https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/cb82c5fedc09acf9816e10c1f7b600ed.pdf 571d22d4f1ece7b9b649afa3ff0b8fc5 PDF Text Text v - y Approved with respect to substance and form: •liig^t^S^^' V: Dated: i-zf.- «=J/ Approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals „W v Lirman o r A c t i n g Chairman fated: i-ii-^4 F i l e d w i t h Deputy Clerk Clerk o r Deputy Clerk Dated: /J^SL/9/ Date of Meeting �t A MEETING OF THE ZONING BOARD WAS HELD ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1990, AT 7:00 P.M., IN VILLAGE HALL, NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK. Members Present: Also Present: Jerome Fine, Chairman Vincent Buonanno John Cappello Costas Boumis Frank Paolantonio James Karr John Morabito James Margotta, Building Inspector John J. Hughes, Village Attorney IN THE MATTER OF AKIN, 2 8 EVERGREEN WAY, NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK. 10. Whether Tax Lots 1, 2 and 8 have been merged so that variances for Lot 2 and a subdivision are required. The applicant has presented copies of three (3) deeds to the premises: 1. Deed to Lot 8 - dated September 17, 1948 from Baker, Evans and Company to Elizabeth D. Akin, grantee; 2. Deed to Lot 2 - dated June 5, 1946 from Robert M. Akin, Jr., grantor, to Robert M. Akin, Jr. and Elizabeth M. Akin, his wife, grantees; 3. Deed to Lot 1 - dated October 26, 1953 from Thomas T. Margotta, grantor, to Elizabeth Denton Akin, grantee. These deeds remain in full force and effect as there have been no subsequent transfers. The Board noted that Tax Lot 2 is improved with a single family residence. The Lot consists of approximately 12,500 square feet. An addition was added in 1958 (a copy of the ledger for building permits is attached). The addition is constructed in such a manner as to be situated, at one point, approximately 2 1/2 feet from the rear property line. The Board also noted, at the onset, that the lots designated on the tax assessment roll of the Village as Tax Lots 1, 2, and 8 are subdivided lots. Prior to the enactment of the 1967 zoning amendment, all conformed to the area requirement of the Zoning code by containing, in all three cases, more than the minimum 10,000 sq. ft. in area. 1 �In determining to grant an area variance to Tax Lot 1, the Board must consider the consequences of the "merger" or "single and separate ownership" doctrine and its applicability to Tax Lot 1, 2 and 8. Mr. Hughes, Village Attorney, noted the Village's zoning code and the definition of nonconforming lot, as found in Section 62-4: A zone lot in single ownership which does not conform to the minimum area arid/or 'dimension required in the district where such lot is located or for any special permit use, as the case may be, and where the owner of said lots does not own any adjoining property, the subdivision of which could create one (1) more conforming lots. Mr. Hughes noted that the definition of non-conforming lot will not apply unless the substandard lot is isolated and under single and separate ownership. The owner may not own adjacent lots which, if combined, would satisfy the zoning ordinance's area or dimensional requirement. Mr. Hughes noted two cases to the Board which hold that even where the owner of a substandard lot also owns an adjacent lot or lots with his wife as tenants byvthe entirety, the ownership- of the lot is considered single anPfseparate. The cases are Edlu Custom Builders, Inc. vs.. Young and Barbara Homes vs. Michaelis, both decided in 1958 by the Supreme Court in Nassau County. Although they are not Appellate Division cases, they are cited in three noted treatises; to wit, Anderson, New York Zoning and Rohan, Zoning and Land Use Law and Rathko, Law of Zoning and Planning. Applying the cases to the one before the Board, it is clear that in 1967 when the amendment was enacted, Mrs. Elizabeth Akin owned Lots 1 and 8 by herself. Lot 2, the improved lot, was owned by Mr. and Mrs. Akin, as husband and wife. Following the reasoning of these cases, the Board finds that Lot 2 is a nonconforming lot, within the meaning of the definition found at Section 62-4 of the Code, for the following reasons: (1) On the effective date of the.amendment, lot 2 was an improved lot in single and separate ownership. As a result of the amendment, it was made not to conform to the new minimum area requirements of the district, and (2) The owner does not own any adjoining property, the subdivision of which could create one or more conforming lots. :^.