<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="2685" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/items/show/2685?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-19T08:57:02+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="2681">
      <src>https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/9ebd016fd3b9dc5edb9b140d2a5d71cc.pdf</src>
      <authentication>25b4fc9d099f55b144d238f4aff29b18</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="21168">
                  <text>iNor.th Tarrytown, N. Y.
August 9, 19 7 9
%

A hearing was held before the Zoning Board of Appeals of North
Tarrytown, New York, on the above date,
PRESENT:

John Arcate, Chairman
Edward Swaby
Martin Ruane
James Margotta
Aldo Ceconi
Atty. Charles Palella,
representing North
Tarrytown
Victor Page, Bldg, Insp.

Chairman Arcate called the meeting to order at 8:00 P.M.
Linda Fukuchi, read the notice of hearing to consider the request of
Elias Tserkerides, 30 Elm Street, for relief oh an appeal from a
decision of the Building Inspector in denying a permit for the
construction of an addition to the second floor of the .owner's
property. The request was for a variance from the provision of
Section" 62-8B.
Chairman Arcate the Board asked whether or not the proposed
construction would "meet all other requisitions and were informed by
Mr. Page that this was the case. Surrounding neighbors had been
notified of the impending change. Enlargement was to be made
elevating but not widening the building and there would thus be no
plot change.

l-.v

A motion was made by Mr. James Margotta to grant the variance in
accordance with the purposes as:stated .in the code, Section 62-2.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Swaby, and carried by an unanimous
vote from the Board.
The next public notice to the people-of North .Tarrytown was then read.
This is the appeal of Mr. Victor Zelig of 34 Miller Avenue,. Tarrytown,
to obtain a permit to construct a single family dwelling at 17 Hemlock
Drive, North Tarrytown and a variance from Section 62-8B-5
Mr. Lou Falasca, builder, representing Mr. Zelig, asked for a variance
to be granted so that the construction oould get underway.
Richard Spauldihg, 19 Hemlock Drive, questioned whether all other
homeowners within 200 feet of the lot at 17.Hemlock DriveV-were advised
a full ten days prior to public notification.. He'claimed the notice
had not been posted a full ten days in advance, as required by the law.
Mr. Zelig then responded, saying he had notified homeowners and the
Sleepy Hollow Manor Taxpayers Inc. back in early July.

«&amp;:.

i/V

Mort Sillman, 20 Hemlock Drive,#objected, to the'].advance work of the trees
having been cut down. He daid'the.cut wood, left outside, has had[a
terrible smell, arid questioned if 1the "mess"- on'the lot pollutes the : air and environment, along with the beatuy of the area.

m~j,'4s££.£i*i-=£%l^S"^

*-? -~-«" ^'l--.-;-.

,-te.

4?*.itiiei&amp;-£i^k^^&amp;iSiX.*.

