https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/f7b488c7fe48aaf514c1164bb7838bda.pdf d5bf6877d22144f186005d55e96426f8 PDF Text Text VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING-APPROVED June 25, 2008 The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:03pm. The Chair noted that a quorum was present. Present: Ana Maria McGinnis David Pysh, Chairman Pat Piereson Sandra Tripp Absent: Carter Sackman Also Present: Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary) Announcements: None Agenda: 1) Anderson 275 Millard Avenue Retaining walls 2) AP Petroleum 3) Scuderia 4) Bearman 5) Yugui Express 6) Cawley 7) Minutes 410 North Broadway 8 Kendall Avenue 515 Bellwood Avenue 110 Beekman Avenue 30 Fremont Avenue Exterior alterations Exterior Alterations Fence Signage Addition and alteration 275 Millard Avenue Retaining walls - 8) Other 1) Anderson Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application along with the owners The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sam Vieira stated that the application consists of replacing existing railroad-tie retaining walls. He gave an overview of the current application before the Planning Board. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the Planning Board issues. Sam Vieira responded that the slope of the property requires Planning Board review. Pat Piereson asked if the heights of the new walls are higher than the existing. Sam Vieira responded that the end result is the same. He stated that there are 3 existing walls that will be replaced with 2 new walls. Pat Piereson asked how the property connected with the adjacent property. �Sam Vieira responded that the walls will return onto themselves. Sam Vieira stated that the existing walls are decaying and need to be replaced. He stated that the 2 retaining walls will allow the owners will be able to better utilize their yard. He stated that the walls will be made of inter-locking masonry blocks. Pat Piereson asked about how the neighbors feel about the work. Ken Anderson responded that he has letters from the neighbors endorsing the proposed work. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that this is a practical solution to the retaining wall problem. She stated that the proposed landscaping plan needs work. Sam Vieira responded that the landscaping plan on the plans is not what is proposed. He stated that the plantings were put on the plans by the engineer. He stated that the landscaping will eventually obscure the wall. Sandra Tripp stated that the choice of materials needs to be better selected. Ken Anderson responded that the landscaping will hide the walls. Sandra Tripp responded that the Board can only review what is presented. There was an open discussion on maintaining any landscaping as part of the application. Sean McCarthy stated that if the landscaping is part of the site plan approval, it must be maintained in perpetuity. He also stated that as part of the site plan approval, a landscape plan will be required. The Chair asked about the need for railings on the wall. Sam Vieira responded that a railing will be installed only on the upper wall. The Chair stated that the wall should be hidden in greenery. Ana Maria McGinnis agreed but wanted to see the landscape plan. Pat Piereson stated that the proposed structure should also be aesthetically pleasing. She stated that the landscaping can grow and die. She asked if another material can be used. Sam Vieira responded that there are other engineering issues with the existing bedrock. He stated that the existing railroad tie system is failing as a result of the unique site conditions. The Chair asked if the property can be re-graded to eliminate one of the retaining walls systems. APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 2 �Sam Vieira responded that the existing rock ledge will not permit re-grading. He stated that the walls stabilize the site. The Chair asked if the applicant can explore possibly eliminating the lower wall and plant on the slope to hide the upper wall. Ken Patterson responded that he would investigate. Pat Piereson asked the applicant to evaluate stone facing in front of the existing wall. This was adjourned to the next meeting. No action was taken. 2) AP Petroleum 410 North Broadway Exterior alterations - Sam Vieira is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owners Sam Vieira gave an overview of the revised application. He stated that there are still issues with the site plan but he wanted to get the Board’s feedback. The Chair asked if the property has a second floor. Sam Vieira responded no. Pat Piereson stated that she likes the window treatments. Sam Vieira stated that the lanterns on the façade can be removed. He stated that the Planning Board’s review will take additional time so the Board does not have to provide comments this evening. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. The Board provided positive feedback on the scheme on drawing A2. The Chair made a motion to recommend the following revisions to the Planning boardthe application (drawing A2) with the following conditions: roofing material be upgraded to an architectural shingle (not green) and that the down-light be eliminated. If there are existing brackets under the soffit, that they be re-used. Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 3) Scuderia 8 Kendall Avenue Exterior Alterations - Roger Pelleton is the project architect and is representing this application on behalf of the owner. 3 APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 �Roger Pelleton gave an overview on the proposed changes. He spoke about the exterior colors and the canopy. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sandra Tripp stated that the stainless steel door should be eliminated. Roger Pelleton agreed. He stated that it is an error on the plans. The Chair asked about the use of glass block. Roger Pelleton responded that the glass block will bring in light but will hide the view of the cars from the exterior. The Chair asked about the adjacent properties. Roger Pelleton responded that one side abuts the Van Tassel garage. The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: 1) The owner can omit the glass block and install translucent panels. 