https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/b338c3d11fa4e6fdb6ab0409a6ebbc12.pdf 55e3c1030b928a2ae6287d1accaafe75 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED May 24, 2006 The meeting was called to order by Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman at 8:06 p.m. Present: Paul Wichmann, Acting Chairman David Pysh Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None. Agenda: 1) Cortese Construction 2) Mill Point Partners 3) Sleepy Hollow Cemetery 4) Carol Lyden 5) RSHM Life Center 6) Serina 7) Fina 8) Mclean 9) Carissimo 10) Davila 11) Mountco Development Corp. 12) Lent 13) Karl Dibble 14) Approval of Minutes Terrace Close 300 North Broadway 540 North Broadway 150 Gorey Brook Road 32-34 Beekman Avenue 222 Beekman Avenue 23 Evergreen Way North Broadway 256 Farrington Avenue 180 Valley Street Valley Street 151 Harwood Avenue 303 North Broadway March 2006 meeting New construction New townhouse develop. Community Mausoleum Horse stable Signage New façade and signage Front addition & dormers New construction Fence Signage Senior Housing Addition & alteration Signage 1) Cortese Construction – Sean McCarthy stated that this application was sent back to the Waterfront Advisory Committee. He stated that the Board needs to provide findings for the Waterfront Advisory Committee. No action was taken. �2) Mill Point Partners This is a continuation from previous meetings. Dan Beaton is representing this application on behalf of the owners. Dan Beaton stated that the proposed turret roof has been modified. He showed the previous standing seam metal roof and the revised asphalt shingle roof. Sean McCarthy asked about the other valley areas around the point. Dan Beaton responded that the proposed material is copper. Sean McCarthy asked about the architect’s recommendation for the flashing around the brick. Dan Beaton responded that his architect did not recommend anything. It was recommended that the applicant use copper for the flashing material. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, David Pysh made a motion to close the public hearing. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). Pat Piereson asked if the asphalt material is common for such a steep roof. Sean McCarthy responded that the material can be used but typically, slate would be used. There was an open discussion on the material selection for the turret roof and flashing. Sean McCarthy stated that if the Board agreed on the material selection, the construction details could be worked out with the Building Department. The Chair made a motion to approve the amended application with lead coated copper on the intersecting valleys and asphalt Grand Manor shingles for the roof. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) Sleepy Hollow Cemetery This is a continuation from last meeting. Ed Napoleon is representing this application along with architect, Jim Wong. Jim Wong stated that the exterior material selection would blend into the landscape in the wintertime. He stated that the slate roof and stone façade will not be visible in the summertime due to the foliage. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 2 �Ana Maria McGinnis stated that a slate roof could be installed to make the building appear more interesting. Ed Napoleon responded that a $300,000 roof to a not-for-profit corporation is not economically feasible. The Chair stated that the proposed changes are trying to incorporate architectural features from the other buildings on the site. Ed Napoleon stated that the lower level contains the crypts. David Pysh asked about the details that the mausoleum is trying to match. Jim Mullen responded that the mausoleum is trying to match the appearance of the main office. David Pysh stated that the rendering does not properly reflect what is proposed. He stated that the profile would be a custom piece that should be matched. Jim Mullen responded that the profile could be matched. The Chair opened the public hearing. Sandro Carissimo (256 Farrington Avenue) stated that the slate roof should remain. Since there were no further public comments, David Pysh made a motion to close the public hearing. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). The Chair stated that the building is too symmetrical. He stated that more detail is needed. David Pysh stated that the profile of the arch should be made to match the office chapel. Sean McCarthy responded that the profile will be difficult to match in color and scale. David Pysh responded that this is what was presented by the applicant. David Pysh stated that the peaked façade on the existing office chapel is flanked by two flat elements. He stated that this would help match the architectural features on the main structure. The Chair asked the applicant to submit a sample of the actual element to be used. The Chair made a motion to adjourn this application to the next meeting. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Carol Lyden This is a continuation from previous meetings. Jonathan Miller is representing this application on behalf of the owners. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 3 �Jonathan Miller stated that the comments from the last meeting were incorporated into the drawings. He stated that the ridgeline was broken-up. He also presented a material board of the proposed materials. Jonathan Miller spoke about the landscape buffer. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, David Pysh made a motion to close the public hearing. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). David Pysh made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 5) RSHM Life Center This is a continuation from previous meetings. Sister Susan Gardello is representing this application. Sister Susan Gardello stated that over a year ago, RSHM Life Center received an approval to re-do the exterior and re-install the existing sign. She stated that the sign does not fit in with the current exterior. The Chair asked if the Board had any comments. There were none. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair made a motion to close the public hearing. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 6) Serina Robert Barstow is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owner, Gary Serina. The Chair asked if the public notices were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 4 �Robert Barstow presented photos of the existing property. He spoke about the proposed renovations and the sign. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the residential portion would change. Robert Barstow responded that only the commercial area would be changing. He stated that just the street façade is being changed. He stated that the pediment is being changed. He stated that there is a 19-foot frontage and three French doors. He stated that there will be a café-type setting. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the siding would be wrapped around the three sides. Robert Barstow responded that the new siding would be separated from the old siding but would be wrapped around three sides. Ana Maria McGinnis reviewed the color scheme. She asked if there would be any contrast in the color scheme. Robert Barstow responded that there would be a color contrast. He stated that the doors and the crown molding would match. The Chair stated that he did not have any problems with the proposed signage. Sean McCarthy stated that the side signage is not allowed under the Village Code and requires a variance. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 7) Steinschneider Barbara Fina is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the public notices were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Barbara Fina submitted two letters from the Sleepy Hollow Manor Association and her adjacent neighbor. She referred to a calculation correction in the zoning table on the front page of the drawing package. She stated that a portico is proposed along with front dormers and a rear turret. She stated that the existing roofline would be lifted from 1-½ stories to 2-stories. Sean McCarthy asked if the ridgeline was being increased. Barbara Fina responded yes. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 5 �Sean McCarthy responded that the non-conformity was not properly explained to the Zoning Board. Barbara Fina responded that the application is still below the allowable limits. Sean McCarthy responded that the application was not properly presented to the Zoning Board. The Chair asked about the exterior finishes. Barbara Fina responded that the new finishes would match the existing finishes. The Chair asked if the windows were changing. Barbara Fina responded that all of the windows would be changing. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson asked if the window over the garage could be enlarged. Barbara Fina responded that to enlarge the window would require alteration to three interior rooms. The Chair asked if the garage door would be changing. Barbara Fina responded no. Ana Maria McGinnis made a motion to approve the application as submitted with confirmation from the Zoning Board of Appeals. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Mclean Dan Pennella is representing this application along with owner, Martha McLean. The Chair asked if the public notices were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Dan Pennella spoke about the proposed project. He stated that this is a proposed single family house. He submitted a rendering of the proposed house to illustrate the proposed exterior finishes. Dan Pennella stated that the exterior material will be a cultured stone. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the material of the shutters. Dan Pennella responded that the shutters are going to be eliminated. Dan Pennella stated that the detail and trim pieces are Styrofoam. He stated that the panels are going to be placed on and stuccoed over. The Chair stated that other views from the road are needed. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 6 �There was an open discussion on the proposed cultured stone. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the material for the railings. Dan Pennella responded wrought iron. David Pysh questioned how the materials would stand-up over time. He stated that the stucco sections should be adjusted with different details. He also stated that the west elevation is very plain and is the most visible façade from the neighborhood. The Chair asked if the chimney finish could be changed from stucco to stone. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the garage door style. Dan Pennella responded that the final doors have not been selected yet. It was agreed that the applicant would make the necessary corrections and reappear at the next meeting. David Pysh asked the applicant to consider wood siding instead of stucco. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 9) Carissimo Sandro Carissimo is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the public notices were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sandro Carissimo stated that his house was renovated. He stated that he wants to relocate the existing vinyl fence to another area on the property. David Pysh asked if the The Chair opened the public hearing. Elizabeth Payti of 254 Farrington Avenue asked about where the fence could be installed. Sean McCarthy responded that the fence could be built on the property line. He also stated that the owner must provide an as-built survey based on the recent work. Elizabeth Payti asked about the proposed height. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 7 �Sean McCarthy responded that the fence could be 5-feet tall. Since there were no other public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve this application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 10) Davila – Manuel Davila is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. David Pysh asked if this sign was already erected. Sean McCarthy responded yes. The Chair asked if the Board had any questions. There were none. The Chair opened the pubic hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. David Pysh seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 11) Mountco Development Corp.– Neil Connuck is representing this application along with NTHA executive Director, Ken Gentile and project architect, Doris Masen. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Neil Connuck discussed the proposed project. He discussed the overall project funding and tight schedule constraints. He spoke about the location of the proposed structure. He also spoke about the need for affordable senior housing in the area. Sean McCarthy gave an update on the status of this project in the Villages review process. He stated that the Village Trustees have issued a special use permit. Neil Connuck spoke about the proposed finish board that was submitted to the Village. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 8 �Doris Masen described the exterior finishes of the proposed structure. David Pysh asked about the parking for the project. Neil Connuck responded that there is a 2-tiered parking garage that will accommodate all of the residents of the building as well as some of the parking for Margotta Courts. David Pysh stated that the A/C opening should be better integrated with the window system. He stated that the expansion joints should be shown on the drawings. The Chair opened the public hearing. There were no public comments at this time. The public hearing was held open to the next meeting. The Chair asked the applicant to show where the proposed stone product is going to be used at the base. He asked for a detail to be provided. He also asked for a full-size set of plans. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 12) Lent – Jean Pieirre van Lent is representing this application along with architect, Roy van Lent. Roy van Lent spoke about the proposed project. He stated that the garage will be eliminated but will be expected to be proposed at a later date. He spoke about the exterior finishes. He stated that the wood shutters are proposed. He spoke about the proposed shingles and the Ana Maria McGinnis asked where a driveway would be located. Roy van Lent showed where the driveway would be located on the site. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. David Pysh stated that a lot of care went into the planning of the project. The Chair made a motion to approve as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 13) Karl Dibble – This is an informational item only. Karl Dibble is the owner and is presenting this information to the Board. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 9 �Karl Dibble spoke about the proposed garden center site plan. He spoke about the proposed retaining walls and proposed landscaping. He spoke about the new privacy wall in the front yard. He spoke about the proposed building. No action was taken. 14) Approval of Minutes The minutes for the March 2006 meeting will be reviewed at the next meeting. Adjourned at 11:40 p.m. Respectfully Submitted APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, May 24, 2006 10 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2006 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2006-05-24 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2006 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2006 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text