-;i^%£4*.J»-J4!2f3£S &v^fE^Ui>£i^^£ds^5ii^^aj^£%^%^aft^^iE& �11. What is the impact of the garage addition situated on Lot 2? The Board then discussed the addition to the building on Lot 2, which addition was constructed in 1958. A site inspection reveals that the addition is located approximately 2 feet from the boundary between lots 2 and 8. The Board finds that it was clearly an error of the Building Inspector in 1958 to issue a building permit for the construction of the addition so close to the rear yard. The Board is reluctant to request that any action be taken at this time for the following reasons: 12. (1) The addition was constructed under a valid building permit; (2) The addition has stood for approximately 3 2 years; (3) The only area which will be affected by this encroachment is Lot 8, now unimproved. The Board notes, in this regard, that Lot 8 has an ample yard and this yard may be used by a future owner of Lot 8 to separate its residence from the residence situated on Lot 2. What is the impact of the "merger" and single and separate ownership^doctrines on Lots 1 and 8? The Board also discussed the merger doctrine and its applicability to Lots 1 and 8, owned by Elizabeth Akin alone. By application of this doctrine, as discussed supra, Lots 1 and 8 are merged to form one building lot consisting of approximately 28,500 sq.ft. The applicant seeks to create two (2) building lots and in order to do so, must subdivide Lot 1 from Lot 8. In addition, as previously discussed, an area variance is required for Lot 1. In determining the line of subdivision between Lot 1 and Lot 8 and, therefore, the extent of the area variance to be granted, the Board is guided by the requirement that the area variance be the minimum required. The Board adopts the proposed map marked "3rd Alternate" which shows proposed Lot 8 as a conforming lot with 15,010.76 sq. ft. (and a proposed home containing 3,000+ sq. ft.) and Tax Lot l with 13569.57 sq. ft. (and a proposed home containing 2710+ sq. ft.). The Board, for all of the aforementioned reasons cited at length herein, determines that this configuration of the lots will most closely meet the requirement that the variance be "de minimus". . „• -. .^i-^, ,*„ „-;r|-i™i~i.Wrt1lvj»,. if.^i.-v.- ^^^z^^^^^-^t^^-ib^^^iAs^j^^jiia^i^ i?£^k%**£=sA&mj!Sgi �DETERMINATION OF THE ZONING BOARD. At this point, the Board determined whether any additional issues needed to be addressed. There being none, the Board determined to include all of the findings of this meeting and the meeting of December 11, 1990 in its resolution. Mr. Buonanno moved to grant the variance, seconded by Mr. Cappello. On the discussion of the motion, the Board agreed that the resolution will incorporate all finding made at this meeting and at the previous meeting on this matter on December 11, 1990. The Board agreed that the applicant had demonstrated the requisite practical difficulties, so that an area variance may be granted. In addition, the Board imposed the following conditions on the granting of the variance: (1) That the matter be referred to the Planning Board for a subdivision where Lot 1 will contain 13,569 sq. ft. and Lot 8 will contain 15,010.76 sq. ft., pursuant to the 3rd Alternate Map submitted by the Applicant. (2) That the matter then be referred to the Architectural Review Board where the homes proposed to be built should contain that amount of square feet so that they are in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. (3) That, at the discretion of the Planning Board, a tree survey be commissioned to retain as many of the existing trees as possible and to provide sufficient buffering so that there will be an enhancement of the aesthetic nature of the neighborhood. (4) That, at the discretion of the Planning Board, the driveway to Lot 1 be located in such a manner as to provide maximum visibility for traffic. The Board voted on the motion as follows: Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Cappello Buonanno Karr Boumis Morabito Fine Paolantonio aye aye aye aye aye aye aye The vote being unanimous, the motion to grant the variance is carried. £ ^-i^^'>ii^^»j^Ji^m&-is^!^i^^S^^^^^^i^^^£^^^^^^^^^^^' �• • At this point, the Board adopted the required findings pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act and Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law as follows: RESOLVED: That the Zoning Board hereby declares itself to be lead agency in determining the environmental consequences of granting an area variance and that the - Zoning Board has examined a Short Environmental Assessment form and declares that this is an unlisted action pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and Part 617 of the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder and this action will not, in and of itself, have a significant effect on the environment. This resolution is a Negative Declaration for the purpose of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Local Law Environmental Quality Review Act of the Village of North Tarrytown and will be kept on file at the Village Hall and be available for public examination. As a point of final discussion on this matter, the Board noted that this was a difficult case where the Board was called upon to exercise its judgment and to consider arid weigh several factors in reaching its decision. All submissions are numbered as Exhibits 1-24 and are incorporated in the record of this proceeding. 