https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/66fab3b670e81c8eec4925930d8d3c84.pdf add2f4184db8a778ba0aeced99739a62 PDF Text Text * * # Approved with respect to substance and form: Vil Dat ge Att< • oard : ?/ty?9 lrman Filed with Village Clerk *e±erk or ^Deputy Clerk Dated: fi-fir/fJ /% Datila^bf Meeting -^ * -v-j---. /ffS^ -,i.^,-.-j>.<r-*'-^rff-•.-;*;..»*- _ - v ? . ^ ! f r J * , £ > V i ; « ; 3 i - ^ ^ : j V , : s - . £ * w c-1».- f K - ^ ? B I iSigOSSS, v £ 0 * . M i •".- W*«: j f e S ^ ^ & » L ^ l s ^ a & a » ^ " a 5 ^ a ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ �REGULAR MEETING NORTH TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK July 19, 1995 A regular meeting of the NDrth Tarrytown Zoning Board of Appeals was held on July 19, 1995 at 8:00 p.m. at the Village Hall,28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York. PRESENT: Robert Anello, Chairman William Taylor John Morabito Gary McLean Angelo LoMascolo Frank Occhipinti Rhonda Mauhs ALSO PRESENT: Janet A. Gandolfo, Attorney James Margotta, Building Inspector Chairman Anello called the meeting to order at 8:10 p.m. 1) MR. & MRS. JOHN MONACO, 53 Fremont Road - Continuation Mr. Monaco came forward and explained that he was present at the previous meeting. He stated that he and Mr. White of the Sleepy Hollow Manor Assoc, had come to a conclusion. Mr. Weiss came forward and explained that they had proposed that the fence, be an overall height not to exceed 4ft. 2inches and Mr. Monaco agreed. Mr. Monaco explained the fence was going to be screened by greenery. He stated that he was very happy with the proposal. Chairman Anello read a letter that the Zoning Board had received from the ARB dated July 19, 1995. Mr. Monaco said that was prior to his meeting with the Sleepy Hollow Association. Discussion on the fence ensued. Mr. Margotta asked Ms. Gandolfo whether the applicant needed approval from the ARB as well as the ZBA. Ms. Gandolfo answered that approval from both Boards was needed. Mr. Monaco asked what will happen if it was approved by one Board and not the other. Ms. Gandolfo answered that he would not be able to construct the fence. She said that he should reach some compromise with the ARB. Chairman Anello ask if anyone from the public had any comments. �• Mr. Occhipinti moved to close the Public Hearing. Mr. McLean seconded. Public Hearing closed. Mr. Occhipinti made a motion to approve the variance with the stipulation that the greenery be bought up to the full height of the fence. Mr. McLean seconded. Motion to approve the variance carried unaniamously. 2) ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, NORTH BROADWAY - RE-NOTICE The clerk read the Notice of Public Hearing to hear and consider an appeal by Antonio Rodrigues from a decision of the Building Inspector which denied a building permit for the construction of an office and retail building at premises located at North Broadway. The applicant is requesting the following variances: 1. The Schedule of Regulations, Part II requires a 20 foot rear yard in addition to a 5 foot buffer area between a business district and a residential area as required by Section 62-9 (2). The applicant's plan provides for a 15 foot rear yard. 2. Section 62-14E of the Code requires 57 parking spaces forthe proposed project. The plan provides for a total of 44 spaces. 3. Section 62-14F of the Code requires that 2 loading spaces be provided. The plan provides for 1 loading space. 4. Section 62-14C requires that an access drive shall not exceed 25 feet. The applicant's plan proposes an access drive of 27 feet. 5. The Village Code prohibits any wall or open or solid fence in excess of six (6) feet in height to be erected in any business or commercial district. The applicant is proposing a 12 feet terraced retaining wall be built on the north side of the project. The premises are known as Section 17, Block 21 and Lots 15 thru 37 on the tax assessment map of the Village of North Tarrytown. Mr. John Hughes came forward. He went over what was said at last month's meeting and the purpose of the present meeting was the re-notice. Louis Contadino, referring to done since the last meeting. wall was going to be and what wouldn't be any landscaping. was on Antonio's property. the site drawing, explained what he had He showed the Board where the retaining it would look like. He said that there He also stated that the retaining wall Discussion on the retaining wall and it's location followed. Ms. Gandolfo asked if they intended to get permission from the property owners prior to construction, Mr. Hughes said that the wall sat on property line and that the wall will be safe. It was better deal all around for everyone. He distributed to the Board the Acquisition & Development costs of the -2-- - - - _- - " - 'i. �* project. Chairman Anello asked Mr. Hughes to address each variance. 