L^aiis^Siil^

�-2-

Mrs. Otto Kraij, 15 Kirigsland Road,said she vzas promised a notice
would be given to her before the trees were cut. But, she said, she
was never so advised.
Chairman Arcate asked the Zoning Board whether the question of notice
would continue to be an issue? It was commented that the request
was received by July 6th. Chairman Arcate questioned when the notice
was posted on the property. Mr. Page said the sign had been posted
by the Village Clerk thru the Highway Department, and that he felt
the ten days'had been allowed,
Robert Friou, H,Lakeyiew Ave., asked that it.be made clear that this
meeting was only to;get a decision as to whether or not a house
might be allowed to be built on the property.
Chairman Arcate then called for a vote of the Board on the question
of notice and enough time had been given, ten days, prior to the
hearing. - Passed unanimously.
Mr. Falasca answered a question re the size of the lot, and submitted to Chairman'Arcate that the total amount vzas "only 200 s q . f t .
less than the 15,000 sq. ft. presently required by the zoning rules.
Mr. Zelig then confirmed a question, saying the lot is owned by his
daughter, who is over 18 years of age. Mr. Zelig acts as agent and
payer of taxes for said lot.
Mr. Page said it is not required that the owner of the lot be present
and that an agent may act in.place of the owner.
Mr. Margotta then asked whether tonight's meeting"should be ppotponed
for one week, or ten days to make certain everything is legal, and
also to allow the owner of 17 Hemlock Dr. to be present. Aldo Ceooni
voiced a similar question.
Mr. Stuart Levine, 63 Fremont Rd., said the notice'had not been received
prior to August 1st, thus'not meeting the ten days requirement of
posting the notice prior to the hearing.
Mr. Margotta commented that he would like the builder to be able
to proceed, but " should any legal problems arise he suggested, as
earlier, to postpone tonight's meeting.
Mr. Levine asked why no tape recorders were used to record the
minutes. Chairman Arcate said minutes have always"been]takenvby the
Clerk, and that in all the years he has been associated with 5 the^
Zoning Board no problem had ever arisen due to the lack of recording
devices.
"
Chairman Arcate said that the Zoning; Board might\decide, pro : or'con,
with Building Inspector Page, or grant a variance for the owner of
said lot at 17 Hemlock Dr.
Mr. Page made it known he had neither granted nor denied the building permit,
'"-&gt;;- :.*'• ,
•-....•'';-. • -':

�Chairman Arcate reminded all present that the issue is whether the
lot at 17 Hemlock Drive is sufficient in spite of lacking 200 sq. ft.,
although it does meet requlations of width,
Mr, Sillman asked Mr, Page if building plans are submitted to him
when a vacant lot is to be built upon prior to approval being given.
Mr. Page answered affirmatively.
Chairman Arcate said the Building Inspector's duties enforce the
Building Code (Village adopted New York State's Code). He then
said the Zoning, however, is a local Village Code. He continued,
noting that after 1964, the zoning in Sleepy Hollow Manor changed
from R2 to R2A. In 1967 or,1968 the required area of a lot was from
10,000 to 15,000 sq. ft.. He noted that there have been many appeals
for the granting of variances over the years.
Mr. Friou reminded the Board that Boards's decisions can be knocked
down in court, as the Zoning Board may not have final jurisdiction.
Mr. Spaulding brought to attention Village Law #1, 1977, which
requires the Village to take action re environmental factors. He
noted several factors on the lot at 17 Hemlock Dr.
-- the slope of the land, causing drainage problems
airing of the lot
danger of a house being built on such a sharp curve
Mr. Spaulding also said that the Sleepy Hollow Taxpayers Association
had not reviewed the situation in discussion.
A July 27, 1979 letter was then shown and read by Mr, Page, This
was from Curtis Heath the Zoning Chairman for the S.H.T.A. to
Mr, Zelig and indicated that the plans for the proposed house are
in the process of review.
Otto Kralj, 15 Kingsland Rd., said he submitted a letter to be kept with'
Mr. Page, In his letter, Mr, Kralj said the building of a new house
at 17 Hemlock Dr. would cause a change in the V7 at erf low, and very
possibly affect and harm their property.
. •
The various building code violations Mr. Kralj said,• would 'bocur
if the house at 17 Hemlock Dr. were to be built, would not apply to
a private dwelling. Articles 62/31 and 62/30-B which Mr. Kralj
brought to attention, are -for changes needed when?changing a domestic
site into a business one. This'was all mentioned^'by; Chairman Arcate.
He also noted that Article 62/28, used by the Planning Board, is for
changes related to change of use or': classification.'
Mr. Friou said the Planning Board should report recommendations to
the Zoning Board. The Zoning Board can freely agree or disagree,
Mr. Kralj brought to attention Article 62-2D. Under the present "plan,
the new house's backyard would be 40ft. from his. He said he tbuld
lose this privacy if a variance were granted. He also objectsVto
the plans that the nev? dwelling would be three stories above the; ,
ground; These factors make Mr, Kralj fear the value of his home would
go down.
-."._.-•.