2) Canopy over the doors be painted to match the doors below. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 4) Bearman 515 Bellwood Avenue Fence - Jeremy Bearman is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Jeremy Bearman stated that there is an existing fence on the property that will remain. He stated that a proposed chain-link fence is proposed to keep-in his dog. He summarized the proposed fence. He stated that the property is on a corner lot and a 5foot high fence is permitted based on his setback conditions. Jeremy Bearman stated that a cedar fence is proposed where the property line can be seen from the road. He stated that a chain-link is proposed elsewhere. Pat Piereson stated that an aluminum fence should be explored as an effective alternative. Jeremy Bearman responded that he is open to alternatives. The Chair opened the public hearing. APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 4 �Dan Lorenzini (114 Kelbourne Avenue) stated that there are 2 issues. He stated that he is concerned with the chain-link fence and the dog. He stated that the dog could be an issue. He stated that a wooden fence is preferred for aesthetic reasons. He noted on the survey where the two properties join. There was an open discussion on what fences the applicant is proposing to install. The Chair noted that since the 5-foot fence is permitted, the Board does not oppose. He stated that the materials are the issue. Elizabeth Lorenzini asked where the cedar fence is proposed. Jeremy Bearman responded that the Bellwood Avenue side should be solid to prevent the dog from seeing other dogs and barking. Pat Piereson stated that the aesthetics of the neighborhood should be maintained. She stated that the responsibility of the owner to prevent their dog from being a nuisance. Ana Maria McGinnis stated that the applicant should return with a revised proposal. Jeremy Bearman asked the Board for advice on what he can install. Sandra Tripp responded that the applicant should look at other neighboring property owners for fence types. Pat Piereson noted a fence that is installed on Merlin Avenue. She stated that the fence would meet the applicant’s needs as well as be more aesthetically pleasing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. This was adjourned to the next meeting. 5) Yugui Express 110 Beekman Avenue Signage - Mercedes Yugui is the owner and is representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the proposed color. Mercedes Yugui responded that she just likes the color. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the type of business. Mercedes Yugui responded that the company is a multi-service company. APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 5 �The Chair asked about the sign requirements. Sean McCarthy reviewed the Village sign requirements. There was an open discussion on the lettering size. The Chair asked the applicant if she would paint the lettering on the window instead of installing a new sign. Mercedes Yugui responded that she is ok with the revision. Sean McCarthy responded that a revised plan should be reviewed by the Board before granting an approval. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sandra Tripp stated that the applicant should return with a revised plan. This was adjourned to the next meeting. No action was taken. 6) Cawley 30 Fremont Avenue Addition and alteration - Sonja and Chris Cawley are the owners and are representing this application. The Chair asked if the mailings were received. Sean McCarthy responded yes. Sonja Cawley gave an overview of the application. She stated that the proposed application involves installing family space. She stated that she has no handicapped accessible facilities to accommodate Chris Cawley’s handicapped brother. She also stated that porch front was added to keep with the house style. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the house is currently vinyl siding. Sonja Cawley responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked if the shutters are real wood. Sonja Cawley responded yes. Ana Maria McGinnis asked about the casement windows on the side of the house. Sonja Cawley responded that the windows are proposed for privacy. She stated that the adjacent neighbors also have the same windows on the side yard. The Chair stated that the porch piers should be hidden by extending the frieze board. APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 6 �The Chair stated that the exterior materials proposed are new stucco, roof and clapboard to match the existing finishes. The Chair opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing. Sandra Tripp asked if the dimensions shown on the drawings are the zoning setbacks. Sonja Cawley responded yes. Sandra Tripp stated that the massing appears to be leaning towards one neighbor. Sonja Cawley responded that the extension is in keeping with the layout of the house. There was an open discussion on the widow selections and spacing on the side of the house. The Chairman provided a sketch of the windows that the applicant could use on the side of the house. The applicant stated that they would consider the revisions. The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 7) Minutes – The May 2008 meeting minutes were reviewed. The Chair made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (4-0). 8) Other – It was agreed that the Board would meet in August. Adjourned at 10:06 p.m. APPROVED-Architectural Review Board Meeting, June 25, 2008 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_ARB_2008-06-25 Subject The topic of the resource Architectural Review Board Minutes-2008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text