1. On the buffer, Mr. Hughes stated that because of the size and the way the property was situated they couldn't comply with the Code. Mr. Contadino referring to the drawing of the project explained that as far as the intent of the buffer or shield to hide items that you rather not see, he thought that the section he prepared several months ago indicated that the site itself was a natural buffer. He said that it was a very narrow building from a retail point of view. 2. On the parking, Mr. Hughes said that they are 20 per cent short of what the Code required. He had given out figures as to why they were short and explained the cost of the project to the applicant. He went over the costs of the construction. Chairman Anello asked Mr. Hughes if they had submitted an EAF. Mr. Hughes said they had done so to the Planning Board. He stated that the only issues the neighbors had were in the safety of their properties and the architectural aspect of the project. Chairman Anello read a letter dated July 14, 1995 regarding Antonio Rodriguez's application, (see attached) Chairman Anello asked if anyone in the public wanted to comment. Ms. Lucielle Anderson stated that the wall had been there for 65 years. The railroad ties were there. She couldn't afford to build a stone wall. She feels that she's going to have a problem because the new wall wasn't going to stand. Mr. Bruno Lightburger, the engineer passed out pamphlets showing what the retaining wall was going to look like. He showed sketches of the wall on the right side and what the wall would look like on the left side. Chairman Anello asked how far it would be from the property line. Mr. Lightburger said 6 feet from the retaining wall. He showed a model of the wall. It would be 8x6x4 height - 20 feet from the foundation. He explained in detail the contents of the wall. He reassured the Board members that the wall will be safe. Discussion on the elevation of the retaining wall followed. Mr. Landy said that he was concerned because he lived right next door. He wanted to know what the retaining wall was going to look like next to him and if it was going to come to the property line. He asked if the driveway was going to be next to his property. He was also concern about the traffic because it was already a busy intersection Mr. LoMascolo moved to close the Public Hearing. �V Mr. McLean seconded. Public Hearing closed. Mr. LoMascolo stated that the reason they had these problems, issues and discussions was because it was a very unusual topography lot and that this was not going to change. What Mr. Rodriguez was proposing added to the concerns about safety, walls and other things. What he was proposing was a benefit to the Village. The real concern was the safety of the wall. If the Board passed the matter, it should do so with a strong word to the Planning Board to carefully take in consideration all of the neighborhood concerns that had been brought up before the ZBA. Ms. Mauhs thought that it will be a great asset to the whole area. The only concern was the slope area on top of the retaining wall. Mr. Morabito stated that everybody was in agreement and that they liked the project. They should leave it up to the engineers to make sure to protect the residences on top of the hill. The Board was there to determine as to whether to pass the variances. Mr. Taylor expressed concern on the retaining wall. Chairman Anello stated that if the Board gave any variances, he would like it to require that there be a buffer zone in the back, landscaping on both sides of the fence and planting of 5 feet high on the outside and inside of the fence. Mr. McLean commented that they were good people and good builders. They will work with the neighbors. Chairman Anello went through.each of the variances for approval. 