-
https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/3ef4c2d43f85b27c792462468bcd5f58.pdf
1cc12625d4c3d22b8cb1c974367c640a
PDF Text
Text
Village
of
Sleepy
Hollow
Architectural
Review
Board
Meeting
-‐
Approved
January
23,
2013
Sean
McCarthy
called
the
meeting
to
order
at
8:02pm.
Present:
Sean
McCarthy
(Village
of
Sleepy
Hollow/Building
Department)
Krista
Callaghan
Also
Present:
Mary
Gerlanc
(Recording
Secretary)
Announcements
-‐
There
were
no
announcements.
Proposed
Agenda:
1)
Maria
Roglieri
&
Dan
Friedman
63
Fremont
Road
New
Application
2)
Laurentino
Rodrigues
172
Valley
Street
New
Application
3)
Approval
of
Minutes
November
28,
2012
1)
Maria
Roglieri
&
Dan
Friedman
63
Fremont
Road
New
Application
Maria
Roglieri
and
Dan
Friedman,
along
with
architect
John
Lentini,
represented
the
application.
Mr.
Lentini
indicated
on
the
plans,
the
repair,
renovation
and
addition
to
the
property.
He
stated
the
applicant
is
going
to
match
existing
details
on
the
house,
including
the
siding.
Sean
McCarthy
asked
it
the
new
windows
would
match
the
existing
windows.
Mr.
Lentini
stated
the
intent
is
to
match
existing
windows.
Sean
McCarthy
asked
if
the
plans
were
compliant
with
the
zoning
codes.
Mr.
Lentini
stated
the
applicant
is
staying
within
the
setbacks
to
comply
with
the
zoning
laws.
Sean
asked
about
the
rear
elevation.
Mr.
Lentini
indicated
the
new
portion
of
the
house
and
the
fireplace.
He
stated
there
is
no
change
to
elevation
on
the
Fremont
side
and
front
of
house.
The
greatest
change
in
elevation
is
on
the
other
side
of
the
house.
Sean
McCarthy
inquired
about
the
door
shown
on
the
new
addition.
Mr.
Lentini
stated
he
would
give
the
building
department
a
full
set
of
construction
plans.
Sean
McCarthy
asked
if
the
Board
had
any
questions.
Krista
Callaghan
stated
it
was
a
great
addition
to
the
property
and
her
questions
about
matching
existing
details
had
been
answered.
�Sean
McCarthy
asked
if
there
was
a
general
note
on
the
plan
to
match
existing
sidings,
exposure
and
finishes.
Mr.
Lentini
said
note
on
plan
stated
all
matching
cedar
clapboard
siding
to
be
stained
to
match
the
current
stain
color.
The
roof
would
be
repaired
where
it
had
been
damaged.
Sean
McCarthy
asked
if
they
were
installing
skylights
again.
Mr.
Lentini
stated
there
were
now
two
skylights
to
be
included
over
the
interior
kitchen.
The
window
in
the
bathroom
is
being
replaced
because
it
was
damaged.
Sean
McCarthy
stated
there
is
enough
information
to
move
towards
a
building
permit
application.
He
asked
Mr.
Lentini
for
complete
construction
details.
2)
Laurentino
Rodrigues
172
Valley
Street
New
Application
The
applicant
did
not
appear
for
the
meeting.
This
is
an
application
for
a
mixed-‐use
property.
The
Board
reviewed
the
floor
plans
and
discussed
the
different
levels
of
the
building.
The
Board
reviewed
each
elevation
of
the
building
and
regarding
sizes
and
materials
The
Board’s
questions
for
the
project
are
as
follows:
• The
different
levels
and
the
elevations
for
the
building.
• The
size
of
the
building
and
the
choice
of
building
materials.
• Functionality
of
the
floor
plan;
specifically
the
entry
into
the
office
space
and
the
entry
courtyard.
• The
design
of
the
residential
courtyard.
• The
types
of
materials
used
on
the
façade
of
the
building.
The
plans
should
state
the
specific
materials
to
be
used,
including
color,
size
and
style
of
windows.
• The
Heights
to
the
ridgeline
of
the
roof.
• Plans
need
to
be
thoroughly
dimensioned,
indicating
heights
and
floor
elevations.
• All
signage
needs
to
be
detailed.
• What
materials
would
be
used
for
the
grating
on
the
garage
window
openings.
Applicant
needs
to
provide
detailed
drawings
or
depictions
of
the
grates
along
with
style
and
material
to
be
used.
• What
does
the
applicant
propose
for
the
space
between
this
property
and
the
adjoining
building
on
Valley
Street.
• The
Valley
Street
residential
elevation
needs
to
show
vertical
consistency
and
a
relationship
between
the
different
levels
of
the
building.
• Choice
and
types
of
window
fenestration.
• Why
is
the
office
level
two
feet
higher
than
the
parking
level.
• Need
landscape
plans
provided
by
licensed
landscape
architect
for
the
residential
courtyard
area
and
the
planter
at
the
corner
of
Valley
Street
and
Depeyster
Street.
• The
outside
residential
porch
area
not
shown
as
a
definitive
entryway
into
the
apartments.
• Applicant
must
provide
detail
for
proposed
fencing
as
to
height
and
materials
to
be
used.
The
Board’s
discussion
of
the
application
was
an
informal
review
in
order
to
facilitate
the
review
process
for
the
applicant.
Architectural
Review
Board
Meeting,
January
23,
2013
–
APPROVED
2
�
3)
Approval
of
Minutes
The
Board
approved
the
minutes
for
November
28,
2012.
The
meeting
was
adjourned
at
9:35pm.
November
28,
2012
Architectural
Review
Board
Meeting,
January
23,
2013
–
APPROVED
3
�
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Architectural Review Board Minutes-2013
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
MINS_ARB_2013-01-23
Subject
The topic of the resource
Architectural Review Board Minutes-2013
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2013
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved.
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text