https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/3edd69598704dc90506d5fbb37952548.pdf afe9dead63d1243d7475a1e145a6b5ae PDF Text Text w i t h r e s p e c t t o substance and form: V i l l a g e Attorney Dated : p / / £ 7$lf ApprovecK^y t h e Zoning ^pard Chairman i*r. A c t i n g Chctfrman Dated: zV/^/?^ Filed w i t h V i l l a g e Clerk o— Cleik- or Deputy Clerk Dated: « 2 y V 7 / ? « / Date of Meeting • \ • ^ ^ ^ s * ; * ^ * ^ . ; * ^ ^ v-i«-i-. ^ w l f J r i H s * * = i j 3 & s i w ^ - S i ^ ^ %Sii^ia8J&aifeSS!fiSil , tf»fei A-jU£**s*>a �,<--N *"» • » BF.fiTTT.AP REGULAR NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK JANUARY 19th, 1994 MEETING y A regular meeting of the North Tarrytown Zoning Board of Appeals was held on January 19th, 1994 at 8:00 P.M. in the Village Hall, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: George Fitzpatrick, Chairman Rhonda Mauhs John Morabito. Frank Paolontonio Michael Masias Mary Galgano ABSENT: Juan Pujadas ALSO PRESENT: Donal Walsh, Attorney James Margotta,. Building Inspector Chairman Fitzpatrick called the meeting to order at 8:05 P.M. 1. VonLosberg/Malofsky, 10 Evergreen Way-Continued. Mr. Robert Ciamei, Architect stated that the house was presently non-conforming on a lot size of 10,500 square feet instead of 15,000 square feet as called for in the Code. Mr. Ciamei outlined the proposed addition to the house which would consist bedroom, bath and.office, to be constructed over the present garage. Mr. Margotta stated that the addition will be over the garage and would not change the non-conforming use. Mr. Paolontonio asked what type of business would be conducted in the office, and if there would be any employees. Mr. Malofsky stated he a Vice-President of an Insurance Company in New York City and commutes every day. He stated that he would bring work home in preparation of meeting clients outside his office. He also stated there would be no increase in traffic as clients would not be coming to his home. Chairman Fitzpatrick asked if there was anyone present who would like to address the Board. No one spoke. Discussion followed regarding the height of the house and garage and the proposed height of the new addition. There being, no further comments Mr. Morabito moved, seconded by Dr. Masias to close the public hearing. Carried. Mr. Morabito moved, seconded by Mr. Paolontonio that pursuant to SEQRA, this is a Type II Action and will have no adverse impact on the environment. Carried.' -'i:-s. ^^^S^^^i-i^v'isciA^i^biisiiiiAl i&ikfSsai^i^m^^XisS^^^^^^tinfm �,f <?T" • ' -2- ft Mr. Morabito moved, seconded by Mrs. Galgano to grant the request on condition that there be no excess traffic in and out of residence for business purposes and . there be no office staff to-work in the residence. Carried. 2. Public Hearing-James Hogan, 19 Maple Street-Certificate of Occupany for Three Family Residence. Clerk read the public notice to hear and consider an appeal by James Hogan of 192 Webber Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York from a decision of the Building Inspector which denied a Certificate of Occupancy, for a three (3) family house located at 19 Maple Street, North Tarrytown, New York on the following grounds: Premises are listed as a two (2) family home on the tax roll of the Village of North Tarrytown. Mr. Hogan presented the affidavit of service=to the Clerk. who Chairman Fitzpatrick asked if there was anyone present would like to address the Board. Mr. Hogan stated that the building was a large three story building .and each apartment is self-sufficient. He stated there would be no impact on the neighborhood as the building has been used as a three family residence for over thirty years. Chairman Fitzpatrick stated.that .the Board had received several affidavits supporting the application from nearby neighbors There being no further comments, Mr. Morabito moved, seconded by Mrs. Mauhs to close the public hearing. Carried. Mr. Morabito stated he was in favor of granting the variance as it has been a three family house owned by the Hogan family for many years. Mr. Palontonio stated that the affidavits received by the Board attested to the .residence being a three family house for many years and there were no objections from the audience, therefore the variance should be granted. Mr. Paolontonio moved, seconded by Mr. Morabito that pursuant to SEQRA this is a Type II Action and will have no adverse impact on the environment. Carried. Mr. Paolontonio moved, seconded by Mr. Morabito that the variance be granted as requested and the village records be corrected to reflect the premises as a three family residence. Carried. 3. Public Hearing-Christine Mangieri, 404 North BroadwayCertificate of Occupancy for three family residence. Clerk read the public notice to hear and consider an �appeal by Christine Mangieri from a decision of the Building Inspector which denied a Certificate of Occupancy for a three family residence with store on the following grounds: Premises which has a street address of 404 North Broadway, North Tarrytown, New York 10591, is listed in the Mxmicipal records as a two family residence with a store. Mr. Morabito moved, seconded by M r s . Galgano that the public hearing be opened for commetits. Carried. Chairman Fitzpatrick asked if there was anyone present who would like to address the Board. Mr. Gerald Klein, Attorney representing Christine Mangieri submitted proof of service to the Clerk. Christina Campbell, daughter of Christine Mangieri stated her mother was unable to appear before the Board as she is elderly and is not well. Mr. Klein stated that the building has been used as a three family residence with a store on the ground floor since the 1930's. Chairman Fitzpatrick reported that the Board had received a report from the Code Enforcement Officer stating that he had inspected the premises and found one commercial store and five separate apartments.