1, A variance from the requirement to allow a 10 ft. setback. * The applicant withdrew his request for the variance of the 5 feet buffer area as required by section 62-9C(2). Mr. McLean made a notion to grant this variance with these conditions, planting on the neighbor's side of the fence, at least 5 feet from the property line and maintaining a 5 ft. buffer. Mr. Morabito seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Mr. Morabito made a motion to approve the request for parking. In the event of a sub-division, they will have to come before the Zoning Board and the Planning Board for the re-allocation of the parking spaces. Mr. Taylor seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 3,4 and 5. Mr. McLean made a motion to approve variances 3,4 and 5. Mr. Taylor seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 3. MR. & MRS. WILLIAM BOUTON - 14 Webb Road The clerk read the Notice of Public Hearing to hear and consider an appeal �by Mr. & Mrs. William Bouton from a decision of the Building Inspector which denied a request to convert a patio to a habitable room at premises located at 14 Webb Road. The request has been denied for the following reasons: 1) The Schedule of Regulations, Part I requires a front yard setback of 30'-0 for a residence located in District R-2. Site plan A-l, dated June 15, 1995 indicated that the front yard setback on Hamlock Drive is 20'-6". The premises are known as Section 11, Block IT, Lot 1A on the tax assessment map of the Village of North Tarrytown. Mr. Bouton came forward and stated that the patio he wanted to convert was on the side of the house. The existing patio was 19' 7" x 10" which at present didn't meet the Zoning Code either. He said that the only people who would see his addition were the Sharoffs. He distributed a letter from the Sharoffs and read the letter,to the Board, (see attached) where they express their approval of the addition. He also turned in a letter from the Sleepy Hollow Manor Association and said that they also were in favor. Chairman Anello asked if the front yard was going to be 20'. Mr. Bouton answered that his existing patio was 19' 7" x 10' and it will be 20* 6" from the property line. Chairman Anello commented that he was looking for a 9 1/2* variance. Chairman Anello asked what the room would be used for. Mr. Bouton answered that it would be a playroom. Ms. Gandolfo stated for the record that the property was a corner lot. Chairman Anello asked if anyone in the audience had any comments. No one came forward. Ms. Mauhs moved to close the Public Hearing. Mr. Taylor seconded. Public hearing closed. Mr. Morabito made a motion that the Zoning Board of Appeals be declared Lead Agency in this matter and this be declared a Type II SEQA Action which will have no material adverse impact on the environment. Ms. Mauhs seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Morabito made a motion that the variance be granted. Ms. Mauhs seconded. Motion to grant the variance carried unanimously. 4. DAVID WARREN - 217 Highland Avenue - Second story addition -5•v^v'ifa* 5 i ^ uSk&rA S*J*rSj»S*J&aKa=-J» J«SJa«J§SE*3S«2iii3^S �The clerk read the Notice of Public Hearing to hear and consider an appeal by David Warren from a decision of the Building Inspector which denied a building permit for the construction of a second story addition at premises located at 217 Highland Avenue. The applicant is requesting the following variance: 1) The Schedule of Regulations, Part I requires both side yards to total a minimum of 25 feet. The survey of the premises indicated that both side yards measure 21.44 feet. The premises are known as Section 14, Block 16, Lot IK on the tax assessment map of the Village of North Tarry town. The architect came forward and passed out photo copies of the original survey and site plans to the Board. He explained that the addition to the house was a second floor addition and it was going to go straight up to the parameters of the existing house. That it was in the eastern part of the house. Chairman Anello commented that the only variance he would need was for the side yard. Discussion on the neighboring houses and their locations to the premises ensued. Chairman Anello commented that the purpose of the addition was for more living room. Mr. Warren said he had a son and another on the way. Chairman Anello asked if anyone in the audience had any comments. No one came forward Mr. LoMascolo moved »:o close the Public Hearing. Mr. McLean seconded. Public Hearing closed. Mr. Morabito saw no problem at all with this reguest. Chairman Anello commented that this addition wouldn't change the character of the neighborhood. Mr. McLean made a motion to declare this a Type II SEQA Action which will have no material adverse impact on the environment. Mr. Taylor seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Morabito moved that the variance be granted. Mr. McLean seconded. Carried unanimously. 