5 �» * ft - - .2.' In the Matter of Steven Blaha, 23 Hudson Street-Certificate of Occupancy for a 4-family residence. Mr. Blaha presented Affidavit of Prooij of Service to Clerk as required by the Ordinance. Clerk read the Public Notice to hearVarid consider an appeal of Stephen Blaha, 86 Hilltop Road, Ardsley, N.Y from a decision of the Building Inspectorvin denying'a Certificate of Occupancy for a four-family residence at 23 Hudson'Street, North Tarrytown, N.Y. duly known arid designated as Section 16, Block 2, Lot 21. Property record cards indicate.the property as a two; family residence. , "' - . .' Chairman Fine asked if there was anyone present who would like to address the Board on the matter. Mr. Blaha stated that the property was previously owned by his late parents. The building has four apartments, one that had been occupied by his parents, one by his sister and her family, one by himself and one rented to a tenant. If was purchased in 1923 and has always been a four-family residence. Mr. Edward Olivieri, 24 Hudson Street stated that he objected to the grantingof a Certificate of Occupancy.as the area was over crowded with people and cars. He felt that Mr. Blaha should provide parking for his tenants in the adjacent lot. Mr. Blaha stated there were 21 houses on Hudson Street and he recently counted 31 cars parked on:the street. Many of the properties have driveways, but owners and tenants do not park their care in them. The area has always been multi-family and cars have always parked on the street. There being.no further comments, Mr. Buonanno moved, seconded by Mr. Morabito that the hearing be closed. Carried. BUSINESS MEETING: Mr. Buonanno stated that he was familiar with the area having lived there for many years arid he recalled Mr. Blaha's parents and sister living there along with Mr. Blaha. After a discussion Mr. Bubnaririo moved, seconded by Mr. Karr that, based upon the affidavits submitted, a ruling be made that the property be listed as a four-family dwelling on the village tax records, and that the records be changed. Carried. 3. In the Matter,of Sosa Construction, 60 & 62 Hudson Terrace, Certificate of Occupancy for two two-family homes. Clerk read the Public Notice to hear and consider an �"appeal of Sosa Construction Company, 40 Church S t r e e t , Tarry town, N.Y. from a decision of t h e Building Inspector in denying a Certificate o f Occupancy for two two-family houses a t 60 & 62 Hudson Terrace, North Tarrytown, N.Y. duly known and designated as Section 17, Block 13,. Lots 10 and 1 0 . 1 . - ,, :Section 62-8B, Schedule of Regulations requires a rear year s e t back of 25 f t . The rear yard s e t back o f 60 Hudson Terrace extends 20 ft. instead o f t h e required 25 ft.; and t h e rear yard set back of 62 Hudson'Terrace extends 23 f t . , instead of t h e required 25 ft. M r . Fine asked/if there w a s anyone present w h o would like to address t h e Board on t h e m a t t e r . M r . Arthur Litt stated h e represented M r . S a m V i e r a , principal of Sosa Construction Company. He stated that M r . Viera was visiting his aging mother in P o r t u g a l . He stated thfet M r . Viera had constructed t h e t w o dwellings arid while-under construction felt,that t h e t w o decks were n o t large enough. H e conferred"with t h e Building Inspector arid decided to enlarge them. In so doing, h e m a d e t h e d e c k s slightly larger than permitted by t h e ordinance. A temporary c.o. had been issued and t h e apartments were rented, and h e is n o w respectfully requesting a variance t o cover t h e e r r o r . Mr. Brian Slavin, owner o f the,;property ori t h e north side of the property in q u e s t i o n , stated there w e r e other violations other than the deck regarding t h e air-cbriditioriirig u n i t s . H e : .; stated h e initially supported t h e sub-division because t h e property had been in a deteriorated condition. Since t h e construction began, there have been so-many1 problems arid ; it looks like;the premises will eventually become a three-family h o u s e . H e i s . against the variance being granted. . H e stated;Mr. V i e r a is-a-'* contractor and should have known that t h e decks w e r e t o o large. -"> M r . Litt stated t h a t ; there h a s ; been^a running• battle ;... during t h e two years o f construction and;Mr. Viera> h a s conformed to t h e Zoning Ordinance except f o r t h e rear yard r e s t r i c t i o n . Mrs. the variance. Peggy Slavin •; also spoke against t h e granting*of . - • *-/.;'.. .