes, windows,
and roofing.
Albert Barros stated that the siding would be stucco. He showed photos to the Board to
illustrate the existing structure.
Sean McCarthy stated that the house has undergone several renovations over the years so
the Board could try to unify the exteriors.
The Chair asked if there were any public comments.
There was none.
The Chair asked if the Board had any comments.
There was none.
Paul Wichmann made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Elvira Aloia
seconded. It was unanimous (5-0).

9) Panachak Michael Panachak is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of
the owner, Li-Wei Choi.
The Chair asked if the mailings were submitted to the Village.
Sean McCarthy responded yes.
Michael Panachak stated that the business has been sold and the new owners want to
renovate the front portion of the store.
Li-Wei Choi stated that there are challenges in trying to keep the existing character of the
original store.
Michael Panachak spoke about the proposed changes.
The Chair stated that in order for the doors to work, the tree would have to be removed.
Michael Panachak responded that the tree would not have to be removed.
Barbara Fina stated that the proposed storefront would fit nicely into Beekman Avenue.
APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 22, 2005

7

�Barbara Fina asked if the tiles would be brought out into the entryway.
Michael Panachak responded yes. He stated that the owners are trying to work with the
existing architectural features of the wood framed building.
The Chair asked if there were any public comments.
There was none.
The Chair asked if the Board had any comments.
Barbara Fina stated that there are many changes proposed.
The Chair stated that the Board should approve the basic concepts (windows, etc). He
stated that the actual colors and materials would be approved by a sub-committee
consisting of Barbara Fina, Ana Maria McGinnis, and Sean McCarthy. The Chair stated
that the applicant would need to bring color samples to the sub-committee meeting.
Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (5-0).

10) Dimovski The Chair stated that this item is off the agenda since the proposed work is not visible
from the street.

11) Minutes of the April and May 2005 meetings –
The minutes for April 2005 were reviewed.
The Chair made a motion as amended. Barbara Fina seconded. It was unanimous (5-0).

The minutes for the May 2005 meetings were reviewed. Paul Wichmann made a motion as
amended. Elvira Aloia seconded. It was unanimous (5-0).

12) Other Sean McCarthy stated that the Board had requested nameplates. He stated that the original
nameplates were not of a good quality. He stated that another type of nameplate is being
evaluated.
Adjourned at 9:55 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted

APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 22, 2005

8

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="39">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6149">
                <text>Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1556">
              <text>MINS_ARB_2005-06-22</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1557">
              <text>Architectural Review Board Minutes-2005</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1558">
              <text>2005</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1559">
              <text>Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1560">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