(Copy in official m i n u t e s ) . Mrs. Campbell agreed with the report but clarified it,by stating that there were furnished rooms with bath which were rented separately. She stated that the physical features of the building have never been changed. Mr. Morabito stated that the Fire Inspector stated there were hot plates being used in the furnished rooms which was not permitted under the Code. Mrs. Campbell stated she would have the tenants remove them immediately, as she was not aware they were using them. Mr. Klein stated that M r s . Mangieri was refinancing heir mortgage and had a commitment from the bank which expired at the end of the month. Discussion followed regarding removal of doors and the vacating of the furnished rooms. Board members felt that a reinspection should be made prior to the consideration of the variance request. Mrs. Galgano stated the matter has been going on for so long another thirty days shouldn't make much difference. Dr Masias felt that the violations should be remedied prior to the granting of the variance. He stated that the Code Enforcement Officer should reinspect the property prior to the �> «i^ next meeting of the Board. Mr.* Paolontonio moved, seconded by Mr. Morabito that the matter be continued at the February meeting, that the furnished rooms be vacated and the Code Enforcement Officer be .allowed to inspect the premises prior to the next meeting. Carried. * » "• - The Board recessed for five minutes. 4. Public Hearing-Gerald:Bregman, 185 Valley Street- Stores and apartments. " '__ Clerk read.the public notice to hear and consider an appeal by Gerald Bregman from a deciaion of the Building Inspector which denied a building permit for renovation/construction of 195 Valley Street from its existing use as a hardware store into a mixed use building with five stores and five apartments. In order for a building permit to be issued, and final site plan approvel to be given by the Planning Board, the following variances required by the Schedule of Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of North Tarrytown for the C-Zdistrict include; *required rear yard setback 25 feet: as planned 0 feet *maximum lot coverage 30 percent; as planned 60 percent *front yard setback 20 feet; as planned 0 feet *one side yard setback, 5.0 feet; as planned 0 feet *both side yards must total 15 feet; as planned 0 feet side yards provided *open space r quired; 100 sq. feet per dwelling unit totalling 500 sq. feet; as planned; no open space provided Other variances are requested for requirements outside the schedule of regulations. *required off-street loading area as per Section 62-14E; one; loading area provided; none *required residential parking spaces as per Section 62-14E; eight; parking shown on plans; none Arthur Litt, Attorney representing Gerald.Bregman presented affidavit of service to the Clerk. Mr. Litt outlined the proposed project stating the lot is an irregular shape. Mr. Bregman has been trying to sell the property for. over a year and now has a buyer who is interested, but the -above variances are required. Mr. Litt stated he has conferred with the Mayor who is in favor of the project. He stated there will be no adverse effect on the area and the project will increase the assessables and will improve the looks of the neighborhood. Ron Turnquist, Architect for the project presented a model of the project and photos of the building as it now exists and stated that the building will conform to all codes. ""«?'* • „ * * - - . * ' - ^ ^ - " i_,, „JU! „-*-„, ^jt - - \ ^ ^ ; ^ r „ , - S - : U ^ ^ ^ " ^ �Mr. Litt stated that the major problem was parking. He stated that there is no parking for the retail stores now and there will be none after the project is completed. He stated the purchaser has contracted to purchase the property at 76 Chestnut Street, which is within two hundred feet of the project, and will provide parking for eight residents cars, plus he will dedicate ten additional spaces for use by the village. Mr. Litt asked that the Board approve the off-site parking area but could defer issuance of a c.o. until the parking area is completed. Mr. Margotta stated that the Chestnut Street property is in a C-2 District and no variances are needed for parking lot construction Mr. Turnquist stated that the parking spaces would be assigned spaces.to residents of the new building. One handicapped space will be provided in an appropriate location. Chairman Fitzpatrick asked if there was anyone present who would like to address the Board. George Samares, 175 Valley Street stated that some property owners were not notified. Mr. Walsh stated 39 letters were sent out and 37 receipts were returned. Mr. Walsh stated that only those property owners within two hundred feet of the project site need to be notified. Mr. Walsh and Mr. Margotta confirmed the Village had listed all property owners within the 200 feet for the use of the applicant. Mr. Samares presented approximately six letters from property owners in the area who objected to the granting of the variances. (Copy in official minutes). Mr. Samares stated the area cannot