:

�Mr, Fascala said there would be hushes and trees planted to give both
privacy and beauty to the lot and the neighborhood.
Mr. Kralj quoted Article 62-2B, saying he fears the exhaust fumes ~
from the car on the new lot would be directed at his house. He asked
that the garage door be set parallell to the street, or else the
fumes will come in his living room. He also noted Article 62-2E
in regard to noise pollution the new house will bring about.
Mr. Kralj fears future damage and flooding to his lot and home if the
variance is granted, and the new house built. He asked that this
be looked into.
Mr. Page then asked Mr. Kralj if he presently has any water problems
in his house. Mr. Kralj answered saying he once did, but no longer
has a water problem since he had the situation rectified,
Mr. Sillman wished to report for the record he would like to see
documentation evidencing that N. Tarrytown's Environmental Board
was aware of the situation.
It was then said that this is out of their domain until Mr.Page
either issues or denies a permit.
The Village Oounsel was asked by Mr. Levine whether the Zoning Board
can direct Mr. Page. Reply was negative.
Under Articles 62/13 and 62/32, Mr. Page said he neither issued or
denied a building permit due to these Articles. He asked for a
ruling. At present he feels it is a non-conforming lot.
Mr. Spaulding commented oh a 1972 ruling, when a building permit
was previously denied on lot at 17 Hemlock Dr., Said/lot was
non-builiable and the then owner went to the Supreme.Court in White
Plains. (The lot became non-conforming in 1967 by the revision of the
Zoning Ordinance.)
Mr.Kralj gave pictures to the Chairman Arcate to pass aroun.d to the
Board members, showing the slopes of the ground.
Mr. Levine asked if Mr. Zelig*z daughter could be'present. He agrees
with Mr. Zelig's"right'to build on land he owns-but does it have to
be at the expense of the immediate neighbors. He asked should he and
his family have to suffer their investments due to thecwooded lot that
is now chopped down? Arid;what is the purpose of letting one lot make
the rest of the neighborhood suffer?
Chairman Arcate asked Mr. Page if he had considered1location of the
driveway?
Mr. Zeliz asked''why other people,; in the neighborhood^ had
not complained? Marvin Smith^.17 Kingsland Rd., commented that the
lot boarders His property too. He.would like the'Zoning Board to look
into other small lots which are not .the right size;under present
requirements, as he is concerned with the future of Sleepy Hollow Manor
if such variances continue to he given. He submitted a letter to
Chairman Arcate.

�-5ourn the hearing was made by Mr. Ruane and seconded by
The hearing adjourned at 11:00 PiM.

Respectfully Submitted,

Linda T. Fukuchi

�'3*&gt;

-6-

BUSINESS MEETING

August 1979

Mr. Page read the letter from the Sleepy Hollow Taxpayers Association
in its entirty to the Zoning Board, and submitted a" copy of such said
letter.
Mr. Margotta made the motion to grant the variance, adding that h e V
would want bushes and shrubs on the lot at 17 Hemlock Dr. as soon
as the new house is completed.
Mr. Swaby agreed with Mr. Margotta.
Mr.Ceconi said he would like the groups to get together and resolve
their present differences.
Chairman Arcate asked that if ..the Board defered it's, decision (for
30 days under the law) would the. two opposing sides negotiate their
differences but was not agreeable to both sides.
Mr, Margotta's motion was seconded by Mr. Ceconi, and carried by an
unanimous vote. The variance was thus granted. The Board ;finds that
there are practical difficulties in strict compliance with the
ordinance arid that there are special circumstances in that the
deficiency is deminimus and/that ba^ed uponTpast^precedent and Code
Sections 62-2, 62-12B, and 62-40A,'this action was required.

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="203">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18445">
                <text>Zoning Board Minutes &amp; Resolutions-1979</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16046">
              <text>MINS_ZONING_1979-08-09</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16047">
              <text>Zoning Board Minutes &amp; Resolutions-1979</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16048">
              <text>1979</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16049">
              <text>Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16050">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