5. MICHAEL MINERVA - 111 Bedford Road The clerk read the Notice of Public Hearing to hear and consider an appeal by Michael Minerva from a decision of the Building Inspector which denied a building permit to erect a new raised deck at the rear �of the house on premises located at 111 Bedford Road. The request has been denied for the following reasons: 1) The Schedule of Regulations, Part I requires a 25'-0 rear yard setback for a residence located in District R-3. The survey indicates a 12*-0 rear yard setback. The premises are known as Section 17, Block 7, lot 23 on the tax assessment map of the Village of North Tarrytown. Mr. Minerva came forward and explained that he lived on Bedford Road and that it was a busy road. He has 2 young children and an infant. It was not a big piece of property and he proposed to build a raised deck for the children to play. chairman Anello asked if he had a survey. The Board went over the survey which was attached to the Notice. Chairman Anello asked if anyone else had any comments. Mr. Morabito moved to close the Public Hearing. Mr. Mclean seconded. Public Hearing closed. Mr. LoMascolo commented that the house would be more in keeping with the neighboring houses with the deck. Mr. McLean moved to declare this a Type II SEQA Action which will have no material adverse impact on the environment. Mr. LoMascolo seconded. Carried unanimously. Mr. Morabito moved to grant the variance. Mr. Taylor seconded. Carried unanimously. 6. MARY ORE - 26 Depeyster Street Chairman Anello said that the applicant did not have proof for the legal notice. V Mr. Occhipinti made a motion to adjourn to next month. Mr. McLean seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 7. JAMES NAZEMETZ - 134 Hunter Avenue The clerk read the'NDtice of Public Hearing to hear and consider an appeal by james Nazemetz from a decision of the Building Inspector which denied a building permit to extend the front of a single family residence located at 134 Hunter Avenue. The application has been denied for the �following reasons: The Schedule of Regulations, Part I requires the following: A front yard of 30'0". The survey shows 23*-0". Lot width of 75' --0. The survey shows a lot width of 59*-0. The premises are known as Section 14, Block 4, Lot IV on the tax assessment of the Village of North Tarrytown. Mr. Nazemetz came forward and explained his reasons for wanting to extend his residence. He needed more room and bigger closets. Mr. Chairman asked him how many rooms were in the house. Mr. Nazemetz said 3 bedrooms. Mr. Morabito moved to close the Public Hearing. Mr. McLean seconded. Public Hcjaring closed. Mr. Occhipinti made a motion to declare this a Type II SEQA Action which will have no material adverse impact on the environment. Mr. McLean seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Morabito made a motion to grant the variance. Mr. Taylor seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Morabito moved to approve the minutes of May 17, 1995 as amended. Mr. McLean seconded. Carried unanimously. Mr. McLean moved to approve the minutes of June2I, 1995 as amended. Mr. LoMascolo seconded. Carried unanimously. There being no further business before the Board, Mr. McLean moved to adjourn the meeting. Mr. Morabito seconded. Carried unanimously. Respectfully T^RMEN G. MARIANO Recording Secretary -8'-Jjl^V^ -«:>itSrS?—, �2*-" u • & • - &--V-AV\* ~5~^*\£ W* AT\WA J $ & ' $£ ; CVi> 4-V\ C * p.070 X ^ - * - \ tn«~V\vi Ci OJ>\ < C ^ ^ I :» fc A *fc<*^ 1 ^ a 1\HA "WfrV ft4^v54pA-t W T A \ «vt^-Wt*o=L W / t * W v A c ~ < i -^> 1 ii \V\fr VVW^t<^A At5YL. V«^i>JL C C n ^ A A t^Uv¥^SVv4^ HOUJ«A-YILU\ \ B ,"---i ^ ^ ' ^ . - - i - s ^ i s i i ; •„-;»BJ-i l .t5.4i.-t--s5<iS&Cw3«r ! : tt^M*^*sas&&»s3i^fa^ t |jai#: �Acquisition and Development 1. Site Development Cost A. B. C. D. Excavation Backfill Paving Retaining Wall $ 20,000;o6 15,00000 60,000.00 175,000.00 Total 2. Improvement Cost 11,900 sq. ft. @ $80 per sq. 3. $ 270,000.00 Land Cost Total Acquisition and Development ft. $ 952,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $1,722,000.00 �1r IO£Q£Q£ 4» Rental Income (10% loss to common areas) A. Professional Office Space 6372 sq. ft. @ $12 per sq. B. Retail Space 4338 sq. ft. @ $15 per sq. ft. $76,464.00 fit 65,070.00 $141,534.00 Expenses 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Real property taxes ($2.50 per sq. ft.) $"^300.00 Utilities (passed on to tenant) Interior maintenance and repairs (passed on to tenant) --— Exterior maintenance and repairs 4,000.00 Management - legal accounting 4,000.00 $1,700,000.00 @ 9.75% (one percent above current prime rate) 15 year amortization, 5 year balloon. 214,000.00 $249,000 00 Net Profit ($107,466.00) Adjustment Cost of land- with no return 63,000.00 63,000.00 ($44,466.00) \ x ~'^--ev&£di&k&!