warrant any more building unless parking is provided and felt it was not legal to have parking on Chestnut Street for the proj ect. Chairman Fitzpatrick stated that the owner needs to provide only eight spaces for the apartments and according to the code is allowed to provide said spaces within 200 feet of the building, and the proposed off-street parking lot is only 70 feet from the proposed project. Frank Occhipinti, 8 Gesner Place stated that the.building is now vacant and feels that the Board should grant the variances. Mr. Caetano stated he feels that the renovation building would be an asset to the community. of the Elle Samares, 175 Valley Street stated the Board should drive down Valley Street and see the condition of the area and feels the variances should not be granted as there is not enough parking now. �There being no further comments, Mr. Morabito moved, seconded by Mrs. Galgano that the public hearing be closed. Carried. Mr. Morabito moved, seconded by Mr. Paolontonio that pursuant to SEQRA this is a Type II Action and will have no adverse effect on the environment. Carried. Mr. Morabito moved, seconded by Dr. Masias that the variances.be granted as requested, with the express condition that the variances relating to the construction of the apartments are conditioned specifically on the acquisition of 76 Chestnut Street for off-street parking, and the approval of the off-street parking site by the Planning Board, and that eight parking spaces be dedicated for-the express use of the apartments and the remaining ten spaces be dedicated to the village for its use. Carried. MINUTES Dr. Masias moved, seconded by Mrs. Mauhs that the minutes of the meeting held on December 15th, 1993 be approved as submitted. Carried. OLD BUSINESS Discussion regarding the Rock of Salvation project on Cortlandt Street and the issuance of a demolition permit followed. There being no further business to come before the meeting Mr. Morabito moved, seconded by Dr. Masias that the same be duly adjourned. Carried. Respectfully submitted, \Irene Amato Acrting Clerk �14-lv*2 (2'67}~7c S17.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review SEQR FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ^ A o s e : The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project e v i c t i o n may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who h.^ve knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to p ovide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full I \F is comprised of three parts: Part 1 : Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a r«,viewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentiallylarge impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Pfrt 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE-Type 1 and Unlisted Actions D Identify the Portions of EAF c< mpleted for this project: Part 1 D Part 2 DPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting ormation, and considering bcth the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the r ad agency that: D A. The project will net result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. D B. Although the projec t could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration w i l l be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or-more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions D Valley Plaza (185 Valley Street, North Tarrytown, NY) Name of Action L. {HO&- Print o r T y ^ e Nam Name of Lead Agency T>Ai/nr> Title of Responsible Officer jsponsibl^Of fjcer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date �PART 1 —PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This d o c u m e n t is d e : gned to assist in d e t e r m i n i n g whether the a c t i o n proposed may have a significant e f f e c:t. t! o n the e n v i r o n m e n t Please c o m p l e t e the entire f o r m . Parts A through E. Answers t o these questions w i l l be considere part of the a p p l i c a t i o n for a p p r o v a l and may be subject to further v e r i f i c a t i o n and public review. Provide any additiona o r m a t i o n y o u believe w i l l b? needed t o c o m p l e t e Parts 2 and 3. # s It is expected t h a t c o m p l e t i o n of the f u l l EAF w i l l be dependent o n i n f o r m a t i o n currently available a n d w i l l not involve new studies, research or investigation If i n f o r m a t i o n requiring such a d d i t i o n a l work is unavailable, so i n d i c a t e and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Valley L Plaz;< LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address. Municipality and County) 185 Valley street, North Tarrytown, NY 10591 (Westchester Co.) NAME OF ArPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Turnquist Architects (914)631-9107 ADDRESS 95 Beekman .'.venue CITY/PO STATE North Tarry •: own NY r 10591 BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER (If different) Gerald ZIP CODE (914) 6 3 1 - 0 2 8 7 Bregiran ADDRESS 17 7 Crest Drive CITY/PO STATE NY Tarrytown ZIP CODE 10591 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Rehabilitation of 1 story retail space and addition of 5 second floor dwelling units. £ Please C o m p l e t e Each Q u e s t i o n - - Indicate N.A. i f not a p p l i c a b l e A. Site Description Physical setting, o f overall projecf, b o t h d e v e l o p e d a n d u n d e v e l o p e d areas. 