-/'.' ?;'-'••. . There being n o further comments M r . Cappello m o v e d , seconded by M r . Karr that t h e hearing b e closed. Carried. ^:^ ;.:,; BUSINESS MEETING: " ,^ -* f -;^H\ Mr. Cappello stated that if therex w e r e other v i o l a t i o n s , w e should consider them before granting a v a r i a n c e / ' ; ./ M r . Buoriaririo'stated w e s h o u l d : b e concerned f o n l y with the variance requested. ; M r . Margotta stated w e should,request M r . f Viera to have a survey outlining t h e position o f t h e a i r - c o n d i t i o n e r s . �. Mr. Cappello stated he felt this was a self-inflicted problem and the contractor should be made to rectify the situation. Mr. Karr stated that the Slavin's keep their property in good condition and the contractor should do the same. Mr. Cappello moved, seconded by Mr. Karr that the variance be denied. Carried. After a discussion, Mr. Cappello moved, seconded by Mr. Buonanno that the motion be rescinded and that the Building Inspector look into the matter and report back at the next meeting. Carried. 4. In the Matter of Leoncio Molina, 15 College Avenue-Two apartments in basemend and sub-divide another apartment. Clerk read the Public Notice to hear and consider an appeal of Leoncio Molina, 15 College Avenue, North Tarrytown, N.Y. from a decision of the Building Inspector in denying a Building Permit to erect and construct two apartments in the basement and sub-dividing another apartment on the second floor (east) at 15 College Avenue, North Tarrytown, N.Y., known and duly designated on Village Tax Assessment Map as Section 16, Block 5k, Lot 8. Sec. 62-34-Building-Permits-states"that no'person shall erect, alter or convert any structure or building or part thereof, or alter until a building permit has been issued by the Building Inspector. This * provision shall also'apply to all repairs exceeding One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) in cost. Mr. Fine asked if there was anyone present who would like to address the Board. , Ms. Alvia Gomez-Riefkohl, Attorney for* Mr. Molina, presented Affidavit of Proof of Service to:the clerk. She ;added that the premises was purchased by Mr. Molina;in 1981[as an 8-family dwelling and had been'used as an 8-family dwelling since at least 1943. She presented affidavits by the previous owners, the Marrapodi family. She stated'that Mrs. Marrapodi still resides at the premises. , She stated that a ruling should be made regarding-the premises as to whether it was ["non-corif orming". or whetrier it was to be covered under the "grandfather section" of the ordinance. She respectfully7asked the Board to fender such a decision. Mr.;: Fin<e stated he had received a 'communication from the Washburn family, whose property abuts the Molina property. They registered their various "objections to;the granting of the Molina requests. (Copy'in Official Minutes). -• /•;MarioBelanich, No. Washington Street, stated he was against; the {granting'-of the variance due to the problems with noise and the fixing.of*cars and motorcycles, etc. EdnajBelanich,\No. WashingtonStreet stated she agreed', with the Washburns and stated that the neighborhood was in a declining �state. She also stated that the garages are utilized by persons other than tenants of the building. There being no further comments Mr. Buonanno moved, seconded by Mr. Morabito that the hearing be closed. Carried. BUSINESS SESSION: Mr. Margotta stated that the apartments were illegal and Mr. Molina applied for a building permit to make them legal. He denied the application. He stated he could only find records indicating permits from a one-family to a three-family dwelling. Mr. Cappello asked if the apartments in the basement could be made to comply with the code. After a discussion, Mr. Margotta was instructed to prepare a list of violations to present to the Board at the next meeting. Mr. Boumis stated that after the war many homes were., converted and it seems most of them were converted illegally arid without permits to escape being reassessed. Mr. Karr stated they were paying taxes on a three-family house for many years. The Board stated they would inspect the premises arid consider the application at the next meeting. * 5. In the Matter of Balbina Triana, 144 Beekman Avenue-BuiId an apartment in the rear garage. , *. Clerk read the Public Notice to hear.and consider an appeal of Balbina Triana, 144 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, N.Y. from a decision of the Building Inspector in denying a building, permit to build an apartment in the rear garage^of said property, known