https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/3a9b97d725b70e1d33d7c9ac2d21203c.pdf ff6d4ae33d3b6d13c84af03bf9078486 PDF Text Text 93 f--"-h ' BOARD :0F; • 1. »#*-. > • Z' W - "Y ^PEALS V.;.***^.? *: %?iQ. ^J.f^e-oi: : $M^ /Appeal-VatM /^fi.'.--, •;-.;. Under $?mh Tarrytown ' Petition' f o r ^Variance Zoning Ordinance Cast No, V 19 October 8, 1973 \B -; c= ?;'dv'd fv>& P p e a 1 s:. -yh *• '/_V: u gQ'^otvKDrtli: Ta rrytown : I. The undersigned; beihq the owner of nropertv shown as Section .16, Block 8, Lbt 34 located on the west side o-f. .CQ*~t--' . " • • ' • ; : * - • . - - .! sndr 'Streeji between' Cedar Street and .Clinton/ SWeet -Hereby^VvSvY.'-rV aiVPs nOti.ce of: appeal fxoir. the decision orHthe^Bui$drr^f>;AK f'-y.'y-: y^S1/ Inspector, made on the 17th day of September, -197 3., in r e -. : . . : • - . • e - - - * - - . - . » - ' • : ' • • > -,*•-.r . „ . ; , - - ' turbine;_to _is-s ..<= a building permit for a"'b r opo s ed~ addition" ''~:'~'[ -"^% ' '""/' -r of approximately..723 .square feet to be; u^edk/prima.^irly;^^ .arH--:**--.* y *?' _- _J- plsvrxGr.: /-i-or ch;e Appellant ' s grandchildren ;':and ( ther. rvla^&'i••-' " >£"""• children who occupy, the premises on the ground, that the sa'nVe* wo'-jld be i n violation * - f. the provisions of Section 62, " Subsectidh 25, Paragraph A and Section 62, Subsection 14, Paragraph's of the Zoning Ordinance of-the Village of Ndrth Tarrytcwn for the following stated reasons: - V"_V?.*- \V V-t, vS, •y.?& m -\v ,-; '.'• " " - ' : l - . ~ - v . "*- ••"£: L ^S^ft$^^ijf&teS44cSi=k45^s«^ _- -iO*F" if/S^ :,^i¥ r^ �fi-*.-": (i) A non-conforming •A - - • . xxs&i - . V/;:':>ct.urally altered^ to aA ext --j;/?:-.- twenty--fivb/(25?0 • :. . . p^veent o'j?. tf^/^^-^feiV^L^ - . » - • - • • . . - - • •v-1-.-.- . u n l e s s ;f5u'c?hl.buirJ,}."iYg- i^j- •': ^ Y i ^ i ^ M " J;V-;;1?'9 l.nc; -. * '.- ^.x*:-vV^ i"rvcf - r e c t u i r e m e r i t f e ' , cH;. Iv. %^Moii-b^'.-'.'. • J?O r s "f-?---i;-->;-'--^ .;-.:V''!.4; •//v?r:-*j s -•• ^ s - , - . •••-\-; c -./••••• ; < ' - L ' . - - - ' • t.\*£/premises 'or '7.>; ; :#a ; ^s' In ':n? . ;:.:crr-'Ma!:e • •• • ; • : ; , - • . - - , * * • - - - - - • . - . ? . . . . . - • ' ,«.,*.*,-•.- . ,- ./.-'/•.^',-.-/ .-.?--i / ^ v , . - v . ? i : -'t: -si'-"--';^". "-'••«•• c u m s T. a n c o? s 1: ; ,mi *?tfesi|K|rfis;; y y v. -; -; ••;", •• ,x • # '-<£*-~A*»!iii2i^-- i-<£^~^.l\&-i:-J£JOi&^ K �t u s e of h i s p r o p e r t v a s a - m u l t i p l e . r e s i d e n c e s , '. ' . • •• * .v u *% >./ \ ( i i i ) A p p e l l a n t owns only/$h"e- (r)W..i3Ti%nlbJ>i:lfe!v^i5 v? ;,'"'Vr'te-'-;••'. -. which h e h a s made a r r a n g e m e n t s fc*r^6 E-£rOs^^^ • -r: g a r a g e and o n l y one (lT^qf ; Aps^i\Um:^ child -; -nephew* . Vi,aeried^' P y ^ p p e l l ^ i V t ;<tq~ b e ; - 1|&:V4'^3|^B^<^>^ pHatcJren/i'riso / i v S - - ' 1 . *'- " " *".r- ' .Z~'7jx± -1-f\ \'-{- ••-•'. •'* . -v -»' #• > '- v •^V^-i^kife'i&U*^^^^^ �isting premises; that the amount of space occupied by a, • family for living quarters is closely associated with tfev .. health, safety, morals and general;'welfare!\^o^they'c'6i^^n^^'-\:y-. i t y ; that the non-conforming use or strucftu^ejwasr,existin^V ^^ at the effective date of the Zoni/rig^'brd3fn^li6%5^ni3^i^,is . ^ ;l^ ^ impossible at this date to c6 „„.pf: Section 62, Subsection 14 '>TiJci'ted b^ a/^4V;'- 'f-.----.the a f o r e s a i d m a n n e r a n d t o i m p r o v e 1,1 s : :-*--v. /^'-*-.:V"vxJ^ib>--«-i^*'^-i?*-?Ai^~'~v>&• > -CTVi'SW' V "' : .^lilsVfamily.".intend -an. o u t ^ o f : p o c K e t ^fS&sQ&Oi f and based vvi^rs*-;^-- to c cost upon s u c h c o s t , '- ;•- > !; '.- v'--.v;v-. - • • - . . ' Secti6n<b2^Subsebtion"~?* . 4. .• .,- . • -•' '• --'";-• .?*.-•£; -r-v-v.:-*?" .- - .'>.-- -z^l^ SHE. ^.^^ l '*^-.'*-v- . .