1. Present l a n d use: ED U r b a n ^Industrial DForest DAgriculture DComrnercial D R u r a l (non-farm) DOthcr 0.11 2. T o t a l acreage o f project area: D R e s i d e n t i a l (suburban) acres PRESENTLY _____ acres AFTER C O M P L E T I O N acres Forested acres acres A g r i c u l t u r a l (Includes orchards, c r o p l a n d , pasture, etc ) acres acres W e t l a n d (Freshwater or t i d a ! as per Articles 24. 25 o f ECL) acres acres W a t e r Surface Area acres acres L'nvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres acres acres acres acres A P P R O X I M A T E ACREACE M e a d o w or Brushland ( N o n - a g r i c u l t u r a l ) 0.11, Roads, b u i l d i n g s a n d other { a\cd surfaces O t h e r i n d i c a t e type) 3. W h a t is p r e d o m i n a n t soil type.>) on project site? a. Soil d r a i n a g e : DWell 'rained DPoorb N/A % o f site drained D M o d e r a t e l y w e l l drained % o f site % of site b. If any a g r i c u l t u r a l land is i v o l v e d . h o w m a n y acres of soil are classified w i t h i n soil group 1 t h r o u g h 4 of the NY! v Land C l a s s i f i c a t i o n Syslerr ' acres (See 1 NYCRR 370). i ^ t tre there b e d r o c k o u t c r o p p i n g ' o n project site? a. W h a t is d e p t h t o bedrocks N/A DYes DNo ( i n feel) 2 3 . , « , 4 . ^ ^ H i v ^ S ^ w w i f c s r f a c ^i ^ k ^ - ^ K M - * * * * * * ^ ? �. 5. Appro*''Male p e r c e n t a g e of n o p o s e d project site w i t h slopes UO-10% N/A % DlO-15% D l 5 % or greater f > ..6 % % Is p r o / r M s u b s t a n t i a l l y c o tiguous to. or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State o r the N a t i o n a l Registers of H i s t o r i c Place?' DYes ©No ^ L I* project s u b s t a n t i a l l y c o n ' guous to a site listed on the Register of N a t i o n a l N a t u r a l Landmarks? M ht» ^ K W h a t is the d e p t h o f the water table? ' A DYes JSMo (in" feel) 9. Is site l o c a t e d over a p r i m r r y . p r i n c i p a l , or sole source- aquifer? DYes D3No 10. Do h u n t i n g , fishing o r she'l fishing o p p o r t u n i t i e s presently exist i n the project area? DYes ©No 1 1 . Does project site c o n t a i n any species of plant or animal l i f e t h a t is i d e n t i f i e d as threatened o r endangered? DYes _ Identify 0 N o According to e a c h spec-es 12. Are there any u n i q u e or v uisual land forms" on the project site? (i.e.. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) DYes ENo Describe . : 13. Is t h e p ' o j e c t site presenr y used b y t h e c o m m u n i t y or n e i g h b o r h o o d as an open space o r recreation area? DYes tSNo f yes, explain . 14. Does the present site inch de scenic views k n o w n t o be i m p o r t a n t t o the community? DYes a No 15. Streams w i t h i n o r c o n t i g u o . s l o project area None . : a. N a m e o f Stream i n d name o f River t o w h i c h it is t r i b u t a r y 16. Lakes, pc-nds. w e t l a n d area: w i t h i n or contiguous t o project area: .-> Name None .___ 17. Is the s i ' ° served by existing public utilities? ©Yes f> Size ( I n acres) i'JNo a) If Yes. does s u f f i c i e n t c a i a c i f v e*ist t o allow- c o n n e c t i o n 7 ESYes ^ ^ B b) If Y e ' , w i l l i m p r o v e m e n t * b'* necessary t o allow Conner-ion? DNo DYes ENo 18. Is the sM" l o c a t e d i n an a g - i c u l ' u r a l district certified pursuant t o A g r i c u l t u r e and /Markets Law, A r t i c l e 25-AA, Section 3fs3 and 304? Dies SNo 19. Is the site located i n o r subr-'anliallv contiguous t o a Crip, al E n v i r o n m e n t a l Area designated pursuant t o A r t i c l e 8 of the E D . and 6 NYCRR M / ? %\es p ^ 20. Has the r i t e ever been used for the disposal of solid or h a - a r d o u s wastes* DYes HNo B. Project Description 1 . Physical dimensions a n d scale o f project ( f i l l i n dimensions as a p p r o p r i a t e ) a. T o t a l contiguous acreaee o w n e d or c o n t r o l l e d by p r o j c ( sponsor b. Proje* t acreage t o be d e v e l o p e d : N / A A'M acres i n i t i a l l y ; c. Project acreage t o r e m a i n u n d e v e ' o p e d D d . Length o f p r o j e c t , in m i l e . : f l f appropriate:) ?J/A N/A 0 - 1 1 acres. &_U . acres u l t i m a t e l y . aces. e. If the project is an exparr ion. i n d i c a t e percent of e x p a - r r o n p r o p o s e d 70 f. Numb,- of off-st,eel p a , ^ g spaces existing ^ n _ _ . g Maximum vehicular trip? ? enerated per hour ^ rJ * - * *** h. If residential: N u m b e r arse type of housing units: One Fam ly T w o Family , ^ p o W ^ v M u l t i p l e Family Q Ultimately 5 33 ^ U ^ ( u p o n c o m p l e t i o n o f project)? Initially i. Dimensions (in feet) o f l a a »st proposed structure %; height; ^ ».-•-- A ? ^ ^ Condominium . 50 j . Linear feet of f r o n t a g e alo g a p u b l i c thoroughfare project w i l l o c c u p y is width; ? 290 120 length. fj • 4 *3aS*^«4^jk^ : i^5£*sai»i3cito*'iS \ --:^-- -: iCS^^fi^^-*-^-*** L " ^s* 1 *^" �2. H o w m u c h natural material (»t »ock. earth, etc j -..ill be r e m o v e d f r o m the sit > 3. W i l l d i s t u r b e d areas be r e c l a i m e d ' GYes DNo toi.s/cubic yards K3N/A ft- If yes. for w h a t intend . purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. W i l l topsoil be stockpiled lor r e c l a m a t i o n ' N / A DYes _ D N o c. W i l l upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNo 4. H o w m a n y acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, g r o u n d covers) w i l l be r e m o v e d fr„>m site? N/A acres. 