<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="28" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/items/show/28?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-19T09:24:32+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="28">
      <src>https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/d72b21e8ec77b88d53197a2aa09bbe33.pdf</src>
      <authentication>6a220eb51c47da1a966e8531a743bec8</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="18516">
                  <text>i
VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW
WATERFRONT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
October 3. 2001

'

'

Vy^cP

lhe meeting was called loordei by Richard Weiss, Chair at 8.04 p.m
Piesent

Absent

Richaid Weiss, Chan man
Kaiph Guilder man
Teience MeGlynn
Kann Adii
Donald Stcvcr

^^£?/Vgn

OCT | o

m

WLLAQj CLBRff

Doug Maass
George Lence

Also Present Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary)
Announcements:
None.
Agenda:
a) Minutes of June 2001 Meeting
b) Doorley sub-division
a) Minutes of June 2001 Meeting Ralph Gundeiman made a motion to appiove the minutes as submitted. Karin Adir
seconded. It was unanimous.
b) Doorley sub-division Michael Doorley is the applicant. He described the project in detail. It involves subdividing a large parcel into thiee conforming lots. Lot # 1 shown as a 150 x 150 would be
subdivided into 2 lots 75x 75 each
I here was an open discussion on the actual lot sizes a number of lots being created.
Don Stevei asked the applicant why they were subdividing.
Michael Doorley responded because if they ever want to sell, they would have the option to
do so. He also stated that they have no intention to sell any lots at the present time
Don Stever responded that the Village must assume that you will build in their decision
concerning the LWRP
The Chair referred policy 23,25 and 25B
Don Stevei agreed

�Ralph Gunderman explained the role of the LWRP to the applicant
Don Stever stated that he does not feel to plot on Palmer Ave. is consistent with policy 23.
He stated that the two lots on Highland are ok. He also stated that Palmer Ave. is a highly
visible street for the V illage.
Ralph Gunderman agreed with Don Stever He stated that the subdivision is inconsistent
with policy 23.
Don Stever stated that this subdivision could affect property values in Phillipse Manor.
1 he Chair referred to page II- 15 in the LWRP.
The Chair asked the applicant if they had any comments.
Michael Doorley spoke about Lot # 1. He staled that they are not visible from Palmer Ave.
Don Stever agreed.
Ralph Gunderman stated that he would vote on what is in front of him this evening. He also
stated that he would find more consistency with one lot of 150-foot wide.
Don Stever asked if the Miller House is split into two lots.
Michael Doorley responded yes. He stated that the property falls between 75 and 150 feet.
[here was an open discussion on the traffic on Palmer Ave
The Chair referred to policy 23, 25 and 25B
1 he Chair stated that this property is the quintessential Phillipse Manor property.
I errance McGlynn stated that he finds this application inconsistent with the LWRP. Karin
Adir, Ralph Gunderman, Don Stever and the Chair agreed. It was unanimous (5-0).
Don Stever stated that he has no problem with lots I and lot 1A on Highland Ave. with
keeping Palmer Ave. intact.
Ralph Gunderman agreed. He stated that he has no problem with a 150-foot lot on Highland Ave.
The Chair agieed with Ralph Gunderman.
Ralph Gunderman made a motion to adjourn Karin Adir seconded. It was unanimous.
Adjourn at 9:08 PM to next meeting.
Respectfully Submitted,

Anthony DeiVecchio
Waterfront Advisory Committee Meeting, October 3,2001

2

�Village of Sleepy Hollow
Waterfront Advisory Committee
28 Beekman Avenue
Sleepy Hollow, New York, 10591
CONSISTENCY FINDINGS
Application for Subdivision - 247 Palmer Avenue
The Waterfront Advisory Committee of the Village of Sleepy Hollow (the "Committee")
reviewed, at its meeting on October 3, 2001, a proposal for the subdivision of the property
located at 247 Palmer Avenue (the "Property"). Present at the meeting was Mr. Michael
Doorley, the owner of the property, who responded to questions from the Committee. The
Committee unanimously concluded that the proposed subdivision of the Property would not be
consistent with the goals of the Sleepy Hollow Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan ("LWRP)
and with the policies thereof.
The Proposal
The Property consists of approximately 1.5 acres, abutting Palmer Avenue to the south
and Highland Avenue to the north. There is a two and one-half story stone residence and a
separate stone garage situated on the Property. The proposed subdivision would create two lots
abutting Highland Avenue, as well as one lot on the Palmer Avenue side of the Property, to the
east of the remaining portion of the Property on which the residence and garage are located.
Each of the proposed lots would have a frontage of seventy-five feet and would be approximately
one hundred fifty feet deep, and would be conforming lots under zoning requirements of the
Village of Sleepy Hollow.
Consistency Findings
Although correspondence from the owners of the Property asserts that they have no
present plans to sell or build upon the subdivided Property, the Committee concluded that, since
there could be no other realistic purpose for the subdivision other than to enable, at some time,
construction at the site, it was appropriate and necessary for the Committee to consider the
proposal as if it presently contemplated such construction. The Committee, in reaching its
determination that the proposed subdivision would not be consistent with the LWRP, gave
particular consideration to Policies 23,25 and 25B of the LWRP.
POLICY 23 - PROTECT, ENHANCE AND RESTORE STRUCTURE, DISTRICTS,
AREAS OR SITES THAT ARE OF SIGNIFICANCE IN THE HISTORY,
ARCHITECTURE OR CULTURE OF THE STATE, ITS COMMUNITES OR THE
NATION.
POLICY 25 - PROTECT, RESTORE OR ENHANCE NATURAL AND MAN-MADE
RESOURCES WHICH ARE NOT IDENTIFIED AS BEING OF STATEWIDE

