https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/c018947707fd8efd079ba71fe529763b.pdf 82c45bdf11269f6258948d1b9892f17a PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED February 28, 2007 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:01 p.m. Present: David Pysh, Chairman Ana Maria McGinnis Pat Piereson Carter Sackman Absent: Paul Wichmann Also Present: Sean McCarthy (Village Architect/Village of Sleepy Hollow) Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None. Agenda: 1. Approval of Minutes 2. Sleepy Hollow Cemetery Community Mausoleum 3. Sleepy Hollow Bank 4. Legends Realty 5. Molina 6. Stroligo November 2006, January 2007 meeting 520 North Broadway Amended façade approval 48 Beekman Avenue 358 No. Broadway 49-51 Chestnut Street 250 Kelbourne Avenue New fence Signage New 2-family dwelling Façade renovation 1) Minutes for November 2006 and January 2007 meetings The minutes for the November 2006 and January 2007 were reviewed. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Carter Sackman seconded. It was unanimous (3-0) (McGinnis absent). 2) Sleepy Hollow Cemetery Ed Napoleon is representing this application on behalf of the cemetery. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ed Napoleon stated that the owners want to make a change from concrete to granite on the finish arches for the cloisters. �Pat Piereson asked about the original finishes. Ed Napoleon responded that the original finish was made of limestone. He stated that the limestone would not hold up as well over time. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if cost was a factor. Ed Napoleon responded that this is only based on aesthetics. The Chair asked the Board how they felt about the mausoleum and the chapel/office not being matching aesthetically as was presented in the original presentation. The Board agreed that the proposed change is aesthetically acceptable. Ed Napoleon stated that there are 10 arches in total that would be changed. Pat Piereson stated that the original application is more appealing. Ana Maria McGinnis agreed. The Chair stated that the thinner material makes the building appear less substantial. The Chair opened the public hearing. Dave Logan (Sleepy Hollow Cemetery Board member) stated that there were 3 original materials that were proposed. He discussed the existing limestone currently on the property. He stated that the existing maintenance is difficult. He stated that the granite product would last longer than the approved concrete product. Carter Sackman stated that concrete over time would also require patching. He stated that the granite is a more practical material over time. Tom Mullen (contractor) stated that a lighter color granite could be used to provide a more comparable match to the chapel/office. Since there were no further public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sean McCarthy asked if the granite could be used with a keyed-in appearance in order to provide a more authentic arch. Carter Sackman stated that if the product was thicker, it would be a closer match. The Chair stated that the granite should be thicker, keyed-in and more contrasted. Ed Napoleon asked for an adjournment so that the applicant can provide more information. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 28, 2007 2 �This was adjourned to the next meeting. 3) Sleepy Hollow National Bank – There was nobody present for this application. It was agreed that this item would be adjourned to the next meeting. 4) Legends Realty Marcene Hedayati is representing this application. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Marcene Hedayati stated that there is only one door on this side of the building. She stated that the awning would allow the entrance to the business to stand out since it is separate from the main lobby. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Pat Piereson made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 5) Molina Henry Molina is the owner and is representing this application. Henry Molina summarized the application to date. He stated that the previous structure burned down and it is now an empty lot. He stated that the proposed structure is a 2family structure. He reviewed the proposed layout of the building. Ana Maria McGinnis asked why the front stairs would not be located in front of the main door. Henry Molina responded that a fire hydrant is located in that area. Henry Molina presented samples of the proposed siding and other exterior submittals. He proposed two colors for the shutters. He also spoke about the trim colors, roofing materials and building exterior products. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 28, 2007 3 �The Chair asked about the types of exteriors on the adjacent houses. Henry Molina responded that the adjacent houses have vinyl and aluminum siding. The Chair stated that the rear roofing configuration needs to change. Sean McCarthy responded that the gables are different. He stated that the roof pitches would be different. He stated that the proposed roof angles are attempting to keep the roof angles similar. The Chair opened the public hearing. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sean McCarthy asked if the lattice in the front would wrap around the front. Henry Molina responded yes. The Chair stated that the front porch steps should be moved to align with the front door. The Chair also stated that the roof line be amended so that the rear ridge line runs continuously from the west face of the house to the east face of the house and that the front roof line intersect it. Any detailing noted as wood would be substituted as Azek®. It was also agreed that the applicant will return with details on the front porch columns and railings. It was also noted that the windows would be trimmed in Azek® as well. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 6) Stroligo Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners. The Chair asked if the returns were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sam Vieira stated that the exterior of the house has deteriorated. He stated that the proposed exterior would be wood. He discussed the changes to the windows and shutters. He spoke about the widening of the driveway. He stated that the existing driveway is narrow and is bound by a retaining wall. He spoke about the changes to the front of the house. The changes included changes to the front door and associated trim as well as the area near the garage door. Lastly, he stated that the exterior would be a cut stone veneer. Carter Sackman asked about the pitch of the roof. Sam Vieira responded that the roof pitch shown is accurate. He stated that the existing roof is not changing. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 28, 2007 4 �Carter Sackman asked about the height of the new windows. Sam Vieira responded that the new windows are larger. He stated that the window sizes need to meet the new code requirements for egress. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the proposed colors. Sam Vieira responded that the Board did not usually require colors. He stated that the owners are not present to discuss the color selections. There was an open discussion on the color selections. Pat Piereson asked about the dentils on the main cornice. Sam Vieira responded that he wanted to add some dimensionality to the house. He discussed the changes that the owners want to make. Carter Sackman suggested adding white panels below the windows in the front elevation. Sam Vieira responded that this suggestion was explored. He also stated that the owners have made decisions regarding new and existing features. Pat Piereson asked about increasing the width of the windows in the front. Sam Vieira responded that the bathroom windows in the front cannot be made larger due to the configuration of the powder room. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there was no public present, the Chair closed the public hearing. This was adjourned to the next meeting so that the applicant can review the Board’s comments and provide sample materials, color schemes and additional information on the dentils. Adjourned to the next meeting. Adjourned at 9:20 p.m. APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, February 28, 2007 5 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2007-02-28 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2007 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2007 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text