-2&2iJ^^^ �V 15 WEBB ROAD. NORTH TARRYTOWN. NEW YORK 10591 July 5, 1995 Zoning Board of Appeals Village of North Tarrytown 28 Beekman Avenue North Tarrytown, New York Attn: Linda David, Village Clerk As owners and residents of property located at 15 Webb Road, we support the appeal of Mr, and Mrs. William Bouton to convert a patio to a family room at their home at 14 Webb Road. We believe that this variance from the schedule of regulations is in the best interests of the property owner, adjoining owners and the village We urge approval of the appeal. / «BRIAN S / JUDITH SHAROFF „ ^r^r>Elc^ife^^ �SLEEPY HOLLOW MANOR ASSOCIATION June 15, 1995 Mr. and Mrs. William Bouton 14 Webb Road North Tarrytown, New York 10591 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bouton: The Board of the Sleepy Hollow Manor Association has reviewed the architectural drawings (KGA Project No. 95-080, dated 6/9/95) submitted by you with respect to the proposed addition to your home at 14 Webb Road, North Tarrytown, New York and has determined that the addition is acceptable. Accordingly, I am hereby notifying you of the approval of such plans by the Sleepy Hollow Manor Association. We wish you well on the impending additions, also, to your family. Very truly yours, Richard D. Weiss, President, Sleepy Hollow Manor Association cc: James Margotta, North Tarrytown Building Inspector --T"-~>mi^~^-~--.-*!«'^"c-J;*:^a^-JJL - ietsSd^^&^S^^US&Sij^^^^^^^^^^^g^^^^ ��W J * . 5W«-"*—*V-~ "-"i-;-j*^f-.t :-,->iis# ;•- •..-i:-', .-..-.» ,»-. i-*.r- -,£^s^j.j-i •»i 1 'ni-iisrt4w*i«^SiaJSfc&ai l : =i£s.S g^Aa^&taa^^^i&^Sig^giE-feil^^^M^i �LEGAL NOTICE VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN \ PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of North Tarrytown will hold a public hearing on Wednesday, June 21, 1995 at 8:00 P.M. in the Municipal Building, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown to Hear and consider an appeal by Mr. and Mrs. John Monaco from a decision of the Building Inspector which denied a building permit for the construction of a six (6) foot fence at premises located at 53 Fremont Road. The applicant is requesting a variance from the Village code which prohibits the erection of fences and walls in excess of three (3) feet in the front yard of any residential district. The premises are known as Section 11, Block IE, Lot 1 on the tax assessment map of the Village of North Tarrytown. All taxpayers, residents and interested parties are entitled to attend and be heard at the aforesaid hearing. By Order of the Zoning Board of Appeals Linda David, Village Clerk Dated: May 12, 1995 �LEGAL NOTICE VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN >* PLEASB TAKE NOTICE that the ZoningBoard of App^s of the Village of North Tarryto^ wilt hold ipublic hearing oil Wednesday, July 19* 1995 at R.00 P.M. in the Municipal Building, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown. to heir and consider ah appeal by Antonio Rodrigueifroriia decision of the Building Inspector Which denied a building permit for the constructiort of an Office and retail building at premises located at J R Broadway.; the applicant is fequeitlnjj sfevfcral variances, as follows: 1) Thi Schedule of Regulations, Part II require! a 20 foot rear yard in addition to a 5 foot buffcf area between a business district arid a residential area as required by Section162-9C(2).?th£applicant's plan providesfora i$ foot rear yard. - jt) Section 62-14E of the Code requires 57 parking spaces for the proposed *V> ptoi^b^^^m^urf^^i. ,v ,--^,v.•*.-:.."• * '~ '..-';.. \ The applicant's plan provide* for a total of 44 spaces. - ? 3)' Sectiol 62ii4F of the Codi requires that 2 loading spaces be provided. The applicant'splait provides for t-loadingSpace. 4) Section 62-14C requires that ah access drive shall not exceed 25 feet, the applicant's plan proposes an accessdrive of 27 feet. ; 5) The Village Code prohibits any wall or open or solid fence in excess of six (6) feet in height to be erected in any business or commercial district. The applicant is proposing a 1 2 foot terraced retaining wall be built on the north side of the project. ^4" The premises irl knb\vii as Section 17, Block 21; tots 15 thru 37 on the tax assessment map of itie Village of Ndrih tarrytown. ''Vlfl'cf Ail taxpiy^s, feiidenti Ihd interested parties are entitled to attend and be heard at the aforesaid hearing. ^ By 6rdcr oHhe.^bnlrig Board of Appeals Linda t)avid, VtUagi fclerk Dated: June i%^99S *> i. - • " 1 T * =r \ • * v ; m ' w " * • ' -. ' -. ' _ - -* 4- :i w € -2 . i- - I' t. %? * -" •" # ^' * ** * .-'<./•" v-----**. . ..