5. W i l l any m a t u r e forest (o\er 100 years old) or other l o c a l l y - i m p o r t a n t vegetatio . be r e m o v e d b y this project? DYes KlNo 6. If single phase project: A n t i c i p a t e d period of c o n s t r u c t i o n 6 month', (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. T o t a l number of phases anticipated N/A ^_ (number) b. A n t i c i p a t e d date of commencement phase I month year, ( i n c l u d i n g demolition) c. A p p r o x i m a t e c o m p l e t i o n date of f i n a l phase month year. d. Is phase 1 f u n c t i o n a l l y dependent o n subsequent phases? 8. W i l l blasting occur during construction? DYes ; after p r o j e c t is c rnplete f) 15 + . 1 1 . W i l l project require relocation of any projects t.i facilities? 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? D l !o GSNo 9. N u m b e r of jobs generated during c o n s t r u c t i o n _ . 3 0 A 10. N u m b e r of jobs eliminated by this project DYes D'ies DYes (v|N\ If yes, e x p l a i n fcQNo a. If yes. indicate type or waste (sewage, i n d m t i i a l , etc.) a n d a m o u n t b. N a m e of water body into w h i c h e f f l u e n t w i l l be discharged 13. Is subsurface l i q u i d waste disposal involved? £3Yes ' DNo T>pe Sewage v 14. W i l l surface area of an existing water b o d y incic.-.se ur decrease by proposal? Explain 15. Is project or any p o r t i o n of project l o c a t e d in a H»0 year f l o o d plain? 16. W i l l the project generate solid waste? £DYes a. If yes. w h a t is the amount per m o n t h b d 2 - ** • QYt'- ® N o tons \^T^-^umri^^^r QQYes O^^ ^ J . DNo ; Helton r t r c c t W i l l any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or i n t o a sanitary lar-;i'ill? e. I f Yes, explain . DYes a. If yes. w h a t is the anticipated rate of d i s p o s a l ' 18. W i l l p r o j e c t use herbicides or pesticides? rZJNo KJNo years. DYes LMNo 19. W i l l p r o j e c t r o u t i n e l y produce odors ( m o r e t h a n one hour per day)? D Y e s L:No 20. W i l l p r o j e c t p r o d u c e operating noise exceeding the l o c a l a m b i e n t noise levels? 2 1 . W i l l p r o j e c t result in an increase in energy use? (3Yes DYes JHNG D N o e l e c t r i c a l & qa^3 f o r h e a t i n g and 1 g h t i n q 22. If water supply is f r o m wells, indicate p u m p i n g c a p a c i t y Total a n t i c i p a t e d water usage per d a y 2 0 0±- . _ Z i l gallons/i . i n u t e . gallons/day. 0.^<^0%. 24. Does p r o j e c t i n v o l v e Local, State or Federal funding? If Yes, e x p l a i n DYes tons/month b. If yes. w h a t is the anticipated site life? If yes , indicate type(s) PgeEJl<>\ . 17. W i l l the project involve the disposal of s o l i d waste? 23. E^No DNo If yes, w i l l an existing solid waste f a c i l i t y be tiseii? c. If yes. give name DYes DYes . v © N o - 4 | £ O 0 ^ p<* . ,., .. �2*> ApprosaU Required: Submittal Date Type r- City. T o w n . V i l l a g e Board P City. T o w n Z o n i n g Board EJYes DN6 City. C o u n t y H e a l t h D e p a r t m e n t DYcs RNO Other L o c a l Agencies ISYes DNo Other R e g i o n a l Agencies DYes RNo State Agencies DYes 63 No Federal Agencies DYes 13 No City. T o w n . V i l l a g e Planning Board KYes t'JNo building permit fSYcs DNo planning hnnrrl >narrT ^ipprnv^l variannp arr?hi h p r f n r a l review board. C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does p r o p o s e d a c t i o n i n - . o k e a p l a n n i n g or zoning decision? IjgYes DNo If Yes. indicate decision required: O z o n i n g amendment Cvzoning variance U s p e c i a l use p e r m i t v D n e w / r e v i s i o n o f m.v er p!--n Drcr-ou'cc manan« ment p l a n 2 . W h a t is the z o n i n g class* 'ration(s)of the site? Dsubdivision © s i t e plan Gother C--2 H ^ c a n t i l c 6&*era.l ^ M l / ^ ^ ' f t J 3 . W h a t is the m a x i m u m p»> ?ntiol d e v e l o p m e n t of t h r site if d e v e l o p e d as p e r m i t t e d b y the present zoning? _ p r e R e n 11.y nOUT- uii£cvani n q „ r 4 . W h a t is t h e proposed zo- -rig of t h e site? Lacrk JR_.n n r k i n q , exi.s-fci.zv-? eiic.. & multip-U? = nn expansion p e r m i t terl dwelling 5 . W h a t is the m a x i m u m p o ' -filial d e v e l o p m e n t of the site if d e v e l o p e d a^- p e r m i t t e d b y the proposed zoning? Nefte 6. 0*2 Si^it fistula o^-f>^of*Wli cW^l-V * ftUltipteAuvfCllihl ] rtfai'l \6fh'ct\C0tor*4rtfoJ Is the p r o p o s e d a c t i o n co* distent w i t h the recommended uses in a d o p t e d l o c a l land use plans? W h a t are the p r e d o m i n a n KJYes DNo land use(s) a n d zoning c l a r i f i c a t i o n s w i t h i n a V* m i l e radius o f proposed action? 8. I : t h e p r o p o s e d a c t i o n c o m p a t i b l e w i t h adjoining'surrounding l a n d us^s w i t h i n a V* mile? 9. If the p r o p o s e d a c t i o n is '.he subdivision o f land, how many lots are proposed? ®Yes DNo N/A a. W h a t is the m i n i m u m ' l o t size proposed 7 10 W i l l p r o p o s e d a c t i o n refit- -e any a u t h o r i z a t i o n ^ } for t h - f o r m a t i o n of sewer or water districts? 