^«' > v-\^r H .S^y^i*. « i ^ r ^ r A ^ ^ - 4™it IM£-*O ^ ^ , ; % , 4 e ^ ^ i r ^ i ^ ^ ^ u ' ^ ^ - i ^ - * ^ V ^ s : i * - �25, Paragraph A would not be applicable, and therefore, the Building Inspector had no right to deny the building permit ; (xi) That by reason of the foregoing Appellant is being denied the reasonable use of his property. (b) That by reason of the aforesaid unusual and pecu- liar circumstances and conditions, there are-practical difficulties in the way of carrying--;out the strict letter of the provisions of Section 62 , ^Siibsect ion - 25 ,. Paragraph A and Section 62, Subsection 14,..Paragraph E of the Zoning 1 Ordinance and same would resultrin",unnecessary hardship \ Jf/to the extent that strict" application'-'of said'provisions wouId deprive Appellant of the reasonable Use of said'property, which practical difficulties^are an"unnecessary hardship would be, as follows: .; "?/ . ,V , .. (i) There already exists J a non-conforming^use .as referred to by the building inspector in"his denial'of the building permit insofar as 7.2-parking spaces are required for the six (6) families occupying,the building; (ii) Appellant does not own sufficient 5 property to cause such non-conforming use to conform; . : . ? , - �(iii) Because of the physical structure existing on the property it would be impossible at this date to provide the parking required by the Zoning Ordinance; (iv) The proposed addition will not in any manner further extend the non-conforming use as to parking; (v) Without the proposed variance Appellant cannot improve his property for the benefit of himself and his family, including grandchildren, nieces and nephews. 3. Because of the aforesaid alleged facts, Appellant pe- titions the Board of Appeals, in acting on this appeal, to vary the strict application of the aforesaid provisions of the Zoning Ordinance to said property to the following specific extent; to permit the construction of an addition to the building of approximately 723 square feet without complying with the parking requirements of 1.2 spaces for each family or 7.2 spaces in the aggregate. Alternatively, Appellant petitions the Board of Appeals to hold that because the cost of the proposed addition will not exceed 2 5 % of the assessed value of the building the Building Inspector had no authority in denying Appellant's application for a building permit. �Attached hereto are: A. Application to Building Inspector for Building Permit. B. 4. Preliminary plans and lot layout. Appellant further alleges that such variance would be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and would not be injurious and detrimental to property or persons in the neighborhood, for the following reasons: (i) The non-conforming use already exists and will not be extended by the proposed*addition; (ii) The approval of the requested variance will tend to promote the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community by providing the children with an area in which to play and in encouraging the improvement of property for such purpose; . (iii) It would not increase congestion in the streets or be inconsistent with any of the other provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. (Signed) /s/ P/,//,^ IA// /)VcDr,J William Williams, Owner Mailing Address:Robert L. Tuchman, Esq. Messrs Grossbach Steinberg Tuchman Wendy & Zabusky 150 White Plains Road Tarrytown, New York 10591 �» p • I hereby certify that this Notice of Appeal was received by me by ma i1. on the -^rt***"*" day of October, 1973. �PREVIOUS DOCUMENTS IN POOR ORIGINAL CONDITION •-•• •- - — ' - - - - > ~ - ^ - ^ ' ' ^ « ^ - - - * - ^ ^ w * ^ � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1973 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_1973-10-08 Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1973 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1973 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text