<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="297" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/items/show/297?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-19T08:37:01+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="297">
      <src>https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/b51cef9deb9d02769e7f51c4ee9417ea.pdf</src>
      <authentication>9c0a1fba5e041994ff364db70d745200</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="18785">
                  <text>VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING - APPROVED
April 22, 2009
The meeting was called to order by David Pysh, Chairman at 8:04pm. The Chair noted
that a quorum was present.
Present:

David Pysh, Chairman
Ana Maria McGinnis
Pat Piereson

Absent:

Carter Sackman
Sandra Tripp

Also Present: Anthony DelVecchio (Recording Secretary)
Sean McCarthy (Village Building Department)

Announcements:
The Chair stated that since there are only 3 members, a unanimous vote is required.
Agenda:
1) Board reorganization
2) Ricardo Rodriguez
97 Cortlandt Street
3) Grotto Holding Corp
300 North Broadway
4) Carlos J. Duluc
95 Beekman Avenue
5) Roger Smith
85 Merlin Ave
6) Planned Comm. Living 1 Evergreen Way
7) Minutes
8) Other

Exerior Security Doors
Amended application
Awning recover and window lettering
New portico, siding
Amended approval

1) Board reorganization There was an open discussion on meeting attendance.
It was agreed that the Chair would contact Carter Sackman regarding a commitment to the
Board otherwise the Board would recommend to the Village Trustees that he be replaced.
The decision of electing a Chairman was deferred to a full Board is present.

2) Ricardo Rodriguez

97 Cortlandt Street

This is a continuation from previous meetings.
Nobody was present to represent this application.

Exterior Security Doors –

�Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant installed the doors without approval and was
issued a stop work order. He has not appeared before the Board.
The Chair made a motion to deny the application based on the fact that the applicant has
not appeared before the Board for the last 2 meetings and that the installed security doors
are not in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. Pat Piereson seconded. It was
unanimous (3-0).

3) Grotto Holding Corp

300 North Broadway

Amended application-

This is a continuation from previous meetings.
David Barbuti is the project architect and is representing this application.
Davis Barbuti stated that the siding cannot be extended to the brick. He stated that if the
brick were to be used, the wall would need to be packed-out and the brick would go over
the property line by about ½“ if it were to be installed. He stated that the stone wall would
be re-pointed and kept.
The Chair opened the public hearing.
Since there were no public comments, the Chair closed the public hearing.
The Chair made a motion to approve the application as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded.
It was unanimous (3-0).

4) Carlos J Ducic

95 Beekman Avenue

Awning recover and window lettering -

Carlos J Ducic is the owner and is representing this application.
The Chair asked if the returns were received.
Sean McCarthy responded yes.
Carlos Ducic stated that the previous dentist office suffered fire damage. He stated that the
new awning is almost identical to the previous awning. He submitted renderings from his
awning contractor.
The Chair opened the public hearing.
Since there was no public present, the Chair closed the public hearing.
The Chair made a motion to approve the application with the following condition:
1) depiction of the tooth be limited to a size of 14” in any dimension.
APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, April 22, 2009

2

�Ana Maria McGinnis seconded. It was unanimous (3-0).

5) Roger Smith

85 Merlin Ave

New portico, siding, front door &amp; railing-

Ty Carsto stated that the rounded portico is proposed. He stated that many houses in the
neighborhood have a similar entryway.
The Chair asked if the returns were received.
Sean McCarthy responded yes.
There was an open discussion on the accuracy of the drawing since the roof is not accurately
shown.
Ty Carsto gave an overview of the proposed project. He stated that the front door will be
replaced with a wood door. He stated that the entire exterior of the house will be replaced
from vinyl siding to a hardy board plank. He stated that the new portico will be added.
Pat Piereson asked about seeing material samples.
It was agreed that the submitted drawing would be marked up and the contractor will be
responsible for complying with the changes.
The Chair opened the public hearing.
Since there was no public present, the Chair closed the public hearing.
The Chair made a motion to approve with the following conditions:
1) cement clapboard siding will be installed on the exterior and not the cedar shakes as the
drawings indicate.
2) trim materials as defined in drawings
3) pediment above door be trim and painted to match siding.
Pat Piereson seconded. It was unanimous (3-0).

6) Planned Community Living

1 Evergreen Way

Amended approval -

Sean McCarthy is representing this application on behalf of the applicant since the applicants
representative is in Albany, NY.
Sean McCarthy stated that the applicant ran out of brick and started installing stone in the
front of the residence.

APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, April 22, 2009

3

�The Board agreed that the installed solution is aesthetically unacceptable. The Board agreed
that the applicant needs to provide a better solution.
Pat Piereson made a motion to deny the application based on the fact that the applicant needs
to install brick instead of the installed stone material. The Chair seconded. It was unanimous
(3-0).

7) Minutes
The minutes for the October 2008 were reviewed.
The Chair made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Pat Piereson seconded. It
was unanimous (3-0).
The minutes for January, February and March will be approved at the next meeting.

8) Other a) Anderson application –
The Chair stated that the Anderson wall application should be discussed. He stated that
the applicant was supposed to present information about the existing wall before installing
the new wall.
Sean McCarthy responded that the test pit performed in the field showed that the existing
lower wall was not sufficient to properly support the required load.
There was an open discussion on the installation of the wall and installed materials.
The minutes reflected that the railing and landscape plan are still outstanding.
b) Harney application –
There was an open discussion on the Harney application and the approved fence style.
There was an open discussion on establishing guidelines for some future application
(fences, signs, etc).
Sean McCarthy responded that the Village Trustees would need to act on any guidelines
that the Board would seek to utilize.

c) Bill Hammer’s letter –
Bill Hammer stated that the fence should still be denied. He stated that the neighborhood
is opposed to the split-rail fence. He stated that there are other alternatives.

APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, April 22, 2009

4

�The Chair stated that the application has been approved.
Bill Hammer responded that the Board has recinded approvals in the past.
Sean McCarthy stated that if the approved application was misrepresented, the application
could be re-evaluated.
The Board stated that the public needs to present information to the Board regarding any
misrepresentations of an approved application.

d) ARB Guidelines –
Sean McCarthy distributed the ARBs guidelines to the Board.
It was agreed that the Board would review the guidelines.

Adjourned at 9:42 p.m.

APPROVED - Architectural Review Board Meeting, April 22, 2009

5

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="43">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6333">
                <text>Architectural Review Board Minutes-2009</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1784">
              <text>MINS_ARB_2009-04-22</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1785">
              <text>Architectural Review Board Minutes-2009</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1786">
              <text>2009</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1787">
              <text>Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1788">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