and designated as Section 16, Block 5, Lot 10 on Village Tax Assessment Map. Article IV; Sec. 62-7C of the Zoning Code 'states that there can be no more than:one (1) principal residential building and its accessory buildings shall hereafter^be erected on any one lot. The garage is considered an accessory building. Ms. Alvia L. Gomez-Riefkohl, Attorney%for Mrs. Triana, presented Affidavit of Proof of Service1to the,Clerk. She stated that an'application had been made in 1985 and was granted, permitting the construction of an apartment for a handicapped'person. y Since then, due to marital problems, the permit had , lapsed and they were requesting renewal of the permit, stating that Mrs; Triana is in need of the income that the apartment would generate. • Mr. Hughes stated that "• he had represented;Mr. Triana in legal matters and would excuse himself from participating in the hearing. •--..t- J;--L«"5 ;,-*:'.* .^Si-a^i..^ •*iri„se>*«iJfi^j>£*f-i'Mf*ih^S^>*^^*^: W?^,r sJV^riC^: L- fe^^pS%^ .^"t *&•* &<%» s^K-^j^ - zd. ^"S^fe* i^Js&MSf^-Z&l^ �The clerk,read a letter from Walter Koval, 166 Beekmah Avenue stating his objections to granting permission to erect an apartment in the garage. He stated the garage should be used for cars generated by the premises. The Clerk read a letter from Edward and Susan McCarthy 2 Andrews Lane, North Tarrytown stating they were opposed to the granting a permit for the construction of an apartment in the garage. Ms. Riefkohl stated there was ample parking on the property for all cars of tenants living on the premises. by Mr. There being no further comments Mr. Morabito moved, seconded Karr that the hearing be closed. Carried. BUSINESS MEETING: Mr. Margotta stated that Mrs. Triana had renovated the garage without a building permit, no plumbing permits and no electrical permits. If the apartment was to be used for the handicapped it would;have to be adapted for a handicapped person. No plans for such have been filed. He also stated there was someone living in the garage. Mrs. Triana denied this and stated her cousin stayed there and took care of the property for her as she is not well. • Mr?. Cappello stated that no permits were issued and they were breaking the law by allowing someone to live there. Mr. Karr stated he would support the Building Inspector and deny the variance. After a discussion Mr. Morabito moved, seconded by Mr. Paolontaonio that the variance be denied. A discussion followed and the Board felt legal assistance was required. Thereupon Mr. Morabito moved, * seconded by"Mr. Paolantonio that their motion to deny the variance be rescinded. Carried. Mr. Cappello moved, seconded by Mr. Paolantonio that the hearing be continued to the next meeting and that the Building Inspector be instructed to inspect the garage and report his findings at the next Board meeting. Carried. 6. In the matter of Amilcar Ferreira, 139 Cortlandt Street-Add a second, floor apartment. . " . ', .- - ' .' • /: Mr. Fine read the Public Notice to hear and consider an appeal of Amilcar Ferreira, 145 Sheldon Avenue,.Tarrytown, N.Y. from a decision of the Building Inspector in denying a building permit to add a second floor^apartment to his buildingrat 139 Cor tlandt Street, North f Tarry town, N. Y ; ,' duly known and designated on Village Tax Assessment Map as Section 16, Block'9, Lot 3. Section 62-8B, Schedule of Regulations, requires a A;i:*-«in.l, �* » * . , * 25'-0 rear yard setback, while the proposed plans indicate no rear yard set back. Mr. Steven Bettman, Attorney for Mr. Ferreira presented Affidavit of Proof of Service to the Clerk. Mr. Bettman* stated that the property was built in 1934 and was owned by the Soriano family and was always a two-family residence. Mrs. Yetta Schwartz, Cortlandt Street stated that she was the owner of Alter's Bakery which was across the street from the property and she knew it as a two-family residence. Mrs. Mary Pastell,Elm Street stated she was a friend of the Soriano family and knew the house to be a two-family residence. Mrs. Margaret Kantrowicz, Cedar Street also knew the house to be two-family residence. There being no further comments Mr. Cappellomoved, seconded by Mr. Buohanno that the hearing be closed. Carried. BUSINESS SESSION; Mr. Cappello stated he lived on Cortlandt Street for many years arid knew the Soriano family and wwas'aware the premises were always a two-family dwelling. Mr. Boumis inquired as to violations on the property. Mr. Margotta stated there were no violations. After a discussion, Mr. Boumis moved, seconded by Mr. Morabito that the Board approve the application to find the premises at 139 Cortlandt Street a legal non-conforming two-family residence. Carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Morabito moved, seconded