11. W i l l t h e proposed a c t i o n rreate a d e m a n d - f o r any c o m m u n i t y p r o v i d e d services (recreation, e d u c a t i o n , police, fire protection)? KYer DNo a. If yes, is existing r ipacity s u f f i c i e n t t o handle projected demand? KJYes J©No DNo 1 2 . - W i l l t h e p r o p o s e d a c t i o n i suit i n the generation of traffic s i g n i f i c a n t l y a b o v e present levels? a. If yes, is the exists n road n e t w o r k adequate to h.mdle the a d d i t i o n a l traffic? K^^s DYes DYes EJNo DNo D. Informational Details A t t a c h a n y a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n as m a y be needed t o c l a r i f y y o u r p r o j e c t If there are o r m a y be any adverse impacts associated w i t h your p oposal. please discuss such impacts a n d the measures w h i c h y o u propose t o mitigate o r avoid them. E. Verification I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e i n f o r m a t i o n p r o v i d e d above is true "to the best o f m y k n o w l e d g e . Applir*rit«ymMgy«gi»g t lature Jy^JAMjAy »e p c i i o n i w i t h this assessment. Turr.quist I UAv- > VuAyi HMP A r c h i t e c t s "" Title 12/24/93 Architect I A r r V and y o u are a stale agency, c o m p l e t e the Coastal Assessment F o r m b e f o r e proceeding 5 �r Pan '-PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responvibilil) o| Lead Agency tJenrr->| Information (Read Ca' •fully) • In completing the f o r m the • -viewer should be guided b\ tlie question Have my responses and determinations been • d determination* reP5f«nable? The reviewer is ' ot expected to be an expert environmental analyst. denlifying that an impact v 'I be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also nee ecessarily significant. j * An> large impact must be e^ iluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impaict in column 2 simply p asks that it be looked at fur' ier. • The Txamples provided are t' majr'itude that w o u l d trigger for most situations. But. for for .-> Potential Large Impact assist the reviewer by shoeing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of a response in column 2 The examples are generally applicable throughout the State arid my specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate 'espouse, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. •„Tbe impacts of each projec'. on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and hav^ been offered as guidance. 1he> do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • Thr "umber of examples per juest»on does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consir ?r Ion?, term, short term and emulative effects Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 quest ->ns in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be cc 'sidced as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a quests i then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold er 'air- or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, cheel column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about - ^e of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. r r i. e. If a potentially large impact (Necked in column 2 can be migrated by chang^(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes !«-»x in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3 IMPACT ON L A N D 1 . W i l l the proposed action resul in a ph\<ical change to the project site? S-NO DYES Examples that would apply to co'umn 2 • Any construction on slopes of ' 5 % or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10% • Construction on land where t h * depth to,the water table is l^'s than 3 feet. 1 2 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo n DYes DYes DNo DNo 3 v Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generall> within 3 feet of existing ground surface. D . D D • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. D D DYes DNo • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e.. rock or soil) per year. D D. DYes DNo • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. D G D D D DYes DYes DNo DNo n DYes DNo • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles • Construction in a designated f l ' odway • Other impacts L 2 . W i l l there be an effect t- ...iy i*:;que f>r unusual land forms found on ^ f c e site? (i.e.. cliffs, dunes, geol pica! formations. etc.)5?NO UYES • ^ ^ eJecifi' c land forms: D D DYes DNo �3 IMPACT ON WATER W i l l proposed a c t i o n affect any water b o d y designated as p r o t e c t e d ' (Under Articles 15. 24. 25 of he f m i r o n m e n t a l Conservation Law. ECL) EJNO F ^ m p l e s that w o u l d appK to c o l u m n 2 • Developable area of site ct lain* a p r o t e c t e d water body. 1 2 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact • D D •Yes •Yes DNo • • • •Yes •Yes •Yes DNo • • • • Yes DNo • Yes • Yes DNo DNo • • • • • • • • • • • Yes • Yes DNo DNo D • Yes DNo • • • • • • Y es • No •Yes •Yes • No • No •Yes •No •Yes •No D • •Yes •No • D •Yes •No a • • Yes •No • D •Yes DNo • D •Yes GNO DYES • Dredging m o r e t h a n 100 cu v »c yards of m a t e r i a l f r o m channel of a protected s t r e a m . D • Extension of u t i l i t y distribute ' facilities through a protected water body. D • Construction in a designate > f r ^ h w a t e r or t i d a l w e t l a n d •, Oth'-r i m p a c t s : '_ 4 . W i l l p r o p o s e d a c t i o n affec» any non p r o t e c t e d existing or new b o d y of water? GDNO DYES Examples t h a t w o u l d apply ' o c o l u m n 2 • A V)% increase or decrease »u the surface area of any b o d y of w a t e r or more t h a n a 10 acre increase or decrease. • C o n s t r u c t i o n of a b o d y of wa*er that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. • OtlK-r i m p a c t s : . 