-^.. Jift* L-^via.sssr^&ejeitji, «w**M2ig! =!B "*™* *™« " Sy*^Jb^SSSBJl'*;-J^a * - » fc -5i *".*«• ^%*T �«% * LEGAL NOTICE VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of North Tarrytown will hold a public hearing on Wednesday, July 19, 1995 at 8:00 P.M. in the Municipal Building, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown to hear and consider an appeal by Mr. & Mrs. William Bouton from a decision of the Building Inspector which denied a request to convert a patio to a habitable room at premises located at 14 Webb Road. The request has been denied for the following reasons: 1) The Schedule of Regulations, Part I requires afrontyard setback of 30'-0 for a residence located in District R-2. She plan A-1, dated June 15, 1995 indicated that the front yard setback on Hemlock Drive is 20-6". The premises are known as Section 11, Block IT, Lot 1A on the tax assessment map of the Village of North Tarrytown. All taxpayers, residents and interested parties are entitled to attend and be heard at the aforesaid hearing. By Order of the Zoning Board of Appeals Linda David, Village Clerk Dated: Junel9, 1995 �• * - • • • . 0 7 - LEGAL NOTICE VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTWVN vPLfc ASE TAkB NOTICB thai ine Zoning Boaid of Appeals of the Village of North Taxrytowii Will hold a jaiblic hearing on Wedneid»y» ^uly 19,1995 at 8:00 P.M. in the Municipal Building, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytowrt to hear and consider an appeal by David Warrenfroma decision of the Building Inspector which denied a building permit for the construction of a second story addition at premises located at 217 Highland Ave. North Tarrytown. The applicant ts Requesting the) following variance: 1) The Schedule of Regulations, Part I requires both side yards to total a minimum of 25 feet. The survey of th6 premises indicates that both side yards measure 21.44 feet. —, • -" a- m - - ~ \ The premisei if6 known as Section 14, Block 16, Lot IK on the tax assessment map of the Village" of Kbrth Tanytowh. All taxpayers, residents and interested parties are entitled to attend and be heard at the aforesaid hearing. By drdo* of the Zoning Board of Appeals Linda David, Village pierk Dated: June 26,1995 • * i V / . . i J r * V- ja»j=-> > s - — ' « i**^?^?*?}' ~^-MS-r*.:-J*r. ^S.:waa4--Anfci-^ BS& ',*&'£% �LEGAL NOTICE VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of North Teurytowti will hold a public hearing on Wednesday, July 19,1995 at 8:00 P.M. in the Municipal Building, 28 Beekmati Avenue, North Tarrytownto hear and consider an appeal by Michael Minervafroma decision of the Building Inspector which denied a building permit to erect i new raised deck at the rear of the house on premises located at 111 Bedford Road. The request has been denied for the following reasons: 1) The Schedule of Regulations, Part I requires a 25'-0 rear yard setback for a residence located in District R-3. The survey indicates a 12'-0 fear yard setback. The premises are known as Section 17, Block 7, Lot 28 on the tax assessment map of the VTlligb of Nohh f arryto\vn. ; •Alt taxpayers, residents and interested parties are entitled to attend and be heard at the aforesaid hearing. By Order of the Zoning Board of Appeals Linda David, Village Clerk Dated: June.** 1995 �LEGAL NOTICE VILLAGE OF NORTH TAJUIYT OWN PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of North Tarrytown will hold a public hearing on Wednesday, Jury i9,1995 at 8:00 P.M. in the Municipal Building, 28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown to hear and consider an appeal by James Nazemefz from a decision of the Building Inspector which denied a building permit to extend the front of a single family residence located at 134 Hunter Avenue. The application has been denied for the following reasons: The Schedule of Regulations, Part I requires the following: Afrontyard of 30»-0\ The survey shows 28*~0". Lot width of 75'-0. The survey shows a lot width of 50'-0. The premises are known as Section 14, Block 4, Lot IV on the tax assessment map of the Village of North Tarrytown. All taxpayers, residents and interested parties are entitled to attend and be heard at the aforesaid hearing. By Order of the Zoning Board of Appeals Linda David/ Village Clerk Dated: June 2T, 1995 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1995 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ZONING_1995-07-19 Subject The topic of the resource Zoning Board Minutes & Resolutions-1995 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1995 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text