by Mr. Karr that the minutes of the meeting held on November 29, 1990 be accepted as presented. Carried. There being no.further business to come before the meeting Mr. Karr moved, seconded by Mr. Morabito'that the same be adjourned. Carried. Mr. Fine stated that the next meeting of the Board would be held on January 16th, 1991. Respectfully submitted, Irene Amato Acting Clerk �Exhibit 1 Application for Variance 2 Short Environmental Assessment Form 3 Minutes of Board of Trustees Meetings October 2, 1967 and January 18, 1967 4 Power of Attorney - Elizabeth Akin to William Akin 5 Minutes of Zoning Board of Appeals March 13, 198 6; June 27, 1985; November 13, 1973 6 Letter dated November 15, 1990 from Duffy and Watkins 7 Memorandum dated November 1, 1990 from George A. O'Hanlon 8 Letter dated October 16, 1990 from Reilly and Lewis, Esqs. (incorporating previous minutes) 9 Memorandum from Melissa Moran dated December 13, 1990 10 Letter dated November 13, 1990 and December 11, 1990 from John P. Streb and Sons 11 Copy of tax bills on properties 12 Copy of Tax Map - shaded to show lots with less than 15,000 sq. ft. 13 Summary prepared by Chas. Riley, Land Surveyor of all lots with less than 15,000 sq. ft. 14 Letter dated November 6, 1990 from Edward Strecklein, architect 15 Letter dated November 27, 1990 from Riley Lewis, Esq. 16 Memorandum from Building Inspector showing lots which are undeveloped in Sleepy Hollow Manor 17 Memorandum from Building Inspector, dated December 12, . 1990 showing lots in Sleepy Hollow Manor which could be developed ^^^g^^^j^iji^.^^^ �18 Letter dated December 13, 1990 from Duffy and Watkins 19 Letter dated December 11, 1990 from Duffy and Watkins 20 Deeds dated.October 2, 1953, September 17, 1941, June 5, 194 6 showing title to all of parcels 21 Map dated November 1, 1990 22 Second alternate Map dated November 14, 1990 23 Third alternate Map dated December 4, 1990 24 Copy of Register of Building Permits - 1958 7 �RESOLVED: *1. The Zoning Board of Appeals (the "Board") of the Village of North Tarrytown hereby designates itself "Lead Agnecy" for purpose of considering the environmental effects of the following project: Applicant: Akin 2. Premises: 28 Evergreen Way Project: Area Variance - Building Lot The Board has examined a Short Environmental Assessment Form prepared by the applicant. 3. The action as above described is an unlisted action pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and Part 617 of the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder, and will, in and of itself, not have a significant effect on the environment, so that no Environmental Impact Statement is required or need be filled therefor. 4. Nothing herein contained, however, shall be deemed to indicate or suggest that subsequent submissions for development of the property will not require the preparation and filing of for the Environmental Impact Statements. 5. This resolution is a Negative Declaration purposes of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Local Law Environmental Quality Review Act for the Village of North Tarrytown, and will be kept on file at the Village Hall and be available for public examination. Dated: / V 'X> ' °[0 Village Counsel �RESOLVED: #/ * *1. The Zoning Board of Appeals (the "Board") of the Village « of North Tarrytown hereby designates itself "Lead Agnecy" for purpose of considering the environmental effects of the following project: 2. Applicant: Ferreira Premises: 139 Cortland Street Project: 2 family use The Board has examined a Short Environmental Assessment Form prepared by the applicant. 3. The action as above described is an unlisted action pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and Part 617 of the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder, and will, in and of itself, not have a significant effect on the environment, so that no Environmental Impact Statement is required or need be filled therefor. 4. Nothing herein contained, however, shall be deemed to indicate or suggest that subsequent submissions for development of the property will not require the preparation and filing of for the Environmental Impact Statements. 5. This resolution is a Negative Declaration purposes of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Local Law Environmental Quality Review Act for the Village of North Tarrytown, and will be kept on file at the Village Hall and be available for public examination. 1 Dated: l}y-ytfMp j-yoj Village Counsel � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1990 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_1990-12-19 Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1990 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1990 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text