https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/a46fbad03653aa4daf0f842455925c10.pdf 625092d50b5cb8a3a362d3b3cfbd0fb2 PDF Text Text \ 1SZ- NORTH TARRYTOWN, N.Y. DECEMBER 4, 1978 One hearing was held before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of North Tarrytown, N.Y. on the above date. Present James Friere, Chairman John Arcate, Vice-Chairman Morton Linzer James Margotta Edward Swaby Donald Walsh - Attorney for Solari Robert Ponzihi - Village Attorney Chairman James Friere opened the meeting at 8:30. Attorney Donald Walsh represented his Client Enrico Solari in regard to various building violations. Clerk Louise Croke read the Public Notice. Mr. Walsh presented to the Chairman an application by former Building Inspector to extend parking lot, dated February 22, 1977, Chairman stated that he did not have a Site Plan. Mr. Walsh stated that Site Plan was his client's omission and that hewas sorry he didn't do it. Mr. Chairman read all violations pertaining to the case. Mr. Margotta s didn't understand #50-6 or #62-21-C. Stating that 90% of the people back ) out of their driveways, particularly in Webber Park. Mr. Linzer asked when the license was filed and when did work begin. Mri Linzer asked why was this just coming up? Mr. Page stated that he inherited this. April 1977 Mr. Jelenek ordered violation. It has been in the works. Mr. Ponzini said that it was taken out of the Justice Court after'discussion with Mr.. Walsh and the Building Inspector and it was decided to place it before this Board. Previous Court was not appropriate. This seems a better way to give Mr, Solari a chance to give his reasons, Mr. Margotta asked if Mr. Solari applied for permit and not Site Plan, Building Inspector said none. Application was vague. Mr, Walsh stated that his Client went ahead and did this work and thought application was okay. Could they go through allegitations and see which ones should stay and which should be removed? Mr. Linzer asked if there had been any comments from the neighbors. Mr. Page stated that all this was instituted by a taxpayer; but I don't see any here tonight. Mr. Arcate asked when permit was dated. February 1977. March 1, 1977 work began. May 1977, after it was revoked, work was completed. Mr. Margotta stated that if Site Plan is needed, the Building Inspector should tell the person. It shouldn't be held against the homeowner. �2. The Chairman stated that application was for parking only* cut a lot more curb than necessary, » He Mr. Arcate stated that records were needed or a history to see who is to blame. The Building Inspector or Client. Mr. Chairman stated that application was vague. Mr. Linzer re-stated that permit was issued in February 1977 work began March 1977 - April 1977 violation - May revoked permit after work. No plans accompanied. Did Mr. Page contact Mr. Jelenek? Mr. Page answered, no, Mr. Jelenek left some months before. Mr. Ponzini stated that there had been a lot of delay. Mr. Chairman stated that the violations are there. If Mr. '. Solari agrees to put everything back to what the code says there should be no problem. Mr. Walsh states that permit was issued. Mr. Chairman states that permit was given for one thing. A halfdozen things have been done on that one thing, Mr, Walsh - he applied for permit, Mr, Chairman - yes but he exceeded for what the permit was for. That permit was given for a couple of cars and then he makes plans for four cars. It's not in the zoning. Mr. Ponzini - Lets adjourn subject to Mr. Solari fixing the violations to Building Inspector's satisfaction. If Building Inspector reports back it's okay Mr, Walsh can make application for permit to open a curb. Mr, Page - I think Council's recommendation is ideal. Bring Site Plan to meet with present code. No need for variance. Mr. Arcate asked Mr, Page if arrangement was made by Mr. Gasparovic to extend size of house to include four lots under one deed. Mr, Solari answered, "no." Mr, Page said permit for house should never have been given. Mr. Linzer stated that discussion regarding permit for house was not pertinent to meeting tonight. Mr. Margotta said that notice states nothing about house. Meeting was not called for this. Mr. Walsh suggested that Mr; Page and client get together and work something out and come back next month. Mr, Ponzini stated that biggest complaint was curb and,parking. Mr, Chairman said thirty days would.be.enough time to work out a solution. Hearing was adjourned for thirty days not to exceed. .-;«,*;-«:^;^i*Sf^.ffej.i^s-:',i.i,u-*-*-,4:-=i.i--'.A,--^*?.;-^,-,i^-^c,-^,.i,i-j;,-:-_.=, ^^i^.^^s^^i^^jsQ^kiis^&s^^^^^d^^iS&t �3. Mr. Arca'te stated that if there were other violations we should address them also* Mr. Chairman said to leave it to the Building Inspector. Mr. Linzer stated that it was up to the Building Inspector to make the violations known. Mr. Arcate stated that the Building Inspector should inform Mr. Solari to clear up all possible violations. Mr. Ponzini stated that it was up to the Building Inspector to inform him so it could be dove-tailed. Maybe it could all be joined in one meeting not to exceed forty days by stipulation of Council,, Respectfully submitted, Acting Clerk � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1978 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_1978-12-04 Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1978 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1978 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text