5 . W i ' l Proposed A c t i o n affect surface or g r o u n d w a t e r q u a l i t y or q u a n t i t y ? K?NO Examples t h a t w o u l d apply o c o l u m n 2 « that does not ave a p p r o v a l t o serve p r o p p e d (project) a c t i o n r o p ^ r e d A c t i o n requires wa? r <i«prh- f r o m w e l l * w i t h £•<• a'--: t h a n 45 gallons per m i n u t e p u m p i n r ri 'ap* .l\ • Construction or o p e r a t i o n ce* "inn an> c o n t a m i n a t i o n of a w a t e r supp'y system. P r o p p e d A c t i o n w i l l adverse affect g r o u n d w a t e r . Liquid e f f l u e n t w i l l be conve\« i off IfV site t o facilities w h i c h presently do not exist or have inadequ e capacity. • P r o p p e d A c t i o n w o u l d use day. ater in excess of 20.000 gallons per • Propc ?ed A c t i o n w i l l likely cr ;se s i l t a t i o n or other discharp.' 1 i n t o an existing b o d y o f w a t e r t o the r ent that there w i l l be an obvious v i s u a l contrast t o n a t u r a l conditions • Proposed A c t i o n w i l l require the storage o f p e t r o l e u m or c h e m i c a l prodf-rts greater t h a n 1,100 p---lions. • Proposed A c t i o n w i l l a l l o w re idential uses in areas w i t h o u t w a t e r and/or sewer services. • P r o p p e d A c t i o n locates c o m m rcial and/or i n d u s t r i a l uses w h i c h m a y r e q u i r ° n e w or expansion of e* sting w a s t e t r e a t m e n t and/or storage facility. • Other impacts: 6 ^ W i l l p r o p o s e d a c t i o n alter r'-ainage f l o w or patterns, or ^ ^ a t e r runoff? ©NO ^^ExarnpJes that w o u l d a p p l y to c o l u m n 2 • Proposed A c t i o n w o u l d change f l o o d w a t e r f l o w s . 7 • • D • • DNo DNo DNO DYES • Proposed A c t i o n w i l l require i discharge p e r m i t . • Proposed A c t i o n requires u<-•• of a source of water Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change surface DYES �3—~1 Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact D D D D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo DNo D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action w i l l result in he incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. D D DYes DNo • Emission rate of total contami lants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more t h j n 10 million BTU's per hour. D D DYes DNo • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. D D DYes ONo • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. D D DYes DNo • Other impacts: D D DYes DNO • Reduction of one or more speci?s listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near -ite or found on the site. D D D Y es DNc • Removal of any portion of a < itical or significant wildlife habitat. D D D D DYes DNo DYes DNo D D D Y es D N O Small to • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion ^proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. • Other impacts: ] Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change I M P A C T O N AIR 7.-Will proposed action affect z r quality? 0NO DYES Examples that would apply t( column 2 • Proposed Action w i l l induce 1. XX) or more vehicle trips in any given hour. t • J \ G E C r, IMPACT ON PLANTS A N D A N I M A L S 8. Will Proposed Action affect a .y threatened or endangered ^fcpecies? ENO ^ ^ x a m p l e s that would apply to column 2 DYES • Application of pesticide or herb cide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ,_, 9. Will Proposed Action substant ; ; lly affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? K)NO Examples that would apply to-CDlumn 2 [ DYES * Proposed Action w o u l d substar Jially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildMe species. D D DYes DNo * Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 year:- of age) or other locally important vegetation. D D DYes DNo c c IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL L A N D RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ENO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 * The proposed action w o u l d sever cross or limit access to agricultural (includes cropland, hayfields. pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) I; D D DYes DNo c • 8 G �• onstruction activity would txcavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. • The proposed action would iireversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or. if lc ated in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would dis upt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (eg . subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches. •ctrip cropping); or create a nerd for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to i ' creased runoff) • O t h e r impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 1 1 . W i l l proposed action affec* aesthetic resources? &)NO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21. Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or proje<? components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to curren: surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible -to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. ^ • C r o j e c t components that will result in the elimination or significant ^^Prreening of scenic views kno-»n to be important to the area. • Other impacts. IMPACT O N HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 1 2 . W i l l Proposed Action impa< t any site or structure of historic, preBNO DYES historic or paleontological nportance? Examples that would apply t • < olurnn 2 • Proposed Action occurring wh •IK or partially within or substantially continuous t o any facility or si? licfr^ o n the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeologi' i l site or fossil bed located within the p r o j r ; * site. • Prop f i ?d Action w i l