�SIGNIFICANCE, BUT WHICH CONTRIBUTE TO THE OVERALL SCENIC
QUALITY OF THE COASTAL AREA.
POLICY 25B - PROTECT OR ENHANCE THE FOLLOWING IDENTIFIED SCENIC
RESOURCES AS AREAS AND VIEWSHEDS [citing Philips Manor as one of nine scenic
landscape subunits].
The Committee observed that the Property is notable as one of the few remaining
examples of the original Philipse Manor development style, which consisted of an "estate"
setting with large residences on large properties. It was also noted that the Property sits at a sort
of "gateway" to Kinglsand Point Park, the Philipse Manor Yacht Club, the Metro North Train
Station and the Hudson Valley Writer's Center.
The scenic assessment of the Philipse Manor subunit in the LWRP "Inventory and
Analysis" section, cites, as the scenic component of this subunit, the following characteristics:
"The residential neighborhood is laid out in a formal grid, and appears more open than
the adjacent residential development in the Sleepy Hollow Manor subunit. The houses
are designed in a variety of styles and are set in landscaped settings, with lawns, shrubs
and garden trees combining with mature street trees to form a vegetative canopy that
screens development from the adjacent U.S. Route 9 and the Hudson River.
" . . . The formal grid setting of the residential neighborhood leads to long and wide vistas
along the residential streets....
"The Philipse Manor subunit was also identified as part of the candidate Haverstraw Bays
Park SASS. The subunit features a variety of contrasting housing styles set in a
distinctive landscaped setting...."
The Committee noted the comment in the "Analysis of Elements of Scenic Importance
Within Sleepy Hollow" portion of the LWRP "Inventory and Analysis" section, that the LWRP
scenic assessment had "considered how the many and varied scenic components of the subunits
contribute to the aesthetic quality of the Village of Sleepy Hollow." Among the components
utilized to identify the "salient characteristics of the landscape" of each subunit are "cultural
character" and "views". The LWRP scenic importance analysis categorizes the Philipse Manor
subunit as one of the "Identified Landscapes of Statewide Scenic Importance and Landscapes of
Regional Scenic Importance", and advises that the identified areas "are afforded protection under
Policy 25 of the Sleepy Hollow Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, which addresses the
protection of overall coastal scenic quality."
The goal of this protection is clearly articulated in the LWRP: "The Village of Sleepy
Hollow is in a position, through the use of their LWRP and exercise of local land use authority,
to protect and improve the scenic quality of the identified scenic resources within their municipal
boundaries." Similarly, since Philipse Manor is identified as a candidate for inclusion the
2

�Haverstraw Bay SASS (Scenic Area of Statewide Significance), the LWRP scenic assessment
specifically includes the Philipse Manor subunit as one of the areas of "very important scenic
values of regional and local significance" and eligible for "a significant measure of recognition
and protection" under Policy 25.
Accordingly, the Committee concluded that to carve away three additional lots from the
Property (with the presumed subsequent construction of three new residences) would irreparably
impair the scenic value of the Philipse Manor subunit and, thus, would not be consistent with the
policy of protection and enhancement of resources which contribute to the overall scenic quality
of the coastal area (Policy 25) or of protection and enhancement of an identified scenic resource
(Policy 25B). The Explanation of Policies applicable to Policies 25 and 25B explicitly
recognizes that:
"Activities which could impair, or further degrade scenic quality are . . . the addition of
structures which because of siting or scale will reduce identified views or which because
of scale, form or materials will diminish the scenic quality of an identified scenic
resource."
Similarly, the Committee determined that such a subdivision would irrevocably impair an
historic resource of the Village, one of the last remnants of the original Philipse Manor
development, and would, therefore, be contrary to the principals of enhancement of a site deemed
to be of significance in the history, architecture and culture of the Village of Sleepy Hollow and
the Philipse Manor community (Policy 23).
Although no alternative subdivision proposal was before the Committee, the members of
the Committee felt that it might be helpful to the Sleepy Hollow Planning Board if the
Committee provided advice as to whether or not there might be another possible subdivision of
the Property that would be consistent with the policies of the LWRP. After consideration, a
majority of the Committee concluded that it could find that a subdivision of the Property that
would result in one new lot, with a frontage of one hundred fifty feet frontage on Highland
Avenue, would have a far less dramatic scenic impact on the Philipse Manor subunit and a much
less damaging effect on the historic value of the Property to the Village and the community.
Such a subdivision could be accepted as consistent with the LWRP.

Village of Sleepy Hollow
Waterfront Advisory Committee

B

^r*L U / A&gt; X
Richard D. Weiss, Chairman

3

�Village of Sleepy Hollow
Department of Fine &amp; Life Safety
MEMORANDUM
TO:

Planning Board Members
Edward Lammers, Esq.
David Smith
Charles A. Manganaro Consulting Engineers

FROM:

Sonja Goldstein-Suss
(914)366-5116

DATE:

October 12, 2001

RE:

Consistency Findings - Waterfront Advisory Committee
Doorley - 247 Palmer Avenue - October 3,2001

The Chairman of the Waterfront Advisory Committee requested that I enclose the
October 3,2001 Consistency Findings for the Doorley Application for Subdivision of
247 Palmer Avenue. The original has been filed with the Village Clerk.
CC:

James T. Margotta
Angela Everett (original)
Michael Doorley

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="12">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4172">
                <text>Waterfront Advisory Committee Minutes-2001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="170">
              <text>MINS_WATER_2001-10-03.pdf</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="171">
              <text>Waterfront Advisory Committee Minutes-2001</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="172">
              <text>2001</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="173">
              <text>Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="174">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