l occur i an area designated as sensitive for arch,T »logical sites on the N^i Site Inventory. • Other impacts: IMPACT O N OPEN 5 ' A C E A N D RECREATION 1 3 . W i l l Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recre. tional opportunities? Examples that w o u l d apply '.o column 2 QNO DYES l a t t i e permanent foreclosure of 3 future recreational opportunity. ^ ^ major reduction of an open space important to the community. • Other impacts: Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D D Y es DN< D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNO D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNO D D DYes DNO D D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNO DNO DNO Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change �t Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact D D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo D D DYes DNo • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply systerr to serve more than 50 single or two family resiliences or to serve a maj i conimercial or industrial use. D D DYes DNo • Other impacts: D D DYes DNo • Blasting within 1,500 feet < * a hospital, school or other sensitive ^_aciiily. D D D Y es DNo ^ ^ R ) d c r s w i l l occur routinely ( r o r e thnn one hour per day) D D D D DYes DYes DNo • Proposed A c t i o n will r e m o \ " natural barriers that nould act as a noise screen. D D DY es DNo • Other D D D Y es DNO • Proposed Action may cause a : sfc of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. o i l , pesticides, < lemicals, radiation, etc ) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. D D DYes DNo • Proposed A c t i o n may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, h ghly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) D D DYes DNo • Storage facilities for one miHK n or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquid' D D DYes DNo • Proposed action may result i i the excavation or other disturbance ^m^ithm 2.000 feet of a site usee: for the disposal of solid or hazardous D D DYes DNO D D DYes DNo IMPACT O f ! T R A N S P O R T A T I O N 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? KJNO Examples that would apply to column 2 DYES Alteration of present patterns of movement of people andfor goods. • Proposed Action will result »n major traffic problems. • Other impacts: ___ Can Impact Be Mitigated By I) Project Change/^ DNO t f IMPACT O N ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? j}()NO DYES Ftamples that would app'y to column 2 • Proposed A c t i o n will cause i greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the n, rnicipality. [ T NOISE Af 1 ODOR IMPACTS 16. W i l l there be objectionab ? odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? GJNO DYES Examples that would appl\ o column 2 • Proposed Action will produ- e operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for nois outside of structures impacts: IMPACT O l DNO PUBLIC-HEALTH 17. W i l l Proposed Action affec public health and safety? SNO Examples that would apply o column 2 DYES L ^Baste • Othc: impacts: . 10 ( �1 1 2 3 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change • The permanent population i the city, town or village in which the . project is located is likely t' grow by more than 5%. D D DYes DNo • The municipal budget for c pitnl expenditures or operating services w i l l increase by more than f ?o per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. D D •Yes DNo D D D D D D DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo • D DYes DNo D D D a DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo 18 V I M P A C T ON GP. 3WTH A N D CHARACTER O F C O M M U N I Y OR N E I G H B O R H O O D W i l l proposed action af f e( the character of the existing: c ommunity? K'N'O DYES t e m p l e s that would app' to column 2 • Proposed action will cause r change in the density of land use. • Proposed A c t i o n will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or .Teas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a dr nand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire. ?tc.) • Proposed A c t i o n will set an'••npoMant precedent for future projects. • Proposed A c t i o n will create ' r eliminate employment • Other impacts: D D 19. Is iere. or is there likely to be, public controversy related to po' ntial adverse environmental impacts? Q3NO DYES If Any Actio In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Canned Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 • Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of l ^ d Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one :r rn'»re impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the f o l l o w i n g for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact 2 . Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project changefs). 3. Based on the information a w lable, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: * T h e probability of the impact occurring * The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact c m or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact . * Its potential divergent <? from local needs and goals » Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) �PREVIOUS DOCUMENTS IN POOR ORIGINAL CONDITION � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1994 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_1994-01-19 Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1994 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text